Commercial Driver's License Testing and Commercial Learner's Permit Standards, 17875-17882 [2013-06760]
Download as PDF
17875
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 172.101 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE—Continued
Hazardous
materials
descriptions
and proper
shipping
names
Hazard
class or
division
Identification
No.
PG
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
G ............
*
Self-reactive
solid type E.
4.1
G ............
*
Self-reactive
solid type F.
4.1
Symbols
(8) Packaging (§ 173.***)
UN3230
*
Bulk
Passenger
aircraft/rail
Cargo
aircraft
only
Location
Other
(8A)
(8B)
(8C)
(9A)
(9B)
(10A)
(10B)
*
....................
151
*
224
None
5 kg
10 kg
*
....................
151
*
224
None
*
10 kg
25 kg
*
*
*
3
Nonbulk
4.1
II
*
Exceptions
4.1
II
*
*
[REMOVE]
*
Gasohol gasoline mixed
with ethyl
alcohol,
with not
more than
10% alcohol.
*
UN3226
*
*
NA1203
II
*
3
150
*
*
202
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Robert Redmond, Office of Safety
Programs, Commercial Driver’s License
Division, telephone (202) 366–5014 or
email robert.redmond@dot.gov. Office
hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. If
you have questions on the docket, call
Ms. Barbara Hairston, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–3024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
49 CFR Parts 383 and 384
[Docket No. FMCSA–2007–27659]
RIN 2126–AB59
Commercial Driver’s License Testing
and Commercial Learner’s Permit
Standards
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
FMCSA amends its May 9,
2011, final rule in response to certain
petitions for reconsideration. The 2011
final rule amended the commercial
driver’s license (CDL) knowledge and
skills testing standards and established
new minimum Federal standards for
States to issue the commercial learner’s
permit (CLP). The Agency received 34
petitions for reconsideration that
covered a wide range of issues. FMCSA
granted or denied each of these
petitions, by orders available in the
docket referenced at the beginning of
this notice. Today’s final rule addresses
the petitions that were granted.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 24, 2013.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
I. Legal Basis
This rule is based on the same
authority as FMCSA’s final rule on
‘‘Commercial Driver’s License Testing
and Commercial Learner’s Permit
Standards’’ published on May 9, 2011
[76 FR 26854]; for a complete discussion
of that authority, see the Legal Basis
section of the 2011 rule [76 FR at
26855].
Briefly, this rule implements or
revises certain provisions of the
Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of
1986 (CMVSA), as amended [49 U.S.C.
chapter 313]; the Motor Carrier Safety
Act of 1984 (MCSA), as amended [49
U.S.C. 31136]; and the Motor Carrier Act
of 1935 (MCA) [49 U.S.C. 31502(b)]. The
rule also carries out certain provisions
of the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century (TEA–21) [Pub. L. 105–
178, 112 Stat. 107, June 9, 1998]; the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) [Pub. L. 109–59,
119 Stat. 1144, Aug. 10, 2005]; and the
Security and Accountability For Every
Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act) [Pub.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
52, 53
D
52, 53
E
..............
*
*
242
D
*
*
*
[FR Doc. C1–2013–04197 Filed 3–22–13; 8:45 am]
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
*
*
*
144, 177
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(10) Vessel
stowage
(7)
(6)
*
(9) Quantity limitations
Special
Provisions
(§ 172.102)
Label
Codes
*
5L
*
60 L
*
L. 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884, Oct. 13,
2006].
The CMVSA established the
commercial driver’s license (CDL) and
drug and alcohol testing programs. The
MCSA directed FMCSA to ensure that
its safety regulations meet certain
general objectives. That statute also
underlies most of FMCSA’s safety
regulations including, as supplemental
authority, those related to the CDL
program. The MCSA inaugurated
Federal regulation of motor carrier
safety and provided broad authority
over for-hire and private motor carriers.
Sec. 4019 of TEA–21 required the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to
determine whether the CDL testing
system accurately measures the
knowledge and skills needed to operate
a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) and,
if not, to correct the system. Sec. 4122
of SAFETEA–LU required FMCSA to
prescribe regulations on minimum
uniform standards for the issuance of
commercial learner’s permits (CLPs), as
it had already done for CDLs. Sec. 703
of the SAFE Port Act required the
Secretary of Transportation to carry out
recommendations issued by the DOT’s
Office of Inspector General (OIG) in
2002, 2004, and 2006 concerning
performance-oriented requirements for
English language proficiency,
verification of the legal status of
commercial drivers, and fraud-reduction
in the CDL program. The 2011 final rule
implemented all of these mandates.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
17876
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The Agency received 34 petitions
seeking reconsideration of various
elements of the 2011 rule. FMCSA is
adopting this rule without additional
notice and opportunity for comment
because the issues raised by petitioners
have already been subjected to the full
range of notice and comment, starting
with the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in 2008 [73 FR 19282, April 9,
2008]. Many parties submitted
comments on the NPRM; the Agency
responded at length in the preamble to
the 2011 rule. A number of the petitions
for reconsideration repeated the
comments and suggestions submitted to
the Agency in response to the 2008
NPRM. However, some of the petitions
included additional analyses and data
such that FMCSA is persuaded to adopt
changes to the 2011 final rule. These
changes include non-substantive
changes to clarify the Agency’s intent
and to resolve confusion over the rule’s
requirements. The changes also include
amendments to lessen the regulatory
burden the 2011 rule placed on both
public and private entities where such
changes fall within the scope of or are
the logical outgrowth of the 2008
NPRM. One final change expands the
amount of time States have to come into
compliance with the new requirements
because of changes made in today’s final
rule. Under these circumstances, a
further round of notice and comment
would serve no purpose and is not
required by the Administrative
Procedure Act.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Background
On April 9, 2008, FMCSA issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend the CDL knowledge and skills
testing standards and establish new
minimum Federal standards for States
to issue the commercial learner’s permit
(CLP) (73 FR 19282). On May 9, 2011,
FMCSA issued a final rule
implementing these changes. In
response to the final rule, FMCSA
received 34 petitions for
reconsideration. FMCSA has decided to
publish a new final rule amending
several provisions of the May 9, 2011
rule.
For additional background
information, please see the Background
section of the May 9, 2011 final rule (76
FR 26854).
III. Discussion of the Petitions for
Reconsideration
After careful review, FMCSA decided
to grant some petitions, in whole or in
part, and deny others. As a result,
FMCSA is publishing a new final rule
modifying seven provisions of the May
2011 final rule. The grant and denial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
orders are available in this rulemaking
docket, referenced at the beginning of
this notice.
In this final rule, FMCSA modifies the
following provisions, which granted, in
whole or in part, are in response to the
petitions for reconsideration:
1. State Procedures—49 CFR
383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7), and
(e)(5)
2. Requiring Two Employees To
Verify Documents—49 CFR 383.73(m)
3. Prohibiting Training Schools From
Administering Skills Tests—49 CFR
383.75(a)(7)
4. Bonding Requirements—49 CFR
383.75(a)(8)(v)
5. Prohibiting States From Using a
Photo on the CLP—49 CFR 383.153(b)(1)
and 384.227
6. Requiring Annual Background
Checks for Skills Test Examiners—49
CFR 384.228(h)
7. Although FMCSA initially denied
petitions seeking to delay the May 2011
final rule’s compliance date, FMCSA
reverses that decision and modifies the
following additional provision:
Substantial compliance—general
requirements—49 CFR 384.301(f).
FMCSA denied the remaining issues
submitted for reconsideration.
State Procedures—49 CFR
383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7), and
(e)(5)
Sections 383.73(b)(6) and 383.73(c)(7)
require States to check for legal
presence and domicile, but provide for
an exception stating that this only needs
to be done once after July 8, 2011,
provided that a notation is made on an
individual’s record. Some States
requested that the Agency extend this
exception to renewals and upgrades.
Sections 383.73(b)(6) and 383.73(c)(7)
state that the exception to checking for
legal presence and domicile applies to
initial issuances, transfers, and
renewals; however, the exception does
not appear in § 383.73(d)(7), which
governs renewals. In addition, § 383.73
does not specify whether the exception
applies to upgrades, which are governed
by § 383.73(e)(5). The Agency
acknowledges that the exception was
not written as the Agency intended. As
a result, FMCSA amends
§§ 383.73(b)(6), 383.73(c)(7),
383.73(d)(7), and 383.73(e)(5) to clarify
that the exception covers all
transactions, whether initial issuance,
transfer, renewal, or upgrade, made after
July 8, 2011.
Requiring Two Employees To Verify
Documents—49 CFR 383.73(m)
Section 383.73(m) requires that two
State Driver’s Licensing Agency (SDLA)
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
staff members verify CLP and CDL
applicants’ test scores, completed
application forms, and documents to
prove legal presence. For SDLA offices
with only one staff member on duty, the
documents must be verified by a
supervisor before issuance.
Alternatively, when the supervisor is
not available, copies must be made of
the documents used to prove legal
presence and domicile so that a
supervisor can verify them along with
the completed application within one
business day of issuance of a CLP or
CDL. A number of States interpreted
§ 383.73(m) to require two employees to
verify each document. They requested
reconsideration, stating that the
perceived requirement would burden
existing resources and increase SDLA
workload at a time when State agencies
are experiencing reduced funding and
resources. In addition, one State asked
for clarification of how this provision
affects central-issuance States.
FMCSA did not intend to create a
redundant process under which two
SDLA employees must verify each
document a particular driver-applicant
presents. Rather, FMCSA intended that
more than one SDLA employee
participate substantively in the
licensing process. For example, one
person might review the legal presence
and other documentation the driver
presents, while a second SDLA
employee would conduct the required
driving record check for driving
violations, take the applicant’s
photograph, and issue the license.
Moreover, the two employees need not
work in the same location. For a centralissuance State, having one employee
accept documents at the point of service
and another verify some or all of them
at the central-issuance facility would
satisfy the requirements of this section.
Similarly, for SDLA offices with only
one staff member on duty, having a
supervisor verify some or all of the
documents within one business day of
issuance of a CLP or CDL would satisfy
the requirements of this section.
FMCSA amends § 383.73(m) to clarify
that FMCSA requires two people to be
substantively involved in the license
issuance process, but does not require
that two people verify each document.
Prohibiting Training Schools From
Administering Skills Tests—49 CFR
383.75(a)(7)
Section 383.75(a)(7) prohibits CDL
training schools from skills testing
applicants they train, except if there is
no skills testing alternative within 50
miles of the school and the same
examiner does not train and test the
same student applicant. The FMCSA
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
received petitions requesting
reconsideration on the grounds that the
provision was too restrictive and would
create hardship for States, training
schools, and motor carriers.
FMCSA acknowledges the hardship
and unintended consequences that this
provision could cause for States,
schools, and aspiring CDL holders.
FMCSA believes, however, that
prohibiting individual examiners from
administering skills tests to student
applicants they have trained will further
the Agency’s and Congress’s fraudprevention objectives. Accordingly,
FMCSA amends § 383.75(a)(7) to
provide that CDL training schools may
test their own student applicants only
so long as an individual examiner does
not administer the skills test to drivers
he or she has trained.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Bonding Requirements—49 CFR
383.75(a)(8)(v)
Section 383.75(a)(8)(v) requires third
party CDL testers to maintain bonds in
an amount sufficient to pay for retesting of drivers if required due to
examiners engaging in fraudulent
activities related to skills testing. A
number of States requested that FMCSA
reconsider this section to require
bonding to be at the State’s discretion or
only apply to non-governmental
entities.
As explained in the May 2011 rule,
FMCSA is aware of a number of third
party testers whose examiners engaged
in fraudulent activities. As a result, a
number of CDL holders were required to
be re-tested, causing States and
individuals to incur additional
expenses. FMCSA implemented this
provision to ensure that, in the event
examiners are involved in fraudulent
activities related to skills testing, States
or individuals would have an
opportunity to recoup expenses related
to re-testing.
FMCSA acknowledges that a number
of third-party testers are governmental
entities performing testing services
under inter-agency or other agreements.
FMCSA believes there is a lower risk
associated with locating and recouping
expenses from governmental entities
than from private third-party testers.
Moreover, FMCSA is aware that many
States normally do not require their own
political subdivisions and agencies,
either at the State or local level, to
obtain bonds. Accordingly, FMCSA
amends § 383.75(a)(8)(v) to eliminate
the bond requirement for governmental
entities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Prohibiting States From Using a Photo
on the CLP—49 CFR 383.153(b)(1) and
384.227
Section 383.153(b)(1) prohibits States
from placing a digital color image or
photograph or black and white laser
engraved photograph or other visual
representation of the driver on the CLP.
FMCSA received petitions requesting
reconsideration on the grounds that
prohibiting the inclusion of a digital
color image or photograph or black and
white laser engraved photograph or
other visual representation of the driver
would cause economic harm to the
States and/or make the CLP less secure.
FMCSA acknowledges that many, but
not all, States have invested in
technologies to develop secure CLPs
that may or may not include a digital
color image or photograph or black and
white laser engraved photograph or
other visual representation of the driver.
Other provisions of this rule establish
that the CLP is a two-part license
comprised of the CLP document and the
underlying CDL or non-CDL, and that
the CLP document must be presented
with the underlying CDL or non-CDL to
be valid. Moreover, the CLP document
will have the same driver’s license
number as the underlying CDL or nonCDL as well as language stating the twopart nature of the document, making
this relationship clear. Accordingly, to
accommodate the States’ requests for
flexibility in determining whether to
include a photograph of the driver on
the CLP, FMCSA amends § 383.153(b)(1)
to make the reference to a digital color
image or photograph or black and white
laser engraved photograph of the driver
permissive rather than prohibited. The
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), however, objected to having a
State issue two photograph IDs to a
single person, stating it would violate
the one driver/one license/one record
principle. In fact, the CLP and the
underlying license constitute a single
document with (potentially) two
photographs. FMCSA leaves the
determination up to the State to include
a photo on the CLP, for an extra security
measure when processing a CDL
request.
FMCSA also amends section 384.227
to reflect the permissive inclusion of a
photograph on the CLP.
Requiring Annual Background Checks
for Skills Test Examiners—49 CFR
384.228(h)
Section 384.228(h) requires States to
conduct annual background checks on
all test examiners. Some States
petitioned for reconsideration of this
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17877
requirement on the grounds that annual
checks are burdensome.
On further consideration, FMCSA
agrees that an annual background check
of 2,200 skills test examiners is
unnecessarily burdensome.
Accordingly, FMCSA amends
§ 384.228(h) to require States to perform
background checks on test examiners
only at the time of hiring.
Substantial Compliance—General
Requirements—49 CFR 384.301(f)
Section 384.301(f) establishes the date
by which all States must come into
substantial compliance with the
provisions of the May 2011 and today’s
final rules. FMCSA received petitions
for reconsideration requesting an
extension of the May 2011 final rule, so
that the States would have sufficient
time to implement the requirements
established in that rule. Although
FMCSA believes that a three year
implementation period is generally
sufficient, the Agency recognizes that
many States have been waiting for
today’s final rule to implement changes
to those provisions for which the
Agency has granted petitions for
reconsideration. As a result, and in
consideration of the changes made in
today’s final rule, the Agency has
extended the compliance date for the
changes established in the May 2011
and today’s final rules by one year, to
July 8, 2015.
Technical Corrections
In addition to addressing the issues
raised in the petitions for
reconsideration, FMCSA is also
adopting the following technical
corrections in this final rule:
• In § 383.73(f)(2)(ii), an incorrect
cross reference to § 383.153(b) is
changed to § 383.153(c).
• The preamble to the 2011 final rule
made it clear that CLPs cannot be
‘‘transferred’’ from one State to another
State. The regulatory language, however,
did not adequately reflect that decision.
The following sections are therefore
revised to include a prohibition on
transfer of CLPs: § 383.73, paragraphs
(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7), (e)(5) and
(m); § 383.153(h); § 384.105, definition
of ‘‘Issue and Issuance;’’ § 384.227, and
§ 384.405(b)(1).
IV. Regulatory Analyses
E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review and DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures as Supplemented by
E.O. 13563)
FMCSA has determined this final rule
is not a significant regulatory action
within the meaning of Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17878
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(E.O.) 12866, as supplemented by E.O.
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011),
and is also not significant within the
meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures (DOT Order 2100.5 dated
May 22, 1980; 44 FR 11034, February
26, 1979). The estimated cost of the final
rule is not expected to exceed the $100
million annual threshold for economic
significance. The Agency expects the
final rule to generate cost savings in the
form of reduced annual paperwork
burden hours compared to the estimates
in the 2011 final rule. The provisions
revised in this rule are intended to
increase fraud reduction, improve
safety, and facilitate entrance into the
commercial motor vehicle (CMV) driver
occupations. Many of the provisions of
this rule impose minimal cost on the
States or industry members, either
because many States are already
complying with the requirements
contained in the May 2011 final rule or
because the requirements have minimal
impact on the SDLA or industry
operations or procedures.
FMCSA emphasizes that this rule
does not change requirements
concerning State procedures in CDL
processing or impose additional burden
hours or costs. The Agency amends
several sections of the current
regulations in 49 CFR
§§ 383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7),
and (e)(5) to cover all transactions
(initial issuance, transfer, renewal, or
upgrades). Likewise, bonding
requirements for third party testers as
written in 49 CFR § 383.75(a)(8)(v)
remain intact, the only difference being
that a third party tester that is a
government entity is no longer required
to maintain a bond.
FMCSA recognized the potential loss
of revenue from reduced enrollment
when it prohibited training schools from
administering skills tests to their own
student applicants. This is even more
evident in smaller training programs in
rural areas. These training schools may
be 100 miles or more from the nearest
tester unaffiliated with the school, who
would be available to test the school’s
drivers. Amending this section will
allow CDL training schools to test their
students, yet prohibit a skills test
examiner who is also a skills instructor
from administering a skills test to an
applicant who received skills training
from that examiner. The Agency does
not know the number or location of
training programs that conduct skills
testing and therefore cannot produce a
reasonable estimate of the total cost
associated with this exclusion on skills
testing.
The SAFE Port Act mandated that the
Agency adopt certain regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
implementing the DOT Office of
Inspector General’s (OIG) anti-fraud
recommendations. Applying these
mandates required the Agency to adopt
specific measures to prevent fraud in
the CDL system. One of the measures
required by the Agency is that CLP
documentation be presented
simultaneously with the underlying
CDL or non-CDL to be valid.
The States will have the discretion to
place a digital photograph on the CLP
(see § 383.153(b)(1) and § 384.227); most
SDLAs currently keep a digital
photograph on file for all drivers they
license.
FMCSA amends § 383.73(m) to clarify
that FMCSA requires two people to be
involved in the license issuance
process, but does not require that two
people verify each document. Two
SDLA staff members can participate
independently in the licensing process
for a CLP/CDL. For example, one person
might review the legal presence and
other documentation the driver
presents, while a second SDLA
employee would view the driving
record for violations, take the
applicant’s photo, and issue the license.
Also, the two employees are not
required to work in the same duty
location. For a central-issuance State,
having one employee accept documents
at the point of service and another verify
some or all of them at the centralissuance facility would satisfy the
requirements of this section. The
amendment to § 383.73(m) splits driver
processing, but it will not double either
the time or effort needed to issue a CDL.
The $2.97 million 1 per year cost for
processing time will remain unchanged
despite the amendment because the
extra time burden has been factored into
the May 2011 Final Rule.
Lastly, FMCSA agreed that annual
background checks for skills test
examiners as described in 49 CFR
384.228(h) were unnecessary. FMCSA
amends this section to require
background checks on test examiners
only at the time of hiring. This will
produce a total cost saving of $214,400 2
per year, after conducting an initial
background check. This represents the
1 This amount is calculated by multiplying
($24.45/hr.) of a licensing clerk by the (1⁄6 of an
hour) of processing time, by the number of new
CDLs processed annually (530,000). Final Rule
Regulatory Evaluation: Commercial Driver’s License
Testing and Commercial Learner’s Permit
Standards. p. 12 March 2011. The processing cost
includes $26,500 CLP CDLIS record change and
$779,100 tamper proofing of CLPs.
2 OMB Control No. 2126–0011 titled,
‘‘Commercial Driver Licensing and Test Standards.’’
May 1, 2012, pp. 22–23. This amount is calculated
by multiplying 2,144 skills test examiners × $100/
per FBI background check = $214,400.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
only quantifiable cost savings of the
rule, but other provisions will result in
unquantifiable benefits.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FMCSA is not required to prepare a
new Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(RFA) because the RFA performed for
the May 2011, final rule pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 604(a) remains fully applicable to
this final rule. The 2011 RFA provided
estimates of the active motor carrier
population and the number of entities
subject to the rule at that time. While
these numbers may have changed
slightly in the intervening months, they
do not affect the conclusions of the 2011
RFA in any way.
Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
FMCSA wants to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on themselves
and participate in the rulemaking
initiative. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance; please consult
the FMCSA point of contact, Robert
Redmond, listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
rule.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce or otherwise determine
compliance with Federal regulations to
the Small Business Administration’s
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of FMCSA, call 1–888–REG–
FAIR (1–888–734–3247). DOT has a
policy ensuring the rights of small
entities to regulatory enforcement
fairness and an explicit policy against
retaliation for exercising these rights.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose an
unfunded Federal mandate, as defined
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.), that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $141.3
million (which is the value of $100
million in 2010 after adjusting for
inflation) or more in any 1 year.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, Apr. 23,
1997), requires agencies issuing
‘‘economically significant’’ rules, if the
regulation also concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
an agency has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, to
include an evaluation of the regulation’s
environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined
this final rule is not significant within
the meaning of E.O. 12866 and the
estimated cost of the rule is not
expected to exceed the economic annual
threshold. Therefore, no analysis of the
impacts on children is required. In any
event, the Agency does not believe that
this regulatory action could create an
environmental or safety risk that could
disproportionately affect children.
E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This final rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule in
accordance with the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132,
‘‘Federalism,’’ and has determined that
it does not have federalism
implications.
The Federalism Order applies to
‘‘policies that have federalism
implications,’’ which it defines as
regulations and other actions that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ Sec. 1(a). The
key concept here is ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States.’’ Sec. 3(b) of the
Federalism Order provides that
‘‘[n]ational action limiting the
policymaking discretion of the States
shall be taken only where there is
constitutional and statutory authority
for the action and the national activity
is appropriate in light of the presence of
a problem of national significance.’’
The rule amends the commercial
driver’s license (CDL) program
authorized by the Commercial Motor
Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C.
chapter 313). States have been issuing
CDLs in accordance with Federal
standards for well over a decade. The
CDL program does not have preemptive
effect. It is voluntary; States may
withdraw at any time, although doing so
will result in the loss of certain Federalaid highway funds pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
31314. Because this rule makes only a
few small incremental changes to the
requirements already imposed on
participating States, FMCSA has
determined that it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the Federal
and State governments, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. This
rulemaking affects the currentlyapproved information collection
covered by the OMB Control No. 2126–
E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this final rule in
accordance with Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and has determined it will not
effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications.
Privacy Impact Assessment
FMCSA conducted a privacy impact
assessment of this rule as required by
section 522(a)(5) of the FY 2005
Omnibus Appropriations Act, Public
Law 108–447, 118 Stat. 3268 (Dec. 8,
2004) [set out as a note to 5 U.S.C.
552a]. The assessment considers any
impacts of the rule on the privacy of
information in an identifiable form and
related matters. FMCSA has determined
this rule would have no privacy
impacts.
E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this program.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17879
0011 titled, ‘‘Commercial Driver
Licensing and Test Standards.’’ The
current OMB approved information
collection has an annual burden of
1,628,582 hours and will expire on
August 31, 2014.
This action updates and provides
more uniform procedures for ensuring
that the applicant has the appropriate
knowledge and skills to operate a
commercial motor vehicle. It also
adjusts some of the procedures used in
the testing and licensing process due to
recommendations accepted in the
petitions for reconsideration of
rulemaking. FMCSA believes this rule
will result in an estimated decrease in
the annual burden hours compared to
the 2011 final rule.
The following table summarizes the
burden hours for current and future
information collection activities for the
first 4 years of implementation of the
new requirements and for the 5th and
subsequent years of maintaining the
CDL program with the new
requirements. Relying on past
experiences, the Agency believes there
will be no increase in annual burden
hours for the first 4 years because the
States have 4 years to pass legislation
and make the necessary system changes
before implementing the new CDL
testing and CLP standards, and posting
the data generated by these new
requirements to the CDLIS driver
record. The increase of 262,705 total
annual burden hours for the 5th and
subsequent years (1,891,287–1,628,582)
is due to the implementation of the new
requirements for CDL testing and the
issuance of CLPs. This represents a
decrease in the total annual burden
estimate for the 5th and subsequent
years of 120,733 hours (2,012,020–
1,891,287) from the previously
anticipated total (see ‘‘Commercial
Driver’s License Testing and
Commercial Learner’s Permit
Standards,’’ 76 FR 26854, May 9, 2011)
due to program changes in this rule,
including the elimination of the second
person to verify all documents and the
elimination of the annual background
checks for test examiners. A detailed
analysis of the annual burden hour
changes for each information collection
activity can be found in the Supporting
Statement of OMB Control Number
2126–0011.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
17880
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
CURRENT AND FUTURE INFORMATION COLLECTION BURDENS
Current and future information collection activities for States and CDL drivers
Currently
approved annual burden
hours
Future annual
burden hours
for first 4
years
(program
change)
Future annual
burden hours
for 5th and
subsequent
years
(program
change)
State recording medical examiner’s certificate information .........................................................
State recording of the self- certification of commercial motor vehicle operation on the CDLIS
record .......................................................................................................................................
State verification of medical certification status of all interstate CDL drivers .............................
Driver to notify employer of convictions/disqualifications ............................................................
Driver to complete previous employment paperwork ..................................................................
States to complete compliance certification documents .............................................................
State to complete compliance review documents .......................................................................
Data/document checks and CDLIS recordkeeping .....................................................................
Drivers to complete the CDL application .....................................................................................
CDL tests recordkeeping .............................................................................................................
Knowledge and skills test examiner certification .........................................................................
Skills test examiner monitoring and auditing ...............................................................................
205,333
205,333
205,333
3,984
2,593
640,000
403,200
1,632
2,400
212,224
48,000
84,000
25,216
0
3,984
2,593
640,000
403,200
1,632
2,400
212,224
48,000
84,000
25,216
0
3,984
2,593
640,000
403,200
1,632
2,400
461,632
56,486
77,910
7,578
28,539
Total Burden Hours ..............................................................................................................
1,628,582
1,628,582
1,891,287
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act and
Clean Air Act
The FMCSA analyzed this rulemaking
for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
determined under its environmental
procedures Order 5610.1, published
March 1, 2004 in the Federal Register
(69 FR 9680), that this action is
categorically excluded (CE) from further
environmental documentation under
Paragraph 4.s of the Order. That CE
relates to establishing regulations, and
actions taken pursuant to these
regulations, concerning requirements for
drivers to have a single commercial
motor vehicle driver’s license. In
addition, the Agency believes that this
rule includes no extraordinary
circumstances that will have any effect
on the quality of the environment. Thus,
the action does not require an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
The FMCSA also analyzed this rule
under the Clean Air Act, as amended
(CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq.), and implementing regulations
promulgated by the Environmental
Protection Agency. Approval of this
action is exempt from the CAA’s general
conformity requirement since it
involves rulemaking and policy
development and issuance.
E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution,
or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use. The Agency has
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
energy action’’ under that Executive
Order because it is not economically
significant and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
This rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through OMB, with
an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods;
sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) are
standards that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
49 CFR Part 384
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
Accordingly, FMCSA amends parts
383 and 384 of title 49 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 383—COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S
LICENSE STANDARDS;
REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES
1. The authority citation for part 383
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et
seq., and 31502; secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L.
106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec.
1012(b) of Pub. L. 107–56, 115 Stat. 272, 397;
sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144,
1726; and 49 CFR 1.86.
2. Amend § 383.73 by revising
paragraphs (a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7),
(e)(5), (f)(2)(ii), and (m) to read as
follows:
■
§ 383.73
State procedures.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Require compliance with the
standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent
residency specified in § 383.71(a)(2)(v)
and proof of State of domicile specified
in § 383.71(a)(2)(vi). Exception: A State
is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified
in this paragraph only for initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of
a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL for the
first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver’s record
confirming that the proof of citizenship
or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the
date it was done;
(b) * * *
(6) Require compliance with the
standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent
residency specified in § 383.71(b)(9) and
proof of State of domicile specified in
§ 383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is
required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified
in this paragraph only for initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of
a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL for the
first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver’s record
confirming that the proof of citizenship
or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the
date it was done;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(7) Require compliance with the
standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent
residency specified in § 383.71(b)(9) and
proof of State of domicile specified in
§ 383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is
required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified
in this paragraph only for initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of
a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL for the
first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver’s record
confirming that the proof of citizenship
or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the
date it was done;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(7) Require compliance with the
standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent
residency specified in § 383.71(b)(9) and
proof of State of domicile specified in
§ 383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is
required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified
in this paragraph only for initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of
a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL for the
first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver’s record
confirming that the proof of citizenship
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the
date it was done; and
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) Require compliance with the
standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent
residency specified in § 383.71(b)(9) and
proof of State of domicile specified in
§ 383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is
required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified
in this paragraph only for initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade, or transfer
of a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL, for the
first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver’s record
confirming that the proof of citizenship
or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the
date it was done;
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The State must add the word
‘‘non-domiciled’’ to the face of the CLP
or CDL, in accordance with § 383.153(c);
and
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Document verification. The State
must require at least two persons within
the driver licensing agency to
participate substantively in the
processing and verification of the
documents involved in the licensing
process for initial issuance, renewal or
upgrade of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP
and for initial issuance, renewal,
upgrade or transfer of a CDL or Nondomiciled CDL. The documents being
processed and verified must include, at
a minimum, those provided by the
applicant to prove legal presence and
domicile, the information filled out on
the application form, and knowledge
and skills test scores. This section does
not require two people to process or
verify each document involved in the
licensing process. Exception: For offices
with only one staff member, at least
some of the documents must be
processed or verified by a supervisor
before issuance or, when a supervisor is
not available, copies must be made of
some of the documents involved in the
licensing process and a supervisor must
verify them within one business day of
issuance of the CLP, Non-domiciled
CLP, CDL or Non-domiciled CDL.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 383.75 by revising
paragraphs (a)(7) and (a)(8)(v) to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 383.75
17881
Third party testing.
(a) * * *
(7) A skills test examiner who is also
a skills instructor either as a part of a
school, training program or otherwise is
prohibited from administering a skills
test to an applicant who received skills
training by that skills test examiner; and
(8) * * *
(v) Require the third party tester to
initiate and maintain a bond in an
amount determined by the State to be
sufficient to pay for re-testing drivers in
the event that the third party or one or
more of its examiners is involved in
fraudulent activities related to
conducting skills testing of applicants
for a CDL. Exception: A third party
tester that is a government entity is not
required to maintain a bond.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 383.153 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1) and (h) to read as
follows:
§ 383.153 Information on the CLP and CDL
documents and applications.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Commercial Learner’s Permit. (1)
A CLP may, but is not required to,
contain a digital color image or
photograph or black and white laser
engraved photograph.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) On or after July 8, 2014 current
CLP and CDL holders who do not have
the standardized endorsement and
restriction codes and applicants for a
CLP or CDL are to be issued CLPs with
the standardized codes upon initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade and CDLs
with the standardized codes upon initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer.
PART 384—STATE COMPLIANCE
WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S
LICENSE PROGRAM
5. The authority citation for part 384
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301, et seq.,
and 31502; secs. 103 and 215 of Pub. L. 106–
59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; and 49 CFR 1.87.
6. Amend § 384.105 by revising the
definition ‘‘Issue and Issuance’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 384.105
Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
Issue and issuance means the initial
issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
or Non-domiciled CLP and the initial
issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of
a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL, as
described in § 383.73 of this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 384.227 to revise
paragraph (c) and add paragraph (d)
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
17882
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 384.227 Record of digital image or
photograph.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Check the digital color image or
photograph or black and white laser
engraved photograph on record
whenever the CLP applicant or holder
appears in person to issue, renew or
upgrade a CLP and when a duplicate
CLP is issued.
(d) If no digital color image or
photograph or black and white laser
engraved photograph exists on record,
the State must check the photograph or
image on the base-license presented
with the CLP or CDL application.
8. Amend § 384.228 by revising
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 384.228
checks.
Examiner training and record
*
*
*
*
*
(h)(1) Complete nationwide criminal
background check of all State and third
party test examiners at the time of
hiring.
(2) Complete nationwide criminal
background check of any State and third
party current test examiner who has not
had a nationwide criminal background
check.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Amend § 384.301 by revising
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 384.301 Substantial compliance—
general requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) A State must come into substantial
compliance with the requirements of
subpart B of this part in effect as of July
8, 2011 and April 24, 2013 as soon as
practical but, unless otherwise
specifically provided in this part, not
later than July 8, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
10. Amend § 384.405 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 384.405
program.
Decertification of State CDL
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The State computer system does
not check the Commercial Driver’s
License Information System (CDLIS)
and/or national Driver Registry problem
Driver Pointer System (PDPS) as
required by § 383.73 of this subchapter
when issuing, renewing or upgrading a
CLP or issuing, renewing, upgrading or
transferring a CDL.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Issued under the authority of delegation in
49 CFR 1.73: March 18, 2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–06760 Filed 3–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 130213132–3132–01]
RIN 0648–BD00
Recreational Closure Authority
Specific to Federal Waters Off
Individual States for the Recreational
Red Snapper Component of the Gulf of
Mexico Reef Fish Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Emergency rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this emergency
rule to authorize NMFS to set the
closure date of the recreational red
snapper fishing season in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off individual Gulf
of Mexico (Gulf) states. At its February
2013 meeting, the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council (Council)
requested an emergency rule to give
NMFS this authority. The intent of this
rulemaking is to constrain recreational
red snapper harvest within the quota
while ensuring a fair and equitable
distribution of fishing privileges among
participants in all the Gulf states.
DATES: This emergency rule is effective
March 25, 2013, through September 23,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
documents in support of this emergency
rule, which include an environmental
assessment, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at
https://sero.nfms.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone: 727–824–
5305, email: Susan.Gerhart@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
reef fish fishery is managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the
Council and is implemented through
regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the
legal authority for the promulgation of
emergency regulations under section
305(c) (16 U.S.C. 1855(c)).
Background
The recreational fishing season for
Gulf red snapper begins June 1 each
year with a two-fish bag limit. The
length of the season is determined by
the amount of the quota, the average
weight of fish landed, and the estimated
catch rates over time. NMFS is
responsible for ensuring the entire
recreational Gulf harvest does not
exceed the recreational quota, including
harvest in state waters. Therefore, if
states establish a longer season or a
larger bag limit for state waters than the
Federal regulations allow in the EEZ,
the Federal season must be reduced to
account for the additional expected
harvest in state waters.
Since 2008, the red snapper
recreational season has been shortened
each year (except in 2010) in an attempt
to constrain harvest to the quota;
however, the quota continues to be
exceeded because of increasing fish size
and catch rates (with the exception of
2010). The 2013 recreational fishing
season has been estimated to be 27 days,
assuming all states have consistent
regulations except Texas (Texas has a
year-round season and a four-fish bag
limit) and the recreational quota will be
increased to 4.145 million lb (1.880
million kg), round weight, through
separate rule making (currently under
development). However, both Louisiana
and Florida have recently indicated they
will implement inconsistent
recreational red snapper regulations for
their state waters, as Texas has done in
the past. Louisiana has proposed an 88day season with a 3-fish bag limit and
Florida has proposed a 44-day season
with a 2-fish bag limit. Based on the
regulations Louisiana and Florida have
proposed and estimated catch rates in
those state waters, without this
emergency rule, the Federal recreational
red snapper fishing season in the entire
Gulf EEZ would need to be shortened to
22 days, to account for the additional
harvest expected from state waters.
Therefore, without this emergency rule,
the closure date for all Federal waters
would be June 22, 2013. Even further
reductions would be needed if other
Gulf states (Mississippi and Alabama)
also implement inconsistent regulations
in their state waters.
Through this emergency rule, if a Gulf
state sets red snapper regulations that
are inconsistent with Federal
regulations, NMFS would calculate the
recreational red snapper fishing season
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 57 (Monday, March 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17875-17882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06760]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 383 and 384
[Docket No. FMCSA-2007-27659]
RIN 2126-AB59
Commercial Driver's License Testing and Commercial Learner's
Permit Standards
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA amends its May 9, 2011, final rule in response to
certain petitions for reconsideration. The 2011 final rule amended the
commercial driver's license (CDL) knowledge and skills testing
standards and established new minimum Federal standards for States to
issue the commercial learner's permit (CLP). The Agency received 34
petitions for reconsideration that covered a wide range of issues.
FMCSA granted or denied each of these petitions, by orders available in
the docket referenced at the beginning of this notice. Today's final
rule addresses the petitions that were granted.
DATES: This final rule is effective on April 24, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Redmond, Office of Safety
Programs, Commercial Driver's License Division, telephone (202) 366-
5014 or email robert.redmond@dot.gov. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. If you have questions on the docket, call Ms. Barbara
Hairston, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-3024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Legal Basis
This rule is based on the same authority as FMCSA's final rule on
``Commercial Driver's License Testing and Commercial Learner's Permit
Standards'' published on May 9, 2011 [76 FR 26854]; for a complete
discussion of that authority, see the Legal Basis section of the 2011
rule [76 FR at 26855].
Briefly, this rule implements or revises certain provisions of the
Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (CMVSA), as amended [49
U.S.C. chapter 313]; the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (MCSA), as
amended [49 U.S.C. 31136]; and the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (MCA) [49
U.S.C. 31502(b)]. The rule also carries out certain provisions of the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) [Pub. L. 105-
178, 112 Stat. 107, June 9, 1998]; the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)
[Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, Aug. 10, 2005]; and the Security and
Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act) [Pub. L. 109-
347, 120 Stat. 1884, Oct. 13, 2006].
The CMVSA established the commercial driver's license (CDL) and
drug and alcohol testing programs. The MCSA directed FMCSA to ensure
that its safety regulations meet certain general objectives. That
statute also underlies most of FMCSA's safety regulations including, as
supplemental authority, those related to the CDL program. The MCSA
inaugurated Federal regulation of motor carrier safety and provided
broad authority over for-hire and private motor carriers.
Sec. 4019 of TEA-21 required the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to determine whether the CDL testing system accurately measures the
knowledge and skills needed to operate a commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
and, if not, to correct the system. Sec. 4122 of SAFETEA-LU required
FMCSA to prescribe regulations on minimum uniform standards for the
issuance of commercial learner's permits (CLPs), as it had already done
for CDLs. Sec. 703 of the SAFE Port Act required the Secretary of
Transportation to carry out recommendations issued by the DOT's Office
of Inspector General (OIG) in 2002, 2004, and 2006 concerning
performance-oriented requirements for English language proficiency,
verification of the legal status of commercial drivers, and fraud-
reduction in the CDL program. The 2011 final rule implemented all of
these mandates.
[[Page 17876]]
The Agency received 34 petitions seeking reconsideration of various
elements of the 2011 rule. FMCSA is adopting this rule without
additional notice and opportunity for comment because the issues raised
by petitioners have already been subjected to the full range of notice
and comment, starting with the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in
2008 [73 FR 19282, April 9, 2008]. Many parties submitted comments on
the NPRM; the Agency responded at length in the preamble to the 2011
rule. A number of the petitions for reconsideration repeated the
comments and suggestions submitted to the Agency in response to the
2008 NPRM. However, some of the petitions included additional analyses
and data such that FMCSA is persuaded to adopt changes to the 2011
final rule. These changes include non-substantive changes to clarify
the Agency's intent and to resolve confusion over the rule's
requirements. The changes also include amendments to lessen the
regulatory burden the 2011 rule placed on both public and private
entities where such changes fall within the scope of or are the logical
outgrowth of the 2008 NPRM. One final change expands the amount of time
States have to come into compliance with the new requirements because
of changes made in today's final rule. Under these circumstances, a
further round of notice and comment would serve no purpose and is not
required by the Administrative Procedure Act.
II. Background
On April 9, 2008, FMCSA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to amend the CDL knowledge and skills testing standards and
establish new minimum Federal standards for States to issue the
commercial learner's permit (CLP) (73 FR 19282). On May 9, 2011, FMCSA
issued a final rule implementing these changes. In response to the
final rule, FMCSA received 34 petitions for reconsideration. FMCSA has
decided to publish a new final rule amending several provisions of the
May 9, 2011 rule.
For additional background information, please see the Background
section of the May 9, 2011 final rule (76 FR 26854).
III. Discussion of the Petitions for Reconsideration
After careful review, FMCSA decided to grant some petitions, in
whole or in part, and deny others. As a result, FMCSA is publishing a
new final rule modifying seven provisions of the May 2011 final rule.
The grant and denial orders are available in this rulemaking docket,
referenced at the beginning of this notice.
In this final rule, FMCSA modifies the following provisions, which
granted, in whole or in part, are in response to the petitions for
reconsideration:
1. State Procedures--49 CFR 383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7),
(d)(7), and (e)(5)
2. Requiring Two Employees To Verify Documents--49 CFR 383.73(m)
3. Prohibiting Training Schools From Administering Skills Tests--49
CFR 383.75(a)(7)
4. Bonding Requirements--49 CFR 383.75(a)(8)(v)
5. Prohibiting States From Using a Photo on the CLP--49 CFR
383.153(b)(1) and 384.227
6. Requiring Annual Background Checks for Skills Test Examiners--49
CFR 384.228(h)
7. Although FMCSA initially denied petitions seeking to delay the
May 2011 final rule's compliance date, FMCSA reverses that decision and
modifies the following additional provision: Substantial compliance--
general requirements--49 CFR 384.301(f). FMCSA denied the remaining
issues submitted for reconsideration.
State Procedures--49 CFR 383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6), (c)(7), (d)(7), and
(e)(5)
Sections 383.73(b)(6) and 383.73(c)(7) require States to check for
legal presence and domicile, but provide for an exception stating that
this only needs to be done once after July 8, 2011, provided that a
notation is made on an individual's record. Some States requested that
the Agency extend this exception to renewals and upgrades.
Sections 383.73(b)(6) and 383.73(c)(7) state that the exception to
checking for legal presence and domicile applies to initial issuances,
transfers, and renewals; however, the exception does not appear in
Sec. 383.73(d)(7), which governs renewals. In addition, Sec. 383.73
does not specify whether the exception applies to upgrades, which are
governed by Sec. 383.73(e)(5). The Agency acknowledges that the
exception was not written as the Agency intended. As a result, FMCSA
amends Sec. Sec. 383.73(b)(6), 383.73(c)(7), 383.73(d)(7), and
383.73(e)(5) to clarify that the exception covers all transactions,
whether initial issuance, transfer, renewal, or upgrade, made after
July 8, 2011.
Requiring Two Employees To Verify Documents--49 CFR 383.73(m)
Section 383.73(m) requires that two State Driver's Licensing Agency
(SDLA) staff members verify CLP and CDL applicants' test scores,
completed application forms, and documents to prove legal presence. For
SDLA offices with only one staff member on duty, the documents must be
verified by a supervisor before issuance. Alternatively, when the
supervisor is not available, copies must be made of the documents used
to prove legal presence and domicile so that a supervisor can verify
them along with the completed application within one business day of
issuance of a CLP or CDL. A number of States interpreted Sec.
383.73(m) to require two employees to verify each document. They
requested reconsideration, stating that the perceived requirement would
burden existing resources and increase SDLA workload at a time when
State agencies are experiencing reduced funding and resources. In
addition, one State asked for clarification of how this provision
affects central-issuance States.
FMCSA did not intend to create a redundant process under which two
SDLA employees must verify each document a particular driver-applicant
presents. Rather, FMCSA intended that more than one SDLA employee
participate substantively in the licensing process. For example, one
person might review the legal presence and other documentation the
driver presents, while a second SDLA employee would conduct the
required driving record check for driving violations, take the
applicant's photograph, and issue the license. Moreover, the two
employees need not work in the same location. For a central-issuance
State, having one employee accept documents at the point of service and
another verify some or all of them at the central-issuance facility
would satisfy the requirements of this section. Similarly, for SDLA
offices with only one staff member on duty, having a supervisor verify
some or all of the documents within one business day of issuance of a
CLP or CDL would satisfy the requirements of this section.
FMCSA amends Sec. 383.73(m) to clarify that FMCSA requires two
people to be substantively involved in the license issuance process,
but does not require that two people verify each document.
Prohibiting Training Schools From Administering Skills Tests--49 CFR
383.75(a)(7)
Section 383.75(a)(7) prohibits CDL training schools from skills
testing applicants they train, except if there is no skills testing
alternative within 50 miles of the school and the same examiner does
not train and test the same student applicant. The FMCSA
[[Page 17877]]
received petitions requesting reconsideration on the grounds that the
provision was too restrictive and would create hardship for States,
training schools, and motor carriers.
FMCSA acknowledges the hardship and unintended consequences that
this provision could cause for States, schools, and aspiring CDL
holders. FMCSA believes, however, that prohibiting individual examiners
from administering skills tests to student applicants they have trained
will further the Agency's and Congress's fraud-prevention objectives.
Accordingly, FMCSA amends Sec. 383.75(a)(7) to provide that CDL
training schools may test their own student applicants only so long as
an individual examiner does not administer the skills test to drivers
he or she has trained.
Bonding Requirements--49 CFR 383.75(a)(8)(v)
Section 383.75(a)(8)(v) requires third party CDL testers to
maintain bonds in an amount sufficient to pay for re-testing of drivers
if required due to examiners engaging in fraudulent activities related
to skills testing. A number of States requested that FMCSA reconsider
this section to require bonding to be at the State's discretion or only
apply to non-governmental entities.
As explained in the May 2011 rule, FMCSA is aware of a number of
third party testers whose examiners engaged in fraudulent activities.
As a result, a number of CDL holders were required to be re-tested,
causing States and individuals to incur additional expenses. FMCSA
implemented this provision to ensure that, in the event examiners are
involved in fraudulent activities related to skills testing, States or
individuals would have an opportunity to recoup expenses related to re-
testing.
FMCSA acknowledges that a number of third-party testers are
governmental entities performing testing services under inter-agency or
other agreements. FMCSA believes there is a lower risk associated with
locating and recouping expenses from governmental entities than from
private third-party testers. Moreover, FMCSA is aware that many States
normally do not require their own political subdivisions and agencies,
either at the State or local level, to obtain bonds. Accordingly, FMCSA
amends Sec. 383.75(a)(8)(v) to eliminate the bond requirement for
governmental entities.
Prohibiting States From Using a Photo on the CLP--49 CFR 383.153(b)(1)
and 384.227
Section 383.153(b)(1) prohibits States from placing a digital color
image or photograph or black and white laser engraved photograph or
other visual representation of the driver on the CLP. FMCSA received
petitions requesting reconsideration on the grounds that prohibiting
the inclusion of a digital color image or photograph or black and white
laser engraved photograph or other visual representation of the driver
would cause economic harm to the States and/or make the CLP less
secure.
FMCSA acknowledges that many, but not all, States have invested in
technologies to develop secure CLPs that may or may not include a
digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved
photograph or other visual representation of the driver. Other
provisions of this rule establish that the CLP is a two-part license
comprised of the CLP document and the underlying CDL or non-CDL, and
that the CLP document must be presented with the underlying CDL or non-
CDL to be valid. Moreover, the CLP document will have the same driver's
license number as the underlying CDL or non-CDL as well as language
stating the two-part nature of the document, making this relationship
clear. Accordingly, to accommodate the States' requests for flexibility
in determining whether to include a photograph of the driver on the
CLP, FMCSA amends Sec. 383.153(b)(1) to make the reference to a
digital color image or photograph or black and white laser engraved
photograph of the driver permissive rather than prohibited. The
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), however, objected to having a
State issue two photograph IDs to a single person, stating it would
violate the one driver/one license/one record principle. In fact, the
CLP and the underlying license constitute a single document with
(potentially) two photographs. FMCSA leaves the determination up to the
State to include a photo on the CLP, for an extra security measure when
processing a CDL request.
FMCSA also amends section 384.227 to reflect the permissive
inclusion of a photograph on the CLP.
Requiring Annual Background Checks for Skills Test Examiners--49 CFR
384.228(h)
Section 384.228(h) requires States to conduct annual background
checks on all test examiners. Some States petitioned for
reconsideration of this requirement on the grounds that annual checks
are burdensome.
On further consideration, FMCSA agrees that an annual background
check of 2,200 skills test examiners is unnecessarily burdensome.
Accordingly, FMCSA amends Sec. 384.228(h) to require States to perform
background checks on test examiners only at the time of hiring.
Substantial Compliance--General Requirements--49 CFR 384.301(f)
Section 384.301(f) establishes the date by which all States must
come into substantial compliance with the provisions of the May 2011
and today's final rules. FMCSA received petitions for reconsideration
requesting an extension of the May 2011 final rule, so that the States
would have sufficient time to implement the requirements established in
that rule. Although FMCSA believes that a three year implementation
period is generally sufficient, the Agency recognizes that many States
have been waiting for today's final rule to implement changes to those
provisions for which the Agency has granted petitions for
reconsideration. As a result, and in consideration of the changes made
in today's final rule, the Agency has extended the compliance date for
the changes established in the May 2011 and today's final rules by one
year, to July 8, 2015.
Technical Corrections
In addition to addressing the issues raised in the petitions for
reconsideration, FMCSA is also adopting the following technical
corrections in this final rule:
In Sec. 383.73(f)(2)(ii), an incorrect cross reference to
Sec. 383.153(b) is changed to Sec. 383.153(c).
The preamble to the 2011 final rule made it clear that
CLPs cannot be ``transferred'' from one State to another State. The
regulatory language, however, did not adequately reflect that decision.
The following sections are therefore revised to include a prohibition
on transfer of CLPs: Sec. 383.73, paragraphs (a)(2)(vi), (b)(6),
(c)(7), (d)(7), (e)(5) and (m); Sec. 383.153(h); Sec. 384.105,
definition of ``Issue and Issuance;'' Sec. 384.227, and Sec.
384.405(b)(1).
IV. Regulatory Analyses
E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review and DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures as Supplemented by E.O. 13563)
FMCSA has determined this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order
[[Page 17878]]
(E.O.) 12866, as supplemented by E.O. 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011), and is also not significant within the meaning of DOT regulatory
policies and procedures (DOT Order 2100.5 dated May 22, 1980; 44 FR
11034, February 26, 1979). The estimated cost of the final rule is not
expected to exceed the $100 million annual threshold for economic
significance. The Agency expects the final rule to generate cost
savings in the form of reduced annual paperwork burden hours compared
to the estimates in the 2011 final rule. The provisions revised in this
rule are intended to increase fraud reduction, improve safety, and
facilitate entrance into the commercial motor vehicle (CMV) driver
occupations. Many of the provisions of this rule impose minimal cost on
the States or industry members, either because many States are already
complying with the requirements contained in the May 2011 final rule or
because the requirements have minimal impact on the SDLA or industry
operations or procedures.
FMCSA emphasizes that this rule does not change requirements
concerning State procedures in CDL processing or impose additional
burden hours or costs. The Agency amends several sections of the
current regulations in 49 CFR Sec. Sec. 383.73(a)(2)(vi), (b)(6),
(c)(7), (d)(7), and (e)(5) to cover all transactions (initial issuance,
transfer, renewal, or upgrades). Likewise, bonding requirements for
third party testers as written in 49 CFR Sec. 383.75(a)(8)(v) remain
intact, the only difference being that a third party tester that is a
government entity is no longer required to maintain a bond.
FMCSA recognized the potential loss of revenue from reduced
enrollment when it prohibited training schools from administering
skills tests to their own student applicants. This is even more evident
in smaller training programs in rural areas. These training schools may
be 100 miles or more from the nearest tester unaffiliated with the
school, who would be available to test the school's drivers. Amending
this section will allow CDL training schools to test their students,
yet prohibit a skills test examiner who is also a skills instructor
from administering a skills test to an applicant who received skills
training from that examiner. The Agency does not know the number or
location of training programs that conduct skills testing and therefore
cannot produce a reasonable estimate of the total cost associated with
this exclusion on skills testing.
The SAFE Port Act mandated that the Agency adopt certain
regulations implementing the DOT Office of Inspector General's (OIG)
anti-fraud recommendations. Applying these mandates required the Agency
to adopt specific measures to prevent fraud in the CDL system. One of
the measures required by the Agency is that CLP documentation be
presented simultaneously with the underlying CDL or non-CDL to be
valid.
The States will have the discretion to place a digital photograph
on the CLP (see Sec. 383.153(b)(1) and Sec. 384.227); most SDLAs
currently keep a digital photograph on file for all drivers they
license.
FMCSA amends Sec. 383.73(m) to clarify that FMCSA requires two
people to be involved in the license issuance process, but does not
require that two people verify each document. Two SDLA staff members
can participate independently in the licensing process for a CLP/CDL.
For example, one person might review the legal presence and other
documentation the driver presents, while a second SDLA employee would
view the driving record for violations, take the applicant's photo, and
issue the license. Also, the two employees are not required to work in
the same duty location. For a central-issuance State, having one
employee accept documents at the point of service and another verify
some or all of them at the central-issuance facility would satisfy the
requirements of this section. The amendment to Sec. 383.73(m) splits
driver processing, but it will not double either the time or effort
needed to issue a CDL. The $2.97 million \1\ per year cost for
processing time will remain unchanged despite the amendment because the
extra time burden has been factored into the May 2011 Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This amount is calculated by multiplying ($24.45/hr.) of a
licensing clerk by the (\1/6\ of an hour) of processing time, by the
number of new CDLs processed annually (530,000). Final Rule
Regulatory Evaluation: Commercial Driver's License Testing and
Commercial Learner's Permit Standards. p. 12 March 2011. The
processing cost includes $26,500 CLP CDLIS record change and
$779,100 tamper proofing of CLPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, FMCSA agreed that annual background checks for skills test
examiners as described in 49 CFR 384.228(h) were unnecessary. FMCSA
amends this section to require background checks on test examiners only
at the time of hiring. This will produce a total cost saving of
$214,400 \2\ per year, after conducting an initial background check.
This represents the only quantifiable cost savings of the rule, but
other provisions will result in unquantifiable benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ OMB Control No. 2126-0011 titled, ``Commercial Driver
Licensing and Test Standards.'' May 1, 2012, pp. 22-23. This amount
is calculated by multiplying 2,144 skills test examiners x $100/per
FBI background check = $214,400.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FMCSA is not required to prepare a new Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (RFA) because the RFA performed for the May 2011, final rule
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a) remains fully applicable to this final
rule. The 2011 RFA provided estimates of the active motor carrier
population and the number of entities subject to the rule at that time.
While these numbers may have changed slightly in the intervening
months, they do not affect the conclusions of the 2011 RFA in any way.
Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, FMCSA wants to assist small entities
in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects
on themselves and participate in the rulemaking initiative. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance; please consult the FMCSA point of contact,
Robert Redmond, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this rule.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of FMCSA, call
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). DOT has a policy ensuring the rights
of small entities to regulatory enforcement fairness and an explicit
policy against retaliation for exercising these rights.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose an unfunded Federal mandate, as
defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532 et
seq.), that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $141.3
million (which is the value of $100 million in 2010 after adjusting for
inflation) or more in any 1 year.
[[Page 17879]]
E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule in accordance with the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' and has determined
that it does not have federalism implications.
The Federalism Order applies to ``policies that have federalism
implications,'' which it defines as regulations and other actions that
have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
Sec. 1(a). The key concept here is ``substantial direct effects on the
States.'' Sec. 3(b) of the Federalism Order provides that ``[n]ational
action limiting the policymaking discretion of the States shall be
taken only where there is constitutional and statutory authority for
the action and the national activity is appropriate in light of the
presence of a problem of national significance.''
The rule amends the commercial driver's license (CDL) program
authorized by the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (49
U.S.C. chapter 313). States have been issuing CDLs in accordance with
Federal standards for well over a decade. The CDL program does not have
preemptive effect. It is voluntary; States may withdraw at any time,
although doing so will result in the loss of certain Federal-aid
highway funds pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 31314. Because this rule makes only
a few small incremental changes to the requirements already imposed on
participating States, FMCSA has determined that it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the Federal and State governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This final rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, Apr. 23, 1997), requires agencies
issuing ``economically significant'' rules, if the regulation also
concerns an environmental health or safety risk that an agency has
reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, to include an
evaluation of the regulation's environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined this final rule is not significant
within the meaning of E.O. 12866 and the estimated cost of the rule is
not expected to exceed the economic annual threshold. Therefore, no
analysis of the impacts on children is required. In any event, the
Agency does not believe that this regulatory action could create an
environmental or safety risk that could disproportionately affect
children.
E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this final rule in accordance with Executive Order
12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights, and has determined it will not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications.
Privacy Impact Assessment
FMCSA conducted a privacy impact assessment of this rule as
required by section 522(a)(5) of the FY 2005 Omnibus Appropriations
Act, Public Law 108-447, 118 Stat. 3268 (Dec. 8, 2004) [set out as a
note to 5 U.S.C. 552a]. The assessment considers any impacts of the
rule on the privacy of information in an identifiable form and related
matters. FMCSA has determined this rule would have no privacy impacts.
E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. This rulemaking
affects the currently-approved information collection covered by the
OMB Control No. 2126-0011 titled, ``Commercial Driver Licensing and
Test Standards.'' The current OMB approved information collection has
an annual burden of 1,628,582 hours and will expire on August 31, 2014.
This action updates and provides more uniform procedures for
ensuring that the applicant has the appropriate knowledge and skills to
operate a commercial motor vehicle. It also adjusts some of the
procedures used in the testing and licensing process due to
recommendations accepted in the petitions for reconsideration of
rulemaking. FMCSA believes this rule will result in an estimated
decrease in the annual burden hours compared to the 2011 final rule.
The following table summarizes the burden hours for current and
future information collection activities for the first 4 years of
implementation of the new requirements and for the 5th and subsequent
years of maintaining the CDL program with the new requirements. Relying
on past experiences, the Agency believes there will be no increase in
annual burden hours for the first 4 years because the States have 4
years to pass legislation and make the necessary system changes before
implementing the new CDL testing and CLP standards, and posting the
data generated by these new requirements to the CDLIS driver record.
The increase of 262,705 total annual burden hours for the 5th and
subsequent years (1,891,287-1,628,582) is due to the implementation of
the new requirements for CDL testing and the issuance of CLPs. This
represents a decrease in the total annual burden estimate for the 5th
and subsequent years of 120,733 hours (2,012,020-1,891,287) from the
previously anticipated total (see ``Commercial Driver's License Testing
and Commercial Learner's Permit Standards,'' 76 FR 26854, May 9, 2011)
due to program changes in this rule, including the elimination of the
second person to verify all documents and the elimination of the annual
background checks for test examiners. A detailed analysis of the annual
burden hour changes for each information collection activity can be
found in the Supporting Statement of OMB Control Number 2126-0011.
[[Page 17880]]
Current and Future Information Collection Burdens
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future annual
Future annual burden hours
Currently burden hours for 5th and
Current and future information collection activities for States approved for first 4 subsequent
and CDL drivers annual burden years years
hours (program (program
change) change)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State recording medical examiner's certificate information...... 205,333 205,333 205,333
State recording of the self- certification of commercial motor 3,984 3,984 3,984
vehicle operation on the CDLIS record..........................
State verification of medical certification status of all 2,593 2,593 2,593
interstate CDL drivers.........................................
Driver to notify employer of convictions/disqualifications...... 640,000 640,000 640,000
Driver to complete previous employment paperwork................ 403,200 403,200 403,200
States to complete compliance certification documents........... 1,632 1,632 1,632
State to complete compliance review documents................... 2,400 2,400 2,400
Data/document checks and CDLIS recordkeeping.................... 212,224 212,224 461,632
Drivers to complete the CDL application......................... 48,000 48,000 56,486
CDL tests recordkeeping......................................... 84,000 84,000 77,910
Knowledge and skills test examiner certification................ 25,216 25,216 7,578
Skills test examiner monitoring and auditing.................... 0 0 28,539
-----------------------------------------------
Total Burden Hours.......................................... 1,628,582 1,628,582 1,891,287
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Air Act
The FMCSA analyzed this rulemaking for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
determined under its environmental procedures Order 5610.1, published
March 1, 2004 in the Federal Register (69 FR 9680), that this action is
categorically excluded (CE) from further environmental documentation
under Paragraph 4.s of the Order. That CE relates to establishing
regulations, and actions taken pursuant to these regulations,
concerning requirements for drivers to have a single commercial motor
vehicle driver's license. In addition, the Agency believes that this
rule includes no extraordinary circumstances that will have any effect
on the quality of the environment. Thus, the action does not require an
environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement.
The FMCSA also analyzed this rule under the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and
implementing regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection
Agency. Approval of this action is exempt from the CAA's general
conformity requirement since it involves rulemaking and policy
development and issuance.
E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use. The Agency has determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that Executive Order because it is
not economically significant and is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.
E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
This rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical Standards)
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards would be
inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) are standards that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of
voluntary consensus standards.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
49 CFR Part 384
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
Accordingly, FMCSA amends parts 383 and 384 of title 49 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 383--COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND
PENALTIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 383 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs.
214 and 215 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec.
1012(b) of Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272, 397; sec. 4140 of Pub. L.
109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1726; and 49 CFR 1.86.
0
2. Amend Sec. 383.73 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(vi), (b)(6),
(c)(7), (d)(7), (e)(5), (f)(2)(ii), and (m) to read as follows:
Sec. 383.73 State procedures.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Require compliance with the standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent residency specified in Sec.
383.71(a)(2)(v) and proof of State of domicile specified in Sec.
383.71(a)(2)(vi). Exception: A State is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified in this paragraph only for
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP
[[Page 17881]]
or Non-domiciled CLP and for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or
transfer of a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL for the first time after July 8,
2011, provided a notation is made on the driver's record confirming
that the proof of citizenship or legal presence check required by this
paragraph has been made and noting the date it was done;
(b) * * *
(6) Require compliance with the standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent residency specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(9) and proof of State of domicile specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified in this paragraph only for
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP and
for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of a CDL or Non-
domiciled CDL for the first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver's record confirming that the proof of
citizenship or legal presence check required by this paragraph has been
made and noting the date it was done;
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(7) Require compliance with the standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent residency specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(9) and proof of State of domicile specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified in this paragraph only for
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP and
for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of a CDL or Non-
domiciled CDL for the first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver's record confirming that the proof of
citizenship or legal presence check required by this paragraph has been
made and noting the date it was done;
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(7) Require compliance with the standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent residency specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(9) and proof of State of domicile specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified in this paragraph only for
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP and
for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer of a CDL or Non-
domiciled CDL for the first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver's record confirming that the proof of
citizenship or legal presence check required by this paragraph has been
made and noting the date it was done; and
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) Require compliance with the standards for providing proof of
citizenship or lawful permanent residency specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(9) and proof of State of domicile specified in Sec.
383.71(b)(10). Exception: A State is required to check the proof of
citizenship or legal presence specified in this paragraph only for
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP and
for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade, or transfer of a CDL or Non-
domiciled CDL, for the first time after July 8, 2011, provided a
notation is made on the driver's record confirming that the proof of
citizenship or legal presence check required by this paragraph has been
made and noting the date it was done;
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The State must add the word ``non-domiciled'' to the face of
the CLP or CDL, in accordance with Sec. 383.153(c); and
* * * * *
(m) Document verification. The State must require at least two
persons within the driver licensing agency to participate substantively
in the processing and verification of the documents involved in the
licensing process for initial issuance, renewal or upgrade of a CLP or
Non-domiciled CLP and for initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or
transfer of a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL. The documents being processed
and verified must include, at a minimum, those provided by the
applicant to prove legal presence and domicile, the information filled
out on the application form, and knowledge and skills test scores. This
section does not require two people to process or verify each document
involved in the licensing process. Exception: For offices with only one
staff member, at least some of the documents must be processed or
verified by a supervisor before issuance or, when a supervisor is not
available, copies must be made of some of the documents involved in the
licensing process and a supervisor must verify them within one business
day of issuance of the CLP, Non-domiciled CLP, CDL or Non-domiciled
CDL.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 383.75 by revising paragraphs (a)(7) and (a)(8)(v) to
read as follows:
Sec. 383.75 Third party testing.
(a) * * *
(7) A skills test examiner who is also a skills instructor either
as a part of a school, training program or otherwise is prohibited from
administering a skills test to an applicant who received skills
training by that skills test examiner; and
(8) * * *
(v) Require the third party tester to initiate and maintain a bond
in an amount determined by the State to be sufficient to pay for re-
testing drivers in the event that the third party or one or more of its
examiners is involved in fraudulent activities related to conducting
skills testing of applicants for a CDL. Exception: A third party tester
that is a government entity is not required to maintain a bond.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 383.153 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (h) to read as
follows:
Sec. 383.153 Information on the CLP and CDL documents and
applications.
* * * * *
(b) Commercial Learner's Permit. (1) A CLP may, but is not required
to, contain a digital color image or photograph or black and white
laser engraved photograph.
* * * * *
(h) On or after July 8, 2014 current CLP and CDL holders who do not
have the standardized endorsement and restriction codes and applicants
for a CLP or CDL are to be issued CLPs with the standardized codes upon
initial issuance, renewal or upgrade and CDLs with the standardized
codes upon initial issuance, renewal, upgrade or transfer.
PART 384--STATE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE PROGRAM
0
5. The authority citation for part 384 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301, et seq., and 31502; secs. 103
and 215 of Pub. L. 106-59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
6. Amend Sec. 384.105 by revising the definition ``Issue and
Issuance'' to read as follows:
Sec. 384.105 Definitions
* * * * *
Issue and issuance means the initial issuance, renewal or upgrade
of a CLP or Non-domiciled CLP and the initial issuance, renewal,
upgrade or transfer of a CDL or Non-domiciled CDL, as described in
Sec. 383.73 of this subchapter.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 384.227 to revise paragraph (c) and add paragraph (d)
read as follows:
[[Page 17882]]
Sec. 384.227 Record of digital image or photograph.
* * * * *
(c) Check the digital color image or photograph or black and white
laser engraved photograph on record whenever the CLP applicant or
holder appears in person to issue, renew or upgrade a CLP and when a
duplicate CLP is issued.
(d) If no digital color image or photograph or black and white
laser engraved photograph exists on record, the State must check the
photograph or image on the base-license presented with the CLP or CDL
application.
0
8. Amend Sec. 384.228 by revising paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 384.228 Examiner training and record checks.
* * * * *
(h)(1) Complete nationwide criminal background check of all State
and third party test examiners at the time of hiring.
(2) Complete nationwide criminal background check of any State and
third party current test examiner who has not had a nationwide criminal
background check.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 384.301 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 384.301 Substantial compliance--general requirements.
* * * * *
(f) A State must come into substantial compliance with the
requirements of subpart B of this part in effect as of July 8, 2011 and
April 24, 2013 as soon as practical but, unless otherwise specifically
provided in this part, not later than July 8, 2015.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec. 384.405 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 384.405 Decertification of State CDL program.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The State computer system does not check the Commercial
Driver's License Information System (CDLIS) and/or national Driver
Registry problem Driver Pointer System (PDPS) as required by Sec.
383.73 of this subchapter when issuing, renewing or upgrading a CLP or
issuing, renewing, upgrading or transferring a CDL.
* * * * *
Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.73: March
18, 2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-06760 Filed 3-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P