Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes, 8052-8054 [2013-02450]
Download as PDF
8052
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
[Quality Assurance] records, which
include information on the design and
contents.’’ However, the petitioner
states that it is important to minimize
the number of markings on a container,
which will reduce the chances that
changes will have to be made to the
permanent markings on a cask. The
petitioner also states, ‘‘[c]hanging
permanent markings on the cask are
problematic since this would require
significant repair work, evaluation to
verify the cask maintains conformance
with the CoC, and worker dose if the
cask contains used fuel.’’ The petitioner
maintains that since this information is
contained in the QA controlled records,
requiring that the empty weight be
permanently marked on the cask does
not ‘‘provide any increase to the
protection of public health and safety’’
and ‘‘serves no useful purpose.’’
6. Amend 10 CFR 72.124 To Clarify the
Applicability of the Criticality
Monitoring Exemptions
The petitioner requests that 10 CFR
part 72, subpart F, be amended ‘‘to
specify that criticality monitoring does
not apply to special nuclear material in
a dry storage cask being managed under
a license granted pursuant to part 72,
with ‘managed’ defined as cask loading,
preparation, onsite transport and storage
operation.’’ The petitioner states that
‘‘no criticality monitoring should be
required as long as the cask/canister is
being managed in accordance with its
approved licensing and design basis as
described in the Cask CoC or ISFSI
license and their respective FSARs
[Final Safety Analysis Reports].’’ In
addition, the petitioner asserts that ‘‘the
proposed rule change to modify 10 CFR
72.124(c), would clarify the regulations
without modifying the intent’’ and ‘‘is
consistent with NRC guidance, and
other parts of the regulations.’’
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Additional Regulatory Framework
Improvements (Not Requested as Part of
This Petition for Rulemaking)
Separate from these rulemaking
changes, the petitioner recommends
eight other regulatory framework
improvements. The petitioner states that
these improvements are not requested as
part of the petition, but believes that
these other changes would provide
‘‘synergies with the improvements’’
requested in the petition. These
recommendations include:
1. Streamlining the cask certification
process.
2. Clarifying ‘‘the implementation of
the general license process and
activities at the interface of Part 50 and
Part 72 requirements.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Feb 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
3. Updating guidance for
implementing 10 CFR 72.48.
4. Examining the role of cladding
integrity in the regulatory framework.
5. Discussing ‘‘the potential to
reinitiate a rulemaking for moderator
exclusion.’’
6. Discussing the ‘‘potential options
for harmonization of Part 71 and Part 72
for spent fuel.’’
7. Making further improvements to
the inspection program.
8. Streamlining the process for
‘‘establishing and maintaining the
relevant NRC guidance’’ and ‘‘achieving
a more straight-forward regulatory
framework by implementing
improvements to the organization of the
network of guidance documents’’ that
exists.
IV. Conclusion
The NRC has determined that the
petition meets the threshold sufficiency
requirements for a petition for
rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802,
‘‘Petition for rulemaking,’’ and the
petition has been docketed as PRM–72–
7. The NRC is requesting public
comment on the petition for rulemaking.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of January 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–02477 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
line, which could result in hydraulic
fluid leakage and possible fire due to
arcing, and consequent loss of control of
the airplane due to structural failure of
the tail.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Dassault
Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South
Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201–
440–6700; Internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1322; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–155–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT
AVIATION Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
DASSAULT AVIATION Model
MYSTERE–FALCON 900 and FALCON
900EX airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of chafing between
the tail strobe power supply and a
hydraulic line. This proposed AD would
require modifying the tail strobe power
supply wire routing. We are proposing
this AD to prevent chafing between the
tail strobe power supply and a hydraulic
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
FAA–2012–1322; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–155–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012–0162,
dated August 29, 2012 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Two reports were received concerning
Falcon 900 aeroplanes, where chafing
between the tail strobe power supply and a
hydraulic line was found. In the latest
reported occurrence, the chafing damaged the
power line and created an electrical arcing
which created a pin hole in the hydraulic
line, leading to hydraulic fluid leakage.
This condition, if not corrected, could
jeopardize the aeroplane’s safe flight.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Dassault Aviation developed modification
(M5741) of the routing of the tail strobe
power supply wire, which is available for
accomplishment in service through Dassault
Service Bulletin (SB) F900–431 or SB
F900EX–437, as applicable to aeroplane
model.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires modification of the
routing of the tail strobe power supply wire.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The unsafe condition is chafing between
the tail strobe power supply and a
hydraulic line, which could result in
hydraulic fluid leakage and possible fire
due to arcing, and consequent loss of
control of the airplane due to structural
failure of the tail. You may obtain
further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault has issued Mandatory
Service Bulletin F900–431, dated
November 8, 2011 (for Model
MYSTERE–FALCON 900 airplanes); and
Mandatory Service Bulletin F900EX–
437, dated November 8, 2011 (for Model
FALCON 900EX airplanes). The actions
described in these service bulletins are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Feb 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 180 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $31 per product.
Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $36,180, or $201 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8053
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
DASSAULT AVIATION: Docket No. FAA–
2012–1322; Directorate Identifier 2012–
NM–155–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 22,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes specified
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD,
certificated in any category.
(1) DASSAULT AVIATION Model
MYSTERE–FALCON 900 airplanes, serial
numbers (S/N) 142 and subsequent.
(2) DASSAULT AVIATION Model
FALCON 900EX airplanes, all serial numbers
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
8054
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
except those on which Dassault Aviation
modification M5741 has been embodied in
production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24, Electrical Power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
chafing between the tail strobe power supply
and a hydraulic line. We are issuing this AD
to prevent chafing between the tail strobe
power supply and a hydraulic line, which
could result in hydraulic fluid leakage and
possible fire due to arcing, and consequent
loss of control of the airplane due to
structural failure of the tail.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Actions
Within 65 days or 200 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first: Modify the tail strobe power supply
wire routing, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F900–431, dated
November 8, 2011 (for Model MYSTERE–
FALCON 900 airplanes); or Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin F900EX–437,
dated November 8, 2011 (for FALCON 900EX
airplanes).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Feb 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012–0162, dated August 29, 2012,
and the service information specified in
paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and (j)(1)(ii) of this AD,
for related information.
(i) Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin
F900–431, dated November 8, 2011.
(ii) Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin
F900EX–437, dated November 8, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; Internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–02450 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1321; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–147–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain Airbus Model
A310 series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
for fatigue cracking of the area around
the fasteners of the landing plate of the
aileron access doors of the bottom skin
panel of the wings, and related
corrective action. The existing AD
provides for an optional terminating
action, which ends the repetitive
inspections. Since we issued that AD, a
reassessment of the previous fatigue
threshold and inspection interval
resulted in a determination that reduced
inspection thresholds and intervals for
accomplishment of the tasks are
necessary. This proposed AD would
reduce the initial inspection compliance
time and intervals and provide
additional terminating action options.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the area
around the fasteners of the landing plate
of the aileron access doors and the
bottom skin panel of the wings, which
could result in reduced structural
integrity of the wings.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8052-8054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02450]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1322; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-155-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 and FALCON 900EX
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of chafing between
the tail strobe power supply and a hydraulic line. This proposed AD
would require modifying the tail strobe power supply wire routing. We
are proposing this AD to prevent chafing between the tail strobe power
supply and a hydraulic line, which could result in hydraulic fluid
leakage and possible fire due to arcing, and consequent loss of control
of the airplane due to structural failure of the tail.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201-440-6700; Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No.
[[Page 8053]]
FAA-2012-1322; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-155-AD'' at the beginning
of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0162, dated August 29, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Two reports were received concerning Falcon 900 aeroplanes,
where chafing between the tail strobe power supply and a hydraulic
line was found. In the latest reported occurrence, the chafing
damaged the power line and created an electrical arcing which
created a pin hole in the hydraulic line, leading to hydraulic fluid
leakage.
This condition, if not corrected, could jeopardize the
aeroplane's safe flight.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Dassault Aviation
developed modification (M5741) of the routing of the tail strobe
power supply wire, which is available for accomplishment in service
through Dassault Service Bulletin (SB) F900-431 or SB F900EX-437, as
applicable to aeroplane model.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
modification of the routing of the tail strobe power supply wire.
The unsafe condition is chafing between the tail strobe power supply
and a hydraulic line, which could result in hydraulic fluid leakage and
possible fire due to arcing, and consequent loss of control of the
airplane due to structural failure of the tail. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin F900-431, dated
November 8, 2011 (for Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes); and
Mandatory Service Bulletin F900EX-437, dated November 8, 2011 (for
Model FALCON 900EX airplanes). The actions described in these service
bulletins are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 180 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $31 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $36,180, or $201 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
DASSAULT AVIATION: Docket No. FAA-2012-1322; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-155-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 22, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes, serial
numbers (S/N) 142 and subsequent.
(2) DASSAULT AVIATION Model FALCON 900EX airplanes, all serial
numbers
[[Page 8054]]
except those on which Dassault Aviation modification M5741 has been
embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical
Power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of chafing between the tail
strobe power supply and a hydraulic line. We are issuing this AD to
prevent chafing between the tail strobe power supply and a hydraulic
line, which could result in hydraulic fluid leakage and possible
fire due to arcing, and consequent loss of control of the airplane
due to structural failure of the tail.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Actions
Within 65 days or 200 flight hours after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first: Modify the tail strobe power supply
wire routing, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin F900-431, dated November 8, 2011
(for Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes); or Dassault Mandatory
Service Bulletin F900EX-437, dated November 8, 2011 (for FALCON
900EX airplanes).
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012-
0162, dated August 29, 2012, and the service information specified
in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and (j)(1)(ii) of this AD, for related
information.
(i) Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin F900-431, dated November
8, 2011.
(ii) Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin F900EX-437, dated
November 8, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201-440-6700; Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-02450 Filed 2-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P