Food and Drug Administration Prescription Drug User Fee Act V Benefit-Risk Plan; Request for Comments, 15019-15020 [2013-05471]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0196]
Food and Drug Administration
Prescription Drug User Fee Act V
Benefit-Risk Plan; Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice, request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft 5year plan describing the Agency’s
approach to further developing and
implementing a structured framework
for benefit-risk assessment in the human
drug and biologic review process and
the opportunity for public comment on
the draft plan. This plan is part of FDA’s
commitments that were made as part of
the fifth authorization of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA
V). FDA has published the draft plan on
its Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/
PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
UCM329758.pdf.
Submit either electronic or
written comments by May 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. All comments should be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Graham Thompson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 1199,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
5003, FAX: 301–847–8443, Email:
Graham.Thompson@fda.hhs.gov; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (HFM–17),
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville,
MD 20852–1448, 301–827–6210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
I. Background
On July 9, 2012, the President signed
into law the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act (FDASIA), (Pub. L. 112–144).
Section 905 of FDASIA amends section
505(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) by requiring
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:44 Mar 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
FDA to ‘‘implement a structured riskbenefit assessment framework in the
new drug approval process to facilitate
the balanced consideration of benefits
and risks, a consistent and systematic
approach to the discussion and
regulatory decisionmaking, and the
communication of the benefits and risks
of new drugs.’’ Title I of FDASIA
reauthorizes PDUFA and provides FDA
with the user fee resources necessary to
maintain an efficient review process for
human drug and biological products.
The reauthorization of PDUFA includes
performance goals and procedures for
the Agency that represent FDA’s
commitments during fiscal years 2013–
2017. These commitments are fully
described in the document entitled
‘‘PDUFA Reauthorization Performance
Goals and Procedures Fiscal Years 2013
through 2017’’ (‘‘PDUFA Goals
Document’’), available on FDA’s Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
ForIndustry/UserFees/
PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
UCM270412.pdf. Section X of the
PDUFA Goals Document, titled
‘‘Enhancing Benefit-Risk Assessment in
Regulatory Decisionmaking,’’ addresses
the development of a 5-year plan that
describes the Agency’s approach to
further develop and implement a
structured benefit-risk framework in its
human drug and biologic review
process. The publication and
implementation of this plan are
intended to fulfill the requirement in
section 905 of FDASIA and the
commitments described in Section X of
the PDUFA Goals Document.
II. Draft Plan Describing Structured
Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment
Ensuring the safety, effectiveness, and
quality of human drugs is a complicated
regulatory task, requiring FDA’s
consideration of a multitude of complex
factors. FDA’s regulatory decision
making process takes into consideration
not only the data submitted in a
marketing application, but also a broad
set of additional factors, including the
clinical context for the proposed
product (such as the nature and severity
of the disease or condition that the
proposed product is intended to treat or
prevent and the benefits and risks of
other available therapies for that disease
or condition) and any risk management
tools that might be necessary to ensure
that the benefits of the proposed
product outweigh its risks.
FDA believes that implementing a
standardized structure for the analysis
of the various benefit and risk
considerations that make up a
regulatory decision will help to
facilitate balanced and consistent
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15019
consideration of the benefit and risk
factors during the review process and to
enhance the transparency of regulatory
review. FDA therefore has developed a
draft plan describing a benefit-risk
assessment framework that is designed
to make explicit the consideration of the
various benefit-risk factors and the role
of those factors in the regulatory
decision-making process for human
drug and biological product marketing
applications. It is important to note that,
as specified in section 905 of FDASIA,
this framework does not change the
criteria for approval of a drug or
biological product. All new drug
applications and biological license
applications must meet the
requirements for approval under the
FD&C Act and the Public Health Service
Act, respectively.
By clearly articulating FDA’s key
considerations in a standard structure,
this framework can serve as an
important tool for the analysis and
discussion of the relevant benefit and
risk considerations during the review
process. A second and equally
important purpose of the benefit-risk
framework is that it can serve as a tool
to communicate the reasoning of FDA’s
regulatory decisions to the public. When
FDA approves a new drug or biological
product, it generally posts decisional
memos on the Agency’s Web site. These
documents may be highly technical and
may not be easily understandable to a
broad audience with varying
backgrounds. The benefit-risk
framework aims to enhance FDA’s
communication of its decisions by
making clear the important
considerations in the Agency’s decisionmaking process, and how they affected
the final regulatory decision, in a clear,
succinct summary.
With this notice, FDA is announcing
the availability of a draft 5-year plan
describing the Agency’s approach to
further developing and implementing
the benefit-risk framework and the
opportunity for the public to comment
on the plan. FDA has published the plan
on the Agency’s Web site at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/
UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
UCM329758.pdf. The comment period
will remain open for 60 days following
the publication of this notice. After
consideration of public comments, FDA
will finalize the plan. Throughout
PDUFA V, the Agency will update the
plan as necessary and post all updates
on the FDA’s Web site.
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
15020
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Notices
Dated: March 5, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–05471 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Report on Carcinogens Webinar on
Pentachlorophenol; Notice of Public
Webinar and Registration Information
SUMMARY: The National Toxicology
Program (NTP) announces a public
webinar, ‘‘Human cancer studies on
exposure to pentachlorophenol (PCP):
Differentiating potential cancer effects
of PCP exposure from effects due to
occupational co-exposures or PCP
contaminants.’’ The Office of the Report
on Carcinogens (ORoC), Division of the
NTP (DNTP), National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
will hold the webinar using Adobe®
ConnectTM, and the public can register
to attend.
DATES:
Webinar: April 11, 2013, 12:30 p.m. to
approximately 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Time (EDT).
Pre-Registration for Webinar: March 8,
2013 to April 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Webinar Web page: The agenda,
speaker abstracts, registration, and other
meeting materials are at https://
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/pcpwebinar.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Ruth M. Lunn, Director, ORoC, DNTP,
NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD K2–14,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Phone: (919) 316–4637; Fax: (301) 480–
2970, Email: lunn@niehs.nih.gov. Hand
Delivery/Courier: 530 Davis Drive,
Room 2138, Morrisville, NC 27560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Report on
Carcinogens (RoC) is a congressionally
mandated, science-based, public health
report that identifies agents, substances,
mixtures, or exposures (collectively
called ‘‘substances’’) in our environment
that are cancer hazards for people living
in the United States. The NTP prepares
the RoC on behalf of the Secretary of
Health and Human Services following
an established, four-part process
(https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocprocess).
PCP, including its sodium salt, is a
chlorinated aromatic compound that is
used primarily as a wood preservative
in the United States. It was selected as
a candidate substance following
solicitation of public comment and
review by the NTP Board of Scientific
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:44 Mar 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Counselors on June 21–22, 2012
(https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/9741) (for
more information on the status of NTP
review of PCP see https://
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/37897).
The objective of the webinar is to
provide scientific input to the ORoC on
issues related to its approach for
evaluating the epidemiologic studies on
exposure to PCP and not to receive
recommendations from invited speakers
or the public on whether or not PCP
should be listed in the RoC. The
webinar will consist of (1) four
presentations, each of which will be
followed by a short question and answer
period specific for the presentation, and
(2) a discussion session across
presentations. The goals of the
individual presentations are (1) to
identify occupational co-exposures and
PCP components or contaminants in
human epidemiologic studies of
exposure to PCP, (2) to identify which
co-exposures should be considered as
potential confounders, and (3) to
discuss the methods used in the
epidemiologic studies to evaluate
confounding.
Webinar and Registration: The
webinar is scheduled for April 11, 2013,
from 12:30 to approximately 5 p.m.
e.d.t. The webinar may end early if the
presentations and general discussion
period are finished. The public may
register for the webinar beginning
March 8, 2013, through April 8, 2013, at
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/pcpwebinar.
There will be 50 connections available
on a first-come, first-served basis for
registrants. Registrants will receive
instructions by email to access the
webinar (via Adobe® ConnectTM) on or
before April 9, 2013.
The preliminary agenda, list of
speakers, and abstracts of the
presentations should be posted on the
NTP Web site (https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/
go/pcpwebinar) by March 26, 2013.
Registrants are encouraged to access the
webinar Web page to stay abreast of the
most current information regarding this
event. Any updates will be posted to the
Web site.
Public Participation: Time will be set
aside following each presentation and
during the general discussion period
after the talks are finished for the public
to ask questions or make brief remarks.
Instructions for participating in the
meeting via Adobe® ConnectTM will be
included in the information for
accessing the webinar. Individuals with
disabilities who need accommodation to
participate in this event should contact
Dr. Lunn. TTY users should contact the
Federal TTY Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. Requests should be made at least
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
five business days in advance of the
event.
Background Information on the RoC:
Published biennially, each edition of the
RoC is cumulative and consists of
substances newly reviewed in addition
to those listed in previous editions. The
12th RoC, the latest edition, was
published on June 10, 2011 (available at
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc12). The
13th RoC is under development. For
each listed substance, the RoC contains
a substance profile, which provides
information on: Cancer studies that
support the listing—including those in
humans, animals, and studies on
possible mechanisms of action—
information about potential sources of
exposure to humans, and current
Federal regulations to limit exposures.
Dated: March 4, 2013.
John R. Bucher,
Associate Director, National Toxicology
Program.
[FR Doc. 2013–05405 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of General Medical
Sciences; Notice of Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis
Panel; Review K99 Grant Applications.
Date: April 3, 2013.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One
Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Contact Person: John J. Laffan, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific
Review, National Institute of General Medical
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45
Center Drive, Room 3An.18J, Bethesda, MD
20892, 301–594–2773, laffanjo@mail.nih.gov.
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15019-15020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05471]
[[Page 15019]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0196]
Food and Drug Administration Prescription Drug User Fee Act V
Benefit-Risk Plan; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft 5-year plan describing the
Agency's approach to further developing and implementing a structured
framework for benefit-risk assessment in the human drug and biologic
review process and the opportunity for public comment on the draft
plan. This plan is part of FDA's commitments that were made as part of
the fifth authorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA
V). FDA has published the draft plan on its Web site at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM329758.pdf.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by May 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Graham Thompson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 1199, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
5003, FAX: 301-847-8443, Email: Graham.Thompson@fda.hhs.gov; or Stephen
Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-17), Food and
Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD
20852-1448, 301-827-6210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 9, 2012, the President signed into law the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), (Pub. L. 112-144).
Section 905 of FDASIA amends section 505(d) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) by requiring FDA to ``implement a
structured risk-benefit assessment framework in the new drug approval
process to facilitate the balanced consideration of benefits and risks,
a consistent and systematic approach to the discussion and regulatory
decisionmaking, and the communication of the benefits and risks of new
drugs.'' Title I of FDASIA reauthorizes PDUFA and provides FDA with the
user fee resources necessary to maintain an efficient review process
for human drug and biological products. The reauthorization of PDUFA
includes performance goals and procedures for the Agency that represent
FDA's commitments during fiscal years 2013-2017. These commitments are
fully described in the document entitled ``PDUFA Reauthorization
Performance Goals and Procedures Fiscal Years 2013 through 2017''
(``PDUFA Goals Document''), available on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM270412.pdf. Section X of the PDUFA Goals Document, titled
``Enhancing Benefit-Risk Assessment in Regulatory Decisionmaking,''
addresses the development of a 5-year plan that describes the Agency's
approach to further develop and implement a structured benefit-risk
framework in its human drug and biologic review process. The
publication and implementation of this plan are intended to fulfill the
requirement in section 905 of FDASIA and the commitments described in
Section X of the PDUFA Goals Document.
II. Draft Plan Describing Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk
Assessment
Ensuring the safety, effectiveness, and quality of human drugs is a
complicated regulatory task, requiring FDA's consideration of a
multitude of complex factors. FDA's regulatory decision making process
takes into consideration not only the data submitted in a marketing
application, but also a broad set of additional factors, including the
clinical context for the proposed product (such as the nature and
severity of the disease or condition that the proposed product is
intended to treat or prevent and the benefits and risks of other
available therapies for that disease or condition) and any risk
management tools that might be necessary to ensure that the benefits of
the proposed product outweigh its risks.
FDA believes that implementing a standardized structure for the
analysis of the various benefit and risk considerations that make up a
regulatory decision will help to facilitate balanced and consistent
consideration of the benefit and risk factors during the review process
and to enhance the transparency of regulatory review. FDA therefore has
developed a draft plan describing a benefit-risk assessment framework
that is designed to make explicit the consideration of the various
benefit-risk factors and the role of those factors in the regulatory
decision-making process for human drug and biological product marketing
applications. It is important to note that, as specified in section 905
of FDASIA, this framework does not change the criteria for approval of
a drug or biological product. All new drug applications and biological
license applications must meet the requirements for approval under the
FD&C Act and the Public Health Service Act, respectively.
By clearly articulating FDA's key considerations in a standard
structure, this framework can serve as an important tool for the
analysis and discussion of the relevant benefit and risk considerations
during the review process. A second and equally important purpose of
the benefit-risk framework is that it can serve as a tool to
communicate the reasoning of FDA's regulatory decisions to the public.
When FDA approves a new drug or biological product, it generally posts
decisional memos on the Agency's Web site. These documents may be
highly technical and may not be easily understandable to a broad
audience with varying backgrounds. The benefit-risk framework aims to
enhance FDA's communication of its decisions by making clear the
important considerations in the Agency's decision-making process, and
how they affected the final regulatory decision, in a clear, succinct
summary.
With this notice, FDA is announcing the availability of a draft 5-
year plan describing the Agency's approach to further developing and
implementing the benefit-risk framework and the opportunity for the
public to comment on the plan. FDA has published the plan on the
Agency's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM329758.pdf. The comment period will remain
open for 60 days following the publication of this notice. After
consideration of public comments, FDA will finalize the plan.
Throughout PDUFA V, the Agency will update the plan as necessary and
post all updates on the FDA's Web site.
[[Page 15020]]
Dated: March 5, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-05471 Filed 3-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P