Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sematech, Inc. D/B/A International Sematech, 19009 [2013-07136]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 60 / Thursday, March 28, 2013 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick W. McDonough, Executive
Director of the Joint Board for the
Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the Advisory
Committee on Actuarial Examinations
will meet at The Segal Company, 333 W.
34th Street, New York, NY, on April 26,
2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss topics and questions that may
be recommended for inclusion on future
Joint Board examinations in actuarial
mathematics, pension law and
methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C.
1242(a)(1)(B).
A determination has been made as
required by section 10(d) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.,
that the subject of the meeting falls
within the exception to the open
meeting requirement set forth in Title 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public
interest requires that such meeting be
closed to public participation.
Dated: March 21, 2013.
Patrick W. McDonough,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the
Enrollment of Actuaries.
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—International Association
of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
Notice is hereby given that, on March
11, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), International
Association of Plumbing and
Mechanical Officials (‘‘IAPMO’’) has
filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, the nature and scope of
IAPMO’s standards development
activities are to provide for the erection,
installation, alteration, repair,
relocation, replacement, addition to,
use, or maintenance of solar energy,
geothermal, and hydronic systems
including but not limited to equipment
20:20 Mar 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–07134 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant To the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Sematech, Inc. D/B/A
International Sematech
[FR Doc. 2013–07160 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
and appliances intended for space
heating or cooling; water heating;
swimming pool heating or process
heating; and snow and ice melt systems.
On September 14, 2004, IAPMO filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on November 29, 2004
(69 FR 69396).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 10, 2004.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5485).
Notice is hereby given that, on March
7, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Sematech, Inc. d/b/
a International Sematech
(‘‘SEMATECH’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Poongsan, Seoul,
REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Advantest,
Tokyo, JAPAN; and Air Products,
Allentown, PA, have been added as
parties to this venture.
Also, Micron, Boise, ID, has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and SEMATECH
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR
17987).
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19009
The last notification was filed with
the Department on January 16, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 12, 2013 (78 FR 9939).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–07136 Filed 3–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 13–7]
Gary Alfred Shearer, M.D.; Decision
And Order
On February 4, 2013, Administrative
Law Judge (ALJ) Christopher B. McNeil
issued the attached recommended
decision. Neither party filed exceptions
to the decision.
Having reviewed the record in its
entirety, including the ALJ’s
recommended decision, I have decided
to adopt the ALJ’s rulings, findings of
fact, conclusions of law,1 and
1 In opposing the Government’s Motion for
Summary Disposition, Respondent argues that the
Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure’s Order is
based upon information provided by law
enforcement which ‘‘is seriously flawed,
misconstrued, unverified, unsupported, or simply,
untrue.’’ Resp. Reply to Govt’s Mot. for Summ.
Disp., at 2. Respondent raises a plethora of
contentions, including that the conduct of the
investigators ‘‘was highly prejudicial and, frankly,
inept,’’ id.; that the Board ‘‘cherry-picked’’ the
charts its consultant reviewed and that the
consultant’s conclusion that Respondent ‘‘violated
the standard of care was wrong—because there was
no standard of care in Kentucky regarding what a
physician should do in the face of inconsistent
[urine drug screens] at the time these patients were
being treated,’’ id. at 4; and that the Board ignored
the consultant’s recommendations that his
prescribing issues could be addressed by educating
[him] about proper follow up.’’ Id. at 8. He then
concludes by arguing that ‘‘DEA created the case
against [him] that led to his suspension[,]’’ that
‘‘[t]he agency now wants to bootstrap the
suspension it caused as a reason to revoke [his]
license to write controls’’ [sic], and that the Board
‘‘most likely would never have suspended [his]
medical license without the DEA’s biased, unfairly
prejudicial input.’’ Id. at 26–27. As relief,
Respondent seeks a hearing and a stay of the matter
until after the Board’s hearing.
The fact remains that the Board’s Order of
Emergency Suspension remains in effect, and ‘‘DEA
has held repeatedly that a registrant cannot
collaterally attack the result of a state criminal or
administrative proceeding in a proceeding under
section 304, 21 U.S.C. 824, of the CSA.’’ Zhiwei Lin,
77 FR 18862, 18864 (2012) (citing cases). As I held
in Lin, ‘‘Respondent’s various challenges to the
validity of the [Board’s] Suspension Order must be
litigated in the forums provided by the State,’’ and
his ‘‘contentions regarding the validity of the
[Board’s] Suspension Order are therefore not
material to this Agency’s resolution of whether he
is entitled to maintain his DEA registration in’’
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
Continued
28MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 60 (Thursday, March 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 19009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07136]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Sematech, Inc. D/B/A International Sematech
Notice is hereby given that, on March 7, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a
International Sematech (``SEMATECH'') has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified
circumstances. Specifically, Poongsan, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA;
Advantest, Tokyo, JAPAN; and Air Products, Allentown, PA, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Micron, Boise, ID, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of
the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).
The last notification was filed with the Department on January 16,
2013. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 12, 2013 (78 FR 9939).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-07136 Filed 3-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
