Pesticide Chemicals; Registration Review; Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments; Notice of Availability, 17201-17204 [2013-06406]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Notices
On October 17, 2012 (77 FR 63813), EPA
sought comments on this ICR pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no
comments. Any additional comments on
this ICR should be submitted to both the
EPA and OMB within 30 days of this
notice.
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OECA–2012–0642, which is
available for either public viewing
online at https://www.regulations.gov, or
in person viewing at the Enforcement
and Compliance Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket is
(202) 566–1752.
Use EPA’s electronic docket and
comment system, at https://
www.regulations.gov, to either submit or
view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and
to access those documents in the docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidentiality of
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to www.regulations.gov.
Title: NESHAP for Chemical
Preparations Industry (Renewal)
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number
2356.03, OMB Control Number 2060–
0636
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to
expire on March 31, 2013. Under OMB
regulations, the Agency may continue to
either conduct or sponsor the collection
of information while this submission is
pending at OMB.
Abstract: The affected entities are
subject to the General Provisions of the
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A,
and any changes, or additions to the
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart BBBBBBB. Owners or operators
of the affected facilities must submit an
initial notification report, performance
tests, and periodic reports and results.
Owners or operators are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and
VerDate Mar<14>2013
18:04 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an
affected facility, or any period during
which the monitoring system is
inoperative. At a minimum, reports are
required semiannually.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 40 hours per
response. ‘‘Burden’’ means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install,
and utilize technology and systems for
the purposes of collecting, validating,
and verifying information, processing
and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with
any previously- applicable instructions
and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Owners or operators of area source
chemical preparation facilities.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
26.
Frequency of Response:
Semiannually.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
2,093.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$203,052, which includes $202,662 in
labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and
$390 in operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is an
adjustment decrease in the total
estimated burden for both the
respondents and the Agency as
currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved Burdens. This
decrease is not due to any program
changes. The change in the burden and
cost estimates occurred because the
standards have been in effect for more
than three years and the requirements
are different during initial compliance
(new facilities) as compared to on-going
compliance (existing facilities). The
previous ICR reflected those burdens
and costs associated with the initial
activities for subject facilities. This
includes understanding rule
requirements, notification of
applicability, conducting engineering
calculations or obtaining data on
performance guarantees to demonstrate
initial compliance, and establishing
recordkeeping systems. This ICR, by in
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17201
large, reflects the on-going burden and
costs for existing facilities. Activities for
existing source include continuous
monitoring of pollutants and the
submission of semiannual reports. The
overall result is a decrease in burden
hours and costs. These changes also
result in a decrease in O&M costs,
which are photocopying and postage
costs associated with submittal of
notifications and semiannual reports.
This ICR corrects a mathematical
mistake in the Agency labor rates. The
previous ICR adjusted the labor rates by
160 percent, thereby overestimating the
Agency’s costs. This ICR corrects the
loading rate to 60 percent to account for
the benefit packages available to
government employees. Additionally,
this ICR corrects the frequency of
occurrence for the review of semiannual
reports from once to twice per year.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–06342 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0152; FRL–9381–3]
Pesticide Chemicals; Registration
Review; Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessments; Notice
of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s draft human health
and ecological risk assessments for the
registration review of ancymidol,
fosthiazate, lactofen, polybutene resins,
quizalofop, and soap salts and opens a
public comment period on these
documents. Registration review is EPA’s
periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that
is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on human health or the
environment. As part of the registration
review process, the Agency has
completed draft risk assessments for
each of the subject chemicals and is
making them available for public
comment. After reviewing comments
received during the public comment
period, EPA will issue a revised risk
assessment, if appropriate, explain any
changes to the draft risk assessment, and
respond to comments and may request
public input on risk mitigation. Through
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
17202
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Notices
this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide’s registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of
interest provided in Table 1. in Unit
III.A., by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about a particular pesticide
included in this document, contact the
Chemical Review Manager identified in
Table 1. in Unit III.A. for the pesticide
of interest.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Jane Robbins, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–0048; fax number:
(703) 305–8005; email address:
robbins.jane@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
VerDate Mar<14>2013
18:04 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager identified in
Table 1. in Unit III.A. for the pesticide
of interest.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts and/or
environmental effects from exposure to
the pesticides discussed in this
document, compared to the general
population.
II. Authority
EPA is conducting its registration
review of the pesticides identified in
this document pursuant to section 3(g)
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Procedural Regulations for Registration
Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among
other things, that the registrations of
pesticides are to be reviewed every 15
years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product
may be registered or remain registered
only if it meets the statutory standard
for registration given in FIFRA section
3(c)(5). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized
practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on the
environment; that is, without any
unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk
from residues that result from the use of
a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g),
EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations for ancymidol, fosthiazate,
lactofen, polybutene resins, quizalofop,
and soap salts to ensure that they
continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard
for registration—that is, that these
pesticides can still be used without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment.
At this stage in the registration review
process, consistent with the proposed
notice, published in the Federal
Register issue of August 17, 2012 (77 FR
49792) (FRL–9356–5), jointly developed
with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, the National Marine
Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (‘‘the Services’’) to
enhance opportunities for stakeholder
input during pesticide registration
reviews and endangered species
consultations, draft environmental risk
assessments include a screening-level
evaluation of the potential risks to
federally listed endangered and
threatened species (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘listed species’’). EPA intends to
complete a refined assessment of
potential risks to individual listed
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Notices
species, as needed. The refined listed
species assessments will be based on the
recommendations of the National
Research Council (NRC), which has
been tasked with providing advice on
ecological risk assessment tools and
scientific approaches in developing
listed species risk assessments that are
compliant with both FIFRA and the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). EPA
anticipates that the NRC report,
expected in Spring 2013, will provide
recommendations to ensure scientific
soundness and maximize the utility of
risk assessment refinements for listed
species. Additional information can be
found at the following Web site:
https://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/
projectview.aspx?key=49396. Useful
refinements to the listed species
assessments are expected to include, but
not be limited to, the following:
• More detailed, species-specific
ecological and biological data.
• More detailed and accurate
information on chemical use patterns.
• Sub-county level spatial proximity
data depicting the co-occurrence of
potential effects areas and listed species
and any designated critical habitat.
In the event that a draft risk
assessment shows risks of concern to
human health or the environment for a
specific chemical, EPA reserves the
right to initiate mitigation at this stage
of registration review. This effort to
mitigate a chemical’s risks early in the
registration review process is consistent
with the Agency’s approach for
registration review. Where risks are
identified early in the registration
review process and opportunities for
early mitigation exist, the Agency may
pursue those opportunities as they arise,
rather then waiting for completion of a
chemical’s registration review in order
to mitigate risks. The public comment
period for the draft risk assessments
allows members of the public to provide
comments and suggestions for revising
the draft risk assessments and for
reducing risks.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is
providing an opportunity, through this
notice of availability, for interested
parties to provide comments and input
concerning the Agency’s draft human
health and ecological risk assessments
for ancymidol, fosthiazate, lactofen,
17203
polybutene resins, quizalofop, and soap
salts. Such comments and input could
address, among other things, the
Agency’s risk assessment methodologies
and assumptions, as applied in these
draft risk assessments.
The Agency will consider all
comments received during the public
comment period and make changes, as
appropriate, to the draft human health
and ecological risk assessments. EPA
will then issue revised risk assessments,
if appropriate, and explain any changes
to the draft risk assessments, and
respond to comments. In the Federal
Register notice announcing the
availability of the revised risk
assessments, if any of the revised risk
assessments indicate risks of concern,
the Agency may provide a comment
period for the public to submit
suggestions for mitigating the risks
identified in those revised risk
assessments. At present, EPA is
releasing registration review draft risk
assessments for the pesticide cases
identified in the following table and
further described in this unit.
TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS
Pesticide docket identification No.
Chemical review manager, telephone No., and email address
Ancymidol, Case No. 3017 ..................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0482 ................
Fosthiazate, Case No. 7604 ................
Lactofen, Case No. 7210 .....................
Polybutene resins, Case No. 4076 ......
Quizalofop, Case No. 7215 .................
Soap salts, Case No. 4083 .................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Registration review case name and
No.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0267
EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0287
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0649
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1089
EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0519
Christina
Scheltema,
(703)
308–2201,
scheltema.christina@epa.gov.
Khue Nguyen, (703) 347–0248, nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
Kelly Ballard, (703) 305–8126, ballard.kelly@epa.gov.
Joel Wolf, (703) 347–0228, wolf.joel@epa.gov.
Khue Nguyen, (703) 347–0248, nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
Monica Wait, (703) 347–8019, wait.monica@epa.gov.
• Ancymidol. The registration review
docket for ancymidol (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2011–0482) opened in the Federal
Register issue of June 29, 2011 (76 FR
38166) (FRL–8877–4). Ancymidol is a
plant growth regulator that acts by
inhibiting giberillin biosynthesis,
resulting in plants with more compact
growth. Ancymidol is registered for use
only on container grown greenhouse
and nursery ornamentals. It is used only
on plants grown for commercial
production and has no food, feed, or
residential uses. The Final Work Plan
for ancymidol described numerous data
requirements for registration review,
and a registration review timeline that
included the issuance of a data call-in.
However, EPA has revisited the timeline
and data requirements for registration
review and determined that a data callin is not necessary for ancymidol. The
Agency has conducted qualitative
environmental and human health risk
VerDate Mar<14>2013
18:04 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
................
................
................
................
................
assessments for ancymidol based on the
available information and on limited
use of this pesticide active ingredient.
• Fosthiazate. The registration review
docket for fosthiazate (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2009–0267) opened in the Federal
Register issue of June 24, 2009 (74 FR
30077) (FRL–8422–4). Fosthiazate is an
organophosphate nematicide and
insecticide that is currently registered
for use on tomatoes. The Agency has
conducted a human health risk
assessment for both dietary (food and
drinking water) and occupational
exposure pathways. The Agency has
also conducted a quantitative ecological
risk assessment, which includes a
screening-level listed species
assessment. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species
assessment will be completed in future
revisions and requests public comment
on specific areas that will reduce the
uncertainties associated with the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
characterization of risk to listed species
identified in the current assessment.
• Lactofen. The registration review
docket for lactofen (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2005–0287) opened in the Federal
Register issue of February 2, 2007 (72
FR 5050) (FRL–8113–1). Lactofen is a
light dependent peroxidizing herbicide
(LDPH), and is registered for use on
conifer seedlings, cotton, kenaf,
peanuts, and soybean, with local
registrations on fruiting vegetables, okra,
snap beans, and strawberries. For
lactofen, the Agency has conducted an
occupational handler exposure risk
assessment for the application of
lactofen on conifer seedlings, snap
beans, soybeans, and strawberries. The
Agency has also conducted an
ecological risk assessment, which
includes a screening-level listed species
assessment. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species
assessment will be completed in future
revisions and requests public comment
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17204
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Notices
on specific areas that will reduce the
uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species
identified in the current assessment.
• Polybutene resins. The registration
review docket for polybutene resins
(EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0649) opened in
the Federal Register issue of June 23,
2010 (75 FR 35810) (FRL–8832–3).
Polybutene is a sticky polymer
registered for use as a bird and small
mammal repellent. It is used to prevent
house sparrows, pigeons, and starlings
from roosting inside and outside of
buildings, as well as to prevent beavers
from attacking trees and shrubs. There
are no food/feed uses and, it is exempt
from a tolerance requirement when used
as a sticker agent in packaging of insect
control products used on food crops.
Polybutene is approved by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) as an
indirect food additive and is used as an
ingredient in cosmetic products that are
applied directly to the skin such as sun
block or moisturizer, and that may be
incidentally ingested, such as lipstick.
EPA has conducted a qualitative
assessment for both human health and
environmental fate and ecological risks.
• Quizalofop. The registration review
docket for quizalofop ethyl and
quizalofop-p-ethyl (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2007–1089) opened in the Federal
Register issue of December 19, 2007 (72
FR 71893) (FRL–8342–9). Quizalofop
ethyl is a 50/50 racemic mixture of Rand S-enantiomers; quizalofop-p-ethyl
is the purified R-enantiomer which is
pesticidally active. Quizalofop-p-ethyl
is registered for use to control weeds in
food crops (including barley, beans,
lentil, peas, sorghum, soybean, and
sugar beets), non-food crops grown for
seed (including alfalfa, carrots, garlic,
onion, radish, and spinach), and noncropland (including rights-of-way and
fencerows). Quizalofop-p-ethyl is not
registered for residential use. The
Agency has conducted a human health
assessment for both dietary (food and
drinking water) and occupational
exposure pathways. The Agency has
conducted a quantitative ecological risk
assessment, including a listed species
assessment, for quizalofop. EPA
acknowledges that further refinements
to the listed species assessment may be
completed in future revisions and
requests public comment on specific
areas that will reduce the uncertainties
associated with the characterization of
risk to listed species identified in the
current assessment.
• Soap salts. The registration review
docket for soap salts (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2008–0519) opened in the Federal
Register issue of September 15, 2008 (73
FR 53244) (FRL–8381–3). The case
VerDate Mar<14>2013
18:04 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
consists of three active ingredients, the
ammonium, potassium, and sodium
salts of fatty acids, which are registered
for use as acaricides, algaecides,
herbicides, and insecticides on food and
non-food crops in various settings,
chiefly residential and agricultural.
Ammonium and sodium soap salts are
also used as animal repellents. Because
the Agency has not identified any
toxicological endpoints for human
health risk assessment and because
current product labels are adequate to
protect for potential eye and skin
irritation, a qualitative human health
risk assessment was conducted for soap
salts. The Agency has conducted a
quantitative ecological risk assessment,
which includes a screening-level listed
species assessment. EPA acknowledges
that further refinements to the listed
species assessment will be completed in
future revisions and requests public
comment on specific areas that will
reduce the uncertainties associated with
the characterization of risk to listed
species identified in the current
assessment.
1. Other related information. Additional
information on ancymidol, fosthiazate,
lactofen, polybutene resins, quizalofop, and
soap salts is available on the chemical pages
for these pesticides in Chemical Search,
https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
chemicalsearch, and in each chemical’s
individual docket listed in Table 1. in Unit
III.A. Information on the Agency’s
registration review program and its
implementing regulation is available at
https://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/
registration_review.
2. Information submission requirements.
Anyone may submit data or information in
response to this document. To be considered
during a pesticide’s registration review, the
submitted data or information must meet the
following requirements:
• To ensure that EPA will consider data or
information submitted, interested persons
must submit the data or information during
the comment period. The Agency may, at its
discretion, consider data or information
submitted at a later date.
• The data or information submitted must
be presented in a legible and useable form.
For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in
English and a written transcript must
accompany any information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record. Written
material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
• Submitters must clearly identify the
source of any submitted data or information.
• Submitters may request the Agency to
reconsider data or information that the
Agency rejected in a previous review.
However, submitters must explain why they
believe the Agency should reconsider the
data or information in the pesticide’s
registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the
registration review docket for each pesticide
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
case will remain publicly accessible through
the duration of the registration review
process; that is, until all actions required in
the final decision on the registration review
case have been completed.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Ancymidol, Fosthiazate, Lactofen,
Pesticides and pests, Polybutene resins,
Quizalofop, Soap salts.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013–06406 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0938; FRL–9374–7]
Pesticide Reregistration Performance
Measures and Goals; Annual Progress
Report; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s progress report in
meeting its performance measures and
goals for pesticide reregistration during
fiscal year 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol P. Stangel, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8007; email address:
stangel.carol@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA announcing the
availability of this report?
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requires
EPA to publish information about EPA’s
annual achievements in meeting its
performance measures and goals for
pesticide reregistration. The report for
fiscal year 2012 discusses the
integration of tolerance reassessment
with the reregistration process, and
describes the status of various
regulatory activities associated with
reregistration and tolerance
reassessment. The 2012 report also gives
total numbers of products reregistered
and products registered under the ‘‘fasttrack’’ provisions of FIFRA.
II. How can I get a copy of the 2012
report?
1. Docket. The 2012 report is available
at https://www.regulations.gov, under
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17201-17204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0152; FRL-9381-3]
Pesticide Chemicals; Registration Review; Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessments; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's draft human
health and ecological risk assessments for the registration review of
ancymidol, fosthiazate, lactofen, polybutene resins, quizalofop, and
soap salts and opens a public comment period on these documents.
Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations
to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory
standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health
or the environment. As part of the registration review process, the
Agency has completed draft risk assessments for each of the subject
chemicals and is making them available for public comment. After
reviewing comments received during the public comment period, EPA will
issue a revised risk assessment, if appropriate, explain any changes to
the draft risk assessment, and respond to comments and may request
public input on risk mitigation. Through
[[Page 17202]]
this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is
based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects
on human health and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket
identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest
provided in Table 1. in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about a particular
pesticide included in this document, contact the Chemical Review
Manager identified in Table 1. in Unit III.A. for the pesticide of
interest.
For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Jane Robbins, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-0048;
fax number: (703) 305-8005; email address: robbins.jane@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager identified in Table 1. in Unit
III.A. for the pesticide of interest.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts and/or environmental effects from exposure to the
pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general
population.
II. Authority
EPA is conducting its registration review of the pesticides
identified in this document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly
recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended
function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that
is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human
dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in
or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations for ancymidol, fosthiazate, lactofen, polybutene resins,
quizalofop, and soap salts to ensure that they continue to satisfy the
FIFRA standard for registration--that is, that these pesticides can
still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or
the environment.
At this stage in the registration review process, consistent with
the proposed notice, published in the Federal Register issue of August
17, 2012 (77 FR 49792) (FRL-9356-5), jointly developed with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (``the Services'') to enhance
opportunities for stakeholder input during pesticide registration
reviews and endangered species consultations, draft environmental risk
assessments include a screening-level evaluation of the potential risks
to federally listed endangered and threatened species (hereafter
referred to as ``listed species''). EPA intends to complete a refined
assessment of potential risks to individual listed
[[Page 17203]]
species, as needed. The refined listed species assessments will be
based on the recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC),
which has been tasked with providing advice on ecological risk
assessment tools and scientific approaches in developing listed species
risk assessments that are compliant with both FIFRA and the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). EPA anticipates that the NRC report, expected in
Spring 2013, will provide recommendations to ensure scientific
soundness and maximize the utility of risk assessment refinements for
listed species. Additional information can be found at the following
Web site: https://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/projectview.aspx?key=49396. Useful refinements to the listed species
assessments are expected to include, but not be limited to, the
following:
More detailed, species-specific ecological and biological
data.
More detailed and accurate information on chemical use
patterns.
Sub-county level spatial proximity data depicting the co-
occurrence of potential effects areas and listed species and any
designated critical habitat.
In the event that a draft risk assessment shows risks of concern to
human health or the environment for a specific chemical, EPA reserves
the right to initiate mitigation at this stage of registration review.
This effort to mitigate a chemical's risks early in the registration
review process is consistent with the Agency's approach for
registration review. Where risks are identified early in the
registration review process and opportunities for early mitigation
exist, the Agency may pursue those opportunities as they arise, rather
then waiting for completion of a chemical's registration review in
order to mitigate risks. The public comment period for the draft risk
assessments allows members of the public to provide comments and
suggestions for revising the draft risk assessments and for reducing
risks.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity,
through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide
comments and input concerning the Agency's draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for ancymidol, fosthiazate, lactofen,
polybutene resins, quizalofop, and soap salts. Such comments and input
could address, among other things, the Agency's risk assessment
methodologies and assumptions, as applied in these draft risk
assessments.
The Agency will consider all comments received during the public
comment period and make changes, as appropriate, to the draft human
health and ecological risk assessments. EPA will then issue revised
risk assessments, if appropriate, and explain any changes to the draft
risk assessments, and respond to comments. In the Federal Register
notice announcing the availability of the revised risk assessments, if
any of the revised risk assessments indicate risks of concern, the
Agency may provide a comment period for the public to submit
suggestions for mitigating the risks identified in those revised risk
assessments. At present, EPA is releasing registration review draft
risk assessments for the pesticide cases identified in the following
table and further described in this unit.
Table 1--Registration Review Draft Risk Assessments
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical review
Registration review case name Pesticide docket manager, telephone
and No. identification No., and email
No. address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ancymidol, Case No. 3017...... EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0 Christina Scheltema,
482. (703) 308-2201,
scheltema.christina@epa.gov.
Fosthiazate, Case No. 7604.... EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0 Khue Nguyen, (703)
267. 347-0248,
nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
Lactofen, Case No. 7210....... EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0 Kelly Ballard, (703)
287. 305-8126,
ballard.kelly@epa.gov.
Polybutene resins, Case No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0 Joel Wolf, (703) 347-
4076. 649. 0228,
wolf.joel@epa.gov.
Quizalofop, Case No. 7215..... EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1 Khue Nguyen, (703)
089. 347-0248,
nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
Soap salts, Case No. 4083..... EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0 Monica Wait, (703)
519. 347-8019,
wait.monica@epa.gov.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ancymidol. The registration review docket for ancymidol
(EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0482) opened in the Federal Register issue of June 29,
2011 (76 FR 38166) (FRL-8877-4). Ancymidol is a plant growth regulator
that acts by inhibiting giberillin biosynthesis, resulting in plants
with more compact growth. Ancymidol is registered for use only on
container grown greenhouse and nursery ornamentals. It is used only on
plants grown for commercial production and has no food, feed, or
residential uses. The Final Work Plan for ancymidol described numerous
data requirements for registration review, and a registration review
timeline that included the issuance of a data call-in. However, EPA has
revisited the timeline and data requirements for registration review
and determined that a data call-in is not necessary for ancymidol. The
Agency has conducted qualitative environmental and human health risk
assessments for ancymidol based on the available information and on
limited use of this pesticide active ingredient.
Fosthiazate. The registration review docket for
fosthiazate (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0267) opened in the Federal Register issue
of June 24, 2009 (74 FR 30077) (FRL-8422-4). Fosthiazate is an
organophosphate nematicide and insecticide that is currently registered
for use on tomatoes. The Agency has conducted a human health risk
assessment for both dietary (food and drinking water) and occupational
exposure pathways. The Agency has also conducted a quantitative
ecological risk assessment, which includes a screening-level listed
species assessment. EPA acknowledges that further refinements to the
listed species assessment will be completed in future revisions and
requests public comment on specific areas that will reduce the
uncertainties associated with the characterization of risk to listed
species identified in the current assessment.
Lactofen. The registration review docket for lactofen
(EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0287) opened in the Federal Register issue of February
2, 2007 (72 FR 5050) (FRL-8113-1). Lactofen is a light dependent
peroxidizing herbicide (LDPH), and is registered for use on conifer
seedlings, cotton, kenaf, peanuts, and soybean, with local
registrations on fruiting vegetables, okra, snap beans, and
strawberries. For lactofen, the Agency has conducted an occupational
handler exposure risk assessment for the application of lactofen on
conifer seedlings, snap beans, soybeans, and strawberries. The Agency
has also conducted an ecological risk assessment, which includes a
screening-level listed species assessment. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species assessment will be completed
in future revisions and requests public comment
[[Page 17204]]
on specific areas that will reduce the uncertainties associated with
the characterization of risk to listed species identified in the
current assessment.
Polybutene resins. The registration review docket for
polybutene resins (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0649) opened in the Federal Register
issue of June 23, 2010 (75 FR 35810) (FRL-8832-3). Polybutene is a
sticky polymer registered for use as a bird and small mammal repellent.
It is used to prevent house sparrows, pigeons, and starlings from
roosting inside and outside of buildings, as well as to prevent beavers
from attacking trees and shrubs. There are no food/feed uses and, it is
exempt from a tolerance requirement when used as a sticker agent in
packaging of insect control products used on food crops. Polybutene is
approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an indirect food
additive and is used as an ingredient in cosmetic products that are
applied directly to the skin such as sun block or moisturizer, and that
may be incidentally ingested, such as lipstick. EPA has conducted a
qualitative assessment for both human health and environmental fate and
ecological risks.
Quizalofop. The registration review docket for
quizalofop ethyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1089) opened
in the Federal Register issue of December 19, 2007 (72 FR 71893) (FRL-
8342-9). Quizalofop ethyl is a 50/50 racemic mixture of R-and S-
enantiomers; quizalofop-p-ethyl is the purified R-enantiomer which is
pesticidally active. Quizalofop-p-ethyl is registered for use to
control weeds in food crops (including barley, beans, lentil, peas,
sorghum, soybean, and sugar beets), non-food crops grown for seed
(including alfalfa, carrots, garlic, onion, radish, and spinach), and
non-cropland (including rights-of-way and fencerows). Quizalofop-p-
ethyl is not registered for residential use. The Agency has conducted a
human health assessment for both dietary (food and drinking water) and
occupational exposure pathways. The Agency has conducted a quantitative
ecological risk assessment, including a listed species assessment, for
quizalofop. EPA acknowledges that further refinements to the listed
species assessment may be completed in future revisions and requests
public comment on specific areas that will reduce the uncertainties
associated with the characterization of risk to listed species
identified in the current assessment.
Soap salts. The registration review docket for soap salts
(EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0519) opened in the Federal Register issue of
September 15, 2008 (73 FR 53244) (FRL-8381-3). The case consists of
three active ingredients, the ammonium, potassium, and sodium salts of
fatty acids, which are registered for use as acaricides, algaecides,
herbicides, and insecticides on food and non-food crops in various
settings, chiefly residential and agricultural. Ammonium and sodium
soap salts are also used as animal repellents. Because the Agency has
not identified any toxicological endpoints for human health risk
assessment and because current product labels are adequate to protect
for potential eye and skin irritation, a qualitative human health risk
assessment was conducted for soap salts. The Agency has conducted a
quantitative ecological risk assessment, which includes a screening-
level listed species assessment. EPA acknowledges that further
refinements to the listed species assessment will be completed in
future revisions and requests public comment on specific areas that
will reduce the uncertainties associated with the characterization of
risk to listed species identified in the current assessment.
1. Other related information. Additional information on
ancymidol, fosthiazate, lactofen, polybutene resins, quizalofop, and
soap salts is available on the chemical pages for these pesticides
in Chemical Search, https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch,
and in each chemical's individual docket listed in Table 1. in Unit
III.A. Information on the Agency's registration review program and
its implementing regulation is available at https://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review.
2. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data
or information in response to this document. To be considered during
a pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information
must meet the following requirements:
To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion,
consider data or information submitted at a later date.
The data or information submitted must be presented in
a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written
transcript must accompany any information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be
submitted in paper or electronic form.
Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should
reconsider the data or information in the pesticide's registration
review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all
actions required in the final decision on the registration review
case have been completed.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Ancymidol, Fosthiazate, Lactofen,
Pesticides and pests, Polybutene resins, Quizalofop, Soap salts.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-06406 Filed 3-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P