Connor Hayden Kraegel, 19917 Spurrier Avenue, Poolesville, MD 20837; Order Denying Export Privileges, 11142-11143 [2013-03547]
Download as PDF
11142
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
The National Advisory Council on
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Meeting of the National Advisory
Council on Innovation and
Entrepreneurship
U.S. Department of Commerce.
Notice of an Open Meeting
Cancellation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Advisory
Council on Innovation and
Entrepreneurship (NACIE) has cancelled
its open meeting, originally planned for
Tuesday, February 19, 2013. The
meeting, which was to be the quarterly
meeting of NACIE, will not be held this
quarter. We expect the next quarterly
meeting to be held later this year. Please
visit the Web site of the Economic
Development Administration
(www.eda.gov) to see documents related
to previous NACIE meetings and
activities and notices about future
meetings.
SUMMARY:
Nish
Acharya, Office of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship, Room 70007R, 1401
Constitution Avenue, Washington DC
20230; telephone: 202–482–4068.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: February 6, 2013.
Nish Acharya
Director, Office of Innovation &
Entrepreneurship, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2013–03124 Filed 2–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Connor Hayden Kraegel, 19917
Spurrier Avenue, Poolesville, MD
20837; Order Denying Export
Privileges
On August 24, 2011, in the U.S.
District Court, District of Maryland,
Connor Hayden Kraegel (‘‘Kraegel’’) was
convicted of violating Section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2778 (2006 & Supp. IV 2010)) (‘‘AECA’’).
Specifically, Kraegel was convicted of
knowingly and willfully exporting from
the United States a set of AN/AVS–6
night vision goggles, which is
designated as a defense article on the
United States Munitions List, without
having first obtained from the
Department of State a license for such
export. Kraegel was sentenced to eight
months of prison, to run concurrent
with the sentence imposed in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:09 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
United States District Court for the
District of Montana, Case 10–27–BU–
SWM. Kraegel was entitled to credit for
time served and was released from
prison on April 2, 2012. Kraegel is also
listed on the U.S. Department of State
Debarred List.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office
of Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
I have received notice of Kraegel’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
have provided notice and an
opportunity for Kraegel to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided
in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I
have received a submission from
Kraegel. Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Kraegel’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of
Kraegel’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2012). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 15, 2012 (77 FR 49699 (August
16, 2012)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Kraegel had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered.
I. Until August 24, 2021, Connor
Hayden Kraegel, with a last known
address at: 19917 Spurrier Avenue,
Poolesville, MD 20837, and when acting
for or on behalf of Kraegel, his
representatives, assigns, agents or
employees (the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2013 / Notices
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Kraegel by
affiliation, ownership, control or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the
Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until August
24, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Kraegel may file an appeal
of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Kraegel. This Order
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
Issued this 8th day of February, 2013.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services .
[FR Doc. 2013–03547 Filed 2–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Transportation and Related Equipment
Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
of Partially Closed Meeting
The Transportation and Related
Equipment Technical Advisory
Committee will meet on
March 7, 2013, 9:30 a.m., in the
Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room
6087B, 14th Street between Constitution
& Pennsylvania Avenues NW.
Washington, DC. The Committee
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:09 Feb 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration
with respect to technical questions that
affect the level of export controls
applicable to transportation and related
equipment or technology.
Agenda
Public Session
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Status reports by working group
chairs.
3. Public comments and Proposals.
Closed Session
4. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference to 20 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at
Yvette.Springer@bis.doc.gov no later
than February 28, 2013.
A limited number of seats will be
available during the public session of
the meeting. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent time permits,
members of the public may present oral
statements to the Committee. The public
may submit written statements at any
time before or after the meeting.
However, to facilitate distribution of
public presentation materials to
Committee members, the Committee
suggests that presenters forward the
public presentation materials prior to
the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on October 19,
2012, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § (10)(d)), that
the portion of the meeting dealing with
pre-decisional changes to the Commerce
Control List and U.S. export control
policies shall be exempt from the
provisions relating to public meetings
found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the
meeting will be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482·2813.
Dated: February 11, 2013.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–03617 Filed 2–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11143
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2009–2010
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 6, 2011, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
sawblades) from the People’s Republic
of China (the PRC). The period of review
(POR) is January 23, 2009, through
October 31, 2010. For the final results,
we continue to find that certain
companies covered by this review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: February 15,
2013.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Romani or Yang Jin Chun, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0198 or (202) 482–
5760, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 6, 2011, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC.1 We received
case and rebuttal briefs with respect to
the Preliminary Results and, at the
request of interested parties, we held a
hearing on February 23, 2012.
On April 5, 2012, the Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition (the
petitioner) alleged that Korean
respondents Ehwa Diamond Industrial
Co., Ltd., and Shinhan Diamond
Industrial Co., Ltd. and SH Trading Inc.,
and their respective Chinese
subsidiaries Weihai Xiangguang
Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.
(Weihai), and Qingdao Shinhan
Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. (Qingdao
Shinhan), sold diamond sawblades into
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Intent to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR
76135 (December 6, 2011) (Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11142-11143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03547]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Connor Hayden Kraegel, 19917 Spurrier Avenue, Poolesville, MD
20837; Order Denying Export Privileges
On August 24, 2011, in the U.S. District Court, District of
Maryland, Connor Hayden Kraegel (``Kraegel'') was convicted of
violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778
(2006 & Supp. IV 2010)) (``AECA''). Specifically, Kraegel was convicted
of knowingly and willfully exporting from the United States a set of
AN/AVS-6 night vision goggles, which is designated as a defense article
on the United States Munitions List, without having first obtained from
the Department of State a license for such export. Kraegel was
sentenced to eight months of prison, to run concurrent with the
sentence imposed in the United States District Court for the District
of Montana, Case 10-27-BU-SWM. Kraegel was entitled to credit for time
served and was released from prison on April 2, 2012. Kraegel is also
listed on the U.S. Department of State Debarred List.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (``EAA''), the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). The denial of
export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10
years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50
U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security
(``BIS'') licenses previously issued in which the person had an
interest in at the time of his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2012). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app.
Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has
been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 15, 2012 (77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have received notice of Kraegel's conviction for violating the
AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Kraegel to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. I have received a submission from Kraegel. Based upon my
review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export Enforcement,
including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided
to deny Kraegel's export privileges under the Regulations for a period
of 10 years from the date of Kraegel's conviction. I have also decided
to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Kraegel had an interest at the time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered.
I. Until August 24, 2021, Connor Hayden Kraegel, with a last known
address at: 19917 Spurrier Avenue, Poolesville, MD 20837, and when
acting for or on behalf of Kraegel, his representatives, assigns,
agents or employees (the ``Denied Person''), may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to
as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that
[[Page 11143]]
has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of
whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States.
For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Kraegel by affiliation, ownership,
control or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect
until August 24, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Kraegel may
file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of
the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Kraegel. This
Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Issued this 8th day of February, 2013.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services .
[FR Doc. 2013-03547 Filed 2-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P