Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 10499-10501 [2013-03267]
Download as PDF
10499
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 31
Thursday, February 14, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1110; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–013–AD; Amendment
39–17353; AD 2013–03–19]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 707
airplanes, and Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes. That AD currently
requires replacing wiring for the fuel
boost pumps and override pumps with
new wiring, installing Teflon sleeving
on the wiring, and doing associated
actions; and doing repetitive inspections
to detect damage of the wiring or
evidence of a fuel leak. This new AD
reduces the repetitive inspection
interval. This AD was prompted by a
determination that an inspection
interval must be reduced. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
damaged wiring for the fuel boost
pumps and override pumps, which
could cause electrical arcing that could
puncture the conduit containing the
SUMMARY:
wire, and result in a fuel tank explosion
or a fire adjacent to the fuel tank.
DATES: This AD is effective March 21,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 1, 2001 (66 FR 44954,
August 27, 2001).
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6509;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
Rebel.Nichols@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954,
August 27, 2001). That AD applies to
the specified products. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
October 29, 2012 (77 FR 65501). That
NPRM proposed to continue to require
replacing wiring for the fuel boost
pumps and override pumps with new
wiring, installing Teflon sleeving on the
wiring, and doing associated actions;
and doing repetitive inspections to
detect damage of the wiring or evidence
of a fuel leak with a reduced repetitive
inspection interval.
Comment
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comment received.
Boeing stated that it has reviewed the
NPRM (77 FR 65501, October 29, 2012),
and concurs with the proposed rule.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed—except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (77 FR
65501, October 29, 2012) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 65501,
October 29, 2012).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 5
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Labor cost
Replacement [retained action from AD
2001–17–20, Amendment 39–12411
(66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001)].
Inspection [retained action from AD
2001–17–20, Amendment 39–12411
(66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001)].
38 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,230
$9,943
$13,173 ..................
$65,865.
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255
per inspection cycle.
$0
$255 per inspection
cycle.
$1,275 per inspection cycle.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Parts cost
Sfmt 4700
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
10500
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The new requirements of this AD add
no additional economic burden. The
increase in replacement labor costs of 31
work hours in AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954,
August 27, 2001), to the 38 work hours
specified in this AD, is due to the
opening and closing hours being
included in the cost of this AD. We have
received no definitive data that would
enable us to provide cost estimates for
the on-condition actions specified in
this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
16:39 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2001–17–20, Amendment 39–12411 (66
FR 44954, August 27, 2001), and adding
the following new AD:
■
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
2013–03–19 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–17353; Docket No.
FAA–2012–1110; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–013–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 21, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954, August
27, 2001).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 707–100 long body, -200, -100B long
body, and -100B short body series airplanes;
Model 707–300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series
airplanes; and Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes; certificated in any category; line
numbers 1 through 941 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 24, Electrical Power.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that,
while investigating a fuel leak around the
bolts on the number 1 fuel boost pump on
a Boeing Model 707 series airplane, an
operator found wire damage where the fuel
boost pump wiring exited the boost pump
and entered the boost pump access area. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps and
override pumps, which could cause electrical
arcing that could puncture the conduit
containing the wire, and result in a fuel tank
explosion or a fire adjacent to the fuel tank.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Replacement of Wiring,
Installation of Sleeving, and Associated
Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (a) of AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954, August
27, 2001). Within 1 year or 4,000 flight hours
after October 1, 2001 (the effective date of AD
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2001–17–20), whichever occurs first: Replace
the wiring for the fuel boost pumps and
override pumps, install Teflon sleeving over
the wiring, and do all associated actions, per
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2001. The associated actions
include performing a general visual
inspection of the area around each fuel boost
pump and override pump for evidence of a
fuel leak; finding the source of any fuel leak
and repairing the affected area; replacing the
conduit, if required; and performing a
detailed visual inspection of the wiring
installed in the conduit for evidence of
electrical arcing or a fuel leak, or exposed
copper wire. If replacement of the conduit is
deferred per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001,
repeat the inspection for fuel leaks every 500
flight hours until the conduit is replaced, and
replace the conduit within 6,000 flight hours
or 18 months, whichever occurs first.
(1) For the purposes of this AD, a general
visual inspection is defined as: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made under normally available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar
lighting, flashlight, or drop-light, and may
require removal or opening of access panels
or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may
be required to gain proximity to the area
being checked.’’
(2) For the purposes of this AD, a detailed
visual inspection is defined as: ‘‘An intensive
visual examination of a specific structural
area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity.
Available lighting is normally supplemented
with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the
inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface
cleaning and elaborate access procedures
may be required.’’
(h) Retained Repetitive Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (b) of AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954, August
27, 2001), with a new compliance time. After
replacement of the wiring per paragraph (g)
of this AD, repeat the detailed visual
inspection of the wiring for the fuel boost
pumps and override pumps for damage, such
as evidence of electrical arcing or exposed
copper wire, or evidence of a fuel leak. After
the effective date of this AD, repeat the
inspection one time at the earlier of the times
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD, per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001. If
any electrical arcing or exposed copper wire
or evidence of a fuel leak is detected during
any inspection per this paragraph, before
further flight, do the applicable corrective
actions (including finding the source of any
fuel leak and repairing the affected area,
replacing the wiring, replacing the conduit,
or installing new Teflon sleeving; as
applicable) according to the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 15,000 flight hours.
(1) Within 30,000 flight hours after the
most recent inspection.
(2) At the later of the compliance times
specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Within 15,000 flight hours after the most
recent inspection.
(ii) Within 3 years after the effective date
of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before
October 1, 2001 (the effective date of AD
2001–17–20, Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR
44954, August 27, 2001)), using Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin A3500, dated July 27, 2000,
which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2001–17–20,
Amendment 39–12411 (66 FR 44954, August
27, 2001), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD, except
for AMOCs that change the inspection
frequency.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6509; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: Rebel.Nichols@faa.gov.
(2) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on October 1, 2001 (66 FR
44954, August 27, 2001).
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision
1, dated April 26, 2001.
(ii) Reserved.
(4) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(5) You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(6) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington on February
6, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–03267 Filed 2–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1055; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NE–33–AD; Amendment 39–
17351; AD 2013–03–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
(RRD) BR700–710A1–10 and BR700–
710A2–20 turbofan engines, and certain
BR700–710C4–11 model engines. This
AD was prompted by RRD performing
an evaluation that determined that
certain high-pressure turbine (HPT)
stage 1 and stage 2 discs from a specific
supplier may contain steel inclusions
that may cause the discs to fail before
they reach their current life limits. This
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10501
AD requires reducing the life limits for
certain HPT stage 1 and stage 2 discs.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the HPT stage 1 and stage 2
discs, which could result in
uncontained failure of the engine and
damage to the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations
office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Morlath, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7154; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: robert.c.morlath@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on November 16, 2012 (77 FR
68714). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
states:
The results of a recent quality review of
high pressure turbine (HPT) stage 1 and stage
2 discs identified potential for steel
inclusions in some production scale parts.
Further investigation concluded that all
affected parts were manufactured by Udimet
720I and melted by a certain supplier.
Subsequent evaluation concluded that the
affected parts life limitation values declared
in the engine Time Limits Manual cannot be
supported for discs with potential steel
inclusion.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to an uncontained HPT disc failure,
potentially resulting in damage to, and/or
reduced control of the aeroplane.
The FAA has further determined that
the risk to the engine is increased by
installing an HPT stage 1 disc and an
HPT stage 2 disc from the affected
population, on the same engine.
Therefore the FAA is prohibiting the
installation of an HPT stage 1 and HPT
stage 2 discs from the affected
population in the same engine. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10499-10501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03267]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 10499]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1110; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-013-AD;
Amendment 39-17353; AD 2013-03-19]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 707 airplanes, and Model 720 and
720B series airplanes. That AD currently requires replacing wiring for
the fuel boost pumps and override pumps with new wiring, installing
Teflon sleeving on the wiring, and doing associated actions; and doing
repetitive inspections to detect damage of the wiring or evidence of a
fuel leak. This new AD reduces the repetitive inspection interval. This
AD was prompted by a determination that an inspection interval must be
reduced. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct damaged wiring
for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps, which could cause
electrical arcing that could puncture the conduit containing the wire,
and result in a fuel tank explosion or a fire adjacent to the fuel
tank.
DATES: This AD is effective March 21, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 1,
2001 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001).
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6509; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Rebel.Nichols@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2001-17-20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954,
August 27, 2001). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on October 29, 2012 (77 FR 65501).
That NPRM proposed to continue to require replacing wiring for the fuel
boost pumps and override pumps with new wiring, installing Teflon
sleeving on the wiring, and doing associated actions; and doing
repetitive inspections to detect damage of the wiring or evidence of a
fuel leak with a reduced repetitive inspection interval.
Comment
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comment received. Boeing stated that it
has reviewed the NPRM (77 FR 65501, October 29, 2012), and concurs with
the proposed rule.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed--except for minor editorial changes. We have determined
that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 65501, October 29, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 65501, October 29, 2012).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 5 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement [retained action from 38 work-hours x $85 $9,943 $13,173............ $65,865.
AD 2001-17-20, Amendment 39- per hour = $3,230.
12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27,
2001)].
Inspection [retained action from 3 work-hours x $85 $0 $255 per inspection $1,275 per
AD 2001-17-20, Amendment 39- per hour = $255 cycle. inspection cycle.
12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, per inspection
2001)]. cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 10500]]
The new requirements of this AD add no additional economic burden.
The increase in replacement labor costs of 31 work hours in AD 2001-17-
20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001), to the 38 work
hours specified in this AD, is due to the opening and closing hours
being included in the cost of this AD. We have received no definitive
data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-
condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2001-17-20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001), and
adding the following new AD:
2013-03-19 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17353; Docket No. FAA-
2012-1110; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-013-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 21, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2001-17-20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR
44954, August 27, 2001).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 707-100 long body, -
200, -100B long body, and -100B short body series airplanes; Model
707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series airplanes; and Model 720 and
720B series airplanes; certificated in any category; line numbers 1
through 941 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical Power.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that, while investigating a
fuel leak around the bolts on the number 1 fuel boost pump on a
Boeing Model 707 series airplane, an operator found wire damage
where the fuel boost pump wiring exited the boost pump and entered
the boost pump access area. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps,
which could cause electrical arcing that could puncture the conduit
containing the wire, and result in a fuel tank explosion or a fire
adjacent to the fuel tank.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Replacement of Wiring, Installation of Sleeving, and
Associated Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (a) of AD
2001-17-20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001).
Within 1 year or 4,000 flight hours after October 1, 2001 (the
effective date of AD 2001-17-20), whichever occurs first: Replace
the wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps, install
Teflon sleeving over the wiring, and do all associated actions, per
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin A3500,
Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001. The associated actions include
performing a general visual inspection of the area around each fuel
boost pump and override pump for evidence of a fuel leak; finding
the source of any fuel leak and repairing the affected area;
replacing the conduit, if required; and performing a detailed visual
inspection of the wiring installed in the conduit for evidence of
electrical arcing or a fuel leak, or exposed copper wire. If
replacement of the conduit is deferred per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2001, repeat the inspection for fuel leaks every 500
flight hours until the conduit is replaced, and replace the conduit
within 6,000 flight hours or 18 months, whichever occurs first.
(1) For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is
defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
(2) For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(h) Retained Repetitive Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (b) of AD
2001-17-20, Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001), with
a new compliance time. After replacement of the wiring per paragraph
(g) of this AD, repeat the detailed visual inspection of the wiring
for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps for damage, such as
evidence of electrical arcing or exposed copper wire, or evidence of
a fuel leak. After the effective date of this AD, repeat the
inspection one time at the earlier of the times specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2001. If any electrical arcing or exposed copper wire or
evidence of a fuel leak is detected during any inspection per this
paragraph, before further flight, do the applicable corrective
actions (including finding the source of any fuel leak and repairing
the affected area, replacing the wiring, replacing the conduit, or
installing new Teflon sleeving; as applicable) according to the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
[[Page 10501]]
A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15,000 flight hours.
(1) Within 30,000 flight hours after the most recent inspection.
(2) At the later of the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 15,000 flight hours after the most recent inspection.
(ii) Within 3 years after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
October 1, 2001 (the effective date of AD 2001-17-20, Amendment 39-
12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001)), using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin A3500, dated July 27, 2000, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2001-17-20,
Amendment 39-12411 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD, except for AMOCs
that change the inspection frequency.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Rebel Nichols,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6509; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
Rebel.Nichols@faa.gov.
(2) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
October 1, 2001 (66 FR 44954, August 27, 2001).
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26,
2001.
(ii) Reserved.
(4) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(5) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington on February 6, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-03267 Filed 2-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P