Agency Information Collection Extension With Changes, 14521-14527 [2013-05152]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
Marta Gospodarczyk, EI–34, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20585, 202–
586–0527, Fax at 202–586–3045,
Email at marta.gospodarczyk@eia.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
forms and instructions should be
directed to Ms. Gospodarczyk at the
contact information given above.
Additionally, forms and instructions
may be viewed at https://www.eia.gov/
survey/#GC-859.
This
information collection request contains:
(1) OMB No.: 1901–0287;
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form GC–859, ‘‘Nuclear Fuel Data
Survey’’;
(3) Type of Request: Reinstatement
and three-year approval of a previously
approved data collection;
(4) Purpose: The Nuclear Fuel Data
Survey collects data from 138
respondents (primarily commercial
utilities that operate nuclear reactors).
Data are collected on all discharged
nuclear assemblies, projections of future
assembly discharges, nuclear fuel
storage capacities and inventories at
reactor sites and storage facilities,
complete reactor operating history, data
on special fuel forms including
nonstandard and failed fuel, nonfuel
components, and Greater Than Class C
low-level waste data.
(5) Number of Respondents: 138;
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: 46 (data collected once
during three-year approval period);
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: 3106.7;
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: EIA
estimates that there are no additional
costs to respondents associated with the
surveys other than the costs associated
with the burden hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974,
Pub. L. 93–275, codified at 15 U.S.C. 772(b);
Section 302 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act
of 1982, codified at 42 U.S.C. 10222.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28,
2013.
Renee Miller,
Acting Director, Office of Survey Development
and Statistical Integration, U.S. Energy
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05157 Filed 3–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection
Extension With Changes
U.S. Energy Information
Administration (EIA), U.S. Department
of Energy.
ACTION: Notice and request for OMB
review and comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EIA, pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
with the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget, intends to
extend for 3 years, with changes, the
following forms:
• Form EIA–63B, ‘‘Annual
Photovoltaic Cell/Module Shipments
Report,’’
• Form EIA–411, ‘‘Coordinated Bulk
Power Supply Program Report,’’
• Form EIA–826, ‘‘Monthly Electric
Utility Sales and Revenue Report with
State Distributions,’’
• Form EIA–860, ‘‘Annual Electric
Generator Report,’’
• Form EIA–860M, ‘‘Monthly Update
to the Annual Electric Generator
Report,’’
• Form EIA–861, ‘‘Annual Electric
Power Industry Report,’’
• Form EIA–861S, ‘‘Annual Electric
Power Industry Report (Short Form),’’
and
• Form EIA–923, ‘‘Power Plant
Operations Report.’’
In addition, EIA proposes to create the
following new form:
• Form EIA–930, ‘‘Balancing
Authority Operations Report.’’
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Comments regarding this
proposed information collection must
be received on or before May 6, 2013.
If you anticipate difficulty in submitting
comments within that period, contact
the person listed in ADDRESSES as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Rebecca
Peterson. To ensure receipt of the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14521
comments by the due date, email is
recommended (ERS2014@eia.gov). The
postal mailing address is U.S.
Department of Energy, U. S. Energy
Information Administration, Mail Stop
EI–23, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Ms. Peterson at
the email address listed above.
Alternatively, Ms. Peterson may be
contacted on (202)-586–4509. The
proposed forms and instructions, along
with related information on this
clearance package, can be viewed at
https://www.eia.gov/survey/changes/
electricity/.
This
information collection request contains
the following:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(1) OMB No. 1905–0129 1
For the Forms EIA–411, 826, 860,
860M, 861, 861S, 923, and 930, EIA
proposes to protect all contact
information associated with the ‘‘Survey
Contact’’ and the ‘‘Supervisor of Contact
Person for Survey’’ on Schedule 1,
including name, email address,
telephone, and Fax number to the extent
that it satisfies the criteria for exemption
under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, the Department of
Energy (DOE) regulations; 10 CFR
1004.11, implementing the FOIA, and
the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905.
The name and business address of the
survey respondents shown in Schedule
1 will continue to be released as public
information.
For the Forms EIA–63B, 411, 826, 860
and 923, EIA proposes to discontinue
applying disclosure limitation rules that
test aggregate statistics for the risk of
disclosing identifiable information. EIA
intends to add the following paragraph
to the section on data confidentiality:
‘‘Disclosure limitation procedures are
not applied to the statistical data
published from the survey information
reported on this form. There may be
some statistics that are based on data
from fewer than three respondents, or
that are dominated by data from one or
two large respondents. In these cases, it
may be possible for a knowledgeable
person to closely estimate the
information reported by a specific
respondent.’’
1 This form has been under OMB No. 1905–0196.
Due to a reorganization of EIA offices, the
renewables data collection program is now housed
with the electricity data collection program.
Therefore, EIA proposes to change the OMB number
to 1905–0129.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
14522
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–63B, ‘‘Annual
Photovoltaic Cell/Module Shipments
Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: The Form EIA–63B tracks
photovoltaic cell/module
manufacturing, shipments, technology
types, revenue and related information.
The data collected on this form appear
in various EIA publications. The data
are used by the U.S. Department of
Energy, the Congress, other government
and non-government entities, and the
public to monitor the current status and
trends of the photovoltaic industry and
to evaluate the future of the industry.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: Currently there are about
168 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is about 168.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 840 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–411, ‘‘Coordinated
Bulk Power Supply Program Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection
(4) Purpose: The Form EIA–411
collects information relating to the
reliability of the electric power system
in the lower 48 states, including
regional electricity supply and demand
projections for a 10-year advance
period, the characteristics and
frequency of outages occurring on the
Bulk Electric System, and other
information on the transmission system
and supporting facilities. The data are
collected from the regional reliability
entities by the North American Electric
Reliability Corp. (NERC), 2 which then
organizes and edits the information and
submits the data to EIA. The proposed
changes include:
• Schedule 6, Part B, Characteristics
of Projected Transmission Lines: EIA
proposes to remove several questions on
conductor size and material, bundling
arrangements, and type of pole or tower.
2 NERC is the official national Electric Reliability
Organization as designated by FERC pursuant to the
Energy Policy Act of 2005. EIA has had a longstanding relationship with NERC and its
predecessor for the collection of the EIA–411 data.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
This information has been determined
to have limited value that is outweighed
by respondent burden.
• Schedule 7, Part A, Annual Data on
Transmission Line Outages for AC
Lines: The transmission line sustained
outage section of the form will have a
new voltage category: below 199kV.
This change will make the form
consistent with the expansion of the
Bulk Electric System definition
requested by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) and
specific recommendations from NERC.
In this section, there are other minor
refinements to the outage data collected,
such as disaggregating outages into the
three principal classifications.
• New Schedule 8, Annual Data on
Generating Unit Outages, Deratings and
Performance Indexes: This new
Schedule will present information on
generating unit reliability,
supplementing the reliability
information on the transmission grid
and the power supply/demand balance
historically collected by this survey.
The information will be extracted by
NERC directly from its existing
Generating Availability Data System
(GADS). The additional burden on
respondents is therefore 0.
• New Schedule 9, Smart Grid
Transmission System Devices and
Applications, will collect information
on smart grid technologies now being
deployed to improve the reliability of
the transmission system. This includes
phasor measurement units, which are
used for real-time monitoring of the
condition of the grid and for forensic
review of grid performance and events.
Information will also be collected on
dynamic capability rating systems on
transmission circuits. These systems
provide operators with information on
the true operational limits of
transmission lines.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: Nine respondents (the
eight NERC regional entities and NERC
Headquarters).
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 9.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 1,098 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–826, ‘‘Monthly Electric
Sales and Revenue with State
Distributions Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–826 collects
monthly information from a sample of
electric utilities, energy service
providers, and distribution companies
that sell or deliver electric power to end
users. Data collected on this form
includes sales and revenue for all enduse sectors (residential, commercial,
industrial, and transportation). This
survey is the monthly complement to
the annual data collection from the
universe of respondents made by the
short and long form versions of the
Form EIA–861 survey (see below). EIA
proposes to make the following changes
to the form:
• Schedule 3, Part A, Green Pricing:
Remove the green pricing schedule.
EIA’s understanding is that green
pricing programs currently have a
minimal presence in the retail power
market and that this situation is not
expected to change. The value of the
data collection is therefore outweighed
by the burden on respondents. EIA
plans to continue to monitor this market
and if necessary will propose
reintroduction of this data collection in
the future.
• Schedule 3, Part C, Advanced
Metering: Separate Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) into two
subgroups—AMI operated solely as
Automated Meter Reading (AMR)
equipment, and AMI operated as AMI.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: There are approximately
526 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 6,312.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 8,647.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–860, ‘‘Annual Electric
Generator Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–860 collects
data on existing and planned electric
generation plants and associated
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
equipment including generators, boilers,
cooling systems, and environmental
control systems. Data are collected from
all existing units and from planned
units scheduled for initial commercial
operation within 10 years of the
specified reporting period (depending
on the type of plant). EIA proposes the
following changes:
• Schedule 1, Identification: collect
the ownership type of the reporting
entity (e.g., investor owned utility,
electric power cooperative, etc.). This
information is frequently requested
within DOE and by outside analysts.
• Schedule 2, Power Plant Data, and
Schedule 3, Part C, Generator
Information—Proposed Generators:
These schedules currently collect data
from plants and generators expected to
begin commercial operation within 10
years of the survey year. EIA proposes
to reduce this time horizon to 5 years for
all types of plants other than coal,
nuclear, and conventional and pumpedstorage hydroelectric power plants. This
change reflects the relatively short
planning and construction horizon for
the predominant types of power plants
now being proposed in the United
States, such as combined cycle, wind,
and solar generators. Coal, nuclear, and
hydroelectric plants, in contrast, have
long planning and construction periods.
• Schedule 2, Power Plant Data:
i. Collect the name of each plant’s
balancing authority instead of its
regional transmission organization
(RTO) or independent system operator
(ISO). This change reflects an effort by
EIA to align its data collections with the
actual operation of the electric power
system, which is based on
approximately 100 ‘‘balancing
authorities’’ that manage the grid. No
information will be lost because EIA can
use balancing authority designations to
assign plants to RTOs and ISOs.
ii. Collect information on ash
impoundments. The condition of ash
impoundments has been an area of
increasing environmental concern at the
federal and state levels. The data to be
collected include whether any
impoundments exist at a plant, the
impoundments’ statuses, and whether
they are lined.
iii. Put space on the schedule to
collect up to three grid voltages at the
power plant’s point of interconnection
with the grid. In the current form plants
with multiple interconnection voltages
must enter information into the
comments section of the form, a
cumbersome procedure. The revised
question will simply provide space on
the survey form to directly enter three
voltages.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
iv. Stop collection of the datum
associated with a plant’s geographic
coordinates. EIA has found that many
and probably most respondents are
unable to provide a correct answer to
this question.
v. Stop collection of plant geographic
coordinates in minutes and seconds.
The form will ask for coordinates only
in modern digital format.
vi. Collect information on whether a
plant that has a primary purpose other
than electricity generation for sale is net
metered. This information is needed to
improve the accuracy with which EIA
can determine small renewable
capacity, particularly solar.
vii. Collect information on whether a
plant or any of the individual generating
units at the plant is a blackstart unit. For
those units that are blackstart units, the
survey will collect information on
nameplate capacity and whether any of
the units are identified as a ‘‘Blackstart
Resource’’ in a Transmission Operator’s
System Restoration Plan (pursuant to
NERC Reliability Standards EOP–005–1
and EOP–005–2). These new questions
are intended to enhance the information
on power system reliability made
available by EIA to analysts and policy
makers.
• Schedule 3, Part A, Generator
Information—Generators:
i. Collect whether a combined-cycle
unit can operate in simple-cycle mode
by bypassing the heat recovery steam
generator. These questions relate to the
reliability and operational flexibility of
combined cycle generators, which
account for a growing share of
generation capacity and actual
generation. Operational flexibility is an
issue of growing importance due to the
introduction of variable renewable
technology (solar and wind) and wider
use of demand response programs. The
combination of more renewable power
and demand response puts a premium
on the ability of generating units to
rapidly start, stop, and change output to
meet variations in load.
ii. Delete three questions on whether
the generator is an electric utility, the
date of a unit’s sale, and whether the
unit can deliver power to the
transmission grid. EIA has determined
that these questions are either
duplicative or provide information of
limited value.
• Schedule 3, Part B, Generator
Information—Existing Generators:
i. Collect information on whether an
uprate or derate was completed during
the reporting period. This information is
needed in particular to confirm when an
uprate became operational at nuclear
units, a subject of great interest to power
market analysts and modelers.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14523
ii. Collect data on nameplate power
factor. This information, which is an
indicator of the maximum potential
output from a generator, will be used in
verifying the reported nameplate and
net capacity of the unit.
iii. Collect data on generator
minimum load and minimum time
required to reach full load from standby
and shutdown. These questions address
the operating flexibility of the power
system, a topic of increased interest due
to the introduction of renewable power
with variable output and demand
response programs. These questions are
limited to units burning combustible
fuels.
iv. Delete the questions relating to
reactive power. EIA has been unable to
collect consistent or clearly correct data
on reactive power. NERC, which
originally requested these data, has
informed EIA that the need no longer
exists.
v. Reduce the number of questions
relating to fuel switching and multi-fuel
operation from 13 questions to eight.
The remaining questions relate to oil
and gas units only. This change is made
to reduce respondent burden by
focusing on the fuel switching questions
of greatest interest, which is essentially
the issue of backup fuel for gas and oil
fired units.
vi. Add new questions on the
characteristics of wind turbines such as
turbine manufacturer, designed average
annual wind speed, wind quality class,
and average hub height; and add new
questions on the characteristics of solar
energy systems such as identification of
tracking, concentrating and collector
technology, and photovoltaic panel
material. These questions will provide
important information on the renewable
technologies which increasingly
account for the additions to the nation’s
generating fleet.
• Schedule 3, Part C, Generator
Information—Proposed Generators:
Consistent with changes discussed
above to Part B (existing generators),
EIA proposes to delete questions
relating to reactive power, fuel
switching and multi-fuel operations at
planned units.
• Schedule 5, Generator Cost
Information:
i. Delete all questions relating to
interconnection costs.
ii. Add new questions on generator
construction and financing costs. There
is no public source of information on
the actual cost of building new power
plants. Nonetheless, cost estimates are
critical elements to projections of, for
example, power industry capital
requirements and forecasts of new
builds. The proposed questions will
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14524
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
collect construction and financing costs
as of the time of completion for most
generating units. Long-lead coal and
nuclear units will be required to provide
annual estimates of the total cost to
completion. All of the data will be
treated as sensitive and protected to the
extent that it satisfies the criteria for
exemption under the Freedom of
Information Act.
• Schedule 6, Boiler Information:
i. Part A, Plant Configuration:
Reorganize the manner in which data on
environmental equipment are collected
to reflect that fact that a single pollution
control technology can reduce
emissions of more than one pollutant.
ii. Part C, Boiler Information: Delete
the question that collects boiler
manufacturer. EIA cannot identify a
need for this information.
iii. Part D, Nitrogen Oxide Emission
Controls, and Part E, Mercury Emission
Controls: Collect information on the
operating status, and installed cost of
nitrogen oxide and mercury control
systems.
iv. Part F, Cooling System
Information—Design Parameters: Add a
new question that collects the name of
the cooling water discharge body if it is
different than the intake body. This
information was requested as part of
EIA’s joint review with U.S. Geological
Survey of data relating to the energy/
water nexus (an initiative recommended
by the Government Accountability
Office).
v. Part H, Flue Gas Desulfurization
Unit Information: Delete the question
that collects the flue gas desulfurization
unit manufacturer. This information had
value in the past when scrubber
technology was still in the
developmental stage, which is no longer
the case.
vi. Part I, Stack and Flue
Information—Design Parameters: Delete
the questions that collect the geographic
coordinate datum of stacks. As noted
above, EIA’s experience is that many
and probably most respondents cannot
provide a correct answer to this
question.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: There are approximately
3,500 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 3,500.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 29,617 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–860M, ‘‘Monthly
Update to the Annual Electric Generator
Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
change, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–860M collects
data on the status of proposed new
generators scheduled to begin
commercial operation within the
forward 12-month period; existing
generators scheduled to retire from
service within the forward 12-month
period; and existing generators that have
proposed modifications that are
scheduled for completion within one
month. The information is needed to
ensure a complete and accurate
inventory of the nation’s generating
fleet, for such purposes as reliability
and environmental analyses.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: During a typical year a
total of about 412 entities will file the
form for at least one month. Note,
however, that in any given month only
about 170 entities fall within the
reporting threshold (i.e., have a new
generator that is within 12 months of
entering commercial operation) and are
therefore required to file the survey.
Most respondents file fewer than 12
forms a year; the average is currently
about 5.6 filings per year per
respondent.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 2,307.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 692 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–861, ‘‘Annual Electric
Power Plant Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–861 collects
annual information on the retail sale,
distribution, transmission and
generation of electric energy in the
United States, its territories, and Puerto
Rico. The data include related activities
such as energy efficiency and demand
response programs. In combination with
the Form EIA–861S short form (see
below) and the monthly Form EIA–826,
this annual survey provides coverage of
retail sales of electric power and related
activities
The Form EIA–861 requests a full
array of data from approximately 2,200
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
larger power companies. EIA proposes
the following:
• For most schedules that request
information by state, add a requirement
to report by state and balancing
authority combination. This reflects an
effort by EIA to align data collection
with the actual operation of the power
system, which is managed by about 100
balancing authorities. As a consequence
of this proposal, in states that have more
than one balancing authority, the
respondent may have more than one
schedule reported per state.
• Schedule 2, Part C, Green Pricing:
Remove the green pricing schedule. As
discussed above in relation to the Form
EIA–826 monthly survey the limited
presence of green pricing in the retail
power market does not appear to justify
the burden of this schedule on
respondents.
• Schedule 4, Part A, Sales to
Ultimate Customers, Full Service: Add
questions about ‘‘rate decoupling,’’ a
form of ratemaking intended to keep
utilities revenue-neutral in a situation in
which sales are dropping due to energy
efficiency and demand response
programs. These programs have been
common for retail sales of natural gas
and are now being implemented for
electricity sales.
• Schedule 6, Parts A and B, Demand
Side Management Programs: Over the
past 18 months EIA consulted with
government, academic, and other
experts on steps to improve the
collection of Energy Efficiency data. The
primary objective of the changes is to
focus on the data respondents are best
able to provide and to improve the
consistency of responses. The specific
changes to Part A, Energy Efficiency
Programs, are as follows:
i. Change the collection of Net Energy
Savings to Gross Energy Savings (MWh);
ii. Change the collection of
Annualized Incremental Effects and
Actual Annual Effects to Incremental
Annual Savings and Incremental Life
Cycle Savings.
iii. Replace Annual Costs with
Reporting Year Incremental Costs and
Incremental Life Cycle Costs; also
reduce the number of cost components
collected.
iv. Add the collection of the Weighed
Average Life of a portfolio of Energy
Efficiency programs and provide an
automated spreadsheet to calculate this
number based on program data entered
into the spreadsheet.
v. Remove questions about
verification and reporting on another
company’s form.
vi. Add question about Web site
address to energy efficiency reports.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
• For Part B, Demand Response
Programs, add the numbers of
customers enrolled and reduce the
number of cost components collected.
• Schedule 2, Part D, Net Metering:
Increase the capacity limit for reporting
net metering installations from 2 MWs
to unlimited. This change will help
identify the amount of net metering
capacity by technology type and,
combined with other changes to
generation capacity data collection, help
EIA to identify all the renewable
capacity installed.
• Schedule 6, Part C, Dynamic Pricing
Programs: Dynamic pricing is a form of
ratemaking that exposes retail customers
to short-term changes in power prices.
These rate structures, particularly in
combination with smart meters, are of
increasing interest as a integrated part of
overall Demand Side Management
Programs and as a means to improve the
operation of restructured power
markets. Consistent with the increased
interest in this topic, EIA proposes to
enhance the demand response
questions, for example by asking
respondents to identify how many
customers they have signed up in these
types of programs and also whether they
have customers signed up for any of five
major time-based rate programs, i.e.
Time-of-Use Pricing, Real Time Pricing,
Variable Peak Pricing, Critical Peak
Pricing, and Critical Peak Rebate.
• Schedule 6, Part C, Advanced
Metering and Customer
Communications: Separate AMI into
two subgroups—AMI operated as AMR
and AMI operated as AMI. In addition,
the definitions of advanced metering
infrastructure (AMI, or ‘‘smart meters’’)
and automated meter reading
technologies have been adjusted to
provide better estimates of total AMI
meter installations. This statistic is of
interest because of federal and state
programs intended to encourage the use
of smart meters and the possible value
of smart meters in energy efficiency and
demand response programs. EIA also
proposed to add to the data collection
the total number of meters (of all types
including mechanical ones), number of
customers that receive certain types of
communication from the service
provider, frequency of this
communication, and the number of
customers participating in direct load
control programs.
• Schedule 6, Parts E and Part F,
Distribution System Information and
Reliability Information: Parts E and F
add new questions dealing with
distribution system automation and the
reliability of electric power distribution
systems. This information expands
EIA’s coverage of power system
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
reliability, which has historically been
limited to the transmission grid (see
discussion of Form EIA–411, above), to
the distribution level at which most
customer interruptions actually occur.
The initial recommendation to add
these questions came from Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, which
identified the lack of a central
repository of distribution system
reliability statistics. The need for this
data collection is further indicated by
requests EIA has received for these data
from Congressional and state energy
offices. The impact on respondent
burden is expected to be minimal
because respondents can respond with
statistics that are typically computed in
the normal course of business. Utilities
that do not collect this information do
not have to respond.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: There are approximately
2,200 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 2,200.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 24,706 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–861S, ‘‘Annual Electric
Power Plant Report (Short Form)’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–861S collects
a limited set of information annually
from 1,100 small companies involved in
the retail sale of electricity. A complete
set of annual data is collected from
2,200 larger companies on the Form
EIA–861 and monthly data are collected
on the Form EIA–826 (see above). EIA
proposes changes to the Form EIA–861S
to comport with those planned for the
EIA–861 long form, specifically:
• For most schedules that request
information by state, add a requirement
to report by state and balancing
authority combination. As noted earlier,
this reflects an effort by EIA to align
data collection with the actual operation
of the power system, which is managed
by about 100 balancing authorities. As
a consequence of this proposal, in states
that have more than one balancing
authority, the respondent may have
more than one schedule reported per
state.
• Schedule 2, Part C, Remove the
green pricing schedule. As discussed
above, the limited presence of green
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14525
pricing in the retail power market does
not appear to justify the burden of this
schedule on respondents.
• Schedule 2, Part D, Net Metering:
Add a Yes or No question concerning
whether the respondent has a net
metering program.
• Schedule 6, Part D, Advanced
Metering and Customer
Communications: Separate AMI into
two subgroups—AMI operated as AMR
and AMI operated as AMI. In addition,
the definitions of advanced metering
infrastructure and automated meter
reading technologies have been adjusted
to provide better estimates of total AMI
meter installations. This statistic is of
interest because of federal and state
programs intended to encourage the use
of smart meters and the possible value
of smart meters in energy efficiency and
demand response programs.
• Schedule 6, Part C, Time-Based
Rate Programs (Dynamic Pricing
Programs): Add a single Yes/No
question asking if the respondent
operates any time-based rate programs.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: There are approximately
1,100 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 1,100.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 2,200 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–923, ‘‘Power Plant
Operations Report’’
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with
changes, of a currently approved
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–923 collects
information from electric power plants
in the United States. Data collected
include electric power generation,
energy source consumption, end of
reporting period fossil fuel stocks, as
well as the quality and cost of fossil fuel
receipts. EIA proposes to make the
following changes:
• Schedule 2, Cost and Quality of
Fuel Purchases: Add to the collection of
coal quality characteristics two
additional elements: coal moisture and
chloride content. These factors relate to
the propensity of the coal to produce
acid gases and assist in assessment of
the quality of the various coal ranks.
• Schedule 2, Cost and Quality of
Fuel Purchases: Add the collection of
the names of the pipeline systems
connected to natural gas burning power
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14526
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
plants. This information is needed to
help reconcile natural gas sales
information collected on other surveys
with the data collected on the Form
EIA–923, and by doing so help ensure
that EIA has a complete picture of the
disposition of natural gas.
• Schedule 4, Fossil Fuel Stocks at
the End of the Reporting Period: EIA
collects coal stocks held for power plant
use to measure the adequacy of shortterm coal supply for power generation.
The proposed change will add questions
to clarify the relationship between
stocks held off-site at coal terminals
with the plants the terminals serve.
• Schedule 3, Boiler and Generator
Information for Steam-Electric
Combustible-Fueled Plants: This change
would simplify the form by combining
two schedules dealing with generation
and fuel consumption (Schedules 3 and
5) into one schedule.
• Schedule 6, Nonutility Annual
Source and Disposition of Electricity:
add ‘‘Energy provided under tolling
arrangements’’ to the Disposition of
Electric Energy; and request
identification of the nature of ‘‘other
incoming’’ and ‘‘other out-going’’
electric energy. These changes are
needed to distinguish power delivered
under tolling agreements from the more
generic category of ‘‘other out-going
power.’’ Plants selling power under
tolling agreements have increased from
about a dozen in 2007 to over 200 in
2012.
• Schedule 7, Annual Revenues from
Retail Sales and/or Sales for Resale:
This schedule will collect data on retail
sales by entities (power plants) that
normally sell power at wholesale. These
data are needed to complete the
disposition of electricity by inclusion of
retail sales by nonutility plants (utilities
report retail sales on the Form EIA–861,
but independent power producers are
not required to complete the Form EIA–
861).
• Schedules 8, Annual Environmental
Information, Parts C, E and F:
Reconfigure these schedules to be
equipment-oriented, rather than
emission type oriented, because
installed environmental controls can
reduce more than one type of air
emission.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: There are approximately
6,295 respondents. The monthly form is
filed by 2,052 respondents; the annual
form is filed by 4,243 respondents; and
the supplemental form is filed by 1,625
respondents. (Those same 1,625
respondents also file the monthly form
and are included in the 2,052
respondents on the monthly form.)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 30,492.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 69,602 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0129
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Form EIA–930, ‘‘Balancing
Authority Operations Report’’
(3) Type of Request: New data
collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA–930 is a new
survey of hourly electric power
operating data from Balancing
Authorities in the contiguous United
States 3 and from selected electric
utilities in Alaska and Hawaii.4 The
data include:
• Hourly demand,
• Hourly next-day demand forecast,
• Hourly net generation,
• Hourly actual interchange with
each interconnected Balancing
Authority.
The purpose of this survey is to
provide basic operating statistics for the
nation’s electric power systems on a
current basis. While electric utilities
individually and as an industry have
3 A Balancing Authority is ‘‘The responsible
entity that integrates resource plans ahead of time,
maintains load-interchange-generation balance
within a Balancing Authority Area, and supports
Interconnection frequency in real time.’’ (NERC,
Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability
Standards, December 21, 2012.) In most, but not all
cases, a balancing authority is an electric utility
company or a Regional Transmission Organization.
The electric power grid in the contiguous United
States is managed on a moment to moment basis by
98 Balancing Authorities. If the Southwest Power
Pool RTO proceeds as planned to consolidate its 17
member Balancing Authorities, the number of
Balancing Authorities will drop to 82.
4 Alaska and Hawaii do not have integrated
electric power grids as in the contiguous United
States. Alaska has numerous small regional electric
power systems. In the case of Alaska, EIA proposes
to collect data from 1) the six interconnected
systems in the Railbelt Intertie extending from the
Kenai Peninsula north to Fairbanks, including
Chugach Electric Association, Anchorage Municipal
Light & Power, Matanuska Electric Association,
Golden Valley Electric Association, Homer Electric
Association, and Seward Electric System; and 2)
Alaska Electric Light & Power, which provides
power to Juneau. These utilities are believed by EIA
to account for over 75 percent of electric power load
in Alaska.
In the case of Hawaii, EIA proposes to collect data
from the Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
operating companies, including Hawaii Electric Co.,
Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. and Maui
Electric Company, Ltd. These companies provide
service to the islands of Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Lanai,
and Molokai, encompassing about 95% of Hawaiian
electric power customers. This approach provides
acceptable coverage of Alaska and Hawaii without
incurring the costs and burden of collecting
complete data for these states.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
primary responsibility for system
operations, many other entities, such as
other industry participants,
policymakers, legislators, regulators,
emergency and disaster response
officials, entrepreneurs, economic
analysts, industry researchers, and the
public, have a direct interest in electric
systems operations and the associated
data. There is currently no central or
comprehensive source for hourly
electric industry operating statistics.
The burden of providing these data is
extremely low relative to their value,
particularly since the information
requested is already collected by or
known to the proposed respondents in
the course of their normal operations,
and a number of proposed respondents
are already posting much of it. Based on
the information in the respondent
postings, EIA would make available a
comprehensive set of the current day’s
system demand data on an hourly basis
and the prior day’s basic hourly electric
system operating data on a daily basis.
Respondents will post hourly demand
data at a web address in a standard
format within ten minutes of the end of
the reported hour. They will also post
separately the prior day’s hourly
demand, demand forecast, net
generation, and actual interchange data
in a standard format by 7:00 a.m.
Eastern Time the next day. The posting
web address must be accessible by EIA
and respondents may, at their
discretion, provide the public with
access to this address. In either case,
EIA will treat this data as public. EIA
requests comment on alternatives or
supplements to the web posting
requirement and the format for the
posted data.
The same-day, soon after the reporting
hour posting of demand provides a basic
measure of the current status of electric
systems and the United States electric
industry as a whole. Comparing actual
system demand with the day-ahead
forecast provides a measure of the
accuracy of forecasting used to commit
resources.
Data regarding the time-varying
nature of electricity supply and demand
is essential to addressing smart grid
related issues such as integrating wind
and solar generation, better coordination
of natural gas and electric short-term
operations, and expanding the use of
demand response, storage, and electric
vehicles in electric system operations.
Due to the lack of sufficient costeffective electricity storage, electricity
must be produced at the moment it is
used. This presents the electric industry
with significant challenges in delivering
its primary product: electricity ondemand. The industry meets the
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 6, 2013 / Notices
challenge by always having more
capacity available than needed and
relying on certain entities to ensure the
moment-to-moment balancing of supply
and demand. Electric utilities that
perform the balancing function are
called Balancing Authorities. Due to the
interconnected nature of power grids,
collecting operating information from
only a subset of the entities involved
significantly undermines the usefulness
of the survey.
Balancing Authority operators
monitor their systems continuously and
may act whenever necessary to maintain
reliability. However, Balancing
Authority operating procedures, such as
scheduling supply, demand and
interchange (the flow of electricity
between Balancing Authorities), and the
mandatory reliability standards that
apply to them, use the hour as the
primary operating period. Consequently,
the proposed survey uses the operating
hour as its data measurement interval.
The proposed survey is specifically
designed to minimize burden on electric
system operators. The surveyed data is
typically produced in the normal course
of business by Balancing Authority
energy management systems. Hourly
demand and demand forecast data is
currently posted on public Web sites in
the proposed posting timeframes by a
number of Balancing Authorities,
including most Regional Transmission
Organizations. These balancing
authorities supply over half of end-use
electricity consumption in the United
States. A few Balancing Authorities post
publicly more detailed operating data.
Under Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) Order 890,
Transmitting Utilities are required to
post on their Open Access Same-time
Information System (OASIS) Web sites
prior-day’s peak hour demand and the
associated demand forecast value. Most
Balancing Authorities are also
Transmitting Utilities. Therefore, the
Balancing Authorities subject to Order
890 already have in place the means for
posting some of the data requested by
the proposed survey.
The proposed survey does not
duplicate existing data collections. EIA
currently collects monthly and annual
production from electric generators and
demand from load-serving entities. The
data are published about 52 days after
the end of a month for major generators
and systems, and about eight months
after the end of the year for smaller
entities.
FERC currently collects demand, net
generation and actual interchange from
Balancing Authorities on an annual
survey, the FERC Form 714. The
reporting is on a monthly and annual
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
basis. In addition, Balancing Authorities
report actual interchange received and
delivered with each directly
interconnected Balancing Authority on
an annual basis. Monthly or annual
values for demand, net generation and
actual interchange do not provide
relevant information about the timevarying nature of these operating values
as would be provided by the proposed
survey.
The FERC Form 714 also collects
historical hourly demand by Planning
Area. Most Balancing Authorities are
also Planning Areas, but not all. The
hourly demand data is collected
annually and posted with the rest of the
form data in August of the year
following the reporting year. The FERC
Form 714 data is both less complete and
far less timely than the data collected by
the proposed survey, and does not offer
current information on the status of the
nation’s electric system that the
proposed survey would provide.
Certain real-time system information
is made available by NERC to DOE’s
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability. However, this data is not
made available to the public and under
the agency’s agreement with NERC the
data is not recorded or otherwise
retained by DOE.
EIA does not believe that this
information is business sensitive. As
noted above, Regional Transmission
Organizations that serve as Balancing
Authorities and some other Balancing
Authorities currently post publicly
hourly operating data. A potential
commercial issue is whether these data
will reveal whether a specific utility is
short on available generating capacity
and may be willing to pay premium
prices for electricity to meet load. The
proposed survey data, including sameday posting of hourly demand, does not
provide information about the
availability of generating units. The
next-day posting of operating data is
after the relevant short-term wholesale
power markets have closed.
Multiple power plants supply most
Balancing Authorities. Therefore, the
generation data reported under the
proposed survey will not reveal which
specific generators are operating or a
history of their operating trends.
However, some individual generators
and small utilities with little or no
generation have chosen for commercial
reasons to operate as Balancing
Authorities. Most Balancing Authorities
of this type are embedded within
another Balancing Authority and have a
single interconnection with that
Balancing Authority.
While the proposed survey data does
not provide information about the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14527
current availability of a single-generator
Balancing Authority power plant, it
does provide a history of the plant’s
hourly output. There is little value in
collecting system level operating data
from these Balancing Authorities.
However, their information is needed to
provide comprehensive operating
statistics. EIA requests comments on
how to exempt these Balancing
Authorities or limit their reporting
while maintaining the
comprehensiveness of the survey.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey
Respondents: The annual estimated
number of respondents is 107. This
includes 98 Balancing Authorities in the
contiguous United States, 6 electric
utilities in Alaska, and 3 electric
utilities in Hawaii.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: The annual estimated
number of total responses is 39,055.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 7,534 hours for the first year
(to include start-up activities) and 3,254
hours each subsequent year.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Additional
costs to respondents are not anticipated
beyond costs associated with response
burden.
Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974,
Pub. L. 93–275, codified at 15 U.S.C. 772(b).
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27,
2013.
Renee Miller,
Acting Director, Office of Survey Development
and Statistical Integration, U.S. Energy
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05152 Filed 3–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC13–4–000; (FERC–538)]
Commission Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Comment request.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) is submitting the
information collection FERC–538, Gas
Pipeline Certificates: Section 7(a)
Mandatory Initial Service, to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review of the information collection
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14521-14527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05152]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection Extension With Changes
AGENCY: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department
of Energy.
ACTION: Notice and request for OMB review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EIA, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and with
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget, intends to extend
for 3 years, with changes, the following forms:
Form EIA-63B, ``Annual Photovoltaic Cell/Module Shipments
Report,''
Form EIA-411, ``Coordinated Bulk Power Supply Program
Report,''
Form EIA-826, ``Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue
Report with State Distributions,''
Form EIA-860, ``Annual Electric Generator Report,''
Form EIA-860M, ``Monthly Update to the Annual Electric
Generator Report,''
Form EIA-861, ``Annual Electric Power Industry Report,''
Form EIA-861S, ``Annual Electric Power Industry Report
(Short Form),'' and
Form EIA-923, ``Power Plant Operations Report.''
In addition, EIA proposes to create the following new form:
Form EIA-930, ``Balancing Authority Operations Report.''
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
DATES: Comments regarding this proposed information collection must be
received on or before May 6, 2013. If you anticipate difficulty in
submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed in
ADDRESSES as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Rebecca Peterson. To ensure receipt of the
comments by the due date, email is recommended (ERS2014@eia.gov). The
postal mailing address is U.S. Department of Energy, U. S. Energy
Information Administration, Mail Stop EI-23, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Ms. Peterson at the email address listed above.
Alternatively, Ms. Peterson may be contacted on (202)-586-4509. The
proposed forms and instructions, along with related information on this
clearance package, can be viewed at https://www.eia.gov/survey/changes/electricity/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request contains
the following:
(1) OMB No. 1905-0129 \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This form has been under OMB No. 1905-0196. Due to a
reorganization of EIA offices, the renewables data collection
program is now housed with the electricity data collection program.
Therefore, EIA proposes to change the OMB number to 1905-0129.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Forms EIA-411, 826, 860, 860M, 861, 861S, 923, and 930, EIA
proposes to protect all contact information associated with the
``Survey Contact'' and the ``Supervisor of Contact Person for Survey''
on Schedule 1, including name, email address, telephone, and Fax number
to the extent that it satisfies the criteria for exemption under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, the Department of
Energy (DOE) regulations; 10 CFR 1004.11, implementing the FOIA, and
the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905. The name and business address of
the survey respondents shown in Schedule 1 will continue to be released
as public information.
For the Forms EIA-63B, 411, 826, 860 and 923, EIA proposes to
discontinue applying disclosure limitation rules that test aggregate
statistics for the risk of disclosing identifiable information. EIA
intends to add the following paragraph to the section on data
confidentiality: ``Disclosure limitation procedures are not applied to
the statistical data published from the survey information reported on
this form. There may be some statistics that are based on data from
fewer than three respondents, or that are dominated by data from one or
two large respondents. In these cases, it may be possible for a
knowledgeable person to closely estimate the information reported by a
specific respondent.''
[[Page 14522]]
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-63B, ``Annual
Photovoltaic Cell/Module Shipments Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: The Form EIA-63B tracks photovoltaic cell/module
manufacturing, shipments, technology types, revenue and related
information. The data collected on this form appear in various EIA
publications. The data are used by the U.S. Department of Energy, the
Congress, other government and non-government entities, and the public
to monitor the current status and trends of the photovoltaic industry
and to evaluate the future of the industry.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: Currently there are
about 168 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is about 168.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 840 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-411, ``Coordinated
Bulk Power Supply Program Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection
(4) Purpose: The Form EIA-411 collects information relating to the
reliability of the electric power system in the lower 48 states,
including regional electricity supply and demand projections for a 10-
year advance period, the characteristics and frequency of outages
occurring on the Bulk Electric System, and other information on the
transmission system and supporting facilities. The data are collected
from the regional reliability entities by the North American Electric
Reliability Corp. (NERC), \2\ which then organizes and edits the
information and submits the data to EIA. The proposed changes include:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ NERC is the official national Electric Reliability
Organization as designated by FERC pursuant to the Energy Policy Act
of 2005. EIA has had a long-standing relationship with NERC and its
predecessor for the collection of the EIA-411 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule 6, Part B, Characteristics of Projected
Transmission Lines: EIA proposes to remove several questions on
conductor size and material, bundling arrangements, and type of pole or
tower. This information has been determined to have limited value that
is outweighed by respondent burden.
Schedule 7, Part A, Annual Data on Transmission Line
Outages for AC Lines: The transmission line sustained outage section of
the form will have a new voltage category: below 199kV. This change
will make the form consistent with the expansion of the Bulk Electric
System definition requested by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) and specific recommendations from NERC. In this section, there
are other minor refinements to the outage data collected, such as
disaggregating outages into the three principal classifications.
New Schedule 8, Annual Data on Generating Unit Outages,
Deratings and Performance Indexes: This new Schedule will present
information on generating unit reliability, supplementing the
reliability information on the transmission grid and the power supply/
demand balance historically collected by this survey. The information
will be extracted by NERC directly from its existing Generating
Availability Data System (GADS). The additional burden on respondents
is therefore 0.
New Schedule 9, Smart Grid Transmission System Devices and
Applications, will collect information on smart grid technologies now
being deployed to improve the reliability of the transmission system.
This includes phasor measurement units, which are used for real-time
monitoring of the condition of the grid and for forensic review of grid
performance and events. Information will also be collected on dynamic
capability rating systems on transmission circuits. These systems
provide operators with information on the true operational limits of
transmission lines.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: Nine respondents (the
eight NERC regional entities and NERC Headquarters).
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 9.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 1,098 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-826, ``Monthly
Electric Sales and Revenue with State Distributions Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-826 collects monthly information from a
sample of electric utilities, energy service providers, and
distribution companies that sell or deliver electric power to end
users. Data collected on this form includes sales and revenue for all
end-use sectors (residential, commercial, industrial, and
transportation). This survey is the monthly complement to the annual
data collection from the universe of respondents made by the short and
long form versions of the Form EIA-861 survey (see below). EIA proposes
to make the following changes to the form:
Schedule 3, Part A, Green Pricing: Remove the green
pricing schedule. EIA's understanding is that green pricing programs
currently have a minimal presence in the retail power market and that
this situation is not expected to change. The value of the data
collection is therefore outweighed by the burden on respondents. EIA
plans to continue to monitor this market and if necessary will propose
reintroduction of this data collection in the future.
Schedule 3, Part C, Advanced Metering: Separate Advanced
Metering Infrastructure (AMI) into two subgroups--AMI operated solely
as Automated Meter Reading (AMR) equipment, and AMI operated as AMI.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: There are approximately
526 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 6,312.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 8,647.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-860, ``Annual
Electric Generator Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-860 collects data on existing and planned
electric generation plants and associated
[[Page 14523]]
equipment including generators, boilers, cooling systems, and
environmental control systems. Data are collected from all existing
units and from planned units scheduled for initial commercial operation
within 10 years of the specified reporting period (depending on the
type of plant). EIA proposes the following changes:
Schedule 1, Identification: collect the ownership type of
the reporting entity (e.g., investor owned utility, electric power
cooperative, etc.). This information is frequently requested within DOE
and by outside analysts.
Schedule 2, Power Plant Data, and Schedule 3, Part C,
Generator Information--Proposed Generators: These schedules currently
collect data from plants and generators expected to begin commercial
operation within 10 years of the survey year. EIA proposes to reduce
this time horizon to 5 years for all types of plants other than coal,
nuclear, and conventional and pumped-storage hydroelectric power
plants. This change reflects the relatively short planning and
construction horizon for the predominant types of power plants now
being proposed in the United States, such as combined cycle, wind, and
solar generators. Coal, nuclear, and hydroelectric plants, in contrast,
have long planning and construction periods.
Schedule 2, Power Plant Data:
i. Collect the name of each plant's balancing authority instead of
its regional transmission organization (RTO) or independent system
operator (ISO). This change reflects an effort by EIA to align its data
collections with the actual operation of the electric power system,
which is based on approximately 100 ``balancing authorities'' that
manage the grid. No information will be lost because EIA can use
balancing authority designations to assign plants to RTOs and ISOs.
ii. Collect information on ash impoundments. The condition of ash
impoundments has been an area of increasing environmental concern at
the federal and state levels. The data to be collected include whether
any impoundments exist at a plant, the impoundments' statuses, and
whether they are lined.
iii. Put space on the schedule to collect up to three grid voltages
at the power plant's point of interconnection with the grid. In the
current form plants with multiple interconnection voltages must enter
information into the comments section of the form, a cumbersome
procedure. The revised question will simply provide space on the survey
form to directly enter three voltages.
iv. Stop collection of the datum associated with a plant's
geographic coordinates. EIA has found that many and probably most
respondents are unable to provide a correct answer to this question.
v. Stop collection of plant geographic coordinates in minutes and
seconds. The form will ask for coordinates only in modern digital
format.
vi. Collect information on whether a plant that has a primary
purpose other than electricity generation for sale is net metered. This
information is needed to improve the accuracy with which EIA can
determine small renewable capacity, particularly solar.
vii. Collect information on whether a plant or any of the
individual generating units at the plant is a blackstart unit. For
those units that are blackstart units, the survey will collect
information on nameplate capacity and whether any of the units are
identified as a ``Blackstart Resource'' in a Transmission Operator's
System Restoration Plan (pursuant to NERC Reliability Standards EOP-
005-1 and EOP-005-2). These new questions are intended to enhance the
information on power system reliability made available by EIA to
analysts and policy makers.
Schedule 3, Part A, Generator Information--Generators:
i. Collect whether a combined-cycle unit can operate in simple-
cycle mode by bypassing the heat recovery steam generator. These
questions relate to the reliability and operational flexibility of
combined cycle generators, which account for a growing share of
generation capacity and actual generation. Operational flexibility is
an issue of growing importance due to the introduction of variable
renewable technology (solar and wind) and wider use of demand response
programs. The combination of more renewable power and demand response
puts a premium on the ability of generating units to rapidly start,
stop, and change output to meet variations in load.
ii. Delete three questions on whether the generator is an electric
utility, the date of a unit's sale, and whether the unit can deliver
power to the transmission grid. EIA has determined that these questions
are either duplicative or provide information of limited value.
Schedule 3, Part B, Generator Information--Existing
Generators:
i. Collect information on whether an uprate or derate was completed
during the reporting period. This information is needed in particular
to confirm when an uprate became operational at nuclear units, a
subject of great interest to power market analysts and modelers.
ii. Collect data on nameplate power factor. This information, which
is an indicator of the maximum potential output from a generator, will
be used in verifying the reported nameplate and net capacity of the
unit.
iii. Collect data on generator minimum load and minimum time
required to reach full load from standby and shutdown. These questions
address the operating flexibility of the power system, a topic of
increased interest due to the introduction of renewable power with
variable output and demand response programs. These questions are
limited to units burning combustible fuels.
iv. Delete the questions relating to reactive power. EIA has been
unable to collect consistent or clearly correct data on reactive power.
NERC, which originally requested these data, has informed EIA that the
need no longer exists.
v. Reduce the number of questions relating to fuel switching and
multi-fuel operation from 13 questions to eight. The remaining
questions relate to oil and gas units only. This change is made to
reduce respondent burden by focusing on the fuel switching questions of
greatest interest, which is essentially the issue of backup fuel for
gas and oil fired units.
vi. Add new questions on the characteristics of wind turbines such
as turbine manufacturer, designed average annual wind speed, wind
quality class, and average hub height; and add new questions on the
characteristics of solar energy systems such as identification of
tracking, concentrating and collector technology, and photovoltaic
panel material. These questions will provide important information on
the renewable technologies which increasingly account for the additions
to the nation's generating fleet.
Schedule 3, Part C, Generator Information--Proposed
Generators: Consistent with changes discussed above to Part B (existing
generators), EIA proposes to delete questions relating to reactive
power, fuel switching and multi-fuel operations at planned units.
Schedule 5, Generator Cost Information:
i. Delete all questions relating to interconnection costs.
ii. Add new questions on generator construction and financing
costs. There is no public source of information on the actual cost of
building new power plants. Nonetheless, cost estimates are critical
elements to projections of, for example, power industry capital
requirements and forecasts of new builds. The proposed questions will
[[Page 14524]]
collect construction and financing costs as of the time of completion
for most generating units. Long-lead coal and nuclear units will be
required to provide annual estimates of the total cost to completion.
All of the data will be treated as sensitive and protected to the
extent that it satisfies the criteria for exemption under the Freedom
of Information Act.
Schedule 6, Boiler Information:
i. Part A, Plant Configuration: Reorganize the manner in which data
on environmental equipment are collected to reflect that fact that a
single pollution control technology can reduce emissions of more than
one pollutant.
ii. Part C, Boiler Information: Delete the question that collects
boiler manufacturer. EIA cannot identify a need for this information.
iii. Part D, Nitrogen Oxide Emission Controls, and Part E, Mercury
Emission Controls: Collect information on the operating status, and
installed cost of nitrogen oxide and mercury control systems.
iv. Part F, Cooling System Information--Design Parameters: Add a
new question that collects the name of the cooling water discharge body
if it is different than the intake body. This information was requested
as part of EIA's joint review with U.S. Geological Survey of data
relating to the energy/water nexus (an initiative recommended by the
Government Accountability Office).
v. Part H, Flue Gas Desulfurization Unit Information: Delete the
question that collects the flue gas desulfurization unit manufacturer.
This information had value in the past when scrubber technology was
still in the developmental stage, which is no longer the case.
vi. Part I, Stack and Flue Information--Design Parameters: Delete
the questions that collect the geographic coordinate datum of stacks.
As noted above, EIA's experience is that many and probably most
respondents cannot provide a correct answer to this question.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: There are approximately
3,500 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 3,500.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 29,617 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-860M, ``Monthly
Update to the Annual Electric Generator Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with change, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-860M collects data on the status of proposed
new generators scheduled to begin commercial operation within the
forward 12-month period; existing generators scheduled to retire from
service within the forward 12-month period; and existing generators
that have proposed modifications that are scheduled for completion
within one month. The information is needed to ensure a complete and
accurate inventory of the nation's generating fleet, for such purposes
as reliability and environmental analyses.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: During a typical year a
total of about 412 entities will file the form for at least one month.
Note, however, that in any given month only about 170 entities fall
within the reporting threshold (i.e., have a new generator that is
within 12 months of entering commercial operation) and are therefore
required to file the survey. Most respondents file fewer than 12 forms
a year; the average is currently about 5.6 filings per year per
respondent.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 2,307.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 692 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-861, ``Annual
Electric Power Plant Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-861 collects annual information on the retail
sale, distribution, transmission and generation of electric energy in
the United States, its territories, and Puerto Rico. The data include
related activities such as energy efficiency and demand response
programs. In combination with the Form EIA-861S short form (see below)
and the monthly Form EIA-826, this annual survey provides coverage of
retail sales of electric power and related activities
The Form EIA-861 requests a full array of data from approximately
2,200 larger power companies. EIA proposes the following:
For most schedules that request information by state, add
a requirement to report by state and balancing authority combination.
This reflects an effort by EIA to align data collection with the actual
operation of the power system, which is managed by about 100 balancing
authorities. As a consequence of this proposal, in states that have
more than one balancing authority, the respondent may have more than
one schedule reported per state.
Schedule 2, Part C, Green Pricing: Remove the green
pricing schedule. As discussed above in relation to the Form EIA-826
monthly survey the limited presence of green pricing in the retail
power market does not appear to justify the burden of this schedule on
respondents.
Schedule 4, Part A, Sales to Ultimate Customers, Full
Service: Add questions about ``rate decoupling,'' a form of ratemaking
intended to keep utilities revenue-neutral in a situation in which
sales are dropping due to energy efficiency and demand response
programs. These programs have been common for retail sales of natural
gas and are now being implemented for electricity sales.
Schedule 6, Parts A and B, Demand Side Management
Programs: Over the past 18 months EIA consulted with government,
academic, and other experts on steps to improve the collection of
Energy Efficiency data. The primary objective of the changes is to
focus on the data respondents are best able to provide and to improve
the consistency of responses. The specific changes to Part A, Energy
Efficiency Programs, are as follows:
i. Change the collection of Net Energy Savings to Gross Energy
Savings (MWh);
ii. Change the collection of Annualized Incremental Effects and
Actual Annual Effects to Incremental Annual Savings and Incremental
Life Cycle Savings.
iii. Replace Annual Costs with Reporting Year Incremental Costs and
Incremental Life Cycle Costs; also reduce the number of cost components
collected.
iv. Add the collection of the Weighed Average Life of a portfolio
of Energy Efficiency programs and provide an automated spreadsheet to
calculate this number based on program data entered into the
spreadsheet.
v. Remove questions about verification and reporting on another
company's form.
vi. Add question about Web site address to energy efficiency
reports.
[[Page 14525]]
For Part B, Demand Response Programs, add the numbers of
customers enrolled and reduce the number of cost components collected.
Schedule 2, Part D, Net Metering: Increase the capacity
limit for reporting net metering installations from 2 MWs to unlimited.
This change will help identify the amount of net metering capacity by
technology type and, combined with other changes to generation capacity
data collection, help EIA to identify all the renewable capacity
installed.
Schedule 6, Part C, Dynamic Pricing Programs: Dynamic
pricing is a form of ratemaking that exposes retail customers to short-
term changes in power prices. These rate structures, particularly in
combination with smart meters, are of increasing interest as a
integrated part of overall Demand Side Management Programs and as a
means to improve the operation of restructured power markets.
Consistent with the increased interest in this topic, EIA proposes to
enhance the demand response questions, for example by asking
respondents to identify how many customers they have signed up in these
types of programs and also whether they have customers signed up for
any of five major time-based rate programs, i.e. Time-of-Use Pricing,
Real Time Pricing, Variable Peak Pricing, Critical Peak Pricing, and
Critical Peak Rebate.
Schedule 6, Part C, Advanced Metering and Customer
Communications: Separate AMI into two subgroups--AMI operated as AMR
and AMI operated as AMI. In addition, the definitions of advanced
metering infrastructure (AMI, or ``smart meters'') and automated meter
reading technologies have been adjusted to provide better estimates of
total AMI meter installations. This statistic is of interest because of
federal and state programs intended to encourage the use of smart
meters and the possible value of smart meters in energy efficiency and
demand response programs. EIA also proposed to add to the data
collection the total number of meters (of all types including
mechanical ones), number of customers that receive certain types of
communication from the service provider, frequency of this
communication, and the number of customers participating in direct load
control programs.
Schedule 6, Parts E and Part F, Distribution System
Information and Reliability Information: Parts E and F add new
questions dealing with distribution system automation and the
reliability of electric power distribution systems. This information
expands EIA's coverage of power system reliability, which has
historically been limited to the transmission grid (see discussion of
Form EIA-411, above), to the distribution level at which most customer
interruptions actually occur. The initial recommendation to add these
questions came from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which
identified the lack of a central repository of distribution system
reliability statistics. The need for this data collection is further
indicated by requests EIA has received for these data from
Congressional and state energy offices. The impact on respondent burden
is expected to be minimal because respondents can respond with
statistics that are typically computed in the normal course of
business. Utilities that do not collect this information do not have to
respond.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: There are approximately
2,200 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 2,200.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 24,706 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-861S, ``Annual
Electric Power Plant Report (Short Form)''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-861S collects a limited set of information
annually from 1,100 small companies involved in the retail sale of
electricity. A complete set of annual data is collected from 2,200
larger companies on the Form EIA-861 and monthly data are collected on
the Form EIA-826 (see above). EIA proposes changes to the Form EIA-861S
to comport with those planned for the EIA-861 long form, specifically:
For most schedules that request information by state, add
a requirement to report by state and balancing authority combination.
As noted earlier, this reflects an effort by EIA to align data
collection with the actual operation of the power system, which is
managed by about 100 balancing authorities. As a consequence of this
proposal, in states that have more than one balancing authority, the
respondent may have more than one schedule reported per state.
Schedule 2, Part C, Remove the green pricing schedule. As
discussed above, the limited presence of green pricing in the retail
power market does not appear to justify the burden of this schedule on
respondents.
Schedule 2, Part D, Net Metering: Add a Yes or No question
concerning whether the respondent has a net metering program.
Schedule 6, Part D, Advanced Metering and Customer
Communications: Separate AMI into two subgroups--AMI operated as AMR
and AMI operated as AMI. In addition, the definitions of advanced
metering infrastructure and automated meter reading technologies have
been adjusted to provide better estimates of total AMI meter
installations. This statistic is of interest because of federal and
state programs intended to encourage the use of smart meters and the
possible value of smart meters in energy efficiency and demand response
programs.
Schedule 6, Part C, Time-Based Rate Programs (Dynamic
Pricing Programs): Add a single Yes/No question asking if the
respondent operates any time-based rate programs.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: There are approximately
1,100 respondents.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 1,100.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 2,200 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-923, ``Power
Plant Operations Report''
(3) Type of Request: Extension, with changes, of a currently
approved collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-923 collects information from electric power
plants in the United States. Data collected include electric power
generation, energy source consumption, end of reporting period fossil
fuel stocks, as well as the quality and cost of fossil fuel receipts.
EIA proposes to make the following changes:
Schedule 2, Cost and Quality of Fuel Purchases: Add to the
collection of coal quality characteristics two additional elements:
coal moisture and chloride content. These factors relate to the
propensity of the coal to produce acid gases and assist in assessment
of the quality of the various coal ranks.
Schedule 2, Cost and Quality of Fuel Purchases: Add the
collection of the names of the pipeline systems connected to natural
gas burning power
[[Page 14526]]
plants. This information is needed to help reconcile natural gas sales
information collected on other surveys with the data collected on the
Form EIA-923, and by doing so help ensure that EIA has a complete
picture of the disposition of natural gas.
Schedule 4, Fossil Fuel Stocks at the End of the Reporting
Period: EIA collects coal stocks held for power plant use to measure
the adequacy of short-term coal supply for power generation. The
proposed change will add questions to clarify the relationship between
stocks held off-site at coal terminals with the plants the terminals
serve.
Schedule 3, Boiler and Generator Information for Steam-
Electric Combustible-Fueled Plants: This change would simplify the form
by combining two schedules dealing with generation and fuel consumption
(Schedules 3 and 5) into one schedule.
Schedule 6, Nonutility Annual Source and Disposition of
Electricity: add ``Energy provided under tolling arrangements'' to the
Disposition of Electric Energy; and request identification of the
nature of ``other incoming'' and ``other out-going'' electric energy.
These changes are needed to distinguish power delivered under tolling
agreements from the more generic category of ``other out-going power.''
Plants selling power under tolling agreements have increased from about
a dozen in 2007 to over 200 in 2012.
Schedule 7, Annual Revenues from Retail Sales and/or Sales
for Resale: This schedule will collect data on retail sales by entities
(power plants) that normally sell power at wholesale. These data are
needed to complete the disposition of electricity by inclusion of
retail sales by nonutility plants (utilities report retail sales on the
Form EIA-861, but independent power producers are not required to
complete the Form EIA-861).
Schedules 8, Annual Environmental Information, Parts C, E
and F: Reconfigure these schedules to be equipment-oriented, rather
than emission type oriented, because installed environmental controls
can reduce more than one type of air emission.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: There are approximately
6,295 respondents. The monthly form is filed by 2,052 respondents; the
annual form is filed by 4,243 respondents; and the supplemental form is
filed by 1,625 respondents. (Those same 1,625 respondents also file the
monthly form and are included in the 2,052 respondents on the monthly
form.)
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 30,492.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 69,602 hours.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden hours.
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0129
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Form EIA-930, ``Balancing
Authority Operations Report''
(3) Type of Request: New data collection.
(4) Purpose: Form EIA-930 is a new survey of hourly electric power
operating data from Balancing Authorities in the contiguous United
States \3\ and from selected electric utilities in Alaska and
Hawaii.\4\ The data include:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Balancing Authority is ``The responsible entity that
integrates resource plans ahead of time, maintains load-interchange-
generation balance within a Balancing Authority Area, and supports
Interconnection frequency in real time.'' (NERC, Glossary of Terms
Used in NERC Reliability Standards, December 21, 2012.) In most, but
not all cases, a balancing authority is an electric utility company
or a Regional Transmission Organization. The electric power grid in
the contiguous United States is managed on a moment to moment basis
by 98 Balancing Authorities. If the Southwest Power Pool RTO
proceeds as planned to consolidate its 17 member Balancing
Authorities, the number of Balancing Authorities will drop to 82.
\4\ Alaska and Hawaii do not have integrated electric power
grids as in the contiguous United States. Alaska has numerous small
regional electric power systems. In the case of Alaska, EIA proposes
to collect data from 1) the six interconnected systems in the
Railbelt Intertie extending from the Kenai Peninsula north to
Fairbanks, including Chugach Electric Association, Anchorage
Municipal Light & Power, Matanuska Electric Association, Golden
Valley Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, and Seward
Electric System; and 2) Alaska Electric Light & Power, which
provides power to Juneau. These utilities are believed by EIA to
account for over 75 percent of electric power load in Alaska.
In the case of Hawaii, EIA proposes to collect data from the
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. operating companies, including
Hawaii Electric Co., Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. and Maui
Electric Company, Ltd. These companies provide service to the
islands of Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Lanai, and Molokai, encompassing
about 95% of Hawaiian electric power customers. This approach
provides acceptable coverage of Alaska and Hawaii without incurring
the costs and burden of collecting complete data for these states.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hourly demand,
Hourly next-day demand forecast,
Hourly net generation,
Hourly actual interchange with each interconnected
Balancing Authority.
The purpose of this survey is to provide basic operating statistics
for the nation's electric power systems on a current basis. While
electric utilities individually and as an industry have primary
responsibility for system operations, many other entities, such as
other industry participants, policymakers, legislators, regulators,
emergency and disaster response officials, entrepreneurs, economic
analysts, industry researchers, and the public, have a direct interest
in electric systems operations and the associated data. There is
currently no central or comprehensive source for hourly electric
industry operating statistics.
The burden of providing these data is extremely low relative to
their value, particularly since the information requested is already
collected by or known to the proposed respondents in the course of
their normal operations, and a number of proposed respondents are
already posting much of it. Based on the information in the respondent
postings, EIA would make available a comprehensive set of the current
day's system demand data on an hourly basis and the prior day's basic
hourly electric system operating data on a daily basis.
Respondents will post hourly demand data at a web address in a
standard format within ten minutes of the end of the reported hour.
They will also post separately the prior day's hourly demand, demand
forecast, net generation, and actual interchange data in a standard
format by 7:00 a.m. Eastern Time the next day. The posting web address
must be accessible by EIA and respondents may, at their discretion,
provide the public with access to this address. In either case, EIA
will treat this data as public. EIA requests comment on alternatives or
supplements to the web posting requirement and the format for the
posted data.
The same-day, soon after the reporting hour posting of demand
provides a basic measure of the current status of electric systems and
the United States electric industry as a whole. Comparing actual system
demand with the day-ahead forecast provides a measure of the accuracy
of forecasting used to commit resources.
Data regarding the time-varying nature of electricity supply and
demand is essential to addressing smart grid related issues such as
integrating wind and solar generation, better coordination of natural
gas and electric short-term operations, and expanding the use of demand
response, storage, and electric vehicles in electric system operations.
Due to the lack of sufficient cost-effective electricity storage,
electricity must be produced at the moment it is used. This presents
the electric industry with significant challenges in delivering its
primary product: electricity on-demand. The industry meets the
[[Page 14527]]
challenge by always having more capacity available than needed and
relying on certain entities to ensure the moment-to-moment balancing of
supply and demand. Electric utilities that perform the balancing
function are called Balancing Authorities. Due to the interconnected
nature of power grids, collecting operating information from only a
subset of the entities involved significantly undermines the usefulness
of the survey.
Balancing Authority operators monitor their systems continuously
and may act whenever necessary to maintain reliability. However,
Balancing Authority operating procedures, such as scheduling supply,
demand and interchange (the flow of electricity between Balancing
Authorities), and the mandatory reliability standards that apply to
them, use the hour as the primary operating period. Consequently, the
proposed survey uses the operating hour as its data measurement
interval.
The proposed survey is specifically designed to minimize burden on
electric system operators. The surveyed data is typically produced in
the normal course of business by Balancing Authority energy management
systems. Hourly demand and demand forecast data is currently posted on
public Web sites in the proposed posting timeframes by a number of
Balancing Authorities, including most Regional Transmission
Organizations. These balancing authorities supply over half of end-use
electricity consumption in the United States. A few Balancing
Authorities post publicly more detailed operating data.
Under Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order 890,
Transmitting Utilities are required to post on their Open Access Same-
time Information System (OASIS) Web sites prior-day's peak hour demand
and the associated demand forecast value. Most Balancing Authorities
are also Transmitting Utilities. Therefore, the Balancing Authorities
subject to Order 890 already have in place the means for posting some
of the data requested by the proposed survey.
The proposed survey does not duplicate existing data collections.
EIA currently collects monthly and annual production from electric
generators and demand from load-serving entities. The data are
published about 52 days after the end of a month for major generators
and systems, and about eight months after the end of the year for
smaller entities.
FERC currently collects demand, net generation and actual
interchange from Balancing Authorities on an annual survey, the FERC
Form 714. The reporting is on a monthly and annual basis. In addition,
Balancing Authorities report actual interchange received and delivered
with each directly interconnected Balancing Authority on an annual
basis. Monthly or annual values for demand, net generation and actual
interchange do not provide relevant information about the time-varying
nature of these operating values as would be provided by the proposed
survey.
The FERC Form 714 also collects historical hourly demand by
Planning Area. Most Balancing Authorities are also Planning Areas, but
not all. The hourly demand data is collected annually and posted with
the rest of the form data in August of the year following the reporting
year. The FERC Form 714 data is both less complete and far less timely
than the data collected by the proposed survey, and does not offer
current information on the status of the nation's electric system that
the proposed survey would provide.
Certain real-time system information is made available by NERC to
DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. However,
this data is not made available to the public and under the agency's
agreement with NERC the data is not recorded or otherwise retained by
DOE.
EIA does not believe that this information is business sensitive.
As noted above, Regional Transmission Organizations that serve as
Balancing Authorities and some other Balancing Authorities currently
post publicly hourly operating data. A potential commercial issue is
whether these data will reveal whether a specific utility is short on
available generating capacity and may be willing to pay premium prices
for electricity to meet load. The proposed survey data, including same-
day posting of hourly demand, does not provide information about the
availability of generating units. The next-day posting of operating
data is after the relevant short-term wholesale power markets have
closed.
Multiple power plants supply most Balancing Authorities. Therefore,
the generation data reported under the proposed survey will not reveal
which specific generators are operating or a history of their operating
trends. However, some individual generators and small utilities with
little or no generation have chosen for commercial reasons to operate
as Balancing Authorities. Most Balancing Authorities of this type are
embedded within another Balancing Authority and have a single
interconnection with that Balancing Authority.
While the proposed survey data does not provide information about
the current availability of a single-generator Balancing Authority
power plant, it does provide a history of the plant's hourly output.
There is little value in collecting system level operating data from
these Balancing Authorities. However, their information is needed to
provide comprehensive operating statistics. EIA requests comments on
how to exempt these Balancing Authorities or limit their reporting
while maintaining the comprehensiveness of the survey.
(5) Estimated Number of Survey Respondents: The annual estimated
number of respondents is 107. This includes 98 Balancing Authorities in
the contiguous United States, 6 electric utilities in Alaska, and 3
electric utilities in Hawaii.
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: The annual
estimated number of total responses is 39,055.
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: The annual estimated
burden is 7,534 hours for the first year (to include start-up
activities) and 3,254 hours each subsequent year.
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
Additional costs to respondents are not anticipated beyond costs
associated with response burden.
Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-275, codified at 15 U.S.C.
772(b).
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27, 2013.
Renee Miller,
Acting Director, Office of Survey Development and Statistical
Integration, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-05152 Filed 3-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P