Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Arizona-California Citrus Crop Insurance Provisions, 17606-17611 [2013-06106]
Download as PDF
17606
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 56
Friday, March 22, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. FCIC- 12–0008]
RIN 0563–AC38
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Insurance Provisions
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, Arizona-California Citrus
Crop Insurance Provisions. The
intended effect of this action is to
provide policy changes, to clarify
existing policy provisions to better meet
the needs of policyholder, and to reduce
vulnerability to program fraud, waste,
and abuse. The proposed changes will
be effective for the 2015 and succeeding
crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business April 22, 2013
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments
be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
ID No. FCIC–12–0008, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64133–6205.
All comments received, including
those received by mail, will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, and can
be accessed by the public. All comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information,
see https://www.regulations.gov. If you
are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
and want to attach a document, we ask
that it be in a text-based format. If you
want to attach a document that is a
scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be
scanned as text and not as an image,
thus allowing FCIC to search and copy
certain portions of your submissions.
For questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF
file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823–4694 or by
email at rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received for any dockets by the name of
the person submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy
Notice for Regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
Tim
Hoffmann, Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, P.O. Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–6205,
telephone (816) 926–7730.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not-significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by the OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information and services, and for other
purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will not have a retroactive
effect. The provisions of this rule will
preempt State and local laws to the
extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to
any direct action taken by FCIC or
action by FCIC directing the insurance
provider to take specific action under
the terms of the crop insurance policy,
the administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11, or 7 CFR
part 400, subpart J for determinations of
good farming practices, as applicable,
must be exhausted before any action
against FCIC for judicial review may be
brought.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common
Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR part
457) by revising § 457.121 ArizonaCalifornia Citrus Crop Insurance
Provisions, to be effective for the 2015
and succeeding crop years. Several
requests have been made for changes to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
improve the insurance coverage offered,
address program integrity issues,
simplify program administration, and
improve clarity of the policy provisions.
Some of the proposed changes are a
result of the United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Acreage Crop
Reporting Streamlining Initiative, which
has an objective of using common
standardized data and terminology to
consolidate and simplify reporting
requirements for farmers. USDA has
made a concerted effort to standardize
terms between agencies as much as
possible to allow the sharing of data,
thereby reducing the burden on
producers in reporting their
information. Many of the changes
proposed in this rule are a part of that
effort. As part of this initiative FCIC is
proposing to change the term ‘‘crop’’ to
‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’ and to rename
the ‘‘citrus fruit commodities’’ to be
consistent with the crop names used by
other USDA agencies. This change will
allow information to be shared among
agencies, thereby relieving producers of
the burden of reporting the same
information multiple times. The
addition of the term ‘‘citrus fruit group’’
is intended to negate the impact of
changes to ‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’
names on coverage levels, unit
structure, and administrative fees. The
‘‘citrus fruit groups’’ for each ‘‘citrus
fruit commodity’’ will be listed in the
Special Provisions. The ‘‘citrus fruit
groups’’ will be the basis for
determining coverage levels and
identifying the insured crop. These
proposed changes are expected to result
in no change from the current basis by
which coverage levels are selected, basic
units are established, and administrative
fees are assessed.
To be consistent with the objectives of
the Acreage Crop Reporting
Streamlining Initiative, FCIC is planning
to replace the category of ‘‘type’’ in the
actuarial documents with four
categories named ‘‘commodity type,’’
‘‘class,’’ ‘‘subclass,’’ and ‘‘intended
use.’’ FCIC is also planning to replace
the category of ‘‘practice’’ in the
actuarial documents with four
categories named ‘‘cropping practice,’’
‘‘organic practice,’’ ‘‘irrigation practice,’’
and ‘‘interval.’’ Proposed changes to the
Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Provisions, such as replacing references
to the term ‘‘type’’ with the term
‘‘commodity type’’ will provide an
avenue for this transition.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. FCIC proposes to remove the
paragraph immediately preceding
section 1 which refers to the order of
priority in the event of a conflict. This
same information is contained in the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17607
Basic Provisions. Therefore, it is
duplicative and should be removed in
the Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Insurance Provisions.
FCIC proposes to remove all section
titles of the Basic Provisions. This
information is currently contained in
parenthesis following references to
section numbers of the Basic Provisions
throughout the Arizona-California
Citrus Crop Insurance Provisions.
2. Section 1—FCIC proposes to revise
the definition of ‘‘carton’’ to allow the
container size and weight to be changed
by the Special Provisions. This will
provide flexibility to update these
figures as industry standards change.
This will also allow standards to be
added through the Special Provisions
for any other citrus fruit commodities
designated as insurable in the actuarial
documents. FCIC proposes to revise the
list of ‘‘citrus fruit commodities’’ to
align with the proposed ‘‘citrus fruit
commodity’’ names.
FCIC proposes to remove the
definition of ‘‘crop’’ and replace it with
a definition of ‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’
since insurable commodities are
identified in the actuarial documents.
FCIC proposes to replace the term
‘‘crop’’ with the term ‘‘citrus fruit
commodity’’ where appropriate
throughout the Crop Provisions.
However, in some places the term
‘‘crop’’ will be changed to ‘‘insured
crop’’ or ‘‘agricultural commodity’’
which are defined in the Basic
Provisions or the term ‘‘crop’’ may be
retained if using the common meaning.
The current definition of ‘‘citrus fruit
crop’’ states that the crops are listed in
the Special Provisions. Adding the
‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’ names to the
Arizona-California Crop Insurance
Provisions will make it easier to
determine the crops that are insurable
under the Arizona-California Citrus
Crop Insurance Provisions. In some
cases, the new ‘‘citrus fruit
commodities’’ will result in several of
the current ‘‘crops’’ being combined into
a single ‘‘citrus fruit commodity.’’ For
example, the current crops ‘‘Navel,’’
‘‘Valencia,’’ and ‘‘Sweet’’ will all fall
under the new ‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’
of ‘‘oranges.’’ This change is being
proposed because of the Acreage Crop
Reporting Streamlining Initiative. This
proposed change in terminology does
not change the varieties of citrus that are
insurable.
FCIC proposes to add the definition of
‘‘citrus fruit group.’’ The term ‘‘citrus
fruit group’’ refers to a method of
grouping commodity types within the
‘‘citrus fruit commodity’’ through the
Special Provisions for the purposes of
electing coverage levels, establishing
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
17608
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
basic units, guarantees, and assessing
administrative fees. This change is being
proposed because of the Acreage Crop
Reporting Streamlining Initiative.
FCIC proposes to add the definition of
‘‘commodity type’’ because this is the
category that will replace type in the
actuarial documents that is applicable to
the Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Provisions. The expected ‘‘commodity
types’’ and ‘‘citrus fruit groups’’ are as
follows:
Citrus fruit
group
Commodity type
Grapefruit ............................................................................
Lemons ...............................................................................
Oranges ..............................................................................
Oranges ..............................................................................
Oranges ..............................................................................
Mandarins/Tangerines ........................................................
Mandarins/Tangerines ........................................................
Mandarins/Tangerines ........................................................
Tangelos .............................................................................
Tangelos .............................................................................
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Citrus fruit commodity
No Commodity Type Specified ............................................................
No Commodity Type Specified ............................................................
Navel ....................................................................................................
Valencia ................................................................................................
Sweet ....................................................................................................
Clementine ...........................................................................................
W. Murcott ............................................................................................
All Other ...............................................................................................
Minneola ...............................................................................................
Orlando .................................................................................................
FCIC proposes to remove the
definition of ‘‘dehorning’’ because this
term is no longer used with the revision
of section 3.
FCIC proposes to add the definitions
of ‘‘graft,’’ ‘‘interstock,’’ ‘‘scion,’’ and
‘‘topwork.’’ The term ‘‘topwork’’ is
proposed to be added because it is used
in a provision proposed to be added to
section 6 that will require the insured
trees to have reached a designated
growing season after ‘‘topwork’’ to be
insurable. The terms ‘‘graft,’’
‘‘interstock,’’ and ‘‘scion’’ are proposed
to be added because they are used in the
proposed definition of ‘‘topwork.’’
FCIC proposes to remove the
definition of ‘‘variety’’ because all
references to the term ‘‘variety’’ have
been removed from the Crop Provisions
and replaced with the term ‘‘commodity
type.’’
3. Section 2—FCIC proposes to revise
section 2(a) to state that basic units will
be established in accordance with
section 1 of the Basic Provisions. The
definition of basic unit in section 1 of
the Basic Provisions states that basic
units include all insurable acreage of the
insured crop in the county on the day
coverage begins for the crop year in
which you have 100 percent crop share
or which is owned by one person and
operated by another person on a share
basis. Because each ‘‘citrus fruit group’’
will be considered a separate insured
crop, separate basic units will be
established for each ‘‘citrus fruit group.’’
For example, under the new ‘‘citrus fruit
commodity’’ of ‘‘oranges’’ all Navel
oranges could be one ‘‘citrus fruit
group’’ and all Valencia oranges could
be another ‘‘citrus fruit group.’’ This
means that all of the policyholder’s
Navel orange acreage can be insured as
one basic unit and all of the
policyholder’s Valencia orange acreage
can be insured as a separate basic unit.
This proposed change in terminology
will allow policyholders to keep their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
current unit structure under the new
classification system.
FCIC proposes to revise section 2(b)
by adding language to allow optional
units by commodity type if allowed by
the Special Provisions. Adding this
language will give FCIC the flexibility to
allow optional units by commodity type
for some citrus fruit commodities or
citrus fruit groups where it may be
appropriate, but not for others.
4. Section 3—FCIC proposes to revise
section 3(a) by adding language to allow
the policyholder to select separate
coverage levels and price elections by
‘‘citrus fruit group.’’ For example, under
the new citrus fruit commodity of
‘‘oranges’’ all Navel oranges will be
grouped together as one ‘‘citrus fruit
group’’ so that the policyholder must
select the same coverage level and price
election for all fruit insured under this
‘‘citrus fruit group.’’ These revisions to
terminology will allow policyholders to
continue to elect coverage levels and
price elections on the same basis they
currently elect coverage levels and price
elections. FCIC also proposes to update
the example in this section to be
consistent with the proposed changes to
this section.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(b)
by removing the years in the example.
This will prevent the provision from
appearing out of date in the future.
FCIC proposes to designate the
undesignated paragraph following
section 3(c) as section 3(d). FCIC
proposes to revise newly designated
section 3(d) to add provisions to specify
the adjustment to be made, if an event
or action occurs that may reduce the
yield potential, based on when the
situation occurred. The current
provision states that FCIC will reduce
the yield used to establish the
production guarantee, but does not
provide additional details. The
proposed section 3(d)(1) states that if a
situation that may reduce the yield
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A
B
C
D
E
F
F
F
G
H
occurred before the beginning of the
insurance period, the yield used to
establish the production guarantee will
be reduced for the current crop year
regardless of whether the situation was
due to an insured or uninsured cause of
loss. The proposed section 3(d)(2) states
that if a situation that may reduce the
yield occurred after the beginning of the
insurance period and the policyholder
notifies the insurance provider by the
production reporting date, the yield
used to establish the production
guarantee will be reduced for the
current crop year only if the potential
reduction in the yield used to establish
your production guarantee is due to an
uninsured cause of loss. The proposed
section 3(d)(3) states that if a situation
that may reduce the yield occurred after
the beginning of the insurance period
and the policyholder fails to notify the
insurance provider by the production
reporting date, an amount equal to the
reduction in the yield will be added to
the production count calculated in
section 11(c) due to uninsured causes
and the insurance provider may reduce
the yield used to establish the
production guarantee for the subsequent
crop year. Adding these provisions
removes any ambiguity regarding the
consequences when situations occur
that will reduce the yield potential of
insured acreage.
FCIC also proposes to revise newly
designated section 3(d) to remove the
list of possible situations that affect
yield and instead refer back to section
3(c), which contains the same
information. This eliminates
redundancy and is consistent with other
perennial Crop Provisions, such as
apples, grapes, and stonefruit.
5. Section 6—FCIC proposes to revise
the introductory paragraph of section 6
by adding language to allow the insured
crop to be all acreage of each ‘‘citrus
fruit group.’’ Because the ‘‘citrus fruit
groups’’ will be considered separate
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
insured crops, they will be assessed
separate administrative fees in
accordance with section 7 of the Basic
Provisions. This proposed change also
allows the policyholder to elect to
insure one ‘‘citrus fruit group’’ and not
another ‘‘citrus fruit group’’ within the
same ‘‘citrus fruit commodity.’’
However, since the current ‘‘citrus fruit
crops’’ will become ‘‘citrus fruit
groups,’’ this proposed change should
not result in any changes to the
administrative fees the policyholder
pays or the crops the policyholder is
able to elect to insure.
FCIC proposes to revise section 6(b) to
clarify that the insured crop must be
grown on rootstock and trees adapted to
the area. The current provision states
that the insured crop must be adapted
to the area, but it is actually the
rootstock and trees the insured crop is
grown on that need to be adapted to the
area.
FCIC proposes to revise section 6(e)
by adding a provision to require trees to
have reached the fifth growing season
after topwork, unless otherwise
provided in the Special Provisions or if
acreage is inspected and insurance is
allowed by written agreement. This
provision is being proposed to address
situations where established trees are
‘‘top-worked.’’ Since trees that have
been topworked will produce little or no
fruit for several years after grafting, it is
not appropriate to insure the fruit these
trees produce until the trees have
reached the designated age.
6. Section 8—FCIC proposes to revise
section 8(a)(2)(i) by adding the names of
the counties in Southern California that
have an end of insurance date of August
31. The current provision indicates
Southern California has an end of
insurance date of August 31, but does
not specify what areas are considered
Southern California.
7. Section 9—FCIC proposes to add
provisions in section 9(a) that allow
insects and disease to be insurable
causes of loss unless damage is due to
insufficient or improper application of
control measures. FCIC proposes to
remove the provisions in section 9(b)(1)
that exclude insects and disease from
insurability unless adverse weather
prevents the proper application of
control measures or causes properly
applied control measures to be
ineffective or causes disease or insect
infestation for which no effective
control mechanism is available. These
changes will provide more
comprehensive coverage and are
consistent with revisions to other crop
policies.
8. Section 10—FCIC proposes to
revise section 10 by adding a new
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
section 10(a) to clarify the policyholder
must leave representative samples for
appraisal purposes in accordance with
the Basic Provisions. The Basic
Provisions stipulate representative
samples must be left if required by the
Crop Provisions. Representative samples
are necessary in order to appraise
damaged production for claims
purposes. The rest of the provisions in
section 10 are proposed to be
redesignated.
FCIC proposes to revise the newly
redesignated section 10(b)(2) to clarify if
the policyholder intends to claim an
indemnity on any unit, the policyholder
must notify the insurance provider at
least 15 days prior to the beginning of
harvest or immediately if damage is
discovered during harvest so that the
insurance provider may have an
opportunity to inspect it. This change
provides a timeframe for reporting
damage and is consistent with revisions
to other perennial crop policies.
9. Section 11—FCIC proposes to
revise section 11(b) by removing the
phrase ‘‘crop, or variety if applicable’’
and inserting the term ‘‘commodity
type’’ in its place. This change is being
proposed because ‘‘commodity type’’ is
the category in the actuarial documents
that is applicable to determining the
amount of insurance for the unit. This
is a proposed change in terminology and
does not change how claims are settled.
FCIC proposes to revise section
11(c)(1)(iv) by removing the term ‘‘crop’’
and adding the term ‘‘insured crop’’ in
its place. This change is being made to
clarify that the provision is referencing
the ‘‘insured crop’’ as defined in the
Basic Provisions and section 6 of the
Crop Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise section 11(f)
to clarify that this provision only
applies if the policyholder elects the
frost protection option. FCIC also
proposes to revise this section to clarify
that frost protection equipment
requirements will be specified in the
Special Provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Arizona-California
citrus, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 457 effective for the 2015 and
succeeding crop years as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17609
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
2. Amend § 457.121 as follows:
a. In the introductory text by
removing ‘‘2000’’ and adding ‘‘2015’’ in
its place;
■ b. By removing the undesignated
paragraph immediately preceding
section 1;
■ c. In section 1:
■ i. By revising the definition of
‘‘carton’’;
■ ii. By removing the definitions of
‘‘crop,’’ ‘‘dehorning,’’ and ‘‘variety’’;
■ iii. By adding the definitions of
‘‘citrus fruit commodity,’’ ‘‘citrus fruit
group,’’ ‘‘commodity type,’’ ‘‘graft,’’
‘‘interstock,’’ ‘‘scion,’’ and ‘‘topwork’’;
■ iv. In the definition of ‘‘crop year’’ by
removing the term ‘‘citrus’’ and adding
the term ‘‘insured’’ in its place;
■ v. In the definition of ‘‘direct
marketing’’ by adding the term
‘‘insured’’ directly preceding the term
‘‘crop’’ in the second sentence; and
■ vi. In the definition of ‘‘interplanted’’
by removing the term ‘‘crops’’ and
adding the term ‘‘agricultural
commodities’’ in its place;
■ d. In section 2:
■ i. By revising paragraph (a); and
■ ii. In paragraph (b) by removing the
term ‘‘only’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘by
commodity type if allowed by the
Special Provisions or’’ in its place;
■ e. In section 3:
■ i. By revising paragraph (a);
■ ii. In paragraph (b) by removing the
term ‘‘1998’’ and adding the term
‘‘current’’ in its place and by removing
the phrase ‘‘1996 crop year production’’
and adding the phrase ‘‘production from
two crop years ago’’ in its place;
■ iii. In paragraph (c) introductory text
by removing the phrase ‘‘(Insurance
Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices
for Determining Indemnities)’’ and
adding the term ‘‘commodity’’ directly
preceding the term ‘‘type’’ in the
introductory paragraph;
■ iv. In paragraph (c)(4) introductory
text by removing the phrase ‘‘crop, and
anytime’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘agricultural commodity and any time’’
in its place;
■ v. In paragraph (c)(4)(i) by removing
the phrase ‘‘crop, and type’’ and adding
the phrase ‘‘agricultural commodity and
commodity type’’ in its place;
■ vi. By designating the undesignated
paragraph following paragraph (c)(4)(iii)
as paragraph (d); and
■ vii. By revising the newly designated
paragraph (d);
■
■
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
17610
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
f. In section 4 by removing the phrase
‘‘(Contract Changes)’’;
■ g. In section 5 by removing the phrase
‘‘(Life of Policy, Cancellation, and
Termination)’’;
■ h. In section 6;
■ i. By revising the introductory text;
■ ii. In paragraph (b) by adding the
phrase ‘‘grown on rootstock and trees’’
following the phrase ‘‘That is’’; and
■ iii. By revising paragraph (f);
■ i. Revise section 7;
■ j. In section 8:
■ i. In paragraph (a) introductory text by
removing the phrase ‘‘(Insurance
Period)’’;
■ ii. In paragraph (a)(1) by removing the
space between the number ‘‘10’’ and the
term ‘‘day’’ and adding a hyphen in its
place and by adding the term ‘‘insured’’
directly preceding the phrase ‘‘crop or
to determine the condition of the
grove’’;
■ iii. By revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ iv. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii) by removing
the term ‘‘citrus crops’’ and adding the
term ‘‘citrus fruit commodities’’ in its
place; and
■ v. In paragraph (b) introductory text
by removing the phrase ‘‘(Insurance
Period)’’;
■ k. In section 9:
■ i. In paragraph (a) introductory text by
removing the phrase ‘‘(Cause of Loss)’’;
■ ii. In paragraph (a)(5) by removing the
term ‘‘or’’ after the semicolon;
■ iii. In paragraph (a)(6) by removing the
period at the end of the sentence and
adding a semicolon in its place;
■ iv. By adding new paragraphs (a)(7)
and (8); and
■ v. By revising paragraph (b);
■ l. In section 10:
■ i. By redesignating paragraph (a) as
(b)(1);
■ ii. By redesignating paragraph (b) as
(b)(2);
■ iii. By adding a new paragraph (a);
■ iv. By designating the introductory
text as paragraph (b);
■ v. In the newly designated paragraph
(b) by removing the phrase ‘‘(Duties in
the Event of Damage or Loss)’’;
■ vi. In the newly designated paragraph
(b)(2) by removing the phrase ‘‘before
beginning to harvest any damaged
production’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘at
least 15 days prior to the beginning of
harvest or immediately if damage is
discovered during harvest’’ in its place;
and by adding the term ‘‘insured’’
directly preceding the phrase ‘‘crop
until after we have given you written
consent to do so’’;
■ m. In section 11:
■ i. In paragraph (b)(1) by removing the
phrase ‘‘crop, or variety if applicable,’’
and adding the term ‘‘commodity type’’
in its place;
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
Interstock. The area of the tree that is
grafted to the rootstock.
*
*
*
*
*
Scion. A detached living portion of a
plant joined to a rootstock or interstock
in grafting.
*
*
*
*
*
Topwork. Grafting a scion onto a
pruned scaffold limb of an interstock.
2. * * *
(a) Basic units will be established in
accordance with section 1 of the Basic
Provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
3. * * *
(a) In addition to the requirements of
§ 457.121 Arizona-California citrus crop
insurance provisions.
section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you
may select only one price election and
*
*
*
*
*
coverage level for each citrus fruit group
1. * * *
you elect to insure. The price election
*
*
*
*
*
you choose for each citrus fruit group
Carton. The standard container for
need not bear the same percentage
marketing the fresh packed citrus fruit
relationship to the maximum price
commodity as shown below unless
offered by us for each citrus fruit group.
otherwise provided in the Special
For example, if you choose one hundred
Provisions. In the absence of marketing
percent (100%) of the maximum price
records on a carton basis, production
will be converted to cartons on the basis election for the citrus fruit group for
Valencia oranges, you may choose
of the following average net pounds of
packed fruit in a standard packed carton seventy-five percent (75%) of the
maximum price election for the citrus
unless otherwise provided in the
fruit group for Navel oranges. However,
Special Provisions.
if separate price elections are available
by commodity type within each citrus
Citrus fruit
Container size
Pounds
commodity
fruit group, the price elections you
choose for each commodity type must
Container #58 ... Oranges ............
38 have the same percentage relationship
Container #58 ... Lemons .............
40
to the maximum price offered by us for
Container #59 ... Grapefruit ..........
32
Container #63 ... Mandarins/Tan25 each commodity type within the citrus
fruit group.
gerines.
Container #63 ... Tangelos ...........
25 *
*
*
*
*
(d) We will reduce the yield used to
Citrus fruit commodity. Citrus fruit as establish your production guarantee, as
follows:
necessary, based on our estimate of the
(1) Oranges;
effect of any such situation listed in
(2) Grapefruit;
section 3(c) that may occur. If you fail
(3) Tangelos;
to notify us of any situation in section
(4) Mandarins/Tangerines;
3(c), we will reduce your production
(5) Lemons; and
guarantee as necessary at any time we
(6) Any other citrus fruit commodity
become aware of the circumstance. If
designated in the actuarial documents.
the situation in 3(c) occurred:
Citrus fruit group. A designation in
(1) Before the beginning of the
the Special Provisions used to identify
insurance period, the yield used to
commodity types within a citrus fruit
establish your production guarantee will
commodity that may be grouped
be reduced for the current crop year
together for the purposes of electing
regardless of whether the situation was
coverage levels and identifying the
due to an insured or uninsured cause of
insured crop.
loss;
Commodity type. A specific subgroup
(2) After the beginning of the
of a commodity having a characteristic
insurance period and you notify us by
or set of characteristics distinguishable
the production reporting date, the yield
from other subgroups of the same
used to establish your production
commodity.
guarantee will be reduced for the
*
*
*
*
*
current crop year only if the potential
Graft. To unite a bud or scion with a
reduction in the yield used to establish
rootstock or interstock in accordance
your production guarantee is due to an
with recommended practices to form a
uninsured cause of loss; or
living union.
(3) After the beginning of the
*
*
*
*
*
insurance period and you fail to notify
ii. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing the
phrase ‘‘crop, or variety, if applicable’’
and adding the phrase ‘‘commodity
type’’ in its place;
■ iii. In paragraph (b)(4) by removing
the phrase ‘‘variety, if applicable’’ and
adding the phrase ‘‘commodity type’’ in
its place;
■ iv. In paragraph (c)(1)(iv) by removing
the term ‘‘crop’’ in all three places it
appears and adding the term ‘‘insured
crop’’ in its place; and
■ v. By revising paragraph (f).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
us by the production reporting date, an
amount equal to the reduction in the
yield will be added to the production to
count calculated in section 11(c) due to
uninsured causes. We may reduce the
yield used to establish your production
guarantee for the subsequent crop year
to reflect any reduction in the
productive capacity of the trees.
*
*
*
*
*
6. * * *
In accordance with section 8 of the
Basic Provisions, the insured crop will
be all the acreage in the county of each
citrus fruit group you elect to insure and
for which a premium rate is provided by
the actuarial documents:
*
*
*
*
*
(f) That is grown on trees that have
reached at least:
(1) The sixth growing season after
being set out, unless otherwise provided
in the Special Provisions or if we
inspect and approve a written
agreement to insure such acreage; or
(2) The fifth growing season after
topwork, unless otherwise provided in
the Special Provisions or if we inspect
and approve a written agreement to
insure such acreage.
7. Insurable Acreage
In lieu of the provisions in section 9
of the Basic Provisions that prohibit
insurance attaching to interplanted
acreage, citrus interplanted with another
perennial agricultural commodity is
insurable unless we inspect the acreage
and determine it does not meet the
requirements contained in your policy.
8. * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) August 31 for:
(A) Navel oranges; and
(B) Southern California lemons
(Imperial, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura
Counties);
*
*
*
*
*
9. * * *
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Insects, but not damage due to
insufficient or improper application of
pest control measures; or
(8) Plant disease, but not damage due
to insufficient or improper application
of disease control measures.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss
excluded in section 12 of the Basic
Provisions, we will not insure against
damage or loss of production due to the
inability to market the citrus for any
reason other than actual physical
damage from an insurable cause of loss
specified in this section. For example,
we will not pay you an indemnity if you
are unable to market due to quarantine,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
boycott, or refusal of any person to
accept production.
10. * * *
(a) In accordance with the
requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, you must leave
representative samples in accordance
with our procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
11. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If you elect the frost protection
option and we determine that frost
protection equipment, as specified in
the Special Provisions, was not properly
utilized or not properly reported, the
indemnity for the unit will be reduced
by the percentage of premium reduction
allowed for frost protection equipment.
You must, at our request, provide us
records showing the start-stop times by
date for each period the frost protection
equipment was used.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 11,
2013.
Brandon Willis,
Administrator, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2013–06106 Filed 3–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part Chapter 1
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0260]
Provisions of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act Related to Medical Gases; Request
for Comments Regarding Regulations
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification; request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is inviting
comments from the public on whether
any potential changes to the Federal
drug regulations are necessary for
medical gases.
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments by May 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17611
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Kirk, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6280,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–2465, christine.kirk@fda.hhs.gov;
or
Germaine Connolly, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–116), Food
and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., MPN2, Rockville, MD
20855, 240–276–8331, germaine.
connolly@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 9, 2012, President Obama
signed the Food and Drug Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112–
144) into law. Section 1112(a) of
FDASIA provides that not later than 18
months after its enactment, the
Secretary of Health and Human
Services, after obtaining input from
medical gas manufacturers and any
other interested members of the public,
shall determine whether any changes to
the Federal drug regulations are
necessary for medical gases and submit
a report regarding any such changes to
the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions of the U.S. Senate
and the Committee on Energy and
Commerce of the U.S. House of
Representatives. Section 1112(c)(l)
defines ‘‘Federal drug regulations’’ to
mean ‘‘regulations in title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations pertaining to
drugs.’’
Section 1112(b) provides that if the
Secretary determines that changes to the
Federal drug regulations are necessary
for medical gases, the Secretary shall
issue final regulations revising the
Federal drug regulations with respect to
medical gases not later than 48 months
after the enactment of FDASIA. FDA is
opening this docket to provide the
public with an opportunity to submit
comments on whether any potential
changes to Federal drug regulations are
necessary for medical gases.
II. Opportunities for Comment on Other
Medical Gas Dockets
FDASIA also added new sections
regarding medical gases to the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (see Title XI, Subtitle B,
section 1111 of FDASIA, adding new
sections 575, 576, and 577 to the FD&C
Act). FDA has previously issued two
other Federal Register notices related to
these new sections.
On November 23, 2012 (77 FR 70166),
FDA issued a Federal Register notice
E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM
22MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17606-17611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06106]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 17606]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. FCIC- 12-0008]
RIN 0563-AC38
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Insurance Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Arizona-California Citrus
Crop Insurance Provisions. The intended effect of this action is to
provide policy changes, to clarify existing policy provisions to better
meet the needs of policyholder, and to reduce vulnerability to program
fraud, waste, and abuse. The proposed changes will be effective for the
2015 and succeeding crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business April 22, 2013 and will be considered
when the rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments be submitted electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may submit comments,
identified by Docket ID No. FCIC-12-0008, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Director, Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64133-6205.
All comments received, including those received by mail, will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, and can be accessed by the public. All
comments must include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information, see https://www.regulations.gov. If you are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal and want to attach a document,
we ask that it be in a text-based format. If you want to attach a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be scanned as text
and not as an image, thus allowing FCIC to search and copy certain
portions of your submissions. For questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823-4694 or by email at
rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received for any dockets by the name of the person submitting
the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the complete
User Notice and Privacy Notice for Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Hoffmann, Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United
States Department of Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421,
P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not-significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has not been
reviewed by the OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002,
to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA),
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the
[[Page 17607]]
kind of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to
small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small
entities, and, therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will not
have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or action by FCIC directing the insurance provider to take specific
action under the terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative
appeal provisions published at 7 CFR part 11, or 7 CFR part 400,
subpart J for determinations of good farming practices, as applicable,
must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for judicial review
may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR
part 457) by revising Sec. 457.121 Arizona-California Citrus Crop
Insurance Provisions, to be effective for the 2015 and succeeding crop
years. Several requests have been made for changes to improve the
insurance coverage offered, address program integrity issues, simplify
program administration, and improve clarity of the policy provisions.
Some of the proposed changes are a result of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Acreage Crop Reporting Streamlining
Initiative, which has an objective of using common standardized data
and terminology to consolidate and simplify reporting requirements for
farmers. USDA has made a concerted effort to standardize terms between
agencies as much as possible to allow the sharing of data, thereby
reducing the burden on producers in reporting their information. Many
of the changes proposed in this rule are a part of that effort. As part
of this initiative FCIC is proposing to change the term ``crop'' to
``citrus fruit commodity'' and to rename the ``citrus fruit
commodities'' to be consistent with the crop names used by other USDA
agencies. This change will allow information to be shared among
agencies, thereby relieving producers of the burden of reporting the
same information multiple times. The addition of the term ``citrus
fruit group'' is intended to negate the impact of changes to ``citrus
fruit commodity'' names on coverage levels, unit structure, and
administrative fees. The ``citrus fruit groups'' for each ``citrus
fruit commodity'' will be listed in the Special Provisions. The
``citrus fruit groups'' will be the basis for determining coverage
levels and identifying the insured crop. These proposed changes are
expected to result in no change from the current basis by which
coverage levels are selected, basic units are established, and
administrative fees are assessed.
To be consistent with the objectives of the Acreage Crop Reporting
Streamlining Initiative, FCIC is planning to replace the category of
``type'' in the actuarial documents with four categories named
``commodity type,'' ``class,'' ``subclass,'' and ``intended use.'' FCIC
is also planning to replace the category of ``practice'' in the
actuarial documents with four categories named ``cropping practice,''
``organic practice,'' ``irrigation practice,'' and ``interval.''
Proposed changes to the Arizona-California Citrus Crop Provisions, such
as replacing references to the term ``type'' with the term ``commodity
type'' will provide an avenue for this transition.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. FCIC proposes to remove the paragraph immediately preceding
section 1 which refers to the order of priority in the event of a
conflict. This same information is contained in the Basic Provisions.
Therefore, it is duplicative and should be removed in the Arizona-
California Citrus Crop Insurance Provisions.
FCIC proposes to remove all section titles of the Basic Provisions.
This information is currently contained in parenthesis following
references to section numbers of the Basic Provisions throughout the
Arizona-California Citrus Crop Insurance Provisions.
2. Section 1--FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``carton''
to allow the container size and weight to be changed by the Special
Provisions. This will provide flexibility to update these figures as
industry standards change. This will also allow standards to be added
through the Special Provisions for any other citrus fruit commodities
designated as insurable in the actuarial documents. FCIC proposes to
revise the list of ``citrus fruit commodities'' to align with the
proposed ``citrus fruit commodity'' names.
FCIC proposes to remove the definition of ``crop'' and replace it
with a definition of ``citrus fruit commodity'' since insurable
commodities are identified in the actuarial documents. FCIC proposes to
replace the term ``crop'' with the term ``citrus fruit commodity''
where appropriate throughout the Crop Provisions. However, in some
places the term ``crop'' will be changed to ``insured crop'' or
``agricultural commodity'' which are defined in the Basic Provisions or
the term ``crop'' may be retained if using the common meaning. The
current definition of ``citrus fruit crop'' states that the crops are
listed in the Special Provisions. Adding the ``citrus fruit commodity''
names to the Arizona-California Crop Insurance Provisions will make it
easier to determine the crops that are insurable under the Arizona-
California Citrus Crop Insurance Provisions. In some cases, the new
``citrus fruit commodities'' will result in several of the current
``crops'' being combined into a single ``citrus fruit commodity.'' For
example, the current crops ``Navel,'' ``Valencia,'' and ``Sweet'' will
all fall under the new ``citrus fruit commodity'' of ``oranges.'' This
change is being proposed because of the Acreage Crop Reporting
Streamlining Initiative. This proposed change in terminology does not
change the varieties of citrus that are insurable.
FCIC proposes to add the definition of ``citrus fruit group.'' The
term ``citrus fruit group'' refers to a method of grouping commodity
types within the ``citrus fruit commodity'' through the Special
Provisions for the purposes of electing coverage levels, establishing
[[Page 17608]]
basic units, guarantees, and assessing administrative fees. This change
is being proposed because of the Acreage Crop Reporting Streamlining
Initiative.
FCIC proposes to add the definition of ``commodity type'' because
this is the category that will replace type in the actuarial documents
that is applicable to the Arizona-California Citrus Crop Provisions.
The expected ``commodity types'' and ``citrus fruit groups'' are as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citrus fruit
Citrus fruit commodity Commodity type group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grapefruit.................. No Commodity Type A
Specified.
Lemons...................... No Commodity Type B
Specified.
Oranges..................... Navel................... C
Oranges..................... Valencia................ D
Oranges..................... Sweet................... E
Mandarins/Tangerines........ Clementine.............. F
Mandarins/Tangerines........ W. Murcott.............. F
Mandarins/Tangerines........ All Other............... F
Tangelos.................... Minneola................ G
Tangelos.................... Orlando................. H
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FCIC proposes to remove the definition of ``dehorning'' because
this term is no longer used with the revision of section 3.
FCIC proposes to add the definitions of ``graft,'' ``interstock,''
``scion,'' and ``topwork.'' The term ``topwork'' is proposed to be
added because it is used in a provision proposed to be added to section
6 that will require the insured trees to have reached a designated
growing season after ``topwork'' to be insurable. The terms ``graft,''
``interstock,'' and ``scion'' are proposed to be added because they are
used in the proposed definition of ``topwork.''
FCIC proposes to remove the definition of ``variety'' because all
references to the term ``variety'' have been removed from the Crop
Provisions and replaced with the term ``commodity type.''
3. Section 2--FCIC proposes to revise section 2(a) to state that
basic units will be established in accordance with section 1 of the
Basic Provisions. The definition of basic unit in section 1 of the
Basic Provisions states that basic units include all insurable acreage
of the insured crop in the county on the day coverage begins for the
crop year in which you have 100 percent crop share or which is owned by
one person and operated by another person on a share basis. Because
each ``citrus fruit group'' will be considered a separate insured crop,
separate basic units will be established for each ``citrus fruit
group.'' For example, under the new ``citrus fruit commodity'' of
``oranges'' all Navel oranges could be one ``citrus fruit group'' and
all Valencia oranges could be another ``citrus fruit group.'' This
means that all of the policyholder's Navel orange acreage can be
insured as one basic unit and all of the policyholder's Valencia orange
acreage can be insured as a separate basic unit. This proposed change
in terminology will allow policyholders to keep their current unit
structure under the new classification system.
FCIC proposes to revise section 2(b) by adding language to allow
optional units by commodity type if allowed by the Special Provisions.
Adding this language will give FCIC the flexibility to allow optional
units by commodity type for some citrus fruit commodities or citrus
fruit groups where it may be appropriate, but not for others.
4. Section 3--FCIC proposes to revise section 3(a) by adding
language to allow the policyholder to select separate coverage levels
and price elections by ``citrus fruit group.'' For example, under the
new citrus fruit commodity of ``oranges'' all Navel oranges will be
grouped together as one ``citrus fruit group'' so that the policyholder
must select the same coverage level and price election for all fruit
insured under this ``citrus fruit group.'' These revisions to
terminology will allow policyholders to continue to elect coverage
levels and price elections on the same basis they currently elect
coverage levels and price elections. FCIC also proposes to update the
example in this section to be consistent with the proposed changes to
this section.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(b) by removing the years in the
example. This will prevent the provision from appearing out of date in
the future.
FCIC proposes to designate the undesignated paragraph following
section 3(c) as section 3(d). FCIC proposes to revise newly designated
section 3(d) to add provisions to specify the adjustment to be made, if
an event or action occurs that may reduce the yield potential, based on
when the situation occurred. The current provision states that FCIC
will reduce the yield used to establish the production guarantee, but
does not provide additional details. The proposed section 3(d)(1)
states that if a situation that may reduce the yield occurred before
the beginning of the insurance period, the yield used to establish the
production guarantee will be reduced for the current crop year
regardless of whether the situation was due to an insured or uninsured
cause of loss. The proposed section 3(d)(2) states that if a situation
that may reduce the yield occurred after the beginning of the insurance
period and the policyholder notifies the insurance provider by the
production reporting date, the yield used to establish the production
guarantee will be reduced for the current crop year only if the
potential reduction in the yield used to establish your production
guarantee is due to an uninsured cause of loss. The proposed section
3(d)(3) states that if a situation that may reduce the yield occurred
after the beginning of the insurance period and the policyholder fails
to notify the insurance provider by the production reporting date, an
amount equal to the reduction in the yield will be added to the
production count calculated in section 11(c) due to uninsured causes
and the insurance provider may reduce the yield used to establish the
production guarantee for the subsequent crop year. Adding these
provisions removes any ambiguity regarding the consequences when
situations occur that will reduce the yield potential of insured
acreage.
FCIC also proposes to revise newly designated section 3(d) to
remove the list of possible situations that affect yield and instead
refer back to section 3(c), which contains the same information. This
eliminates redundancy and is consistent with other perennial Crop
Provisions, such as apples, grapes, and stonefruit.
5. Section 6--FCIC proposes to revise the introductory paragraph of
section 6 by adding language to allow the insured crop to be all
acreage of each ``citrus fruit group.'' Because the ``citrus fruit
groups'' will be considered separate
[[Page 17609]]
insured crops, they will be assessed separate administrative fees in
accordance with section 7 of the Basic Provisions. This proposed change
also allows the policyholder to elect to insure one ``citrus fruit
group'' and not another ``citrus fruit group'' within the same ``citrus
fruit commodity.'' However, since the current ``citrus fruit crops''
will become ``citrus fruit groups,'' this proposed change should not
result in any changes to the administrative fees the policyholder pays
or the crops the policyholder is able to elect to insure.
FCIC proposes to revise section 6(b) to clarify that the insured
crop must be grown on rootstock and trees adapted to the area. The
current provision states that the insured crop must be adapted to the
area, but it is actually the rootstock and trees the insured crop is
grown on that need to be adapted to the area.
FCIC proposes to revise section 6(e) by adding a provision to
require trees to have reached the fifth growing season after topwork,
unless otherwise provided in the Special Provisions or if acreage is
inspected and insurance is allowed by written agreement. This provision
is being proposed to address situations where established trees are
``top-worked.'' Since trees that have been topworked will produce
little or no fruit for several years after grafting, it is not
appropriate to insure the fruit these trees produce until the trees
have reached the designated age.
6. Section 8--FCIC proposes to revise section 8(a)(2)(i) by adding
the names of the counties in Southern California that have an end of
insurance date of August 31. The current provision indicates Southern
California has an end of insurance date of August 31, but does not
specify what areas are considered Southern California.
7. Section 9--FCIC proposes to add provisions in section 9(a) that
allow insects and disease to be insurable causes of loss unless damage
is due to insufficient or improper application of control measures.
FCIC proposes to remove the provisions in section 9(b)(1) that exclude
insects and disease from insurability unless adverse weather prevents
the proper application of control measures or causes properly applied
control measures to be ineffective or causes disease or insect
infestation for which no effective control mechanism is available.
These changes will provide more comprehensive coverage and are
consistent with revisions to other crop policies.
8. Section 10--FCIC proposes to revise section 10 by adding a new
section 10(a) to clarify the policyholder must leave representative
samples for appraisal purposes in accordance with the Basic Provisions.
The Basic Provisions stipulate representative samples must be left if
required by the Crop Provisions. Representative samples are necessary
in order to appraise damaged production for claims purposes. The rest
of the provisions in section 10 are proposed to be redesignated.
FCIC proposes to revise the newly redesignated section 10(b)(2) to
clarify if the policyholder intends to claim an indemnity on any unit,
the policyholder must notify the insurance provider at least 15 days
prior to the beginning of harvest or immediately if damage is
discovered during harvest so that the insurance provider may have an
opportunity to inspect it. This change provides a timeframe for
reporting damage and is consistent with revisions to other perennial
crop policies.
9. Section 11--FCIC proposes to revise section 11(b) by removing
the phrase ``crop, or variety if applicable'' and inserting the term
``commodity type'' in its place. This change is being proposed because
``commodity type'' is the category in the actuarial documents that is
applicable to determining the amount of insurance for the unit. This is
a proposed change in terminology and does not change how claims are
settled.
FCIC proposes to revise section 11(c)(1)(iv) by removing the term
``crop'' and adding the term ``insured crop'' in its place. This change
is being made to clarify that the provision is referencing the
``insured crop'' as defined in the Basic Provisions and section 6 of
the Crop Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise section 11(f) to clarify that this
provision only applies if the policyholder elects the frost protection
option. FCIC also proposes to revise this section to clarify that frost
protection equipment requirements will be specified in the Special
Provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Arizona-California citrus, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 effective for
the 2015 and succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
0
2. Amend Sec. 457.121 as follows:
0
a. In the introductory text by removing ``2000'' and adding ``2015'' in
its place;
0
b. By removing the undesignated paragraph immediately preceding section
1;
0
c. In section 1:
0
i. By revising the definition of ``carton'';
0
ii. By removing the definitions of ``crop,'' ``dehorning,'' and
``variety'';
0
iii. By adding the definitions of ``citrus fruit commodity,'' ``citrus
fruit group,'' ``commodity type,'' ``graft,'' ``interstock,''
``scion,'' and ``topwork'';
0
iv. In the definition of ``crop year'' by removing the term ``citrus''
and adding the term ``insured'' in its place;
0
v. In the definition of ``direct marketing'' by adding the term
``insured'' directly preceding the term ``crop'' in the second
sentence; and
0
vi. In the definition of ``interplanted'' by removing the term
``crops'' and adding the term ``agricultural commodities'' in its
place;
0
d. In section 2:
0
i. By revising paragraph (a); and
0
ii. In paragraph (b) by removing the term ``only'' and adding the
phrase ``by commodity type if allowed by the Special Provisions or'' in
its place;
0
e. In section 3:
0
i. By revising paragraph (a);
0
ii. In paragraph (b) by removing the term ``1998'' and adding the term
``current'' in its place and by removing the phrase ``1996 crop year
production'' and adding the phrase ``production from two crop years
ago'' in its place;
0
iii. In paragraph (c) introductory text by removing the phrase
``(Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities)'' and adding the term ``commodity'' directly preceding the
term ``type'' in the introductory paragraph;
0
iv. In paragraph (c)(4) introductory text by removing the phrase
``crop, and anytime'' and adding the phrase ``agricultural commodity
and any time'' in its place;
0
v. In paragraph (c)(4)(i) by removing the phrase ``crop, and type'' and
adding the phrase ``agricultural commodity and commodity type'' in its
place;
0
vi. By designating the undesignated paragraph following paragraph
(c)(4)(iii) as paragraph (d); and
0
vii. By revising the newly designated paragraph (d);
[[Page 17610]]
0
f. In section 4 by removing the phrase ``(Contract Changes)'';
0
g. In section 5 by removing the phrase ``(Life of Policy, Cancellation,
and Termination)'';
0
h. In section 6;
0
i. By revising the introductory text;
0
ii. In paragraph (b) by adding the phrase ``grown on rootstock and
trees'' following the phrase ``That is''; and
0
iii. By revising paragraph (f);
0
i. Revise section 7;
0
j. In section 8:
0
i. In paragraph (a) introductory text by removing the phrase
``(Insurance Period)'';
0
ii. In paragraph (a)(1) by removing the space between the number ``10''
and the term ``day'' and adding a hyphen in its place and by adding the
term ``insured'' directly preceding the phrase ``crop or to determine
the condition of the grove'';
0
iii. By revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
iv. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii) by removing the term ``citrus crops'' and
adding the term ``citrus fruit commodities'' in its place; and
0
v. In paragraph (b) introductory text by removing the phrase
``(Insurance Period)'';
0
k. In section 9:
0
i. In paragraph (a) introductory text by removing the phrase ``(Cause
of Loss)'';
0
ii. In paragraph (a)(5) by removing the term ``or'' after the
semicolon;
0
iii. In paragraph (a)(6) by removing the period at the end of the
sentence and adding a semicolon in its place;
0
iv. By adding new paragraphs (a)(7) and (8); and
0
v. By revising paragraph (b);
0
l. In section 10:
0
i. By redesignating paragraph (a) as (b)(1);
0
ii. By redesignating paragraph (b) as (b)(2);
0
iii. By adding a new paragraph (a);
0
iv. By designating the introductory text as paragraph (b);
0
v. In the newly designated paragraph (b) by removing the phrase
``(Duties in the Event of Damage or Loss)'';
0
vi. In the newly designated paragraph (b)(2) by removing the phrase
``before beginning to harvest any damaged production'' and adding the
phrase ``at least 15 days prior to the beginning of harvest or
immediately if damage is discovered during harvest'' in its place; and
by adding the term ``insured'' directly preceding the phrase ``crop
until after we have given you written consent to do so'';
0
m. In section 11:
0
i. In paragraph (b)(1) by removing the phrase ``crop, or variety if
applicable,'' and adding the term ``commodity type'' in its place;
0
ii. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing the phrase ``crop, or variety, if
applicable'' and adding the phrase ``commodity type'' in its place;
0
iii. In paragraph (b)(4) by removing the phrase ``variety, if
applicable'' and adding the phrase ``commodity type'' in its place;
0
iv. In paragraph (c)(1)(iv) by removing the term ``crop'' in all three
places it appears and adding the term ``insured crop'' in its place;
and
0
v. By revising paragraph (f).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 457.121 Arizona-California citrus crop insurance provisions.
* * * * *
1. * * *
* * * * *
Carton. The standard container for marketing the fresh packed
citrus fruit commodity as shown below unless otherwise provided in the
Special Provisions. In the absence of marketing records on a carton
basis, production will be converted to cartons on the basis of the
following average net pounds of packed fruit in a standard packed
carton unless otherwise provided in the Special Provisions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Container size Citrus fruit commodity Pounds
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Container 58................ Oranges................. 38
Container 58................ Lemons.................. 40
Container 59................ Grapefruit.............. 32
Container 63................ Mandarins/Tangerines.... 25
Container 63................ Tangelos................ 25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citrus fruit commodity. Citrus fruit as follows:
(1) Oranges;
(2) Grapefruit;
(3) Tangelos;
(4) Mandarins/Tangerines;
(5) Lemons; and
(6) Any other citrus fruit commodity designated in the actuarial
documents.
Citrus fruit group. A designation in the Special Provisions used to
identify commodity types within a citrus fruit commodity that may be
grouped together for the purposes of electing coverage levels and
identifying the insured crop.
Commodity type. A specific subgroup of a commodity having a
characteristic or set of characteristics distinguishable from other
subgroups of the same commodity.
* * * * *
Graft. To unite a bud or scion with a rootstock or interstock in
accordance with recommended practices to form a living union.
* * * * *
Interstock. The area of the tree that is grafted to the rootstock.
* * * * *
Scion. A detached living portion of a plant joined to a rootstock
or interstock in grafting.
* * * * *
Topwork. Grafting a scion onto a pruned scaffold limb of an
interstock.
2. * * *
(a) Basic units will be established in accordance with section 1 of
the Basic Provisions.
* * * * *
3. * * *
(a) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, you may select only one price election and coverage level
for each citrus fruit group you elect to insure. The price election you
choose for each citrus fruit group need not bear the same percentage
relationship to the maximum price offered by us for each citrus fruit
group. For example, if you choose one hundred percent (100%) of the
maximum price election for the citrus fruit group for Valencia oranges,
you may choose seventy-five percent (75%) of the maximum price election
for the citrus fruit group for Navel oranges. However, if separate
price elections are available by commodity type within each citrus
fruit group, the price elections you choose for each commodity type
must have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price offered
by us for each commodity type within the citrus fruit group.
* * * * *
(d) We will reduce the yield used to establish your production
guarantee, as necessary, based on our estimate of the effect of any
such situation listed in section 3(c) that may occur. If you fail to
notify us of any situation in section 3(c), we will reduce your
production guarantee as necessary at any time we become aware of the
circumstance. If the situation in 3(c) occurred:
(1) Before the beginning of the insurance period, the yield used to
establish your production guarantee will be reduced for the current
crop year regardless of whether the situation was due to an insured or
uninsured cause of loss;
(2) After the beginning of the insurance period and you notify us
by the production reporting date, the yield used to establish your
production guarantee will be reduced for the current crop year only if
the potential reduction in the yield used to establish your production
guarantee is due to an uninsured cause of loss; or
(3) After the beginning of the insurance period and you fail to
notify
[[Page 17611]]
us by the production reporting date, an amount equal to the reduction
in the yield will be added to the production to count calculated in
section 11(c) due to uninsured causes. We may reduce the yield used to
establish your production guarantee for the subsequent crop year to
reflect any reduction in the productive capacity of the trees.
* * * * *
6. * * *
In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the insured
crop will be all the acreage in the county of each citrus fruit group
you elect to insure and for which a premium rate is provided by the
actuarial documents:
* * * * *
(f) That is grown on trees that have reached at least:
(1) The sixth growing season after being set out, unless otherwise
provided in the Special Provisions or if we inspect and approve a
written agreement to insure such acreage; or
(2) The fifth growing season after topwork, unless otherwise
provided in the Special Provisions or if we inspect and approve a
written agreement to insure such acreage.
7. Insurable Acreage
In lieu of the provisions in section 9 of the Basic Provisions that
prohibit insurance attaching to interplanted acreage, citrus
interplanted with another perennial agricultural commodity is insurable
unless we inspect the acreage and determine it does not meet the
requirements contained in your policy.
8. * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) August 31 for:
(A) Navel oranges; and
(B) Southern California lemons (Imperial, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura Counties);
* * * * *
9. * * *
(a) * * *
* * * * *
(7) Insects, but not damage due to insufficient or improper
application of pest control measures; or
(8) Plant disease, but not damage due to insufficient or improper
application of disease control measures.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss excluded in section 12 of the
Basic Provisions, we will not insure against damage or loss of
production due to the inability to market the citrus for any reason
other than actual physical damage from an insurable cause of loss
specified in this section. For example, we will not pay you an
indemnity if you are unable to market due to quarantine, boycott, or
refusal of any person to accept production.
10. * * *
(a) In accordance with the requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, you must leave representative samples in accordance with
our procedures.
* * * * *
11. * * *
* * * * *
(f) If you elect the frost protection option and we determine that
frost protection equipment, as specified in the Special Provisions, was
not properly utilized or not properly reported, the indemnity for the
unit will be reduced by the percentage of premium reduction allowed for
frost protection equipment. You must, at our request, provide us
records showing the start-stop times by date for each period the frost
protection equipment was used.
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 11, 2013.
Brandon Willis,
Administrator, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2013-06106 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P