Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Tangelos Grown in Florida; Revising Reporting Requirements and New Information Collection, 14236-14238 [2013-04964]
Download as PDF
14236
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
continue to be acceptable records for
processing by the retirement and
insurance processing system.
■ 10. Revise § 850.401 to read as
follows:
§ 850.401 Electronic notice of coverage
determination.
An agency or other entity that submits
electronic employee records directly or
through a Shared Service Center must
include in the notice of law enforcement
officer, firefighter, or nuclear materials
retirement coverage, required by
§§ 831.811(a), 831.911(a), 842.808(a), or
842.910(a) of this chapter, the position
description number, or other unique
alphanumeric identifier, in the notice
for the position for which law
enforcement officer, firefighter, or
nuclear materials courier retirement
coverage has been approved. Agencies
or other entities must submit position
descriptions to OPM in a PDF document
to combox address: combox@opm.gov.
[FR Doc. 2013–04965 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 905
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0052; FV12–905–2
PR]
Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and
Tangelos Grown in Florida; Revising
Reporting Requirements and New
Information Collection
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments
on a proposed change to reporting
requirements prescribed under the
Federal marketing order for oranges,
grapefruit, tangerines, and tangelos
grown in Florida (order). The Citrus
Administrative Committee (Committee)
is responsible for local administration of
the order. This action would require all
fresh citrus handlers to provide the
Committee with a list of all growers
whose fruit they handled each season.
This information would enable the
Committee to more efficiently
administer the order and improve
communication with growers. This
proposal also announces the
Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS)
intention to request approval from
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) of a new information collection.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
rulemaking must be received by May 6,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
2013. Pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on the
information collection burden must be
received by May 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian D. Nissen, Regional
Director, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or Email:
Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR part
905), regulating the handling of oranges,
grapefruit, tangerines, and tangelos
grown in Florida, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would revise the
reporting requirements prescribed under
the order. This action would require all
fresh citrus handlers to provide the
Committee with a list of all growers
whose fruit they handled each season.
This information would enable the
Committee to more efficiently
administer the order and better
communicate fresh market issues to
fresh market citrus growers. This
proposed change was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
July 17, 2012, meeting.
Section 905.71 of the order provides
the Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, authority to collect
information from handlers that is
deemed necessary for administering the
order. This proposed rule would utilize
this authority to establish a new
§ 905.171 under the rules and
regulations of the order. This new
section would require handlers of fresh
citrus to report to the Committee a list
of names and contact information for all
growers whose fruit they have shipped
by June 15 of each season.
Currently, the Committee does not
require handlers to report any
information regarding the growers who
supply them. In order to communicate
with its grower base regarding the order
or Committee actions, the Committee
depends on mailing lists from other
industry groups. However, third-party
lists are often incomplete, out of date, or
do not distinguish between those
growing for the fresh market or those
growing for the processed market.
Ninety percent of the volume of citrus
produced in Florida is sold for
processing into juice, which is not
regulated under the order.
Consequently, while there are an
estimated 8,000 citrus growers, it is
estimated only 750 growers produce for
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the fresh market. Because there is no
readily available comprehensive list of
fresh citrus growers, the Committee
could allocate a great deal of resources
into information distribution and still
not be certain that the information is
getting to those covered under the order.
Recently, the Committee began
discussing potential changes to the
order to make it more efficient and
responsive to industry needs. In these
discussions, the Committee recognized
that grower involvement could be
improved through focused
communication with fresh market citrus
growers. However, in order to actively
reach out to growers in the industry, the
Committee must have accurate
information. The Committee discussed
developing a list of growers compiled
annually from information provided by
handlers to make effective outreach
possible. Some members expressed
concerns about the disclosure of
proprietary information. The Committee
addressed these concerns by stating the
scope of the information collection
could be limited to only grower contact
information.
In addition, while this action would
assist the Committee in its efforts to
keep growers informed and to solicit
their input on potential changes to the
order, it also could be used to increase
grower outreach and involvement in
Committee elections and membership,
facilitate grower participation in
amendment and continuance referenda,
and provide for a more efficient use of
Committee resources.
As a result, Committee members
recommended collecting grower names
and contact information each season
from handlers of fresh citrus so that the
Committee would have an accurate and
updated list to use in communicating
with fresh market citrus growers. June
15 was selected as the due date for this
information as it is toward the end of
the season, and Committee members
agreed handlers would have a complete
list at that time.
This change would revise reporting
requirements to require all fresh citrus
handlers regulated under the order to
provide the Committee with contact
information for all growers whose fruit
they have shipped. This information
would be due by June 15 of each season.
The change would enable the
Committee to more efficiently
administer the order and communicate
fresh market issues to fresh market
citrus growers.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 8,000
growers of citrus in the production area
and approximately 45 handlers subject
to regulation under the marketing order;
however, it is estimated that only 750
growers produce for the fresh market.
Small agricultural producers are defined
by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on production data, grower
prices as reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, and the
total number of Florida citrus growers,
the average annual grower revenue is
below $750,000. In addition, based on
industry and Committee data, the
average annual f.o.b. price for fresh
Florida citrus during the 2010–11
season was approximately $12.16 per 4⁄5
bushel carton, and total fresh shipments
were approximately 30.4 million
cartons. Using the average f.o.b. price
and shipment data, about 55 percent of
the Florida citrus handlers could be
considered small businesses under
SBA’s definition. Thus, assuming a
normal distribution, the majority of
producers and handlers of Florida citrus
may be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule would revise the
reporting requirements prescribed under
the order. This action would require all
fresh citrus handlers to provide the
Committee with a list of all growers
whose fruit they handled by June 15 of
each season. This information would
enable the Committee to more
efficiently administer the order and
better communicate fresh market issues
to fresh market citrus growers. This rule
would create a new § 905.171, which
would establish the new reporting
requirement. The authority for this
action is provided for in § 905.71 of the
order. This proposed change was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a July 17, 2012, meeting.
Requiring grower contact information
each season would impose a minor
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14237
increase in the reporting burden on all
citrus handlers. However, this data is
already recorded and maintained by
handlers as a part of their daily
business. Handlers, regardless of size,
should be able to readily access this
information. Consequently, any
additional costs associated with this
change would be minimal and apply
equally to all handlers.
This action should also help growers
receive more information about the
activities under the order and make
them more aware of their opportunities
to participate in the efforts of the
Committee. The benefits of this rule are
expected to be equally available to all
fresh citrus growers, regardless of their
size.
The Committee discussed making no
change as an alternative to this action
but determined that in order to
efficiently carry out the objectives of the
marketing order, the information
collection within this new report was
necessary. Therefore, this alternative
was rejected.
This proposal would establish one
new reporting requirement and would
require one new Committee form.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
impose a minor increase in the reporting
burden for all handlers, which is
discussed in the Paperwork Reduction
Act section of this document.
As with all Federal Marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the citrus
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the July 17, 2012, meeting was
a public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments
on this proposed rule, including the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
14238
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), this notice announces
AMS’s intent to request approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for a new information collection
under OMB No. 0581–NEW. It will be
merged with the forms currently
approved under OMB No. 0581–0189
‘‘Generic Fruit Crops.’’
Title: Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines,
and Tangelos Grown in Florida;
Marketing Order No. 905.
OMB Number: 0581–NEW.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The information
requirements in this request are
essential to carry out the intent of the
Act, to provide the respondents the type
of service they request, and to
administer the Florida citrus marketing
order program.
On July 17, 2012, the Committee
unanimously recommended that all
fresh citrus handlers, covered under the
order, provide the Committee with a list
of all growers whose fruit they handled
each season. This form, titled Handler
Supplier Report, would be submitted
directly to the Committee by handlers
by June 15 of each year.
This information collection would
benefit the facilitation of
communication between the Committee
and the growers. The information
collected would only be used by
authorized representatives of the USDA,
including the AMS Fruit and Vegetable
Program regional and headquarters staff,
and authorized employees of the
Committee. Authorized Committee
employees would be the primary users
of the information, and the AMS would
be the secondary users. The
Committee’s staff would compile the
information and utilize it to distribute
regulatory information, to seek grower
nominations for Committee positions, to
keep fresh growers informed of issues
affecting the fresh segment of the
industry, and to prepare both the annual
report and marketing policy, as required
under the order. All proprietary
information would be kept confidential
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
in accordance with the Act and the
order.
The proposed request for new
information collection under the order
is as follows:
PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT,
TANGERINES, AND TANGELOS
GROWN IN FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 905 continues to read as follows:
■
Handler Supplier Report
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.33
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of fresh
Florida citrus
Estimated Number of Respondents: 45
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 14.85 hours
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No.
0581–NEW and the Marketing Order for
Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and
Tangelos Grown in Florida, and should
be sent to the USDA in care of the
Docket Clerk at the previouslymentioned address or at https://
www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the address of the Docket Clerk
or at https://www.regulations.gov.
If this proposed rule is finalized, this
information collection will be merged
with the forms currently approved
under OMB No. 0581–0189 ‘‘Generic
Fruit Crops.’’
Citrus, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 905 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Section 905.171 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 905.171
Handler Supplier Report.
Each handler shall furnish a supplier
report to the Committee on an annual
basis. Such reports shall be made on
forms provided by the Committee and
shall include the name and business
address of each grower whose fruit was
shipped or acquired by the handler
during the season. Handlers shall
submit this report to the Committee not
later than June 15 of each season.
Dated: February 27, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–04964 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Minority Business Development
Agency
15 CFR Part 1400
[Docket No. 121130667–2667–02]
Determination of Group Eligibility for
MBDA Assistance
Minority Business
Development Agency, Commerce.
ACTION: Response to petition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On January 11, 2012, the
Minority Business Development Agency
(MBDA) received a petition from the
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee (ADC or Petitioner)
requesting designation of the ArabAmerican community as a socially or
economically disadvantaged group
whose members are eligible for MBDA
assistance. This document announces
MBDA’s determination that the ADC
Petition is not currently supported by
sufficient evidence to establish social or
economic disadvantage as required by
the MBDA regulations and applicable
legal precedent.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Marcus, Associate Director for
Legislation, Education, and
Intergovernmental Affairs, Minority
Business Development Agency, 1401
Constitution Ave., Room 5065,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–6272.
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14236-14238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04964]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 905
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-12-0052; FV12-905-2 PR]
Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Tangelos Grown in Florida;
Revising Reporting Requirements and New Information Collection
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on a proposed change to reporting
requirements prescribed under the Federal marketing order for oranges,
grapefruit, tangerines, and tangelos grown in Florida (order). The
Citrus Administrative Committee (Committee) is responsible for local
administration of the order. This action would require all fresh citrus
handlers to provide the Committee with a list of all growers whose
fruit they handled each season. This information would enable the
Committee to more efficiently administer the order and improve
communication with growers. This proposal also announces the
Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) intention to request approval
from Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of a new information
collection.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rulemaking must be received by May 6,
2013. Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the
information collection burden must be received by May 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie M. Varela, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863)
325-8793, or Email: Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR part 905), regulating the handling of
oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and tangelos grown in Florida,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would revise the reporting requirements
prescribed under the order. This action would require all fresh citrus
handlers to provide the Committee with a list of all growers whose
fruit they handled each season. This information would enable the
Committee to more efficiently administer the order and better
communicate fresh market issues to fresh market citrus growers. This
proposed change was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a July
17, 2012, meeting.
Section 905.71 of the order provides the Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, authority to collect information from
handlers that is deemed necessary for administering the order. This
proposed rule would utilize this authority to establish a new Sec.
905.171 under the rules and regulations of the order. This new section
would require handlers of fresh citrus to report to the Committee a
list of names and contact information for all growers whose fruit they
have shipped by June 15 of each season.
Currently, the Committee does not require handlers to report any
information regarding the growers who supply them. In order to
communicate with its grower base regarding the order or Committee
actions, the Committee depends on mailing lists from other industry
groups. However, third-party lists are often incomplete, out of date,
or do not distinguish between those growing for the fresh market or
those growing for the processed market.
Ninety percent of the volume of citrus produced in Florida is sold
for processing into juice, which is not regulated under the order.
Consequently, while there are an estimated 8,000 citrus growers, it is
estimated only 750 growers produce for
[[Page 14237]]
the fresh market. Because there is no readily available comprehensive
list of fresh citrus growers, the Committee could allocate a great deal
of resources into information distribution and still not be certain
that the information is getting to those covered under the order.
Recently, the Committee began discussing potential changes to the
order to make it more efficient and responsive to industry needs. In
these discussions, the Committee recognized that grower involvement
could be improved through focused communication with fresh market
citrus growers. However, in order to actively reach out to growers in
the industry, the Committee must have accurate information. The
Committee discussed developing a list of growers compiled annually from
information provided by handlers to make effective outreach possible.
Some members expressed concerns about the disclosure of proprietary
information. The Committee addressed these concerns by stating the
scope of the information collection could be limited to only grower
contact information.
In addition, while this action would assist the Committee in its
efforts to keep growers informed and to solicit their input on
potential changes to the order, it also could be used to increase
grower outreach and involvement in Committee elections and membership,
facilitate grower participation in amendment and continuance referenda,
and provide for a more efficient use of Committee resources.
As a result, Committee members recommended collecting grower names
and contact information each season from handlers of fresh citrus so
that the Committee would have an accurate and updated list to use in
communicating with fresh market citrus growers. June 15 was selected as
the due date for this information as it is toward the end of the
season, and Committee members agreed handlers would have a complete
list at that time.
This change would revise reporting requirements to require all
fresh citrus handlers regulated under the order to provide the
Committee with contact information for all growers whose fruit they
have shipped. This information would be due by June 15 of each season.
The change would enable the Committee to more efficiently administer
the order and communicate fresh market issues to fresh market citrus
growers.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 8,000 growers of citrus in the production
area and approximately 45 handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order; however, it is estimated that only 750 growers produce
for the fresh market. Small agricultural producers are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on production data, grower prices as reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, and the total number of Florida citrus
growers, the average annual grower revenue is below $750,000. In
addition, based on industry and Committee data, the average annual
f.o.b. price for fresh Florida citrus during the 2010-11 season was
approximately $12.16 per \4/5\ bushel carton, and total fresh shipments
were approximately 30.4 million cartons. Using the average f.o.b. price
and shipment data, about 55 percent of the Florida citrus handlers
could be considered small businesses under SBA's definition. Thus,
assuming a normal distribution, the majority of producers and handlers
of Florida citrus may be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule would revise the reporting requirements
prescribed under the order. This action would require all fresh citrus
handlers to provide the Committee with a list of all growers whose
fruit they handled by June 15 of each season. This information would
enable the Committee to more efficiently administer the order and
better communicate fresh market issues to fresh market citrus growers.
This rule would create a new Sec. 905.171, which would establish the
new reporting requirement. The authority for this action is provided
for in Sec. 905.71 of the order. This proposed change was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a July 17, 2012, meeting.
Requiring grower contact information each season would impose a
minor increase in the reporting burden on all citrus handlers. However,
this data is already recorded and maintained by handlers as a part of
their daily business. Handlers, regardless of size, should be able to
readily access this information. Consequently, any additional costs
associated with this change would be minimal and apply equally to all
handlers.
This action should also help growers receive more information about
the activities under the order and make them more aware of their
opportunities to participate in the efforts of the Committee. The
benefits of this rule are expected to be equally available to all fresh
citrus growers, regardless of their size.
The Committee discussed making no change as an alternative to this
action but determined that in order to efficiently carry out the
objectives of the marketing order, the information collection within
this new report was necessary. Therefore, this alternative was
rejected.
This proposal would establish one new reporting requirement and
would require one new Committee form. Therefore, this proposed rule
would impose a minor increase in the reporting burden for all handlers,
which is discussed in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
document.
As with all Federal Marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the citrus industry and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the July 17, 2012, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/
[[Page 14238]]
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), this notice announces AMS's intent to request approval
from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a new information
collection under OMB No. 0581-NEW. It will be merged with the forms
currently approved under OMB No. 0581-0189 ``Generic Fruit Crops.''
Title: Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Tangelos Grown in
Florida; Marketing Order No. 905.
OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The information requirements in this request are
essential to carry out the intent of the Act, to provide the
respondents the type of service they request, and to administer the
Florida citrus marketing order program.
On July 17, 2012, the Committee unanimously recommended that all
fresh citrus handlers, covered under the order, provide the Committee
with a list of all growers whose fruit they handled each season. This
form, titled Handler Supplier Report, would be submitted directly to
the Committee by handlers by June 15 of each year.
This information collection would benefit the facilitation of
communication between the Committee and the growers. The information
collected would only be used by authorized representatives of the USDA,
including the AMS Fruit and Vegetable Program regional and headquarters
staff, and authorized employees of the Committee. Authorized Committee
employees would be the primary users of the information, and the AMS
would be the secondary users. The Committee's staff would compile the
information and utilize it to distribute regulatory information, to
seek grower nominations for Committee positions, to keep fresh growers
informed of issues affecting the fresh segment of the industry, and to
prepare both the annual report and marketing policy, as required under
the order. All proprietary information would be kept confidential in
accordance with the Act and the order.
The proposed request for new information collection under the order
is as follows:
Handler Supplier Report
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.33 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of fresh Florida citrus
Estimated Number of Respondents: 45
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 14.85 hours
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-NEW and the Marketing Order
for Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Tangelos Grown in Florida, and
should be sent to the USDA in care of the Docket Clerk at the
previously-mentioned address or at https://www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments received will become a matter of
public record and will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the address of the Docket Clerk or at https://www.regulations.gov.
If this proposed rule is finalized, this information collection
will be merged with the forms currently approved under OMB No. 0581-
0189 ``Generic Fruit Crops.''
Citrus, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 905 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 905--ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT, TANGERINES, AND TANGELOS GROWN IN
FLORIDA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 905 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 905.171 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 905.171 Handler Supplier Report.
Each handler shall furnish a supplier report to the Committee on an
annual basis. Such reports shall be made on forms provided by the
Committee and shall include the name and business address of each
grower whose fruit was shipped or acquired by the handler during the
season. Handlers shall submit this report to the Committee not later
than June 15 of each season.
Dated: February 27, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-04964 Filed 3-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P