Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Parrotfish Management Measures in St. Croix, 15338-15340 [2013-05538]
Download as PDF
15338
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R02–RCRA–2013–0144; FRL–9693–3]
New York: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
New York State has applied to
EPA for final authorization of changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended,
commonly referred to as the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
EPA proposes to grant final
authorization to New York for these
changes, with limited exceptions. EPA
has determined that these changes
satisfy all requirements needed to
qualify for final authorization, and is
authorizing the state’s changes through
a direct final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R02–
RCRA–2013–0144, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: infurna.michael@.epa.gov.
• Fax: (212) 637–4437, to the
attention of Michael Infurna.
• Mail: Michael Infurna, EPA, Region
2, 290 Broadway, 22nd Floor, New
York, NY 10007.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: Michael Infurna,
EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 22nd
Floor, New York, NY 10007. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The public is advised to call
in advance to verify the business hours.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
For further information on how to
submit comments, please see today’s
direct final rule published in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Infurna, EPA Region 2, 290
Broadway, 22nd floor, New York, NY
10007; telephone number (212) 637–
4177; fax number: (212) 637–4437;
email address:
infurna.michael@.epa.gov.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
In the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register notice, EPA is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Mar 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
authorizing the changes by a direct final
rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior
to the direct final rule because we
believe this action is not controversial
and do not expect comments that
oppose it. We have explained the
reasons for this authorization in the
preamble to the direct final rule. Unless
we receive adverse written comments
which oppose this authorization during
the comment period, the direct final
rule will become effective on the date it
establishes, and we will not take further
action on this proposal. If we receive
comments that oppose this action, we
will either withdraw the direct final rule
or the portion of the direct final rule
that is the subject of the comments.
Only the remaining portion of the rule
will take effect. We will then respond to
those public comments opposing this
authorization in a later final
authorization notice based on this
proposal. This final authorization notice
may or may not include changes based
on comments received during the public
notice comment period. You may not
have another opportunity for comment.
If you want to comment on this action,
you should do so at this time.
Dated: December 19, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2013–05479 Filed 3–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120510052–3174–01]
RIN 0648–BC20
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands; Parrotfish Management
Measures in St. Croix
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement management measures
described in Regulatory Amendment 4
to the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands (FMP), as prepared
by the Caribbean Fishery Management
Council (Council). If implemented, this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rule would establish minimum size
limits for parrotfish in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off St. Croix in the
U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). The intent of
this proposed rule is to provide
additional protection from harvest to
maturing parrotfish and to assist the
stock in achieving optimum yield (OY).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2013–0009’’, by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130009, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Britni Tokotch, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South,
St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the regulatory
amendment, which includes an
environmental assessment and an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA),
and a regulatory impact review may be
obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office Web site at https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/
CaribbeanReefFish.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Britni Tokotch, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone 727–824–5305;
email: Britni.Tokotch@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef
fish fishery of Puerto Rico and the USVI
is managed under the FMP, which was
prepared by the Council and
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Background
In the 2011 Status of U.S. Fisheries
Report to Congress, Caribbean parrotfish
were classified as undergoing
overfishing. Parrotfish perform an
important ecological function on U.S.
Caribbean coral reefs: They graze on
algae, which competes for space with a
variety of coral species. This ecological
role has become more relevant in the
past 30 years as the longspine sea
urchin, another important coral reef
grazer, has declined in population
throughout the Caribbean. Additionally,
parrotfish are considered a cultural
component of the U.S. Caribbean diet,
particularly in St. Croix, where they are
a targeted species.
To maintain the viability of the
parrotfish stock, an adequate number of
juvenile parrotfish must achieve
maturity and spawn prior to being
harvested. In the absence of minimum
size limits, substantial numbers of
immature parrotfish will likely be
harvested, eliminating the potential of
those fish to reach maturity and spawn.
Within the Caribbean reef fish fishery,
the parrotfish fishery management unit
is composed of 10 species: blue,
midnight, rainbow, princess, queen,
redfin, redtail, stoplight, striped, and
redband parrotfish. Amendment 5 to the
FMP (Amendment 5)(76 FR 82404,
December 30, 2011), prohibited the
harvest of midnight, blue, and rainbow
parrotfish, and established recreational
bag and possession limits for the other
parrotfish species. Additionally,
Amendment 5 set annual catch limits
(ACLs) and accountability measures
(AMs) for three island management
areas: Puerto Rico, St. Thomas/St. John
(USVI), and St. Croix (USVI).
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Management Measure Contained in this
Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would establish
minimum size limits for parrotfish
species in the EEZ off St. Croix. These
limits would apply to both the
commercial and recreational sectors.
This rule would establish a minimum
size limit of 8 inches (20.3 cm), fork
length, for redband parrotfish and 9
inches (22.9 cm), fork length, for all
other parrotfish. The current harvest
prohibition for midnight, blue, and
rainbow parrotfish would remain in
effect.
The Council and NMFS are proposing
a minimum size limit of 9 inches (22.9
cm) for all but one of the parrotfish
species for which harvest is allowed,
because this size limit best captures the
range of sizes at maturity for these
species. The Council and NMFS are
proposing a minimum size limit of 8
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Mar 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
inches (20.3 cm) for redband parrotfish
because they are relatively smaller fish
and they reach maturity at a smaller size
than the other managed parrotfish
species. A minimum size limit would
reduce reduce mortality of smaller
(generally female) parrotfish, thereby
enhancing spawning biomass and the
supply of gametes (especially eggs), and
ultimately increasing yield-per-recruit
from the stock (assuming discard
mortality is low). Parrotfish discard
mortality is assumed to be low because
spears are the predominant gear used to
harvest parrotfish and therefore the fish
are individually targeted. In addition,
discard mortality of parrotfish harvested
by trap is expected to be low because
parrotfish are harvested in relatively
shallow waters, thus reducing the threat
of barotrauma related mortality. A
minimum size limit also reduces the
likelihood of recruitment overfishing
that might otherwise lead to a stock
biomass level below maximum
sustainable yield. Therefore, this
proposed rule would set a size limit to
increase the number of juvenile
parrotfish that can reach sexual maturity
and assist the stock in achieving OY.
The Council chose not to establish
minimum size limits for Puerto Rico
and St. Thomas/St. John island
management areas in the U.S. Caribbean
because parrotfish harvest in those areas
is substantially lower than in St. Croix.
St. Croix parrotfish harvest represents
36.4 percent of the total combined St.
Croix commercial ACL (all St. Croix
commercial ACLs), in pounds. The
recreational harvest of parrotfish in St.
Croix and in St. Thomas/St. John is
unknown. In Puerto Rico, parrotfish
comprise 3.5 percent and 2.3 percent
total combined of the Puerto Rico
recreational and commercial ACLs, in
pounds, respectively. In St. Thomas/St.
John, parrotfish comprise 7.2 percent of
the total combined commercial ACL, in
pounds.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
FMP, the regulatory amendment, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 603, for this
rule. The IRFA describes the economic
impact that this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15339
A description of the proposed rule, why
it is being considered, the objectives of,
and legal basis for the rule are contained
at the beginning of this section in the
preamble and in the SUMMARY section of
the preamble. A copy of the full analysis
is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA
follows.
The purpose of this rule is to provide
protection from harvest to maturing
parrotfish in the EEZ off St. Croix. The
parrotfish management unit in the U.S.
Caribbean is composed of multiple
species. Together, these species
represent an ecologically, culturally,
and economically important group,
particularly on the island of St. Croix
where they support a targeted fishery for
both the commercial and recreational
sectors, in both the EEZ and territorial
waters. The commercial and
recreational minimum size limits are
necessary for the St. Croix island
management unit because without
minimum size limits, substantial
numbers of immature parrotfish may be
harvested, thus eliminating individuals
before they have a chance to reproduce.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for the proposed
action. No duplicative, overlapping, or
conflicting Federal rules have been
identified.
The rule would apply directly to
licensed commercial fishermen in the
Finfish Fishing Industry (NAICS
114111) and indirectly to for-hire
operations in the Charter Fishing
Industry (NAICS 487210) that harvest
seven parrotfish species (princess,
queen, redfin, redtail, redband,
stoplight, and striped) within the EEZ
off St. Croix, USVI.
An estimated 142 of St. Croix’s 177
small businesses in the Finfish Fishing
Industry are expected to be affected by
this proposed rule. None of the three
small businesses in the Charter Fishing
Industry are expected to be affected
because for-hire fishing boats in the U.S.
Caribbean tend to target pelagic species
and other sport fish, not parrotfish.
This rule would not establish any new
reporting or record-keeping
requirements. This rule would require
small businesses in the Finfish Fishing
Industry to measure parrotfish and
discard those that are under their
respective minimum size limit. Three
scenarios are presented to illustrate the
range of adverse economic impacts on
these small businesses.
In the first scenario, small businesses
are assumed to be currently catching
and landing larger parrotfish in reaction
to the ACL established for parrotfish off
St. Croix (76 FR 82404, December 30,
2011), and rarely, if at all, catching
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
15340
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
parrotfish less than the proposed
minimum size limits. If true, the
establishment of an 8 inch (20.3 cm)
minimum size limit for redband
parrotfish and a 9 inch (22.9 cm)
minimum size limit for all other
allowable parrotfish would have little to
no adverse economic impact beyond the
estimated $5 to $10 cost of acquiring a
measuring tool and an additional small
amount of time (estimated 4–5 seconds)
to measure a smaller sized parrotfish.
The second scenario assumes small
businesses have not changed their catch
patterns because of the St. Croix
parrotfish ACL and cannot mitigate for
losses of landings due to discarded and
not speared undersized parrotfish. If
true, the proposed implementation of
parrotfish minimum size limits for St.
Croix would result in an estimated
annual loss of parrotfish landings
between 960 lb (435 kg) and 13,920 lb
(6,314 kg). If the average ex-vessel price
of a parrotfish is estimated as high as $5
per pound, then annual revenue losses
to all small businesses would be
between $4,800 and $69,600. Added to
these revenue losses would be the
additional time needed to measure
every parrotfish that was caught in
traps, nets or lines, which would
increase trip time and trip-associated
costs. Also, there would be the
additional time for divers to visually
measure every parrotfish that could be
speared, which would increase trip time
and trip-associated costs. These
combined losses of revenue and added
time and trip costs would not be
distributed equally. Because pot-andtrap fishermen have landed the greatest
percent of smaller parrotfish, small
businesses that use pots and traps
would experience the greatest percent
losses of revenues and greatest increase
in fishing time and trip costs.
A third and final scenario expects
small businesses would act to mitigate
for losses of commercial landings
caused by the establishment of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Mar 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
parrotfish minimum size limits in St.
Croix by increasing fishing time to catch
enough legally sized parrotfish, or other
species, to offset pounds discarded in
undersized parrotfish. It is expected that
the ability of small businesses to
increase their time on, or in the water,
and associated costs of that time varies
significantly, depending on the
commercial fisher’s personal and family
responsibilities, including if they are
engaged in full-time or part-time wage
labor or not. It is unknown if such a
disproportionate adverse impact on potand-trap fishermen could also represent
a disproportionate adverse impact on St.
Croix’s small businesses of a specific
geographic area or business size or by
the ethnicity, age, or race of the owner
of the business.
The status quo alternative (no setting
of a parrotfish minimum size limit) was
considered but rejected by the Council
because it would allow for continued
harvest of juvenile parrotfish in St.
Croix before they can reach sexual
maturity, which increases the risk of an
inferior (less productive) stock and
reduced revenues from parrotfish
landings in the long term.
In summary, the proposed rule, if
implemented, would likely have a
significantly larger adverse economic
impact on St. Croix pot-and-trap and
other non-diving fishermen because a
larger percentage of their historical
catches are composed of smaller
parrotfish. The proposed action may
drive pot-and-trap and other non-diving
commercial fishermen out of the
parrotfish component of the reef fish
fishery. Moreover, the economic impact
of this rule cannot be considered in
isolation. It would add to the adverse
economic impacts of the recently
implemented St. Croix Parrotfish ACL
(76 FR 82404, December 30, 2011),
which is expected to reduce non-diving
fishermen’s historical shares of annual
landings of parrotfish.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
This proposed rule would not be
expected to directly affect any other
small entities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: March 5, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.37, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
■
§ 622.37
Size limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Caribbean reef fish: (1) Yellowtail
snapper—12 inches (30.5 cm), TL.
(2) Parrotfishes, except redband
parrotfish, in the St. Croix Management
Area only (as defined in Table 2 of
Appendix E to Part 622)—9 inches (22.9
cm), fork length. See § 622.32(b)(1)(v)
for the current prohibition on the
harvest and possession of midnight
parrotfish, blue parrotfish, or rainbow
parrotfish.
(3) Redband parrotfish, in the St.
Croix Management Area only (as
defined in Table 2 of Appendix E to Part
622)—8 inches (20.3 cm), fork length.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–05538 Filed 3–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15338-15340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05538]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120510052-3174-01]
RIN 0648-BC20
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;
Parrotfish Management Measures in St. Croix
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement management measures
described in Regulatory Amendment 4 to the Fishery Management Plan for
the Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands (FMP),
as prepared by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council (Council). If
implemented, this rule would establish minimum size limits for
parrotfish in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off St. Croix in the
U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). The intent of this proposed rule is to
provide additional protection from harvest to maturing parrotfish and
to assist the stock in achieving optimum yield (OY).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
``NOAA-NMFS-2013-0009'', by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0009, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Britni Tokotch, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the regulatory amendment, which includes an
environmental assessment and an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA), and a regulatory impact review may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/CaribbeanReefFish.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Britni Tokotch, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone 727-824-5305; email: Britni.Tokotch@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef fish fishery of Puerto Rico and the
USVI is managed under the FMP, which was prepared by the Council and
implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
[[Page 15339]]
Background
In the 2011 Status of U.S. Fisheries Report to Congress, Caribbean
parrotfish were classified as undergoing overfishing. Parrotfish
perform an important ecological function on U.S. Caribbean coral reefs:
They graze on algae, which competes for space with a variety of coral
species. This ecological role has become more relevant in the past 30
years as the longspine sea urchin, another important coral reef grazer,
has declined in population throughout the Caribbean. Additionally,
parrotfish are considered a cultural component of the U.S. Caribbean
diet, particularly in St. Croix, where they are a targeted species.
To maintain the viability of the parrotfish stock, an adequate
number of juvenile parrotfish must achieve maturity and spawn prior to
being harvested. In the absence of minimum size limits, substantial
numbers of immature parrotfish will likely be harvested, eliminating
the potential of those fish to reach maturity and spawn.
Within the Caribbean reef fish fishery, the parrotfish fishery
management unit is composed of 10 species: blue, midnight, rainbow,
princess, queen, redfin, redtail, stoplight, striped, and redband
parrotfish. Amendment 5 to the FMP (Amendment 5)(76 FR 82404, December
30, 2011), prohibited the harvest of midnight, blue, and rainbow
parrotfish, and established recreational bag and possession limits for
the other parrotfish species. Additionally, Amendment 5 set annual
catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs) for three island
management areas: Puerto Rico, St. Thomas/St. John (USVI), and St.
Croix (USVI).
Management Measure Contained in this Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would establish minimum size limits for
parrotfish species in the EEZ off St. Croix. These limits would apply
to both the commercial and recreational sectors. This rule would
establish a minimum size limit of 8 inches (20.3 cm), fork length, for
redband parrotfish and 9 inches (22.9 cm), fork length, for all other
parrotfish. The current harvest prohibition for midnight, blue, and
rainbow parrotfish would remain in effect.
The Council and NMFS are proposing a minimum size limit of 9 inches
(22.9 cm) for all but one of the parrotfish species for which harvest
is allowed, because this size limit best captures the range of sizes at
maturity for these species. The Council and NMFS are proposing a
minimum size limit of 8 inches (20.3 cm) for redband parrotfish because
they are relatively smaller fish and they reach maturity at a smaller
size than the other managed parrotfish species. A minimum size limit
would reduce reduce mortality of smaller (generally female) parrotfish,
thereby enhancing spawning biomass and the supply of gametes
(especially eggs), and ultimately increasing yield-per-recruit from the
stock (assuming discard mortality is low). Parrotfish discard mortality
is assumed to be low because spears are the predominant gear used to
harvest parrotfish and therefore the fish are individually targeted. In
addition, discard mortality of parrotfish harvested by trap is expected
to be low because parrotfish are harvested in relatively shallow
waters, thus reducing the threat of barotrauma related mortality. A
minimum size limit also reduces the likelihood of recruitment
overfishing that might otherwise lead to a stock biomass level below
maximum sustainable yield. Therefore, this proposed rule would set a
size limit to increase the number of juvenile parrotfish that can reach
sexual maturity and assist the stock in achieving OY.
The Council chose not to establish minimum size limits for Puerto
Rico and St. Thomas/St. John island management areas in the U.S.
Caribbean because parrotfish harvest in those areas is substantially
lower than in St. Croix. St. Croix parrotfish harvest represents 36.4
percent of the total combined St. Croix commercial ACL (all St. Croix
commercial ACLs), in pounds. The recreational harvest of parrotfish in
St. Croix and in St. Thomas/St. John is unknown. In Puerto Rico,
parrotfish comprise 3.5 percent and 2.3 percent total combined of the
Puerto Rico recreational and commercial ACLs, in pounds, respectively.
In St. Thomas/St. John, parrotfish comprise 7.2 percent of the total
combined commercial ACL, in pounds.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the FMP, the regulatory amendment, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 603, for this rule. The IRFA describes the
economic impact that this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on
small entities. A description of the proposed rule, why it is being
considered, the objectives of, and legal basis for the rule are
contained at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A copy of the full analysis is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA follows.
The purpose of this rule is to provide protection from harvest to
maturing parrotfish in the EEZ off St. Croix. The parrotfish management
unit in the U.S. Caribbean is composed of multiple species. Together,
these species represent an ecologically, culturally, and economically
important group, particularly on the island of St. Croix where they
support a targeted fishery for both the commercial and recreational
sectors, in both the EEZ and territorial waters. The commercial and
recreational minimum size limits are necessary for the St. Croix island
management unit because without minimum size limits, substantial
numbers of immature parrotfish may be harvested, thus eliminating
individuals before they have a chance to reproduce.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for the
proposed action. No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal
rules have been identified.
The rule would apply directly to licensed commercial fishermen in
the Finfish Fishing Industry (NAICS 114111) and indirectly to for-hire
operations in the Charter Fishing Industry (NAICS 487210) that harvest
seven parrotfish species (princess, queen, redfin, redtail, redband,
stoplight, and striped) within the EEZ off St. Croix, USVI.
An estimated 142 of St. Croix's 177 small businesses in the Finfish
Fishing Industry are expected to be affected by this proposed rule.
None of the three small businesses in the Charter Fishing Industry are
expected to be affected because for-hire fishing boats in the U.S.
Caribbean tend to target pelagic species and other sport fish, not
parrotfish.
This rule would not establish any new reporting or record-keeping
requirements. This rule would require small businesses in the Finfish
Fishing Industry to measure parrotfish and discard those that are under
their respective minimum size limit. Three scenarios are presented to
illustrate the range of adverse economic impacts on these small
businesses.
In the first scenario, small businesses are assumed to be currently
catching and landing larger parrotfish in reaction to the ACL
established for parrotfish off St. Croix (76 FR 82404, December 30,
2011), and rarely, if at all, catching
[[Page 15340]]
parrotfish less than the proposed minimum size limits. If true, the
establishment of an 8 inch (20.3 cm) minimum size limit for redband
parrotfish and a 9 inch (22.9 cm) minimum size limit for all other
allowable parrotfish would have little to no adverse economic impact
beyond the estimated $5 to $10 cost of acquiring a measuring tool and
an additional small amount of time (estimated 4-5 seconds) to measure a
smaller sized parrotfish.
The second scenario assumes small businesses have not changed their
catch patterns because of the St. Croix parrotfish ACL and cannot
mitigate for losses of landings due to discarded and not speared
undersized parrotfish. If true, the proposed implementation of
parrotfish minimum size limits for St. Croix would result in an
estimated annual loss of parrotfish landings between 960 lb (435 kg)
and 13,920 lb (6,314 kg). If the average ex-vessel price of a
parrotfish is estimated as high as $5 per pound, then annual revenue
losses to all small businesses would be between $4,800 and $69,600.
Added to these revenue losses would be the additional time needed to
measure every parrotfish that was caught in traps, nets or lines, which
would increase trip time and trip-associated costs. Also, there would
be the additional time for divers to visually measure every parrotfish
that could be speared, which would increase trip time and trip-
associated costs. These combined losses of revenue and added time and
trip costs would not be distributed equally. Because pot-and-trap
fishermen have landed the greatest percent of smaller parrotfish, small
businesses that use pots and traps would experience the greatest
percent losses of revenues and greatest increase in fishing time and
trip costs.
A third and final scenario expects small businesses would act to
mitigate for losses of commercial landings caused by the establishment
of parrotfish minimum size limits in St. Croix by increasing fishing
time to catch enough legally sized parrotfish, or other species, to
offset pounds discarded in undersized parrotfish. It is expected that
the ability of small businesses to increase their time on, or in the
water, and associated costs of that time varies significantly,
depending on the commercial fisher's personal and family
responsibilities, including if they are engaged in full-time or part-
time wage labor or not. It is unknown if such a disproportionate
adverse impact on pot-and-trap fishermen could also represent a
disproportionate adverse impact on St. Croix's small businesses of a
specific geographic area or business size or by the ethnicity, age, or
race of the owner of the business.
The status quo alternative (no setting of a parrotfish minimum size
limit) was considered but rejected by the Council because it would
allow for continued harvest of juvenile parrotfish in St. Croix before
they can reach sexual maturity, which increases the risk of an inferior
(less productive) stock and reduced revenues from parrotfish landings
in the long term.
In summary, the proposed rule, if implemented, would likely have a
significantly larger adverse economic impact on St. Croix pot-and-trap
and other non-diving fishermen because a larger percentage of their
historical catches are composed of smaller parrotfish. The proposed
action may drive pot-and-trap and other non-diving commercial fishermen
out of the parrotfish component of the reef fish fishery. Moreover, the
economic impact of this rule cannot be considered in isolation. It
would add to the adverse economic impacts of the recently implemented
St. Croix Parrotfish ACL (76 FR 82404, December 30, 2011), which is
expected to reduce non-diving fishermen's historical shares of annual
landings of parrotfish.
This proposed rule would not be expected to directly affect any
other small entities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: March 5, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 622.37, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.37 Size limits.
* * * * *
(a) Caribbean reef fish: (1) Yellowtail snapper--12 inches (30.5
cm), TL.
(2) Parrotfishes, except redband parrotfish, in the St. Croix
Management Area only (as defined in Table 2 of Appendix E to Part
622)--9 inches (22.9 cm), fork length. See Sec. 622.32(b)(1)(v) for
the current prohibition on the harvest and possession of midnight
parrotfish, blue parrotfish, or rainbow parrotfish.
(3) Redband parrotfish, in the St. Croix Management Area only (as
defined in Table 2 of Appendix E to Part 622)--8 inches (20.3 cm), fork
length.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-05538 Filed 3-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P