Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees; Correction, 17102-17108 [2013-06362]
Download as PDF
17102
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: March 6, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013–06443 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
37 CFR Parts 1 and 41
[Docket No. PTO–C–2013–0010]
RIN 0651–AC86
Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees;
Correction
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Interim rule.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) is correcting
final regulations that were published in
the Federal Register on January 18,
2013 (78 FR 4212) (‘‘Fee Setting final
rule’’) to set and adjust patent fees as
authorized by the Leahy-Smith America
Invents Act (‘‘AIA’’). The Fee Setting
rule became effective on March 19, 2013
(except that certain regulations relating
to international applications become
effective on January 1, 2014). This
rulemaking corrects those final
regulations to revise minor
inconsistencies within the Fee Setting
final rule or arising from other recent
rulemakings under the AIA. It also
corrects minor inconsistencies with a
few of the Regulations under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and
typographical errors.
DATES: Effective March 20, 2013.
Comment deadline date: Written
comments must be received on or before
May 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent
by electronic mail message over the
Internet addressed to:
AC86.comments@uspto.gov. Comments
may also be submitted by postal mail
addressed to: Mail Stop Comments CFO,
Office of the Chief Financial Officer,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia
22313–1450, marked to the attention of
Michelle Picard, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer.
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Comments may also be sent by
electronic mail message over the
Internet via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal. See the Federal eRulemaking
Portal Web site (https://
www.regulations.gov) for additional
instructions on providing comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Although comments may be
submitted by postal mail, the Office
prefers to receive comments by
electronic mail message over the
Internet because sharing comments with
the public is more easily accomplished.
Electronic comments are preferred to be
submitted in plain text, but also may be
submitted in ADOBE® portable
document format or MICROSOFT
WORD® format. Comments not
submitted electronically should be
submitted on paper in a format that
facilitates convenient digital scanning
into ADOBE® portable document
format.
The comments will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Chief Financial Officer, currently
located in Madison West, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
Comments also will be available for
viewing via the Office’s Internet Web
site (https://www.uspto.gov). Because
comments will be made available for
public inspection, information that the
submitter does not desire to make
public, such as an address or phone
number, should not be included in the
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Picard, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, by telephone at (571)
272–6354 or by email at
michelle.picard@uspto.gov; or Dianne
Buie, Office of Planning and Budget, by
telephone at (571) 272–6301 or by email
at dianne.buie@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 18, 2013, the Office published
the Fee Setting final rule setting and
adjusting patent fees as authorized by
the AIA. See Setting and Adjusting
Patent Fees, 78 FR 4212 (Jan. 18, 2013)
(‘‘Fee Setting final rule’’). This interim
rule is a procedural correction to minor
inconsistencies within the Fee Setting
final rule or arising from other recent
rulemakings under the AIA, namely:
Changes to Implement the First Inventor
to File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith
America Invents Act, 78 FR 11024 (Feb.
14, 2013) (‘‘FITF final rule’’); Changes to
Implement Micro Entity Status for
Paying Patent Fees, 77 FR 75019 (Dec.
19, 2012) (‘‘Micro Entity final rule’’);
Changes to Implement the Inventor’s
Oath or Declaration Provisions of the
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 77
FR 48776 (Aug. 14, 2012) (‘‘Inventor’s
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Oath or Declaration final rule’’); and
Changes to Implement the Preissuance
Submissions by Third Parties Provision
of the Leahy-Smith America Invents
Act, 77 FR 42150 (July 17, 2012) (‘‘Third
Party Submissions final rule’’). It also
corrects minor inconsistencies with the
nomenclature and application of a few
of the Regulations under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. Good cause exists
to make these minor corrections without
prior notice and opportunity for
comment and to be effective shortly
after the effective date of the Fee Setting
final rule to avoid inconsistent
provisions. For ease of reference, this
interim rule provides the full text of the
corrected rules. These rules are 37 CFR
1.17, 1.20, 1.445, 1.482, 41.37 and 41.45.
Brief Description of Corrections
This interim rule corrects minor
inconsistencies and typographical errors
in the text of 37 CFR 1.17, 1.20, 1.445,
1.482, 41.37 and 41.45 (which were
published in the Federal Register on
January 18, 2013 (78 FR 4212)), as
described briefly below.
1. Section 1.17
In paragraph (b), revise ‘‘For fees in
proceedings before the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board, see § 41.20 of this title’’
to ‘‘For fees in proceedings before the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, see
§ 41.20 and § 42.15 of this title’’ to
correct a typographical error in the Fee
Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4285.
In paragraph (g), add ‘‘§ 1.46—for
filing an application on behalf of an
inventor by a person who otherwise
shows sufficient proprietary interest in
the matter’’ and ‘‘§ 1.55(f)—for filing a
belated certified copy of a foreign
application.’’ These corrections are
made because the FITF final rule
established these fees under this
paragraph. See 78 FR 11052.
In paragraph (g), delete ‘‘§ 1.47—for
filing by other than all the inventors or
a person not the inventor.’’ This
correction is made because the
Inventor’s Oath or Declaration final rule
removed this fee. See 77 FR 48816.
In paragraph (g), delete ‘‘§ 1.295—for
review of refusal to publish a statutory
invention registration’’ and ‘‘§ 1.296—to
withdraw a request for publication of a
statutory invention registration filed on
or after the date the notice of intent to
publish issued.’’ These corrections are
made because the FITF final rule
removed these fees. See 78 FR 11059.
In subparagraph (i)(1), add
‘‘§ 1.29(k)(3)—for processing a nonitemized fee deficiency based on an
error in micro entity status.’’ This
correction is made because the Micro-
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Entity final rule established this fee
under this paragraph. See 77 FR 75035.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise
‘‘§ 1.41—for supplying the name or
names of the inventor or inventors after
the filing date without an oath or
declaration as prescribed by § 1.63,
except in provisional applications’’ to
‘‘§ 1.41(b)—for supplying the name or
names of the inventor or joint inventors
in an application without either an
application data sheet or the inventor’s
oath or declaration, except in
provisional applications.’’ This
correction is made because the
Inventor’s Oath or Declaration final rule
established this fee under this
subparagraph. See 77 FR 48814.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise
‘‘§ 1.53(b)(3)’’ to ‘‘§ 1.53(c)(3)’’ to correct
a typographical error in the Fee Setting
final rule. See 78 FR 4286.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise
‘‘§ 1.55—for entry of late priority
papers’’ to ‘‘§ 1.55—for entry of a
priority claim or certified copy of a
foreign application after payment of the
issue fee.’’ This correction is made
because the FITF final rule established
this fee under this paragraph. See 78 FR
11052.
In subparagraph (i)(1), delete
‘‘§ 1.99(e)—for processing a belated
submission under § 1.99.’’ This
correction is made because the Third
Party Submissions final rule removed
this fee. See 77 FR 42173.
In subparagraph (i)(1), delete
‘‘§ 1.497(d)—for filing an oath or
declaration pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
371(c)(4) naming an inventive entity
different from the inventive entity set
forth in the international stage.’’ This
correction is made because the
Inventor’s Oath or Declaration final rule
removed this fee. See 77 FR 48824–25.
In subparagraph (i)(2), delete ‘‘By
other than a small or micro entity.’’ This
correction addresses a typographical
error in the Fee Setting final rule. See
78 FR 4267, Table 43.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Section 1.20
In paragraph (d), delete ‘‘By other
than a small or micro entity.’’ This
correction addresses a typographical
error in the Fee Setting final rule. See
78 FR 4223.
3. Section 1.445
In subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(A), revise
‘‘For a transmittal fee paid on or after
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international application having a
receipt date that is on or after January
1, 2014.’’ In subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(B),
revise ‘‘For a transmittal fee paid before
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international application having a
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
receipt date that is before January 1,
2014.’’
In subparagraph (a)(2)(i), revise ‘‘For a
search fee paid on or after January 1,
2014’’ to ‘‘For an international
application having a receipt date that is
on or after January 1, 2014.’’ In
subparagraph (a)(2)(ii), revise ‘‘For a
search fee paid before January 1, 2014’’
to ‘‘For an international application
having a receipt date that is before
January 1, 2014.’’
In subparagraph (a)(3)(i), revise ‘‘For a
supplemental search fee paid on or after
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international application having a
receipt date that is on or after January
1, 2014.’’ In subparagraph (a)(3)(ii),
revise ‘‘For a supplemental search fee
paid before January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international application having a
receipt date that is before January 1,
2014.’’
The foregoing corrections ensure
consistent nomenclature with and
application of Rules 14–16 under the
regulations adopted under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty.
In subparagraph (a)(4), delete
1.445(a)(4)(i) and 1.445(a)(4)(ii). This
corrects an inconsistency within 37 CFR
§ 1.445(a)(4) in the Fee Setting final
rule. See 78 FR 4289.
4. Section 1.482
In subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(A), revise
‘‘For an international search fee filed on
or after January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international preliminary examination
fee paid on or after January 1, 2014.’’ In
subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(B), revise ‘‘For an
international search fee filed before
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international preliminary examination
fee paid before January 1, 2014.’’
In subparagraph (a)(1)(ii)(A), revise
‘‘For an international search fee filed on
or after January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international preliminary examination
fee paid on or after January 1, 2014.’’ In
subparagraph (a)(1)(ii)(B), revise ‘‘For an
international search fee filed before
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘For an
international preliminary examination
fee paid before January 1, 2014.’’
In subparagraph (a)(2)(i), revise ‘‘For
an additional preliminary examination
fee filed on or after January 1, 2014’’ to
‘‘If the international preliminary
examination fee set forth in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section was paid on or after
January 1, 2014.’’ In subparagraph
(a)(2)(ii), revise ‘‘For an additional
preliminary examination fee filed before
January 1, 2014’’ to ‘‘If the international
preliminary examination fee set forth in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section was paid
before January 1, 2014.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17103
The foregoing corrections ensure
consistent nomenclature with and
application of Rules 57 and 58 under
the regulations adopted under the
Patent Cooperation Treaty.
5. Section 41.37
In paragraph (a), second sentence,
replace ‘‘§ 41.48’’ with ‘‘§ 41.45’’ to
correct a typographical error in the Fee
Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4291.
6. Section 41.45
In paragraph (b), add ‘‘to pay the’’ so
that the provision reads ‘‘On failure to
pay the fee set forth in * * *.’’ This
corrects a typographical error in the Fee
Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4291.
Rulemaking Considerations
A. Administrative Procedure Act: This
rulemaking is a procedural correction to
revise minor inconsistencies within the
Fee Setting final rule or arising from
other recent rulemakings under the AIA,
namely: The FITF final rule; the Micro
Entity final rule; the Inventor’s Oath or
Declaration final rule; and the Third
Party Submissions final rule. It also
corrects minor inconsistencies with the
nomenclature and application of a few
of the Regulations under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. This interim rule
does not set or adjust fees under the fee
setting authority provided in Section 10
of the AIA. These changes do not alter
the amount of fees or the obligation to
pay fees, nor do they alter the
substantive criteria of patentability or
patent term adjustment. Therefore, these
changes involve rules of agency practice
and procedure, and are not subject to
prior notice and an opportunity for
comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b); see also
Bachow Commc’ns, Inc. v. F.C.C., 237
F.3d 683, 690 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (rules
governing an application process are
procedural under the Administrative
Procedure Act).
In addition, good cause exists to make
these procedural changes without prior
notice and opportunity for comment
and to be effective immediately to avoid
inconsistencies and confusion with the
Fee Setting final rule.
Although prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or
(c) (or any other law), nor is the thirtyday delay in effectiveness under 5
U.S.C. 553(d) required, the Office
nonetheless provides the opportunity
for comment as it seeks the benefit of
the public’s views on these corrections
to the Fee Setting final rule.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act: For the
reasons set forth herein, the Deputy
General Counsel for General Law of the
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
17104
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
United States Patent and Trademark
Office has certified to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that changes in this
rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
The changes in this rulemaking are
procedural corrections to revise minor
inconsistencies within the Fee Setting
final rule or arising from other recent
rulemakings under the AIA. This
rulemaking also corrects minor
inconsistencies with the nomenclature
and application of a few of the
Regulations under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. This interim rule
does not set or adjust fees under the fee
setting authority provided in Section 10
of the AIA. These changes do not alter
the amount of fees or the obligation to
pay fees, nor do they alter the
substantive criteria of patentability or
patent term adjustment. These changes
do not add any additional requirements
(including information collection
requirements) or fees for patent
applicants or patentees. For these
reasons, the changes in this rulemaking
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
C. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review): This rulemaking
has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 (Sept. 30, 1993).
D. Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review): The
Office has complied with Executive
Order 13563. Specifically, the Office
has, to the extent feasible and
applicable: (1) Made a reasoned
determination that the benefits justify
the costs of the rule; (2) tailored the rule
to impose the least burden on society
consistent with obtaining the regulatory
objectives; (3) selected a regulatory
approach that maximizes net benefits;
(4) specified performance objectives; (5)
identified and assessed available
alternatives; (6) involved the public in
an open exchange of information and
perspectives among experts in relevant
disciplines, affected stakeholders in the
private sector and the public as a whole,
and provided on-line access to the
rulemaking docket; (7) attempted to
promote coordination, simplification,
and harmonization across government
agencies and identified goals designed
to promote innovation; (8) considered
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public; and (9) ensured
the objectivity of scientific and
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
technological information and
processes.
E. Executive Order 13132
(Federalism): This rulemaking does not
contain policies with federalism
implications sufficient to warrant
preparation of a Federalism Assessment
under Executive Order 13132 (Aug. 4,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation): This rulemaking will not:
(1) Have substantial direct effects on one
or more Indian tribes; (2) impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; or (3)
preempt tribal law. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required under Executive Order 13175
(Nov. 6, 2000).
G. Executive Order 13211 (Energy
Effects): This rulemaking is not a
significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211 because this
rulemaking is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required under Executive Order 13211
(May 18, 2001).
H. Executive Order 12988 (Civil
Justice Reform): This rulemaking meets
applicable standards to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and
reduce burden as set forth in sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order
12988 (Feb. 5, 1996).
I. Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children): This rulemaking does not
concern an environmental risk to health
or safety that may disproportionately
affect children under Executive Order
13045 (Apr. 21, 1997).
J. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property): This rulemaking will
not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications
under Executive Order 12630 (Mar. 15,
1988).
K. Congressional Review Act: Under
the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), prior to
issuing any final rule, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office will
submit a report containing the final rule
and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the Government
Accountability Office.
The changes in this rulemaking are
not expected to result in an annual
effect on the economy of 100 million
dollars or more, a major increase in
costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. Therefore, this
rulemaking is not expected to result in
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined in 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
L. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995: The changes set forth in this
rulemaking do not involve a Federal
intergovernmental mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, or a Federal
private sector mandate that will result
in the expenditure by the private sector
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. See 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
M. National Environmental Policy
Act: This rulemaking will not have any
effect on the quality of the environment
and is thus categorically excluded from
review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. See
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
N. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act: The requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) are not
applicable because this rulemaking does
not contain provisions which involve
the use of technical standards.
O. Paperwork Reduction Act: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires that the
Office consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. The
collection of information involved in
the Fee Setting final rule was submitted
to OMB with that final rule as a new
information collection request and was
preapproved under OMB control
number 0651–0072. The changes in this
interim rule are procedural corrections
to revise minor inconsistencies within
the Fee Setting final rule or arising from
other recent rulemakings under the AIA.
This rulemaking also corrects minor
inconsistencies with the nomenclature
and application of a few of the
Regulations under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. This interim rule
does not set or adjust fees under the fee
setting authority provided in Section 10
of the AIA. These changes do not alter
the amount of fees or the obligation to
pay fees, nor do they alter the
substantive criteria of patentability or
patent term adjustment. These changes
do not add any additional requirements
(including information collection
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requirements) or fees for patent
applicants or patentees. Therefore, the
Office is not resubmitting information
collection packages to OMB for its
review and approval because the
changes in this rulemaking do not affect
the information collection requirements
associated with the information
collections approved under OMB
control number 0651–0072 or any other
information collections.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Courts, Freedom of
information, Inventions and patents,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
37 CFR Part 41
Administrative practice and
procedure, Inventions and patents,
Lawyers.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 37 CFR parts 1 and 41 are
amended to read as follows:
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR
part 1 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2).
2. Section 1.17 is revised to read as
follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.17 Patent application and
reexamination processing fees.
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
$50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$150.00
$300.00
$600.00
$350.00
$700.00
$1,400.00
$550.00
$1,100.00
$2,200.00
$750.00
$1,500.00
Jkt 229001
$3,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$150.00
$300.00
$600.00
$300.00
$600.00
$1,200.00
$425.00
$850.00
$1,700.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
§ 1.36(a)—for revocation of a power of
attorney by fewer than all of the
applicants.
§ 1.53(e)—to accord a filing date.
§ 1.57(a)—to accord a filing date.
§ 1.182—for decision on a question
not specifically provided for.
§ 1.183—to suspend the rules.
§ 1.378(e)—for reconsideration of
decision on petition refusing to accept
delayed payment of maintenance fee in
an expired patent.
§ 1.741(b)—to accord a filing date to
an application under § 1.740 for
extension of a patent term.
PART 1—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PATENT CASES
(a) Extension fees pursuant to
§ 1.136(a):
(1) For reply within first month:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(2) For reply within second month:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(3) For reply within third month:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(4) For reply within fourth month:.
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(5) For reply within fifth month:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(b) For fees in proceedings before the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, see
§ 41.20 and § 42.15 of this title.
(c) For filing a request for prioritized
examination under § 1.102(e):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(d) For correction of inventorship in
an application after the first action
on the merits:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(e) To request continued examination pursuant to § 1.114:
(1) For filing a first request for continued examination pursuant to
§ 1.114 in an application:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(2) For filing a second or subsequent
request for continued examination
pursuant to § 1.114 in an application:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(f) For filing a petition under one of
the following sections which refers
to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(g) For filing a petition under one of
the following sections which refers
to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$50.00
$100.00
$200.00
§ 1.12—for access to an assignment
record.
§ 1.14—for access to an application.
§ 1.46—for filing an application on
behalf of an inventor by a person who
otherwise shows sufficient proprietary
interest in the matter.
§ 1.55(f)—for filing a belated certified
copy of a foreign application.
§ 1.59—for expungement of
information.
§ 1.103(a)—to suspend action in an
application.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17105
§ 1.136(b)—for review of a request for
extension of time when the provisions
of § 1.136(a) are not available.
§ 1.377—for review of decision
refusing to accept and record payment
of a maintenance fee filed prior to
expiration of a patent.
§ 1.550(c)—for patent owner requests
for extension of time in ex parte
reexamination proceedings.
§ 1.956—for patent owner requests for
extension of time in inter partes
reexamination proceedings.
§ 5.12—for expedited handling of a
foreign filing license.
§ 5.15—for changing the scope of a
license.
§ 5.25—for retroactive license.
(h) For filing a petition under one of
the following sections which refers
to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$35.00
$70.00
$140.00
§ 1.19(g)—to request documents in a
form other than provided in this part.
§ 1.84—for accepting color drawings
or photographs.
§ 1.91—for entry of a model or
exhibit.
§ 1.102(d)—to make an application
special.
§ 1.138(c)—to expressly abandon an
application to avoid publication.
§ 1.313—to withdraw an application
from issue.
§ 1.314—to defer issuance of a patent.
(i) Processing fees:
(1) For taking action under one of
the following sections which refers
to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$35.00
$70.00
$140.00
§ 1.28(c)(3)—for processing a nonitemized fee deficiency based on an
error in small entity status.
§ 1.29(k)(3)—for processing a nonitemized fee deficiency based on an
error in micro entity status.
§ 1.41(b)—for supplying the name or
names of the inventor or joint inventors
in an application without either an
application data sheet or the inventor’s
oath or declaration, except in
provisional applications.
§ 1.48—for correcting inventorship,
except in provisional applications.
§ 1.52(d)—for processing a
nonprovisional application filed with a
specification in a language other than
English.
§ 1.53(c)(3)—to convert a provisional
application filed under § 1.53(c) into a
nonprovisional application under
§ 1.53(b).
§ 1.55—for entry of a priority claim or
certified copy of a foreign application
after payment of the issue fee.
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
17106
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1.71(g)(2)—for processing a belated
amendment under § 1.71(g).
§ 1.102(e)—for requesting prioritized
examination of an application.
§ 1.103(b)—for requesting limited
suspension of action, continued
prosecution application for a design
patent (§ 1.53(d)).
§ 1.103(c)—for requesting limited
suspension of action, request for
continued examination (§ 1.114).
§ 1.103(d)—for requesting deferred
examination of an application.
§ 1.291(c)(5)—for processing a second
or subsequent protest by the same real
party in interest.
§ 3.81—for a patent to issue to
assignee, assignment submitted after
payment of the issue fee.
(2) For taking action under one of
the following sections which refers to this paragraph ..................
$130.00
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.217—for processing a redacted
copy of a paper submitted in the file of
an application in which a redacted copy
was submitted for the patent application
publication.
§ 1.221—for requesting voluntary
publication or republication of an
application.
(j) [Reserved]
(k) For filing a request for expedited
examination under § 1.155(a):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity. ...............................................
(l) For filing a petition for the revival
of an unavoidably abandoned application under 35 U.S.C. 111,
133, 364, or 371, for the unavoidably delayed payment of the issue
fee under 35 U.S.C. 151, or for the
revival of an unavoidably terminated reexamination proceeding
under 35 U.S.C. 133 (§ 1.137(a)):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(m) For filing a petition for the revival of an unintentionally abandoned application, for the unintentionally delayed payment of the
fee for issuing a patent, or for the
revival of an unintentionally terminated reexamination proceeding
under
35
U.S.C.
41(a)(7)
(§ 1.137(b)):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(n) [Reserved]
(o) [Reserved]
(p) For an information disclosure
statement under § 1.97(c) or (d) or
for the document fee for a submission under § 1.290:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(q) Processing fee for taking action
under one of the following sections which refers to this paragraph ................................................
VerDate Mar<14>2013
17:47 Mar 19, 2013
§ 1.41—to supply the name or names
of the inventor or inventors after the
filing date without a cover sheet as
prescribed by § 1.51(c)(1) in a
provisional application.
§ 1.48—for correction of inventorship
in a provisional application.
§ 1.53(c)(2)—to convert a
nonprovisional application filed under
§ 1.53(b) to a provisional application
under § 1.53(c).
(r) For entry of a submission after
final rejection under § 1.129(a):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(s) For each additional invention requested to be examined under
§ 1.129(b):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(t) For the acceptance of an unintentionally delayed claim for priority
under 35 U.S.C. 119, 120, 121, or
365(a) or (c) (§§ 1.55 and 1.78) or
for filing a request for the restoration of the right of priority under
§ 1.452:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)). ..........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$210.00
$420.00
$840.00
$210.00
$420.00
$840.00
$355.00
$710.00
$1,420.00
3. Section 1.20 is revised to read as
follows:
$225.00
$450.00
■
$900.00
§ 1.20
$160.00
$320.00
$640.00
$475.00
$950.00
$1,900.00
$45.00
$90.00
$180.00
$50.00
Jkt 229001
Post issuance fees.
(a) For providing a certificate of correction for applicant’s mistake
(§ 1.323) ...........................................
(b) Processing fee for correcting
inventorship in a patent (§ 1.324)
(c) In reexamination proceedings:
(1) For filing a request for ex parte
reexamination (§ 1.510(a)):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(2) [Reserved]
(3) For filing with a request for reexamination or later presentation at
any other time of each claim in
independent form in excess of 3
and also in excess of the number
of claims in independent form in
the patent under reexamination:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(4) For filing with a request for reexamination or later presentation at
any other time of each claim
(whether dependent or independent) in excess of 20 and also
in excess of the number of claims
in the patent under reexamination
(note that § 1.75(c) indicates how
multiple dependent claims are
considered for fee calculation purposes):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$100.00
$130.00
$3,000.00
$6,000.00
$12,000.00
$105.00
$210.00
$420.00
$20.00
$40.00
(5) If the excess claims fees required
by paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) of this
section are not paid with the request for reexamination or on later
presentation of the claims for
which the excess claims fees are
due, the fees required by paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) must be paid
or the claims canceled by amendment prior to the expiration of the
time period set for reply by the Office in any notice of fee deficiency
in order to avoid abandonment.
(6) For filing a petition in a reexamination proceeding, except for
those specifically enumerated in
§§ 1.550(i) and 1.937(d):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(7) For a refused request for ex parte
reexamination under § 1.510 (included in the request for ex parte
reexamination fee at § 1.20(c)(1)):
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(d) For filing each statutory disclaimer (§ 1.321) .............................
(e) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a design or
plant patent, based on an application filed on or after December 12,
1980, in force beyond four years,
the fee being due by three years
and six months after the original
grant:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(f) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a design or
plant patent, based on an application filed on or after December 12,
1980, in force beyond eight years,
the fee being due by seven years
and six months after the original
grant:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(g) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a design or
plant patent, based on an application filed on or after December 12,
1980, in force beyond twelve
years, the fee being due by eleven
years and six months after the
original grant:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(h) Surcharge for paying a maintenance fee during the six-month
grace period following the expiration of three years and six months,
seven years and six months, and
eleven years and six months after
the date of the original grant of a
patent based on an application
filed on or after December 12,
1980:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$80.00
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
$485.00
$970.00
$1,940.00
$900.00
$1,800.00
$3,600.00
$160.00
$400.00
$800.00
$1,600.00
$900.00
$1,800.00
$3,600.00
$1,850.00
$3,700.00
$7,400.00
$40.00
$80.00
$160.00
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Surcharge for accepting a maintenance fee after expiration of a patent for non-timely payment of a
maintenance fee where the delay
in payment is shown to the satisfaction of the Director to have
been—
(1) Unavoidable:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(2) Unintentional:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(j) For filing an application for extension of the term of a patent.
Application for extension under
§ 1.740 .............................................
Initial application for interim extension under § 1.790 ..........................
Subsequent application for interim
extension under § 1.790 .................
(k) In supplemental examination
proceedings:
(1) For processing and treating a request for supplemental examination:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(2) For ex parte reexamination ordered as a result of a supplemental
examination proceeding:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(3) For processing and treating, in a
supplemental examination proceeding, a non-patent document
over 20 sheets in length, per document:
(i) Between 21 and 50 sheets:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity. ...............................................
(ii) For each additional 50 sheets or
a fraction thereof:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
$175.00
$350.00
$700.00
$410.00
$820.00
$1,640.00
$1,120.00
$420.00
$220.00
$1,100.00
$2,200.00
$4,400.00
$3,025.00
$6,050.00
$12,100.00
$45.00
$90.00
$180.00
$70.00
$140.00
$280.00
4. Section 1.445 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 1.445 International application filing,
processing and search fees.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) The following fees and charges for
international applications are
established by law or by the Director
under the authority of 35 U.S.C. 376:
(1) A transmittal fee (see 35 U.S.C.
361(d) and PCT Rule 14) consisting of:
(i) A basic portion:
(A) For an international application
having a receipt date that is on or
after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(B) For an international application
having a receipt date that is before
January 1, 2014 ...............................
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
$60.00
$120.00
$240.00
$240.00
Jkt 229001
(ii) A non-electronic filing fee portion for any international application designating the United States
of America that is filed on or after
November 15, 2011, other than by
the Office electronic filing system,
except for a plant application:
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small entity ..........
(2) A search fee (see 35 U.S.C. 361(d)
and PCT Rule 16):
(i) For an international application
having a receipt date that is on or
after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(ii) For an international application
having a receipt date that is before
January 1, 2014 ...............................
(3) A supplemental search fee when
required, per additional invention:
(i) For an international application
having a receipt date that is on or
after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(ii) For an international application
having a receipt date that is before
January 1, 2014 ...............................
$200.00
$400.00
$520.00
$1,040.00
$2,080.00
$2,080.00
$520.00
$1,040.00
$2,080.00
§ 1.482 International preliminary
examination fees.
(a) The following fees and charges for
international preliminary examination
are established by the Director under the
authority of 35 U.S.C. 376:
(1) The following preliminary
examination fee is due on filing the
Demand:
(i) If an international search fee as set
forth in § 1.445(a)(2) has been paid on
the international application to the
United States Patent and Trademark
Office as an International Searching
Authority:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$190.00
$380.00
$760.00
$150.00
$300.00
$600.00
$600.00
(b) The handling fee is due on filing
the Demand and shall be prescribed in
PCT Rule 57.
PART 41—PRACTICE BEFORE THE
PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
6. The authority citation for 37 CFR
part 41 continues to read as follows:
■
$2,080.00
(4) A fee equivalent to the transmittal
fee in paragraph (a)(1) of this section
that would apply if the USPTO was the
Receiving Office for transmittal of an
international application to the
International Bureau for processing in
its capacity as a Receiving Office (PCT
Rule 19.4).
(b) The international filing fee shall be
as prescribed in PCT Rule 15.
■ 5. Section 1.482 is revised to read as
follows:
(A) For an international preliminary
examination fee paid on or after
January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(B) For an international preliminary
examination fee paid before January 1, 2014 ......................................
(ii) If the International Searching Authority for the international application was an authority other than
the United States Patent and
Trademark Office:
(A) For an international preliminary
examination fee paid on or after
January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(B) For an international preliminary
examination fee paid before January 1, 2014 $750.00.
(2) An additional preliminary examination fee when required, per additional invention:
(i) If the international preliminary
examination fee set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section was
paid on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (§ 1.29) ...............
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ...........
By other than a small or micro entity ................................................
(ii) If the international preliminary
examination fee set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section was
paid before January 1, 2014 ...........
17107
$150.00
$300.00
$600.00
$600.00
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2), 3(a)(2)(A), 21,
23, 32, 41, 134, 135, and Pub. L. 112–29.
7. Section 41.37 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:
■
§ 41.37
Appeal brief.
(a) Timing. Appellant must file a brief
under this section within two months
from the date of filing the notice of
appeal under § 41.31. The appeal brief
fee in an application or ex parte
reexamination proceeding is $0.00, but
if the appeal results in an examiner’s
answer, the appeal forwarding fee set
forth in § 41.20(b)(4) must be paid
within the time period specified in
§ 41.45 to avoid dismissal of an appeal.
(b) Failure to file a brief. On failure to
file the brief within the period specified
in paragraph (a) of this section, the
appeal will stand dismissed.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 41.45 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 41.45
Appeal forwarding fee.
(a) Timing. Appellant in an
application or ex parte reexamination
proceeding must pay the fee set forth in
§ 41.20(b)(4) within the later of two
months from the date of either the
examiner’s answer, or a decision
refusing to grant a petition under § 1.181
of this chapter to designate a new
ground of rejection in an examiner’s
answer.
(b) Failure to pay appeal forwarding
fee. On failure to pay the fee set forth
in § 41.20(b)(4) within the period
specified in paragraph (a) of this
section, the appeal will stand dismissed.
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
17108
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Extensions of time. Extensions of
time under § 1.136(a) of this title for
patent applications are not applicable to
the time period set forth in this section.
See § 1.136(b) of this title for extensions
of time to reply for patent applications
and § 1.550(c) of this title for extensions
of time to reply for ex parte
reexamination proceedings.
Dated: March 14, 2013.
Teresa Stanek Rea,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Acting Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–06362 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2012–0356; FRL–9768–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Washington; Revised Format for
Materials Incorporated by Reference
Table of Contents
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of
administrative change.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is revising the format for
materials submitted by the State of
Washington that are incorporated by
reference (IBR) into the Washington
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
regulations affected by this format
change have all been previously
submitted by the State of Washington
and approved by EPA. This format
revision will primarily affect the
‘‘Identification of plan’’ section, as well
as the format of the SIP materials that
will be available for public inspection at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA), the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information
Center located at EPA Headquarters in
Washington, DC, and the EPA Regional
Office. EPA is also adding a table in the
‘‘Identification of plan’’ section which
summarizes the approval actions that
EPA has taken on the non-regulatory
and quasi-regulatory portions of the
Washington SIP.
DATES: This action is effective April 19,
2013.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR
part 52 are available for inspection at
the following locations:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste, and
VerDate Mar<14>2013
15:24 Mar 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Toxics (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101;
Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, EPA Headquarters
Library, Infoterra Room (Room
Number 3334), EPA West Building,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; and
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
If you wish to obtain materials from
a docket in the EPA Headquarters
Library, please call the Office of Air and
Radiation (OAR) Docket/Telephone
number: 202–566–1742. For information
on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt, EPA Region 10, (206) 553–0256,
hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
I. Background
A. What a SIP Is
B. How EPA Enforces SIPs
C. How the State and EPA Updates the SIP
D. How EPA Compiles the SIPs
E. How EPA Organizes the SIP Compilation
F. Where You Can Find a Copy of the SIP
Compilation
G. The Format of the New Identification of
Plan Section
H. When a SIP Revision Becomes Federally
Enforceable
I. The Historical Record of SIP Revision
Approvals
II. What EPA Is Doing in This Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. Background
A. What a SIP Is
Each State has a SIP containing the
control measures and strategies used to
attain and maintain the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
The SIP is extensive, containing such
elements as air pollution control
regulations, emission inventories,
monitoring network, attainment
demonstrations, and enforcement
mechanisms.
B. How EPA Enforces SIPs
Each state must formally adopt the
control measures and strategies in the
SIP after the public has had an
opportunity to comment on them. They
are then submitted to EPA as SIP
revisions upon which EPA must
formally act. Once these control
measures and strategies are approved by
EPA, after notice and comment, they are
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
incorporated into the Federally
approved SIP and are identified in part
52 (Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans), title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
part 52). The actual state regulations
approved by EPA are not reproduced in
their entirety in 40 CFR part 52, but are
‘‘incorporated by reference’’ (IBR’d)
which means that EPA has approved a
given state regulation with a specific
effective date. This format allows both
EPA and the public to know which
measures are contained in a given SIP
and ensures that the state is enforcing
the regulations. It also allows EPA and
the public to take enforcement action,
should a state not enforce its SIPapproved regulations.
C. How the State and EPA Updates the
SIP
The SIP is a living document which
the state can revise as necessary to
address the unique air pollution
problems in the state. Therefore, EPA
must, from time to time, take action on
SIP revisions containing new and/or
revised regulations in order to make
them part of the SIP. On May 22, 1997
(62 FR 27968), EPA revised the
procedures for IBR’ing Federallyapproved SIPs, as a result of
consultations between EPA and the
Office of the Federal Register (OFR).
EPA began the process of developing:
(1) A revised SIP document for each
state that would be IBR’d under the
provisions of title 1 CFR part 51; (2) a
revised mechanism for announcing EPA
approval of revisions to an applicable
SIP and updating both the IBR
document and the CFR; and (3) a
revised format of the ‘‘Identification of
Plan’’ sections for each applicable
subpart to reflect these revised IBR
procedures. The description of the
revised SIP document, IBR procedures,
and ‘‘Identification of Plan’’ format are
discussed in further detail in the May
22, 1997, Federal Register document.
D. How EPA Compiles the SIPs
The Federally-approved regulations,
source-specific permits, and
nonregulatory provisions (entirely or
portions of) submitted by each state
agency have been compiled by EPA into
a ‘‘SIP compilation.’’ The SIP
compilation contains the updated
regulations, source-specific permits, and
nonregulatory provisions approved by
EPA through previous rulemaking
actions in the Federal Register.
E. How EPA Organizes the SIP
Compilation
Each compilation contains three parts.
Part one contains the regulations, part
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17102-17108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06362]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Parts 1 and 41
[Docket No. PTO-C-2013-0010]
RIN 0651-AC86
Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees; Correction
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is
correcting final regulations that were published in the Federal
Register on January 18, 2013 (78 FR 4212) (``Fee Setting final rule'')
to set and adjust patent fees as authorized by the Leahy-Smith America
Invents Act (``AIA''). The Fee Setting rule became effective on March
19, 2013 (except that certain regulations relating to international
applications become effective on January 1, 2014). This rulemaking
corrects those final regulations to revise minor inconsistencies within
the Fee Setting final rule or arising from other recent rulemakings
under the AIA. It also corrects minor inconsistencies with a few of the
Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and typographical
errors.
DATES: Effective March 20, 2013.
Comment deadline date: Written comments must be received on or
before May 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent by electronic mail message over the
Internet addressed to: AC86.comments@uspto.gov. Comments may also be
submitted by postal mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments CFO, Office
of the Chief Financial Officer, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia
22313-1450, marked to the attention of Michelle Picard, Office of the
Chief Financial Officer.
Comments may also be sent by electronic mail message over the
Internet via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. See the Federal
eRulemaking Portal Web site (https://www.regulations.gov) for additional
instructions on providing comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Although comments may be submitted by postal mail, the Office
prefers to receive comments by electronic mail message over the
Internet because sharing comments with the public is more easily
accomplished. Electronic comments are preferred to be submitted in
plain text, but also may be submitted in ADOBE[supreg] portable
document format or MICROSOFT WORD[supreg] format. Comments not
submitted electronically should be submitted on paper in a format that
facilitates convenient digital scanning into ADOBE[supreg] portable
document format.
The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer, currently located in Madison West,
Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. Comments also
will be available for viewing via the Office's Internet Web site
(https://www.uspto.gov). Because comments will be made available for
public inspection, information that the submitter does not desire to
make public, such as an address or phone number, should not be included
in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Picard, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, by telephone at (571) 272-6354 or by email at
michelle.picard@uspto.gov; or Dianne Buie, Office of Planning and
Budget, by telephone at (571) 272-6301 or by email at
dianne.buie@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 18, 2013, the Office published
the Fee Setting final rule setting and adjusting patent fees as
authorized by the AIA. See Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees, 78 FR
4212 (Jan. 18, 2013) (``Fee Setting final rule''). This interim rule is
a procedural correction to minor inconsistencies within the Fee Setting
final rule or arising from other recent rulemakings under the AIA,
namely: Changes to Implement the First Inventor to File Provisions of
the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 78 FR 11024 (Feb. 14, 2013)
(``FITF final rule''); Changes to Implement Micro Entity Status for
Paying Patent Fees, 77 FR 75019 (Dec. 19, 2012) (``Micro Entity final
rule''); Changes to Implement the Inventor's Oath or Declaration
Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 77 FR 48776 (Aug.
14, 2012) (``Inventor's Oath or Declaration final rule''); and Changes
to Implement the Preissuance Submissions by Third Parties Provision of
the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 77 FR 42150 (July 17, 2012)
(``Third Party Submissions final rule''). It also corrects minor
inconsistencies with the nomenclature and application of a few of the
Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. Good cause exists to make these minor corrections
without prior notice and opportunity for comment and to be effective
shortly after the effective date of the Fee Setting final rule to avoid
inconsistent provisions. For ease of reference, this interim rule
provides the full text of the corrected rules. These rules are 37 CFR
1.17, 1.20, 1.445, 1.482, 41.37 and 41.45.
Brief Description of Corrections
This interim rule corrects minor inconsistencies and typographical
errors in the text of 37 CFR 1.17, 1.20, 1.445, 1.482, 41.37 and 41.45
(which were published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2013 (78
FR 4212)), as described briefly below.
1. Section 1.17
In paragraph (b), revise ``For fees in proceedings before the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, see Sec. 41.20 of this title'' to ``For
fees in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, see Sec.
41.20 and Sec. 42.15 of this title'' to correct a typographical error
in the Fee Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4285.
In paragraph (g), add ``Sec. 1.46--for filing an application on
behalf of an inventor by a person who otherwise shows sufficient
proprietary interest in the matter'' and ``Sec. 1.55(f)--for filing a
belated certified copy of a foreign application.'' These corrections
are made because the FITF final rule established these fees under this
paragraph. See 78 FR 11052.
In paragraph (g), delete ``Sec. 1.47--for filing by other than all
the inventors or a person not the inventor.'' This correction is made
because the Inventor's Oath or Declaration final rule removed this fee.
See 77 FR 48816.
In paragraph (g), delete ``Sec. 1.295--for review of refusal to
publish a statutory invention registration'' and ``Sec. 1.296--to
withdraw a request for publication of a statutory invention
registration filed on or after the date the notice of intent to publish
issued.'' These corrections are made because the FITF final rule
removed these fees. See 78 FR 11059.
In subparagraph (i)(1), add ``Sec. 1.29(k)(3)--for processing a
non-itemized fee deficiency based on an error in micro entity status.''
This correction is made because the Micro-
[[Page 17103]]
Entity final rule established this fee under this paragraph. See 77 FR
75035.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise ``Sec. 1.41--for supplying the name
or names of the inventor or inventors after the filing date without an
oath or declaration as prescribed by Sec. 1.63, except in provisional
applications'' to ``Sec. 1.41(b)--for supplying the name or names of
the inventor or joint inventors in an application without either an
application data sheet or the inventor's oath or declaration, except in
provisional applications.'' This correction is made because the
Inventor's Oath or Declaration final rule established this fee under
this subparagraph. See 77 FR 48814.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise ``Sec. 1.53(b)(3)'' to ``Sec.
1.53(c)(3)'' to correct a typographical error in the Fee Setting final
rule. See 78 FR 4286.
In subparagraph (i)(1), revise ``Sec. 1.55--for entry of late
priority papers'' to ``Sec. 1.55--for entry of a priority claim or
certified copy of a foreign application after payment of the issue
fee.'' This correction is made because the FITF final rule established
this fee under this paragraph. See 78 FR 11052.
In subparagraph (i)(1), delete ``Sec. 1.99(e)--for processing a
belated submission under Sec. 1.99.'' This correction is made because
the Third Party Submissions final rule removed this fee. See 77 FR
42173.
In subparagraph (i)(1), delete ``Sec. 1.497(d)--for filing an oath
or declaration pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 371(c)(4) naming an inventive
entity different from the inventive entity set forth in the
international stage.'' This correction is made because the Inventor's
Oath or Declaration final rule removed this fee. See 77 FR 48824-25.
In subparagraph (i)(2), delete ``By other than a small or micro
entity.'' This correction addresses a typographical error in the Fee
Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4267, Table 43.
2. Section 1.20
In paragraph (d), delete ``By other than a small or micro entity.''
This correction addresses a typographical error in the Fee Setting
final rule. See 78 FR 4223.
3. Section 1.445
In subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(A), revise ``For a transmittal fee paid
on or after January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international application
having a receipt date that is on or after January 1, 2014.'' In
subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(B), revise ``For a transmittal fee paid before
January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international application having a
receipt date that is before January 1, 2014.''
In subparagraph (a)(2)(i), revise ``For a search fee paid on or
after January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international application having a
receipt date that is on or after January 1, 2014.'' In subparagraph
(a)(2)(ii), revise ``For a search fee paid before January 1, 2014'' to
``For an international application having a receipt date that is before
January 1, 2014.''
In subparagraph (a)(3)(i), revise ``For a supplemental search fee
paid on or after January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international
application having a receipt date that is on or after January 1,
2014.'' In subparagraph (a)(3)(ii), revise ``For a supplemental search
fee paid before January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international application
having a receipt date that is before January 1, 2014.''
The foregoing corrections ensure consistent nomenclature with and
application of Rules 14-16 under the regulations adopted under the
Patent Cooperation Treaty.
In subparagraph (a)(4), delete 1.445(a)(4)(i) and 1.445(a)(4)(ii).
This corrects an inconsistency within 37 CFR Sec. 1.445(a)(4) in the
Fee Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4289.
4. Section 1.482
In subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(A), revise ``For an international search
fee filed on or after January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international
preliminary examination fee paid on or after January 1, 2014.'' In
subparagraph (a)(1)(i)(B), revise ``For an international search fee
filed before January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international preliminary
examination fee paid before January 1, 2014.''
In subparagraph (a)(1)(ii)(A), revise ``For an international search
fee filed on or after January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international
preliminary examination fee paid on or after January 1, 2014.'' In
subparagraph (a)(1)(ii)(B), revise ``For an international search fee
filed before January 1, 2014'' to ``For an international preliminary
examination fee paid before January 1, 2014.''
In subparagraph (a)(2)(i), revise ``For an additional preliminary
examination fee filed on or after January 1, 2014'' to ``If the
international preliminary examination fee set forth in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section was paid on or after January 1, 2014.'' In subparagraph
(a)(2)(ii), revise ``For an additional preliminary examination fee
filed before January 1, 2014'' to ``If the international preliminary
examination fee set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section was paid
before January 1, 2014.''
The foregoing corrections ensure consistent nomenclature with and
application of Rules 57 and 58 under the regulations adopted under the
Patent Cooperation Treaty.
5. Section 41.37
In paragraph (a), second sentence, replace ``Sec. 41.48'' with
``Sec. 41.45'' to correct a typographical error in the Fee Setting
final rule. See 78 FR 4291.
6. Section 41.45
In paragraph (b), add ``to pay the'' so that the provision reads
``On failure to pay the fee set forth in * * *.'' This corrects a
typographical error in the Fee Setting final rule. See 78 FR 4291.
Rulemaking Considerations
A. Administrative Procedure Act: This rulemaking is a procedural
correction to revise minor inconsistencies within the Fee Setting final
rule or arising from other recent rulemakings under the AIA, namely:
The FITF final rule; the Micro Entity final rule; the Inventor's Oath
or Declaration final rule; and the Third Party Submissions final rule.
It also corrects minor inconsistencies with the nomenclature and
application of a few of the Regulations under the Patent Cooperation
Treaty, as well as typographical errors. This interim rule does not set
or adjust fees under the fee setting authority provided in Section 10
of the AIA. These changes do not alter the amount of fees or the
obligation to pay fees, nor do they alter the substantive criteria of
patentability or patent term adjustment. Therefore, these changes
involve rules of agency practice and procedure, and are not subject to
prior notice and an opportunity for comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b); see
also Bachow Commc'ns, Inc. v. F.C.C., 237 F.3d 683, 690 (D.C. Cir.
2001) (rules governing an application process are procedural under the
Administrative Procedure Act).
In addition, good cause exists to make these procedural changes
without prior notice and opportunity for comment and to be effective
immediately to avoid inconsistencies and confusion with the Fee Setting
final rule.
Although prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or (c) (or any other law), nor is
the thirty-day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) required,
the Office nonetheless provides the opportunity for comment as it seeks
the benefit of the public's views on these corrections to the Fee
Setting final rule.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act: For the reasons set forth herein,
the Deputy General Counsel for General Law of the
[[Page 17104]]
United States Patent and Trademark Office has certified to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration that changes
in this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
The changes in this rulemaking are procedural corrections to revise
minor inconsistencies within the Fee Setting final rule or arising from
other recent rulemakings under the AIA. This rulemaking also corrects
minor inconsistencies with the nomenclature and application of a few of
the Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, as well as
typographical errors. This interim rule does not set or adjust fees
under the fee setting authority provided in Section 10 of the AIA.
These changes do not alter the amount of fees or the obligation to pay
fees, nor do they alter the substantive criteria of patentability or
patent term adjustment. These changes do not add any additional
requirements (including information collection requirements) or fees
for patent applicants or patentees. For these reasons, the changes in
this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review): This
rulemaking has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 (Sept. 30, 1993).
D. Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review): The Office has complied with Executive Order 13563.
Specifically, the Office has, to the extent feasible and applicable:
(1) Made a reasoned determination that the benefits justify the costs
of the rule; (2) tailored the rule to impose the least burden on
society consistent with obtaining the regulatory objectives; (3)
selected a regulatory approach that maximizes net benefits; (4)
specified performance objectives; (5) identified and assessed available
alternatives; (6) involved the public in an open exchange of
information and perspectives among experts in relevant disciplines,
affected stakeholders in the private sector and the public as a whole,
and provided on-line access to the rulemaking docket; (7) attempted to
promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization across
government agencies and identified goals designed to promote
innovation; (8) considered approaches that reduce burdens and maintain
flexibility and freedom of choice for the public; and (9) ensured the
objectivity of scientific and technological information and processes.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): This rulemaking does not
contain policies with federalism implications sufficient to warrant
preparation of a Federalism Assessment under Executive Order 13132
(Aug. 4, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation): This rulemaking
will not: (1) Have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes; (2) impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; or (3) preempt tribal law. Therefore, a tribal summary
impact statement is not required under Executive Order 13175 (Nov. 6,
2000).
G. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects): This rulemaking is not a
significant energy action under Executive Order 13211 because this
rulemaking is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of
Energy Effects is not required under Executive Order 13211 (May 18,
2001).
H. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform): This rulemaking
meets applicable standards to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity,
and reduce burden as set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988 (Feb. 5, 1996).
I. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children): This rulemaking
does not concern an environmental risk to health or safety that may
disproportionately affect children under Executive Order 13045 (Apr.
21, 1997).
J. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property): This
rulemaking will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Mar. 15, 1988).
K. Congressional Review Act: Under the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), prior to issuing any final rule, the
United States Patent and Trademark Office will submit a report
containing the final rule and other required information to the United
States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the Government Accountability Office.
The changes in this rulemaking are not expected to result in an
annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more, a major
increase in costs or prices, or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises in domestic and export markets. Therefore, this
rulemaking is not expected to result in a ``major rule'' as defined in
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995: The changes set forth in
this rulemaking do not involve a Federal intergovernmental mandate that
will result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or more in any
one year, or a Federal private sector mandate that will result in the
expenditure by the private sector of 100 million dollars (as adjusted)
or more in any one year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Therefore, no actions are necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. See 2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.
M. National Environmental Policy Act: This rulemaking will not have
any effect on the quality of the environment and is thus categorically
excluded from review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969. See 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
N. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act: The
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) are not applicable because
this rulemaking does not contain provisions which involve the use of
technical standards.
O. Paperwork Reduction Act: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires that the Office consider the impact of
paperwork and other information collection burdens imposed on the
public. The collection of information involved in the Fee Setting final
rule was submitted to OMB with that final rule as a new information
collection request and was preapproved under OMB control number 0651-
0072. The changes in this interim rule are procedural corrections to
revise minor inconsistencies within the Fee Setting final rule or
arising from other recent rulemakings under the AIA. This rulemaking
also corrects minor inconsistencies with the nomenclature and
application of a few of the Regulations under the Patent Cooperation
Treaty, as well as typographical errors. This interim rule does not set
or adjust fees under the fee setting authority provided in Section 10
of the AIA. These changes do not alter the amount of fees or the
obligation to pay fees, nor do they alter the substantive criteria of
patentability or patent term adjustment. These changes do not add any
additional requirements (including information collection
[[Page 17105]]
requirements) or fees for patent applicants or patentees. Therefore,
the Office is not resubmitting information collection packages to OMB
for its review and approval because the changes in this rulemaking do
not affect the information collection requirements associated with the
information collections approved under OMB control number 0651-0072 or
any other information collections.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and procedure, Courts, Freedom of
information, Inventions and patents, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
37 CFR Part 41
Administrative practice and procedure, Inventions and patents,
Lawyers.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 37 CFR parts 1 and 41
are amended to read as follows:
PART 1--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES
0
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR part 1 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2).
0
2. Section 1.17 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.17 Patent application and reexamination processing fees.
(a) Extension fees pursuant to Sec. 1.136(a):
(1) For reply within first month:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $50.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $100.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $200.00
(2) For reply within second month:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $150.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $300.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $600.00
(3) For reply within third month:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $350.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $700.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,400.00
(4) For reply within fourth month:.......................
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $550.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,100.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $2,200.00
(5) For reply within fifth month:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $750.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,500.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $3,000.00
(b) For fees in proceedings before the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board, see Sec. 41.20 and Sec. 42.15 of this
title.
(c) For filing a request for prioritized examination under
Sec. 1.102(e):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $1,000.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $2,000.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $4,000.00
(d) For correction of inventorship in an application after
the first action on the merits:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $150.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $300.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $600.00
(e) To request continued examination pursuant to Sec.
1.114:
(1) For filing a first request for continued examination
pursuant to Sec. 1.114 in an application:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $300.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $600.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,200.00
(2) For filing a second or subsequent request for continued
examination pursuant to Sec. 1.114 in an application:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $425.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $850.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,700.00
(f) For filing a petition under one of the following
sections which refers to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $100.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $200.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $400.00
Sec. 1.36(a)--for revocation of a power of attorney by fewer than
all of the applicants.
Sec. 1.53(e)--to accord a filing date.
Sec. 1.57(a)--to accord a filing date.
Sec. 1.182--for decision on a question not specifically provided
for.
Sec. 1.183--to suspend the rules.
Sec. 1.378(e)--for reconsideration of decision on petition
refusing to accept delayed payment of maintenance fee in an expired
patent.
Sec. 1.741(b)--to accord a filing date to an application under
Sec. 1.740 for extension of a patent term.
(g) For filing a petition under one of the following
sections which refers to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $50.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $100.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $200.00
Sec. 1.12--for access to an assignment record.
Sec. 1.14--for access to an application.
Sec. 1.46--for filing an application on behalf of an inventor by a
person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the
matter.
Sec. 1.55(f)--for filing a belated certified copy of a foreign
application.
Sec. 1.59--for expungement of information.
Sec. 1.103(a)--to suspend action in an application.
Sec. 1.136(b)--for review of a request for extension of time when
the provisions of Sec. 1.136(a) are not available.
Sec. 1.377--for review of decision refusing to accept and record
payment of a maintenance fee filed prior to expiration of a patent.
Sec. 1.550(c)--for patent owner requests for extension of time in
ex parte reexamination proceedings.
Sec. 1.956--for patent owner requests for extension of time in
inter partes reexamination proceedings.
Sec. 5.12--for expedited handling of a foreign filing license.
Sec. 5.15--for changing the scope of a license.
Sec. 5.25--for retroactive license.
(h) For filing a petition under one of the following
sections which refers to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $35.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $70.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $140.00
Sec. 1.19(g)--to request documents in a form other than provided
in this part.
Sec. 1.84--for accepting color drawings or photographs.
Sec. 1.91--for entry of a model or exhibit.
Sec. 1.102(d)--to make an application special.
Sec. 1.138(c)--to expressly abandon an application to avoid
publication.
Sec. 1.313--to withdraw an application from issue.
Sec. 1.314--to defer issuance of a patent.
(i) Processing fees:
(1) For taking action under one of the following sections
which refers to this paragraph:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $35.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $70.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $140.00
Sec. 1.28(c)(3)--for processing a non-itemized fee deficiency
based on an error in small entity status.
Sec. 1.29(k)(3)--for processing a non-itemized fee deficiency
based on an error in micro entity status.
Sec. 1.41(b)--for supplying the name or names of the inventor or
joint inventors in an application without either an application data
sheet or the inventor's oath or declaration, except in provisional
applications.
Sec. 1.48--for correcting inventorship, except in provisional
applications.
Sec. 1.52(d)--for processing a nonprovisional application filed
with a specification in a language other than English.
Sec. 1.53(c)(3)--to convert a provisional application filed under
Sec. 1.53(c) into a nonprovisional application under Sec. 1.53(b).
Sec. 1.55--for entry of a priority claim or certified copy of a
foreign application after payment of the issue fee.
[[Page 17106]]
Sec. 1.71(g)(2)--for processing a belated amendment under Sec.
1.71(g).
Sec. 1.102(e)--for requesting prioritized examination of an
application.
Sec. 1.103(b)--for requesting limited suspension of action,
continued prosecution application for a design patent (Sec. 1.53(d)).
Sec. 1.103(c)--for requesting limited suspension of action,
request for continued examination (Sec. 1.114).
Sec. 1.103(d)--for requesting deferred examination of an
application.
Sec. 1.291(c)(5)--for processing a second or subsequent protest by
the same real party in interest.
Sec. 3.81--for a patent to issue to assignee, assignment submitted
after payment of the issue fee.
(2) For taking action under one of the following sections $130.00
which refers to this paragraph..........................
Sec. 1.217--for processing a redacted copy of a paper submitted in
the file of an application in which a redacted copy was submitted for
the patent application publication.
Sec. 1.221--for requesting voluntary publication or republication
of an application.
(j) [Reserved]
(k) For filing a request for expedited examination under
Sec. 1.155(a):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $225.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $450.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $900.00
(l) For filing a petition for the revival of an unavoidably
abandoned application under 35 U.S.C. 111, 133, 364, or
371, for the unavoidably delayed payment of the issue fee
under 35 U.S.C. 151, or for the revival of an unavoidably
terminated reexamination proceeding under 35 U.S.C. 133
(Sec. 1.137(a)):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $160.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $320.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $640.00
(m) For filing a petition for the revival of an
unintentionally abandoned application, for the
unintentionally delayed payment of the fee for issuing a
patent, or for the revival of an unintentionally
terminated reexamination proceeding under 35 U.S.C.
41(a)(7) (Sec. 1.137(b)):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $475.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $950.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,900.00
(n) [Reserved]
(o) [Reserved]
(p) For an information disclosure statement under Sec.
1.97(c) or (d) or for the document fee for a submission
under Sec. 1.290:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $45.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $90.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $180.00
(q) Processing fee for taking action under one of the $50.00
following sections which refers to this paragraph.........
Sec. 1.41--to supply the name or names of the inventor or
inventors after the filing date without a cover sheet as prescribed by
Sec. 1.51(c)(1) in a provisional application.
Sec. 1.48--for correction of inventorship in a provisional
application.
Sec. 1.53(c)(2)--to convert a nonprovisional application filed
under Sec. 1.53(b) to a provisional application under Sec. 1.53(c).
(r) For entry of a submission after final rejection under
Sec. 1.129(a):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $210.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $420.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $840.00
(s) For each additional invention requested to be examined
under Sec. 1.129(b):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $210.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $420.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $840.00
(t) For the acceptance of an unintentionally delayed claim
for priority under 35 U.S.C. 119, 120, 121, or 365(a) or
(c) (Sec. Sec. 1.55 and 1.78) or for filing a request
for the restoration of the right of priority under Sec.
1.452:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $355.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $710.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,420.00
0
3. Section 1.20 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.20 Post issuance fees.
(a) For providing a certificate of correction for $100.00
applicant's mistake (Sec. 1.323)........................
(b) Processing fee for correcting inventorship in a patent $130.00
(Sec. 1.324)............................................
(c) In reexamination proceedings:
(1) For filing a request for ex parte reexamination (Sec.
1.510(a)):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $3,000.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $6,000.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $12,000.00
(2) [Reserved]
(3) For filing with a request for reexamination or later
presentation at any other time of each claim in
independent form in excess of 3 and also in excess of the
number of claims in independent form in the patent under
reexamination:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $105.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $210.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $420.00
(4) For filing with a request for reexamination or later
presentation at any other time of each claim (whether
dependent or independent) in excess of 20 and also in
excess of the number of claims in the patent under
reexamination (note that Sec. 1.75(c) indicates how
multiple dependent claims are considered for fee
calculation purposes):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $20.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $40.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $80.00
(5) If the excess claims fees required by paragraphs (c)(3)
and (4) of this section are not paid with the request for
reexamination or on later presentation of the claims for
which the excess claims fees are due, the fees required by
paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) must be paid or the claims
canceled by amendment prior to the expiration of the time
period set for reply by the Office in any notice of fee
deficiency in order to avoid abandonment.
(6) For filing a petition in a reexamination proceeding,
except for those specifically enumerated in Sec. Sec.
1.550(i) and 1.937(d):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $485.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $970.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,940.00
(7) For a refused request for ex parte reexamination under
Sec. 1.510 (included in the request for ex parte
reexamination fee at Sec. 1.20(c)(1)):
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $900.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,800.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $3,600.00
(d) For filing each statutory disclaimer (Sec. 1.321).... $160.00
(e) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a
design or plant patent, based on an application filed on
or after December 12, 1980, in force beyond four years,
the fee being due by three years and six months after the
original grant:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $400.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $800.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,600.00
(f) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a
design or plant patent, based on an application filed on
or after December 12, 1980, in force beyond eight years,
the fee being due by seven years and six months after the
original grant:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $900.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,800.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $3,600.00
(g) For maintaining an original or reissue patent, except a
design or plant patent, based on an application filed on
or after December 12, 1980, in force beyond twelve years,
the fee being due by eleven years and six months after the
original grant:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $1,850.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $3,700.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $7,400.00
(h) Surcharge for paying a maintenance fee during the six-
month grace period following the expiration of three years
and six months, seven years and six months, and eleven
years and six months after the date of the original grant
of a patent based on an application filed on or after
December 12, 1980:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $40.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $80.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $160.00
[[Page 17107]]
(i) Surcharge for accepting a maintenance fee after
expiration of a patent for non-timely payment of a
maintenance fee where the delay in payment is shown to the
satisfaction of the Director to have been--
(1) Unavoidable:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $175.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $350.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $700.00
(2) Unintentional:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $410.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $820.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $1,640.00
(j) For filing an application for extension of the term of
a patent..................................................
Application for extension under Sec. 1.740............... $1,120.00
Initial application for interim extension under Sec. $420.00
1.790.....................................................
Subsequent application for interim extension under Sec. $220.00
1.790.....................................................
(k) In supplemental examination proceedings:
(1) For processing and treating a request for supplemental
examination:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $1,100.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $2,200.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $4,400.00
(2) For ex parte reexamination ordered as a result of a
supplemental examination proceeding:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $3,025.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $6,050.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $12,100.00
(3) For processing and treating, in a supplemental
examination proceeding, a non-patent document over 20
sheets in length, per document:
(i) Between 21 and 50 sheets:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $45.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $90.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $180.00
(ii) For each additional 50 sheets or a fraction thereof:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $70.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $140.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $280.00
0
4. Section 1.445 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.445 International application filing, processing and search
fees.
(a) The following fees and charges for international applications
are established by law or by the Director under the authority of 35
U.S.C. 376:
(1) A transmittal fee (see 35 U.S.C. 361(d) and PCT Rule 14)
consisting of:
(i) A basic portion:
(A) For an international application having a receipt date
that is on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $60.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $120.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $240.00
(B) For an international application having a receipt date $240.00
that is before January 1, 2014............................
(ii) A non-electronic filing fee portion for any
international application designating the United States of
America that is filed on or after November 15, 2011, other
than by the Office electronic filing system, except for a
plant application:
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $200.00
By other than a small entity............................. $400.00
(2) A search fee (see 35 U.S.C. 361(d) and PCT Rule 16):
(i) For an international application having a receipt date
that is on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $520.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,040.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $2,080.00
(ii) For an international application having a receipt date $2,080.00
that is before January 1, 2014............................
(3) A supplemental search fee when required, per additional
invention:
(i) For an international application having a receipt date
that is on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $520.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $1,040.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $2,080.00
(ii) For an international application having a receipt date $2,080.00
that is before January 1, 2014............................
(4) A fee equivalent to the transmittal fee in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section that would apply if the USPTO was the Receiving Office for
transmittal of an international application to the International Bureau
for processing in its capacity as a Receiving Office (PCT Rule 19.4).
(b) The international filing fee shall be as prescribed in PCT Rule
15.
0
5. Section 1.482 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.482 International preliminary examination fees.
(a) The following fees and charges for international preliminary
examination are established by the Director under the authority of 35
U.S.C. 376:
(1) The following preliminary examination fee is due on filing the
Demand:
(i) If an international search fee as set forth in Sec.
1.445(a)(2) has been paid on the international application to the
United States Patent and Trademark Office as an International Searching
Authority:
(A) For an international preliminary examination fee paid
on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $150.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $300.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $600.00
(B) For an international preliminary examination fee paid $600.00
before January 1, 2014....................................
(ii) If the International Searching Authority for the
international application was an authority other than the
United States Patent and Trademark Office:
(A) For an international preliminary examination fee paid
on or after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $190.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $380.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $760.00
(B) For an international preliminary examination fee paid
before January 1, 2014 $750.00............................
(2) An additional preliminary examination fee when
required, per additional invention:
(i) If the international preliminary examination fee set
forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section was paid on or
after January 1, 2014:
By a micro entity (Sec. 1.29).......................... $150.00
By a small entity (Sec. 1.27(a))....................... $300.00
By other than a small or micro entity.................... $600.00
(ii) If the international preliminary examination fee set $600.00
forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section was paid before
January 1, 2014...........................................
(b) The handling fee is due on filing the Demand and shall be
prescribed in PCT Rule 57.
PART 41--PRACTICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
0
6. The authority citation for 37 CFR part 41 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2), 3(a)(2)(A), 21, 23, 32, 41, 134,
135, and Pub. L. 112-29.
0
7. Section 41.37 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:
Sec. 41.37 Appeal brief.
(a) Timing. Appellant must file a brief under this section within
two months from the date of filing the notice of appeal under Sec.
41.31. The appeal brief fee in an application or ex parte reexamination
proceeding is $0.00, but if the appeal results in an examiner's answer,
the appeal forwarding fee set forth in Sec. 41.20(b)(4) must be paid
within the time period specified in Sec. 41.45 to avoid dismissal of
an appeal.
(b) Failure to file a brief. On failure to file the brief within
the period specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the appeal will
stand dismissed.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 41.45 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 41.45 Appeal forwarding fee.
(a) Timing. Appellant in an application or ex parte reexamination
proceeding must pay the fee set forth in Sec. 41.20(b)(4) within the
later of two months from the date of either the examiner's answer, or a
decision refusing to grant a petition under Sec. 1.181 of this chapter
to designate a new ground of rejection in an examiner's answer.
(b) Failure to pay appeal forwarding fee. On failure to pay the fee
set forth in Sec. 41.20(b)(4) within the period specified in paragraph
(a) of this section, the appeal will stand dismissed.
[[Page 17108]]
(c) Extensions of time. Extensions of time under Sec. 1.136(a) of
this title for patent applications are not applicable to the time
period set forth in this section. See Sec. 1.136(b) of this title for
extensions of time to reply for patent applications and Sec. 1.550(c)
of this title for extensions of time to reply for ex parte
reexamination proceedings.
Dated: March 14, 2013.
Teresa Stanek Rea,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-06362 Filed 3-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P