Foreign Quarantine; Import Regulations for Infectious Biological Agents, Infectious Substances, and Vectors, 7674-7679 [2013-02391]
Download as PDF
7674
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Name of SIP provision
State
submittal/
effective
date
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
*
*
*
On-Road Mobile Source Emis- Beaumont/Port Arthur, TX .....
sions Inventory and Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budget
Update.
*
12/10/2012
EPA approval date
*
*
*
2/4/2013 [Insert citation of
MOVES update to motor vepublication in Federal Reghicle emissions budgets.
ister].
[Docket No. CDC–2011–0007]
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses Under
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
V. Other Administrative Requirements
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
B. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform and Executive Order 13132,
Federalism
C. Plain Language in Government Writing
42 CFR Part 71
I. Background
RIN 0920–AA37
On October 14, 2011, we published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(76 FR 63891) to clarify regulatory
definitions, ensure adequate biosafety
measures, increase oversight through
inspections, to address permit
exemptions and transportation
requirements, and to describe an appeal
process. The proposed rule provided a
60-day public comment period that
ended on December 13, 2011.
This final rule contains provisions
that apply to a variety of entities
including academic institutions and
biomedical centers, commercial
manufacturing facilities, Federal, State,
and local laboratories, including clinical
and diagnostic laboratories, research
facilities, exhibition facilities, and
educational facilities.
[FR Doc. 2013–02237 Filed 2–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Foreign Quarantine; Import
Regulations for Infectious Biological
Agents, Infectious Substances, and
Vectors
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) within
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is issuing this final rule
amending the regulations regarding the
importation of infectious biological
agents, infectious substances, and
vectors. The amendments improve
HHS/CDC’s ability to prevent the
introduction, transmission, or spread of
communicable diseases into the United
States.
DATES: The final rule is effective April
5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robbin Weyant, Ph.D., Director,
Division of Select Agents and Toxins,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS
A–46, Atlanta, GA 30333. Telephone:
404–718–2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble is organized as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
II. Statutory Authority
III. Responses to Public Comments
A. Definitions
B. Infectious Biological Agent
C. Biosafety
D. Permit Exemptions
E. Transportation
F. Subsequent Transfer
G. Miscellaneous
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
II. Statutory Authority
This final rule is issued under the
authority of Section 361 of the Public
Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C.
264). This provision authorizes the
Health and Human Services (HHS)
Secretary to make and enforce such
regulations as in her judgment are
necessary to prevent the introduction,
transmission, or spread of
communicable diseases from foreign
countries into the States or possessions
of the United States and from one State
or possession into any other State or
possession. For purposes of carrying out
and enforcing such regulations, the HHS
Secretary may authorize a variety of
public health measures, including
inspection, fumigation, disinfection,
sanitation, pest extermination,
destruction of animals or articles found
to be sources of dangerous infection to
human beings, and other measures.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
The Foreign Quarantine regulations
(42 CFR part 71) set forth provisions to
prevent the introduction, transmission,
and spread of communicable disease
from foreign countries into the United
States. Part 71, Subpart F (Importations)
contains provisions for importation of
etiological agents, hosts, and vectors (42
CFR 71.54), requiring persons to obtain
a permit issued by the CDC before
importing, or distributing after import,
any of these materials.
III. Responses to Public Comment
We received nine comments from
academic, private and government
facilities. The comments are discussed
below.
A. Definitions
Commenters requested clarification
about whether the definition of ‘‘vector’’
should (1) include an exemption for
animals meant for a zoo, (2) address
pelts or other objects meant for museum
use or (3) limit the definition to the
importation of live animals. Prior to
entry into the United States and
regardless of the purpose for the
importation, a permit will continue to
be required for any live animal or
animal product (e.g., a mount, rug, or
other display item composed of the
hide, hair, skull, teeth, bones, or claws
of an animal) unless (1) the animal or
animal product is not known to transfer
or to be capable of transferring an
infectious biological agent to a human
or (2) the animal product has been
rendered noninfectious. The
documentation may include a statement
from a treating veterinarian, statement
from a medical facility, medical
certificate, or in the case of an animal
product, documentary evidence, such as
a veterinary or taxidermy certificate,
describing how the material had been
treated to render it noninfectious. Any
live animal or animal product imported
for scientific, educational or exhibition
purposes (e.g., bats and bat products)
will also continue to require a permit,
unless accompanied by documentation
indicating that the animal or animal
product is not known to transfer or to
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
be capable of transferring an infectious
biological agent to a human or the
product has been rendered
noninfectious.
The terms ‘‘educational purpose,’’
‘‘exhibition purpose’’ and ‘‘scientific
purpose’’ are defined in 42 CFR 71.1.
‘‘Scientific purpose’’ means ‘‘use for
scientific research following a defined
protocol and other standards for
research projects as normally conducted
at the university level. The term also
includes the use for safety testing,
potency testing, and other activities
related to the production of medical
products.’’ ‘‘Educational purpose’’
means ‘‘use in the teaching of a defined
educational program at the university
level or equivalent.’’ ‘‘Exhibition
purpose’’ means ‘‘use as a part of a
display in a facility comparable to a
zoological park or in a trained animal
act. The animal display must be open to
the general public at routinely
scheduled hours on 5 or more days of
each week. The trained animal act must
be routinely scheduled for multiple
performances each week and open to
the general public except for reasonable
vacation and retraining periods.’’
One commenter urged HHS/CDC to
modify the definition section to include
a new definition for the term ‘‘infectious
substance.’’ The commenter indicated
that defining the term ‘‘infectious
substance’’ in the context of applicable
transportation standards and
requirements for dangerous goods and
hazardous materials would clarify HHS/
CDC’s expectations regarding the
packaging and shipping of these
materials and help applicants to better
understand and address these issues.
We agree with the commenter and are
replacing the definition of ‘‘infectious
material’’ with an ‘‘infectious
substance’’ definition, which states ‘‘any
material that is known or reasonably
expected to contain an infectious
biological agent.’’ This definition for
‘‘infectious substance’’ is consistent
with the definitions found in the
Department of Transportation (DOT)
regulations set forth at 49 CFR Part 171–
180 (‘‘A material known or suspected to
contain a pathogen:—a microorganism
(including bacteria, viruses, parasites,
fungi) or other agent, that can cause
disease in humans or animals’’) and
World Health Organization (WHO)
Transport of Infectious Substances
Standard (‘‘For the purposes of
transport, infectious substances are
defined as substances which are known
or are reasonably expected to contain
pathogens. Pathogens are defined as
microorganisms (including bacteria,
viruses, rickettsiae, parasites, fungi) and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
7675
other agents such as prions, which can
cause disease in humans or animals’’).
A commenter recommended defining
the term ‘‘biosafety measures,’’ which is
used several times in the proposed
regulatory language, to help importers
prepare for use of these requirements
and to assist in agency review of such
measures before the issuance of a
permit. The commenter recommended
that ‘‘biosafety measures’’ be defined as
‘‘standard microbiological practices,
special practices, safety equipment
(primary and personal protective
equipment) and laboratory facilities
(secondary barriers) as noted in the
current edition of Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories (BMBL) and additional
safeguards as provided in the NIH
Guidelines for recombinant and
synthetic DNA if appropriate for the
substance or material for which such
measures are implemented.’’ We made
no changes based on this comment.
While the commenter provided
excellent references, we believe that
citing only these references is limiting
since there are other references that
provide useful recommendations for
safely working with a variety of human
pathogens (i.e., Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA)
regulations, World Health Organization
guidance, etc.).
through an intermediate animal host,
vector, or the inanimate environment.’’
All examples cited by this commenter
meet this definition of the term
‘‘infectious biological agents’’ because
each of the fungi cited are capable of
causing communicable disease.
B. Infectious Biological Agent
One commenter noted that she was
not aware of any medically important
fungal agents that are communicable
(transmissible from person to person),
with the possible exception of
dermatophyte agents (Epidermophyton,
Microsporum, and Trichophyton). The
commenter argued that the hazardous
characteristics of dermatophyte agents
are not sufficiently severe to merit
regulation of these agents through the
import permit mechanism. The
commenter suggested that the regulatory
text be clarified to list the fungal agents
that would be regulated. The commenter
further reasoned that Coccidioides
species, Histoplasma capsulatum, and
Blastomyces dermatitidis should no
longer require an import permit since
they do not cause communicable
disease and are not transmissible from
person to person. We made no changes
based on this comment. Section 71.1
(Scope and definitions) of Title 42, Code
of Federal Regulations defines
‘‘communicable disease’’ as ‘‘an illness
due to a specific infectious agent or its
toxic products which arises through
transmission of that agent or its
products from an infected person or
animal or a reservoir to a susceptible
host, either directly, or indirectly
D. Permit Exemptions
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Biosafety
One commenter was interested in
knowing specifically how HHS/CDC
will ‘‘work with’’ entities to address
safety issues. The commenter
questioned if this will entail providing
additional financing to bring importers
into compliance, or is this ‘‘offer to
work with’’ the importer a distinctive
part of the permit issuance process.
HHS/CDC’s statement in the preamble
to the proposed rule that it was willing
to work with an entity whose biosafety
measures were found to be inadequate
was neither an offer to provide financial
assistance nor a distinctive part of the
permit issuance process. It was simply
a statement that, rather than simply
deny a permit, HHS/CDC would be
willing to assist an applicant to achieve
compliance with the import regulations.
If an importer is unable to address the
inadequate biosafety measures
identified, the importer would not
receive a permit to import the infectious
biological agent, infectious substance, or
vector requested.
Diagnostic Specimens
One commenter proposed to replace
the term ‘‘diagnostic specimen’’ with
the phrase, ‘‘exempt human specimen or
exempt animal specimen’’, consistent
with DOT Hazardous Materials
Regulations and the International Air
Transport Association Dangerous Goods
Standards. We made no changes based
on this comment since the proposed
replacement language limits the
specimens to human and animals and
does not include environmental
samples.
Another commenter stated that the
proposed rule leaves too much
speculation about what is potentially
infectious material. The commenter
suggested that a standard which was
more closely aligned with the WHO
standard for biological materials and
infectious substances would provide
more clarity. We agree with the
commenter and have replaced the
definition for ‘‘infectious material’’ with
an ‘‘infectious substance’’ definition
that closely aligns with definitions
found in the DOT regulations and WHO
standards.
Even though we did not receive a
comment regarding bats, we clarified
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
7676
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
that these materials should not be
exempted since people become infected
with germs either through direct or
close contact with bats or their
droppings. Specifically, bats are known
carriers of germs that cause disease in
humans, including internal and external
parasites, fungi, bacteria, and viruses.
The most significant of these germs are
Nipah virus and viruses that cause
diseases such as Ebola, Marburg
Hemorrhagic Fever, Sudden Acute
Severe Respiratory Syndrome (SARS),
and rabies.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Genomic Material
One commenter requested that the
importation and subsequent transfer of
positive stranded viral RNA be
considered in this Part. The commenter
reasoned that if this material could be
used to recover an infectious agent, its
importation and subsequent transfer
would be, for all intents and purposes,
identical to the importation and
subsequent transfer of an etiological
agent. The commenter also reasoned
that if the intent was the extraction of
the genetic information only, and the
recipient had no intention to retrieve
the infectious agent from the nucleic
acid preparation, then the need for the
permit would seem not to be warranted.
We made no changes based on this
comment since positive stranded viral
rRNA genomic material would meet our
proposed definition as a ‘‘component of
such microorganism or prion that is
capable of causing communicable
disease in a human.’’ It should be noted
that our proposed rule already contains
an exemption for genomic materials
certified by the importer to be incapable
of producing infectious biological
agents.
E. Transportation
One commenter argued that the
regulations should place the
responsibility for compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations
concerning the packaging and shipment
of infectious substances on the shipper
since the only thing related to shipping
that could be practically mandated for
the recipient would be to open the
shipment in a manner consistent with
the expected hazard and report any
spillage/leakage. The commenter stated
that the importer could be required to
obtain some type of affirmation from the
shipper to the effect that the shipment
is done in compliance with applicable
regulations. We agree with the
commenter insofar as the commenter
suggests that the shipper comply with
all applicable legal requirements
relating to the packaging, labeling, and
shipment of infectious substances, such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
as those found at 49 CFR part 173 and
standards issued by the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). We
disagree with the commenter, however,
insofar as the commenter suggests that
the importer should bear no legal
responsibility under these regulations
for actions taken by the shipper on the
importer’s behalf. Accordingly, under
these regulations the importer, as the
initiator of the Import Permit request,
must implement measures to ensure that
the shipper will package, label, and ship
the requested infectious substance,
infectious biological agent, or vector in
a manner that is safe and in compliance
with all applicable legal requirements.
Another commenter suggested that we
amend the statement ‘‘The importer is
in compliance with all applicable laws
concerning the packaging and shipment
of infectious substance’’ to include ‘‘and
regulations’’ in the statement. The
commenter also recommended that
guidance be provided on the HHS/CDC
Web site to clarify HHS/CDC’s
expectations regarding the packaging
and shipping of infectious substances.
We agreed with the commenter that the
statement should be revised to include
all laws and regulations. Therefore, we
changed the language to read, ‘‘The
importer takes measures to help ensure
that the shipper complies with all
applicable legal requirements
concerning the packaging, labeling, and
shipment of infectious substances.’’ To
clarify HHS/CDC’s expectations
regarding the packaging and shipping of
infectious substances, we have posted
guidance regarding our expectations on
the HHS/CDC import permit Web site at:
https://www.cdc.gov/od/eaipp/faq.htm.
F. Subsequent Transfer
One commenter requested
confirmation that an importer may still
seek authorization for subsequent
transfers of the items within the United
States through the initial permit
application. We confirm that an
importer may still seek authorization for
subsequent transfers of items within the
United States in the initial permit
application.
G. Miscellaneous
Cost
One commenter believed that there
would be a significant cost to
implement the HHS/CDC inspection
program. The commenter stated it
should be an institutional responsibility
to ensure that an appropriate biosafety
plan is in place. The commenter
believed if an institution does not have
a biosafety office or plan; it should not
have the permit to import items that
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
may pose any kind of risk. We agree that
an entity that does not have a biosafety
plan should not have a permit to import
items that have the potential to pose a
risk to public health and safety.
Since 2009, we have refined the HHS/
CDC import permit database to include
better descriptions of material being
imported, the biosafety level of the
laboratory where the work will be
performed, and the type of work to be
conducted (e.g., diagnostic, research).
To estimate the number of facilities that
would require a biosafety inspection
under this Part; we first identified those
facilities that had previously applied to
import agents which are capable of
causing serious or potentially lethal
disease in humans via the aerosol route.
From that list, we deleted those
facilities already receiving periodic
biosafety inspections from either HHS/
CDC or the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS)
under the HHS or USDA Select Agent
Regulations (42 CFR part 73, 9 CFR part
121, or 7 CFR part 131) and concluded
that approximately 25 facilities would
need to be inspected per year to verify
that they have in place the appropriate
biosafety measures. Since we already
review documents regarding biosafety
and have a staff of fully trained and
experienced biosafety inspectors, and
based on our review of recent permitting
activity, we believe the projected travel
costs to perform these inspections will
be less than 1% of the current budget for
the HHS/CDC’s Division of Select
Agents and Toxins. We also plan to
coordinate these inspections with those
we are already conducting under the
Federal Select Agent Inspection
Program to recognize greater
efficiencies.
Internet Site
One commenter suggested that HHS/
CDC maintain on its internet site the
current permit preparation guidance
text so that permit applicants will have
ready access to information regarding
their responsibilities under the
regulations, separate from the
regulations themselves. We agree with
this commenter and will review our
Web site content on a regular ongoing
basis to ensure that the content is
consistent with the regulations and easy
to find.
Alternatives Considered
In the proposed rule we discussed the
alternative approaches we considered in
development of this rulemaking in order
to reduce burden for clinical/diagnostic
laboratories or small businesses selling
manufactured goods.
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
First, we noted that, from HHS/CDC’s
Select Agent inspection program,
specific biosafety measure
implementation issues were identified
in 81 of the 316 entities inspected by
CDC since 2003. Some of the biosafety
measure implementation issues were
serious enough to require the
suspension of registration or other
restrictions on biological work at these
facilities. We noted that USDA/APHIS
had identified similar biosafety issues.
Because of these issues, we proposed to
require specific biosafety measures to be
implemented by the applicant.
Second, we considered proposing a
requirement that applicants develop and
maintain a written biosafety plan
commensurate with the hazard posed by
the infectious biological agent,
infectious material, and/or vector to be
imported, and the level of risk given the
intended use including what elements
of the plan are essential to prevent
exposures and dramatically reduce the
incidence of laboratory acquired
infections and protect the public health
and the environment. We acknowledged
that most, if not all, importers of
etiological agents already have such
biosafety plans. We based this on our
experience with import permit
submissions that address Section G
(Receiving Laboratory Capabilities) of
the permit application. We specifically
sought comment from the public
concerning the cost and burden of
requiring a formal a written biosafety
plan. We did not receive any comments
specifically addressing the cost and
burden of requiring a formal written
biosafety plan.
Finally, we proposed exemptions to
allow importers to import certain
material that is already approved or
authorized by another Federal agency or
material that has been determined not to
be an infectious biological agent.
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses
Under Executive Orders 12866 and
13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule is
being treated as ‘‘not significant’’ under
EO 12866. It clarifies regulatory
definitions, insures adequate biosafety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
measures, increases oversight through
inspections, addresses permit
exemptions and transportation
requirements, and describes an appeal
process when the permit request is
denied. Thus, the rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
Based on past experience, we estimate
that there will be approximately 2,000
applications for both import and
distribution permit requests each year
and that the average response time to
complete the application is 20 minutes.
We believe that the burden has been
limited to requesting only essential
information on the application,
verifying information, when required,
by telephone, and mailing information
to the appropriate parties.
With regard to the new requirement to
have biosafety measures in place, our
current experience from reviewing the
information submitted for the import
permit applications addressing Section
G (Receiving Laboratory Capabilities)
(e.g., detailed description of any
required personal protective equipment
(PPE)), and laboratory equipment (i.e.,
biosafety cabinets, autoclaves) that
ensures materials are properly handled
and contained indicates that the vast
majority of importers of etiological
agents already have instituted such
biosafety measures. Based on our review
of applications received between March
2011 and January 2012, we estimate that
98% (632 out of 644) of the applicants
possess written biosafety plans and
already follow standard biosafety
practices and procedures.
With regard to whether HHS/CDC will
inspect an import facility, as noted
above, HHS/CDC will use the following
specific criteria to determine which
entities are to be inspected: (1) facilities
that request to perform research with
imported agents that would need to be
conducted in a biosafety level (BSL) 3,
BSL–4, animal biosafety level (ABSL) 3,
ABSL–4 or BSL–3 Agriculture
laboratory as described in the BMBL
(e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis used
in aerosol studies required at BSL–3),
and (2) facilities that have not been
inspected by either HHS/CDC or USDA/
APHIS under the Federal Select Agent
Regulations.
Since 2009, we have refined the HHS/
CDC import permit database to include
better descriptions of material being
imported, the biosafety level of the
facility where the work would be
performed, and the type of work to be
conducted (e.g., diagnostic, research).
To estimate the number of facilities that
would require a biosafety inspection, we
first identified those facilities that
applied to import agents to use in
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7677
research, which may cause serious or
potentially lethal disease after
inhalation. From that list, we removed
those facilities already subject to
periodic biosafety inspections under the
Federal Select Agent Regulations. We
concluded that approximately 25
facilities would need to be inspected per
year to verify that they have in place the
appropriate biosafety measures. To
minimize additional burdens on
inspected facilities, we will be
contacting those facilities that received
a permit in 2012, and would meet the
criteria for requiring an inspection, 3
months prior to the expiration of the
facility’s import permit to initiate the
renewal process. We plan to inspect
these facilities once in a two year
timeframe, assuming that no significant
biosafety problems are identified.
We also anticipate that there will be
minimal increased cost to HHS/CDC to
implement these changes since we
already review documents regarding
biosafety and have a staff of fully
trained and experienced biosafety
inspectors. Based on our review of
recent permitting activity, we believe
the projected travel costs to perform
these inspections will be less than 1%
of the current budget for the HHS/CDC’s
Division of Select Agents and Toxins.
We also plan to coordinate these
inspections with those we are already
conducting under the Federal Select
Agent Inspection Program to recognize
greater efficiencies.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
agencies must consider the impact of
regulations on small entities and
analyze regulatory options that would
minimize a rule’s impacts on these
entities. Alternatively, the agency head
may certify that the proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The U.S. Small Business
Administration defines a small business
concern as one that is independently
owned and operated, is organized for
profit, and is not dominant in its field.
Depending on the industry, eligibility
for classification as a small business is
based on the average number of
employees for the preceding twelve
months or on sales volume averaged
over a three-year period. For example, a
business is considered small if its
annual revenue ranges between $2.5 to
$21.5 million for services provided or
the number of its employees range from
100 to 500 depending on the particular
product being provided. Based on this
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
7678
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
definition, HHS/CDC does not
anticipate that these regulatory changes
will have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
businesses or other small entities. HHS/
CDC estimates that only 100
applications out of the approximately
2,000 applications that we receive each
year will be from small businesses. We
received no comments to the proposed
rule concerning the cost and burden of
the proposed rule on small businesses.
V. Other Administrative Requirements
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), HHS/CDC has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does apply to
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule. We note that the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements are already approved by
OMB under OMB Control Number
0920–0199, expiration 1/31/2014. There
are no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements in this rule.
Since 2003, HHS/CDC has denied 2
applications for permits. HHS/CDC
proposes to provide applicants with an
opportunity for a written appeal in the
event that the HHS/CDC denies a
request for a permit to import infectious
biological agents, infectious substances,
or vectors under this part. Under the
proposal, an applicant who wishes to
make such an appeal would have 30
calendar days after receiving the denial
to submit the appeal in writing to the
HHS/CDC Director. The appeal must
state the factual basis for the appeal and
provide any supporting documentations
to justify the appeal (e.g., documents
that demonstrate the facility has the
appropriate biosafety measures in place
for working safely with requested
imported material). HHS/CDC would
then issue a written response, which
would constitute final agency action.
HHS/CDC estimates the time to prepare
and submit such a request is four hours.
We received no comments regarding
this process.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform and Executive Order 13132,
Federalism
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, and Executive Order 13132,
Federalism. This rule: (1) Preempts all
State and local laws and regulations that
are in conflict with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
C. Plain Language in Government
Writing
Pursuant to Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998 Plain
Language in Government Writing (63 FR
31885), Executive Departments and
Agencies are directed to use plain
language in all proposed and final rules.
HHS/CDC believes it has used plain
language in drafting of this final rule.
We received no comments from the
public to the proposed rule in this
regard.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 71
Airports, Animals, Communicable
diseases, Harbors, Imports, Pesticides
and pests, Public health, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: January 28, 2013.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services, amends 42 CFR Part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 215 and 311 of Public
Health Service (PHS) Act as amended (42
U.S.C. 216, 243); secs. 361–369, PHS Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 264–272).
■
2. Revise § 71.54 to read as follows:
§ 71.54 Import regulations for infectious
biological agents, infectious substances,
and vectors.
(a) The following definitions apply to
this section:
Animal. Any member of the animal
kingdom except a human including an
animal product (e.g., a mount, rug, or
other display item composed of the
hide, hair, skull, teeth, bones, or claws).
Diagnostic specimen. Specimens of
human and animal matter (including
tissue, blood, body discharges, fluids,
excretions or similar material), or
environmental samples.
Genomic material. Deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) or Ribonucleic acid (RNA)
comprising the genome or organism’s
hereditary information, that may be
single-stranded or double-stranded, and
in a linear, circular, or segmented
configuration and may be positive sense
(same polarity as mRNA), negative
sense, or ambisense (mixture of the
two).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Infectious biological agent. A
microorganism (including, but not
limited to, bacteria (including
rickettsiae), viruses, fungi, or protozoa)
or prion, whether naturally occurring,
bioengineered, or artificial, or a
component of such microorganism or
prion that is capable of causing
communicable disease in a human.
Infectious substance. Any material
that is known or reasonably expected to
contain an infectious biological agent.
Select agents and toxins. Biological
agents and toxins that could pose a
severe threat to public health and safety
as listed in 42 CFR 73.3 and 73.4.
Vector. Any animals (vertebrate or
invertebrate) including arthropods or
any noninfectious self-replicating
system (e.g., plasmids or other
molecular vector) or animal products
(e.g., a mount, rug, or other display item
composed of the hide, hair, skull, teeth,
bones, or claws of an animal) that are
known to transfer or are capable of
transferring an infectious biological
agent to a human.
(b) Unless excluded pursuant to
paragraph (f) of this section, a person
may not import into the United States
any infectious biological agent,
infectious substance, or vector unless:
(1) It is accompanied by a permit
issued by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). The
possession of a permit issued by the
CDC does not satisfy permitting
requirements placed on materials by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture that may
pose hazards to agriculture or
agricultural production in addition to
hazards to human health.
(2) The importer is in compliance
with all of the permit requirements and
conditions that are outlined in the
permit issued by the CDC.
(3) The importer has implemented
biosafety measures commensurate with
the hazard posed by the infectious
biological agent, infectious substance,
and/or vector to be imported, and the
level of risk given its intended use.
(4) The importer takes measures to
help ensure that the shipper complies
with all applicable legal requirements
concerning the packaging, labeling, and
shipment of infectious substances.
(c) If noted as a condition of the
issued permit, subsequent transfers of
any infectious biological agent,
infectious substance or vector within
the United States will require an
additional permit issued by the CDC.
(d) A permit is valid only for:
(1) The time period and/or term
indicated on the permit, and
(2) Only for so long as the permit
conditions continue to be met.
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(e) A permit can be denied, revoked
or suspended if:
(1) The biosafety measures of the
permit holder are not commensurate
with the hazard posed by the infectious
biological agent, infectious substance, or
vector, and the level of risk given its
intended use; or,
(2) The permit holder fails to comply
with all conditions, restrictions, and
precautions specified in the permit.
(f) A permit issued under this part is
not required for an item if:
(1) It is a biological agent listed in 42
CFR Part 73 as a select agent and its
importation has been authorized in
accordance with 42 CFR 73.16 or 9 CFR
121.16.
(2) With the exception of bat or
nonhuman primate specimens, it is a
diagnostic specimen not known by the
importer to contain, or suspected by the
importer of containing, an infectious
biological agent and is accompanied by
an importer certification statement
confirming that the material is not
known to contain or suspected of
containing an infectious biological
agent, or has been rendered
noninfectious.
(3) With the exception of live bats or
bat or nonhuman primate products, it is
an animal or animal product being
imported for educational, exhibition, or
scientific purposes and is accompanied
by documentation confirming that the
animal or animal product is not known
to contain (or suspected of containing)
an infectious biological agent or has
been rendered noninfectious.
(4) It consists only of nucleic acids
that cannot produce infectious forms of
any infectious biological agent and the
specimen is accompanied by an
importer certification statement
confirming that the material is not
known to contain or suspected of
containing an infectious biological
agent.
(5) It is a product that is cleared,
approved, licensed, or otherwise
authorized under any of the following
laws:
(i) The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), or
(ii) Section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act pertaining to biological
products (42 U.S.C. 262), or
(iii) The Virus-Serum-Toxin Act (21
U.S.C. 151–159).
(6) It is an animal or animal product
listed in 42 CFR Part 71 and its
importation has been authorized in
accordance with 42 CFR 71.52, 71.53, or
71.56.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Feb 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
(g) To apply for a permit, an
individual must:
(1) Submit a signed, completed CDC
Form 0.753 (Application for Permit to
Import Biological Agents or Vectors of
Human Disease into the United States)
to the HHS/CDC Import Permit Program.
(2) Have in place biosafety measures
that are commensurate with the hazard
posed by the infectious biological agent,
infectious substance, and/or vector to be
imported, and the level of risk given its
intended use.
(h) Issuance of a permit may be
contingent upon an inspection of the
importer’s facility by the CDC to
evaluate whether the importer’s
biosafety measures (e.g., physical
structure and features of the facility, and
operational and procedural safeguards)
are commensurate with the hazard
posed by the infectious biological agent,
infectious substance, and/or vector, and
the level of risk given its intended use.
(i) Denial, suspension, or revocation
of a permit under this section may be
appealed to the CDC Director. The
appeal must be in writing, state the
factual basis for the appeal, and be
submitted to the CDC Director within 30
calendar days of the denial, suspension,
or revocation of the permit. HHS/CDC
will issue a written response to the
appeal, which shall constitute final
agency action.
[FR Doc. 2013–02391 Filed 2–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1611
Income Level for Individuals Eligible
for Assistance
Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295–1596;
karaward@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 1007(a)(2) of the Legal
Services Corporation Act (Act), 42
U.S.C. 2996f(a)(2), requires the
Corporation to establish maximum
income levels for individuals eligible for
legal assistance, and the Act provides
that other specified factors shall be
taken into account along with income.
Section 1611.3(c) of the Corporation’s
regulations establishes a maximum
income level equivalent to one hundred
and twenty-five percent (125%) of the
Federal Poverty Guidelines. Since 1982,
the Department of Health and Human
Services has been responsible for
updating and issuing the Federal
Poverty Guidelines. The figures for 2013
set out below are equivalent to 125
percent (125%) of the current Federal
Poverty Guidelines as published on
January 24, 2013 (78 FR 5182).
In addition, LSC is publishing charts
listing income levels that are two
hundred percent (200%) of the Federal
Poverty Guidelines. These charts are for
reference purposes only as an aid to
grant recipients in assessing the
financial eligibility of an applicant
whose income is greater than 125
percent (125%) of the applicable
Federal Poverty Guidelines amount, but
less than 200 percent (200%) of the
applicable Federal Poverty Guidelines
amount (and who may be found to be
financially eligible under duly adopted
exceptions to the annual income ceiling
in accordance with sections 1611.3,
1611.4 and 1611.5).
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1611
Grant programs—law, Legal services.
AGENCY:
The Legal Services
Corporation (‘‘Corporation’’) is required
by law to establish maximum income
levels for individuals eligible for legal
assistance. This document updates the
specified income levels to reflect the
annual amendments to the Federal
Poverty Guidelines as issued by the
Department of Health and Human
Services.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is
effective as of February 4, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kara
Ward, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K St. NW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7679
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
the Legal Services Corporation amends
45 CFR part 1611 as follows:
PART 1611—ELIGIBILITY
1. The authority citation for part 1611
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1006(b)(1), 1007(a)(1)
Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974, 42
U.S.C. 2996e(b)(1), 2996f(a)(1), 2996f(a)(2).
2. Revise Appendix A to part 1611 to
read as follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 1611—Income
Level for Individuals Eligible for
Assistance
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7674-7679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02391]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. CDC-2011-0007]
42 CFR Part 71
RIN 0920-AA37
Foreign Quarantine; Import Regulations for Infectious Biological
Agents, Infectious Substances, and Vectors
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is issuing this final
rule amending the regulations regarding the importation of infectious
biological agents, infectious substances, and vectors. The amendments
improve HHS/CDC's ability to prevent the introduction, transmission, or
spread of communicable diseases into the United States.
DATES: The final rule is effective April 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbin Weyant, Ph.D., Director,
Division of Select Agents and Toxins, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS A-46, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Telephone: 404-718-2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble is organized as follows:
I. Background
II. Statutory Authority
III. Responses to Public Comments
A. Definitions
B. Infectious Biological Agent
C. Biosafety
D. Permit Exemptions
E. Transportation
F. Subsequent Transfer
G. Miscellaneous
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses Under Executive Orders 13563 and
12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
V. Other Administrative Requirements
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
B. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform and Executive
Order 13132, Federalism
C. Plain Language in Government Writing
I. Background
On October 14, 2011, we published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register (76 FR 63891) to clarify regulatory definitions, ensure
adequate biosafety measures, increase oversight through inspections, to
address permit exemptions and transportation requirements, and to
describe an appeal process. The proposed rule provided a 60-day public
comment period that ended on December 13, 2011.
This final rule contains provisions that apply to a variety of
entities including academic institutions and biomedical centers,
commercial manufacturing facilities, Federal, State, and local
laboratories, including clinical and diagnostic laboratories, research
facilities, exhibition facilities, and educational facilities.
II. Statutory Authority
This final rule is issued under the authority of Section 361 of the
Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C. 264). This provision
authorizes the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary to make and
enforce such regulations as in her judgment are necessary to prevent
the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from
foreign countries into the States or possessions of the United States
and from one State or possession into any other State or possession.
For purposes of carrying out and enforcing such regulations, the HHS
Secretary may authorize a variety of public health measures, including
inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination,
destruction of animals or articles found to be sources of dangerous
infection to human beings, and other measures.
The Foreign Quarantine regulations (42 CFR part 71) set forth
provisions to prevent the introduction, transmission, and spread of
communicable disease from foreign countries into the United States.
Part 71, Subpart F (Importations) contains provisions for importation
of etiological agents, hosts, and vectors (42 CFR 71.54), requiring
persons to obtain a permit issued by the CDC before importing, or
distributing after import, any of these materials.
III. Responses to Public Comment
We received nine comments from academic, private and government
facilities. The comments are discussed below.
A. Definitions
Commenters requested clarification about whether the definition of
``vector'' should (1) include an exemption for animals meant for a zoo,
(2) address pelts or other objects meant for museum use or (3) limit
the definition to the importation of live animals. Prior to entry into
the United States and regardless of the purpose for the importation, a
permit will continue to be required for any live animal or animal
product (e.g., a mount, rug, or other display item composed of the
hide, hair, skull, teeth, bones, or claws of an animal) unless (1) the
animal or animal product is not known to transfer or to be capable of
transferring an infectious biological agent to a human or (2) the
animal product has been rendered noninfectious. The documentation may
include a statement from a treating veterinarian, statement from a
medical facility, medical certificate, or in the case of an animal
product, documentary evidence, such as a veterinary or taxidermy
certificate, describing how the material had been treated to render it
noninfectious. Any live animal or animal product imported for
scientific, educational or exhibition purposes (e.g., bats and bat
products) will also continue to require a permit, unless accompanied by
documentation indicating that the animal or animal product is not known
to transfer or to
[[Page 7675]]
be capable of transferring an infectious biological agent to a human or
the product has been rendered noninfectious.
The terms ``educational purpose,'' ``exhibition purpose'' and
``scientific purpose'' are defined in 42 CFR 71.1. ``Scientific
purpose'' means ``use for scientific research following a defined
protocol and other standards for research projects as normally
conducted at the university level. The term also includes the use for
safety testing, potency testing, and other activities related to the
production of medical products.'' ``Educational purpose'' means ``use
in the teaching of a defined educational program at the university
level or equivalent.'' ``Exhibition purpose'' means ``use as a part of
a display in a facility comparable to a zoological park or in a trained
animal act. The animal display must be open to the general public at
routinely scheduled hours on 5 or more days of each week. The trained
animal act must be routinely scheduled for multiple performances each
week and open to the general public except for reasonable vacation and
retraining periods.''
One commenter urged HHS/CDC to modify the definition section to
include a new definition for the term ``infectious substance.'' The
commenter indicated that defining the term ``infectious substance'' in
the context of applicable transportation standards and requirements for
dangerous goods and hazardous materials would clarify HHS/CDC's
expectations regarding the packaging and shipping of these materials
and help applicants to better understand and address these issues. We
agree with the commenter and are replacing the definition of
``infectious material'' with an ``infectious substance'' definition,
which states ``any material that is known or reasonably expected to
contain an infectious biological agent.'' This definition for
``infectious substance'' is consistent with the definitions found in
the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations set forth at 49 CFR
Part 171-180 (``A material known or suspected to contain a pathogen:--a
microorganism (including bacteria, viruses, parasites, fungi) or other
agent, that can cause disease in humans or animals'') and World Health
Organization (WHO) Transport of Infectious Substances Standard (``For
the purposes of transport, infectious substances are defined as
substances which are known or are reasonably expected to contain
pathogens. Pathogens are defined as microorganisms (including bacteria,
viruses, rickettsiae, parasites, fungi) and other agents such as
prions, which can cause disease in humans or animals'').
A commenter recommended defining the term ``biosafety measures,''
which is used several times in the proposed regulatory language, to
help importers prepare for use of these requirements and to assist in
agency review of such measures before the issuance of a permit. The
commenter recommended that ``biosafety measures'' be defined as
``standard microbiological practices, special practices, safety
equipment (primary and personal protective equipment) and laboratory
facilities (secondary barriers) as noted in the current edition of
Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) and
additional safeguards as provided in the NIH Guidelines for recombinant
and synthetic DNA if appropriate for the substance or material for
which such measures are implemented.'' We made no changes based on this
comment. While the commenter provided excellent references, we believe
that citing only these references is limiting since there are other
references that provide useful recommendations for safely working with
a variety of human pathogens (i.e., Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) regulations, World Health Organization guidance,
etc.).
B. Infectious Biological Agent
One commenter noted that she was not aware of any medically
important fungal agents that are communicable (transmissible from
person to person), with the possible exception of dermatophyte agents
(Epidermophyton, Microsporum, and Trichophyton). The commenter argued
that the hazardous characteristics of dermatophyte agents are not
sufficiently severe to merit regulation of these agents through the
import permit mechanism. The commenter suggested that the regulatory
text be clarified to list the fungal agents that would be regulated.
The commenter further reasoned that Coccidioides species, Histoplasma
capsulatum, and Blastomyces dermatitidis should no longer require an
import permit since they do not cause communicable disease and are not
transmissible from person to person. We made no changes based on this
comment. Section 71.1 (Scope and definitions) of Title 42, Code of
Federal Regulations defines ``communicable disease'' as ``an illness
due to a specific infectious agent or its toxic products which arises
through transmission of that agent or its products from an infected
person or animal or a reservoir to a susceptible host, either directly,
or indirectly through an intermediate animal host, vector, or the
inanimate environment.'' All examples cited by this commenter meet this
definition of the term ``infectious biological agents'' because each of
the fungi cited are capable of causing communicable disease.
C. Biosafety
One commenter was interested in knowing specifically how HHS/CDC
will ``work with'' entities to address safety issues. The commenter
questioned if this will entail providing additional financing to bring
importers into compliance, or is this ``offer to work with'' the
importer a distinctive part of the permit issuance process. HHS/CDC's
statement in the preamble to the proposed rule that it was willing to
work with an entity whose biosafety measures were found to be
inadequate was neither an offer to provide financial assistance nor a
distinctive part of the permit issuance process. It was simply a
statement that, rather than simply deny a permit, HHS/CDC would be
willing to assist an applicant to achieve compliance with the import
regulations. If an importer is unable to address the inadequate
biosafety measures identified, the importer would not receive a permit
to import the infectious biological agent, infectious substance, or
vector requested.
D. Permit Exemptions
Diagnostic Specimens
One commenter proposed to replace the term ``diagnostic specimen''
with the phrase, ``exempt human specimen or exempt animal specimen'',
consistent with DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations and the
International Air Transport Association Dangerous Goods Standards. We
made no changes based on this comment since the proposed replacement
language limits the specimens to human and animals and does not include
environmental samples.
Another commenter stated that the proposed rule leaves too much
speculation about what is potentially infectious material. The
commenter suggested that a standard which was more closely aligned with
the WHO standard for biological materials and infectious substances
would provide more clarity. We agree with the commenter and have
replaced the definition for ``infectious material'' with an
``infectious substance'' definition that closely aligns with
definitions found in the DOT regulations and WHO standards.
Even though we did not receive a comment regarding bats, we
clarified
[[Page 7676]]
that these materials should not be exempted since people become
infected with germs either through direct or close contact with bats or
their droppings. Specifically, bats are known carriers of germs that
cause disease in humans, including internal and external parasites,
fungi, bacteria, and viruses. The most significant of these germs are
Nipah virus and viruses that cause diseases such as Ebola, Marburg
Hemorrhagic Fever, Sudden Acute Severe Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and
rabies.
Genomic Material
One commenter requested that the importation and subsequent
transfer of positive stranded viral RNA be considered in this Part. The
commenter reasoned that if this material could be used to recover an
infectious agent, its importation and subsequent transfer would be, for
all intents and purposes, identical to the importation and subsequent
transfer of an etiological agent. The commenter also reasoned that if
the intent was the extraction of the genetic information only, and the
recipient had no intention to retrieve the infectious agent from the
nucleic acid preparation, then the need for the permit would seem not
to be warranted. We made no changes based on this comment since
positive stranded viral rRNA genomic material would meet our proposed
definition as a ``component of such microorganism or prion that is
capable of causing communicable disease in a human.'' It should be
noted that our proposed rule already contains an exemption for genomic
materials certified by the importer to be incapable of producing
infectious biological agents.
E. Transportation
One commenter argued that the regulations should place the
responsibility for compliance with all applicable laws and regulations
concerning the packaging and shipment of infectious substances on the
shipper since the only thing related to shipping that could be
practically mandated for the recipient would be to open the shipment in
a manner consistent with the expected hazard and report any spillage/
leakage. The commenter stated that the importer could be required to
obtain some type of affirmation from the shipper to the effect that the
shipment is done in compliance with applicable regulations. We agree
with the commenter insofar as the commenter suggests that the shipper
comply with all applicable legal requirements relating to the
packaging, labeling, and shipment of infectious substances, such as
those found at 49 CFR part 173 and standards issued by the
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). We disagree with the
commenter, however, insofar as the commenter suggests that the importer
should bear no legal responsibility under these regulations for actions
taken by the shipper on the importer's behalf. Accordingly, under these
regulations the importer, as the initiator of the Import Permit
request, must implement measures to ensure that the shipper will
package, label, and ship the requested infectious substance, infectious
biological agent, or vector in a manner that is safe and in compliance
with all applicable legal requirements.
Another commenter suggested that we amend the statement ``The
importer is in compliance with all applicable laws concerning the
packaging and shipment of infectious substance'' to include ``and
regulations'' in the statement. The commenter also recommended that
guidance be provided on the HHS/CDC Web site to clarify HHS/CDC's
expectations regarding the packaging and shipping of infectious
substances. We agreed with the commenter that the statement should be
revised to include all laws and regulations. Therefore, we changed the
language to read, ``The importer takes measures to help ensure that the
shipper complies with all applicable legal requirements concerning the
packaging, labeling, and shipment of infectious substances.'' To
clarify HHS/CDC's expectations regarding the packaging and shipping of
infectious substances, we have posted guidance regarding our
expectations on the HHS/CDC import permit Web site at: https://www.cdc.gov/od/eaipp/faq.htm.
F. Subsequent Transfer
One commenter requested confirmation that an importer may still
seek authorization for subsequent transfers of the items within the
United States through the initial permit application. We confirm that
an importer may still seek authorization for subsequent transfers of
items within the United States in the initial permit application.
G. Miscellaneous
Cost
One commenter believed that there would be a significant cost to
implement the HHS/CDC inspection program. The commenter stated it
should be an institutional responsibility to ensure that an appropriate
biosafety plan is in place. The commenter believed if an institution
does not have a biosafety office or plan; it should not have the permit
to import items that may pose any kind of risk. We agree that an entity
that does not have a biosafety plan should not have a permit to import
items that have the potential to pose a risk to public health and
safety.
Since 2009, we have refined the HHS/CDC import permit database to
include better descriptions of material being imported, the biosafety
level of the laboratory where the work will be performed, and the type
of work to be conducted (e.g., diagnostic, research). To estimate the
number of facilities that would require a biosafety inspection under
this Part; we first identified those facilities that had previously
applied to import agents which are capable of causing serious or
potentially lethal disease in humans via the aerosol route. From that
list, we deleted those facilities already receiving periodic biosafety
inspections from either HHS/CDC or the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS) under the HHS
or USDA Select Agent Regulations (42 CFR part 73, 9 CFR part 121, or 7
CFR part 131) and concluded that approximately 25 facilities would need
to be inspected per year to verify that they have in place the
appropriate biosafety measures. Since we already review documents
regarding biosafety and have a staff of fully trained and experienced
biosafety inspectors, and based on our review of recent permitting
activity, we believe the projected travel costs to perform these
inspections will be less than 1% of the current budget for the HHS/
CDC's Division of Select Agents and Toxins. We also plan to coordinate
these inspections with those we are already conducting under the
Federal Select Agent Inspection Program to recognize greater
efficiencies.
Internet Site
One commenter suggested that HHS/CDC maintain on its internet site
the current permit preparation guidance text so that permit applicants
will have ready access to information regarding their responsibilities
under the regulations, separate from the regulations themselves. We
agree with this commenter and will review our Web site content on a
regular ongoing basis to ensure that the content is consistent with the
regulations and easy to find.
Alternatives Considered
In the proposed rule we discussed the alternative approaches we
considered in development of this rulemaking in order to reduce burden
for clinical/diagnostic laboratories or small businesses selling
manufactured goods.
[[Page 7677]]
First, we noted that, from HHS/CDC's Select Agent inspection
program, specific biosafety measure implementation issues were
identified in 81 of the 316 entities inspected by CDC since 2003. Some
of the biosafety measure implementation issues were serious enough to
require the suspension of registration or other restrictions on
biological work at these facilities. We noted that USDA/APHIS had
identified similar biosafety issues. Because of these issues, we
proposed to require specific biosafety measures to be implemented by
the applicant.
Second, we considered proposing a requirement that applicants
develop and maintain a written biosafety plan commensurate with the
hazard posed by the infectious biological agent, infectious material,
and/or vector to be imported, and the level of risk given the intended
use including what elements of the plan are essential to prevent
exposures and dramatically reduce the incidence of laboratory acquired
infections and protect the public health and the environment. We
acknowledged that most, if not all, importers of etiological agents
already have such biosafety plans. We based this on our experience with
import permit submissions that address Section G (Receiving Laboratory
Capabilities) of the permit application. We specifically sought comment
from the public concerning the cost and burden of requiring a formal a
written biosafety plan. We did not receive any comments specifically
addressing the cost and burden of requiring a formal written biosafety
plan.
Finally, we proposed exemptions to allow importers to import
certain material that is already approved or authorized by another
Federal agency or material that has been determined not to be an
infectious biological agent.
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule is being treated as ``not significant'' under EO
12866. It clarifies regulatory definitions, insures adequate biosafety
measures, increases oversight through inspections, addresses permit
exemptions and transportation requirements, and describes an appeal
process when the permit request is denied. Thus, the rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Based on past experience, we estimate that there will be
approximately 2,000 applications for both import and distribution
permit requests each year and that the average response time to
complete the application is 20 minutes. We believe that the burden has
been limited to requesting only essential information on the
application, verifying information, when required, by telephone, and
mailing information to the appropriate parties.
With regard to the new requirement to have biosafety measures in
place, our current experience from reviewing the information submitted
for the import permit applications addressing Section G (Receiving
Laboratory Capabilities) (e.g., detailed description of any required
personal protective equipment (PPE)), and laboratory equipment (i.e.,
biosafety cabinets, autoclaves) that ensures materials are properly
handled and contained indicates that the vast majority of importers of
etiological agents already have instituted such biosafety measures.
Based on our review of applications received between March 2011 and
January 2012, we estimate that 98% (632 out of 644) of the applicants
possess written biosafety plans and already follow standard biosafety
practices and procedures.
With regard to whether HHS/CDC will inspect an import facility, as
noted above, HHS/CDC will use the following specific criteria to
determine which entities are to be inspected: (1) facilities that
request to perform research with imported agents that would need to be
conducted in a biosafety level (BSL) 3, BSL-4, animal biosafety level
(ABSL) 3, ABSL-4 or BSL-3 Agriculture laboratory as described in the
BMBL (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis used in aerosol studies required
at BSL-3), and (2) facilities that have not been inspected by either
HHS/CDC or USDA/APHIS under the Federal Select Agent Regulations.
Since 2009, we have refined the HHS/CDC import permit database to
include better descriptions of material being imported, the biosafety
level of the facility where the work would be performed, and the type
of work to be conducted (e.g., diagnostic, research). To estimate the
number of facilities that would require a biosafety inspection, we
first identified those facilities that applied to import agents to use
in research, which may cause serious or potentially lethal disease
after inhalation. From that list, we removed those facilities already
subject to periodic biosafety inspections under the Federal Select
Agent Regulations. We concluded that approximately 25 facilities would
need to be inspected per year to verify that they have in place the
appropriate biosafety measures. To minimize additional burdens on
inspected facilities, we will be contacting those facilities that
received a permit in 2012, and would meet the criteria for requiring an
inspection, 3 months prior to the expiration of the facility's import
permit to initiate the renewal process. We plan to inspect these
facilities once in a two year timeframe, assuming that no significant
biosafety problems are identified.
We also anticipate that there will be minimal increased cost to
HHS/CDC to implement these changes since we already review documents
regarding biosafety and have a staff of fully trained and experienced
biosafety inspectors. Based on our review of recent permitting
activity, we believe the projected travel costs to perform these
inspections will be less than 1% of the current budget for the HHS/
CDC's Division of Select Agents and Toxins. We also plan to coordinate
these inspections with those we are already conducting under the
Federal Select Agent Inspection Program to recognize greater
efficiencies.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), agencies must consider the impact of regulations on small
entities and analyze regulatory options that would minimize a rule's
impacts on these entities. Alternatively, the agency head may certify
that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The U.S. Small Business
Administration defines a small business concern as one that is
independently owned and operated, is organized for profit, and is not
dominant in its field. Depending on the industry, eligibility for
classification as a small business is based on the average number of
employees for the preceding twelve months or on sales volume averaged
over a three-year period. For example, a business is considered small
if its annual revenue ranges between $2.5 to $21.5 million for services
provided or the number of its employees range from 100 to 500 depending
on the particular product being provided. Based on this
[[Page 7678]]
definition, HHS/CDC does not anticipate that these regulatory changes
will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small businesses or other small entities. HHS/CDC estimates that only
100 applications out of the approximately 2,000 applications that we
receive each year will be from small businesses. We received no
comments to the proposed rule concerning the cost and burden of the
proposed rule on small businesses.
V. Other Administrative Requirements
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), HHS/CDC has determined that the
Paperwork Reduction Act does apply to information collection and
recordkeeping requirements included in this rule. We note that the
information collection and recordkeeping requirements are already
approved by OMB under OMB Control Number 0920-0199, expiration 1/31/
2014. There are no new information collection or recordkeeping
requirements in this rule.
Since 2003, HHS/CDC has denied 2 applications for permits. HHS/CDC
proposes to provide applicants with an opportunity for a written appeal
in the event that the HHS/CDC denies a request for a permit to import
infectious biological agents, infectious substances, or vectors under
this part. Under the proposal, an applicant who wishes to make such an
appeal would have 30 calendar days after receiving the denial to submit
the appeal in writing to the HHS/CDC Director. The appeal must state
the factual basis for the appeal and provide any supporting
documentations to justify the appeal (e.g., documents that demonstrate
the facility has the appropriate biosafety measures in place for
working safely with requested imported material). HHS/CDC would then
issue a written response, which would constitute final agency action.
HHS/CDC estimates the time to prepare and submit such a request is four
hours. We received no comments regarding this process.
B. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform and Executive Order
13132, Federalism
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, and Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule: (1)
Preempts all State and local laws and regulations that are in conflict
with this rule; (2) has no retroactive effect; and (3) does not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
C. Plain Language in Government Writing
Pursuant to Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998 Plain Language
in Government Writing (63 FR 31885), Executive Departments and Agencies
are directed to use plain language in all proposed and final rules.
HHS/CDC believes it has used plain language in drafting of this final
rule. We received no comments from the public to the proposed rule in
this regard.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 71
Airports, Animals, Communicable diseases, Harbors, Imports,
Pesticides and pests, Public health, Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 28, 2013.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
amends 42 CFR Part 71 as follows:
PART 71--FOREIGN QUARANTINE
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 215 and 311 of Public Health Service (PHS) Act
as amended (42 U.S.C. 216, 243); secs. 361-369, PHS Act, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 264-272).
0
2. Revise Sec. 71.54 to read as follows:
Sec. 71.54 Import regulations for infectious biological agents,
infectious substances, and vectors.
(a) The following definitions apply to this section:
Animal. Any member of the animal kingdom except a human including
an animal product (e.g., a mount, rug, or other display item composed
of the hide, hair, skull, teeth, bones, or claws).
Diagnostic specimen. Specimens of human and animal matter
(including tissue, blood, body discharges, fluids, excretions or
similar material), or environmental samples.
Genomic material. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or Ribonucleic acid
(RNA) comprising the genome or organism's hereditary information, that
may be single-stranded or double-stranded, and in a linear, circular,
or segmented configuration and may be positive sense (same polarity as
mRNA), negative sense, or ambisense (mixture of the two).
Infectious biological agent. A microorganism (including, but not
limited to, bacteria (including rickettsiae), viruses, fungi, or
protozoa) or prion, whether naturally occurring, bioengineered, or
artificial, or a component of such microorganism or prion that is
capable of causing communicable disease in a human.
Infectious substance. Any material that is known or reasonably
expected to contain an infectious biological agent.
Select agents and toxins. Biological agents and toxins that could
pose a severe threat to public health and safety as listed in 42 CFR
73.3 and 73.4.
Vector. Any animals (vertebrate or invertebrate) including
arthropods or any noninfectious self-replicating system (e.g., plasmids
or other molecular vector) or animal products (e.g., a mount, rug, or
other display item composed of the hide, hair, skull, teeth, bones, or
claws of an animal) that are known to transfer or are capable of
transferring an infectious biological agent to a human.
(b) Unless excluded pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section, a
person may not import into the United States any infectious biological
agent, infectious substance, or vector unless:
(1) It is accompanied by a permit issued by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). The possession of a permit issued by the
CDC does not satisfy permitting requirements placed on materials by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture that may pose hazards to agriculture or
agricultural production in addition to hazards to human health.
(2) The importer is in compliance with all of the permit
requirements and conditions that are outlined in the permit issued by
the CDC.
(3) The importer has implemented biosafety measures commensurate
with the hazard posed by the infectious biological agent, infectious
substance, and/or vector to be imported, and the level of risk given
its intended use.
(4) The importer takes measures to help ensure that the shipper
complies with all applicable legal requirements concerning the
packaging, labeling, and shipment of infectious substances.
(c) If noted as a condition of the issued permit, subsequent
transfers of any infectious biological agent, infectious substance or
vector within the United States will require an additional permit
issued by the CDC.
(d) A permit is valid only for:
(1) The time period and/or term indicated on the permit, and
(2) Only for so long as the permit conditions continue to be met.
[[Page 7679]]
(e) A permit can be denied, revoked or suspended if:
(1) The biosafety measures of the permit holder are not
commensurate with the hazard posed by the infectious biological agent,
infectious substance, or vector, and the level of risk given its
intended use; or,
(2) The permit holder fails to comply with all conditions,
restrictions, and precautions specified in the permit.
(f) A permit issued under this part is not required for an item if:
(1) It is a biological agent listed in 42 CFR Part 73 as a select
agent and its importation has been authorized in accordance with 42 CFR
73.16 or 9 CFR 121.16.
(2) With the exception of bat or nonhuman primate specimens, it is
a diagnostic specimen not known by the importer to contain, or
suspected by the importer of containing, an infectious biological agent
and is accompanied by an importer certification statement confirming
that the material is not known to contain or suspected of containing an
infectious biological agent, or has been rendered noninfectious.
(3) With the exception of live bats or bat or nonhuman primate
products, it is an animal or animal product being imported for
educational, exhibition, or scientific purposes and is accompanied by
documentation confirming that the animal or animal product is not known
to contain (or suspected of containing) an infectious biological agent
or has been rendered noninfectious.
(4) It consists only of nucleic acids that cannot produce
infectious forms of any infectious biological agent and the specimen is
accompanied by an importer certification statement confirming that the
material is not known to contain or suspected of containing an
infectious biological agent.
(5) It is a product that is cleared, approved, licensed, or
otherwise authorized under any of the following laws:
(i) The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et
seq.), or
(ii) Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act pertaining to
biological products (42 U.S.C. 262), or
(iii) The Virus-Serum-Toxin Act (21 U.S.C. 151-159).
(6) It is an animal or animal product listed in 42 CFR Part 71 and
its importation has been authorized in accordance with 42 CFR 71.52,
71.53, or 71.56.
(g) To apply for a permit, an individual must:
(1) Submit a signed, completed CDC Form 0.753 (Application for
Permit to Import Biological Agents or Vectors of Human Disease into the
United States) to the HHS/CDC Import Permit Program.
(2) Have in place biosafety measures that are commensurate with the
hazard posed by the infectious biological agent, infectious substance,
and/or vector to be imported, and the level of risk given its intended
use.
(h) Issuance of a permit may be contingent upon an inspection of
the importer's facility by the CDC to evaluate whether the importer's
biosafety measures (e.g., physical structure and features of the
facility, and operational and procedural safeguards) are commensurate
with the hazard posed by the infectious biological agent, infectious
substance, and/or vector, and the level of risk given its intended use.
(i) Denial, suspension, or revocation of a permit under this
section may be appealed to the CDC Director. The appeal must be in
writing, state the factual basis for the appeal, and be submitted to
the CDC Director within 30 calendar days of the denial, suspension, or
revocation of the permit. HHS/CDC will issue a written response to the
appeal, which shall constitute final agency action.
[FR Doc. 2013-02391 Filed 2-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P