Safety Zone; Mamaroneck Beach and Yacht Club Fireworks, Mamaroneck Harbor, Long Island Sound, NY, 11116-11119 [2013-03551]
Download as PDF
11116
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2011–1431/Airspace
Docket No. 11–ACE–24.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://www.faa.
gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/
publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of
the Central Service Center, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), Part 71 by modifying Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for standard
instrument approach procedures at
Atwood—Rawlins County—City County
Airport, Atwood, KS. The airspace
extension north of the airport would be
removed due to the decommissioning of
the Atwood NDB and cancellation of the
NDB approach. Geographic coordinates
would also be updated to coincide with
the FAA’s aeronautical database.
Controlled airspace within the existing
6.5-mile radius is necessary for the
safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012 and
effective September 15, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend controlled airspace at AtwoodRawlins County-City County Airport,
Atwood, KS.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ACE KS E5 Atwood, KS [Amended]
Atwood-Rawlins County-City County
Airport, KS
(lat. 39°50′25″ N., long. 101°02′33″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of Atwood-Rawlins County-City
County Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, TX on January 22,
2013.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–03556 Filed 2–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0013]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Mamaroneck Beach and
Yacht Club Fireworks, Mamaroneck
Harbor, Long Island Sound, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Long Island Sound
in the vicinity of Mamaroneck Harbor
for a fireworks display. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays. This
rule is intended to restrict all vessels
from a portion of Long Island Sound
before, during, and immediately after
the fireworks event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 18, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade
Kristopher Kesting, Sector NY
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard; Telephone (718) 354–4154,
Email Kristopher.R.Kesting@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
COTP Captain of the Port
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0013) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0013) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES on or before
February 22, 2013. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11117
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
This proposed safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels from hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
Based on the inherent hazards
associated with fireworks, the Captain
of the Port (COTP) New York has
determined that fireworks launches in
close proximity to water crafts pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. The combination of increased
number of recreational vessels,
congested waterways, darkness
punctuated by bright flashes of light,
and debris especially burning debris
falling on passing or spectator vessels
has the potential to result in serious
injuries or fatalities. The proposed
temporary safety zone will restrict
vessel movement in the Long Island
Sound around the location of the
fireworks launch platform before,
during, and after the fireworks display.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Bay Fireworks is sponsoring a
fireworks display for the Mamaroneck
Beach and Yacht Club on the navigable
waters of Long Island Sound in the
vicinity of Mamaroneck Harbor, NY.
The proposed safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels from hazards associated with the
fireworks display.
The fireworks display will occur from
approximately 8:30 p.m. until
approximately 9:15 p.m. In order to
coordinate the safe movement of vessels
within the area and to ensure that the
area is clear of unauthorized persons
and vessels before, during, and
immediately after the fireworks launch,
this zone will be enforced from
approximately 8:00 p.m. until
approximately 9:30 p.m. on May 11,
2013.
The proposed safety zone will include
all navigable waters of Long Island
Sound within a 240-yard radius of the
fireworks barge located in approximate
position 40°56′24.95″ N, 073°43′00.39″
W, approximately 520 yards northeast of
Orienta Point, NY. Vessels will still be
able to transit the surrounding area and
may be authorized to transit through the
proposed safety zone with the
permission from the COTP. The COTP
does not anticipate any negative impact
on vessel traffic due to this proposed
safety zone.
The fireworks barge will also have a
sign on its port and starboard side
labeled ‘‘FIREWORKS—STAY AWAY.’’
The sign will consist of 10″ high by 1.5″
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
11118
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wide red lettering on a white
background.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
The Coast Guard’s enforcement of this
proposed safety zone will be of short
duration, approximately 90 minutes
during the scheduled fireworks event.
The proposed safety zone will restrict
access to only a small portion of the
navigable waterways of Long Island
Sound. Vessels will be able to navigate
around the proposed safety zone.
Furthermore, vessels may be authorized
to transit through the proposed safety
zone with the permission of the COTP.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a small portion of the Long
Island Sound during the effective
period.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This proposed
rule would be in effect for only 85
minutes late at night when vessel traffic
is low. Vessel traffic could pass safely
around the safety zone. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishment of a
temporary safety zone. This rule may be
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and record keeping
requirements, waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the
Port Sector New York (COTP), to act on
his or her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official
patrol vessel or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as the
following regulations, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for fireworks
barge and accompanying vessels, will be
allowed to transit the safety zone
without the permission of the COTP.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated representative.
Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area
shall contact the COTP or the
designated representative via VHF
channel 16 or 718–354–4353 (Sector
New York command center) to obtain
permission to do so.
Dated: January 30, 2013.
G.P. Hitchen,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2013–03551 Filed 2–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T01.0013 to read as
follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 165.T01–0013 Safety Zone; Mamaroneck
Beach and Yacht Club Fireworks,
Mamaroneck Harbor, Long Island Sound,
NY
40 CFR Part 51
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a temporary safety zone: All navigable
waters of Long Island Sound within a
240-yard radius of the fireworks barge
located in approximate position
40°56′24.95″ N, 073°43′00.39″ W, in the
vicinity of Orienta Point, NY.
(b) Effective Period. This rule will be
effective from approximately 8:00 p.m.
until approximately 9:30 p.m. on May
11, 2013.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0393; FRL–9779–4]
RIN 2060–AQ38
Air Quality: Revision to Definition of
Volatile Organic Compounds—
Exclusion of trans 1-chloro-3,3,3trifluoroprop-1-ene [SolsticeTM
1233zd(E)]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is proposing to
revise the definition of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) for purposes of
preparing state implementation plans
(SIPs) to attain the national ambient air
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11119
quality standards for ozone under title
I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). This
proposed revision would add trans 1chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene (also
known as SolsticeTM 1233zd(E)) to the
list of compounds excluded from the
definition of VOCs on the basis that this
compound makes a negligible
contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation. In the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register, we are making these same
amendments as a direct final rule
without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will
not take further action on this proposed
rule.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 1, 2013.
Public Hearing: If anyone contacts the
EPA requesting to present oral
testimony at a public hearing
concerning the proposed regulation by
February 25, 2013, we will hold a public
hearing on March 4, 2013. If a public
hearing is held, it will be held at 10 a.m.
at Building C on the EPA campus in
Research Triangle Park, NC, or at an
alternate site nearby. Please refer to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on the comment
period and the public hearing.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2012–0393, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: a-and-rDocket@epamail.epa.gov, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–
0393.
• Fax: 202–566–1541, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–
0393.
• Mail: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2012–0393, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Room:
3334, Mail Code: 6102T, Washington,
DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0393. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–
0393. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11116-11119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03551]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2013-0013]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Mamaroneck Beach and Yacht Club Fireworks,
Mamaroneck Harbor, Long Island Sound, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of Long Island Sound in the vicinity of
Mamaroneck Harbor for a fireworks display. This temporary safety zone
is necessary to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays. This rule is intended to restrict
all vessels from a portion of Long Island Sound before, during, and
immediately after the fireworks event.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 18, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
[[Page 11117]]
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Kristopher Kesting, Sector NY
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard; Telephone (718) 354-4154, Email
Kristopher.R.Kesting@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
COTP Captain of the Port
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0013) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0013) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES on
or before February 22, 2013. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
This proposed safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels from hazards associated with the fireworks
display. Based on the inherent hazards associated with fireworks, the
Captain of the Port (COTP) New York has determined that fireworks
launches in close proximity to water crafts pose a significant risk to
public safety and property. The combination of increased number of
recreational vessels, congested waterways, darkness punctuated by
bright flashes of light, and debris especially burning debris falling
on passing or spectator vessels has the potential to result in serious
injuries or fatalities. The proposed temporary safety zone will
restrict vessel movement in the Long Island Sound around the location
of the fireworks launch platform before, during, and after the
fireworks display.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Bay Fireworks is sponsoring a fireworks display for the Mamaroneck
Beach and Yacht Club on the navigable waters of Long Island Sound in
the vicinity of Mamaroneck Harbor, NY. The proposed safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels from hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
The fireworks display will occur from approximately 8:30 p.m. until
approximately 9:15 p.m. In order to coordinate the safe movement of
vessels within the area and to ensure that the area is clear of
unauthorized persons and vessels before, during, and immediately after
the fireworks launch, this zone will be enforced from approximately
8:00 p.m. until approximately 9:30 p.m. on May 11, 2013.
The proposed safety zone will include all navigable waters of Long
Island Sound within a 240-yard radius of the fireworks barge located in
approximate position 40[deg]56'24.95'' N, 073[deg]43'00.39'' W,
approximately 520 yards northeast of Orienta Point, NY. Vessels will
still be able to transit the surrounding area and may be authorized to
transit through the proposed safety zone with the permission from the
COTP. The COTP does not anticipate any negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this proposed safety zone.
The fireworks barge will also have a sign on its port and starboard
side labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY.'' The sign will consist of 10''
high by 1.5''
[[Page 11118]]
wide red lettering on a white background.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The Coast Guard's enforcement of this proposed safety zone will be
of short duration, approximately 90 minutes during the scheduled
fireworks event. The proposed safety zone will restrict access to only
a small portion of the navigable waterways of Long Island Sound.
Vessels will be able to navigate around the proposed safety zone.
Furthermore, vessels may be authorized to transit through the proposed
safety zone with the permission of the COTP.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a small portion of the Long Island
Sound during the effective period.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
proposed rule would be in effect for only 85 minutes late at night when
vessel traffic is low. Vessel traffic could pass safely around the
safety zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories widely available to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 11119]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishment of a temporary safety zone. This rule may be
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01.0013 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0013 Safety Zone; Mamaroneck Beach and Yacht Club
Fireworks, Mamaroneck Harbor, Long Island Sound, NY
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a temporary safety zone:
All navigable waters of Long Island Sound within a 240-yard radius of
the fireworks barge located in approximate position 40[deg]56'24.95''
N, 073[deg]43'00.39'' W, in the vicinity of Orienta Point, NY.
(b) Effective Period. This rule will be effective from
approximately 8:00 p.m. until approximately 9:30 p.m. on May 11, 2013.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port Sector
New York (COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be on shore
and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as
the following regulations, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for fireworks barge and accompanying
vessels, will be allowed to transit the safety zone without the
permission of the COTP.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or the designated representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area shall contact the COTP or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 or 718-354-4353 (Sector New York command center) to
obtain permission to do so.
Dated: January 30, 2013.
G.P. Hitchen,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2013-03551 Filed 2-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P