Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Unallowable Fringe Benefit Costs (DFARS Case 2012-D038), 13606-13607 [2013-04353]
Download as PDF
13606
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
226.7200
226.7201
226.7202
226.7203
226.7204
Scope of subpart.
Definition.
Applicability.
Policy.
Contract clause.
226.7200
Scope of subpart.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
4. The authority citation for part 252
continues to read as follows:
■
This subpart implements section 862
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112–
81).
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
226.7201
252.226–70XX Encouragement of Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
(STEM) Programs.
Definition.
‘‘Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics (STEM) Programs,’’ as
used in this subpart, means programs or
incentives, either formal or informal,
that encourage the pursuit of education
and experience in the science,
technology, engineering, and
mathematics disciplines.
226.7202
Applicability.
This subpart applies to all
solicitations and contracts.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
226.7203
Policy.
DoD encourages contractors to
undertake actions, to the maximum
extent practicable, that—
(a) Enhance undergraduate, graduate,
and doctoral programs in science,
technology, engineering, and
mathematics (referred to as ‘‘STEM’’
disciplines);
(b) Make investments, such as
programming and curriculum
development, in STEM programs within
elementary and secondary schools;
(c) Encourage employees to volunteer
in Title I schools in order to enhance
STEM education and programs;
(d) Make personnel available to advise
and assist faculty at such colleges and
universities in the performance of STEM
research and disciplines critical to the
functions of DoD;
(e) Establish partnerships between the
contractor and historically black
colleges and universities and minority
institutions for the purpose of training
students in scientific disciplines;
(f) Award scholarships and
fellowships, and establish cooperative
work-education programs in scientific
disciplines; or
(g) Conduct recruitment activities at
historically black colleges and
universities and other minority-serving
institutions or offer internships or
apprenticeships.
226.7204
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 252.226–70XX, Encouragement
of Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics (STEM) Programs, in
all solicitations and contracts.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Feb 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
5. Section 252.226–70XX is added to
read as follows:
■
As prescribed in 226.7204, insert the
following clause:
Encouragement of Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
Programs (Date)
(a) Definition.
‘‘Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Programs,’’ as used in
this clause, means programs and or
incentives, either formal or informal, that
encourage the pursuit of education and
experience in the science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics disciplines.
(b) In accordance with section 862 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112–81), the Contractor is
encouraged to undertake actions, to the
maximum extent practicable, that—
(1) Enhance undergraduate, graduate, and
doctoral programs in science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (referred to as
‘‘STEM’’ disciplines);
(2) Make investments, such as
programming and curriculum development,
in STEM programs within elementary and
secondary schools;
(3) Encourage employees to volunteer in
Title I schools in order to enhance STEM
education and programs;
(4) Make personnel available to advise and
assist faculty at such colleges and
universities in the performance of STEM
research and disciplines critical to the
functions of DoD;
(5) Establish partnerships between the
contractor and historically black colleges and
universities and minority institutions for the
purpose of training students in scientific
disciplines;
(6) Award scholarships and fellowships,
and establish cooperative work-education
programs in scientific disciplines; or
(7) Conduct recruitment activities at
historically black colleges and universities
and other minority-serving institutions or
offer internships or apprenticeships.
(c) Costs. (1) The Contractor shall assume
the responsibility for all the costs and
investments in support of the STEM
disciplines.
(2) The Contractor will not be reimbursed
for any costs incurred or associated with the
support of the STEM disciplines. Any costs
incurred for supporting the STEM disciplines
are unallowable under this contract.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2013–04352 Filed 2–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 231
RIN 0750–AH76
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Unallowable
Fringe Benefit Costs (DFARS Case
2012–D038)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
explicitly state that fringe benefit costs
incurred or estimated that are contrary
to law, employer-employee agreement,
or an established policy of the
contractor are unallowable.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before April
29, 2013, to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2012–D038,
using any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inserting ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–D038’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–
D038.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–
D038’’ on your attached document.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2012–D038 in the subject line of
the message.
Fax: 571–372–6094.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Ms. Amy Williams,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room
3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Amy Williams, telephone 571–372–
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
at 231.205–6 to implement the Director
of Defense Pricing policy memo
‘‘Unallowable Costs for Ineligible
Dependent Health Care Benefits, dated
February 17, 2012. The rule adds
paragraph 231.205–6(m)(1) to explicitly
state that fringe benefit costs incurred or
estimated that are contrary to law,
employer-employee agreement, or an
established policy of the contractor are
unallowable.
FAR 42.709, which implements 10
U.S.C. 2324(a) through (d) and 41 U.S.C.
4303, covers the assessment of penalties
against contractors that include
unallowable indirect costs in final
indirect cost rate proposals or the final
statement of costs incurred or estimated
to be incurred under a fixed-price
incentive contract. The section applies
to all contracts in excess of $700,000,
except fixed-price contracts without
cost incentives or firm-fixed-price
contracts for the purchase of
commercial items. FAR 42.709–1(a)
provides penalties that apply if the
indirect cost is expressly unallowable
under a cost principle in the FAR, or an
executive agency supplement to the
FAR.
FAR 31.205–6(m) states that the costs
of fringe benefits (which include
employee health care benefits) are
allowable to the extent that they are
reasonable and are required by law,
employer-employee agreement, or an
established policy of the contractor.
Although fringe benefit costs that do not
meet these criteria are not allowable, the
FAR does not make them expressly
unallowable. Specifying these fringe
benefit costs as expressly unallowable
in the DFARS makes it clear that the
penalties at FAR 42.709–1 are
applicable if a contractor includes such
unallowable fringe benefit costs in a
final indirect cost rate proposal or in the
final statement of costs incurred or
estimated to be incurred under a fixedprice incentive contract.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Feb 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs has determined
that this is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993. This rule is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis consistent with 5
U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may
be obtained from the point of contact
specified herein. The analysis is
summarized as follows:
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because this rule will only
impact entities that are submitting
covered proposals containing
unallowable indirect fringe benefit
costs. FAR 31.205–6(m) already states
what fringe benefit costs are allowable.
This rule provides explicit clarification
that fringe benefit costs incurred or
estimated that are contrary to law,
employer-employee agreement, or an
established policy of the contractor are
unallowable. If this rule takes effect, the
penalties at FAR 42.709–1 will apply to
any entity that includes such
unallowable indirect charges in a final
indirect cost rate proposal or the final
statement of costs incurred or estimated
to be incurred under a fixed-price
incentive contract for a contract that
exceeds $700,000.
At this time, DoD is unable to
estimate the number of small entities to
which this rule will apply. According to
FPDS date for FY 2012, there were
approximately 3000 contract awards
exceeding $700,000 to small entities,
excluding fixed-price contracts without
cost incentives or any firm-fixed–price
contract for the purchase of commercial
items. We estimate that a very small
percentage of the entities receiving these
awards would be submitting covered
proposals containing unallowable fringe
benefit costs. DoD invites comments
from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13607
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2012–D038) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 231.
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR parts 231 as follows:
PART 231—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 231 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Section 231.205–6 is amended by
adding paragraph (m)(1) to read as
follows:
■
231.205–6
services.
Compensation for personal
*
*
*
*
*
(m)(1) Fringe benefit costs incurred or
estimated that are contrary to law,
employer-employee agreement, or an
established policy of the contractor are
unallowable.
[FR Doc. 2013–04353 Filed 2–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 380, 383, and 384
[Docket No. FMCSA–2007–27748]
Minimum Training Requirements for
Entry-Level Commercial Motor Vehicle
Operators; Public Listening Session
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of public listening
session.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces that it will
hold a public listening session to solicit
ideas and information on the issue of
entry-level training for drivers of
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs).
Specifically, the Agency solicits input
on factors, issues, and data it should
consider in anticipation of a rulemaking
to implement the entry-level driver
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13606-13607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04353]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 231
RIN 0750-AH76
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Unallowable
Fringe Benefit Costs (DFARS Case 2012-D038)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to explicitly state that fringe benefit
costs incurred or estimated that are contrary to law, employer-employee
agreement, or an established policy of the contractor are unallowable.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before April 29, 2013, to be considered
in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2012-D038,
using any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via
the Federal eRulemaking portal by inserting ``DFARS Case 2012-D038''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``DFARS Case
2012-D038.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``DFARS Case 2012-D038'' on your attached document. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2012-D038 in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: 571-372-6094.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
[[Page 13607]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372-
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS at 231.205-6 to implement the
Director of Defense Pricing policy memo ``Unallowable Costs for
Ineligible Dependent Health Care Benefits, dated February 17, 2012. The
rule adds paragraph 231.205-6(m)(1) to explicitly state that fringe
benefit costs incurred or estimated that are contrary to law, employer-
employee agreement, or an established policy of the contractor are
unallowable.
FAR 42.709, which implements 10 U.S.C. 2324(a) through (d) and 41
U.S.C. 4303, covers the assessment of penalties against contractors
that include unallowable indirect costs in final indirect cost rate
proposals or the final statement of costs incurred or estimated to be
incurred under a fixed-price incentive contract. The section applies to
all contracts in excess of $700,000, except fixed-price contracts
without cost incentives or firm-fixed-price contracts for the purchase
of commercial items. FAR 42.709-1(a) provides penalties that apply if
the indirect cost is expressly unallowable under a cost principle in
the FAR, or an executive agency supplement to the FAR.
FAR 31.205-6(m) states that the costs of fringe benefits (which
include employee health care benefits) are allowable to the extent that
they are reasonable and are required by law, employer-employee
agreement, or an established policy of the contractor. Although fringe
benefit costs that do not meet these criteria are not allowable, the
FAR does not make them expressly unallowable. Specifying these fringe
benefit costs as expressly unallowable in the DFARS makes it clear that
the penalties at FAR 42.709-1 are applicable if a contractor includes
such unallowable fringe benefit costs in a final indirect cost rate
proposal or in the final statement of costs incurred or estimated to be
incurred under a fixed-price incentive contract.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may be obtained
from the point of contact specified herein. The analysis is summarized
as follows:
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this rule will only impact entities that are submitting covered
proposals containing unallowable indirect fringe benefit costs. FAR
31.205-6(m) already states what fringe benefit costs are allowable.
This rule provides explicit clarification that fringe benefit costs
incurred or estimated that are contrary to law, employer-employee
agreement, or an established policy of the contractor are unallowable.
If this rule takes effect, the penalties at FAR 42.709-1 will apply to
any entity that includes such unallowable indirect charges in a final
indirect cost rate proposal or the final statement of costs incurred or
estimated to be incurred under a fixed-price incentive contract for a
contract that exceeds $700,000.
At this time, DoD is unable to estimate the number of small
entities to which this rule will apply. According to FPDS date for FY
2012, there were approximately 3000 contract awards exceeding $700,000
to small entities, excluding fixed-price contracts without cost
incentives or any firm-fixed-price contract for the purchase of
commercial items. We estimate that a very small percentage of the
entities receiving these awards would be submitting covered proposals
containing unallowable fringe benefit costs. DoD invites comments from
small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2012-D038) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 231.
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR parts 231 as follows:
PART 231--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 231 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Section 231.205-6 is amended by adding paragraph (m)(1) to read as
follows:
231.205-6 Compensation for personal services.
* * * * *
(m)(1) Fringe benefit costs incurred or estimated that are contrary
to law, employer-employee agreement, or an established policy of the
contractor are unallowable.
[FR Doc. 2013-04353 Filed 2-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P