International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) Program Change, 14912-14913 [2013-05452]
Download as PDF
14912
§ 71.1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
[Amended]
Paragraph 6005: Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
document modifies the IASA policies
previously announced by the FAA.
DATES: Effective date: April 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manager of the International Programs
and Policy Division (AFS–50), Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591,
(202) 385–8070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Background
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
AGL SD E5 Hot Springs, SD [Amended]
Hot Springs Municipal Airport, SD
(Lat. 43°22′06″ N., long. 103°23′18″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.4-mile
radius of Hot Springs Municipal Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 021° bearing
from the airport extending from the 7.4-mile
radius to 12.1 miles north of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February
12, 2013.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–05214 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 129
International Aviation Safety
Assessment (IASA) Program Change
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Policy statement.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This statement describes a
policy change to the FAA’s International
Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA)
program. The FAA wants to ensure that
countries do not remain on this listing
when the results of the FAA’s IASA
determinations as to those countries
might no longer be accurate or
reasonably current. The FAA is
accordingly adopting a procedure to
remove a country from the IASA
program summary listing when that
country’s air carriers no longer provide
air service to the United States, none of
the country’s air carriers participates in
code-share arrangements with U.S. air
carriers, and the country’s civil aviation
authority (CAA) has ceased interacting
with the FAA for an extended period of
time. The FAA is making this change to
improve the quality of the IASA
summary listing. This statement also
explains IASA Categories 1 and 2 in
terms of what the flying public may
reasonably take them to mean. This
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Mar 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Removal of Inactive Countries; and
Public Expectations of IASA Categories
Removal of Inactive Countries
Under the IASA program, the FAA
assesses whether another country’s
oversight of its air carriers that operate,
or seek to operate, into the U.S., or
codeshare with a U.S. air carrier,
complies with international aviation
safety standards established by the
International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO). The FAA
maintains and publishes a country-bycountry summary listing of the results of
its IASA determinations. Some
countries continue to be listed on the
IASA summary, whether in Category 1
or 2, even though the countries have no
air carriers that are serving the United
States or code sharing with one or more
U.S. partner airlines. Because of the lack
of air service to the United States, there
is minimal, if any, interaction between
the FAA and the subject CAAs. To date,
countries have not been removed from
the category listing for inactivity, even
though the safety oversight information
previously collected may become stale
and unreliable. To improve the quality
of information on the IASA program
summary category listing, the FAA is
initiating a process to remove inactive
countries from the listing.
Information generated by the IASA
program is used by the U.S. and foreign
governments, the aviation industry, and
the traveling public. IASA information
disseminated should be accurate and
reasonably current. To this end,
countries whose IASA information can
no longer be considered accurate and
reasonably current will be removed
from the published IASA summary
listing.
In determining whether a country’s
IASA information is no longer accurate
and reasonably current, we will proceed
on the basis that if, after a four year
period, a country has no air carrier
providing air transport service to the
United States, none of the country’s air
carriers participates in code-share
arrangements with U.S. air carriers, and
the CAA does not interact significantly
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with the FAA, the FAA will remove that
country from the IASA summary
category listing. These criteria will be
applied immediately in a review of
countries currently on the list and on a
continual basis going forward.
Before the FAA removes a country
from the IASA program listing, the
country’s CAA will receive formal
notification prior to the removal. Just as
it does when a country is added to the
list or a country’s IASA category is
changed, the FAA will notify the public
regarding the removal of a country from
the IASA summary listing.
Once a country is removed from the
IASA summary listing, a full
reassessment of the CAA must be
conducted before the country can be
rated in the IASA program and before a
carrier subject to that country’s aviation
safety oversight can serve the United
States using its own aircraft or can put
a U.S. carrier code on its flights.
Public Expectations of IASA Category
Ratings
Members of the public have asked
what the IASA category rating for a
country means when they are making
transportation choices. Category 1
means that the FAA has found that the
country meets ICAO Standards for
safety oversight of civil aviation.
Category 2 means that the FAA has
found that the country does not meet
those Standards. The ICAO Standards
are presumptively binding on ICAO
Member States as signatories to the
Chicago Convention. The Standards are
promulgated from time to time by ICAO
and grouped by subject matter (for
example, airline personnel licensing or
operation of aircraft) in Annexes to the
Chicago Convention.
The FAA normally determines the
appropriate IASA category rating for a
country using information collected
during an in-country assessment of that
country’s CAA. The FAA also may
consider other reliable sources of
information on a CAA’s compliance
with international standards when
making a determination of safety
oversight under the IASA program. The
FAA may use the information
developed by these other sources to
supplement the information developed
during an FAA assessment of the CAA,
or to entirely replace the assessment
altogether, when making an IASA
category determination.
In conducting its IASA assessments,
the FAA uses a standardized checklist
that groups the ICAO Standards on
safety oversight into eight critical
elements: (1) Primary aviation
legislation, (2) specific operating
regulations, (3) organization structure
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and safety oversight functions, (4)
technical personnel qualification and
training, (5) technical guidance, (6)
certification personnel and procedures,
(7) surveillance obligations, and (8)
resolution of safety issues. To achieve
Category 1, the country must
demonstrate that it meets the ICAO
Standards for each of the eight elements.
Category 2 means that the CAA was
noncompliant in at least one critical
element. The IASA assessment typically
is conducted over the course of one
week by a team consisting of a team
leader and at least one expert in
operations, maintenance, and aviation
law. Each FAA expert works through
the checklist with host country officials
for each of the critical elements. The
team looks at a representative sampling
of records and processes, and it follows
up with host country aviation officials
if deficiencies appear.
The FAA assessment focuses on the
ability of the host country’s aeronautical
authorities to oversee the operational
safety of its airlines. It does not assess
the safety compliance of any particular
air carrier (nor does it address aviation
security, airports, or air traffic
management). Although the FAA
assessment team typically visits one or
more air carriers during its mission, it
does so only to verify the relationship
between the carrier and the country’s
aviation safety officials, not to assess the
carrier itself.
Finally, the IASA category rating
applies only to services to and from the
United States and to codeshare
operations when the code of a U.S. air
carrier is placed on a foreign carrier
flight. The category ratings do not apply
to a foreign carrier’s domestic flights or
to flights by that carrier between its
homeland and a third country. The
assessment team looks at those flights
only to the extent that they reflect on
the country’s oversight of operations to
and from the United States and to
codeshare operations where a U.S. air
carrier code is placed on a flight
conducted by a foreign operator.
In short, a category 1 rating means
that, as to the operations by a category
1 country’s carriers between that
country and the United States, and
when the code of a U.S. air carrier is
placed on a foreign carrier flight, the
FAA has found that the country’s civil
aviation authorities exercise safety
oversight over those carriers consistent
with international safety standards. A
Category 2 rating, on the other hand,
means the FAA has found that, in at
least one critical area, the safety
measures applied by the country’s civil
aviation authorities do not meet
international standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Mar 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Current IASA category determinations
for countries included in the IASA
categorization system are available on
the FAA Web site at: https://
www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/iasa.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25,
2013.
Margaret Gilligan,
Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety.
[FR Doc. 2013–05452 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Part 254
RIN 2105–AE21
[Docket DOT–OST–2013–0044]
Domestic Baggage Liability
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with existing
regulations, this final rule raises the
minimum limit on domestic baggage
liability applicable to air carriers to
reflect inflation since July 2008, the
basis month of the most recent previous
revision to the liability limit. DOT
regulations require that the Department
of Transportation periodically revise the
limit to reflect changes in the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers
(CPI–U). This revision adjusts the
minimum limit of liability from the
current amount of $3,300, set by the
Department in November 2008, to
$3,400, to take into account the changes
in consumer prices since the prior
revision.
DATES:
This rule is effective on June 6,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Lowry, Senior Attorney, Office
of the General Counsel, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202–366–
9351, nick.lowry@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Revision of Liability Limit
Part 254 of the Department’s rules (14
CFR part 254) establishes minimum
baggage liability limits applicable to
domestic air service. Section 254.6 of
this rule requires the Department to
review every 2 years the minimum limit
of liability prescribed in Part 254 in
light of changes in the CPI–U and to
revise the limit of liability to reflect
changes in that index as of July of each
review year. Section 254.6 prescribes
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14913
the use of a specific formula to calculate
the revised minimum liability amount
when making these periodic
adjustments. The formula is below.
$2500 × (a/b) rounded to the nearest
$100
Where:
a = July CPI–U of year of current adjustment
b = the CPI–U figure in December 1999 when
the inflation adjustment provision was
added to part 254.
The review in 2010 indicated that no
inflation adjustment was required. In
2012, the review indicated that an
inflation adjustment is required.
Applying the formula to price index
changes occurring between December
1999 (the basis month required by the
formula) and July 2012 (the month for
each biannual adjustment as specified
in the formula), the appropriate
inflation adjustment is $2,500 ×
228.723/168.8 [$2,500 × 1.355], which
yields $3,387.50. (The base amount of
$2,500 in the formula was the minimum
liability limit in Part 254 at the time that
this biennial indexing provision was
added to the rule, 228.723 was the CPI–
U for July 2012, and 168.8 was the CPI–
U for December 1999. The CPI–U data
are from the seasonally adjusted series.)
Section 254.6 requires us to round the
adjustment to the nearest $100, or to
$3,400 in this case.
In its rule ‘‘Enhancing Airline
Passenger Protections’’ (76 FR 23110,
Apr. 25, 2011), the Department required
the amount of compensation due to
passengers in instances of denied
boarding (DBC) to be adjusted to reflect
CPI–U changes. Under 14 CFR 250.5(e),
the review of denied boarding
compensation was to take place every 2
years, with the first such review
occurring in July 2012, to coincide with
our review of the baggage liability
amount. We have reviewed the
compensation amounts stated in the
2011 rule according to the formula set
out in section 250.5(e) and found that
no change in DBC amounts is warranted
in 2012.
II. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) contains a ‘‘good
cause’’ exemption which allows
agencies to dispense with notice and
comment if those procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest. We have
determined that under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) good cause exists for
dispensing with a notice of proposed
rulemaking and public comment as the
application of this rule does not involve
any agency discretion. This rulemaking
is required by the terms of 14 CFR
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14912-14913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05452]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 129
International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) Program Change
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Policy statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This statement describes a policy change to the FAA's
International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) program. The FAA wants
to ensure that countries do not remain on this listing when the results
of the FAA's IASA determinations as to those countries might no longer
be accurate or reasonably current. The FAA is accordingly adopting a
procedure to remove a country from the IASA program summary listing
when that country's air carriers no longer provide air service to the
United States, none of the country's air carriers participates in code-
share arrangements with U.S. air carriers, and the country's civil
aviation authority (CAA) has ceased interacting with the FAA for an
extended period of time. The FAA is making this change to improve the
quality of the IASA summary listing. This statement also explains IASA
Categories 1 and 2 in terms of what the flying public may reasonably
take them to mean. This document modifies the IASA policies previously
announced by the FAA.
DATES: Effective date: April 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manager of the International Programs
and Policy Division (AFS-50), Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20591, (202) 385-8070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Removal of Inactive Countries; and Public Expectations of IASA
Categories
Removal of Inactive Countries
Under the IASA program, the FAA assesses whether another country's
oversight of its air carriers that operate, or seek to operate, into
the U.S., or codeshare with a U.S. air carrier, complies with
international aviation safety standards established by the
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The FAA maintains and
publishes a country-by-country summary listing of the results of its
IASA determinations. Some countries continue to be listed on the IASA
summary, whether in Category 1 or 2, even though the countries have no
air carriers that are serving the United States or code sharing with
one or more U.S. partner airlines. Because of the lack of air service
to the United States, there is minimal, if any, interaction between the
FAA and the subject CAAs. To date, countries have not been removed from
the category listing for inactivity, even though the safety oversight
information previously collected may become stale and unreliable. To
improve the quality of information on the IASA program summary category
listing, the FAA is initiating a process to remove inactive countries
from the listing.
Information generated by the IASA program is used by the U.S. and
foreign governments, the aviation industry, and the traveling public.
IASA information disseminated should be accurate and reasonably
current. To this end, countries whose IASA information can no longer be
considered accurate and reasonably current will be removed from the
published IASA summary listing.
In determining whether a country's IASA information is no longer
accurate and reasonably current, we will proceed on the basis that if,
after a four year period, a country has no air carrier providing air
transport service to the United States, none of the country's air
carriers participates in code-share arrangements with U.S. air
carriers, and the CAA does not interact significantly with the FAA, the
FAA will remove that country from the IASA summary category listing.
These criteria will be applied immediately in a review of countries
currently on the list and on a continual basis going forward.
Before the FAA removes a country from the IASA program listing, the
country's CAA will receive formal notification prior to the removal.
Just as it does when a country is added to the list or a country's IASA
category is changed, the FAA will notify the public regarding the
removal of a country from the IASA summary listing.
Once a country is removed from the IASA summary listing, a full
reassessment of the CAA must be conducted before the country can be
rated in the IASA program and before a carrier subject to that
country's aviation safety oversight can serve the United States using
its own aircraft or can put a U.S. carrier code on its flights.
Public Expectations of IASA Category Ratings
Members of the public have asked what the IASA category rating for
a country means when they are making transportation choices. Category 1
means that the FAA has found that the country meets ICAO Standards for
safety oversight of civil aviation. Category 2 means that the FAA has
found that the country does not meet those Standards. The ICAO
Standards are presumptively binding on ICAO Member States as
signatories to the Chicago Convention. The Standards are promulgated
from time to time by ICAO and grouped by subject matter (for example,
airline personnel licensing or operation of aircraft) in Annexes to the
Chicago Convention.
The FAA normally determines the appropriate IASA category rating
for a country using information collected during an in-country
assessment of that country's CAA. The FAA also may consider other
reliable sources of information on a CAA's compliance with
international standards when making a determination of safety oversight
under the IASA program. The FAA may use the information developed by
these other sources to supplement the information developed during an
FAA assessment of the CAA, or to entirely replace the assessment
altogether, when making an IASA category determination.
In conducting its IASA assessments, the FAA uses a standardized
checklist that groups the ICAO Standards on safety oversight into eight
critical elements: (1) Primary aviation legislation, (2) specific
operating regulations, (3) organization structure
[[Page 14913]]
and safety oversight functions, (4) technical personnel qualification
and training, (5) technical guidance, (6) certification personnel and
procedures, (7) surveillance obligations, and (8) resolution of safety
issues. To achieve Category 1, the country must demonstrate that it
meets the ICAO Standards for each of the eight elements. Category 2
means that the CAA was noncompliant in at least one critical element.
The IASA assessment typically is conducted over the course of one week
by a team consisting of a team leader and at least one expert in
operations, maintenance, and aviation law. Each FAA expert works
through the checklist with host country officials for each of the
critical elements. The team looks at a representative sampling of
records and processes, and it follows up with host country aviation
officials if deficiencies appear.
The FAA assessment focuses on the ability of the host country's
aeronautical authorities to oversee the operational safety of its
airlines. It does not assess the safety compliance of any particular
air carrier (nor does it address aviation security, airports, or air
traffic management). Although the FAA assessment team typically visits
one or more air carriers during its mission, it does so only to verify
the relationship between the carrier and the country's aviation safety
officials, not to assess the carrier itself.
Finally, the IASA category rating applies only to services to and
from the United States and to codeshare operations when the code of a
U.S. air carrier is placed on a foreign carrier flight. The category
ratings do not apply to a foreign carrier's domestic flights or to
flights by that carrier between its homeland and a third country. The
assessment team looks at those flights only to the extent that they
reflect on the country's oversight of operations to and from the United
States and to codeshare operations where a U.S. air carrier code is
placed on a flight conducted by a foreign operator.
In short, a category 1 rating means that, as to the operations by a
category 1 country's carriers between that country and the United
States, and when the code of a U.S. air carrier is placed on a foreign
carrier flight, the FAA has found that the country's civil aviation
authorities exercise safety oversight over those carriers consistent
with international safety standards. A Category 2 rating, on the other
hand, means the FAA has found that, in at least one critical area, the
safety measures applied by the country's civil aviation authorities do
not meet international standards.
Current IASA category determinations for countries included in the
IASA categorization system are available on the FAA Web site at: https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/iasa.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25, 2013.
Margaret Gilligan,
Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety.
[FR Doc. 2013-05452 Filed 3-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P