Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring Fishery; Adjustment to 2013 Annual Catch Limits, 12625-12627 [2013-04261]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Agenda in April and October of each
year. You may use the RIN contained in
the heading at the beginning of this
document to find this action in the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 544
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor
vehicles, Tires, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing,
under the authority of Sec. 31313,
Public Law 112–141, NHTSA amends
49 CFR Chapter V as set forth below:
PART 544—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
■
Background
1. Part 544 is removed and reserved.
Issued in Washington, DC on February 13,
2013 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–04300 Filed 2–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 121022572–3075–02]
RIN 0648–XC318
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Herring Fishery;
Adjustment to 2013 Annual Catch
Limits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action reduces the
Atlantic herring 2013 sub-annual catch
limits in herring management area 1A to
account for catch overages in 2011, and
to prevent overfishing.
DATES: This rule is effective from March
27, 2013 through December 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, the 2010–2012 Herring
Specifications and Amendment 4 to the
Herring Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) are available from: John K.
Bullard, Northeast Regional
Administrator, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. This
document is also accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
NMFS prepared a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), which is
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 Feb 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
contained in the Classification section
of this rule. Copies of the FRFA and the
Small Entity Compliance Guide are
available from: John K. Bullard,
Regional Administrator, National
Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast
Region, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930–2276, or via the
internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lindsey Feldman, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–675–2179, fax 978–281–
9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council)
developed herring specifications for
2010–2012, which were approved by
NMFS on August 12, 2010 (75 FR
48874). The Herring FMP divides the
stock-wide herring ACL (91,200 mt)
among three management areas, one of
which has two sub-areas. Area 1 is
located in the Gulf of Maine (GOM) and
consists of an inshore section (Area 1A)
and an offshore section (Area 1B). Area
2 is located in the coastal waters
between Massachusetts and North
Carolina, and Area 3 is on Georges Bank
(GB). Each management area has its own
sub-ACL to allow greater control of the
fishing mortality on each stock
component. The management area subACLs established for 2010–2012 were:
26,546 mt for Area 1A, 4,362 mt for
Area 1B, 22,146 mt for Area 2, and
38,146 mt for Area 3.
Amendment 4 to the Herring FMP
(Amendment 4) (76 FR 11373, March 2,
2011) revised the specification-setting
process, bringing the Herring FMP into
compliance with ACL and
accountability measure (AM)
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA). Under the FMP, if NMFS
determines catch will reach 95 percent
of the sub-ACL allocated to a
management area or seasonal period,
then NMFS prohibits vessels from
fishing for, possessing, catching,
transferring, or landing more than 2,000
lb (907.2 kg) of herring per trip from that
area or seasonal period. This AM slows
catch to prevent or minimize catch in
excess of a management area or seasonal
period sub-ACL. As a way to account for
ACL overages in the herring fishery,
Amendment 4 also established an AM
that provided for overage deductions. If
the catch of herring in any given
management area in any given fishing
year exceeds any sub-ACL, the overage
will subsequently be deducted from the
corresponding management area subACL in a subsequent fishing year. A
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12625
range of additional AMs are currently
being considered as a part of the 2013–
2015 specifications process. Until then,
the current AMs, including the overage
deduction addressed in this rule, are
still in place.
Final Adjustment to the 2013 Annual
Catch Limits
The 2011 Atlantic herring fishing year
began on January 1, 2011, and ended on
December 31, 2011. Based on dealer,
VTR, and observer data, 2011 herring
catch exceeded the sub-ACL in Area 1A
by 1,425 mt. There were no sub-ACL
overages in the other herring
management areas. Therefore, NMFS is
required to deduct the Area 1A overage
in 2011 from the 2013 Area 1A subACL. At the time of this final rule, the
Atlantic herring 2013 specifications
have not yet been finalized. The 2013–
2015 herring specifications are currently
in development and will not be effective
prior to the 2013 herring fishing year,
which begins on January 1, 2013.
The Council’s Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) met on
September 13, 2012, and again on
November 19, 2012, and recommended
herring acceptable biological catch
(ABC) levels for 2013–2015. The
Council expects to take final action at its
January meeting, and a proposed and
final rule for the 2013–2015 herring
specifications will follow. Although the
2013 herring specifications will not be
in place on January 1, 2013, the
regulations at § 648.200(d) include a
provision that allows the previous years’
specifications to roll over to the
following year(s) when new
specifications are delayed past the start
of the fishing year. Therefore, in
accordance with regulations at
§ 648.201(a)(3), this action deducts the
1,425-mt 2011 overage in Area 1A from
the 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL. Since the
2012 herring specifications will be in
place on January 1, 2013, this action
adjusts the rolled over sub-ACL in Area
1A until the 2013–2015 specifications
are finalized. As a result, NMFS is
revising the sub-ACL for Area 1A from
26,546 mt to 25,121 mt (a reduction of
1,425 mt). When the 2013 specifications
are finalized, NMFS will deduct the
1,425-mt overage from the final 2013
Area 1A sub-ACL.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received five comment letters
on the proposed rule for this action from
the following: The Cape Cod
Commercial Hook Fishermen’s
Association (CCCHFA); Coalition for the
Atlantic Herring Fishery’s Orderly,
Informed, and Responsible Long-Term
Development (CHOIR); the Conservation
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
12626
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Law Foundation (CLF) and Earthjustice,
both on behalf of the Herring Alliance;
and a member of the public.
Comment 1: CCCHFA, CHOIR, CLF,
and the member of the public
commented in support of adjusting the
2013 Herring sub-ACL in Area 1A to
account for catch overages in 2011.
Response: NMFS agrees and is
adjusting the 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL to
account for 2011 Area 1A sub-ACL
catch overages in this final rule.
Comment 2: CCCHFA, Earthjustice,
and CHOIR commented that the catch
overage of 1,425 mt in Area 1A indicates
that the current monitoring, reporting
methods, and AMs in the Atlantic
herring FMP are not sufficient to
prevent sub-ACL overages.
Response: The comment on NMFS’s
ability to adequately monitor catch in
the herring fishery, and comments on
the reporting methods and AMs in the
Herring FMP are beyond the scope of
this rulemaking, which simply
implements the AM currently required
under the Herring FMP. Nevertheless,
NMFS believes the current reporting
and monitoring methods and AMs are
sufficient to adequately monitor the
fishery on a real-time basis. However,
NMFS recognizes the difficulties in
monitoring high volume fisheries, such
as the herring fishery, in which the fleet
catches and lands large volumes of fish
in a very short period of time. We
currently monitor the herring quota
using a combination of daily VMS
reporting, weekly VTR reporting, and
weekly dealer reporting. We recognize
that VMS catch reports may be
overestimate catch, and that data errors
in catch reports, late reporting, or noncompliance have been a challenge to
monitor the fishery in real-time. While
we believe that the current reporting
and monitoring methods are sufficient
to adequately monitor this fishery on a
real-time basis, it is imperative that
vessels and dealers report catch and
landings consistently and accurately.
We are currently planning outreach
meetings with the Atlantic herring
industry to discuss ways to improve the
accuracy of catch reporting to improve
the timing of management area closures.
In addition, for the 2013–2015 herring
specifications, the Council is
considering a range of AMs to better
ensure that herring catch does not
exceed management area sub-ACLs.
Moreover, under the National Standard
Guidelines at 50 CFR 600.310(g)(3), if
herring fishery exceeds the stockwide
herring ACL, the stock’s ACLs and AMs
may be reexamined.
Comment 3: Earthjustice and CHOIR
commented that NMFS should modify
the overage deduction AM so that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 Feb 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
NMFS deducts any sub-ACL overages
from the following year’s sub-ACL,
instead of from the 2nd fishing year
after the overage. CHOIR noted that
waiting until two years after the catch
overage to account for any sub-ACL
overages could have a significant impact
on the herring resource.
Response: Like Comment 2, this
comment on adjusting the AMs is
beyond the scope of this rulemaking,
which NMFS is implementing under the
limited authority under the Herring
FMP. AMs must be adjusted through a
Council action, such as the 2013–2015
specifications or a future framework or
amendment. This action is an inseason
adjustment to the herring ACL. Because
this is not a framework adjustment or
amendment.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that
accounting for sub-ACL overages in the
year after determining the total catch
has a significant adverse impact on the
herring resource. For example, there is
no evidence that a single year delay
versus an immediate deduction the year
following an overage affects the
reproductive potential of the stock.
Herring is a relatively long-lived species
(over 10 years) and the fishery harvests
multiple year classes. These
characteristics suggest that the herring
stock may withstand a single year delay
in overage deductions. Moreover, the
herring stock is neither overfished nor
subject to overfishing at this time.
Comment 4: Earthjustice criticized
NMFS’ discard accounting methodology
for the herring fishery. Earthjustice
believes that discards coded as ‘‘fish not
known (fish nk)’’ contain substantial
amounts of herring, which should have
been included in the amount of Atlantic
herring caught during the 2011 fishing
year. In referenced prior comments,
Earthjustice argues that counting ‘‘fish
nk’’ as herring catch would change the
amount of the overage and overage
deduction. When calculating a herring
discard estimate, they recommended
that NMFS assume all ‘‘fish nk’’
discarded from limited access herring
vessels are Atlantic herring and that the
fleet-wide estimate of discarded ‘‘fish
nk’’ should be added to the discard
estimate of herring to calculate total
herring discards in 2011.
Response: NMFS calculated 2011
herring discards consistent with how it
calculated discards in 2010, as
recommended by the Herring Plan
Development Team (PDT). Herring
discards are estimated by dividing the
amount of observed herring discards
(labeled ‘‘herring’’ and ‘‘herring not
known (herring nk’’) in observer haul
logs) by the amount of all observed fish
landed. NMFS then multiplies that
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
discard ratio by the amount of all fish
landed for each trip to calculate total
amount of herring discards in 2011. If
an observer verifies that fish are Atlantic
herring, they code those fish as
‘‘herring’’ and if the observer identifies
the fish as a type of herring but cannot
verify species of herring, the observer
codes those fish as ‘‘herring nk.’’ Only
in the instance where an observer
cannot verify species identification on
discarded catch, does the observer code
that discard event as ‘‘fish nk.’’ When
developing the discard methodology,
the Herring PDT concurred that NMFS
should calculate the discard estimate for
the herring based on the amount of
observed ‘‘herring’’ and ‘‘herring nk’’
and that it should not include discards
coded as ‘‘fish nk.’’
NMFS does not believe it is
appropriate to count discards coded as
‘fish nk’ as Atlantic herring. Including
‘fish nk’ discards in determining the
amount of an overage would likely
overstate the overage. ‘Fish nk’ consists
of a mix of multiple species and is not
limited to Atlantic herring. And while
excluding ‘fish nk’ discards would
likely understate the overage, any
understatement would be an extremely
small percentage of the sub-ACL for
Area 1A. Total ‘fish nk’ discards for the
Atlantic herring fishery in 2011 are
estimated at 510 mt, equaling less than
1 percent of the 26,546 mt quota in Area
1A, and only a portion of those total
discards occurred in Area 1A. Given
these facts, we believe that when
choosing between including all or
including none of the ‘fish nk’ discards,
the better course is to not include ‘fish
nk’ discards.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
final rule is consistent with the Atlantic
Herring FMP, other provisions of the
MSA, and other applicable law.
NMFS completed the National
Environmental Policy Act analysis to
support this action in Amendment 4 (76
FR 11373, March 2, 2011).
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866. This final rule
does not contain a collection-ofinformation requirement for purposes of
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
NMFS, pursuant to section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, has prepared
a FRFA, included in the preamble of
this final rule. The FRFA describes the
economic impact that this final rule,
along with other non-preferred
alternatives, will have on small entities.
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The FRFA incorporates the economic
impacts and analysis summaries in the
IRFA, a summary of the significant
issues, if any, raised by the public in
response to the IRFA, and NMFS’
responses to those comments. A copy of
the IRFA, the RIR, and the EA are
available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Statement of Objective and Need
In 2011, there was a herring catch
limit overage in herring management
area 1A equal to 1,425 mt. In accordance
with regulations at § 648.201(a)(3), this
action deducts the 2011 management
Area 1A overage from the 2013
management Area 1A catch limits. Since
the 2013 specifications will not be
finalized by January 1, 2013, and the
2012 specifications will be in place at
the start of the herring fishing year, this
action revises the rolled over sub-ACL
for Area 1A for 2013 from 26,546 mt to
25,121 mt to account for 2011 the catch
overage. When NMFS finalizes the 2013
herring specifications, it will deduct the
1,425 mt from the final 2013 Area 1A
sub-ACL.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public Comments in
Response to the IRFA, a Summary of the
Assessment of the Agency of Such
Issues, and a Statement of Any Changes
Made in the Final Rule as a Result of
Such Comments
There were no issues related to the
IRFA raised in public comments.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities To Which the Rule Will
Apply
All participants in the herring fishery
are small entities as defined by the SBA
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
none grossed more than $4 million
annually, so there would be no
disproportionate economic impacts on
small entities. In 2011, 93 vessels were
issued limited access herring permits,
and 2,149 were issued open access
herring permits.
Total herring revenue in 2011 equaled
approximately $22.4 million for limited
access vessels, and $43,000 for open
access vessels. NMFS estimates the
reduced sub-ACL in Areas 1A to equal
approximately $400,000 in lost revenue
for the fishery in 2013. While this action
reduces the amount of fish available for
harvest, both the fishery-wide and
individual-vessel economic effects are
anticipated to be minimal, because the
reduction overall and per vessel is
relatively minor, as compared with the
fishery’s overall revenue, and because it
only affects one of the herring
management areas.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 Feb 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
There are no new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements contained
in any of the alternatives considered for
this action. In addition, there are no
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impacts on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes, Including a
Statement of the Factual, Policy, and
Legal Reasons for Selecting the
Alternative Adopted in the Final Rule
and Why Each One of the Other
Significant Alternatives to the Rule
Considered by the Agency Which Affect
the Impact on Small Entities Was
Rejected
Amendment 4 analyzed the effects of
deducting ACL/sub-ACL overages from
the subsequent corresponding ACL/subACL. During a year when the fishery
exceeds the ACL/sub-ACL, fishery
participants may benefit economically
from higher catch. In the subsequent
year, when NMFS deducts the amount
of the overage from that ACL/sub-ACL
and the amount of harvest is lower,
fishery participants may experience
negative economic impacts. Since the
participants in the fishery from year to
year vary, there could be a minor
economic impact on the fishery
participants operating in Area 1A in
2013 due to the overage deduction from
2011.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 19, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–04261 Filed 2–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12627
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 110321210–3057–02]
RIN 0648–BA93
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area;
Groundfish Retention Standard
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS publishes a regulatory
amendment to modify the groundfish
retention standard (GRS) program in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (BSAI). This final
rule removes certain regulatory
requirements that mandate minimum
levels of groundfish retention by the
owners and operators of trawl catcher/
processor (C/P) vessels not listed in the
American Fisheries Act (AFA),
commonly referred to as either non-AFA
trawl C/Ps or Amendment 80 vessels,
and Amendment 80 cooperatives
participating in the BSAI groundfish
fisheries. The GRS program was
implemented to increase the retention
and utilization of groundfish; however,
NMFS has discovered that the
regulatory methodology used to
calculate compliance with the GRS
requires individual Amendment 80
vessels and Amendment 80 cooperatives
to retain groundfish at rates well above
the minimum retention rates
recommended by the Council or
implemented by NMFS. As a result, the
GRS imposes significantly higher than
predicted compliance costs on vessel
owners and operators due to the
increased level of retention needed to
meet the minimum retention rates.
Additionally, NMFS discovered that
enforcement of the GRS has proven far
more complex, challenging, and
potentially costly than anticipated by
NMFS. This action is necessary to
relieve Amendment 80 vessels and
Amendment 80 cooperatives from
undue compliance costs stemming from
the minimum retention rates while
continuing to promote the GRS program
goals of increased groundfish retention
and utilization. This action maintains
current monitoring requirements for the
Amendment 80 fleet and establishes a
new requirement for Amendment 80
cooperatives to annually report
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12625-12627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 121022572-3075-02]
RIN 0648-XC318
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring
Fishery; Adjustment to 2013 Annual Catch Limits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action reduces the Atlantic herring 2013 sub-annual catch
limits in herring management area 1A to account for catch overages in
2011, and to prevent overfishing.
DATES: This rule is effective from March 27, 2013 through December 31,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents, the 2010-2012 Herring
Specifications and Amendment 4 to the Herring Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) are available from: John K. Bullard, Northeast Regional
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. This document is also accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov. NMFS prepared a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), which is contained in the Classification
section of this rule. Copies of the FRFA and the Small Entity
Compliance Guide are available from: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Region, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2276, or via the internet at
https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lindsey Feldman, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978-675-2179, fax 978-281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) developed
herring specifications for 2010-2012, which were approved by NMFS on
August 12, 2010 (75 FR 48874). The Herring FMP divides the stock-wide
herring ACL (91,200 mt) among three management areas, one of which has
two sub-areas. Area 1 is located in the Gulf of Maine (GOM) and
consists of an inshore section (Area 1A) and an offshore section (Area
1B). Area 2 is located in the coastal waters between Massachusetts and
North Carolina, and Area 3 is on Georges Bank (GB). Each management
area has its own sub-ACL to allow greater control of the fishing
mortality on each stock component. The management area sub-ACLs
established for 2010-2012 were: 26,546 mt for Area 1A, 4,362 mt for
Area 1B, 22,146 mt for Area 2, and 38,146 mt for Area 3.
Amendment 4 to the Herring FMP (Amendment 4) (76 FR 11373, March 2,
2011) revised the specification-setting process, bringing the Herring
FMP into compliance with ACL and accountability measure (AM)
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA). Under the FMP, if NMFS determines catch will
reach 95 percent of the sub-ACL allocated to a management area or
seasonal period, then NMFS prohibits vessels from fishing for,
possessing, catching, transferring, or landing more than 2,000 lb
(907.2 kg) of herring per trip from that area or seasonal period. This
AM slows catch to prevent or minimize catch in excess of a management
area or seasonal period sub-ACL. As a way to account for ACL overages
in the herring fishery, Amendment 4 also established an AM that
provided for overage deductions. If the catch of herring in any given
management area in any given fishing year exceeds any sub-ACL, the
overage will subsequently be deducted from the corresponding management
area sub-ACL in a subsequent fishing year. A range of additional AMs
are currently being considered as a part of the 2013-2015
specifications process. Until then, the current AMs, including the
overage deduction addressed in this rule, are still in place.
Final Adjustment to the 2013 Annual Catch Limits
The 2011 Atlantic herring fishing year began on January 1, 2011,
and ended on December 31, 2011. Based on dealer, VTR, and observer
data, 2011 herring catch exceeded the sub-ACL in Area 1A by 1,425 mt.
There were no sub-ACL overages in the other herring management areas.
Therefore, NMFS is required to deduct the Area 1A overage in 2011 from
the 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL. At the time of this final rule, the Atlantic
herring 2013 specifications have not yet been finalized. The 2013-2015
herring specifications are currently in development and will not be
effective prior to the 2013 herring fishing year, which begins on
January 1, 2013.
The Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) met on
September 13, 2012, and again on November 19, 2012, and recommended
herring acceptable biological catch (ABC) levels for 2013-2015. The
Council expects to take final action at its January meeting, and a
proposed and final rule for the 2013-2015 herring specifications will
follow. Although the 2013 herring specifications will not be in place
on January 1, 2013, the regulations at Sec. 648.200(d) include a
provision that allows the previous years' specifications to roll over
to the following year(s) when new specifications are delayed past the
start of the fishing year. Therefore, in accordance with regulations at
Sec. 648.201(a)(3), this action deducts the 1,425-mt 2011 overage in
Area 1A from the 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL. Since the 2012 herring
specifications will be in place on January 1, 2013, this action adjusts
the rolled over sub-ACL in Area 1A until the 2013-2015 specifications
are finalized. As a result, NMFS is revising the sub-ACL for Area 1A
from 26,546 mt to 25,121 mt (a reduction of 1,425 mt). When the 2013
specifications are finalized, NMFS will deduct the 1,425-mt overage
from the final 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received five comment letters on the proposed rule for this
action from the following: The Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fishermen's
Association (CCCHFA); Coalition for the Atlantic Herring Fishery's
Orderly, Informed, and Responsible Long-Term Development (CHOIR); the
Conservation
[[Page 12626]]
Law Foundation (CLF) and Earthjustice, both on behalf of the Herring
Alliance; and a member of the public.
Comment 1: CCCHFA, CHOIR, CLF, and the member of the public
commented in support of adjusting the 2013 Herring sub-ACL in Area 1A
to account for catch overages in 2011.
Response: NMFS agrees and is adjusting the 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL to
account for 2011 Area 1A sub-ACL catch overages in this final rule.
Comment 2: CCCHFA, Earthjustice, and CHOIR commented that the catch
overage of 1,425 mt in Area 1A indicates that the current monitoring,
reporting methods, and AMs in the Atlantic herring FMP are not
sufficient to prevent sub-ACL overages.
Response: The comment on NMFS's ability to adequately monitor catch
in the herring fishery, and comments on the reporting methods and AMs
in the Herring FMP are beyond the scope of this rulemaking, which
simply implements the AM currently required under the Herring FMP.
Nevertheless, NMFS believes the current reporting and monitoring
methods and AMs are sufficient to adequately monitor the fishery on a
real-time basis. However, NMFS recognizes the difficulties in
monitoring high volume fisheries, such as the herring fishery, in which
the fleet catches and lands large volumes of fish in a very short
period of time. We currently monitor the herring quota using a
combination of daily VMS reporting, weekly VTR reporting, and weekly
dealer reporting. We recognize that VMS catch reports may be
overestimate catch, and that data errors in catch reports, late
reporting, or non-compliance have been a challenge to monitor the
fishery in real-time. While we believe that the current reporting and
monitoring methods are sufficient to adequately monitor this fishery on
a real-time basis, it is imperative that vessels and dealers report
catch and landings consistently and accurately. We are currently
planning outreach meetings with the Atlantic herring industry to
discuss ways to improve the accuracy of catch reporting to improve the
timing of management area closures. In addition, for the 2013-2015
herring specifications, the Council is considering a range of AMs to
better ensure that herring catch does not exceed management area sub-
ACLs. Moreover, under the National Standard Guidelines at 50 CFR
600.310(g)(3), if herring fishery exceeds the stockwide herring ACL,
the stock's ACLs and AMs may be reexamined.
Comment 3: Earthjustice and CHOIR commented that NMFS should modify
the overage deduction AM so that NMFS deducts any sub-ACL overages from
the following year's sub-ACL, instead of from the 2nd fishing year
after the overage. CHOIR noted that waiting until two years after the
catch overage to account for any sub-ACL overages could have a
significant impact on the herring resource.
Response: Like Comment 2, this comment on adjusting the AMs is
beyond the scope of this rulemaking, which NMFS is implementing under
the limited authority under the Herring FMP. AMs must be adjusted
through a Council action, such as the 2013-2015 specifications or a
future framework or amendment. This action is an inseason adjustment to
the herring ACL. Because this is not a framework adjustment or
amendment.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that accounting for sub-ACL
overages in the year after determining the total catch has a
significant adverse impact on the herring resource. For example, there
is no evidence that a single year delay versus an immediate deduction
the year following an overage affects the reproductive potential of the
stock. Herring is a relatively long-lived species (over 10 years) and
the fishery harvests multiple year classes. These characteristics
suggest that the herring stock may withstand a single year delay in
overage deductions. Moreover, the herring stock is neither overfished
nor subject to overfishing at this time.
Comment 4: Earthjustice criticized NMFS' discard accounting
methodology for the herring fishery. Earthjustice believes that
discards coded as ``fish not known (fish nk)'' contain substantial
amounts of herring, which should have been included in the amount of
Atlantic herring caught during the 2011 fishing year. In referenced
prior comments, Earthjustice argues that counting ``fish nk'' as
herring catch would change the amount of the overage and overage
deduction. When calculating a herring discard estimate, they
recommended that NMFS assume all ``fish nk'' discarded from limited
access herring vessels are Atlantic herring and that the fleet-wide
estimate of discarded ``fish nk'' should be added to the discard
estimate of herring to calculate total herring discards in 2011.
Response: NMFS calculated 2011 herring discards consistent with how
it calculated discards in 2010, as recommended by the Herring Plan
Development Team (PDT). Herring discards are estimated by dividing the
amount of observed herring discards (labeled ``herring'' and ``herring
not known (herring nk'') in observer haul logs) by the amount of all
observed fish landed. NMFS then multiplies that discard ratio by the
amount of all fish landed for each trip to calculate total amount of
herring discards in 2011. If an observer verifies that fish are
Atlantic herring, they code those fish as ``herring'' and if the
observer identifies the fish as a type of herring but cannot verify
species of herring, the observer codes those fish as ``herring nk.''
Only in the instance where an observer cannot verify species
identification on discarded catch, does the observer code that discard
event as ``fish nk.'' When developing the discard methodology, the
Herring PDT concurred that NMFS should calculate the discard estimate
for the herring based on the amount of observed ``herring'' and
``herring nk'' and that it should not include discards coded as ``fish
nk.''
NMFS does not believe it is appropriate to count discards coded as
`fish nk' as Atlantic herring. Including `fish nk' discards in
determining the amount of an overage would likely overstate the
overage. `Fish nk' consists of a mix of multiple species and is not
limited to Atlantic herring. And while excluding `fish nk' discards
would likely understate the overage, any understatement would be an
extremely small percentage of the sub-ACL for Area 1A. Total `fish nk'
discards for the Atlantic herring fishery in 2011 are estimated at 510
mt, equaling less than 1 percent of the 26,546 mt quota in Area 1A, and
only a portion of those total discards occurred in Area 1A. Given these
facts, we believe that when choosing between including all or including
none of the `fish nk' discards, the better course is to not include
`fish nk' discards.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this final rule is consistent with
the Atlantic Herring FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and other
applicable law.
NMFS completed the National Environmental Policy Act analysis to
support this action in Amendment 4 (76 FR 11373, March 2, 2011).
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. This final rule does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
NMFS, pursuant to section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
has prepared a FRFA, included in the preamble of this final rule. The
FRFA describes the economic impact that this final rule, along with
other non-preferred alternatives, will have on small entities.
[[Page 12627]]
The FRFA incorporates the economic impacts and analysis summaries
in the IRFA, a summary of the significant issues, if any, raised by the
public in response to the IRFA, and NMFS' responses to those comments.
A copy of the IRFA, the RIR, and the EA are available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Statement of Objective and Need
In 2011, there was a herring catch limit overage in herring
management area 1A equal to 1,425 mt. In accordance with regulations at
Sec. 648.201(a)(3), this action deducts the 2011 management Area 1A
overage from the 2013 management Area 1A catch limits. Since the 2013
specifications will not be finalized by January 1, 2013, and the 2012
specifications will be in place at the start of the herring fishing
year, this action revises the rolled over sub-ACL for Area 1A for 2013
from 26,546 mt to 25,121 mt to account for 2011 the catch overage. When
NMFS finalizes the 2013 herring specifications, it will deduct the
1,425 mt from the final 2013 Area 1A sub-ACL.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public Comments in
Response to the IRFA, a Summary of the Assessment of the Agency of Such
Issues, and a Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a
Result of Such Comments
There were no issues related to the IRFA raised in public comments.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Will Apply
All participants in the herring fishery are small entities as
defined by the SBA under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as none
grossed more than $4 million annually, so there would be no
disproportionate economic impacts on small entities. In 2011, 93
vessels were issued limited access herring permits, and 2,149 were
issued open access herring permits.
Total herring revenue in 2011 equaled approximately $22.4 million
for limited access vessels, and $43,000 for open access vessels. NMFS
estimates the reduced sub-ACL in Areas 1A to equal approximately
$400,000 in lost revenue for the fishery in 2013. While this action
reduces the amount of fish available for harvest, both the fishery-wide
and individual-vessel economic effects are anticipated to be minimal,
because the reduction overall and per vessel is relatively minor, as
compared with the fishery's overall revenue, and because it only
affects one of the herring management areas.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
There are no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained
in any of the alternatives considered for this action. In addition,
there are no Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impacts on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes, Including a Statement of the
Factual, Policy, and Legal Reasons for Selecting the Alternative
Adopted in the Final Rule and Why Each One of the Other Significant
Alternatives to the Rule Considered by the Agency Which Affect the
Impact on Small Entities Was Rejected
Amendment 4 analyzed the effects of deducting ACL/sub-ACL overages
from the subsequent corresponding ACL/sub-ACL. During a year when the
fishery exceeds the ACL/sub-ACL, fishery participants may benefit
economically from higher catch. In the subsequent year, when NMFS
deducts the amount of the overage from that ACL/sub-ACL and the amount
of harvest is lower, fishery participants may experience negative
economic impacts. Since the participants in the fishery from year to
year vary, there could be a minor economic impact on the fishery
participants operating in Area 1A in 2013 due to the overage deduction
from 2011.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 19, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-04261 Filed 2-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P