National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers, 7487-7522 [2012-31645]
Download as PDF
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 22
February 1, 2013
Part II
Environmental Protection Agency
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 63
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Final Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7488
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0790; FRL–9698–5]
RIN 2060–AR14
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and
Institutional Boilers
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of final action
on reconsideration.
AGENCY:
In this action, the EPA is
taking final action on reconsideration of
certain issues related to the emission
standards to control hazardous air
pollutants from new and existing
industrial, commercial and institutional
boilers at area sources which were
issued under section 112 of the Clean
Air Act. As part of this action, the EPA
is amending certain compliance dates
for the standard and making technical
corrections to the final rule to clarify
definitions, references, applicability and
compliance issues raised by petitioners
and other stakeholders affected by the
rule. The EPA today is taking final
action on the proposed reconsideration.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 1, 2013. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in this final rule were approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
February 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA established a
single docket under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2006–0790 for this action. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading
Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20004. This Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the Air Docket is (202) 566–1741.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
Ms.
Mary Johnson, Energy Strategies Group
(D243–01), Sector Policies and Programs
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone
number: (919) 541–5025; fax number:
(919) 541–5450; email address:
johnson.mary@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Executive Summary
Purpose of This Regulatory Action
The EPA is taking final action on its
proposed reconsideration of certain
provisions of its March 21, 2011, final
rule that established emission standards
for the source category of new and
existing industrial, commercial, and
institutional boilers located at area
source facilities listed pursuant to CAA
sections 112(c)(3), 112(c)(6), and
112(k)(3)(B).
Section 112(d) of the CAA requires
the EPA to regulate HAP from both
major and area stationary sources.
Section 112(d)(5) of the CAA allows the
EPA to establish standards for area
sources of HAP ‘‘which provide for the
use of generally available control
technologies (GACT) or management
practices by such sources to reduce
emissions of hazardous air pollutants.’’
While GACT serves as the basis for
standards of most emissions from area
source boilers, two pollutants emitted
by coal-fired boilers, POM as 7–PAH
and Hg, must be regulated based on the
performance of MACT. These two
pollutants are regulated based on MACT
because area source industrial,
commercial and institutional boilers
combusting coal were listed under
section 112(c)(6) of the CAA due to the
source categories’ emissions of POM
and Hg. Section 112(c)(6) requires the
EPA to regulate sources listed pursuant
to that provision by issuing standards
under section 112(d)(2) or (d)(4). The
final rule meets this requirement by
setting MACT standards for Hg and CO
(as a surrogate for POM) for units in the
coal-fired subcategory. Further, the final
rule sets standards based on GACT for
the urban HAP, other than Hg and POM,
emitted from coal-fired boilers that pose
the greatest public health risk, pursuant
to section 112(c)(3) of the CAA,
including arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
lead, chromium, manganese, nickel,
ethylene dioxide, and PCBs. In addition,
the final rule sets standards based on
GACT for boilers combusting oil or
biomass for urban HAP, including Hg,
arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, lead,
chromium, manganese, nickel, POM,
ethylene dioxide, and PCBs.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
In developing the MACT standards for
coal-fired boilers, the EPA considered
section 112(h) of the CAA, which allows
the EPA to establish work practice
standards in lieu of numerical emission
limits under section 112(d)(2) only in
cases where the agency determines that
it is not feasible to prescribe or enforce
an emission standard. The EPA has set
work practice standards for emissions of
Hg and POM from small coal-fired
boilers, pursuant to section 112(h), in
the form of periodic tune-ups.
This final rule amends certain
provisions of the final rule issued by
EPA on March 11, 2011, and responds
to petitions for reconsideration filed by
a number of different entities.
Summary of Major Reconsideration
Provisions
In general, the final rule requires
facilities classified as area sources of
HAP with affected boilers to reduce
emissions of harmful toxic air emissions
from these combustion sources,
improving air quality, and protecting
public health in communities where
these facilities are located.
Recognizing the diversity of this
source category and the multiple sectors
of the economy this rule affects, the EPA
is establishing seven subcategories for
boilers based on the design of the
combustion equipment and operating
schedules of the unit. In addition to the
coal, biomass, and oil subcategories in
the March 2011 final rule, we are
establishing subcategories for seasonal
boilers, limited-use boilers, oil-fired
boilers with heat input capacity of equal
to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr, and certain
boilers that use a continuous oxygen
trim system.
Numerical emission limits, based on
MACT, are established for Hg and CO at
new and existing large coal-fired boilers
(i.e., with a design heat input capacity
of 10 MMBtu/hr or more). A review of
the data has resulted in changes to the
Hg and CO emission limits contained in
the March 2011 final rule. The EPA is
also establishing a CEMS alternative
compliance option for the numeric CO
emission limit. Coal-fired boilers subject
to a CO emission limit can comply with
the limit using a periodic stack test and
CPMS, or by using CEMS. The CO
CEMS alternative compliance option is
based on a 10-day rolling average and
provides additional compliance
flexibility to sources with existing CO
CEMS equipment. New and existing
small coal-fired units (i.e., with a design
heat input capacity of less than 10
MMBtu/hr) are subject to periodic tuneup work practices for CO and Hg in lieu
of numeric emission limits because the
EPA found that it was technologically
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
and economically impracticable to
apply measurement methodology to
these small sources, pursuant to CAA
section 112(h).
Numerical emission limits, based on
GACT, are established for PM as a
surrogate for urban metal HAP other
than Hg for new large coal-fired boilers.
New and existing small coal-fired
boilers are subject to periodic tune-up
management practices for PM as a
surrogate for urban metal HAP other
than Hg, and for CO as a surrogate for
urban organic HAP other than POM,
based on GACT.
New large biomass- and oil-fired
boilers are subject to numerical
emission limits for PM as a surrogate for
urban metal HAP, based on GACT.
Existing biomass and oil-fired boilers
and new small biomass- and oil-fired
boilers are subject to periodic tune-up
management practices for PM as a
surrogate for urban metal HAP, based on
GACT. New and existing biomass- and
oil-fired boilers are subject to periodic
tune-up management practices for CO as
a surrogate for urban organic HAP,
based on GACT. Certain other
subcategories (seasonal boilers, limiteduse boilers, oil-fired boilers with heat
input capacity of equal to or less than
5 MMBtu/hr, and boilers with an
oxygen trim system) are subject to
periodic tune-up work practice or
management practice requirements
tailored to their schedule of operation
and types of fuel.
The compliance date for existing
sources is March 21, 2014. The
compliance date for new sources that
began operations on or before May 20,
2011 is May 20, 2011. For new sources
that start up after May 20, 2011, the
compliance date is the date of startup.
New sources are defined as sources that
began operation after June 4, 2010.
Costs and Benefits
This final action is intended to clarify
definitions, references, applicability and
compliance issues, but not change the
coverage of the final rule. The final rule
will affect an estimated 180,000 existing
area source boilers and the EPA projects
that approximately an additional 6,800
new boilers will be subject to the rule
over the initial 3-year period. The
clarifications should make it easier for
owners and operators and for local and
state authorities to understand and
implement the rule’s requirements. As
compared to the March 2011 final rule,
this final rule will not affect the
estimated emission reductions, control
costs or the benefits of the rule in
substance. This final rule does not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements beyond those imposed by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
the previously promulgated boiler area
source rule and, in fact, will result in a
decrease in regulatory requirements for
certain subcategories of boilers. A more
detailed discussion of the costs and
benefits of the March 2011 final rule is
provided at 76 FR 15579, March 21,
2011, and 76 FR 80542, December 23,
2011. Section VI of this preamble
provides a discussion of the impacts of
this final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The
following acronyms and abbreviations
are used in this document.
7–PAH 7-polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons
ACI activated carbon injection
ASTM American Society for Testing and
Materials
Btu British thermal unit
CO carbon monoxide
CEMS continuous emission monitoring
system
CDX Central Data Exchange
CAA Clean Air Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COMS continuous opacity monitoring
system
CPMS continuous parameter monitoring
system
DOE Department of Energy
ERT Electronic Reporting Tool
ESP electrostatic precipitator
FR Federal Register
GACT generally available control
technologies
HAP hazardous air pollutants
Hg mercury
HQ Headquarters
ISO International Standards Organization
lb pounds
MACT maximum achievable control
technology
MMBtu million British thermal units
NAA No Action Assurance
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System
NESHAP national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants
NSPS new source performance standard
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls
PM particulate matter
POM polycyclic organic matter
ppm parts per million
PSD prevention of significant deterioration
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RIN Regulatory Information Number
TBtu trillion British thermal units
TTN Technology Transfer Network
tpy tons per year
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
UPL upper prediction limit
VCS Voluntary Consensus Standards
WWW Worldwide Web
Organization of This Document. The
information presented in this preamble
is organized as follows:
I. General Information
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7489
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I get a copy of this
document?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background Information
III. Summary of Final Action on
Reconsideration
A. Affected Sources
B. Source Category Exclusions
C. Emission Limits
D. Tune-Up Work Practice and
Management Practice Standards
E. Energy Assessment Work Practice and
Management Practice Standards
F. GACT-Based Standards
G. Initial Compliance
H. Operating Limits
I. Continuous Compliance
J. Periods of Startup and Shutdown
K. Affirmative Defense Language
L. Notification, Recordkeeping and
Reporting Requirements
M. Title V Permitting Requirements
N. Definition of Period of Gas Curtailment
or Supply Interruption
O. Miscellaneous Technical Corrections
P. Other Issues
IV. Summary of Significant Changes Since
Proposed Action on Reconsideration
A. Applicability
B. Tune-Up Requirements
C. Energy Assessment
D. Clarification of Oxygen Concentration
Operating Limits
E. Definitions Regarding Averaging Times
F. Fuel Sampling Frequency
G. Performance Testing Frequency
H. Startup and Shutdown Definitions
I. Notifications
J. Miscellaneous Definitions
V. Other Actions the EPA Is Taking
VI. Impacts Associated With This Final Rule
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The regulated categories and entities
potentially affected by this action
include:
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7490
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
NAICS Code a
Industry category
Any area source facility using a boiler as defined in the final rule. .............................
321
11
311
327
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
424
531
611
813
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
92
722
62
22111
a North
Wood product manufacturing.
Agriculture, greenhouses.
Food manufacturing.
Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing.
Wholesale trade, nondurable goods.
Real estate.
Educational services.
Religious, civic, professional, and similar
organizations.
Public administration.
Food services and drinking places.
Health care and social assistance.
Electric power generation.
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this final action. To
determine whether your facility may be
affected by this action, you should
examine the applicability criteria in 40
CFR 63.11193 of subpart JJJJJJ (National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial,
and Institutional Boilers Area Sources).
If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this final rule to a
particular entity, consult either the air
permit authority for the entity or your
EPA regional representative, as listed in
40 CFR 63.13 of subpart A (General
Provisions).
B. Where can I get a copy of this
document?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this action
will also be available on the WWW
through the TTN. Following signature, a
copy of the action will be posted on the
TTN’s policy and guidance page for
newly proposed or promulgated rules at
the following address: https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN
provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air
pollution control.
C. Judicial Review
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Examples of regulated entities
Under the CAA section 307(b)(1),
judicial review of this final rule is
available only by filing a petition for
review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit by April
2, 2013. Under CAA section
307(d)(7)(B), only an objection to this
final rule that was raised with
reasonable specificity during the period
for public comment can be raised during
judicial review.
Under CAA section 307(b)(2), the
requirements established by this final
rule may not be challenged separately in
any civil or criminal proceedings
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
brought by EPA to enforce these
requirements.
II. Background Information
Section 112(d) of the CAA requires
the EPA to establish NESHAP for both
major and area sources of HAP that are
listed for regulation under CAA section
112(c). A major source is any stationary
source that emits or has the potential to
emit 10 tpy or more of any single HAP
or 25 tpy or more of any combination of
HAP. An area source is a stationary
source that is not a major source.
On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15554), the
EPA issued the NESHAP for industrial,
commercial and institutional area
source boilers pursuant to CAA sections
112(c)(3), 112(c)(6), and 112(k)(3)(B).
CAA section 112(k)(3)(B) directs the
EPA to identify at least 30 HAP that, as
a result of emissions from area sources,
pose the greatest threat to public health
in the largest number of urban areas.
The EPA implemented this provision in
1999 in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics
Strategy, (64 FR 38715, July 19, 1999)
(Strategy). Specifically, in the Strategy,
the EPA identified 30 HAP that pose the
greatest potential health threat in urban
areas, and these HAP are referred to as
the ‘‘30 urban HAP.’’ Section 112(c)(3)
of the CAA requires the EPA to list
sufficient categories or subcategories of
area sources to ensure that area sources
representing 90 percent of the emissions
of the 30 urban HAP are subject to
regulation. Under CAA section
112(d)(5), the EPA may elect to
promulgate standards or requirements
for area sources ‘‘which provide for the
use of generally available control
technologies (‘‘GACT’’) or management
practices by such sources to reduce
emissions of hazardous air pollutants.’’
CAA section 112(c)(6) requires that
the EPA list categories and
subcategories of sources assuring that
sources accounting for not less than 90
percent of the aggregate emissions of
each of seven specified HAP are subject
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to standards under CAA sections
112(d)(2) or (d)(4), which require the
application of the more stringent MACT.
The seven HAP specified in CAA
section 112(c)(6) are as follows:
Alkylated lead compounds, POM,
hexachlorobenzene, Hg, PCBs, 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzofuran, and 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
As noted in the preamble to the final
rule, (76 FR 15556, March 21, 2011), we
listed area source industrial boilers and
commercial/institutional boilers
combusting coal under CAA section
112(c)(6) based on the source categories’
contribution of Hg and POM, and under
CAA section 112(c)(3) for their
contribution of arsenic, beryllium,
cadmium, lead, chromium, manganese,
nickel, ethylene dioxide, and PCBs, as
well as Hg and POM. We promulgated
final standards for coal-fired area source
boilers to reflect the application of
MACT for Hg and POM, and to reflect
GACT for the urban HAP other than Hg
and POM.
We listed industrial and commercial/
institutional boilers combusting oil or
biomass under CAA section 112(c)(3) for
their contribution of Hg, arsenic,
beryllium, cadmium, lead, chromium,
manganese, nickel, POM, ethylene
dioxide, and PCBs. For boilers firing oil
or biomass, the final standards reflect
GACT for all of the urban HAP.
On March 21, 2011, we also published
a notice to initiate the reconsideration of
certain aspects of the final rule for area
source industrial, commercial and
institutional boilers (76 FR 15266). The
reconsideration notice identified several
provisions of the final rule where
additional public comment was
appropriate. The notice also identified
several issues of central relevance to the
rulemaking where reconsideration was
appropriate under CAA section 307(d).
Following promulgation of the final
rule, the EPA also received petitions for
reconsideration from the following
organizations (Petitioners): American
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Sugar Cane League of the U.S.A., Alaska
Oil and Gas Association, American Coke
and Coal Chemicals Institute, American
Iron and Steel Institute, American
Petroleum Institute, Council of
Industrial Boiler Owners, Industry
Coalition (American Forest and Paper
Association (AF&PA) et. al.), National
Petrochemical and Refiners Association,
Sierra Club, and the State of Washington
Department of Ecology. Petitioners,
pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(7)(B),
requested that the EPA reconsider
numerous provisions in the rules. On
December 23, 2011, the EPA granted the
petitions for reconsideration on certain
issues, and proposed certain revisions to
the final rule in response to the
reconsideration petitions and to address
the issues that the EPA previously
identified as warranting
reconsideration. That proposal solicited
comment on several specific aspects of
the rule, including:
• Establishing separate requirements
for seasonally operated boilers.
• Addressing temporary boilers.
• Clarifying the initial compliance
schedule for existing boilers subject to
tune-ups.
• Defining periods of gas curtailment.
• Providing an optional CO
compliance mechanism using CEMS.
• Averaging times for parameter
monitoring.
• Providing an affirmative defense for
malfunction events.
• Adjusting frequency of tune-up
work practices for very small units.
• Selecting a 99 percent confidence
interval for setting the CO emission
limit.
• Establishing GACT-based limits for
biomass and oil-fired boilers.
• Scope and duration of the energy
assessment and deadline for completing
the assessment.
• Revising GACT-based limits for PM
at new oil-fired boilers.
• Exempting area sources from title V
permitting requirements.
In this action, the EPA is finalizing
multiple changes to this NESHAP after
considering public comments on the
items under reconsideration.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Summary of Final Action on
Reconsideration
As stated above, the December 23,
2011, proposed rule addressed specific
issues and provisions the EPA identified
for reconsideration. This summary
reflects the agency’s final action in
regards to those provisions identified for
reconsideration and on other discrete
matters identified in response to
comments or data received during the
comment period.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
A. Affected Sources
This final rule amends 40 CFR
63.11194 to specify that an existing
dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced
construction or reconstruction on or
before June 4, 2010) meeting the
definition of gas-fired boiler, as defined
in 40 CFR 63.11237, that meets the
applicability requirements of subpart
JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010 due to a fuel
switch from gaseous fuel to solid fossil
fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel is
considered to be an existing source
under this subpart as long as the boiler
was designed to accommodate the
alternate fuel. A new or reconstructed
dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced
construction or reconstruction after June
4, 2010) meeting the definition of gasfired boiler, as defined in 40 CFR
63.11237, that meets the applicability
criteria of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4,
2010 due to a fuel switch from gaseous
fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or
liquid fuel is considered to be a new
source under this subpart.
B. Source Category Exclusions
This final rule amends the list of
boilers that are not part of the source
categories subject to subpart JJJJJJ. We
are revising this list (as set forth in 40
CFR 63.11195) to clarify certain boiler
types and to include certain additional
boilers that may be located at an
industrial, commercial or institutional
area source facility. These revisions of
the source categories are described
below.
1. Electric Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11195 by adding electric boilers to
the list of boilers not subject to subpart
JJJJJJ. Electric boilers are defined in 40
CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Electric boiler means a boiler in which
electric heating serves as the source of heat.
Electric boilers that burn gaseous or liquid
fuel during periods of electrical power
curtailment or failure are included in this
definition.
2. Residential Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11195 by adding residential boilers
to the list of boilers not subject to
subpart JJJJJJ. We are clarifying that a
residential boiler may be part of a
residential combined heat and power
system and that a boiler serving a single
unit residence dwelling that has since
been converted or subdivided into
condominiums or apartments may also
be considered a residential boiler.
Residential boilers are defined in 40
CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Residential boiler means a boiler used to
provide heat and/or hot water and/or as part
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7491
of a residential combined heat and power
system. This definition includes boilers
located at an institutional facility (e.g.,
university campus, military base, church
grounds) or commercial/industrial facility
(e.g., farm) used primarily to provide heat
and/or hot water for:
(1) A dwelling containing four or fewer
families, or
(2) A single unit residence dwelling that
has since been converted or subdivided into
condominiums or apartments.
3. Temporary Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11195 by adding temporary boilers to
the list of boilers not subject to subpart
JJJJJJ. Similar to residential boilers, we
did not intend to regulate temporary
boilers under the area source standards
because they are not part of either the
industrial boiler source category or the
commercial/institutional boiler source
category. We note that neither the CAA
section 112(c)(6) inventory nor the CAA
section 112(c)(3) inventory included
temporary boilers. In this final action,
the EPA is simply clarifying the scope
of categories regulated by subpart JJJJJJ.
By their nature of being temporary,
these boilers are operating in place of
another non-temporary boiler while that
boiler is being constructed, replaced or
repaired, in which case we would have
counted the non-temporary boiler as one
being regulated. Additionally, the final
major source rule for boilers excludes
temporary boilers.
The definition of ‘‘temporary boiler’’
specifies that a boiler is not a temporary
boiler if it remains at a location within
the facility and performs the same or
similar function for more than 12
consecutive months unless the
regulatory agency approves an
extension. The definition of ‘‘temporary
boiler’’ also specifies that any temporary
boiler that replaces a temporary boiler at
a location within the facility and
performs the same or similar function
will be included in calculating the
consecutive time period unless there is
a gap in operation of 12 months or more.
Temporary boilers are defined in 40
CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Temporary boiler means any gaseous or
liquid fuel boiler that is designed to, and is
capable of, being carried or moved from one
location to another by means of, for example,
wheels, skids, carrying handles, dollies,
trailers, or platforms. A boiler is not a
temporary boiler if any one of the following
conditions exists:
(1) The equipment is attached to a
foundation.
(2) The boiler or a replacement remains at
a location within the facility and performs
the same or similar function for more than 12
consecutive months, unless the regulatory
agency approves an extension. An extension
may be granted by the regulatory agency
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7492
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
upon petition by the owner or operator of a
unit specifying the basis for such a request.
Any temporary boiler that replaces a
temporary boiler at a location within the
facility and performs the same or similar
function will be included in calculating the
consecutive time period unless there is a gap
in operation of 12 months or more.
(3) The equipment is located at a seasonal
facility and operates during the full annual
operating period of the seasonal facility,
remains at the facility for at least 2 years, and
operates at that facility for at least 3 months
each year.
(4) The equipment is moved from one
location to another within the facility but
continues to perform the same or similar
function and serve the same electricity,
steam, and/or hot water system in an attempt
to circumvent the residence time
requirements of this definition.
4. Boilers With Section 3005 Permits
The EPA is clarifying the language in
40 CFR 63.11195(c) to provide an
exclusion stating ‘‘unless such units do
not combust hazardous waste and
combust comparable fuels’’ such that it
reads: ‘‘A boiler required to have a
permit under section 3005 of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act or covered by
subpart EEE of this part (e.g., hazardous
waste boilers), unless such units do not
combust hazardous waste and combust
comparable fuels.’’
5. Boilers Used as Control Devices
The EPA is amending the language in
40 CFR 63.11195(g) to clarify that any
boiler that is used as a control device to
comply with a subpart under part 60,
61, or 65 of chapter 40 is not subject to
subpart JJJJJJ provided that at least 50
percent of the heat input to the boiler is
provided by the gas stream that is
regulated under another subpart.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Emission Limits
1. Hg Emission Limit for Coal-Fired
Boilers
The EPA is amending the Hg emission
limit for large coal-fired boilers to
0.000022 lb per MMBtu based on a
revised analysis. The revised analysis
excludes data for a utility boiler that
were erroneously used as the basis for
the Hg emission limit included in the
March 2011 final rule. Further
discussion of this revision to the Hg
emission limit is located in the
December 23, 2011, proposal (76 FR
80541).
A memorandum ‘‘Beyond-the-Floor
Analysis for Mercury and Carbon
Monoxide’’ located in the docket for the
rulemaking describes our beyond-thefloor analysis for Hg and CO emissions
from new and existing area source coalfired boilers with heat input capacity of
10 MMBtu/hr or greater. In the beyondthe-floor option for Hg emissions, new
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
and existing coal-fired boilers would be
required to comply with a Hg emission
limit more stringent than the MACT
floor-based emission limit of 2.2 X 10¥5
lb of Hg per MMBtu. To comply with a
limit more stringent than the fabric
filter-based MACT floor limit, it is
expected that an affected boiler would
need to employ fabric filter control
along with ACI. In summary, we
determined that the beyond-the-floor
option of installing ACI for Hg control
from area source coal-fired boilers is not
economically feasible.
As discussed in the preamble to the
June 2010 proposed rule (75 FR 31896)
and the preamble to the March 2011
final rule (76 FR 15554), we also
considered whether fuel switching was
an appropriate control technology for
purposes of determining either the
MACT floor level or beyond-the-floor
level of control. We determined that fuel
switching was not an appropriate floor
or beyond-the-floor control. As also
discussed in the June 2010 and March
2011 preambles, we determined that an
energy assessment requirement was an
appropriate beyond-the-floor option for
existing large boilers. These previous
analyses continue to be applicable for
mercury.
2. Using the UPL for Setting the CO
Emission Limit
The EPA is amending the CO
emission limit for coal-fired boilers to
reflect a revised analysis that uses the
99 percent confidence level in
determining the UPL. Based on the
results of the revised analysis, we are
amending the CO emission limit for new
and existing coal-fired boilers from 400
ppm by volume on a dry basis, corrected
to 3 percent oxygen, to 420 ppm by
volume on a dry basis, corrected to 3
percent oxygen.
As discussed in the ‘‘Beyond-theFloor Analysis for Mercury and Carbon
Monoxide’’ memorandum, to comply
with a limit more stringent than the
MACT floor based CO limit, it is
expected that new and existing area
source coal-fired boilers with heat input
capacity of 10 MMBtu/hr or greater may
need to install an oxidation catalyst. As
fully explained in the memorandum, we
determined that the beyond-the-floor
option of installing an oxidation catalyst
for CO control was technically
infeasible. Other methods of reducing
CO emissions, such as upgrading new
burners and overfire air systems, were
also considered and determined to be
technically infeasible options. As
explained earlier in this preamble, we
determined that fuel switching was not
an appropriate floor or beyond-the-floor
control and that an energy assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
requirement was an appropriate beyondthe-floor option for existing large
boilers. These previous analyses
continue to be applicable for CO.
3. Compliance Alternative for PM for
Certain Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA is amending the
applicability of PM emission limit
requirements for certain new or
reconstructed oil-fired boilers. We are
amending 40 CFR 63.11210 to specify
that new or reconstructed oil-fired
boilers satisfy GACT for PM when they
combust only oil that contains no more
than 0.50 weight percent sulfur or a
mixture of 0.50 weight percent sulfur oil
with other fuels not subject to a PM
emission limit under this subpart and
do not use a post-combustion
technology (except a wet scrubber) to
reduce PM or sulfur dioxide emissions.
D. Tune-Up Work Practice and
Management Practice Standards
1. Requirements for Seasonally
Operated Boilers
The EPA is establishing separate
requirements for a subcategory of boilers
that are seasonally operated. For
seasonally operated boilers, we are
amending 40 CFR 63.11223 to specify
that these boilers are required to
complete a tune-up every 5 years,
instead of on a biennial basis as is
required for most non-seasonal boilers.
Specifically, existing seasonal boilers
are required to complete the initial tuneup by March 21, 2014, and a subsequent
tune-up every 5 years after the initial
tune-up. New and reconstructed
seasonal boilers are not required to
complete an initial tune-up, but are
required to complete a tune-up every 5
years after the initial startup of the new
or reconstructed boiler.1 A combined
total of 15 days of periodic testing of the
seasonal boiler during the 7-month
shutdown is allowed. The definition of
‘‘seasonal boiler’’ clarifies that it only
applies to biomass- or oil-fired boilers.
Seasonally operated boilers are defined
in 40 CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Seasonal boiler means a boiler that
undergoes a shutdown for a period of at least
7 consecutive months (or 210 consecutive
days) each 12-month period due to seasonal
conditions, except for periodic testing.
Periodic testing shall not exceed a combined
total of 15 days during the 7-month
shutdown. This definition only applies to
1 Generally, boilers are initially installed
optimized for efficiency, i.e., ‘‘in tune.’’ Periodic
tune-ups restore a boiler to its efficient state, given
its age and other parameters. We do not require a
tune-up upon startup because boilers normally
would already be efficient at that time. Emission
reductions are projected to occur by maintaining
efficient combustion through periodic tune-ups.
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
boilers that would otherwise be included in
the biomass subcategory or the oil
subcategory.
2. Requirements for Small Oil-Fired
Units
The EPA is establishing separate
requirements for a subcategory of oilfired boilers with a heat input capacity
of equal to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr. We
are amending 40 CFR 63.11223 to
specify that this subcategory of small
oil-fired boilers are required to complete
a tune-up every 5 years, instead of on
a biennial basis as is required for most
larger oil-fired boilers. Specifically,
existing oil-fired boilers with a heat
input capacity of equal to or less than
5 MMBtu/hr are required to complete
the initial tune-up by March 21, 2014,
and a subsequent tune-up every 5 years
after the initial tune-up. New and
reconstructed oil-fired boilers with a
heat input capacity of equal to or less
than 5 MMBtu/hr are not required to
complete an initial tune-up, but are
required to complete a tune-up every 5
years after the initial startup of the new
or reconstructed boiler.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Requirements for Boilers With
Oxygen Trim Systems
The EPA is establishing separate
requirements for boilers with oxygen
trim systems that maintain an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio that would otherwise be
subject to a biennial tune-up. We are
amending 40 CFR 63.11223 to specify
that this subcategory of boilers is
required to complete a tune-up every 5
years. Specifically, existing boilers with
oxygen trim systems are required to
complete the initial tune-up by March
21, 2014, and a subsequent tune-up
every 5 years after the initial tune-up.
New and reconstructed boilers with
oxygen trim systems are not required to
complete an initial tune-up, but are
required to complete a tune-up every 5
years after the initial startup of the new
or reconstructed boiler.
4. Requirements for Limited-Use Boilers
The EPA is establishing separate
requirements for a subcategory of boilers
that operate on a limited basis. The
limited-use subcategory includes any
boiler that burns any amount of solid or
liquid fuels and has a federally
enforceable average annual capacity
factor of no more than 10 percent. For
limited-use boilers, we are amending 40
CFR 63.11223 of the final rule to specify
that these boilers are required to
complete a tune-up every 5 years.
Specifically, existing limited-use boilers
are required to complete the initial tuneup by March 21, 2014, and a subsequent
tune-up every 5 years after the initial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
7493
tune-up. New and reconstructed
limited-use boilers are not required to
complete an initial tune-up, but are
required to complete a tune-up every 5
years after the initial startup of the new
or reconstructed boiler. Limited-use
boilers are not subject to the emission
limits in Table 1 to the subpart, the
energy assessment requirements in
Table 2 to the subpart, or the operating
limits in Table 4 to the subpart.
2. Compliance Date
As specified in 40 CFR 63.11196(a)(3),
existing boilers that are subject to the
energy assessment requirement must
achieve compliance with the energy
assessment requirement no later than
March 21, 2014. Thus, in order to meet
the requirements of the rule, energy
assessments must, therefore, be
completed by the compliance date
(March 21, 2014) for existing sources.
E. Energy Assessment Work Practice
and Management Practice Standards
3. Maximum Duration Requirements
The EPA is amending the definition of
‘‘energy assessment’’ for facilities with
affected boilers with less than 0.3 TBtu/
yr heat input capacity and for facilities
with affected boilers with 0.3 to 1 TBtu/
yr heat input capacity to change the
maximum time to conduct the energy
assessment from one day to 8 on-site
technical hours and from three days to
24 on-site technical hours, respectively,
and to allow sources to perform longer
assessments at their discretion. We are
also amending the definition of ‘‘energy
assessment’’ for facilities with affected
boilers with greater than 1 TBtu/yr heat
input capacity to specify that the
maximum time to conduct the
assessment is up to 24 on-site technical
hours for the first TBtu/yr plus 8 on-site
technical hours for every additional 1.0
TBtu/yr not to exceed 160 on-site
technical hours, but may be longer at
the discretion of the owner or operator.
1. Scope
The EPA is amending the definition of
‘‘energy assessment’’ to clarify that the
scope of the energy assessment does not
encompass energy use systems located
off-site or energy use systems using
electricity purchased from an off-site
source. The energy assessment is
limited to only those energy use
systems, located on-site, associated with
the affected boilers. We are also
clarifying that the scope of the
assessment is based on energy use by
discrete segments of a facility (e.g.,
production area or building) and not by
a total aggregation of all individual
energy using segments of a facility.
The definition of ‘‘boiler system’’ is
being revised in this final rule to clarify
that it means the boiler and associated
components directly connected to and
serving the energy use systems. We are
amending the definition of ‘‘energy use
system’’ to clarify that energy use
systems are only those systems using
energy clearly produced by affected
boilers.
We are clarifying that energy assessor
approval and qualification requirements
are waived in instances where an energy
assessment completed on or after
January 1, 2008 meets or is amended to
meet the energy assessment
requirements in this final rule by March
21, 2014. Finally, we are specifying that
a source that is operating under an
energy management program
established through energy management
systems compatible with ISO 50001,
that includes the affected boilers, by
March 21, 2014, satisfies the energy
assessment requirement. We consider
these energy management programs to
be equivalent to the one-time energy
assessment because facilities having
these programs operate under a set of
practices and procedures designed to
manage energy use on an ongoing basis.
These programs contain energy
performance measurements and tracking
plans with periodic reviews.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
F. GACT-Based Standards
1. Establishing GACT-Based Emission
Limits for Biomass- and Oil-Fired
Boilers
The EPA is not amending the GACTbased standards, as specified in the
March 21, 2011, final rule, for biomassand oil-fired boilers. Specifically, the
final standards for biomass- and oilfired area source boilers are based on
GACT instead of MACT as were the
proposed standards for all pollutants
except POM. Our rationale for the
changes between proposal and
promulgation for the biomass- and oilfired boilers, including not requiring
MACT for POM, can be found in the
preamble to the promulgated area
source standards (76 FR 15565–15567
and 15574–15575, March 21, 2011). The
final standards for area source biomassand oil-fired boilers require these
boilers to meet the following standards:
New boilers with heat input capacity
greater than 10 MMBtu/hr that are
biomass-fired or oil-fired must meet
GACT-based numerical emission limits
for PM.
New boilers with heat input capacity
greater than 10 MMBtu/hr that are
biomass-fired or oil-fired must comply
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7494
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
with work practice standards to
minimize the boiler’s startup and
shutdown periods following the
manufacturer’s recommendations, or the
manufacturer’s recommendations for a
unit of similar design.
Existing boilers with heat input
capacity greater than 10 MMBtu/hr that
are biomass-fired or oil-fired must have
a one-time energy assessment performed
by a qualified energy assessor, an energy
assessment completed on or after
January 1, 2008 that meets or is
amended to meet the energy assessment
requirements in this final rule by March
21, 2014, or an energy management
program established through energy
management systems compatible with
ISO 50001, that includes the affected
boilers, by March 21, 2014, under which
the owner or operator currently
operates.
All new and existing units, regardless
of size, that are biomass-fired or oil-fired
must have a GACT-based periodic tuneup.
2. Setting GACT-Based PM Standards
for New Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA is not making any changes
to the PM limit for new oil-fired boilers.
New oil-fired boilers with heat input
capacity greater than 10 MMBtu/hr must
meet a GACT-based numerical emission
limit for PM (0.03 lb per MMBtu of heat
input). New oil-fired units, regardless of
size, must have a GACT-based periodic
tune-up. Our rationale for finalizing
GACT-based PM emissions limits can be
found in the preamble to the
promulgated area source standards (76
FR 15574, March 21, 2011).
G. Initial Compliance
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Dates
Some commenters have argued that
the 3-year compliance deadline of
March 21, 2014, for existing sources to
meet the standards does not provide
sufficient time for sources to meet the
standards in view of the large number
of sources subject to the rule and that
these sources will be competing for the
needed resources and materials from
engineering consultants, permitting
authorities, equipment vendors,
construction contractors, financial
institutions, and other critical suppliers.
As an initial matter, we note that
many sources subject to the standards
should be able to meet the standards
within 3 years (i.e., by March 21, 2014),
even those that need to install pollution
control technologies to do so. In
addition, many sources subject to the
standards are existing biomass- or oilfired boilers or small coal-fired boilers
(less than 10 MMBtu/hr) and will not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
need to install controls in order to
demonstrate compliance, as these
sources are subject only to work
practices or management practices.
At the same time, the CAA allows title
V permitting authorities to grant
sources, on a case-by-case basis,
extensions to the compliance time of up
to 1 year if such time is needed for the
installation of controls. See CAA section
112(i)(3)(B)). Permitting authorities are
already familiar with, and in many cases
have experience with, applying the 1year extension authority under section
112(i)(3)(B) since the provision applies
to all NESHAP. See 40 CFR
63.6(i)(4)(A). We believe that should the
range of circumstances that commenters
have cited as impeding sources’ ability
to install controls within 3 years
materialize, then permitting authorities
can take those circumstances into
consideration when evaluating an
existing source’s request for a 1-year
extension, and where such applications
prove to be well-founded, permitting
authorities can make the 1-year
extension available to applicants.
In making a determination as to
whether an extension is appropriate, we
believe it is reasonable for permitting
authorities to consider the large number
of pollution control retrofit projects
being undertaken for purposes of
complying either with the standards in
this rule or with those of other rules
such as the Major Source Boilers
Standards and the Mercury and Air
Toxics Standards for the power sector
that may be competing for similar
resources.
Further, commenters have pointed out
that in some cases operators of existing
sources that are subject to these
standards and that generate energy may
opt to meet the standards by terminating
operations at these sources and building
new sources to replace the energy
generation at the shut-down sources.
While the ultimate discretion to provide
a 1-year extension lies with the
permitting authority, the EPA believes
that it may be reasonable for permitting
authorities to allow the fourth year
extension for the installation of
replacement sources of energy
generation at the site of a facility
applying for an extension for that
purpose. Specifically, the EPA believes
where an applicant demonstrates that it
is building replacement sources of
energy generation for purposes of
meeting the requirements of these
standards, such a replacement project
could be deemed to constitute the
‘‘installation of controls’’ under section
112(i)(3)(B).
In sum, the EPA believes that
although most, if not all, units will be
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
able to fully comply with the standards
within 3 years, the fourth year that
permitting authorities are allowed to
grant for installation of controls is an
important flexibility that will address
situations where an extra year is
necessary.
2. Demonstrating Initial Compliance
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11210 to clarify the dates by which
new and reconstructed boilers need to
demonstrate initial compliance. We are
amending 40 CFR 63.11210(d) to clarify
that only boilers that are subject to
emission limits for PM, Hg or CO in
Table 1 to subpart JJJJJJ have a 180-day
period after the applicable compliance
date to demonstrate initial compliance.
We are adding a new paragraph (i) to
40 CFR 63.11210 to clarify the initial
compliance requirements for boilers
located at existing major sources of HAP
that become area sources on a timely
basis. Any such existing boiler at the
existing source must demonstrate
compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within
180 days of the later of March 21, 2014
or upon the existing major source
commencing operation as an area
source. Any new or reconstructed boiler
at the existing source must demonstrate
compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within
180 days of the later of March 21, 2011
or startup. Notification of such changes
must be submitted according to 40 CFR
63.11225(g).
We are adding a new paragraph (j) to
40 CFR 63.11210 that specifies initial
compliance demonstration requirements
for existing affected boilers that have
not operated between the effective date
of the rule and the source’s compliance
date. Owners and operators of boilers
subject to emission limits must
complete the initial compliance
demonstration no later than 180 days
after the re-start of the affected boiler,
sources subject to tune-up requirements
must complete the initial performance
tune-up no later than 30 days after the
re-start of the affected boiler, and
sources subject to the one-time energy
assessment must complete the
assessment no later than the compliance
date specified in 40 CFR 63.11196.
3. Schedule for Existing Boilers Subject
to Tune-Up Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11196 to specify that all existing
boilers subject to the tune-up
requirement have 3 years (by March 21,
2014) in which to demonstrate initial
compliance, instead of 1 year as
specified in the 2011 final rule (76 FR
15554, March 21, 2011) or 2 years as
specified in the proposed
reconsideration of final rule action (76
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
FR 80532, December 23, 2011). In the
December 23, 2011, proposal, we
specifically requested comment on
whether the initial compliance period
for the tune-up requirement should be
extended to March 21, 2014.
4. Conducting Initial Tune-Ups at New
and Reconstructed Sources
The EPA is removing the requirement
for an initial tune-up for new and
reconstructed boilers. Thus, new and
reconstructed units are required to
complete the applicable biennial or 5year tune-up no later than 25 months or
61 months, respectively, after the initial
startup of the new or reconstructed
boiler.
5. Fuel Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11223(a) to specify that boiler tuneups must be conducted while burning
the type of fuel that provided the
majority of the heat input to the boiler
over the 12 months prior to the tune-up.
H. Operating Limits
1. Operating Limits for Oxygen
Concentration
The EPA is clarifying that the oxygen
concentration must be at or above the
minimum established during a
performance stack test. These limits
have also been clarified to be applicable
when the unit is firing the fuel or fuel
mixture utilized during the CO
performance test.
2. Maximum Operating Load
The EPA is including provisions for
establishing a unit-specific limit for
maximum operating load that applies to
any boiler subject to an emission limit
for which compliance is demonstrated
by a performance stack test. Operating
load data includes fuel feed rate data or
steam generation rate data.
3. Establishing Operating Limits for Wet
Scrubbers
The EPA is amending the operating
limit provisions in 40 CFR
63.11211(b)(2) for an ESP operated with
a wet scrubber to remove the statement
that the operating limits for ESP do not
apply to dry ESP systems operated
without a wet scrubber.
I. Continuous Compliance
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. CO Emission Limit
The March 2011 final rule requires
sources subject to a CO emission limit
to demonstrate compliance by
measuring CO emissions while also
monitoring the oxygen content of the
exhaust. We are amending the
monitoring requirements in 40 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
63.11224(a) to allow sources subject to
a CO emission limit the option to
install, operate, and maintain CO and
oxygen CEMS. The CEMS must be
installed, operated and maintained
according to Performance Specifications
3 and 4, 4A, or 4B at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B, and according to the sitespecific monitoring plan that each
facility is required to develop. The
CEMS will also be required to complete
a performance evaluation, also
according to Performance Specifications
3 and 4, 4A, or 4B.
Sources have the option to
demonstrate continuous compliance by
monitoring both CO and oxygen using
CEMS to demonstrate compliance with
the CO emission limit, corrected to 3
percent oxygen, or monitoring and
complying with an oxygen content
operating limit that is established
during the performance stack test.
Sources that use CO and oxygen CEMS
are not required to perform initial CO
performance testing nor are they subject
to oxygen content operating limit
requirements. Sources that choose to
demonstrate continuous compliance by
monitoring and complying with an
oxygen content operating limit must
install, operate, and maintain an oxygen
analyzer system at or above the
minimum percent oxygen by volume
that is established as the operating limit
for oxygen when firing the fuel or fuel
mixture utilized during the most recent
CO performance stack test. We have
removed the requirement that the
oxygen monitor be located at the outlet
of the boiler, so that it can be located
either within the combustion zone or at
the outlet as a flue gas oxygen monitor.
We are amending the oxygen
monitoring requirements to allow for
the use of oxygen trim systems and have
included oxygen trim systems in the
definition of ‘‘oxygen analyzer system.’’
We have clarified that operation of
oxygen trim systems to meet the oxygen
monitoring requirements shall not be
done in a manner that compromises
furnace safety. The definitions of
‘‘oxygen analyzer system’’ and ‘‘oxygen
trim system’’ in 40 CFR 63.11237 read
as follows:
• Oxygen analyzer system means all
equipment required to determine the
oxygen content of a gas stream and used
to monitor oxygen in the boiler flue gas,
boiler firebox, or other appropriate
intermediate location. This definition
includes oxygen trim systems.
• Oxygen trim system means a system
of monitors that is used to maintain
excess air at the desired level in a
combustion device. A typical system
consists of a flue gas oxygen and/or
carbon monoxide monitor that
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7495
automatically provides a feedback signal
to the combustion air controller.
2. Tune-Up Standards
The EPA is amending the
requirements for demonstrating
continuous compliance with the work
practice and management practice tuneup standards in 40 CFR 63.11223 to
clarify that CO measurements that are
required before and after tune-up
adjustments may be taken using a
portable CO analyzer. We are clarifying
that the requirements to inspect the
burner and the system controlling the
air-to-fuel ratio may be delayed until the
next scheduled shutdown. We are also
clarifying that units that produce
electricity for sale may delay these
inspections until the first outage, not to
exceed 36 months from the previous
inspection. In addition, we are
clarifying that optimization of CO
emissions should be consistent with any
NOX requirements to which the unit is
subject. Finally, we are specifying for
units that are not operating on the
required date for a tune-up, the tune-up
must be conducted within 30 days of
startup.
3. Performance Testing Frequency
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11220 to specify in paragraph (b) that
the owner or operator of an affected
boiler does not need to conduct further
PM emissions testing if, when
demonstrating initial compliance with
the PM emission limit, the performance
test results show that the PM emissions
are equal to or less than half of the PM
emission limit. The owner or operator
must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and
monitoring requirements. If the initial
performance test results show that the
PM emissions are greater than half of
the PM emission limit, the owner or
operator must conduct subsequent
performance tests as specified in 40 CFR
63.11220(a).
We are clarifying in 40 CFR
63.11220(d) that existing affected boilers
that have not operated since the
previous compliance demonstration
must complete their subsequent
compliance demonstration no later than
180 days after the re-start of the affected
boiler.
4. Fuel Analysis
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11220 to specify in paragraph (c) that
the owner or operator of an affected
coal-fired boiler does not need to
conduct further fuel analysis sampling
if, when demonstrating initial
compliance with the Hg emission limit,
the Hg constituents in the fuel or fuel
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7496
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mixture are measured to be equal to or
less than half of the Hg emission limit.
The owner or operator must continue to
comply with all applicable operating
limits and monitoring requirements.
When demonstrating initial
compliance with the Hg emission limit,
if the Hg constituents in the fuel or fuel
mixture are greater than half of the Hg
emission limit, the owner or operator
must conduct quarterly sampling.
5. Averaging Times
The EPA is amending the averaging
time for parameter monitoring and
compliance with operating limits to a
30-day rolling average.
The EPA is revising the definitions of
‘‘30-day rolling average’’ and ‘‘daily
block average’’ to exclude periods of
startup and shutdown and periods when
the unit is not operating in the
calculation of the arithmetic mean.
6. Monitoring Data
The EPA is clarifying in 40 CFR
63.11221 the monitoring data collection
requirements.
J. Periods of Startup and Shutdown
1. Definitions
The EPA is revising the definitions of
‘‘startup’’ and ‘‘shutdown’’ such that
they are tailored for industrial boilers
and are consistent with the definitions
of ‘‘startup’’ and ‘‘shutdown’’ in the 40
CFR part 63, subpart A General
Provisions. The revised definitions
reflect the fact that industrial boilers
function to provide steam or, in the case
of cogeneration units, electricity. We are
defining startup as the period between
either the first-ever firing of fuel in the
boiler or the firing of fuel in the boiler
after a shutdown and when the boiler
first supplies steam or heat. We are
defining shutdown as the period
between either when no more steam or
heat is supplied by the boiler or no fuel
is being fired in the boiler and when
there is no steam and no heat being
supplied and no fuel being fired in the
boiler.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Compliance With Operating Limits
The EPA has clarified that operating
limits must be met at all times except
during periods of startup and shutdown.
3. Minimization of Startup and
Shutdown Periods
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11223(g) to include biomass- and oilfired boilers in the requirement to
minimize the time spent in startup and
shutdown periods. Specifically, the
requirement is to minimize the boiler’s
startup and shutdown periods and
conduct startups and shutdowns
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
according to the manufacturer’s
recommended procedures. If
manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are not available,
recommended procedures for a unit of
similar design for which manufacturer’s
recommended procedures are available
must be followed.
K. Affirmative Defense Language
In this final rule, the EPA is updating
the affirmative defense provisions for
malfunctions that were included in the
March 21, 2011, final rule. We have
made certain changes to 40 CFR
63.11226 to clarify the circumstances
under which a source may assert an
affirmative defense. The changes clarify
that a source may assert an affirmative
defense to a claim for civil penalties for
violations of standards that are caused
by malfunctions. A source can avail
itself of the affirmative defense when
there has been a violation of the
emission standards due to an event that
meets the definition of malfunction
under 40 CFR 63.2 and qualifies for
assertion of an affirmative defense
under 40 CFR 63.11226. In the March
2011 final rule, we used terms such as
‘‘exceedance’’ or ‘‘excess emissions’’ in
40 CFR 63.11226, which created
unnecessary confusion as to when the
affirmative defense could be used. In
this final rule, we have eliminated those
terms and used the word ‘‘violation’’ to
make clear that the affirmative defense
to civil penalties is available only where
an event that causes a violation of the
emissions standard meets the criteria for
the assertion of an affirmative defense
under 40 CFR 63.11226.
This final rule requires that to
establish the affirmative defense the
owner must prove by a preponderance
of evidence that repairs were made as
expeditiously as possible when a
violation occurs. We have re-evaluated
the language concerning the use of offshift and overtime labor, to the extent
practicable, to make the repairs and
believe that the language is not
necessary. Thus, the language has been
eliminated from this final rule.
We have also eliminated the 2-day
notification requirement that was
included in 40 CFR 63.11226(b) of the
March 2011 final rule because we
expect to receive sufficient notification
of malfunction events that result in
violations in other required compliance
reports as specified under 40 CFR
63.11225. In addition, we have revised
the 45-day affirmative defense reporting
requirement that was included in 40
CFR 63.11226(b) of the March 2011 final
rule. This final rule requires sources to
include the report in the first
compliance, deviation or excess
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
emission report due after the initial
occurrence of the violation, unless the
compliance, deviation or excess
emission report is due less than 45 days
after the violation. In that case, the
affirmative defense report may be
included in the second compliance,
deviation or excess emission report due
after the initial occurrence of the
violation. Because the affirmative
defense report is now included in a
subsequent compliance, deviation or
excess emission report, there is no
longer a need for the 30-day extension
for submitting a stand-alone affirmative
defense report. Consequently, we are
not including that provision in this final
rule.
L. Notification, Recordkeeping and
Reporting Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11225(a)(2) to specify that existing
affected boilers have until January 20,
2014 to submit their Initial Notification.
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11225(c)(2) to specify that records of
fuel use and type are required only for
boilers that are subject to numerical
emission limits. We are also amending
40 CFR 63.11223(b) to clarify that the
type and amount of fuel needs to be
included in reports only if the boiler
was physically and legally capable of
using more than one type of fuel during
that time period and that the report
should include concentrations of CO
and oxygen, measured at high fire or
typical operating load, before and after
the tune-up of the boiler. Finally, we are
specifying that for units sharing a fuel
meter, the fuel use by each boiler may
be estimated.
The EPA is amending 40 CFR
63.11225(b) to clarify the requirements
for submitting a biennial or 5-year
report for units that are only subject to
tune-up requirements and to specify the
information that must be included in
the annual, biennial, or 5-year
compliance report.
We are amending 40 CFR
63.11225(c)(2) to specify, as applicable,
that a copy of the energy assessment,
records documenting the days of
operation for each boiler that meets the
definition of a seasonal boiler, and a
copy of the federally enforceable permit
for each boiler that meets the definition
of a limited-use boiler must be
maintained.
We are revising 40 CFR 63.11225(d) to
remove the requirement that the most
recent 2 years of records be maintained
on site and are adding language that
allows for computer access or other
means of immediate access of records
stored in a centralized location.
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
We are adding a new paragraph 40
CFR 63.11225(g) to require that boilers
that switch fuels, make a physical
change, or take a permit limit that
results in the applicability of a different
subcategory within subpart JJJJJJ, a
switch out of subpart JJJJJJ, or the
applicability of subpart JJJJJJ must
provide notification within 30 days of
the fuel switch, physical change, or
permit limit. 40 CFR 63.11225(g) also
specifies what information the
notification must include.
M. Title V Permitting Requirements
For the reasons stated in our March
21, 2011, final rule (76 FR 15554) as
well as our reconsideration proposal (76
FR 80532, December 23, 2011), the EPA
is not making any changes to the title V
exemption for area sources. Thus, no
area sources subject to subpart JJJJJJ are
required to obtain a title V permit as a
result of being subject to subpart JJJJJJ.
Facilities that are synthetic area
sources for HAP under subpart JJJJJJ may
already be covered by a title V permit
or may be required to obtain a title V
permit in the future for a reason other
than subpart JJJJJJ. For example, area
source boilers could be major sources of
non-HAP pollutants or could be located
at sources that are subject to title V.
Thus, the title V exemption in subpart
JJJJJJ does not affect whether or not these
area sources under subpart JJJJJJ are
otherwise required to obtain a permit
under part 70 or part 71. See 40 CFR
70.3(a) and (b) or 71.3(a) and (b).
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
N. Definition of Period of Gas
Curtailment or Supply Interruption
We are amending the definition of
‘‘period of natural gas curtailment or
supply interruption’’ in 40 CFR
63.11237 to clarify that a curtailment
does not include normal market
fluctuations in the price of gas that are
not associated with periods of supplier
delivery restrictions. We are also
amending the definition to indicate that
periods of supply interruption that are
beyond control of the facility can also
include on-site natural gas system
emergencies and equipment failures,
and that legitimate periods of supply
interruption are not limited to off-site
circumstances. We are revising the term
and the definition so that it includes the
curtailment of any gaseous fuel, and is
not limited to just natural gas. Finally,
we are clarifying that the supply of
gaseous fuel is to an ‘‘affected boiler’’
rather than ‘‘affected facility’’ and that
the supply of gaseous fuel is ‘‘restricted
or halted’’ for reasons beyond the
control of the facility. The definition is
amended to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
Period of gas curtailment or supply
interruption means a period of time during
which the supply of gaseous fuel to an
affected boiler is restricted or halted for
reasons beyond the control of the facility.
The act of entering into a contractual
agreement with a supplier of natural gas
established for curtailment purposes does not
constitute a reason that is under the control
of a facility for the purposes of this
definition. An increase in the cost or unit
price of natural gas due to normal market
fluctuations not during periods of supplier
delivery restriction does not constitute a
period of natural gas curtailment or supply
interruption. On-site gaseous fuel system
emergencies or equipment failures qualify as
periods of supply interruption when the
emergency or failure is beyond the control of
the facility.
O. Miscellaneous Technical Corrections
In addition to the above summary of
the EPA’s final action regarding
provisions identified for reconsideration
and on other discrete matters identified
in response to comments or data
received during the comment period,
other definitional and regulatory text
revisions are being made. These
clarifications will help affected sources
determine their applicability and better
understand the rule requirements. In
some instances, definitions and
regulatory text have been revised or
added to correspond with other related
rules, especially the emission standards
for industrial, commercial, and
institutional boilers at major sources of
HAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDDD).
Section IV of this preamble includes
additional details regarding these
miscellaneous technical corrections.
P. Other Issues
40 CFR 63.11196(a)(1) of the March
21, 2011, final rule (76 FR 15554)
requires that owners and operators of
existing affected boilers subject to the
tune-up requirement complete the
initial boiler tune-up by March 21, 2012.
In addition, 40 CFR 63.11225(a)(4)
requires that owners and operators of
existing affected boilers subject to the
tune-up requirement submit their
Notification of Compliance Status no
later than 120 days after the applicable
compliance date specified in 40 CFR
63.11196. That means that those owners
and operators were required to submit
their Notification of Compliance Status
by July 19, 2012. The Notification must
include, among other information, a
certification that states ‘‘This facility
complies with the requirements in
§ 63.11214 to conduct an initial tune-up
of the boiler.’’
On March 13, 2012, the EPA issued a
No Action Assurance (NAA) to all
owners and/or operators of existing
industrial boilers and commercial and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7497
institutional boilers at area sources of
HAP emissions stating that we would
not enforce the requirement to conduct
an initial tune-up by March 21, 2012.
The NAA was primarily based upon the
EPA’s concern that sources were
reporting a shortage of qualified
individuals to prepare boilers for tuneups and then conduct those tune-ups by
the regulatory deadline, as well as upon
the uncertainty in the regulated
community resulting from the pending
reconsideration of the Area Source
Boiler Rule. The March 13, 2012, NAA
states that it remains in effect until
either (1) 11:59 p.m. EDT, October 1,
2012, or (2) the effective date of a final
rule addressing the proposed
reconsideration of the Area Source
Boiler Rule, whichever occurs earlier.
As the July 19, 2012, Notification of
Compliance Status deadline
approached, a final rule addressing the
proposed reconsideration of the Area
Source Boiler Rule had not been issued,
and thus the NAA continued to remain
in effect. Nothing that the EPA learned
since the issuance of the original NAA
letter led us to question our original
concerns about the feasibility of all
sources timely completing an initial
tune-up. Further, sources that did not
complete a tune-up could not certify
that they conducted one. Thus, on July
18, 2012, the EPA extended the NAA for
sources required to complete an initial
tune-up by March 21, 2012, to also
include the deadline for submitting the
Notification of Compliance Status
regarding the initial tune-up. In
addition, given that no final rule
addressing the proposed reconsideration
of the Area Source Boiler Rule had been
issued as of July 18, 2012, the pending
reconsideration continued to create
uncertainty in the regulated community.
Thus, the NAA letter also amended the
expiration date of the March 13, 2012,
NAA, such that the NAA would remain
in effect until either (1) 11:59 p.m. EST,
December 31, 2012, or (2) the effective
date of a final rule addressing the
proposed reconsideration of the Area
Source Boiler Rule, whichever occurs
earlier.
This final rule revises the compliance
date for existing affected boilers subject
to a tune-up from March 21, 2012, to
March 21, 2014. The July 19, 2012,
deadline for submitting the Notification
of Compliance Status regarding the
initial tune-up is reset to July 19, 2014,
as a result of revising the compliance
date for existing affected boilers subject
to a tune-up to March 21, 2014. Owners
or operators that had not yet conducted
their boiler tune-up, but submitted a
Notification of Compliance Status by
July 19, 2012, simply to notify the EPA
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7498
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
that the tune-up had not been
completed, will need to submit a
revised Notification of Compliance
Status after their boiler tune-up is
conducted.
IV. Summary of Significant Changes
Since Proposed Action on
Reconsideration
Numerous changes are being made to
the March 2011 final rule based on the
public comments received. Most of the
changes are editorial to clarify
applicability and implementation issues
raised by the commenters. The public
comments received on the proposed
changes and the responses to them can
be viewed in the memorandum
‘‘Summary of Public Comments and
Responses for: National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Area Sources: Industrial,
Commercial, and Institutional Boilers’’
located in the docket.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Applicability
Since proposal, changes to the
applicability of this final rule have been
made.
1. Dual-Fuel Fired Boilers
The March 2011 final rule includes as
a new affected source a boiler that
commences fuel switching from natural
gas to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or
liquid fuel after June 4, 2010. For
example, under the March 2011 final
rule, if an unaffected gas-fired boiler
currently burns oil as allowed under the
definition of gas-fired boiler, but after
June 4, 2010 burns oil for reasons not
allowed under the definition of gasfired, these boilers would become new
affected oil-fired units. The December
2011 reconsideration action did not
propose any revisions to the provisions
regarding boilers that fuel switch after
June 4, 2010. However, the EPA has
been made aware through public
comments that many dual-fuel fired
units presently burn primarily natural
gas with limited or no amounts of oil,
and that these units may want to burn
oil in the future for reasons not allowed
under subpart JJJJJJ’s definition of gasfired (e.g. cost). Under the March 2011
final rule, such an existing dual-fuel
gas-fired boiler that wanted to avoid
being subject to the new source
requirements would notify as an
existing oil-fired unit and be subject to
the requirements for existing oil-fired
boilers.
We received public comments
regarding rule applicability and
compliance requirements for these
existing dual-fuel fired boilers. One
commenter asserted that regardless of
the fuel capability identified in an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
initial notification, the distinction
between a new source and an existing
source should only be made based upon
a source’s capability to burn a particular
fuel as of the effective date of the rule.
The commenter explained that many
facilities have boilers that can burn
either gas or liquid and, because the
price of gas is currently lower than the
price of most liquid fuels, they likely are
currently firing gas during normal
operation, with liquid being fired only
during periods of curtailment. The
commenter pointed out that, in the
future, the price of liquid fuel may be
lower than the price of gaseous fuel, and
facilities may want to preferentially
burn liquid fuel over gas fuel. The
commenter asserted that a change in the
fuel from the initial notification should
not, in and of itself, reclassify a source
as a new source for purposes of subpart
JJJJJJ. Further, the commenter asserted
that their interpretation is comparable to
the fuel switching provisions in the
EPA’s NSPS and PSD regulations. The
same commenter asserted that if a
source already has oil or alternate fuel
capability, then that source would not
be commencing construction or making
a change to the source. The commenter
explained that many of these facilities
with boilers capable of burning fuel oil
as a back-up for natural gas may not
have submitted an initial notification
since gaseous fuel-fired boilers that only
burn liquid during periods of
curtailment are not covered by the Area
Source Boiler Rule. The commenter
maintained the EPA’s guidance, that a
dual-fuel fired boiler that fails to file an
initial notification and then plans to
burn oil in the future would be
considered to be a new source, appears
to be contrary to regulatory text stating
that an affected source is a new source
if construction or reconstruction of the
affected source is commenced after June
4, 2010 and the applicability criteria are
met at the time construction is
commenced. The commenter suggested
that the EPA clarify that to become a
new source, the source must be altered
to be capable of accommodating a new
fuel, so that new sources are not created
simply by failing to submit an initial
notification or a notice of fuel switching
for a unit that is already capable of
accommodating that fuel. Another
commenter explained that owners and
operators of dual-fuel fired boilers
anticipate firing natural gas for many
years to come, or until gas supply is
temporarily curtailed outside of their
control or until such a time when fuel
oil becomes more cost effective to burn
than gas. The commenter asserted that,
based on common sense and increased
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
flexibility, these dual-fuel fired boilers
normally burning gas could not be
considered subject to any oil-fired
requirements as long as they continue to
fire only gas, except under the
regulation’s stated exemptions for
burning oil.
In addition to carefully considering
the public comments received regarding
dual-fuel fired boilers, the EPA
reconsidered its overall intent with
regard to existing dual-fuel fired boilers
that fuel switch after June 4, 2010.
Consequently, in this final rule, we are
revising the provisions regarding
existing boilers that fuel switch after
June 4, 2010. This final rule amends 40
CFR 63.11194 to specify that an existing
dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced
construction or reconstruction on or
before June 4, 2010) meeting the
definition of gas-fired boiler, as defined
in 40 CFR 63.11237, that meets the
applicability requirements of subpart
JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010 due to a fuel
switch from gaseous fuel to solid fossil
fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel is
considered to be an existing source
under this subpart as long as the boiler
was designed to accommodate the
alternate fuel. A new or reconstructed
dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced
construction or reconstruction after June
4, 2010) meeting the definition of gasfired boiler, as defined in 40 CFR
63.11237, that meets the applicability
criteria of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4,
2010 due to a fuel switch from gaseous
fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or
liquid fuel is considered to be a new
source under this subpart. This revision
maintains consistency with the rule’s
applicability criteria for determining
new versus existing sources, eliminates
the requirement that existing dual-fuel
fired boilers notify as affected sources
although, at the time, they are not
subject to subpart JJJJJJ, and promotes
flexibility in that these existing dualfuel fired sources that were designed to
accommodate an alternate fuel may fire
the alternate fuel and move into subpart
JJJJJJ without being subject to the more
stringent requirements for new boilers.
2. Residential Boilers
One commenter suggested that the
definition of ‘‘residential boiler,’’ as
proposed, be revised to acknowledge the
use of combined heat and power
systems which function with heat and/
or hot water systems. The EPA agrees
and is amending the proposed
definition to clarify that a boiler that
operates as part of a residential
combined heat and power system (and
that meets other definitional
requirements) is a residential boiler.
Another commenter explained that
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
historical buildings may be subdivided
into more than four units but boilers
serving those units should still be
considered residential boilers. We agree
and, in this final rule, are amending the
proposed definition to clarify that a
boiler serving a single unit residence
dwelling that has since been converted
or subdivided into condominiums or
apartments may also be considered a
residential boiler.
3. Temporary Boilers
One commenter supported the EPA’s
12-month threshold above which the
boiler would no longer be considered
temporary but pointed out that a boiler
used on a temporary basis during
construction of a commercial building
may be needed for more than 12 months
due to the length of the construction
period. The commenter suggested that
the definition of temporary boiler, as
proposed, be revised to allow owners or
operators to petition for an extension
beyond 12 months. We agree with the
commenter and, in this final rule, are
amending the proposed definition to
allow an owner or operator to submit to
their regulatory agency a petition for an
extension beyond 12 months. Another
commenter suggested that the EPA
expand on the intent of ‘‘location’’ in
the definition of ‘‘temporary boiler.’’ We
are amending the proposed definition to
clarify that ‘‘location’’ means ‘‘location
within the facility.’’ This clarification
will allow a boiler to be moved from one
location to another within a facility and
be considered a different temporary
boiler (i.e., a new time period begins) as
long as the boiler does not continue to
perform the same or similar function
and to serve the same electricity, steam,
and/or hot water system. Another
commenter pointed out that our
definition, as proposed, does not specify
a time period associated with the
statement ‘‘Any temporary boiler that
replaces a temporary boiler at a location
within the facility and performs the
same or similar function will be
included in calculating the consecutive
time period.’’ The commenter explained
that it is not unusual for a temporary
boiler to be used for short periods
during turnarounds or other
maintenance activities that recur several
years apart. Under the proposal, these
boilers would not be considered
temporary because each boiler replaces
the previous one and performs the same
function, even though there is a multiyear gap between the occurrences. The
commenter suggested that replacements
that occur after a gap of at least one year
should not be considered consecutive
for the purposes of the definition. We
agree with the commenter and are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
amending numbered paragraph (2) in
the proposed definition of ‘‘temporary
boiler’’ such that it specifies that ‘‘Any
temporary boiler that replaces a
temporary boiler at a location within the
facility and performs the same or similar
function will be included in calculating
the consecutive time period unless there
is a gap in operation of 12 months or
more.’’.
4. Seasonal Boilers
Several commenters explained that
boilers subject to semi-annual testing
requirements would not meet the
proposed 7 consecutive month
shutdown criteria, but otherwise would
be considered seasonal boilers.
Commenters suggested that seasonal
boiler be defined to allow periodic
testing during the 7-month shutdown
period. We agree with the commenters
and, in this final rule, are revising the
proposed definition of seasonal boiler to
allow for a combined total of 15 days of
use during the shutdown period for
periodic testing.
Another commenter pointed out that
the EPA’s seasonal boiler definition, as
proposed, would potentially allow more
regular use. The commenter specifically
suggested that the proposed definition
be revised to clarify that there must be
a 7 consecutive month shutdown every
12 months. It was the EPA’s intent that
the shutdown period of at least 7
consecutive months be on a 12-month
basis. In response to this comment, we
are clarifying in the definition of
seasonal boiler that the shutdown must
be for a period of at least 7 consecutive
months (or 210 consecutive days) each
12-month period.
5. Limited-Use Boilers
Several commenters asserted that the
EPA should also include a limited-use
subcategory in the area source rule for
the same reasons we determined a
seasonal boiler subcategory was
appropriate. Commenters suggested that
we should apply the same 5-year tuneup cycle for limited-use units such as
auxiliary boilers that we proposed for
seasonally-operated units and small oilfired units. Commenters explained that
in the electric utility industry, auxiliary
boilers are typically used to generate the
steam necessary to bring a main EGU on
line during startup and, since auxiliary
boilers are primarily operated during
unit startup, operation for many of these
boilers is typically very limited and
sporadic. Commenters also pointed out
that the Major Source Boiler Rule
includes a limited-use subcategory.
The EPA has determined that a
limited-use subcategory is appropriate
and is including a limited-use
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7499
subcategory in this final Area Source
Boiler Rule. Specifically, a limited-use
boiler is defined in this final rule to
mean any boiler that burns any amount
of solid or liquid fuels and has a
federally enforceable average annual
capacity factor of no more than 10
percent. We are using a capacity-factor
approach for the same reasons that the
approach is being used in the Major
Source Boiler Rule. A capacity-factor
approach allows operational flexibility
for units that operate on standby mode
or low loads for periods longer than
would be allowed under an approach
that limited hours of operation (e.g., the
876 hours per year included in the
proposed limited-use definition for
major source boilers). The operational
flexibility associated with a capacityfactor approach can be achieved without
increasing emissions or harm to human
health and the environment. Units
operating at 10 percent load for 8,760
hours per year would emit the same
amount of emissions as units operating
at full load for 876 hours per year.
Further, it is technically infeasible to
test these limited-use boilers since these
units serve as back-up energy sources
and their operating schedules can be
intermittent and unpredictable.
This final rule specifies that limiteduse boilers are required to complete a
tune-up every 5 years. Boilers that
operate no more than 10 percent of the
year (i.e., a limited-use boiler) would
operate for no more than 6 months in
between tune-ups on a 5-year tune-up
cycle. The brief period of operations is
even less than the number of operating
months that seasonal boilers and fulltime boilers will operate between tuneups. The irregular schedule of
operations also makes it difficult to
schedule more frequent tune-ups. We
believe that establishing a limited-use
subcategory is reasonable.
6. Alternative PM Emission Control for
Certain Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA received a number of
comments urging that we provide an
exemption from the PM limit for units
burning low-sulfur liquid fuel as is
provided in subpart Dc of 40 CFR part
60 (standards of performance for new
small industrial-commercialinstitutional steam generating units).
Commenters asserted that such an
exemption is justified since the low
sulfur content indicates low PM
emissions and that boilers firing lowsulfur liquid fuel should only be subject
to a requirement to maintain records
documenting the liquid fuel fired. We
agree burning low-sulfur liquid fuel can
be an alternative method of meeting
GACT for PM. We are amending 40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7500
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
63.11210 to specify that new or
reconstructed oil-fired boilers that
combust only oil that contains no more
than 0.50 weight percent sulfur or a
mixture of 0.50 weight percent sulfur oil
with other fuels not subject to a PM
emission limit under this subpart and
that do not use a post-combustion
technology (except a wet scrubber) to
reduce PM or sulfur dioxide emissions
meet GACT for PM providing the type
of fuel combusted is monitored and
recorded on a monthly basis. Further,
we are specifying that if you intend to
burn a new type of fuel or fuel mixture
that does not meet the requirements of
this paragraph, you must conduct a
performance test within 60 days of
burning the new fuel.
B. Tune-Up Requirements
1. Boilers With Oxygen Trim Systems
In this final rule, the EPA is adding
to the types of boilers that must conduct
a tune-up every 5 years boilers that have
an oxygen trim system that maintain an
optimum air-to-fuel ratio that would
otherwise be subject to biennial tuneups. These units do not need to be
tuned as frequently as other types of
boilers because the trim system is
designed to maintain an optimum air-tofuel ratio which is the purpose of a
tune-up.
2. Initial Compliance for Existing
Boilers
The EPA is revising the initial
compliance date for existing boilers
subject to the work practice or
management practice standard of a tuneup. Under the proposed rule, owners
and operators of existing affected boilers
would have had to comply with the
final rule by March 21, 2013. We
solicited comments on whether to
extend the compliance date to March
21, 2014. We received no comments
objecting to either of these dates.
Support for an extension until 2014
came from a variety of stakeholders
affected by the rule. Therefore, this final
rule requires that if you own or operate
an existing boiler subject to a work
practice or management practice
standard of a tune-up, you must comply
with the final rule no later than March
21, 2014.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Compliance Demonstration
We solicited comment on the
requirements for demonstrating
compliance with the work practice and
management practice tune-up standards,
with one focus on clarifying how to
measure CO. Commenters requested that
we clarify that CO measurements may
be taken with a portable CO analyzer.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
We agree that this clarification is
appropriate and are including this
clarification in this final rule.
C. Energy Assessment
The EPA received a number of
comments regarding the energy
assessment requirements and in this
final rule is making a series of changes
to the energy assessment provisions and
related definitions that clarify terms
used and better set the scope of the
assessment.
In this final rule, we are revising the
definition of energy assessment by
providing a duration for performing the
energy assessment for numbered
paragraph (3) in the definition of
‘‘energy assessment’’ in 40 CFR
63.11237 for facilities with units with
greater than 1 TBtu/yr heat input
capacity to specify time duration/size
ratio and are including a cap to the
maximum number of on-site technical
hours that should be used in the energy
assessment. The energy assessment for
facilities with affected boilers and
process heaters with greater than 1.0
TBtu/yr heat input capacity will be up
to 24 on-site technical labor hours in
length for the first TBtu/yr plus 8
technical labor hours for every
additional 1.0 TBtu/yr not to exceed 160
technical hours, but may be longer at
the discretion of the owner or operator.
The revised definition of energy
assessment also clarifies our intentions
that the scope of assessment is based on
energy use by discrete segments of a
facility, which could vary significantly
depending on the site and its
complexity, and not by a total
aggregation of all individual energy
using elements of a facility. We are
adding the following language, as
paragraph (4), to the ‘‘energy
assessment’’ definition to help resolve
current problems and allow for more
streamlined assessments:
‘‘(4) The on-site energy use systems
serving as the basis for the percent of
affected boiler(s) energy output in
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this
definition may be segmented by
production area or energy use area as
most logical and applicable to the
specific facility being assessed (e.g.,
product X manufacturing area; product
Y drying area; Building Z).’’
In this final rule, we are revising 40
CFR 63.11201 and Table 2 to subpart
JJJJJJ to allow a source that is operating
under an energy management program
established through energy management
systems compatible with ISO 50001,
that includes the affected boilers, by
March 21, 2014, to satisfy the energy
assessment requirement. In addition, we
are clarifying that energy assessor
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
approval and qualification requirements
are waived in instances where an energy
assessment completed on or after
January 1, 2008 meets or is amended to
meet the energy assessment
requirements in this final rule by March
21.
The definition of ‘‘boiler system’’ is
being revised in this final rule to clarify
that it means the boiler and associated
components directly connected to and
serving the energy use systems.
The definition of ‘‘energy use system’’
is also being revised in this final rule to
clarify that energy use systems are only
those on-site systems using energy
clearly produced by affected boilers.
D. Clarification of Oxygen
Concentration Operating Limits
We are clarifying in this final rule that
operating limits for oxygen
concentration must be at or above the
minimum established during a
performance stack test. We are also
clarifying that these limits are
applicable when the unit is firing the
fuel or fuel mixture utilized during the
CO performance test.
E. Definitions Regarding Averaging
Times
The EPA received comments
requesting that we clarify that periods of
startup and shutdown are excluded
from calculation of the arithmetic mean
in the definitions of ‘‘30-day rolling
average’’ and ‘‘daily block average.’’ We
agree with the commenters and, in this
final rule, are revising the definitions
accordingly.
F. Fuel Sampling Frequency
The EPA is amending the fuel
sampling requirements in 40 CFR
63.11220(c) because we realized that
when performance stack testing
requirements were revised in the March
2011 final rule we neglected to revise
the fuel analysis requirements. In this
final rule, we are specifying that the
owner or operator does not need to
conduct further fuel analysis sampling
if, when demonstrating initial
compliance with the Hg emission limit,
the Hg constituents in the fuel or fuel
mixture are measured to be equal to or
less than half of the Hg emission limit.
If, when demonstrating initial
compliance, the Hg constituents in the
fuel or fuel mixture are greater than half
of the Hg emission limit, the owner or
operator must conduct quarterly
sampling.
G. Performance Testing Frequency
The EPA is amending the PM
performance testing requirements in 40
CFR 63.11220(b) to specify that the
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
owner or operator of an affected boiler
does not need to conduct further PM
emission testing if, when demonstrating
initial compliance with the PM
emission limit, the performance test
results show that the PM emissions are
equal to or less than half of the PM
emission limit. The owner or operator
must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and
monitoring requirements. If the initial
performance test results show that the
PM emissions are greater than half of
the PM emission limit, the owner or
operator must conduct subsequent
performance tests as specified in 40 CFR
63.11220(a).
With respect to the reconsideration
issue regarding the GACT-based PM
standards for new oil-fired boilers, we
received comments asserting that the
most effective control strategy for small
oil-fired boilers is the tune-up required
by the standards and that establishing a
PM limit for those boilers between 10
MMBtu/hr and 30 MMBtu/hr just
ensures that those boilers will do stack
testing demonstrating that the boilers
are in compliance without the need for
controls; a fact already known.
Commenters also asserted that
establishing a PM limit imposes a stack
test obligation on small facilities with
the least resources to deal with the
testing.
We have reviewed the comments and
are not eliminating or revising the PM
limit for new oil-fired boilers with heat
input capacity between 10 MMBtu/hr
and 30 MMBtu/hr. We do however,
believe that adjustments to the PM
performance test frequency as described
above are appropriate for boilers that
demonstrate during their initial
performance test that their PM
emissions are equal to or less than half
of the PM limit. We believe that the
performance test adjustment should not
be potentially applicable to only new
oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity
between 10 MMBtu/hr and 30 MMBtu/
hr, but to all new boilers. Owners or
operators of boilers whose initial
performance test results show that their
PM emissions are equal to or less than
half of the PM emission limit and, thus,
do not need to conduct further PM
emissions testing, must continue to
comply with all applicable operating
limits and monitoring requirements to
ensure that there are no changes in
operation of the boiler or air pollution
control equipment that could increase
emissions. This adjustment in PM
performance test frequency will
potentially reduce the burden on small
entities operating boilers that meet the
adjustment criteria.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
H. Startup and Shutdown Definitions
A number of commenters indicated
that the proposed load specifications
(i.e., 25 percent load) within the
definitions of ‘‘startup’’ and
‘‘shutdown’’ were inconsistent with
either safe or normal (proper) operation
of the various types of boilers
encountered within the source category.
As the basis for defining periods of
startup and shutdown, a number of
commenters suggested alternative load
specifications based on the specific
considerations of their boilers; other
commenters suggested the achievement
of various steady-state conditions.
We have reviewed these comments
and believe adjustments are appropriate
in the definitions of ‘‘startup’’ and
‘‘shutdown.’’ These adjustments are
tailored for industrial boilers and are
consistent with the definitions of
‘‘startup’’ and ‘‘shutdown’’ contained in
the 40 CFR part 63, subpart A General
Provisions. We believe these revised
definitions address the comments and
are rational based on the fact that
industrial boilers function to provide
steam or, in the case of cogeneration
units, electricity. Therefore, industrial
boilers should be considered subject to
applicable standards at all times steam
of the proper pressure, temperature and
flow rate is being provided to a common
header system or energy user(s) for use
as either process steam or for the
cogeneration of electricity. The
definitions of ‘‘startup’’ and
‘‘shutdown’’ have been revised in this
final rule as follows:
Startup means either the first-ever firing of
fuel in a boiler for the purpose of supplying
steam or heat for heating and/or producing
electricity, or for any other purpose, or the
firing of fuel in a boiler after a shutdown
event for any purpose. Startup ends when
any of the steam or heat from the boiler is
supplied for heating and/or producing
electricity, or for any other purpose.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation
of a boiler for any purpose. Shutdown begins
either when none of the steam or heat from
the boiler is supplied for heating and/or
producing electricity, or for any other
purpose, or at the point of no fuel being fired
in the boiler, whichever is earlier. Shutdown
ends when there is no steam and no heat
being supplied and no fuel being fired in the
boiler.
I. Notifications
1. Initial Notification
The EPA has been made aware that
there are many affected boilers at area
sources that are just becoming aware, or
are not yet aware, that they are subject
to emission standards. Thus, we are
amending 40 CFR 63.11225(a)(2) to
allow these sources until January 20,
2014 to submit their Initial Notification.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7501
2. Notification of Fuel Change, Physical
Change, or Permit Limit
The notification requirement in 40
CFR 63.11225(g) of the final rule for
instances when a change in fuel or a
physical change to a boiler results in the
applicability of a different subcategory
or a change out of subpart JJJJJJ is being
revised. Under the proposed
reconsideration action, a facility would
have been required to provide 30 days
prior notice of the date upon which the
change was scheduled to occur.
Commenters explained that an
advanced notification requirement
would delay such a change if the owner
or operator decided to immediately
make a change (e.g., switch to 100
percent natural gas) and could
potentially restrict flexibility in
manufacturing operations, and
suggested that the owner or operator be
allowed to make notification within 30
days after the change has occurred. We
agree that notification within 30 days
after a change that results in
applicability of a different subcategory
or a change out of subpart JJJJJJ will
provide the EPA or state/local agency
with the required information within a
reasonable timeframe. Thus, in this final
rule, we are requiring facilities making
these types of changes to provide
notification within 30 days following
the change. The notification
requirement in 40 CFR 63.11225(g) is
also being amended to clarify that it
includes affected boilers that switch
fuels or make a physical change to the
boiler and the fuel switch or change
results in the applicability of a different
subcategory within subpart JJJJJJ, in the
boiler becoming subject to subpart JJJJJJ,
or in the boiler switching out of subpart
JJJJJJ due to a change to 100 percent
natural gas, as well as affected boilers
that take a permit limit that results in
the applicability of subpart JJJJJJ.
Commenters requested that we make
this clarification and we agree that it is
appropriate.
J. Miscellaneous Definitions
In this final rule, we are revising some
definitions and adding others to help
affected sources determine their
applicability. Specifically, definitions
have been added for the terms ‘‘10-day
rolling average,’’ ‘‘30-day rolling
average,’’ ‘‘Annual heat input,’’
‘‘Biodiesel,’’ ‘‘Calendar year,’’ ‘‘Common
stack,’’ ‘‘Daily block average,’’
‘‘Distillate oil,’’ ‘‘Electric boiler,’’
‘‘Electric utility steam generating unit
(EGU),’’ ‘‘Energy management program,’’
‘‘Fluidized bed boiler,’’ ‘‘Fluidized bed
combustion,’’ ‘‘Hourly average,’’
‘‘Limited-use boiler,’’ ‘‘Load fraction,’’
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7502
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
‘‘Minimum scrubber pressure drop,’’
‘‘Minimum sorbent injection rate,’’
‘‘Minimum total secondary electric
power,’’ ‘‘Operating day,’’ ‘‘Oxygen
analyzer system,’’ ‘‘Oxygen trim
system,’’ ‘‘Process heater,’’ ‘‘Regulated
gas stream,’’ ‘‘Residential boiler,’’
‘‘Residual oil,’’ ‘‘Seasonal boiler,’’
‘‘Shutdown,’’ ‘‘Solid fuel,’’ ‘‘Startup,’’
‘‘Temporary boiler,’’ ‘‘Tune-up,’’
‘‘Vegetable oil,’’ ‘‘Voluntary Consensus
Standards (VCS),’’ and ‘‘Wet scrubber.’’
Definitions revised to clarify the term
include ‘‘Bag leak detection system,’’
‘‘Biomass subcategory,’’ ‘‘Boiler,’’
‘‘Boiler system,’’ ‘‘Deviation,’’ ‘‘Dry
scrubber,’’ ‘‘Electrostatic precipitator
(ESP),’’ ‘‘Energy assessment,’’ ‘‘Energy
use system,’’ ‘‘Federally enforceable,’’
‘‘Gas-fired boiler,’’ ‘‘Heat input,’’ ‘‘Hot
water heater,’’ ‘‘Institutional boiler,’’
‘‘Liquid fuel,’’ ‘‘Minimum activated
carbon injection rate,’’ ‘‘Minimum
oxygen level,’’ ‘‘Minimum scrubber
liquid flow rate,’’ ‘‘Natural gas,’’ ‘‘Oil
subcategory,’’ ‘‘Particulate matter,’’
‘‘Period of gas curtailment or supply
interruption,’’ ‘‘Qualified Energy
Assessor,’’ and ‘‘Waste heat boiler.’’
V. Other Actions the EPA Is Taking
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA states
that ‘‘[o]nly an objection to a rule or
procedure which was raised with
reasonable specificity during the period
for public comment (including any
public hearing) may be raised during
judicial review. If the person raising an
objection can demonstrate to the
Administrator that it was impracticable
to raise such objection within such time
or if the grounds for such objection
arose after the period for public
comment (but within the time specified
for judicial review) and if such objection
is of central relevance to the outcome of
the rule, the Administrator shall
convene a proceeding for
reconsideration of the rule and provide
the same procedural rights as would
have been afforded had the information
been available at the time the rule was
proposed. If the Administrator refuses to
convene such a proceeding, such person
may seek review of such refusal in the
United States court of appeals for the
appropriate circuit (as provided in
subsection (b)).’’
As to the first procedural criterion for
reconsideration, a petitioner must show
why the issue could not have been
presented during the comment period,
either because it was impracticable to
raise the issue during that time or
because the grounds for the issue arose
after the period for public comment (but
within 60 days of publication of the
final action). The EPA is denying the
petitions for reconsideration of five
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
issues because this criterion has not
been met. In many cases, the petitions
reiterate comments made on the
proposed June 2010 rule during the
public comment period for that rule. On
those issues, the EPA responded to
those comments in the March 2011 final
rule, and made appropriate revisions to
the proposed rule after consideration of
public comments received. It is well
established that an agency may refine its
proposed approach without providing
an additional opportunity for public
comment. See Community Nutrition
Institute v. Block, 749 F.2d 50, 58 (DC
Cir. 1984) and International Fabricare
Institute v. EPA, 972 F.2d 384, 399 (DC
Cir. 1992) (notice and comment is not
intended to result in ‘‘interminable
back-and-forth[,]’’ nor is agency
required to provide additional
opportunity to comment on its response
to comments) and Small Refiner Lead
Phase-Down Task Force v. EPA, 705
F.2d 506, 547 (DC Cir. 1983) (‘‘notice
requirement should not force an agency
endlessly to repropose a rule because of
minor changes’’)
In the EPA’s view, an objection is of
central relevance to the outcome of the
rule only if it provides substantial
support for the argument that the
promulgated regulation should be
revised. See Union Oil v. EPA, 821 F.2d
768, 683 (DC Cir. 1987) (court declined
to remand rule because petitioners
failed to show substantial likelihood
that final rule would have been changed
based on information in petition). See
also the EPA’s Denial of the Petitions to
Reconsider the Endangerment and
Cause or Contribute Findings for
Greenhouse Gases under Section 202 of
the Clean Air Act, 75 FR at 49556, 49561
(August 13, 2010). See also, 75 FR at
49556, 49560–49563 (August 13, 2010)
and 76 FR at 4780, 4786—4788 (January
26, 2011) for additional discussion of
the standard for reconsideration under
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B).
We are denying reconsideration on
the following five issues contained in
the petitions for reconsideration because
they failed to meet the standard
described above for reconsideration
under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B).
Specifically, on these issues, the
petitioner has failed to show the
following: That it was impracticable to
raise their objections during the
comment period or that the grounds for
their objections arose after the close of
the comment period; and/or that their
concern is of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule. Therefore, the EPA
is denying the petitions for
reconsideration on the issues for the
reasons described below.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Issue: Use of RDL Is Unlawful
The petitioner (Sierra Club) objected
to the EPA establishing a MACT floor
emission limit at a level equal to three
times the RDL as being unlawful and
arbitrary. This issue is not of central
relevance to the outcome of this final
rule. The final emission limits in this
rule are based on the UPL at a
confidence interval of 99 percent. The
RDL analysis was not used in this final
rule.
Issue: MACT Floor for Existing Sources
Must Reflect Average Performance of
the Top 12 Percent of Units
The petitioner (Sierra Club) stated
that the MACT floor for existing sources
must reflect the average performance of
the top 12 percent of units. The
petitioner has not demonstrated that it
lacked the opportunity to comment on
the EPA’s MACT floor analysis. The
methods used to compute the MACT
floors were subject to notice and
comment. Rationale and responses to
comments on the MACT floor
methodology were provided at 75 FR
31904, June 4, 2010; 76 FR 15571,
March 21, 2011. Therefore, the EPA is
denying the request for reconsideration.
Issue: Consider a De Minimis Size
Threshold
The petitioners (American Petroleum
Institute, National Petrochemical and
Refiners Association, Alaska Oil and
Gas Association) requested that the EPA
consider a de minimis size threshold
using guidelines from insignificance
thresholds authorized under CAA part
71. The EPA is denying the request for
reconsideration on this issue. In the
June 2010 proposed rule, it was readily
apparent that we were not establishing
de minimis size thresholds in the area
source rulemaking. We received
multiple comments on this issue and
responded to them in the response to
comments document for the March 2011
final rule. The issue on which
petitioners seek reconsideration was one
that could have been raised during the
comment period and thus does not meet
the requirements for reconsideration.
Therefore, the EPA is denying this
request for reconsideration.
Issue: MACT Standards Must Be Set for
All HAP
The petitioner (Sierra Club) asserted
that MACT standards must be set for all
HAP including HAP not listed in CAA
section 112(c)(6). The EPA is denying
the request for reconsideration on this
issue. We disagree with the petitioner
that the EPA must issue emission
standards for all HAP. MACT standards
have been set for Hg and CO, as a
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
surrogate for POM emissions, but the
EPA does not interpret CAA section
112(c)(6) to compel regulation of all
HAP emitted by area sources. The EPA’s
position on this issue was clear in the
proposed rule (75 FR 31900, 31904,
31918). This commenter raised this
issue in its comments (76 FR 15567,
March 21, 2011). Not only did the
petitioner have an opportunity to
present its theory in its comments, but
also it did so.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Issue: CO Is Not a Valid Surrogate for
POM
The petitioner (Sierra Club) requested
that the EPA remove the CO standard as
a surrogate for POM and instead adopt
a numeric limit for POM because CO is
not an appropriate surrogate. The EPA
is denying the request for
reconsideration on this issue. While the
EPA disagrees with the petitioner’s
argument regarding the suitability of CO
as a surrogate for POM, the petitioner
has not demonstrated that it lacked the
opportunity to comment on this issue.
The EPA revised the final CO emission
limit to ensure a more accurate
correlation between POM and CO levels.
The EPA made its position on this issue
clear and explained the agency’s basis
for concluding that CO was an
appropriate surrogate in the proposed
rule (75 FR 31900, 31904, June 4, 2010).
The petitioner raised this issue in its
comments (Document ID: EPA–HQ–
OAR–2006–0790–1982, Comments of
Earthjustice, Sierra Club, Clean Air Task
Force, and Natural Resources Defense
Council, p. 4). Therefore, the EPA is
denying the request for reconsideration.
VI. Impacts Associated With This Final
Rule
The amendments contained in this
final action are corrections that are
intended to clarify, but not change, the
coverage of the final rule. The
clarifications and corrections should
make it easier for owners and operators
and for local and state authorities to
understand and implement the
requirements. The final amendments
will not affect the estimated emission
reductions, control costs or the benefits
of the rule in substance. The
amendments do not impose any
additional regulatory requirements
beyond those imposed by the previously
promulgated boiler area source rule and,
in fact, will result in a decrease in the
burden on small facilities as a result of
the reduction in the frequency of
conducting tune-ups for seasonal
boilers, limited-use boilers, small (equal
to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr) oil-fired
boilers and boilers using an oxygen trim
system that maintain an optimum air-to-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
fuel ratio. Additionally, the burden will
be reduced on facilities with existing
large boilers that currently operate
under an energy management program
established through energy management
systems compatible with ISO 50001,
that includes the affected boilers,
because a one-time energy assessment
will not be required. Burden will also be
reduced on facilities with affected
boilers that burn low-sulfur oil because,
in lieu of needing to meet an emission
limit, we consider low-sulfur oil
combustion to be GACT for PM for those
boilers. This change should allow
sources currently complying with 40
CFR 60 subpart Dc to use the same
compliance approach rather than
needing to monitor limits. Further
reduction in burden will occur in
instances where initial compliance
demonstrations with the Hg emission
limit via fuel sampling or with the PM
emission limit via performance stack
testing show that the emissions are
equal to or less than half the respective
emission limit because no further
sampling or testing of those boilers will
be required.
As discussed in section III, the Hg
emission limits for new and existing
large (10 MMBtu/hr or greater) coalfired area source boilers were revised
because of an error discovered in the
analysis conducted for the final rule.
This technical correction resulted in an
increase in the emission limit for Hg. As
explained in the December 2011
proposal, we also revised our impacts
analysis to be consistent with emission
factor changes made to the Major Source
Boiler Rule. The baseline emissions for
area sources are calculated using the
emission factors developed for the
Major Source Boiler Rule because of
insufficient data for area sources.
Emission factor changes resulted in a
higher baseline emission for Hg from
coal-fired area source boilers.
Consequently, the result of the increase
in both baseline Hg emissions and Hg
emission limits is that the overall
reduction in Hg emissions does not
change significantly from the estimated
reduction for the promulgated rule.
In summary, as compared to the
control costs estimated for the March
2011 final rule, this final rule will not
result in any meaningful change in the
capital and annual cost due to the
increase in emission limits and the
decrease in burden on small facilities.
PO 00000
7503
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
Under section 3(f)(1) of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), this action is a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ because it is likely to
raise novel legal or policy issues.
Accordingly, the EPA submitted this
action to the OMB for review under
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011), and any changes made in
response to OMB recommendations
have been documented in the docket for
this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden. This
action results in no significant changes
to the information collection
requirements of the promulgated rule
and will have no increased impact on
the information collection estimate of
projected cost and hour burden made
and approved by OMB. In fact, the
reduction in tune-up frequency for some
boilers will result in less information
collection burden. Therefore, the
information collection request has not
been revised. However, the OMB has
previously approved the information
collection requirements contained in the
existing regulation (40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJJJJJ) under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq. and has assigned OMB
control number 2060–0668. The OMB
control numbers for the EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40
CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.2
2 Small entities include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts
of this final rule on small entities, small entity is
defined as: (1) A small business as defined by the
Small Business Administration size standards for
small businesses at 13 CFR 121.201 (less than 500,
750, or 1,000 employees, depending on the specific
NAICS Code under subcategory 325); (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or special district
with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a
Continued
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7504
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The RFA also allows an agency to
‘‘consider a series of closely related
rules as one rule for the purposes of
sections’’ 603 (initial regulatory
flexibility analysis) and 604 (final
regulatory flexibility analysis) in order
to avoid ‘‘duplicative action.’’ 5 U.S.C.
section 605(c). These amendments and
notice of final action on reconsideration
are closely related to the final Area
Source Boiler Rule, which the EPA
signed on February 21, 2011, and that
took effect on May 20, 2011. The EPA
prepared a final regulatory flexibility
analysis in connection with the final
Area Source Boiler Rule. Therefore,
pursuant to section 605(c), the EPA is
not required to complete a final
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rule (i.e., the amendments and final
action).
The EPA has been concerned with
potential small entity impacts since it
began developing the Area Source
Boiler Rule. The EPA conducted
outreach to small entities and, pursuant
to section 609 of RFA, convened a Small
Business Advocacy Review Panel (the
Panel) on January 22, 2009, to obtain
advice and recommendations from
small entity representatives. Pursuant to
the RFA, the EPA used the Panel’s
report and prepared both an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis and a final
regulatory flexibility analysis in
connection with the closely related final
Area Source Boiler Rule. Convening an
additional Panel and preparing an
additional final regulatory flexibility
analysis would be procedurally
duplicative and is unnecessary given
that the issues here are within the scope
of those considered by the Panel.
Finally, we note that this action, which
amends the Area Source Boiler Rule,
will not impose any additional
regulatory requirements beyond those
imposed by the previously promulgated
Area Source Boiler Rule and, in fact, the
amendments will afford relief to some
boilers.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no new federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the UMRA of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
action imposes no new enforceable duty
on any state, local, or tribal governments
or the private sector. Therefore, this
action is not subject to the requirements
of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise that is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its field.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
rule finalizes amendments to aid with
compliance.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This final rule
will not impose new direct compliance
costs on state or local governments, and
will not preempt state law. Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this action.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). It will not have substantial new
direct effects on tribal governments, on
the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying to those regulatory actions that
concern health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5–
501 of the Order has the potential to
influence the regulation. This action is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is based solely on technology
performance.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001), because it is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. We
estimate no significant changes for the
energy sector for price, production, or
imports.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA of 1995,
Public Law No. 104–113, 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA to use
VCS in its regulatory activities, unless to
do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
VCS are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by VCS bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the agency decides
not use available and applicable VCS.
This action does not involve any new
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
did not consider the use of any VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this
final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because the level of protection provided
to human health or the environment
through the rule’s requirements does not
vary. Therefore, it does not have any
disproportionately high or adverse
human health or environmental effects
on any population, including any
minority or low-income population.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A Major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is a
reconsideration of a previous action that
was a major rule under the CRA.
However, today’s action makes only
certain limited revisions to the March
2011 rule and those revisions do not
qualify as a major rule under the CRA.
Therefore, this action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
rule will be effective February 1, 2013.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference.
Dated: December 20, 2012.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 63—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—[Amended]
2. Section 63.14 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (b)(19), (b)(23),
(b)(35), (b)(40), (b)(69), and (b)(70).
■ b. Removing and reserving paragraph
(b)(53).
■ c. Adding paragraphs (b)(46), (b)(55),
and (b)(76) through (83).
■ d. Adding paragraphs (p)(12) through
(20).
■ e. Adding paragraph (r).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 63.14
Incorporations by reference.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(19) ASTM D95–05 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Test Method for Water
in Petroleum Products and Bituminous
Materials by Distillation, approved May
1, 2010, IBR approved for § 63.10005(i)
and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(23) ASTM D4006–11, Standard Test
Method for Water in Crude Oil by
Distillation, including Annex A1 and
Appendix X1, approved June 1, 2011,
IBR approved for § 63.10005(i) and table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(35) ASTM D6784–02 (Reapproved
2008) Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary
Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
approved April 1, 2008, IBR approved
for table 1 to subpart DDDDD of this
part, table 2 to subpart DDDDD of this
part, table 5 to subpart DDDDD, table 11
to subpart DDDDD of this part, table 12
to subpart DDDDD of this part, table 13
to subpart DDDDD of this part, and table
4 to subpart JJJJJJ of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(40) ASTM D396–10 Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, approved
October 1, 2010, IBR approved for
§ 63.7575 and § 6311237.
*
*
*
*
*
(46) ASTM D4606–03(2007), Standard
Test Method for Determination of
Arsenic and Selenium in Coal by the
Hydride Generation/Atomic Absorption
Method, approved October 1, 2007, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(55) ASTM D6357–11, Test Methods
for Determination of Trace Elements in
Coal, Coke, and Combustion Residues
from Coal Utilization Processes by
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic
Emission Spectrometry, approved April
1, 2011, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(69) ASTM D4057–06 (Reapproved
2011), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, including Annex A1,
approved June 1, 2011, IBR approved for
§ 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(70) ASTM D4177–95 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Practice for Automatic
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, including Annexes A1
through A6 and Appendices X1 and X2,
approved May 1, 2010, IBR approved for
§ 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(76) ASTM D6751–11b, Standard
Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels,
approved July 15, 2011, IBR approved
for § 63.7575 and § 63.11237.
(77) ASTM D975–11b, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
approved December 1, 2011, IBR
approved for § 63.7575.
(78) ASTM D5864–11 Standard Test
Method for Determining Aerobic
Aquatic Biodegradation of Lubricants or
Their Components, approved March 1,
2011, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(79) ASTM D240–09 Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7505
Calorimeter, approved July 1, 2009, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(80) ASTM D4208–02(2007) Standard
Test Method for Total Chlorine in Coal
by the Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Ion
Selective Electrode Method, approved
May 1, 2007, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(81) ASTM D5192–09 Standard
Practice for Collection of Coal Samples
from Core, approved June 1, 2009, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(82) ASTM D7430–11ae1, Standard
Practice for Mechanical Sampling of
Coal, approved October 1, 2011, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(83) ASTM D6883–04, Standard
Practice for Manual Sampling of
Stationary Coal from Railroad Cars,
Barges, Trucks, or Stockpiles, approved
June 1, 2004, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(12) Method 5050 (SW–846–5050),
Bomb Preparation Method for Solid
Waste, Revision 0, September 1994, in
EPA Publication No. SW–846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(13) Method 9056 (SW–846–9056),
Determination of Inorganic Anions by
Ion Chromatography, Revision 1,
February 2007, in EPA Publication No.
SW–846, Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(14) Method 9076 (SW–846–9076),
Test Method for Total Chlorine in New
and Used Petroleum Products by
Oxidative Combustion and
Microcoulometry, Revision 0,
September 1994, in EPA Publication No.
SW–846, Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(15) Method 1631 Revision E,
Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge
and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic
Absorption Fluorescence Spectrometry,
Revision E, EPA–821–R–02–019, August
2002, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(16) Method 200.8, Determination of
Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by
Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass
Spectrometry, Revision 5.4, 1994, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(17) Method 6020A (SW–846–6020A),
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry, Revision 1, February
2007, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7506
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(18) Method 6010C (SW–846–6010C),
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometry, Revision 3,
February 2007, in EPA Publication No.
SW–846, Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(19) Method 7060A (SW–846–7060A),
Arsenic (Atomic Absorption, Furnace
Technique), Revision 1, September
1994, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(20) Method 7740 (SW–846–7740),
Selenium (Atomic Absorption, Furnace
Technique), Revision 0, September
1986, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) The following material is available
for purchase from the Technical
Association of the Pulp and Paper
Industry (TAPPI), 15 Technology
Parkway South, Norcross, GA 30092,
(800) 332–8686, https://www.tappi.org.
(1) TAPPI T 266, Determination of
Sodium, Calcium, Copper, Iron, and
Manganese in Pulp and Paper by
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Reaffirmation of T 266 om-02), Draft
No. 2, July 2006, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) [Reserved]
Subpart JJJJJJ—[AMENDED]
3. Section 63.11194 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1), (c) and (d), by
redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph
(f) and by adding new paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
■
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 63.11194 What is the affected source of
this subpart?
(a) * * *
(1) The affected source of this subpart
is the collection of all existing
industrial, commercial, and institutional
boilers within a subcategory, as listed in
§ 63.11200 and defined in § 63.11237,
located at an area source.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An affected source is a new source
if you commenced construction of the
affected source after June 4, 2010, and
the boiler meets the applicability
criteria at the time you commence
construction.
(d) An affected source is a
reconstructed source if the boiler meets
the reconstruction criteria as defined in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 63.2, you commenced reconstruction
after June 4, 2010, and the boiler meets
the applicability criteria at the time you
commence reconstruction.
(e) An existing dual-fuel fired boiler
meeting the definition of gas-fired
boiler, as defined in § 63.11237, that
meets the applicability requirements of
this subpart after June 4, 2010 due to a
fuel switch from gaseous fuel to solid
fossil fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel is
considered to be an existing source
under this subpart as long as the boiler
was designed to accommodate the
alternate fuel.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 63.11195 is amended by
revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (c) and (g) and by adding
paragraphs (h) through (k) to read as
follows:
practice standard no later than March
21, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If you own or operate an
industrial, commercial, or institutional
boiler and would be subject to this
subpart except for the exemption in
§ 63.11195(b) for commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration units
covered by 40 CFR part 60, subpart
CCCC or subpart DDDD, and you cease
combusting solid waste, you must be in
compliance with this subpart on the
effective date of the waste to fuel switch
as specified in § 60.2145(a)(2) and (3) of
subpart CCCC or § 60.2710(a)(2) and (3)
of subpart DDDD.
■ 6. Section 63.11200 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.11195 Are any boilers not subject to
this subpart?
The subcategories of boilers, as
defined in § 63.11237 are:
(a) Coal.
(b) Biomass.
(c) Oil.
(d) Seasonal boilers.
(e) Oil-fired boilers with heat input
capacity of equal to or less than 5
million British thermal units (Btu) per
hour.
(f) Boilers with an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel
ratio that would otherwise be subject to
a biennial tune-up.
(g) Limited-use boilers.
■ 7. Section 63.11201 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read
as follows:
The types of boilers listed in
paragraphs (a) through (k) of this section
are not subject to this subpart and to any
requirements in this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) A boiler required to have a permit
under section 3005 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act or covered by subpart EEE
of this part (e.g., hazardous waste
boilers), unless such units do not
combust hazardous waste and combust
comparable fuels.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Any boiler that is used as a control
device to comply with another subpart
of this part, or part 60, part 61, or part
65 of this chapter provided that at least
50 percent of the average annual heat
input during any 3 consecutive calendar
years to the boiler is provided by
regulated gas streams that are subject to
another standard.
(h) Temporary boilers as defined in
this subpart.
(i) Residential boilers as defined in
this subpart.
(j) Electric boilers as defined in this
subpart.
(k) An electric utility steam generating
unit (EGU) covered by subpart UUUUU
of this part.
■ 5. Section 63.11196 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (d) to read
as follows:
§ 63.11196
dates?
What are my compliance
(a) * * *
(1) If the existing affected boiler is
subject to a work practice or
management practice standard of a tuneup, you must achieve compliance with
the work practice or management
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 63.11200
boilers?
§ 63.11201
What are the subcategories of
What standards must I meet?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You must comply with each work
practice standard, emission reduction
measure, and management practice
specified in Table 2 to this subpart that
applies to your boiler. An energy
assessment completed on or after
January 1, 2008 that meets or is
amended to meet the energy assessment
requirements in Table 2 to this subpart
satisfies the energy assessment
requirement. A facility that operates
under an energy management program
established through energy management
systems compatible with ISO 50001,
that includes the affected units, also
satisfies the energy assessment
requirement.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) These standards apply at all times
the affected boiler is operating, except
during periods of startup and shutdown
as defined in § 63.11237, during which
time you must comply only with Table
2 to this subpart.
■ 8. Section 63.11205 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b), (c) introductory
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
text, (c)(1) introductory text, and (c)(1)(i)
to read as follows:
§ 63.11210 What are my initial compliance
requirements and by what date must I
conduct them?
§ 63.11205 What are my general
requirements for complying with this
subpart?
*
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You must demonstrate compliance
with all applicable emission limits
using performance stack testing, fuel
analysis, or a continuous monitoring
system (CMS), including a continuous
emission monitoring system (CEMS), a
continuous opacity monitoring system
(COMS), or a continuous parameter
monitoring system (CPMS), where
applicable. You may demonstrate
compliance with the applicable mercury
emission limit using fuel analysis if the
emission rate calculated according to
§ 63.11211(c) is less than the applicable
emission limit. Otherwise, you must
demonstrate compliance using stack
testing.
(c) If you demonstrate compliance
with any applicable emission limit
through performance stack testing and
subsequent compliance with operating
limits (including the use of CPMS), with
a CEMS, or with a COMS, you must
develop a site-specific monitoring plan
according to the requirements in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
section for the use of any CEMS, COMS,
or CPMS. This requirement also applies
to you if you petition the EPA
Administrator for alternative monitoring
parameters under § 63.8(f).
(1) For each CMS required in this
section (including CEMS, COMS, or
CPMS), you must develop, and submit
to the Administrator for approval upon
request, a site-specific monitoring plan
that addresses paragraphs (c)(1)(i)
through (vi) of this section. You must
submit this site-specific monitoring
plan, if requested, at least 60 days before
your initial performance evaluation of
your CMS. This requirement to develop
and submit a site-specific monitoring
plan does not apply to affected sources
with existing CEMS or COMS operated
according to the performance
specifications under appendix B to part
60 of this chapter and that meet the
requirements of § 63.11224.
(i) Installation of the CMS sampling
probe or other interface at a
measurement location relative to each
affected process unit such that the
measurement is representative of
control of the exhaust emissions (e.g.,
on or downstream of the last control
device);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 63.11210 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) through (e) and
adding paragraphs (f) through (j) to read
as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
(b) For existing affected boilers that
have applicable emission limits, you
must demonstrate initial compliance
with the applicable emission limits no
later than 180 days after the compliance
date that is specified in § 63.11196 and
according to the applicable provisions
in § 63.7(a)(2), except as provided in
paragraph (j) of this section.
(c) For existing affected boilers that
have applicable work practice
standards, management practices, or
emission reduction measures, you must
demonstrate initial compliance no later
than the compliance date that is
specified in § 63.11196 and according to
the applicable provisions in § 63.7(a)(2),
except as provided in paragraph (j) of
this section.
(d) For new or reconstructed affected
boilers that have applicable emission
limits, you must demonstrate initial
compliance with the applicable
emission limits no later than 180 days
after March 21, 2011 or within 180 days
after startup of the source, whichever is
later, according to § 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
(e) For new or reconstructed oil-fired
boilers that combust only oil that
contains no more than 0.50 weight
percent sulfur or a mixture of 0.50
weight percent sulfur oil with other
fuels not subject to a PM emission limit
under this subpart and that do not use
a post-combustion technology (except a
wet scrubber) to reduce particulate
matter (PM) or sulfur dioxide emissions,
you are not subject to the PM emission
limit in Table 1 of this subpart
providing you monitor and record on a
monthly basis the type of fuel
combusted. If you intend to burn a new
type of fuel or fuel mixture that does not
meet the requirements of this paragraph,
you must conduct a performance test
within 60 days of burning the new fuel.
(f) For new or reconstructed affected
boilers that have applicable work
practice standards or management
practices, you are not required to
complete an initial performance tuneup, but you are required to complete the
applicable biennial or 5-year tune-up as
specified in § 63.11223 no later than 25
months or 61 months, respectively, after
the initial startup of the new or
reconstructed affected source.
(g) For affected boilers that ceased
burning solid waste consistent with
§ 63.11196(d) and for which your initial
compliance date has passed, you must
demonstrate compliance within 60 days
of the effective date of the waste-to-fuel
switch as specified in § 60.2145(a)(2)
and (3) of subpart CCCC or
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7507
§ 60.2710(a)(2) and (3) of subpart DDDD.
If you have not conducted your
compliance demonstration for this
subpart within the previous 12 months,
you must complete all compliance
demonstrations for this subpart before
you commence or recommence
combustion of solid waste.
(h) For affected boilers that switch
fuels or make a physical change to the
boiler that results in the applicability of
a different subcategory within subpart
JJJJJJ or the boiler becoming subject to
subpart JJJJJJ, you must demonstrate
compliance within 180 days of the
effective date of the fuel switch or the
physical change. Notification of such
changes must be submitted according to
§ 63.11225(g).
(i) For boilers located at existing
major sources of HAP that limit their
potential to emit (e.g., make a physical
change or take a permit limit) such that
the existing major source becomes an
area source, you must comply with the
applicable provisions as specified in
paragraphs (i)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(1) Any such existing boiler at the
existing source must demonstrate
compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within
180 days of the later of March 21, 2014
or upon the existing major source
commencing operation as an area
source.
(2) Any new or reconstructed boiler at
the existing source must demonstrate
compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within
180 days of the later of March 21, 2011
or startup.
(3) Notification of such changes must
be submitted according to § 63.11225(g).
(j) For existing affected boilers that
have not operated between the effective
date of the rule and the compliance date
that is specified for your source in
§ 63.11196, you must comply with the
applicable provisions as specified in
paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(1) You must complete the initial
compliance demonstration, if subject to
the emission limits in Table 1 to this
subpart, as specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, no later than 180
days after the re-start of the affected
boiler and according to the applicable
provisions in § 63.7(a)(2).
(2) You must complete the initial
performance tune-up, if subject to the
tune-up requirements in § 63.11223, by
following the procedures described in
§ 63.11223(b) no later than 30 days after
the re-start of the affected boiler.
(3) You must complete the one-time
energy assessment, if subject to the
energy assessment requirements
specified in Table 2 to this subpart, no
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7508
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
later than the compliance date specified
in § 63.11196.
■ 10. Section 63.11211 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2)
to read as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 63.11211 How do I demonstrate initial
compliance with the emission limits?
(a) For affected boilers that
demonstrate compliance with any of the
emission limits of this subpart through
performance (stack) testing, your initial
compliance requirements include
conducting performance tests according
to § 63.11212 and Table 4 to this
subpart, conducting a fuel analysis for
each type of fuel burned in your boiler
according to § 63.11213 and Table 5 to
this subpart, establishing operating
limits according to § 63.11222, Table 6
to this subpart and paragraph (b) of this
section, as applicable, and conducting
CMS performance evaluations according
to § 63.11224. For affected boilers that
burn a single type of fuel, you are
exempted from the compliance
requirements of conducting a fuel
analysis for each type of fuel burned in
your boiler. For purposes of this
subpart, boilers that use a supplemental
fuel only for startup, unit shutdown,
and transient flame stability purposes
still qualify as affected boilers that burn
a single type of fuel, and the
supplemental fuel is not subject to the
fuel analysis requirements under
§ 63.11213 and Table 5 to this subpart.
(b) * * *
(1) For a wet scrubber, you must
establish the minimum scrubber liquid
flow rate and minimum scrubber
pressure drop as defined in § 63.11237,
as your operating limits during the
three-run performance stack test. If you
use a wet scrubber and you conduct
separate performance stack tests for PM
and mercury emissions, you must
establish one set of minimum scrubber
liquid flow rate and pressure drop
operating limits. If you conduct
multiple performance stack tests, you
must set the minimum scrubber liquid
flow rate and pressure drop operating
limits at the highest minimum values
established during the performance
stack tests.
(2) For an electrostatic precipitator
operated with a wet scrubber, you must
establish the minimum total secondary
electric power (secondary voltage and
secondary current), as defined in
§ 63.11237, as your operating limits
during the three-run performance stack
test.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Section 63.11212 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to read
as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 63.11212 What stack tests and
procedures must I use for the performance
tests?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You must conduct each stack test
according to the requirements in Table
4 to this subpart. Boilers that use a
CEMS for carbon monoxide (CO) are
exempt from the initial CO performance
testing in Table 4 to this subpart and the
oxygen concentration operating limit
requirement specified in Table 3 to this
subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) To determine compliance with the
emission limits, you must use the FFactor methodology and equations in
sections 12.2 and 12.3 of EPA Method
19 of appendix A–7 to part 60 of this
chapter to convert the measured PM
concentrations and the measured
mercury concentrations that result from
the performance test to pounds per
million Btu heat input emission rates.
■ 12. Section 63.11214 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 63.11214 How do I demonstrate initial
compliance with the work practice
standard, emission reduction measures,
and management practice?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If you own or operate an existing
affected boiler with a heat input
capacity of 10 million Btu per hour or
greater, you must submit a signed
certification in the Notification of
Compliance Status report that an energy
assessment of the boiler and its energy
use systems was completed according to
Table 2 to this subpart and is an
accurate depiction of your facility.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Section 63.11220 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.11220 When must I conduct
subsequent performance tests or fuel
analyses?
(a) If your boiler has a heat input
capacity of 10 million British thermal
units per hour or greater, you must
conduct all applicable performance
(stack) tests according to § 63.11212 on
a triennial basis, except as specified in
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this
section. Triennial performance tests
must be completed no more than 37
months after the previous performance
test.
(b) When demonstrating initial
compliance with the PM emission limit,
if your boiler’s performance test results
show that your PM emissions are equal
to or less than half of the PM emission
limit, you do not need to conduct
further performance tests for PM but
must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
monitoring requirements. If your initial
performance test results show that your
PM emissions are greater than half of
the PM emission limit, you must
conduct subsequent performance tests
as specified in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) If you demonstrate compliance
with the mercury emission limit based
on fuel analysis, you must conduct a
fuel analysis according to § 63.11213 for
each type of fuel burned as specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
If you plan to burn a new type of fuel
or fuel mixture, you must conduct a fuel
analysis before burning the new type of
fuel or mixture in your boiler. You must
recalculate the mercury emission rate
using Equation 1 of § 63.11211. The
recalculated mercury emission rate must
be less than the applicable emission
limit.
(1) When demonstrating initial
compliance with the mercury emission
limit, if the mercury constituents in the
fuel or fuel mixture are measured to be
equal to or less than half of the mercury
emission limit, you do not need to
conduct further fuel analysis sampling
but must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and
monitoring requirements.
(2) When demonstrating initial
compliance with the mercury emission
limit, if the mercury constituents in the
fuel or fuel mixture are greater than half
of the mercury emission limit, you must
conduct quarterly sampling.
(d) For existing affected boilers that
have not operated since the previous
compliance demonstration and more
than 3 years have passed since the
previous compliance demonstration,
you must complete your subsequent
compliance demonstration no later than
180 days after the re-start of the affected
boiler.
■ 14. Section 63.11221 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.11221 Is there a minimum amount of
monitoring data I must obtain?
(a) You must monitor and collect data
according to this section and the sitespecific monitoring plan required by
§ 63.11205(c).
(b) You must operate the monitoring
system and collect data at all required
intervals at all times the affected source
is operating and compliance is required,
except for periods of monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods
(see § 63.8(c)(7) of this part), repairs
associated with monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods,
and required monitoring system quality
assurance or quality control activities
including, as applicable, calibration
checks, required zero and span
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
adjustments, and scheduled CMS
maintenance as defined in your sitespecific monitoring plan. A monitoring
system malfunction is any sudden,
infrequent, not reasonably preventable
failure of the monitoring system to
provide valid data. Monitoring system
failures that are caused in part by poor
maintenance or careless operation are
not malfunctions. You are required to
complete monitoring system repairs in
response to monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods
and to return the monitoring system to
operation as expeditiously as
practicable.
(c) You may not use data collected
during monitoring system malfunctions
or out-of-control periods, repairs
associated with monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods,
or required monitoring system quality
assurance or quality control activities in
calculations used to report emissions or
operating levels. Any such periods must
be reported according to the
requirements in § 63.11225. You must
use all the data collected during all
other periods in assessing the operation
of the control device and associated
control system.
(d) Except for periods of monitoring
system malfunctions or monitoring
system out-of-control periods, repairs
associated with monitoring system
malfunctions or monitoring system outof-control periods, and required
monitoring system quality assurance or
quality control activities (including, as
applicable, calibration checks, required
zero and span adjustments, and
scheduled CMS maintenance as defined
in your site-specific monitoring plan),
failure to collect required data is a
deviation of the monitoring
requirements.
■ 15. Section 63.11223 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b) introductory
text, (b)(1), (b)(3) through (5), (b)(6)
introductory text, (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(iii),
(b)(7), and (c), and adding paragraphs
(d) through (g) to read as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 63.11223 How do I demonstrate
continuous compliance with the work
practice and management practice
standards?
(a) For affected sources subject to the
work practice standard or the
management practices of a tune-up, you
must conduct a performance tune-up
according to paragraph (b) of this
section and keep records as required in
§ 63.11225(c) to demonstrate continuous
compliance. You must conduct the
tune-up while burning the type of fuel
(or fuels in the case of boilers that
routinely burn two types of fuels at the
same time) that provided the majority of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
the heat input to the boiler over the 12
months prior to the tune-up.
(b) Except as specified in paragraphs
(c) through (f) of this section, you must
conduct a tune-up of the boiler
biennially to demonstrate continuous
compliance as specified in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (7) of this section. Each
biennial tune-up must be conducted no
more than 25 months after the previous
tune-up. For a new or reconstructed
boiler, the first biennial tune-up must be
no later than 25 months after the initial
startup of the new or reconstructed
boiler.
(1) As applicable, inspect the burner,
and clean or replace any components of
the burner as necessary (you may delay
the burner inspection until the next
scheduled unit shutdown, not to exceed
36 months from the previous
inspection). Units that produce
electricity for sale may delay the burner
inspection until the first outage, not to
exceed 36 months from the previous
inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Inspect the system controlling the
air-to-fuel ratio, as applicable, and
ensure that it is correctly calibrated and
functioning properly (you may delay the
inspection until the next scheduled unit
shutdown, not to exceed 36 months
from the previous inspection). Units
that produce electricity for sale may
delay the inspection until the first
outage, not to exceed 36 months from
the previous inspection.
(4) Optimize total emissions of CO.
This optimization should be consistent
with the manufacturer’s specifications,
if available, and with any nitrogen oxide
requirement to which the unit is subject.
(5) Measure the concentrations in the
effluent stream of CO in parts per
million, by volume, and oxygen in
volume percent, before and after the
adjustments are made (measurements
may be either on a dry or wet basis, as
long as it is the same basis before and
after the adjustments are made).
Measurements may be taken using a
portable CO analyzer.
(6) Maintain on-site and submit, if
requested by the Administrator, a report
containing the information in
paragraphs (b)(6)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(i) The concentrations of CO in the
effluent stream in parts per million, by
volume, and oxygen in volume percent,
measured at high fire or typical
operating load, before and after the
tune-up of the boiler.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) The type and amount of fuel used
over the 12 months prior to the tune-up
of the boiler, but only if the unit was
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7509
physically and legally capable of using
more than one type of fuel during that
period. Units sharing a fuel meter may
estimate the fuel use by each unit.
(7) If the unit is not operating on the
required date for a tune-up, the tune-up
must be conducted within 30 days of
startup.
(c) Boilers with an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel
ratio that would otherwise be subject to
a biennial tune-up must conduct a tuneup of the boiler every 5 years as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(7) of this section. Each 5-year tune-up
must be conducted no more than 61
months after the previous tune-up. For
a new or reconstructed boiler with an
oxygen trim system, the first 5-year
tune-up must be no later than 61
months after the initial startup. You
may delay the burner inspection
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section and inspection of the system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio specified
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until
the next scheduled unit shutdown, but
you must inspect each burner and
system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at
least once every 72 months.
(d) Seasonal boilers must conduct a
tune-up every 5 years as specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this
section. Each 5-year tune-up must be
conducted no more than 61 months after
the previous tune-up. For a new or
reconstructed seasonal boiler, the first 5year tune-up must be no later than 61
months after the initial startup. You
may delay the burner inspection
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section and inspection of the system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio specified
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until
the next scheduled unit shutdown, but
you must inspect each burner and
system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at
least once every 72 months. Seasonal
boilers are not subject to the emission
limits in Table 1 to this subpart or the
operating limits in Table 3 to this
subpart.
(e) Oil-fired boilers with a heat input
capacity of equal to or less than 5
million Btu per hour must conduct a
tune-up every 5 years as specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this
section. Each 5-year tune-up must be
conducted no more than 61 months after
the previous tune-up. For a new or
reconstructed oil-fired boiler with a heat
input capacity of equal to or less than
5 million Btu per hour, the first 5-year
tune-up must be no later than 61
months after the initial startup. You
may delay the burner inspection
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section and inspection of the system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio specified
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are not available.
■ 16. Section 63.11224 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (a)(1) through (3),
(a)(5), (a)(6),
■ b. Adding paragraph (a)(7).
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1)
introductory text, (c)(2) introductory
text, and (d).
■ d. Revising paragraphs (e)
introductory text, (e)(6), and (e)(7).
■ e. Adding paragraph (e)(8).
■ f. Revising paragraph (f)(7).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Where:
Hpvi = the hourly parameter value for hour
i
n = the number of valid hourly parameter
values collected over 10 boiler operating
days
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until
the next scheduled unit shutdown, but
you must inspect each burner and
system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at
least once every 72 months.
(f) Limited-use boilers must conduct a
tune-up every 5 years as specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this
section. Each 5-year tune-up must be
conducted no more than 61 months after
the previous tune-up. For a new or
reconstructed limited-use boiler, the
first 5-year tune-up must be no later
than 61 months after the initial startup.
You may delay the burner inspection
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section and inspection of the system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio specified
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until
the next scheduled unit shutdown, but
you must inspect each burner and
system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at
least once every 72 months. Limited-use
boilers are not subject to the emission
limits in Table 1 to this subpart, the
energy assessment requirements in
Table 2 to this subpart, or the operating
limits in Table 3 to this subpart.
(g) If you own or operate a boiler
subject to emission limits in Table 1 of
this subpart, you must minimize the
boiler’s startup and shutdown periods
following the manufacturer’s
recommended procedures, if available.
If manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are not available, you must
follow recommended procedures for a
unit of similar design for which
manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are available. You must
submit a signed statement in the
Notification of Compliance Status report
that indicates that you conducted
startups and shutdowns according to the
manufacturer’s recommended
procedures or procedures specified for a
boiler of similar design if
monitoring deviations as specified in
§ 63.11221(d).
(7) You must operate the oxygen
analyzer system at or above the
minimum oxygen level that is
established as the operating limit
according to Table 6 to this subpart
when firing the fuel or fuel mixture
utilized during the most recent CO
performance stack test. Operation of
oxygen trim systems to meet these
requirements shall not be done in a
manner which compromises furnace
safety.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) For purposes of collecting CO data,
you must operate the CO CEMS as
specified in § 63.11221(b). For purposes
of calculating data averages, you must
use all the data collected during all
periods in assessing compliance, except
that you must exclude certain data as
specified in § 63.11221(c). Periods when
CO data are unavailable may constitute
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 63.11224 What are my monitoring,
installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
(a) If your boiler is subject to a CO
emission limit in Table 1 to this subpart,
you must either install, operate, and
maintain a CEMS for CO and oxygen
according to the procedures in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this
section, or install, calibrate, operate, and
maintain an oxygen analyzer system, as
defined in § 63.11237, according to the
manufacturer’s recommendations and
paragraphs (a)(7) and (d) of this section,
as applicable, by the compliance date
specified in § 63.11196. Where a
certified CO CEMS is used, the CO level
shall be monitored at the outlet of the
boiler, after any add-on controls or flue
gas recirculation system and before
release to the atmosphere. Boilers that
use a CO CEMS are exempt from the
initial CO performance testing and
oxygen concentration operating limit
requirements specified in § 63.11211(a)
of this subpart. Oxygen monitors and
oxygen trim systems must be installed
to monitor oxygen in the boiler flue gas,
boiler firebox, or other appropriate
intermediate location.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(1) Each CO CEMS must be installed,
operated, and maintained according to
the applicable procedures under
Performance Specification 4, 4A, or 4B
at 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, and each
oxygen CEMS must be installed,
operated, and maintained according to
Performance Specification 3 at 40 CFR
part 60, appendix B. Both the CO and
oxygen CEMS must also be installed,
operated, and maintained according to
the site-specific monitoring plan
developed according to paragraph (c) of
this section.
(2) You must conduct a performance
evaluation of each CEMS according to
the requirements in § 63.8(e) and
according to Performance Specifications
3 and 4, 4A, or 4B at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B.
(3) Each CEMS must complete a
minimum of one cycle of operation
(sampling, analyzing, and data
recording) every 15 minutes. You must
have CEMS data values from a
minimum of four successive cycles of
operation representing each of the four
15-minute periods in an hour, or at least
two 15-minute data values during an
hour when CEMS calibration, quality
assurance, or maintenance activities are
being performed, to have a valid hour of
data.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) You must calculate hourly
averages, corrected to 3 percent oxygen,
from each hour of CO CEMS data in
parts per million CO concentrations and
determine the 10-day rolling average of
all recorded readings, except as
provided in § 63.11221(c). Calculate a
10-day rolling average from all of the
hourly averages collected for the 10-day
operating period using Equation 2 of
this section.
(c) * * *
(1) For each CMS required in this
section, you must develop, and submit
to the EPA Administrator for approval
upon request, a site-specific monitoring
plan that addresses paragraphs (c)(1)(i)
through (iii) of this section. You must
submit this site-specific monitoring plan
(if requested) at least 60 days before
your initial performance evaluation of
your CMS.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
ER01FE13.000
7510
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
7511
(2) You must calculate hourly
arithmetic averages from each hour of
CPMS data in units of the operating
limit and determine the 30-day rolling
average of all recorded readings, except
as provided in § 63.11221(c). Calculate a
30-day rolling average from all of the
hourly averages collected for the 30-day
operating period using Equation 3 of
this section.
that you must exclude certain data as
specified in § 63.11221(c). Periods when
COMS data are unavailable may
constitute monitoring deviations as
specified in § 63.11221(d).
(f) * * *
(7) For positive pressure fabric filter
systems that do not duct all
compartments or cells to a common
stack, a bag leak detection system must
be installed in each baghouse
compartment or cell.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 17. Section 63.11225 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4),
(a)(5), (b) introductory text, (b)(2), (c)
introductory text, (c)(2) introductory
text, and (c)(2)(ii).
■ b. Adding paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)
through (vi).
■ c. Revising paragraphs (d), (e), and (g).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
completing the performance stack test.
You must submit the Notification of
Compliance Status in accordance with
paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (vi) of this
section. The Notification of Compliance
Status must include the information and
certification(s) of compliance in
paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (v) of this
section, as applicable, and signed by a
responsible official.
(i) You must submit the information
required in § 63.9(h)(2), except the
information listed in § 63.9(h)(2)(i)(B),
(D), (E), and (F). If you conduct any
performance tests or CMS performance
evaluations, you must submit that data
as specified in paragraph (e) of this
section. If you conduct any opacity or
visible emission observations, or other
monitoring procedures or methods, you
must submit that data to the
Administrator at the appropriate
address listed in § 63.13.
(ii) ‘‘This facility complies with the
requirements in § 63.11214 to conduct
an initial tune-up of the boiler.’’
(iii) ‘‘This facility has had an energy
assessment performed according to
§ 63.11214(c).’’
(iv) For units that install bag leak
detection systems: ‘‘This facility
complies with the requirements in
§ 63.11224(f).’’
(v) For units that do not qualify for a
statutory exemption as provided in
section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act:
‘‘No secondary materials that are solid
waste were combusted in any affected
unit.’’
(vi) The notification must be
submitted electronically using the
Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is
accessed through EPA’s Central Data
Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx).
However, if the reporting form specific
to this subpart is not available in CEDRI
at the time that the report is due, the
written Notification of Compliance
Status must be submitted to the
(3) For purposes of collecting data,
you must operate the CPMS as specified
in § 63.11221(b). For purposes of
calculating data averages, you must use
all the data collected during all periods
in assessing compliance, except that you
must exclude certain data as specified
in § 63.11221(c). Periods when CPMS
data are unavailable may constitute
monitoring deviations as specified in
§ 63.11221(d).
(4) Record the results of each
inspection, calibration, and validation
check.
(e) If you have an applicable opacity
operating limit under this rule, you
must install, operate, certify and
maintain each COMS according to the
procedures in paragraphs (e)(1) through
(8) of this section by the compliance
date specified in § 63.11196.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) You must operate and maintain
each COMS according to the
requirements in the monitoring plan
and the requirements of § 63.8(e). You
must identify periods the COMS is out
of control including any periods that the
COMS fails to pass a daily calibration
drift assessment, a quarterly
performance audit, or an annual zero
alignment audit.
(7) You must calculate and record 6minute averages from the opacity
monitoring data and determine and
record the daily block average of
recorded readings, except as provided in
§ 63.11221(c).
(8) For purposes of collecting opacity
data, you must operate the COMS as
specified in § 63.11221(b). For purposes
of calculating data averages, you must
use all the data collected during all
periods in assessing compliance, except
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 63.11225 What are my notification,
reporting, and recordkeeping,
requirements?
(a) You must submit the notifications
specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(5) of this section to the administrator.
(1) You must submit all of the
notifications in §§ 63.7(b); 63.8(e) and
(f); and 63.9(b) through (e), (g), and (h)
that apply to you by the dates specified
in those sections except as specified in
paragraphs (a)(2) and (4) of this section.
(2) An Initial Notification must be
submitted no later than January 20, 2014
or within 120 days after the source
becomes subject to the standard.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) You must submit the Notification
of Compliance Status no later than 120
days after the applicable compliance
date specified in § 63.11196 unless you
must conduct a performance stack test.
If you must conduct a performance stack
test, you must submit the Notification of
Compliance Status within 60 days of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
ER01FE13.001
(1) The CPMS must complete a
minimum of one cycle of operation
every 15 minutes. You must have data
values from a minimum of four
successive cycles of operation
representing each of the four 15-minute
periods in an hour, or at least two 15minute data values during an hour
when CMS calibration, quality
assurance, or maintenance activities are
being performed, to have a valid hour of
data.
Where:
Hpvi = the hourly parameter value for hour
i
n = the number of valid hourly parameter
values collected over 30 boiler operating
days
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(2) In your site-specific monitoring
plan, you must also address paragraphs
(c)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If you have an operating limit that
requires the use of a CMS, you must
install, operate, and maintain each
CPMS according to the procedures in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this
section.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7512
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Administrator at the appropriate
address listed in § 63.13.
(5) If you are using data from a
previously conducted emission test to
serve as documentation of conformance
with the emission standards and
operating limits of this subpart, you
must include in the Notification of
Compliance Status the date of the test
and a summary of the results, not a
complete test report, relative to this
subpart.
(b) You must prepare, by March 1 of
each year, and submit to the delegated
authority upon request, an annual
compliance certification report for the
previous calendar year containing the
information specified in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (4) of this section. You
must submit the report by March 15 if
you had any instance described by
paragraph (b)(3) of this section. For
boilers that are subject only to a
requirement to conduct a biennial or 5year tune-up according to § 63.11223(a)
and not subject to emission limits or
operating limits, you may prepare only
a biennial or 5-year compliance report
as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Statement by a responsible official,
with the official’s name, title, phone
number, email address, and signature,
certifying the truth, accuracy and
completeness of the notification and a
statement of whether the source has
complied with all the relevant standards
and other requirements of this subpart.
Your notification must include the
following certification(s) of compliance,
as applicable, and signed by a
responsible official:
(i) ‘‘This facility complies with the
requirements in § 63.11223 to conduct a
biennial or 5-year tune-up, as
applicable, of each boiler.’’
(ii) For units that do not qualify for a
statutory exemption as provided in
section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act:
‘‘No secondary materials that are solid
waste were combusted in any affected
unit.’’
(iii) ‘‘This facility complies with the
requirement in §§ 63.11214(d) and
63.11223(g) to minimize the boiler’s
time spent during startup and shutdown
and to conduct startups and shutdowns
according to the manufacturer’s
recommended procedures or procedures
specified for a boiler of similar design
if manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are not available.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(c) You must maintain the records
specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through
(7) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) You must keep records to
document conformance with the work
practices, emission reduction measures,
and management practices required by
§ 63.11214 and § 63.11223 as specified
in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (vi) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) For operating units that combust
non-hazardous secondary materials that
have been determined not to be solid
waste pursuant to § 241.3(b)(1) of this
chapter, you must keep a record which
documents how the secondary material
meets each of the legitimacy criteria
under § 241.3(d)(1). If you combust a
fuel that has been processed from a
discarded non-hazardous secondary
material pursuant to § 241.3(b)(4) of this
chapter, you must keep records as to
how the operations that produced the
fuel satisfies the definition of processing
in § 241.2 and each of the legitimacy
criteria in § 241.3(d)(1) of this chapter.
If the fuel received a non-waste
determination pursuant to the petition
process submitted under § 241.3(c) of
this chapter, you must keep a record
that documents how the fuel satisfies
the requirements of the petition process.
For operating units that combust nonhazardous secondary materials as fuel
per § 241.4, you must keep records
documenting that the material is a listed
non-waste under § 241.4(a).
(iii) For each boiler required to
conduct an energy assessment, you must
keep a copy of the energy assessment
report.
(iv) For each boiler subject to an
emission limit in Table 1 to this subpart,
you must also keep records of monthly
fuel use by each boiler, including the
type(s) of fuel and amount(s) used.
(v) For each boiler that meets the
definition of seasonal boiler, you must
keep records of days of operation per
year.
(vi) For each boiler that meets the
definition of limited-use boiler, you
must keep a copy of the federally
enforceable permit that limits the
annual capacity factor to less than or
equal to 10 percent and records of fuel
use for the days the boiler is operating.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Your records must be in a form
suitable and readily available for
expeditious review. You must keep each
record for 5 years following the date of
each recorded action. You must keep
each record on-site or be accessible from
a central location by computer or other
means that instantly provide access at
the site for at least 2 years after the date
of each recorded action. You may keep
the records off site for the remaining 3
years.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(e)(1) Within 60 days after the date of
completing each performance test
(defined in § 63.2) as required by this
subpart you must submit the results of
the performance tests, including any
associated fuel analyses, required by
this subpart to EPA’s WebFIRE database
by using CEDRI that is accessed through
EPA’s CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx).
Performance test data must be submitted
in the file format generated through use
of EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool
(ERT) (see https://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/
ert/). Only data collected
using test methods on the ERT Web site
are subject to this requirement for
submitting reports electronically to
WebFIRE. Owners or operators who
claim that some of the information being
submitted for performance tests is
confidential business information (CBI)
must submit a complete ERT file
including information claimed to be CBI
on a compact disk or other commonly
used electronic storage media
(including, but not limited to, flash
drives) to EPA. The electronic media
must be clearly marked as CBI and
mailed to U.S. EPA/OAPQS/CORE CBI
Office, Attention: WebFIRE
Administrator, MD C404–02, 4930 Old
Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same
ERT file with the CBI omitted must be
submitted to EPA via CDX as described
earlier in this paragraph. At the
discretion of the delegated authority,
you must also submit these reports,
including CBI, to the delegated
authority in the format specified by the
delegated authority. For any
performance test conducted using test
methods that are not listed on the ERT
Web site, the owner or operator shall
submit the results of the performance
test in paper submissions to the
Administrator at the appropriate
address listed in § 63.13.
(2) Within 60 days after the date of
completing each CEMS performance
evaluation test as defined in § 63.2, you
must submit relative accuracy test audit
(RATA) data to EPA’s CDX by using
CEDRI in accordance with paragraph
(e)(1) of this section. Only RATA
pollutants that can be documented with
the ERT (as listed on the ERT Web site)
are subject to this requirement. For any
performance evaluations with no
corresponding RATA pollutants listed
on the ERT Web site, the owner or
operator shall submit the results of the
performance evaluation in paper
submissions to the Administrator at the
appropriate address listed in § 63.13.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) If you have switched fuels or made
a physical change to the boiler and the
fuel switch or change resulted in the
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
applicability of a different subcategory
within subpart JJJJJJ, in the boiler
becoming subject to subpart JJJJJJ, or in
the boiler switching out of subpart JJJJJJ
due to a change to 100 percent natural
gas, or you have taken a permit limit
that resulted in you being subject to
subpart JJJJJJ, you must provide notice of
the date upon which you switched
fuels, made the physical change, or took
a permit limit within 30 days of the
change. The notification must identify:
(1) The name of the owner or operator
of the affected source, the location of the
source, the boiler(s) that have switched
fuels, were physically changed, or took
a permit limit, and the date of the
notice.
(2) The date upon which the fuel
switch, physical change, or permit limit
occurred.
18. Section 63.11226 is revised to read
as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 63.11226 Affirmative defense for
violation of emission standards during
malfunction.
In response to an action to enforce the
standards set forth in § 63.11201 you
may assert an affirmative defense to a
claim for civil penalties for violations of
such standards that are caused by
malfunction, as defined at 40 CFR 63.2.
Appropriate penalties may be assessed
if you fail to meet your burden of
proving all of the requirements in the
affirmative defense. The affirmative
defense shall not be available for claims
for injunctive relief.
(a) Assertion of affirmative defense.
To establish the affirmative defense in
any action to enforce such a standard,
you must timely meet the reporting
requirements in paragraph (b) of this
section, and must prove by a
preponderance of evidence that:
(1) The violation:
(i) Was caused by a sudden,
infrequent, and unavoidable failure of
air pollution control equipment, process
equipment, or a process to operate in a
normal or usual manner; and
(ii) Could not have been prevented
through careful planning, proper design
or better operation and maintenance
practices; and
(iii) Did not stem from any activity or
event that could have been foreseen and
avoided, or planned for; and
(iv) Was not part of a recurring pattern
indicative of inadequate design,
operation, or maintenance; and
(2) Repairs were made as
expeditiously as possible when a
violation occurred; and
(3) The frequency, amount, and
duration of the violation (including any
bypass) were minimized to the
maximum extent practicable; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
(4) If the violation resulted from a
bypass of control equipment or a
process, then the bypass was
unavoidable to prevent loss of life,
personal injury, or severe property
damage; and
(5) All possible steps were taken to
minimize the impact of the violation on
ambient air quality, the environment,
and human health; and
(6) All emissions monitoring and
control systems were kept in operation
if at all possible, consistent with safety
and good air pollution control practices;
and
(7) All of the actions in response to
the violation were documented by
properly signed, contemporaneous
operating logs; and
(8) At all times, the affected source
was operated in a manner consistent
with good practices for minimizing
emissions; and
(9) A written root cause analysis has
been prepared, the purpose of which is
to determine, correct, and eliminate the
primary causes of the malfunction and
the violation resulting from the
malfunction event at issue. The analysis
shall also specify, using best monitoring
methods and engineering judgment, the
amount of any emissions that were the
result of the malfunction.
(b) Report. The owner or operator
seeking to assert an affirmative defense
shall submit a written report to the
Administrator with all necessary
supporting documentation, that it has
met the requirements set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section. This
affirmative defense report shall be
included in the first periodic
compliance, deviation report or excess
emission report otherwise required after
the initial occurrence of the violation of
the relevant standard (which may be the
end of any applicable averaging period).
If such compliance, deviation report or
excess emission report is due less than
45 days after the initial occurrence of
the violation, the affirmative defense
report may be included in the second
compliance, deviation report or excess
emission report due after the initial
occurrence of the violation of the
relevant standard.
■ 19. Section 63.11236 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 63.11236 Who implements and enforces
this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented
and enforced by EPA or an
administrator such as your state, local,
or tribal agency. If the EPA
Administrator has delegated authority to
your state, local, or tribal agency, then
that agency has the authority to
implement and enforce this subpart.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7513
You should contact your EPA Regional
Office to find out if implementation and
enforcement of this subpart is delegated
to your state, local, or tribal agency.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Section 63.11237 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By adding definitions in
alphabetical order for ‘‘10-day rolling
average,’’ ‘‘30-day rolling average,’’
‘‘Annual heat input,’’ ‘‘Biodiesel,’’
‘‘Calendar year,’’ ‘‘Common stack,’’
‘‘Daily block average,’’ ‘‘Distillate oil,’’
‘‘Electric boiler,’’ ‘‘Electric utility steam
generating unit (EGU),’’ ‘‘Energy
management program,’’ ‘‘Fluidized bed
boiler,’’ ‘‘Fluidized bed combustion,’’
‘‘Hourly average,’’ ‘‘Limited-use boiler,’’
‘‘Load fraction,’’ ‘‘Minimum scrubber
pressure drop,’’ ‘‘Minimum sorbent
injection rate,’’ ‘‘Minimum total
secondary electric power,’’ ‘‘Operating
day,’’ ‘‘Oxygen analyzer system,’’
‘‘Oxygen trim system,’’ ‘‘Process
heater,’’ ‘‘Regulated gas stream,’’
‘‘Residential boiler,’’ ‘‘Residual oil,’’
‘‘Seasonal boiler,’’ ‘‘Shutdown,’’ ‘‘Solid
fuel,’’ ‘‘Startup,’’ ‘‘Temporary boiler,’’
‘‘Tune-up,’’ ‘‘Vegetable oil,’’ ‘‘Voluntary
Consensus Standards (VCS),’’ and ‘‘Wet
scrubber.’’
■ b. By revising the definitions for ‘‘Bag
leak detection system,’’ ‘‘Biomass
subcategory,’’ ‘‘Boiler,’’ ‘‘Boiler system,’’
‘‘Deviation,’’ ‘‘Dry scrubber,’’
‘‘Electrostatic precipitator (ESP),’’
‘‘Energy assessment,’’ ‘‘Energy use
system,’’ ‘‘Federally enforceable,’’ ‘‘Gasfired boiler,’’ ‘‘Heat input,’’ ‘‘Hot water
heater,’’ ‘‘Institutional boiler,’’ ‘‘Liquid
fuel,’’ ‘‘Minimum activated carbon
injection rate,’’ ‘‘Minimum oxygen
level,’’ ‘‘Minimum scrubber liquid flow
rate,’’ ‘‘Natural gas,’’ ‘‘Oil subcategory,’’
‘‘Particulate matter,’’ ‘‘Period of gas
curtailment or supply interruption,’’
‘‘Qualified Energy Assessor,’’ ‘‘Solid
fossil fuel,’’ and ‘‘Waste heat boiler.’’
■ c. By removing the definitions for
‘‘Annual heat input basis,’’ ‘‘Minimum
PM scrubber pressure drop,’’ ‘‘Minimum
sorbent flow rate,’’ and ‘‘Minimum
voltage or amperage’’.
§ 63.11237
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
10-day rolling average means the
arithmetic mean of all valid hours of
data from 10 successive operating days,
except for periods of startup and
shutdown and periods when the unit is
not operating.
30-day rolling average means the
arithmetic mean of all valid hours of
data from 30 successive operating days,
except for periods of startup and
shutdown and periods when the unit is
not operating.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7514
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Annual heat input means the heat
input for the 12 months preceding the
compliance demonstration.
Bag leak detection system means a
group of instruments that are capable of
monitoring particulate matter loadings
in the exhaust of a fabric filter (i.e.,
baghouse) in order to detect bag failures.
A bag leak detection system includes,
but is not limited to, an instrument that
operates on electrodynamic,
triboelectric, light scattering, light
transmittance, or other principle to
monitor relative particulate matter
loadings.
Biodiesel means a mono-alkyl ester
derived from biomass and conforming to
ASTM D6751–11b, Standard
Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels
(incorporated by reference, see § 63.14).
*
*
*
*
*
Biomass subcategory includes any
boiler that burns any biomass and is not
in the coal subcategory.
Boiler means an enclosed device
using controlled flame combustion in
which water is heated to recover
thermal energy in the form of steam
and/or hot water. Controlled flame
combustion refers to a steady-state, or
near steady-state, process wherein fuel
and/or oxidizer feed rates are
controlled. A device combusting solid
waste, as defined in § 241.3 of this
chapter, is not a boiler unless the device
is exempt from the definition of a solid
waste incineration unit as provided in
section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act.
Waste heat boilers, process heaters, and
autoclaves are excluded from the
definition of Boiler.
Boiler system means the boiler and
associated components, such as,
feedwater systems, combustion air
systems, fuel systems (including
burners), blowdown systems,
combustion control systems, steam
systems, and condensate return systems,
directly connected to and serving the
energy use systems.
Calendar year means the period
between January 1 and December 31,
inclusive, for a given year.
*
*
*
*
*
Common stack means the exhaust of
emissions from two or more affected
units through a single flue. Affected
units with a common stack may each
have separate air pollution control
systems located before the common
stack, or may have a single air pollution
control system located after the exhausts
come together in a single flue.
Daily block average means the
arithmetic mean of all valid emission
concentrations or parameter levels
recorded when a unit is operating
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
measured over the 24-hour period from
12 a.m. (midnight) to 12 a.m.
(midnight), except for periods of startup
and shutdown and periods when the
unit is not operating.
Deviation (1) Means any instance in
which an affected source subject to this
subpart, or an owner or operator of such
a source:
(i) Fails to meet any applicable
requirement or obligation established by
this subpart including, but not limited
to, any emission limit, operating limit,
or work practice standard; or
(ii) Fails to meet any term or
condition that is adopted to implement
an applicable requirement in this
subpart and that is included in the
operating permit for any affected source
required to obtain such a permit.
(2) A deviation is not always a
violation.
Distillate oil means fuel oils that
contain 0.05 weight percent nitrogen or
less and comply with the specifications
for fuel oil numbers 1 and 2, as defined
by the American Society of Testing and
Materials in ASTM D396 (incorporated
by reference, see § 63.14) or diesel fuel
oil numbers 1 and 2, as defined by the
American Society for Testing and
Materials in ASTM D975 (incorporated
by reference, see § 63.14), kerosene, and
biodiesel as defined by the American
Society of Testing and Materials in
ASTM D6751–11b (incorporated by
reference, see § 63.14).
Dry scrubber means an add-on air
pollution control system that injects dry
alkaline sorbent (dry injection) or sprays
an alkaline sorbent (spray dryer) to react
with and neutralize acid gas in the
exhaust stream forming a dry powder
material. Sorbent injection systems used
as control devices in fluidized bed
boilers and process heaters are included
in this definition. A dry scrubber is a
dry control system.
Electric boiler means a boiler in
which electric heating serves as the
source of heat. Electric boilers that burn
gaseous or liquid fuel during periods of
electrical power curtailment or failure
are included in this definition.
Electric utility steam generating unit
(EGU) means a fossil fuel-fired
combustion unit of more than 25
megawatts that serves a generator that
produces electricity for sale. A fossil
fuel-fired unit that cogenerates steam
and electricity and supplies more than
one-third of its potential electric output
capacity and more than 25 megawatts
electrical output to any utility power
distribution system for sale is
considered an electric utility steam
generating unit. To be ‘‘capable of
combusting’’ fossil fuels, an EGU would
need to have these fuels allowed in their
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
operating permits and have the
appropriate fuel handling facilities onsite or otherwise available (e.g., coal
handling equipment, including coal
storage area, belts and conveyers,
pulverizers, etc.; oil storage facilities). In
addition, fossil fuel-fired EGU means
any EGU that fired fossil fuel for more
than 10.0 percent of the average annual
heat input in any 3 consecutive calendar
years or for more than 15.0 percent of
the annual heat input during any one
calendar year after April 16, 2015.
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) means
an add-on air pollution control device
used to capture particulate matter by
charging the particles using an
electrostatic field, collecting the
particles using a grounded collecting
surface, and transporting the particles
into a hopper. An electrostatic
precipitator is usually a dry control
system.
Energy assessment means the
following for the emission units covered
by this subpart:
(1) The energy assessment for
facilities with affected boilers with less
than 0.3 trillion Btu per year (TBtu/year)
heat input capacity will be 8 on-site
technical labor hours in length
maximum, but may be longer at the
discretion of the owner or operator of
the affected source. The boiler system(s)
and any on-site energy use system(s)
accounting for at least 50 percent of the
affected boiler(s) energy (e.g., steam, hot
water, or electricity) production, as
applicable, will be evaluated to identify
energy savings opportunities, within the
limit of performing an 8-hour energy
assessment.
(2) The energy assessment for
facilities with affected boilers with 0.3
to 1.0 TBtu/year heat input capacity will
be 24 on-site technical labor hours in
length maximum, but may be longer at
the discretion of the owner or operator
of the affected source. The boiler
system(s) and any on-site energy use
system(s) accounting for at least 33
percent of the affected boiler(s) energy
(e.g., steam, hot water, or electricity)
production, as applicable, will be
evaluated to identify energy savings
opportunities, within the limit of
performing a 24-hour energy
assessment.
(3) The energy assessment for
facilities with affected boilers with
greater than 1.0 TBtu/year heat input
capacity will be up to 24 on-site
technical labor hours in length for the
first TBtu/year plus 8 on-site technical
labor hours for every additional 1.0
TBtu/year not to exceed 160 on-site
technical hours, but may be longer at
the discretion of the owner or operator
of the affected source. The boiler
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
system(s) and any on-site energy use
system(s) accounting for at least 20
percent of the affected boiler(s) energy
(e.g., steam, hot water, or electricity)
production, as applicable, will be
evaluated to identify energy savings
opportunities.
(4) The on-site energy use system(s)
serving as the basis for the percent of
affected boiler(s) energy production, as
applicable, in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)
of this definition may be segmented by
production area or energy use area as
most logical and applicable to the
specific facility being assessed (e.g.,
product X manufacturing area; product
Y drying area; Building Z).
Energy management program means a
program that includes a set of practices
and procedures designed to manage
energy use that are demonstrated by the
facility’s energy policies, a facility
energy manager and other staffing
responsibilities, energy performance
measurement and tracking methods, an
energy saving goal, action plans,
operating procedures, internal reporting
requirements, and periodic review
intervals used at the facility. Facilities
may establish their program through
energy management systems compatible
with ISO 50001.
Energy use system (1) Includes the
following systems located on the site of
the affected boiler that use energy
provided by the boiler:
(i) Process heating; compressed air
systems; machine drive (motors, pumps,
fans); process cooling; facility heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning
systems; hot water systems; building
envelop; and lighting; or
(ii) Other systems that use steam, hot
water, process heat, or electricity,
provided by the affected boiler.
(2) Energy use systems are only those
systems using energy clearly produced
by affected boilers.
*
*
*
*
*
Federally enforceable means all
limitations and conditions that are
enforceable by the EPA Administrator,
including, but not limited to, the
requirements of 40 CFR parts 60, 61, 63,
and 65, requirements within any
applicable state implementation plan,
and any permit requirements
established under 40 CFR 52.21 or
under 40 CFR 51.18 and 40 CFR 51.24.
Fluidized bed boiler means a boiler
utilizing a fluidized bed combustion
process that is not a pulverized coal
boiler.
Fluidized bed combustion means a
process where a fuel is burned in a bed
of granulated particles, which are
maintained in a mobile suspension by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
the forward flow of air and combustion
products.
*
*
*
*
*
Gas-fired boiler includes any boiler
that burns gaseous fuels not combined
with any solid fuels and burns liquid
fuel only during periods of gas
curtailment, gas supply interruption,
startups, or periodic testing on liquid
fuel. Periodic testing of liquid fuel shall
not exceed a combined total of 48 hours
during any calendar year.
Heat input means heat derived from
combustion of fuel in a boiler and does
not include the heat input from
preheated combustion air, recirculated
flue gases, returned condensate, or
exhaust gases from other sources such
as gas turbines, internal combustion
engines, kilns.
Hot water heater means a closed
vessel with a capacity of no more than
120 U.S. gallons in which water is
heated by combustion of gaseous,
liquid, or biomass fuel and hot water is
withdrawn for use external to the vessel.
Hot water boilers (i.e., not generating
steam) combusting gaseous, liquid, or
biomass fuel with a heat input capacity
of less than 1.6 million Btu per hour are
included in this definition. The 120 U.S.
gallon capacity threshold to be
considered a hot water heater is
independent of the 1.6 million Btu per
hour heat input capacity threshold for
hot water boilers. Hot water heater also
means a tankless unit that provides ondemand hot water.
Hourly average means the arithmetic
average of at least four CMS data values
representing the four 15-minute periods
in an hour, or at least two 15-minute
data values during an hour when CMS
calibration, quality assurance, or
maintenance activities are being
performed.
*
*
*
*
*
Institutional boiler means a boiler
used in institutional establishments
such as, but not limited to, medical
centers, nursing homes, research
centers, institutions of higher education,
elementary and secondary schools,
libraries, religious establishments, and
governmental buildings to provide
electricity, steam, and/or hot water.
Limited-use boiler means any boiler
that burns any amount of solid or liquid
fuels and has a federally enforceable
average annual capacity factor of no
more than 10 percent.
Liquid fuel includes, but is not
limited to, distillate oil, residual oil, any
form of liquid fuel derived from
petroleum, used oil meeting the
specification in 40 CFR 279.11, liquid
biofuels, biodiesel, and vegetable oil,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7515
and comparable fuels as defined under
40 CFR 261.38.
Load fraction means the actual heat
input of a boiler divided by heat input
during the performance test that
established the minimum sorbent
injection rate or minimum activated
carbon injection rate, expressed as a
fraction (e.g., for 50 percent load the
load fraction is 0.5).
Minimum activated carbon injection
rate means load fraction multiplied by
the lowest hourly average activated
carbon injection rate measured
according to Table 6 to this subpart
during the most recent performance
stack test demonstrating compliance
with the applicable emission limit.
Minimum oxygen level means the
lowest hourly average oxygen level
measured according to Table 6 to this
subpart during the most recent
performance stack test demonstrating
compliance with the applicable carbon
monoxide emission limit.
Minimum scrubber liquid flow rate
means the lowest hourly average
scrubber liquid flow rate (e.g., to the
particulate matter scrubber) measured
according to Table 6 to this subpart
during the most recent performance
stack test demonstrating compliance
with the applicable emission limit.
Minimum scrubber pressure drop
means the lowest hourly average
scrubber pressure drop measured
according to Table 6 to this subpart
during the most recent performance
stack test demonstrating compliance
with the applicable emission limit.
Minimum sorbent injection rate
means:
(1) The load fraction multiplied by the
lowest hourly average sorbent injection
rate for each sorbent measured
according to Table 6 to this subpart
during the most recent performance
stack test demonstrating compliance
with the applicable emission limits; or
(2) For fluidized bed combustion, the
lowest average ratio of sorbent to sulfur
measured during the most recent
performance test.
Minimum total secondary electric
power means the lowest hourly average
total secondary electric power
determined from the values of
secondary voltage and secondary
current to the electrostatic precipitator
measured according to Table 6 to this
subpart during the most recent
performance stack test demonstrating
compliance with the applicable
emission limits.
Natural gas means:
(1) A naturally occurring mixture of
hydrocarbon and nonhydrocarbon gases
found in geologic formations beneath
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7516
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
the earth’s surface, of which the
principal constituent is methane; or
(2) Liquefied petroleum gas, as
defined by the American Society for
Testing and Materials in ASTM D1835
(incorporated by reference, see § 63.14);
or
(3) A mixture of hydrocarbons that
maintains a gaseous state at ISO
conditions (i.e., a temperature of 288
Kelvin, a relative humidity of 60
percent, and a pressure of 101.3
kilopascals). Additionally, natural gas
must either be composed of at least 70
percent methane by volume or have a
gross calorific value between 35 and 41
megajoules (MJ) per dry standard cubic
meter (950 and 1,100 Btu per dry
standard cubic foot); or
(4) Propane or propane-derived
synthetic natural gas. Propane means a
colorless gas derived from petroleum
and natural gas, with the molecular
structure C3H8.
Oil subcategory includes any boiler
that burns any liquid fuel and is not in
either the biomass or coal subcategories.
Gas-fired boilers that burn liquid fuel
only during periods of gas curtailment,
gas supply interruptions, startups, or for
periodic testing are not included in this
definition. Periodic testing on liquid
fuel shall not exceed a combined total
of 48 hours during any calendar year.
*
*
*
*
*
Operating day means a 24-hour
period between 12 midnight and the
following midnight during which any
fuel is combusted at any time in the
boiler unit. It is not necessary for fuel
to be combusted for the entire 24-hour
period.
Oxygen analyzer system means all
equipment required to determine the
oxygen content of a gas stream and used
to monitor oxygen in the boiler flue gas,
boiler firebox, or other appropriate
intermediate location. This definition
includes oxygen trim systems.
Oxygen trim system means a system of
monitors that is used to maintain excess
air at the desired level in a combustion
device. A typical system consists of a
flue gas oxygen and/or carbon monoxide
monitor that automatically provides a
feedback signal to the combustion air
controller.
Particulate matter (PM) means any
finely divided solid or liquid material,
other than uncombined water, as
measured by the test methods specified
under this subpart, or an approved
alternative method.
*
*
*
*
*
Period of gas curtailment or supply
interruption means a period of time
during which the supply of gaseous fuel
to an affected boiler is restricted or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
halted for reasons beyond the control of
the facility. The act of entering into a
contractual agreement with a supplier of
natural gas established for curtailment
purposes does not constitute a reason
that is under the control of a facility for
the purposes of this definition. An
increase in the cost or unit price of
natural gas due to normal market
fluctuations not during periods of
supplier delivery restriction does not
constitute a period of natural gas
curtailment or supply interruption. Onsite gaseous fuel system emergencies or
equipment failures qualify as periods of
supply interruption when the
emergency or failure is beyond the
control of the facility.
Process heater means an enclosed
device using controlled flame, and the
unit’s primary purpose is to transfer
heat indirectly to a process material
(liquid, gas, or solid) or to a heat transfer
material (e.g., glycol or a mixture of
glycol and water) for use in a process
unit, instead of generating steam.
Process heaters are devices in which the
combustion gases do not come into
direct contact with process materials.
Process heaters include units that heat
water/water mixtures for pool heating,
sidewalk heating, cooling tower water
heating, power washing, or oil heating.
Qualified energy assessor means:
(1) Someone who has demonstrated
capabilities to evaluate energy savings
opportunities for steam generation and
major energy using systems, including,
but not limited to:
(i) Boiler combustion management.
(ii) Boiler thermal energy recovery,
including
(A) Conventional feed water
economizer,
(B) Conventional combustion air
preheater, and
(C) Condensing economizer.
(iii) Boiler blowdown thermal energy
recovery.
(iv) Primary energy resource selection,
including
(A) Fuel (primary energy source)
switching, and
(B) Applied steam energy versus
direct-fired energy versus electricity.
(v) Insulation issues.
(vi) Steam trap and steam leak
management.
(vii) Condensate recovery.
(viii) Steam end-use management.
(2) Capabilities and knowledge
includes, but is not limited to:
(i) Background, experience, and
recognized abilities to perform the
assessment activities, data analysis, and
report preparation.
(ii) Familiarity with operating and
maintenance practices for steam or
process heating systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(iii) Additional potential steam
system improvement opportunities
including improving steam turbine
operations and reducing steam demand.
(iv) Additional process heating system
opportunities including effective
utilization of waste heat and use of
proper process heating methods.
(v) Boiler-steam turbine cogeneration
systems.
(vi) Industry specific steam end-use
systems.
Regulated gas stream means an offgas
stream that is routed to a boiler for the
purpose of achieving compliance with a
standard under another subpart of this
part or part 60, part 61, or part 65 of this
chapter.
Residential boiler means a boiler used
to provide heat and/or hot water and/or
as part of a residential combined heat
and power system. This definition
includes boilers located at an
institutional facility (e.g., university
campus, military base, church grounds)
or commercial/industrial facility (e.g.,
farm) used primarily to provide heat
and/or hot water for:
(1) A dwelling containing four or
fewer families, or
(2) A single unit residence dwelling
that has since been converted or
subdivided into condominiums or
apartments.
Residual oil means crude oil, fuel oil
that does not comply with the
specifications under the definition of
distillate oil, and all fuel oil numbers 4,
5, and 6, as defined by the American
Society of Testing and Materials in
ASTM D396–10 (incorporated by
reference, see § 63.14(b)).
*
*
*
*
*
Seasonal boiler means a boiler that
undergoes a shutdown for a period of at
least 7 consecutive months (or 210
consecutive days) each 12-month period
due to seasonal conditions, except for
periodic testing. Periodic testing shall
not exceed a combined total of 15 days
during the 7-month shutdown. This
definition only applies to boilers that
would otherwise be included in the
biomass subcategory or the oil
subcategory.
Shutdown means the cessation of
operation of a boiler for any purpose.
Shutdown begins either when none of
the steam or heat from the boiler is
supplied for heating and/or producing
electricity, or for any other purpose, or
at the point of no fuel being fired in the
boiler, whichever is earlier. Shutdown
ends when there is no steam and no
heat being supplied and no fuel being
fired in the boiler.
Solid fossil fuel includes, but is not
limited to, coal, coke, petroleum coke,
and tire-derived fuel.
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Solid fuel means any solid fossil fuel
or biomass or bio-based solid fuel.
Startup means either the first-ever
firing of fuel in a boiler for the purpose
of supplying steam or heat for heating
and/or producing electricity, or for any
other purpose, or the firing of fuel in a
boiler after a shutdown event for any
purpose. Startup ends when any of the
steam or heat from the boiler is supplied
for heating and/or producing electricity,
or for any other purpose.
Temporary boiler means any gaseous
or liquid fuel boiler that is designed to,
and is capable of, being carried or
moved from one location to another by
means of, for example, wheels, skids,
carrying handles, dollies, trailers, or
platforms. A boiler is not a temporary
boiler if any one of the following
conditions exists:
(1) The equipment is attached to a
foundation.
(2) The boiler or a replacement
remains at a location within the facility
and performs the same or similar
function for more than 12 consecutive
months, unless the regulatory agency
approves an extension. An extension
may be granted by the regulating agency
upon petition by the owner or operator
of a unit specifying the basis for such a
request. Any temporary boiler that
replaces a temporary boiler at a location
within the facility and performs the
same or similar function will be
included in calculating the consecutive
time period unless there is a gap in
operation of 12 months or more.
(3) The equipment is located at a
seasonal facility and operates during the
full annual operating period of the
seasonal facility, remains at the facility
for at least 2 years, and operates at that
facility for at least 3 months each year.
(4) The equipment is moved from one
location to another within the facility
but continues to perform the same or
similar function and serve the same
electricity, steam, and/or hot water
system in an attempt to circumvent the
residence time requirements of this
definition.
Tune-up means adjustments made to
a boiler in accordance with the
procedures outlined in § 63.11223(b).
Vegetable oil means oils extracted
from vegetation.
Voluntary Consensus Standards
(VCS) mean technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, business
practices) developed or adopted by one
or more voluntary consensus bodies.
EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, by precedent, has only used
VCS that are written in English.
Examples of VCS bodies are: American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM
100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box CB700,
West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
19428–B2959, (800) 262–1373, https://
www.astm.org), American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME ASME,
Three Park Avenue, New York, NY
10016–5990, (800) 843–2763, https://
www.asme.org), International Standards
Organization (ISO 1, ch. de la VoieCreuse, Case postale 56, CH–1211
Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22 749 01
11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm),
Standards Australia (AS Level 10, The
Exchange Centre, 20 Bridge Street,
Sydney, GPO Box 476, Sydney NSW
2001, + 61 2 9237 6171 https://
www.stadards.org.au), British Standards
Institution (BSI, 389 Chiswick High
Road, London, W4 4AL, United
Kingdom, +44 (0)20 8996 9001, https://
www.bsigroup.com), Canadian
Standards Association (CSA 5060
Spectrum Way, Suite 100, Mississauga,
Ontario L4W 5N6, Canada, 800–463–
6727, https://www.csa.ca), European
Committee for Standardization (CEN
CENELEC Management Centre Avenue
Marnix 17 B–1000 Brussels, Belgium
+32 2 550 08 11, https://www.cen.eu/
cen), and German Engineering
Standards (VDI VDI Guidelines
7517
Department, P.O. Box 10 11 39 40002,
Duesseldorf, Germany, +49 211 6214–
230, https://www.vdi.eu). The types of
standards that are not considered VCS
are standards developed by: the United
States, e.g., California (CARB) and Texas
(TCEQ); industry groups, such as
American Petroleum Institute (API), Gas
Processors Association (GPA), and Gas
Research Institute (GRI); and other
branches of the U.S. government, e.g.,
Department of Defense (DOD) and
Department of Transportation (DOT).
This does not preclude EPA from using
standards developed by groups that are
not VCS bodies within their rule. When
this occurs, EPA has done searches and
reviews for VCS equivalent to these
non-EPA methods.
Waste heat boiler means a device that
recovers normally unused energy (i.e.,
hot exhaust gas) and converts it to
usable heat. Waste heat boilers are also
referred to as heat recovery steam
generators. Waste heat boilers are heat
exchangers generating steam from
incoming hot exhaust gas from an
industrial (e.g., thermal oxidizer, kiln,
furnace) or power (e.g., combustion
turbine, engine) equipment. Duct
burners are sometimes used to increase
the temperature of the incoming hot
exhaust gas.
Wet scrubber means any add-on air
pollution control device that mixes an
aqueous stream or slurry with the
exhaust gases from a boiler to control
emissions of particulate matter or to
absorb and neutralize acid gases, such
as hydrogen chloride. A wet scrubber
creates an aqueous stream or slurry as
a byproduct of the emissions control
process.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Table 1 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised
to read as follows:
As stated in § 63.11201, you must
comply with the following applicable
emission limits:
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—EMISSION LIMITS
For the following
pollutants . . .
You must achieve less than or equal to the following
emission limits, except during periods of startup and
shutdown . . .
1. New coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of 30
million British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr) or
greater that do not meet the definition of limited-use
boiler.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
If your boiler is in this subcategory . . .
a. PM (Filterable) ................
b. Mercury
c. CO
2. New coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of between 10 and 30 MMBtu/hr that do not meet the definition of limited-use boiler.
a. PM (Filterable) ................
b. Mercury
c. CO
3.0E–02 pounds(lb) per million British thermal units
(MMBtu) of heat input.
2.2E–05 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
420 parts per million (ppm) by volume on a dry basis
corrected to 3 percent oxygen (3-run average or 10day rolling average).
4.2E–01 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
2.2E–05 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
420 ppm by volume on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen (3-run average or 10-day rolling average).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7518
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—EMISSION LIMITS—Continued
If your boiler is in this subcategory . . .
For the following
pollutants . . .
You must achieve less than or equal to the following
emission limits, except during periods of startup and
shutdown . . .
3. New biomass-fired boilers with heat input capacity of
30 MMBtu/hr or greater that do not meet the definition
of seasonal boiler or limited-use boiler.
4. New biomass fired boilers with heat input capacity of
between 10 and 30 MMBtu/hr that do not meet the
definition of seasonal boiler or limited-use boiler.
5. New oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity of 10
MMBtu/hr or greater that do not meet the definition of
seasonal boiler or limited-use boiler.
6. Existing coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of
10 MMBtu/hr or greater that do not meet the definition
of limited-use boiler.
PM (Filterable) ....................
3.0E–02 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
PM (Filterable) ....................
7.0E–02 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
PM (Filterable) ....................
3.0E–02 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
a. Mercury ..........................
b. CO
2.2E–05 lb per MMBtu of heat input.
420 ppm by volume on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen.
22. Table 2 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised
to read as follows:
As stated in § 63.11201, you must
comply with the following applicable
work practice standards, emission
■
reduction measures, and management
practices:
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS, EMISSION REDUCTION MEASURES, AND
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
If your boiler is in this subcategory . . .
You must meet the following . . .
1. Existing or new coal-fired, new biomass-fired,
or new oil-fired boilers (units with heat input
capacity of 10 MMBtu/hr or greater).
Minimize the boiler’s startup and shutdown periods and conduct startups and shutdowns according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedures. If manufacturer’s recommended
procedures are not available, you must follow recommended procedures for a unit of similar
design for which manufacturer’s recommended procedures are available.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
2. Existing coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of less than 10 MMBtu/hr that do not
meet the definition of limited-use boiler, or
use an oxygen trim system that maintains an
optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
3. New coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of less than 10 MMBtu/hr that do not meet
the definition of limited-use boiler, or use an
oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
4. Existing oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity greater than 5 MMBtu/hr that do not
meet the definition of seasonal boiler or limited-use boiler, or use an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
5. New oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity
greater than 5 MMBtu/hr that do not meet the
definition of seasonal boiler or limited-use
boiler, or use an oxygen trim system that
maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
6. Existing biomass-fired boilers that do not
meet the definition of seasonal boiler or limited-use boiler, or use an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
7. New biomass-fired boilers that do not meet
the definition of seasonal boiler or limited-use
boiler, or use an oxygen trim system that
maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
8. Existing seasonal boilers ................................
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. New seasonal boilers .....................................
10. Existing limited-use boilers ...........................
11. New limited-use boilers ................................
12. Existing oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity of equal to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr.
13. New oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity
of equal to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler
every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler
every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler
every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
7519
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS, EMISSION REDUCTION MEASURES, AND
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES—Continued
If your boiler is in this subcategory . . .
You must meet the following . . .
14. Existing coal-fired, biomass-fired, or oil-fired
boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio that would
otherwise be subject to a biennial tune-up.
15. New coal-fired, biomass-fired, or oil-fired
boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air-to-fuel ratio that would
otherwise be subject to a biennial tune-up.
16. Existing coal-fired, biomass-fired, or oil-fired
boilers (units with heat input capacity of 10
MMBtu/hr and greater), not including limiteduse boilers.
Conduct an initial tune-up as specified in § 63.11214, and conduct a tune-up of the boiler
every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
23.Table 3 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised
to read as follows:
Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5 years as specified in § 63.11223.
Must have a one-time energy assessment performed by a qualified energy assessor. An energy assessment completed on or after January 1, 2008, that meets or is amended to meet
the energy assessment requirements in this table satisfies the energy assessment requirement. Energy assessor approval and qualification requirements are waived in instances
where past or amended energy assessments are used to meet the energy assessment requirements. A facility that operates under an energy management program compatible with
ISO 50001 that includes the affected units also satisfies the energy assessment requirement. The energy assessment must include the following with extent of the evaluation for
items (1) to (4) appropriate for the on-site technical hours listed in § 63.11237:
(1) A visual inspection of the boiler system,
(2) An evaluation of operating characteristics of the affected boiler systems, specifications of
energy use systems, operating and maintenance procedures, and unusual operating constraints,
(3) An inventory of major energy use systems consuming energy from affected boiler(s) and
which are under control of the boiler owner or operator,
(4) A review of available architectural and engineering plans, facility operation and maintenance procedures and logs, and fuel usage,
(5) A list of major energy conservation measures that are within the facility’s control,
(6) A list of the energy savings potential of the energy conservation measures identified, and
(7) A comprehensive report detailing the ways to improve efficiency, the cost of specific improvements, benefits, and the time frame for recouping those investments.
As stated in § 63.11201, you must
comply with the applicable operating
limits:
■
TABLE 3 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—OPERATING LIMITS FOR BOILERS WITH EMISSION LIMITS
If you demonstrate compliance with applicable
emission limits using . . .
You must meet these operating limits except during periods of startup and shutdown . . .
1. Fabric filter control ..........................................
a. Maintain opacity to less than or equal to 10 percent opacity (daily block average); OR
b. Install and operate a bag leak detection system according to § 63.11224 and operate the
fabric filter such that the bag leak detection system alarm does not sound more than 5 percent of the operating time during each 6-month period.
a. Maintain opacity to less than or equal to 10 percent opacity (daily block average); OR
b. Maintain the 30-day rolling average total secondary electric power of the electrostatic precipitator at or above the minimum total secondary electric power as defined in § 63.11237.
Maintain the 30-day rolling average pressure drop across the wet scrubber at or above the
minimum scrubber pressure drop as defined in § 63.11237 and the 30-day rolling average
liquid flow rate at or above the minimum scrubber liquid flow rate as defined in § 63.11237.
Maintain the 30-day rolling average sorbent or activated carbon injection rate at or above the
minimum sorbent injection rate or minimum activated carbon injection rate as defined in
§ 63.11237. When your boiler operates at lower loads, multiply your sorbent or activated carbon injection rate by the load fraction (e.g., actual heat input divided by the heat input during
the performance stack test; for 50 percent load, multiply the injection rate operating limit by
0.5).
This option is for boilers that operate dry control systems. Boilers must maintain opacity to
less than or equal to 10 percent opacity (daily block average).
Maintain the fuel type or fuel mixture (annual average) such that the mercury emission rate
calculated according to § 63.11211(c) are less than the applicable emission limit for mercury.
For boilers that demonstrate compliance with a performance stack test, maintain the operating
load of each unit such that it does not exceed 110 percent of the average operating load recorded during the most recent performance stack test.
For boilers subject to a CO emission limit that demonstrate compliance with an oxygen analyzer system as specified in § 63.11224(a), maintain the 30-day rolling average oxygen level
at or above the minimum oxygen level as defined in § 63.11237. This requirement does not
apply to units that install an oxygen trim system since these units will set the trim system to
the level specified in § 63.11224(a)(7).
2. Electrostatic precipitator control .....................
3. Wet scrubber control ......................................
4. Dry sorbent or activated carbon injection control.
5. Any other add-on air pollution control type. ...
6. Fuel analysis ...................................................
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7. Performance stack testing ..............................
8. Oxygen analyzer system ................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7520
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
24. Table 6 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised
to read as follows:
■
As stated in § 63.11211, you must
comply with the following requirements
for establishing operating limits:
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—ESTABLISHING OPERATING LIMITS
If you have an applicable emission
limit for . . .
And your operating limits are
based on . . .
1. PM or mercury ..
a. Wet scrubber
operating parameters.
b. Electrostatic
precipitator operating parameters.
2. Mercury .............
Dry sorbent or activated carbon
injection rate
operating parameters.
You must . . .
Using . . .
Establish site-specific minimum scrubber pressure
drop and minimum scrubber liquid flow rate operating limits according to
§ 63.11211(b).
Data from the pressure
drop and liquid flow rate
monitors and the PM or
mercury performance
stack tests.
Establish a site-specific
minimum total secondary
electric power operating
limit according to
§ 63.11211(b).
Establish a site-specific
minimum sorbent or activated carbon injection
rate operating limit according to § 63.11211(b).
According to the following requirements
Data from the secondary
electric power monitors
and the PM or mercury
performance stack tests.
Data from the sorbent or
activated carbon injection
rate monitors and the
mercury performance
stack tests.
Oxygen ...............
Establish a unit-specific
limit for minimum oxygen
level.
Data from the oxygen analyzer system specified in
§ 63.11224(a).
4. Any pollutant for
which compliance is demonstrated by a
performance
stack test.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. CO .....................
Boiler operating
load.
Establish a unit-specific
limit for maximum operating load according to
§ 63.11212(c).
Data from the operating
load monitors (fuel feed
monitors or steam generation monitors).
(a) You must collect pressure drop and
liquid flow rate data every 15 minutes
during the entire period of the performance stack tests;
(b) Determine the average pressure drop
and liquid flow rate for each individual
test run in the three-run performance
stack test by computing the average of
all the 15-minute readings taken during
each test run.
(a) You must collect secondary electric
power data every 15 minutes during
the entire period of the performance
stack tests;
(b) Determine the average total secondary electric power for each individual test run in the three-run performance stack test by computing the average of all the 15-minute readings taken
during each test run.
(a) You must collect sorbent or activated
carbon injection rate data every 15
minutes during the entire period of the
performance stack tests;
(b) Determine the average sorbent or activated carbon injection rate for each
individual test run in the three-run performance stack test by computing the
average of all the 15-minute readings
taken during each test run.
(c) When your unit operates at lower
loads, multiply your sorbent or activated carbon injection rate by the load
fraction (e.g., actual heat input divided
by heat input during performance stack
test, for 50 percent load, multiply the
injection rate operating limit by 0.5) to
determine the required injection rate.
(a) You must collect oxygen data every
15 minutes during the entire period of
the performance stack tests;
(b) Determine the average hourly oxygen
concentration for each individual test
run in the three-run performance stack
test by computing the average of all
the 15-minute readings taken during
each test run.
(a) You must collect operating load data
(fuel feed rate or steam generation
data) every 15 minutes during the entire period of the performance test.
(b) Determine the average operating load
by computing the hourly averages
using all of the 15-minute readings
taken during each performance test.
(c) Determine the average of the three
test run averages during the performance test, and multiply this by 1.1 (110
percent) as your operating limit.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
25. Table 7 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised
to read as follows:
As stated in § 63.11222, you must
show continuous compliance with the
■
7521
emission limitations for each boiler
according to the following:
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—DEMONSTRATING CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE
If you must meet the following operating
limits . . .
You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .
1. Opacity ............................................................
a. Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § 63.11224(e) and § 63.11221;
and
b. Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6-minute averages; and
c. Maintaining opacity to less than or equal to 10 percent (daily block average).
Installing and operating a bag leak detection system according to § 63.11224(f) and operating
the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.11222(a)(4) are met.
a. Collecting the pressure drop and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according to
§§ 63.11224 and 63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average pressure drop and liquid flow rate at or above the
minimum pressure drop and minimum liquid flow rate according to § 63.11211.
a. Collecting the sorbent or activated carbon injection rate monitoring system data for the dry
scrubber according to §§ 63.11224 and 63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average sorbent or activated carbon injection rate at or above
the minimum sorbent or activated carbon injection rate according to § 63.11211.
a. Collecting the total secondary electric power monitoring system data for the electrostatic
precipitator according to §§ 63.11224 and 63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average total secondary electric power at or above the minimum total secondary electric power according to § 63.11211.
a. Only burning the fuel types and fuel mixtures used to demonstrate compliance with the applicable emission limit according to § 63.11213 as applicable; and
b. Keeping monthly records of fuel use according to §§ 63.11222(a)(2) and 63.11225(b)(4).
a. Continuously monitoring the oxygen content of flue gas according to § 63.11224 (This requirement does not apply to units that install an oxygen trim system since these units will
set the trim system to the level specified in § 63.11224(a)(7)); and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average oxygen content at or above the minimum oxygen
level established during the most recent CO performance test.
a. Continuously monitoring the CO concentration in the combustion exhaust according to
§§ 63.11224 and 63.11221; and
b. Correcting the data to 3 percent oxygen, and reducing the data to 1-hour averages; and
c. Reducing the data from the hourly averages to 10-day rolling averages; and
d. Maintaining the 10-day rolling average CO concentration at or below the applicable emission limit in Table 1 to this subpart.
a. Collecting operating load data (fuel feed rate or steam generation data) every 15 minutes;
and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average at or below the operating limit established during the
performance test according to § 63.11212(c) and Table 6 to this subpart.
2. Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Operation ...
3. Wet Scrubber Pressure Drop and Liquid Flow
Rate.
4. Dry Scrubber Sorbent or Activated Carbon
Injection Rate.
5. Electrostatic Precipitator Total Secondary
Electric Power.
6. Fuel Pollutant Content ....................................
7. Oxygen content ..............................................
8. CO emissions .................................................
9. Boiler operating load ......................................
26. Table 8 to subpart JJJJJJ is amended
by:
■ a. Revising the entry for ‘‘§ 63.9’’.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
b. Revising the entry for ‘‘§ 63.10(e)
and (f)’’.
■ c. Adding an entry for ‘‘§ 63.10(f)’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
*
The revisions read as follows:
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
7522
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 8 TO SUBPART JJJJJJ OF PART 63—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART JJJJJJ
General
provisions cite
Subject
Does it apply?
*
*
*
*
§ 63.9 ................................... Notification Requirements ...............................................
*
*
*
Yes,
excluding
the
information
required
in
§ 63.9(h)(2)(i)(B), (D), (E) and (F). See § 63.11225.
*
*
*
*
§ 63.10(e) ............................ Additional reporting requirements for sources with CMS
§ 63.10(f) ............................. Waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements .......
*
Yes.
Yes.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–31645 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Jan 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\01FER2.SGM
01FER2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7487-7522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31645]
[[Page 7487]]
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 22
February 1, 2013
Part II
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Part 63
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 78 , No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 7488]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790; FRL-9698-5]
RIN 2060-AR14
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of final action on reconsideration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this action, the EPA is taking final action on
reconsideration of certain issues related to the emission standards to
control hazardous air pollutants from new and existing industrial,
commercial and institutional boilers at area sources which were issued
under section 112 of the Clean Air Act. As part of this action, the EPA
is amending certain compliance dates for the standard and making
technical corrections to the final rule to clarify definitions,
references, applicability and compliance issues raised by petitioners
and other stakeholders affected by the rule. The EPA today is taking
final action on the proposed reconsideration.
DATES: This final rule is effective on February 1, 2013. The
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this final
rule were approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
February 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA established a single docket under Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2006-0790 for this action. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA's Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20004. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
Air Docket is (202) 566-1741.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Johnson, Energy Strategies
Group (D243-01), Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-5025; fax number: (919) 541-5450; email address:
johnson.mary@epa.gov.
Executive Summary
Purpose of This Regulatory Action
The EPA is taking final action on its proposed reconsideration of
certain provisions of its March 21, 2011, final rule that established
emission standards for the source category of new and existing
industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers located at area
source facilities listed pursuant to CAA sections 112(c)(3), 112(c)(6),
and 112(k)(3)(B).
Section 112(d) of the CAA requires the EPA to regulate HAP from
both major and area stationary sources. Section 112(d)(5) of the CAA
allows the EPA to establish standards for area sources of HAP ``which
provide for the use of generally available control technologies (GACT)
or management practices by such sources to reduce emissions of
hazardous air pollutants.'' While GACT serves as the basis for
standards of most emissions from area source boilers, two pollutants
emitted by coal-fired boilers, POM as 7-PAH and Hg, must be regulated
based on the performance of MACT. These two pollutants are regulated
based on MACT because area source industrial, commercial and
institutional boilers combusting coal were listed under section
112(c)(6) of the CAA due to the source categories' emissions of POM and
Hg. Section 112(c)(6) requires the EPA to regulate sources listed
pursuant to that provision by issuing standards under section 112(d)(2)
or (d)(4). The final rule meets this requirement by setting MACT
standards for Hg and CO (as a surrogate for POM) for units in the coal-
fired subcategory. Further, the final rule sets standards based on GACT
for the urban HAP, other than Hg and POM, emitted from coal-fired
boilers that pose the greatest public health risk, pursuant to section
112(c)(3) of the CAA, including arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, lead,
chromium, manganese, nickel, ethylene dioxide, and PCBs. In addition,
the final rule sets standards based on GACT for boilers combusting oil
or biomass for urban HAP, including Hg, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
lead, chromium, manganese, nickel, POM, ethylene dioxide, and PCBs.
In developing the MACT standards for coal-fired boilers, the EPA
considered section 112(h) of the CAA, which allows the EPA to establish
work practice standards in lieu of numerical emission limits under
section 112(d)(2) only in cases where the agency determines that it is
not feasible to prescribe or enforce an emission standard. The EPA has
set work practice standards for emissions of Hg and POM from small
coal-fired boilers, pursuant to section 112(h), in the form of periodic
tune-ups.
This final rule amends certain provisions of the final rule issued
by EPA on March 11, 2011, and responds to petitions for reconsideration
filed by a number of different entities.
Summary of Major Reconsideration Provisions
In general, the final rule requires facilities classified as area
sources of HAP with affected boilers to reduce emissions of harmful
toxic air emissions from these combustion sources, improving air
quality, and protecting public health in communities where these
facilities are located.
Recognizing the diversity of this source category and the multiple
sectors of the economy this rule affects, the EPA is establishing seven
subcategories for boilers based on the design of the combustion
equipment and operating schedules of the unit. In addition to the coal,
biomass, and oil subcategories in the March 2011 final rule, we are
establishing subcategories for seasonal boilers, limited-use boilers,
oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity of equal to or less than 5
MMBtu/hr, and certain boilers that use a continuous oxygen trim system.
Numerical emission limits, based on MACT, are established for Hg
and CO at new and existing large coal-fired boilers (i.e., with a
design heat input capacity of 10 MMBtu/hr or more). A review of the
data has resulted in changes to the Hg and CO emission limits contained
in the March 2011 final rule. The EPA is also establishing a CEMS
alternative compliance option for the numeric CO emission limit. Coal-
fired boilers subject to a CO emission limit can comply with the limit
using a periodic stack test and CPMS, or by using CEMS. The CO CEMS
alternative compliance option is based on a 10-day rolling average and
provides additional compliance flexibility to sources with existing CO
CEMS equipment. New and existing small coal-fired units (i.e., with a
design heat input capacity of less than 10 MMBtu/hr) are subject to
periodic tune-up work practices for CO and Hg in lieu of numeric
emission limits because the EPA found that it was technologically
[[Page 7489]]
and economically impracticable to apply measurement methodology to
these small sources, pursuant to CAA section 112(h).
Numerical emission limits, based on GACT, are established for PM as
a surrogate for urban metal HAP other than Hg for new large coal-fired
boilers. New and existing small coal-fired boilers are subject to
periodic tune-up management practices for PM as a surrogate for urban
metal HAP other than Hg, and for CO as a surrogate for urban organic
HAP other than POM, based on GACT.
New large biomass- and oil-fired boilers are subject to numerical
emission limits for PM as a surrogate for urban metal HAP, based on
GACT. Existing biomass and oil-fired boilers and new small biomass- and
oil-fired boilers are subject to periodic tune-up management practices
for PM as a surrogate for urban metal HAP, based on GACT. New and
existing biomass- and oil-fired boilers are subject to periodic tune-up
management practices for CO as a surrogate for urban organic HAP, based
on GACT. Certain other subcategories (seasonal boilers, limited-use
boilers, oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity of equal to or less
than 5 MMBtu/hr, and boilers with an oxygen trim system) are subject to
periodic tune-up work practice or management practice requirements
tailored to their schedule of operation and types of fuel.
The compliance date for existing sources is March 21, 2014. The
compliance date for new sources that began operations on or before May
20, 2011 is May 20, 2011. For new sources that start up after May 20,
2011, the compliance date is the date of startup. New sources are
defined as sources that began operation after June 4, 2010.
Costs and Benefits
This final action is intended to clarify definitions, references,
applicability and compliance issues, but not change the coverage of the
final rule. The final rule will affect an estimated 180,000 existing
area source boilers and the EPA projects that approximately an
additional 6,800 new boilers will be subject to the rule over the
initial 3-year period. The clarifications should make it easier for
owners and operators and for local and state authorities to understand
and implement the rule's requirements. As compared to the March 2011
final rule, this final rule will not affect the estimated emission
reductions, control costs or the benefits of the rule in substance.
This final rule does not impose any additional regulatory requirements
beyond those imposed by the previously promulgated boiler area source
rule and, in fact, will result in a decrease in regulatory requirements
for certain subcategories of boilers. A more detailed discussion of the
costs and benefits of the March 2011 final rule is provided at 76 FR
15579, March 21, 2011, and 76 FR 80542, December 23, 2011. Section VI
of this preamble provides a discussion of the impacts of this final
rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The following acronyms and
abbreviations are used in this document.
7-PAH 7-polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
ACI activated carbon injection
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
Btu British thermal unit
CO carbon monoxide
CEMS continuous emission monitoring system
CDX Central Data Exchange
CAA Clean Air Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COMS continuous opacity monitoring system
CPMS continuous parameter monitoring system
DOE Department of Energy
ERT Electronic Reporting Tool
ESP electrostatic precipitator
FR Federal Register
GACT generally available control technologies
HAP hazardous air pollutants
Hg mercury
HQ Headquarters
ISO International Standards Organization
lb pounds
MACT maximum achievable control technology
MMBtu million British thermal units
NAA No Action Assurance
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NESHAP national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
NSPS new source performance standard
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls
PM particulate matter
POM polycyclic organic matter
ppm parts per million
PSD prevention of significant deterioration
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RIN Regulatory Information Number
TBtu trillion British thermal units
TTN Technology Transfer Network
tpy tons per year
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
UPL upper prediction limit
VCS Voluntary Consensus Standards
WWW Worldwide Web
Organization of This Document. The information presented in this
preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I get a copy of this document?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background Information
III. Summary of Final Action on Reconsideration
A. Affected Sources
B. Source Category Exclusions
C. Emission Limits
D. Tune-Up Work Practice and Management Practice Standards
E. Energy Assessment Work Practice and Management Practice
Standards
F. GACT-Based Standards
G. Initial Compliance
H. Operating Limits
I. Continuous Compliance
J. Periods of Startup and Shutdown
K. Affirmative Defense Language
L. Notification, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
M. Title V Permitting Requirements
N. Definition of Period of Gas Curtailment or Supply
Interruption
O. Miscellaneous Technical Corrections
P. Other Issues
IV. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposed Action on
Reconsideration
A. Applicability
B. Tune-Up Requirements
C. Energy Assessment
D. Clarification of Oxygen Concentration Operating Limits
E. Definitions Regarding Averaging Times
F. Fuel Sampling Frequency
G. Performance Testing Frequency
H. Startup and Shutdown Definitions
I. Notifications
J. Miscellaneous Definitions
V. Other Actions the EPA Is Taking
VI. Impacts Associated With This Final Rule
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The regulated categories and entities potentially affected by this
action include:
[[Page 7490]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry category NAICS Code \a\ Examples of regulated entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any area source facility using a 321 Wood product manufacturing.
boiler as defined in the final 11 Agriculture, greenhouses.
rule.. 311 Food manufacturing.
327 Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing.
424 Wholesale trade, nondurable goods.
531 Real estate.
611 Educational services.
813 Religious, civic, professional, and similar organizations.
92 Public administration.
722 Food services and drinking places.
62 Health care and social assistance.
22111 Electric power generation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
final action. To determine whether your facility may be affected by
this action, you should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR
63.11193 of subpart JJJJJJ (National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
Area Sources). If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
this final rule to a particular entity, consult either the air permit
authority for the entity or your EPA regional representative, as listed
in 40 CFR 63.13 of subpart A (General Provisions).
B. Where can I get a copy of this document?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this action will also be available on the WWW through the TTN.
Following signature, a copy of the action will be posted on the TTN's
policy and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated rules at the
following address: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN provides
information and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution
control.
C. Judicial Review
Under the CAA section 307(b)(1), judicial review of this final rule
is available only by filing a petition for review in the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by April 2, 2013. Under
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), only an objection to this final rule that was
raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment
can be raised during judicial review.
Under CAA section 307(b)(2), the requirements established by this
final rule may not be challenged separately in any civil or criminal
proceedings brought by EPA to enforce these requirements.
II. Background Information
Section 112(d) of the CAA requires the EPA to establish NESHAP for
both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for regulation under
CAA section 112(c). A major source is any stationary source that emits
or has the potential to emit 10 tpy or more of any single HAP or 25 tpy
or more of any combination of HAP. An area source is a stationary
source that is not a major source.
On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15554), the EPA issued the NESHAP for
industrial, commercial and institutional area source boilers pursuant
to CAA sections 112(c)(3), 112(c)(6), and 112(k)(3)(B).
CAA section 112(k)(3)(B) directs the EPA to identify at least 30
HAP that, as a result of emissions from area sources, pose the greatest
threat to public health in the largest number of urban areas. The EPA
implemented this provision in 1999 in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics
Strategy, (64 FR 38715, July 19, 1999) (Strategy). Specifically, in the
Strategy, the EPA identified 30 HAP that pose the greatest potential
health threat in urban areas, and these HAP are referred to as the ``30
urban HAP.'' Section 112(c)(3) of the CAA requires the EPA to list
sufficient categories or subcategories of area sources to ensure that
area sources representing 90 percent of the emissions of the 30 urban
HAP are subject to regulation. Under CAA section 112(d)(5), the EPA may
elect to promulgate standards or requirements for area sources ``which
provide for the use of generally available control technologies
(``GACT'') or management practices by such sources to reduce emissions
of hazardous air pollutants.''
CAA section 112(c)(6) requires that the EPA list categories and
subcategories of sources assuring that sources accounting for not less
than 90 percent of the aggregate emissions of each of seven specified
HAP are subject to standards under CAA sections 112(d)(2) or (d)(4),
which require the application of the more stringent MACT. The seven HAP
specified in CAA section 112(c)(6) are as follows: Alkylated lead
compounds, POM, hexachlorobenzene, Hg, PCBs, 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzofuran, and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
As noted in the preamble to the final rule, (76 FR 15556, March 21,
2011), we listed area source industrial boilers and commercial/
institutional boilers combusting coal under CAA section 112(c)(6) based
on the source categories' contribution of Hg and POM, and under CAA
section 112(c)(3) for their contribution of arsenic, beryllium,
cadmium, lead, chromium, manganese, nickel, ethylene dioxide, and PCBs,
as well as Hg and POM. We promulgated final standards for coal-fired
area source boilers to reflect the application of MACT for Hg and POM,
and to reflect GACT for the urban HAP other than Hg and POM.
We listed industrial and commercial/institutional boilers
combusting oil or biomass under CAA section 112(c)(3) for their
contribution of Hg, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, lead, chromium,
manganese, nickel, POM, ethylene dioxide, and PCBs. For boilers firing
oil or biomass, the final standards reflect GACT for all of the urban
HAP.
On March 21, 2011, we also published a notice to initiate the
reconsideration of certain aspects of the final rule for area source
industrial, commercial and institutional boilers (76 FR 15266). The
reconsideration notice identified several provisions of the final rule
where additional public comment was appropriate. The notice also
identified several issues of central relevance to the rulemaking where
reconsideration was appropriate under CAA section 307(d).
Following promulgation of the final rule, the EPA also received
petitions for reconsideration from the following organizations
(Petitioners): American
[[Page 7491]]
Sugar Cane League of the U.S.A., Alaska Oil and Gas Association,
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute, American Iron and Steel
Institute, American Petroleum Institute, Council of Industrial Boiler
Owners, Industry Coalition (American Forest and Paper Association
(AF&PA) et. al.), National Petrochemical and Refiners Association,
Sierra Club, and the State of Washington Department of Ecology.
Petitioners, pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), requested that the
EPA reconsider numerous provisions in the rules. On December 23, 2011,
the EPA granted the petitions for reconsideration on certain issues,
and proposed certain revisions to the final rule in response to the
reconsideration petitions and to address the issues that the EPA
previously identified as warranting reconsideration. That proposal
solicited comment on several specific aspects of the rule, including:
Establishing separate requirements for seasonally operated
boilers.
Addressing temporary boilers.
Clarifying the initial compliance schedule for existing
boilers subject to tune-ups.
Defining periods of gas curtailment.
Providing an optional CO compliance mechanism using CEMS.
Averaging times for parameter monitoring.
Providing an affirmative defense for malfunction events.
Adjusting frequency of tune-up work practices for very
small units.
Selecting a 99 percent confidence interval for setting the
CO emission limit.
Establishing GACT-based limits for biomass and oil-fired
boilers.
Scope and duration of the energy assessment and deadline
for completing the assessment.
Revising GACT-based limits for PM at new oil-fired
boilers.
Exempting area sources from title V permitting
requirements.
In this action, the EPA is finalizing multiple changes to this
NESHAP after considering public comments on the items under
reconsideration.
III. Summary of Final Action on Reconsideration
As stated above, the December 23, 2011, proposed rule addressed
specific issues and provisions the EPA identified for reconsideration.
This summary reflects the agency's final action in regards to those
provisions identified for reconsideration and on other discrete matters
identified in response to comments or data received during the comment
period.
A. Affected Sources
This final rule amends 40 CFR 63.11194 to specify that an existing
dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced construction or reconstruction
on or before June 4, 2010) meeting the definition of gas-fired boiler,
as defined in 40 CFR 63.11237, that meets the applicability
requirements of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010 due to a fuel switch
from gaseous fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel is
considered to be an existing source under this subpart as long as the
boiler was designed to accommodate the alternate fuel. A new or
reconstructed dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced construction or
reconstruction after June 4, 2010) meeting the definition of gas-fired
boiler, as defined in 40 CFR 63.11237, that meets the applicability
criteria of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010 due to a fuel switch from
gaseous fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel is
considered to be a new source under this subpart.
B. Source Category Exclusions
This final rule amends the list of boilers that are not part of the
source categories subject to subpart JJJJJJ. We are revising this list
(as set forth in 40 CFR 63.11195) to clarify certain boiler types and
to include certain additional boilers that may be located at an
industrial, commercial or institutional area source facility. These
revisions of the source categories are described below.
1. Electric Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11195 by adding electric boilers to
the list of boilers not subject to subpart JJJJJJ. Electric boilers are
defined in 40 CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Electric boiler means a boiler in which electric heating serves
as the source of heat. Electric boilers that burn gaseous or liquid
fuel during periods of electrical power curtailment or failure are
included in this definition.
2. Residential Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11195 by adding residential boilers
to the list of boilers not subject to subpart JJJJJJ. We are clarifying
that a residential boiler may be part of a residential combined heat
and power system and that a boiler serving a single unit residence
dwelling that has since been converted or subdivided into condominiums
or apartments may also be considered a residential boiler. Residential
boilers are defined in 40 CFR 63.11237 as follows:
Residential boiler means a boiler used to provide heat and/or
hot water and/or as part of a residential combined heat and power
system. This definition includes boilers located at an institutional
facility (e.g., university campus, military base, church grounds) or
commercial/industrial facility (e.g., farm) used primarily to
provide heat and/or hot water for:
(1) A dwelling containing four or fewer families, or
(2) A single unit residence dwelling that has since been
converted or subdivided into condominiums or apartments.
3. Temporary Boilers
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11195 by adding temporary boilers to
the list of boilers not subject to subpart JJJJJJ. Similar to
residential boilers, we did not intend to regulate temporary boilers
under the area source standards because they are not part of either the
industrial boiler source category or the commercial/institutional
boiler source category. We note that neither the CAA section 112(c)(6)
inventory nor the CAA section 112(c)(3) inventory included temporary
boilers. In this final action, the EPA is simply clarifying the scope
of categories regulated by subpart JJJJJJ. By their nature of being
temporary, these boilers are operating in place of another non-
temporary boiler while that boiler is being constructed, replaced or
repaired, in which case we would have counted the non-temporary boiler
as one being regulated. Additionally, the final major source rule for
boilers excludes temporary boilers.
The definition of ``temporary boiler'' specifies that a boiler is
not a temporary boiler if it remains at a location within the facility
and performs the same or similar function for more than 12 consecutive
months unless the regulatory agency approves an extension. The
definition of ``temporary boiler'' also specifies that any temporary
boiler that replaces a temporary boiler at a location within the
facility and performs the same or similar function will be included in
calculating the consecutive time period unless there is a gap in
operation of 12 months or more. Temporary boilers are defined in 40 CFR
63.11237 as follows:
Temporary boiler means any gaseous or liquid fuel boiler that is
designed to, and is capable of, being carried or moved from one
location to another by means of, for example, wheels, skids,
carrying handles, dollies, trailers, or platforms. A boiler is not a
temporary boiler if any one of the following conditions exists:
(1) The equipment is attached to a foundation.
(2) The boiler or a replacement remains at a location within the
facility and performs the same or similar function for more than 12
consecutive months, unless the regulatory agency approves an
extension. An extension may be granted by the regulatory agency
[[Page 7492]]
upon petition by the owner or operator of a unit specifying the
basis for such a request. Any temporary boiler that replaces a
temporary boiler at a location within the facility and performs the
same or similar function will be included in calculating the
consecutive time period unless there is a gap in operation of 12
months or more.
(3) The equipment is located at a seasonal facility and operates
during the full annual operating period of the seasonal facility,
remains at the facility for at least 2 years, and operates at that
facility for at least 3 months each year.
(4) The equipment is moved from one location to another within
the facility but continues to perform the same or similar function
and serve the same electricity, steam, and/or hot water system in an
attempt to circumvent the residence time requirements of this
definition.
4. Boilers With Section 3005 Permits
The EPA is clarifying the language in 40 CFR 63.11195(c) to provide
an exclusion stating ``unless such units do not combust hazardous waste
and combust comparable fuels'' such that it reads: ``A boiler required
to have a permit under section 3005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act or
covered by subpart EEE of this part (e.g., hazardous waste boilers),
unless such units do not combust hazardous waste and combust comparable
fuels.''
5. Boilers Used as Control Devices
The EPA is amending the language in 40 CFR 63.11195(g) to clarify
that any boiler that is used as a control device to comply with a
subpart under part 60, 61, or 65 of chapter 40 is not subject to
subpart JJJJJJ provided that at least 50 percent of the heat input to
the boiler is provided by the gas stream that is regulated under
another subpart.
C. Emission Limits
1. Hg Emission Limit for Coal-Fired Boilers
The EPA is amending the Hg emission limit for large coal-fired
boilers to 0.000022 lb per MMBtu based on a revised analysis. The
revised analysis excludes data for a utility boiler that were
erroneously used as the basis for the Hg emission limit included in the
March 2011 final rule. Further discussion of this revision to the Hg
emission limit is located in the December 23, 2011, proposal (76 FR
80541).
A memorandum ``Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for Mercury and Carbon
Monoxide'' located in the docket for the rulemaking describes our
beyond-the-floor analysis for Hg and CO emissions from new and existing
area source coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of 10 MMBtu/hr
or greater. In the beyond-the-floor option for Hg emissions, new and
existing coal-fired boilers would be required to comply with a Hg
emission limit more stringent than the MACT floor-based emission limit
of 2.2 X 10-\5\ lb of Hg per MMBtu. To comply with a limit
more stringent than the fabric filter-based MACT floor limit, it is
expected that an affected boiler would need to employ fabric filter
control along with ACI. In summary, we determined that the beyond-the-
floor option of installing ACI for Hg control from area source coal-
fired boilers is not economically feasible.
As discussed in the preamble to the June 2010 proposed rule (75 FR
31896) and the preamble to the March 2011 final rule (76 FR 15554), we
also considered whether fuel switching was an appropriate control
technology for purposes of determining either the MACT floor level or
beyond-the-floor level of control. We determined that fuel switching
was not an appropriate floor or beyond-the-floor control. As also
discussed in the June 2010 and March 2011 preambles, we determined that
an energy assessment requirement was an appropriate beyond-the-floor
option for existing large boilers. These previous analyses continue to
be applicable for mercury.
2. Using the UPL for Setting the CO Emission Limit
The EPA is amending the CO emission limit for coal-fired boilers to
reflect a revised analysis that uses the 99 percent confidence level in
determining the UPL. Based on the results of the revised analysis, we
are amending the CO emission limit for new and existing coal-fired
boilers from 400 ppm by volume on a dry basis, corrected to 3 percent
oxygen, to 420 ppm by volume on a dry basis, corrected to 3 percent
oxygen.
As discussed in the ``Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for Mercury and
Carbon Monoxide'' memorandum, to comply with a limit more stringent
than the MACT floor based CO limit, it is expected that new and
existing area source coal-fired boilers with heat input capacity of 10
MMBtu/hr or greater may need to install an oxidation catalyst. As fully
explained in the memorandum, we determined that the beyond-the-floor
option of installing an oxidation catalyst for CO control was
technically infeasible. Other methods of reducing CO emissions, such as
upgrading new burners and overfire air systems, were also considered
and determined to be technically infeasible options. As explained
earlier in this preamble, we determined that fuel switching was not an
appropriate floor or beyond-the-floor control and that an energy
assessment requirement was an appropriate beyond-the-floor option for
existing large boilers. These previous analyses continue to be
applicable for CO.
3. Compliance Alternative for PM for Certain Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA is amending the applicability of PM emission limit
requirements for certain new or reconstructed oil-fired boilers. We are
amending 40 CFR 63.11210 to specify that new or reconstructed oil-fired
boilers satisfy GACT for PM when they combust only oil that contains no
more than 0.50 weight percent sulfur or a mixture of 0.50 weight
percent sulfur oil with other fuels not subject to a PM emission limit
under this subpart and do not use a post-combustion technology (except
a wet scrubber) to reduce PM or sulfur dioxide emissions.
D. Tune-Up Work Practice and Management Practice Standards
1. Requirements for Seasonally Operated Boilers
The EPA is establishing separate requirements for a subcategory of
boilers that are seasonally operated. For seasonally operated boilers,
we are amending 40 CFR 63.11223 to specify that these boilers are
required to complete a tune-up every 5 years, instead of on a biennial
basis as is required for most non-seasonal boilers. Specifically,
existing seasonal boilers are required to complete the initial tune-up
by March 21, 2014, and a subsequent tune-up every 5 years after the
initial tune-up. New and reconstructed seasonal boilers are not
required to complete an initial tune-up, but are required to complete a
tune-up every 5 years after the initial startup of the new or
reconstructed boiler.\1\ A combined total of 15 days of periodic
testing of the seasonal boiler during the 7-month shutdown is allowed.
The definition of ``seasonal boiler'' clarifies that it only applies to
biomass- or oil-fired boilers. Seasonally operated boilers are defined
in 40 CFR 63.11237 as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Generally, boilers are initially installed optimized for
efficiency, i.e., ``in tune.'' Periodic tune-ups restore a boiler to
its efficient state, given its age and other parameters. We do not
require a tune-up upon startup because boilers normally would
already be efficient at that time. Emission reductions are projected
to occur by maintaining efficient combustion through periodic tune-
ups.
Seasonal boiler means a boiler that undergoes a shutdown for a
period of at least 7 consecutive months (or 210 consecutive days)
each 12-month period due to seasonal conditions, except for periodic
testing. Periodic testing shall not exceed a combined total of 15
days during the 7-month shutdown. This definition only applies to
[[Page 7493]]
boilers that would otherwise be included in the biomass subcategory
or the oil subcategory.
2. Requirements for Small Oil-Fired Units
The EPA is establishing separate requirements for a subcategory of
oil-fired boilers with a heat input capacity of equal to or less than 5
MMBtu/hr. We are amending 40 CFR 63.11223 to specify that this
subcategory of small oil-fired boilers are required to complete a tune-
up every 5 years, instead of on a biennial basis as is required for
most larger oil-fired boilers. Specifically, existing oil-fired boilers
with a heat input capacity of equal to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr are
required to complete the initial tune-up by March 21, 2014, and a
subsequent tune-up every 5 years after the initial tune-up. New and
reconstructed oil-fired boilers with a heat input capacity of equal to
or less than 5 MMBtu/hr are not required to complete an initial tune-
up, but are required to complete a tune-up every 5 years after the
initial startup of the new or reconstructed boiler.
3. Requirements for Boilers With Oxygen Trim Systems
The EPA is establishing separate requirements for boilers with
oxygen trim systems that maintain an optimum air-to-fuel ratio that
would otherwise be subject to a biennial tune-up. We are amending 40
CFR 63.11223 to specify that this subcategory of boilers is required to
complete a tune-up every 5 years. Specifically, existing boilers with
oxygen trim systems are required to complete the initial tune-up by
March 21, 2014, and a subsequent tune-up every 5 years after the
initial tune-up. New and reconstructed boilers with oxygen trim systems
are not required to complete an initial tune-up, but are required to
complete a tune-up every 5 years after the initial startup of the new
or reconstructed boiler.
4. Requirements for Limited-Use Boilers
The EPA is establishing separate requirements for a subcategory of
boilers that operate on a limited basis. The limited-use subcategory
includes any boiler that burns any amount of solid or liquid fuels and
has a federally enforceable average annual capacity factor of no more
than 10 percent. For limited-use boilers, we are amending 40 CFR
63.11223 of the final rule to specify that these boilers are required
to complete a tune-up every 5 years. Specifically, existing limited-use
boilers are required to complete the initial tune-up by March 21, 2014,
and a subsequent tune-up every 5 years after the initial tune-up. New
and reconstructed limited-use boilers are not required to complete an
initial tune-up, but are required to complete a tune-up every 5 years
after the initial startup of the new or reconstructed boiler. Limited-
use boilers are not subject to the emission limits in Table 1 to the
subpart, the energy assessment requirements in Table 2 to the subpart,
or the operating limits in Table 4 to the subpart.
E. Energy Assessment Work Practice and Management Practice Standards
1. Scope
The EPA is amending the definition of ``energy assessment'' to
clarify that the scope of the energy assessment does not encompass
energy use systems located off-site or energy use systems using
electricity purchased from an off-site source. The energy assessment is
limited to only those energy use systems, located on-site, associated
with the affected boilers. We are also clarifying that the scope of the
assessment is based on energy use by discrete segments of a facility
(e.g., production area or building) and not by a total aggregation of
all individual energy using segments of a facility.
The definition of ``boiler system'' is being revised in this final
rule to clarify that it means the boiler and associated components
directly connected to and serving the energy use systems. We are
amending the definition of ``energy use system'' to clarify that energy
use systems are only those systems using energy clearly produced by
affected boilers.
We are clarifying that energy assessor approval and qualification
requirements are waived in instances where an energy assessment
completed on or after January 1, 2008 meets or is amended to meet the
energy assessment requirements in this final rule by March 21, 2014.
Finally, we are specifying that a source that is operating under an
energy management program established through energy management systems
compatible with ISO 50001, that includes the affected boilers, by March
21, 2014, satisfies the energy assessment requirement. We consider
these energy management programs to be equivalent to the one-time
energy assessment because facilities having these programs operate
under a set of practices and procedures designed to manage energy use
on an ongoing basis. These programs contain energy performance
measurements and tracking plans with periodic reviews.
2. Compliance Date
As specified in 40 CFR 63.11196(a)(3), existing boilers that are
subject to the energy assessment requirement must achieve compliance
with the energy assessment requirement no later than March 21, 2014.
Thus, in order to meet the requirements of the rule, energy assessments
must, therefore, be completed by the compliance date (March 21, 2014)
for existing sources.
3. Maximum Duration Requirements
The EPA is amending the definition of ``energy assessment'' for
facilities with affected boilers with less than 0.3 TBtu/yr heat input
capacity and for facilities with affected boilers with 0.3 to 1 TBtu/yr
heat input capacity to change the maximum time to conduct the energy
assessment from one day to 8 on-site technical hours and from three
days to 24 on-site technical hours, respectively, and to allow sources
to perform longer assessments at their discretion. We are also amending
the definition of ``energy assessment'' for facilities with affected
boilers with greater than 1 TBtu/yr heat input capacity to specify that
the maximum time to conduct the assessment is up to 24 on-site
technical hours for the first TBtu/yr plus 8 on-site technical hours
for every additional 1.0 TBtu/yr not to exceed 160 on-site technical
hours, but may be longer at the discretion of the owner or operator.
F. GACT-Based Standards
1. Establishing GACT-Based Emission Limits for Biomass- and Oil-Fired
Boilers
The EPA is not amending the GACT-based standards, as specified in
the March 21, 2011, final rule, for biomass- and oil-fired boilers.
Specifically, the final standards for biomass- and oil-fired area
source boilers are based on GACT instead of MACT as were the proposed
standards for all pollutants except POM. Our rationale for the changes
between proposal and promulgation for the biomass- and oil-fired
boilers, including not requiring MACT for POM, can be found in the
preamble to the promulgated area source standards (76 FR 15565-15567
and 15574-15575, March 21, 2011). The final standards for area source
biomass- and oil-fired boilers require these boilers to meet the
following standards:
New boilers with heat input capacity greater than 10 MMBtu/hr that
are biomass-fired or oil-fired must meet GACT-based numerical emission
limits for PM.
New boilers with heat input capacity greater than 10 MMBtu/hr that
are biomass-fired or oil-fired must comply
[[Page 7494]]
with work practice standards to minimize the boiler's startup and
shutdown periods following the manufacturer's recommendations, or the
manufacturer's recommendations for a unit of similar design.
Existing boilers with heat input capacity greater than 10 MMBtu/hr
that are biomass-fired or oil-fired must have a one-time energy
assessment performed by a qualified energy assessor, an energy
assessment completed on or after January 1, 2008 that meets or is
amended to meet the energy assessment requirements in this final rule
by March 21, 2014, or an energy management program established through
energy management systems compatible with ISO 50001, that includes the
affected boilers, by March 21, 2014, under which the owner or operator
currently operates.
All new and existing units, regardless of size, that are biomass-
fired or oil-fired must have a GACT-based periodic tune-up.
2. Setting GACT-Based PM Standards for New Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA is not making any changes to the PM limit for new oil-fired
boilers. New oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity greater than 10
MMBtu/hr must meet a GACT-based numerical emission limit for PM (0.03
lb per MMBtu of heat input). New oil-fired units, regardless of size,
must have a GACT-based periodic tune-up. Our rationale for finalizing
GACT-based PM emissions limits can be found in the preamble to the
promulgated area source standards (76 FR 15574, March 21, 2011).
G. Initial Compliance
1. Dates
Some commenters have argued that the 3-year compliance deadline of
March 21, 2014, for existing sources to meet the standards does not
provide sufficient time for sources to meet the standards in view of
the large number of sources subject to the rule and that these sources
will be competing for the needed resources and materials from
engineering consultants, permitting authorities, equipment vendors,
construction contractors, financial institutions, and other critical
suppliers.
As an initial matter, we note that many sources subject to the
standards should be able to meet the standards within 3 years (i.e., by
March 21, 2014), even those that need to install pollution control
technologies to do so. In addition, many sources subject to the
standards are existing biomass- or oil-fired boilers or small coal-
fired boilers (less than 10 MMBtu/hr) and will not need to install
controls in order to demonstrate compliance, as these sources are
subject only to work practices or management practices.
At the same time, the CAA allows title V permitting authorities to
grant sources, on a case-by-case basis, extensions to the compliance
time of up to 1 year if such time is needed for the installation of
controls. See CAA section 112(i)(3)(B)). Permitting authorities are
already familiar with, and in many cases have experience with, applying
the 1-year extension authority under section 112(i)(3)(B) since the
provision applies to all NESHAP. See 40 CFR 63.6(i)(4)(A). We believe
that should the range of circumstances that commenters have cited as
impeding sources' ability to install controls within 3 years
materialize, then permitting authorities can take those circumstances
into consideration when evaluating an existing source's request for a
1-year extension, and where such applications prove to be well-founded,
permitting authorities can make the 1-year extension available to
applicants.
In making a determination as to whether an extension is
appropriate, we believe it is reasonable for permitting authorities to
consider the large number of pollution control retrofit projects being
undertaken for purposes of complying either with the standards in this
rule or with those of other rules such as the Major Source Boilers
Standards and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for the power sector
that may be competing for similar resources.
Further, commenters have pointed out that in some cases operators
of existing sources that are subject to these standards and that
generate energy may opt to meet the standards by terminating operations
at these sources and building new sources to replace the energy
generation at the shut-down sources. While the ultimate discretion to
provide a 1-year extension lies with the permitting authority, the EPA
believes that it may be reasonable for permitting authorities to allow
the fourth year extension for the installation of replacement sources
of energy generation at the site of a facility applying for an
extension for that purpose. Specifically, the EPA believes where an
applicant demonstrates that it is building replacement sources of
energy generation for purposes of meeting the requirements of these
standards, such a replacement project could be deemed to constitute the
``installation of controls'' under section 112(i)(3)(B).
In sum, the EPA believes that although most, if not all, units will
be able to fully comply with the standards within 3 years, the fourth
year that permitting authorities are allowed to grant for installation
of controls is an important flexibility that will address situations
where an extra year is necessary.
2. Demonstrating Initial Compliance
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11210 to clarify the dates by which
new and reconstructed boilers need to demonstrate initial compliance.
We are amending 40 CFR 63.11210(d) to clarify that only boilers that
are subject to emission limits for PM, Hg or CO in Table 1 to subpart
JJJJJJ have a 180-day period after the applicable compliance date to
demonstrate initial compliance.
We are adding a new paragraph (i) to 40 CFR 63.11210 to clarify the
initial compliance requirements for boilers located at existing major
sources of HAP that become area sources on a timely basis. Any such
existing boiler at the existing source must demonstrate compliance with
subpart JJJJJJ within 180 days of the later of March 21, 2014 or upon
the existing major source commencing operation as an area source. Any
new or reconstructed boiler at the existing source must demonstrate
compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within 180 days of the later of March
21, 2011 or startup. Notification of such changes must be submitted
according to 40 CFR 63.11225(g).
We are adding a new paragraph (j) to 40 CFR 63.11210 that specifies
initial compliance demonstration requirements for existing affected
boilers that have not operated between the effective date of the rule
and the source's compliance date. Owners and operators of boilers
subject to emission limits must complete the initial compliance
demonstration no later than 180 days after the re-start of the affected
boiler, sources subject to tune-up requirements must complete the
initial performance tune-up no later than 30 days after the re-start of
the affected boiler, and sources subject to the one-time energy
assessment must complete the assessment no later than the compliance
date specified in 40 CFR 63.11196.
3. Schedule for Existing Boilers Subject to Tune-Up Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11196 to specify that all existing
boilers subject to the tune-up requirement have 3 years (by March 21,
2014) in which to demonstrate initial compliance, instead of 1 year as
specified in the 2011 final rule (76 FR 15554, March 21, 2011) or 2
years as specified in the proposed reconsideration of final rule action
(76
[[Page 7495]]
FR 80532, December 23, 2011). In the December 23, 2011, proposal, we
specifically requested comment on whether the initial compliance period
for the tune-up requirement should be extended to March 21, 2014.
4. Conducting Initial Tune-Ups at New and Reconstructed Sources
The EPA is removing the requirement for an initial tune-up for new
and reconstructed boilers. Thus, new and reconstructed units are
required to complete the applicable biennial or 5-year tune-up no later
than 25 months or 61 months, respectively, after the initial startup of
the new or reconstructed boiler.
5. Fuel Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11223(a) to specify that boiler tune-
ups must be conducted while burning the type of fuel that provided the
majority of the heat input to the boiler over the 12 months prior to
the tune-up.
H. Operating Limits
1. Operating Limits for Oxygen Concentration
The EPA is clarifying that the oxygen concentration must be at or
above the minimum established during a performance stack test. These
limits have also been clarified to be applicable when the unit is
firing the fuel or fuel mixture utilized during the CO performance
test.
2. Maximum Operating Load
The EPA is including provisions for establishing a unit-specific
limit for maximum operating load that applies to any boiler subject to
an emission limit for which compliance is demonstrated by a performance
stack test. Operating load data includes fuel feed rate data or steam
generation rate data.
3. Establishing Operating Limits for Wet Scrubbers
The EPA is amending the operating limit provisions in 40 CFR
63.11211(b)(2) for an ESP operated with a wet scrubber to remove the
statement that the operating limits for ESP do not apply to dry ESP
systems operated without a wet scrubber.
I. Continuous Compliance
1. CO Emission Limit
The March 2011 final rule requires sources subject to a CO emission
limit to demonstrate compliance by measuring CO emissions while also
monitoring the oxygen content of the exhaust. We are amending the
monitoring requirements in 40 CFR 63.11224(a) to allow sources subject
to a CO emission limit the option to install, operate, and maintain CO
and oxygen CEMS. The CEMS must be installed, operated and maintained
according to Performance Specifications 3 and 4, 4A, or 4B at 40 CFR
part 60, appendix B, and according to the site-specific monitoring plan
that each facility is required to develop. The CEMS will also be
required to complete a performance evaluation, also according to
Performance Specifications 3 and 4, 4A, or 4B.
Sources have the option to demonstrate continuous compliance by
monitoring both CO and oxygen using CEMS to demonstrate compliance with
the CO emission limit, corrected to 3 percent oxygen, or monitoring and
complying with an oxygen content operating limit that is established
during the performance stack test. Sources that use CO and oxygen CEMS
are not required to perform initial CO performance testing nor are they
subject to oxygen content operating limit requirements. Sources that
choose to demonstrate continuous compliance by monitoring and complying
with an oxygen content operating limit must install, operate, and
maintain an oxygen analyzer system at or above the minimum percent
oxygen by volume that is established as the operating limit for oxygen
when firing the fuel or fuel mixture utilized during the most recent CO
performance stack test. We have removed the requirement that the oxygen
monitor be located at the outlet of the boiler, so that it can be
located either within the combustion zone or at the outlet as a flue
gas oxygen monitor.
We are amending the oxygen monitoring requirements to allow for the
use of oxygen trim systems and have included oxygen trim systems in the
definition of ``oxygen analyzer system.'' We have clarified that
operation of oxygen trim systems to meet the oxygen monitoring
requirements shall not be done in a manner that compromises furnace
safety. The definitions of ``oxygen analyzer system'' and ``oxygen trim
system'' in 40 CFR 63.11237 read as follows:
Oxygen analyzer system means all equipment required to
determine the oxygen content of a gas stream and used to monitor oxygen
in the boiler flue gas, boiler firebox, or other appropriate
intermediate location. This definition includes oxygen trim systems.
Oxygen trim system means a system of monitors that is used
to maintain excess air at the desired level in a combustion device. A
typical system consists of a flue gas oxygen and/or carbon monoxide
monitor that automatically provides a feedback signal to the combustion
air controller.
2. Tune-Up Standards
The EPA is amending the requirements for demonstrating continuous
compliance with the work practice and management practice tune-up
standards in 40 CFR 63.11223 to clarify that CO measurements that are
required before and after tune-up adjustments may be taken using a
portable CO analyzer. We are clarifying that the requirements to
inspect the burner and the system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio may
be delayed until the next scheduled shutdown. We are also clarifying
that units that produce electricity for sale may delay these
inspections until the first outage, not to exceed 36 months from the
previous inspection. In addition, we are clarifying that optimization
of CO emissions should be consistent with any NOX
requirements to which the unit is subject. Finally, we are specifying
for units that are not operating on the required date for a tune-up,
the tune-up must be conducted within 30 days of startup.
3. Performance Testing Frequency
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11220 to specify in paragraph (b)
that the owner or operator of an affected boiler does not need to
conduct further PM emissions testing if, when demonstrating initial
compliance with the PM emission limit, the performance test results
show that the PM emissions are equal to or less than half of the PM
emission limit. The owner or operator must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and monitoring requirements. If the initial
performance test results show that the PM emissions are greater than
half of the PM emission limit, the owner or operator must conduct
subsequent performance tests as specified in 40 CFR 63.11220(a).
We are clarifying in 40 CFR 63.11220(d) that existing affected
boilers that have not operated since the previous compliance
demonstration must complete their subsequent compliance demonstration
no later than 180 days after the re-start of the affected boiler.
4. Fuel Analysis
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11220 to specify in paragraph (c)
that the owner or operator of an affected coal-fired boiler does not
need to conduct further fuel analysis sampling if, when demonstrating
initial compliance with the Hg emission limit, the Hg constituents in
the fuel or fuel
[[Page 7496]]
mixture are measured to be equal to or less than half of the Hg
emission limit. The owner or operator must continue to comply with all
applicable operating limits and monitoring requirements.
When demonstrating initial compliance with the Hg emission limit,
if the Hg constituents in the fuel or fuel mixture are greater than
half of the Hg emission limit, the owner or operator must conduct
quarterly sampling.
5. Averaging Times
The EPA is amending the averaging time for parameter monitoring and
compliance with operating limits to a 30-day rolling average.
The EPA is revising the definitions of ``30-day rolling average''
and ``daily block average'' to exclude periods of startup and shutdown
and periods when the unit is not operating in the calculation of the
arithmetic mean.
6. Monitoring Data
The EPA is clarifying in 40 CFR 63.11221 the monitoring data
collection requirements.
J. Periods of Startup and Shutdown
1. Definitions
The EPA is revising the definitions of ``startup'' and ``shutdown''
such that they are tailored for industrial boilers and are consistent
with the definitions of ``startup'' and ``shutdown'' in the 40 CFR part
63, subpart A General Provisions. The revised definitions reflect the
fact that industrial boilers function to provide steam or, in the case
of cogeneration units, electricity. We are defining startup as the
period between either the first-ever firing of fuel in the boiler or
the firing of fuel in the boiler after a shutdown and when the boiler
first supplies steam or heat. We are defining shutdown as the period
between either when no more steam or heat is supplied by the boiler or
no fuel is being fired in the boiler and when there is no steam and no
heat being supplied and no fuel being fired in the boiler.
2. Compliance With Operating Limits
The EPA has clarified that operating limits must be met at all
times except during periods of startup and shutdown.
3. Minimization of Startup and Shutdown Periods
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11223(g) to include biomass- and oil-
fired boilers in the requirement to minimize the time spent in startup
and shutdown periods. Specifically, the requirement is to minimize the
boiler's startup and shutdown periods and conduct startups and
shutdowns according to the manufacturer's recommended procedures. If
manufacturer's recommended procedures are not available, recommended
procedures for a unit of similar design for which manufacturer's
recommended procedures are available must be followed.
K. Affirmative Defense Language
In this final rule, the EPA is updating the affirmative defense
provisions for malfunctions that were included in the March 21, 2011,
final rule. We have made certain changes to 40 CFR 63.11226 to clarify
the circumstances under which a source may assert an affirmative
defense. The changes clarify that a source may assert an affirmative
defense to a claim for civil penalties for violations of standards that
are caused by malfunctions. A source can avail itself of the
affirmative defense when there has been a violation of the emission
standards due to an event that meets the definition of malfunction
under 40 CFR 63.2 and qualifies for assertion of an affirmative defense
under 40 CFR 63.11226. In the March 2011 final rule, we used terms such
as ``exceedance'' or ``excess emissions'' in 40 CFR 63.11226, which
created unnecessary confusion as to when the affirmative defense could
be used. In this final rule, we have eliminated those terms and used
the word ``violation'' to make clear that the affirmative defense to
civil penalties is available only where an event that causes a
violation of the emissions standard meets the criteria for the
assertion of an affirmative defense under 40 CFR 63.11226.
This final rule requires that to establish the affirmative defense
the owner must prove by a preponderance of evidence that repairs were
made as expeditiously as possible when a violation occurs. We have re-
evaluated the language concerning the use of off-shift and overtime
labor, to the extent practicable, to make the repairs and believe that
the language is not necessary. Thus, the language has been eliminated
from this final rule.
We have also eliminated the 2-day notification requirement that was
included in 40 CFR 63.11226(b) of the March 2011 final rule because we
expect to receive sufficient notification of malfunction events that
result in violations in other required compliance reports as specified
under 40 CFR 63.11225. In addition, we have revised the 45-day
affirmative defense reporting requirement that was included in 40 CFR
63.11226(b) of the March 2011 final rule. This final rule requires
sources to include the report in the first compliance, deviation or
excess emission report due after the initial occurrence of the
violation, unless the compliance, deviation or excess emission report
is due less than 45 days after the violation. In that case, the
affirmative defense report may be included in the second compliance,
deviation or excess emission report due after the initial occurrence of
the violation. Because the affirmative defense report is now included
in a subsequent compliance, deviation or excess emission report, there
is no longer a need for the 30-day extension for submitting a stand-
alone affirmative defense report. Consequently, we are not including
that provision in this final rule.
L. Notification, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11225(a)(2) to specify that existing
affected boilers have until January 20, 2014 to submit their Initial
Notification.
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11225(c)(2) to specify that records
of fuel use and type are required only for boilers that are subject to
numerical emission limits. We are also amending 40 CFR 63.11223(b) to
clarify that the type and amount of fuel needs to be included in
reports only if the boiler was physically and legally capable of using
more than one type of fuel during that time period and that the report
should include concentrations of CO and oxygen, measured at high fire
or typical operating load, before and after the tune-up of the boiler.
Finally, we are specifying that for units sharing a fuel meter, the
fuel use by each boiler may be estimated.
The EPA is amending 40 CFR 63.11225(b) to clarify the requirements
for submitting a biennial or 5-year report for units that are only
subject to tune-up requirements and to specify the information that
must be included in the annual, biennial, or 5-year compliance report.
We are amending 40 CFR 63.11225(c)(2) to specify, as applicable,
that a copy of the energy assessment, records documenting the days of
operation for each boiler that meets the definition of a seasonal
boiler, and a copy of the federally enforceable permit for each boiler
that meets the definition of a limited-use boiler must be maintained.
We are revising 40 CFR 63.11225(d) to remove the requirement that
the most recent 2 years of records be maintained on site and are adding
language that allows for computer access or other means of immediate
access of records stored in a centralized location.
[[Page 7497]]
We are adding a new paragraph 40 CFR 63.11225(g) to require that
boilers that switch fuels, make a physical change, or take a permit
limit that results in the applicability of a different subcategory
within subpart JJJJJJ, a switch out of subpart JJJJJJ, or the
applicability of subpart JJJJJJ must provide notification within 30
days of the fuel switch, physical change, or permit limit. 40 CFR
63.11225(g) also specifies what information the notification must
include.
M. Title V Permitting Requirements
For the reasons stated in our March 21, 2011, final rule (76 FR
15554) as well as our reconsideration proposal (76 FR 80532, December
23, 2011), the EPA is not making any changes to the title V exemption
for area sources. Thus, no area sources subject to subpart JJJJJJ are
required to obtain a title V permit as a result of being subject to
subpart JJJJJJ.
Facilities that are synthetic area sources for HAP under subpart
JJJJJJ may already be covered by a title V permit or may be required to
obtain a title V permit in the future for a reason other than subpart
JJJJJJ. For example, area source boilers could be major sources of non-
HAP pollutants or could be located at sources that are subject to title
V. Thus, the title V exemption in subpart JJJJJJ does not affect
whether or not these area sources under subpart JJJJJJ are otherwise
required to obtain a permit under part 70 or part 71. See 40 CFR
70.3(a) and (b) or 71.3(a) and (b).
N. Definition of Period of Gas Curtailment or Supply Interruption
We are amending the definition of ``period of natural gas
curtailment or supply interruption'' in 40 CFR 63.11237 to clarify that
a curtailment does not include normal market fluctuations in the price
of gas that are not associated with periods of supplier delivery
restrictions. We are also amending the definition to indicate that
periods of supply interruption that are beyond control of the facility
can also include on-site natural gas system emergencies and equipment
failures, and that legitimate periods of supply interruption are not
limited to off-site circumstances. We are revising the term and the
definition so that it includes the curtailment of any gaseous fuel, and
is not limited to just natural gas. Finally, we are clarifying that the
supply of gaseous fuel is to an ``affected boiler'' rather than
``affected facility'' and that the supply of gaseous fuel is
``restricted or halted'' for reasons beyond the control of the
facility. The definition is amended to read as follows:
Period of gas curtailment or supply interruption means a period
of time during which the supply of gaseous fuel to an affected
boiler is restricted or halted for reasons beyond the control of the
facility. The act of entering into a contractual agreement with a
supplier of natural gas established for curtailment purposes does
not constitute a reason that is under the control of a facility for
the purposes of this definition. An increase in the cost or unit
price of natural gas due to normal market fluctuations not during
periods of supplier delivery restriction does not constitute a
period of natural gas curtailment or supply interruption. On-site
gaseous fuel system emergencies or equipment failures qualify as
periods of supply interruption when the emergency or failure is
beyond the control of the facility.
O. Miscellaneous Technical Corrections
In addition to the above summary of the EPA's final action
regarding provisions identified for reconsideration and on other
discrete matters identified in response to comments or data received
during the comment period, other definitional and regulatory text
revisions are being made. These clarifications will help affected
sources determine their applicability and better understand the rule
requirements. In some instances, definitions and regulatory text have
been revised or added to correspond with other related rules,
especially the emission standards for industrial, commercial, and
institutional boilers at major sources of HAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
DDDDD). Section IV of this preamble includes additional details
regarding these miscellaneous technical corrections.
P. Other Issues
40 CFR 63.11196(a)(1) of the March 21, 2011, final rule (76 FR
15554) requires that owners and operators of existing affected boilers
subject to the tune-up requirement complete the initial boiler tune-up
by March 21, 2012. In addition, 40 CFR 63.11225(a)(4) requires that
owners and operators of existing affected boilers subject to the tune-
up requirement submit their Notification of Compliance Status no later
than 120 days after the applicable compliance date specified in 40 CFR
63.11196. That means that those owners and operators were required to
submit their Notification of Compliance Status by July 19, 2012. The
Notification must include, among other information, a certification
that states ``This facility complies with the requirements in Sec.
63.11214 to conduct an initial tune-up of the boiler.''
On March 13, 2012, the EPA issued a No Action Assurance (NAA) to
all owners and/or operators of existing industrial boilers and
commercial and institutional boilers at area sources of HAP emissions
stating that we would not enforce the requirement to conduct an initial
tune-up by March 21, 2012. The NAA was primarily based upon the EPA's
concern that sources were reporting a shortage of qualified individuals
to prepare boilers for tune-ups and then conduct those tune-ups by the
regulatory deadline, as well as upon the uncertainty in the regulated
community resulting from the pending reconsideration of the Area Source
Boiler Rule. The March 13, 2012, NAA states that it remains in effect
until either (1) 11:59 p.m. EDT, October 1, 2012, or (2) the effective
date of a final rule addressing the proposed reconsideration of the
Area Source Boiler Rule, whichever occurs earlier.
As the July 19, 2012, Notification of Compliance Status deadline
approached, a final rule addressing the proposed reconsideration of the
Area Source Boiler Rule had not been issued, and thus the NAA continued
to remain in effect. Nothing that the EPA learned since the issuance of
the original NAA letter led us to question our original concerns about
the feasibility of all sources timely completing an initial tune-up.
Further, sources that did not complete a tune-up could not certify that
they conducted one. Thus, on July 18, 2012, the EPA extended the NAA
for sources required to complete an initial tune-up by March 21, 2012,
to also include the deadline for submitting the Notification of
Compliance Status regarding the initial tune-up. In addition, given
that no final rule addressing the proposed reconsideration of the Area
Source Boiler Rule had been issued as of July 18, 2012, the pending
reconsideration continued to create uncertainty in the regulated
community. Thus, the NAA letter also amended the expiration date of the
March 13, 2012, NAA, such that the NAA would remain in effect until
either (1) 11:59 p.m. EST, December 31, 2012, or (2) the effective date
of a final rule addressing the proposed reconsideration of the Area
Source Boiler Rule, whichever occurs earlier.
This final rule revises the compliance date for existing affected
boilers subject to a tune-up from March 21, 2012, to March 21, 2014.
The July 19, 2012, deadline for submitting the Notification of
Compliance Status regarding the initial tune-up is reset to July 19,
2014, as a result of revising the compliance date for existing affected
boilers subject to a tune-up to March 21, 2014. Owners or operators
that had not yet conducted their boiler tune-up, but submitted a
Notification of Compliance Status by July 19, 2012, simply to notify
the EPA
[[Page 7498]]
that the tune-up had not been completed, will need to submit a revised
Notification of Compliance Status after their boiler tune-up is
conducted.
IV. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposed Action on
Reconsideration
Numerous changes are being made to the March 2011 final rule based
on the public comments received. Most of the changes are editorial to
clarify applicability and implementation issues raised by the
commenters. The public comments received on the proposed changes and
the responses to them can be viewed in the memorandum ``Summary of
Public Comments and Responses for: National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and
Institutional Boilers'' located in the docket.
A. Applicability
Since proposal, changes to the applicability of this final rule
have been made.
1. Dual-Fuel Fired Boilers
The March 2011 final rule includes as a new affected source a
boiler that commences fuel switching from natural gas to solid fossil
fuel, biomass, or liquid fuel after June 4, 2010. For example, under
the March 2011 final rule, if an unaffected gas-fired boiler currently
burns oil as allowed under the definition of gas-fired boiler, but
after June 4, 2010 burns oil for reasons not allowed under the
definition of gas-fired, these boilers would become new affected oil-
fired units. The December 2011 reconsideration action did not propose
any revisions to the provisions regarding boilers that fuel switch
after June 4, 2010. However, the EPA has been made aware through public
comments that many dual-fuel fired units presently burn primarily
natural gas with limited or no amounts of oil, and that these units may
want to burn oil in the future for reasons not allowed under subpart
JJJJJJ's definition of gas-fired (e.g. cost). Under the March 2011
final rule, such an existing dual-fuel gas-fired boiler that wanted to
avoid being subject to the new source requirements would notify as an
existing oil-fired unit and be subject to the requirements for existing
oil-fired boilers.
We received public comments regarding rule applicability and
compliance requirements for these existing dual-fuel fired boilers. One
commenter asserted that regardless of the fuel capability identified in
an initial notification, the distinction between a new source and an
existing source should only be made based upon a source's capability to
burn a particular fuel as of the effective date of the rule. The
commenter explained that many facilities have boilers that can burn
either gas or liquid and, because the price of gas is currently lower
than the price of most liquid fuels, they likely are currently firing
gas during normal operation, with liquid being fired only during
periods of curtailment. The commenter pointed out that, in the future,
the price of liquid fuel may be lower than the price of gaseous fuel,
and facilities may want to preferentially burn liquid fuel over gas
fuel. The commenter asserted that a change in the fuel from the initial
notification should not, in and of itself, reclassify a source as a new
source for purposes of subpart JJJJJJ. Further, the commenter asserted
that their interpretation is comparable to the fuel switching
provisions in the EPA's NSPS and PSD regulations. The same commenter
asserted that if a source already has oil or alternate fuel capability,
then that source would not be commencing construction or making a
change to the source. The commenter explained that many of these
facilities with boilers capable of burning fuel oil as a back-up for
natural gas may not have submitted an initial notification since
gaseous fuel-fired boilers that only burn liquid during periods of
curtailment are not covered by the Area Source Boiler Rule. The
commenter maintained the EPA's guidance, that a dual-fuel fired boiler
that fails to file an initial notification and then plans to burn oil
in the future would be considered to be a new source, appears to be
contrary to regulatory text stating that an affected source is a new
source if construction or reconstruction of the affected source is
commenced after June 4, 2010 and the applicability criteria are met at
the time construction is commenced. The commenter suggested that the
EPA clarify that to become a new source, the source must be altered to
be capable of accommodating a new fuel, so that new sources are not
created simply by failing to submit an initial notification or a notice
of fuel switching for a unit that is already capable of accommodating
that fuel. Another commenter explained that owners and operators of
dual-fuel fired boilers anticipate firing natural gas for many years to
come, or until gas supply is temporarily curtailed outside of their
control or until such a time when fuel oil becomes more cost effective
to burn than gas. The commenter asserted that, based on common sense
and increased flexibility, these dual-fuel fired boilers normally
burning gas could not be considered subject to any oil-fired
requirements as long as they continue to fire only gas, except under
the regulation's stated exemptions for burning oil.
In addition to carefully considering the public comments received
regarding dual-fuel fired boilers, the EPA reconsidered its overall
intent with regard to existing dual-fuel fired boilers that fuel switch
after June 4, 2010. Consequently, in this final rule, we are revising
the provisions regarding existing boilers that fuel switch after June
4, 2010. This final rule amends 40 CFR 63.11194 to specify that an
existing dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced construction or
reconstruction on or before June 4, 2010) meeting the definition of
gas-fired boiler, as defined in 40 CFR 63.11237, that meets the
applicability requirements of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010 due to
a fuel switch from gaseous fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or
liquid fuel is considered to be an existing source under this subpart
as long as the boiler was designed to accommodate the alternate fuel. A
new or reconstructed dual-fuel fired boiler (i.e., commenced
construction or reconstruction after June 4, 2010) meeting the
definition of gas-fired boiler, as defined in 40 CFR 63.11237, that
meets the applicability criteria of subpart JJJJJJ after June 4, 2010
due to a fuel switch from gaseous fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass,
or liquid fuel is considered to be a new source under this subpart.
This revision maintains consistency with the rule's applicability
criteria for determining new versus existing sources, eliminates the
requirement that existing dual-fuel fired boilers notify as affected
sources although, at the time, they are not subject to subpart JJJJJJ,
and promotes flexibility in that these existing dual-fuel fired sources
that were designed to accommodate an alternate fuel may fire the
alternate fuel and move into subpart JJJJJJ without being subject to
the more stringent requirements for new boilers.
2. Residential Boilers
One commenter suggested that the definition of ``residential
boiler,'' as proposed, be revised to acknowledge the use of combined
heat and power systems which function with heat and/or hot water
systems. The EPA agrees and is amending the proposed definition to
clarify that a boiler that operates as part of a residential combined
heat and power system (and that meets other definitional requirements)
is a residential boiler. Another commenter explained that
[[Page 7499]]
historical buildings may be subdivided into more than four units but
boilers serving those units should still be considered residential
boilers. We agree and, in this final rule, are amending the proposed
definition to clarify that a boiler serving a single unit residence
dwelling that has since been converted or subdivided into condominiums
or apartments may also be considered a residential boiler.
3. Temporary Boilers
One commenter supported the EPA's 12-month threshold above which
the boiler would no longer be considered temporary but pointed out that
a boiler used on a temporary basis during construction of a commercial
building may be needed for more than 12 months due to the length of the
construction period. The commenter suggested that the definition of
temporary boiler, as proposed, be revised to allow owners or operators
to petition for an extension beyond 12 months. We agree with the
commenter and, in this final rule, are amending the proposed definition
to allow an owner or operator to submit to their regulatory agency a
petition for an extension beyond 12 months. Another commenter suggested
that the EPA expand on the intent of ``location'' in the definition of
``temporary boiler.'' We are amending the proposed definition to
clarify that ``location'' means ``location within the facility.'' This
clarification will allow a boiler to be moved from one location to
another within a facility and be considered a different temporary
boiler (i.e., a new time period begins) as long as the boiler does not
continue to perform the same or similar function and to serve the same
electricity, steam, and/or hot water system. Another commenter pointed
out that our definition, as proposed, does not specify a time period
associated with the statement ``Any temporary boiler that replaces a
temporary boiler at a location within the facility and performs the
same or similar function will be included in calculating the
consecutive time period.'' The commenter explained that it is not
unusual for a temporary boiler to be used for short periods during
turnarounds or other maintenance activities that recur several years
apart. Under the proposal, these boilers would not be considered
temporary because each boiler replaces the previous one and performs
the same function, even though there is a multi-year gap between the
occurrences. The commenter suggested that replacements that occur after
a gap of at least one year should not be considered consecutive for the
purposes of the definition. We agree with the commenter and are
amending numbered paragraph (2) in the proposed definition of
``temporary boiler'' such that it specifies that ``Any temporary boiler
that replaces a temporary boiler at a location within the facility and
performs the same or similar function will be included in calculating
the consecutive time period unless there is a gap in operation of 12
months or more.''.
4. Seasonal Boilers
Several commenters explained that boilers subject to semi-annual
testing requirements would not meet the proposed 7 consecutive month
shutdown criteria, but otherwise would be considered seasonal boilers.
Commenters suggested that seasonal boiler be defined to allow periodic
testing during the 7-month shutdown period. We agree with the
commenters and, in this final rule, are revising the proposed
definition of seasonal boiler to allow for a combined total of 15 days
of use during the shutdown period for periodic testing.
Another commenter pointed out that the EPA's seasonal boiler
definition, as proposed, would potentially allow more regular use. The
commenter specifically suggested that the proposed definition be
revised to clarify that there must be a 7 consecutive month shutdown
every 12 months. It was the EPA's intent that the shutdown period of at
least 7 consecutive months be on a 12-month basis. In response to this
comment, we are clarifying in the definition of seasonal boiler that
the shutdown must be for a period of at least 7 consecutive months (or
210 consecutive days) each 12-month period.
5. Limited-Use Boilers
Several commenters asserted that the EPA should also include a
limited-use subcategory in the area source rule for the same reasons we
determined a seasonal boiler subcategory was appropriate. Commenters
suggested that we should apply the same 5-year tune-up cycle for
limited-use units such as auxiliary boilers that we proposed for
seasonally-operated units and small oil-fired units. Commenters
explained that in the electric utility industry, auxiliary boilers are
typically used to generate the steam necessary to bring a main EGU on
line during startup and, since auxiliary boilers are primarily operated
during unit startup, operation for many of these boilers is typically
very limited and sporadic. Commenters also pointed out that the Major
Source Boiler Rule includes a limited-use subcategory.
The EPA has determined that a limited-use subcategory is
appropriate and is including a limited-use subcategory in this final
Area Source Boiler Rule. Specifically, a limited-use boiler is defined
in this final rule to mean any boiler that burns any amount of solid or
liquid fuels and has a federally enforceable average annual capacity
factor of no more than 10 percent. We are using a capacity-factor
approach for the same reasons that the approach is being used in the
Major Source Boiler Rule. A capacity-factor approach allows operational
flexibility for units that operate on standby mode or low loads for
periods longer than would be allowed under an approach that limited
hours of operation (e.g., the 876 hours per year included in the
proposed limited-use definition for major source boilers). The
operational flexibility associated with a capacity-factor approach can
be achieved without increasing emissions or harm to human health and
the environment. Units operating at 10 percent load for 8,760 hours per
year would emit the same amount of emissions as units operating at full
load for 876 hours per year. Further, it is technically infeasible to
test these limited-use boilers since these units serve as back-up
energy sources and their operating schedules can be intermittent and
unpredictable.
This final rule specifies that limited-use boilers are required to
complete a tune-up every 5 years. Boilers that operate no more than 10
percent of the year (i.e., a limited-use boiler) would operate for no
more than 6 months in between tune-ups on a 5-year tune-up cycle. The
brief period of operations is even less than the number of operating
months that seasonal boilers and full-time boilers will operate between
tune-ups. The irregular schedule of operations also makes it difficult
to schedule more frequent tune-ups. We believe that establishing a
limited-use subcategory is reasonable.
6. Alternative PM Emission Control for Certain Oil-Fired Boilers
The EPA received a number of comments urging that we provide an
exemption from the PM limit for units burning low-sulfur liquid fuel as
is provided in subpart Dc of 40 CFR part 60 (standards of performance
for new small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating
units). Commenters asserted that such an exemption is justified since
the low sulfur content indicates low PM emissions and that boilers
firing low-sulfur liquid fuel should only be subject to a requirement
to maintain records documenting the liquid fuel fired. We agree burning
low-sulfur liquid fuel can be an alternative method of meeting GACT for
PM. We are amending 40 CFR
[[Page 7500]]
63.11210 to specify that new or reconstructed oil-fired boilers that
combust only oil that contains no more than 0.50 weight percent sulfur
or a mixture of 0.50 weight percent sulfur oil with other fuels not
subject to a PM emission limit under this subpart and that do not use a
post-combustion technology (except a wet scrubber) to reduce PM or
sulfur dioxide emissions meet GACT for PM providing the type of fuel
combusted is monitored and recorded on a monthly basis. Further, we are
specifying that if you intend to burn a new type of fuel or fuel
mixture that does not meet the requirements of this paragraph, you must
conduct a performance test within 60 days of burning the new fuel.
B. Tune-Up Requirements
1. Boilers With Oxygen Trim Systems
In this final rule, the EPA is adding to the types of boilers that
must conduct a tune-up every 5 years boilers that have an oxygen trim
system that maintain an optimum air-to-fuel ratio that would otherwise
be subject to biennial tune-ups. These units do not need to be tuned as
frequently as other types of boilers because the trim system is
designed to maintain an optimum air-to-fuel ratio which is the purpose
of a tune-up.
2. Initial Compliance for Existing Boilers
The EPA is revising the initial compliance date for existing
boilers subject to the work practice or management practice standard of
a tune-up. Under the proposed rule, owners and operators of existing
affected boilers would have had to comply with the final rule by March
21, 2013. We solicited comments on whether to extend the compliance
date to March 21, 2014. We received no comments objecting to either of
these dates. Support for an extension until 2014 came from a variety of
stakeholders affected by the rule. Therefore, this final rule requires
that if you own or operate an existing boiler subject to a work
practice or management practice standard of a tune-up, you must comply
with the final rule no later than March 21, 2014.
3. Compliance Demonstration
We solicited comment on the requirements for demonstrating
compliance with the work practice and management practice tune-up
standards, with one focus on clarifying how to measure CO. Commenters
requested that we clarify that CO measurements may be taken with a
portable CO analyzer. We agree that this clarification is appropriate
and are including this clarification in this final rule.
C. Energy Assessment
The EPA received a number of comments regarding the energy
assessment requirements and in this final rule is making a series of
changes to the energy assessment provisions and related definitions
that clarify terms used and better set the scope of the assessment.
In this final rule, we are revising the definition of energy
assessment by providing a duration for performing the energy assessment
for numbered paragraph (3) in the definition of ``energy assessment''
in 40 CFR 63.11237 for facilities with units with greater than 1 TBtu/
yr heat input capacity to specify time duration/size ratio and are
including a cap to the maximum number of on-site technical hours that
should be used in the energy assessment. The energy assessment for
facilities with affected boilers and process heaters with greater than
1.0 TBtu/yr heat input capacity will be up to 24 on-site technical
labor hours in length for the first TBtu/yr plus 8 technical labor
hours for every additional 1.0 TBtu/yr not to exceed 160 technical
hours, but may be longer at the discretion of the owner or operator.
The revised definition of energy assessment also clarifies our
intentions that the scope of assessment is based on energy use by
discrete segments of a facility, which could vary significantly
depending on the site and its complexity, and not by a total
aggregation of all individual energy using elements of a facility. We
are adding the following language, as paragraph (4), to the ``energy
assessment'' definition to help resolve current problems and allow for
more streamlined assessments:
``(4) The on-site energy use systems serving as the basis for the
percent of affected boiler(s) energy output in paragraphs (1), (2), and
(3) of this definition may be segmented by production area or energy
use area as most logical and applicable to the specific facility being
assessed (e.g., product X manufacturing area; product Y drying area;
Building Z).''
In this final rule, we are revising 40 CFR 63.11201 and Table 2 to
subpart JJJJJJ to allow a source that is operating under an energy
management program established through energy management systems
compatible with ISO 50001, that includes the affected boilers, by March
21, 2014, to satisfy the energy assessment requirement. In addition, we
are clarifying that energy assessor approval and qualification
requirements are waived in instances where an energy assessment
completed on or after January 1, 2008 meets or is amended to meet the
energy assessment requirements in this final rule by March 21.
The definition of ``boiler system'' is being revised in this final
rule to clarify that it means the boiler and associated components
directly connected to and serving the energy use systems.
The definition of ``energy use system'' is also being revised in
this final rule to clarify that energy use systems are only those on-
site systems using energy clearly produced by affected boilers.
D. Clarification of Oxygen Concentration Operating Limits
We are clarifying in this final rule that operating limits for
oxygen concentration must be at or above the minimum established during
a performance stack test. We are also clarifying that these limits are
applicable when the unit is firing the fuel or fuel mixture utilized
during the CO performance test.
E. Definitions Regarding Averaging Times
The EPA received comments requesting that we clarify that periods
of startup and shutdown are excluded from calculation of the arithmetic
mean in the definitions of ``30-day rolling average'' and ``daily block
average.'' We agree with the commenters and, in this final rule, are
revising the definitions accordingly.
F. Fuel Sampling Frequency
The EPA is amending the fuel sampling requirements in 40 CFR
63.11220(c) because we realized that when performance stack testing
requirements were revised in the March 2011 final rule we neglected to
revise the fuel analysis requirements. In this final rule, we are
specifying that the owner or operator does not need to conduct further
fuel analysis sampling if, when demonstrating initial compliance with
the Hg emission limit, the Hg constituents in the fuel or fuel mixture
are measured to be equal to or less than half of the Hg emission limit.
If, when demonstrating initial compliance, the Hg constituents in the
fuel or fuel mixture are greater than half of the Hg emission limit,
the owner or operator must conduct quarterly sampling.
G. Performance Testing Frequency
The EPA is amending the PM performance testing requirements in 40
CFR 63.11220(b) to specify that the
[[Page 7501]]
owner or operator of an affected boiler does not need to conduct
further PM emission testing if, when demonstrating initial compliance
with the PM emission limit, the performance test results show that the
PM emissions are equal to or less than half of the PM emission limit.
The owner or operator must continue to comply with all applicable
operating limits and monitoring requirements. If the initial
performance test results show that the PM emissions are greater than
half of the PM emission limit, the owner or operator must conduct
subsequent performance tests as specified in 40 CFR 63.11220(a).
With respect to the reconsideration issue regarding the GACT-based
PM standards for new oil-fired boilers, we received comments asserting
that the most effective control strategy for small oil-fired boilers is
the tune-up required by the standards and that establishing a PM limit
for those boilers between 10 MMBtu/hr and 30 MMBtu/hr just ensures that
those boilers will do stack testing demonstrating that the boilers are
in compliance without the need for controls; a fact already known.
Commenters also asserted that establishing a PM limit imposes a stack
test obligation on small facilities with the least resources to deal
with the testing.
We have reviewed the comments and are not eliminating or revising
the PM limit for new oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity between
10 MMBtu/hr and 30 MMBtu/hr. We do however, believe that adjustments to
the PM performance test frequency as described above are appropriate
for boilers that demonstrate during their initial performance test that
their PM emissions are equal to or less than half of the PM limit. We
believe that the performance test adjustment should not be potentially
applicable to only new oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity
between 10 MMBtu/hr and 30 MMBtu/hr, but to all new boilers. Owners or
operators of boilers whose initial performance test results show that
their PM emissions are equal to or less than half of the PM emission
limit and, thus, do not need to conduct further PM emissions testing,
must continue to comply with all applicable operating limits and
monitoring requirements to ensure that there are no changes in
operation of the boiler or air pollution control equipment that could
increase emissions. This adjustment in PM performance test frequency
will potentially reduce the burden on small entities operating boilers
that meet the adjustment criteria.
H. Startup and Shutdown Definitions
A number of commenters indicated that the proposed load
specifications (i.e., 25 percent load) within the definitions of
``startup'' and ``shutdown'' were inconsistent with either safe or
normal (proper) operation of the various types of boilers encountered
within the source category. As the basis for defining periods of
startup and shutdown, a number of commenters suggested alternative load
specifications based on the specific considerations of their boilers;
other commenters suggested the achievement of various steady-state
conditions.
We have reviewed these comments and believe adjustments are
appropriate in the definitions of ``startup'' and ``shutdown.'' These
adjustments are tailored for industrial boilers and are consistent with
the definitions of ``startup'' and ``shutdown'' contained in the 40 CFR
part 63, subpart A General Provisions. We believe these revised
definitions address the comments and are rational based on the fact
that industrial boilers function to provide steam or, in the case of
cogeneration units, electricity. Therefore, industrial boilers should
be considered subject to applicable standards at all times steam of the
proper pressure, temperature and flow rate is being provided to a
common header system or energy user(s) for use as either process steam
or for the cogeneration of electricity. The definitions of ``startup''
and ``shutdown'' have been revised in this final rule as follows:
Startup means either the first-ever firing of fuel in a boiler
for the purpose of supplying steam or heat for heating and/or
producing electricity, or for any other purpose, or the firing of
fuel in a boiler after a shutdown event for any purpose. Startup
ends when any of the steam or heat from the boiler is supplied for
heating and/or producing electricity, or for any other purpose.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation of a boiler for any
purpose. Shutdown begins either when none of the steam or heat from
the boiler is supplied for heating and/or producing electricity, or
for any other purpose, or at the point of no fuel being fired in the
boiler, whichever is earlier. Shutdown ends when there is no steam
and no heat being supplied and no fuel being fired in the boiler.
I. Notifications
1. Initial Notification
The EPA has been made aware that there are many affected boilers at
area sources that are just becoming aware, or are not yet aware, that
they are subject to emission standards. Thus, we are amending 40 CFR
63.11225(a)(2) to allow these sources until January 20, 2014 to submit
their Initial Notification.
2. Notification of Fuel Change, Physical Change, or Permit Limit
The notification requirement in 40 CFR 63.11225(g) of the final
rule for instances when a change in fuel or a physical change to a
boiler results in the applicability of a different subcategory or a
change out of subpart JJJJJJ is being revised. Under the proposed
reconsideration action, a facility would have been required to provide
30 days prior notice of the date upon which the change was scheduled to
occur. Commenters explained that an advanced notification requirement
would delay such a change if the owner or operator decided to
immediately make a change (e.g., switch to 100 percent natural gas) and
could potentially restrict flexibility in manufacturing operations, and
suggested that the owner or operator be allowed to make notification
within 30 days after the change has occurred. We agree that
notification within 30 days after a change that results in
applicability of a different subcategory or a change out of subpart
JJJJJJ will provide the EPA or state/local agency with the required
information within a reasonable timeframe. Thus, in this final rule, we
are requiring facilities making these types of changes to provide
notification within 30 days following the change. The notification
requirement in 40 CFR 63.11225(g) is also being amended to clarify that
it includes affected boilers that switch fuels or make a physical
change to the boiler and the fuel switch or change results in the
applicability of a different subcategory within subpart JJJJJJ, in the
boiler becoming subject to subpart JJJJJJ, or in the boiler switching
out of subpart JJJJJJ due to a change to 100 percent natural gas, as
well as affected boilers that take a permit limit that results in the
applicability of subpart JJJJJJ. Commenters requested that we make this
clarification and we agree that it is appropriate.
J. Miscellaneous Definitions
In this final rule, we are revising some definitions and adding
others to help affected sources determine their applicability.
Specifically, definitions have been added for the terms ``10-day
rolling average,'' ``30-day rolling average,'' ``Annual heat input,''
``Biodiesel,'' ``Calendar year,'' ``Common stack,'' ``Daily block
average,'' ``Distillate oil,'' ``Electric boiler,'' ``Electric utility
steam generating unit (EGU),'' ``Energy management program,''
``Fluidized bed boiler,'' ``Fluidized bed combustion,'' ``Hourly
average,'' ``Limited-use boiler,'' ``Load fraction,''
[[Page 7502]]
``Minimum scrubber pressure drop,'' ``Minimum sorbent injection rate,''
``Minimum total secondary electric power,'' ``Operating day,'' ``Oxygen
analyzer system,'' ``Oxygen trim system,'' ``Process heater,''
``Regulated gas stream,'' ``Residential boiler,'' ``Residual oil,''
``Seasonal boiler,'' ``Shutdown,'' ``Solid fuel,'' ``Startup,''
``Temporary boiler,'' ``Tune-up,'' ``Vegetable oil,'' ``Voluntary
Consensus Standards (VCS),'' and ``Wet scrubber.''
Definitions revised to clarify the term include ``Bag leak
detection system,'' ``Biomass subcategory,'' ``Boiler,'' ``Boiler
system,'' ``Deviation,'' ``Dry scrubber,'' ``Electrostatic precipitator
(ESP),'' ``Energy assessment,'' ``Energy use system,'' ``Federally
enforceable,'' ``Gas-fired boiler,'' ``Heat input,'' ``Hot water
heater,'' ``Institutional boiler,'' ``Liquid fuel,'' ``Minimum
activated carbon injection rate,'' ``Minimum oxygen level,'' ``Minimum
scrubber liquid flow rate,'' ``Natural gas,'' ``Oil subcategory,''
``Particulate matter,'' ``Period of gas curtailment or supply
interruption,'' ``Qualified Energy Assessor,'' and ``Waste heat
boiler.''
V. Other Actions the EPA Is Taking
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA states that ``[o]nly an objection
to a rule or procedure which was raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment (including any public hearing) may
be raised during judicial review. If the person raising an objection
can demonstrate to the Administrator that it was impracticable to raise
such objection within such time or if the grounds for such objection
arose after the period for public comment (but within the time
specified for judicial review) and if such objection is of central
relevance to the outcome of the rule, the Administrator shall convene a
proceeding for reconsideration of the rule and provide the same
procedural rights as would have been afforded had the information been
available at the time the rule was proposed. If the Administrator
refuses to convene such a proceeding, such person may seek review of
such refusal in the United States court of appeals for the appropriate
circuit (as provided in subsection (b)).''
As to the first procedural criterion for reconsideration, a
petitioner must show why the issue could not have been presented during
the comment period, either because it was impracticable to raise the
issue during that time or because the grounds for the issue arose after
the period for public comment (but within 60 days of publication of the
final action). The EPA is denying the petitions for reconsideration of
five issues because this criterion has not been met. In many cases, the
petitions reiterate comments made on the proposed June 2010 rule during
the public comment period for that rule. On those issues, the EPA
responded to those comments in the March 2011 final rule, and made
appropriate revisions to the proposed rule after consideration of
public comments received. It is well established that an agency may
refine its proposed approach without providing an additional
opportunity for public comment. See Community Nutrition Institute v.
Block, 749 F.2d 50, 58 (DC Cir. 1984) and International Fabricare
Institute v. EPA, 972 F.2d 384, 399 (DC Cir. 1992) (notice and comment
is not intended to result in ``interminable back-and-forth[,]'' nor is
agency required to provide additional opportunity to comment on its
response to comments) and Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v.
EPA, 705 F.2d 506, 547 (DC Cir. 1983) (``notice requirement should not
force an agency endlessly to repropose a rule because of minor
changes'')
In the EPA's view, an objection is of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule only if it provides substantial support for the
argument that the promulgated regulation should be revised. See Union
Oil v. EPA, 821 F.2d 768, 683 (DC Cir. 1987) (court declined to remand
rule because petitioners failed to show substantial likelihood that
final rule would have been changed based on information in petition).
See also the EPA's Denial of the Petitions to Reconsider the
Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases
under Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, 75 FR at 49556, 49561 (August
13, 2010). See also, 75 FR at 49556, 49560-49563 (August 13, 2010) and
76 FR at 4780, 4786--4788 (January 26, 2011) for additional discussion
of the standard for reconsideration under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B).
We are denying reconsideration on the following five issues
contained in the petitions for reconsideration because they failed to
meet the standard described above for reconsideration under CAA section
307(d)(7)(B). Specifically, on these issues, the petitioner has failed
to show the following: That it was impracticable to raise their
objections during the comment period or that the grounds for their
objections arose after the close of the comment period; and/or that
their concern is of central relevance to the outcome of the rule.
Therefore, the EPA is denying the petitions for reconsideration on the
issues for the reasons described below.
Issue: Use of RDL Is Unlawful
The petitioner (Sierra Club) objected to the EPA establishing a
MACT floor emission limit at a level equal to three times the RDL as
being unlawful and arbitrary. This issue is not of central relevance to
the outcome of this final rule. The final emission limits in this rule
are based on the UPL at a confidence interval of 99 percent. The RDL
analysis was not used in this final rule.
Issue: MACT Floor for Existing Sources Must Reflect Average Performance
of the Top 12 Percent of Units
The petitioner (Sierra Club) stated that the MACT floor for
existing sources must reflect the average performance of the top 12
percent of units. The petitioner has not demonstrated that it lacked
the opportunity to comment on the EPA's MACT floor analysis. The
methods used to compute the MACT floors were subject to notice and
comment. Rationale and responses to comments on the MACT floor
methodology were provided at 75 FR 31904, June 4, 2010; 76 FR 15571,
March 21, 2011. Therefore, the EPA is denying the request for
reconsideration.
Issue: Consider a De Minimis Size Threshold
The petitioners (American Petroleum Institute, National
Petrochemical and Refiners Association, Alaska Oil and Gas Association)
requested that the EPA consider a de minimis size threshold using
guidelines from insignificance thresholds authorized under CAA part 71.
The EPA is denying the request for reconsideration on this issue. In
the June 2010 proposed rule, it was readily apparent that we were not
establishing de minimis size thresholds in the area source rulemaking.
We received multiple comments on this issue and responded to them in
the response to comments document for the March 2011 final rule. The
issue on which petitioners seek reconsideration was one that could have
been raised during the comment period and thus does not meet the
requirements for reconsideration. Therefore, the EPA is denying this
request for reconsideration.
Issue: MACT Standards Must Be Set for All HAP
The petitioner (Sierra Club) asserted that MACT standards must be
set for all HAP including HAP not listed in CAA section 112(c)(6). The
EPA is denying the request for reconsideration on this issue. We
disagree with the petitioner that the EPA must issue emission standards
for all HAP. MACT standards have been set for Hg and CO, as a
[[Page 7503]]
surrogate for POM emissions, but the EPA does not interpret CAA section
112(c)(6) to compel regulation of all HAP emitted by area sources. The
EPA's position on this issue was clear in the proposed rule (75 FR
31900, 31904, 31918). This commenter raised this issue in its comments
(76 FR 15567, March 21, 2011). Not only did the petitioner have an
opportunity to present its theory in its comments, but also it did so.
Issue: CO Is Not a Valid Surrogate for POM
The petitioner (Sierra Club) requested that the EPA remove the CO
standard as a surrogate for POM and instead adopt a numeric limit for
POM because CO is not an appropriate surrogate. The EPA is denying the
request for reconsideration on this issue. While the EPA disagrees with
the petitioner's argument regarding the suitability of CO as a
surrogate for POM, the petitioner has not demonstrated that it lacked
the opportunity to comment on this issue. The EPA revised the final CO
emission limit to ensure a more accurate correlation between POM and CO
levels. The EPA made its position on this issue clear and explained the
agency's basis for concluding that CO was an appropriate surrogate in
the proposed rule (75 FR 31900, 31904, June 4, 2010). The petitioner
raised this issue in its comments (Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790-
1982, Comments of Earthjustice, Sierra Club, Clean Air Task Force, and
Natural Resources Defense Council, p. 4). Therefore, the EPA is denying
the request for reconsideration.
VI. Impacts Associated With This Final Rule
The amendments contained in this final action are corrections that
are intended to clarify, but not change, the coverage of the final
rule. The clarifications and corrections should make it easier for
owners and operators and for local and state authorities to understand
and implement the requirements. The final amendments will not affect
the estimated emission reductions, control costs or the benefits of the
rule in substance. The amendments do not impose any additional
regulatory requirements beyond those imposed by the previously
promulgated boiler area source rule and, in fact, will result in a
decrease in the burden on small facilities as a result of the reduction
in the frequency of conducting tune-ups for seasonal boilers, limited-
use boilers, small (equal to or less than 5 MMBtu/hr) oil-fired boilers
and boilers using an oxygen trim system that maintain an optimum air-
to-fuel ratio. Additionally, the burden will be reduced on facilities
with existing large boilers that currently operate under an energy
management program established through energy management systems
compatible with ISO 50001, that includes the affected boilers, because
a one-time energy assessment will not be required. Burden will also be
reduced on facilities with affected boilers that burn low-sulfur oil
because, in lieu of needing to meet an emission limit, we consider low-
sulfur oil combustion to be GACT for PM for those boilers. This change
should allow sources currently complying with 40 CFR 60 subpart Dc to
use the same compliance approach rather than needing to monitor limits.
Further reduction in burden will occur in instances where initial
compliance demonstrations with the Hg emission limit via fuel sampling
or with the PM emission limit via performance stack testing show that
the emissions are equal to or less than half the respective emission
limit because no further sampling or testing of those boilers will be
required.
As discussed in section III, the Hg emission limits for new and
existing large (10 MMBtu/hr or greater) coal-fired area source boilers
were revised because of an error discovered in the analysis conducted
for the final rule. This technical correction resulted in an increase
in the emission limit for Hg. As explained in the December 2011
proposal, we also revised our impacts analysis to be consistent with
emission factor changes made to the Major Source Boiler Rule. The
baseline emissions for area sources are calculated using the emission
factors developed for the Major Source Boiler Rule because of
insufficient data for area sources. Emission factor changes resulted in
a higher baseline emission for Hg from coal-fired area source boilers.
Consequently, the result of the increase in both baseline Hg emissions
and Hg emission limits is that the overall reduction in Hg emissions
does not change significantly from the estimated reduction for the
promulgated rule.
In summary, as compared to the control costs estimated for the
March 2011 final rule, this final rule will not result in any
meaningful change in the capital and annual cost due to the increase in
emission limits and the decrease in burden on small facilities.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), this action is a ``significant regulatory action''
because it is likely to raise novel legal or policy issues.
Accordingly, the EPA submitted this action to the OMB for review under
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011), and any changes made in response to OMB recommendations have
been documented in the docket for this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden. This
action results in no significant changes to the information collection
requirements of the promulgated rule and will have no increased impact
on the information collection estimate of projected cost and hour
burden made and approved by OMB. In fact, the reduction in tune-up
frequency for some boilers will result in less information collection
burden. Therefore, the information collection request has not been
revised. However, the OMB has previously approved the information
collection requirements contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR
part 63, subpart JJJJJJ) under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. and has assigned OMB control
number 2060-0668. The OMB control numbers for the EPA's regulations in
40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.\2\
[[Page 7504]]
The RFA also allows an agency to ``consider a series of closely related
rules as one rule for the purposes of sections'' 603 (initial
regulatory flexibility analysis) and 604 (final regulatory flexibility
analysis) in order to avoid ``duplicative action.'' 5 U.S.C. section
605(c). These amendments and notice of final action on reconsideration
are closely related to the final Area Source Boiler Rule, which the EPA
signed on February 21, 2011, and that took effect on May 20, 2011. The
EPA prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis in connection with
the final Area Source Boiler Rule. Therefore, pursuant to section
605(c), the EPA is not required to complete a final regulatory
flexibility analysis for this rule (i.e., the amendments and final
action).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Small entities include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of
assessing the impacts of this final rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined by the Small
Business Administration size standards for small businesses at 13
CFR 121.201 (less than 500, 750, or 1,000 employees, depending on
the specific NAICS Code under subcategory 325); (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county,
town, school district or special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA has been concerned with potential small entity impacts
since it began developing the Area Source Boiler Rule. The EPA
conducted outreach to small entities and, pursuant to section 609 of
RFA, convened a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (the Panel) on
January 22, 2009, to obtain advice and recommendations from small
entity representatives. Pursuant to the RFA, the EPA used the Panel's
report and prepared both an initial regulatory flexibility analysis and
a final regulatory flexibility analysis in connection with the closely
related final Area Source Boiler Rule. Convening an additional Panel
and preparing an additional final regulatory flexibility analysis would
be procedurally duplicative and is unnecessary given that the issues
here are within the scope of those considered by the Panel. Finally, we
note that this action, which amends the Area Source Boiler Rule, will
not impose any additional regulatory requirements beyond those imposed
by the previously promulgated Area Source Boiler Rule and, in fact, the
amendments will afford relief to some boilers.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no new federal mandates under the provisions
of Title II of the UMRA of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 for state, local,
or tribal governments or the private sector. This action imposes no new
enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. Therefore, this action is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This rule finalizes
amendments to aid with compliance.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This final rule will not impose new
direct compliance costs on state or local governments, and will not
preempt state law. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this
action.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It will not have
substantial new direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) as applying to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is based solely on
technology performance.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. We estimate no significant changes for
the energy sector for price, production, or imports.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA of 1995, Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA to use VCS in its regulatory
activities, unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law
or otherwise impractical. VCS are technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. NTTAA directs
the EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the agency
decides not use available and applicable VCS.
This action does not involve any new technical standards.
Therefore, the EPA did not consider the use of any VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because the level of
protection provided to human health or the environment through the
rule's requirements does not vary. Therefore, it does not have any
disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental
effects on any population, including any minority or low-income
population.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to
[[Page 7505]]
publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A Major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is a reconsideration of a previous action that
was a major rule under the CRA. However, today's action makes only
certain limited revisions to the March 2011 rule and those revisions do
not qualify as a major rule under the CRA. Therefore, this action is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be
effective February 1, 2013.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference.
Dated: December 20, 2012.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part
63 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
2. Section 63.14 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b)(19), (b)(23), (b)(35), (b)(40), (b)(69), and
(b)(70).
0
b. Removing and reserving paragraph (b)(53).
0
c. Adding paragraphs (b)(46), (b)(55), and (b)(76) through (83).
0
d. Adding paragraphs (p)(12) through (20).
0
e. Adding paragraph (r).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 63.14 Incorporations by reference.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(19) ASTM D95-05 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for Water
in Petroleum Products and Bituminous Materials by Distillation,
approved May 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(23) ASTM D4006-11, Standard Test Method for Water in Crude Oil by
Distillation, including Annex A1 and Appendix X1, approved June 1,
2011, IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(35) ASTM D6784-02 (Reapproved 2008) Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
approved April 1, 2008, IBR approved for table 1 to subpart DDDDD of
this part, table 2 to subpart DDDDD of this part, table 5 to subpart
DDDDD, table 11 to subpart DDDDD of this part, table 12 to subpart
DDDDD of this part, table 13 to subpart DDDDD of this part, and table 4
to subpart JJJJJJ of this part.
* * * * *
(40) ASTM D396-10 Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, approved
October 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. 63.7575 and Sec. 6311237.
* * * * *
(46) ASTM D4606-03(2007), Standard Test Method for Determination of
Arsenic and Selenium in Coal by the Hydride Generation/Atomic
Absorption Method, approved October 1, 2007, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(55) ASTM D6357-11, Test Methods for Determination of Trace
Elements in Coal, Coke, and Combustion Residues from Coal Utilization
Processes by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry,
approved April 1, 2011, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(69) ASTM D4057-06 (Reapproved 2011), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including Annex A1,
approved June 1, 2011, IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(70) ASTM D4177-95 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including
Annexes A1 through A6 and Appendices X1 and X2, approved May 1, 2010,
IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(76) ASTM D6751-11b, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel
Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, approved July 15, 2011,
IBR approved for Sec. 63.7575 and Sec. 63.11237.
(77) ASTM D975-11b, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
approved December 1, 2011, IBR approved for Sec. 63.7575.
(78) ASTM D5864-11 Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic
Aquatic Biodegradation of Lubricants or Their Components, approved
March 1, 2011, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(79) ASTM D240-09 Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, approved July 1, 2009,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(80) ASTM D4208-02(2007) Standard Test Method for Total Chlorine in
Coal by the Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Ion Selective Electrode Method,
approved May 1, 2007, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(81) ASTM D5192-09 Standard Practice for Collection of Coal Samples
from Core, approved June 1, 2009, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(82) ASTM D7430-11ae1, Standard Practice for Mechanical Sampling of
Coal, approved October 1, 2011, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(83) ASTM D6883-04, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Stationary Coal from Railroad Cars, Barges, Trucks, or Stockpiles,
approved June 1, 2004, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(12) Method 5050 (SW-846-5050), Bomb Preparation Method for Solid
Waste, Revision 0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(13) Method 9056 (SW-846-9056), Determination of Inorganic Anions
by Ion Chromatography, Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication
No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(14) Method 9076 (SW-846-9076), Test Method for Total Chlorine in
New and Used Petroleum Products by Oxidative Combustion and
Microcoulometry, Revision 0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-
846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(15) Method 1631 Revision E, Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge
and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Fluorescence Spectrometry,
Revision E, EPA-821-R-02-019, August 2002, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(16) Method 200.8, Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and
Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma--Mass Spectrometry, Revision 5.4,
1994, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(17) Method 6020A (SW-846-6020A), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry, Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
[[Page 7506]]
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(18) Method 6010C (SW-846-6010C), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometry, Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA Publication
No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(19) Method 7060A (SW-846-7060A), Arsenic (Atomic Absorption,
Furnace Technique), Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA Publication No.
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(20) Method 7740 (SW-846-7740), Selenium (Atomic Absorption,
Furnace Technique), Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA Publication No.
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
* * * * *
(r) The following material is available for purchase from the
Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI), 15
Technology Parkway South, Norcross, GA 30092, (800) 332-8686, https://www.tappi.org.
(1) TAPPI T 266, Determination of Sodium, Calcium, Copper, Iron,
and Manganese in Pulp and Paper by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Reaffirmation of T 266 om-02), Draft No. 2, July 2006, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) [Reserved]
Subpart JJJJJJ--[AMENDED]
0
3. Section 63.11194 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (c) and
(d), by redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (f) and by adding new
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11194 What is the affected source of this subpart?
(a) * * *
(1) The affected source of this subpart is the collection of all
existing industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers within a
subcategory, as listed in Sec. 63.11200 and defined in Sec. 63.11237,
located at an area source.
* * * * *
(c) An affected source is a new source if you commenced
construction of the affected source after June 4, 2010, and the boiler
meets the applicability criteria at the time you commence construction.
(d) An affected source is a reconstructed source if the boiler
meets the reconstruction criteria as defined in Sec. 63.2, you
commenced reconstruction after June 4, 2010, and the boiler meets the
applicability criteria at the time you commence reconstruction.
(e) An existing dual-fuel fired boiler meeting the definition of
gas-fired boiler, as defined in Sec. 63.11237, that meets the
applicability requirements of this subpart after June 4, 2010 due to a
fuel switch from gaseous fuel to solid fossil fuel, biomass, or liquid
fuel is considered to be an existing source under this subpart as long
as the boiler was designed to accommodate the alternate fuel.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 63.11195 is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (c) and (g) and by adding paragraphs (h) through (k) to read
as follows:
Sec. 63.11195 Are any boilers not subject to this subpart?
The types of boilers listed in paragraphs (a) through (k) of this
section are not subject to this subpart and to any requirements in this
subpart.
* * * * *
(c) A boiler required to have a permit under section 3005 of the
Solid Waste Disposal Act or covered by subpart EEE of this part (e.g.,
hazardous waste boilers), unless such units do not combust hazardous
waste and combust comparable fuels.
* * * * *
(g) Any boiler that is used as a control device to comply with
another subpart of this part, or part 60, part 61, or part 65 of this
chapter provided that at least 50 percent of the average annual heat
input during any 3 consecutive calendar years to the boiler is provided
by regulated gas streams that are subject to another standard.
(h) Temporary boilers as defined in this subpart.
(i) Residential boilers as defined in this subpart.
(j) Electric boilers as defined in this subpart.
(k) An electric utility steam generating unit (EGU) covered by
subpart UUUUU of this part.
0
5. Section 63.11196 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.11196 What are my compliance dates?
(a) * * *
(1) If the existing affected boiler is subject to a work practice
or management practice standard of a tune-up, you must achieve
compliance with the work practice or management practice standard no
later than March 21, 2014.
* * * * *
(d) If you own or operate an industrial, commercial, or
institutional boiler and would be subject to this subpart except for
the exemption in Sec. 63.11195(b) for commercial and industrial solid
waste incineration units covered by 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC or
subpart DDDD, and you cease combusting solid waste, you must be in
compliance with this subpart on the effective date of the waste to fuel
switch as specified in Sec. 60.2145(a)(2) and (3) of subpart CCCC or
Sec. 60.2710(a)(2) and (3) of subpart DDDD.
0
6. Section 63.11200 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11200 What are the subcategories of boilers?
The subcategories of boilers, as defined in Sec. 63.11237 are:
(a) Coal.
(b) Biomass.
(c) Oil.
(d) Seasonal boilers.
(e) Oil-fired boilers with heat input capacity of equal to or less
than 5 million British thermal units (Btu) per hour.
(f) Boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio that would otherwise be subject to a biennial tune-
up.
(g) Limited-use boilers.
0
7. Section 63.11201 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.11201 What standards must I meet?
* * * * *
(b) You must comply with each work practice standard, emission
reduction measure, and management practice specified in Table 2 to this
subpart that applies to your boiler. An energy assessment completed on
or after January 1, 2008 that meets or is amended to meet the energy
assessment requirements in Table 2 to this subpart satisfies the energy
assessment requirement. A facility that operates under an energy
management program established through energy management systems
compatible with ISO 50001, that includes the affected units, also
satisfies the energy assessment requirement.
* * * * *
(d) These standards apply at all times the affected boiler is
operating, except during periods of startup and shutdown as defined in
Sec. 63.11237, during which time you must comply only with Table 2 to
this subpart.
0
8. Section 63.11205 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (c)
introductory
[[Page 7507]]
text, (c)(1) introductory text, and (c)(1)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11205 What are my general requirements for complying with
this subpart?
* * * * *
(b) You must demonstrate compliance with all applicable emission
limits using performance stack testing, fuel analysis, or a continuous
monitoring system (CMS), including a continuous emission monitoring
system (CEMS), a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS), or a
continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS), where applicable. You
may demonstrate compliance with the applicable mercury emission limit
using fuel analysis if the emission rate calculated according to Sec.
63.11211(c) is less than the applicable emission limit. Otherwise, you
must demonstrate compliance using stack testing.
(c) If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission
limit through performance stack testing and subsequent compliance with
operating limits (including the use of CPMS), with a CEMS, or with a
COMS, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan according to the
requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section for the
use of any CEMS, COMS, or CPMS. This requirement also applies to you if
you petition the EPA Administrator for alternative monitoring
parameters under Sec. 63.8(f).
(1) For each CMS required in this section (including CEMS, COMS, or
CPMS), you must develop, and submit to the Administrator for approval
upon request, a site-specific monitoring plan that addresses paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section. You must submit this site-
specific monitoring plan, if requested, at least 60 days before your
initial performance evaluation of your CMS. This requirement to develop
and submit a site-specific monitoring plan does not apply to affected
sources with existing CEMS or COMS operated according to the
performance specifications under appendix B to part 60 of this chapter
and that meet the requirements of Sec. 63.11224.
(i) Installation of the CMS sampling probe or other interface at a
measurement location relative to each affected process unit such that
the measurement is representative of control of the exhaust emissions
(e.g., on or downstream of the last control device);
* * * * *
0
9. Section 63.11210 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) through (e)
and adding paragraphs (f) through (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11210 What are my initial compliance requirements and by what
date must I conduct them?
* * * * *
(b) For existing affected boilers that have applicable emission
limits, you must demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable
emission limits no later than 180 days after the compliance date that
is specified in Sec. 63.11196 and according to the applicable
provisions in Sec. 63.7(a)(2), except as provided in paragraph (j) of
this section.
(c) For existing affected boilers that have applicable work
practice standards, management practices, or emission reduction
measures, you must demonstrate initial compliance no later than the
compliance date that is specified in Sec. 63.11196 and according to
the applicable provisions in Sec. 63.7(a)(2), except as provided in
paragraph (j) of this section.
(d) For new or reconstructed affected boilers that have applicable
emission limits, you must demonstrate initial compliance with the
applicable emission limits no later than 180 days after March 21, 2011
or within 180 days after startup of the source, whichever is later,
according to Sec. 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
(e) For new or reconstructed oil-fired boilers that combust only
oil that contains no more than 0.50 weight percent sulfur or a mixture
of 0.50 weight percent sulfur oil with other fuels not subject to a PM
emission limit under this subpart and that do not use a post-combustion
technology (except a wet scrubber) to reduce particulate matter (PM) or
sulfur dioxide emissions, you are not subject to the PM emission limit
in Table 1 of this subpart providing you monitor and record on a
monthly basis the type of fuel combusted. If you intend to burn a new
type of fuel or fuel mixture that does not meet the requirements of
this paragraph, you must conduct a performance test within 60 days of
burning the new fuel.
(f) For new or reconstructed affected boilers that have applicable
work practice standards or management practices, you are not required
to complete an initial performance tune-up, but you are required to
complete the applicable biennial or 5-year tune-up as specified in
Sec. 63.11223 no later than 25 months or 61 months, respectively,
after the initial startup of the new or reconstructed affected source.
(g) For affected boilers that ceased burning solid waste consistent
with Sec. 63.11196(d) and for which your initial compliance date has
passed, you must demonstrate compliance within 60 days of the effective
date of the waste-to-fuel switch as specified in Sec. 60.2145(a)(2)
and (3) of subpart CCCC or Sec. 60.2710(a)(2) and (3) of subpart DDDD.
If you have not conducted your compliance demonstration for this
subpart within the previous 12 months, you must complete all compliance
demonstrations for this subpart before you commence or recommence
combustion of solid waste.
(h) For affected boilers that switch fuels or make a physical
change to the boiler that results in the applicability of a different
subcategory within subpart JJJJJJ or the boiler becoming subject to
subpart JJJJJJ, you must demonstrate compliance within 180 days of the
effective date of the fuel switch or the physical change. Notification
of such changes must be submitted according to Sec. 63.11225(g).
(i) For boilers located at existing major sources of HAP that limit
their potential to emit (e.g., make a physical change or take a permit
limit) such that the existing major source becomes an area source, you
must comply with the applicable provisions as specified in paragraphs
(i)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) Any such existing boiler at the existing source must
demonstrate compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within 180 days of the later
of March 21, 2014 or upon the existing major source commencing
operation as an area source.
(2) Any new or reconstructed boiler at the existing source must
demonstrate compliance with subpart JJJJJJ within 180 days of the later
of March 21, 2011 or startup.
(3) Notification of such changes must be submitted according to
Sec. 63.11225(g).
(j) For existing affected boilers that have not operated between
the effective date of the rule and the compliance date that is
specified for your source in Sec. 63.11196, you must comply with the
applicable provisions as specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of
this section.
(1) You must complete the initial compliance demonstration, if
subject to the emission limits in Table 1 to this subpart, as specified
in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, no later than 180 days after
the re-start of the affected boiler and according to the applicable
provisions in Sec. 63.7(a)(2).
(2) You must complete the initial performance tune-up, if subject
to the tune-up requirements in Sec. 63.11223, by following the
procedures described in Sec. 63.11223(b) no later than 30 days after
the re-start of the affected boiler.
(3) You must complete the one-time energy assessment, if subject to
the energy assessment requirements specified in Table 2 to this
subpart, no
[[Page 7508]]
later than the compliance date specified in Sec. 63.11196.
0
10. Section 63.11211 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11211 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the
emission limits?
(a) For affected boilers that demonstrate compliance with any of
the emission limits of this subpart through performance (stack)
testing, your initial compliance requirements include conducting
performance tests according to Sec. 63.11212 and Table 4 to this
subpart, conducting a fuel analysis for each type of fuel burned in
your boiler according to Sec. 63.11213 and Table 5 to this subpart,
establishing operating limits according to Sec. 63.11222, Table 6 to
this subpart and paragraph (b) of this section, as applicable, and
conducting CMS performance evaluations according to Sec. 63.11224. For
affected boilers that burn a single type of fuel, you are exempted from
the compliance requirements of conducting a fuel analysis for each type
of fuel burned in your boiler. For purposes of this subpart, boilers
that use a supplemental fuel only for startup, unit shutdown, and
transient flame stability purposes still qualify as affected boilers
that burn a single type of fuel, and the supplemental fuel is not
subject to the fuel analysis requirements under Sec. 63.11213 and
Table 5 to this subpart.
(b) * * *
(1) For a wet scrubber, you must establish the minimum scrubber
liquid flow rate and minimum scrubber pressure drop as defined in Sec.
63.11237, as your operating limits during the three-run performance
stack test. If you use a wet scrubber and you conduct separate
performance stack tests for PM and mercury emissions, you must
establish one set of minimum scrubber liquid flow rate and pressure
drop operating limits. If you conduct multiple performance stack tests,
you must set the minimum scrubber liquid flow rate and pressure drop
operating limits at the highest minimum values established during the
performance stack tests.
(2) For an electrostatic precipitator operated with a wet scrubber,
you must establish the minimum total secondary electric power
(secondary voltage and secondary current), as defined in Sec.
63.11237, as your operating limits during the three-run performance
stack test.
* * * * *
0
11. Section 63.11212 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.11212 What stack tests and procedures must I use for the
performance tests?
* * * * *
(b) You must conduct each stack test according to the requirements
in Table 4 to this subpart. Boilers that use a CEMS for carbon monoxide
(CO) are exempt from the initial CO performance testing in Table 4 to
this subpart and the oxygen concentration operating limit requirement
specified in Table 3 to this subpart.
* * * * *
(e) To determine compliance with the emission limits, you must use
the F-Factor methodology and equations in sections 12.2 and 12.3 of EPA
Method 19 of appendix A-7 to part 60 of this chapter to convert the
measured PM concentrations and the measured mercury concentrations that
result from the performance test to pounds per million Btu heat input
emission rates.
0
12. Section 63.11214 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.11214 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the work
practice standard, emission reduction measures, and management
practice?
* * * * *
(c) If you own or operate an existing affected boiler with a heat
input capacity of 10 million Btu per hour or greater, you must submit a
signed certification in the Notification of Compliance Status report
that an energy assessment of the boiler and its energy use systems was
completed according to Table 2 to this subpart and is an accurate
depiction of your facility.
* * * * *
0
13. Section 63.11220 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11220 When must I conduct subsequent performance tests or
fuel analyses?
(a) If your boiler has a heat input capacity of 10 million British
thermal units per hour or greater, you must conduct all applicable
performance (stack) tests according to Sec. 63.11212 on a triennial
basis, except as specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this
section. Triennial performance tests must be completed no more than 37
months after the previous performance test.
(b) When demonstrating initial compliance with the PM emission
limit, if your boiler's performance test results show that your PM
emissions are equal to or less than half of the PM emission limit, you
do not need to conduct further performance tests for PM but must
continue to comply with all applicable operating limits and monitoring
requirements. If your initial performance test results show that your
PM emissions are greater than half of the PM emission limit, you must
conduct subsequent performance tests as specified in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(c) If you demonstrate compliance with the mercury emission limit
based on fuel analysis, you must conduct a fuel analysis according to
Sec. 63.11213 for each type of fuel burned as specified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) of this section. If you plan to burn a new type of fuel
or fuel mixture, you must conduct a fuel analysis before burning the
new type of fuel or mixture in your boiler. You must recalculate the
mercury emission rate using Equation 1 of Sec. 63.11211. The
recalculated mercury emission rate must be less than the applicable
emission limit.
(1) When demonstrating initial compliance with the mercury emission
limit, if the mercury constituents in the fuel or fuel mixture are
measured to be equal to or less than half of the mercury emission
limit, you do not need to conduct further fuel analysis sampling but
must continue to comply with all applicable operating limits and
monitoring requirements.
(2) When demonstrating initial compliance with the mercury emission
limit, if the mercury constituents in the fuel or fuel mixture are
greater than half of the mercury emission limit, you must conduct
quarterly sampling.
(d) For existing affected boilers that have not operated since the
previous compliance demonstration and more than 3 years have passed
since the previous compliance demonstration, you must complete your
subsequent compliance demonstration no later than 180 days after the
re-start of the affected boiler.
0
14. Section 63.11221 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11221 Is there a minimum amount of monitoring data I must
obtain?
(a) You must monitor and collect data according to this section and
the site-specific monitoring plan required by Sec. 63.11205(c).
(b) You must operate the monitoring system and collect data at all
required intervals at all times the affected source is operating and
compliance is required, except for periods of monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods (see Sec. 63.8(c)(7) of this
part), repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions or out-
of-control periods, and required monitoring system quality assurance or
quality control activities including, as applicable, calibration
checks, required zero and span
[[Page 7509]]
adjustments, and scheduled CMS maintenance as defined in your site-
specific monitoring plan. A monitoring system malfunction is any
sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable failure of the
monitoring system to provide valid data. Monitoring system failures
that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are
not malfunctions. You are required to complete monitoring system
repairs in response to monitoring system malfunctions or out-of-control
periods and to return the monitoring system to operation as
expeditiously as practicable.
(c) You may not use data collected during monitoring system
malfunctions or out-of-control periods, repairs associated with
monitoring system malfunctions or out-of-control periods, or required
monitoring system quality assurance or quality control activities in
calculations used to report emissions or operating levels. Any such
periods must be reported according to the requirements in Sec.
63.11225. You must use all the data collected during all other periods
in assessing the operation of the control device and associated control
system.
(d) Except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions or
monitoring system out-of-control periods, repairs associated with
monitoring system malfunctions or monitoring system out-of-control
periods, and required monitoring system quality assurance or quality
control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks,
required zero and span adjustments, and scheduled CMS maintenance as
defined in your site-specific monitoring plan), failure to collect
required data is a deviation of the monitoring requirements.
0
15. Section 63.11223 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b)
introductory text, (b)(1), (b)(3) through (5), (b)(6) introductory
text, (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(iii), (b)(7), and (c), and adding paragraphs
(d) through (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11223 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the
work practice and management practice standards?
(a) For affected sources subject to the work practice standard or
the management practices of a tune-up, you must conduct a performance
tune-up according to paragraph (b) of this section and keep records as
required in Sec. 63.11225(c) to demonstrate continuous compliance. You
must conduct the tune-up while burning the type of fuel (or fuels in
the case of boilers that routinely burn two types of fuels at the same
time) that provided the majority of the heat input to the boiler over
the 12 months prior to the tune-up.
(b) Except as specified in paragraphs (c) through (f) of this
section, you must conduct a tune-up of the boiler biennially to
demonstrate continuous compliance as specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (7) of this section. Each biennial tune-up must be conducted no
more than 25 months after the previous tune-up. For a new or
reconstructed boiler, the first biennial tune-up must be no later than
25 months after the initial startup of the new or reconstructed boiler.
(1) As applicable, inspect the burner, and clean or replace any
components of the burner as necessary (you may delay the burner
inspection until the next scheduled unit shutdown, not to exceed 36
months from the previous inspection). Units that produce electricity
for sale may delay the burner inspection until the first outage, not to
exceed 36 months from the previous inspection.
* * * * *
(3) Inspect the system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio, as
applicable, and ensure that it is correctly calibrated and functioning
properly (you may delay the inspection until the next scheduled unit
shutdown, not to exceed 36 months from the previous inspection). Units
that produce electricity for sale may delay the inspection until the
first outage, not to exceed 36 months from the previous inspection.
(4) Optimize total emissions of CO. This optimization should be
consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, if available, and
with any nitrogen oxide requirement to which the unit is subject.
(5) Measure the concentrations in the effluent stream of CO in
parts per million, by volume, and oxygen in volume percent, before and
after the adjustments are made (measurements may be either on a dry or
wet basis, as long as it is the same basis before and after the
adjustments are made). Measurements may be taken using a portable CO
analyzer.
(6) Maintain on-site and submit, if requested by the Administrator,
a report containing the information in paragraphs (b)(6)(i) through
(iii) of this section.
(i) The concentrations of CO in the effluent stream in parts per
million, by volume, and oxygen in volume percent, measured at high fire
or typical operating load, before and after the tune-up of the boiler.
* * * * *
(iii) The type and amount of fuel used over the 12 months prior to
the tune-up of the boiler, but only if the unit was physically and
legally capable of using more than one type of fuel during that period.
Units sharing a fuel meter may estimate the fuel use by each unit.
(7) If the unit is not operating on the required date for a tune-
up, the tune-up must be conducted within 30 days of startup.
(c) Boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio that would otherwise be subject to a biennial tune-up
must conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5 years as specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section. Each 5-year tune-up must
be conducted no more than 61 months after the previous tune-up. For a
new or reconstructed boiler with an oxygen trim system, the first 5-
year tune-up must be no later than 61 months after the initial startup.
You may delay the burner inspection specified in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section and inspection of the system controlling the air-to-fuel
ratio specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until the next
scheduled unit shutdown, but you must inspect each burner and system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at least once every 72 months.
(d) Seasonal boilers must conduct a tune-up every 5 years as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section. Each 5-year
tune-up must be conducted no more than 61 months after the previous
tune-up. For a new or reconstructed seasonal boiler, the first 5-year
tune-up must be no later than 61 months after the initial startup. You
may delay the burner inspection specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section and inspection of the system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio
specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until the next scheduled
unit shutdown, but you must inspect each burner and system controlling
the air-to-fuel ratio at least once every 72 months. Seasonal boilers
are not subject to the emission limits in Table 1 to this subpart or
the operating limits in Table 3 to this subpart.
(e) Oil-fired boilers with a heat input capacity of equal to or
less than 5 million Btu per hour must conduct a tune-up every 5 years
as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section. Each 5-
year tune-up must be conducted no more than 61 months after the
previous tune-up. For a new or reconstructed oil-fired boiler with a
heat input capacity of equal to or less than 5 million Btu per hour,
the first 5-year tune-up must be no later than 61 months after the
initial startup. You may delay the burner inspection specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section and inspection of the system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio specified
[[Page 7510]]
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until the next scheduled unit
shutdown, but you must inspect each burner and system controlling the
air-to-fuel ratio at least once every 72 months.
(f) Limited-use boilers must conduct a tune-up every 5 years as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section. Each 5-year
tune-up must be conducted no more than 61 months after the previous
tune-up. For a new or reconstructed limited-use boiler, the first 5-
year tune-up must be no later than 61 months after the initial startup.
You may delay the burner inspection specified in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section and inspection of the system controlling the air-to-fuel
ratio specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section until the next
scheduled unit shutdown, but you must inspect each burner and system
controlling the air-to-fuel ratio at least once every 72 months.
Limited-use boilers are not subject to the emission limits in Table 1
to this subpart, the energy assessment requirements in Table 2 to this
subpart, or the operating limits in Table 3 to this subpart.
(g) If you own or operate a boiler subject to emission limits in
Table 1 of this subpart, you must minimize the boiler's startup and
shutdown periods following the manufacturer's recommended procedures,
if available. If manufacturer's recommended procedures are not
available, you must follow recommended procedures for a unit of similar
design for which manufacturer's recommended procedures are available.
You must submit a signed statement in the Notification of Compliance
Status report that indicates that you conducted startups and shutdowns
according to the manufacturer's recommended procedures or procedures
specified for a boiler of similar design if manufacturer's recommended
procedures are not available.
0
16. Section 63.11224 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1) through (3),
(a)(5), (a)(6),
0
b. Adding paragraph (a)(7).
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1) introductory text, (c)(2) introductory
text, and (d).
0
d. Revising paragraphs (e) introductory text, (e)(6), and (e)(7).
0
e. Adding paragraph (e)(8).
0
f. Revising paragraph (f)(7).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 63.11224 What are my monitoring, installation, operation, and
maintenance requirements?
(a) If your boiler is subject to a CO emission limit in Table 1 to
this subpart, you must either install, operate, and maintain a CEMS for
CO and oxygen according to the procedures in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(6) of this section, or install, calibrate, operate, and maintain an
oxygen analyzer system, as defined in Sec. 63.11237, according to the
manufacturer's recommendations and paragraphs (a)(7) and (d) of this
section, as applicable, by the compliance date specified in Sec.
63.11196. Where a certified CO CEMS is used, the CO level shall be
monitored at the outlet of the boiler, after any add-on controls or
flue gas recirculation system and before release to the atmosphere.
Boilers that use a CO CEMS are exempt from the initial CO performance
testing and oxygen concentration operating limit requirements specified
in Sec. 63.11211(a) of this subpart. Oxygen monitors and oxygen trim
systems must be installed to monitor oxygen in the boiler flue gas,
boiler firebox, or other appropriate intermediate location.
(1) Each CO CEMS must be installed, operated, and maintained
according to the applicable procedures under Performance Specification
4, 4A, or 4B at 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, and each oxygen CEMS must
be installed, operated, and maintained according to Performance
Specification 3 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix B. Both the CO and oxygen
CEMS must also be installed, operated, and maintained according to the
site-specific monitoring plan developed according to paragraph (c) of
this section.
(2) You must conduct a performance evaluation of each CEMS
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.8(e) and according to
Performance Specifications 3 and 4, 4A, or 4B at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B.
(3) Each CEMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation
(sampling, analyzing, and data recording) every 15 minutes. You must
have CEMS data values from a minimum of four successive cycles of
operation representing each of the four 15-minute periods in an hour,
or at least two 15-minute data values during an hour when CEMS
calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance activities are being
performed, to have a valid hour of data.
* * * * *
(5) You must calculate hourly averages, corrected to 3 percent
oxygen, from each hour of CO CEMS data in parts per million CO
concentrations and determine the 10-day rolling average of all recorded
readings, except as provided in Sec. 63.11221(c). Calculate a 10-day
rolling average from all of the hourly averages collected for the 10-
day operating period using Equation 2 of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01FE13.000
Where:
Hpvi = the hourly parameter value for hour i
n = the number of valid hourly parameter values collected over 10
boiler operating days
(6) For purposes of collecting CO data, you must operate the CO
CEMS as specified in Sec. 63.11221(b). For purposes of calculating
data averages, you must use all the data collected during all periods
in assessing compliance, except that you must exclude certain data as
specified in Sec. 63.11221(c). Periods when CO data are unavailable
may constitute monitoring deviations as specified in Sec. 63.11221(d).
(7) You must operate the oxygen analyzer system at or above the
minimum oxygen level that is established as the operating limit
according to Table 6 to this subpart when firing the fuel or fuel
mixture utilized during the most recent CO performance stack test.
Operation of oxygen trim systems to meet these requirements shall not
be done in a manner which compromises furnace safety.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) For each CMS required in this section, you must develop, and
submit to the EPA Administrator for approval upon request, a site-
specific monitoring plan that addresses paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through
(iii) of this section. You must submit this site-specific monitoring
plan (if requested) at least 60 days before your initial performance
evaluation of your CMS.
* * * * *
[[Page 7511]]
(2) In your site-specific monitoring plan, you must also address
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.
* * * * *
(d) If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a CMS,
you must install, operate, and maintain each CPMS according to the
procedures in paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section.
(1) The CPMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation
every 15 minutes. You must have data values from a minimum of four
successive cycles of operation representing each of the four 15-minute
periods in an hour, or at least two 15-minute data values during an
hour when CMS calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance activities
are being performed, to have a valid hour of data.
(2) You must calculate hourly arithmetic averages from each hour of
CPMS data in units of the operating limit and determine the 30-day
rolling average of all recorded readings, except as provided in Sec.
63.11221(c). Calculate a 30-day rolling average from all of the hourly
averages collected for the 30-day operating period using Equation 3 of
this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01FE13.001
Where:
Hpvi = the hourly parameter value for hour i
n = the number of valid hourly parameter values collected over 30
boiler operating days
(3) For purposes of collecting data, you must operate the CPMS as
specified in Sec. 63.11221(b). For purposes of calculating data
averages, you must use all the data collected during all periods in
assessing compliance, except that you must exclude certain data as
specified in Sec. 63.11221(c). Periods when CPMS data are unavailable
may constitute monitoring deviations as specified in Sec. 63.11221(d).
(4) Record the results of each inspection, calibration, and
validation check.
(e) If you have an applicable opacity operating limit under this
rule, you must install, operate, certify and maintain each COMS
according to the procedures in paragraphs (e)(1) through (8) of this
section by the compliance date specified in Sec. 63.11196.
* * * * *
(6) You must operate and maintain each COMS according to the
requirements in the monitoring plan and the requirements of Sec.
63.8(e). You must identify periods the COMS is out of control including
any periods that the COMS fails to pass a daily calibration drift
assessment, a quarterly performance audit, or an annual zero alignment
audit.
(7) You must calculate and record 6-minute averages from the
opacity monitoring data and determine and record the daily block
average of recorded readings, except as provided in Sec. 63.11221(c).
(8) For purposes of collecting opacity data, you must operate the
COMS as specified in Sec. 63.11221(b). For purposes of calculating
data averages, you must use all the data collected during all periods
in assessing compliance, except that you must exclude certain data as
specified in Sec. 63.11221(c). Periods when COMS data are unavailable
may constitute monitoring deviations as specified in Sec. 63.11221(d).
(f) * * *
(7) For positive pressure fabric filter systems that do not duct
all compartments or cells to a common stack, a bag leak detection
system must be installed in each baghouse compartment or cell.
* * * * *
0
17. Section 63.11225 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4),
(a)(5), (b) introductory text, (b)(2), (c) introductory text, (c)(2)
introductory text, and (c)(2)(ii).
0
b. Adding paragraphs (c)(2)(iii) through (vi).
0
c. Revising paragraphs (d), (e), and (g).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 63.11225 What are my notification, reporting, and recordkeeping,
requirements?
(a) You must submit the notifications specified in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (5) of this section to the administrator.
(1) You must submit all of the notifications in Sec. Sec. 63.7(b);
63.8(e) and (f); and 63.9(b) through (e), (g), and (h) that apply to
you by the dates specified in those sections except as specified in
paragraphs (a)(2) and (4) of this section.
(2) An Initial Notification must be submitted no later than January
20, 2014 or within 120 days after the source becomes subject to the
standard.
* * * * *
(4) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status no later
than 120 days after the applicable compliance date specified in Sec.
63.11196 unless you must conduct a performance stack test. If you must
conduct a performance stack test, you must submit the Notification of
Compliance Status within 60 days of completing the performance stack
test. You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status in
accordance with paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (vi) of this section. The
Notification of Compliance Status must include the information and
certification(s) of compliance in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (v) of
this section, as applicable, and signed by a responsible official.
(i) You must submit the information required in Sec. 63.9(h)(2),
except the information listed in Sec. 63.9(h)(2)(i)(B), (D), (E), and
(F). If you conduct any performance tests or CMS performance
evaluations, you must submit that data as specified in paragraph (e) of
this section. If you conduct any opacity or visible emission
observations, or other monitoring procedures or methods, you must
submit that data to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed
in Sec. 63.13.
(ii) ``This facility complies with the requirements in Sec.
63.11214 to conduct an initial tune-up of the boiler.''
(iii) ``This facility has had an energy assessment performed
according to Sec. 63.11214(c).''
(iv) For units that install bag leak detection systems: ``This
facility complies with the requirements in Sec. 63.11224(f).''
(v) For units that do not qualify for a statutory exemption as
provided in section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act: ``No secondary
materials that are solid waste were combusted in any affected unit.''
(vi) The notification must be submitted electronically using the
Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is
accessed through EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx).
However, if the reporting form specific to this subpart is not
available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, the written
Notification of Compliance Status must be submitted to the
[[Page 7512]]
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(5) If you are using data from a previously conducted emission test
to serve as documentation of conformance with the emission standards
and operating limits of this subpart, you must include in the
Notification of Compliance Status the date of the test and a summary of
the results, not a complete test report, relative to this subpart.
(b) You must prepare, by March 1 of each year, and submit to the
delegated authority upon request, an annual compliance certification
report for the previous calendar year containing the information
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. You must
submit the report by March 15 if you had any instance described by
paragraph (b)(3) of this section. For boilers that are subject only to
a requirement to conduct a biennial or 5-year tune-up according to
Sec. 63.11223(a) and not subject to emission limits or operating
limits, you may prepare only a biennial or 5-year compliance report as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) Statement by a responsible official, with the official's name,
title, phone number, email address, and signature, certifying the
truth, accuracy and completeness of the notification and a statement of
whether the source has complied with all the relevant standards and
other requirements of this subpart. Your notification must include the
following certification(s) of compliance, as applicable, and signed by
a responsible official:
(i) ``This facility complies with the requirements in Sec.
63.11223 to conduct a biennial or 5-year tune-up, as applicable, of
each boiler.''
(ii) For units that do not qualify for a statutory exemption as
provided in section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act: ``No secondary
materials that are solid waste were combusted in any affected unit.''
(iii) ``This facility complies with the requirement in Sec. Sec.
63.11214(d) and 63.11223(g) to minimize the boiler's time spent during
startup and shutdown and to conduct startups and shutdowns according to
the manufacturer's recommended procedures or procedures specified for a
boiler of similar design if manufacturer's recommended procedures are
not available.''
* * * * *
(c) You must maintain the records specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (7) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) You must keep records to document conformance with the work
practices, emission reduction measures, and management practices
required by Sec. 63.11214 and Sec. 63.11223 as specified in
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(ii) For operating units that combust non-hazardous secondary
materials that have been determined not to be solid waste pursuant to
Sec. 241.3(b)(1) of this chapter, you must keep a record which
documents how the secondary material meets each of the legitimacy
criteria under Sec. 241.3(d)(1). If you combust a fuel that has been
processed from a discarded non-hazardous secondary material pursuant to
Sec. 241.3(b)(4) of this chapter, you must keep records as to how the
operations that produced the fuel satisfies the definition of
processing in Sec. 241.2 and each of the legitimacy criteria in Sec.
241.3(d)(1) of this chapter. If the fuel received a non-waste
determination pursuant to the petition process submitted under Sec.
241.3(c) of this chapter, you must keep a record that documents how the
fuel satisfies the requirements of the petition process. For operating
units that combust non-hazardous secondary materials as fuel per Sec.
241.4, you must keep records documenting that the material is a listed
non-waste under Sec. 241.4(a).
(iii) For each boiler required to conduct an energy assessment, you
must keep a copy of the energy assessment report.
(iv) For each boiler subject to an emission limit in Table 1 to
this subpart, you must also keep records of monthly fuel use by each
boiler, including the type(s) of fuel and amount(s) used.
(v) For each boiler that meets the definition of seasonal boiler,
you must keep records of days of operation per year.
(vi) For each boiler that meets the definition of limited-use
boiler, you must keep a copy of the federally enforceable permit that
limits the annual capacity factor to less than or equal to 10 percent
and records of fuel use for the days the boiler is operating.
* * * * *
(d) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available
for expeditious review. You must keep each record for 5 years following
the date of each recorded action. You must keep each record on-site or
be accessible from a central location by computer or other means that
instantly provide access at the site for at least 2 years after the
date of each recorded action. You may keep the records off site for the
remaining 3 years.
(e)(1) Within 60 days after the date of completing each performance
test (defined in Sec. 63.2) as required by this subpart you must
submit the results of the performance tests, including any associated
fuel analyses, required by this subpart to EPA's WebFIRE database by
using CEDRI that is accessed through EPA's CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx).
Performance test data must be submitted in the file format generated
through use of EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) (see https://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/). Only data collected using test
methods on the ERT Web site are subject to this requirement for
submitting reports electronically to WebFIRE. Owners or operators who
claim that some of the information being submitted for performance
tests is confidential business information (CBI) must submit a complete
ERT file including information claimed to be CBI on a compact disk or
other commonly used electronic storage media (including, but not
limited to, flash drives) to EPA. The electronic media must be clearly
marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAPQS/CORE CBI Office, Attention:
WebFIRE Administrator, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703.
The same ERT file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to EPA via CDX
as described earlier in this paragraph. At the discretion of the
delegated authority, you must also submit these reports, including CBI,
to the delegated authority in the format specified by the delegated
authority. For any performance test conducted using test methods that
are not listed on the ERT Web site, the owner or operator shall submit
the results of the performance test in paper submissions to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec. 63.13.
(2) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS
performance evaluation test as defined in Sec. 63.2, you must submit
relative accuracy test audit (RATA) data to EPA's CDX by using CEDRI in
accordance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Only RATA pollutants
that can be documented with the ERT (as listed on the ERT Web site) are
subject to this requirement. For any performance evaluations with no
corresponding RATA pollutants listed on the ERT Web site, the owner or
operator shall submit the results of the performance evaluation in
paper submissions to the Administrator at the appropriate address
listed in Sec. 63.13.
* * * * *
(g) If you have switched fuels or made a physical change to the
boiler and the fuel switch or change resulted in the
[[Page 7513]]
applicability of a different subcategory within subpart JJJJJJ, in the
boiler becoming subject to subpart JJJJJJ, or in the boiler switching
out of subpart JJJJJJ due to a change to 100 percent natural gas, or
you have taken a permit limit that resulted in you being subject to
subpart JJJJJJ, you must provide notice of the date upon which you
switched fuels, made the physical change, or took a permit limit within
30 days of the change. The notification must identify:
(1) The name of the owner or operator of the affected source, the
location of the source, the boiler(s) that have switched fuels, were
physically changed, or took a permit limit, and the date of the notice.
(2) The date upon which the fuel switch, physical change, or permit
limit occurred.
18. Section 63.11226 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 63.11226 Affirmative defense for violation of emission standards
during malfunction.
In response to an action to enforce the standards set forth in
Sec. 63.11201 you may assert an affirmative defense to a claim for
civil penalties for violations of such standards that are caused by
malfunction, as defined at 40 CFR 63.2. Appropriate penalties may be
assessed if you fail to meet your burden of proving all of the
requirements in the affirmative defense. The affirmative defense shall
not be available for claims for injunctive relief.
(a) Assertion of affirmative defense. To establish the affirmative
defense in any action to enforce such a standard, you must timely meet
the reporting requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, and must
prove by a preponderance of evidence that:
(1) The violation:
(i) Was caused by a sudden, infrequent, and unavoidable failure of
air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to
operate in a normal or usual manner; and
(ii) Could not have been prevented through careful planning, proper
design or better operation and maintenance practices; and
(iii) Did not stem from any activity or event that could have been
foreseen and avoided, or planned for; and
(iv) Was not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate
design, operation, or maintenance; and
(2) Repairs were made as expeditiously as possible when a violation
occurred; and
(3) The frequency, amount, and duration of the violation (including
any bypass) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable; and
(4) If the violation resulted from a bypass of control equipment or
a process, then the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life,
personal injury, or severe property damage; and
(5) All possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of the
violation on ambient air quality, the environment, and human health;
and
(6) All emissions monitoring and control systems were kept in
operation if at all possible, consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices; and
(7) All of the actions in response to the violation were documented
by properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs; and
(8) At all times, the affected source was operated in a manner
consistent with good practices for minimizing emissions; and
(9) A written root cause analysis has been prepared, the purpose of
which is to determine, correct, and eliminate the primary causes of the
malfunction and the violation resulting from the malfunction event at
issue. The analysis shall also specify, using best monitoring methods
and engineering judgment, the amount of any emissions that were the
result of the malfunction.
(b) Report. The owner or operator seeking to assert an affirmative
defense shall submit a written report to the Administrator with all
necessary supporting documentation, that it has met the requirements
set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. This affirmative defense
report shall be included in the first periodic compliance, deviation
report or excess emission report otherwise required after the initial
occurrence of the violation of the relevant standard (which may be the
end of any applicable averaging period). If such compliance, deviation
report or excess emission report is due less than 45 days after the
initial occurrence of the violation, the affirmative defense report may
be included in the second compliance, deviation report or excess
emission report due after the initial occurrence of the violation of
the relevant standard.
0
19. Section 63.11236 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.11236 Who implements and enforces this subpart?
(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by EPA or an
administrator such as your state, local, or tribal agency. If the EPA
Administrator has delegated authority to your state, local, or tribal
agency, then that agency has the authority to implement and enforce
this subpart. You should contact your EPA Regional Office to find out
if implementation and enforcement of this subpart is delegated to your
state, local, or tribal agency.
* * * * *
0
20. Section 63.11237 is amended as follows:
0
a. By adding definitions in alphabetical order for ``10-day rolling
average,'' ``30-day rolling average,'' ``Annual heat input,''
``Biodiesel,'' ``Calendar year,'' ``Common stack,'' ``Daily block
average,'' ``Distillate oil,'' ``Electric boiler,'' ``Electric utility
steam generating unit (EGU),'' ``Energy management program,''
``Fluidized bed boiler,'' ``Fluidized bed combustion,'' ``Hourly
average,'' ``Limited-use boiler,'' ``Load fraction,'' ``Minimum
scrubber pressure drop,'' ``Minimum sorbent injection rate,'' ``Minimum
total secondary electric power,'' ``Operating day,'' ``Oxygen analyzer
system,'' ``Oxygen trim system,'' ``Process heater,'' ``Regulated gas
stream,'' ``Residential boiler,'' ``Residual oil,'' ``Seasonal
boiler,'' ``Shutdown,'' ``Solid fuel,'' ``Startup,'' ``Temporary
boiler,'' ``Tune-up,'' ``Vegetable oil,'' ``Voluntary Consensus
Standards (VCS),'' and ``Wet scrubber.''
0
b. By revising the definitions for ``Bag leak detection system,''
``Biomass subcategory,'' ``Boiler,'' ``Boiler system,'' ``Deviation,''
``Dry scrubber,'' ``Electrostatic precipitator (ESP),'' ``Energy
assessment,'' ``Energy use system,'' ``Federally enforceable,'' ``Gas-
fired boiler,'' ``Heat input,'' ``Hot water heater,'' ``Institutional
boiler,'' ``Liquid fuel,'' ``Minimum activated carbon injection rate,''
``Minimum oxygen level,'' ``Minimum scrubber liquid flow rate,''
``Natural gas,'' ``Oil subcategory,'' ``Particulate matter,'' ``Period
of gas curtailment or supply interruption,'' ``Qualified Energy
Assessor,'' ``Solid fossil fuel,'' and ``Waste heat boiler.''
0
c. By removing the definitions for ``Annual heat input basis,''
``Minimum PM scrubber pressure drop,'' ``Minimum sorbent flow rate,''
and ``Minimum voltage or amperage''.
Sec. 63.11237 What definitions apply to this subpart?
10-day rolling average means the arithmetic mean of all valid hours
of data from 10 successive operating days, except for periods of
startup and shutdown and periods when the unit is not operating.
30-day rolling average means the arithmetic mean of all valid hours
of data from 30 successive operating days, except for periods of
startup and shutdown and periods when the unit is not operating.
* * * * *
[[Page 7514]]
Annual heat input means the heat input for the 12 months preceding
the compliance demonstration.
Bag leak detection system means a group of instruments that are
capable of monitoring particulate matter loadings in the exhaust of a
fabric filter (i.e., baghouse) in order to detect bag failures. A bag
leak detection system includes, but is not limited to, an instrument
that operates on electrodynamic, triboelectric, light scattering, light
transmittance, or other principle to monitor relative particulate
matter loadings.
Biodiesel means a mono-alkyl ester derived from biomass and
conforming to ASTM D6751-11b, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel
Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14).
* * * * *
Biomass subcategory includes any boiler that burns any biomass and
is not in the coal subcategory.
Boiler means an enclosed device using controlled flame combustion
in which water is heated to recover thermal energy in the form of steam
and/or hot water. Controlled flame combustion refers to a steady-state,
or near steady-state, process wherein fuel and/or oxidizer feed rates
are controlled. A device combusting solid waste, as defined in Sec.
241.3 of this chapter, is not a boiler unless the device is exempt from
the definition of a solid waste incineration unit as provided in
section 129(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act. Waste heat boilers, process
heaters, and autoclaves are excluded from the definition of Boiler.
Boiler system means the boiler and associated components, such as,
feedwater systems, combustion air systems, fuel systems (including
burners), blowdown systems, combustion control systems, steam systems,
and condensate return systems, directly connected to and serving the
energy use systems.
Calendar year means the period between January 1 and December 31,
inclusive, for a given year.
* * * * *
Common stack means the exhaust of emissions from two or more
affected units through a single flue. Affected units with a common
stack may each have separate air pollution control systems located
before the common stack, or may have a single air pollution control
system located after the exhausts come together in a single flue.
Daily block average means the arithmetic mean of all valid emission
concentrations or parameter levels recorded when a unit is operating
measured over the 24-hour period from 12 a.m. (midnight) to 12 a.m.
(midnight), except for periods of startup and shutdown and periods when
the unit is not operating.
Deviation (1) Means any instance in which an affected source
subject to this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
(i) Fails to meet any applicable requirement or obligation
established by this subpart including, but not limited to, any emission
limit, operating limit, or work practice standard; or
(ii) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to
obtain such a permit.
(2) A deviation is not always a violation.
Distillate oil means fuel oils that contain 0.05 weight percent
nitrogen or less and comply with the specifications for fuel oil
numbers 1 and 2, as defined by the American Society of Testing and
Materials in ASTM D396 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14) or
diesel fuel oil numbers 1 and 2, as defined by the American Society for
Testing and Materials in ASTM D975 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14), kerosene, and biodiesel as defined by the American
Society of Testing and Materials in ASTM D6751-11b (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14).
Dry scrubber means an add-on air pollution control system that
injects dry alkaline sorbent (dry injection) or sprays an alkaline
sorbent (spray dryer) to react with and neutralize acid gas in the
exhaust stream forming a dry powder material. Sorbent injection systems
used as control devices in fluidized bed boilers and process heaters
are included in this definition. A dry scrubber is a dry control
system.
Electric boiler means a boiler in which electric heating serves as
the source of heat. Electric boilers that burn gaseous or liquid fuel
during periods of electrical power curtailment or failure are included
in this definition.
Electric utility steam generating unit (EGU) means a fossil fuel-
fired combustion unit of more than 25 megawatts that serves a generator
that produces electricity for sale. A fossil fuel-fired unit that
cogenerates steam and electricity and supplies more than one-third of
its potential electric output capacity and more than 25 megawatts
electrical output to any utility power distribution system for sale is
considered an electric utility steam generating unit. To be ``capable
of combusting'' fossil fuels, an EGU would need to have these fuels
allowed in their operating permits and have the appropriate fuel
handling facilities on-site or otherwise available (e.g., coal handling
equipment, including coal storage area, belts and conveyers,
pulverizers, etc.; oil storage facilities). In addition, fossil fuel-
fired EGU means any EGU that fired fossil fuel for more than 10.0
percent of the average annual heat input in any 3 consecutive calendar
years or for more than 15.0 percent of the annual heat input during any
one calendar year after April 16, 2015.
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) means an add-on air pollution
control device used to capture particulate matter by charging the
particles using an electrostatic field, collecting the particles using
a grounded collecting surface, and transporting the particles into a
hopper. An electrostatic precipitator is usually a dry control system.
Energy assessment means the following for the emission units
covered by this subpart:
(1) The energy assessment for facilities with affected boilers with
less than 0.3 trillion Btu per year (TBtu/year) heat input capacity
will be 8 on-site technical labor hours in length maximum, but may be
longer at the discretion of the owner or operator of the affected
source. The boiler system(s) and any on-site energy use system(s)
accounting for at least 50 percent of the affected boiler(s) energy
(e.g., steam, hot water, or electricity) production, as applicable,
will be evaluated to identify energy savings opportunities, within the
limit of performing an 8-hour energy assessment.
(2) The energy assessment for facilities with affected boilers with
0.3 to 1.0 TBtu/year heat input capacity will be 24 on-site technical
labor hours in length maximum, but may be longer at the discretion of
the owner or operator of the affected source. The boiler system(s) and
any on-site energy use system(s) accounting for at least 33 percent of
the affected boiler(s) energy (e.g., steam, hot water, or electricity)
production, as applicable, will be evaluated to identify energy savings
opportunities, within the limit of performing a 24-hour energy
assessment.
(3) The energy assessment for facilities with affected boilers with
greater than 1.0 TBtu/year heat input capacity will be up to 24 on-site
technical labor hours in length for the first TBtu/year plus 8 on-site
technical labor hours for every additional 1.0 TBtu/year not to exceed
160 on-site technical hours, but may be longer at the discretion of the
owner or operator of the affected source. The boiler
[[Page 7515]]
system(s) and any on-site energy use system(s) accounting for at least
20 percent of the affected boiler(s) energy (e.g., steam, hot water, or
electricity) production, as applicable, will be evaluated to identify
energy savings opportunities.
(4) The on-site energy use system(s) serving as the basis for the
percent of affected boiler(s) energy production, as applicable, in
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this definition may be segmented by
production area or energy use area as most logical and applicable to
the specific facility being assessed (e.g., product X manufacturing
area; product Y drying area; Building Z).
Energy management program means a program that includes a set of
practices and procedures designed to manage energy use that are
demonstrated by the facility's energy policies, a facility energy
manager and other staffing responsibilities, energy performance
measurement and tracking methods, an energy saving goal, action plans,
operating procedures, internal reporting requirements, and periodic
review intervals used at the facility. Facilities may establish their
program through energy management systems compatible with ISO 50001.
Energy use system (1) Includes the following systems located on the
site of the affected boiler that use energy provided by the boiler:
(i) Process heating; compressed air systems; machine drive (motors,
pumps, fans); process cooling; facility heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning systems; hot water systems; building envelop; and
lighting; or
(ii) Other systems that use steam, hot water, process heat, or
electricity, provided by the affected boiler.
(2) Energy use systems are only those systems using energy clearly
produced by affected boilers.
* * * * *
Federally enforceable means all limitations and conditions that are
enforceable by the EPA Administrator, including, but not limited to,
the requirements of 40 CFR parts 60, 61, 63, and 65, requirements
within any applicable state implementation plan, and any permit
requirements established under 40 CFR 52.21 or under 40 CFR 51.18 and
40 CFR 51.24.
Fluidized bed boiler means a boiler utilizing a fluidized bed
combustion process that is not a pulverized coal boiler.
Fluidized bed combustion means a process where a fuel is burned in
a bed of granulated particles, which are maintained in a mobile
suspension by the forward flow of air and combustion products.
* * * * *
Gas-fired boiler includes any boiler that burns gaseous fuels not
combined with any solid fuels and burns liquid fuel only during periods
of gas curtailment, gas supply interruption, startups, or periodic
testing on liquid fuel. Periodic testing of liquid fuel shall not
exceed a combined total of 48 hours during any calendar year.
Heat input means heat derived from combustion of fuel in a boiler
and does not include the heat input from preheated combustion air,
recirculated flue gases, returned condensate, or exhaust gases from
other sources such as gas turbines, internal combustion engines, kilns.
Hot water heater means a closed vessel with a capacity of no more
than 120 U.S. gallons in which water is heated by combustion of
gaseous, liquid, or biomass fuel and hot water is withdrawn for use
external to the vessel. Hot water boilers (i.e., not generating steam)
combusting gaseous, liquid, or biomass fuel with a heat input capacity
of less than 1.6 million Btu per hour are included in this definition.
The 120 U.S. gallon capacity threshold to be considered a hot water
heater is independent of the 1.6 million Btu per hour heat input
capacity threshold for hot water boilers. Hot water heater also means a
tankless unit that provides on-demand hot water.
Hourly average means the arithmetic average of at least four CMS
data values representing the four 15-minute periods in an hour, or at
least two 15-minute data values during an hour when CMS calibration,
quality assurance, or maintenance activities are being performed.
* * * * *
Institutional boiler means a boiler used in institutional
establishments such as, but not limited to, medical centers, nursing
homes, research centers, institutions of higher education, elementary
and secondary schools, libraries, religious establishments, and
governmental buildings to provide electricity, steam, and/or hot water.
Limited-use boiler means any boiler that burns any amount of solid
or liquid fuels and has a federally enforceable average annual capacity
factor of no more than 10 percent.
Liquid fuel includes, but is not limited to, distillate oil,
residual oil, any form of liquid fuel derived from petroleum, used oil
meeting the specification in 40 CFR 279.11, liquid biofuels, biodiesel,
and vegetable oil, and comparable fuels as defined under 40 CFR 261.38.
Load fraction means the actual heat input of a boiler divided by
heat input during the performance test that established the minimum
sorbent injection rate or minimum activated carbon injection rate,
expressed as a fraction (e.g., for 50 percent load the load fraction is
0.5).
Minimum activated carbon injection rate means load fraction
multiplied by the lowest hourly average activated carbon injection rate
measured according to Table 6 to this subpart during the most recent
performance stack test demonstrating compliance with the applicable
emission limit.
Minimum oxygen level means the lowest hourly average oxygen level
measured according to Table 6 to this subpart during the most recent
performance stack test demonstrating compliance with the applicable
carbon monoxide emission limit.
Minimum scrubber liquid flow rate means the lowest hourly average
scrubber liquid flow rate (e.g., to the particulate matter scrubber)
measured according to Table 6 to this subpart during the most recent
performance stack test demonstrating compliance with the applicable
emission limit.
Minimum scrubber pressure drop means the lowest hourly average
scrubber pressure drop measured according to Table 6 to this subpart
during the most recent performance stack test demonstrating compliance
with the applicable emission limit.
Minimum sorbent injection rate means:
(1) The load fraction multiplied by the lowest hourly average
sorbent injection rate for each sorbent measured according to Table 6
to this subpart during the most recent performance stack test
demonstrating compliance with the applicable emission limits; or
(2) For fluidized bed combustion, the lowest average ratio of
sorbent to sulfur measured during the most recent performance test.
Minimum total secondary electric power means the lowest hourly
average total secondary electric power determined from the values of
secondary voltage and secondary current to the electrostatic
precipitator measured according to Table 6 to this subpart during the
most recent performance stack test demonstrating compliance with the
applicable emission limits.
Natural gas means:
(1) A naturally occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and nonhydrocarbon
gases found in geologic formations beneath
[[Page 7516]]
the earth's surface, of which the principal constituent is methane; or
(2) Liquefied petroleum gas, as defined by the American Society for
Testing and Materials in ASTM D1835 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14); or
(3) A mixture of hydrocarbons that maintains a gaseous state at ISO
conditions (i.e., a temperature of 288 Kelvin, a relative humidity of
60 percent, and a pressure of 101.3 kilopascals). Additionally, natural
gas must either be composed of at least 70 percent methane by volume or
have a gross calorific value between 35 and 41 megajoules (MJ) per dry
standard cubic meter (950 and 1,100 Btu per dry standard cubic foot);
or
(4) Propane or propane-derived synthetic natural gas. Propane means
a colorless gas derived from petroleum and natural gas, with the
molecular structure C3H8.
Oil subcategory includes any boiler that burns any liquid fuel and
is not in either the biomass or coal subcategories. Gas-fired boilers
that burn liquid fuel only during periods of gas curtailment, gas
supply interruptions, startups, or for periodic testing are not
included in this definition. Periodic testing on liquid fuel shall not
exceed a combined total of 48 hours during any calendar year.
* * * * *
Operating day means a 24-hour period between 12 midnight and the
following midnight during which any fuel is combusted at any time in
the boiler unit. It is not necessary for fuel to be combusted for the
entire 24-hour period.
Oxygen analyzer system means all equipment required to determine
the oxygen content of a gas stream and used to monitor oxygen in the
boiler flue gas, boiler firebox, or other appropriate intermediate
location. This definition includes oxygen trim systems.
Oxygen trim system means a system of monitors that is used to
maintain excess air at the desired level in a combustion device. A
typical system consists of a flue gas oxygen and/or carbon monoxide
monitor that automatically provides a feedback signal to the combustion
air controller.
Particulate matter (PM) means any finely divided solid or liquid
material, other than uncombined water, as measured by the test methods
specified under this subpart, or an approved alternative method.
* * * * *
Period of gas curtailment or supply interruption means a period of
time during which the supply of gaseous fuel to an affected boiler is
restricted or halted for reasons beyond the control of the facility.
The act of entering into a contractual agreement with a supplier of
natural gas established for curtailment purposes does not constitute a
reason that is under the control of a facility for the purposes of this
definition. An increase in the cost or unit price of natural gas due to
normal market fluctuations not during periods of supplier delivery
restriction does not constitute a period of natural gas curtailment or
supply interruption. On-site gaseous fuel system emergencies or
equipment failures qualify as periods of supply interruption when the
emergency or failure is beyond the control of the facility.
Process heater means an enclosed device using controlled flame, and
the unit's primary purpose is to transfer heat indirectly to a process
material (liquid, gas, or solid) or to a heat transfer material (e.g.,
glycol or a mixture of glycol and water) for use in a process unit,
instead of generating steam. Process heaters are devices in which the
combustion gases do not come into direct contact with process
materials. Process heaters include units that heat water/water mixtures
for pool heating, sidewalk heating, cooling tower water heating, power
washing, or oil heating.
Qualified energy assessor means:
(1) Someone who has demonstrated capabilities to evaluate energy
savings opportunities for steam generation and major energy using
systems, including, but not limited to:
(i) Boiler combustion management.
(ii) Boiler thermal energy recovery, including
(A) Conventional feed water economizer,
(B) Conventional combustion air preheater, and
(C) Condensing economizer.
(iii) Boiler blowdown thermal energy recovery.
(iv) Primary energy resource selection, including
(A) Fuel (primary energy source) switching, and
(B) Applied steam energy versus direct-fired energy versus
electricity.
(v) Insulation issues.
(vi) Steam trap and steam leak management.
(vii) Condensate recovery.
(viii) Steam end-use management.
(2) Capabilities and knowledge includes, but is not limited to:
(i) Background, experience, and recognized abilities to perform the
assessment activities, data analysis, and report preparation.
(ii) Familiarity with operating and maintenance practices for steam
or process heating systems.
(iii) Additional potential steam system improvement opportunities
including improving steam turbine operations and reducing steam demand.
(iv) Additional process heating system opportunities including
effective utilization of waste heat and use of proper process heating
methods.
(v) Boiler-steam turbine cogeneration systems.
(vi) Industry specific steam end-use systems.
Regulated gas stream means an offgas stream that is routed to a
boiler for the purpose of achieving compliance with a standard under
another subpart of this part or part 60, part 61, or part 65 of this
chapter.
Residential boiler means a boiler used to provide heat and/or hot
water and/or as part of a residential combined heat and power system.
This definition includes boilers located at an institutional facility
(e.g., university campus, military base, church grounds) or commercial/
industrial facility (e.g., farm) used primarily to provide heat and/or
hot water for:
(1) A dwelling containing four or fewer families, or
(2) A single unit residence dwelling that has since been converted
or subdivided into condominiums or apartments.
Residual oil means crude oil, fuel oil that does not comply with
the specifications under the definition of distillate oil, and all fuel
oil numbers 4, 5, and 6, as defined by the American Society of Testing
and Materials in ASTM D396-10 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14(b)).
* * * * *
Seasonal boiler means a boiler that undergoes a shutdown for a
period of at least 7 consecutive months (or 210 consecutive days) each
12-month period due to seasonal conditions, except for periodic
testing. Periodic testing shall not exceed a combined total of 15 days
during the 7-month shutdown. This definition only applies to boilers
that would otherwise be included in the biomass subcategory or the oil
subcategory.
Shutdown means the cessation of operation of a boiler for any
purpose. Shutdown begins either when none of the steam or heat from the
boiler is supplied for heating and/or producing electricity, or for any
other purpose, or at the point of no fuel being fired in the boiler,
whichever is earlier. Shutdown ends when there is no steam and no heat
being supplied and no fuel being fired in the boiler.
Solid fossil fuel includes, but is not limited to, coal, coke,
petroleum coke, and tire-derived fuel.
[[Page 7517]]
Solid fuel means any solid fossil fuel or biomass or bio-based
solid fuel.
Startup means either the first-ever firing of fuel in a boiler for
the purpose of supplying steam or heat for heating and/or producing
electricity, or for any other purpose, or the firing of fuel in a
boiler after a shutdown event for any purpose. Startup ends when any of
the steam or heat from the boiler is supplied for heating and/or
producing electricity, or for any other purpose.
Temporary boiler means any gaseous or liquid fuel boiler that is
designed to, and is capable of, being carried or moved from one
location to another by means of, for example, wheels, skids, carrying
handles, dollies, trailers, or platforms. A boiler is not a temporary
boiler if any one of the following conditions exists:
(1) The equipment is attached to a foundation.
(2) The boiler or a replacement remains at a location within the
facility and performs the same or similar function for more than 12
consecutive months, unless the regulatory agency approves an extension.
An extension may be granted by the regulating agency upon petition by
the owner or operator of a unit specifying the basis for such a
request. Any temporary boiler that replaces a temporary boiler at a
location within the facility and performs the same or similar function
will be included in calculating the consecutive time period unless
there is a gap in operation of 12 months or more.
(3) The equipment is located at a seasonal facility and operates
during the full annual operating period of the seasonal facility,
remains at the facility for at least 2 years, and operates at that
facility for at least 3 months each year.
(4) The equipment is moved from one location to another within the
facility but continues to perform the same or similar function and
serve the same electricity, steam, and/or hot water system in an
attempt to circumvent the residence time requirements of this
definition.
Tune-up means adjustments made to a boiler in accordance with the
procedures outlined in Sec. 63.11223(b).
Vegetable oil means oils extracted from vegetation.
Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) mean technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, business
practices) developed or adopted by one or more voluntary consensus
bodies. EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, by precedent,
has only used VCS that are written in English. Examples of VCS bodies
are: American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, P.O. Box CB700, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428-B2959,
(800) 262-1373, https://www.astm.org), American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME ASME, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990, (800)
843-2763, https://www.asme.org), International Standards Organization
(ISO 1, ch. de la Voie-Creuse, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20,
Switzerland, +41 22 749 01 11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm),
Standards Australia (AS Level 10, The Exchange Centre, 20 Bridge
Street, Sydney, GPO Box 476, Sydney NSW 2001, + 61 2 9237 6171 https://www.stadards.org.au), British Standards Institution (BSI, 389 Chiswick
High Road, London, W4 4AL, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 8996 9001, https://www.bsigroup.com), Canadian Standards Association (CSA 5060 Spectrum
Way, Suite 100, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5N6, Canada, 800-463-6727,
https://www.csa.ca), European Committee for Standardization (CEN CENELEC
Management Centre Avenue Marnix 17 B-1000 Brussels, Belgium +32 2 550
08 11, https://www.cen.eu/cen), and German Engineering Standards (VDI
VDI Guidelines Department, P.O. Box 10 11 39 40002, Duesseldorf,
Germany, +49 211 6214-230, https://www.vdi.eu). The types of standards
that are not considered VCS are standards developed by: the United
States, e.g., California (CARB) and Texas (TCEQ); industry groups, such
as American Petroleum Institute (API), Gas Processors Association
(GPA), and Gas Research Institute (GRI); and other branches of the U.S.
government, e.g., Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of
Transportation (DOT). This does not preclude EPA from using standards
developed by groups that are not VCS bodies within their rule. When
this occurs, EPA has done searches and reviews for VCS equivalent to
these non-EPA methods.
Waste heat boiler means a device that recovers normally unused
energy (i.e., hot exhaust gas) and converts it to usable heat. Waste
heat boilers are also referred to as heat recovery steam generators.
Waste heat boilers are heat exchangers generating steam from incoming
hot exhaust gas from an industrial (e.g., thermal oxidizer, kiln,
furnace) or power (e.g., combustion turbine, engine) equipment. Duct
burners are sometimes used to increase the temperature of the incoming
hot exhaust gas.
Wet scrubber means any add-on air pollution control device that
mixes an aqueous stream or slurry with the exhaust gases from a boiler
to control emissions of particulate matter or to absorb and neutralize
acid gases, such as hydrogen chloride. A wet scrubber creates an
aqueous stream or slurry as a byproduct of the emissions control
process.
* * * * *
0
21. Table 1 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.11201, you must comply with the following
applicable emission limits:
Table 1 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Emission Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must achieve less
than or equal to the
For the following following emission
If your boiler is in this pollutants . . . limits, except during
subcategory . . . periods of startup
and shutdown . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. New coal-fired boilers with a. PM 3.0E-02 pounds(lb)
heat input capacity of 30 (Filterable). per million British
million British thermal units b. Mercury....... thermal units
per hour (MMBtu/hr) or c. CO............ (MMBtu) of heat
greater that do not meet the input.
definition of limited-use 2.2E-05 lb per MMBtu
boiler. of heat input.
420 parts per million
(ppm) by volume on a
dry basis corrected
to 3 percent oxygen
(3-run average or 10-
day rolling
average).
2. New coal-fired boilers with a. PM 4.2E-01 lb per MMBtu
heat input capacity of (Filterable). of heat input.
between 10 and 30 MMBtu/hr b. Mercury....... 2.2E-05 lb per MMBtu
that do not meet the c. CO............ of heat input.
definition of limited-use 420 ppm by volume on
boiler. a dry basis
corrected to 3
percent oxygen (3-
run average or 10-
day rolling
average).
[[Page 7518]]
3. New biomass-fired boilers PM (Filterable).. 3.0E-02 lb per MMBtu
with heat input capacity of of heat input.
30 MMBtu/hr or greater that
do not meet the definition of
seasonal boiler or limited-
use boiler.
4. New biomass fired boilers PM (Filterable).. 7.0E-02 lb per MMBtu
with heat input capacity of of heat input.
between 10 and 30 MMBtu/hr
that do not meet the
definition of seasonal boiler
or limited-use boiler.
5. New oil-fired boilers with PM (Filterable).. 3.0E-02 lb per MMBtu
heat input capacity of 10 of heat input.
MMBtu/hr or greater that do
not meet the definition of
seasonal boiler or limited-
use boiler.
6. Existing coal-fired boilers a. Mercury....... 2.2E-05 lb per MMBtu
with heat input capacity of b. CO............ of heat input.
10 MMBtu/hr or greater that 420 ppm by volume on
do not meet the definition of a dry basis
limited-use boiler. corrected to 3
percent oxygen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
22. Table 2 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.11201, you must comply with the following
applicable work practice standards, emission reduction measures, and
management practices:
Table 2 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Work Practice Standards, Emission
Reduction Measures, and Management Practices
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If your boiler is in this
subcategory . . . You must meet the following . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Existing or new coal- Minimize the boiler's startup and
fired, new biomass-fired, or shutdown periods and conduct startups
new oil-fired boilers (units and shutdowns according to the
with heat input capacity of manufacturer's recommended procedures.
10 MMBtu/hr or greater). If manufacturer's recommended procedures
are not available, you must follow
recommended procedures for a unit of
similar design for which manufacturer's
recommended procedures are available.
2. Existing coal-fired Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
boilers with heat input in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
capacity of less than 10 up of the boiler biennially as specified
MMBtu/hr that do not meet in Sec. 63.11223.
the definition of limited-
use boiler, or use an oxygen
trim system that maintains
an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
3. New coal-fired boilers Conduct a tune-up of the boiler
with heat input capacity of biennially as specified in Sec.
less than 10 MMBtu/hr that 63.11223.
do not meet the definition
of limited-use boiler, or
use an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio.
4. Existing oil-fired boilers Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
with heat input capacity in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
greater than 5 MMBtu/hr that up of the boiler biennially as specified
do not meet the definition in Sec. 63.11223.
of seasonal boiler or
limited-use boiler, or use
an oxygen trim system that
maintains an optimum air-to-
fuel ratio.
5. New oil-fired boilers with Conduct a tune-up of the boiler
heat input capacity greater biennially as specified in Sec.
than 5 MMBtu/hr that do not 63.11223.
meet the definition of
seasonal boiler or limited-
use boiler, or use an oxygen
trim system that maintains
an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
6. Existing biomass-fired Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
boilers that do not meet the in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
definition of seasonal up of the boiler biennially as specified
boiler or limited-use in Sec. 63.11223.
boiler, or use an oxygen
trim system that maintains
an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
7. New biomass-fired boilers Conduct a tune-up of the boiler
that do not meet the biennially as specified in Sec.
definition of seasonal 63.11223.
boiler or limited-use
boiler, or use an oxygen
trim system that maintains
an optimum air-to-fuel ratio.
8. Existing seasonal boilers. Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
up of the boiler every 5 years as
specified in Sec. 63.11223.
9. New seasonal boilers...... Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5
years as specified in Sec. 63.11223.
10. Existing limited-use Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
boilers. in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
up of the boiler every 5 years as
specified in Sec. 63.11223.
11. New limited-use boilers.. Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5
years as specified in Sec. 63.11223.
12. Existing oil-fired Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
boilers with heat input in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
capacity of equal to or less up of the boiler every 5 years as
than 5 MMBtu/hr. specified in Sec. 63.11223.
13. New oil-fired boilers Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5
with heat input capacity of years as specified in Sec. 63.11223.
equal to or less than 5
MMBtu/hr.
[[Page 7519]]
14. Existing coal-fired, Conduct an initial tune-up as specified
biomass-fired, or oil-fired in Sec. 63.11214, and conduct a tune-
boilers with an oxygen trim up of the boiler every 5 years as
system that maintains an specified in Sec. 63.11223.
optimum air-to-fuel ratio
that would otherwise be
subject to a biennial tune-
up.
15. New coal-fired, biomass- Conduct a tune-up of the boiler every 5
fired, or oil-fired boilers years as specified in Sec. 63.11223.
with an oxygen trim system
that maintains an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio that would
otherwise be subject to a
biennial tune-up.
16. Existing coal-fired, Must have a one-time energy assessment
biomass-fired, or oil-fired performed by a qualified energy
boilers (units with heat assessor. An energy assessment completed
input capacity of 10 MMBtu/ on or after January 1, 2008, that meets
hr and greater), not or is amended to meet the energy
including limited-use assessment requirements in this table
boilers. satisfies the energy assessment
requirement. Energy assessor approval
and qualification requirements are
waived in instances where past or
amended energy assessments are used to
meet the energy assessment requirements.
A facility that operates under an energy
management program compatible with ISO
50001 that includes the affected units
also satisfies the energy assessment
requirement. The energy assessment must
include the following with extent of the
evaluation for items (1) to (4)
appropriate for the on-site technical
hours listed in Sec. 63.11237:
(1) A visual inspection of the boiler
system,
(2) An evaluation of operating
characteristics of the affected boiler
systems, specifications of energy use
systems, operating and maintenance
procedures, and unusual operating
constraints,
(3) An inventory of major energy use
systems consuming energy from affected
boiler(s) and which are under control of
the boiler owner or operator,
(4) A review of available architectural
and engineering plans, facility
operation and maintenance procedures and
logs, and fuel usage,
(5) A list of major energy conservation
measures that are within the facility's
control,
(6) A list of the energy savings
potential of the energy conservation
measures identified, and
(7) A comprehensive report detailing the
ways to improve efficiency, the cost of
specific improvements, benefits, and the
time frame for recouping those
investments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
23.Table 3 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.11201, you must comply with the applicable
operating limits:
Table 3 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Operating Limits for Boilers With
Emission Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you demonstrate compliance You must meet these operating limits
with applicable emission except during periods of startup and
limits using . . . shutdown . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Fabric filter control..... a. Maintain opacity to less than or equal
to 10 percent opacity (daily block
average); OR
b. Install and operate a bag leak
detection system according to Sec.
63.11224 and operate the fabric filter
such that the bag leak detection system
alarm does not sound more than 5 percent
of the operating time during each 6-
month period.
2. Electrostatic precipitator a. Maintain opacity to less than or equal
control. to 10 percent opacity (daily block
average); OR
b. Maintain the 30-day rolling average
total secondary electric power of the
electrostatic precipitator at or above
the minimum total secondary electric
power as defined in Sec. 63.11237.
3. Wet scrubber control...... Maintain the 30-day rolling average
pressure drop across the wet scrubber at
or above the minimum scrubber pressure
drop as defined in Sec. 63.11237 and
the 30-day rolling average liquid flow
rate at or above the minimum scrubber
liquid flow rate as defined in Sec.
63.11237.
4. Dry sorbent or activated Maintain the 30-day rolling average
carbon injection control. sorbent or activated carbon injection
rate at or above the minimum sorbent
injection rate or minimum activated
carbon injection rate as defined in Sec.
63.11237. When your boiler operates at
lower loads, multiply your sorbent or
activated carbon injection rate by the
load fraction (e.g., actual heat input
divided by the heat input during the
performance stack test; for 50 percent
load, multiply the injection rate
operating limit by 0.5).
5. Any other add-on air This option is for boilers that operate
pollution control type.. dry control systems. Boilers must
maintain opacity to less than or equal
to 10 percent opacity (daily block
average).
6. Fuel analysis............. Maintain the fuel type or fuel mixture
(annual average) such that the mercury
emission rate calculated according to
Sec. 63.11211(c) are less than the
applicable emission limit for mercury.
7. Performance stack testing. For boilers that demonstrate compliance
with a performance stack test, maintain
the operating load of each unit such
that it does not exceed 110 percent of
the average operating load recorded
during the most recent performance stack
test.
8. Oxygen analyzer system.... For boilers subject to a CO emission
limit that demonstrate compliance with
an oxygen analyzer system as specified
in Sec. 63.11224(a), maintain the 30-
day rolling average oxygen level at or
above the minimum oxygen level as
defined in Sec. 63.11237. This
requirement does not apply to units that
install an oxygen trim system since
these units will set the trim system to
the level specified in Sec.
63.11224(a)(7).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7520]]
* * * * *
0
24. Table 6 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.11211, you must comply with the following
requirements for establishing operating limits:
Table 6 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Establishing Operating Limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And your operating
If you have an applicable limits are based on . . You must . . . Using . . . According to the following
emission limit for . . . . requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PM or mercury............. a. Wet scrubber Establish site-specific Data from the pressure drop (a) You must collect pressure drop
operating parameters. minimum scrubber pressure and liquid flow rate and liquid flow rate data every 15
drop and minimum scrubber monitors and the PM or minutes during the entire period of
liquid flow rate operating mercury performance stack the performance stack tests;
limits according to Sec. tests.
63.11211(b).
(b) Determine the average pressure
drop and liquid flow rate for each
individual test run in the three-run
performance stack test by computing
the average of all the 15-minute
readings taken during each test run.
b. Electrostatic Establish a site-specific Data from the secondary (a) You must collect secondary
precipitator operating minimum total secondary electric power monitors electric power data every 15 minutes
parameters. electric power operating and the PM or mercury during the entire period of the
limit according to Sec. performance stack tests. performance stack tests;
63.11211(b).
(b) Determine the average total
secondary electric power for each
individual test run in the three-run
performance stack test by computing
the average of all the 15-minute
readings taken during each test run.
2. Mercury................... Dry sorbent or Establish a site-specific Data from the sorbent or (a) You must collect sorbent or
activated carbon minimum sorbent or activated carbon injection activated carbon injection rate data
injection rate activated carbon injection rate monitors and the every 15 minutes during the entire
operating parameters. rate operating limit mercury performance stack period of the performance stack
according to Sec. tests. tests;
63.11211(b).
(b) Determine the average sorbent or
activated carbon injection rate for
each individual test run in the
three-run performance stack test by
computing the average of all the 15-
minute readings taken during each
test run.
(c) When your unit operates at lower
loads, multiply your sorbent or
activated carbon injection rate by
the load fraction (e.g., actual heat
input divided by heat input during
performance stack test, for 50
percent load, multiply the injection
rate operating limit by 0.5) to
determine the required injection
rate.
3. CO........................ Oxygen................. Establish a unit-specific Data from the oxygen (a) You must collect oxygen data
limit for minimum oxygen analyzer system specified every 15 minutes during the entire
level. in Sec. 63.11224(a). period of the performance stack
tests;
(b) Determine the average hourly
oxygen concentration for each
individual test run in the three-run
performance stack test by computing
the average of all the 15-minute
readings taken during each test run.
4. Any pollutant for which Boiler operating load.. Establish a unit-specific Data from the operating (a) You must collect operating load
compliance is demonstrated limit for maximum operating load monitors (fuel feed data (fuel feed rate or steam
by a performance stack test. load according to Sec. monitors or steam generation data) every 15 minutes
63.11212(c). generation monitors). during the entire period of the
performance test.
(b) Determine the average operating
load by computing the hourly
averages using all of the 15-minute
readings taken during each
performance test.
(c) Determine the average of the
three test run averages during the
performance test, and multiply this
by 1.1 (110 percent) as your
operating limit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7521]]
0
25. Table 7 to subpart JJJJJJ is revised to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.11222, you must show continuous compliance
with the emission limitations for each boiler according to the
following:
Table 7 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Demonstrating Continuous
Compliance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you must meet the
following operating limits . You must demonstrate continuous
. . compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Opacity................... a. Collecting the opacity monitoring
system data according to Sec.
63.11224(e) and Sec. 63.11221; and
b. Reducing the opacity monitoring data
to 6-minute averages; and
c. Maintaining opacity to less than or
equal to 10 percent (daily block
average).
2. Fabric Filter Bag Leak Installing and operating a bag leak
Detection Operation. detection system according to Sec.
63.11224(f) and operating the fabric
filter such that the requirements in
Sec. 63.11222(a)(4) are met.
3. Wet Scrubber Pressure Drop a. Collecting the pressure drop and
and Liquid Flow Rate. liquid flow rate monitoring system data
according to Sec. Sec. 63.11224 and
63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling
averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average
pressure drop and liquid flow rate at or
above the minimum pressure drop and
minimum liquid flow rate according to
Sec. 63.11211.
4. Dry Scrubber Sorbent or a. Collecting the sorbent or activated
Activated Carbon Injection carbon injection rate monitoring system
Rate. data for the dry scrubber according to
Sec. Sec. 63.11224 and 63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling
averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average
sorbent or activated carbon injection
rate at or above the minimum sorbent or
activated carbon injection rate
according to Sec. 63.11211.
5. Electrostatic Precipitator a. Collecting the total secondary
Total Secondary Electric electric power monitoring system data
Power. for the electrostatic precipitator
according to Sec. Sec. 63.11224 and
63.11221; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling
averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average
total secondary electric power at or
above the minimum total secondary
electric power according to Sec.
63.11211.
6. Fuel Pollutant Content.... a. Only burning the fuel types and fuel
mixtures used to demonstrate compliance
with the applicable emission limit
according to Sec. 63.11213 as
applicable; and
b. Keeping monthly records of fuel use
according to Sec. Sec. 63.11222(a)(2)
and 63.11225(b)(4).
7. Oxygen content............ a. Continuously monitoring the oxygen
content of flue gas according to Sec.
63.11224 (This requirement does not
apply to units that install an oxygen
trim system since these units will set
the trim system to the level specified
in Sec. 63.11224(a)(7)); and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling
averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average
oxygen content at or above the minimum
oxygen level established during the most
recent CO performance test.
8. CO emissions.............. a. Continuously monitoring the CO
concentration in the combustion exhaust
according to Sec. Sec. 63.11224 and
63.11221; and
b. Correcting the data to 3 percent
oxygen, and reducing the data to 1-hour
averages; and
c. Reducing the data from the hourly
averages to 10-day rolling averages; and
d. Maintaining the 10-day rolling average
CO concentration at or below the
applicable emission limit in Table 1 to
this subpart.
9. Boiler operating load..... a. Collecting operating load data (fuel
feed rate or steam generation data)
every 15 minutes; and
b. Reducing the data to 30-day rolling
averages; and
c. Maintaining the 30-day rolling average
at or below the operating limit
established during the performance test
according to Sec. 63.11212(c) and
Table 6 to this subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
26. Table 8 to subpart JJJJJJ is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entry for ``Sec. 63.9''.
0
b. Revising the entry for ``Sec. 63.10(e) and (f)''.
0
c. Adding an entry for ``Sec. 63.10(f)''.
The revisions read as follows:
* * * * *
[[Page 7522]]
Table 8 to Subpart JJJJJJ of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart JJJJJJ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General provisions cite Subject Does it apply?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Sec. 63.9........................ Notification Requirements............ Yes, excluding the information
required in Sec.
63.9(h)(2)(i)(B), (D), (E) and (F).
See Sec. 63.11225.
* * * * * * *
Sec. 63.10(e).................... Additional reporting requirements for Yes.
sources with CMS.
Sec. 63.10(f).................... Waiver of recordkeeping or reporting Yes.
requirements.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2012-31645 Filed 1-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P