Submission for OMB Review; Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects, 18348-18349 [2013-06924]
Download as PDF
18348
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0175; Docket 2012–
0076, Sequence 65]
Submission for OMB Review; Use of
Project Labor Agreements for Federal
Construction Projects
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension of an
existing OMB information clearance.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of an existing
information collection requirement
regarding Use of Project Labor
Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects. A notice was published in the
Federal Register at 13057, on February
26, 2013. One comment was received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0175, Use of Project Labor
Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects, by any of the following
methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘Information Collection 9000–
0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements
for Federal Construction Projects’’.
Follow the instructions provided at the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please
include your name, company name (if
any), and ‘‘Information Collection 9000–
0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements
for Federal Construction Projects’’ on
your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada
Flowers/IC 9000–0175, Use of Project
Labor Agreements for Federal
Construction Projects.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0175, Use of Project Labor
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects, in all correspondence related
to this collection. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business
confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward Loeb, Procurement Analyst,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition
Policy, at telephone (202) 501–0650 or
via email to Edward.loeb@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
FAR 22.501 prescribes policies and
procedures to implement Executive
Order 13502, February 6, 2009, which
encourages Federal agencies to consider
the use of a project labor agreement
(PLA), as they may decide appropriate,
on large-scale construction projects,
where the total cost to the Government
is more than $25 million, in order to
promote economy and efficiency in
Federal procurement. A PLA is a prehire collective bargaining agreement
with one or more labor organizations
that establishes the terms and
conditions of employment for a specific
construction project. FAR 22.503(b)
provides that an agency may, if
appropriate, require that every
contractor and subcontractor engaged in
construction on the project agree, for
that project, to negotiate or become a
party to a project labor agreement with
one or more labor organizations if the
agency decides that the use of project
labor agreements will—
(1) Advance the Federal Government’s
interest in achieving economy and
efficiency in Federal procurement,
producing labor-management stability,
and ensuring compliance with laws and
regulations governing safety and health,
equal employment opportunity, labor
and employment standards, and other
matters; and
(2) Be consistent with law.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One public comment was received.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the
fundamental purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Response: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval on
an existing information collection. PRA
requires that agencies use the Federal
Register notice and comment process, to
extend OMB’s approval, at least every
three years. This extension, to a
previously approved information
collection, pertains to the requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to submit a project labor agreement to
the Government when such an
agreement is deemed needed. Absent
this information the Government would
not be in a position to carry out the FAR
prescribed policies and procedures to
implement Executive Order 13502,
which encourages Federal agencies to
consider the use of a project labor
agreement (PLA), as they may decide
appropriate, on large-scale construction
projects, where the total cost to the
Government is more than $25 million.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden
challenging that the agency’s
methodology for calculating it is
insufficient and inadequate and does
not reflect the total burden. Specifically,
the respondent challenged the estimated
70 respondents, the one response per
respondent and the estimated one hour
of burden to meet information collection
requirement. The respondent
recommend the use of the actual
number of responses received and
suggested that one hour of burden is
understated.
Response: There is no existing
Governmentwide data base that collects
PLAs and specifically the number
submitted under the various options
included in the existing FAR policies
and procedures. For FY 2010 and 2011,
a two year average of 258 large-scale
construction contracts, were awarded.
The estimated number of 70 responses
per year represents about thirty percent
of the two year average, which is
believed to be a valid estimate. As stated
in the final rule in the Federal Register
at 75 FR 19169 on April 10, 2010,
Project Labor Agreements are mandated
by an Executive order, not by the FAR.
Therefore, the time required to negotiate
a Project Labor Agreement was never
intended to be included in this renewal
request. Further, the FAR requires only
that a Project Labor Agreement be
submitted to the Government on an
exception basis and only in order to
confirm the existence of a negotiated
Project Labor Agreement when someone
or some circumstance has cast doubt on
whether there is a Project Labor
Agreement on a particular Federal
construction project. The allotted hour
is the time required to copy an existing
document and mail it to the
Government, essentially a clerical task,
as such the one hour per response is
retained in this information collection
renewal request.
Comment: The respondent provided
that the burden of compliance with the
information collection requirement
greatly exceeds the agency’s estimate
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
and outweighs any potential utility of
the extension.
Response: The Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) was designed to improve the
quality and use of Federal information
to strengthen decision-making,
accountability, and openness in
government and society. Central to this
process is the solicitation of comments
from the public. This process
incorporates and enumerated
specification of targeted information
and provides interested parties a
meaningful opportunity for comment on
the relevant compliance cost. This
process has led to decreases in the
overall collection requirement in
regards to the public. Based on OMB
estimates, in FY 2010, the public spent
8.8 billion hours responding to
information collections. This was a
decrease of one billion hours, or ten
percent from the previous fiscal year. In
effect, the collective burden of
compliance for the public is going down
as the Government publishes rule that
make the process less complex, more
transparent, and reduces the cost of
federal regulations to both the
Contractor community and Government.
Comment: The respondent provided
that agency should reassess the
estimated total burden hours and revise
the estimate, as was done in FAR Case
2007–006.
Response: Serious consideration
given, during the open comment period,
to all comments received and
adjustments are made to the paperwork
burden estimate based on reasonable
considerations provided by the public.
This is evidenced, as the respondent
notes, in FAR Case 2007–006 where
adjustment was made from the total
preparation hours from three to 60. This
change was made considering
particularly the hours that would be
required for review within the company
prior to release to the Government. The
burden is prepared taking into
consideration the necessary criteria
OMB guidance for estimating the
paperwork burden put on the entity
submitting the information. For
example, consideration is given to entity
reviewing instructions; using
technology to collect, process, and
disclose information; adjusting existing
practices to comply with requirements;
searching data sources; completing
reviewing the response; and
transmitting or disclosing information.
The estimated burden hours for a
collection are based on an average
between the hours that a simple
disclosure by a very small business
might require and the much higher
numbers that might be required for a
very complex disclosure by a major
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
corporation. Also, the estimated burden
hours should only include projected
hours for those actions which a
company would not undertake in the
normal course of business.
Careful consideration went into
assessing the estimated burden hours for
this collection. However, at any point,
members of the public may submit
comments for further consideration, and
are encouraged to provide data to
support their request for an adjustment.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 70.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 70.
Hours per Response: 1.
Total Burden Hours: 70.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0175, Use of
Project Labor Agreements for Federal
Construction Projects, in all
correspondence.
Dated: March 21, 2013.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–06924 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0136; Docket 2012–
0076; Sequence 63]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Commercial
Item Acquisitions
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding an extension to an existing
OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18349
collection requirement concerning the
clauses and provisions required for use
in commercial item acquisitions.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0136, Commercial Item
Acquisitions, by any of the following
methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching the OMB control number.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘Information
Collection 9000–0136, Commercial Item
Acquisitions’’. Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0136,
Commercial Item Acquisitions’’ on your
attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada
Flowers/IC 9000–0136, Commercial
Item Acquisitions.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0136, Commercial Item
Acquisitions, in all correspondence
related to this collection. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business
confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 208–4949
or email at michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
The Federal Acquisition Streamlining
Act of 1994 included Title VIII, entitled
Commercial Items. The title made
numerous additions and revisions to
both the civilian agency and Armed
Service acquisition statutes to encourage
and facilitate the acquisition of
commercial items and services by
Federal Government agencies.
To implement these changes, DoD,
NASA, and GSA amended the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to include
several streamlined and simplified
clauses and provisions to be used in
place of existing clauses and provisions.
They were designed to simplify
solicitations and contracts for
commercial items. Information is used
by Federal agencies to facilitate the
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18348-18349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06924]
[[Page 18348]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0175; Docket 2012-0076, Sequence 65]
Submission for OMB Review; Use of Project Labor Agreements for
Federal Construction Projects
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension of
an existing OMB information clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of an
existing information collection requirement regarding Use of Project
Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects. A notice was
published in the Federal Register at 13057, on February 26, 2013. One
comment was received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before April 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000-
0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects, by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
corresponds with ``Information Collection 9000-0175, Use of Project
Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects''. Follow the
instructions provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please
include your name, company name (if any), and ``Information Collection
9000-0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. ATTN:
Hada Flowers/IC 9000-0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal
Construction Projects.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 9000-0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal
Construction Projects, in all correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business
confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward Loeb, Procurement Analyst,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, at telephone (202) 501-
0650 or via email to Edward.loeb@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
FAR 22.501 prescribes policies and procedures to implement
Executive Order 13502, February 6, 2009, which encourages Federal
agencies to consider the use of a project labor agreement (PLA), as
they may decide appropriate, on large-scale construction projects,
where the total cost to the Government is more than $25 million, in
order to promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement. A PLA
is a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor
organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment
for a specific construction project. FAR 22.503(b) provides that an
agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and
subcontractor engaged in construction on the project agree, for that
project, to negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement
with one or more labor organizations if the agency decides that the use
of project labor agreements will--
(1) Advance the Federal Government's interest in achieving economy
and efficiency in Federal procurement, producing labor-management
stability, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing
safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment
standards, and other matters; and
(2) Be consistent with law.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One public comment was received.
Comment: The respondent commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the fundamental purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
Response: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval on an existing information
collection. PRA requires that agencies use the Federal Register notice
and comment process, to extend OMB's approval, at least every three
years. This extension, to a previously approved information collection,
pertains to the requirement to submit a project labor agreement to the
Government when such an agreement is deemed needed. Absent this
information the Government would not be in a position to carry out the
FAR prescribed policies and procedures to implement Executive Order
13502, which encourages Federal agencies to consider the use of a
project labor agreement (PLA), as they may decide appropriate, on
large-scale construction projects, where the total cost to the
Government is more than $25 million.
Comment: The respondent commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden challenging that the agency's
methodology for calculating it is insufficient and inadequate and does
not reflect the total burden. Specifically, the respondent challenged
the estimated 70 respondents, the one response per respondent and the
estimated one hour of burden to meet information collection
requirement. The respondent recommend the use of the actual number of
responses received and suggested that one hour of burden is
understated.
Response: There is no existing Governmentwide data base that
collects PLAs and specifically the number submitted under the various
options included in the existing FAR policies and procedures. For FY
2010 and 2011, a two year average of 258 large-scale construction
contracts, were awarded. The estimated number of 70 responses per year
represents about thirty percent of the two year average, which is
believed to be a valid estimate. As stated in the final rule in the
Federal Register at 75 FR 19169 on April 10, 2010, Project Labor
Agreements are mandated by an Executive order, not by the FAR.
Therefore, the time required to negotiate a Project Labor Agreement was
never intended to be included in this renewal request. Further, the FAR
requires only that a Project Labor Agreement be submitted to the
Government on an exception basis and only in order to confirm the
existence of a negotiated Project Labor Agreement when someone or some
circumstance has cast doubt on whether there is a Project Labor
Agreement on a particular Federal construction project. The allotted
hour is the time required to copy an existing document and mail it to
the Government, essentially a clerical task, as such the one hour per
response is retained in this information collection renewal request.
Comment: The respondent provided that the burden of compliance with
the information collection requirement greatly exceeds the agency's
estimate
[[Page 18349]]
and outweighs any potential utility of the extension.
Response: The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) was designed to improve
the quality and use of Federal information to strengthen decision-
making, accountability, and openness in government and society. Central
to this process is the solicitation of comments from the public. This
process incorporates and enumerated specification of targeted
information and provides interested parties a meaningful opportunity
for comment on the relevant compliance cost. This process has led to
decreases in the overall collection requirement in regards to the
public. Based on OMB estimates, in FY 2010, the public spent 8.8
billion hours responding to information collections. This was a
decrease of one billion hours, or ten percent from the previous fiscal
year. In effect, the collective burden of compliance for the public is
going down as the Government publishes rule that make the process less
complex, more transparent, and reduces the cost of federal regulations
to both the Contractor community and Government.
Comment: The respondent provided that agency should reassess the
estimated total burden hours and revise the estimate, as was done in
FAR Case 2007-006.
Response: Serious consideration given, during the open comment
period, to all comments received and adjustments are made to the
paperwork burden estimate based on reasonable considerations provided
by the public. This is evidenced, as the respondent notes, in FAR Case
2007-006 where adjustment was made from the total preparation hours
from three to 60. This change was made considering particularly the
hours that would be required for review within the company prior to
release to the Government. The burden is prepared taking into
consideration the necessary criteria OMB guidance for estimating the
paperwork burden put on the entity submitting the information. For
example, consideration is given to entity reviewing instructions; using
technology to collect, process, and disclose information; adjusting
existing practices to comply with requirements; searching data sources;
completing reviewing the response; and transmitting or disclosing
information. The estimated burden hours for a collection are based on
an average between the hours that a simple disclosure by a very small
business might require and the much higher numbers that might be
required for a very complex disclosure by a major corporation. Also,
the estimated burden hours should only include projected hours for
those actions which a company would not undertake in the normal course
of business.
Careful consideration went into assessing the estimated burden
hours for this collection. However, at any point, members of the public
may submit comments for further consideration, and are encouraged to
provide data to support their request for an adjustment.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 70.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 70.
Hours per Response: 1.
Total Burden Hours: 70.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control
No. 9000-0175, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction
Projects, in all correspondence.
Dated: March 21, 2013.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of
Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office
of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-06924 Filed 3-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P