Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, Cayuga, Seneca, and Wayne Counties, NY; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment, 19000-19002 [2013-07237]
Download as PDF
19000
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices
Notice is
hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12
and 19 CFR 151.13, that SGS North
America, Inc., 1084 West Lathrop Ave.,
Savannah, GA 31415, has been
approved to gauge and accredited to test
petroleum and petroleum products,
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes, in accordance with
the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19
CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ
this entity to conduct laboratory
analyses and gauger services should
request and receive written assurances
from the entity that it is accredited or
approved by the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to conduct the
specific test or gauger service requested.
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the
specific test or gauger service this entity
is accredited or approved to perform
may be directed to the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection by calling (202) 344–
1060. The inquiry may also be sent to
cbp.labhq@dhs.gov. Please reference the
Web site listed below for a complete
listing of CBP approved gaugers and
accredited laboratories. https://cbp.gov/
linkhandler/cgov/trade/basic_trade/
labs_scientific_svcs/
commercial_gaugers/gaulist.ctt/
gaulist.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 19, 2013.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and
Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–07075 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
30, 2012. The next triennial inspection
date will be scheduled for August 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Approved Gauger and Accredited
Laboratories Manager, Laboratories and
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington,
DC 20229, tel. 202–344–1060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12
and 19 CFR 151.13, that SGS North
America, Inc., 11729 Port Road,
Seabrook, TX 77586, has been approved
to gauge and accredited to test
petroleum and petroleum products,
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes, in accordance with
the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19
CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ
this entity to conduct laboratory
analyses and gauger services should
request and receive written assurances
from the entity that it is accredited or
approved by the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to conduct the
specific test or gauger service requested.
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the
specific test or gauger service this entity
is accredited or approved to perform
may be directed to the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection by calling (202) 344–
1060. The inquiry may also be sent to
cbp.labhq@dhs.gov. Please reference the
Web site listed below for a complete
listing of CBP approved gaugers and
accredited laboratories. https://cbp.gov/
linkhandler/cgov/trade/basic_trade/
labs_scientific_svcs/
commercial_gaugers/gaulist.ctt/
gaulist.pdf.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Accreditation and Approval of SGS
North America, Inc., as a Commercial
Gauger and Laboratory
Dated: March 19, 2013.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and
Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–07077 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of accreditation and
approval of SGS North America, Inc., as
a commercial gauger and laboratory.
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to CBP regulations, that SGS
North America, Inc., has been approved
to gauge and accredited to test
petroleum and petroleum products,
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes for the next three
years as of August 30, 2012.
DATES: Effective Dates: The
accreditation and approval of SGS North
America, Inc., as commercial gauger and
laboratory became effective on August
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:20 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2012–N170; BAC–4311–K9–S3]
Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge,
Cayuga, Seneca, and Wayne Counties,
NY; Final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a final comprehensive
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
environmental assessment (EA) for
Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR), located in Cayuga, Seneca, and
Wayne Counties, New York. In this final
CCP, we describe how we will manage
the refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies by any of the following methods.
You may request a hard copy or a CD–
ROM of the document.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document at https://www.fws.gov/
northeast/planning/Montezuma/
ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to
northeastplanning@fws.gov. Please
include ‘‘Montezuma NWR Final CCP’’
in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Lia McLaughlin, Natural
Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Lia McLaughlin, 413–
253–8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
315–568–5987 to make an appointment
(necessary for view/pickup only) during
regular business hours at 3395 Route 5/
20 East, Seneca Falls, NY 13148–9778.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Jasikoff, Refuge Manager, 315–568–5987
(phone), or Lia McLaughlin, Planning
Team Leader, 413–253–8575 (phone);
email: northeastplanning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Montezuma NWR. We
started this process through a notice in
the Federal Register (75 FR 25286; May
7, 2010). We released the draft CCP and
EA to the public, announcing and
requesting comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (75
FR 25286; May 22, 2012).
Montezuma NWR was established in
1938 to provide nesting, feeding, and
resting habitat for waterfowl and other
migratory birds. Situated in Seneca,
Wayne, and Cayuga Counties, the refuge
currently encompasses 9,809 acres.
Refuge habitats include emergent
marshes and shallow water mudflats,
open water, bottomland floodplain
forest, old fields, shrublands, croplands,
grassland, and successional forest. The
refuge is part of the Montezuma
Wetlands Complex, an area identified
by the Service, the New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC), and other
partners for its role in the conservation
of migratory birds, particularly
waterfowl. The refuge’s public use
program provides wildlife-oriented
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices
educational and recreational
opportunities compatible with refuge
management objectives. Public use
facilities and programs include several
trails, a visitor center, observation
towers and platforms, fishing access
sites, a hunting program, educational
programs and materials, guided tours,
and other special programs.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the FONSI for the final
CCP for Montezuma NWR in accordance
with National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
requirements. We completed a thorough
analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the
draft CCP and EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering Montezuma NWR for
the next 15 years. Alternative B, as
described in the refuge’s draft CCP and
EA, and with the modifications
described below, is the foundation for
the final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CCP Alternatives, Including the
Selected Alternative
During the public scoping process,
we, the NYSDEC, other governmental
partners, and the public raised several
issues. To address these issues, we
developed and evaluated three
alternatives in the draft CCP and EA.
Here we present a brief summary of
each of the alternatives; a full
description of each alternative is in the
draft CCP and EA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:20 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Management Alternatives
Alternative A (Current Management)
Alternative A satisfies the NEPA
requirement of a ‘‘No Action’’
alternative, which we define as
‘‘continuing current management.’’ It
describes our existing management
priorities and activities, and serves as a
baseline for comparing and contrasting
alternatives B and C. It would maintain
our present levels of approved refuge
staffing and the biological and visitor
programs now in place. We would
continue to focus on managing
impoundments to provide emergent
marsh and open water habitats for
migrating and nesting wading birds,
marshbirds, waterfowl, shorebirds, and
other wildlife. We would also continue
to actively control invasive species,
manage grassland habitats, and improve
riparian and other forested habitats. We
would continue to provide
opportunities for all six priority public
uses: hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, photography,
environmental education, and
interpretation.
Alternative B (Service-preferred
Alternative)
This alternative is the Servicepreferred alternative. It combines the
actions we believe would most
effectively achieve the refuge’s
purposes, vision, and goals, and
respond to the issues raised during the
scoping period. Under alternative B,
emergent marsh management would
remain a priority on the refuge. We
would focus efforts on improving
existing emergent wetland habitat and
restoring additional acres, and reestablishing wetland and riparian
forests, where feasible. More upland
forest would be promoted through
succession or planting native species.
Additionally, we would continue to
manage about 400 acres of shrublands,
and grassland management would focus
on creating larger patches with less
edge, resulting in fewer grassland acres
overall. Opportunities for visitors to
participate in priority public uses would
increase. Added trails, viewing areas,
and photography blinds would support
additional opportunities for wildlife
observation and photography. We
would develop a formal, curriculumbased environmental education
program. Environmental interpretation
would be enhanced through updated
interpretive displays and associated
services. The refuge would be opened to
new hunting opportunities, and we
would provide more accessible sites.
Fishing opportunities would be
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19001
increased by providing additional
access to canal waters for anglers.
Alternative C (Less Active Habitat
Management)
Under alternative C, most emergent
marsh habitat on the refuge would be
allowed to convert to bottomland
floodplain forest. Only the Main Pool,
Tschache Pool, and Visitor Center
Wetland impoundments would be
maintained. Newly acquired lands
would not be converted to
impoundments. Natural succession
would play a larger role in shaping
vegetative communities on the refuge
compared to alternatives A and B. We
would allow most early successional
habitats in the uplands to revert to
forests. Compared to alternative A,
opportunities for visitors to participate
in priority public uses would increase
under this alternative, but not to the
extent proposed under alternative B. We
would develop a few additional sites to
support wildlife observation and
photography. Interpretation would be
somewhat increased with the expansion
of the visitor contact station.
Interpretive messages would be
changed, reflecting the different focus of
refuge management. Hunting
opportunities would increase, similar to
alternative B; however, waterfowl
hunting would remain unchanged.
Fishing opportunities would be the
same as alternative B.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft
CCP and EA for Montezuma NWR from
May 22 to June 21, 2012 (77 FR 25286).
During the comment period, we
received 36 sets of responses, including
comments from public meetings, a
phone call, email, and letters. We
evaluated all of the substantive
comments we received, and include a
summary of those comments, and our
responses to them, as appendix K in the
final CCP.
Selected Alternative
We have selected alternative B for
implementation, with the following
modifications:
• We increased the amount of
shrubland we intend to maintain to 396
acres (similar to alternative A), which is
about 100 acres more than originally
proposed under alternative B of the
draft CCP and EA.
• We included additional information
in chapter 4, under ‘‘Protecting Land
and Proposed Land Expansion,’’ to
explain that we will evaluate newly
acquired lands for their potential for
habitat restoration (i.e., emergent marsh,
forest, shrubland, grassland).
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
19002
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices
• We have added estimates of hazard
abatement surveys to table 4.1, and have
revised the cost estimates for
demolition.
• We added a section titled
‘‘Alternatives Considered but not Fully
Developed’’ to the final hunt program
EA (appendix E), which includes a
discussion on closing the refuge to
hunting.
• We modified the land protection
plan (appendix F) to incorporate climate
change information from the CCP and
estimated numbers of migratory birds
and breeding marshbirds that could use
emergent marsh habitats, once lands
have been acquired and restored. We
also revised the land protection plan
and final CCP to clarify which parcels
are existing refuge lands, which have
been previously added to the refuge’s
approved acquisition boundary but not
purchased, and which would be
included in the refuge expansion.
• We corrected the final fire
management plan EA to show that
alternative B is both the current
management (the no action alternative)
and the preferred-alternative.
We have selected alternative B to
implement for Montezuma NWR, with
these minor changes, for several
reasons. Alternative B incorporates a
combination of actions that, in our
professional judgment, work best
towards achieving the refuge’s purposes,
vision, and goals, Service policies, and
the goals of other State and regional
conservation plans. We also believe that
alternative B most effectively addresses
key issues raised during the planning
process. The basis of our decision is
detailed in the FONSI (appendix L in
the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
You can view or obtain the final CCP,
including the FONSI, as indicated under
ADDRESSES, and at the following
location:
• Public Library: the Seneca Falls
Library, located at 47 Cayuga Street,
Seneca Falls, NY 13148, during regular
library hours.
Dated: February 21, 2013.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–07237 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:20 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0081;
FF04EF1000 123 FX.ES11130400000D2]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Draft
Revised Stock Assessment Reports for
Two Stocks of West Indian Manatee
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (MMPA), and its
implementing regulations, we, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) have
developed draft revised marine mammal
stock assessment reports (SAR) for two
West Indian manatee stocks: the Puerto
Rico stock of Antillean manatees and
the Florida manatee stock. We now
make the SARs available for public
review and comment.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
may view the draft revised stock
assessment reports on https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2012–0081. You may also
view them in Adobe Acrobat format at
https://www.fws.gov/caribbean/es/
manatee.html (Puerto Rico stock) or at
https://www.fws.gov/northflorida/
(Florida stock). Alternatively, you may
contact the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Caribbean
Ecological Services Office, P.O. Box 491,
´
Boqueron, PR 00622; telephone: 787–
851–7297 (Puerto Rico stock) or the
Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, North Florida Ecological
Services Office, 7915 Baymeadows Way,
Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32256–7517;
telephone: 904–731–3336 (Florida
stock).
Written Comments: You may submit
comments on the draft revised stock
assessment reports by one of the
following methods:
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2012–0081; Division of
Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N.
Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM;
Arlington, VA 22203; or
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0081.
Please indicate to which revised stock
assessment report(s)—the Antillean
manatee or Florida manatee—your
comments apply. We will not accept
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
email or faxes. We will post all
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan
Zegarra, Caribbean Ecological Services
Field Office, 787–851–7297, ext. 220
(telephone), for information about the
draft revised SAR for the Puerto Rico
stock of Antillean manatees, and Jim
Valade, North Florida Ecological
Services Office, 904–731–3116
(telephone), for information about the
draft revised SAR for the Florida
manatee. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We announce for review and
comment the availability of draft revised
marine mammal stock assessment
reports (SAR) for the Puerto Rico stock
of Antillean manatees (Trichechus
manatus manatus) and the Florida
manatee stock (Trichechus manatus
latirostris).
Under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations
in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) at 50 CFR part 18, we regulate the
taking, possession, transportation,
purchasing, selling, offering for sale,
exporting, and importing of marine
mammals. One of the goals of the
MMPA is to ensure that stocks of marine
mammals occurring in waters under
U.S. jurisdiction do not experience a
level of human-caused mortality and
serious injury that is likely to cause the
stock to be reduced below its optimum
sustainable population level (OSP). OSP
is defined under the MMPA as ’’ * * *
the number of animals which will result
in the maximum productivity of the
population or the species, keeping in
mind the carrying capacity of the habitat
and the health of the ecosystem of
which they form a constituent element’’
(16 U.S.C. 1362(3)(9)).
To help accomplish the goal of
maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA
requires the Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to
prepare a SAR for each marine mammal
stock that occurs in waters under U.S.
jurisdiction. Each SAR must include:
1. A description of the stock and its
geographic range;
2. A minimum population estimate,
maximum net productivity rate, and
current population trend;
3. An estimate of human-caused
mortality and serious injury;
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 60 (Thursday, March 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19000-19002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07237]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-R-2012-N170; BAC-4311-K9-S3]
Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, Cayuga, Seneca, and Wayne
Counties, NY; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental
assessment (EA) for Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), located
in Cayuga, Seneca, and Wayne Counties, New York. In this final CCP, we
describe how we will manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies by any of the following
methods. You may request a hard copy or a CD-ROM of the document.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document at https://www.fws.gov/northeast/planning/Montezuma/ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to northeastplanning@fws.gov. Please include
``Montezuma NWR Final CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Lia McLaughlin, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Lia McLaughlin, 413-253-8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call 315-568-5987 to make an
appointment (necessary for view/pickup only) during regular business
hours at 3395 Route 5/20 East, Seneca Falls, NY 13148-9778.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Jasikoff, Refuge Manager, 315-568-
5987 (phone), or Lia McLaughlin, Planning Team Leader, 413-253-8575
(phone); email: northeastplanning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for Montezuma NWR. We
started this process through a notice in the Federal Register (75 FR
25286; May 7, 2010). We released the draft CCP and EA to the public,
announcing and requesting comments in a notice of availability in the
Federal Register (75 FR 25286; May 22, 2012).
Montezuma NWR was established in 1938 to provide nesting, feeding,
and resting habitat for waterfowl and other migratory birds. Situated
in Seneca, Wayne, and Cayuga Counties, the refuge currently encompasses
9,809 acres. Refuge habitats include emergent marshes and shallow water
mudflats, open water, bottomland floodplain forest, old fields,
shrublands, croplands, grassland, and successional forest. The refuge
is part of the Montezuma Wetlands Complex, an area identified by the
Service, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC), and other partners for its role in the conservation of
migratory birds, particularly waterfowl. The refuge's public use
program provides wildlife-oriented
[[Page 19001]]
educational and recreational opportunities compatible with refuge
management objectives. Public use facilities and programs include
several trails, a visitor center, observation towers and platforms,
fishing access sites, a hunting program, educational programs and
materials, guided tours, and other special programs.
We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the
final CCP for Montezuma NWR in accordance with National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requirements. We completed a
thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment, which we
included in the draft CCP and EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering Montezuma NWR
for the next 15 years. Alternative B, as described in the refuge's
draft CCP and EA, and with the modifications described below, is the
foundation for the final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Refuge Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including the Selected Alternative
During the public scoping process, we, the NYSDEC, other
governmental partners, and the public raised several issues. To address
these issues, we developed and evaluated three alternatives in the
draft CCP and EA. Here we present a brief summary of each of the
alternatives; a full description of each alternative is in the draft
CCP and EA.
Management Alternatives
Alternative A (Current Management)
Alternative A satisfies the NEPA requirement of a ``No Action''
alternative, which we define as ``continuing current management.'' It
describes our existing management priorities and activities, and serves
as a baseline for comparing and contrasting alternatives B and C. It
would maintain our present levels of approved refuge staffing and the
biological and visitor programs now in place. We would continue to
focus on managing impoundments to provide emergent marsh and open water
habitats for migrating and nesting wading birds, marshbirds, waterfowl,
shorebirds, and other wildlife. We would also continue to actively
control invasive species, manage grassland habitats, and improve
riparian and other forested habitats. We would continue to provide
opportunities for all six priority public uses: hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, photography, environmental education, and
interpretation.
Alternative B (Service-preferred Alternative)
This alternative is the Service-preferred alternative. It combines
the actions we believe would most effectively achieve the refuge's
purposes, vision, and goals, and respond to the issues raised during
the scoping period. Under alternative B, emergent marsh management
would remain a priority on the refuge. We would focus efforts on
improving existing emergent wetland habitat and restoring additional
acres, and re-establishing wetland and riparian forests, where
feasible. More upland forest would be promoted through succession or
planting native species. Additionally, we would continue to manage
about 400 acres of shrublands, and grassland management would focus on
creating larger patches with less edge, resulting in fewer grassland
acres overall. Opportunities for visitors to participate in priority
public uses would increase. Added trails, viewing areas, and
photography blinds would support additional opportunities for wildlife
observation and photography. We would develop a formal, curriculum-
based environmental education program. Environmental interpretation
would be enhanced through updated interpretive displays and associated
services. The refuge would be opened to new hunting opportunities, and
we would provide more accessible sites. Fishing opportunities would be
increased by providing additional access to canal waters for anglers.
Alternative C (Less Active Habitat Management)
Under alternative C, most emergent marsh habitat on the refuge
would be allowed to convert to bottomland floodplain forest. Only the
Main Pool, Tschache Pool, and Visitor Center Wetland impoundments would
be maintained. Newly acquired lands would not be converted to
impoundments. Natural succession would play a larger role in shaping
vegetative communities on the refuge compared to alternatives A and B.
We would allow most early successional habitats in the uplands to
revert to forests. Compared to alternative A, opportunities for
visitors to participate in priority public uses would increase under
this alternative, but not to the extent proposed under alternative B.
We would develop a few additional sites to support wildlife observation
and photography. Interpretation would be somewhat increased with the
expansion of the visitor contact station. Interpretive messages would
be changed, reflecting the different focus of refuge management.
Hunting opportunities would increase, similar to alternative B;
however, waterfowl hunting would remain unchanged. Fishing
opportunities would be the same as alternative B.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft CCP and EA for Montezuma NWR
from May 22 to June 21, 2012 (77 FR 25286). During the comment period,
we received 36 sets of responses, including comments from public
meetings, a phone call, email, and letters. We evaluated all of the
substantive comments we received, and include a summary of those
comments, and our responses to them, as appendix K in the final CCP.
Selected Alternative
We have selected alternative B for implementation, with the
following modifications:
We increased the amount of shrubland we intend to maintain
to 396 acres (similar to alternative A), which is about 100 acres more
than originally proposed under alternative B of the draft CCP and EA.
We included additional information in chapter 4, under
``Protecting Land and Proposed Land Expansion,'' to explain that we
will evaluate newly acquired lands for their potential for habitat
restoration (i.e., emergent marsh, forest, shrubland, grassland).
[[Page 19002]]
We have added estimates of hazard abatement surveys to
table 4.1, and have revised the cost estimates for demolition.
We added a section titled ``Alternatives Considered but
not Fully Developed'' to the final hunt program EA (appendix E), which
includes a discussion on closing the refuge to hunting.
We modified the land protection plan (appendix F) to
incorporate climate change information from the CCP and estimated
numbers of migratory birds and breeding marshbirds that could use
emergent marsh habitats, once lands have been acquired and restored. We
also revised the land protection plan and final CCP to clarify which
parcels are existing refuge lands, which have been previously added to
the refuge's approved acquisition boundary but not purchased, and which
would be included in the refuge expansion.
We corrected the final fire management plan EA to show
that alternative B is both the current management (the no action
alternative) and the preferred-alternative.
We have selected alternative B to implement for Montezuma NWR, with
these minor changes, for several reasons. Alternative B incorporates a
combination of actions that, in our professional judgment, work best
towards achieving the refuge's purposes, vision, and goals, Service
policies, and the goals of other State and regional conservation plans.
We also believe that alternative B most effectively addresses key
issues raised during the planning process. The basis of our decision is
detailed in the FONSI (appendix L in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP, including the FONSI, as
indicated under ADDRESSES, and at the following location:
Public Library: the Seneca Falls Library, located at 47
Cayuga Street, Seneca Falls, NY 13148, during regular library hours.
Dated: February 21, 2013.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-07237 Filed 3-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P