Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling, 11981-11984 [2013-04047]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace
Designated as an Extension to a Class D
Surface area.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
*
Coast Guard
*
*
ANM WY E4
*
*
Casper, WY [Modified]
33 CFR Part 165
Casper, Natrona County International
Airport, WY
(Lat. 42°54′29″ N., long. 106°27′52″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within 4.3 miles each side of the 036°
bearing of the Natrona County International
Airport extending from the airport to 13.7
miles northeast of the airport, and within 4.3
miles each side of the 216° bearing of the
Natrona County International Airport
extending from the airport to 15 miles
southwest of the airport, and within 2.7 miles
each side of the 269° bearing of the Natrona
County International Airport extending from
airport to 13.5 miles west of the airport. This
Class E airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
ANM WY E5
*
*
Casper, WY [Modified]
Casper, Natrona County International
Airport, WY
(Lat. 42°54′29″ N., long. 106°27′52″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 24-mile radius
of the Natrona County International Airport;
that airspace extending upward from 1,200
feet above the surface within a 38-mile radius
of the Natrona County International Airport.
Paragraph 6006
Airspace Areas.
En Route Domestic
*
*
*
*
ANM WY E6
*
Casper, WY [Modified]
Casper, Natrona County International
Airport, WY
(Lat. 42°54′29″ N., long. 106°27′52″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from
1,200 feet above the surface within an 85mile radius of Natrona County International
Airport.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February
1, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2013–03981 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0087]
Security Zone; Protection of Military
Cargo, Captain of the Port Zone Puget
Sound, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Sitcum Waterway Security Zone in
Commencement Bay, Tacoma,
Washington from 6 a.m. on February 23,
2013, through 11:59 p.m. on March 4,
2013, unless cancelled sooner by the
Captain of the Port. This action is
necessary for the security of Department
of Defense assets and military cargo in
the navigable waters of Puget Sound and
adjacent waters. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless otherwise exempted
or excluded under 33 CFR 165.1321 or
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.1321 will be enforced from 6 a.m.
on February 23, 2013, through 11:59
p.m. on March 4, 2013, unless cancelled
sooner by the Captain of the Port.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger,
Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6045, email
SectorPugetSound WWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will activate and enforce the
Sitcum Waterway Security Zone set
forth in 33 CFR 165.1321(c)(2) on
February 23, 2013, from 6 a.m. through
11:59 p.m. on March 4, 2013, unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port or Designated Representative.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1321, the Coast Guard published a
final rule for the security of Department
of Defense assets and military cargo in
the navigable waters of Puget Sound and
adjacent waters. (See 69 FR 52600, Aug.
27, 2004). When activated, this
regulation provides for the regulation of
vessel traffic in the vicinity of military
cargo loading facilities in the navigable
waters of the United States. The security
zones also exclude persons and vessels
from the immediate vicinity of these
facilities during military cargo loading
and unloading operations. In addition,
the regulation establishes requirements
for all vessels to obtain permission of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11981
the COTP or Designated Representative,
including the Vessel Traffic Service
(VTS), to enter, move within, or exit
these security zones when they are
enforced. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless otherwise exempted
or excluded under 33 CFR 165.1321 or
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or Designated Representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.1321 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with
notification of this enforcement period
via marine information broadcasts and
on-scene assets.
If the COTP determines that the
regulated area need not be enforced for
the full duration stated in this notice, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be
used to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.
Dated: February 9, 2013.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2013–03917 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS–SLBE–12083; PPMWSLBES0–
PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024–AE11
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System, Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This rule designates the
Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail currently
under construction within Sleeping
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore as a
route for bicycle use. The approximately
27-mile-long trail will generally parallel
major state highways and offer visitors
safe, non-motorized access to the park.
National Park Service general
regulations require promulgation of a
special regulation to designate new
routes for bicycle use outside developed
areas or off park roads.
DATES: The rule is effective March 25,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Tom
Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent,
Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore, Telephone: 231–326–5135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
11982
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Background
Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was
established in 1970 ‘‘for the benefit,
inspiration, education, recreation, and
enjoyment of the public.’’ (16 U.S.C.
460x). SLBE’s enabling legislation
requires the National Park Service (NPS)
to ‘‘administer and protect [the
Lakeshore] in a manner which provides
for recreational opportunities consistent
with the maximum protection of the
natural environment within the area.’’
(16 U.S.C. 460x). The 71,000-acre
Lakeshore is located in the northwest
portion of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula
and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of
Lake Michigan’s eastern coastline as
well as North Manitou and South
Manitou islands. The mainland portion
is located within Benzie and Leelanau
Counties. The Manitou Islands, in
Leelanau County, are located to the
northwest in Lake Michigan, about
seven miles from the shore. The nearest
city is Traverse City, Michigan
(population 15,000), located 30 miles
east of the Lakeshore. Smaller
communities such as Empire, Glen
Arbor, and Frankfort are closer.
Named after a complex of coastal sand
dunes, the Lakeshore features white
sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as
high as 450 feet above Lake Michigan,
thick maple and beech forests, and clear
inland lakes. The Lakeshore’s most
notable feature—the ancient sand
dunes—are products of wind, ice, and
water action over thousands of years.
The high, perched dunes afford
spectacular views across Lake Michigan
and of other glacially formed
landscapes. The contrast between the
open, sunny environment of the dunes
and the adjacent lush beech-maple
forests is striking.
A lighthouse, three former U.S. LifeSaving Service/Coast Guard stations,
several coastal villages, and picturesque
farmsteads reflect the Lakeshore’s rich
maritime, agricultural, and recreational
history. The region surrounding the
Lakeshore is a popular vacation and
summer home destination. SLBE offers
visitors recreational activities such as
hiking, backpacking, kayaking, crosscountry skiing, backcountry camping,
hunting, fishing, and boating.
Over 1.1 million people visit the
Lakeshore annually. SLBE’s main visitor
attractions include the Dune Climb
(330,000+ visitors/year), Pierce Stocking
Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and
the Visitor Center (130,000+ visitors/
year). Traffic and parking congestion are
a concern at these locations. A multi-use
trail connecting the main visitor
destinations would help relieve these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
traffic concerns while simultaneously
enhancing visitor access to a variety of
recreational activities.
History of Bicycle Use
Currently, bicycling within SLBE is
allowed only on a lane shared with
motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking
Scenic Drive, on the road shoulders of
state highways (M–22 and M–109), and
on county roads that run through the
Lakeshore.
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
(SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced,
approximately 27-mile-long trail from
the southern Leelanau County line at
Manning Road to County Road 651 at
Good Harbor Beach. The trail will be
separated from the roadway wherever
possible, providing a safe, nonmotorized route connecting the
Lakeshore’s main visitor destinations
with neighboring communities in Glen
Arbor and Empire. Construction of the
first segment of the trail was completed
in June 2012, with the remainder to be
constructed over a period of
approximately 10 years. The route will
generally parallel state highways M–22
and M–109, but will occasionally depart
from these rights-of-way to take
advantage of other existing corridors,
such as old logging trails and a narrow
gauge railbed. By using these and other
disturbed areas whenever feasible, the
location of the SBHT will minimize
disturbance to and protect Lakeshore
resources. The SBHT will be located
entirely on public lands within the
Lakeshore.
Moving bicycle traffic off roads used
by motor vehicles will reduce safety
hazards and enhance opportunities for
non-motorized enjoyment of the
Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use
of alternate means of transportation by
park employees and park visitors to
access these extremely popular areas.
The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers,
runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers,
and cross-country skiers a safe,
enjoyable, and healthy way to access
and explore the Lakeshore.
Maps depicting the planned trail
route including the completed first
segment are available for review in the
office of the Superintendent and on the
Lakeshore’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Trail Planning and Environmental
Analyses
The idea for a multi-use trail came
from the Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Route Committee (LSHR), which was
created by the State of Michigan to
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
preserve the historical integrity and
safety of state highways M–22, M–109,
and M–204. The LSHR is a broad
partnership with representatives from
12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the
Michigan Department of Transportation,
the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and
Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau
Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road
Commission, the Leelanau County
Planning Commission, chambers of
commerce, interested organizations, and
citizens.
Planning for the trail began in 2005
when the LSHR suggested the concept
to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created
a Trailway Work Group to develop a
multi-use trail along the M–22 and M–
109 corridor in the Lakeshore. The Work
Group included representatives of
SLBE, the Michigan Department of
Transportation, local townships and
villages, and other interested groups and
citizens. Through the LSHR, the public
had many opportunities for involvement
in planning the SBHT. The public
provided input and review at various
meetings and events, including over 25
LSHR Committee meetings and 15
Trailway Work Group meetings from
2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at
the Lakeshore in August 2006 and 2007.
In 2006 the LSHR staff also made
introductory presentations to local
governments, with follow-up
presentations made in 2008.
The multi-use trail concept, including
bicycle use, and the trail route were
considered in the preferred alternative
of SLBE’s October 2008 Final General
Management Plan/Wilderness Study/
Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/
EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD)
signed by the NPS SLBE Superintendent
and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in
January 2009. In March 2009, SLBE
published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Route Trailway Plan and Environmental
Assessment (EA), which evaluated the
environmental impacts of a no-action
alterative and two action alternatives,
including one identified as the preferred
alternative.
The Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Trailway route was named the Sleeping
Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009,
the NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS
Mid-West Regional Director signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). The FONSI identified the
preferred alternative as the selected
action and concluded that the
construction of the multi-use trail,
which would include bicycle use,
would not have a significant effect on
the human environment. The GMP/EIS,
ROD, EA, FONSI, and related
documents may be viewed on the
Lakeshore’s planning Web site at
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Final Rule
The SBHT will generally be
constructed in M–22/M–109 and county
road rights-of-way, and primarily within
developed area zones as described in
the Lakeshore’s GMP. However, the trail
route will occasionally deviate from the
highway corridor and outside of
developed areas to provide access to
natural, cultural, and recreation
resources, and to promote a broader
variety of experiences for the trailway
user. Therefore, a special regulation is
required by the NPS general regulation
pertaining to bicycles found at 36 CFR
4.30.
Accordingly, this final rule adds a
new paragraph to 36 CFR 7.80,
designating the 27-mile-long SBHT as a
route for bicycle use. The rule also
grants the Superintendent the authority
to impose closures or restrictions upon
bicycle use on designated trails after
taking into consideration public health
and safety, resource protection, and
other management activities and
objectives, provided public notice is
given under 36 CFR 1.7.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 15, 2012, the NPS
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking for the designation of the
Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail as a route
for bicycle use (77 FR 62476). The
proposed rule was available for a 60-day
public comment period, from October
15, 2012 through December 14, 2012.
Summary of and Responses to Public
Comment
Comments were accepted by email
and through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The
NPS received four public comments
during the comment period. All of the
comments were from individuals and
expressed clear support for the
proposed rule and specific goals for the
bicycle trail as detailed in the public
planning documents that led to its
construction (GMP/EIS and EA).
Commenters also cited support for the
manner in which the bicycle trail and
the associated rule will provide for safe
enjoyment of the Lakeshore; safe travel
routes to nearby communities; a new,
healthful, recreational opportunity in
the Lakeshore; and finally, the
anticipated reduction in vehicle traffic,
congestion, and emissions.
One commenter suggested adding
lane designations to the trail to separate
bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
NPS Response: The trail has been
designed to allow for flexibility in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
management, including the addition of
lane delineation in the future, if trail use
warrants such an action.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
After consideration of the public
comments, the park has decided that no
changes are necessary in the final rule.
Compliance With Other Laws and
Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. OIRA has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is
based on information contained in the
report entitled ‘‘Cost-Benefit and
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route
Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore’’ (NPS Environmental Quality
Division—May 2012), available for
review at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/
parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11983
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The rule would not require fees, or
involve other measures that would
increase costs to visitors or, businesses.
Rather, this rule would reasonably
increase Lakeshore visitation and
thereby generate benefits for businesses
through increased visitor spending.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments. A
statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of
Executive Order 12630, this rule does
not have significant takings
implications. The rule will not deny any
property owner beneficial uses, or
reduce the value, of their land. No
taking of property will occur as a result
of this rule. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This rule only affects use of
NPS administered lands and waters. It
has no outside effects on other areas. A
Federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
11984
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Representatives of the five Indian
tribes affiliated with SLBE were
consulted during the evaluation of the
trail concept and route in the
preparation of the GMP/EIS.
Representatives of the nearest affiliated
tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of
Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are
members of the LSHR that proposed the
trail and helped to prepare the EA.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission under the PRA is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is
not required because we reached a
FONSI. The GMP/EIS, EA, FONSI, and
related documents may be viewed on
the Lakeshore’s planning Web site
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation
were Tom Ulrich, Deputy
Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes
National Lakeshore, Michael Tiernan,
Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of the Interior, Washington, DC, A.J.
North, Jay P. Calhoun, and Rose
Wilkinson, NPS Regulations and Special
Park Uses, Washington, DC.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service amends 36 CFR
Part 7 as set forth below:
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 7
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under 36 U.S.C. 501–511,
D.C. Code 10–137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50–
2201 (2001).
2. In § 7.80 add paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
■
§ 7.80 Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear
Heritage Trail, approximately 27 miles
in length from the southern Leelanau
County line at Manning Road to County
Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is
designated as a route for bicycle use.
(2) The Superintendent may open or
close designated routes, or portions
thereof, or impose conditions or
restrictions for bicycle use after taking
into consideration public health and
safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives. (i) The
Superintendent will provide public
notice of all such actions through one or
more of the methods listed in § 1.7 of
this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or
restriction is prohibited.
Dated: February 11, 2013.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013–04047 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4132–EJ–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[HI 126–NBK; FRL–9712–2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of Hawaii;
Update to Materials Incorporated by
Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of
administrative change.
AGENCY:
EPA is updating the materials
submitted by the State of Hawaii that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
are incorporated by reference (IBR) into
the Hawaii State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The regulations affected by this
update have been previously submitted
by the State of Hawaii and approved by
EPA. This update affects the SIP
materials that are available for public
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA), the
Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center located at EPA
Headquarters in Washington, DC, and
the EPA Regional Office.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR
part 52 are available for inspection at
the following locations:
Air Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105–3901;
Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, EPA Headquarters
Library, Infoterra Room (Room
Number 3334), EPA West Building,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; and
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
If you wish to obtain materials from a
docket in the EPA Headquarters Library,
please call the Office of Air and
Radiation (OAR) Docket/Telephone
number: 202–566–1742. For information
on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The SIP is a living document which
the State revises as necessary to address
its unique air pollution problems.
Therefore, EPA from time to time must
take action on SIP revisions containing
new and/or revised regulations to make
them part of the SIP. On May 22, 1997
(62 FR 27968), EPA revised the
procedures for incorporating by
reference federally-approved SIPs, as a
result of consultations between EPA and
the Office of the Federal Register (OFR).
The description of the revised SIP
document, IBR procedures and
‘‘Identification of plan’’ format are
discussed in further detail in the May
22, 1997 Federal Register document. On
August 4, 2005 (70 FR 44852), as
corrected on August 23, 2005 (70 FR
49377), EPA published a document in
the Federal Register beginning the new
IBR procedures for the State of Hawaii.
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11981-11984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04047]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-SLBE-12083; PPMWSLBES0-PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024-AE11
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule designates the Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
currently under construction within Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore as a route for bicycle use. The approximately 27-mile-long
trail will generally parallel major state highways and offer visitors
safe, non-motorized access to the park. National Park Service general
regulations require promulgation of a special regulation to designate
new routes for bicycle use outside developed areas or off park roads.
DATES: The rule is effective March 25, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent,
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Telephone: 231-326-5135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 11982]]
Background
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was
established in 1970 ``for the benefit, inspiration, education,
recreation, and enjoyment of the public.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). SLBE's
enabling legislation requires the National Park Service (NPS) to
``administer and protect [the Lakeshore] in a manner which provides for
recreational opportunities consistent with the maximum protection of
the natural environment within the area.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). The
71,000-acre Lakeshore is located in the northwest portion of Michigan's
Lower Peninsula and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of Lake Michigan's
eastern coastline as well as North Manitou and South Manitou islands.
The mainland portion is located within Benzie and Leelanau Counties.
The Manitou Islands, in Leelanau County, are located to the northwest
in Lake Michigan, about seven miles from the shore. The nearest city is
Traverse City, Michigan (population 15,000), located 30 miles east of
the Lakeshore. Smaller communities such as Empire, Glen Arbor, and
Frankfort are closer.
Named after a complex of coastal sand dunes, the Lakeshore features
white sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as high as 450 feet above
Lake Michigan, thick maple and beech forests, and clear inland lakes.
The Lakeshore's most notable feature--the ancient sand dunes--are
products of wind, ice, and water action over thousands of years. The
high, perched dunes afford spectacular views across Lake Michigan and
of other glacially formed landscapes. The contrast between the open,
sunny environment of the dunes and the adjacent lush beech-maple
forests is striking.
A lighthouse, three former U.S. Life-Saving Service/Coast Guard
stations, several coastal villages, and picturesque farmsteads reflect
the Lakeshore's rich maritime, agricultural, and recreational history.
The region surrounding the Lakeshore is a popular vacation and summer
home destination. SLBE offers visitors recreational activities such as
hiking, backpacking, kayaking, cross-country skiing, backcountry
camping, hunting, fishing, and boating.
Over 1.1 million people visit the Lakeshore annually. SLBE's main
visitor attractions include the Dune Climb (330,000+ visitors/year),
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and the Visitor
Center (130,000+ visitors/year). Traffic and parking congestion are a
concern at these locations. A multi-use trail connecting the main
visitor destinations would help relieve these traffic concerns while
simultaneously enhancing visitor access to a variety of recreational
activities.
History of Bicycle Use
Currently, bicycling within SLBE is allowed only on a lane shared
with motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive, on the road
shoulders of state highways (M-22 and M-109), and on county roads that
run through the Lakeshore.
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail (SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced,
approximately 27-mile-long trail from the southern Leelanau County line
at Manning Road to County Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach. The trail will
be separated from the roadway wherever possible, providing a safe, non-
motorized route connecting the Lakeshore's main visitor destinations
with neighboring communities in Glen Arbor and Empire. Construction of
the first segment of the trail was completed in June 2012, with the
remainder to be constructed over a period of approximately 10 years.
The route will generally parallel state highways M-22 and M-109, but
will occasionally depart from these rights-of-way to take advantage of
other existing corridors, such as old logging trails and a narrow gauge
railbed. By using these and other disturbed areas whenever feasible,
the location of the SBHT will minimize disturbance to and protect
Lakeshore resources. The SBHT will be located entirely on public lands
within the Lakeshore.
Moving bicycle traffic off roads used by motor vehicles will reduce
safety hazards and enhance opportunities for non-motorized enjoyment of
the Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use of alternate means of
transportation by park employees and park visitors to access these
extremely popular areas. The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers,
runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers, and cross-country skiers a
safe, enjoyable, and healthy way to access and explore the Lakeshore.
Maps depicting the planned trail route including the completed
first segment are available for review in the office of the
Superintendent and on the Lakeshore's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Trail Planning and Environmental Analyses
The idea for a multi-use trail came from the Leelanau Scenic
Heritage Route Committee (LSHR), which was created by the State of
Michigan to preserve the historical integrity and safety of state
highways M-22, M-109, and M-204. The LSHR is a broad partnership with
representatives from 12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the Michigan
Department of Transportation, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and
Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road
Commission, the Leelanau County Planning Commission, chambers of
commerce, interested organizations, and citizens.
Planning for the trail began in 2005 when the LSHR suggested the
concept to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created a Trailway Work Group to
develop a multi-use trail along the M-22 and M-109 corridor in the
Lakeshore. The Work Group included representatives of SLBE, the
Michigan Department of Transportation, local townships and villages,
and other interested groups and citizens. Through the LSHR, the public
had many opportunities for involvement in planning the SBHT. The public
provided input and review at various meetings and events, including
over 25 LSHR Committee meetings and 15 Trailway Work Group meetings
from 2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at the Lakeshore in August 2006
and 2007. In 2006 the LSHR staff also made introductory presentations
to local governments, with follow-up presentations made in 2008.
The multi-use trail concept, including bicycle use, and the trail
route were considered in the preferred alternative of SLBE's October
2008 Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental
Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) signed by the
NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in January
2009. In March 2009, SLBE published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route
Trailway Plan and Environmental Assessment (EA), which evaluated the
environmental impacts of a no-action alterative and two action
alternatives, including one identified as the preferred alternative.
The Leelanau Scenic Heritage Trailway route was named the Sleeping
Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009, the NPS SLBE Superintendent
and NPS Mid-West Regional Director signed a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI). The FONSI identified the preferred alternative as the
selected action and concluded that the construction of the multi-use
trail, which would include bicycle use, would not have a significant
effect on the human environment. The GMP/EIS, ROD, EA, FONSI, and
related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's planning Web site at
[[Page 11983]]
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Final Rule
The SBHT will generally be constructed in M-22/M-109 and county
road rights-of-way, and primarily within developed area zones as
described in the Lakeshore's GMP. However, the trail route will
occasionally deviate from the highway corridor and outside of developed
areas to provide access to natural, cultural, and recreation resources,
and to promote a broader variety of experiences for the trailway user.
Therefore, a special regulation is required by the NPS general
regulation pertaining to bicycles found at 36 CFR 4.30.
Accordingly, this final rule adds a new paragraph to 36 CFR 7.80,
designating the 27-mile-long SBHT as a route for bicycle use. The rule
also grants the Superintendent the authority to impose closures or
restrictions upon bicycle use on designated trails after taking into
consideration public health and safety, resource protection, and other
management activities and objectives, provided public notice is given
under 36 CFR 1.7.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 15, 2012, the NPS published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking for the designation of the Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail as a
route for bicycle use (77 FR 62476). The proposed rule was available
for a 60-day public comment period, from October 15, 2012 through
December 14, 2012.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comment
Comments were accepted by email and through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The NPS received four public
comments during the comment period. All of the comments were from
individuals and expressed clear support for the proposed rule and
specific goals for the bicycle trail as detailed in the public planning
documents that led to its construction (GMP/EIS and EA). Commenters
also cited support for the manner in which the bicycle trail and the
associated rule will provide for safe enjoyment of the Lakeshore; safe
travel routes to nearby communities; a new, healthful, recreational
opportunity in the Lakeshore; and finally, the anticipated reduction in
vehicle traffic, congestion, and emissions.
One commenter suggested adding lane designations to the trail to
separate bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
NPS Response: The trail has been designed to allow for flexibility
in management, including the addition of lane delineation in the
future, if trail use warrants such an action.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
After consideration of the public comments, the park has decided
that no changes are necessary in the final rule.
Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This certification is based on information contained in the
report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore'' (NPS Environmental Quality Division--May 2012), available
for review at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
rule would not require fees, or involve other measures that would
increase costs to visitors or, businesses. Rather, this rule would
reasonably increase Lakeshore visitation and thereby generate benefits
for businesses through increased visitor spending.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule
does not have significant takings implications. The rule will not deny
any property owner beneficial uses, or reduce the value, of their land.
No taking of property will occur as a result of this rule. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This rule only
affects use of NPS administered lands and waters. It has no outside
effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
[[Page 11984]]
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Representatives of the five Indian tribes affiliated with SLBE were
consulted during the evaluation of the trail concept and route in the
preparation of the GMP/EIS. Representatives of the nearest affiliated
tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are
members of the LSHR that proposed the trail and helped to prepare the
EA.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission under the PRA is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the NEPA is not required because we reached a FONSI. The GMP/EIS,
EA, FONSI, and related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's
planning Web site https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation were Tom Ulrich, Deputy
Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Michael
Tiernan, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC, A.J. North, Jay P. Calhoun, and Rose Wilkinson, NPS
Regulations and Special Park Uses, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service amends
36 CFR Part 7 as set forth below:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under 36 U.S.C. 501-511, D.C. Code 10-137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50-
2201 (2001).
0
2. In Sec. 7.80 add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.80 Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.
* * * * *
(c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail, approximately
27 miles in length from the southern Leelanau County line at Manning
Road to County Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is designated as a route
for bicycle use.
(2) The Superintendent may open or close designated routes, or
portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle use
after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and
cultural resource protection, and other management activities and
objectives. (i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all
such actions through one or more of the methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of
this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited.
Dated: February 11, 2013.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013-04047 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4132-EJ-P