Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC (Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility); Order Approving Indirect Transfer of Control of Construction Authorization, 9431-9432 [2013-02873]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices
Individuals who need other
accommodations due to disability in
order to attend the meeting in person or
telephonically should contact Atitaya
Rok, at (202) 295–1500 or
FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov, at
least 2 business days in advance of the
meeting. If a request is made without
advance notice, LSC will make every
effort to accommodate the request but
cannot guarantee that all requests can be
fulfilled.
Dated: February 6, 2013.
Kara Ward,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–03067 Filed 2–6–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION
BOARD
Notice of Opportunity To File Amicus
Briefs
AGENCY:
Merit Systems Protection
Board.
ACTION:
Notice.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17:23 Feb 07, 2013
All briefs submitted in response
to this notice must be received by the
Clerk of the Board on or before March
1, 2013.
DATES:
The Merit Systems Protection
Board (MSPB or Board) announces the
opportunity to file amicus briefs in the
matter of Thomas F. Day v. Department
of Homeland Security, MSPB Docket
Number SF–1221–12–0528–W–1,
currently pending before the Board on
interlocutory appeal. The administrative
judge certified for interlocutory review
the question of whether the provisions
of the Whistleblower Protection
Enhancement Act of 2012 (WPEA), 112
Public Law 199, may be applied
retroactively to pending cases involving
conduct occurring prior to its effective
date.
Of particular relevance in Day is the
question of the retroactive effect of
section 101(b)(2)(B) of the WPEA, which
provides in relevant part that a
disclosure made to an alleged
wrongdoer or during an employee’s
normal course of duties is not excluded
from protection against reprisal under 5
U.S.C. 2302(b)(8). In Huffman v. Office
of Personnel Management, 263 F.3d
1341, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2001), the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
held that a disclosure made as part of an
employee’s normal duties, and through
normal channels, was not protected
under the Whistleblower Protection Act
(WPA). The court in Huffman further
held that a complaint made to a
supervisor regarding the supervisor’s
own alleged wrongdoing was not
protected under the WPA. Id. at 1350.
The Board has applied the holdings in
Huffman as binding precedent. See, e.g.,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Stiles v. Department of Homeland
Security, 116 M.S.P.R. 263, ¶ 15 (2011).
Therefore, the Board must determine in
Day whether to apply the WPEA
standard or the Huffman standard in
determining whether disclosures that
occurred prior to the effective date of
the WPEA are entitled to protection.
Information about the Day case and the
WPEA may be found on the Board’s
Web site at www.mspb.gov/
SignificantCases.
Interested individuals or
organizations may submit amicus briefs
or other comments on the question
presented in Day no later than March 1,
2013. Amicus briefs must be filed with
the Clerk of the Board. Briefs shall not
exceed 30 pages in length. The text shall
be double-spaced, except for quotations
and footnotes, and the briefs shall be on
81⁄2 by 11 inch paper with one inch
margins on all four sides. All amicus
briefs received will be posted on the
Board’s Web site at www.mspb.gov/
SignificantCases after March 1, 2013.
Jkt 229001
All briefs shall be captioned
‘‘Thomas F. Day v. Department of
Homeland Security’’ and entitled
‘‘Amicus Brief.’’ Only one copy of the
brief need be submitted. The Board
encourages interested parties to submit
amicus briefs as attachments to
electronic mail addressed to
mspb@mspb.gov. An email should
contain a subject line indicating that the
submission contains an amicus brief in
the Day case. Any commonly-used word
processing format or PDF format is
acceptable; text formats are preferable to
image formats. Briefs may also be filed
with William D. Spencer, Clerk of the
Board, Merit Systems Protection Board,
1615 M Street NW., Washington, DC
20419; Fax (202) 653–7130.
ADDRESSES:
9431
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Information Security Oversight Office
National Industrial Security Program
Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC)
National Archives and Records
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app 2) and implementing
regulation 41 CFR 101–6,
announcement is made for the following
committee meeting to discuss National
Industrial Security Program policy
matters.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
March 20, 2013 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m.
ADDRESSES: National Archives and
Records Administration, 700
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Archivist’s
Reception Room, Room 105,
Washington, DC 20408.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting will be open to the public.
However, due to space limitations and
access procedures, the name and
telephone number of individuals
planning to attend must be submitted to
the Information Security Oversight
Office (AISOO) no later than Friday,
March 15, 2013. ISOO will provide
additional instructions for gaining
access to the location of the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David O. Best, Senior Program Analyst,
ISOO, National Archives Building, 700
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357–
5123, or at david.best@nara.gov. Contact
ISOO at ISOO@nara.gov and the
NISPPAC at NISPPAC@nara.gov.
SUMMARY:
Dated: February 4, 2013.
Patrice Little Murray,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–02884 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Molly Leckey, Office of the Clerk of the
Board, Merit Systems Protection Board,
1615 M Street NW., Washington, DC
20419; (202) 653–7200;
mspb@mspb.gov.
William D. Spencer,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–02879 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400–01–P
PO 00000
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0081; Docket No. 70–3098;
Construction Authorization No. CAMOX–
001]
Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC
(Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility);
Order Approving Indirect Transfer of
Control of Construction Authorization
I
Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC
(MOX Services) holds Construction
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
9432
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices
Authorization (CA) CAMOX–001 for
construction of a Mixed Oxide (MOX)
Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF) at the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Savannah River Site in Aiken, South
Carolina.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II
By letter dated August 30, 2012, as
supplemented by letters dated October
1, 2012, December 20, 2012, and January
16, 2013, and a purchase transaction
agreement dated July 30, 2012 (together,
the Transfer Application), MOX
Services requested that the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) consent
to the proposed indirect transfer of
Construction Authorization (‘‘CA’’)
CAMOX–001 that would be effected by
the indirect transfer of control of Shaw
Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.’s
(‘‘Shaw E&I’’) 30% interest, and Shaw
Project Services Group, LLC’s (‘‘SPSG’’)
40% interest in MOX Services. The
transfer will occur as a result of the
purchase of Shaw E&I and SPSG’s
ultimate parent company, The Shaw
Group Inc. (‘‘Shaw’’), by Chicago Bridge
and Iron Company NV (‘‘CB&I’’),
pursuant to a purchase transaction
agreement. MOX Services would
continue to hold the CA. Upon
completion of the transaction, Shaw
will become a wholly owned subsidiary
of CB&I. Shaw holds a 70% ownership
interest in MOX Services through its
subsidiaries, Shaw E&I and SPSG. In
addition, DOE is requiring that a proxy
agreement be established pursuant to
the policies duly authorized under the
National Industrial Security Program.
The proxy agreement will give control
of CB&I’s interest in MOX Services to
SPSG, as a proxy for CB&I, Shaw, and
Shaw E&I, in order to insulate SPSG and
MOX Services from any potential
Foreign Ownership, Control or
Influence (FOCI) in order to maintain
the Facility Security Clearance held by
MOX Services. No physical changes to
the MFFF are being proposed.
Approval of the indirect transfer of
the CA was requested pursuant to
Section 184 of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended (AEA) (42 U.S.C.
2234) and Section 70.36 of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR). A notice of the request for
approval and opportunity for a hearing
or to submit written comments was
published in the Federal Register on
October 25, 2012 (77 FR 65208). No
comments or requests for a hearing were
received in response to this notice. The
Federal Register notice was corrected
on (January 30, 2013; 78 FR 6356) to fix
a typographical error.
Pursuant to Section 184 of the AEA,
no license granted under the AEA, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
pursuant to 10 CFR 70.36, no license
granted under 10 CFR part 70, shall be
transferred, assigned, or in any manner
disposed of, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of any
license to any person unless the
Commission, after securing full
information, finds that the transfer is in
accordance with the provisions of the
AEA, and gives its consent in writing.
The CA does not authorize MOX
Services to use Special Nuclear Material
at the MFFF; it only authorizes MOX
Services to construct the MFFF. The CA
is analogous to a construction permit,
and it has served as the mechanism
under which the NRC staff has overseen
the MFFF construction activities. The
Commission’s regulations at 10 CFR 2.4,
define ‘‘license’’ as including a
construction permit. Therefore, the CA
is analogous to a license and the
requirements of Section 184 of the AEA
and 10 CFR 70.36 are applicable to this
action.
Upon review of the information
received from MOX Services, and other
information before the Commission, and
relying upon the representations and
agreements contained in the Transfer
Application, the NRC staff finds that (1)
it has secured full information regarding
the proposed indirect transfer of control
of CAMOX–001, and (2) the proposed
indirect transfer, to the extent that CB&I
will acquire a 70% ownership interest
in MOX Services pursuant to its
planned acquisition of Shaw, as
described in the Transfer Application,
and to the extent that CB&I, Shaw, Shaw
E&I, SPSG, and MOX Services are in
compliance with DOE FOCI
requirements for maintenance of the
MFFF DOE Facility Security Clearance,
is in accordance with the provisions of
the AEA of 1954, as amended.
The findings set forth above are
supported by a Safety Evaluation (SE)
dated January 30, 2013.
III
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 184
of the AEA Act of 1954, as amended and
Section 70.36 of 10 CFR, it is hereby
ordered that the indirect transfer of
control of CAMOX–001, as described
herein, is approved.
It is further ordered that after receipt
of all required regulatory approvals of
the proposed indirect transfer, MOX
Services shall inform the Director of the
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, in writing, of such receipt
no later than one (1) business day prior
to the closing of the proposed indirect
transfer. Should the proposed indirect
transfer not be completed within 60
days from the date of issuance of this
Order, the Order shall become null and
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
void; however, on written application
and for good cause shown, such date
may be extended by order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the letter dated August 30,
2012, as amended, (which can be found
at Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System [ADAMS]
Accession Number ML12243A498).
Publicly-available records will be
accessible electronically from the
ADAMS Public Electronic Reading
Room on the Internet at the NRC Web
site https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or
by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 31st day
of January 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2013–02873 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Agency Forms Submitted for OMB
Review, Request for Comments
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad
Retirement Board (RRB) is forwarding
an Information Collection Request (ICR)
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Our
ICR describes the information we seek
to collect from the public. Review and
approval by OIRA ensures that we
impose appropriate paperwork burdens.
The RRB invites comments on the
proposed collection of information to
determine (1) The practical utility of the
collection; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden of the collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information that is the
subject of collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of collections on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments to the RRB or OIRA must
contain the OMB control number of the
ICR. For proper consideration of your
comments, it is best if the RRB and
OIRA receive them within 30 days of
the publication date.
Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement
Act (RRA) provides for payment of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9431-9432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02873]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2011-0081; Docket No. 70-3098; Construction Authorization No.
CAMOX-001]
Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC (Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication
Facility); Order Approving Indirect Transfer of Control of Construction
Authorization
I
Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC (MOX Services) holds Construction
[[Page 9432]]
Authorization (CA) CAMOX-001 for construction of a Mixed Oxide (MOX)
Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF) at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina.
II
By letter dated August 30, 2012, as supplemented by letters dated
October 1, 2012, December 20, 2012, and January 16, 2013, and a
purchase transaction agreement dated July 30, 2012 (together, the
Transfer Application), MOX Services requested that the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) consent to the proposed indirect transfer
of Construction Authorization (``CA'') CAMOX-001 that would be effected
by the indirect transfer of control of Shaw Environmental &
Infrastructure, Inc.'s (``Shaw E&I'') 30% interest, and Shaw Project
Services Group, LLC's (``SPSG'') 40% interest in MOX Services. The
transfer will occur as a result of the purchase of Shaw E&I and SPSG's
ultimate parent company, The Shaw Group Inc. (``Shaw''), by Chicago
Bridge and Iron Company NV (``CB&I''), pursuant to a purchase
transaction agreement. MOX Services would continue to hold the CA. Upon
completion of the transaction, Shaw will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of CB&I. Shaw holds a 70% ownership interest in MOX Services
through its subsidiaries, Shaw E&I and SPSG. In addition, DOE is
requiring that a proxy agreement be established pursuant to the
policies duly authorized under the National Industrial Security
Program. The proxy agreement will give control of CB&I's interest in
MOX Services to SPSG, as a proxy for CB&I, Shaw, and Shaw E&I, in order
to insulate SPSG and MOX Services from any potential Foreign Ownership,
Control or Influence (FOCI) in order to maintain the Facility Security
Clearance held by MOX Services. No physical changes to the MFFF are
being proposed.
Approval of the indirect transfer of the CA was requested pursuant
to Section 184 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA) (42
U.S.C. 2234) and Section 70.36 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR). A notice of the request for approval and
opportunity for a hearing or to submit written comments was published
in the Federal Register on October 25, 2012 (77 FR 65208). No comments
or requests for a hearing were received in response to this notice. The
Federal Register notice was corrected on (January 30, 2013; 78 FR 6356)
to fix a typographical error.
Pursuant to Section 184 of the AEA, no license granted under the
AEA, and pursuant to 10 CFR 70.36, no license granted under 10 CFR part
70, shall be transferred, assigned, or in any manner disposed of,
directly or indirectly, through transfer of control of any license to
any person unless the Commission, after securing full information,
finds that the transfer is in accordance with the provisions of the
AEA, and gives its consent in writing. The CA does not authorize MOX
Services to use Special Nuclear Material at the MFFF; it only
authorizes MOX Services to construct the MFFF. The CA is analogous to a
construction permit, and it has served as the mechanism under which the
NRC staff has overseen the MFFF construction activities. The
Commission's regulations at 10 CFR 2.4, define ``license'' as including
a construction permit. Therefore, the CA is analogous to a license and
the requirements of Section 184 of the AEA and 10 CFR 70.36 are
applicable to this action.
Upon review of the information received from MOX Services, and
other information before the Commission, and relying upon the
representations and agreements contained in the Transfer Application,
the NRC staff finds that (1) it has secured full information regarding
the proposed indirect transfer of control of CAMOX-001, and (2) the
proposed indirect transfer, to the extent that CB&I will acquire a 70%
ownership interest in MOX Services pursuant to its planned acquisition
of Shaw, as described in the Transfer Application, and to the extent
that CB&I, Shaw, Shaw E&I, SPSG, and MOX Services are in compliance
with DOE FOCI requirements for maintenance of the MFFF DOE Facility
Security Clearance, is in accordance with the provisions of the AEA of
1954, as amended.
The findings set forth above are supported by a Safety Evaluation
(SE) dated January 30, 2013.
III
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 184 of the AEA Act of 1954, as
amended and Section 70.36 of 10 CFR, it is hereby ordered that the
indirect transfer of control of CAMOX-001, as described herein, is
approved.
It is further ordered that after receipt of all required regulatory
approvals of the proposed indirect transfer, MOX Services shall inform
the Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
in writing, of such receipt no later than one (1) business day prior to
the closing of the proposed indirect transfer. Should the proposed
indirect transfer not be completed within 60 days from the date of
issuance of this Order, the Order shall become null and void; however,
on written application and for good cause shown, such date may be
extended by order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this Order, see the letter
dated August 30, 2012, as amended, (which can be found at Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System [ADAMS] Accession Number
ML12243A498). Publicly-available records will be accessible
electronically from the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at the NRC Web site https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by
email to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 31st day of January 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2013-02873 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P