Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; 2013-2014 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications, 11809-11813 [2013-03781]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register. interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: February 7, 2013. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2013–03764 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2012–0758; FRL 9781–6] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of Missouri on March 17, 2011. This revision proposes to amend the rule restricting emissions of particulate matter from industrial sources by providing an alternative compliance method for wet corn milling drying operations. The revision to Missouri’s rule does not have an adverse affect on air quality. EPA’s approval of this SIP revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by March 22, 2013. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2012–0758, by mail to Amy Bhesania, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal Register, EPA is approving the state’s SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:24 Feb 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 Dated: February 5, 2013. Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, Region 7. [FR Doc. 2013–03770 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648 [Docket No. 130104009–3099–01] RIN 0648–XC432 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; 2013–2014 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed specifications; request for comments. AGENCY: NMFS proposes specifications for the 2013 and 2014 Atlantic bluefish fishery, including an annual catch limit, total allowable landings, a commercial quota and recreational harvest limit, and a recreational possession limit. The intent of this action is to establish the allowable 2013 and 2014 harvest levels and other management measures to achieve the target fishing mortality rate, consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 7, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA–NMFS–2013–0006, by any one of the following methods: SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11809 • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= NOAA–NMFS–2013–0006, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: Submit written comments to John Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. • Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Carly Bari. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publically accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only. Copies of the specifications document, including the Environmental Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and other supporting documents for the specifications, are available from Dr. Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The specifications document is also accessible via the Internet at: https:// www.nero.noaa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carly Bari, Fishery Management Specialist, (978) 281–9224. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Atlantic bluefish fishery is managed cooperatively by the MidAtlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission). The management unit for bluefish specified in the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) is U.S. waters of the western Atlantic Ocean. Regulations implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A and J. The regulations requiring annual specifications are found at § 648.162. E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1 11810 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules The FMP requires the Council to recommend, on an annual basis, the annual catch limit (ACL), annual catch target (ACT), and total allowable landings (TAL) that will control fishing mortality (F). An estimate of annual discards is deducted from the ACT to calculate the TAL that can be harvested during the year by the commercial and recreational fishing sectors. The FMP requires that 17 percent of the ACT be allocated to the commercial fishery, with the remaining 83 percent allocated to the recreational fishery. The Council may also recommend a research setaside (RSA) quota, which is deducted from the bluefish TAL (after any applicable transfer) in an amount proportional to the percentage of the overall TAL as allocated to the commercial and recreational sectors. The annual review process for bluefish requires that the Council’s Bluefish Monitoring Committee and Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) review and make recommendations based on the best available scientific information, including, but not limited to, commercial and recreational catch/ landing statistics, current estimates of fishing mortality, stock abundance, discards for the recreational fishery, and juvenile recruitment. Based on the recommendations of the Monitoring Committee and SSC, the Council makes a recommendation to the NMFS Northeast Regional Administrator. Because this FMP is a joint plan, the Commission also meets during the annual specification process to adopt complementary measures. The Council’s recommendations must include supporting documentation concerning the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the recommendations. NMFS is responsible for reviewing these recommendations to ensure that they achieve the FMP objectives, and may modify them if they do not. NMFS then publishes proposed specifications in the Federal Register, and after considering public comment, NMFS will publish final specifications in the Federal Register. Proposed Specifications wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Updated Model Estimates According to Amendment 1 to the FMP, overfishing for bluefish occurs when F exceeds the fishing mortality rate that allows maximum sustainable yield (FMSY), or the maximum F threshold to be achieved. The stock is considered overfished if the biomass (B) falls below the minimum biomass threshold, which is defined as 1⁄2 BMSY. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:24 Feb 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 Amendment 1 also established that the long-term target F is 90 percent of FMSY (FMSY = 0.19; therefore Ftarget = 90 percent of FMSY, or 0.17), and the longterm target B is BMSY = 324 million lb (147,052 mt). An age-structured assessment program (ASAP) model for bluefish was approved by the 41st Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC 41) in 2005 to estimate F and annual biomass. In June 2012, the ASAP model was updated in order to estimate the current status of the bluefish stock (i.e., 2011 biomass and F estimates) and enable the Monitoring Committee and SSC to recommend 2013 and 2014 specifications using landings information and survey indices through the 2011 fishing year. The results of the assessment update were as follows: (1) An estimated stock biomass for 2011, B2011 = 292.972 million lb (132,890 mt); and (2) an estimated fishing mortality rate for 2011, F2011 = 0.114. Based on the updated 2011 estimate of bluefish stock biomass, the bluefish stock is not considered overfished: B2011 is slightly less than BMSY, but well above the minimum biomass threshold, 1⁄2 BMSY, of 162 million lb (73,526 mt). Estimates of F have declined from 0.41 in 1991 to 0.114 in 2011. The updated model results also conclude that the Atlantic bluefish stock is not experiencing overfishing; i.e., the most recent F (F2011 = 0.114) is less than the maximum F overfishing threshold specified by SARC 41 (FMSY = 0.19). Bluefish was declared rebuilt in 2009. 2013 and 2014 Catch Limits Following the framework implemented by the Council’s ACL Omnibus Amendment, the Council recommended that ACL be set to acceptable biological catch (ABC) for 2013 (27.472 million lb, 12,461 mt) and for 2014 (27.057 million lb, 12,273 mt). No deductions were recommended to account for management uncertainty; therefore, ABC=ACL=ACT for both years. The ACT is initially allocated between the recreational fishery (83 percent) and the commercial fishery (17 percent). After deducting an estimate of recreational discards (commercial discards are considered negligible), the recreational harvest limit (RHL) would be 19.190 million lb (8,704 mt) for 2013 and 18.846 million lb (8,548 mt) for 2014 and the commercial quota would be 4.670 million lb (2,118 mt) for 2013 and 4.60 million lb (2,087 mt) for 2014. The FMP specifies that, if 17 percent of the TAL is less than 10.5 million lb, and the recreational fishery is not projected to land its harvest limit for the PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 upcoming year, the commercial fishery may be allocated up to 10.5 million lb as its quota, provided that the combination of the projected recreational landings and the commercial quota does not exceed the TAL. The RHL would then be adjusted downward so that the TAL would be unchanged. The Council projected an estimated annual recreational harvest for 2013 and 2014 of 14.069 million lb (6,381 mt). As such, it is expected that a transfer of up to 4.686 million lb (2,125 mt) for 2013 and 4.342 million lb (1,969 mt) for 2014 from the recreational sector to the commercial sector could be approved. These options represent the preferred alternatives recommended by the Council in its specifications document. The actual transfer amount in the final rule, if any, will depend on the final 2012 recreational landings data. RSA For 2013, the Council preliminarily approved two research projects that would utilize bluefish RSA quota and forwarded them to NOAA’s Grants Management Division. The Council preliminarily approved 715,819 lb (325 mt) of RSA quota for use by these projects during 2013. For 2014, the Council preliminarily approved 703,385 lb (319 mt) of RSA quota for future research projects. Proportional adjustments of these amounts to the commercial and recreational allocations would result in a final commercial quota of 9.076 million lb (4,117 mt) for 2013 and 8.674 million lb (3,934 mt) for 2014, and a final RHL of 14.069 million lb (6,381 mt) for both 2013 and 2014. NMFS staff will update the commercial and recreational allocations based on the final 2013 RSA awards as part of the final rule for the 2013 specifications. Proposed Recreational Possession Limit The Council recommended, and NMFS proposes, to maintain the current recreational possession limit of up to 15 fish per person to achieve the RHL for both 2013 and 2014. Proposed State Commercial Allocations The proposed state commercial allocations for the recommended 2013 and 2014 commercial quota are shown in Table 1, based on the percentages specified in the FMP. These quotas do not reflect any adjustments for quota overages that may have occurred in some states in 2012. Any potential deductions for states that exceeded their quota in 2012 will be accounted for in the final rule. E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules 11811 TABLE 1—PROPOSED BLUEFISH COMMERCIAL STATE-BY-STATE ALLOCATIONS FOR 2013 AND 2014 (INCLUDING RSA DEDUCTIONS) Percent share State 2013 Councilproposed commercial quota (lb) 2013 Councilproposed commercial quota (kg) 2014 Councilproposed commercial quota (lb) 2014 Councilproposed commercial quota (kg) ME ........................................................................................ NH ........................................................................................ MA ........................................................................................ RI ......................................................................................... CT ........................................................................................ NY ........................................................................................ NJ ......................................................................................... DE ........................................................................................ MD ....................................................................................... VA ........................................................................................ NC ........................................................................................ SC ........................................................................................ GA ........................................................................................ FL ......................................................................................... 0.6685 0.4145 6.7167 6.8081 1.2663 10.3851 14.8162 1.8782 3.0018 11.8795 32.0608 0.0352 0.0095 10.0597 60,673 37,620 609,606 617,902 114,929 942,549 1,344,715 170,465 272,443 1,078,181 2,909,831 3,195 862 913,016 27,521 17,064 276,513 280,276 52,131 427,533 609,953 77,322 123,578 489,055 1,319,878 1,449 391 414,137 57,985 35,953 582,603 590,531 109,838 900,797 1,285,148 162,914 260,374 1,030,421 2,780,935 3,053 824 872,572 26,302 16,308 264,264 267,860 49,822 408,595 582,933 73,897 118,104 467,391 1,261,411 1,385 374 395,792 Total .............................................................................. 100.0001 9,075,976 4,116,795 8,673,941 3,934,435 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Classification Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment. These proposed specifications are exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this preamble and in the SUMMARY. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). Small businesses operating in commercial and recreational (i.e., party and charter vessel operations) fisheries have been defined by the Small Business Administration as firms with gross revenues of up to $4.0 and $6.5 million, respectively. The categories of small entities likely to be affected by this action include commercial and charter/party vessel owners holding an active Federal permit for Atlantic bluefish, as well as owners of vessels that fish for Atlantic bluefish in state waters. All federally permitted vessels fall into the definition of small businesses; thus, there would be no VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:24 Feb 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 disproportionate impacts between large and small entities as a result of the proposed rule. An active participant in the commercial sector was defined as any vessel that reported having landed 1 or more lb (0.45 kg) in the Atlantic bluefish fishery in 2011 (the most recent year for which there are complete data). The active participants in the commercial sector were defined using two sets of data. The Northeast seafood dealer reports were used to identify 742 vessels that landed bluefish in states from Maine through North Carolina in 2011. However, the Northeast dealer database does not provide information about fishery participation in South Carolina, Georgia or Florida. South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports were used to identify 768 vessels that landed bluefish in North Carolina and 791 vessels that landed bluefish on Florida’s east coast in 2011.1 Bluefish landings in South Carolina and Georgia were near zero in 2011, representing a negligible proportion of the total bluefish landings along the Atlantic Coast. Therefore, this analysis assumed that no vessel activity for these two states took place in 2011. In recent years, approximately 2,000 party/charter vessels may have been active in the bluefish fishery and/or have caught bluefish. There are no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained in any of the alternatives considered for this action. In addition, NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. 1 Some of these vessels were also identified in the Northeast dealer data; therefore, double counting is possible. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 The IRFA in the Draft EA addressed three alternatives (including a no action/status quo alternative) for the 2013 and 2014 Atlantic bluefish fishing years. All quota alternatives considered in this analysis are based on various commercial harvest levels for bluefish (a low, medium, and high level of harvest). For analysis of impacts of Alternatives 1 and 2 for both 2013 and 2014, the maximum potential RSA quota of 3 percent of the TAL (715,819 lb (324 mt) for 2013 and 703,385 lb (319 mt) for 2014) was used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 3 for both years, the status quo RSA quota of 491,672 lb (223 mt) was used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 1 for 2013, the recommended transfer of 4.686 million lb (2,125 mt) from the recreational sector to the commercial sector were used. Alternative 1 for 2014, the recommended transfer of 4.342 million lb (1,969 mt) was used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 3 for 2013 and 2014, the transfer of 5.052 million lb (2,291 mt) from the recreational sector to the commercial sector was used, which is the same as the 2012 transfer amount. Under Alternative 2 for both 2013 and 2014, no transfer of bluefish would be made from the recreational sector to the commercial sector, and the allocation of the TAL would be based strictly on the percentages specified in the FMP (17 percent commercial, 83 percent recreational). For 2013, Alternatives 1 and 2 would implement a TAL of 23.861 million lb (10,823 mt). For 2014, Alternatives 1 and 2 would implement a TAL of 23.446 million lb (10,635 mt). Alternative 3, for 2013 and 2014, would implement status quo management measures for both E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1 11812 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules years, which would result in a TAL identical to the 2012 TAL, or 28.267 million lb (12,822 mt). The proposed 2013 and 2014 Atlantic bluefish specification alternatives are shown in Table 2, along with the resulting commercial quota and RHL after any applicable transfer described earlier in the preamble and after deduction of the RSA quota. Alternative 1 (Council’s preferred) would allocate 9.076 million lb (4,117 mt) for 2013 and 8.674 million lb (3,934 mt) for 2014 to the commercial sector, and 14.096 million lb (6,381 mt) to the recreational sector for both 2013 and 2014. For 2013, Alternative 2 would result in the most restrictive commercial quota and would allocate 4.530 million lb (2,055 mt) to the commercial sector and leave 18.615 million lb (8,444 mt) available to the recreational sector. For 2014, Alternative 2 would also result in the most restrictive commercial quota and would allocate 4.462 million lb (2,024 mt) to the commercial sector and leave 18.281 million lb (8,292 mt) available to the recreational sector. For both 2013 and 2014, Alternative 3 (status quo) would allocate 10.317 million lb (4,680 mt) to the commercial sector and 17.457 million lb (7,918 mt) to the recreational sector. This alternative would also implement the status quo RSA level, which is currently approved for 491,672 lb (223 mt). TABLE 2—PROPOSED 2013 AND 2014 ATLANTIC BLUEFISH SPECIFICATION ALTERNATIVES FOR TAL, COMMERCIAL QUOTA, AND RHL Year 2013 .. 2014 .. TAL (million lb) Alternatives Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative 1 2 3 1 2 3 ..................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................... wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Commercial Fishery Impacts To assess the impact of the alternatives on commercial fisheries, the Council conducted a threshold analysis and analysis of potential changes in exvessel gross revenue that would result from each alternative, using Northeast dealer reports and South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports. Under Alternative 1, the recommended commercial quota for 2013 is approximately 79 percent higher than 2011 commercial landings. When this commercial quota is distributed to the states from Maine to Florida (based on the percentages specified in the FMP), except for New York, each state’s 2013 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For New York, 2013 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2013 commercial quota under Alternative 1. The threshold analysis projected that 147 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 9 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or more, 22 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 44 percent had gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence on fishing for some of these vessels is small. If commercial quota is transferred from a state or states that do not land their entire bluefish quota for 2013, as was done in 2011 and frequently in previous years, the number of affected entities could change, thus changing the adverse economic impact on vessels VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:24 Feb 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 23.861 23.861 28.267 23.446 23.446 28.267 TAL (mt) 10,823 10,823 12,822 10,635 10,635 12,822 Commercial quota (million lb) 9.076 4.530 10.317 8.674 4.462 10.317 landing in the state(s) receiving quota transfers. For 2013, Alternative 2 would result in a commercial quota 11 percent below the 2011 commercial landings. Although the overall commercial quota is lower than 2011 commercial landings, except for Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, each state’s 2013 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For these states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina), 2013 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2013 commercial quota under Alternative 2. The threshold analysis projected that 596 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 67 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or more, 19 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 55 percent had gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence on fishing for some of these vessels is small. Under Alternative 3, the 2013 commercial quota is approximately 103 percent higher than the 2011 commercial landings. Most states show a similar increase in fishing opportunities under this alternative; however, New York’s 2013 commercial quota would be lower than its 2011 commercial landings. Analysis of Alternative 3 concluded that 586 vessels would likely have no change in revenue relative to 2011, 154 vessels were projected to incur revenue losses of less PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Commercial quota (mt) 4,117 2,044 4,680 3,934 2,024 4,680 RHL (million lb) 14.096 18.615 17.457 14.096 18.281 17.457 RHL (mt) 6,381 8,444 7,918 6,381 8,292 7,918 than 5 percent, and 2 vessels were projected to incur revenue loss of 5 percent or more. Under Alternative 1, the recommended commercial quota for 2014 is approximately 71 percent higher than 2011 commercial landings. When this commercial quota is distributed to the states from Maine to Florida (based on the percentages specified in the FMP), except for New York, each state’s 2014 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For New York, 2014 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2014 commercial quota under Alternative 1. The threshold analysis projected that 147 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 13 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or more, 22 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 56 percent had gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence on fishing for some of these vessels is small. If commercial quota is transferred from a state or states that do not land their entire bluefish quota for 2014, as was done in 2011 and frequently in previous years, the number of affected entities could change, thus changing the adverse economic impact on vessels landing in the state(s) receiving quota transfers. For 2014, Alternative 2 would result in a commercial quota 12 percent below the 2011 commercial landings. Although the overall commercial quota is lower than 2011 commercial landings, E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules except for Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, each state’s 2014 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For these states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina), 2014 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2014 commercial quota under Alternative 2. The threshold analysis projected that 594 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 69 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. It is expected that the description of the impacted vessels under non-preferred Alternative 2 for 2013 would also apply to this alternative. The commercial impacts under Alternative 3 for 2014 would be identical to the impacts described in Alternative 3 for 2013. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Recreational Fishery Impacts In Alternative 1 for 2013, the recommended RHL for the recreational sector (14.096 million lb, 6,381 mt) is approximately 22 percent above the recreational landings for 2011 (11.499 million lb, 5,216 mt) and 21 percent below the RHL implemented for 2012 (17.457 million lb, 7,919 mt). It is not anticipated that the recommend RHL will result in decreased demand for party/charter boat trips or affect angler participation in a negative manner. At the present time, there are neither behavioral or demand data available to estimate how sensitive party/charter boat anglers might be to proposed fishing regulations. However, given the level of the adjusted recreational harvest limit for 2013 and 2014 and recreational landings in recent years, it is likely that VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:24 Feb 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 given the proposed recreational harvest limits under all alternatives evaluated, the demand for party/charter boat trips may not be negatively impacted. Overall, it is not expected that the final recreational management measures will affect gross revenues of businesses providing goods and services to anglers participating in the party/charter boat, private/rental boat, and shore fisheries for bluefish. For 2013, the impacts under Alternative 2 and 3 are expected to be similar to the recreational impacts under Alternative 1. The IRFA analyzed the maximum transfer amount from the recreational sector to the commercial sector, but future updates of recreational harvest projections could result in a smaller transfer amount, resulting in a higher RHL. The 2013 RHL under Alternative 2 would be 62 percent higher than the recreational landings in 2011 and 7 percent higher than the 2012 RHL. Under Alternative 3, the 2013 RHL would be 52 percent higher than 2011 recreational landings and the same as the 2012 RHL. Thus, Alternatives 2 and 3 are not expected to have any negative effects on recreational fishermen or the demand for party/charter boat trips. In addition, neither of these alternatives are expected to result in recreational landings in excess of the RHL. The recreational impacts for the 2014 alternatives are the same as those for the respective alternatives for 2013. RSA Quota Impacts For analysis of each alternative, the maximum RSA quota amount (3 percent of the TAL) was deducted from the initial overall TAL for 2013 and 2014 to derive the adjusted 2013 and 2014 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 11813 commercial quotas and RHLs under each alternative. Thus, the threshold analyses for each alternative accounted for overall reductions in fishing opportunities due to RSA. Specifications of RSA quota for 2013 and 2014 are expected to benefit all participants in the fishery as a result of improved data and information for management or stock assessment purposes. Summary The Council recommended Alternative 1 for both 2013 and 2014, over Alternatives 2 and 3, because it is projected to achieve the target F in 2013 and 2014, respectively, while providing the second least restrictive commercial quota among the alternatives analyzed. Alternative 2 was not recommended by the Council because it would yield the lowest commercial fishing opportunities among the alternatives due to an absence of a quota transfer under this alternative. Alternative 3 was not selected because it would be inconsistent with the advice of the SSC and the Monitoring Committee due to failing to make an effort to prevent overfishing. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: February 12, 2013. Alan D. Risenhoover, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2013–03781 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11809-11813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 130104009-3099-01]
RIN 0648-XC432


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; 2013-2014 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed specifications; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes specifications for the 2013 and 2014 Atlantic 
bluefish fishery, including an annual catch limit, total allowable 
landings, a commercial quota and recreational harvest limit, and a 
recreational possession limit. The intent of this action is to 
establish the allowable 2013 and 2014 harvest levels and other 
management measures to achieve the target fishing mortality rate, 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 7, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2013-0006, 
by any one of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0006, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments to John Bullard, Regional 
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic 
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
     Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Carly Bari.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publically accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in 
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
    Copies of the specifications document, including the Environmental 
Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and 
other supporting documents for the specifications, are available from 
Dr. Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901. 
The specifications document is also accessible via the Internet at: 
https://www.nero.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carly Bari, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Atlantic bluefish fishery is managed cooperatively by the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the Atlantic States 
Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission). The management unit for 
bluefish specified in the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan 
(FMP) is U.S. waters of the western Atlantic Ocean. Regulations 
implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A and J. The 
regulations requiring annual specifications are found at Sec.  648.162.

[[Page 11810]]

    The FMP requires the Council to recommend, on an annual basis, the 
annual catch limit (ACL), annual catch target (ACT), and total 
allowable landings (TAL) that will control fishing mortality (F). An 
estimate of annual discards is deducted from the ACT to calculate the 
TAL that can be harvested during the year by the commercial and 
recreational fishing sectors. The FMP requires that 17 percent of the 
ACT be allocated to the commercial fishery, with the remaining 83 
percent allocated to the recreational fishery. The Council may also 
recommend a research set-aside (RSA) quota, which is deducted from the 
bluefish TAL (after any applicable transfer) in an amount proportional 
to the percentage of the overall TAL as allocated to the commercial and 
recreational sectors.
    The annual review process for bluefish requires that the Council's 
Bluefish Monitoring Committee and Scientific and Statistical Committee 
(SSC) review and make recommendations based on the best available 
scientific information, including, but not limited to, commercial and 
recreational catch/landing statistics, current estimates of fishing 
mortality, stock abundance, discards for the recreational fishery, and 
juvenile recruitment. Based on the recommendations of the Monitoring 
Committee and SSC, the Council makes a recommendation to the NMFS 
Northeast Regional Administrator. Because this FMP is a joint plan, the 
Commission also meets during the annual specification process to adopt 
complementary measures.
    The Council's recommendations must include supporting documentation 
concerning the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the 
recommendations. NMFS is responsible for reviewing these 
recommendations to ensure that they achieve the FMP objectives, and may 
modify them if they do not. NMFS then publishes proposed specifications 
in the Federal Register, and after considering public comment, NMFS 
will publish final specifications in the Federal Register.

Proposed Specifications

Updated Model Estimates

    According to Amendment 1 to the FMP, overfishing for bluefish 
occurs when F exceeds the fishing mortality rate that allows maximum 
sustainable yield (FMSY), or the maximum F threshold to be 
achieved. The stock is considered overfished if the biomass (B) falls 
below the minimum biomass threshold, which is defined as \1/2\ 
BMSY. Amendment 1 also established that the long-term target 
F is 90 percent of FMSY (FMSY = 0.19; therefore 
Ftarget = 90 percent of FMSY, or 0.17), and the 
long-term target B is BMSY = 324 million lb (147,052 mt).
    An age-structured assessment program (ASAP) model for bluefish was 
approved by the 41st Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC 41) in 
2005 to estimate F and annual biomass. In June 2012, the ASAP model was 
updated in order to estimate the current status of the bluefish stock 
(i.e., 2011 biomass and F estimates) and enable the Monitoring 
Committee and SSC to recommend 2013 and 2014 specifications using 
landings information and survey indices through the 2011 fishing year. 
The results of the assessment update were as follows: (1) An estimated 
stock biomass for 2011, B2011 = 292.972 million lb (132,890 
mt); and (2) an estimated fishing mortality rate for 2011, 
F2011 = 0.114. Based on the updated 2011 estimate of 
bluefish stock biomass, the bluefish stock is not considered 
overfished: B2011 is slightly less than BMSY, but 
well above the minimum biomass threshold, \1/2\ BMSY, of 162 
million lb (73,526 mt). Estimates of F have declined from 0.41 in 1991 
to 0.114 in 2011. The updated model results also conclude that the 
Atlantic bluefish stock is not experiencing overfishing; i.e., the most 
recent F (F2011 = 0.114) is less than the maximum F 
overfishing threshold specified by SARC 41 (FMSY = 0.19). 
Bluefish was declared rebuilt in 2009.

2013 and 2014 Catch Limits

    Following the framework implemented by the Council's ACL Omnibus 
Amendment, the Council recommended that ACL be set to acceptable 
biological catch (ABC) for 2013 (27.472 million lb, 12,461 mt) and for 
2014 (27.057 million lb, 12,273 mt). No deductions were recommended to 
account for management uncertainty; therefore, ABC=ACL=ACT for both 
years. The ACT is initially allocated between the recreational fishery 
(83 percent) and the commercial fishery (17 percent). After deducting 
an estimate of recreational discards (commercial discards are 
considered negligible), the recreational harvest limit (RHL) would be 
19.190 million lb (8,704 mt) for 2013 and 18.846 million lb (8,548 mt) 
for 2014 and the commercial quota would be 4.670 million lb (2,118 mt) 
for 2013 and 4.60 million lb (2,087 mt) for 2014.
    The FMP specifies that, if 17 percent of the TAL is less than 10.5 
million lb, and the recreational fishery is not projected to land its 
harvest limit for the upcoming year, the commercial fishery may be 
allocated up to 10.5 million lb as its quota, provided that the 
combination of the projected recreational landings and the commercial 
quota does not exceed the TAL. The RHL would then be adjusted downward 
so that the TAL would be unchanged.
    The Council projected an estimated annual recreational harvest for 
2013 and 2014 of 14.069 million lb (6,381 mt). As such, it is expected 
that a transfer of up to 4.686 million lb (2,125 mt) for 2013 and 4.342 
million lb (1,969 mt) for 2014 from the recreational sector to the 
commercial sector could be approved. These options represent the 
preferred alternatives recommended by the Council in its specifications 
document. The actual transfer amount in the final rule, if any, will 
depend on the final 2012 recreational landings data.

RSA

    For 2013, the Council preliminarily approved two research projects 
that would utilize bluefish RSA quota and forwarded them to NOAA's 
Grants Management Division. The Council preliminarily approved 715,819 
lb (325 mt) of RSA quota for use by these projects during 2013. For 
2014, the Council preliminarily approved 703,385 lb (319 mt) of RSA 
quota for future research projects. Proportional adjustments of these 
amounts to the commercial and recreational allocations would result in 
a final commercial quota of 9.076 million lb (4,117 mt) for 2013 and 
8.674 million lb (3,934 mt) for 2014, and a final RHL of 14.069 million 
lb (6,381 mt) for both 2013 and 2014. NMFS staff will update the 
commercial and recreational allocations based on the final 2013 RSA 
awards as part of the final rule for the 2013 specifications.

Proposed Recreational Possession Limit

    The Council recommended, and NMFS proposes, to maintain the current 
recreational possession limit of up to 15 fish per person to achieve 
the RHL for both 2013 and 2014.

Proposed State Commercial Allocations

    The proposed state commercial allocations for the recommended 2013 
and 2014 commercial quota are shown in Table 1, based on the 
percentages specified in the FMP. These quotas do not reflect any 
adjustments for quota overages that may have occurred in some states in 
2012. Any potential deductions for states that exceeded their quota in 
2012 will be accounted for in the final rule.

[[Page 11811]]



  Table 1--Proposed Bluefish Commercial State-by-State Allocations for 2013 and 2014 (Including RSA Deductions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               2013 Council-    2013 Council-    2014 Council-    2014 Council-
                                    Percent       proposed         proposed         proposed         proposed
              State                  share       commercial       commercial       commercial       commercial
                                                 quota (lb)       quota (kg)       quota (lb)       quota (kg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ME...............................     0.6685           60,673           27,521           57,985           26,302
NH...............................     0.4145           37,620           17,064           35,953           16,308
MA...............................     6.7167          609,606          276,513          582,603          264,264
RI...............................     6.8081          617,902          280,276          590,531          267,860
CT...............................     1.2663          114,929           52,131          109,838           49,822
NY...............................    10.3851          942,549          427,533          900,797          408,595
NJ...............................    14.8162        1,344,715          609,953        1,285,148          582,933
DE...............................     1.8782          170,465           77,322          162,914           73,897
MD...............................     3.0018          272,443          123,578          260,374          118,104
VA...............................    11.8795        1,078,181          489,055        1,030,421          467,391
NC...............................    32.0608        2,909,831        1,319,878        2,780,935        1,261,411
SC...............................     0.0352            3,195            1,449            3,053            1,385
GA...............................     0.0095              862              391              824              374
FL...............................    10.0597          913,016          414,137          872,572          395,792
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total........................   100.0001        9,075,976        4,116,795        8,673,941        3,934,435
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS 
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further 
consideration after public comment.
    These proposed specifications are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866.
    An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA), which describes the economic impact this 
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description 
of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this 
action are contained at the beginning of this preamble and in the 
SUMMARY. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is 
available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
    Small businesses operating in commercial and recreational (i.e., 
party and charter vessel operations) fisheries have been defined by the 
Small Business Administration as firms with gross revenues of up to 
$4.0 and $6.5 million, respectively. The categories of small entities 
likely to be affected by this action include commercial and charter/
party vessel owners holding an active Federal permit for Atlantic 
bluefish, as well as owners of vessels that fish for Atlantic bluefish 
in state waters. All federally permitted vessels fall into the 
definition of small businesses; thus, there would be no 
disproportionate impacts between large and small entities as a result 
of the proposed rule.
    An active participant in the commercial sector was defined as any 
vessel that reported having landed 1 or more lb (0.45 kg) in the 
Atlantic bluefish fishery in 2011 (the most recent year for which there 
are complete data). The active participants in the commercial sector 
were defined using two sets of data. The Northeast seafood dealer 
reports were used to identify 742 vessels that landed bluefish in 
states from Maine through North Carolina in 2011. However, the 
Northeast dealer database does not provide information about fishery 
participation in South Carolina, Georgia or Florida. South Atlantic 
Trip Ticket reports were used to identify 768 vessels that landed 
bluefish in North Carolina and 791 vessels that landed bluefish on 
Florida's east coast in 2011.\1\ Bluefish landings in South Carolina 
and Georgia were near zero in 2011, representing a negligible 
proportion of the total bluefish landings along the Atlantic Coast. 
Therefore, this analysis assumed that no vessel activity for these two 
states took place in 2011. In recent years, approximately 2,000 party/
charter vessels may have been active in the bluefish fishery and/or 
have caught bluefish.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Some of these vessels were also identified in the Northeast 
dealer data; therefore, double counting is possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained 
in any of the alternatives considered for this action. In addition, 
NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
    The IRFA in the Draft EA addressed three alternatives (including a 
no action/status quo alternative) for the 2013 and 2014 Atlantic 
bluefish fishing years. All quota alternatives considered in this 
analysis are based on various commercial harvest levels for bluefish (a 
low, medium, and high level of harvest). For analysis of impacts of 
Alternatives 1 and 2 for both 2013 and 2014, the maximum potential RSA 
quota of 3 percent of the TAL (715,819 lb (324 mt) for 2013 and 703,385 
lb (319 mt) for 2014) was used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 
3 for both years, the status quo RSA quota of 491,672 lb (223 mt) was 
used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 1 for 2013, the 
recommended transfer of 4.686 million lb (2,125 mt) from the 
recreational sector to the commercial sector were used. Alternative 1 
for 2014, the recommended transfer of 4.342 million lb (1,969 mt) was 
used. For analysis of impacts of Alternative 3 for 2013 and 2014, the 
transfer of 5.052 million lb (2,291 mt) from the recreational sector to 
the commercial sector was used, which is the same as the 2012 transfer 
amount. Under Alternative 2 for both 2013 and 2014, no transfer of 
bluefish would be made from the recreational sector to the commercial 
sector, and the allocation of the TAL would be based strictly on the 
percentages specified in the FMP (17 percent commercial, 83 percent 
recreational).
    For 2013, Alternatives 1 and 2 would implement a TAL of 23.861 
million lb (10,823 mt). For 2014, Alternatives 1 and 2 would implement 
a TAL of 23.446 million lb (10,635 mt). Alternative 3, for 2013 and 
2014, would implement status quo management measures for both

[[Page 11812]]

years, which would result in a TAL identical to the 2012 TAL, or 28.267 
million lb (12,822 mt). The proposed 2013 and 2014 Atlantic bluefish 
specification alternatives are shown in Table 2, along with the 
resulting commercial quota and RHL after any applicable transfer 
described earlier in the preamble and after deduction of the RSA quota. 
Alternative 1 (Council's preferred) would allocate 9.076 million lb 
(4,117 mt) for 2013 and 8.674 million lb (3,934 mt) for 2014 to the 
commercial sector, and 14.096 million lb (6,381 mt) to the recreational 
sector for both 2013 and 2014. For 2013, Alternative 2 would result in 
the most restrictive commercial quota and would allocate 4.530 million 
lb (2,055 mt) to the commercial sector and leave 18.615 million lb 
(8,444 mt) available to the recreational sector. For 2014, Alternative 
2 would also result in the most restrictive commercial quota and would 
allocate 4.462 million lb (2,024 mt) to the commercial sector and leave 
18.281 million lb (8,292 mt) available to the recreational sector. For 
both 2013 and 2014, Alternative 3 (status quo) would allocate 10.317 
million lb (4,680 mt) to the commercial sector and 17.457 million lb 
(7,918 mt) to the recreational sector. This alternative would also 
implement the status quo RSA level, which is currently approved for 
491,672 lb (223 mt).

 Table 2--Proposed 2013 and 2014 Atlantic Bluefish Specification Alternatives for TAL, Commercial Quota, and RHL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Commercial
    Year        Alternatives     TAL  (million    TAL         quota        Commercial     RHL  (million    RHL
                                      lb)         (mt)    (million lb)     quota (mt)          lb)         (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013.......  Alternative 1....          23.861   10,823           9.076           4,117          14.096    6,381
             Alternative 2....          23.861   10,823           4.530           2,044          18.615    8,444
             Alternative 3....          28.267   12,822          10.317           4,680          17.457    7,918
2014.......  Alternative 1....          23.446   10,635           8.674           3,934          14.096    6,381
             Alternative 2....          23.446   10,635           4.462           2,024          18.281    8,292
             Alternative 3....          28.267   12,822          10.317           4,680          17.457    7,918
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commercial Fishery Impacts

    To assess the impact of the alternatives on commercial fisheries, 
the Council conducted a threshold analysis and analysis of potential 
changes in ex-vessel gross revenue that would result from each 
alternative, using Northeast dealer reports and South Atlantic Trip 
Ticket reports.
    Under Alternative 1, the recommended commercial quota for 2013 is 
approximately 79 percent higher than 2011 commercial landings. When 
this commercial quota is distributed to the states from Maine to 
Florida (based on the percentages specified in the FMP), except for New 
York, each state's 2013 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For New 
York, 2013 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2013 
commercial quota under Alternative 1. The threshold analysis projected 
that 147 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 
9 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the 
vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or 
more, 22 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 44 percent had 
gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence 
on fishing for some of these vessels is small. If commercial quota is 
transferred from a state or states that do not land their entire 
bluefish quota for 2013, as was done in 2011 and frequently in previous 
years, the number of affected entities could change, thus changing the 
adverse economic impact on vessels landing in the state(s) receiving 
quota transfers.
    For 2013, Alternative 2 would result in a commercial quota 11 
percent below the 2011 commercial landings. Although the overall 
commercial quota is lower than 2011 commercial landings, except for 
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, 
each state's 2013 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For these 
states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North 
Carolina), 2013 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2013 
commercial quota under Alternative 2. The threshold analysis projected 
that 596 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 
67 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the 
vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or 
more, 19 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 55 percent had 
gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence 
on fishing for some of these vessels is small.
    Under Alternative 3, the 2013 commercial quota is approximately 103 
percent higher than the 2011 commercial landings. Most states show a 
similar increase in fishing opportunities under this alternative; 
however, New York's 2013 commercial quota would be lower than its 2011 
commercial landings. Analysis of Alternative 3 concluded that 586 
vessels would likely have no change in revenue relative to 2011, 154 
vessels were projected to incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent, 
and 2 vessels were projected to incur revenue loss of 5 percent or 
more.
    Under Alternative 1, the recommended commercial quota for 2014 is 
approximately 71 percent higher than 2011 commercial landings. When 
this commercial quota is distributed to the states from Maine to 
Florida (based on the percentages specified in the FMP), except for New 
York, each state's 2014 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For New 
York, 2014 commercial landings would be constrained by the 2014 
commercial quota under Alternative 1. The threshold analysis projected 
that 147 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 percent and 
13 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. Of the 
vessels likely to be impacted with revenue reductions of 5 percent or 
more, 22 percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less and 56 percent had 
gross sales of $10,000 or less, which may indicate that the dependence 
on fishing for some of these vessels is small. If commercial quota is 
transferred from a state or states that do not land their entire 
bluefish quota for 2014, as was done in 2011 and frequently in previous 
years, the number of affected entities could change, thus changing the 
adverse economic impact on vessels landing in the state(s) receiving 
quota transfers.
    For 2014, Alternative 2 would result in a commercial quota 12 
percent below the 2011 commercial landings. Although the overall 
commercial quota is lower than 2011 commercial landings,

[[Page 11813]]

except for Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and North 
Carolina, each state's 2014 quota is higher than its 2011 landings. For 
these states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and 
North Carolina), 2014 commercial landings would be constrained by the 
2014 commercial quota under Alternative 2. The threshold analysis 
projected that 594 vessels could incur revenue losses of less than 5 
percent and 69 vessels could incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more. 
It is expected that the description of the impacted vessels under non-
preferred Alternative 2 for 2013 would also apply to this alternative.
    The commercial impacts under Alternative 3 for 2014 would be 
identical to the impacts described in Alternative 3 for 2013.

Recreational Fishery Impacts

    In Alternative 1 for 2013, the recommended RHL for the recreational 
sector (14.096 million lb, 6,381 mt) is approximately 22 percent above 
the recreational landings for 2011 (11.499 million lb, 5,216 mt) and 21 
percent below the RHL implemented for 2012 (17.457 million lb, 7,919 
mt). It is not anticipated that the recommend RHL will result in 
decreased demand for party/charter boat trips or affect angler 
participation in a negative manner. At the present time, there are 
neither behavioral or demand data available to estimate how sensitive 
party/charter boat anglers might be to proposed fishing regulations. 
However, given the level of the adjusted recreational harvest limit for 
2013 and 2014 and recreational landings in recent years, it is likely 
that given the proposed recreational harvest limits under all 
alternatives evaluated, the demand for party/charter boat trips may not 
be negatively impacted. Overall, it is not expected that the final 
recreational management measures will affect gross revenues of 
businesses providing goods and services to anglers participating in the 
party/charter boat, private/rental boat, and shore fisheries for 
bluefish. For 2013, the impacts under Alternative 2 and 3 are expected 
to be similar to the recreational impacts under Alternative 1. The IRFA 
analyzed the maximum transfer amount from the recreational sector to 
the commercial sector, but future updates of recreational harvest 
projections could result in a smaller transfer amount, resulting in a 
higher RHL.
    The 2013 RHL under Alternative 2 would be 62 percent higher than 
the recreational landings in 2011 and 7 percent higher than the 2012 
RHL. Under Alternative 3, the 2013 RHL would be 52 percent higher than 
2011 recreational landings and the same as the 2012 RHL. Thus, 
Alternatives 2 and 3 are not expected to have any negative effects on 
recreational fishermen or the demand for party/charter boat trips. In 
addition, neither of these alternatives are expected to result in 
recreational landings in excess of the RHL.
    The recreational impacts for the 2014 alternatives are the same as 
those for the respective alternatives for 2013.

RSA Quota Impacts

    For analysis of each alternative, the maximum RSA quota amount (3 
percent of the TAL) was deducted from the initial overall TAL for 2013 
and 2014 to derive the adjusted 2013 and 2014 commercial quotas and 
RHLs under each alternative. Thus, the threshold analyses for each 
alternative accounted for overall reductions in fishing opportunities 
due to RSA. Specifications of RSA quota for 2013 and 2014 are expected 
to benefit all participants in the fishery as a result of improved data 
and information for management or stock assessment purposes.

Summary

    The Council recommended Alternative 1 for both 2013 and 2014, over 
Alternatives 2 and 3, because it is projected to achieve the target F 
in 2013 and 2014, respectively, while providing the second least 
restrictive commercial quota among the alternatives analyzed. 
Alternative 2 was not recommended by the Council because it would yield 
the lowest commercial fishing opportunities among the alternatives due 
to an absence of a quota transfer under this alternative. Alternative 3 
was not selected because it would be inconsistent with the advice of 
the SSC and the Monitoring Committee due to failing to make an effort 
to prevent overfishing.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 12, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and 
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-03781 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.