Federal Housing Administration (FHA): Direct Endorsement Program Solicitation of Comment on Timeframe for Conducting Pre-Endorsement Review, 17303-17304 [2013-06110]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 55 / Thursday, March 21, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 13, 2013.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
[FR Doc. 2013–06498 Filed 3–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 203
[Docket No. FR–5658–N–01]
Federal Housing Administration (FHA):
Direct Endorsement Program
Solicitation of Comment on Timeframe
for Conducting Pre-Endorsement
Review
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking comment on
moving the timeframe that FHA
conducts its pre-endorsement review of
loans originated by Direct Endorsement
lenders from a time that is prior to the
lender closing each loan and before
FHA’s endorsement of the mortgage for
insurance to a period after the loan has
been closed. Comment is sought on
whether this shift in time, as further
described in this document, would
reduce the processing time before the
loans may be closed, and facilitate loan
closing.
DATES: Comment Due Date. April 22,
2013.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this rule to the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, 451 7th
Street SW., Room 10276, Department of
Housing and Urban Development,
Washington, DC 20410–0500. There are
two methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<14>2013
14:39 Mar 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the notice.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern Time,
weekdays at the above address. Due to
security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling
the Regulations Division at 202–708–
3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with speech or hearing
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339 (this is
a toll-free number). Copies of all
comments submitted are available for
inspection and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Hadley, Director, Office of Lender
Activities and Program Compliance,
Office of Housing, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 490
L’Enfant Plaza East SW., Room P3214,
Washington, DC 20024–8000; telephone
number 202–708–1515 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FHA grants lenders unconditional
Direct Endorsement authority to close
loans without prior FHA approval in
accordance with the terms and
conditions of HUD’s regulations in 24
CFR 203.3. Under the Direct
Endorsement program, the lender
underwrites and closes the mortgage
loan without prior FHA review or
approval. Before being granted
unconditional Direct Endorsement
authority, the lender must submit a
specified number of loan files for review
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17303
and approval by FHA as described in 24
CFR 203.3(b)(4). The regulations
provide for the review of each loan file
to be conducted by FHA, and the lender
to be notified of the acceptability of the
mortgage, prior to FHA endorsement of
the mortgage for insurance. The Direct
Endorsement program has been
designed to give the lender sufficient
certainty of FHA endorsement
requirements to justify the assumption
of the responsibilities involved in
originating and closing mortgage loans
without prior FHA review.
At present, FHA generally conducts
this review of the loan files required
under 24 CFR 203.3(b)(4) prior to
closing and, if acceptable, issues a
commitment to the lender at that time.
After closing, the mortgage is then
submitted to FHA for endorsement for
insurance. While this is the general
procedure utilized by lenders seeking
unconditional Direct Endorsement
approval, FHA currently allows lenders
to close the loans before submission for
review. A lender is eligible for
unconditional Direct Endorsement
authority once FHA has reviewed and
found acceptable the requisite number
of loan files, at either pre-closing or preendorsement review, provided that the
lender has met the other requirements
for Direct Endorsement approval under
24 CFR 203.3.
II. This Request for Comments
Proposed Transition of FHA’s Review to
Post-Closing, Pre-Endorsement
Through this document FHA proposes
for consideration and public comment
shifting the timeframe for FHA’s review
of loans prior to endorsement from preclosing to post-closing. FHA proposes
that a lender applying for unconditional
Direct Endorsement authority submit
the loan files required under 24 CFR
203.3(b)(4) only after closing. After
determining that the mortgage is
acceptable and meets all FHA
requirements, FHA will notify the
lender that the loan has been endorsed.
Feedback is sought on whether the
proposed change in review time would
benefit the lender by reducing the
amount of time between loan
origination and closing, and would
result in operational savings of time and
costs associated with approval
timeframes, which FHA recognizes can
be lengthy at times. Feedback is also
sought on whether the proposed change
in review time would benefit the
borrower; that is, would the borrower be
able to take advantage of shorter interest
rate lock-in periods, which could help
to ensure that the borrower receives the
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
17304
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 55 / Thursday, March 21, 2013 / Proposed Rules
best interest rate available at the lowest
possible cost to the borrower.
The proposed change in review time
should not alter the current quality of
review of the loan file or the quality of
the Direct Endorsement lender approval
process. FHA guidance, issued in
accordance with 24 CFR 203.3(b)(2),
already requires the lender to certify
that their underwriter(s) have the
qualifications, expertise, and experience
to underwrite mortgage loans in
accordance with FHA requirements.
Given the certification required of
lenders, the shift in the timeframe for
review may in fact result in enhanced
lender accountability; that is, the lender
will place more emphasis on ensuring
that their underwriting staff is
sufficiently trained prior to requesting
Direct Endorsement authority. Properly
trained underwriters will help to
increase the number of loans that are
found to be acceptable, resulting in an
even higher percentage of loan files that
meet FHA policies and guidelines.
FHA analyzed data for mortgage loans
that were submitted for review during
the period beginning October 1, 2009
through June 30, 2012. The data
demonstrated that 86.7 percent of all
loans reviewed during this time period,
and 90.5 percent of all loans reviewed
year to date in FY 2012, were found to
meet FHA policies and guidelines and
were subsequently endorsed. In
addition, of the lenders entering the
Direct Endorsement review process
during the October 1, 2009 through June
30, 2012 timeframe, 48.6 percent did not
receive an unacceptable rating on any
loan submitted for review, while 28
percent of lenders had only one loan
rated unacceptable and 10.9 percent of
lenders had two loans rated
unacceptable. Overall, 87.4 percent of
lenders had two or fewer loans rated
unacceptable. Currently, in FY 2012, the
percentage of lenders with two or fewer
loans rated unacceptable has increased
to 93.3 percent and is expected to
continue to improve.
When material violations of FHA
policies and procedures are uncovered
during the loan file review, FHA will
notify the lender that a preliminary
assessment, based on file
documentation, indicates that the loan
contains material findings such that
FHA is exposed to an unacceptable level
of risk. FHA will provide the lender
with an opportunity to present missing
information or documentation to
address the review findings and permit
subsequent submission for
endorsement. As is the current practice,
if the lender is unable to adequately
respond (or fails to respond) to the
material findings, FHA will notify the
VerDate Mar<14>2013
14:39 Mar 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
lender that the loan is not eligible for
endorsement.
The lender will have satisfied the preendorsement review requirements
necessary to be approved for
unconditional Direct Endorsement
authority once FHA has reviewed and
found acceptable the requisite number
of loan files pursuant to 24 CFR
203.3(b)(4).
III. Solicitation of Comment
Comment is solicited on the proposed
shift in the timeframe for conducting its
pre-endorsement review of the loans
originated by prospective Direct
Endorsement lenders from prior to the
lender closing each loan to before FHA’s
endorsement of the mortgage for
insurance. Comment is also solicited on
other proposals that would reduce the
processing time and facilitate loan
closing.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Carol J. Galante,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2013–06110 Filed 3–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0884, FRL– 9791–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oregon:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter
and 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
approve the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submittals from the State of
Oregon to demonstrate that the SIP
meets the infrastructure requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) promulgated for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) on July 18,
1997 and October 17, 2006, and for
ozone on March 12, 2008. The EPA is
proposing to find that the Federallyapproved provisions currently in the
Oregon SIP meet the CAA infrastructure
requirements for the 1997 PM2.5, 2006
PM2.5, and the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The
EPA is also proposing to find that the
Federally-approved provisions currently
in the Oregon SIP meet the interstate
transport requirements of the CAA
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
related to prevention of significant
deterioration for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, and related to visibility for the
2006 PM2.5 and 2008 ozone NAAQS.
This action does not propose to approve
any additional provisions into the
Oregon SIP but is a proposed finding
that the current provisions of the
Oregon SIP are adequate to satisfy the
above-mentioned infrastructure
elements required by the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2011–0884, by any of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: R10Public_Comments@epa.gov.
• Mail: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT–
107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region
10 Mailroom, 9th Floor, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101.
Attention: Kristin Hall, Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, AWT–107. Such
deliveries are only accepted during
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2011–
0884. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information that
you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 55 (Thursday, March 21, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17303-17304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06110]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 203
[Docket No. FR-5658-N-01]
Federal Housing Administration (FHA): Direct Endorsement Program
Solicitation of Comment on Timeframe for Conducting Pre-Endorsement
Review
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking comment on moving the timeframe that FHA
conducts its pre-endorsement review of loans originated by Direct
Endorsement lenders from a time that is prior to the lender closing
each loan and before FHA's endorsement of the mortgage for insurance to
a period after the loan has been closed. Comment is sought on whether
this shift in time, as further described in this document, would reduce
the processing time before the loans may be closed, and facilitate loan
closing.
DATES: Comment Due Date. April 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this rule to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Washington, DC 20410-0500. There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the
notice.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern Time,
weekdays at the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at 202-
708-3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).
Copies of all comments submitted are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Hadley, Director, Office of Lender
Activities and Program Compliance, Office of Housing, U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 490 L'Enfant Plaza East SW., Room
P3214, Washington, DC 20024-8000; telephone number 202-708-1515 (this
is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FHA grants lenders unconditional Direct Endorsement authority to
close loans without prior FHA approval in accordance with the terms and
conditions of HUD's regulations in 24 CFR 203.3. Under the Direct
Endorsement program, the lender underwrites and closes the mortgage
loan without prior FHA review or approval. Before being granted
unconditional Direct Endorsement authority, the lender must submit a
specified number of loan files for review and approval by FHA as
described in 24 CFR 203.3(b)(4). The regulations provide for the review
of each loan file to be conducted by FHA, and the lender to be notified
of the acceptability of the mortgage, prior to FHA endorsement of the
mortgage for insurance. The Direct Endorsement program has been
designed to give the lender sufficient certainty of FHA endorsement
requirements to justify the assumption of the responsibilities involved
in originating and closing mortgage loans without prior FHA review.
At present, FHA generally conducts this review of the loan files
required under 24 CFR 203.3(b)(4) prior to closing and, if acceptable,
issues a commitment to the lender at that time. After closing, the
mortgage is then submitted to FHA for endorsement for insurance. While
this is the general procedure utilized by lenders seeking unconditional
Direct Endorsement approval, FHA currently allows lenders to close the
loans before submission for review. A lender is eligible for
unconditional Direct Endorsement authority once FHA has reviewed and
found acceptable the requisite number of loan files, at either pre-
closing or pre-endorsement review, provided that the lender has met the
other requirements for Direct Endorsement approval under 24 CFR 203.3.
II. This Request for Comments
Proposed Transition of FHA's Review to Post-Closing, Pre-Endorsement
Through this document FHA proposes for consideration and public
comment shifting the timeframe for FHA's review of loans prior to
endorsement from pre-closing to post-closing. FHA proposes that a
lender applying for unconditional Direct Endorsement authority submit
the loan files required under 24 CFR 203.3(b)(4) only after closing.
After determining that the mortgage is acceptable and meets all FHA
requirements, FHA will notify the lender that the loan has been
endorsed.
Feedback is sought on whether the proposed change in review time
would benefit the lender by reducing the amount of time between loan
origination and closing, and would result in operational savings of
time and costs associated with approval timeframes, which FHA
recognizes can be lengthy at times. Feedback is also sought on whether
the proposed change in review time would benefit the borrower; that is,
would the borrower be able to take advantage of shorter interest rate
lock-in periods, which could help to ensure that the borrower receives
the
[[Page 17304]]
best interest rate available at the lowest possible cost to the
borrower.
The proposed change in review time should not alter the current
quality of review of the loan file or the quality of the Direct
Endorsement lender approval process. FHA guidance, issued in accordance
with 24 CFR 203.3(b)(2), already requires the lender to certify that
their underwriter(s) have the qualifications, expertise, and experience
to underwrite mortgage loans in accordance with FHA requirements. Given
the certification required of lenders, the shift in the timeframe for
review may in fact result in enhanced lender accountability; that is,
the lender will place more emphasis on ensuring that their underwriting
staff is sufficiently trained prior to requesting Direct Endorsement
authority. Properly trained underwriters will help to increase the
number of loans that are found to be acceptable, resulting in an even
higher percentage of loan files that meet FHA policies and guidelines.
FHA analyzed data for mortgage loans that were submitted for review
during the period beginning October 1, 2009 through June 30, 2012. The
data demonstrated that 86.7 percent of all loans reviewed during this
time period, and 90.5 percent of all loans reviewed year to date in FY
2012, were found to meet FHA policies and guidelines and were
subsequently endorsed. In addition, of the lenders entering the Direct
Endorsement review process during the October 1, 2009 through June 30,
2012 timeframe, 48.6 percent did not receive an unacceptable rating on
any loan submitted for review, while 28 percent of lenders had only one
loan rated unacceptable and 10.9 percent of lenders had two loans rated
unacceptable. Overall, 87.4 percent of lenders had two or fewer loans
rated unacceptable. Currently, in FY 2012, the percentage of lenders
with two or fewer loans rated unacceptable has increased to 93.3
percent and is expected to continue to improve.
When material violations of FHA policies and procedures are
uncovered during the loan file review, FHA will notify the lender that
a preliminary assessment, based on file documentation, indicates that
the loan contains material findings such that FHA is exposed to an
unacceptable level of risk. FHA will provide the lender with an
opportunity to present missing information or documentation to address
the review findings and permit subsequent submission for endorsement.
As is the current practice, if the lender is unable to adequately
respond (or fails to respond) to the material findings, FHA will notify
the lender that the loan is not eligible for endorsement.
The lender will have satisfied the pre-endorsement review
requirements necessary to be approved for unconditional Direct
Endorsement authority once FHA has reviewed and found acceptable the
requisite number of loan files pursuant to 24 CFR 203.3(b)(4).
III. Solicitation of Comment
Comment is solicited on the proposed shift in the timeframe for
conducting its pre-endorsement review of the loans originated by
prospective Direct Endorsement lenders from prior to the lender closing
each loan to before FHA's endorsement of the mortgage for insurance.
Comment is also solicited on other proposals that would reduce the
processing time and facilitate loan closing.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Carol J. Galante,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2013-06110 Filed 3-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P