Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Roll-Out, West Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA, 10064-10066 [2013-03264]
Download as PDF
10064
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: January 29, 2013.
J.A. Janszen,
Commander, United States Coast Guard,
Acting, Captain of the Port San Diego.
Table of Acronyms
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
[FR Doc. 2013–03261 Filed 2–12–13; 8:45 am]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be impracticable to do so.
Delaying promulgation may result in
injury or damage to persons and vessels
since the roll-out event is scheduled to
occur before a comment period would
end and a Final Rule could be
published.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
until 30 days after publication would be
impracticable, as this delay would
eliminate the safety zones’ effectiveness
and usefulness in protecting persons,
property, and the safe navigation of
maritime traffic during the 30-day
period.
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Coast Guard
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
33 CFR Part 165
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0039]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
RIN 1625–AA00
2. Add § 165.T11–545 to read as
follows:
ACTION:
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T11–545 Safety Zone; Sea World San
Diego Fireworks, Mission Bay; San Diego,
CA.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
include the area within 600 feet of the
fireworks barge in approximate position
32°46′03″ N, 117°13′11″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 8:50 p.m. to
10 p.m. on February 16, 2013.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local,
state, or federal law enforcement vessels
who have been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Sector San Diego Command Center. The
Command Center may be contacted on
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Feb 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Roll-Out,
West Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the West Duwamish Waterway in
Seattle, Washington for a vessel roll-out
at Vigor Industrial. The safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
maritime public and workers involved
in the roll-out. The safety zone will
prohibit any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or a Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
28, 2013 from 2:00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2013–0039]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6045, email Sector
PugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
B. Basis and Purpose
Vigor Industrial is conducting a vessel
roll-out in the West Duwamish
Waterway in Seattle, Washington on
February 28, 2013. Due to the dangers
involved with a large slow moving dry
dock that will be maneuvering close to
the shore, the Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone to
ensure the safety of the workers
involved as well as the maritime public.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The safety zone helps ensure the
public’s safety during a vessel roll-out
that will take place on February 28,
2013 in the waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway. The safety zone
created by this rule encompasses all
waters of the West Duwamish Waterway
in Seattle, Washington within the area
created by connecting the following
points: 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W
thence westerly to 47°35′04″ N,
122°21′50″ W thence northerly to
47°35′19″ N, 122°21′50″ W thence
easterly to 47°35′19″ N, 122°21′30″ W
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
thence southerly to 47°35′04″ N,
122°21′30″ W. Geographically, the safety
zone is adjacent to the northern tip of
Harbor Island in Seattle, WA.
All persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering or remaining
in the safety zone. The safety zone will
be effective on February 28, 2013 from
2:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. unless cancelled
sooner by the Captain of the Port or a
Designated Representative. The safety
zone will be enforced by the U.S. Coast
Guard. The Captain of the Port may also
be assisted in the enforcement of this
safety zone by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The Coast Guard has made this
finding based on the fact that the safety
zone is limited in duration, and
maritime traffic may be able to transit
through the safety zone with permission
of the Captain of the Port or a
Designated Representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
safety zone created by this rule. This
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Feb 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
number of small entities, although the
safety zone will apply to the entire
width of the waterway, the zone will be
enforced for a limited period of time,
and vessel traffic will be allowed to pass
through the safety zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
a Designated Representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10065
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
10066
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–241 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–241 Safety Zone; Vigor
Industrial Vessel Roll-Out, West Duwamish
Waterway, Seattle, WA.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA
encompassed within the area created by
connecting the following points:
47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
westerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′50″ W
thence northerly to 47°35′19″ N,
122°21′50″ W thence easterly to
47°35′19″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
southerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
rule unless authorized by the Captain of
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–03264 Filed 2–12–13; 8:45 am]
[Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002]
■
15:25 Feb 12, 2013
Dated: February 1, 2013.
S. J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
44 CFR Part 67
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
the Port or a Designated Representative.
See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements. Vessel operators wishing
to enter the zone during the
enforcement period must request
permission for entry by contacting
Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on
VHF channel 14, or the Sector Puget
Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at
(206) 217–6001.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety
zone created in this rule is enforced
from 2:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on February
28, 2013 unless cancelled sooner by the
Captain of the Port.
Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified
BFEs are made final for the
communities listed below. The BFEs
and modified BFEs are the basis for the
floodplain management measures that
each community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or
remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing
BFEs and modified BFEs for each
community. This date may be obtained
by contacting the office where the maps
are available for inspection as indicated
in the table below.
ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations
listed below for the modified BFEs for
each community listed. These modified
elevations have been published in
newspapers of local circulation and
ninety (90) days have elapsed since that
publication. The Deputy Associate
Administrator for Mitigation has
resolved any appeals resulting from this
notification.
This final rule is issued in accordance
with section 110 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104,
and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has
developed criteria for floodplain
management in floodprone areas in
accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
Interested lessees and owners of real
property are encouraged to review the
proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM
available at the address cited below for
each community. The BFEs and
modified BFEs are made final in the
communities listed below. Elevations at
selected locations in each community
are shown.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This final rule is categorically excluded
from the requirements of 44 CFR part
10, Environmental Consideration. An
environmental impact assessment has
not been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
elevation determinations are not within
the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Regulatory Classification. This final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This final rule involves no policies that
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This final rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order
12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67
Administrative practice and
procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
amended as follows:
PART 67—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 67
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10064-10066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2013-0039]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Roll-Out, West Duwamish Waterway,
Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, Washington for a vessel roll-out at
Vigor Industrial. The safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
the maritime public and workers involved in the roll-out. The safety
zone will prohibit any person or vessel from entering or remaining in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a
Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 28, 2013 from 2:00 a.m. until
10:00 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2013-0039]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound, Coast Guard; telephone 206-
217-6045, email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it would be impracticable to do so.
Delaying promulgation may result in injury or damage to persons and
vessels since the roll-out event is scheduled to occur before a comment
period would end and a Final Rule could be published.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date until
30 days after publication would be impracticable, as this delay would
eliminate the safety zones' effectiveness and usefulness in protecting
persons, property, and the safe navigation of maritime traffic during
the 30-day period.
B. Basis and Purpose
Vigor Industrial is conducting a vessel roll-out in the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, Washington on February 28, 2013. Due to
the dangers involved with a large slow moving dry dock that will be
maneuvering close to the shore, the Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone to ensure the safety of the workers involved as
well as the maritime public.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The safety zone helps ensure the public's safety during a vessel
roll-out that will take place on February 28, 2013 in the waters of the
West Duwamish Waterway. The safety zone created by this rule
encompasses all waters of the West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle,
Washington within the area created by connecting the following points:
47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W thence westerly to 47[deg]35'04''
N, 122[deg]21'50'' W thence northerly to 47[deg]35'19'' N,
122[deg]21'50'' W thence easterly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'30''
W
[[Page 10065]]
thence southerly to 47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W.
Geographically, the safety zone is adjacent to the northern tip of
Harbor Island in Seattle, WA.
All persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering or
remaining in the safety zone. The safety zone will be effective on
February 28, 2013 from 2:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. unless cancelled sooner
by the Captain of the Port or a Designated Representative. The safety
zone will be enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard. The Captain of the Port
may also be assisted in the enforcement of this safety zone by other
federal, state, or local agencies.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made
this finding based on the fact that the safety zone is limited in
duration, and maritime traffic may be able to transit through the
safety zone with permission of the Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit through the safety zone created by this rule. This
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, although the safety zone will apply to the
entire width of the waterway, the zone will be enforced for a limited
period of time, and vessel traffic will be allowed to pass through the
safety zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port or a
Designated Representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 10066]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-241 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-241 Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Vessel Roll-Out, West
Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA encompassed within the area
created by connecting the following points: 47[deg]35'04'' N,
122[deg]21'30'' W thence westerly to 47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'50''
W thence northerly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'50'' W thence
easterly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W thence southerly to
47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this rule unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
or a Designated Representative. See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and requirements. Vessel operators wishing to
enter the zone during the enforcement period must request permission
for entry by contacting Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on VHF
channel 14, or the Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at
(206) 217-6001.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety zone created in this rule is
enforced from 2:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on February 28, 2013 unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: February 1, 2013.
S. J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2013-03264 Filed 2-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P