Sea Turtle Conservation; Shrimp Trawling Requirements, 9024-9026 [2013-02786]
Download as PDF
9024
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
44. This Public Notice contains
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13 that
were originally proposed in the USF/
ICC Transformation Order and FNPRM.
The USF/ICC Transformation Order and
FNPRM was submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under section 3507(d) of the
PRA. OMB, the general public, and
other Federal agencies were invited to
comment on the new information
collection requirements contained in
that proceeding and referenced in this
Public Notice.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Filing Requirements
45. Interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments are to
reference WC Docket Nos. 10–90 and
DA 13–69 and may be filed using the
Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS). Electronic Filing
of Documents in Rulemaking
Proceedings, 63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998.
D Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
D Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing.
D Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
D All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
D Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
D U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
In addition, we request that one copy
of each pleading be sent to each of the
following:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Feb 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
(1) Ted Burmeister,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Room 5–A445,
Washington, DC 20554; email:
Theodore.Burmeister@fcc.gov;
(2) Heidi Lankau,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division,Wireline Competition Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Room 5–B511,
Washington, DC 20554; email:
Heidi.Lankau@fcc.gov;
(3) Charles Tyler,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Room 5–A452,
Washington, DC 20554; email: mail to:
Charles.Tyler@fcc.gov.
46. People with Disabilities: To
request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the Consumer & Governmental
Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice),
202–418–0432 (tty).
47. This matter shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with rule
section 1.1206(b). In proceedings
governed by rule section 1.49(f) or for
which the Commission has made
available a method of electronic filing,
written ex parte presentations and
memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Trent B. Harkrader,
Division Chief, Telecommunications Access
Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2013–02686 Filed 2–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 223
RIN 0648–BC10
Sea Turtle Conservation; Shrimp
Trawling Requirements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
We (NMFS) have determined
that a final rule to withdraw the
alternative tow time restriction and
require all skimmer trawls, pusher-head
trawls, and wing nets (butterfly trawls)
rigged for fishing to use turtle excluder
devices (TEDs) in their nets is not
warranted at this time. Thus, we are
discontinuing our Environmental
Review process under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
do not intend to prepare a Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
this Action. We therefore withdraw our
proposed rule to require TEDs in these
vessels published May 10, 2012, in the
Federal Register.
DATES: The proposed rule published on
May 10, 2012 (77 FR 27411), is
withdrawn as of February 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnette, 727–551–5794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On May 10, 2012, we published a
proposed rule (77 FR 27411) that would
require all skimmer trawls, pusher-head
trawls, and wing nets (butterfly trawls)
to use TEDs in their nets. Subsequently,
a notice of availability on a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
to Reduce Incidental Bycatch and
Mortality of Sea Turtles in the
Southeastern U.S. Shrimp Fisheries was
E:\FR\FM\07FEP1.SGM
07FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
published on May 18, 2012 (77 FR
29636). The comment periods for the
proposed rule and DEIS ended on July
9 and July 2, 2012, respectively.
We prepared the DEIS and proposed
rule in response to elevated sea turtle
strandings in the Northern Gulf of
Mexico, particularly throughout the
Mississippi Sound area, in 2010 and
2011. Necropsy results indicated a
significant number of stranded turtles
from both the 2010 and 2011 events
likely perished due to forced
submergence, which is commonly
associated with fishery interactions. The
most likely cause of the strandings was
thought to be the shrimp fisheries, and,
in particular, the inshore skimmer trawl
fisheries; for the purposes of this notice,
skimmer trawls, pusher-head trawls,
and wing nets (butterfly trawls) will be
collectively referred to as skimmer
trawls or as the skimmer trawl fisheries.
Skimmer trawlers are currently
authorized to use alternative tow times
in lieu of TEDs, pursuant to 50 CFR
223.206(d)(2)(ii)(A)(3). The alternative
tow time restrictions limit tow times to
a maximum of 55 minutes from April 1
through October 31, and 75 minutes
from November 1 through March 31.
The DEIS and proposed rule noted
compliance issues with the alternative
tow time restrictions by skimmer trawl
vessels, which could result in mortality
of sea turtles. Based on new information
discussed below, our previous
conclusions regarding the impact of
non-compliance with tow time
restrictions in the skimmer trawl fleet
were likely overly conservative and the
DEIS mortality estimates likely do not
reflect actual fishery impacts on sea
turtles.
At the time the DEIS was prepared,
we had extremely limited information
on the effects of the skimmer trawl
fisheries on sea turtle populations.
During this past summer, we shifted
observer effort from the offshore otter
shrimp trawl fishery to the inshore
skimmer trawl fisheries in the Northern
Gulf of Mexico to obtain more
information on the potential impacts to
sea turtle populations. Between May
and July 2012, observers reported the
capture of 24 sea turtles on skimmer
trawl vessels, all of which were Kemp’s
ridley sea turtles. Tow times ranged
from 24 to 128 minutes, with
approximately 20 percent being over 70
minutes, with an average tow time of 57
minutes. While only 35 percent of tows
were within the required 55-minute tow
time limit, all sea turtles were released
alive. One turtle was initially comatose
but became active while on deck before
release. Additionally, all observed sea
turtles were small, juvenile specimens,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Feb 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
and approximately 58 percent of these
turtles had a body depth that could
allow them to pass between the required
maximum 4-inch bar spacing of a TED.
Using catch per unit effort (CPUE)
from the recent summer observer
coverage, we completed new estimates
of sea turtle captures within the Gulf of
Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries.
Additionally, we applied a summer
mortality rate based on the 2012
observer data to calculate estimated
mortalities of sea turtles within the
skimmer trawl fisheries currently
operating without TEDs. While all
observed sea turtle captures were
released alive, one turtle was originally
boated in a comatose state. Based on
National Research Council (1990)
recommendations, this turtle was scored
as a mortality to be conservative and
account for real-world fishery
conditions where turtles may not be
properly resuscitated before being
released.
To evaluate the effects of requiring
TEDs in the Gulf of Mexico skimmer
trawl fisheries, we modified our
approach from the DEIS based on advice
from the Southeast Fisheries Science
Center’s (SEFSC) regarding the
utilization and limitations of the
summer observer coverage data. The
new approach accounted for the
significant number of small turtles that
might pass between the deflector bars of
a TED and back into the bag of the trawl
net, and also examined less optimistic
compliance scenarios should TEDs be
required in the skimmer trawl fisheries.
Since the majority of skimmer trawls
operate in Louisiana state waters where
federal TED requirements are not
enforced by Louisiana state law
enforcement (due to state legislation and
significant resistance to the original sea
turtle conservation efforts in the shrimp
fishery), we would not expect high
compliance immediately following
potential rule implementation. While
compliance has likely fluctuated over
the years, it took the offshore otter trawl
fishery over 20 years of implementation
and 2 years of intensive outreach and
enforcement efforts to achieve an
estimated 84 percent TED effectiveness
rate. Therefore, we estimated sea turtle
captures and mortalities under a
potential TED requirement for the
skimmer trawl fisheries based on
staggered rates of TED effectiveness.
Specifically, we assumed TED
effectiveness would be 65 percent for
years 1–2 following implementation, 75
percent for years 3–4, and, ultimately,
84 percent for year 5 and into the future.
To account for the issue of small turtles
potentially passing through the deflector
bars, we estimated a range, assuming
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9025
that roughly one-third to one-half of the
small turtles would not be excluded by
the TED but would pass through the
bars and be exposed to a higher
mortality rate in the bag of the trawl.
Also, the mortality rate for small
turtles that pass through the bars and
into the bag of the net, and for other
turtles that do not escape the TED due
to compliance issues that impact TEDs’
effectiveness, was based on long tow
times (i.e., 102 minutes) as modeled by
Sasso and Epperly (2006). The
assumption is that with an installed
TED, vessels would not be limited by a
55 or 75 minute tow time (depending on
season), and would likely tow for longer
periods. However, actual tow times may
be dictated by environmental conditions
(e.g., debris issues) or navigational
requirements (e.g., tight or irregular
water bodies, such as bayous along the
Louisiana coast). In areas where vessels
need to clear their nets of debris or raise
their gear to navigate, tow times may be
on average shorter than compared to
skimmer vessels operating in larger,
open water bodies (e.g., Mississippi
Sound). Therefore, based on past
experience recording tow times prior to
the observer coverage, we determined a
mortality rate corresponding to a tow
time of 102 minutes accounted for the
potential changes in fishing behavior as
a result of the proposed rule.
The revised capture and mortality
estimates indicated the Gulf of Mexico
skimmer trawl fisheries result in 1,893
sea turtle mortalities per year as they
currently operate (versus 2,066–6,386
sea turtle mortalities estimated for the
Gulf of Mexico in the DEIS). Sea turtle
mortalities resulting from the Gulf of
Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries under a
with-TED scenario were estimated to be
1,977–2,219 for years 1–2; 1,576–1,855
for years 3–4; and 1,217–1,530 for years
5 and on.
In contrast to the estimates included
in the DEIS, the revised capture and
mortality estimates indicate that the
potential benefits of a TED requirement
in the Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl
fisheries are significantly less than
previously estimated in the DEIS.
Therefore, given the potentially
significant economic ramifications a
TED requirement would have on
fishermen participating in the inshore
skimmer trawl fisheries combined with
highly uncertain ecological benefits to
sea turtle populations compared to the
status quo based on the new observer
data, we concluded a final rule to
require all skimmer trawls, pusher-head
trawls, and wing nets (butterfly trawls)
in the Gulf of Mexico to use TEDs in
their nets is not warranted at this time,
and are withdrawing our proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\07FEP1.SGM
07FEP1
9026
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Observer coverage has also been
initiated in 2012 for the North Carolina
skimmer trawl fishery, but new data are
currently unavailable. Caution would be
prudent when considering the DEIS
estimates and conclusions for the North
Carolina fishery, given the insight
obtained on the skimmer trawl fisheries
in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (e.g.,
average tow times and mortality rates).
For instance, estimating sea turtle
mortalities based on the proxy of a 102minute average tow time is most likely
overly conservative for the North
Carolina fleet given the 57-minute
average tow time documented in the
summer observer coverage work for the
Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries.
Further, our previous CPUE rates and
information on species composition and
size classes for North Carolina is
extrapolated from only three captures.
The observer information from this past
summer’s work in the Gulf of Mexico
significantly changed our understanding
of these important variables. Therefore,
we believe pursuing a final rule strictly
for the North Carolina skimmer trawl
fishery is also unwarranted at this time.
We believe additional observer effort
is necessary to evaluate the potential
effects of the skimmer trawl fisheries on
sea turtle populations. In particular, we
would like to have information on
interactions during winter months,
which have not been sampled, and for
which we have not been able to update
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Feb 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
the analysis used in the DEIS.
Additionally, extended observer
sampling in the Northern Gulf of
Mexico during summer months is
needed to determine if this year’s
observed interactions, particularly the
prevalence of very small Kemp’s ridley
sea turtles, were an anomaly based on
oceanographic conditions or the impact
of strong recruitment from increased
nesting success of Kemp’s ridley sea
turtles, which could be expected to
continue into the future. The prevalence
of these very small turtles has
potentially significant implications for
future management directions, and
needs to be better understood.
We also expect to explore
technological solutions to address the
small turtle issue, such as conducting
TED feasibility and catch loss studies on
TEDs with bar spacing less than 4
inches. Additional observer data and an
analysis of the size of turtles interacting
with the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries
would be pursued to determine TED bar
spacing that would maximize benefits to
sea turtle conservation. Our objective is
to have sufficient information to
evaluate a potential proposed rule that
would be effective in reducing sea turtle
bycatch in the inshore skimmer trawl
fisheries in the near future.
Additionally, we believe there is a
need to explore if there are better
criteria to determine mortality in trawl
fisheries. In consultation with relevant
experts, the agency will examine this
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
issue and produce a report with our
findings and any new criteria that may
be developed.
Concurrently, we expect to improve
outreach efforts with industry to address
compliance issues with tow time
requirements observed in the inshore
skimmer trawl fisheries. Numerous
requests to strengthen outreach,
specifically in regards to education on
tow time requirements, were received
from the public and industry during the
comment periods for the proposed rule
and DEIS. These outreach efforts would
likely improve compliance and,
therefore, decrease sea turtle mortality
in the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries
in the near term.
References
National Research Council. 1990.
Decline of the Sea Turtles: Causes
and Prevention. National Academy
Press, Washington, DC. 259 pp.
Sasso, C.R. and S.P. Epperly. 2006.
Seasonal sea turtle mortality risk
from forced submergence in bottom
trawls. Fisheries Research 81:86–88.
Dated: February 4, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–02786 Filed 2–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3501–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07FEP1.SGM
07FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9024-9026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02786]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 223
RIN 0648-BC10
Sea Turtle Conservation; Shrimp Trawling Requirements
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We (NMFS) have determined that a final rule to withdraw the
alternative tow time restriction and require all skimmer trawls,
pusher-head trawls, and wing nets (butterfly trawls) rigged for fishing
to use turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in their nets is not warranted at
this time. Thus, we are discontinuing our Environmental Review process
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and do not intend to
prepare a Final Environmental Impact Statement for this Action. We
therefore withdraw our proposed rule to require TEDs in these vessels
published May 10, 2012, in the Federal Register.
DATES: The proposed rule published on May 10, 2012 (77 FR 27411), is
withdrawn as of February 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Barnette, 727-551-5794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 10, 2012, we published a proposed rule (77 FR 27411) that
would require all skimmer trawls, pusher-head trawls, and wing nets
(butterfly trawls) to use TEDs in their nets. Subsequently, a notice of
availability on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to Reduce
Incidental Bycatch and Mortality of Sea Turtles in the Southeastern
U.S. Shrimp Fisheries was
[[Page 9025]]
published on May 18, 2012 (77 FR 29636). The comment periods for the
proposed rule and DEIS ended on July 9 and July 2, 2012, respectively.
We prepared the DEIS and proposed rule in response to elevated sea
turtle strandings in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, particularly
throughout the Mississippi Sound area, in 2010 and 2011. Necropsy
results indicated a significant number of stranded turtles from both
the 2010 and 2011 events likely perished due to forced submergence,
which is commonly associated with fishery interactions. The most likely
cause of the strandings was thought to be the shrimp fisheries, and, in
particular, the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries; for the purposes of
this notice, skimmer trawls, pusher-head trawls, and wing nets
(butterfly trawls) will be collectively referred to as skimmer trawls
or as the skimmer trawl fisheries. Skimmer trawlers are currently
authorized to use alternative tow times in lieu of TEDs, pursuant to 50
CFR 223.206(d)(2)(ii)(A)(3). The alternative tow time restrictions
limit tow times to a maximum of 55 minutes from April 1 through October
31, and 75 minutes from November 1 through March 31. The DEIS and
proposed rule noted compliance issues with the alternative tow time
restrictions by skimmer trawl vessels, which could result in mortality
of sea turtles. Based on new information discussed below, our previous
conclusions regarding the impact of non-compliance with tow time
restrictions in the skimmer trawl fleet were likely overly conservative
and the DEIS mortality estimates likely do not reflect actual fishery
impacts on sea turtles.
At the time the DEIS was prepared, we had extremely limited
information on the effects of the skimmer trawl fisheries on sea turtle
populations. During this past summer, we shifted observer effort from
the offshore otter shrimp trawl fishery to the inshore skimmer trawl
fisheries in the Northern Gulf of Mexico to obtain more information on
the potential impacts to sea turtle populations. Between May and July
2012, observers reported the capture of 24 sea turtles on skimmer trawl
vessels, all of which were Kemp's ridley sea turtles. Tow times ranged
from 24 to 128 minutes, with approximately 20 percent being over 70
minutes, with an average tow time of 57 minutes. While only 35 percent
of tows were within the required 55-minute tow time limit, all sea
turtles were released alive. One turtle was initially comatose but
became active while on deck before release. Additionally, all observed
sea turtles were small, juvenile specimens, and approximately 58
percent of these turtles had a body depth that could allow them to pass
between the required maximum 4-inch bar spacing of a TED.
Using catch per unit effort (CPUE) from the recent summer observer
coverage, we completed new estimates of sea turtle captures within the
Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries. Additionally, we applied a
summer mortality rate based on the 2012 observer data to calculate
estimated mortalities of sea turtles within the skimmer trawl fisheries
currently operating without TEDs. While all observed sea turtle
captures were released alive, one turtle was originally boated in a
comatose state. Based on National Research Council (1990)
recommendations, this turtle was scored as a mortality to be
conservative and account for real-world fishery conditions where
turtles may not be properly resuscitated before being released.
To evaluate the effects of requiring TEDs in the Gulf of Mexico
skimmer trawl fisheries, we modified our approach from the DEIS based
on advice from the Southeast Fisheries Science Center's (SEFSC)
regarding the utilization and limitations of the summer observer
coverage data. The new approach accounted for the significant number of
small turtles that might pass between the deflector bars of a TED and
back into the bag of the trawl net, and also examined less optimistic
compliance scenarios should TEDs be required in the skimmer trawl
fisheries. Since the majority of skimmer trawls operate in Louisiana
state waters where federal TED requirements are not enforced by
Louisiana state law enforcement (due to state legislation and
significant resistance to the original sea turtle conservation efforts
in the shrimp fishery), we would not expect high compliance immediately
following potential rule implementation. While compliance has likely
fluctuated over the years, it took the offshore otter trawl fishery
over 20 years of implementation and 2 years of intensive outreach and
enforcement efforts to achieve an estimated 84 percent TED
effectiveness rate. Therefore, we estimated sea turtle captures and
mortalities under a potential TED requirement for the skimmer trawl
fisheries based on staggered rates of TED effectiveness. Specifically,
we assumed TED effectiveness would be 65 percent for years 1-2
following implementation, 75 percent for years 3-4, and, ultimately, 84
percent for year 5 and into the future. To account for the issue of
small turtles potentially passing through the deflector bars, we
estimated a range, assuming that roughly one-third to one-half of the
small turtles would not be excluded by the TED but would pass through
the bars and be exposed to a higher mortality rate in the bag of the
trawl.
Also, the mortality rate for small turtles that pass through the
bars and into the bag of the net, and for other turtles that do not
escape the TED due to compliance issues that impact TEDs'
effectiveness, was based on long tow times (i.e., 102 minutes) as
modeled by Sasso and Epperly (2006). The assumption is that with an
installed TED, vessels would not be limited by a 55 or 75 minute tow
time (depending on season), and would likely tow for longer periods.
However, actual tow times may be dictated by environmental conditions
(e.g., debris issues) or navigational requirements (e.g., tight or
irregular water bodies, such as bayous along the Louisiana coast). In
areas where vessels need to clear their nets of debris or raise their
gear to navigate, tow times may be on average shorter than compared to
skimmer vessels operating in larger, open water bodies (e.g.,
Mississippi Sound). Therefore, based on past experience recording tow
times prior to the observer coverage, we determined a mortality rate
corresponding to a tow time of 102 minutes accounted for the potential
changes in fishing behavior as a result of the proposed rule.
The revised capture and mortality estimates indicated the Gulf of
Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries result in 1,893 sea turtle mortalities
per year as they currently operate (versus 2,066-6,386 sea turtle
mortalities estimated for the Gulf of Mexico in the DEIS). Sea turtle
mortalities resulting from the Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries
under a with-TED scenario were estimated to be 1,977-2,219 for years 1-
2; 1,576-1,855 for years 3-4; and 1,217-1,530 for years 5 and on.
In contrast to the estimates included in the DEIS, the revised
capture and mortality estimates indicate that the potential benefits of
a TED requirement in the Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries are
significantly less than previously estimated in the DEIS. Therefore,
given the potentially significant economic ramifications a TED
requirement would have on fishermen participating in the inshore
skimmer trawl fisheries combined with highly uncertain ecological
benefits to sea turtle populations compared to the status quo based on
the new observer data, we concluded a final rule to require all skimmer
trawls, pusher-head trawls, and wing nets (butterfly trawls) in the
Gulf of Mexico to use TEDs in their nets is not warranted at this time,
and are withdrawing our proposed rule.
[[Page 9026]]
Observer coverage has also been initiated in 2012 for the North
Carolina skimmer trawl fishery, but new data are currently unavailable.
Caution would be prudent when considering the DEIS estimates and
conclusions for the North Carolina fishery, given the insight obtained
on the skimmer trawl fisheries in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (e.g.,
average tow times and mortality rates). For instance, estimating sea
turtle mortalities based on the proxy of a 102-minute average tow time
is most likely overly conservative for the North Carolina fleet given
the 57-minute average tow time documented in the summer observer
coverage work for the Gulf of Mexico skimmer trawl fisheries. Further,
our previous CPUE rates and information on species composition and size
classes for North Carolina is extrapolated from only three captures.
The observer information from this past summer's work in the Gulf of
Mexico significantly changed our understanding of these important
variables. Therefore, we believe pursuing a final rule strictly for the
North Carolina skimmer trawl fishery is also unwarranted at this time.
We believe additional observer effort is necessary to evaluate the
potential effects of the skimmer trawl fisheries on sea turtle
populations. In particular, we would like to have information on
interactions during winter months, which have not been sampled, and for
which we have not been able to update the analysis used in the DEIS.
Additionally, extended observer sampling in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
during summer months is needed to determine if this year's observed
interactions, particularly the prevalence of very small Kemp's ridley
sea turtles, were an anomaly based on oceanographic conditions or the
impact of strong recruitment from increased nesting success of Kemp's
ridley sea turtles, which could be expected to continue into the
future. The prevalence of these very small turtles has potentially
significant implications for future management directions, and needs to
be better understood.
We also expect to explore technological solutions to address the
small turtle issue, such as conducting TED feasibility and catch loss
studies on TEDs with bar spacing less than 4 inches. Additional
observer data and an analysis of the size of turtles interacting with
the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries would be pursued to determine TED
bar spacing that would maximize benefits to sea turtle conservation.
Our objective is to have sufficient information to evaluate a potential
proposed rule that would be effective in reducing sea turtle bycatch in
the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries in the near future.
Additionally, we believe there is a need to explore if there are
better criteria to determine mortality in trawl fisheries. In
consultation with relevant experts, the agency will examine this issue
and produce a report with our findings and any new criteria that may be
developed.
Concurrently, we expect to improve outreach efforts with industry
to address compliance issues with tow time requirements observed in the
inshore skimmer trawl fisheries. Numerous requests to strengthen
outreach, specifically in regards to education on tow time
requirements, were received from the public and industry during the
comment periods for the proposed rule and DEIS. These outreach efforts
would likely improve compliance and, therefore, decrease sea turtle
mortality in the inshore skimmer trawl fisheries in the near term.
References
National Research Council. 1990. Decline of the Sea Turtles: Causes and
Prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 259 pp.
Sasso, C.R. and S.P. Epperly. 2006. Seasonal sea turtle mortality risk
from forced submergence in bottom trawls. Fisheries Research 81:86-88.
Dated: February 4, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-02786 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3501-22-P