Individuals With Certain Criminal Convictions as Representative Payees, 9766-9768 [2013-02919]
Download as PDF
9766
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
associate your comments with the
correct document.
Caution: You should be careful to
include in your comments only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. We strongly urge you
not to include in your comments any
Request for Comments
personal information, such as Social
We are requesting comments
Security numbers or medical
concerning the proposed policy change
information.
for assigning new SSNs to children age
1. Internet: We strongly recommend
13 and under. We ask that, in preparing that you submit your comments via the
comments, you address questions such
Internet. Please visit the Federal
as:
eRulemaking portal at https://
1. Is age 13 the appropriate cut off for
www.regulations.gov. Use the Search
application of the revised policy?
function to find docket number SSA–
2. Are the circumstances that we
2012–0076. The system will issue you a
propose for assigning a new SSN to
tracking number to confirm your
children age 13 and under appropriate?
submission. You will not be able to
3. Are there other circumstances that
view your comment immediately
would warrant assigning a new SSN to
because we must post each comment
children age 13 and under?
manually. It may take up to a week for
Please see the information under
your comment to be viewable.
ADDRESSES earlier in this document for
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966–
methods to give us your comments. We
2830.
will not respond to your comments, but
3. Mail: Address your comments to
we will consider them as we review our the Office of Regulations and Reports
policies and instructions to determine if Clearance, Social Security
we should revise or update them.
Administration, 107 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Dated: February 5, 2013.
Maryland 21235–6401.
Michael J. Astrue,
Comments are available for public
Commissioner of Social Security.
viewing on the Federal eRulemaking
[FR Doc. 2013–03043 Filed 2–8–13; 8:45 am]
portal at https://www.regulations.gov or
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
in person, during regular business
hours, by arranging with the contact
person identified below.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina
[Docket No. SSA–2012–0076]
Clemons, Office of Retirement and
Disability Policy, Social Security
Individuals With Certain Criminal
Convictions as Representative Payees Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401,
AGENCY: Social Security Administration. (410) 966–9897. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
ACTION: Notice; Request for comments.
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
SUMMARY: We are requesting information 1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
from the public regarding whether we
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
should prohibit persons who have been
at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
convicted of certain crimes from serving
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
as representative payees under titles II,
Background
VIII, and XVI of the Social Security Act
(Act). We are seeking this information in
A person who receives benefits from
order to determine the best way to
us may be unable to manage those
protect our beneficiaries from persons
benefits for reasons such as his or her
whose criminal history indicates they
young age or mental or physical
may pose an increased risk of abuse or
impairment. In these cases, we select a
exploitation of vulnerable individuals.
representative payee if we believe that
DATES: To ensure that your comments
representative payment, rather than
are considered, we must receive them
direct payment of benefits, will serve
no later than April 12, 2013.
the beneficiary’s interest. Generally, we
appoint a representative payee if we
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
determine that the beneficiary is not
by any one of three methods—Internet,
able to manage or direct the
fax, or mail. Do not submit the same
management of benefit payments in his
comments multiple times or by more
or her interest. The representative payee
than one method. Regardless of which
may be an organization or a person,
method you choose, please state that
such as a parent, relative, or friend of
your comments refer to Docket No.
the beneficiary. We require the
SSA–2012–0076 so that we may
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
child’s SSN to a police officer when
stopped for a traffic violation.
We would no longer require proof that
the number holder was disadvantaged
due to the misuse in any of the three
situations outlined above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
representative payee to use the money
in the beneficiary’s best interest and to
report the expenditures to us to ensure
that the representative payee is using
the funds appropriately. Our policies on
appointing representative payees and
their use of benefits are designed to
protect the beneficiaries’ interests.
When a person or an organization
requests to serve as a representative
payee, we investigate the potential
representative payee to help ensure that
the person or organization will perform
the duties of a representative payee
responsibly and in the beneficiary’s best
interests. When we investigate, we look
at factors such as the potential
representative payee’s relationship to
the beneficiary, any past performance as
a representative payee for other
beneficiaries, and any criminal history
the potential representative payee may
have.
The Act prohibits certain groups of
persons from serving as representative
payees due to their criminal history. For
example, the Act prohibits from serving
as representative payees persons
convicted of Social Security fraud 1 and
persons who are fleeing to avoid
prosecution, or custody or confinement
after conviction, of a felony, or an
attempt to commit a felony.2 In other
cases, the Act gives us discretion to
determine whether it would be
appropriate to appoint someone as a
representative payee despite his or her
criminal history. The Act provides that
we may not certify payment of benefits
to a person as a representative payee if
that person has been convicted of an
offense under Federal or State law that
results in imprisonment for more than 1
year, ‘‘unless the Commissioner
determines that such certification would
be appropriate notwithstanding such
conviction.’’ 3
Over 5.5 million of our beneficiaries
have a representative payee.4 Most
representative payees serve beneficiaries
appropriately. Given the sheer size of
our representative payment program,
however, we occasionally find that a
1 Sections 205(j)(2)(B)(i)(III), 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(I),
807(d)(1)(A), 1631(a)(2)(B)(ii)(III), and
1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(I) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(j)(2)(B)(i)(III), 405(j)(2)(C)(i)(I), 1007(d)(1)(A),
1383(a)(2)(B)(ii)(III), and 1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(I).
2 Sections 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(V), 807(d)(1)(E), and
1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(V) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(j)(2)(C)(i)(V), 1007(d)(1)(E), and
1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(V).
3 Sections 205 (j)(2)(B)(i)(IV), 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(IV),
807(d)(1)(D), 1631(a)(2)(B)(ii)(IV), and
1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(IV) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(j)(2)(B)(i)(IV), 405(j)(2)(C)(i)(IV), 1007(d)(1)(D),
1383(a)(2)(B)(ii)(IV), and 1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(IV).
4 Social Security Administration, Annual
Statistical Supplement, 2012, Table 5.L.1 (available
at: https://www.socialsecurity.gov/policy/docs/
statcomps/supplement/2012/5l.html.
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
representative payee has used his or her
position of trust to take advantage of
beneficiaries. Over the last several years,
we have become aware of several
situations in which representative
payees took advantage of beneficiaries.
For example, one organizational
representative payee mistreated several
intellectually disabled men for whom it
served both as representative payee and
employer. Inspectors from the State of
Iowa, acting on a complaint, found that
the organization kept the men in substandard housing and committed a
number of violations of the Iowa Code
with respect to the men’s pay. The state
brought charges against the
organization, including failure to
provide minimum wage, failure to
provide pay stubs, and making illegal
deductions. The United States Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
also brought an action against the
organization under the American with
Disabilities Act, alleging that the
organization denied the workers lawful
wages, subjected them to abusive verbal
and physical harassment, restricted
their freedom of movement, required
them to live in deplorable and substandard living conditions, and failed to
provide adequate medical care.
In another case, law enforcement
officials in Philadelphia have charged a
representative payee with holding
captive and abusing several vulnerable
beneficiaries over a period of years as
part of a scheme to steal their Social
Security benefits and Supplemental
Security Income payments. As we
learned of the criminal proceedings in
this case, we also learned that this
person had been convicted of murder
more than 20 years ago.
We take the well-being of our
beneficiaries very seriously. As
Congress intended, when we evaluate a
potential representative payee, we
carefully consider the applicant’s
criminal history, even when it does not
fall within the categories that result in
a prohibition under the Act from serving
as a representative payee. If a potential
representative payee has a criminal
history that does not result in a
prohibition under the Act, we do not
appoint that person unless we find a
compelling reason to do so after we
weigh the person’s criminal history, his
or her relationship to the beneficiary,
custody of the beneficiary, and other
factors. We have a number of
procedures designed to prevent the
appointment of representative payees
who might take advantage of
beneficiaries, as well as to discover
situations in which representative
payees act inappropriately. We also take
quick action when we become aware of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
situations where representative payees
are not acting appropriately.
Congress amended the Act to provide
that we may prohibit a person from
serving as a representative payee if that
person has been convicted of an offense
under Federal or State law that results
in imprisonment for more than 1 year
because it believed the provision would
decrease the likelihood of
mismanagement or abuse of
beneficiaries’ funds and help ensure
that we act as an appropriate steward of
taxpayer funds.5 As part of our
commitment to further Congress’ intent
and protect beneficiaries, we began a
pilot in our Philadelphia region in June
2012. In this pilot, we bar potential
representative payees who have been
convicted of certain crimes involving
violence or theft from serving as a
representative payee. We also remove
that person as a representative payee if
he or she is already serving another
beneficiary. We ask about an applicant’s
criminal history during the
representative payee interview process,
and we review information we have
regarding criminal convictions. Under
this pilot, we do not choose an
applicant to be a payee if he or she has
been convicted under Federal or State
law for: (1) Human trafficking; (2) false
imprisonment; (3) kidnapping, rape or
other sexual offense requiring
registration as a sex offender; (4) first
degree murder; (5) robbery; (6) fraud to
obtain government assistance; (7) fraud
by scheme; (8) theft of government
funds or property; 9) abuse; (10) neglect;
(11) forgery; or (12) identity theft. We
also bar a representative payee applicant
who has been convicted of an attempt
to commit any of these crimes or
conspiracy in connection with any of
these crimes.
We designed the pilot as a means to
utilize our scarce administrative
resources efficiently. Under the
procedures in our pilot, we ask an
applicant to be a representative payee
about his or her criminal history during
the representative payee interview
process. To date, we only use
information from our systems or selfreporting to obtain information about
the applicant’s criminal history, but we
intend to use public information to
conduct a criminal background check of
the applicant. If we find that the person
has been convicted of one of the
specified crimes, we would not select
the person to be a representative payee,
and we would remove that person as
representative payee if he or she already
5 S. Rep. No. 108–176, at 10 (2003); H.R. Rep. No.
108–46, at 30 (2003).
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9767
serves as a representative payee for
another beneficiary.
In our pilot, we do not apply this bar
if the applicant is the custodial parent,
custodial spouse, or custodial courtappointed legal guardian of the
beneficiary for whom the applicant is
applying to serve as representative
payee. In our experience, custodial
parents and spouses generally serve
appropriately as representative payees
for their children and spouses. Under
the pilot, if a potential representative
payee who is the custodial parent or
custodial spouse of the beneficiary has
one of the specified criminal
convictions, we weigh various factors,
including the potential representative
payee’s criminal history and his or her
relationship to and custody of the
beneficiary, before we decide whether to
appoint the person as representative
payee.
Given the serious nature of the crimes
we specify, we believe it would be
appropriate to apply the prohibition
regardless of how far in the past the
crime or the conviction for the crime
took place. We would not, of course,
apply this bar if the representative
payee applicant provides satisfactory
evidence that his or her conviction has
been overturned on appeal, or that he or
she has been granted a full or absolute
pardon by the President of the United
States or appropriate state authority.
Request for Comments
We ask for your comments about
whether we should prohibit persons
who have been convicted of certain
crimes from serving as a representative
payee. We ask that, in preparing
comments, you address questions such
as:
(1) Should we apply the prohibition
to a representative payee applicant who
is the custodial parent or custodial
spouse of the beneficiary?
(2) Are the crimes that we have
identified appropriate ones to which to
apply the prohibition? Are there other
crimes to which we should apply the
prohibition?
(3) If you believe that the crimes that
we have identified should not result in
a prohibition from serving as a
representative payee, how would you
further Congress’ intent that we
decrease the likelihood of
mismanagement or abuse of
beneficiaries’ funds and ensure that we
act as an appropriate steward of
taxpayer funds?
(4) Should we apply the prohibition
regardless of how far in the past the
crime or the conviction for the crime
took place?
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
9768
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2013 / Notices
(5) Are there any additional groups to
whom the prohibition should or should
not apply?
(6) If you have you ever served as a
representative payee, would a ‘‘bar’’
policy have discouraged you from
applying to be a payee? If you have
never served as a representative payee,
do you believe that a ‘‘bar’’ policy will
discourage individuals from applying to
be a payee? If so, please explain how
you believe you would have been
discouraged, or other individuals will
be discouraged, from applying to be a
representative payee.
Please see the information under
ADDRESSES earlier in this document for
methods to give us your comments. We
will not respond to your comments, but
we will consider them as we review our
policies and instructions to determine if
we should revise or update them.
Dated: February 1, 2013.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 2013–02919 Filed 2–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 8183]
Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation Imposition of Missile
Sanctions on Two Chinese Foreign
Persons
Bureau of International
Security and Nonproliferation,
Department of State.
ACTION: Notice.
App. 2410b(b)(1)), as carried out under
Executive Order 13222 of August 17,
2001 (hereinafter cited as the ‘‘Export
Administration Act of 1979’’); and
Executive Order 12851 of June 11, 1993;
the U.S. Government determined on
December 21, 2012 that the following
foreign persons have engaged in missile
technology proliferation activities that
require the imposition of missile
sanctions described in Section 73 of the
AECA (22 U.S.C. 2797b) and Section
11B of the EAA (50 U.S.C. Appx
24710b):
Dalian Sunny Industries, (China), and
its sub-units and successors; Li Fangwei
(China) [also known as: Karl Lee].
Accordingly, the following sanctions
are being imposed on these foreign
persons for two years:
(A) Denial of all new individual
export licenses for the transfer of MTCR
Annex items to the sanctioned entities;
(B) Denial of all U.S. Government
contracts relating to MTCR Annex items
with the sanctioned entities.
These measures shall be implemented
by the responsible departments and
agencies of the United States
Government as provided in Executive
Order 12851 of June 11, 1993.
Dated: February 5, 2013.
Simon Limage,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for
International Security and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2013–03035 Filed 2–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 8184]
A determination has been
made that two foreign persons in China
have engaged in activities that require
the imposition of missile sanctions
pursuant to the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended, and the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(as carried out under Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001).
DATES: Effective Date: February 11,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Pam
Durham, Office of Missile, Biological,
and Chemical Nonproliferation, Bureau
of International Security and
Nonproliferation, Department of State
(202–647–4930). On U.S. Government
procurement ban issues, Eric Moore,
Office of the Procurement Executive,
Department of State (703–875–4079).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 73(a)(1) of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2797b(a)(1));
Section 11B(b)(1) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:26 Feb 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation Imposition of
Nonproliferation Measures Against
Foreign Persons, Including a Ban on
U.S. Government Procurement
Bureau of International
Security and Nonproliferation,
Department of State.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
A determination has been
made that a number of foreign persons
have engaged in activities that warrant
the imposition of measures pursuant to
Section 3 of the Iran, North Korea, and
Syria Nonproliferation Act. The Act
provides for penalties on entities and
individuals for the transfer to or
acquisition from Iran since January 1,
1999; the transfer to or acquisition from
Syria since January 1, 2005; or the
transfer to or acquisition from North
Korea since January 1, 2006, of goods,
services, or technology controlled under
multilateral control lists (Missile
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Technology Control Regime, Australia
Group, Chemical Weapons Convention,
Nuclear Suppliers Group, Wassenaar
Arrangement) or otherwise having the
potential to make a material
contribution to the development of
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or
cruise or ballistic missile sytems. The
latter category includes (a) items of the
same kind as those on multilateral lists
but falling below the control list
parameters when it is determined that
such items have the potential of making
a material contribution to WMD or
cruise or ballistic missile systems, (b)
items on U.S. national control lists for
WMD/missile reasons that are not on
multilateral lists, and (c) other items
with the potential of making such a
material contribution when added
through case-by-case decisions.
DATES: Effective Date: February 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On
general issues: Pam Durham, Office of
Missile, Biological, and Chemical
Nonproliferation, Bureau of
International Security and
Nonproliferation, Department of State,
Telephone (202) 647–4930. For U.S.
Government procurement ban issues:
Eric Moore, Office of the Procurement
Executive, Department of State,
Telephone: (703) 875–4079.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 20, 2012, the U.S.
Government determined that the
measures authorized in Section 3 of the
Iran, North Korea, and Syria
Nonproliferation Act (Pub. L. 109–353)
shall apply to the following foreign
persons identified in the report
submitted pursuant to Section 2(a) of
the Act:
TM Services Limited (TMS) (Belarus) and
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Scientific and Industrial Republic Unitary
Enterprise (Belarus) [also known as DB
Radar] and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
BST Technology and Trade Company
(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
China Precision Machinery Import and
Export Corporation (CPMIEC) (China) and
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Dalian Sunny Industries (China) [also
known as: LIMMT] and any successor, subunit, or subsidiary thereof;
Karl Lee (China) [also known as: Li
Fangwei];
Poly Technologies Incorporated (China)
and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Iran Electronics Industries (IEI) (Iran) and
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Marine Industries Organization (MIO)
(Iran) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9766-9768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02919]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA-2012-0076]
Individuals With Certain Criminal Convictions as Representative
Payees
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice; Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are requesting information from the public regarding
whether we should prohibit persons who have been convicted of certain
crimes from serving as representative payees under titles II, VIII, and
XVI of the Social Security Act (Act). We are seeking this information
in order to determine the best way to protect our beneficiaries from
persons whose criminal history indicates they may pose an increased
risk of abuse or exploitation of vulnerable individuals.
DATES: To ensure that your comments are considered, we must receive
them no later than April 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of three methods--
Internet, fax, or mail. Do not submit the same comments multiple times
or by more than one method. Regardless of which method you choose,
please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2012-0076 so
that we may associate your comments with the correct document.
Caution: You should be careful to include in your comments only
information that you wish to make publicly available. We strongly urge
you not to include in your comments any personal information, such as
Social Security numbers or medical information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend that you submit your comments
via the Internet. Please visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Use the Search function to find docket number
SSA-2012-0076. The system will issue you a tracking number to confirm
your submission. You will not be able to view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment manually. It may take up to a week
for your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966-2830.
3. Mail: Address your comments to the Office of Regulations and
Reports Clearance, Social Security Administration, 107 Altmeyer
Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401.
Comments are available for public viewing on the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov or in person, during
regular business hours, by arranging with the contact person identified
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Clemons, Office of Retirement and
Disability Policy, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (410) 966-9897. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number,
1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
A person who receives benefits from us may be unable to manage
those benefits for reasons such as his or her young age or mental or
physical impairment. In these cases, we select a representative payee
if we believe that representative payment, rather than direct payment
of benefits, will serve the beneficiary's interest. Generally, we
appoint a representative payee if we determine that the beneficiary is
not able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments in his
or her interest. The representative payee may be an organization or a
person, such as a parent, relative, or friend of the beneficiary. We
require the representative payee to use the money in the beneficiary's
best interest and to report the expenditures to us to ensure that the
representative payee is using the funds appropriately. Our policies on
appointing representative payees and their use of benefits are designed
to protect the beneficiaries' interests.
When a person or an organization requests to serve as a
representative payee, we investigate the potential representative payee
to help ensure that the person or organization will perform the duties
of a representative payee responsibly and in the beneficiary's best
interests. When we investigate, we look at factors such as the
potential representative payee's relationship to the beneficiary, any
past performance as a representative payee for other beneficiaries, and
any criminal history the potential representative payee may have.
The Act prohibits certain groups of persons from serving as
representative payees due to their criminal history. For example, the
Act prohibits from serving as representative payees persons convicted
of Social Security fraud \1\ and persons who are fleeing to avoid
prosecution, or custody or confinement after conviction, of a felony,
or an attempt to commit a felony.\2\ In other cases, the Act gives us
discretion to determine whether it would be appropriate to appoint
someone as a representative payee despite his or her criminal history.
The Act provides that we may not certify payment of benefits to a
person as a representative payee if that person has been convicted of
an offense under Federal or State law that results in imprisonment for
more than 1 year, ``unless the Commissioner determines that such
certification would be appropriate notwithstanding such conviction.''
\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Sections 205(j)(2)(B)(i)(III), 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(I),
807(d)(1)(A), 1631(a)(2)(B)(ii)(III), and 1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(I) of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(j)(2)(B)(i)(III), 405(j)(2)(C)(i)(I),
1007(d)(1)(A), 1383(a)(2)(B)(ii)(III), and 1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(I).
\2\ Sections 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(V), 807(d)(1)(E), and
1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(V) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(j)(2)(C)(i)(V),
1007(d)(1)(E), and 1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(V).
\3\ Sections 205 (j)(2)(B)(i)(IV), 205(j)(2)(C)(i)(IV),
807(d)(1)(D), 1631(a)(2)(B)(ii)(IV), and 1631(a)(2)(B)(iii)(IV) of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(j)(2)(B)(i)(IV), 405(j)(2)(C)(i)(IV),
1007(d)(1)(D), 1383(a)(2)(B)(ii)(IV), and 1383(a)(2)(B)(iii)(IV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over 5.5 million of our beneficiaries have a representative
payee.\4\ Most representative payees serve beneficiaries appropriately.
Given the sheer size of our representative payment program, however, we
occasionally find that a
[[Page 9767]]
representative payee has used his or her position of trust to take
advantage of beneficiaries. Over the last several years, we have become
aware of several situations in which representative payees took
advantage of beneficiaries. For example, one organizational
representative payee mistreated several intellectually disabled men for
whom it served both as representative payee and employer. Inspectors
from the State of Iowa, acting on a complaint, found that the
organization kept the men in sub-standard housing and committed a
number of violations of the Iowa Code with respect to the men's pay.
The state brought charges against the organization, including failure
to provide minimum wage, failure to provide pay stubs, and making
illegal deductions. The United States Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission also brought an action against the organization under the
American with Disabilities Act, alleging that the organization denied
the workers lawful wages, subjected them to abusive verbal and physical
harassment, restricted their freedom of movement, required them to live
in deplorable and sub-standard living conditions, and failed to provide
adequate medical care.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Social Security Administration, Annual Statistical
Supplement, 2012, Table 5.L.1 (available at: https://www.socialsecurity.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/supplement/2012/5l.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In another case, law enforcement officials in Philadelphia have
charged a representative payee with holding captive and abusing several
vulnerable beneficiaries over a period of years as part of a scheme to
steal their Social Security benefits and Supplemental Security Income
payments. As we learned of the criminal proceedings in this case, we
also learned that this person had been convicted of murder more than 20
years ago.
We take the well-being of our beneficiaries very seriously. As
Congress intended, when we evaluate a potential representative payee,
we carefully consider the applicant's criminal history, even when it
does not fall within the categories that result in a prohibition under
the Act from serving as a representative payee. If a potential
representative payee has a criminal history that does not result in a
prohibition under the Act, we do not appoint that person unless we find
a compelling reason to do so after we weigh the person's criminal
history, his or her relationship to the beneficiary, custody of the
beneficiary, and other factors. We have a number of procedures designed
to prevent the appointment of representative payees who might take
advantage of beneficiaries, as well as to discover situations in which
representative payees act inappropriately. We also take quick action
when we become aware of situations where representative payees are not
acting appropriately.
Congress amended the Act to provide that we may prohibit a person
from serving as a representative payee if that person has been
convicted of an offense under Federal or State law that results in
imprisonment for more than 1 year because it believed the provision
would decrease the likelihood of mismanagement or abuse of
beneficiaries' funds and help ensure that we act as an appropriate
steward of taxpayer funds.\5\ As part of our commitment to further
Congress' intent and protect beneficiaries, we began a pilot in our
Philadelphia region in June 2012. In this pilot, we bar potential
representative payees who have been convicted of certain crimes
involving violence or theft from serving as a representative payee. We
also remove that person as a representative payee if he or she is
already serving another beneficiary. We ask about an applicant's
criminal history during the representative payee interview process, and
we review information we have regarding criminal convictions. Under
this pilot, we do not choose an applicant to be a payee if he or she
has been convicted under Federal or State law for: (1) Human
trafficking; (2) false imprisonment; (3) kidnapping, rape or other
sexual offense requiring registration as a sex offender; (4) first
degree murder; (5) robbery; (6) fraud to obtain government assistance;
(7) fraud by scheme; (8) theft of government funds or property; 9)
abuse; (10) neglect; (11) forgery; or (12) identity theft. We also bar
a representative payee applicant who has been convicted of an attempt
to commit any of these crimes or conspiracy in connection with any of
these crimes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ S. Rep. No. 108-176, at 10 (2003); H.R. Rep. No. 108-46, at
30 (2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We designed the pilot as a means to utilize our scarce
administrative resources efficiently. Under the procedures in our
pilot, we ask an applicant to be a representative payee about his or
her criminal history during the representative payee interview process.
To date, we only use information from our systems or self-reporting to
obtain information about the applicant's criminal history, but we
intend to use public information to conduct a criminal background check
of the applicant. If we find that the person has been convicted of one
of the specified crimes, we would not select the person to be a
representative payee, and we would remove that person as representative
payee if he or she already serves as a representative payee for another
beneficiary.
In our pilot, we do not apply this bar if the applicant is the
custodial parent, custodial spouse, or custodial court-appointed legal
guardian of the beneficiary for whom the applicant is applying to serve
as representative payee. In our experience, custodial parents and
spouses generally serve appropriately as representative payees for
their children and spouses. Under the pilot, if a potential
representative payee who is the custodial parent or custodial spouse of
the beneficiary has one of the specified criminal convictions, we weigh
various factors, including the potential representative payee's
criminal history and his or her relationship to and custody of the
beneficiary, before we decide whether to appoint the person as
representative payee.
Given the serious nature of the crimes we specify, we believe it
would be appropriate to apply the prohibition regardless of how far in
the past the crime or the conviction for the crime took place. We would
not, of course, apply this bar if the representative payee applicant
provides satisfactory evidence that his or her conviction has been
overturned on appeal, or that he or she has been granted a full or
absolute pardon by the President of the United States or appropriate
state authority.
Request for Comments
We ask for your comments about whether we should prohibit persons
who have been convicted of certain crimes from serving as a
representative payee. We ask that, in preparing comments, you address
questions such as:
(1) Should we apply the prohibition to a representative payee
applicant who is the custodial parent or custodial spouse of the
beneficiary?
(2) Are the crimes that we have identified appropriate ones to
which to apply the prohibition? Are there other crimes to which we
should apply the prohibition?
(3) If you believe that the crimes that we have identified should
not result in a prohibition from serving as a representative payee, how
would you further Congress' intent that we decrease the likelihood of
mismanagement or abuse of beneficiaries' funds and ensure that we act
as an appropriate steward of taxpayer funds?
(4) Should we apply the prohibition regardless of how far in the
past the crime or the conviction for the crime took place?
[[Page 9768]]
(5) Are there any additional groups to whom the prohibition should
or should not apply?
(6) If you have you ever served as a representative payee, would a
``bar'' policy have discouraged you from applying to be a payee? If you
have never served as a representative payee, do you believe that a
``bar'' policy will discourage individuals from applying to be a payee?
If so, please explain how you believe you would have been discouraged,
or other individuals will be discouraged, from applying to be a
representative payee.
Please see the information under ADDRESSES earlier in this document
for methods to give us your comments. We will not respond to your
comments, but we will consider them as we review our policies and
instructions to determine if we should revise or update them.
Dated: February 1, 2013.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-02919 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P