Determination That BENADRYL (diphenhydramine hydrochloride) Injection and Two Other Drug Products Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness, 17933-17934 [2013-06726]
Download as PDF
17933
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Notices
‘‘[a]nalysis of the sample may be
performed for the plant by competent
commercial laboratories (e.g.,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and State-certified laboratories)’’
(§ 129.35(a)(3)(iii)). For product water,
the regulations also state that bottled
water manufacturers will ‘‘[a]nalyze
such samples by methods approved by
the government agency or agencies
having jurisdiction’’ (§ 129.80(g)(3)).
One comment noted that the EPA
issued a final rule on February 13, 2013,
that established a maximum
contaminant level for E. coli and stated
that E. coli is a more specific indicator
of fecal contamination and the potential
presence of associated pathogen
occurrence than fecal coliforms. FDA
agrees that E. coli is an appropriate
indicator of fecal contamination and
that the presence of fecal indicators
demonstrates the potential for the
presence of fecal pathogens. FDA
requires bottled water manufacturers to
sample and analyze source water
obtained from other than a public water
system for total coliform at least once
each week. If any coliform organisms
are detected, manufacturers must
conduct followup testing to determine
whether any of the coliform organisms
are E. coli. Source water found to
contain E. coli is not considered water
of a safe, sanitary quality as required for
use in bottled water. Manufacturers
must also analyze product water
samples at least once a week for total
coliform, and, if any coliform organisms
are detected, they must conduct
followup testing to determine whether
any of the coliform organisms are E.
coli. Product water containing E. coli is
considered adulterated. Thus, the
presence of the fecal indicator E. coli is
the key factor for determining whether
source water is of a safe, sanitary
quality, and whether product water is
adulterated. FDA is reviewing the EPA
final rule referenced in the comment
(National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations: Revisions to the Total
Coliform Rule, 78 FR 10269; February
13, 2013) to determine what actions, if
any, FDA needs to take to respond to the
rule.
To the extent that the comments
recommended changes to FDA’s bottled
water regulations, which can only be
accomplished by rulemaking, the
comments were outside the scope of the
four collection of information topics on
which the notice requested comments
and will not be discussed in this
document.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average burden
per recordkeeping
21 CFR Section
Number of recordkeepers
§§ 129.35(a)(3)(i) and 129.80(h) ......
6
1,914
0.08 (5 minutes)
153
3
285
0.08 (5 minutes)
23
5
15
0.08 (5 minutes)
1
§§ 129.35(a)(3)(i) and 129.80(h) ......
319 (bottlers subject to source
water and finished product testing).
95 (bottlers testing finished product
only).
3 (bottlers conducting secondary
testing of source water).
3 (bottlers rectifying contamination)
3
9
0.25 (15 minutes)
2
Total ..........................................
..........................................................
........................
........................
§ 129.80(g) and 129.80(h) ...............
§§ 129.35(a)(3)(i) and 129.80(h) ......
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 There
Total hours
179
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The current CGMP regulations already
reflect the time and associated
recordkeeping costs for those bottlers
that are required to conduct
microbiological testing of their source
water, as well as total coliform testing
of their finished bottled water products.
We therefore conclude that any
additional burden and costs in
recordkeeping based on followup testing
that is required if any coliform
organisms detected in the source water
test positive for E.coli are negligible. We
estimate that the labor burden of
keeping records of each test is about 5
minutes per test. We also require
followup testing of source water and
finished bottled water products for E.
coli when total coliform positives occur.
We expect that 319 bottlers that use
sources other than PWSs may find a
total coliform positive sample about 3
times per year in source testing and
about 3 times in finished product
testing, for a total of 153 hours of
recordkeeping. In addition to the 319
bottlers, about 95 bottlers that use PWSs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
may find a total coliform positive
sample about 3 times per year in
finished product testing, for a total of 23
hours of recordkeeping. Upon finding a
total coliform sample, bottlers will then
have to conduct a followup test for E.
coli.
We expect that recordkeeping for the
followup test for E. coli will also take
about 5 minutes per test. As shown in
table 1 of this document, we expect that
3 bottlers per year will have to carry out
the additional E. coli testing, with a
burden of 1 hour. These bottlers will
also have to keep records about
rectifying the source contamination, for
a burden of 2 hours. For all expected
total coliform testing, E. coli testing, and
source rectification, we estimate a total
burden of 179 hours. We base our
estimate on our experience with the
current CGMP regulations.
PO 00000
Dated: March 20, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–06727 Filed 3–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0320]
Determination That BENADRYL
(diphenhydramine hydrochloride)
Injection and Two Other Drug Products
Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for
Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
that the three drug products listed in
this document were not withdrawn from
SUMMARY:
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
17934
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 57 / Monday, March 25, 2013 / Notices
sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. This determination means
that FDA will not begin procedures to
withdraw approval of abbreviated new
drug applications (ANDAs) that refer to
these drug products, and it will allow
FDA to continue to approve ANDAs that
refer to the products as long as they
meet relevant legal and regulatory
requirements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Geanacopoulos, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6206,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–6925.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984,
Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) (the 1984 amendments), which
authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products approved
under an ANDA procedure. ANDA
sponsors must, with certain exceptions,
show that the drug for which they are
seeking approval contains the same
active ingredient in the same strength
and dosage form as the ‘‘listed drug,’’
which is a version of the drug that was
previously approved. Sponsors of
ANDAs do not have to repeat the
extensive clinical testing otherwise
necessary to gain approval of a new
drug application (NDA). The only
clinical data required in an ANDA are
data to show that the drug that is the
subject of the ANDA is bioequivalent to
the listed drug.
The 1984 amendments include what
is now section 505(j)(7) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
355(j)(7)), which requires FDA to
publish a list of all approved drugs.
FDA publishes this list as part of the
‘‘Approved Drug Products With
Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,’’
which is generally known as the
‘‘Orange Book.’’ Under FDA regulations,
a drug is removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends
approval of the drug’s NDA or ANDA
for reasons of safety or effectiveness, or
if FDA determines that the listed drug
was withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness (21 CFR 314.162).
Under § 314.161(a) (21 CFR
314.161(a)), the Agency must determine
whether a listed drug was withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness: (1) Before an ANDA that
refers to that listed drug may be
approved, (2) whenever a listed drug is
voluntarily withdrawn from sale and
ANDAs that refer to the listed drug have
been approved, and (3) when a person
petitions for such a determination under
21 CFR 10.25(a) and 10.30. Section
314.161(d) provides that if FDA
determines that a listed drug was
withdrawn from sale for safety or
effectiveness reasons, the Agency will
initiate proceedings that could result in
the withdrawal of approval of the
ANDAs that refer to the listed drug.
FDA has become aware that the drug
products listed in the table in this
document are no longer being marketed.
Application No.
Drug
Applicant
NDA 006146 ......
BENADRYL (diphenhydramine hydrochloride) Injection, 50
milligrams (mg)/milliliter (mL).
BENADRYL PRESERVATIVE FREE (diphenhydramine hydrochloride) Injection, 50 mg/mL.
FLEXERIL (cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride) Tablets, 5 mg
and 10 mg.
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 7050 Camp Hill Rd., Fort
Washington, PA 19034.
Do.
NDA 009486 ......
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NDA 017821 ......
FDA has reviewed its records and,
under § 314.161, has determined that
the drug products listed in this
document were not withdrawn from
sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. Accordingly, the Agency
will continue to list the drug products
listed in this document in the
‘‘Discontinued Drug Product List’’
section of the Orange Book. The
‘‘Discontinued Drug Product List’’
identifies, among other items, drug
products that have been discontinued
from marketing for reasons other than
safety or effectiveness.
Approved ANDAs that refer to the
NDAs listed in this document are
unaffected by the discontinued
marketing of the products subject to
those NDAs. Additional ANDAs that
refer to these products may also be
approved by the Agency if they comply
with relevant legal and regulatory
requirements. If FDA determines that
labeling for these drug products should
be revised to meet current standards, the
Agency will advise ANDA applicants to
submit such labeling.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Mar 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 920 Rt. 202, Raritan, NJ 08869.
Dated: March 19, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–06726 Filed 3–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Standardized Medical Device Labeling.’’
The agency is taking this action in
response to a request for an extension to
allow interested persons additional time
to submit comments.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by May 17, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2012–N–
1205, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–1205]
Accessible Medical Device Labeling in
a Standard Content and Format Public
Workshop; Extension of Comment
Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public workshop;
request for comments; extension of
comment period.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is extending the
comment period for the notice that
appeared in the Federal Register of
January 7, 2013 (78 FR 951). In the
notice, FDA requested comments on the
public workshop entitled ‘‘Accessible
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2012–N–1205. All
comments received may be posted
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 57 (Monday, March 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17933-17934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06726]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0320]
Determination That BENADRYL (diphenhydramine hydrochloride)
Injection and Two Other Drug Products Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for
Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that the
three drug products listed in this document were not withdrawn from
[[Page 17934]]
sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination means
that FDA will not begin procedures to withdraw approval of abbreviated
new drug applications (ANDAs) that refer to these drug products, and it
will allow FDA to continue to approve ANDAs that refer to the products
as long as they meet relevant legal and regulatory requirements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Geanacopoulos, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6206, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-6925.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984, Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417)
(the 1984 amendments), which authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products approved under an ANDA procedure. ANDA
sponsors must, with certain exceptions, show that the drug for which
they are seeking approval contains the same active ingredient in the
same strength and dosage form as the ``listed drug,'' which is a
version of the drug that was previously approved. Sponsors of ANDAs do
not have to repeat the extensive clinical testing otherwise necessary
to gain approval of a new drug application (NDA). The only clinical
data required in an ANDA are data to show that the drug that is the
subject of the ANDA is bioequivalent to the listed drug.
The 1984 amendments include what is now section 505(j)(7) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(7)), which
requires FDA to publish a list of all approved drugs. FDA publishes
this list as part of the ``Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic
Equivalence Evaluations,'' which is generally known as the ``Orange
Book.'' Under FDA regulations, a drug is removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends approval of the drug's NDA or ANDA for
reasons of safety or effectiveness, or if FDA determines that the
listed drug was withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness (21 CFR 314.162).
Under Sec. 314.161(a) (21 CFR 314.161(a)), the Agency must
determine whether a listed drug was withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness: (1) Before an ANDA that refers to that listed
drug may be approved, (2) whenever a listed drug is voluntarily
withdrawn from sale and ANDAs that refer to the listed drug have been
approved, and (3) when a person petitions for such a determination
under 21 CFR 10.25(a) and 10.30. Section 314.161(d) provides that if
FDA determines that a listed drug was withdrawn from sale for safety or
effectiveness reasons, the Agency will initiate proceedings that could
result in the withdrawal of approval of the ANDAs that refer to the
listed drug.
FDA has become aware that the drug products listed in the table in
this document are no longer being marketed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application No. Drug Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NDA 006146............. BENADRYL McNeil Consumer
(diphenhydramine Healthcare, 7050 Camp
hydrochloride) Hill Rd., Fort
Injection, 50 Washington, PA 19034.
milligrams (mg)/
milliliter (mL).
NDA 009486............. BENADRYL PRESERVATIVE Do.
FREE (diphenhydramine
hydrochloride)
Injection, 50 mg/mL.
NDA 017821............. FLEXERIL Janssen Research &
(cyclobenzaprine Development, LLC, 920
hydrochloride) Rt. 202, Raritan, NJ
Tablets, 5 mg and 10 08869.
mg.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has reviewed its records and, under Sec. 314.161, has
determined that the drug products listed in this document were not
withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness.
Accordingly, the Agency will continue to list the drug products listed
in this document in the ``Discontinued Drug Product List'' section of
the Orange Book. The ``Discontinued Drug Product List'' identifies,
among other items, drug products that have been discontinued from
marketing for reasons other than safety or effectiveness.
Approved ANDAs that refer to the NDAs listed in this document are
unaffected by the discontinued marketing of the products subject to
those NDAs. Additional ANDAs that refer to these products may also be
approved by the Agency if they comply with relevant legal and
regulatory requirements. If FDA determines that labeling for these drug
products should be revised to meet current standards, the Agency will
advise ANDA applicants to submit such labeling.
Dated: March 19, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-06726 Filed 3-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P