Deposit of Biological Materials, 16472-16474 [2013-06046]
Download as PDF
16472
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC565
Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico;
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 33 Gulf of
Mexico Gag and Greater Amberjack Data
Scoping Webinar.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The SEDAR 33 assessment of
the Gulf of Mexico gag and greater
amberjack fisheries will consist of a
series of workshops and supplemental
webinars. This notice is for a data
scoping webinar of the Data Workshop
portion of the SEDAR process. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: The SEDAR 33 Data Scoping
Webinar will be held on April 10, 2013.
The webinar will begin at 1 p.m. and
conclude no later than 5 p.m. EDT.
ADDRESSES:
Meeting address: The data scoping
webinar will be held via GoToWebinar.
The webinar is open to members of the
public. Those interested in participating
should contact Ryan Rindone at SEDAR
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT)
to request an invitation providing
webinar access information. Please
request meeting information at least 24
hours in advance.
SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place
Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC
29405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Rindone, SEDAR Coordinator;
telephone: (813) 348–1630; email:
ryan.rindone@gulfcouncil.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
of Mexico, South Atlantic, and
Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils, in conjunction with NOAA
Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions,
have implemented the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process, a multi-step method for
determining the status of fish stocks in
the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a threestep process including: (1) Data
Workshop; (2) Assessment Process
including a workshop and webinars;
and (3) Review Workshop. The product
of the Data Workshop is a data report
which compiles and evaluates potential
datasets and recommends which
datasets are appropriate for assessment
analyses. The product of the Assessment
VerDate Mar<14>2013
17:37 Mar 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
Process is a stock assessment report
which describes the fisheries, evaluates
the status of the stock, estimates
biological benchmarks, projects future
population conditions, and recommends
research and monitoring needs. The
assessment is independently peer
reviewed at the Review Workshop. The
product of the Review Workshop is a
Consensus Summary documenting
panel opinions regarding the strengths
and weaknesses of the stock assessment
and input data. Participants for SEDAR
Workshops are appointed by the Gulf of
Mexico, South Atlantic, and Caribbean
Fishery Management Councils and
NOAA Fisheries Southeast Regional
Office, Highly Migratory Species
Management Division, and Southeast
Fisheries Science Center. Participants
include: data collectors and database
managers; stock assessment scientists,
biologists, and researchers; constituency
representatives including fishermen,
environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
international experts; and staff of
Councils, Commissions, and state and
federal agencies.
The items of discussion in the SEDAR
33 Data Scoping Webinar are as follows:
Panelists will review data determined
to be pertinent in the assessment for
Gulf of Mexico gag and greater
amberjack prior to the Data Workshop.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
identified in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is accessible to people
with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary
aids should be directed to the SEDAR
office (see ADDRESSES) at least 10
business days prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–05975 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email:
InformationCollection@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0022 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo,
Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, United States Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email
to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The deposit of biological materials as
part of a patent application is required
by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2) and outlined in 37
CFR 1.801–1.809. Every patent must
contain a description of the invention
sufficient to enable a person
(knowledgeable in the relevant science),
to make and use the invention as
specified by 35 U.S.C. 112. The term
‘‘biological material’’ is defined by 37
CFR 1.801 as including material that is
capable of self-replication, either
directly or indirectly. When the
invention involves a biological material,
sometimes words and figures are not
sufficient to satisfy the statutory
requirement for patentability under 35
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
16473
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Notices
U.S.C. 112. In such cases, the required
biological material must either be: (1)
Known and readily available (neither
condition alone is sufficient) or, (2)
deposited in a suitable depository that
has been recognized as an International
Depositary Authority (IDA) established
under the Budapest Treaty, or a
depository recognized by the USPTO to
meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112.
In cases where a deposit is necessary,
it must be made under conditions that
assure access to those entitled thereto
under 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 U.S.C. 122
and upon issuance as a patent that all
restriction to public access is
permanently removed.
In order to meet and satisfy
requirements for international
patenting, all countries signing the
Budapest Treaty must recognize the
deposit of biological material with any
International Depositary Authority
(IDA).
II. Method of Collection
depository seeking approval to store
biological materials approximately 5
hours to collect and submit the
necessary approval information.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 2,005 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $61,855 per year to submit
the information to the USPTO. Using
the professional hourly rate of $30 for a
senior administrative assistant, the
USPTO estimates $60,000 per year for
salary costs associated with collecting
and submitting the necessary deposit
information to the USPTO. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection associated with the average
depository seeking approval to store
biological material will be prepared by
attorneys at an estimated rate of $371
per hour, for a total of $1,855. Therefore,
the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for this
collection will be approximately
$61,855 per year.
By mail, hand delivery, or
electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,001 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 5% of
these responses will be from small
entities.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public 1 hour to gather the necessary
information, prepare the appropriate
form or documents, and submit the
information to the USPTO for a deposit
of biological materials. The USPTO
estimates that it will take the average
Estimated time
for
response
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual
burden hours
1 hour
5 hours
2,000
1
2,000
5
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Deposited Materials .....................................................................................................................
Depository Approval ....................................................................................................................
........................
2,001
2,005
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $5,938,646.
There are no maintenance costs,
recordkeeping costs, or filing fees
associated with this information
collection. However, this collection has
annual (non-hour) costs in the form of
capital start-up and postage costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors;
all depositories charge about the same
rates for their services. For example, the
American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), one of the world’s leading
biological supply houses and recognized
patent depositories, offers
comprehensive patent services for
$2,500 per deposit. Most deposits
received from outside the United States
require an import permit from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) as
well as a Public Health Service (PHS)
permit, available from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to
humans. There is no extra charge for
this permit application processing. The
USPTO estimates that the total non-hour
respondent cost burden in the form of
capital start-up costs amounts to
$5,000,000.
In addition, this collection does have
postage costs. Biological deposits are
generally shipped to the depository
VerDate Mar<14>2013
17:37 Mar 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ by Federal
Express (FedEx) and, since depositors
are urged to supply frozen or freezedried material, it must be packed in dry
ice according to a representative from
the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry ice
itself is considered dangerous goods and
requires special packaging. Additional
FedEx special handling charges for
inaccessible dangerous goods shipments
of $37.50 per shipment apply for
temperature-sensitive biological
materials and also for the dry ice. An
average cost for shipping by FedEx
‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ is estimated to be
$75. If the shipment requires pick-up by
FedEx, there is an additional charge of
$4. Special packaging is also required
for these shipments. According to DG
Supplies Inc., a supplier of infectious
and diagnostic goods packaging, the
average cost of frozen infectious
shippers is estimated to be $352.82 per
package of four for specimen shipments
requiring refrigeration or dry ice.
Therefore, postage costs average $469.32
per shipment, for a total cost to
respondents of $938,640.
The postage cost for a depository
seeking recognition is estimated to be
$5.95, sent to the USPTO by priority
mail through the United States Postal
Service. Since the USPTO estimates that
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
it receives one request for recognition
from a depository every four years, the
average postage cost to respondents is
approximately $6 per year.
The USPTO estimates that the (nonhour) respondent cost burden in the
form of mailing costs amounts to
$938,646.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that
the total (non-hour) respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
capital start-up costs and postage costs
is $5,938,646.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
16474
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Notices
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–06046 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2012–0052]
Extension of the Period for Comments
on the Enhancement of Quality of
Software-Related Patents
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments;
extension of the comment period.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) published a
notice announcing the formation of a
partnership with the software
community to enhance the quality of
software-related patents (Software
Partnership), and a request for
comments on the preparation of patent
applications, seeking input on potential
practices for preparing patent
applications. The USPTO also
conducted two roundtables to obtain
public input from organizations and
individuals on topics relating to the
quality of software-related patents and
the preparation of software-related
patent applications including:
establishing clear boundaries for claims
that use functional language; identifying
additional topics for future discussion
by the Software Partnership; and
potential practices that applicants can
employ at the drafting stage of a patent
application in order to facilitate
examination and bring more certainty to
the scope of issued patents. The USPTO
has received several requests for
additional time to submit comments in
response to the notice. Accordingly, the
USPTO is extending the comment
period to provide interested members of
the public with additional time to
submit comments to the USPTO.
DATES: Comment Deadline Date: To be
assured of consideration, written
VerDate Mar<14>2013
17:37 Mar 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
comments must be received on or before
April 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent by electronic mail addressed to
SoftwareRoundtable2013@uspto.gov.
Comments may also be submitted by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450, marked to the attention of
Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100. Although comments may be
submitted by postal mail, the USPTO
prefers to receive comments via
electronic mail because sharing
comments with the public is more easily
accomplished.
The comments will be available for
public inspection on the USPTO’s Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov, and will
also be available at the Office of the
Commissioner for Patents, currently
located in Madison East, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that the submitter does not
desire to make public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments. Parties who
would like to rely on confidential
information to illustrate a point are
requested to summarize or otherwise
submit the information in a way that
will permit its public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100, by telephone at 571–272–5253, or
by electronic mail message at
seema.rao@uspto.gov; or Matthew J.
Sked, Legal Advisor, by telephone at
(571) 272–7627, or by electronic mail
message at matthew.sked@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 3, 2013, the USPTO published
a notice announcing the Software
Partnership, which is a cooperative
effort between the USPTO and the
software community to explore ways to
enhance the quality of software-related
patents. See Request for Comments and
Notice of Roundtable Events for
Partnership for Enhancement of Quality
of Software-Related Patents, 78 FR 292
(January 3, 2013). The Software
Partnership commenced with two bicoastal roundtable events held in
Silicon Valley on February 12, 2013,
and in New York City on February 27,
2013, during which multiple speakers
from the software community and the
public offered oral comments on
functional claim language, topics for
future discussion by the Software
Partnership, and the preparation of
patent applications. The notice also
invited the public to submit written
comments on or before March 15, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The USPTO has received several
requests for additional time to submit
comments, and is now extending the
period for submission of public
comments until April 15, 2013.
Dated: March 11, 2013.
Teresa Stanek Rea,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Acting Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–06014 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2011–0046]
Extension of the Period for Comments
on the Preparation of Patent
Applications
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments;
extension of the comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) published a
request for comments on the preparation
of patent applications, seeking input on
potential practices that applicants can
employ at the drafting stage of a patent
application in order to facilitate
examination and bring more certainty to
the scope of issued patents. The USPTO
has received several requests for
additional time to submit comments on
the preparation of patent applications.
Accordingly, the USPTO is extending
the comment period to provide
interested members of the public with
additional time to submit comments to
the USPTO.
DATES: Comment Deadline Date: To be
assured of consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
April 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent by electronic mail addressed to
QualityApplications_Comments@
uspto.gov. Comments may also be
submitted by mail addressed to: Mail
Stop Comments—Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Nicole D.
Haines. Although comments may be
submitted by postal mail, the USPTO
prefers to receive comments via
electronic mail because sharing
comments with the public is more easily
accomplished.
The comments will be available for
public inspection on the USPTO’s Web
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16472-16474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06046]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0022 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Legal Advisor, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728; or
by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ``Paperwork'' in the subject
line. Additional information about this collection is also available at
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The deposit of biological materials as part of a patent application
is required by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2) and outlined in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809.
Every patent must contain a description of the invention sufficient to
enable a person (knowledgeable in the relevant science), to make and
use the invention as specified by 35 U.S.C. 112. The term ``biological
material'' is defined by 37 CFR 1.801 as including material that is
capable of self-replication, either directly or indirectly. When the
invention involves a biological material, sometimes words and figures
are not sufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement for
patentability under 35
[[Page 16473]]
U.S.C. 112. In such cases, the required biological material must either
be: (1) Known and readily available (neither condition alone is
sufficient) or, (2) deposited in a suitable depository that has been
recognized as an International Depositary Authority (IDA) established
under the Budapest Treaty, or a depository recognized by the USPTO to
meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112.
In cases where a deposit is necessary, it must be made under
conditions that assure access to those entitled thereto under 37 CFR
1.14 and 35 U.S.C. 122 and upon issuance as a patent that all
restriction to public access is permanently removed.
In order to meet and satisfy requirements for international
patenting, all countries signing the Budapest Treaty must recognize the
deposit of biological material with any International Depositary
Authority (IDA).
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits; and not-for-
profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,001 responses per year. The
USPTO estimates that approximately 5% of these responses will be from
small entities.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public 1 hour to gather the necessary information, prepare the
appropriate form or documents, and submit the information to the USPTO
for a deposit of biological materials. The USPTO estimates that it will
take the average depository seeking approval to store biological
materials approximately 5 hours to collect and submit the necessary
approval information.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 2,005 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $61,855 per year to
submit the information to the USPTO. Using the professional hourly rate
of $30 for a senior administrative assistant, the USPTO estimates
$60,000 per year for salary costs associated with collecting and
submitting the necessary deposit information to the USPTO. The USPTO
expects that the information in this collection associated with the
average depository seeking approval to store biological material will
be prepared by attorneys at an estimated rate of $371 per hour, for a
total of $1,855. Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for this collection will be approximately $61,855 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time annual annual burden
for response responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deposited Materials............................................. 1 hour 2,000 2,000
Depository Approval............................................. 5 hours 1 5
-----------------------------------------------
Totals...................................................... .............. 2,001 2,005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $5,938,646.
There are no maintenance costs, recordkeeping costs, or filing fees
associated with this information collection. However, this collection
has annual (non-hour) costs in the form of capital start-up and postage
costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors; all depositories charge
about the same rates for their services. For example, the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC), one of the world's leading biological supply
houses and recognized patent depositories, offers comprehensive patent
services for $2,500 per deposit. Most deposits received from outside
the United States require an import permit from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) as well as a Public Health Service (PHS) permit,
available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to humans. There is no extra
charge for this permit application processing. The USPTO estimates that
the total non-hour respondent cost burden in the form of capital start-
up costs amounts to $5,000,000.
In addition, this collection does have postage costs. Biological
deposits are generally shipped to the depository ``Domestic Overnight''
by Federal Express (FedEx) and, since depositors are urged to supply
frozen or freeze-dried material, it must be packed in dry ice according
to a representative from the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry ice itself
is considered dangerous goods and requires special packaging.
Additional FedEx special handling charges for inaccessible dangerous
goods shipments of $37.50 per shipment apply for temperature-sensitive
biological materials and also for the dry ice. An average cost for
shipping by FedEx ``Domestic Overnight'' is estimated to be $75. If the
shipment requires pick-up by FedEx, there is an additional charge of
$4. Special packaging is also required for these shipments. According
to DG Supplies Inc., a supplier of infectious and diagnostic goods
packaging, the average cost of frozen infectious shippers is estimated
to be $352.82 per package of four for specimen shipments requiring
refrigeration or dry ice. Therefore, postage costs average $469.32 per
shipment, for a total cost to respondents of $938,640.
The postage cost for a depository seeking recognition is estimated
to be $5.95, sent to the USPTO by priority mail through the United
States Postal Service. Since the USPTO estimates that it receives one
request for recognition from a depository every four years, the average
postage cost to respondents is approximately $6 per year.
The USPTO estimates that the (non-hour) respondent cost burden in
the form of mailing costs amounts to $938,646.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the total (non-hour) respondent
cost burden for this collection in the form of capital start-up costs
and postage costs is $5,938,646.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public comments to: (a) Evaluate whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of
the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be
[[Page 16474]]
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Dated: March 12, 2013.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-06046 Filed 3-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P