Sunshine Federal Register Notice, 13099-13100 [2013-04511]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Notices
even if one or more of the criteria are
not deemed to be adequate, the NRC
staff may still decide that the overall
IPEEE analysis is adequate to support its
use for screening purposes. The NRC
staff may conduct site visits to view
IPEEE documentation referenced in
support of the IPEEE adequacy
submittal.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Development of FIRS
The SPID report does not discuss the
development of FIRS used for
performing soil-structure interaction
analyses. Consistent with guidance
described in DC/COL–ISG–017,
‘‘Ensuring Hazard-Consistent Seismic
Input for Site Response and Soil
Structure Interaction Analyses,’’ the
FIRS should be derived in a manner
consistent with the site response used in
the development of the site-specific
GMRS. As such, the FIRS should be
derived as performance-based sitespecific response spectra at the
foundation level in the free field. The
starting point for development of the
FIRS should be the same hard rock
elevation used as the starting point for
developing the GMRS. As the
engineering properties of soil are straindependent and can be highly non-linear,
the characterization of soil layers and
their associated properties used in the
GMRS analysis should also be used for
the derivation of the site-specific FIRS
at the foundation elevation. The
performance-based FIRS can be
developed using either a full-column
outcrop motion that includes the effect
of the soil above, or as a geologic
outcrop motion for which the soil layers
above the foundation elevation have
been removed.
Updating the Central and Eastern
United States (CEUS)-Seismic Source
Characterization (SSC) Model
Section 2.2 of the SPID report
provides an overview of the CEUS–SSC
model and explains why it is
appropriate to use without update for
the seismic reevaluations. Specifically,
Section 2.2 states ‘‘for site-specific
licensing applications or site-specific
safety decisions, these seismic sources
would be reviewed on a site-specific
basis to determine if they need to be
updated. Such evaluations would be
appropriate in a licensing application,
where focus could be made on sitespecific applications. However, for a
screening-level study of multiple plants
for the purpose of setting priorities, the
use of these seismic sources as
published is appropriate.’’
The NRC staff agrees that the CEUS–
SSC model does not need to be updated
for the seismic reevaluations, but the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Feb 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
staff’s rationale is different than that
presented in the SPID report.
Specifically, the staff has determined
that the CEUS–SSC model does not
need to be updated because the model
is up-to-date and is sufficiently refined
to allow a site-specific source model to
be developed. To adequately respond to
the 50.54(f) letter, a site-specific GMRS
should be calculated for each plant so
that an informed decision can be made
regarding which plants will be required
to complete a risk evaluation. Further,
the site-specific GMRS will also be used
in the risk evaluations.
Prior to issuing the CEUS–SSC model,
the Technical Integration Team
considered potentially significant events
(such as the 2011 Mineral, VA
earthquake) that had occurred after the
model was developed, and determined
that those events did not change their
interpretations of seismic sources or
earthquake recurrence rates. If a
significant earthquake in the CEUS were
to occur or new information were to
emerge during the reevaluation period
that could require an update of the
CEUS–SSC model, the staff expects
licensees to evaluate the significance of
the new information to determine if the
CEUS–SSC model needs to be updated
in order to appropriately respond to the
50.54(f) request.
Site Response
Section 2.4.1 and Appendix B of the
SPID report provides guidance on how
to develop the site response in cases
where limited site response data exists.
As stated in Appendix B, the NRC staff
expects licensees to use available
geologic, geotechnical, and geophysical
data collected during the initial
licensing or subsequent activities at the
site to the extent practicable. Where
limited site response data exists,
information from core borings and data
collected from site and regional
evaluations should be used to develop
the site response amplification. Section
4 of the SPID report states that licensees
should provide the basis for the site
responses used in the reevaluations. The
NRC staff expects site-specific geology,
geotechnical, and geophysical
information to be a significant part of
the basis.
Non-Concurrence
An NRC staff member did not agree
with some content of the SPID report
and submitted a non-concurrence on the
SPID endorsement letter. In accordance
with the NRC’s non-concurrence
process, NRC management and staff
worked to address the staff member’s
concerns, and documentation of the
non-concurrence can be found in
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13099
ADAMS at Accession No.
ML12324A195.
60-Day Response
In accordance with the 50.54(f) letter,
each licensee is to submit to the NRC its
intention to follow the NRC-endorsed
seismic reevaluation guidance, or an
alternative approach, 60 days after the
issuance of the NRC-endorsed guidance.
For the purpose of meeting this
deadline, the 60-day response period
commences on the date the
endorsement letter is published in the
Federal Register.
Backfitting and Issue Finality
This endorsement letter does not
constitute backfitting as defined in 10
CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) and is not
otherwise inconsistent with the issue
finality provisions in Part 52, ‘‘Licenses,
Certifications, and Approvals for
Nuclear Power Plants,’’ of 10 CFR. This
endorsement letter provides guidance
on an acceptable method for
implementing the March 12, 2012, RFI.
Applicants and licensees may
voluntarily use the guidance in the SPID
report, as clarified by the NRC staff in
the endorsement letter, to comply with
the RFI. Methods, analyses, or solutions
that differ from those described in the
SPID report may be deemed acceptable
if they provide sufficient basis and
information for the NRC staff to verify
that the proposed alternative is
acceptable.
Congressional Review Act
This endorsement letter is a rule as
designated in the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808). The Office of
Management and Budget has found that
this is a major rule in accordance with
the Congressional Review Act.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of February 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David L. Skeen,
Director, Japan Lessons-Learned Project
Directorate, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2013–04396 Filed 2–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Federal Register Notice
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, [NRC–2013–
0001].
Weeks of February 25, March 4,
11, 18, 25, April 1, 2013.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
13100
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Notices
PLACE:
Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an email to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Week of February 25, 2013
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of February 25, 2013.
Dated: February 20, 2013.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
Week of March 4, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 4, 2013.
Week of March 11, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 11, 2013.
Week of March 18, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 18, 2013.
Week of March 25, 2013—Tentative
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 25, 2013.
Week of April 1, 2013—Tentative
Tuesday April 2, 2013
9:30 a.m. Meeting With Organization
of Agreement States (OAS) and
Conference of Radiation Control
Program Directors (CRCPD) (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Cindy Flannery,
301–415–0223)
This meeting will be Webcast live at
the Web address—www.nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
* The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—301–415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, 301–415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, or
by email at kimberly.meyerchambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Feb 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–04511 Filed 2–22–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Project No. 753; NRC–2012–0280]
Models for Plant-Specific Adoption of
Technical Specifications Task Force
Traveler TSTF–535, Revision 0,
‘‘Revise Shutdown Margin Definition
To Address Advanced Fuel Designs,’’
Using the Consolidated Line Item
Improvement Process
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is announcing the
availability of Technical Specifications
(TSs) Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF–
535, Revision 0, ‘‘Revise Shutdown
Margin Definition to Address Advanced
Fuel Designs,’’ for plant-specific
adoption using the Consolidated Line
Item Improvement Process (CLIIP).
Additionally, the NRC staff finds the
proposed TS (Volume 1) and TS Bases
(Volume 2) changes in Traveler TSTF–
535 acceptable for inclusion in the
following Standard Technical
Specifications (STS): NUREG–1433,
‘‘Standard Technical Specifications
General Electric Plants BWR/4,’’ and
NUREG–1434, ‘‘Standard Technical
Specifications General Electric Plants,
BWR/6.’’
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2012–0280 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access information related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and are publicly available,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0280. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this notice (if
that document is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that a
document is referenced. TSTF–535,
Revision 0, includes a model
application and is available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML112200436.
The model safety evaluation (SE) of
TSTF–535, Revision 0, is available
under ADAMS Accession No.
ML12355A772. No public comments
were received from the Notice of
Opportunity for Public Comment
announced in the Federal Register on
November 19, 2012; 77 FR 69507.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Michelle C. Honcharik, Senior Project
Manager, telephone: 301–415–1774 or
email at Michelle.Honcharik@nrc.gov; or
Mr. Ravinder Grover, Reactor Systems
Engineer, telephone: 301–415–2166 or
email at Ravinder.Grover@nrc.gov. Both
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, 20555–
0001.
Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act of 1996, the NRC has
determined that this action is not a
major rule and has verified this
determination with the OMB Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSTF–
535, Revision 0, is applicable to all
boiling water reactor (BWR) power
plants. The change revises the STS,
NUREG–1433, ‘‘Standard Technical
Specifications General Electric Plants
BWR/4,’’ and NUREG–1434, ‘‘Standard
Technical Specifications General
Electric Plants, BWR/6.’’ Specifically,
the change revises the STS definition of
shutdown margin (SDM) to require
calculation of SDM at the reactor
moderator temperature corresponding to
the most reactive state throughout the
operating cycle (68 °F or higher). The
purpose is to address newer BWR fuel
designs, which may be more reactive at
shutdown temperatures above 68 °F.
This STS improvement is part of the
CLIIP.
The NRC staff has reviewed the model
application for TSTF–535 and has found
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13099-13100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04511]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Sunshine Federal Register Notice
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [NRC-2013-
0001].
DATES: Weeks of February 25, March 4, 11, 18, 25, April 1, 2013.
[[Page 13100]]
PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
Week of February 25, 2013
There are no meetings scheduled for the week of February 25, 2013.
Week of March 4, 2013--Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 4, 2013.
Week of March 11, 2013--Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 11, 2013.
Week of March 18, 2013--Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 18, 2013.
Week of March 25, 2013--Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 25, 2013.
Week of April 1, 2013--Tentative
Tuesday April 2, 2013
9:30 a.m. Meeting With Organization of Agreement States (OAS) and
Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Cindy Flannery, 301-415-0223)
This meeting will be Webcast live at the Web address--www.nrc.gov.
* * * * *
* The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--301-
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, 301-415-
1651.
* * * * *
The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/schedule.html.
* * * * *
The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Kimberly Meyer, NRC
Disability Program Manager, at 301-287-0727, or by email at
kimberly.meyer-chambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington,
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an email to darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: February 20, 2013.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04511 Filed 2-22-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P