Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 9695-9697 [2013-03003]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by GSA,
be sure to identify the ICR title on the
first page of your response. You may
also provide the Federal Register
citation.
What information collection activity or
ICR does this apply to?
Title: MyGov.
OMB Control Number: 3090–00XX.
Abstract: MyGov is a citizen-centric
platform for delivering government
services. Rather than organizing services
around the agencies that deliver them as
we do today and forcing citizens to
absorb the complexity of modern
government, MyGov organizes services
around people, specific tasks at all
levels of government. Specifically,
MyGov consists of four distinct
components:
Platform—The MyGov profile, which
serves to enable a consistent experience
from transaction to transaction is a basic
user persona, consists of limited
information such as name, address, and
basic preferences, which then provides
agencies with the ability to create taskbased workflows for users. The MyGov
profile is completely optional.
Additionally, MyGov notifications
enable agencies to sustain
communication with MyGov account
holders over time. Through an
administrative interface, agencies can
send users simple messages and alerts.
For example ‘‘Your online form
submission to change your name has
been approved’’ or, ‘‘Stay tuned to
FEMA.gov for Hurricane updates.’’
Users may be notified via their MyGov
dashboard, discovery bar, email or text
message, depending on their MyGov
preferences.
Applications—MyGov is architected
as a series of applications built on an
open platform, not unlike a Facebook or
iPhone app. Apps are explicitly granted
permission by the user, and have access
to limited information (such as a user’s
email, if authorized). Apps maintain
their own data, and interact with the
platform through a series of Application
Programming Interfaces (APIs). APIs
allow the desperate applications to
securely communicate with one
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
another. Although initially limited to
government, apps can be created by the
public sector or private sector.
Forms—The MyGov forms engine
allows agencies to quickly and easily
move existing information collections
(which are currently transacted as PDFs
or other offline process) to the Web, or
to streamline the creation of new, Webbased services. The forms engine exists
as a service independent of the MyGov
profile and is not dissimilar to Google
forms, Survey Monkey, or Wufoo.
Discovery—The MyGov discovery bar
and widgets are tools that agencies can
embed into existing Web pages to help
citizens discover services and
information relevant to their interests
and needs. Similar to Netflix
recommending movies you may enjoy,
or Amazon informing you that
‘‘customers who bought this product
also bought’’, the discovery tools seek to
allow online resources to be grouped
around citizen-centric tasks and
transactions, rather than the agencies
that maintain them.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average less than one hour
per year. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The estimated annual burden request
is summarized here:
Affected entities: citizens seeking a
more intuitive way to utilize existing
government services.
Estimated number of respondents:
20,000.
Frequency of response: 1.
Total number of responses: 20,000.
Estimated hours per response: .5.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
10,000.
What is the next step in the process for
this ICR?
GSA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9695
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, GSA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB.
If you have any questions about this
ICR or the approval process, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: February 5, 2013.
Casey Colemen,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–02977 Filed 2–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30 Day–13–12QC]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Costs and Cost Savings of Motor
Vehicle Injury Prevention: EvidenceBased Policy and Behavioral
Interventions—NEW—National Center
for Injury Prevention and Control
(NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) is seeking a 1-year
OMB approval to collect information
relating to the costs of implementing
motor vehicle injury prevention
interventions. This information is
needed to complete a research study of
the costs and costs savings to society of
implementing evidence-based
interventions. The main product of the
study is an online tool that can be used
to identify the intervention or sets of
interventions that can be implemented
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
9696
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
in individual states that will provide the
‘‘biggest bang for the buck.’’
The study focuses on thirteen
interventions. These interventions are:
1. Red light camera automated
enforcement,
2. Speed camera automated
enforcement,
3. Alcohol interlocks,
4. Sobriety checkpoints,
5. Saturation patrols,
6. Bicycle helmet laws for children,
7. High visibility child restraint/
booster or seat belt law enforcement,
8. Motorcycle helmet use laws,
9. Primary enforcement of seat belt
laws,
10. Limits on diversion and plea
agreements,
11. Lower blood alcohol content
(BAC) limits for repeat offenders,
12. Vehicle impoundment,
13. and license plate impoundment.
For each intervention, secondary data
on the following will be compiled:
1. Effects on fatalities and injury
prevention: We have specifically
determined fatality and injury
reductions for interventions by state,
total fatalities and estimated injury rates
by state, injury to fatality ratios, and the
current laws for each state.
2. Estimated costs associated with
motor vehicle injuries and deaths and
how costs of similar injuries vary from
state to state: We are currently
developing state-specific estimates of
expected cost savings associated with
the reductions in injuries and deaths
from each intervention.
3. Costs of implementing each
intervention in states: We have
developed a matrix of implementation
cost categories by interventions and are
populating the resultant cells.
Implementation cost categories include
items such as: cost of creating the
legislation, costs for publicity,
personnel (e.g., law enforcement, court)
time, and equipment purchase, or
maintenance cost, jail or prison facility
costs.
This Information Collection Request
(ICR) is being requested to fill these gaps
in information on the costs of
implementing interventions. Without
this information, the principal product
of the research—the online tool—cannot
be completed. The value of the
information collected via the subject
matter interviews and the online Delphi
panel is to fill gaps in knowledge for
interventions that do not have extensive
literature on their costs of
implementation. The gaps in evidence
relate to implementation cost issues
such as the amount of time it takes for
police to deal with an incident,
paperwork, and court; the amount of
court staff time it takes to handle
various cases and whether there are
costs to the court in particular
situations, particularly among DWI
cases. We also seek information to
complete multiple missing cells
pertaining to the costs of implementing
lower BAC-Blood Alcohol Content,
limits on diversion, and saturation
patrols.
Semi-structured interviews will be
conducted to collect the necessary
information from subject matter experts.
An online Delphi panel will be used to
collect additional missing information.
Form name
Public Safety Advocacy Groups .....................
DWI/DUI Defense Attorneys ...........................
Court Case Managers .....................................
State Parole Agencies ....................................
State Depts. of Public Safety ..........................
Local Law Enforcement ..................................
Academic Researchers ...................................
CDC Staff ........................................................
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Staff.
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Semi-Structured Interviews ............................
Discussion Guide-Online Expert Panel ..........
Discussion Guide-Online Expert Panel ..........
Discussion Guide-Online Expert Panel ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The semi-structured interviews will
be conducted over the telephone and
will last approximately 60 minutes
depending on the type of expert. The
burden table identifies the total number
of respondents per group, the average
response burden per semi-structured
interview, and the total response burden
for the semi-structured interviews.
The total estimated one-time burden
for data collection for the following
expert respondents are calculated as
follows; Public Safety Advocacy Groups
= (4 respondents × 1 hour/response);
DWI/DUI Defense Attorneys = (4
respondents × 1hour/response); Court
Case Managers = (4 respondents × 1
hour/response); State Parole Agencies =
(2 respondents × 1hour/response); State
Depts. Of Public Safety = (6 respondents
× 1 hour/response); Local Law
Enforcement = (4 respondents × 1 hour/
response). Twenty-four experts will be
interviewed. The experts will come
from various agencies across the country
in the identified specialized areas.
These twenty-four telephone interviews
will be conducted by RAND researchers:
Dr. Andres Villaveces and Liisa Ecola.
For the online Delphi panel, we will
select 8 experts to participate based
upon our knowledge of the person(s)
with the required expertise. These
person(s) will likely be employed by
academia or a public agency (i.e. CDC or
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA))
There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.
Total annualized burden hours are 32.
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
4
4
4
2
6
4
3
3
2
11FEN1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9697
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
Dated: February 5, 2013.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI),
Office of the Associate Director for Science
(OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–03003 Filed 2–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–13–0923]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Evaluation of the National Tobacco
Prevention and Control Public
Education Campaign (OMB No. 0920–
0923, exp. 2/28/2013)—Revision—
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion
(NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) requests a Revision of
the current OMB approval for
Evaluation of the National Tobacco
Prevention and Control Public
Education Campaign (The Campaign)
(OMB no. 0920–0923, exp. 2/28/2012).
In 2012, CDC conducted web-based
surveys of smokers and non-smokers in
the U.S. for purposes of evaluating
phase 1 of the CDC’s National Tobacco
Prevention and Control Public
Education Campaign (The Campaign).
This information collection consisted of
an initial baseline survey (Wave 1)
before the launch of The Campaign and
a longitudinal follow-up survey (Wave
2) of those participants approximately
three months later after the conclusion
of The Campaign. Data from this
information collection has been used by
CDC to examine the association between
smokers’ and nonsmokers’ exposure to
The Campaign and changes in outcome
variables of interest.
CDC has recently announced plans to
launch a second phase of The Campaign
(Phase 2), using the same campaign
name (‘‘Tips from Former Smokers’’),
similar advertisement styles, similar
message themes and strategies, and in
some cases the same ad cast members.
CDC therefore plans to continue
evaluation of The Campaign with a new,
third wave of data collection. Wave 3
will consist of web-based follow-up
surveys of smokers and nonsmokers that
will facilitate pre-post analysis of the
cumulative Phase 1 and Phase 2
campaigns. This pre-post design is
similar to the currently-approved
information collection that examined
pre-post changes in relevant outcomes
for the Phase 1 campaign only.
The timeframe for the Wave 3 data
collection is related to the anticipated
launch and duration of the Phase 2
campaign. The Phase 2 Campaign is
expected to launch in early winter/
spring 2013 and will air for
approximately four months. Therefore,
our proposed Wave 3 data collection
will occur approximately four months
after the Phase 2 Campaign launch to
ensure accurate measurement of
Campaign awareness after all media
have been delivered.
Information will be collected about
adult smokers’ awareness of and
exposure to campaign advertisements,
knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related
to smoking and secondhand smoke. In
addition, the survey will measure
behaviors related to smoking cessation
(among the smokers in the sample) and
behaviors related to non-smokers’
encouragement of smokers to quit
smoking. Information will also be
collected on demographic variables
including age, sex, race, education,
income, primary language, and marital
status.
Data from this survey will be used to
estimate the extent to which smokers
and non-smokers in the U.S. were
exposed to cumulative Phase 1 and
Phase 2 Campaigns and to examine the
statistical relationships between adults’
exposure to Phase 1 and Phase 2
Campaigns and changes in outcome
variables of interest which will include
knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and
intentions related to smoking and
cessation as well as behavioral
outcomes including quit attempts and
cigarette consumption.
Information will be collected through
on-line questionnaires involving adult
smokers and non-smokers in the U.S.,
ages 18–54. Respondents who are
smokers will be recruited from two
sources: a probability sample drawn
from the Knowledge Networks
KnowledgePanel®, a panel that uses
address-based postal mail sampling to
generate a probability-based online
panel of U.S. adults, and a supplemental
sample from SSI, a leading provider of
online sampling in the U.S.
Respondents who are non-smokers will
be recruited from Knowledge Networks.
To obtain the target number of
complete Wave 3 responses,
approximately 43,737 respondents will
be contacted through an initial
screening and consent process. The
estimated burden per response is two
minutes. The target number of complete
wave 3 questionnaires for smokers is
14,250. The target number of complete
wave for non-smokers is 3,286. For both
respondent groups, the estimated
burden per response is 25 minutes for
each follow-up questionnaire.
OMB approval is requested for one
year. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time. The total
estimated burden hours are 8,765.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Type of respondent
Form name
General Population .................
Adults, ages 18–54 in the U.S.
Screening and Consent Process ...........................................
Smoker Phase 2 Follow-Up Questionnaire ............................
Non-Smoker Phase 2 Follow-Up Questionnaire ....................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
43,737
14,250
3,286
11FEN1
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
1
1
1
2/60
25/60
25/60
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9695-9697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03003]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30 Day-13-12QC]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments
to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC
20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Costs and Cost Savings of Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention:
Evidence-Based Policy and Behavioral Interventions--NEW--National
Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is seeking a
1-year OMB approval to collect information relating to the costs of
implementing motor vehicle injury prevention interventions. This
information is needed to complete a research study of the costs and
costs savings to society of implementing evidence-based interventions.
The main product of the study is an online tool that can be used to
identify the intervention or sets of interventions that can be
implemented
[[Page 9696]]
in individual states that will provide the ``biggest bang for the
buck.''
The study focuses on thirteen interventions. These interventions
are:
1. Red light camera automated enforcement,
2. Speed camera automated enforcement,
3. Alcohol interlocks,
4. Sobriety checkpoints,
5. Saturation patrols,
6. Bicycle helmet laws for children,
7. High visibility child restraint/booster or seat belt law
enforcement,
8. Motorcycle helmet use laws,
9. Primary enforcement of seat belt laws,
10. Limits on diversion and plea agreements,
11. Lower blood alcohol content (BAC) limits for repeat offenders,
12. Vehicle impoundment,
13. and license plate impoundment.
For each intervention, secondary data on the following will be
compiled:
1. Effects on fatalities and injury prevention: We have
specifically determined fatality and injury reductions for
interventions by state, total fatalities and estimated injury rates by
state, injury to fatality ratios, and the current laws for each state.
2. Estimated costs associated with motor vehicle injuries and
deaths and how costs of similar injuries vary from state to state: We
are currently developing state-specific estimates of expected cost
savings associated with the reductions in injuries and deaths from each
intervention.
3. Costs of implementing each intervention in states: We have
developed a matrix of implementation cost categories by interventions
and are populating the resultant cells. Implementation cost categories
include items such as: cost of creating the legislation, costs for
publicity, personnel (e.g., law enforcement, court) time, and equipment
purchase, or maintenance cost, jail or prison facility costs.
This Information Collection Request (ICR) is being requested to
fill these gaps in information on the costs of implementing
interventions. Without this information, the principal product of the
research--the online tool--cannot be completed. The value of the
information collected via the subject matter interviews and the online
Delphi panel is to fill gaps in knowledge for interventions that do not
have extensive literature on their costs of implementation. The gaps in
evidence relate to implementation cost issues such as the amount of
time it takes for police to deal with an incident, paperwork, and
court; the amount of court staff time it takes to handle various cases
and whether there are costs to the court in particular situations,
particularly among DWI cases. We also seek information to complete
multiple missing cells pertaining to the costs of implementing lower
BAC-Blood Alcohol Content, limits on diversion, and saturation patrols.
Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to collect the
necessary information from subject matter experts. An online Delphi
panel will be used to collect additional missing information.
The semi-structured interviews will be conducted over the telephone
and will last approximately 60 minutes depending on the type of expert.
The burden table identifies the total number of respondents per group,
the average response burden per semi-structured interview, and the
total response burden for the semi-structured interviews.
The total estimated one-time burden for data collection for the
following expert respondents are calculated as follows; Public Safety
Advocacy Groups = (4 respondents x 1 hour/response); DWI/DUI Defense
Attorneys = (4 respondents x 1hour/response); Court Case Managers = (4
respondents x 1 hour/response); State Parole Agencies = (2 respondents
x 1hour/response); State Depts. Of Public Safety = (6 respondents x 1
hour/response); Local Law Enforcement = (4 respondents x 1 hour/
response). Twenty-four experts will be interviewed. The experts will
come from various agencies across the country in the identified
specialized areas. These twenty-four telephone interviews will be
conducted by RAND researchers: Dr. Andres Villaveces and Liisa Ecola.
For the online Delphi panel, we will select 8 experts to participate
based upon our knowledge of the person(s) with the required expertise.
These person(s) will likely be employed by academia or a public agency
(i.e. CDC or National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA))
There are no costs to respondents other than their time.
Total annualized burden hours are 32.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per
Type of respondent Form name respondents responses per response
respondent (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Safety Advocacy Groups......... Semi-Structured 4 1 1
Interviews.
DWI/DUI Defense Attorneys............. Semi-Structured 4 1 1
Interviews.
Court Case Managers................... Semi-Structured 4 1 1
Interviews.
State Parole Agencies................. Semi-Structured 2 1 1
Interviews.
State Depts. of Public Safety......... Semi-Structured 6 1 1
Interviews.
Local Law Enforcement................. Semi-Structured 4 1 1
Interviews.
Academic Researchers.................. Discussion Guide-Online 3 1 1
Expert Panel.
CDC Staff............................. Discussion Guide-Online 3 1 1
Expert Panel.
National Highway Traffic Safety Discussion Guide-Online 2 1 1
Administration (NHTSA) Staff. Expert Panel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9697]]
Dated: February 5, 2013.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate
Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013-03003 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
