Food Ingredients and Sources of Radiation Listed and Approved for Use in the Production of Meat and Poultry Products, 14636-14640 [2013-05341]
Download as PDF
14636
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
products. However, FSIS will not make
any changes to the performance
standards for these products until FSIS
has evaluated all comments received
and has analyzed the results of the new
testing.
Done at Washington, DC, on: February 11,
2013.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–05342 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, gender,
religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family
status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s Target Center at 202–720–2600
(voice and TTY).
To file a written complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call
202–720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA
is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce this document
online through the FSIS Web page
located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations_&_policies/
Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp.
FSIS will also make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for
industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page. In
addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
News_&_Events/Email_Subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives,
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves, and
have the option to password protect
their accounts.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 424
[Docket No. FSIS–2011–0018]
RIN 0583–AD47
Food Ingredients and Sources of
Radiation Listed and Approved for Use
in the Production of Meat and Poultry
Products
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending
the Federal meat and poultry products
inspection regulations to remove
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate,
and benzoic acid from the list of
substances that the regulations prohibit
for use in meat or poultry products.
New uses of these substances in meat or
poultry products will continue to be
approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for safety and by
FSIS for suitability. FSIS will add
approved uses of these substances to the
list of approved substances contained in
the Agency’s directive system.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Williams, Director, Policy
Issuances Division, Office of Policy and
Program Development, FSIS, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3700, (202) 720–
5627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 7, 2012, FSIS issued a
proposed rule entitled ‘‘Food
Ingredients and Sources of Radiation
Listed and Approved for Use in the
Production of Meat and Poultry
Products’’ and requested comments on
the document (77 FR 26706). FSIS
proposed to remove sodium benzoate,
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid
from the list of substances that the
regulations prohibit for use in meat or
poultry products.
As explained in the proposal, under
the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics
Act (FFDCA)(21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), FDA
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is responsible for determining the safety
of ingredients and sources of irradiation
used in the production of meat and
poultry products, as well as prescribing
safe conditions of use. Under the
Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21
U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and the Poultry
Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21
U.S.C. 451 et seq.), FSIS is responsible
for determining the suitability of FDAapproved substances in meat and
poultry products. Pursuant to a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
that was implemented in January 2000,
FDA and FSIS work together to evaluate
petitions requesting the approval of new
substances, or new uses of previously
approved substances, for use in or on
meat and poultry products. The MOU is
available for viewing by the public in
the FSIS docket room and on the FSIS
Web site at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
Regulations_&_Policies/
Labeling_FDA_MOU/index.asp. Under
this MOU, if FDA and FSIS approve an
ingredient for use in meat or poultry
products, FDA establishes the
parameters of the approved use under
its regulatory system. FSIS also lists the
substance in FSIS Directive 7120.1,
‘‘Safe and Suitable Ingredients Used in
the Production of Meat, Poultry, and Egg
Products,’’ as part of a comprehensive
listing of the substances that have been
reviewed and that have been accepted
as safe and suitable. (The Directive is
available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
OPPDE/rdad/FSISDirectives/
7120.1.pdf.)
The proposed rule also explained
that, under FSIS’s regulations, certain
antimicrobial substances are prohibited
for use in meat or poultry products
because these substances have the
potential to conceal damage or
inferiority when used at certain levels (9
CFR 424.23(a)(3)). Among these
substances are potassium sorbate,
propylparaben (propyl
phydroxybenzoate), calcium propionate,
sodium propionate, benzoic acid, and
sodium benzoate.
In 2006, Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
petitioned FSIS to amend the Federal
meat and poultry products inspection
regulations to permit the use of sodium
benzoate and sodium propionate as
acceptable antimicrobial agents that
may be used in combination with other
approved ingredients to inhibit the
growth of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm)
in ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry
products. On July 26, 2010, Kemin Food
Technologies petitioned FSIS to amend
the regulations to permit the use of
liquid sodium propionate and liquid
sodium benzoate as acceptable
antimicrobial agents in meat and
poultry products.
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
After receiving each petition, FSIS
conducted an initial evaluation of the
requested action to confirm that FDA
had no objections to the safety of
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, or
benzoic acid at the proposed levels of
use. FSIS also considered each
petitioner’s supporting data on the
suitability of these substances for use in
meat and poultry products. FSIS
concluded that the petitioners had
established the safety of sodium
benzoate, sodium propionate, and
benzoic acid at the proposed levels of
use but that the Agency needed
additional data to make a final
suitability determination. Therefore, in
July 2007, FSIS issued a waiver of
provisions under 9 CFR 303.1(h) and
381.3(b) to enable Kraft to conduct
various experimental trials involving
the use of sodium benzoate and sodium
propionate, in combination with other
ingredients, to control the growth of Lm
in RTE meat and poultry products.
Additionally, from September 2010
through March 2011, FSIS issued
waivers to Kemin and to various meat
and poultry product processing
establishments to conduct trials on the
use of antimicrobial agents containing
liquid sodium propionate and propionic
acid supplied by Kemin for Lm control
in RTE meat an poultry products.
While operating under the waivers,
the Kemin and Kraft companies
gathered sufficient data to support the
use of sodium propionate, sodium
benzoate, and benzoic acid as
antimicrobial agents in RTE meat and
poultry products. Kraft submitted data
collected from its in-plant-trials and
from scientific studies that show that
these substances do not conceal damage
or inferiority or make products appear
better or of greater value than they are
under the proposed conditions of use.
Kraft submitted research findings to
demonstrate that its proposed use of
sodium benzoate and sodium
propionate is effective in controlling the
growth of Lm in RTE meat and poultry
products. Kemin also submitted
findings supporting the use of its
sodium propionate and propionic acid
formulations.
The Kemin petition and supporting
materials are available for viewing by
the public on the FSIS Web site at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/
Petition_Kemin.pdf. The Kraft petition
is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
PDF/Petition_Kraft.pdf.
Final Rule
After considering the comments
received and discussed below, FSIS has
determined that sodium benzoate,
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
under the conditions proposed in the
petitions, are both safe and suitable for
use as antimicrobial agents in certain
RTE meat and poultry products.
Therefore, FSIS is amending 9 CFR
424.23(a)(3) to remove these substances
from the list of prohibited substances
that may be used ‘‘* * * in or on any
product, only as provided in 9 CFR
Chapter III.’’
Under this final rule, use of these
substances in or on meat or poultry
products will continue to be approved
by FDA for safety and by FSIS for
suitability. FDA will continue to
establish the parameters of the approved
use under its regulatory system, and
FSIS will list approved uses of these
substances in the table of approved
substances in Directive 7120.1. In that
directive, FSIS will specify that sodium
propionate (generally recognized as safe
under 21 CFR 184.1784) can be used as
an antimicrobial in various meat and
poultry products in an amount not to
exceed 0.5 percent (by weight of total
formulation) when used alone. Sodium
propionate is a direct food ingredient
that must be labeled by its common or
usual name in the ingredients statement
of a product (21 CFR 101.4, 9 CFR
317.2(f), 381.118(a)).
The directive also will state that,
when used as an antimicrobial, sodium
benzoate can be used in various meat
and poultry products at up to 0.1
percent when used alone (21 CFR
184.1733). Sodium benzoate is a direct
food additive that must be labeled by its
common or usual name in the
ingredients statement of a product.
Similarly, benzoic acid is a generally
recognized as safe (GRAS) direct food
ingredient that can be used in various
meat and poultry products at up to 0.1
percent (21 184.1021 and similarly must
be labeled (21 CFR 101.4, 9 CFR 317.2(f)
and 381.118(a)).
The uses of these substances are
consistent with FDA regulations and
reflect the levels that the petitioners
requested to use in meat and poultry
products and that they provided
supporting data. Also, the use of these
substances enhances food safety by
controlling Lm in RTE products.
The Kraft petition also addressed
sodium diacetate (GRAS under 21 CFR
184.1754 when used as an antimicrobial
agent under cGMP). The company
intends to use this substance in
combination with sodium benzoate and
sodium propionate. Sodium diacetate is
not one of the substances considered in
this rulemaking because is not
prohibited by FSIS regulations. When
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, or
sodium diacetate are used in
combination with each other, the overall
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14637
maximum level for the combination
cannot exceed 0.1 percent (in
accordance with 21 CFR 184.1(d)). FSIS
will include this information in the
directive.
As a result of amending 9 CFR
424.23(a)(3), the procedures for listing
approved uses of sodium propionate,
benzoic acid, and sodium benzoate in
the FSIS directive will be consistent
with the procedures for listing approved
uses in meat and poultry products of
other safe and suitable substances.
Approved new uses of potassium
sorbate, propylparaben (propyl phydroxybenzoate), and calcium
propionate will continue to be listed
through rulemaking because the
regulations (9 CFR 424.23(a)(3)) prohibit
their use in meat and poultry products.
FSIS carefully considered all the
comments received and developed the
following responses.
Discussion of Comments
FSIS received 20 comments in
response to the proposed rule. Members
of the public submitted twelve,
organizations related to the food
industry five, and a food safety
consulting firm, a non-profit
association, and a trade association each
submitted one. Several commenters
supported the proposal to remove
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate,
and benzoic acid from the list of
substances that the regulations prohibit
for use in meat or poultry products.
They stated that the additives are
effective as anti-Listerial agents and are
suitable for specified uses in meat and
poultry products.
FSIS agrees that adding sodium
propionate to the list of approved
ingredients also provides meat and
poultry processors greater flexibility in
formulating new products while
protecting the food supply against
Listeria. Moreover, sodium propionate
and propionic acid, which are GRAS (21
CFR 170.30, 21 CFR 184.1784) for use as
antimicrobials under current good
manufacturing practices, have been
confirmed as safe and effective at
inhibiting Lm. Sodium propionate does
not mask spoilage or negatively affect
sensory attributes. This ingredient
provides the benefit of lowering sodium
contribution in meat and poultry
products, while extending shelf-life.
The following is a discussion of the
relevant issues raised in the comments.
Comment: A commenter asked why
there were no tests involving the human
body after eating the substances.
Another commenter expressed concern
about the cumulative effects of
combined dosages of sodium benzoate,
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
14638
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid on
children.
Response: FSIS and FDA do not
conduct tests of the effects of food
ingredients directly on humans. For a
GRAS substance, such as the substances
discussed in this rule, generally
available data and information about the
use of the substance are known and
widely accepted and FDA has a basis for
concluding that there is consensus
among qualified experts that the data
and information establish that the
substance is safe under the conditions of
its intended use (21 CFR
170.36(c)(4)(i)(C)). For a food additive,
privately held data and information
about the use of the substance are sent
by the sponsor to FDA. FDA then
evaluates the data and information to
determine whether they establish that
the substance is safe under the
conditions of its intended use (21 CFR
171.1).
FSIS and FDA have evaluated all the
data and determined that the uses of
these substances considered in this rule
are safe for individual consumers,
including children.
Comment: A few commenters
disapproved removing sodium benzoate,
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid
from the list of substances prohibited
from use in meat and poultry products
because they stated that these
ingredients would have harmful effects
on human health. One commenter
explained that, as a potential consumer
of harmful additives, she found the
evidence submitted by Kraft Foods and
Kemin Food Technologies insufficient
to prove that all three agents are safe for
use in meat and poultry products.
Specifically, the commenter stated that
Kemin had relied on old research (a
1973 study conducted by the Select
Committee on Generally Recognized as
Safe Substances) to prove the safe use of
sodium benzoate and benzoic acid and
that new research must be performed to
ensure the safety of benzoic acid for
public use.
Another commenter expressed
concern because Kraft stated that it used
Lem-O-Fos in its meat and poultry
products to ‘‘enhance antimicrobial
activity.’’ The commenter stated that
studies have shown that when benzoic
acid is mixed with citric acid it forms
benzene, which is a carcinogen. In the
commenter’s opinion, the substances
should be kept separate from one
another or concrete evidence must
prove that the mixture does not
constitute a hazard to consumers.
Another commenter stated that, in the
early 1990s, the FDA urged companies
not to use benzoate in products that also
contain ascorbic acid. The commenter
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
noted that a lawsuit filed in 2006 by
private attorneys ultimately forced
Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and other soft-drink
makers in the United States to
reformulate affected beverages—
typically fruit-flavored products.
According to this commenter, soft-drink
makers are now eliminating the use of
benzoate in combination with vitamin C
worldwide. This commenter stated that
these developments should cause FDA
and FSIS to reconsider whether
benzoate should continue to be
classified as GRAS. Another stated that
the GRAS status of the sodium benzoate
should be reviewed to take into account
changes in consumer diets and advances
in science and technology. The
commenter also stated that FSIS should
not expand its use until a safety
assessment is done and noted that the
European Union is in the process of
reviewing its safety now.
Response: FDA and FSIS have
considered the points made by the
commenters and have determined that
there are no human health hazards
arising from the approved uses that will
be listed in FSIS Directive 7120.1.
The conditions under which benzene
is produced in soft drinks are different
from the conditions under which
benzene could be produced in ready-toeat (RTE) meats. RTE meats have a pH
close to neutral, are continuously
refrigerated or stored at room
temperature (canned RTE meats), and
are protected from excessive exposure to
light. Therefore, the use of sodium
benzoate in RTE meats does not present
a safety concern even if combined with
Vitamin C or similar compounds.
Regarding the concern that the GRAS
status of sodium benzoate should be
reviewed, FDA has confirmed that the
petitioner’s intended use of sodium
benzoate is covered under the GRAS
regulations (at 21 CFR 184.1733) and
that there are no safety issues with the
intended use. FSIS accepts the
conclusion of FDA. Further, FSIS is
aware that the Codex Committee on
Food Additives (1995)1 has also
approved the use of benzoates in cured
(including salted) and dried non-heat
treated processed (including
comminuted) meat and poultry
products, at a maximum level of 0.1
percent.
Regarding the European Union’s
evaluation, the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA) issued a data call June
1, 2012, on the occurrence in foods and
1 Codex Alimentarius Committee on Food
Additives. 1995. Codex General Standard for Food
Additive, Codex Stan 192, pg 80. Available at:
https://www.codexalimentarius.org/committees-andtask-forces/en/?provide=committeeDetail&idList=9.
Accessed November 9, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
beverages of certain food additives
(sorbates, benzoates, and gallates) that
were already permitted in the EU before
January 20, 2009. Benzoic acid and
sodium benzoate are among the
ingredients on the list. The data are to
be used to re-evaluate the ingredients.
We understand from EFSA that the
report on this re-evaluation will be
available in late Spring 2013. When the
re-evaluation is completed, experts in
this Agency, and particularly in FDA,
will consider the results and their
possible implications. At this time,
however, the available evidence
supports the safety of the use of these
ingredients.
Comment: One commenter supported
the proposed rule but suggested that
more studies be conducted on the
effects of these three preservatives in
higher dosages (higher than the use
levels currently permitted under the
FDA GRAS regulations), possible
allergic reactions through contact or
ingestion and the extent of those
reactions, and potential alternatives to
these preservatives that produce the
same outcome without the use of
preservatives.
Response: The levels that FSIS would
allow to be used under this rule have
not been shown to cause allergic
reactions. Data on uses at higher levels
would be evaluated under the joint FDA
and FSIS ingredient approval system.
Data in the scientific literature on the
amounts of these substances that are
necessary to trigger or give rise to
allergic reactions are not available. Food
additives, such as benzoic acid and
benzoates, have been known to cause
hypersensitivity reactions. Such
reactions are known to be very unusual
in healthy individuals. However, in
some cases, doses as low as 50 mg of
benzoates have been shown to cause
allergic reactions in individuals already
suffering from allergic reactions.
Information on the effects of these doses
on healthy individuals is not currently
available. Therefore, it is important that
food additives or ingredients that may
cause severe allergic or hypersensitivity
reactions be appropriately declared in
the ingredient statement on the product
label.
Industry is likely to pursue research
on the preservatives that are the subject
of this rulemaking and on others. FSIS
and FDA will continue to review new
substances for safety and suitability
under the MOU.
Comment: A commenter
recommended not specifying a pH range
of 4.8 to 5.2 percent for the use of
sodium propionate as indicated in the
Kemin petition, increasing the
permissible use level of propionate
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
when used in combination with other
antimicrobial ingredients, and
specifying that the substances are to be
used in meat and poultry, including
RTE products. The commenter
explained that a higher pH provides
several benefits including greater
stability of the antimicrobial solution,
better handling and shipping
classifications, and improved sensory
characteristics in finished meat
products.
The commenter further stated that not
including a pH specification in the
approved ingredient listing in the FSIS
Directive will provide room for
innovation and fair competition in the
market. Moreover, a permitted use level
of sodium propionate in RTE meat and
poultry products is necessary because
the firm’s testing results indicate that
propionate, when combined with
commonly used existing antimicrobials
for meat and poultry (e.g., lactate,
acetate, and diacetate), is required at
higher levels to ensure safety of uncured
high-moisture items.
Response: As noted above, sodium
propionate that meets food grade
standards as outlined in the Food
Chemicals Codex, when used in
accordance with 21 CFR 184.1784, is
GRAS for use as an antimicrobial agent
in meat products with no other
limitations than cGMP. Therefore, FSIS
will not specify a pH level in its
Directive 7120.1. Also, since 21 CFR
184.1784 does not prescribe a maximum
use level for sodium propionate, when
the substance is used in combination
with another antimicrobial agent, the
maximum level for the combination is
governed by the maximum use level of
the other antimicrobial. For example,
when sodium propionate is used in
combination with sodium benzoate, the
maximum level for the mixture is not to
exceed 0.1 percent. When sodium
propionate is used in combination with
sodium diacetate, the maximum use
level for the mixture is not to exceed
0.25 percent.
The directive will specify the uses of
benzoic acid, sodium benzoate, and
sodium propionate in meat and poultry
products, including RTE meat and
poultry products.
Executive Order 12866, Executive
Order 13563, and Regulatory Flexibility
Act
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This final
rule has been determined not to be
significant and therefore has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866.
The rule will benefit companies that
want to use these substances in the
production of meat and poultry
products by expediting the approval
process. It will also benefit consumers
by expediting the approved use of
substances that enhance food safety by
controlling the growth of Lm in RTE
meat and poultry products. The rule
also will make the approval process for
new uses of sodium propionate, sodium
benzoate, and benzoic acid in meat and
poultry products consistent with the
process for obtaining approval for other
safe and suitable substances.
There are no expected costs
associated with this final rule. All
substances intended for use in the
production of meat and poultry
products will continue to be subject to
FDA evaluation for safety and FSIS
evaluation for suitability. Company
costs and the agencies’ costs associated
with these evaluations will not be
affected by this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the FSIS Administrator has
determined that this final rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This determination is based primarily
on the fact that the final rule will not
affect the process for approving new
uses of sodium benzoate, sodium
propionate, and benzoic acid in meat or
poultry products. This final rule will
make the process of listing approved
uses of these substances more efficient
by eliminating the need for FSIS to
conduct rulemaking each time a new
use is approved.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) has no
retroactive effect; and (2) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule. However, the
administrative procedures specified in 9
CFR 306.5, 381.35, and 590.300 through
590.370, respectively, must be
exhausted before any judicial challenge
may be made of the application of the
provisions of the final rule, if the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14639
challenge involves any decision of an
FSIS employee relating to inspection
services provided under the FMIA,
PPIA, or EPIA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new
information collection or record keeping
requirements that are subject to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to
achieving the purposes of the EGovernment Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et
seq.) by, among other things, promoting
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies and providing
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce the availability of
this final rule on-line through the FSIS
Web page located at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations_&_policies/
Interim_&_Final_Rules/index.asp.
FSIS also will make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to our constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is
communicated via Listserv, a free email
subscription service for industry, trade,
and farm groups, consumer interest
groups, allied health professionals,
scientific professionals, and other
individuals who have requested to be
included. The Update also is available
on the FSIS Web page. Through Listserv
and the Web page, FSIS is able to
provide information to a much broader,
more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an email
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
news_and_events/email_subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves, and
have the option to password-protect
their accounts.
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
14640
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 424
Food additives, Food packaging, Meat
inspection, Poultry and poultry
products.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, FSIS is amending 9 CFR part
424 as follows:
PART 424—PREPARATION AND
PROCESSING OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 424
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 1901–1906; 21
U.S.C. 451–470, 601–695; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.
2. In § 424.23, revise paragraph (a)(3)
to read as follows:
■
§ 424.23
Prohibited uses.
(a) * * *
(3) Sorbic acid, calcium sorbate,
sodium sorbate, and other salts of sorbic
acid shall not be used in cooked
sausages or any other meat; sulfurous
acid and salts of sulfurous acid shall not
be used in or on any meat; and niacin
or nicotinamide shall not be used in or
on fresh meat product; except that
potassium sorbate, propylparaben
(propyl p-hydroxybenzoate), and
calcium propionate, may be used in or
on any product, only as provided in 9
CFR Chapter III.
*
*
*
*
*
Done at Washington, DC on: February 28,
2013.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–05341 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0720; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–059–AD; Amendment
39–17360; AD 2013–04–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Cessna Aircraft Company Model 750
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of loss of displayed airspeed.
This AD requires inspecting certain
logic modules to determine if certain
cabin altitude/pitot static heater module
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
assemblies are installed and replacing
those assemblies with a new assembly;
and revising the Non-Normal
Procedures Section of the airplane flight
manual (AFM) to include procedures for
resetting the pitot switch in the event of
pitot heater failure and for total loss of
airspeed indication. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the loss of all displayed
airspeed, which could result in reduced
ability to control the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective April 11,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publication listed in the AD
as of April 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Cessna
Aircraft Co., P.O. Box 7706, Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone 316–517–6215;
fax 316–517–5802; email
citationpubs@cessna.textron.com;
Internet https://
www.cessnasupport.com/newlogin.html.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Abraham, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics Branch,
ACE–119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport
Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent
Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone:
316–946–4165; fax: 316–946–4107;
email: Christine.Abraham@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on July 17, 2012 (77 FR 41937).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
That NPRM proposed to require
inspecting certain logic modules to
determine if certain cabin altitude/pitot
static heater module assemblies are
installed and replacing those assemblies
with a new assembly; and revising the
Non-Normal Procedures Section of the
AFM to include procedures for resetting
the pitot switch in the event of pitot
heater failure and for total loss of
airspeed indication.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (77 FR 41937,
July 17, 2012) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.
Request To Change Compliance Time
Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna)
requested that the NPRM (77 FR 41937,
July 17, 2012) use the compliance time
described in Cessna Service Letter
SL750–30–08, Revision 1, dated July 11,
2011, of within two years or 1,200 flight
hours after July 11, 2011 (The issue date
of Cessna Service Letter SL750–30–08,
Revision 1), whichever occurs first.
Cessna noted that the proposed NPRM
compliance time is within 600 flight
hours or one year after the effective date
of the AD, whichever occurs first.
Cessna stated that the NPRM
compliance time will extend the
compliance time beyond what is
suggested by Cessna Service Letter
SL750–30–08, Revision 1, dated July 11,
2011.
We disagree with the request to
change the compliance time. We
coordinated with Cessna regarding the
compliance time difference prior to
issuing the NPRM (77 FR 41937, July 17,
2012). We have determined that a
compliance time of within 600 flight
hours or one year after the effective date
of the AD (whichever occurs first) is an
appropriate compliance time to
adequately address the identified unsafe
condition. If additional data are
presented to justify a shorter
compliance time, we might consider
further rulemaking. We have not
changed the AD in this regard.
Request To Change Logic Module
Designators
Cessna requested that we change the
reference designators to the logic
modules in paragraph (g) of the NPRM
(77 FR 41937, July 17, 2012). Cessna
stated that NC006 and NC007 are the
correct reference designators for the
logic modules.
We agree to change the references
because we have determined that the
commenter’s stated references are
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14636-14640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05341]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 424
[Docket No. FSIS-2011-0018]
RIN 0583-AD47
Food Ingredients and Sources of Radiation Listed and Approved for
Use in the Production of Meat and Poultry Products
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending the
Federal meat and poultry products inspection regulations to remove
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, and benzoic acid from the list of
substances that the regulations prohibit for use in meat or poultry
products. New uses of these substances in meat or poultry products will
continue to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
safety and by FSIS for suitability. FSIS will add approved uses of
these substances to the list of approved substances contained in the
Agency's directive system.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Williams, Director, Policy
Issuances Division, Office of Policy and Program Development, FSIS,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3700, (202) 720-5627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 7, 2012, FSIS issued a proposed rule entitled ``Food
Ingredients and Sources of Radiation Listed and Approved for Use in the
Production of Meat and Poultry Products'' and requested comments on the
document (77 FR 26706). FSIS proposed to remove sodium benzoate, sodium
propionate, and benzoic acid from the list of substances that the
regulations prohibit for use in meat or poultry products.
As explained in the proposal, under the Federal Food Drug and
Cosmetics Act (FFDCA)(21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), FDA is responsible for
determining the safety of ingredients and sources of irradiation used
in the production of meat and poultry products, as well as prescribing
safe conditions of use. Under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA)
(21 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA)
(21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.), FSIS is responsible for determining the
suitability of FDA-approved substances in meat and poultry products.
Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was implemented in
January 2000, FDA and FSIS work together to evaluate petitions
requesting the approval of new substances, or new uses of previously
approved substances, for use in or on meat and poultry products. The
MOU is available for viewing by the public in the FSIS docket room and
on the FSIS Web site at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/Regulations_&_Policies/Labeling_FDA_MOU/index.asp. Under this MOU, if FDA and FSIS
approve an ingredient for use in meat or poultry products, FDA
establishes the parameters of the approved use under its regulatory
system. FSIS also lists the substance in FSIS Directive 7120.1, ``Safe
and Suitable Ingredients Used in the Production of Meat, Poultry, and
Egg Products,'' as part of a comprehensive listing of the substances
that have been reviewed and that have been accepted as safe and
suitable. (The Directive is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FSISDirectives/7120.1.pdf.)
The proposed rule also explained that, under FSIS's regulations,
certain antimicrobial substances are prohibited for use in meat or
poultry products because these substances have the potential to conceal
damage or inferiority when used at certain levels (9 CFR 424.23(a)(3)).
Among these substances are potassium sorbate, propylparaben (propyl
phydroxybenzoate), calcium propionate, sodium propionate, benzoic acid,
and sodium benzoate.
In 2006, Kraft Foods Global, Inc. petitioned FSIS to amend the
Federal meat and poultry products inspection regulations to permit the
use of sodium benzoate and sodium propionate as acceptable
antimicrobial agents that may be used in combination with other
approved ingredients to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes
(Lm) in ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products. On July 26, 2010,
Kemin Food Technologies petitioned FSIS to amend the regulations to
permit the use of liquid sodium propionate and liquid sodium benzoate
as acceptable antimicrobial agents in meat and poultry products.
[[Page 14637]]
After receiving each petition, FSIS conducted an initial evaluation
of the requested action to confirm that FDA had no objections to the
safety of sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, or benzoic acid at the
proposed levels of use. FSIS also considered each petitioner's
supporting data on the suitability of these substances for use in meat
and poultry products. FSIS concluded that the petitioners had
established the safety of sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, and
benzoic acid at the proposed levels of use but that the Agency needed
additional data to make a final suitability determination. Therefore,
in July 2007, FSIS issued a waiver of provisions under 9 CFR 303.1(h)
and 381.3(b) to enable Kraft to conduct various experimental trials
involving the use of sodium benzoate and sodium propionate, in
combination with other ingredients, to control the growth of Lm in RTE
meat and poultry products. Additionally, from September 2010 through
March 2011, FSIS issued waivers to Kemin and to various meat and
poultry product processing establishments to conduct trials on the use
of antimicrobial agents containing liquid sodium propionate and
propionic acid supplied by Kemin for Lm control in RTE meat an poultry
products.
While operating under the waivers, the Kemin and Kraft companies
gathered sufficient data to support the use of sodium propionate,
sodium benzoate, and benzoic acid as antimicrobial agents in RTE meat
and poultry products. Kraft submitted data collected from its in-plant-
trials and from scientific studies that show that these substances do
not conceal damage or inferiority or make products appear better or of
greater value than they are under the proposed conditions of use. Kraft
submitted research findings to demonstrate that its proposed use of
sodium benzoate and sodium propionate is effective in controlling the
growth of Lm in RTE meat and poultry products. Kemin also submitted
findings supporting the use of its sodium propionate and propionic acid
formulations.
The Kemin petition and supporting materials are available for
viewing by the public on the FSIS Web site at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Petition_Kemin.pdf. The Kraft petition is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Petition_Kraft.pdf.
Final Rule
After considering the comments received and discussed below, FSIS
has determined that sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, and benzoic
acid, under the conditions proposed in the petitions, are both safe and
suitable for use as antimicrobial agents in certain RTE meat and
poultry products. Therefore, FSIS is amending 9 CFR 424.23(a)(3) to
remove these substances from the list of prohibited substances that may
be used ``* * * in or on any product, only as provided in 9 CFR Chapter
III.''
Under this final rule, use of these substances in or on meat or
poultry products will continue to be approved by FDA for safety and by
FSIS for suitability. FDA will continue to establish the parameters of
the approved use under its regulatory system, and FSIS will list
approved uses of these substances in the table of approved substances
in Directive 7120.1. In that directive, FSIS will specify that sodium
propionate (generally recognized as safe under 21 CFR 184.1784) can be
used as an antimicrobial in various meat and poultry products in an
amount not to exceed 0.5 percent (by weight of total formulation) when
used alone. Sodium propionate is a direct food ingredient that must be
labeled by its common or usual name in the ingredients statement of a
product (21 CFR 101.4, 9 CFR 317.2(f), 381.118(a)).
The directive also will state that, when used as an antimicrobial,
sodium benzoate can be used in various meat and poultry products at up
to 0.1 percent when used alone (21 CFR 184.1733). Sodium benzoate is a
direct food additive that must be labeled by its common or usual name
in the ingredients statement of a product. Similarly, benzoic acid is a
generally recognized as safe (GRAS) direct food ingredient that can be
used in various meat and poultry products at up to 0.1 percent (21
184.1021 and similarly must be labeled (21 CFR 101.4, 9 CFR 317.2(f)
and 381.118(a)).
The uses of these substances are consistent with FDA regulations
and reflect the levels that the petitioners requested to use in meat
and poultry products and that they provided supporting data. Also, the
use of these substances enhances food safety by controlling Lm in RTE
products.
The Kraft petition also addressed sodium diacetate (GRAS under 21
CFR 184.1754 when used as an antimicrobial agent under cGMP). The
company intends to use this substance in combination with sodium
benzoate and sodium propionate. Sodium diacetate is not one of the
substances considered in this rulemaking because is not prohibited by
FSIS regulations. When sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, or sodium
diacetate are used in combination with each other, the overall maximum
level for the combination cannot exceed 0.1 percent (in accordance with
21 CFR 184.1(d)). FSIS will include this information in the directive.
As a result of amending 9 CFR 424.23(a)(3), the procedures for
listing approved uses of sodium propionate, benzoic acid, and sodium
benzoate in the FSIS directive will be consistent with the procedures
for listing approved uses in meat and poultry products of other safe
and suitable substances. Approved new uses of potassium sorbate,
propylparaben (propyl p-hydroxybenzoate), and calcium propionate will
continue to be listed through rulemaking because the regulations (9 CFR
424.23(a)(3)) prohibit their use in meat and poultry products.
FSIS carefully considered all the comments received and developed
the following responses.
Discussion of Comments
FSIS received 20 comments in response to the proposed rule. Members
of the public submitted twelve, organizations related to the food
industry five, and a food safety consulting firm, a non-profit
association, and a trade association each submitted one. Several
commenters supported the proposal to remove sodium benzoate, sodium
propionate, and benzoic acid from the list of substances that the
regulations prohibit for use in meat or poultry products. They stated
that the additives are effective as anti-Listerial agents and are
suitable for specified uses in meat and poultry products.
FSIS agrees that adding sodium propionate to the list of approved
ingredients also provides meat and poultry processors greater
flexibility in formulating new products while protecting the food
supply against Listeria. Moreover, sodium propionate and propionic
acid, which are GRAS (21 CFR 170.30, 21 CFR 184.1784) for use as
antimicrobials under current good manufacturing practices, have been
confirmed as safe and effective at inhibiting Lm. Sodium propionate
does not mask spoilage or negatively affect sensory attributes. This
ingredient provides the benefit of lowering sodium contribution in meat
and poultry products, while extending shelf-life.
The following is a discussion of the relevant issues raised in the
comments.
Comment: A commenter asked why there were no tests involving the
human body after eating the substances. Another commenter expressed
concern about the cumulative effects of combined dosages of sodium
benzoate,
[[Page 14638]]
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid on children.
Response: FSIS and FDA do not conduct tests of the effects of food
ingredients directly on humans. For a GRAS substance, such as the
substances discussed in this rule, generally available data and
information about the use of the substance are known and widely
accepted and FDA has a basis for concluding that there is consensus
among qualified experts that the data and information establish that
the substance is safe under the conditions of its intended use (21 CFR
170.36(c)(4)(i)(C)). For a food additive, privately held data and
information about the use of the substance are sent by the sponsor to
FDA. FDA then evaluates the data and information to determine whether
they establish that the substance is safe under the conditions of its
intended use (21 CFR 171.1).
FSIS and FDA have evaluated all the data and determined that the
uses of these substances considered in this rule are safe for
individual consumers, including children.
Comment: A few commenters disapproved removing sodium benzoate,
sodium propionate, and benzoic acid from the list of substances
prohibited from use in meat and poultry products because they stated
that these ingredients would have harmful effects on human health. One
commenter explained that, as a potential consumer of harmful additives,
she found the evidence submitted by Kraft Foods and Kemin Food
Technologies insufficient to prove that all three agents are safe for
use in meat and poultry products. Specifically, the commenter stated
that Kemin had relied on old research (a 1973 study conducted by the
Select Committee on Generally Recognized as Safe Substances) to prove
the safe use of sodium benzoate and benzoic acid and that new research
must be performed to ensure the safety of benzoic acid for public use.
Another commenter expressed concern because Kraft stated that it
used Lem-O-Fos in its meat and poultry products to ``enhance
antimicrobial activity.'' The commenter stated that studies have shown
that when benzoic acid is mixed with citric acid it forms benzene,
which is a carcinogen. In the commenter's opinion, the substances
should be kept separate from one another or concrete evidence must
prove that the mixture does not constitute a hazard to consumers.
Another commenter stated that, in the early 1990s, the FDA urged
companies not to use benzoate in products that also contain ascorbic
acid. The commenter noted that a lawsuit filed in 2006 by private
attorneys ultimately forced Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and other soft-drink
makers in the United States to reformulate affected beverages--
typically fruit-flavored products. According to this commenter, soft-
drink makers are now eliminating the use of benzoate in combination
with vitamin C worldwide. This commenter stated that these developments
should cause FDA and FSIS to reconsider whether benzoate should
continue to be classified as GRAS. Another stated that the GRAS status
of the sodium benzoate should be reviewed to take into account changes
in consumer diets and advances in science and technology. The commenter
also stated that FSIS should not expand its use until a safety
assessment is done and noted that the European Union is in the process
of reviewing its safety now.
Response: FDA and FSIS have considered the points made by the
commenters and have determined that there are no human health hazards
arising from the approved uses that will be listed in FSIS Directive
7120.1.
The conditions under which benzene is produced in soft drinks are
different from the conditions under which benzene could be produced in
ready-to-eat (RTE) meats. RTE meats have a pH close to neutral, are
continuously refrigerated or stored at room temperature (canned RTE
meats), and are protected from excessive exposure to light. Therefore,
the use of sodium benzoate in RTE meats does not present a safety
concern even if combined with Vitamin C or similar compounds.
Regarding the concern that the GRAS status of sodium benzoate
should be reviewed, FDA has confirmed that the petitioner's intended
use of sodium benzoate is covered under the GRAS regulations (at 21 CFR
184.1733) and that there are no safety issues with the intended use.
FSIS accepts the conclusion of FDA. Further, FSIS is aware that the
Codex Committee on Food Additives (1995)\1\ has also approved the use
of benzoates in cured (including salted) and dried non-heat treated
processed (including comminuted) meat and poultry products, at a
maximum level of 0.1 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Codex Alimentarius Committee on Food Additives. 1995. Codex
General Standard for Food Additive, Codex Stan 192, pg 80. Available
at: https://www.codexalimentarius.org/committees-and-task-forces/en/?provide=committeeDetail&idList=9. Accessed November 9, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the European Union's evaluation, the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA) issued a data call June 1, 2012, on the occurrence in
foods and beverages of certain food additives (sorbates, benzoates, and
gallates) that were already permitted in the EU before January 20,
2009. Benzoic acid and sodium benzoate are among the ingredients on the
list. The data are to be used to re-evaluate the ingredients. We
understand from EFSA that the report on this re-evaluation will be
available in late Spring 2013. When the re-evaluation is completed,
experts in this Agency, and particularly in FDA, will consider the
results and their possible implications. At this time, however, the
available evidence supports the safety of the use of these ingredients.
Comment: One commenter supported the proposed rule but suggested
that more studies be conducted on the effects of these three
preservatives in higher dosages (higher than the use levels currently
permitted under the FDA GRAS regulations), possible allergic reactions
through contact or ingestion and the extent of those reactions, and
potential alternatives to these preservatives that produce the same
outcome without the use of preservatives.
Response: The levels that FSIS would allow to be used under this
rule have not been shown to cause allergic reactions. Data on uses at
higher levels would be evaluated under the joint FDA and FSIS
ingredient approval system.
Data in the scientific literature on the amounts of these
substances that are necessary to trigger or give rise to allergic
reactions are not available. Food additives, such as benzoic acid and
benzoates, have been known to cause hypersensitivity reactions. Such
reactions are known to be very unusual in healthy individuals. However,
in some cases, doses as low as 50 mg of benzoates have been shown to
cause allergic reactions in individuals already suffering from allergic
reactions. Information on the effects of these doses on healthy
individuals is not currently available. Therefore, it is important that
food additives or ingredients that may cause severe allergic or
hypersensitivity reactions be appropriately declared in the ingredient
statement on the product label.
Industry is likely to pursue research on the preservatives that are
the subject of this rulemaking and on others. FSIS and FDA will
continue to review new substances for safety and suitability under the
MOU.
Comment: A commenter recommended not specifying a pH range of 4.8
to 5.2 percent for the use of sodium propionate as indicated in the
Kemin petition, increasing the permissible use level of propionate
[[Page 14639]]
when used in combination with other antimicrobial ingredients, and
specifying that the substances are to be used in meat and poultry,
including RTE products. The commenter explained that a higher pH
provides several benefits including greater stability of the
antimicrobial solution, better handling and shipping classifications,
and improved sensory characteristics in finished meat products.
The commenter further stated that not including a pH specification
in the approved ingredient listing in the FSIS Directive will provide
room for innovation and fair competition in the market. Moreover, a
permitted use level of sodium propionate in RTE meat and poultry
products is necessary because the firm's testing results indicate that
propionate, when combined with commonly used existing antimicrobials
for meat and poultry (e.g., lactate, acetate, and diacetate), is
required at higher levels to ensure safety of uncured high-moisture
items.
Response: As noted above, sodium propionate that meets food grade
standards as outlined in the Food Chemicals Codex, when used in
accordance with 21 CFR 184.1784, is GRAS for use as an antimicrobial
agent in meat products with no other limitations than cGMP. Therefore,
FSIS will not specify a pH level in its Directive 7120.1. Also, since
21 CFR 184.1784 does not prescribe a maximum use level for sodium
propionate, when the substance is used in combination with another
antimicrobial agent, the maximum level for the combination is governed
by the maximum use level of the other antimicrobial. For example, when
sodium propionate is used in combination with sodium benzoate, the
maximum level for the mixture is not to exceed 0.1 percent. When sodium
propionate is used in combination with sodium diacetate, the maximum
use level for the mixture is not to exceed 0.25 percent.
The directive will specify the uses of benzoic acid, sodium
benzoate, and sodium propionate in meat and poultry products, including
RTE meat and poultry products.
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule has been determined not to be significant
and therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866.
The rule will benefit companies that want to use these substances
in the production of meat and poultry products by expediting the
approval process. It will also benefit consumers by expediting the
approved use of substances that enhance food safety by controlling the
growth of Lm in RTE meat and poultry products. The rule also will make
the approval process for new uses of sodium propionate, sodium
benzoate, and benzoic acid in meat and poultry products consistent with
the process for obtaining approval for other safe and suitable
substances.
There are no expected costs associated with this final rule. All
substances intended for use in the production of meat and poultry
products will continue to be subject to FDA evaluation for safety and
FSIS evaluation for suitability. Company costs and the agencies' costs
associated with these evaluations will not be affected by this final
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the FSIS Administrator has determined that this final
rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This determination is based primarily on the fact that
the final rule will not affect the process for approving new uses of
sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, and benzoic acid in meat or poultry
products. This final rule will make the process of listing approved
uses of these substances more efficient by eliminating the need for
FSIS to conduct rulemaking each time a new use is approved.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) has no retroactive effect; and (2)
does not require administrative proceedings before parties may file
suit in court challenging this rule. However, the administrative
procedures specified in 9 CFR 306.5, 381.35, and 590.300 through
590.370, respectively, must be exhausted before any judicial challenge
may be made of the application of the provisions of the final rule, if
the challenge involves any decision of an FSIS employee relating to
inspection services provided under the FMIA, PPIA, or EPIA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new information collection or record
keeping requirements that are subject to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by, among other things,
promoting the use of the Internet and other information technologies
and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce the availability of this final rule on-line
through the FSIS Web page located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/Interim_&_Final_Rules/index.asp.
FSIS also will make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest to our constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free email
subscription service for industry, trade, and farm groups, consumer
interest groups, allied health professionals, scientific professionals,
and other individuals who have requested to be included. The Update
also is available on the FSIS Web page. Through Listserv and the Web
page, FSIS is able to provide information to a much broader, more
diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which
provides automatic and customized access to selected food safety news
and information. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/email_subscription/. Options range from recalls to
export information to regulations, directives and notices. Customers
can add or delete subscriptions themselves, and have the option to
password-protect their accounts.
[[Page 14640]]
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 424
Food additives, Food packaging, Meat inspection, Poultry and
poultry products.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FSIS is amending 9 CFR
part 424 as follows:
PART 424--PREPARATION AND PROCESSING OPERATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 424 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 1901-1906; 21 U.S.C. 451-470, 601-695;
7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.
0
2. In Sec. 424.23, revise paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 424.23 Prohibited uses.
(a) * * *
(3) Sorbic acid, calcium sorbate, sodium sorbate, and other salts
of sorbic acid shall not be used in cooked sausages or any other meat;
sulfurous acid and salts of sulfurous acid shall not be used in or on
any meat; and niacin or nicotinamide shall not be used in or on fresh
meat product; except that potassium sorbate, propylparaben (propyl p-
hydroxybenzoate), and calcium propionate, may be used in or on any
product, only as provided in 9 CFR Chapter III.
* * * * *
Done at Washington, DC on: February 28, 2013.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-05341 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P