Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Deferral for CO2, 13497-13499 [2013-04145]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
13497
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: February 8, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
Subpart I—Delaware
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
Regulation 1125, Section 1.0 to read as
follows:
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.420
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE DELAWARE SIP
State regulation
(7 DNREC 1100)
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
1125
Section 1.0 .....................
*
*
*
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0305; FRL–9783–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Deferral for CO2 Emissions
From Bioenergy and Other Biogenic
Sources Under the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Maryland Department
of the Environmental (MDE) on April 4,
2012. This revision defers until July 21,
2014 the application of the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting requirements to biogenic
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from
bioenergy and other biogenic stationary
sources in the State of Maryland. This
action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 1, 2013.
SUMMARY:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
8/11/12
2/28/13 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
Added definitions of ‘‘GHG’’ and ‘‘Subject to
Regulation’’ under Section 1.9. Note: In section 1.9, the previous SIP-approved baseline
dates for sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and
nitrogen dioxide in the definition of ‘‘Baseline
Date’’ remain part of the SIP.
*
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0305. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Talley, (215) 814–2117, or by
email at talley.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
19:07 Feb 27, 2013
Additional explanation
Requirements for Preconstruction Permitting
*
[FR Doc. 2013–04143 Filed 2–27–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
General Provisions .......
*
*
EPA approval date
I. Background
On September 7, 2012 (77 FR 55171),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of a revision to the Maryland SIP which
would defer until July 21, 2014 the
application of PSD permitting
requirements to biogenic CO2 emissions
from bioenergy and other biogenic
stationary sources in Maryland. The
formal SIP revision (#12–02) was
submitted by MDE on April 4, 2012.
During the public comment period, EPA
received a request from a commenter to
extend the comment period. In response
to that request, EPA re-opened the
public comment period for an
additional 30 days under additional
notice on November 16, 2012 (77 FR
68721).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
EPA incorporated the biomass
deferral into the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) governing state
programs and into the Federal PSD
program by amending the definition of
‘‘subject to regulation’’ under 40 CFR
51.166 and 52.21 respectively. Maryland
implements its PSD program by
incorporating section 52.21 by
reference. This incorporation references
a date specific version of the CFR and
is updated periodically and submitted
to EPA for approval into the SIP. In
order to adopt the Biomass Deferral,
Maryland has revised COMAR
26.11.06.14B(1) to incorporate the 2009
version of 40 CFR 52.21 ‘‘as amended
by’’ the Tailoring Rule and the Biomass
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
13498
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Deferral. Additionally, the definitions of
‘‘PSD source’’ and ‘‘greenhouse gas’’ at
COMAR 26.11.01.01 and 26.11.02.01
respectively have been revised to
incorporate the Biomass Deferral.
Other specific requirements of
Maryland’s April 4, 2012 submittal and
the rationale for EPA’s proposed action
are explained in the NPR and will not
be restated here. No public comments
were received on the NPR, either during
the initial comment period, or the
additional 30-day comment period.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland’s April 4,
2012 SIP submittal as a revision to the
Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 29, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
pertaining to the regulation of biogenic
GHGs in Maryland may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: February 8, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the second
entry for COMAR 26.11.01.01, and the
entries for COMAR 26.11.02.01, and
26.11.06.14.
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c)* * *
*
*
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland
administrative
regulations (COMAR)
citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
26.11.01
*
26.11.01.01 ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
General Administrative Provisions
*
*
Definitions ...................................
19:07 Feb 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Additional explanation/citation at
40 CFR 52.1100
EPA approval date
Frm 00056
*
3/5/12
Fmt 4700
*
2/28/13 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
*
*
Revised .01B(6–1) and .01B(37).
13499
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP—Continued
Code of Maryland
administrative
regulations (COMAR)
citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
26.11.02
26.11.02.01 ...............
*
*
26.11.06.14 ...............
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0887; FRL– 9785–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Revisions to the Knox County Portion
of the Tennessee State Implementation
Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the Knox
County portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted
by the State of Tennessee, through the
Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC) on August 19,
2009, August 22, 2012, and October 12,
2012. The SIP submittals include
changes to Knox County Air Quality
Management Regulations concerning
open burning, permits and regulation of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
TDEC considers Knox County’s SIP
revisions to be as or more stringent than
the Tennessee SIP requirements. EPA is
approving the Knox County SIP
revisions because the State has
demonstrated that they are consistent
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
April 29, 2013 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Feb 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
Revised .01B(44) and .01C(1).
*
*
General Emissions Standards, Prohibitions, and Standards
*
3/5/12
*
[FR Doc. 2013–04145 Filed 2–27–13; 8:45 am]
*
2/28/13 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
*
*
*
Control of PSD Sources .............
*
3/5/12
*
26.11.06
*
Permits, Approvals, and Registration
Definitions ...................................
*
Additional explanation/citation at
40 CFR 52.1100
EPA approval date
*
2/28/13 .......................................
[Insert page number where the
document begins].
*
*
by April 1, 2013. If adverse comment is
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2012–0887, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2012–
0887,’’ Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2012–
0887. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Revised .14B(1).
*
*
*
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13497-13499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04145]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0305; FRL-9783-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Deferral for CO2 Emissions From Bioenergy and
Other Biogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environmental (MDE) on
April 4, 2012. This revision defers until July 21, 2014 the application
of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting
requirements to biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from
bioenergy and other biogenic stationary sources in the State of
Maryland. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on April 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0305. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment,
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Talley, (215) 814-2117, or by
email at talley.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 7, 2012 (77 FR 55171), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. The NPR proposed
approval of a revision to the Maryland SIP which would defer until July
21, 2014 the application of PSD permitting requirements to biogenic
CO2 emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic stationary
sources in Maryland. The formal SIP revision (12-02) was
submitted by MDE on April 4, 2012. During the public comment period,
EPA received a request from a commenter to extend the comment period.
In response to that request, EPA re-opened the public comment period
for an additional 30 days under additional notice on November 16, 2012
(77 FR 68721).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
EPA incorporated the biomass deferral into the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) governing state programs and into the Federal PSD
program by amending the definition of ``subject to regulation'' under
40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21 respectively. Maryland implements its PSD
program by incorporating section 52.21 by reference. This incorporation
references a date specific version of the CFR and is updated
periodically and submitted to EPA for approval into the SIP. In order
to adopt the Biomass Deferral, Maryland has revised COMAR
26.11.06.14B(1) to incorporate the 2009 version of 40 CFR 52.21 ``as
amended by'' the Tailoring Rule and the Biomass
[[Page 13498]]
Deferral. Additionally, the definitions of ``PSD source'' and
``greenhouse gas'' at COMAR 26.11.01.01 and 26.11.02.01 respectively
have been revised to incorporate the Biomass Deferral.
Other specific requirements of Maryland's April 4, 2012 submittal
and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR
and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the
NPR, either during the initial comment period, or the additional 30-day
comment period.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland's April 4, 2012 SIP submittal as a
revision to the Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 29, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action pertaining to the regulation of biogenic GHGs in
Maryland may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 8, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the second entry for COMAR 26.11.01.01, and the entries for COMAR
26.11.02.01, and 26.11.06.14.
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c)* * *
EPA-Approved Regulations, Technical Memoranda, and Statutes in the Maryland SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
Code of Maryland State explanation/
administrative regulations Title/subject effective EPA approval date citation at 40 CFR
(COMAR) citation date 52.1100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26.11.01.01.................... Definitions......... 3/5/12 2/28/13 [Insert page Revised .01B(6-1)
number where the and .01B(37).
document begins].
[[Page 13499]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.02 Permits, Approvals, and Registration
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.02.01.................... Definitions......... 3/5/12 2/28/13 [Insert page Revised .01B(44)
number where the and .01C(1).
document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.06 General Emissions Standards, Prohibitions, and Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26.11.06.14.................... Control of PSD 3/5/12 2/28/13............. Revised .14B(1).
Sources. [Insert page number
where the document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-04145 Filed 2-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
