Transportation of Agricultural Commodities, 16189-16195 [2013-05897]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 382, 383, 390, 391, 395,
396
Table of Contents
[Docket No. FMCSA–2012–0378]
Executive Summary
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
Background
Current Rules and MAP–21 Exemptions:
Comparison and Discussion
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Final Rule
Regulatory Analyses
RIN 2126–AB58
Transportation of Agricultural
Commodities
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Summary
FMCSA promulgates the
regulatory exemptions for the
‘‘transportation of agricultural
commodities and farm supplies’’ and for
‘‘covered farm vehicles’’ and their
drivers enacted by sections 32101(d)
and 32934, respectively, of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Act (MAP–21). Although prior statutory
exemptions involving agriculture are
unchanged, some of these exemptions
overlap with MAP–21 provisions. In
these cases, regulated entities will be
able to choose the exemption, or set of
exemptions, under which to operate.
They must, however, comply fully with
the terms of each exemption they claim.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is
effective March 14, 2013.
Compliance dates: The Motor Carrier
Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP)
requires participating States to adopt
regulations compatible with 49 CFR
Parts 390–397 to remain eligible for
MCSAP grants [49 CFR 350.201(a)].
Section 350.331(d) requires
participating States to adopt compatible
regulations as soon as practicable after
the effective date of any newly adopted
or amended FMCSA regulation, but no
later than 3 years after that date. The
amendments to Parts 390, 391, 395, and
396 made by this rule must therefore be
adopted by March 14, 2016.
Although the Commercial Driver’s
License (CDL) program in 49 CFR part
383 is not covered by the MCSAP
regulations, the States are required by
49 U.S.C. 31314 (as implemented by 49
CFR part 384) to comply with the
requirements of Part 383 in order to
avoid the withholding of certain
Federal-aid highway funds. Consistent
with FMCSA’s previous practice, States
must adopt the amendment made by
this rule by March 14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Thomas Yager, Driver and Carrier
Operations, (202) 366–4325 or
MCPSD@dot.gov, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, U.S. Department
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to
4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Rule and Summary of
Major Provision
This rule promulgates
Congressionally-mandated exemptions
from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) for certain
agricultural operations.
Section 32101(d) of MAP–21,
implemented as 49 CFR 395.1(k),
expands an hours-of-service (HOS)
exemption for farm-related operations
during the planting and harvesting
season (as defined by each State) that
has been in effect since 1995. Under the
new provision, drivers transporting
agricultural commodities within a 150
(instead of 100) air-mile radius of the
farm or source of the commodities are
exempt from the HOS rules. Also
exempt are retailers delivering farm
supplies for agricultural purposes
within a 150 (instead of 100) air-mile
radius of their distribution point to a
farm or other place where the supplies
will be used, and wholesalers delivering
farm supplies within the same radius to
a retailer, farm, or place where they will
be used.
Section 32934 of MAP–21 created a
new set of exemptions for ‘‘covered farm
vehicles’’ (CFVs) and their drivers. The
definition of a CFV is discussed in the
Background section below. Briefly,
CFVs and their drivers are exempt from
the commercial driver’s license (CDL)
and drug and alcohol testing
regulations; the medical qualification
requirements; the hours of service
limits; and vehicle inspection, repair
and maintenance rules. Vehicles
transporting placardable quantities of
hazardous materials are not eligible for
these exemptions. The States will have
to adopt these exemptions into their
own laws and regulations within 3 years
in order to avoid the withholding of
certain Federal grant funds.
Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the rule will take the
form of reduced expenditures in the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16189
agricultural sector. Neither the benefits
nor the costs of the exemptions can be
estimated at this time. There will also be
costs associated with re-training Federal
and State enforcement personnel on the
sometimes intricate details of the
exemptions.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
CDL Commercial Driver’s License
CFV Commercial Farm Vehicle
CMV Commercial Motor Vehicle
DOT Department of Transportation
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
FMCSRs Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations
HM Hazardous Materials
HOS Hours of Service
MAP–21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act
MCSAP Motor Carrier Safety Assistance
Program
NHS National Highway System
Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rule is based on sections
32101(d) and 32934 of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Act (MAP–21) (Pub. L. 112–141, 126
Stat. 405, 778, 830, July 6, 2012).
Section 32101(d) expanded both the
scope and the geographical reach of an
hours-of-service (HOS) exemption
enacted by Sec. 345(a)(1) of the National
Highway System (NHS) Designation Act
of 1995 [Pub. L. 104–59, 109 Stat. 568,
613, Nov. 28, 1995] and redesignated as
Sec. 229 of the Motor Carrier Safety
Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) [Pub.
L. 106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1773, Dec.
9, 1999] by Sec. 4115 of the Safe
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) [Pub. L. 109–59,
119 Stat. 1144, 1726, 1743–1744, Aug.
10, 2005]. As so redesignated, section
229 of MCSIA was amended by sections
4130–4132 of SAFETEA–LU [119 Stat.
1743–1744].
Section 345(a)(1) of the NHS
Designation Act created an exemption
from the HOS regulations for drivers
transporting agricultural commodities or
farm supplies for agricultural purposes
within a 100 air-mile radius of the
source of the commodities or the
distribution point for the farm supplies,
provided the transportation occurred
during the planting and harvesting
seasons, as determined by each State.
Pursuant to the legislative history of the
provision, FMCSA interpreted Sec.
345(a)(1) as exempting only drivers
transporting farm supplies from a farm
retailer to the ultimate consumer,
typically a farmer.
Section 32101(d) supersedes that
interpretation by expanding the
exemption to include drivers
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
16190
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
transporting farm supplies from a
wholesale or retail distribution point to
a farm or other location where the
supplies are intended to be used, and
from a wholesale distribution point to a
retail distribution point. It also extended
the geographical radius of the
exemption from 100 to 150 air-miles.
Section 32934 of MAP–21 created a
series of exemptions from the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs) for ‘‘covered farm vehicles’’
(CFVs), as defined therein and
explained in the Background section
below. Briefly, a CFV and its driver are
exempt from any requirement relating to
(1) commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs)
or drug and alcohol testing established
under 49 U.S.C. chapter 313; (2) medical
certificates established under 49 U.S.C.
chapter 311, subchapter III, or 49 U.S.C.
chapter 313; and (3) HOS and vehicle
inspection, repair, and maintenance
established under 49 U.S.C. chapter 311,
subchapter III, or 49 U.S.C. chapter 315.
FMCSA must consider the ‘‘costs and
benefits’’ of a rule before adopting it (49
U.S.C. 31136(c)(2)(A) and 31502(d)).
This rule simply adopts jurisdictional
limitations enacted by Congress, and
FMCSA therefore finds ‘‘good cause’’
under 5 U.S.C. 553 to promulgate this
rule as a final rule because prior notice
and comment would be ‘‘unnecessary’’
under the circumstances. The Agency
also finds ‘‘good cause’’ to make the rule
effective upon publication because it
‘‘relieves a restriction’’ [49 U.S.C.
553(d)(1)].
Background
FMCSA and its predecessor agencies
exercised their discretion to adopt a
number of exemptions related to
agricultural operations. Congress has
also enacted statutory exemptions
concerning agricultural operations. To
understand the impact of the
amendments promulgated in this final
rule, the exemptions already in effect—
both discretionary and statutory—must
first be described. We will then compare
the MAP–21 provisions to the current
exemptions.
To be eligible for MCSAP grants,
participating States agree to adopt as
State law motor carrier safety statutes
and regulations that are ‘‘compatible’’
with FMCSA’s regulations. For State
regulations applicable to interstate
commerce, ‘‘compatible’’ means
identical to or having the same effect as
the Federal standards; for regulations
applicable to intrastate commerce,
‘‘compatibility’’ includes limited
variation from Federal standards (as
specified in 49 CFR 350.341). To retain
MCSAP funding, participating States are
required to adopt not only Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
regulatory requirements but also Federal
exemptions, both discretionary and
statutory. Similar rules apply to the CDL
regulations, as explained in the DATES
section above. States participating in
MCSAP and the CDL program must
adopt all of the exemptions promulgated
today within 3 years of the effective date
of this rule, or they will be ineligible to
receive certain Federal funds.
Current Discretionary Exemptions
Part 383
The regulations in 49 CFR Part 383
(Commercial Driver’s License
Standards; Requirements and Penalties)
include a number of exemptions. The
applicability provisions in § 383.3
allow, but do not require, the States to
exempt from the mandate to obtain a
CDL, operators of a farm vehicle that
would otherwise qualify as a
‘‘commercial motor vehicle’’ requiring a
CDL, provided the farm vehicle is (1)
controlled and operated by a farmer,
including operation by employees or
family members; (2) used to transport
either agricultural products, farm
machinery, farm supplies, or both, to or
from a farm; (3) not used in the
operations of a common or contract
motor carrier; and (4) used within 241
kilometers (150 miles) of the farmer’s
farm [49 CFR 383.3(d)(1)]. Because the
term ‘‘farmer’’ is not defined in part 383,
the definition in 49 CFR 390.5 applies:1
‘‘Farmer’’ means any person who
operates a farm or is directly involved
in the cultivation of land, crops, or
livestock which (1) are owned by that
person or (2) are under the direct
control of that person. Similarly,
because the term ‘‘operators of a farm
vehicle’’ used in § 383.3(d)(1) is not
defined in § 383.5, the nearest
equivalent term—‘‘farm vehicle driver,’’
as defined in § 390.5—is applicable. A
‘‘farm vehicle driver’’ is a person who
drives only a commercial motor vehicle
that is—(1) controlled and operated by
a farmer as a private motor carrier of
property; (2) being used to transport
either (a) agricultural products or (b)
farm machinery, farm supplies, or both,
to or from a farm; (3) not being used in
the operation of a for-hire motor carrier;
(4) not carrying hazardous materials of
a type or quantity that requires the
commercial motor vehicle to be
placarded in accordance with § 177.823
of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
1 Pursuant to the introductory clause of § 390.5,
the definitions in that section apply ‘‘Unless
specifically defined elsewhere in this subchapter’’
(i.e., subchapter B of chapter III of subtitle B of title
49, Code of Federal regulations, which covers 49
CFR Parts 350–399). Because ‘‘farmer’’ is not
defined in Part 383, the definition of that term in
§ 390.5 is therefore applicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and (5) being used within 150 air-miles
of the farmer’s farm [49 CFR 390.5].
It is important to note that, although
the exemption authorized by
§ 383.3(d)(1) and the definition of a
‘‘farm vehicle driver’’ in § 390.5 are very
similar, they are not identical. While
§ 383.3(d)(1) makes no mention of
placardable quantities of hazardous
materials (HM)—and thus appears to
allow agricultural drivers transporting
HM an exemption from the CDL
requirement—the definition of a ‘‘farm
vehicle driver’’ in § 390.5 excludes
drivers who meet the other 4 elements
of that definition if they are carrying
placardable quantities of HM. In other
words, ‘‘operators of a farm vehicle’’
under § 383.3(d)(1), whom FMCSA
treats as equivalent to ‘‘farm vehicle
drivers’’ under § 390.5, are not eligible
for the CDL exemption if they transport
placardable quantities of HM.
A driver who is not required to hold
a CDL as a result of § 383.3(d)(1) is also
exempt from the FMCSA drug and
alcohol testing regulations [see 49 CFR
382.103(a)(1)].
Section 383.3(e) allows Alaska to
issue restricted CDLs to applicants who
do not comply with the test procedures
in Subpart H of Part 383. This partial
exemption is utilized by few, if any,
drivers for agricultural operations.
Section 383.3(f) allows States, under
certain conditions, to issue restricted
CDLs to employees of 4 farm-related
service industries, specifically (1) agrichemical businesses; (2) custom
harvesters; (3) farm retail outlets and
suppliers; and (4) livestock feeders.
Part 391
The driver qualification rules in 49
CFR part 391 (Qualifications of Drivers
and Longer Combination Vehicle (LCV)
Driver Instructors) also include
discretionary exemptions.
Section 391.2 sets forth 3 agriculturerelated exemptions. (It should be noted,
however, that drivers otherwise exempt
under § 391.2 remain subject to the rules
in § 391.15(e) dealing with
disqualification for violating a
prohibition on texting while driving a
CMV.)
Section 391.2(a) exempts from the
rules in Part 391 the driver of a CMV
controlled and operated by a person
engaged in custom harvesting, provided
the CMV is used to transport (1) farm
machinery, supplies, or both, to or from
a farm for custom-harvesting operations
on a farm; or (2) custom-harvested crops
to storage or market.
Section 391.2(b) exempts from the
rules in Part 391 the driver of a CMV
controlled and operated by a beekeeper
engaged in the seasonal transportation
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of bees. The exemption does not apply
to a beekeeper’s transportation of honey.
Section 391.2(c) exempts from the
rules in Part 391 a ‘‘farm vehicle
driver,’’ as defined in § 390.5, who
drives a straight truck (but not an
articulated vehicle). As indicated above,
a ‘‘farm vehicle driver’’ is a person who
drives only a CMV that is—(1)
controlled and operated by a farmer as
a private motor carrier of property; (2)
being used to transport either (a)
agricultural products or (b) farm
machinery, farm supplies, or both, to or
from a farm; (3) not being used in the
operation of a for-hire motor carrier; (4)
not carrying hazardous materials of a
type or quantity that requires the
commercial motor vehicle to be
placarded in accordance with § 177.823
of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
and (5) being used within 150 air-miles
of the farmer’s farm.
Although the broad exemption in
§ 391.2(c) for drivers of straight trucks is
not applicable to drivers of articulated
vehicles, § 391.2(c) cross-references
§ 391.67, which sets forth a shorter list
of exemptions available to farm vehicle
drivers of articulated CMVs. Section
391.67 exempts a ‘‘farm vehicle driver,’’
as defined in § 390.5, who is also at least
18 years of age and drives an articulated
CMV, from certain general qualification
standards in § 391.11, specifically
§ 391.11(b)(1), (6), and (8); this driver is
also exempt from Subparts C, D, and F
of Part 391.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Part 395
The HOS regulations in 49 CFR Part
395 include a variety of exceptions that
could apply to agricultural operations,
though the provisions described below
were not intended specifically for that
purpose.
Section 395.1(e)(1) allows drivers
operating within a 100 air-mile radius of
their normal work-reporting location to
dispense with normal records of duty
status (RODS, often called logs),
provided they meet certain other
requirements.
Section 395.1(e)(2) allows drivers
operating vehicles that do not require a
CDL within a 150 air-mile radius of
their normal work reporting location to
drive within a 16 hour window after
coming on duty (instead of the normal
14-hour driving window) 2 days per
week, providing other limits and
recordkeeping requirements are met.
Section 395.1(h) includes special HOS
limits for drivers operating in Alaska.
Section 395.1(i) includes special HOS
exemptions for drivers operating in
Hawaii.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Current Statutory Exemptions
NHS Designation Act. Section
345(a)(1) of the NHS Designation Act
provided that the regulations regarding
maximum driving and on-duty time
prescribed by the Department of
Transportation under 49 U.S.C. 31136
and 31502 do not apply to drivers
transporting agricultural commodities or
farm supplies for agricultural purposes
in a State if such transportation is
limited to an area within a 100 air mile
radius of the source of the commodities
or the distribution point for the farm
supplies and the transportation takes
place during the planting and harvesting
seasons within that State, as determined
by the State. The terms ‘‘agricultural
commodities’’ and ‘‘farm supplies for
agricultural purposes’’ were defined by
section 4130(c) of SAFETEA–LU and
enacted as section 229(e) of MCSIA.
The agricultural exemption from the
hours-of-service (HOS) regulations is
codified in 49 CFR 395.1(k) and the
statutory definitions of ‘‘agricultural
commodities’’ and ‘‘farm supplies for
agricultural purposes’’ are codified in
§ 395.2.
MAP–21. MAP–21 includes two
different provisions applicable to
agricultural operations. Section
32101(d) enacted amendments to the
HOS exemption originally adopted in
the NHS Designation Act, while Sec.
32934 promulgated a set of exemptions
that covered many provisions of the
FMCSRs.
Section 32101(d). Section 32101(d)
amended the NHS Designation Act
exemption in two ways. First, it
extended the geographical reach of the
exemption from 100 to 150 air-miles of
the source of the agricultural
commodities or the distribution point of
farm supplies for agricultural purposes.
Second, it extended the exemption to
wholesalers of farm supplies. As
amended, the 150 air-mile radius is now
measured from a wholesale to a retail
distribution point, or from a wholesale
or retail distribution point to a farm or
other place where the supplies are
intended to be used.
Section 32934. The exemptions
created by Sec. 32934 are available only
to ‘‘covered farm vehicles’’ (CFVs) and
their operators. The CFV definition is
complex, and the resulting exemptions
sometimes overlap or conflict with
previous exemptions. The
inconsistencies will be discussed below.
In order to make the implementing
regulations more readable, FMCSA has
rephrased them. The statutory definition
of a ‘‘covered farm vehicle’’ is provided
at Sec. 32934(c) of MAP–21.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16191
A ‘‘covered farm vehicle’’ (CFV), as
defined in Sec. 32934, is a straight truck
or articulated vehicle (e.g., a large
pickup, a truck pulling a trailer,
sometimes a standard tractor semitrailer
combination) registered in a State that is
used by the owner or operator of a farm
or ranch (or an employee or family
member of a farm or ranch owner or
operator) to transport agricultural
commodities, livestock, machinery or
supplies, provided the truck has a
license plate or other designation issued
by the State of registration that allows
law enforcement personnel to identify it
as a farm vehicle. Although a CFV may
not be used in for-hire motor carrier
operations, a share-cropper’s use of a
vehicle to transport the landlord’s share
of the crops may not be treated as a forhire operation. If the CFV has a gross
vehicle weight (GVW) or gross vehicle
weight rating (GVWR), whichever is
greater, of 26,001 pounds or less, it may
take advantage of the CFV exemption
described below while operating
anywhere in the United States. A CFV
with a GVW or GVWR, whichever is
greater, above 26,001 pounds, may
travel anywhere in the State of
registration or across State borders
within 150 air miles of the home farm
or ranch—but the vehicle would lose its
status as a CFV and the corresponding
exemptions if it exceeded these
geographical limits. In large States like
Texas or California, the operator of a
CFV with a GVW or GVWR above
26,001 pounds will be able to travel
much more than 150 air-miles within
the State. However, if the CFV crosses
a State line, its exempt operations under
this MAP–21 provision are limited to a
150 air-mile radius from the home farm
or ranch.
While Sec. 32934 identifies the
Federal rules from which CFVs and
their drivers are exempt, it does so in
statutory terms that would be unfamiliar
to most drivers and motor carriers, and
difficult to use for compliance or
enforcement. FMCSA has therefore
chosen to promulgate the regulatory
equivalents of the statutory terms.
Current Rules and MAP–21
Exemptions: Comparison and
Discussion
Part 383
The option granted the States in 49
CFR 383.3(d)(1) to exempt certain
operators of a farm vehicle from the CDL
and drug and alcohol testing regulations
is very similar, but not identical, to the
CDL exemption created by MAP–21.
While the exemption in § 383.3(d)(1) is
available to the operator of a farm
vehicle controlled and operated by a
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
16192
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
farmer, the CFV definition includes a
ranch owner. Similarly, § 383.3(d)(1) is
limited to farmers transporting
agricultural products, farm machinery
or farm supplies, while the CFV
definition also includes livestock. The
exemption allowed by § 383.3(d)(1),
although narrower than the MAP–21
exemption, is currently in effect in most
(if not all) States and immediately
available to designated farmers.
Removing that exemption and requiring
States to adopt the new exemption
would include a 3 year implementation
period during which there may be
periods that farmers are not, in State
statutes, provided any exemption.
FMCSA is therefore retaining
§ 383.3(d)(1) at this time.
The restricted CDLs allowed in Alaska
[§ 383.3(e)] and for certain farm-related
service industries [§ 383.3(f)] have been
partially overtaken by MAP–21. Drivers
of CFVs in Alaska and livestock feeders
anywhere who meet the conditions set
forth in the definition of a CFV in 49
CFR 390.5 would be completely exempt
from the CDL requirement—and thus
from drug and alcohol testing, which is
otherwise applicable to these limited
exemptions in Part 383. However,
drivers for agri-chemical businesses,
custom harvesters, and farm retail
outlets and suppliers would not qualify
for the CFV exemptions because drivers
of CFVs, by definition, must be farm
owners or operators, or their employees
or family members. Sections 383.3(e)
and (f) are being retained because they
remain available to drivers of vehicles
that do not qualify as CFVs.
Part 391
Section 391.2(a), which provides an
exception from Part 391 for custom
harvesters, is also being retained
because those operations do not meet
the MAP–21 definition of a CFV,
particularly the requirement that the
vehicle be operated by the owner or
operator of a farm or ranch. Custom
harvesters move from one farm to
another to harvest grain but are not the
owner or operator of a particular farm.
In any case, § 391.2(a) is broader than
Sec. 32934, which provides an
exemption only from Subpart E
(Physical Qualifications and
Examinations) of Part 391, not from all
of Part 391.
Section 391.2(b), which provides an
exception from Part 391 for a beekeeper
using a CMV for the seasonal
transportation of bees, is also retained.
Like custom harvesters, beekeepers do
not meet the definition of a CFV because
they rarely operate a farm or ranch; they
typically place beehives on marginal
farm or ranch land owned or operated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
by someone else. Section 391.2(b) also
provides an exception, not just from
Subpart E of Part 391, but from the
entire Part.
Section 391.2(c) provides an
exception from all of Part 391, apart
from the rules on texting, for a ‘‘farm
vehicle driver’’ (as defined in § 390.5) of
a straight truck. On the other hand, Sec.
32934(a)(3) of MAP–21 exempts CFV
drivers only from ‘‘any requirement
relating to medical certificates,’’ which
corresponds to Subpart E of Part 391.
Section 391.2(c) is substantially broader
than Sec. 32934 and is therefore being
retained. Many ‘‘farm vehicle drivers’’
of straight trucks could qualify as CFV
drivers, and vice versa, but the two
provisions are not identical. For
example, drivers of articulated CFVs or
CFVs operating beyond a radius of 150
air-miles from the home farm or ranch
would not qualify for the exemption in
§ 391.2(c) because only straight trucks
are eligible and then only when used
within 150 air-miles of the farmer’s
farm.
Section 391.2(c) also refers to
§ 391.67, which provides a more
limited, but still extensive, set of
exceptions for ‘‘farm vehicle drivers’’ of
articulated vehicles. Under § 391.67, a
‘‘farm vehicle driver’’ who is at least 18
years old and drives an articulated CMV
is not subject to Subparts C, D, and F of
Part 391. Subpart C covers employment
applications (§ 391.21), investigations of
drivers’ safety performance history for
the prior 3 years (§ 391.23), the annual
review of a driver’s record with the state
driver licensing agency (§ 391.25), and
the requirement for drivers to submit
annually, and for carriers to review, a
list of all traffic convictions during the
preceding year (§ 391.27). Subpart D
requires motor carriers to subject newlyhired drivers to road tests (§ 391.31),
though certain equivalents are also
acceptable (§ 391.33). Subpart F requires
motor carriers to maintain a
qualification file on each driver it
employs (§ 391.51) as well as the
records relating to its safety
performance history investigations
undertaken pursuant to § 391.23
(§ 391.53). Any motor carrier that uses
an instructor to train longer
combination vehicle (LCV) drivers must
maintain a qualification file on each
instructor (§ 391.55). Finally, § 391.67
excepts covered farm vehicle drivers
from § 391.11(b)(1), requiring them to be
at least 21 years old (§ 391.67(a)). While
MAP–21 exempts the driver of a CFV
from ‘‘any requirement relating to
medical certificates’’ [Sec. 32934(a)(3)],
which corresponds to Subpart E of Part
391, § 391.67 excepts farm vehicle
drivers of articulated vehicles from
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
many requirements except those relating
to medical qualifications. Section
391.67 is thus quite different from the
CFV exemption. Determining the
applicability of these exceptions and
exemptions will require a careful factual
evaluation of the operations in question.
Part 395
Sections 395.1(e)(1) and (2) are
currently available to many kinds of
commercial motor vehicle drivers. Some
of them may be farm or ranch
operators—one of the elements in the
definition of a CFV—but many are
drivers for general trucking operations
that are not eligible for the CFV
exemption.
Drivers in Alaska and Hawaii who are
currently operating under § 395.1(h) and
(i) may continue to do so, but some of
them may now be eligible for the MAP–
21 exemptions.
Section-by-Section Description of Final
Rule
Part 382 is amended by adding
‘‘covered farm vehicle’’ drivers to the
list of exceptions from the drug and
alcohol testing requirements in
§ 382.103(d). This amendment has
preemptive effect pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
31306(g), which provides that ‘‘[a] State
or local government may not prescribe
or continue in effect a law, regulation,
standard, or order that is inconsistent
with the regulations prescribed under
this section. Although States must
comply with this rule, the change to
Part 382 is self-executing in the sense
that a person exempt from the
requirement to obtain a CDL, as
provided by this rule, is also exempt
from drug and alcohol testing, since
testing is required only for CDL holders.
Part 383 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to § 383.3 explaining that
the CDL requirements do not apply to a
CFV driver.
Part 390 is amended by adding the
definition of a ‘‘covered farm vehicle’’ to
the list of definitions in § 390.5. The
exemptions for ‘‘covered farm vehicles’’
and their drivers are codified as
§ 390.39(a). Section 390.39(b)(1)
explains that MCSAP funds may not be
withheld merely because a State
exempts CFVs from State requirements
relating to the operation of that vehicle.
Section 390.39(b)(2) explains that CFVs
transporting placardable quantities of
hazardous materials (HM) are not
eligible for the exemptions in
§ 390.39(a). This provision is based on
FMCSA’s interpretation of Sec.
32934(b)(2) of MAP–21. As promulgated
by § 390.39(b)(1) of this rule, Sec.
32934(b)(1) of MAP–21 clearly prohibits
the withholding of MCSAP funds from
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
States that exempt CFVs ‘‘from any
State requirement relating to the
operation of that vehicle’’ (emphasis
added). However, because Sec.
32934(b)(2) makes Sec. 32934(b)(1)
inapplicable to CFVs transporting
placardable quantities of HM, it thus
authorizes FMCSA to withhold MCSAP
funds from States that exempt such
CFVs ‘‘from any State requirement
relating to the operation of that
vehicle,’’ including the exemptions
otherwise available to CFVs under Sec.
32934(a).
Part 391 is amended by adding
paragraph (d) to the general exceptions
in § 391.2. Paragraph (d) describes the
exemptions applicable to drivers of
‘‘covered farm vehicles.’’
Part 395 is amended by revising the
provision on ‘‘agricultural operations’’
in § 395.1(k) to include the changes
made by Sec. 32101(d) and by adding
new § 395.1(s) to exempt drivers of
‘‘covered farm vehicles’’ from the HOS
regulations.
Part 396 is amended by adding
paragraph (c) to § 396.1, Scope, to
exempt drivers of ‘‘covered farm
vehicles’’ from the regulations on
inspection, repair, and maintenance.
Regulatory Analyses
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
FMCSA has determined that this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 18, 2011),
and DOT regulatory policies and
procedures (44 FR 1103, February 26,
1979). Neither the benefits nor the costs
of this rule can be reliably estimated.
The benefits consist of reductions in the
expenditures that parts of the
agricultural sector of the economy
would otherwise incur in order to
comply with regulatory requirements
from which MAP–21 provides
exemptions. Both the current costs of
those regulatory requirements and the
value of the exemptions are unknown.
In fact, the number of drivers who will
qualify for the exemptions is itself
unknown. Neither the benefits nor the
costs of the exemptions can be
estimated at this time. However, the
benefits of the rule will take the form of
reduced expenditures in the agricultural
sector and there will be some costs
associated with re-training Federal and
State enforcement personnel on the
sometimes intricate details of the
exemptions.
Nonetheless, the Agency does not
believe that the economic costs of the
rule would exceed the $100 million
annually, and Congressional or public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
interest in the rule is likely to focus on
demands for its immediate publication
so that the exemptions can be utilized.
This rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when
an agency finds good cause pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without
prior notice and comment. Because this
rule promulgates jurisdictional
limitations enacted by Congress, as
explained in the Legal Basis section
above, FMCSA has determined that it
has good cause to adopt the rule without
notice and comment. An RFA analysis
is therefore not required. This final rule
also complies with the President’s
memorandum of January 18, 2011,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility, Small
Business, and Job Creation’’ (76 FR
3827).
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
A rule has federalism implications if
it has a substantial direct effect on State
or local governments and would either
preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on
the States. FMCSA analyzed this rule
under E.O. 13132 and has determined
that it has no federalism implications.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose an
unfunded Federal mandate, as defined
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.), that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $143.1
million (which is the value of $100
million in 2010 after adjusting for
inflation) or more in any 1 year.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
FMCSA analyzed this action under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. The Agency has
determined that this rule will not create
an environmental risk to health or safety
that may disproportionately affect
children.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16193
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this rule in
accordance with Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and has determined it does not
effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications.
Privacy Impact Assessment
Section 522 of title I of division H of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2005, enacted December 8, 2004 (Pub. L.
108–447, 118 Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C.
552a note), requires the Agency to
conduct a privacy impact assessment
(PIA) of a regulation that affects the
privacy of individuals. This rule will
not require the collection of any
personally identifiable information.
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a)
applies only to Federal agencies and any
non-Federal agency which receives
records contained in a system of records
from a Federal agency for use in a
matching program. FMCSA has
determined this rule will not result in
a new or revised Privacy Act System of
Records for FMCSA.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the OMB for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. This rule
does not require a new information
collection. However the rule reduces by
an unknown amount the information
collection burden for driver physical
qualifications under Part 391, HOS
under Part 395, and inspection, repairs
and maintenance under Part 396.
National Environmental Policy Act and
Clean Air Act
FMCSA analyzed this rule in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
FMCSA’s NEPA Implementing
Procedures and Policy for Considering
Environmental Impacts, Order 5610.1
(FMCSA Order), March 1, 2004 (69 FR
9680). FMCSA’s Order states that
‘‘[w]here FMCSA has no discretion to
withhold or condition an action if the
action is taken in accordance with
specific statutory criteria and FMCSA
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
16194
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
lacks control and responsibility over the
effects of an action, that action is not
subject to this Order.’’ Id. at chapter
1(D) (69 FR 9684). Because Congress
limited the Agency’s normal safety
jurisdiction through the MAP–21
exemptions promulgated today, this
rulemaking falls under chapter 1(D).
Therefore, no further analysis is
necessary.
In addition to the NEPA requirements
to examine impacts on air quality, the
Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) also requires
FMCSA to analyze the potential impact
of its actions on air quality and to
ensure that FMCSA actions conform to
State and local air quality
implementation plans. This nondiscretionary action is expected to fall
within the CAA de minimis standards
and is not subject to the Environmental
Protection Agency’s General Conformity
Rule (40 CFR parts 51 and 93).
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use. The Agency has
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that Executive
Order because it is not economically
significant and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
49 CFR Part 396
■
Highway safety, Motor carriers, Motor
vehicle safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
§ 390.5
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, FMCSA amends 49 CFR Parts
382, 383, 390, 391, 395, and 396 in title
49, Code of Federal Regulations, chapter
III, subchapter B, as follows:
PART 382—CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL USE
AND TESTING
1. The authority citation for Part 382
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31133, 31136, 31301
et seq., 31502; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112–141,
126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
2. Amend § 382.103 by adding
paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 382.103
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) Who operate ‘‘covered farm
vehicles,’’ as defined in 49 CFR 390.5.
PART 383—COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S
LICENSE STANDARDS;
REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES
3. The authority citation for Part 383
is revised to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 382
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Drug testing, Highway safety, Motor
carriers, Penalties, Safety,
Transportation.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et
seq., and 31502; secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L.
106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec.
4140 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1746;
sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405,
830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
■
4. Amend § 383.3 by adding paragraph
(h) to read as follows:
§ 383.3
Applicability.
49 CFR Part 390
Highway safety, Intermodal
transportation, Motor carriers, Motor
vehicle safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Commercial
driver’s license, Commercial motor
vehicles, Drug abuse, Highway safety,
Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety.
*
PART 390—FEDERAL MOTOR
CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS;
GENERAL
49 CFR Part 391
Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Drug
testing, Highway safety, Motor carriers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety, Transportation.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 508, 31132,
31133, 31136, 31144, 31151, 31502; sec. 114,
Pub. L. 103–311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1677–1678;
sec. 212, 217, 229, Pub. L. 106–159, 113 Stat.
1748, 1766, 1767; sec. 229, Pub. L. 106–159
(as transferred by sec. 4114 and amended by
secs. 4130–4132, Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat.
1144, 1726, 1743–1744); sec. 4136, Pub. L.
109–59, 119 Stat. 114, 1745; sections
32101(d) and 34934, Pub. L. 112–141, 126
Stat. 405, 778, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
49 CFR Part 395
Highway safety, Motor carriers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
(h) Exception for drivers of ‘‘covered
farm vehicles.’’ The rules in this part do
not apply to a driver of a ‘‘covered farm
vehicle,’’ as defined in § 390.5 of this
chapter.
5. The authority citation for Part 390
is revised to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6. Amend § 390.5 by adding a
definition of ‘‘Covered farm vehicle’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Covered farm vehicle—
(1) Means a straight truck or
articulated vehicle—
(i) Registered in a State with a license
plate or other designation issued by the
State of registration that allows law
enforcement officials to identify it as a
farm vehicle;
(ii) Operated by the owner or operator
of a farm or ranch, or an employee or
family member of a an owner or
operator of a farm or ranch;
(iii) Used to transport agricultural
commodities, livestock, machinery or
supplies to or from a farm or ranch; and
(iv) Not used in for-hire motor carrier
operations; however, for-hire motor
carrier operations do not include the
operation of a vehicle meeting the
requirements of paragraphs (1)(i)
through (iii) of this definition by a
tenant pursuant to a crop share farm
lease agreement to transport the
landlord’s portion of the crops under
that agreement.
(2) Meeting the requirements of
paragraphs (1)(i) through (iv) of this
definition:
(i) With a gross vehicle weight or
gross vehicle weight rating, whichever
is greater, of 26,001 pounds or less may
utilize the exemptions in § 390.39
anywhere in the United States; or
(ii) With a gross vehicle weight or
gross vehicle weight rating, whichever
is greater, of more than 26,001 pounds
may utilize the exemptions in § 390.39
anywhere in the State of registration or
across State lines within 150 air miles
of the farm or ranch with respect to
which the vehicle is being operated.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Add new § 390.39 to subpart B to
read as follows:
§ 390.39 Exemptions for ‘‘covered farm
vehicles.’’
(a) Federal requirements. A covered
farm vehicle, as defined in § 390.5,
including the individual operating that
vehicle, is exempt from the following:
(1) Any requirement relating to
commercial driver’s licenses in 49 CFR
Part 383 or controlled substances and
alcohol use and testing in 49 CFR Part
382;
(2) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part
391, Subpart E, Physical Qualifications
and Examinations.
(3) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part
395, Hours of Service of Drivers.
(4) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part
396, Inspection, Repair, and
Maintenance.
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(b) State requirements—(1) In
general.—Federal transportation
funding to a State may not be
terminated, limited, or otherwise
interfered with as a result of the State
exempting a covered farm vehicle,
including the individual operating that
vehicle, from any State requirement
relating to the operation of that vehicle.
(2) Exception.—Paragraph (b)(1) of
this section does not apply with respect
to a covered farm vehicle transporting
hazardous materials that require a
placard.
(c) Other exemptions and
exceptions.—The exemptions in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are
in addition to, not in place of, the
agricultural exemptions and exceptions
in §§ 383.3(d)(1), 383.3(e), 383.3(f),
391.2(a), 391.2(b), 391.2(c), 391.67,
395.1(e)(1), 395.1(e)(2), 395.1(h),
395.1(i), and 395.1(k) of this chapter.
Motor carriers and drivers may utilize
any combination of these exemptions
and exceptions, providing they comply
fully with each separate exemption and
exception.
PART 391—QUALIFICATIONS OF
DRIVERS AND LONGER
COMBINATION VEHICLE (LCV)
DRIVER INSTRUCTORS
8. The authority citation for Part 391
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 508, 31133,
31136, and 31502; sec. 4007(b) of Pub. L.
102–240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2152; sec. 114 of
Pub. L. 103–311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1677; sec.
215 of Pub. L. 106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1767;
sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405,
830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
9. Amend § 391.2 by adding paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
■
§ 391.2
General exceptions.
*
*
*
*
(d) Covered farm vehicles. The rules
in part 391, Subpart E—Physical
Qualifications and Examinations—do
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Mar 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
16195
not apply to drivers of ‘‘covered farm
vehicles,’’ as defined in 49 CFR 390.5.
PART 396—INSPECTION, REPAIR,
AND MAINTENANCE
PART 395—HOURS OF SERVICE OF
DRIVERS
■
10. The authority citation for Part 395
is revised to read as follows:
■
12. The authority citation for Part 396
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136,
31151, and 31502; sec. 32934, Pub. L. 112–
141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136,
31137, and 31502; sec. 113, Pub. L. 103–311,
108 Stat. 1673, 1676; sec. 229, Pub. L. 106–
159 (as transferred by sec. 4115 and amended
by secs. 4130–4132, Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat.
1144, 1726, 1743, 1744); sec. 4133, Pub. L.
109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1744; sec. 108, Pub.
L. 110–432, 122 Stat. 4860–4866; sec. 32934,
Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49
CFR 1.87.
■
11. Amend § 395.1 by revising
paragraph (k) and adding a new
paragraph (s) to read as follows:
Issued under the authority delegated in 49
CFR 1.87 on: March 8, 2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
■
§ 395.1
Scope of rules in this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Agricultural operations. The
provisions of this part shall not apply
during planting and harvesting periods,
as determined by each State, to drivers
transporting
(1) Agricultural commodities from the
source of the agricultural commodities
to a location within a 150 air-mile
radius from the source;
(2) Farm supplies for agricultural
purposes from a wholesale or retail
distribution point of the farm supplies
to a farm or other location where the
farm supplies are intended to be used
within a 150 air-mile radius from the
distribution point; or
(3) Farm supplies for agricultural
purposes from a wholesale distribution
point of the farm supplies to a retail
distribution point of the farm supplies
within a 150 air-mile radius from the
wholesale distribution point.
*
*
*
*
*
(s) Covered farm vehicles. The rules in
this part do not apply to drivers of
‘‘covered farm vehicles,’’ as defined in
49 CFR 390.5.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
13. Amend § 396.1 by adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 396.1
Scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) This part does not apply to
‘‘covered farm vehicles,’’ as defined in
49 CFR 390.5, or to the drivers of such
vehicles.
[FR Doc. 2013–05897 Filed 3–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 121018563–3148–02]
RIN 0648–XC311
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands; 2013 and 2014
Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
Correction
In rule document 2013–04822,
appearing on pages 13813–13834 in the
issue of Friday, March 1, 2013, make the
following correction:
On page 13822 in the heading of
Table 9, the year ‘‘2013’’ is corrected
read ‘‘2014’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2013–04822 Filed 3–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16189-16195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05897]
[[Page 16189]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 382, 383, 390, 391, 395, 396
[Docket No. FMCSA-2012-0378]
RIN 2126-AB58
Transportation of Agricultural Commodities
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA promulgates the regulatory exemptions for the
``transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies'' and
for ``covered farm vehicles'' and their drivers enacted by sections
32101(d) and 32934, respectively, of the Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Although prior statutory exemptions
involving agriculture are unchanged, some of these exemptions overlap
with MAP-21 provisions. In these cases, regulated entities will be able
to choose the exemption, or set of exemptions, under which to operate.
They must, however, comply fully with the terms of each exemption they
claim.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective March 14, 2013.
Compliance dates: The Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program
(MCSAP) requires participating States to adopt regulations compatible
with 49 CFR Parts 390-397 to remain eligible for MCSAP grants [49 CFR
350.201(a)]. Section 350.331(d) requires participating States to adopt
compatible regulations as soon as practicable after the effective date
of any newly adopted or amended FMCSA regulation, but no later than 3
years after that date. The amendments to Parts 390, 391, 395, and 396
made by this rule must therefore be adopted by March 14, 2016.
Although the Commercial Driver's License (CDL) program in 49 CFR
part 383 is not covered by the MCSAP regulations, the States are
required by 49 U.S.C. 31314 (as implemented by 49 CFR part 384) to
comply with the requirements of Part 383 in order to avoid the
withholding of certain Federal-aid highway funds. Consistent with
FMCSA's previous practice, States must adopt the amendment made by this
rule by March 14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas Yager, Driver and Carrier
Operations, (202) 366-4325 or MCPSD@dot.gov, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from
7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
Background
Current Rules and MAP-21 Exemptions: Comparison and Discussion
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Final Rule
Regulatory Analyses
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Rule and Summary of Major Provision
This rule promulgates Congressionally-mandated exemptions from the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for certain
agricultural operations.
Section 32101(d) of MAP-21, implemented as 49 CFR 395.1(k), expands
an hours-of-service (HOS) exemption for farm-related operations during
the planting and harvesting season (as defined by each State) that has
been in effect since 1995. Under the new provision, drivers
transporting agricultural commodities within a 150 (instead of 100)
air-mile radius of the farm or source of the commodities are exempt
from the HOS rules. Also exempt are retailers delivering farm supplies
for agricultural purposes within a 150 (instead of 100) air-mile radius
of their distribution point to a farm or other place where the supplies
will be used, and wholesalers delivering farm supplies within the same
radius to a retailer, farm, or place where they will be used.
Section 32934 of MAP-21 created a new set of exemptions for
``covered farm vehicles'' (CFVs) and their drivers. The definition of a
CFV is discussed in the Background section below. Briefly, CFVs and
their drivers are exempt from the commercial driver's license (CDL) and
drug and alcohol testing regulations; the medical qualification
requirements; the hours of service limits; and vehicle inspection,
repair and maintenance rules. Vehicles transporting placardable
quantities of hazardous materials are not eligible for these
exemptions. The States will have to adopt these exemptions into their
own laws and regulations within 3 years in order to avoid the
withholding of certain Federal grant funds.
Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the rule will take the form of reduced expenditures
in the agricultural sector. Neither the benefits nor the costs of the
exemptions can be estimated at this time. There will also be costs
associated with re-training Federal and State enforcement personnel on
the sometimes intricate details of the exemptions.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
CDL Commercial Driver's License
CFV Commercial Farm Vehicle
CMV Commercial Motor Vehicle
DOT Department of Transportation
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
FMCSRs Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
HM Hazardous Materials
HOS Hours of Service
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
MCSAP Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program
NHS National Highway System
Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rule is based on sections 32101(d) and 32934 of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141,
126 Stat. 405, 778, 830, July 6, 2012).
Section 32101(d) expanded both the scope and the geographical reach
of an hours-of-service (HOS) exemption enacted by Sec. 345(a)(1) of the
National Highway System (NHS) Designation Act of 1995 [Pub. L. 104-59,
109 Stat. 568, 613, Nov. 28, 1995] and redesignated as Sec. 229 of the
Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) [Pub. L. 106-159,
113 Stat. 1748, 1773, Dec. 9, 1999] by Sec. 4115 of the Safe
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU) [Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1726, 1743-
1744, Aug. 10, 2005]. As so redesignated, section 229 of MCSIA was
amended by sections 4130-4132 of SAFETEA-LU [119 Stat. 1743-1744].
Section 345(a)(1) of the NHS Designation Act created an exemption
from the HOS regulations for drivers transporting agricultural
commodities or farm supplies for agricultural purposes within a 100
air-mile radius of the source of the commodities or the distribution
point for the farm supplies, provided the transportation occurred
during the planting and harvesting seasons, as determined by each
State. Pursuant to the legislative history of the provision, FMCSA
interpreted Sec. 345(a)(1) as exempting only drivers transporting farm
supplies from a farm retailer to the ultimate consumer, typically a
farmer.
Section 32101(d) supersedes that interpretation by expanding the
exemption to include drivers
[[Page 16190]]
transporting farm supplies from a wholesale or retail distribution
point to a farm or other location where the supplies are intended to be
used, and from a wholesale distribution point to a retail distribution
point. It also extended the geographical radius of the exemption from
100 to 150 air-miles.
Section 32934 of MAP-21 created a series of exemptions from the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for ``covered farm
vehicles'' (CFVs), as defined therein and explained in the Background
section below. Briefly, a CFV and its driver are exempt from any
requirement relating to (1) commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or drug
and alcohol testing established under 49 U.S.C. chapter 313; (2)
medical certificates established under 49 U.S.C. chapter 311,
subchapter III, or 49 U.S.C. chapter 313; and (3) HOS and vehicle
inspection, repair, and maintenance established under 49 U.S.C. chapter
311, subchapter III, or 49 U.S.C. chapter 315.
FMCSA must consider the ``costs and benefits'' of a rule before
adopting it (49 U.S.C. 31136(c)(2)(A) and 31502(d)).
This rule simply adopts jurisdictional limitations enacted by
Congress, and FMCSA therefore finds ``good cause'' under 5 U.S.C. 553
to promulgate this rule as a final rule because prior notice and
comment would be ``unnecessary'' under the circumstances. The Agency
also finds ``good cause'' to make the rule effective upon publication
because it ``relieves a restriction'' [49 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)].
Background
FMCSA and its predecessor agencies exercised their discretion to
adopt a number of exemptions related to agricultural operations.
Congress has also enacted statutory exemptions concerning agricultural
operations. To understand the impact of the amendments promulgated in
this final rule, the exemptions already in effect--both discretionary
and statutory--must first be described. We will then compare the MAP-21
provisions to the current exemptions.
To be eligible for MCSAP grants, participating States agree to
adopt as State law motor carrier safety statutes and regulations that
are ``compatible'' with FMCSA's regulations. For State regulations
applicable to interstate commerce, ``compatible'' means identical to or
having the same effect as the Federal standards; for regulations
applicable to intrastate commerce, ``compatibility'' includes limited
variation from Federal standards (as specified in 49 CFR 350.341). To
retain MCSAP funding, participating States are required to adopt not
only Federal regulatory requirements but also Federal exemptions, both
discretionary and statutory. Similar rules apply to the CDL
regulations, as explained in the DATES section above. States
participating in MCSAP and the CDL program must adopt all of the
exemptions promulgated today within 3 years of the effective date of
this rule, or they will be ineligible to receive certain Federal funds.
Current Discretionary Exemptions
Part 383
The regulations in 49 CFR Part 383 (Commercial Driver's License
Standards; Requirements and Penalties) include a number of exemptions.
The applicability provisions in Sec. 383.3 allow, but do not require,
the States to exempt from the mandate to obtain a CDL, operators of a
farm vehicle that would otherwise qualify as a ``commercial motor
vehicle'' requiring a CDL, provided the farm vehicle is (1) controlled
and operated by a farmer, including operation by employees or family
members; (2) used to transport either agricultural products, farm
machinery, farm supplies, or both, to or from a farm; (3) not used in
the operations of a common or contract motor carrier; and (4) used
within 241 kilometers (150 miles) of the farmer's farm [49 CFR
383.3(d)(1)]. Because the term ``farmer'' is not defined in part 383,
the definition in 49 CFR 390.5 applies:\1\ ``Farmer'' means any person
who operates a farm or is directly involved in the cultivation of land,
crops, or livestock which (1) are owned by that person or (2) are under
the direct control of that person. Similarly, because the term
``operators of a farm vehicle'' used in Sec. 383.3(d)(1) is not
defined in Sec. 383.5, the nearest equivalent term--``farm vehicle
driver,'' as defined in Sec. 390.5--is applicable. A ``farm vehicle
driver'' is a person who drives only a commercial motor vehicle that
is--(1) controlled and operated by a farmer as a private motor carrier
of property; (2) being used to transport either (a) agricultural
products or (b) farm machinery, farm supplies, or both, to or from a
farm; (3) not being used in the operation of a for-hire motor carrier;
(4) not carrying hazardous materials of a type or quantity that
requires the commercial motor vehicle to be placarded in accordance
with Sec. 177.823 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and (5)
being used within 150 air-miles of the farmer's farm [49 CFR 390.5].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pursuant to the introductory clause of Sec. 390.5, the
definitions in that section apply ``Unless specifically defined
elsewhere in this subchapter'' (i.e., subchapter B of chapter III of
subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal regulations, which covers 49
CFR Parts 350-399). Because ``farmer'' is not defined in Part 383,
the definition of that term in Sec. 390.5 is therefore applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is important to note that, although the exemption authorized by
Sec. 383.3(d)(1) and the definition of a ``farm vehicle driver'' in
Sec. 390.5 are very similar, they are not identical. While Sec.
383.3(d)(1) makes no mention of placardable quantities of hazardous
materials (HM)--and thus appears to allow agricultural drivers
transporting HM an exemption from the CDL requirement--the definition
of a ``farm vehicle driver'' in Sec. 390.5 excludes drivers who meet
the other 4 elements of that definition if they are carrying
placardable quantities of HM. In other words, ``operators of a farm
vehicle'' under Sec. 383.3(d)(1), whom FMCSA treats as equivalent to
``farm vehicle drivers'' under Sec. 390.5, are not eligible for the
CDL exemption if they transport placardable quantities of HM.
A driver who is not required to hold a CDL as a result of Sec.
383.3(d)(1) is also exempt from the FMCSA drug and alcohol testing
regulations [see 49 CFR 382.103(a)(1)].
Section 383.3(e) allows Alaska to issue restricted CDLs to
applicants who do not comply with the test procedures in Subpart H of
Part 383. This partial exemption is utilized by few, if any, drivers
for agricultural operations.
Section 383.3(f) allows States, under certain conditions, to issue
restricted CDLs to employees of 4 farm-related service industries,
specifically (1) agri-chemical businesses; (2) custom harvesters; (3)
farm retail outlets and suppliers; and (4) livestock feeders.
Part 391
The driver qualification rules in 49 CFR part 391 (Qualifications
of Drivers and Longer Combination Vehicle (LCV) Driver Instructors)
also include discretionary exemptions.
Section 391.2 sets forth 3 agriculture-related exemptions. (It
should be noted, however, that drivers otherwise exempt under Sec.
391.2 remain subject to the rules in Sec. 391.15(e) dealing with
disqualification for violating a prohibition on texting while driving a
CMV.)
Section 391.2(a) exempts from the rules in Part 391 the driver of a
CMV controlled and operated by a person engaged in custom harvesting,
provided the CMV is used to transport (1) farm machinery, supplies, or
both, to or from a farm for custom-harvesting operations on a farm; or
(2) custom-harvested crops to storage or market.
Section 391.2(b) exempts from the rules in Part 391 the driver of a
CMV controlled and operated by a beekeeper engaged in the seasonal
transportation
[[Page 16191]]
of bees. The exemption does not apply to a beekeeper's transportation
of honey.
Section 391.2(c) exempts from the rules in Part 391 a ``farm
vehicle driver,'' as defined in Sec. 390.5, who drives a straight
truck (but not an articulated vehicle). As indicated above, a ``farm
vehicle driver'' is a person who drives only a CMV that is--(1)
controlled and operated by a farmer as a private motor carrier of
property; (2) being used to transport either (a) agricultural products
or (b) farm machinery, farm supplies, or both, to or from a farm; (3)
not being used in the operation of a for-hire motor carrier; (4) not
carrying hazardous materials of a type or quantity that requires the
commercial motor vehicle to be placarded in accordance with Sec.
177.823 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and (5) being used
within 150 air-miles of the farmer's farm.
Although the broad exemption in Sec. 391.2(c) for drivers of
straight trucks is not applicable to drivers of articulated vehicles,
Sec. 391.2(c) cross-references Sec. 391.67, which sets forth a
shorter list of exemptions available to farm vehicle drivers of
articulated CMVs. Section 391.67 exempts a ``farm vehicle driver,'' as
defined in Sec. 390.5, who is also at least 18 years of age and drives
an articulated CMV, from certain general qualification standards in
Sec. 391.11, specifically Sec. 391.11(b)(1), (6), and (8); this
driver is also exempt from Subparts C, D, and F of Part 391.
Part 395
The HOS regulations in 49 CFR Part 395 include a variety of
exceptions that could apply to agricultural operations, though the
provisions described below were not intended specifically for that
purpose.
Section 395.1(e)(1) allows drivers operating within a 100 air-mile
radius of their normal work-reporting location to dispense with normal
records of duty status (RODS, often called logs), provided they meet
certain other requirements.
Section 395.1(e)(2) allows drivers operating vehicles that do not
require a CDL within a 150 air-mile radius of their normal work
reporting location to drive within a 16 hour window after coming on
duty (instead of the normal 14-hour driving window) 2 days per week,
providing other limits and recordkeeping requirements are met.
Section 395.1(h) includes special HOS limits for drivers operating
in Alaska.
Section 395.1(i) includes special HOS exemptions for drivers
operating in Hawaii.
Current Statutory Exemptions
NHS Designation Act. Section 345(a)(1) of the NHS Designation Act
provided that the regulations regarding maximum driving and on-duty
time prescribed by the Department of Transportation under 49 U.S.C.
31136 and 31502 do not apply to drivers transporting agricultural
commodities or farm supplies for agricultural purposes in a State if
such transportation is limited to an area within a 100 air mile radius
of the source of the commodities or the distribution point for the farm
supplies and the transportation takes place during the planting and
harvesting seasons within that State, as determined by the State. The
terms ``agricultural commodities'' and ``farm supplies for agricultural
purposes'' were defined by section 4130(c) of SAFETEA-LU and enacted as
section 229(e) of MCSIA.
The agricultural exemption from the hours-of-service (HOS)
regulations is codified in 49 CFR 395.1(k) and the statutory
definitions of ``agricultural commodities'' and ``farm supplies for
agricultural purposes'' are codified in Sec. 395.2.
MAP-21. MAP-21 includes two different provisions applicable to
agricultural operations. Section 32101(d) enacted amendments to the HOS
exemption originally adopted in the NHS Designation Act, while Sec.
32934 promulgated a set of exemptions that covered many provisions of
the FMCSRs.
Section 32101(d). Section 32101(d) amended the NHS Designation Act
exemption in two ways. First, it extended the geographical reach of the
exemption from 100 to 150 air-miles of the source of the agricultural
commodities or the distribution point of farm supplies for agricultural
purposes. Second, it extended the exemption to wholesalers of farm
supplies. As amended, the 150 air-mile radius is now measured from a
wholesale to a retail distribution point, or from a wholesale or retail
distribution point to a farm or other place where the supplies are
intended to be used.
Section 32934. The exemptions created by Sec. 32934 are available
only to ``covered farm vehicles'' (CFVs) and their operators. The CFV
definition is complex, and the resulting exemptions sometimes overlap
or conflict with previous exemptions. The inconsistencies will be
discussed below.
In order to make the implementing regulations more readable, FMCSA
has rephrased them. The statutory definition of a ``covered farm
vehicle'' is provided at Sec. 32934(c) of MAP-21.
A ``covered farm vehicle'' (CFV), as defined in Sec. 32934, is a
straight truck or articulated vehicle (e.g., a large pickup, a truck
pulling a trailer, sometimes a standard tractor semitrailer
combination) registered in a State that is used by the owner or
operator of a farm or ranch (or an employee or family member of a farm
or ranch owner or operator) to transport agricultural commodities,
livestock, machinery or supplies, provided the truck has a license
plate or other designation issued by the State of registration that
allows law enforcement personnel to identify it as a farm vehicle.
Although a CFV may not be used in for-hire motor carrier operations, a
share-cropper's use of a vehicle to transport the landlord's share of
the crops may not be treated as a for-hire operation. If the CFV has a
gross vehicle weight (GVW) or gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR),
whichever is greater, of 26,001 pounds or less, it may take advantage
of the CFV exemption described below while operating anywhere in the
United States. A CFV with a GVW or GVWR, whichever is greater, above
26,001 pounds, may travel anywhere in the State of registration or
across State borders within 150 air miles of the home farm or ranch--
but the vehicle would lose its status as a CFV and the corresponding
exemptions if it exceeded these geographical limits. In large States
like Texas or California, the operator of a CFV with a GVW or GVWR
above 26,001 pounds will be able to travel much more than 150 air-miles
within the State. However, if the CFV crosses a State line, its exempt
operations under this MAP-21 provision are limited to a 150 air-mile
radius from the home farm or ranch.
While Sec. 32934 identifies the Federal rules from which CFVs and
their drivers are exempt, it does so in statutory terms that would be
unfamiliar to most drivers and motor carriers, and difficult to use for
compliance or enforcement. FMCSA has therefore chosen to promulgate the
regulatory equivalents of the statutory terms.
Current Rules and MAP-21 Exemptions: Comparison and Discussion
Part 383
The option granted the States in 49 CFR 383.3(d)(1) to exempt
certain operators of a farm vehicle from the CDL and drug and alcohol
testing regulations is very similar, but not identical, to the CDL
exemption created by MAP-21. While the exemption in Sec. 383.3(d)(1)
is available to the operator of a farm vehicle controlled and operated
by a
[[Page 16192]]
farmer, the CFV definition includes a ranch owner. Similarly, Sec.
383.3(d)(1) is limited to farmers transporting agricultural products,
farm machinery or farm supplies, while the CFV definition also includes
livestock. The exemption allowed by Sec. 383.3(d)(1), although
narrower than the MAP-21 exemption, is currently in effect in most (if
not all) States and immediately available to designated farmers.
Removing that exemption and requiring States to adopt the new exemption
would include a 3 year implementation period during which there may be
periods that farmers are not, in State statutes, provided any
exemption. FMCSA is therefore retaining Sec. 383.3(d)(1) at this time.
The restricted CDLs allowed in Alaska [Sec. 383.3(e)] and for
certain farm-related service industries [Sec. 383.3(f)] have been
partially overtaken by MAP-21. Drivers of CFVs in Alaska and livestock
feeders anywhere who meet the conditions set forth in the definition of
a CFV in 49 CFR 390.5 would be completely exempt from the CDL
requirement--and thus from drug and alcohol testing, which is otherwise
applicable to these limited exemptions in Part 383. However, drivers
for agri-chemical businesses, custom harvesters, and farm retail
outlets and suppliers would not qualify for the CFV exemptions because
drivers of CFVs, by definition, must be farm owners or operators, or
their employees or family members. Sections 383.3(e) and (f) are being
retained because they remain available to drivers of vehicles that do
not qualify as CFVs.
Part 391
Section 391.2(a), which provides an exception from Part 391 for
custom harvesters, is also being retained because those operations do
not meet the MAP-21 definition of a CFV, particularly the requirement
that the vehicle be operated by the owner or operator of a farm or
ranch. Custom harvesters move from one farm to another to harvest grain
but are not the owner or operator of a particular farm. In any case,
Sec. 391.2(a) is broader than Sec. 32934, which provides an exemption
only from Subpart E (Physical Qualifications and Examinations) of Part
391, not from all of Part 391.
Section 391.2(b), which provides an exception from Part 391 for a
beekeeper using a CMV for the seasonal transportation of bees, is also
retained. Like custom harvesters, beekeepers do not meet the definition
of a CFV because they rarely operate a farm or ranch; they typically
place beehives on marginal farm or ranch land owned or operated by
someone else. Section 391.2(b) also provides an exception, not just
from Subpart E of Part 391, but from the entire Part.
Section 391.2(c) provides an exception from all of Part 391, apart
from the rules on texting, for a ``farm vehicle driver'' (as defined in
Sec. 390.5) of a straight truck. On the other hand, Sec. 32934(a)(3)
of MAP-21 exempts CFV drivers only from ``any requirement relating to
medical certificates,'' which corresponds to Subpart E of Part 391.
Section 391.2(c) is substantially broader than Sec. 32934 and is
therefore being retained. Many ``farm vehicle drivers'' of straight
trucks could qualify as CFV drivers, and vice versa, but the two
provisions are not identical. For example, drivers of articulated CFVs
or CFVs operating beyond a radius of 150 air-miles from the home farm
or ranch would not qualify for the exemption in Sec. 391.2(c) because
only straight trucks are eligible and then only when used within 150
air-miles of the farmer's farm.
Section 391.2(c) also refers to Sec. 391.67, which provides a more
limited, but still extensive, set of exceptions for ``farm vehicle
drivers'' of articulated vehicles. Under Sec. 391.67, a ``farm vehicle
driver'' who is at least 18 years old and drives an articulated CMV is
not subject to Subparts C, D, and F of Part 391. Subpart C covers
employment applications (Sec. 391.21), investigations of drivers'
safety performance history for the prior 3 years (Sec. 391.23), the
annual review of a driver's record with the state driver licensing
agency (Sec. 391.25), and the requirement for drivers to submit
annually, and for carriers to review, a list of all traffic convictions
during the preceding year (Sec. 391.27). Subpart D requires motor
carriers to subject newly-hired drivers to road tests (Sec. 391.31),
though certain equivalents are also acceptable (Sec. 391.33). Subpart
F requires motor carriers to maintain a qualification file on each
driver it employs (Sec. 391.51) as well as the records relating to its
safety performance history investigations undertaken pursuant to Sec.
391.23 (Sec. 391.53). Any motor carrier that uses an instructor to
train longer combination vehicle (LCV) drivers must maintain a
qualification file on each instructor (Sec. 391.55). Finally, Sec.
391.67 excepts covered farm vehicle drivers from Sec. 391.11(b)(1),
requiring them to be at least 21 years old (Sec. 391.67(a)). While
MAP-21 exempts the driver of a CFV from ``any requirement relating to
medical certificates'' [Sec. 32934(a)(3)], which corresponds to Subpart
E of Part 391, Sec. 391.67 excepts farm vehicle drivers of articulated
vehicles from many requirements except those relating to medical
qualifications. Section 391.67 is thus quite different from the CFV
exemption. Determining the applicability of these exceptions and
exemptions will require a careful factual evaluation of the operations
in question.
Part 395
Sections 395.1(e)(1) and (2) are currently available to many kinds
of commercial motor vehicle drivers. Some of them may be farm or ranch
operators--one of the elements in the definition of a CFV--but many are
drivers for general trucking operations that are not eligible for the
CFV exemption.
Drivers in Alaska and Hawaii who are currently operating under
Sec. 395.1(h) and (i) may continue to do so, but some of them may now
be eligible for the MAP-21 exemptions.
Section-by-Section Description of Final Rule
Part 382 is amended by adding ``covered farm vehicle'' drivers to
the list of exceptions from the drug and alcohol testing requirements
in Sec. 382.103(d). This amendment has preemptive effect pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 31306(g), which provides that ``[a] State or local government
may not prescribe or continue in effect a law, regulation, standard, or
order that is inconsistent with the regulations prescribed under this
section. Although States must comply with this rule, the change to Part
382 is self-executing in the sense that a person exempt from the
requirement to obtain a CDL, as provided by this rule, is also exempt
from drug and alcohol testing, since testing is required only for CDL
holders.
Part 383 is amended by adding paragraph (h) to Sec. 383.3
explaining that the CDL requirements do not apply to a CFV driver.
Part 390 is amended by adding the definition of a ``covered farm
vehicle'' to the list of definitions in Sec. 390.5. The exemptions for
``covered farm vehicles'' and their drivers are codified as Sec.
390.39(a). Section 390.39(b)(1) explains that MCSAP funds may not be
withheld merely because a State exempts CFVs from State requirements
relating to the operation of that vehicle. Section 390.39(b)(2)
explains that CFVs transporting placardable quantities of hazardous
materials (HM) are not eligible for the exemptions in Sec. 390.39(a).
This provision is based on FMCSA's interpretation of Sec. 32934(b)(2)
of MAP-21. As promulgated by Sec. 390.39(b)(1) of this rule, Sec.
32934(b)(1) of MAP-21 clearly prohibits the withholding of MCSAP funds
from
[[Page 16193]]
States that exempt CFVs ``from any State requirement relating to the
operation of that vehicle'' (emphasis added). However, because Sec.
32934(b)(2) makes Sec. 32934(b)(1) inapplicable to CFVs transporting
placardable quantities of HM, it thus authorizes FMCSA to withhold
MCSAP funds from States that exempt such CFVs ``from any State
requirement relating to the operation of that vehicle,'' including the
exemptions otherwise available to CFVs under Sec. 32934(a).
Part 391 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to the general
exceptions in Sec. 391.2. Paragraph (d) describes the exemptions
applicable to drivers of ``covered farm vehicles.''
Part 395 is amended by revising the provision on ``agricultural
operations'' in Sec. 395.1(k) to include the changes made by Sec.
32101(d) and by adding new Sec. 395.1(s) to exempt drivers of
``covered farm vehicles'' from the HOS regulations.
Part 396 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to Sec. 396.1, Scope,
to exempt drivers of ``covered farm vehicles'' from the regulations on
inspection, repair, and maintenance.
Regulatory Analyses
Regulatory Planning and Review
FMCSA has determined that this action is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 18, 2011), and DOT
regulatory policies and procedures (44 FR 1103, February 26, 1979).
Neither the benefits nor the costs of this rule can be reliably
estimated. The benefits consist of reductions in the expenditures that
parts of the agricultural sector of the economy would otherwise incur
in order to comply with regulatory requirements from which MAP-21
provides exemptions. Both the current costs of those regulatory
requirements and the value of the exemptions are unknown. In fact, the
number of drivers who will qualify for the exemptions is itself
unknown. Neither the benefits nor the costs of the exemptions can be
estimated at this time. However, the benefits of the rule will take the
form of reduced expenditures in the agricultural sector and there will
be some costs associated with re-training Federal and State enforcement
personnel on the sometimes intricate details of the exemptions.
Nonetheless, the Agency does not believe that the economic costs of
the rule would exceed the $100 million annually, and Congressional or
public interest in the rule is likely to focus on demands for its
immediate publication so that the exemptions can be utilized. This rule
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because this rule promulgates
jurisdictional limitations enacted by Congress, as explained in the
Legal Basis section above, FMCSA has determined that it has good cause
to adopt the rule without notice and comment. An RFA analysis is
therefore not required. This final rule also complies with the
President's memorandum of January 18, 2011, entitled ``Regulatory
Flexibility, Small Business, and Job Creation'' (76 FR 3827).
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
A rule has federalism implications if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law
or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on the States. FMCSA
analyzed this rule under E.O. 13132 and has determined that it has no
federalism implications.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose an unfunded Federal mandate, as defined
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.),
that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $143.1
million (which is the value of $100 million in 2010 after adjusting for
inflation) or more in any 1 year.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FMCSA analyzed this action under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. The
Agency has determined that this rule will not create an environmental
risk to health or safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this rule in accordance with Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and has determined it does not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have taking implications.
Privacy Impact Assessment
Section 522 of title I of division H of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2005, enacted December 8, 2004 (Pub. L. 108-447,
118 Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note), requires the Agency to
conduct a privacy impact assessment (PIA) of a regulation that affects
the privacy of individuals. This rule will not require the collection
of any personally identifiable information.
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) applies only to Federal agencies
and any non-Federal agency which receives records contained in a system
of records from a Federal agency for use in a matching program. FMCSA
has determined this rule will not result in a new or revised Privacy
Act System of Records for FMCSA.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the OMB for each
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulations. This rule does not require a new information collection.
However the rule reduces by an unknown amount the information
collection burden for driver physical qualifications under Part 391,
HOS under Part 395, and inspection, repairs and maintenance under Part
396.
National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Air Act
FMCSA analyzed this rule in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
FMCSA's NEPA Implementing Procedures and Policy for Considering
Environmental Impacts, Order 5610.1 (FMCSA Order), March 1, 2004 (69 FR
9680). FMCSA's Order states that ``[w]here FMCSA has no discretion to
withhold or condition an action if the action is taken in accordance
with specific statutory criteria and FMCSA
[[Page 16194]]
lacks control and responsibility over the effects of an action, that
action is not subject to this Order.'' Id. at chapter 1(D) (69 FR
9684). Because Congress limited the Agency's normal safety jurisdiction
through the MAP-21 exemptions promulgated today, this rulemaking falls
under chapter 1(D). Therefore, no further analysis is necessary.
In addition to the NEPA requirements to examine impacts on air
quality, the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)
also requires FMCSA to analyze the potential impact of its actions on
air quality and to ensure that FMCSA actions conform to State and local
air quality implementation plans. This non-discretionary action is
expected to fall within the CAA de minimis standards and is not subject
to the Environmental Protection Agency's General Conformity Rule (40
CFR parts 51 and 93).
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use. The Agency has determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that Executive Order because it is
not economically significant and is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 382
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Drug testing, Highway safety, Motor carriers, Penalties, Safety,
Transportation.
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Commercial
driver's license, Commercial motor vehicles, Drug abuse, Highway
safety, Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety.
49 CFR Part 390
Highway safety, Intermodal transportation, Motor carriers, Motor
vehicle safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 391
Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Drug testing, Highway safety, Motor
carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
Transportation.
49 CFR Part 395
Highway safety, Motor carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 396
Highway safety, Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, FMCSA amends 49 CFR Parts
382, 383, 390, 391, 395, and 396 in title 49, Code of Federal
Regulations, chapter III, subchapter B, as follows:
PART 382--CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL USE AND TESTING
0
1. The authority citation for Part 382 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31133, 31136, 31301 et seq., 31502; sec.
32934 of Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
2. Amend Sec. 382.103 by adding paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 382.103 Applicability.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) Who operate ``covered farm vehicles,'' as defined in 49 CFR
390.5.
PART 383--COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND
PENALTIES
0
3. The authority citation for Part 383 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs.
214 and 215 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec.
4140 of Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1746; sec. 32934 of Pub. L.
112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
4. Amend Sec. 383.3 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 383.3 Applicability.
* * * * *
(h) Exception for drivers of ``covered farm vehicles.'' The rules
in this part do not apply to a driver of a ``covered farm vehicle,'' as
defined in Sec. 390.5 of this chapter.
PART 390--FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS; GENERAL
0
5. The authority citation for Part 390 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 508, 31132, 31133, 31136, 31144,
31151, 31502; sec. 114, Pub. L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1677-1678;
sec. 212, 217, 229, Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767;
sec. 229, Pub. L. 106-159 (as transferred by sec. 4114 and amended
by secs. 4130-4132, Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1726, 1743-
1744); sec. 4136, Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 114, 1745; sections
32101(d) and 34934, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 778, 830; and 49
CFR 1.87.
0
6. Amend Sec. 390.5 by adding a definition of ``Covered farm vehicle''
in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 390.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
Covered farm vehicle--
(1) Means a straight truck or articulated vehicle--
(i) Registered in a State with a license plate or other designation
issued by the State of registration that allows law enforcement
officials to identify it as a farm vehicle;
(ii) Operated by the owner or operator of a farm or ranch, or an
employee or family member of a an owner or operator of a farm or ranch;
(iii) Used to transport agricultural commodities, livestock,
machinery or supplies to or from a farm or ranch; and
(iv) Not used in for-hire motor carrier operations; however, for-
hire motor carrier operations do not include the operation of a vehicle
meeting the requirements of paragraphs (1)(i) through (iii) of this
definition by a tenant pursuant to a crop share farm lease agreement to
transport the landlord's portion of the crops under that agreement.
(2) Meeting the requirements of paragraphs (1)(i) through (iv) of
this definition:
(i) With a gross vehicle weight or gross vehicle weight rating,
whichever is greater, of 26,001 pounds or less may utilize the
exemptions in Sec. 390.39 anywhere in the United States; or
(ii) With a gross vehicle weight or gross vehicle weight rating,
whichever is greater, of more than 26,001 pounds may utilize the
exemptions in Sec. 390.39 anywhere in the State of registration or
across State lines within 150 air miles of the farm or ranch with
respect to which the vehicle is being operated.
* * * * *
0
7. Add new Sec. 390.39 to subpart B to read as follows:
Sec. 390.39 Exemptions for ``covered farm vehicles.''
(a) Federal requirements. A covered farm vehicle, as defined in
Sec. 390.5, including the individual operating that vehicle, is exempt
from the following:
(1) Any requirement relating to commercial driver's licenses in 49
CFR Part 383 or controlled substances and alcohol use and testing in 49
CFR Part 382;
(2) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part 391, Subpart E, Physical
Qualifications and Examinations.
(3) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part 395, Hours of Service of
Drivers.
(4) Any requirement in 49 CFR Part 396, Inspection, Repair, and
Maintenance.
[[Page 16195]]
(b) State requirements--(1) In general.--Federal transportation
funding to a State may not be terminated, limited, or otherwise
interfered with as a result of the State exempting a covered farm
vehicle, including the individual operating that vehicle, from any
State requirement relating to the operation of that vehicle.
(2) Exception.--Paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply
with respect to a covered farm vehicle transporting hazardous materials
that require a placard.
(c) Other exemptions and exceptions.--The exemptions in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section are in addition to, not in place of, the
agricultural exemptions and exceptions in Sec. Sec. 383.3(d)(1),
383.3(e), 383.3(f), 391.2(a), 391.2(b), 391.2(c), 391.67, 395.1(e)(1),
395.1(e)(2), 395.1(h), 395.1(i), and 395.1(k) of this chapter. Motor
carriers and drivers may utilize any combination of these exemptions
and exceptions, providing they comply fully with each separate
exemption and exception.
PART 391--QUALIFICATIONS OF DRIVERS AND LONGER COMBINATION VEHICLE
(LCV) DRIVER INSTRUCTORS
0
8. The authority citation for Part 391 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 508, 31133, 31136, and 31502; sec.
4007(b) of Pub. L. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2152; sec. 114 of Pub.
L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1677; sec. 215 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113
Stat. 1748, 1767; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830;
and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
9. Amend Sec. 391.2 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 391.2 General exceptions.
* * * * *
(d) Covered farm vehicles. The rules in part 391, Subpart E--
Physical Qualifications and Examinations--do not apply to drivers of
``covered farm vehicles,'' as defined in 49 CFR 390.5.
PART 395--HOURS OF SERVICE OF DRIVERS
0
10. The authority citation for Part 395 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136, 31137, and 31502; sec.
113, Pub. L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1676; sec. 229, Pub. L. 106-
159 (as transferred by sec. 4115 and amended by secs. 4130-4132,
Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1726, 1743, 1744); sec. 4133, Pub.
L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1744; sec. 108, Pub. L. 110-432, 122
Stat. 4860-4866; sec. 32934, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830;
and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
11. Amend Sec. 395.1 by revising paragraph (k) and adding a new
paragraph (s) to read as follows:
Sec. 395.1 Scope of rules in this part.
* * * * *
(k) Agricultural operations. The provisions of this part shall not
apply during planting and harvesting periods, as determined by each
State, to drivers transporting
(1) Agricultural commodities from the source of the agricultural
commodities to a location within a 150 air-mile radius from the source;
(2) Farm supplies for agricultural purposes from a wholesale or
retail distribution point of the farm supplies to a farm or other
location where the farm supplies are intended to be used within a 150
air-mile radius from the distribution point; or
(3) Farm supplies for agricultural purposes from a wholesale
distribution point of the farm supplies to a retail distribution point
of the farm supplies within a 150 air-mile radius from the wholesale
distribution point.
* * * * *
(s) Covered farm vehicles. The rules in this part do not apply to
drivers of ``covered farm vehicles,'' as defined in 49 CFR 390.5.
PART 396--INSPECTION, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE
0
12. The authority citation for Part 396 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136, 31151, and 31502; sec.
32934, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
13. Amend Sec. 396.1 by adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 396.1 Scope.
* * * * *
(c) This part does not apply to ``covered farm vehicles,'' as
defined in 49 CFR 390.5, or to the drivers of such vehicles.
Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: March 8,
2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-05897 Filed 3-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P