Revision of Regulations Defining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets, 9330-9331 [2013-02811]
Download as PDF
9330
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 27
Friday, February 8, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Executive Order 12866
Agricultural Marketing Service
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and,
therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. #AMS–CN–12–0024]
RIN 0581–AD26
Revision of Regulations Defining Bona
Fide Cotton Spot Markets
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the regulation that specifies which
states compose bona fide cotton spot
markets in order to assure consistency
with the revised Cotton Research and
Promotion Act. Updated bona fide spot
market definitions will allow for
published spot quotes to consider spot
prices of cotton marketed in Kansas and
Virginia. AMS is also proposing to
amend references to the ‘‘New York
Cotton Exchange’’ to read the
‘‘Intercontinental Exchange.’’
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may
comment on the proposed rule using the
following procedures:
• Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Comments may be submitted
by mail to: Darryl Earnest, Deputy
Administrator, Cotton & Tobacco
Programs, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Room 11, Memphis, TN 38133.
Comments should be submitted in
triplicate. All comments should
reference the docket number and the
date and the page of this issue of the
Federal Register. All comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at Cotton &
Tobacco Program, AMS, USDA, 3275
Appling Road, Memphis, TN 38133. A
copy of this notice may be found at:
www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/
rulemaking.htm.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton & Tobacco Programs, AMS,
USDA, 3275 Appling Road, Room 11,
Memphis, TN 38133. Telephone (901)
384–3060, facsimile (901) 384–3021, or
email darryl.earnest@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities and has determined that
its implementation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are
an estimated 25,000 cotton growers in
the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS
cotton classing services annually, and
the majority of these cotton growers are
small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
Revisions to the regulations concerning
bona fide spot market definitions are
necessary to assure consistency with the
revised Cotton Research and Promotion
Act and to allow for published spot
quotes to consider spot prices of cotton
marketed in Kansas and Virginia.
Changes in spot market definitions as
stated will not significantly affect small
businesses as defined in the RFA
because:
(1) How spot prices are estimated are
not expected to be impacted by this
action;
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Business practices of the U.S.
cotton industry are not expected to
change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing
market news services will not be
significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for
by appropriated funds, therefore users
are not charged fees for the provision of
the services.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320), which implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501), the information collection
requirements contained in the
provisions to be amended by this
proposed rule have been previously
approved by OMB and were assigned
OMB control number 0581–0009, Cotton
Classification and Market New Service.
Background
The Secretary of Agriculture is
authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to
designate at least five bona fide spot
markets from which cotton price
information can be collected. A spot
market—also called the ‘‘cash market’’
or ‘‘physical market’’—is a market
where commodities are sold on the spot
for cash at current market prices and
delivered immediately. Designation of
these bona fide spot markets and the
determination of which counties and
states compose each of these spot
markets was most recently published in
the Federal Register on August 4, 1988
(53 FR 29327). For each of these bona
fide spot markets, the Cotton and
Tobacco Programs of the Agricultural
Marketing Service collects market price
information under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b), the
Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act (7
U.S.C. 473b) and the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C.
1622(g)). This price information is then
used to calculate price differences for
cotton futures contracts.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy
Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110–234, 122 Stat.
923, enacted May 22, 2008, H.R. 2419)
amended Section 17(f) of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act (7 U.S.C.
2116(f)), designating Kansas, Virginia,
and Florida as cotton producing states
for purposes of the Cotton Research and
Promotion Act. To achieve consistency
with the revised Cotton Research and
Promotion Act and to allow for
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
published spot quotes to consider spot
prices of cotton marketed in the
aforementioned states, § 27.93 would be
amended to add all the counties of
Virginia to the Southeastern spot
market, and Kansas to the East Texas
and Oklahoma spot market.
On September 14, 2006, New York
Board of Trade—the parent company of
the New York Cotton Exchange—agreed
to become a unit of Intercontinental
Exchange. This transaction was
completed on January 12, 2007. To
reflect this organizational change in the
regulations, § 27.94 would amend
references to the ‘‘New York Cotton
Exchange’’ to read as the
‘‘Intercontinental Exchange.’’
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
Commodity futures, Cotton.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 27 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 27—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 27 continues to read as follows:
■
2. In § 27.93, definitions of the
Southeastern market and the East Texas
and Oklahoma market are revised to
read as follows:
■
*
*
Bona fide spot markets.
*
*
*
Southeastern
All counties in the states of Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Virginia and all counties
in the state of Tennessee east of and
including Stewart, Houston,
Humphreys, Perry, Wayne and Hardin
counties.
*
*
*
*
*
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
East Texas and Oklahoma
All counties in the states of Kansas
and Oklahoma and the Texas counties
east of and including Montague, Wise,
Parker, Erath, Comanche, Mills, San
Saba, Mason, Sutton, Edwards, Kinney,
Maverick, Webb, Zapata, Star and
Hidalgo counties.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 27.94 Spot markets for contract
settlement purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement
of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE);
Southeastern, North and South Delta,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: February 4, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–02811 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 920
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0008; FV12–920–1
PR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California;
Proposed Amendments to Marketing
Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule invites comments
on five proposed amendments to
Marketing Order No. 920 (order) which
regulates the handling of kiwifruit
grown in California. The amendments
were proposed by the Kiwifruit
Administrative Committee (Committee
or KAC), which is responsible for local
administration of the order. The five
proposals would amend the marketing
order by adding authority to recommend
and conduct production and postharvest
research, adding authority to
recommend and conduct market
research and development projects,
adding authority to receive and expend
voluntary contributions, amending
procedures to specify that
recommendations for production
research and market development be
approved by eight members of the
Committee, and updating provisions
regarding alternate members’ service on
the Committee.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. All comments submitted in
response to this proposed rule will be
included in the record and will be made
available for public inspection in the
SUMMARY:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7
U.S.C. 1622(g).
§ 27.93
Eastern Texas and Oklahoma, West
Texas, and Desert Southwest.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9331
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
To the extent practicable, all
documents filed with the Docket Clerk
should also be submitted electronically
to Kathleen Bright at the email address
noted for her in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Bright, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 205–2830, Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Email:
Kathleen.Bright@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 920, as amended (7 CFR part
920), regulating the handling of
kiwifruit produced in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
Section 608c(17) of the Act and the
applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR
part 900) authorize amendment of the
order through this informal rulemaking
action. AMS will consider comments
received in response to this rule, and
based on all the information received,
will determine if order amendment is
warranted. If AMS determines
amendment of the order is warranted, a
subsequent proposed rule and
referendum order would be issued and
producers would be allowed to vote for
or against the proposed order
amendments. AMS would then issue a
final rule effectuating any amendments
approved by producers in the
referendum.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9330-9331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02811]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 9330]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. AMS-CN-12-0024]
RIN 0581-AD26
Revision of Regulations Defining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the regulation that specifies which states compose bona fide cotton
spot markets in order to assure consistency with the revised Cotton
Research and Promotion Act. Updated bona fide spot market definitions
will allow for published spot quotes to consider spot prices of cotton
marketed in Kansas and Virginia. AMS is also proposing to amend
references to the ``New York Cotton Exchange'' to read the
``Intercontinental Exchange.''
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may comment on the proposed rule using
the following procedures:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Comments may be submitted by mail to: Darryl
Earnest, Deputy Administrator, Cotton & Tobacco Programs, AMS, USDA,
3275 Appling Road, Room 11, Memphis, TN 38133. Comments should be
submitted in triplicate. All comments should reference the docket
number and the date and the page of this issue of the Federal Register.
All comments will be available for public inspection during regular
business hours at Cotton & Tobacco Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Memphis, TN 38133. A copy of this notice may be found at:
www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/rulemaking.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton & Tobacco Programs, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling Road, Room 11,
Memphis, TN 38133. Telephone (901) 384-3060, facsimile (901) 384-3021,
or email darryl.earnest@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to
any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has determined that its
implementation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are an estimated 25,000 cotton
growers in the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS cotton classing
services annually, and the majority of these cotton growers are small
businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201). Revisions to the regulations
concerning bona fide spot market definitions are necessary to assure
consistency with the revised Cotton Research and Promotion Act and to
allow for published spot quotes to consider spot prices of cotton
marketed in Kansas and Virginia. Changes in spot market definitions as
stated will not significantly affect small businesses as defined in the
RFA because:
(1) How spot prices are estimated are not expected to be impacted
by this action;
(2) Business practices of the U.S. cotton industry are not expected
to change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing market news services will not
be significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for by appropriated funds,
therefore users are not charged fees for the provision of the services.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320), which
implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501), the
information collection requirements contained in the provisions to be
amended by this proposed rule have been previously approved by OMB and
were assigned OMB control number 0581-0009, Cotton Classification and
Market New Service.
Background
The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to designate at least five bona fide
spot markets from which cotton price information can be collected. A
spot market--also called the ``cash market'' or ``physical market''--is
a market where commodities are sold on the spot for cash at current
market prices and delivered immediately. Designation of these bona fide
spot markets and the determination of which counties and states compose
each of these spot markets was most recently published in the Federal
Register on August 4, 1988 (53 FR 29327). For each of these bona fide
spot markets, the Cotton and Tobacco Programs of the Agricultural
Marketing Service collects market price information under the United
States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b), the Cotton Statistics and
Estimates Act (7 U.S.C. 473b) and the Agricultural Marketing Act of
1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622(g)). This price information is then used to
calculate price differences for cotton futures contracts.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-234,
122 Stat. 923, enacted May 22, 2008, H.R. 2419) amended Section 17(f)
of the Cotton Research and Promotion Act (7 U.S.C. 2116(f)),
designating Kansas, Virginia, and Florida as cotton producing states
for purposes of the Cotton Research and Promotion Act. To achieve
consistency with the revised Cotton Research and Promotion Act and to
allow for
[[Page 9331]]
published spot quotes to consider spot prices of cotton marketed in the
aforementioned states, Sec. 27.93 would be amended to add all the
counties of Virginia to the Southeastern spot market, and Kansas to the
East Texas and Oklahoma spot market.
On September 14, 2006, New York Board of Trade--the parent company
of the New York Cotton Exchange--agreed to become a unit of
Intercontinental Exchange. This transaction was completed on January
12, 2007. To reflect this organizational change in the regulations,
Sec. 27.94 would amend references to the ``New York Cotton Exchange''
to read as the ``Intercontinental Exchange.''
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
Commodity futures, Cotton.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 27 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 27--[Amended]
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 27 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7 U.S.C. 1622(g).
0
2. In Sec. 27.93, definitions of the Southeastern market and the East
Texas and Oklahoma market are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.93 Bona fide spot markets.
* * * * *
Southeastern
All counties in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia and all counties in the state of
Tennessee east of and including Stewart, Houston, Humphreys, Perry,
Wayne and Hardin counties.
* * * * *
East Texas and Oklahoma
All counties in the states of Kansas and Oklahoma and the Texas
counties east of and including Montague, Wise, Parker, Erath, Comanche,
Mills, San Saba, Mason, Sutton, Edwards, Kinney, Maverick, Webb,
Zapata, Star and Hidalgo counties.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.94 Spot markets for contract settlement purposes.
* * * * *
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE); Southeastern, North and South Delta,
Eastern Texas and Oklahoma, West Texas, and Desert Southwest.
* * * * *
Dated: February 4, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-02811 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P