Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Pacific Coast Groundfish Rationalization Sociocultural Study, 9886-9887 [2013-03066]
Download as PDF
9886
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2013 / Notices
Producer
Weighted-Average
Margin
(percentage)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Akzo Nobel Functional
Chemicals B.V. .........
9.03
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department normally calculates an
assessment rate for each importer of the
subject merchandise covered by the
review. In this review, we have
calculated, whenever possible, an
importer-specific assessment rate or
value for merchandise subject to this
review as described below.
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
all of Akzo Nobel’s U.S. sales of CMC
were constructed-export-price sales
(e.g., sales through Akzo Nobel’s U.S.
affiliate to the unaffiliated purchaser in
the United States). Accordingly, we
divided the total dumping margins for
the reviewed sales by the total entered
value of those reviewed sales for each
importer. We will direct CBP to assess
the resulting percentage margin against
the entered customs values for the
subject merchandise on each importer’s
respective POR entries. See 19 CFR
351.212(b).
The calculated ad valorem rates will
be assessed uniformly on all entries
made by the respective importers during
the POR. Where the assessment rate is
above de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to assess duties on all entries of subject
merchandise by that importer.
As stated above, the Department
clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’
regulation on May 6, 2003. This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by reviewed companies for
which these companies did not know
their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
6, 2003).
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after publication of these final
results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Feb 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended: (1) The cash deposit rate for
Akzo Nobel will be the rate established
in the final results of this review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not covered in this review,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this or
any previous review or in the less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
or the investigation, the cash-deposit
rate will continue to be the all-others
rate of 14.57 percent, which is the allothers rate established by the
Department in the LTFV investigation.
See Order. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation,
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: January 31, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I
List of Issues Discussed in the
Accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Issue 1: Targeted Dumping Methodology
Issue 2: Monthly Time Period Allegation
Issue 3: Cost Database
[FR Doc. 2013–03212 Filed 2–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Pacific Coast
Groundfish Rationalization
Sociocultural Study
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Suzanne Russell (206) 860–
3274, or Suzanne.Russell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
This request is for a revision and
extension of a currently approved
information collection. The revision
consists of minor changes to the
information collection tool.
Historically, changes in fisheries
management regulations have been
shown to result in impacts to
individuals within the fishery. An
understanding of social impacts in
fisheries—achieved through the
E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM
12FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2013 / Notices
collection of data on fishing
communities, as well as on individuals
who fish—is a requirement under
several federal laws. Laws such as the
National Environmental Protection Act
and the Magnuson Stevens Fishery
Conservation Act (as amended 2007)
describe such requirements. The
collection of this data not only helps to
inform legal requirements for the
existing management actions, but will
inform future management actions
requiring equivalent information.
Literature indicates fisheries
rationalization programs have an impact
on those individuals participating in the
affected fishery. The Pacific Fisheries
Management Council implemented a
new rationalization program for the
Pacific Coast Groundfish limited entry
trawl fishery in January 2011. This
research aims to continue to study the
individuals in the affected fishery after
the implementation of the
rationalization program. Data collected
is correlated to changes in the programs’
design elements. In addition, the study
will compare results to previous data
collection efforts in 2010 and 2012. The
data collected will provide updated and
more comprehensive descriptions of the
industry as well as allow for analysis of
changes the rationalization program
may create in the fishery. The
measurement of these changes will lead
to a greater understanding of the social
impacts the management measure may
have on the individuals in the fishery.
To achieve these goals it is critical to
continue data collection for comparison
to data collected prior to the
implementation of the rationalization
program, in 2010, and after the first year
of implementation in 2012. This study
will continue data collection efforts to
achieve the stated objectives.
II. Method of Collection
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0606.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular (revision and
extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit
organizations; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
600.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour
and 30 minutes.
16:40 Feb 11, 2013
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 6, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–03066 Filed 2–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; National Estuaries
Restoration Inventory
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Contact and collaboration with key
informants, focus groups, paper surveys,
electronic surveys, and in-person
interviews will be utilized in
combination to obtain the greatest
breadth of information as possible.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,000.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0 in recordkeeping/recording
costs.
Jkt 229001
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9887
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Perry Gayaldo, (301) 427–
8665 or Perry.Gayaldo@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This request is for a revision and
extension of a currently approved
information collection.
Collection of estuary habitat
restoration project information (e.g.,
location, habitat type, goals, status,
monitoring information) will be
undertaken in order to populate a
restoration project database mandated
by the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000.
The database is intended to provide
information to improve restoration
methods, provide the basis for required
reports to Congress, and track estuary
habitat acreage restored. Estuary habitat
restoration project information will be
submitted by habitat restoration project
managers and will be accessible to the
public via the Internet for data queries
and project reports.
The collection method will be revised
to only include paper or electronic form
instead of web-based data entry forms,
as maintaining the web-based data entry
option is not cost-effective.
II. Method of Collection
Respondents have a choice of either
electronic or paper forms. Methods of
submittal include email of electronic
forms, and mail and facsimile
transmission of paper forms.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0479.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(revision and extension of a currently
approved collection).
Affected Public: Non-profit
institutions; State, local, or tribal
government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
32.
Estimated Time Per Response: Data
entry of new projects, 4 hours; updates
to existing projects, 2 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 103.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $100 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM
12FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9886-9887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03066]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Pacific Coast
Groundfish Rationalization Sociocultural Study
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Suzanne Russell (206) 860-3274, or
Suzanne.Russell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This request is for a revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection. The revision consists of minor changes
to the information collection tool.
Historically, changes in fisheries management regulations have been
shown to result in impacts to individuals within the fishery. An
understanding of social impacts in fisheries--achieved through the
[[Page 9887]]
collection of data on fishing communities, as well as on individuals
who fish--is a requirement under several federal laws. Laws such as the
National Environmental Protection Act and the Magnuson Stevens Fishery
Conservation Act (as amended 2007) describe such requirements. The
collection of this data not only helps to inform legal requirements for
the existing management actions, but will inform future management
actions requiring equivalent information.
Literature indicates fisheries rationalization programs have an
impact on those individuals participating in the affected fishery. The
Pacific Fisheries Management Council implemented a new rationalization
program for the Pacific Coast Groundfish limited entry trawl fishery in
January 2011. This research aims to continue to study the individuals
in the affected fishery after the implementation of the rationalization
program. Data collected is correlated to changes in the programs'
design elements. In addition, the study will compare results to
previous data collection efforts in 2010 and 2012. The data collected
will provide updated and more comprehensive descriptions of the
industry as well as allow for analysis of changes the rationalization
program may create in the fishery. The measurement of these changes
will lead to a greater understanding of the social impacts the
management measure may have on the individuals in the fishery. To
achieve these goals it is critical to continue data collection for
comparison to data collected prior to the implementation of the
rationalization program, in 2010, and after the first year of
implementation in 2012. This study will continue data collection
efforts to achieve the stated objectives.
II. Method of Collection
Contact and collaboration with key informants, focus groups, paper
surveys, electronic surveys, and in-person interviews will be utilized
in combination to obtain the greatest breadth of information as
possible.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648-0606.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular (revision and extension of a current
information collection).
Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 600.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour and 30 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,000.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0 in recordkeeping/
recording costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 6, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-03066 Filed 2-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P