List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR® System, 16601-16604 [2013-06015]
Download as PDF
16601
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 52
Monday, March 18, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC–2012–0308]
RIN 3150–AJ22
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: MAGNASTOR® System
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
spent fuel storage regulations by
revising the NAC International, Inc.
(NAC) Modular Advanced Generation
Nuclear All-purpose Storage
(MAGNASTOR®) System listing within
the ‘‘List of Approved Spent Fuel
Storage Casks’’ to include Amendment
No. 3 to Certificate of Compliance (CoC)
No. 1031. Amendment No. 3 revises
authorized contents to include:
Pressurized water reactor (PWR)
damaged fuel contained in damaged fuel
(DF) cans that are placed in a damaged
fuel basket assembly; PWR fuel
assemblies with nonfuel hardware per
the expanded definition in the
Amendment No. 3 application; and
PWR fuel assemblies with up to five
activated stainless steel fuel
replacement rods at a maximum
burnup/exposure of 32.5 gigawatt days
per metric ton of uranium (GWd/MTU).
Additionally, Amendment No. 3 revises
paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the
CoC Technical Specifications (TS) to
clarify that the maximum design basis
earthquake accelerations of 0.37g in the
horizontal direction (without cask
sliding) and 0.25g in the vertical
direction at the independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI) pad top
surface do not result in cask tip-over.
Amendment No. 3 also makes
additional changes to appendix A,
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<14>2013
13:48 Mar 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
Technical Specifications and Design
Features for the MAGNASTOR® System,
and appendix B, Approved Contents for
the MAGNASTOR® System, of the CoC.
DATES: The final rule is effective June 3,
2013, unless significant adverse
comments are received by April 17,
2013. If the rule is withdrawn as a result
of such comments, timely notice of the
withdrawal will be published in the
Federal Register. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC staff is
able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2012–0308 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this final rule. You may
access information and comment
submittals related to this final
rulemaking, which the NRC possesses
and is publicly available by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0308.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An
electronic copy of the proposed CoC,
including appendices A and B of the TS,
and preliminary safety evaluation report
(SER) can be found in ADAMS under
Package Accession No. ML12227A900.
The ADAMS Accession No. for the
MAGNASTOR® Cask System
Amendment No. 3 application dated
August 26, 2010, is ML102420569.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O–1F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naiem S. Tanious, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415–
6103, email: Naiem.Tanious@nrc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Procedural Background
II. Background
III. Discussion of Changes
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
V. Agreement State Compatibility
VI. Plain Writing
VII. Finding of No Significant Environmental
Impact: Availability
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
IX. Regulatory Analysis
X. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
XI. Backfit Analysis
XII. Congressional Review Act
I. Procedural Background
This rule is limited to the changes
contained in Amendment No. 3 to CoC
No. 1031 and does not include other
aspects of the MAGNASTOR® Cask
System design. The NRC is using the
‘‘direct final rule procedure’’ to issue
this amendment because it represents a
limited and routine change to an
existing CoC that is expected to be
noncontroversial. Adequate protection
of public health and safety continues to
be ensured. The amendment to the rule
will become effective on June 3, 2013.
However, if the NRC receives significant
adverse comments on this direct final
rule by April 17, 2013, then the NRC
will publish a document that withdraws
this action and will subsequently
address the comments received in a
final rule as a response to the
companion proposed rule published in
the Proposed Rule section of this issue
of the Federal Register. Absent
significant modifications to the
proposed revisions requiring
republication, the NRC will not initiate
a second comment period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff
to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position
or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
16602
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff
to make a change (other than editorial)
to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing
comments, please see the companion
proposed rule published in the
Proposed Rule section of this issue of
the Federal Register.
II. Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act (NWPA) of 1982, as
amended, requires that ‘‘the Secretary
[of the Department of Energy] shall
establish a demonstration program, in
cooperation with the private sector, for
the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at
civilian nuclear power reactor sites,
with the objective of establishing one or
more technologies that the [Nuclear
Regulatory] Commission may, by rule,
approve for use at the sites of civilian
nuclear power reactors without, to the
maximum extent practicable, the need
for additional site-specific approvals by
the Commission.’’ Section 133 of the
NWPA states, in part, that ‘‘[the
Commission] shall, by rule, establish
procedures for the licensing of any
technology approved by the
Commission under Section 219(a) [sic:
218(a)] for use at the site of any civilian
nuclear power reactor.’’
To implement this mandate, the
Commission approved dry storage of
spent nuclear fuel in NRC-approved
casks under a general license by
publishing a final rule in part 72 of Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), which added a new subpart K
within 10 CFR part 72 entitled, ‘‘General
License for Storage of Spent Fuel at
Power Reactor Sites’’ (55 FR 29181; July
18, 1990). This rule also established a
new subpart L within 10 CFR part 72
entitled, ‘‘Approval of Spent Fuel
Storage Casks,’’ which contains
procedures and criteria for obtaining
NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask
designs. The NRC subsequently issued a
final rule on November 21, 2008 (73 FR
70587), that approved the
MAGNASTOR® Cask System design and
added it to the list of NRC-approved
cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214 as CoC
No. 1031.
III. Discussion of Changes
On August 26, 2010 NAC submitted a
request to the NRC to amend CoC No.
1031 (ML102420569). NAC
VerDate Mar<14>2013
13:48 Mar 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
supplemented its request on the
following dates: February 4, 2011
(ML11138A224), February 16, 2011
(ML110480498), August 15, 2011
(ML11229A701), October 3, 2011
(ML11287A020), March 21, 2012
(ML120820463), March 30, 2012
(ML12094A056), and April 6, 2012
(ML12104A025). The amendment
revises authorized contents to include:
(1) PWR damaged fuel contained in
damaged fuel cans that are placed in a
damaged fuel basket assembly; (2) PWR
fuel assemblies with nonfuel hardware
per the expanded definition in the
Amendment No. 3 application; and (3)
PWR fuel assemblies with up to five
activated stainless steel fuel
replacement rods at a maximum
burnup/exposure of 32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment also revises
paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the
CoC to clarify that the maximum design
basis earthquake accelerations of 0.37g
in the horizontal direction (without cask
sliding) and 0.25g in the vertical
direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do
not result in cask tip-over. Furthermore,
this amendment makes additional
changes to appendix A (ML12227A913)
and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the
CoC. The changes to the aforementioned
documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
As documented in the SER
(ML12227A914), the NRC staff
performed a detailed safety evaluation
of the proposed CoC amendment
request. There are no significant
changes to cask design requirements in
the proposed CoC amendment.
Considering the specific design
requirements for each accident
condition, the design of the cask would
prevent loss of containment, shielding,
and criticality control. If there is no loss
of containment, shielding, or criticality
control, the environmental impacts
would be insignificant. This amendment
does not reflect a significant change in
design or fabrication of the cask. In
addition, any resulting occupational
exposure or offsite dose rates from the
implementation of Amendment No. 3
would remain well within the 10 CFR
part 20 limits. Thus, the proposed CoC
changes will not result in any
radiological or non-radiological
environmental impacts that significantly
differ from the environmental impacts
evaluated in the environmental
assessment supporting the November
21, 2008, final rule. There will be no
significant change in the types or
significant revisions in the amounts of
any effluent released, no significant
increase in the individual or cumulative
radiation exposure, and no significant
increase in the potential for or
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
consequences from radiological
accidents.
This direct final rule revises the
MAGNASTOR® System listing in 10
CFR 72.214 by adding Amendment No.
3 to CoC No.1031. The amendment
consists of the changes previously
described, as set forth in the revised
CoC and TS. The revised TS are
identified in the SER.
The amended MAGNASTOR® cask
design, when used under the conditions
specified in the CoC, the TS, and the
NRC’s regulations, will meet the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72; thus,
adequate protection of public health and
safety will continue to be ensured.
When this direct final rule becomes
effective, persons who hold a general
license under 10 CFR 72.210 may load
spent nuclear fuel into MAGNASTOR®
Systems that meet the criteria of
Amendment No. 3 to CoC No. 1031
under 10 CFR 72.212.
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113) requires that Federal agencies
use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this direct final rule, the
NRC will revise the MAGNASTOR®
Cask System design listed in § 72.214
(List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks). This action does not constitute
the establishment of a standard that
contains generally applicable
requirements.
V. Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ‘‘Policy Statement on
Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs’’ approved by
the Commission on June 30, 1997, and
published in the Federal Register on
September 3, 1997 (62 FR 46517), this
rule is classified as Compatibility
Category ‘‘NRC.’’ Compatibility is not
required for Category ‘‘NRC’’
regulations. The NRC program elements
in this category are those that relate
directly to areas of regulation reserved
to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the provisions of
10 CFR. Although an Agreement State
may not adopt program elements
reserved to the NRC, it may wish to
inform its licensees of certain
requirements via a mechanism that is
consistent with the particular State’s
administrative procedure laws, but does
not confer regulatory authority on the
State.
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
VI. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to
write documents in a clear, concise,
well-organized manner that also follows
other best practices appropriate to the
subject or field and the intended
audience. The NRC has attempted to use
plain language in promulgating this rule
consistent with the Federal Plain
Writing Act guidelines.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VII. Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the
NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR
part 51, the NRC has determined that
this rule, if adopted, would not be a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required. The NRC has prepared an
environmental assessment
(ML13043A147) and, on the basis of this
environmental assessment, has made a
finding of no significant impact. This
rule amends the CoC for the
MAGNASTOR® System cask design
within the list of approved spent fuel
storage casks that power reactor
licensees can use to store spent fuel at
reactor sites under a general license.
Specifically, NAC requested changes to
revise authorized contents to include:
(1) PWR damaged fuel contained in
damaged fuel cans that are placed in a
damaged fuel basket assembly; (2) PWR
fuel assemblies with nonfuel hardware
per the expanded definition in the
Amendment No. 3 application; and (3)
PWR fuel assemblies with up to five
activated stainless steel fuel
replacement rods at a maximum
burnup/exposure of 32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment revises paragraph
4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the CoC to
clarify that the maximum design basis
earthquake accelerations of 0.37g in the
horizontal direction (without cask
sliding) and 0.25g in the vertical
direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do
not result in cask tip-over. Furthermore,
this amendment makes additional
changes to appendix A (ML12227A913)
and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the
CoC. The changes to the aforementioned
documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact on
which this determination is based are
available for inspection at the NRC PDR,
Room O–1F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Single copies of the
environmental assessment and finding
VerDate Mar<14>2013
13:48 Mar 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
of no significant impact are available
from Naiem Tanious, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415–
6103, email: Naiem.Tanious@nrc.gov.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
Statement
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
and, therefore, is not subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing
requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Approval Number 3150–0132.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
IX. Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the
NRC issued an amendment to 10 CFR
part 72 to provide for the storage of
spent nuclear fuel under a general
license in cask designs approved by the
NRC. Any nuclear power reactor
licensee can use NRC-approved cask
designs to store spent nuclear fuel if it
notifies the NRC in advance, the spent
fuel is stored under the conditions
specified in the cask’s CoC, and the
conditions of the general license are
met. A list of NRC-approved cask
designs is contained in 10 CFR 72.214.
On November 21, 2008 (73 FR 70587),
the NRC issued an amendment to 10
CFR part 72 that approved the
MAGNASTOR® Cask System design by
adding it to the list of NRC-approved
cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214.
On August 26, 2010 (ML102420569),
and as supplemented on February 4,
2011 (ML11138A224), February 16,
2011 (ML110480498), August 15, 2011
(ML11229A701), October 3, 2011
(ML11287A020), March 21, 2012
(ML120820463), March 30, 2012
(ADAMS ML12094A056), and April 6,
2012 (ML12104A025), NAC submitted
an application to amend the
MAGNASTOR® Cask System. The
amendment revises authorized contents
to include: (1) PWR damaged fuel
contained in damaged fuel cans that are
placed in a damaged fuel basket
assembly; (2) PWR fuel assemblies with
nonfuel hardware per the expanded
definition in the application; and (3)
PWR fuel assemblies with up to five
activated stainless steel fuel
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16603
replacement rods at a maximum
burnup/exposure of 32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment also revises
paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the
CoC to clarify that the maximum design
basis earthquake accelerations of 0.37g
in the horizontal direction (without cask
sliding) and 0.25g in the vertical
direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do
not result in cask tip-over. Furthermore,
this amendment makes additional
changes to appendix A (ML12227A913)
and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the
CoC. The changes to the aforementioned
documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
The alternative to this action is to
withhold approval of Amendment No. 3
and to require any 10 CFR part 72
general licensee seeking to load spent
nuclear fuel into MAGNASTOR®
Systems under the changes described in
Amendment No. 3 to request an
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 72.212 and 72.214. Under this
alternative, each interested 10 CFR part
72 licensee would have to prepare, and
the NRC would have to review, a
separate exemption request, thereby
increasing the administrative burden
upon the NRC and the costs to each
licensee.
Approval of the direct final rule is
consistent with previous NRC actions.
Further, as documented in the SER and
the environmental assessment, the
direct final rule will have no adverse
effect on public health and safety or the
environment. This direct final rule has
no significant identifiable impact or
benefit on other Government agencies.
Based on this regulatory analysis, the
NRC concludes that the requirements of
the direct final rule are commensurate
with the NRC’s responsibilities for
public health and safety and the
common defense and security. No other
available alternative is believed to be as
satisfactory, and thus, this action is
recommended.
X. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC
certifies that this rule will not, if issued,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule affects only
nuclear power plant licensees and NAC
International, Inc. These entities do not
fall within the scope of the definition of
small entities set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act or the size standards
established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
XI. Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the
backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does not
apply to this direct final rule because
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
16604
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
this amendment does not involve any
provisions that would impose backfits
as defined in 10 CFR 72.62 Therefore, a
backfit analysis is not required.
XII. Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act
of 1996, the NRC has determined that
this action is not a major rule and has
verified this determination with the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and
procedure, Criminal penalties,
Manpower training programs, Nuclear
materials, Occupational safety and
health, Penalties, Radiation protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Spent
fuel, Whistleblowing.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982, as amended; and 5 U.S.C.
552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the
following amendments to 10 CFR part
72.
PART 72—LICENSING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF SPENT
NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL
RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND
REACTOR-RELATED GREATER THAN
CLASS C WASTE
1. The authority citation for part 72
continues to read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
13:48 Mar 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel
storage casks.
*
*
*
*
*
Certificate Number: 1031.
Initial Certificate Effective Date:
February 4, 2009.
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date:
August 30, 2010.
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date:
January 30, 2012.
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date:
June 3, 2013.
SAR Submitted by: NAC
International, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis
Report for the MAGNASTOR® System.
Docket Number: 72–1031.
Certificate Expiration Date: February
4, 2024.
Model Number: MAGNASTOR®.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of March 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–06015 Filed 3–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0247; Directorate
Identifier 2013–CE–001–AD; Amendment
39–17397; AD 2013–06–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 51, 53,
57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186,
187, 189, 223, 234, 274 (42 U.S.C. 2071, 2073,
2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201,
2232, 2233, 2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2273,
2282, 2021); Energy Reorganization Act sec.
201, 202, 206, 211 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842,
5846, 5851); National Environmental Policy
Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear Waste
Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141
148 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153, 10155,
10157, 10161, 10168); sec. 1704, 112 Stat.
2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act
of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109–58, 119 Stat. 549
(2005).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs.
Nuclear Waste Policy Act 142(b) and 148(c),
(d) (42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)).
Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic
Energy Act sec. 189 (42 U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear
Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154).
Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear
Waste Policy Act sec. 145(g) (42 U.S.C.
10165(g)). Subpart J also issued under
Nuclear Waste Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h)
(42 U.S.C. 10137(a), 10161(h)). Subpart K is
also issued under sec. 218(a) (42 U.S.C.
10198).
VerDate Mar<14>2013
2. In § 72.214, Certificate of
Compliance 1031 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Airworthiness Directives; Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Models DA 42 M–NG and DA 42 NG
airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the
aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as the
engine air inlet filter is subject to icing.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 8,
2013.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of April 8, 2013.
We must receive comments on this
AD by May 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra+e 5,
A–2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria,
telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43
2622 26780; email: office@diamondair.at; Internet: https://www.diamondair.at. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816)
329–4090; email: mike.kiesov@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD No.: 2012–
0269, dated December 19, 2012 (referred
to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16601-16604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06015]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2013 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 16601]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC-2012-0308]
RIN 3150-AJ22
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR[supreg]
System
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its
spent fuel storage regulations by revising the NAC International, Inc.
(NAC) Modular Advanced Generation Nuclear All-purpose Storage
(MAGNASTOR[supreg]) System listing within the ``List of Approved Spent
Fuel Storage Casks'' to include Amendment No. 3 to Certificate of
Compliance (CoC) No. 1031. Amendment No. 3 revises authorized contents
to include: Pressurized water reactor (PWR) damaged fuel contained in
damaged fuel (DF) cans that are placed in a damaged fuel basket
assembly; PWR fuel assemblies with nonfuel hardware per the expanded
definition in the Amendment No. 3 application; and PWR fuel assemblies
with up to five activated stainless steel fuel replacement rods at a
maximum burnup/exposure of 32.5 gigawatt days per metric ton of uranium
(GWd/MTU). Additionally, Amendment No. 3 revises paragraph 4.3.1(i) in
appendix A of the CoC Technical Specifications (TS) to clarify that the
maximum design basis earthquake accelerations of 0.37g in the
horizontal direction (without cask sliding) and 0.25g in the vertical
direction at the independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI)
pad top surface do not result in cask tip-over. Amendment No. 3 also
makes additional changes to appendix A, Technical Specifications and
Design Features for the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System, and appendix B,
Approved Contents for the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System, of the CoC.
DATES: The final rule is effective June 3, 2013, unless significant
adverse comments are received by April 17, 2013. If the rule is
withdrawn as a result of such comments, timely notice of the withdrawal
will be published in the Federal Register. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC staff
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2012-0308 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information for this final rule. You may
access information and comment submittals related to this final
rulemaking, which the NRC possesses and is publicly available by any of
the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012-0308.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An electronic copy of the
proposed CoC, including appendices A and B of the TS, and preliminary
safety evaluation report (SER) can be found in ADAMS under Package
Accession No. ML12227A900. The ADAMS Accession No. for the
MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System Amendment No. 3 application dated August
26, 2010, is ML102420569.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naiem S. Tanious, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-
6103, email: Naiem.Tanious@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Procedural Background
II. Background
III. Discussion of Changes
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
V. Agreement State Compatibility
VI. Plain Writing
VII. Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
IX. Regulatory Analysis
X. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
XI. Backfit Analysis
XII. Congressional Review Act
I. Procedural Background
This rule is limited to the changes contained in Amendment No. 3 to
CoC No. 1031 and does not include other aspects of the
MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System design. The NRC is using the ``direct
final rule procedure'' to issue this amendment because it represents a
limited and routine change to an existing CoC that is expected to be
noncontroversial. Adequate protection of public health and safety
continues to be ensured. The amendment to the rule will become
effective on June 3, 2013. However, if the NRC receives significant
adverse comments on this direct final rule by April 17, 2013, then the
NRC will publish a document that withdraws this action and will
subsequently address the comments received in a final rule as a
response to the companion proposed rule published in the Proposed Rule
section of this issue of the Federal Register. Absent significant
modifications to the proposed revisions requiring republication, the
NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider)
its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
[[Page 16602]]
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing comments, please see the
companion proposed rule published in the Proposed Rule section of this
issue of the Federal Register.
II. Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) of 1982, as
amended, requires that ``the Secretary [of the Department of Energy]
shall establish a demonstration program, in cooperation with the
private sector, for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at civilian
nuclear power reactor sites, with the objective of establishing one or
more technologies that the [Nuclear Regulatory] Commission may, by
rule, approve for use at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors
without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional
site-specific approvals by the Commission.'' Section 133 of the NWPA
states, in part, that ``[the Commission] shall, by rule, establish
procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the
Commission under Section 219(a) [sic: 218(a)] for use at the site of
any civilian nuclear power reactor.''
To implement this mandate, the Commission approved dry storage of
spent nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license by
publishing a final rule in part 72 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), which added a new subpart K within 10 CFR part 72
entitled, ``General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor
Sites'' (55 FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This rule also established a new
subpart L within 10 CFR part 72 entitled, ``Approval of Spent Fuel
Storage Casks,'' which contains procedures and criteria for obtaining
NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask designs. The NRC subsequently
issued a final rule on November 21, 2008 (73 FR 70587), that approved
the MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System design and added it to the list of
NRC-approved cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214 as CoC No. 1031.
III. Discussion of Changes
On August 26, 2010 NAC submitted a request to the NRC to amend CoC
No. 1031 (ML102420569). NAC supplemented its request on the following
dates: February 4, 2011 (ML11138A224), February 16, 2011 (ML110480498),
August 15, 2011 (ML11229A701), October 3, 2011 (ML11287A020), March 21,
2012 (ML120820463), March 30, 2012 (ML12094A056), and April 6, 2012
(ML12104A025). The amendment revises authorized contents to include:
(1) PWR damaged fuel contained in damaged fuel cans that are placed in
a damaged fuel basket assembly; (2) PWR fuel assemblies with nonfuel
hardware per the expanded definition in the Amendment No. 3
application; and (3) PWR fuel assemblies with up to five activated
stainless steel fuel replacement rods at a maximum burnup/exposure of
32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment also revises paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the
CoC to clarify that the maximum design basis earthquake accelerations
of 0.37g in the horizontal direction (without cask sliding) and 0.25g
in the vertical direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do not result in
cask tip-over. Furthermore, this amendment makes additional changes to
appendix A (ML12227A913) and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the CoC. The
changes to the aforementioned documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
As documented in the SER (ML12227A914), the NRC staff performed a
detailed safety evaluation of the proposed CoC amendment request. There
are no significant changes to cask design requirements in the proposed
CoC amendment. Considering the specific design requirements for each
accident condition, the design of the cask would prevent loss of
containment, shielding, and criticality control. If there is no loss of
containment, shielding, or criticality control, the environmental
impacts would be insignificant. This amendment does not reflect a
significant change in design or fabrication of the cask. In addition,
any resulting occupational exposure or offsite dose rates from the
implementation of Amendment No. 3 would remain well within the 10 CFR
part 20 limits. Thus, the proposed CoC changes will not result in any
radiological or non-radiological environmental impacts that
significantly differ from the environmental impacts evaluated in the
environmental assessment supporting the November 21, 2008, final rule.
There will be no significant change in the types or significant
revisions in the amounts of any effluent released, no significant
increase in the individual or cumulative radiation exposure, and no
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents.
This direct final rule revises the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System listing
in 10 CFR 72.214 by adding Amendment No. 3 to CoC No.1031. The
amendment consists of the changes previously described, as set forth in
the revised CoC and TS. The revised TS are identified in the SER.
The amended MAGNASTOR[supreg] cask design, when used under the
conditions specified in the CoC, the TS, and the NRC's regulations,
will meet the requirements of 10 CFR part 72; thus, adequate protection
of public health and safety will continue to be ensured. When this
direct final rule becomes effective, persons who hold a general license
under 10 CFR 72.210 may load spent nuclear fuel into MAGNASTOR[supreg]
Systems that meet the criteria of Amendment No. 3 to CoC No. 1031 under
10 CFR 72.212.
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that
are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless
the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC will revise
the MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System design listed in Sec. 72.214 (List
of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks). This action does not constitute
the establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable
requirements.
V. Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997,
and published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997 (62 FR
46517), this rule is classified as Compatibility Category ``NRC.''
Compatibility is not required for Category ``NRC'' regulations. The NRC
program elements in this category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the provisions of 10 CFR. Although an Agreement
State may not adopt program elements reserved to the NRC, it may wish
to inform its licensees of certain requirements via a mechanism that is
consistent with the particular State's administrative procedure laws,
but does not confer regulatory authority on the State.
[[Page 16603]]
VI. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, well-organized manner
that also follows other best practices appropriate to the subject or
field and the intended audience. The NRC has attempted to use plain
language in promulgating this rule consistent with the Federal Plain
Writing Act guidelines.
VII. Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended,
and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has
determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
NRC has prepared an environmental assessment (ML13043A147) and, on the
basis of this environmental assessment, has made a finding of no
significant impact. This rule amends the CoC for the MAGNASTOR[supreg]
System cask design within the list of approved spent fuel storage casks
that power reactor licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor
sites under a general license. Specifically, NAC requested changes to
revise authorized contents to include: (1) PWR damaged fuel contained
in damaged fuel cans that are placed in a damaged fuel basket assembly;
(2) PWR fuel assemblies with nonfuel hardware per the expanded
definition in the Amendment No. 3 application; and (3) PWR fuel
assemblies with up to five activated stainless steel fuel replacement
rods at a maximum burnup/exposure of 32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment revises paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the CoC
to clarify that the maximum design basis earthquake accelerations of
0.37g in the horizontal direction (without cask sliding) and 0.25g in
the vertical direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do not result in
cask tip-over. Furthermore, this amendment makes additional changes to
appendix A (ML12227A913) and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the CoC. The
changes to the aforementioned documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
on which this determination is based are available for inspection at
the NRC PDR, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Single copies of the environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact are available from
Naiem Tanious, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-6103, email: Naiem.Tanious@nrc.gov.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
and, therefore, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Approval Number 3150-0132.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
IX. Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10
CFR part 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a
general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. Any nuclear power
reactor licensee can use NRC-approved cask designs to store spent
nuclear fuel if it notifies the NRC in advance, the spent fuel is
stored under the conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the
conditions of the general license are met. A list of NRC-approved cask
designs is contained in 10 CFR 72.214. On November 21, 2008 (73 FR
70587), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 CFR part 72 that approved the
MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System design by adding it to the list of NRC-
approved cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214.
On August 26, 2010 (ML102420569), and as supplemented on February
4, 2011 (ML11138A224), February 16, 2011 (ML110480498), August 15, 2011
(ML11229A701), October 3, 2011 (ML11287A020), March 21, 2012
(ML120820463), March 30, 2012 (ADAMS ML12094A056), and April 6, 2012
(ML12104A025), NAC submitted an application to amend the
MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask System. The amendment revises authorized
contents to include: (1) PWR damaged fuel contained in damaged fuel
cans that are placed in a damaged fuel basket assembly; (2) PWR fuel
assemblies with nonfuel hardware per the expanded definition in the
application; and (3) PWR fuel assemblies with up to five activated
stainless steel fuel replacement rods at a maximum burnup/exposure of
32.5 GWd/MTU.
This amendment also revises paragraph 4.3.1(i) in appendix A of the
CoC to clarify that the maximum design basis earthquake accelerations
of 0.37g in the horizontal direction (without cask sliding) and 0.25g
in the vertical direction at the ISFSI pad top surface do not result in
cask tip-over. Furthermore, this amendment makes additional changes to
appendix A (ML12227A913) and appendix B (ML12227A912) of the CoC. The
changes to the aforementioned documents are identified with revisions
bars in the margin of each document.
The alternative to this action is to withhold approval of Amendment
No. 3 and to require any 10 CFR part 72 general licensee seeking to
load spent nuclear fuel into MAGNASTOR[supreg] Systems under the
changes described in Amendment No. 3 to request an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 72.214. Under this alternative, each
interested 10 CFR part 72 licensee would have to prepare, and the NRC
would have to review, a separate exemption request, thereby increasing
the administrative burden upon the NRC and the costs to each licensee.
Approval of the direct final rule is consistent with previous NRC
actions. Further, as documented in the SER and the environmental
assessment, the direct final rule will have no adverse effect on public
health and safety or the environment. This direct final rule has no
significant identifiable impact or benefit on other Government
agencies. Based on this regulatory analysis, the NRC concludes that the
requirements of the direct final rule are commensurate with the NRC's
responsibilities for public health and safety and the common defense
and security. No other available alternative is believed to be as
satisfactory, and thus, this action is recommended.
X. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
NRC certifies that this rule will not, if issued, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This direct
final rule affects only nuclear power plant licensees and NAC
International, Inc. These entities do not fall within the scope of the
definition of small entities set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act or the size standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
XI. Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does
not apply to this direct final rule because
[[Page 16604]]
this amendment does not involve any provisions that would impose
backfits as defined in 10 CFR 72.62 Therefore, a backfit analysis is
not required.
XII. Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act of 1996, the NRC has determined
that this action is not a major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and procedure, Criminal penalties, Manpower
training programs, Nuclear materials, Occupational safety and health,
Penalties, Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Spent fuel, Whistleblowing.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as
amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the following
amendments to 10 CFR part 72.
PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND REACTOR-
RELATED GREATER THAN CLASS C WASTE
0
1. The authority citation for part 72 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69,
81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 223, 234, 274 (42 U.S.C.
2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2273, 2282, 2021); Energy Reorganization Act
sec. 201, 202, 206, 211 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846, 5851); National
Environmental Policy Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear Waste
Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141 148 (42 U.S.C. 10151,
10152, 10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750
(44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-
58, 119 Stat. 549 (2005).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. Nuclear Waste Policy
Act 142(b) and 148(c), (d) (42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)).
Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic Energy Act sec. 189 (42
U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154).
Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec.
145(g) (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also issued under Nuclear
Waste Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h) (42 U.S.C. 10137(a),
10161(h)). Subpart K is also issued under sec. 218(a) (42 U.S.C.
10198).
0
2. In Sec. 72.214, Certificate of Compliance 1031 is revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 72.214 List of approved spent fuel storage casks.
* * * * *
Certificate Number: 1031.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: February 4, 2009.
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: August 30, 2010.
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: January 30, 2012.
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: June 3, 2013.
SAR Submitted by: NAC International, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis Report for the MAGNASTOR[supreg]
System.
Docket Number: 72-1031.
Certificate Expiration Date: February 4, 2024.
Model Number: MAGNASTOR[supreg].
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of March 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-06015 Filed 3-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P