Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Tilefish Fishery Management Plan; Regulatory Amendment, Corrections, and Clarifications, 18947-18953 [2013-07161]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
therefore is not considered small. The
other mining operation is owned by
Georgia-Pacific; however, the company
operates on Arizona State Land
Department managed land where no
Federal nexus exists, and all potential
impacts resulting from mallow
conservation are considered to be
baseline impacts. The remaining
forecast impacts are anticipated to be
conducted for road and highway
maintenance projects. Little to no
impact to third parties is expected
associated with these activities. For this
reason, there would be little to no
impacts to small entities as a result of
critical habitat designation for Gierisch
mallow. Please refer to Appendix A of
the draft economic analysis of the
proposed critical habitat designation for
a more detailed discussion of potential
economic impacts.
The Service’s current understanding
of recent case law is that Federal
agencies are only required to evaluate
the potential impacts of rulemaking on
those entities directly regulated by the
rulemaking; therefore, they are not
required to evaluate the potential
impacts to those entities not directly
regulated. The designation of critical
habitat for an endangered or threatened
species only has a regulatory effect
where a Federal action agency is
involved in a particular action that may
affect the designated critical habitat.
Under these circumstances, only the
Federal action agency is directly
regulated by the designation, and,
therefore, consistent with the Service’s
current interpretation of RFA and recent
case law, the Service may limit its
evaluation of the potential impacts to
those identified for Federal action
agencies. Under this interpretation,
there is no requirement under the RFA
to evaluate potential impacts to entities
not directly regulated, such as small
businesses. However, Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct Federal agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives in
quantitative (to the extent feasible) and
qualitative terms. Consequently, it is the
current practice of the Service to assess
to the extent practicable these potential
impacts, if sufficient data are available,
whether or not this analysis is believed
by the Service to be strictly required by
the RFA. In other words, while the
effects analysis required under the RFA
is limited to entities directly regulated
by the rulemaking, the effects analysis
under the Act, consistent with the E.O.
regulatory analysis requirements, can
take into consideration impacts to both
directly and indirectly impacted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
entities, where practicable and
reasonable.
In summary, we have considered
whether the proposed designation
would result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Information for this analysis
was gathered from the Small Business
Administration, stakeholders, and the
Service. We conclude that future
consultations are unlikely to involve a
third party. For the above reasons and
based on currently available
information, we certify that, if
promulgated, the proposed critical
habitat designation would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business
entities. Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
It is our position that, outside the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Tenth Circuit, we do not need to
prepare environmental analyses as
defined by NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) in connection with designating
critical habitat under the Act. We
published a notice outlining our reasons
for this determination in the Federal
Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR
49244). This position was upheld by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit (Douglas County v. Babbitt, 48
F.3d 1495 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied
516 U.S. 1042 (1996)). However, when
the range of the species includes States
within the Tenth Circuit, such as that of
the Gieirsch mallow, under the Tenth
Circuit ruling in Catron County Board of
Commissioners v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 75 F.3d 1429 (10th Cir. 1996),
we will undertake a NEPA analysis for
critical habitat designation. In
accordance with the Tenth Circuit, we
have completed a draft environmental
assessment to identify and disclose the
environmental consequences resulting
from the proposed designation of
critical habitat for the Gieirsch mallow.
Our preliminary determination is that
the designation of critical habitat for the
Gieirsch mallow would not have direct
impacts on the environment. However,
we will further evaluate this issue as we
complete our final environmental
assessment.
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Arizona
Ecological Services Field Office,
Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18947
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 18, 2013.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013–07122 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120416018–3159–01]
RIN 0648–BC05
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Tilefish Fishery Management
Plan; Regulatory Amendment,
Corrections, and Clarifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Tilefish Individual
Fishing Quota Program was
implemented at the start of the 2010
fishing year (November 1, 2009). After 3
years of operation, it has become
apparent that some of the implementing
regulations need to be clarified,
corrected, or modified to better reflect
the intent of Tilefish Amendment 1 and
clarify certain regulatory text that may
cause confusion or otherwise appear
inconsistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA). This action would make
corrections, clarifications, and
regulatory modifications to the
regulations that implemented the
Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota
Program. These changes would not
affect the fishing operation of any
vessel.
DATES: Written comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m. eastern
standard time, on April 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2012–0247, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20120247, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
18948
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the
outside of the envelope: ‘‘Comments on
Tilefish Correction Proposed Rule.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Douglas
Potts.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst,
phone (978) 281–9341, fax (978) 281–
9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
On August 24, 2009, NMFS published
a final rule (74 FR 42580) to implement
provisions of Amendment 1 to the
Tilefish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) (Tilefish Amendment 1). Tilefish
Amendment 1 included a new structure
for managing the commercial tilefish
fishery using an individual fishing
quota (IFQ) system. The new tilefish
IFQ program became effective on
November 1, 2009. After 3 years of
operation, it has become apparent that
some of the implementing regulations
need to be clarified, corrected, or
modified to better reflect the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1.
In most IFQ programs, there is a clear
distinction between quota share (QS)
and quota pounds (QP). QS is the
percentage of the total annual allocation
of fish to the IFQ program that is held
by an allocation holder from year to year
(e.g., 2 percent of the total allocation).
QP refers to the quota, expressed in
weight of fish, that is issued annually to
each IFQ allocation permit holder based
on the QS they hold and the total
amount of fish allocated to the IFQ
program (e.g., 2-percent QS × 1,000,000
lb (453,592 kg) = 20,000 lb (9,072 kg)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
QP). The current regulations regarding
the tilefish IFQ program use the term
‘‘allocation’’ to refer to both QS and QP
in the tilefish IFQ fishery. In some
instances, this lack of distinction can
cause confusion, particularly when
discussing transfers of QS and QP. For
example, QP transfers are temporary
(i.e., a lease), effective for the duration
of the current fishing year, while QS
transfers are permanent and affect the
calculation of QP that would be
allocated to an IFQ allocation permit
holder in the following fishing year.
Accordingly, an IFQ allocation permit
holder could potentially conduct either
or both types of transfer in a given year,
not necessarily to the same individuals.
In order to clarify the difference
between QS and QP, this rule would
adopt, throughout the tilefish IFQ
regulations, the terms ‘‘IFQ quota share’’
and ‘‘annual IFQ allocation’’ to refer to
QS and QP, respectively, rather than
using the term ‘‘allocation’’ to refer to
both QS and QP.
The use of the term ‘‘allocation’’ to
refer to both QS and QP also resulted in
the current regulations referring to
‘‘permanent allocation’’ and allocation
‘‘ownership,’’ as another way to
distinguish QS from QP. These terms
could be confusing to the reader,
because the MSA specifically states that
harvest authorizations under a limited
access privilege program (such as the
tilefish IFQ program) do not create any
right, title, or interest to or in any fish
prior to harvest and may be revoked,
limited, or modified at any time (16
U.S.C. 1853a(b)). Therefore, allocations
are not permanent and are not ‘‘owned’’
by the allocation holder. This rule
would modify language throughout the
regulation that might appear to be
inconsistent with the MSA by removing
references to IFQ allocation being
‘‘owned’’ or ‘‘permanent,’’ and, where
appropriate, would replace such
references with references to these
allocations being held by or allocated to
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holders.
Tilefish Amendment 1 specifies that
U.S. citizens, permanent resident aliens,
or corporations eligible to own a U.S.
Coast Guard documented vessel are
eligible to hold a tilefish IFQ allocation
permit for both QS and QP. However,
the current regulatory language
regarding who can hold a tilefish IFQ
allocation permit only makes reference
to the section of the U.S. Code
pertaining to ownership of a U.S. Coast
Guard documented vessel. Because
permanent resident aliens cannot own a
U.S. Coast Guard documented vessel,
their ability to hold a tilefish IFQ
allocation permit is not addressed by
the current regulations. Therefore, this
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
action would consolidate the number of
cross references to the relevant section
of the U.S. Code into a single cross
reference in a new subparagraph at
§ 648.294(a)(3) and add language to
specifically allow permanent resident
aliens to hold a tilefish IFQ allocation
permit. This action would also correct
an error in the cross reference to the
U.S. Code.
The regulations require vessel owners
or operators in the tilefish IFQ program
to report landings of tilefish within 48
hours of landing, through the Interactive
Voice Response (IVR) system. This
action would specify in § 648.7(b)(2)(ii)
that such reports may be submitted
through the IVR system, or through
another system approved by the
Regional Administrator. This would
allow for the future development of an
online reporting option that could be
more convenient for the fishing industry
and less prone to data entry errors.
When the tilefish IFQ system was first
implemented, a deadline of September 1
was set for all transfers of both QS
(permanent transfer) and QP (temporary
transfer) allocations. The September 1
deadline was intended to allow time for
NMFS to process any permanent
transfers of QS before QP allocations
needed to be issued prior to the start of
the next fishing year on November 1.
This action proposes to maintain the
September 1 deadline for submitting an
application for a QS transfer, but would
revise § 648.294(e)(4) to allow a
deadline of October 10 for a QP transfer.
This additional time would allow IFQ
allocation permit holders who exceed
their available QP by a small amount
near the end of the fishing year to lease
more QP to cover the potential overage
and avoid a deduction in their QP
allocation the following year. It would
also allow IFQ allocation permit holders
who have more QP than they intend to
harvest to gain some value by leasing it
out. This additional time for transferring
annual QP could lead to fuller and more
efficient utilization of the available QP.
Section 304(d) of the MSA requires
NMFS to recover the actual costs
directly related to the management, data
collection, and enforcement of any
limited access privilege program. This
action proposes regulatory changes to
the process of determining and
collecting IFQ cost recovery fees under
the authority granted the Secretary in
section 305(d) of the MSA. The Tilefish
Amendment 1 document and the
August 24, 2009, final rule were both
written before the tilefish IFQ cost
recovery fee year had been established
and before the system for billing and
collecting payments had been fully
developed. Consequently, the
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
regulations do not fully reflect the
current practices of the cost recovery
system that developed after the initial
stages of the IFQ cost recovery process.
This action proposes regulatory changes
to § 648.294(h) to reconcile the
regulatory language with the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1 to ensure clear
and efficient collection of the required
cost-recovery fees, and the current cost
recovery fee collection system. For
example, the current regulations require
the Regional Administrator to deny
renewal of an IFQ allocation permit if
the cost recovery fee is not paid by the
initial due date. However, since the fee
year that was established after the
regulations were written does not align
with the fishing year, permits are issued
3 months before cost recovery bills are
calculated, making denial of permit
renewal a potentially ineffective
deterrent against non-payment.
Therefore, the proposed action would
authorize the Regional Administrator to
suspend an IFQ allocation permit,
prohibiting landing or leasing QP or
transferring QS, if full payment of the
cost recovery fee is not made by the
initial due date, rather than waiting
until the next fishing year to deny the
renewal of the IFQ allocation permit.
Under the current regulations, a
fisherman may submit additional
documentation to support a different fee
amount, but it is not clear when or how
such documents must be submitted, or
if this represents a formal appeal of the
fee amount. NMFS has provided more
information about how to appeal an IFQ
cost recovery fee as part of the annual
IFQ cost recovery fee bill that is sent to
IFQ allocation permit holders. The
proposed changes would clarify in the
regulation that an IFQ allocation permit
holder may appeal the fee amount, and,
if an appeal is made, the permit holder
may request a letter of authorization to
allow continued fishing for tilefish
while the appeal is pending. These
changes would bring the regulatory text
in line with the intent of Tilefish
Amendment 1 to ensure clear and
efficient collection of the required costrecovery fees and the current cost
recovery fee system as described in the
cost recovery bills, and provide greater
detail on the consequences of failing to
pay or appeal the fee before the due
date, as well as the process by which an
IFQ allocation permit holder could
appeal the cost recovery fee. In addition,
the action would reorganize
§ 648.294(h) to improve the section’s
clarity by using additional
subparagraphs identified by headers to
separate different aspects of the cost
recovery fee collection process,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
including Payment Responsibility, IFQ
Fee Determination, Fee Payment
Procedure, Payment Compliance,
Appeal of the IFQ Fee Amount, and
Annual Cost Recovery Report.
The action also would correct a
regulatory cross reference pertaining to
the Research Set-Aside program through
revisions to 648.292(e).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
MSA, the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that
this proposed rule is consistent with the
Tilefish FMP, other provisions of the
MSA, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The factual basis for this certification
is as follows:
The proposed measures would only
affect vessels holding an active Federal
open-access tilefish permit and fishing
under the tilefish IFQ program. In 2011,
there were 12 Federal open-access
tilefish vessels that were authorized to
land tilefish under the tilefish IFQ
program. All of these vessels fall within
the SBA’s definition of a small business,
because none of the vessels exceeds the
$4 million gross revenue threshold for
commercial harvesters. No other small
entities that would be expected to be
directly affected by this proposed rule
have been identified.
The purpose of this action is to
clarify, correct, and/or modify certain
provisions of the tilefish IFQ program’s
implementing regulations to clarify
potentially confusing regulatory
language and to better reflect the intent
of the Tilefish Amendment 1 and
current practices under the tilefish IFQ
program. Specifically, if implemented,
this action would (1) clarify potentially
confusing regulatory language regarding
the difference between QS and QP or
that such allocations are ‘‘owned’’ or
‘‘permanent;’’ (2) specify in the
regulations that tilefish landings may be
reported through the IVR system, or
through another system approved by the
Regional Administrator, to allow for the
future development of an online
reporting option; (3) correct cross
references within the regulations
pertaining to the Research Set-Aside
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18949
Program; (4) revise regulatory language
and cross references in the regulations
to clarify that permanent resident aliens
are allowed to hold a tilefish IFQ
allocation permit, as specified in
Tilefish Amendment 1; (5) modify the
regulations to extend the deadline for
QP transfers from September 1 to
October 10 of each fishing year; and (6)
modify the regulations governing the
cost recovery fee collection system to
reflect current fee collection practices
and the intent of Tilefish Amendment 1
to ensure clear and efficient collection
of the required cost-recovery fees.
Proposed changes (1) through (4)
would make only minor, nonsubstantive changes to the regulations to
clarify confusing regulatory language,
provide for potential alternative tilefish
landing reporting methods, and correct
cross references in the regulations.
These proposed changes would not
change the operating practices in the
fishery or cause a net change to fishing
effort, participation in the fishery, or
increases in fishery expenses. Thus,
these proposed changes are not
expected to have a significant (if any)
economic impact on the tilefish IFQ
allocation permit holders.
Proposed changes (5) and (6), which
would make minor substantive changes
to the regulations, are not expected to
have a significant economic impact on
the affected entities. The extended
deadline for QP transfers until October
10 of each fishing year is not expected
to significantly impact the amount of QP
transferred nor the number of QP
transfer requests. The intent of the
modification is to allow IFQ allocation
permit holders additional time to lease
small amounts of QP to cover minor
exceedances of their QP allocations
prior to the beginning of the next fishing
year on November 1. Likewise, the
extended deadline for QP transfers
would allow for similarly small gains in
value by leasing surplus QP. For
example, by the September 1 deadline
in fishing year 2012, 7 of the 12 tilefish
IFQ allocation permit holders requested
a total of 5 QP transfers, in which 13
percent of the total allowable landings
were transferred (254,379 lbs of the total
allowable landings of 1,895,250 lbs).
While the additional time for QP
transfers could result in more transfer
requests, the amount of QP that IFQ
allocation permit holders have
requested to transfer by September 1 in
the past would not be expected to
increase significantly by extending the
deadline to October 10. Accordingly,
extending the QP transfer deadline is
not expected to cause a significant net
change to fishing effort, participation in
the fishery, or increases in fishery
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
18950
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
expenses, and therefore is expected to
have a minor economic impact on the
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holders.
Similarly, the proposed changes to the
cost recovery fee regulations in
§ 648.294(h) are not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
affected entities. The action’s proposed
changes would allow the Regional
Administrator to suspend an IFQ
allocation permit during the current
fishing year for failure to pay the cost
recovery fee, rather than not renewing
the permit for the following fishing year.
The proposed changes also would
provide greater detail on the
consequences of failing to pay or appeal
the fee before the due date, as well as
clarify the right of and process for
appealing the cost recovery fee. Under
the appeals process, an IFQ allocation
permit holder may request a letter of
authorization to allow continued fishing
for tilefish while an appeal is pending.
Therefore, because an IFQ allocation
permit holder may appeal the cost
recovery fee and request such a letter to
continue fishing during that appeal, the
proposed change is not expected to have
a significant impact on the affected
entities. Furthermore, during the time
the Tilefish IFQ Program has been in
existence, the cost recovery fees have
been significantly less than the
maximum 3 percent fee allowed under
the MSA (the cost recovery fee
percentages for 2010 and 2011 were
0.424 percent and 0.3836 percent,
respectively), and no IFQ allocation
permit holder has failed to pay his/her
cost recovery fee on time or appealed a
fee amount. These proposed changes to
the cost recovery fee regulations would
reconcile the regulatory language with
the intent of Tilefish Amendment 1 to
ensure clear and efficient collection of
the required cost-recovery fees, as well
as with the current cost recovery fee
collection system as communicated to
IFQ allocation permit holders in the
annual cost recovery bills. The action
also would improve the clarity of
§ 648.294(h) by adding additional
subparagraphs identified by headers to
separate different aspects of the cost
recovery fee collection system. All of
these proposed changes to § 648.294(h)
would provide greater clarity to the
affected entities of the cost recovery fee
system, but are not expected to cause a
net change to fishing effort,
participation in the fishery, or increases
in fishery expenses. Thus the proposed
changes are not expected to result in a
significant economic impact on the IFQ
allocation permit holders.
Therefore, because this action
proposes to make minor corrections,
clarifications, and modifications to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
regulations, and because no significant
net change in fishing effort,
participation in the fishery, or fishery
expenses is expected, this action will
not have a significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule does not establish
any new reporting, record-keeping, or
other compliance requirements.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.2, the definitions of
‘‘Interest in an IFQ allocation’’ and
‘‘Lessee’’ are revised to read as follows:
■
§ 648.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Interest in an IFQ allocation means:
An allocation of quota share or annual
IFQ allocation held by an individual; or
by a company in which the individual
is an owner, part owner, officer,
shareholder, or partner; or by an
immediate family member (an
individual’s parents, spouse, children,
and siblings).
*
*
*
*
*
Lessee means:
(1) A vessel owner who receives
temporarily transferred NE multispecies
DAS from another vessel through the
DAS Leasing Program specified at
§ 648.82(k); or
(2) A person or entity eligible to hold
tilefish IFQ allocation, who receives
temporarily transferred tilefish IFQ
allocation, as specified at
§ 648.294(e)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 648.7, paragraph (b)(2)(ii) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.7 Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00053
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
(2) * * *
(ii) Tilefish vessel owners or
operators. The owner or operator of any
vessel fishing under a tilefish IFQ
allocation permit issued under this part,
as described in § 648.294(a), must
submit a tilefish catch report by using
the IVR system, or other reporting
system approved by the Regional
Administrator, within 48 hours after
returning to port and offloading. The
report shall include at least the
following information, and any other
information required by the Regional
Administrator: Vessel identification;
trip during which tilefish are caught;
pounds landed; VTR pre-printed serial
number; and the Federal dealer number
for the dealer who purchases the
tilefish. This reporting requirement does
not exempt the owner or operator from
other applicable reporting requirements
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 648.292, paragraph (e) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.292
Tilefish specifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Research quota. See § 648.22(g).
■ 5. Section 648.294 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 648.294
program.
Individual fishing quota (IFQ)
(a) IFQ allocation permits. (1) After
adjustments for incidental catch,
research set-asides, and overages, as
appropriate, pursuant to § 648.292(c),
the Regional Administrator shall divide
the remaining TAL among the IFQ quota
share holders who held IFQ quota share
as of September 1 of a given fishing
year. Allocations shall be made by
applying the IFQ quota share
percentages that exist on September 1 of
a given fishing year to the IFQ TAL
pursuant to § 648.292(c), subject to any
deductions for overages pursuant to
paragraph (f) of this section. Amounts of
IFQ allocation of 0.5 lb (0.23 kg) or
smaller created by this calculation shall
be rounded downward to the nearest
whole number, and amounts of IFQ
allocation greater than 0.5 lb (0.23 kg)
shall be rounded upward to the nearest
whole number, so that annual IFQ
allocations are specified in whole
pounds.
(2) Allocations shall be issued in the
form of an annual IFQ allocation permit.
The IFQ allocation permit shall specify
the quota share percentage held by the
IFQ allocation permit holder and the
total pounds of tilefish that the IFQ
allocation permit holder is authorized to
harvest.
(3) In order to be eligible hold tilefish
IFQ allocation, an individual must be a
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
U.S. citizen or permanent resident alien.
Businesses or other entities that wish to
hold allocation must be eligible to own
a documented vessel under the terms of
46 U.S.C. 12103(b).
(b) Application—(1) General.
Applicants for a permit under this
section must submit a completed
application on an appropriate form
obtained from NMFS. The application
must be filled out completely and
signed by the applicant. Each
application must include a declaration
of all interests in IFQ quota shares and
IFQ allocations, as defined in § 648.2,
listed by IFQ allocation permit number,
and must list all Federal vessel permit
numbers for all vessels that an applicant
owns or leases that would be authorized
to possess tilefish pursuant to the IFQ
allocation permit. The Regional
Administrator will notify the applicant
of any deficiency in the application.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Renewal applications.
Applications to renew an IFQ allocation
permit must be received by September
15 to be processed in time for the
November 1 start of the next fishing
year. Renewal applications received
after this date may not be approved, and
a new permit may not be issued before
the start of the next fishing year. An IFQ
allocation permit holder must renew
his/her IFQ allocation permit on an
annual basis by submitting an
application for such permit prior to the
end of the fishing year for which the
permit is required. Failure to renew an
IFQ allocation permit in any fishing
year will result in any IFQ quota share
held by that IFQ allocation permit
holder to be considered abandoned and
relinquished.
(2) Issuance. Except as provided in
subpart D of 15 CFR part 904, and
provided an application for such permit
is submitted by September 15, as
specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this
section, NMFS shall issue annual IFQ
allocation permits on or before October
31 to those who hold IFQ quota share
as of September 1 of the current fishing
year. From September 1 through
October 31, permanent transfer of IFQ
quota share is not permitted, as
described in paragraph (e)(4) of this
section.
(3) Duration. An annual IFQ
allocation permit is valid until October
31 of each fishing year unless it is
suspended, modified, or revoked
pursuant to 15 CFR part 904; revised
due to a transfer of all or part of the IFQ
quota share or annual IFQ allocation
under paragraph (e) of this section; or
suspended for non-payment of the cost
recovery fee as described in paragraph
(h)(4) of this section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
(4) IFQ Vessel. All Federal vessel
permit numbers that are listed on the
IFQ allocation permit are authorized to
possess tilefish pursuant to the IFQ
allocation permit until the end of the
fishing year or until NMFS receives
written notification from the IFQ
allocation permit holder that the vessel
is no longer authorized to possess
tilefish pursuant to the subject permit.
An IFQ allocation permit holder who
wishes to authorize an additional
vessel(s) to possess tilefish pursuant to
the IFQ allocation permit must send
written notification to NMFS. This
notification must include the vessel
name and permit number, and the dates
on which the IFQ allocation permit
holder desires the vessel to be
authorized to land tilefish pursuant to
the IFQ allocation permit. A copy of the
IFQ allocation permit must be carried
on board each vessel so authorized to
possess IFQ tilefish.
(5) Alteration. An annual IFQ
allocation permit that is altered, erased,
or mutilated is invalid.
(6) Replacement. The Regional
Administrator may issue a replacement
permit upon written application of the
annual IFQ allocation permit holder.
(7) Transfer. The annual IFQ
allocation permit is valid only for the
person to whom it is issued. All or part
of the IFQ quota share or the annual IFQ
allocation specified in the IFQ
allocation permit may be transferred in
accordance with paragraph (e) of this
section.
(8) Abandonment or voluntary
relinquishment. Any IFQ allocation
permit that is voluntarily relinquished
to the Regional Administrator, or
deemed to have been voluntarily
relinquished for failure to pay a
recoverable cost fee, in accordance with
the requirements specified in paragraph
(h)(2) of this section, or for failure to
renew in accordance with paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section, shall not be
reissued or renewed in a subsequent
year.
(c)–(d) [Reserved]
(e) Transferring IFQ allocations—(1)
Temporary transfers. Unless otherwise
restricted by the provisions in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section, the initial holder
of an annual IFQ allocation may transfer
the entire annual IFQ allocation, or a
portion of the annual IFQ allocation, to
any person or entity eligible to hold
tilefish IFQ allocation under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section. Annual IFQ
allocation transfers shall be effective
only for the fishing year in which the
transfer is requested and processed,
unless the applicant specifically
requests that the transfer be processed
for the subsequent fishing year. The
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18951
Regional Administrator has final
approval authority for all annual IFQ
allocation transfer requests. The
approval of a temporary transfer may be
rescinded if the Regional Administrator
finds that an emergency has rendered
the lessee unable to fish for the
transferred annual IFQ allocation, but
only if none of the transferred allocation
has been landed.
(2) Permanent transfers. Unless
otherwise restricted by the provisions in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section, and
subject to final approval by the Regional
Administrator, a holder of IFQ quota
share may permanently transfer the
entire IFQ quota share allocation, or a
portion of the IFQ quota share
allocation, to any person or entity
eligible to hold tilefish IFQ allocation
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(3) IFQ allocation transfer restrictions.
(i) If annual IFQ allocation is
temporarily transferred to any eligible
person or entity, it may not be
transferred again within the same
fishing year, unless the transfer is
rescinded due to an emergency, as
described in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
(ii) A transfer of IFQ allocation or
quota share will not be approved by the
Regional Administrator if it would
result in an entity holding, or having an
interest in, a percentage of IFQ
allocation exceeding 49 percent of the
total tilefish adjusted TAL.
(iii) For the purpose of calculating the
appropriate IFQ cost recovery fee, if the
holder of an IFQ allocation leases
additional IFQ allocation, the quantity
and value of landings made after the
date the lease is approved by the
Regional Administrator are attributed to
the transferred quota before being
attributed to the allocation holder’s base
IFQ allocation, if any exists. In the event
of multiple leases, landings would be
attributed to the leased allocations in
the order the leases were approved by
the Regional Administrator. As
described in paragraph (h) of this
section, a tilefish IFQ quota share
allocation holder shall incur a cost
recovery fee, based on the value of
landings of tilefish authorized under the
allocation holder’s annual tilefish IFQ
allocation, including allocation that is
leased to another IFQ allocation permit
holder.
(4) Application for an IFQ allocation
transfer. Any IFQ allocation permit
holder applying for either permanent
transfer of IFQ quota share or temporary
transfer of annual IFQ allocation must
submit a completed IFQ Allocation
Transfer Form, available from NMFS.
The IFQ Allocation Transfer Form must
be submitted to the NMFS Northeast
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
18952
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Regional Office at least 30 days before
the date on which the applicant desires
to have the IFQ allocation transfer
effective. The Regional Administrator
shall notify the applicants of any
deficiency in the application pursuant
to this section. Applications for
permanent IFQ quota share allocation
transfers must be received by September
1 to be processed for the current fishing
year. Applications for annual IFQ
allocation transfers must be received by
October 10 to be processed for the
current fishing year.
(i) Application information
requirements. An application to transfer
IFQ allocation must include the
following information: The type of
transfer (either temporary or
permanent); the signature of both parties
involved; the price paid for the transfer;
a declaration of the recipient’s eligibility
to receive IFQ allocation; the amount of
allocation or quota share to be
transferred; and a declaration, by IFQ
allocation permit number, of all the IFQ
allocations in which the person or entity
receiving the IFQ allocation has an
interest. The person or entity receiving
the IFQ allocation must indicate the
permit numbers of all federally
permitted vessels that will possess or
land the IFQ allocation. Information
obtained from the IFQ Allocation
Transfer Form is confidential pursuant
to 16 U.S.C. 1881a.
(ii) Approval of IFQ transfer
applications. Unless an application to
transfer IFQ catch share and/or IFQ
allocation is denied according to
paragraph (e)(4)(iii) of this section, the
Regional Administrator shall issue
confirmation of application approval in
the form of a new or updated IFQ
allocation permit to the parties involved
in the transfer within 30 days of receipt
of a completed application.
(iii) Denial of transfer application.
The Regional Administrator may reject
an application to transfer IFQ catch
share or IFQ allocation for the following
reasons: The application is incomplete;
the transferor does not possess a valid
tilefish IFQ allocation permit; the
transferor’s or transferee’s vessel or
tilefish IFQ allocation permit has been
sanctioned, pursuant to an enforcement
proceeding under 15 CFR part 904; the
transfer would result in the transferee
having a tilefish IFQ allocation or
holding IFQ quota share that exceeds 49
percent of the adjusted TAL allocated to
IFQ allocation permit holders; the
transfer is to a person or entity that is
not eligible to hold tilefish IFQ
allocation under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section; the transferor or transferee is
delinquent in payment of an IFQ cost
recovery fee as described in paragraph
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
(h)(4) of this section; or any other failure
to meet the requirements of this subpart.
Upon denial of an application to
transfer IFQ allocation, the Regional
Administrator shall send a letter to the
applicant describing the reason(s) for
the denial. The decision by the Regional
Administrator is the final decision of
the Department of Commerce; there is
no opportunity for an administrative
appeal.
(f) IFQ allocation overages. If an IFQ
allocation is exceeded, including by
amounts of tilefish landed by a lessee in
excess of a temporary transfer of IFQ
allocation, the amount of the overage
will be deducted from the IFQ
shareholder’s allocation in the
subsequent fishing year(s). If an IFQ
allocation overage is not deducted from
the appropriate allocation before the
IFQ allocation permit is issued for the
subsequent fishing year, a revised IFQ
allocation permit reflecting the
deduction of the overage shall be issued
by NMFS. If the allocation cannot be
reduced in the subsequent fishing year
because the full allocation has already
been landed or transferred, the IFQ
allocation permit will indicate a
reduced allocation for the amount of the
overage in the next fishing year.
(g) IFQ allocation acquisition
restriction. No person or entity may
acquire more than 49 percent of the
annual adjusted tilefish TAL, specified
pursuant to § 648.294, at any point
during a fishing year. For purposes of
this paragraph, acquisition includes any
permanent transfer of IFQ quota share or
temporary transfer of annual IFQ
allocation. The calculation of IFQ
allocation for purposes of the restriction
on acquisition includes IFQ allocation
interests held by: A company in which
the IFQ holder is a shareholder, officer,
or partner; an immediate family
member; or a company in which the IFQ
holder is a part owner or partner.
(h) IFQ cost recovery. As required
under section 304(d)(2)(A)(i) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Regional
Administrator shall collect a fee to
recover the actual costs directly related
to the management, data collection and
analysis, and enforcement of the tilefish
IFQ program.
(1) Payment responsibility. Each
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holder
with quota share shall incur a cost
recovery fee annually, based on the
value of landings of tilefish authorized
under his/her tilefish IFQ allocation,
including allocation that he/she leases
to another IFQ allocation permit holder.
The tilefish IFQ allocation permit
holder is responsible for paying the fee
assessed by NMFS.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) IFQ fee determination. The tilefish
IFQ cost recovery billing period runs
annually from January 1 through
December 31.
(i) Determination of total recoverable
costs. The Regional Administrator shall
determine the actual costs directly
associated with the management, data
collection and analysis, and
enforcement of the tilefish IFQ program
incurred by NMFS during the cost
recovery billing period.
(ii) Calculating fee percentage. The
recoverable costs determined by the
Regional Administrator will be divided
by the total ex-vessel value of all tilefish
IFQ landings during the cost recovery
billing period to derive a fee percentage.
Each IFQ allocation permit holder with
quota share will be assessed a fee based
on the fee percentage multiplied by the
total ex-vessel value of all landings
under his/her IFQ allocation permit,
including landings of allocation that
was leased to another IFQ allocation
permit holder.
(A) The ex-vessel value for each
pound of tilefish landed by an IFQ
allocation permit holder shall be
determined from Northeast Federal
dealer reports submitted to NMFS,
which include the price per pound paid
to the vessel at the time of dealer
purchase.
(B) The cost recovery fee percentage
shall not exceed 3 percent of the total
value of tilefish landings, as required
under section 304(d)(2)(B) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
(3) Fee payment procedure. NMFS
will create an annual IFQ allocation bill
for each cost recovery billing period and
provide it to IFQ allocation permit
holder with quota share. The bill will
include information regarding the
amount and value of IFQ allocation
landed during the prior cost recovery
billing period, and the associated cost
recovery fees.
(i) Payment due date. An IFQ
allocation permit holder who has
incurred a cost recovery fee must pay
the fee to NMFS within 45 days of the
date of the bill.
(ii) Payment submission method. Cost
recovery payments shall be made
electronically via the Federal Web
portal, www.pay.gov, or other Internet
sites designated by the Regional
Administrator. Instructions for
electronic payment shall be available on
both the payment Web site and the cost
recovery fee bill. Electronic payment
options shall include payment via a
credit card, as specified in the cost
recovery bill, or via direct automated
clearing house (ACH) withdrawal from
a designated checking account.
Alternatively, payment by check may be
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
authorized by Regional Administrator if
he/she determines that electronic
payment is not practicable.
(4) Payment compliance. If an IFQ
allocation permit holder does not
submit full payment by the due date
described in paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this
section, the Regional Administrator
may:
(i) At any time thereafter, notify the
IFQ allocation permit holder in writing
that his/her IFQ allocation permit is
suspended, thereby prohibiting landings
of tilefish above the incidental limit, as
specified at § 648.295.
(ii) Disapprove any transfer of annual
tilefish allocation or quota share to or
from the IFQ allocation permit holder as
described in paragraph (e)(4)(iii) of this
section, until such time as the amount
due is paid.
(iii) Deny renewal of the IFQ
allocation permit if it had not yet been
issued for the current year, or deny
renewal of the IFQ allocation permit for
the following year.
(iv) If the fee amount is not appealed,
the Regional Administrator may issue a
Final Administrative Determination
(FAD) as described in paragraph (h)(5)
of this section, based upon available
information.
(5) Appeal of IFQ fee amount. If a
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holder
disagrees with the fee amount
determined by NMFS, he/she may
appeal the cost recovery bill.
(i) IFQ fee appeals must be submitted
to NMFS in writing before the due date
described in paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this
section.
(ii) The IFQ allocation permit holder
shall have the burden of demonstrating
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
that the fee amount calculated by NMFS
is incorrect and what the correct amount
is.
(iii) If a request to appeal is submitted
on time, the Regional Administrator
shall notify the IFQ allocation permit
holder in writing, acknowledging the
appeal and providing 30 days to submit
any additional relevant documentation
supporting an alternative fee amount.
(iv) While the IFQ fee is under appeal
and the tilefish IFQ allocation permit is
suspended, as described in paragraph
(h)(4) of this section, the IFQ allocation
permit holder may request a Letter of
Authorization to fish until the appeal is
concluded. Any tilefish landed pursuant
to the above authorization will count
against the IFQ allocation permit, if
issued.
(v) Final Administrative
Determination (FAD). Based on a review
of available information, including any
documentation submitted by the IFQ
allocation permit holder in support of
the appropriateness of a different fee
amount, the Regional Administrator
shall determine whether there is a
reasonable basis upon which to
conclude that an alternate fee amount is
correct. This determination shall be in
set forth in a FAD that is signed by the
Regional Administrator. A FAD shall be
the final decision of the Department of
Commerce.
(A) The IFQ allocation permit holder
shall have 30 days from the date of the
FAD to comply with the terms of the
FAD.
(B) If the IFQ allocation permit holder
does not comply with the terms of the
FAD within this period, the Regional
Administrator shall:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
18953
(1) Refer the matter to the appropriate
authorities within the U.S. Department
of the Treasury for purposes of
collection; and
(2) Cancel any Letter of Authorization
to fish that had been issued during the
appeal.
(vi) If NMFS does not receive full
payment of an IFQ cost recovery fee
prior to the end of the cost recovery
billing period immediately following
the one for which the fee was incurred,
the subject IFQ allocation permit and
any associated IFQ quota share shall be
deemed to have been voluntarily
relinquished pursuant to paragraph
(b)(8) of this section.
(6) Annual cost recovery report.
NMFS will publish annually a report on
the status of the tilefish IFQ cost
recovery program. The report will
provide details of the costs incurred by
NMFS for the management,
enforcement, and data collection and
analysis associated with the tilefish IFQ
program during the prior cost recovery
billing period, and other relevant
information at the discretion of the
Regional Administrator.
(i) Periodic review of the IFQ program.
A formal review of the IFQ program
must be conducted by the MAFMC
within 5 years of the effective date of
the final regulations. Thereafter, it shall
be incorporated into every scheduled
MAFMC review of the FMP (i.e., future
amendments or frameworks), but no less
frequently than every 7 years.
[FR Doc. 2013–07161 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 60 (Thursday, March 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18947-18953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07161]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120416018-3159-01]
RIN 0648-BC05
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Tilefish Fishery
Management Plan; Regulatory Amendment, Corrections, and Clarifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program was implemented
at the start of the 2010 fishing year (November 1, 2009). After 3 years
of operation, it has become apparent that some of the implementing
regulations need to be clarified, corrected, or modified to better
reflect the intent of Tilefish Amendment 1 and clarify certain
regulatory text that may cause confusion or otherwise appear
inconsistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA). This action would make corrections,
clarifications, and regulatory modifications to the regulations that
implemented the Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program. These
changes would not affect the fishing operation of any vessel.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. eastern
standard time, on April 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2012-0247, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2012-0247, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon,
[[Page 18948]]
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope:
``Comments on Tilefish Correction Proposed Rule.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Douglas Potts.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst,
phone (978) 281-9341, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 24, 2009, NMFS published a final rule (74 FR 42580) to
implement provisions of Amendment 1 to the Tilefish Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) (Tilefish Amendment 1). Tilefish Amendment 1 included a new
structure for managing the commercial tilefish fishery using an
individual fishing quota (IFQ) system. The new tilefish IFQ program
became effective on November 1, 2009. After 3 years of operation, it
has become apparent that some of the implementing regulations need to
be clarified, corrected, or modified to better reflect the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1.
In most IFQ programs, there is a clear distinction between quota
share (QS) and quota pounds (QP). QS is the percentage of the total
annual allocation of fish to the IFQ program that is held by an
allocation holder from year to year (e.g., 2 percent of the total
allocation). QP refers to the quota, expressed in weight of fish, that
is issued annually to each IFQ allocation permit holder based on the QS
they hold and the total amount of fish allocated to the IFQ program
(e.g., 2-percent QS x 1,000,000 lb (453,592 kg) = 20,000 lb (9,072 kg)
QP). The current regulations regarding the tilefish IFQ program use the
term ``allocation'' to refer to both QS and QP in the tilefish IFQ
fishery. In some instances, this lack of distinction can cause
confusion, particularly when discussing transfers of QS and QP. For
example, QP transfers are temporary (i.e., a lease), effective for the
duration of the current fishing year, while QS transfers are permanent
and affect the calculation of QP that would be allocated to an IFQ
allocation permit holder in the following fishing year. Accordingly, an
IFQ allocation permit holder could potentially conduct either or both
types of transfer in a given year, not necessarily to the same
individuals. In order to clarify the difference between QS and QP, this
rule would adopt, throughout the tilefish IFQ regulations, the terms
``IFQ quota share'' and ``annual IFQ allocation'' to refer to QS and
QP, respectively, rather than using the term ``allocation'' to refer to
both QS and QP.
The use of the term ``allocation'' to refer to both QS and QP also
resulted in the current regulations referring to ``permanent
allocation'' and allocation ``ownership,'' as another way to
distinguish QS from QP. These terms could be confusing to the reader,
because the MSA specifically states that harvest authorizations under a
limited access privilege program (such as the tilefish IFQ program) do
not create any right, title, or interest to or in any fish prior to
harvest and may be revoked, limited, or modified at any time (16 U.S.C.
1853a(b)). Therefore, allocations are not permanent and are not
``owned'' by the allocation holder. This rule would modify language
throughout the regulation that might appear to be inconsistent with the
MSA by removing references to IFQ allocation being ``owned'' or
``permanent,'' and, where appropriate, would replace such references
with references to these allocations being held by or allocated to
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holders.
Tilefish Amendment 1 specifies that U.S. citizens, permanent
resident aliens, or corporations eligible to own a U.S. Coast Guard
documented vessel are eligible to hold a tilefish IFQ allocation permit
for both QS and QP. However, the current regulatory language regarding
who can hold a tilefish IFQ allocation permit only makes reference to
the section of the U.S. Code pertaining to ownership of a U.S. Coast
Guard documented vessel. Because permanent resident aliens cannot own a
U.S. Coast Guard documented vessel, their ability to hold a tilefish
IFQ allocation permit is not addressed by the current regulations.
Therefore, this action would consolidate the number of cross references
to the relevant section of the U.S. Code into a single cross reference
in a new subparagraph at Sec. 648.294(a)(3) and add language to
specifically allow permanent resident aliens to hold a tilefish IFQ
allocation permit. This action would also correct an error in the cross
reference to the U.S. Code.
The regulations require vessel owners or operators in the tilefish
IFQ program to report landings of tilefish within 48 hours of landing,
through the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system. This action would
specify in Sec. 648.7(b)(2)(ii) that such reports may be submitted
through the IVR system, or through another system approved by the
Regional Administrator. This would allow for the future development of
an online reporting option that could be more convenient for the
fishing industry and less prone to data entry errors.
When the tilefish IFQ system was first implemented, a deadline of
September 1 was set for all transfers of both QS (permanent transfer)
and QP (temporary transfer) allocations. The September 1 deadline was
intended to allow time for NMFS to process any permanent transfers of
QS before QP allocations needed to be issued prior to the start of the
next fishing year on November 1. This action proposes to maintain the
September 1 deadline for submitting an application for a QS transfer,
but would revise Sec. 648.294(e)(4) to allow a deadline of October 10
for a QP transfer. This additional time would allow IFQ allocation
permit holders who exceed their available QP by a small amount near the
end of the fishing year to lease more QP to cover the potential overage
and avoid a deduction in their QP allocation the following year. It
would also allow IFQ allocation permit holders who have more QP than
they intend to harvest to gain some value by leasing it out. This
additional time for transferring annual QP could lead to fuller and
more efficient utilization of the available QP.
Section 304(d) of the MSA requires NMFS to recover the actual costs
directly related to the management, data collection, and enforcement of
any limited access privilege program. This action proposes regulatory
changes to the process of determining and collecting IFQ cost recovery
fees under the authority granted the Secretary in section 305(d) of the
MSA. The Tilefish Amendment 1 document and the August 24, 2009, final
rule were both written before the tilefish IFQ cost recovery fee year
had been established and before the system for billing and collecting
payments had been fully developed. Consequently, the
[[Page 18949]]
regulations do not fully reflect the current practices of the cost
recovery system that developed after the initial stages of the IFQ cost
recovery process. This action proposes regulatory changes to Sec.
648.294(h) to reconcile the regulatory language with the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1 to ensure clear and efficient collection of the
required cost-recovery fees, and the current cost recovery fee
collection system. For example, the current regulations require the
Regional Administrator to deny renewal of an IFQ allocation permit if
the cost recovery fee is not paid by the initial due date. However,
since the fee year that was established after the regulations were
written does not align with the fishing year, permits are issued 3
months before cost recovery bills are calculated, making denial of
permit renewal a potentially ineffective deterrent against non-payment.
Therefore, the proposed action would authorize the Regional
Administrator to suspend an IFQ allocation permit, prohibiting landing
or leasing QP or transferring QS, if full payment of the cost recovery
fee is not made by the initial due date, rather than waiting until the
next fishing year to deny the renewal of the IFQ allocation permit.
Under the current regulations, a fisherman may submit additional
documentation to support a different fee amount, but it is not clear
when or how such documents must be submitted, or if this represents a
formal appeal of the fee amount. NMFS has provided more information
about how to appeal an IFQ cost recovery fee as part of the annual IFQ
cost recovery fee bill that is sent to IFQ allocation permit holders.
The proposed changes would clarify in the regulation that an IFQ
allocation permit holder may appeal the fee amount, and, if an appeal
is made, the permit holder may request a letter of authorization to
allow continued fishing for tilefish while the appeal is pending. These
changes would bring the regulatory text in line with the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1 to ensure clear and efficient collection of the
required cost-recovery fees and the current cost recovery fee system as
described in the cost recovery bills, and provide greater detail on the
consequences of failing to pay or appeal the fee before the due date,
as well as the process by which an IFQ allocation permit holder could
appeal the cost recovery fee. In addition, the action would reorganize
Sec. 648.294(h) to improve the section's clarity by using additional
subparagraphs identified by headers to separate different aspects of
the cost recovery fee collection process, including Payment
Responsibility, IFQ Fee Determination, Fee Payment Procedure, Payment
Compliance, Appeal of the IFQ Fee Amount, and Annual Cost Recovery
Report.
The action also would correct a regulatory cross reference
pertaining to the Research Set-Aside program through revisions to
648.292(e).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the MSA, the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that this proposed
rule is consistent with the Tilefish FMP, other provisions of the MSA,
and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The factual basis for this certification is as follows:
The proposed measures would only affect vessels holding an active
Federal open-access tilefish permit and fishing under the tilefish IFQ
program. In 2011, there were 12 Federal open-access tilefish vessels
that were authorized to land tilefish under the tilefish IFQ program.
All of these vessels fall within the SBA's definition of a small
business, because none of the vessels exceeds the $4 million gross
revenue threshold for commercial harvesters. No other small entities
that would be expected to be directly affected by this proposed rule
have been identified.
The purpose of this action is to clarify, correct, and/or modify
certain provisions of the tilefish IFQ program's implementing
regulations to clarify potentially confusing regulatory language and to
better reflect the intent of the Tilefish Amendment 1 and current
practices under the tilefish IFQ program. Specifically, if implemented,
this action would (1) clarify potentially confusing regulatory language
regarding the difference between QS and QP or that such allocations are
``owned'' or ``permanent;'' (2) specify in the regulations that
tilefish landings may be reported through the IVR system, or through
another system approved by the Regional Administrator, to allow for the
future development of an online reporting option; (3) correct cross
references within the regulations pertaining to the Research Set-Aside
Program; (4) revise regulatory language and cross references in the
regulations to clarify that permanent resident aliens are allowed to
hold a tilefish IFQ allocation permit, as specified in Tilefish
Amendment 1; (5) modify the regulations to extend the deadline for QP
transfers from September 1 to October 10 of each fishing year; and (6)
modify the regulations governing the cost recovery fee collection
system to reflect current fee collection practices and the intent of
Tilefish Amendment 1 to ensure clear and efficient collection of the
required cost-recovery fees.
Proposed changes (1) through (4) would make only minor, non-
substantive changes to the regulations to clarify confusing regulatory
language, provide for potential alternative tilefish landing reporting
methods, and correct cross references in the regulations. These
proposed changes would not change the operating practices in the
fishery or cause a net change to fishing effort, participation in the
fishery, or increases in fishery expenses. Thus, these proposed changes
are not expected to have a significant (if any) economic impact on the
tilefish IFQ allocation permit holders.
Proposed changes (5) and (6), which would make minor substantive
changes to the regulations, are not expected to have a significant
economic impact on the affected entities. The extended deadline for QP
transfers until October 10 of each fishing year is not expected to
significantly impact the amount of QP transferred nor the number of QP
transfer requests. The intent of the modification is to allow IFQ
allocation permit holders additional time to lease small amounts of QP
to cover minor exceedances of their QP allocations prior to the
beginning of the next fishing year on November 1. Likewise, the
extended deadline for QP transfers would allow for similarly small
gains in value by leasing surplus QP. For example, by the September 1
deadline in fishing year 2012, 7 of the 12 tilefish IFQ allocation
permit holders requested a total of 5 QP transfers, in which 13 percent
of the total allowable landings were transferred (254,379 lbs of the
total allowable landings of 1,895,250 lbs). While the additional time
for QP transfers could result in more transfer requests, the amount of
QP that IFQ allocation permit holders have requested to transfer by
September 1 in the past would not be expected to increase significantly
by extending the deadline to October 10. Accordingly, extending the QP
transfer deadline is not expected to cause a significant net change to
fishing effort, participation in the fishery, or increases in fishery
[[Page 18950]]
expenses, and therefore is expected to have a minor economic impact on
the tilefish IFQ allocation permit holders.
Similarly, the proposed changes to the cost recovery fee
regulations in Sec. 648.294(h) are not expected to have a significant
economic impact on the affected entities. The action's proposed changes
would allow the Regional Administrator to suspend an IFQ allocation
permit during the current fishing year for failure to pay the cost
recovery fee, rather than not renewing the permit for the following
fishing year. The proposed changes also would provide greater detail on
the consequences of failing to pay or appeal the fee before the due
date, as well as clarify the right of and process for appealing the
cost recovery fee. Under the appeals process, an IFQ allocation permit
holder may request a letter of authorization to allow continued fishing
for tilefish while an appeal is pending. Therefore, because an IFQ
allocation permit holder may appeal the cost recovery fee and request
such a letter to continue fishing during that appeal, the proposed
change is not expected to have a significant impact on the affected
entities. Furthermore, during the time the Tilefish IFQ Program has
been in existence, the cost recovery fees have been significantly less
than the maximum 3 percent fee allowed under the MSA (the cost recovery
fee percentages for 2010 and 2011 were 0.424 percent and 0.3836
percent, respectively), and no IFQ allocation permit holder has failed
to pay his/her cost recovery fee on time or appealed a fee amount.
These proposed changes to the cost recovery fee regulations would
reconcile the regulatory language with the intent of Tilefish Amendment
1 to ensure clear and efficient collection of the required cost-
recovery fees, as well as with the current cost recovery fee collection
system as communicated to IFQ allocation permit holders in the annual
cost recovery bills. The action also would improve the clarity of Sec.
648.294(h) by adding additional subparagraphs identified by headers to
separate different aspects of the cost recovery fee collection system.
All of these proposed changes to Sec. 648.294(h) would provide greater
clarity to the affected entities of the cost recovery fee system, but
are not expected to cause a net change to fishing effort, participation
in the fishery, or increases in fishery expenses. Thus the proposed
changes are not expected to result in a significant economic impact on
the IFQ allocation permit holders.
Therefore, because this action proposes to make minor corrections,
clarifications, and modifications to the regulations, and because no
significant net change in fishing effort, participation in the fishery,
or fishery expenses is expected, this action will not have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required
and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule does not establish any new reporting, record-
keeping, or other compliance requirements.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.2, the definitions of ``Interest in an IFQ allocation''
and ``Lessee'' are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Interest in an IFQ allocation means: An allocation of quota share
or annual IFQ allocation held by an individual; or by a company in
which the individual is an owner, part owner, officer, shareholder, or
partner; or by an immediate family member (an individual's parents,
spouse, children, and siblings).
* * * * *
Lessee means:
(1) A vessel owner who receives temporarily transferred NE
multispecies DAS from another vessel through the DAS Leasing Program
specified at Sec. 648.82(k); or
(2) A person or entity eligible to hold tilefish IFQ allocation,
who receives temporarily transferred tilefish IFQ allocation, as
specified at Sec. 648.294(e)(1).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 648.7, paragraph (b)(2)(ii) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.7 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Tilefish vessel owners or operators. The owner or operator of
any vessel fishing under a tilefish IFQ allocation permit issued under
this part, as described in Sec. 648.294(a), must submit a tilefish
catch report by using the IVR system, or other reporting system
approved by the Regional Administrator, within 48 hours after returning
to port and offloading. The report shall include at least the following
information, and any other information required by the Regional
Administrator: Vessel identification; trip during which tilefish are
caught; pounds landed; VTR pre-printed serial number; and the Federal
dealer number for the dealer who purchases the tilefish. This reporting
requirement does not exempt the owner or operator from other applicable
reporting requirements of this section.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 648.292, paragraph (e) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.292 Tilefish specifications.
* * * * *
(e) Research quota. See Sec. 648.22(g).
0
5. Section 648.294 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.294 Individual fishing quota (IFQ) program.
(a) IFQ allocation permits. (1) After adjustments for incidental
catch, research set-asides, and overages, as appropriate, pursuant to
Sec. 648.292(c), the Regional Administrator shall divide the remaining
TAL among the IFQ quota share holders who held IFQ quota share as of
September 1 of a given fishing year. Allocations shall be made by
applying the IFQ quota share percentages that exist on September 1 of a
given fishing year to the IFQ TAL pursuant to Sec. 648.292(c), subject
to any deductions for overages pursuant to paragraph (f) of this
section. Amounts of IFQ allocation of 0.5 lb (0.23 kg) or smaller
created by this calculation shall be rounded downward to the nearest
whole number, and amounts of IFQ allocation greater than 0.5 lb (0.23
kg) shall be rounded upward to the nearest whole number, so that annual
IFQ allocations are specified in whole pounds.
(2) Allocations shall be issued in the form of an annual IFQ
allocation permit. The IFQ allocation permit shall specify the quota
share percentage held by the IFQ allocation permit holder and the total
pounds of tilefish that the IFQ allocation permit holder is authorized
to harvest.
(3) In order to be eligible hold tilefish IFQ allocation, an
individual must be a
[[Page 18951]]
U.S. citizen or permanent resident alien. Businesses or other entities
that wish to hold allocation must be eligible to own a documented
vessel under the terms of 46 U.S.C. 12103(b).
(b) Application--(1) General. Applicants for a permit under this
section must submit a completed application on an appropriate form
obtained from NMFS. The application must be filled out completely and
signed by the applicant. Each application must include a declaration of
all interests in IFQ quota shares and IFQ allocations, as defined in
Sec. 648.2, listed by IFQ allocation permit number, and must list all
Federal vessel permit numbers for all vessels that an applicant owns or
leases that would be authorized to possess tilefish pursuant to the IFQ
allocation permit. The Regional Administrator will notify the applicant
of any deficiency in the application.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Renewal applications. Applications to renew an IFQ allocation
permit must be received by September 15 to be processed in time for the
November 1 start of the next fishing year. Renewal applications
received after this date may not be approved, and a new permit may not
be issued before the start of the next fishing year. An IFQ allocation
permit holder must renew his/her IFQ allocation permit on an annual
basis by submitting an application for such permit prior to the end of
the fishing year for which the permit is required. Failure to renew an
IFQ allocation permit in any fishing year will result in any IFQ quota
share held by that IFQ allocation permit holder to be considered
abandoned and relinquished.
(2) Issuance. Except as provided in subpart D of 15 CFR part 904,
and provided an application for such permit is submitted by September
15, as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, NMFS shall
issue annual IFQ allocation permits on or before October 31 to those
who hold IFQ quota share as of September 1 of the current fishing year.
From September 1 through October 31, permanent transfer of IFQ quota
share is not permitted, as described in paragraph (e)(4) of this
section.
(3) Duration. An annual IFQ allocation permit is valid until
October 31 of each fishing year unless it is suspended, modified, or
revoked pursuant to 15 CFR part 904; revised due to a transfer of all
or part of the IFQ quota share or annual IFQ allocation under paragraph
(e) of this section; or suspended for non-payment of the cost recovery
fee as described in paragraph (h)(4) of this section.
(4) IFQ Vessel. All Federal vessel permit numbers that are listed
on the IFQ allocation permit are authorized to possess tilefish
pursuant to the IFQ allocation permit until the end of the fishing year
or until NMFS receives written notification from the IFQ allocation
permit holder that the vessel is no longer authorized to possess
tilefish pursuant to the subject permit. An IFQ allocation permit
holder who wishes to authorize an additional vessel(s) to possess
tilefish pursuant to the IFQ allocation permit must send written
notification to NMFS. This notification must include the vessel name
and permit number, and the dates on which the IFQ allocation permit
holder desires the vessel to be authorized to land tilefish pursuant to
the IFQ allocation permit. A copy of the IFQ allocation permit must be
carried on board each vessel so authorized to possess IFQ tilefish.
(5) Alteration. An annual IFQ allocation permit that is altered,
erased, or mutilated is invalid.
(6) Replacement. The Regional Administrator may issue a replacement
permit upon written application of the annual IFQ allocation permit
holder.
(7) Transfer. The annual IFQ allocation permit is valid only for
the person to whom it is issued. All or part of the IFQ quota share or
the annual IFQ allocation specified in the IFQ allocation permit may be
transferred in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(8) Abandonment or voluntary relinquishment. Any IFQ allocation
permit that is voluntarily relinquished to the Regional Administrator,
or deemed to have been voluntarily relinquished for failure to pay a
recoverable cost fee, in accordance with the requirements specified in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section, or for failure to renew in accordance
with paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, shall not be reissued or
renewed in a subsequent year.
(c)-(d) [Reserved]
(e) Transferring IFQ allocations--(1) Temporary transfers. Unless
otherwise restricted by the provisions in paragraph (e)(3) of this
section, the initial holder of an annual IFQ allocation may transfer
the entire annual IFQ allocation, or a portion of the annual IFQ
allocation, to any person or entity eligible to hold tilefish IFQ
allocation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section. Annual IFQ
allocation transfers shall be effective only for the fishing year in
which the transfer is requested and processed, unless the applicant
specifically requests that the transfer be processed for the subsequent
fishing year. The Regional Administrator has final approval authority
for all annual IFQ allocation transfer requests. The approval of a
temporary transfer may be rescinded if the Regional Administrator finds
that an emergency has rendered the lessee unable to fish for the
transferred annual IFQ allocation, but only if none of the transferred
allocation has been landed.
(2) Permanent transfers. Unless otherwise restricted by the
provisions in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, and subject to final
approval by the Regional Administrator, a holder of IFQ quota share may
permanently transfer the entire IFQ quota share allocation, or a
portion of the IFQ quota share allocation, to any person or entity
eligible to hold tilefish IFQ allocation under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section.
(3) IFQ allocation transfer restrictions. (i) If annual IFQ
allocation is temporarily transferred to any eligible person or entity,
it may not be transferred again within the same fishing year, unless
the transfer is rescinded due to an emergency, as described in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(ii) A transfer of IFQ allocation or quota share will not be
approved by the Regional Administrator if it would result in an entity
holding, or having an interest in, a percentage of IFQ allocation
exceeding 49 percent of the total tilefish adjusted TAL.
(iii) For the purpose of calculating the appropriate IFQ cost
recovery fee, if the holder of an IFQ allocation leases additional IFQ
allocation, the quantity and value of landings made after the date the
lease is approved by the Regional Administrator are attributed to the
transferred quota before being attributed to the allocation holder's
base IFQ allocation, if any exists. In the event of multiple leases,
landings would be attributed to the leased allocations in the order the
leases were approved by the Regional Administrator. As described in
paragraph (h) of this section, a tilefish IFQ quota share allocation
holder shall incur a cost recovery fee, based on the value of landings
of tilefish authorized under the allocation holder's annual tilefish
IFQ allocation, including allocation that is leased to another IFQ
allocation permit holder.
(4) Application for an IFQ allocation transfer. Any IFQ allocation
permit holder applying for either permanent transfer of IFQ quota share
or temporary transfer of annual IFQ allocation must submit a completed
IFQ Allocation Transfer Form, available from NMFS. The IFQ Allocation
Transfer Form must be submitted to the NMFS Northeast
[[Page 18952]]
Regional Office at least 30 days before the date on which the applicant
desires to have the IFQ allocation transfer effective. The Regional
Administrator shall notify the applicants of any deficiency in the
application pursuant to this section. Applications for permanent IFQ
quota share allocation transfers must be received by September 1 to be
processed for the current fishing year. Applications for annual IFQ
allocation transfers must be received by October 10 to be processed for
the current fishing year.
(i) Application information requirements. An application to
transfer IFQ allocation must include the following information: The
type of transfer (either temporary or permanent); the signature of both
parties involved; the price paid for the transfer; a declaration of the
recipient's eligibility to receive IFQ allocation; the amount of
allocation or quota share to be transferred; and a declaration, by IFQ
allocation permit number, of all the IFQ allocations in which the
person or entity receiving the IFQ allocation has an interest. The
person or entity receiving the IFQ allocation must indicate the permit
numbers of all federally permitted vessels that will possess or land
the IFQ allocation. Information obtained from the IFQ Allocation
Transfer Form is confidential pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 1881a.
(ii) Approval of IFQ transfer applications. Unless an application
to transfer IFQ catch share and/or IFQ allocation is denied according
to paragraph (e)(4)(iii) of this section, the Regional Administrator
shall issue confirmation of application approval in the form of a new
or updated IFQ allocation permit to the parties involved in the
transfer within 30 days of receipt of a completed application.
(iii) Denial of transfer application. The Regional Administrator
may reject an application to transfer IFQ catch share or IFQ allocation
for the following reasons: The application is incomplete; the
transferor does not possess a valid tilefish IFQ allocation permit; the
transferor's or transferee's vessel or tilefish IFQ allocation permit
has been sanctioned, pursuant to an enforcement proceeding under 15 CFR
part 904; the transfer would result in the transferee having a tilefish
IFQ allocation or holding IFQ quota share that exceeds 49 percent of
the adjusted TAL allocated to IFQ allocation permit holders; the
transfer is to a person or entity that is not eligible to hold tilefish
IFQ allocation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section; the transferor
or transferee is delinquent in payment of an IFQ cost recovery fee as
described in paragraph (h)(4) of this section; or any other failure to
meet the requirements of this subpart. Upon denial of an application to
transfer IFQ allocation, the Regional Administrator shall send a letter
to the applicant describing the reason(s) for the denial. The decision
by the Regional Administrator is the final decision of the Department
of Commerce; there is no opportunity for an administrative appeal.
(f) IFQ allocation overages. If an IFQ allocation is exceeded,
including by amounts of tilefish landed by a lessee in excess of a
temporary transfer of IFQ allocation, the amount of the overage will be
deducted from the IFQ shareholder's allocation in the subsequent
fishing year(s). If an IFQ allocation overage is not deducted from the
appropriate allocation before the IFQ allocation permit is issued for
the subsequent fishing year, a revised IFQ allocation permit reflecting
the deduction of the overage shall be issued by NMFS. If the allocation
cannot be reduced in the subsequent fishing year because the full
allocation has already been landed or transferred, the IFQ allocation
permit will indicate a reduced allocation for the amount of the overage
in the next fishing year.
(g) IFQ allocation acquisition restriction. No person or entity may
acquire more than 49 percent of the annual adjusted tilefish TAL,
specified pursuant to Sec. 648.294, at any point during a fishing
year. For purposes of this paragraph, acquisition includes any
permanent transfer of IFQ quota share or temporary transfer of annual
IFQ allocation. The calculation of IFQ allocation for purposes of the
restriction on acquisition includes IFQ allocation interests held by: A
company in which the IFQ holder is a shareholder, officer, or partner;
an immediate family member; or a company in which the IFQ holder is a
part owner or partner.
(h) IFQ cost recovery. As required under section 304(d)(2)(A)(i) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Regional Administrator shall collect a
fee to recover the actual costs directly related to the management,
data collection and analysis, and enforcement of the tilefish IFQ
program.
(1) Payment responsibility. Each tilefish IFQ allocation permit
holder with quota share shall incur a cost recovery fee annually, based
on the value of landings of tilefish authorized under his/her tilefish
IFQ allocation, including allocation that he/she leases to another IFQ
allocation permit holder. The tilefish IFQ allocation permit holder is
responsible for paying the fee assessed by NMFS.
(2) IFQ fee determination. The tilefish IFQ cost recovery billing
period runs annually from January 1 through December 31.
(i) Determination of total recoverable costs. The Regional
Administrator shall determine the actual costs directly associated with
the management, data collection and analysis, and enforcement of the
tilefish IFQ program incurred by NMFS during the cost recovery billing
period.
(ii) Calculating fee percentage. The recoverable costs determined
by the Regional Administrator will be divided by the total ex-vessel
value of all tilefish IFQ landings during the cost recovery billing
period to derive a fee percentage. Each IFQ allocation permit holder
with quota share will be assessed a fee based on the fee percentage
multiplied by the total ex-vessel value of all landings under his/her
IFQ allocation permit, including landings of allocation that was leased
to another IFQ allocation permit holder.
(A) The ex-vessel value for each pound of tilefish landed by an IFQ
allocation permit holder shall be determined from Northeast Federal
dealer reports submitted to NMFS, which include the price per pound
paid to the vessel at the time of dealer purchase.
(B) The cost recovery fee percentage shall not exceed 3 percent of
the total value of tilefish landings, as required under section
304(d)(2)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
(3) Fee payment procedure. NMFS will create an annual IFQ
allocation bill for each cost recovery billing period and provide it to
IFQ allocation permit holder with quota share. The bill will include
information regarding the amount and value of IFQ allocation landed
during the prior cost recovery billing period, and the associated cost
recovery fees.
(i) Payment due date. An IFQ allocation permit holder who has
incurred a cost recovery fee must pay the fee to NMFS within 45 days of
the date of the bill.
(ii) Payment submission method. Cost recovery payments shall be
made electronically via the Federal Web portal, www.pay.gov, or other
Internet sites designated by the Regional Administrator. Instructions
for electronic payment shall be available on both the payment Web site
and the cost recovery fee bill. Electronic payment options shall
include payment via a credit card, as specified in the cost recovery
bill, or via direct automated clearing house (ACH) withdrawal from a
designated checking account. Alternatively, payment by check may be
[[Page 18953]]
authorized by Regional Administrator if he/she determines that
electronic payment is not practicable.
(4) Payment compliance. If an IFQ allocation permit holder does not
submit full payment by the due date described in paragraph (h)(3)(i) of
this section, the Regional Administrator may:
(i) At any time thereafter, notify the IFQ allocation permit holder
in writing that his/her IFQ allocation permit is suspended, thereby
prohibiting landings of tilefish above the incidental limit, as
specified at Sec. 648.295.
(ii) Disapprove any transfer of annual tilefish allocation or quota
share to or from the IFQ allocation permit holder as described in
paragraph (e)(4)(iii) of this section, until such time as the amount
due is paid.
(iii) Deny renewal of the IFQ allocation permit if it had not yet
been issued for the current year, or deny renewal of the IFQ allocation
permit for the following year.
(iv) If the fee amount is not appealed, the Regional Administrator
may issue a Final Administrative Determination (FAD) as described in
paragraph (h)(5) of this section, based upon available information.
(5) Appeal of IFQ fee amount. If a tilefish IFQ allocation permit
holder disagrees with the fee amount determined by NMFS, he/she may
appeal the cost recovery bill.
(i) IFQ fee appeals must be submitted to NMFS in writing before the
due date described in paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this section.
(ii) The IFQ allocation permit holder shall have the burden of
demonstrating that the fee amount calculated by NMFS is incorrect and
what the correct amount is.
(iii) If a request to appeal is submitted on time, the Regional
Administrator shall notify the IFQ allocation permit holder in writing,
acknowledging the appeal and providing 30 days to submit any additional
relevant documentation supporting an alternative fee amount.
(iv) While the IFQ fee is under appeal and the tilefish IFQ
allocation permit is suspended, as described in paragraph (h)(4) of
this section, the IFQ allocation permit holder may request a Letter of
Authorization to fish until the appeal is concluded. Any tilefish
landed pursuant to the above authorization will count against the IFQ
allocation permit, if issued.
(v) Final Administrative Determination (FAD). Based on a review of
available information, including any documentation submitted by the IFQ
allocation permit holder in support of the appropriateness of a
different fee amount, the Regional Administrator shall determine
whether there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that an
alternate fee amount is correct. This determination shall be in set
forth in a FAD that is signed by the Regional Administrator. A FAD
shall be the final decision of the Department of Commerce.
(A) The IFQ allocation permit holder shall have 30 days from the
date of the FAD to comply with the terms of the FAD.
(B) If the IFQ allocation permit holder does not comply with the
terms of the FAD within this period, the Regional Administrator shall:
(1) Refer the matter to the appropriate authorities within the U.S.
Department of the Treasury for purposes of collection; and
(2) Cancel any Letter of Authorization to fish that had been issued
during the appeal.
(vi) If NMFS does not receive full payment of an IFQ cost recovery
fee prior to the end of the cost recovery billing period immediately
following the one for which the fee was incurred, the subject IFQ
allocation permit and any associated IFQ quota share shall be deemed to
have been voluntarily relinquished pursuant to paragraph (b)(8) of this
section.
(6) Annual cost recovery report. NMFS will publish annually a
report on the status of the tilefish IFQ cost recovery program. The
report will provide details of the costs incurred by NMFS for the
management, enforcement, and data collection and analysis associated
with the tilefish IFQ program during the prior cost recovery billing
period, and other relevant information at the discretion of the
Regional Administrator.
(i) Periodic review of the IFQ program. A formal review of the IFQ
program must be conducted by the MAFMC within 5 years of the effective
date of the final regulations. Thereafter, it shall be incorporated
into every scheduled MAFMC review of the FMP (i.e., future amendments
or frameworks), but no less frequently than every 7 years.
[FR Doc. 2013-07161 Filed 3-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P