The Freedom of Information Act, 18473-18475 [2013-06967]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
g. § 214.6(g)(1);
h. § 214.7(c)(2)(i);
i. § 214.14(c)(5)(i)(A);
j. § 215.8(a)(1);
k. § 231.1(b)(1);
l. § 231.2(b)(1);
m. § 235.1(f)(1)(ii);
n. § 245.15(h)(4);
o. § 245.21(g)(3);
p. § 245.23(e)(1)(vi);
q. § 245.24(d)(6);
r. § 245a.1(d)(2);
s. § 245a.2(b)(8);
t. § 245a.4(b)(2)(i)(F);
u. § 245a.15(b)(2)(i);
v. § 247.12(a);
w. § 253.1(a);
x. § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)(5); and
y. § 286.9(b)(1).
■ 5. In § 264.1, add a note to the end of
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
address for the Army Litigation
Division. The Army Litigation Division
moved to Fort Belvoir in September
2011.
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
§ 264.1
*
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because
the rule change does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply
because the rule change does not
include a mandate that may result in
estimated costs to State, local or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
Registration and fingerprinting.
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–06974 Filed 3–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 505
Army Privacy Act Program
Department of the Army, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
is amending its rule on notification of
the Army Litigation Division when
complaints citing the Privacy Act are
filed in order to correct the mailing
address in § 505.12. The address for
notifying the Army Litigation Division
of cases citing the Privacy Act and filed
in a U.S. District Court has changed.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective March 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MAJ
Lisa R. Bloom, 703–693–1009, email:
lisa.bloom@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In the August 10, 2006, issue of the
Federal Register (71 FR 46052), the
Department of the Army issued a final
rule. This final rule corrects the mailing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13132 that
Executive Order does not apply because
the rule change will not have a
substantial effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Kevin K. Robitaille,
COL, JA, Chief, U.S. Army Litigation Division.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 505
Privacy, Enforcement actions.
For reasons stated in the preamble 32
CFR part 505 is amended as follows:
PART 505—ARMY PRIVACY ACT
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 505
continues to read as follows:
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not
apply because the rule change does not
have an adverse impact on the
environment.
■
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because
the rule change does not involve
collection of information from the
public.
Note to paragraph (b): In addition to the
forms noted in this paragraph (b), a valid,
unexpired nonimmigrant DHS admission or
parole stamp in a foreign passport constitutes
evidence of registration.
18473
*
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 12630
does not apply because the rule change
does not impair private property rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 this rule change
is not a significant regulatory action. As
such, the rule is not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13045 that
Executive Order does not apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a).
2. Revise paragraph (b) (1) of § 505.12
to read as follows:
■
§ 505.12
Privacy Act enforcement actions.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) When a complaint citing the
Privacy Act is filed in a U.S. District
Court against the Department of the
Army, an Army Component, a DA
Official, or any Army employee, the
responsible system manager will
promptly notify the Army Litigation
Division, U.S. Army Legal Services
Agency (USALSA), 9275 Gunston Road,
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–06968 Filed 3–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 518
The Freedom of Information Act
Department of the Army, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
is amending its rule on notification of
the Army Litigation Division when a
request is made for a record related to
pending litigation involving the United
States in order to correct the mailing
address in § 518.15 and § 518.18. The
address for notifying the U.S. Army
Litigation Division of record requests
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
18474
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
related to litigation involving the United
States has changed.
Effective Date: This rule is
effective March 27, 2013.
DATES:
MAJ
Lisa R. Bloom, 703–693–1009, email:
lisa.bloom@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In the February 26, 2006, issue of the
Federal Register (71 FR 9222), the
Department of the Army issued a final
rule. This final rule corrects the mailing
address for the Army Litigation
Division. The Army Litigation Division
moved to Fort Belvoir in September
2011.
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because
the rule change does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply
because the rule change does not
include a mandate that may result in
estimated costs to State, local or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not
apply because the rule change does not
have an adverse impact on the
environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because
the rule change does not involve
collection of information from the
public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 12630
does not apply because the rule change
does not impair private property rights.
15:14 Mar 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 this rule change
is not a significant regulatory action. As
such, the rule is not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13045 that
Executive Order does not apply.
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13132 that
Executive Order does not apply because
the rule change will not have a
substantial effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Kevin K. Robitaille,
COL, JA, Chief, U.S. Army Litigation Division.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 518
Freedom of information.
For reasons stated in the preamble 32
CFR part 518 is amended as follows:
PART 518—THE FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT
1. The authority citation for part 518
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 551, 552, 552a, 5101–
5108, 5110–5113, 5115, 5332–5334, 5341–42,
5504–5509, 7154; 10 U.S.C. 130, 1102, 2320–
2321, 2328; 18 U.S.C. 798, 3500; 31 U.S.C.
3710; 35 U.S.C. 181–188; 42 U.S.C. 2162; 44
U.S.C. 33; and Executive Order 12600.
2. Revise paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (iii)
of § 518.15 to read as follows:
■
§ 518.15
General Provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Litigation. Each request for a record
related to pending litigation involving
the United States will be referred to the
staff judge advocate or legal officer of
the command. He or she will promptly
inform the Litigation Division, U.S.
Army Legal Services Agency (USALSA),
of the substance of the request and the
content of the record requested.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(Mailing address: Army Litigation
Division, U.S. Army Legal Services
Agency (USALSA), 9275 Gunston Road,
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. If information is
released for use in litigation involving
the United States, the Chief, Army
Litigation Division (AR 27–40, para 1–
4d) must be advised of the release. He
or she will note the release in such
investigative reports. Information or
records normally exempted from release
(i.e., personnel and medical records)
may be releasable to the judge or court
concerned, for use in litigation to which
the United States is not a party. Refer
such requests to the local staff judge
advocate or legal officer, who will
coordinate it with the Litigation Center,
USALSA.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Contract disputes. Each request
for a record that relates to a potential
contract dispute or a dispute that has
not reached final decision by the
contracting officer will be treated as a
request for procurement records and not
as litigation. However, the officials will
consider the effect of release on the
potential dispute. Those officials may
consult with the USALSA, Contract and
Fiscal Law Division. (Mailing address:
Contract and Fiscal Law Division, U.S.
Army Legal Services Agency (USALSA),
9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA
22060. If the request is for a record that
relates to a pending contract appeal to
the Armed Services Board of Contract
Appeals, or to a final decision that is
still subject to appeal (i.e., 90 days have
not lapsed after receipt of the final
decision by the contractor) then the
request will be: Treated as involving a
contract dispute; and referred to the
USALSA, Contract and Fiscal Law
Division.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise paragraph (f)(2) of § 518.18
to read as follows:
■
§ 518.18
Judicial actions.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) Responsibility for FOIA litigation.
For the Army, under the general
oversight of the OGC, FOIA litigation is
the responsibility of the General
Litigation Branch, Army Litigation
Division. If you are notified of a FOIA
lawsuit involving the Army, contact the
General Litigation Branch immediately
at: General Litigation Branch, Army
Litigation Division, U.S. Army Legal
Services Agency (USALSA), 9275
Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060.
The General Litigation Branch will
provide guidance on gathering
information and assembling a litigation
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
report necessary to respond to FOIA
litigation.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–06967 Filed 3–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0150]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations; Stuart
Sailfish Regatta, Indian River; Stuart,
FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Table of Acronyms
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation on
the Indian River located northeast of the
Ernest F. Lyons Bridge and south of Joes
Cove, in Stuart, Florida during the
Stuart Sailfish Regatta, a series of highspeed boat races. The Stuart Sailfish
Regatta will take place from Friday,
April 19, 2013, until Sunday, April 21,
2013. Approximately 40–80 high-speed
power boats will be participating in the
event and it is anticipated that at least
100 spectator vessels will be. This
special local regulation is necessary for
the safety of race participants,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public during the event. The
special local regulation establishes the
following three areas: A race area, where
all persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels participating in the
high-speed boat races, are prohibited
from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within; a
buffer zone around the race area, where
all persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels enforcing the buffer
zone, or authorized participants or
vessels transiting to the race area, are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within; and a spectator area.
DATES: This rule is effective from April
19, 2013, until April 21, 2013. This rule
is enforced from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m.
daily from April 19, 2013, until April
21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0150. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade Mike H.
Wu, Sector Miami Prevention
Department, Coast Guard; telephone
(305) 535–7576, email
Mike.H.Wu@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On January 9, 2013, the USCG
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, ‘‘Special
Local Regulations; Stuart Sailfish
Regatta, Indian River; Stuart, FL’’ in the
Federal Register (78 FR 1792). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
From Friday, April 19, 2013, until
Sunday, April 21, 2013, Stuart Sailfish
Regatta, Inc. will be hosting the Stuart
Sailfish Regatta, a series of high-speed
boat races. The races will be held on the
Indian River located northeast of Ernest
F. Lyons Bridge and south of Joes Cove,
in Stuart, Florida. Approximately 40–80
high-speed power boats will be
participating in the event. It is
anticipated that at least 100 spectator
vessels will be present during the race.
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
special local regulations: 33 U.S.C.
1233. The purpose of the rule is to
insure safety of life on navigable waters
of the United States during the Stuart
Sailfish Regatta.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard did not receive any
comments to the proposed rule. Two
changes were made to the regulatory
text. First, the published NPRM
included an overlap between the buffer
zone and the spectator area. This has
been corrected so that these two areas
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18475
are in fact defined and separate. Second,
the paragraph pertaining to the spectator
area was amended to further explain the
regulation for that area. Entrance into
the spectator area will be regulated and
all persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering the spectator area unless
and until given permission by the
Captain of the Port Miami or designated
representative via radio on channel 16.
This temporary final rule establishes
a special local regulation that will
encompass certain waters of the Indian
River located northeast of Ernest F.
Lyons Bridge and south of Joes Cove, in
Stuart, Florida. The special local
regulation will be enforced daily from 9
a.m. until 5 p.m. from April 19, 2013
until April 21, 2013. The special local
regulation consists of the following
three areas: (1) A race area, where all
persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels participating in the
high-speed boat races, are prohibited
from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within; (2) a
buffer zone around the race area, where
all persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels enforcing the buffer
zone, or authorized participants or
vessels transiting to the race area, are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within; and (3) a spectator area.
Persons and vessels may request
authorization by contacting the Captain
of the Port Miami by telephone at (305)
535–4472, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel
16, to enter, transit through, anchor in,
or remain within the race area or the
buffer zone. If authorization is granted
by the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative. The Coast
Guard will provide notice of the
regulated areas by Local Notice to
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and on-scene designated
representatives.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM
27MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 27, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18473-18475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06967]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 518
The Freedom of Information Act
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army is amending its rule on
notification of the Army Litigation Division when a request is made for
a record related to pending litigation involving the United States in
order to correct the mailing address in Sec. 518.15 and Sec. 518.18.
The address for notifying the U.S. Army Litigation Division of record
requests
[[Page 18474]]
related to litigation involving the United States has changed.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective March 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MAJ Lisa R. Bloom, 703-693-1009,
email: lisa.bloom@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In the February 26, 2006, issue of the Federal Register (71 FR
9222), the Department of the Army issued a final rule. This final rule
corrects the mailing address for the Army Litigation Division. The Army
Litigation Division moved to Fort Belvoir in September 2011.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because the rule change does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply because the rule change does not
include a mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $100
million or more.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not apply because the rule change does
not have an adverse impact on the environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because the rule change does not involve
collection of information from the public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights)
The Department of the Army has determined that Executive Order
12630 does not apply because the rule change does not impair private
property rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
this rule change is not a significant regulatory action. As such, the
rule is not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under
section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13045 that Executive Order does not
apply.
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13132 that Executive Order does not
apply because the rule change will not have a substantial effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Kevin K. Robitaille,
COL, JA, Chief, U.S. Army Litigation Division.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 518
Freedom of information.
For reasons stated in the preamble 32 CFR part 518 is amended as
follows:
PART 518--THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 518 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 551, 552, 552a, 5101-5108, 5110-5113, 5115,
5332-5334, 5341-42, 5504-5509, 7154; 10 U.S.C. 130, 1102, 2320-2321,
2328; 18 U.S.C. 798, 3500; 31 U.S.C. 3710; 35 U.S.C. 181-188; 42
U.S.C. 2162; 44 U.S.C. 33; and Executive Order 12600.
0
2. Revise paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (iii) of Sec. 518.15 to read as
follows:
Sec. 518.15 General Provisions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Litigation. Each request for a record related to pending
litigation involving the United States will be referred to the staff
judge advocate or legal officer of the command. He or she will promptly
inform the Litigation Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency
(USALSA), of the substance of the request and the content of the record
requested. (Mailing address: Army Litigation Division, U.S. Army Legal
Services Agency (USALSA), 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. If
information is released for use in litigation involving the United
States, the Chief, Army Litigation Division (AR 27-40, para 1-4d) must
be advised of the release. He or she will note the release in such
investigative reports. Information or records normally exempted from
release (i.e., personnel and medical records) may be releasable to the
judge or court concerned, for use in litigation to which the United
States is not a party. Refer such requests to the local staff judge
advocate or legal officer, who will coordinate it with the Litigation
Center, USALSA.
* * * * *
(iii) Contract disputes. Each request for a record that relates to
a potential contract dispute or a dispute that has not reached final
decision by the contracting officer will be treated as a request for
procurement records and not as litigation. However, the officials will
consider the effect of release on the potential dispute. Those
officials may consult with the USALSA, Contract and Fiscal Law
Division. (Mailing address: Contract and Fiscal Law Division, U.S. Army
Legal Services Agency (USALSA), 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA
22060. If the request is for a record that relates to a pending
contract appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, or to
a final decision that is still subject to appeal (i.e., 90 days have
not lapsed after receipt of the final decision by the contractor) then
the request will be: Treated as involving a contract dispute; and
referred to the USALSA, Contract and Fiscal Law Division.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise paragraph (f)(2) of Sec. 518.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 518.18 Judicial actions.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) Responsibility for FOIA litigation. For the Army, under the
general oversight of the OGC, FOIA litigation is the responsibility of
the General Litigation Branch, Army Litigation Division. If you are
notified of a FOIA lawsuit involving the Army, contact the General
Litigation Branch immediately at: General Litigation Branch, Army
Litigation Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency (USALSA), 9275
Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. The General Litigation Branch
will provide guidance on gathering information and assembling a
litigation
[[Page 18475]]
report necessary to respond to FOIA litigation.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-06967 Filed 3-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
