Designation of Payor as Agent To Perform Acts Required of an Employer, 6056-6062 [2013-01857]
Download as PDF
6056
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(d) Information regarding the Office of
Finance. A Bank president that receives
any information regarding the Office of
Finance in his or her capacity as a
member of the board of directors of the
Office of Finance may share the
information with the board of directors
of the Bank at which he or she is
employed, as well as with the
appropriate officers and employees of
the Bank, subject to the limitations of
this part.
Dated: January 17, 2013.
Edward J. DeMarco,
Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013–01428 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 1142
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–1032]
Smokeless Tobacco Product Warning
Statements; Request for Comments
and Scientific Evidence
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification; request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is establishing a
public docket to obtain comments,
supported by scientific evidence,
regarding what changes to the smokeless
tobacco product warnings, if any, would
promote greater public understanding of
the risks associated with the use of
smokeless tobacco products.
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments by April 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail
Schmerfeld, Center for Tobacco
Products, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850–3229, 1–877–287–
1373, gail.schmerfeld@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On June 22, 2009, the President
signed the Family Smoking Prevention
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
and Tobacco Control Act (Pub. L. 111–
31) (Tobacco Control Act) into law. The
Tobacco Control Act grants FDA
authority to regulate the manufacture,
marketing, and distribution of tobacco
products to protect public health
generally and to reduce tobacco use by
minors.
Section 204 of the Tobacco Control
Act amended section 3 of the
Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco
Health Education Act (Smokeless
Tobacco Act) (15 U.S.C. 4402) to
prescribe new requirements for health
warnings that must appear on smokeless
tobacco product packages and
advertising. The Smokeless Tobacco Act
(15 U.S.C. 4402(a)(1) and (b)(1)),
requires that smokeless tobacco product
packages and advertising must bear one
of four required warning statements.
The four required warning statements
are:
‘‘WARNING: This product can cause
mouth cancer.’’
‘‘WARNING: This product can cause
gum disease and tooth loss.’’
‘‘WARNING: This product is not a
safe alternative to cigarettes.’’
‘‘WARNING: Smokeless tobacco is
addictive.’’ (15 U.S.C. 4402(a)(1))
One of the four required warning
statements must be located on each of
the two principal display panels of the
package and comprise at least 30
percent of each such display panel (15
U.S.C. 4402(a)(2)(A)). The Smokeless
Tobacco Act (15 U.S.C. 4402(a)(2) and
(b)(2)), also sets forth requirements for
the placement, type, size, and color of
warnings on packaging and
advertisements, respectively.
Section 205(a) of the Tobacco Control
Act further amended section 3 of the
Smokeless Tobacco Act to give FDA the
authority to ‘‘adjust the format, type size
and text of any of the label
requirements, require color graphics to
accompany the text, increase the
required label area from 30 up to 50
percent of the front and rear panels of
the package, or establish the format,
type size, and text of any other
disclosures required under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act’’ through
rulemaking conducted under the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C.
552, et seq.) if FDA ‘‘finds that such a
change would promote greater public
understanding of the risks associated
with the use of smokeless tobacco
products’’ (15 U.S.C. 4402(d)).
II. Request for Scientific Evidence and
Information
We are interested in comments,
supported by scientific evidence,
regarding what changes, if any, to the
smokeless tobacco product warnings
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would promote greater public
understanding of the risks associated
with the use of smokeless tobacco
products. The ‘‘public’’ includes both
tobacco users and nonusers (i.e., never
users and former users). Comments and
supporting evidence should address
how any changes in the warnings would
affect both users’ and nonusers’
understanding of the risks associated
with the use of smokeless tobacco
products.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
written comments regarding this
document to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) or
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 18, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–01626 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
[REG–102966–10]
RIN 1545–BJ31
Designation of Payor as Agent To
Perform Acts Required of an Employer
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations under section
3504 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) providing circumstances under
which a person (payor) is designated as
an agent to perform the acts required of
an employer and is liable for
employment taxes with respect to wages
or compensation paid by the payor to
individuals performing services for the
payor’s client pursuant to a service
agreement between the payor and the
client.
SUMMARY:
Written or electronic comments
must be received by April 29, 2013.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–102966–10), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday,
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–102966–10),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. Additionally,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. (Indicate IRS and
REG–102966–10.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
contact Jeanne Royal Singley at (202)
622–0047; concerning the submission of
comments or requests for a hearing,
contact Oluwafunmilayo (Fumni) Taylor
at (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
Background
Employment Taxes in General
Employers generally are required to
deduct and withhold federal income tax
and Federal Insurance Contributions
Act (FICA) taxes from wages paid to
their employees under sections 3402(a)
and 3102(a), and are separately liable for
the employer’s share of FICA taxes
under section 3111 and Federal
Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes
under section 3301. Instead of FICA
taxes, railroad employers are required to
deduct and withhold Railroad
Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) taxes from
their employees’ compensation under
section 3202, and are separately liable
for the employer’s share of RRTA tax
under section 3221. These taxes are
collectively referred to for purposes of
these proposed regulations as
employment taxes. Sections 31.3102–
1(d), 31.3202–1(e) and 31.3403–1
establish that the employer is the person
liable for the withholding and payment
of employment taxes, whether or not
amounts are actually withheld.
When an individual performs services
for another person, an employeremployee relationship may exist.
Generally, the Code determines the
existence of an employer-employee
relationship by applying the common
law test to the particular facts and
circumstances of each case. See section
3121(d)(2). The Code, however, also
provides for other categories of
employees, such as corporate officers in
section 3121(d)(1).
Under the common law test, an
employment relationship exists when
the person for whom the services are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
performed has the right to control and
direct the individual who performs the
services, not only as to the result to be
accomplished by the work but also as to
the details and means by which that
result is accomplished. An employment
relationship exists if an employee is
subject to the will and control of the
employer not only as to what shall be
done but how it shall be done. In this
connection, it is not necessary that the
employer actually direct or control the
manner in which the services are
performed; it is sufficient if the
employer has the right to do so. See
§§ 31.3121(d)–1(c), 31.3231(b)–1(a)(2),
31.3306(i)–1(b), and 31.3401(c)–1(b).
This test is also applicable in
determining which of two parties in a
three-party arrangement is the
employer. See for example, Professional
and Executive Leasing, Inc. v.
Commissioner, 89 T.C. 225 (1987), aff’d,
862 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1988).
While other factors are helpful in
analyzing the common law test, the
critical factor in determining whether a
person is the common law employer of
an individual who performs services is
whether the individual is subject to the
will and control of the person receiving
the services both as to the work to be
done and how it is to be done. Thus, the
person’s control of the individual’s
actual job performance, rather than
merely control of certain administrative
functions related to the individual
performing services at the worksite, is
paramount under the common law
analysis. In unique circumstances, an
individual may be an employee of more
than one employer (concurrent
employment) with regard to the same
services. See Rev. Rul. 66–162, 1966–1
C.B. 234 (citing Rest. 2d Agency, § 226).
However, in order for an individual to
be concurrently employed by two
entities, each entity must separately
satisfy the common law control test.
An employer must file an
employment tax return reporting
employment taxes for each employment
tax return period. Generally, an
employer files Form 941, Employer’s
Quarterly Federal Tax Return to report
wages the employer paid—during a
quarter of a calendar year—that are
subject to federal income tax
withholding and FICA taxes. Wages an
employer pays that are subject to FUTA
tax are reported annually on Form 940,
Employer’s Annual Federal
Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Return.
Employers that pay compensation
subject to the RRTA file Form CT–1,
Employer’s Annual Railroad Retirement
Tax Return, as well as Form 941 to
report federal income tax withholding.
All employers that pay wages or
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6057
compensation subject to federal income
tax withholding, FICA tax, or RRTA tax
must file Forms W–2, Wage and Tax
Statement, and a Form W–3,
Transmittal of Wage and Tax
Statements, with the Social Security
Administration (SSA) and furnish a
Form W–2 to each employee. The
employer must obtain an employer
identification number (EIN) using Form
SS–4, Application for Employer
Identification Number, for use in filing
the forms. An EIN is a nine-digit
number used by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) to identify an employer’s
tax account. See section 6109.
For various reasons, an employer may
choose to enter into an agreement with
a third party (such as a payroll service
provider or a professional employer
organization (PEO)), sometimes referred
to as a third-party payor. Under the
agreement the third-party payor remits
the wages to employees and takes steps
to ensure the employer’s employment
tax withholding, reporting, and payment
obligations are satisfied. However,
employment tax liability cannot be
altered by private agreement between an
employer and a third-party payor. See In
re Professional Security Services, Inc.,
162 B.R. 901 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1993).
Rather the liability of the employer and/
or the third-party payor for employment
taxes is determined under the Code and
depends on all of the facts and
circumstances, including the terms and
substance of the arrangement between
the employer and the third-party payor.
There are limited circumstances in a
three-party arrangement when the thirdparty payor may be considered the
person responsible for the withholding
and payment of employment taxes in
addition to, or in lieu of, the common
law employer. A description of some
common three-party arrangements
follows.
Section 3401(d)(1) Employers
Section 3401(d)(1) provides that for
purposes of federal income tax
withholding, the term employer means
the person for whom an individual
performs or performed any service, of
whatever nature, as an employee of such
person, except that, if the person for
whom the individual performs or
performed the services does not have
control of the payment of wages for such
services, the term employer means the
person having control of the payment of
such wages. For purposes of section
3401(d)(1), the term control means legal
control. See § 31.3401(d)–1(f). Thus,
when one person is the common law
employer of an individual because it
controls the day-to-day performance of
services by the individual, another
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
6058
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
person may be the employer liable to
collect, report, and pay employment
taxes because it is the entity solely in
control of the payment of wages to the
individual. See Winstead v. United
States, 109 F.3d 989 (4th Cir. 1997).
Whether an entity is in control of the
payment of wages is determined by
considering the facts and circumstances
related to each payment of wages. Thus,
an entity can be in control of the
payment of wages for one employment
tax return period, but not in control of
the payment of wages for a prior or
subsequent employment tax return
period.
The legislative history to section
3401(d)(1) specifies that section
3401(d)(1) was intended solely to meet
unusual situations and was not
intended as a departure from the basic
structure of centralizing employment
tax obligations with the common law
employer. See S. Rep. No. 221, 78th
Cong. 1st Sess., May 10, 1943.
Accordingly, an entity is not in control
of the payment of wages if the payment
of wages is contingent upon, or
proximately related to, the entity having
first received funds from its clients.
The FICA, FUTA, and RRTA do not
contain a definition of the term
employer similar to the definition
contained in section 3401(d)(1);
however, courts have applied the
section 3401(d)(1) definition to
determine liability for the payment of
FICA tax under sections 3102 and 3111
and FUTA tax under section 3301. See
Otte v. United States, 419 U.S. 43, 95 S.
Ct. 247, 42 L. Ed. 2d 212 (1974); In re
Armadillo Corp., 410 F. Supp. 407 (D.
Colo. 1976), aff’d, 561 F. 2d 1382 (10th
Cir. 1977). Due to the similarity between
the purpose and scope of the RRTA and
the purpose and scope of the FICA, the
same definition also applies to the
RRTA. Accordingly, section 3401(d)(1)
shifts the liability for all the
employment taxes due on wages or
compensation from the common law
employer to the third-party payor with
control of the payment of those wages
or compensation.
Section 3504—Agents
Under section 3504, if a payor pays
wages or compensation to employees
who are employed by one or more
employers, the Secretary is authorized,
in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary, to designate
such payor to perform acts required of
employers under the Code. Section 3504
further provides that, except as
otherwise prescribed by the Secretary,
all provisions of law (including
penalties) applicable with respect to an
employer are applicable to the person so
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
designated, but the employer for whom
the person acts remains subject to the
provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable with respect to employers.
Accordingly, both an employer and the
payor designated in accordance with
regulations under section 3504 are liable
for the employment taxes on wages or
compensation paid by the payor.
Current regulations issued under
section 3504 permit district directors
and service centers in the IRS to
authorize a payor to perform acts
required of employers with respect to
chapters 21 (FICA tax), 22 (RRTA tax),
and 24 (federal income tax withholding)
of the Code if the payor applies for such
authorization. See Treas. Reg.
§ 31.3504–1(a). The Treasury
Department and the IRS have separately
proposed updating these regulations to
remove the references to the district
director and service center and to
provide that the application by the
payor (referred to therein as an ‘‘agent’’)
must be signed by both the payor and
employer and made on the form
prescribed by the IRS and according to
the instructions provided by the IRS.
See Proposed Regulations § 31.3504–
1(a), published in the Federal Register
on January 13, 2010, (75 FR 1735–01).
Pursuant to section 3504 and the
regulations, the IRS has established
administrative procedures under which
a payor may request authorization to file
employment tax returns and perform
other acts for the employer. Specifically,
Revenue Procedure 70–6, 1970–1 CB
420, provides the general procedures for
a payor to request authorization to act
as an agent under section 3504 for FICA,
income tax withholding, and RRTA
purposes, and describes the agent’s
resulting reporting and filing
requirements. Each employer for whom
the agent is to act provides the payor
with a signed IRS Form 2678, Employer/
Payer Appointment of Agent. A payor
seeking to act as an agent under section
3504 submits these Forms 2678 to the
IRS. The IRS sends a letter to the agent
once it has approved the application,
and the appointment remains in effect
until terminated by one of the parties.
An agent with an approved Form 2678
files an aggregate Form 941 reporting
FICA tax and income tax withholding
for each tax return period using the
agent’s own EIN (regardless of the
number of employers for whom the
agent acts). Effective for periods on or
after January 1, 2010, an agent with an
approved Form 2678 must also
complete and attach to the aggregate
Form 941 a Schedule R (Form 941),
Allocation Schedule for Aggregate Form
941 Filers. The agent uses Schedule R
(Form 941) to allocate the aggregate
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information reported on Form 941 to
each employer. Schedule R (Form 941)
is attached to the Form 941 in every
quarter for which the agent files an
aggregate Form 941. See
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b). If an agent with an
approved Form 2678 is acting for
employers under the RRTA, the agent
must report for each employer the
taxable compensation as determined
under RRTA with respect to each
employer on an aggregate Form CT–1.
Consistent with the limitations in the
current regulations, an agent with an
approved Form 2678 is generally not
authorized to perform the employment
tax obligations of an employer with
respect to the FUTA tax. Thus, an
employer generally must continue to
satisfy its FUTA tax obligations by filing
a Form 940 using its own EIN. Proposed
Regulation § 31.3504–1(b), however,
provides a limited exception to the
general rule regarding FUTA, which
employers may rely on for periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2010.
The proposed regulation allows agents
acting on behalf of employers receiving
home care services to perform the acts
of an employer required under Chapter
23 (FUTA tax). An agent that files an
aggregate Form 940 under the limited
exception must complete and attach to
the Form 940 a Schedule R (Form 940),
Allocation Schedule for Aggregate Form
940 Filers.
Generally, Forms W–2 filed with the
SSA and furnished to employees must
reflect the name and EIN of the agent
with an approved Form 2678; however,
special rules may apply if the agent is
acting as an agent for two or more
employers.
Payroll Service Providers (PSPs) and
Reporting Agents
An employer may enter into an
agreement with a payroll service
provider (PSP) to prepare employment
tax returns (including Forms 940 and
941) using the EIN of the employer for
the signature of the employer. A PSP
may also process the withholding,
deposit, and payment of the associated
employment taxes for the employer. A
PSP is not liable under subtitle C of the
Code as the employer, or as an agent of
the employer, for the employer’s
employment taxes. An employer’s use of
a PSP does not relieve the employer of
its employment tax obligations or
liability for the taxes.
Generally, a reporting agent is a PSP
that is authorized to sign and file certain
employment tax returns on behalf of the
employer using the employer’s EIN,
including Forms 940 and 941. A
reporting agent may also process the
withholding, deposit, and payment of
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
the associated employment taxes for the
employer. The IRS has prescribed Form
8655, Reporting Agent Authorization, as
the appropriate authorization form for
an employer to use to designate a PSP
as a reporting agent. Additional
information concerning reporting agent
authorizations may be found in Rev.
Proc. 2012–32, 2012–35 I.R.B. 1. A
reporting agent is not liable under
subtitle C of the Code as the employer,
or as an agent of the employer, for the
employer’s employment taxes. An
employer’s use of a reporting agent does
not relieve the employer of its
employment tax obligations or liability
for the taxes.
Analyzing Three-Party Arrangements
In certain instances, an employer may
mistakenly believe it is relieved of
employment tax liabilities merely
because it has entered into an agreement
with a third-party payor (for example, a
PEO or employee leasing company) for
assistance in fulfilling its employment
tax obligations. However, an employer
remains liable for employment taxes
irrespective of any agreement it may
enter into that purports to place the
employment tax obligations and
liabilities with the payor, except in the
limited circumstances when the payor
satisfies the conditions to be liable
under section 3401(d)(1). In this regard,
status as the employer of the worker is
determined based on all the facts and
circumstances under the common law
test (or under other specific Code
provisions related to particular types of
employees, such as corporate officers).
Neither claims by a payor that it is the
employer (or ‘‘co-employer’’) of the
worker for federal employment tax or
other purposes nor the fact that the
payor may file employment tax returns
under its own EIN are determinative
under the Code for purposes of
identifying the employer liable for
employment taxes.
The application of the employment
tax obligations in a three-party
arrangement often requires an analysis
of complex facts and circumstances that
can vary widely. Consequently, the
parties to an arrangement may not
always understand which party or
parties will be liable for any unpaid
employment taxes. Even when there is
no underlying dispute about the status
of the workers as employees or that
employment taxes are due with respect
to the wages paid to the employees, the
IRS must expend substantial resources
to develop the facts to determine the
liabilities of the parties. The Treasury
Department and the IRS intend that
these proposed regulations assist
taxpayers and the IRS in determining
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
the parties’ employment tax obligations
in a three-party arrangement when a
payor has represented to its client that
it will pay the employment taxes with
respect to wages or compensation it
pays to employees for services
performed by employees for the client.
Explanation of Provisions
In General
The proposed regulations provide
rules regarding employment tax
obligations in certain three-party
arrangements when the employer enters
into an agreement with a third-party
payor under which the payor performs
the employment tax obligations of the
client with regard to wages or
compensation paid by the payor to
individuals performing services for the
client, but the payor does not meet the
legal conditions necessary to be a
section 3401(d)(1) employer, does not
obtain an approved Form 2678, and is
not a PSP or reporting agent. More
specifically, the proposed regulations
provide that, unless one of the
enumerated exceptions discussed below
applies, a payor is designated as an
agent under section 3504 to perform the
acts required of an employer with
respect to wages or compensation paid
by the payor to any individual
performing services for any client
pursuant to a service agreement (as
defined in these proposed regulations)
between the payor and the client.
The designation of a payor as an agent
to perform acts of an employer under
the proposed regulations addresses all
federal employment taxes. Thus, for
purposes of the proposed regulations,
the term wages includes wages as
defined for purposes of Chapters 21
(FICA tax), 23 (FUTA tax), and 24
(federal income tax withholding) of the
Code, and the term compensation
means compensation as defined for
purposes of Chapter 22 (RRTA tax) of
the Code. The rules in the proposed
regulations regarding the designation of
a payor as an agent required to perform
acts of an employer are provided solely
for purposes of determining liability for
employment taxes under section 3504.
No inference is intended that the same
rules would apply for any other
provision of the Code.
As required by section 3504 and
consistent with the rules relating to
agents authorized under § 31.3504–1(a),
the proposed regulations provide that if
a payor is designated as an agent to
perform the acts of an employer, all
provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable with respect to an employer
are applicable to that payor and that
each employer for whom the payor is
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6059
designated to act remains subject to all
provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable to an employer. However,
consistent with the IRS’s position on
administering the section 6672 trust
fund recovery penalty, under the
proposed regulations the employment
tax liability of an employer will be
collected only once, whether from the
payor or the employer.
Scope and Effect of Designation
Subject to the exceptions set forth in
the proposed regulations, a payor is
designated as an agent under section
3504 to perform the acts of an employer
in any case in which the payor entered
into a service agreement with a client.
For this purpose, the term service
agreement means a written or oral
agreement pursuant to which the payor:
(1) Asserts it is the employer (or ‘‘coemployer’’) of individuals performing
services for the client, (2) pays wages or
compensation to the individuals for
services the individuals performed for
the client, and (3) assumes
responsibility to collect, report, and pay,
or assumes liability for, any
employment taxes with respect to the
wages or compensation paid by the
payor to the individuals who performed
services for the client.
The first component of a service
agreement is that the payor asserts it is
the employer (or ‘‘co-employer’’) of
individuals performing services for
another individual or entity (the client).
For purposes of these regulations, a
payor may implicitly or explicitly assert
it is the employer (or ‘‘co-employer’’) of
individuals performing services for a
client, including by agreeing to: (1)
Recruit and hire employees or assign
employees as permanent or temporary
members of the client’s workforce, or
participate with the client in these
actions; (2) hire the client’s employees
as its own and then provide them back
to the client to perform services for the
client; or (3) file employment tax returns
using its own EIN that include wages or
compensation paid to the individuals
performing services for the client. A
payor that is the common law employer
of the individuals performing services
for a client under all of the facts and
circumstances, however, is not
designated under the proposed
regulations to perform the acts of an
employer with respect to wages or
compensation paid to such individuals
(see ‘‘Exceptions to Designation’’) but is
liable for employment taxes as the
employer.
The second component of a service
agreement is that the payor pays wages
or compensation to the individuals
performing services for its client. A
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
6060
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
payor with legal control of the payment
of wages or compensation within the
meaning of section 3401(d)(1), however,
is not designated under the proposed
regulations with respect to such wages
or compensation (see ‘‘Exceptions to
Designation’’) but is liable for
employment taxes as a section
3401(d)(1) employer.
The third component of a service
agreement is that the payor assumes
responsibility for the collection,
reporting, and payment of, or assumes
liability for, any employment taxes with
respect to the wages or compensation
paid by the payor to the individuals
performing services for the client. Under
the proposed regulations, a payor
assumes the responsibility to collect,
report, and pay the applicable taxes if
the payor represents to the client that it
would make any or all of the federal
employment tax deposits and other
payments required by law. A payor that
is a PSP or reporting agent, however, is
not designated under the proposed
regulations with respect to such wages
or compensation (see ‘‘Exceptions to
Designation’’) if the payor files the
employment tax returns reporting such
wages or compensation under the
client’s EIN.
Exceptions to Designation
As mentioned above, the proposed
regulations provide exceptions to when
a payor is designated under section
3504 to perform the acts of an employer
even if the payor has entered into an
agreement that includes the components
of a service agreement. The proposed
regulations contain eight examples
demonstrating the application or nonapplication of the proposed regulations
to various factual scenarios.
First, the proposed regulations do not
apply to the extent that the payor files
employment tax returns under the
client’s EIN, reporting the wages or
compensation paid to individuals
performing services for the client. Thus,
a reporting agent or a PSP that prepares
returns using the employer’s EIN is not
designated under the proposed
regulations.
Second, the proposed regulations do
not affect the application of the common
paymaster rules under sections 3121(s)
and 3231(i). Therefore, a second
exception provides that a common
paymaster is not designated under the
proposed regulations for wages or
compensation it pays within the context
of the concurrent employment
arrangement described in section
3121(s) or 3231(i) and the related
regulations.
Third, a payor is not designated under
the proposed regulations if the person is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
the employer of the employees under
the common law test (because the
person has the right to control and
direct the individual with regard to the
details and means of performing
services for the client) or under one of
the other section 3121(d) provisions, or
is a section 3401(d)(1) employer. Thus,
a third exception provides that if the
payor is the employer of the individuals
performing services for a client, it is not
designated as an agent under section
3504. The payor remains liable for
payment of employment taxes, however,
as the employer. For example, if a
consulting firm contracts to provide
consulting services to a client and the
consulting firm directs and controls the
employees providing the consulting
services under the contract with regard
to how to perform those services, the
consulting firm is liable for employment
taxes as the common law employer of
the employees, not as a payor
designated under the proposed
regulations.
Designation Under Proposed
Regulations Is Not the Exclusive
Remedy for the IRS
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize that the determination of the
employer and the liabilities of the
parties in a three-party arrangement is a
factually and resource intensive
undertaking involving multiple parties.
The regulations as proposed will assist
the IRS in cases in which a payor has
represented to a client that the payor is
liable for some or all of the client’s
employment tax obligations, but the
payor has not received authorization to
act as an agent through an approved
Form 2678. However, the designation of
a payor as an agent to perform the acts
required of an employer under the
proposed regulations will not preclude
the IRS from asserting, in the
alternative, that the payor is the
common law employer (or an employer
of an employee under one of the other
section 3121(d) provisions) or the
section 3401(d)(1) employer of
individuals providing services for a
client. Additionally, the fact that the IRS
does not assert that a payor is
designated as an agent to perform the
acts required of an employer under the
proposed regulations will not preclude
the IRS from determining the payor’s
employment tax-related liability under
other Code provisions (for example, the
section 6672 trust fund recovery
penalty).
Effective Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to be
effective the date the final regulations
are published in the Federal Register
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and are applicable to wages or
compensation paid by a payor in
quarters beginning on or after the
effective date to individuals performing
services for its client pursuant to a
service agreement.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to this regulation, and because the
regulation does not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, this regulation has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS.
The IRS and Treasury Department
request comments on the proposed
regulations and are particularly
interested in comments on the following
issues:
(1) Whether the application of the
definition of service agreement
inappropriately results in a payor being
designated an agent under section 3504,
or inappropriately results in a payor
failing to be designated an agent under
section 3504;
(2) Whether additional exceptions are
warranted; and
(3) Potential additional examples.
All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested
in writing by any person that timely
submits written comment. If a public
hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Jeanne Royal
Singley, Office of Division Counsel/
Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt
and Government Entities). However,
personnel from other offices of the IRS
and Treasury participated in their
development.
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 31
Employment taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Pensions, Railroad retirement,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social security,
Unemployment compensation.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 31 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND
COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT
SOURCE
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 31 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 31.3504–2 is added to
read as follows:
■
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
§ 31.3504–2 Designation of Payor as Agent
to Perform Acts of an Employer.
(a) In general. A person (as defined in
section 7701(a)(1)) that pays wages or
compensation (‘‘payor’’) to the
individual(s) performing services for
any client pursuant to a service
agreement, except as provided in
paragraph (d) of this section, is
designated as an agent to perform the
acts required of an employer with
respect to the wages or compensation
paid. For purposes of this section the
term wages has the same meaning as the
term wages has for purposes of chapters
21, 23, and 24, and the term
compensation has the same meaning as
the term compensation has for purposes
of chapter 22. This section is not
applicable if the payor has been
authorized as an agent of the employer
under § 31.3504–1.
(b) Definitions—(1) Client. The term
client means an individual or entity that
enters into a service agreement with the
payor.
(2) Service agreement. (i) The term
service agreement means an agreement
pursuant to which the payor:
(A) Asserts it is the employer (or ‘‘coemployer’’) of the individual(s)
performing services for the client;
(B) Pays wages or compensation to the
individual(s) for services the
individual(s) perform for the client; and
(C) Assumes responsibility to collect,
report, and pay, or assumes liability for,
any taxes applicable under subtitle C of
the Code with respect to the wages or
compensation paid by the payor to the
individual(s) performing services for the
client.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section, the payor
may implicitly or explicitly assert it is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
the employer (or ‘‘co-employer’’) of the
individual(s) performing services for the
client, including by agreeing to:
(A) Recruit and hire employees for the
client or assign employees as permanent
or temporary members of the client’s
work force, or participate with the client
in these actions;
(B) Hire the client’s employees as its
own and then provide them back to the
client to perform services for the client;
or
(C) File employment tax returns using
its own EIN that include wages or
compensation paid to the individual(s)
performing services for the client.
(c) Effects of designation. If a payor is
designated as an agent to perform the
acts required of an employer under this
section—
(1) A payor must perform the acts
required of an employer under each
applicable chapter of the Code and the
relevant regulations with respect to the
wages or compensation paid by such
payor. All provisions of law (including
penalties) and the regulations applicable
to the employer are applicable to the
payor so designated with respect to the
wages or compensation paid by the
payor; and
(2) Each employer for whom the payor
is designated as an agent remains
subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) and of the
regulations applicable to an employer.
(d) Exceptions. A payor is not
designated as an agent to perform the
acts required of an employer under this
section for any wages or compensation
paid by the payor to the individual(s)
performing services for a client to the
extent that—
(1) The wages or compensation are
reported on a return filed under the
client’s employer identification number
(as defined in section 6109 and the
applicable regulations);
(2) The payor is a common paymaster
under sections 3121(s) or 3231(i); or
(3) The payor is the employer of the
individual(s).
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this section:
(1) Example 1. Corporation P enters into
an agreement with Employer, effective
January 1, 2013. Under the agreement,
Corporation P hires the Employer’s
employees as its own employees and
provides them back to Employer to perform
services for Employer. Corporation P also
assumes responsibility to make payment of
the individuals’ wages and for the collection,
reporting, and payment of applicable taxes.
For all pay periods in 2013, Employer
provides Corporation P with an amount equal
to the gross payroll (that is, wage and tax
amounts) of the individuals, and Corporation
P pays wages (less the applicable
withholding) to the individuals performing
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6061
services for Employer. Corporation P also
reports the wage and tax amounts on Form
941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax
Return, filed for each quarter of 2013 under
Corporation P’s employer identification
number. Corporation P is not a common
paymaster or the employer of the individuals.
Corporation P is designated to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the
wages Corporation P paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation
P are each subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(2) Example 2. Same facts as Example 1,
except that Corporation P only reports the
wage and tax amounts on Form 941,
Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return,
filed for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2013.
Neither Corporation P nor Employer files
returns for the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2013.
Corporation P is designated to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the
wages Corporation P paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation
P are each subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(3) Example 3. Same facts as Example 1,
except that neither Corporation P nor
Employer reports the wage and tax amounts
on Form 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal
Tax Return for any quarter of 2013.
Corporation P is designated to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the
wages Corporation P paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation
P are each subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(4) Example 4. Same facts as Example 1,
except that Employer provides only net
payroll (that is, wages less tax amounts) to
Corporation P for each pay period.
Corporation P is designated to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the
wages Corporation P paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation
P are each subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(5) Example 5. Same facts as Example 1,
except that after Corporation P reports the
wage and tax amounts on Form 941,
Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return,
filed for each quarter of 2013 under
Corporation P’s employer identification
number, Corporation P files a claim for
refund of the employment taxes it paid for
each quarter of 2013 that are related to wages
Corporation P paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer. The basis
for Corporation P’s refund claim is that
Corporation P is not the employer of the
individuals that performed services for
Employer. Corporation P is designated to
perform the acts of an employer with respect
to all of the wages Corporation P paid to the
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
6062
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Proposed Rules
individuals performing services for Employer
for all quarters of 2013. Accordingly,
Corporation P is not entitled to a refund.
Employer and Corporation P are each subject
to all provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable in respect of employers for all
quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(6) Example 6. Corporation S enters into
an agreement with Employer, effective
January 1, 2013. Under the agreement,
Corporation S provides payroll services,
including payment of wages to individuals
performing services for Employer, and
assumes responsibility for the collection,
reporting, and payment of applicable taxes.
For all pay periods in 2013, Employer
provides Corporation S with an amount equal
to the gross payroll (that is, wage and tax
amounts) of the individuals, and Corporation
S pays wages (less the applicable
withholding) to the individuals performing
services for Employer. Corporation S also
reports the wage and tax amounts on Form
941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax
Return, filed for each quarter of 2013 under
Employer’s employer identification number.
Corporation S is not designated to perform
the acts of an employer with respect to all of
the wages Corporation S paid to the
individuals performing services for Employer
for all quarters of 2013. Corporation S did not
assert it was the employer and filed Forms
941 using Employer’s employer identification
number. Accordingly, Corporation S is not
liable for the applicable employment taxes
under this section. Employer remains subject
to all provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable in respect of employers for all
quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(7) Example 7. Corporation V enters into
a consulting agreement with Manufacturer
effective January 1, 2013, to provide
consulting services to Manufacturer.
Corporation V is responsible to pay wages to
the individuals providing the consulting
services to Manufacturer and to collect,
report, and pay the applicable taxes.
Corporation V has the right to direct and
control the individuals as to when and how
to perform the consulting services and, thus,
is the common law employer of the
individuals providing the consulting
services. Corporation V is not designated to
perform the acts of an employer with respect
to all of the wages Corporation V paid to
individuals providing consulting services to
Manufacturer. However, as the common law
employer of the individuals, Corporation V is
subject to all provisions of law (including
penalties) applicable in respect of employers
with respect to such wages.
(8) Example 8. Corporation U and
Employer execute and submit a Form 2678,
Employer/Payer Appointment of Agent, to
the Service, requesting approval to authorize
Corporation U to report, deposit, and pay
taxes with respect to wages it pays, as agent
of Employer for purposes of Form 941,
Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return.
The Form 2678 is approved by the Service
and effective for all quarters of 2013.
Accordingly, Corporation U reports the
wages it pays to individuals performing
services for Employer and related tax
amounts on Form 941 and Schedule R (Form
941), Allocation Schedule for Aggregate Form
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jan 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
941 Filers, filed for each quarter of 2013
under Corporation U’s employer
identification number. Corporation U is not
designated under this section to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the
wages Corporation U paid to the individuals
performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. However, as an agent
authorized under § 31.3504–1(a), Corporation
U is subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages. Employer also remains
subject to all provisions of law (including
penalties) applicable in respect of employers
for all quarters of 2013 with respect to such
wages.
(f) Effective/applicability date. These
regulations apply to wages or
compensation paid by a payor in
quarters beginning on or after the date
of publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register to individuals
performing services for the payor’s
client pursuant to a service agreement.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2013–01857 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 934
[SATS No. ND–052–FOR; Docket ID OSM–
2012–0021]
North Dakota Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the North
Dakota regulatory program (hereinafter,
the ‘‘North Dakota program’’) under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (‘‘SMCRA’’ or
‘‘the Act’’). North Dakota intends to
revise its program to be consistent with
the corresponding Federal regulations,
add a new subsection to an existing rule
with general requirements on the format
of electronic applications, and make a
minor correction to a provision
pertaining to a separate rule which was
amended to no longer require renewal of
a permit once lands in that permit are
no longer being mined or used in the
support of mining.
This document gives the times and
locations that the North Dakota program
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4:00
p.m., m.s.t. February 28, 2013. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on February 25,
2013. We will accept requests to speak
until 4:00 p.m., m.s.t. on February 13,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following two methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. This proposed
rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2012–0021. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Jeffrey
Fleischman, Director, Casper Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Dick
Cheney Federal Building, POB 11018,
150 East B Street, Casper, Wyoming
82601–1018.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘III. Public Comment
Procedures’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
In addition to viewing the docket and
obtaining copies of documents at
www.regulations.gov, you may review
copies of the North Dakota program, this
amendment, a listing of any public
hearings, and all written comments
received in response to this document at
the addresses listed below during
normal business hours, Monday through
Friday, excluding holidays. You may
also receive one free copy of the
amendment by contacting OSM’s Casper
Field Office.
Jeffrey Fleischman, Director, Casper
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Dick
Cheney Federal Building, P.O. Box
11018, 150 East B Street, Casper,
Wyoming 82601–1018, (307) 261–
6555, jfleischman@osmre.gov.
James Deutsch, Director, Reclamation
Division, North Dakota Public Service
Commission, 600 East Boulevard,
Dept. 408, Bismarck, North Dakota
58505–0480, (701) 328–2251,
jdeutsch@nd.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Fleischman, Telephone: (307)
261–6555. Internet:
jfleischman@osmre.gov.
E:\FR\FM\29JAP1.SGM
29JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6056-6062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01857]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
[REG-102966-10]
RIN 1545-BJ31
Designation of Payor as Agent To Perform Acts Required of an
Employer
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 3504
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) providing circumstances under which
a person (payor) is designated as an agent to perform the acts required
of an employer and is liable for employment taxes with respect to wages
or compensation paid by the payor to individuals performing services
for the payor's client pursuant to a service agreement between the
payor and the client.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by April 29,
2013.
[[Page 6057]]
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-102966-10), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
102966-10), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Additionally, taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. (Indicate IRS and REG-102966-10.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
contact Jeanne Royal Singley at (202) 622-0047; concerning the
submission of comments or requests for a hearing, contact
Oluwafunmilayo (Fumni) Taylor at (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Employment Taxes in General
Employers generally are required to deduct and withhold federal
income tax and Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes from
wages paid to their employees under sections 3402(a) and 3102(a), and
are separately liable for the employer's share of FICA taxes under
section 3111 and Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes under
section 3301. Instead of FICA taxes, railroad employers are required to
deduct and withhold Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) taxes from their
employees' compensation under section 3202, and are separately liable
for the employer's share of RRTA tax under section 3221. These taxes
are collectively referred to for purposes of these proposed regulations
as employment taxes. Sections 31.3102-1(d), 31.3202-1(e) and 31.3403-1
establish that the employer is the person liable for the withholding
and payment of employment taxes, whether or not amounts are actually
withheld.
When an individual performs services for another person, an
employer-employee relationship may exist. Generally, the Code
determines the existence of an employer-employee relationship by
applying the common law test to the particular facts and circumstances
of each case. See section 3121(d)(2). The Code, however, also provides
for other categories of employees, such as corporate officers in
section 3121(d)(1).
Under the common law test, an employment relationship exists when
the person for whom the services are performed has the right to control
and direct the individual who performs the services, not only as to the
result to be accomplished by the work but also as to the details and
means by which that result is accomplished. An employment relationship
exists if an employee is subject to the will and control of the
employer not only as to what shall be done but how it shall be done. In
this connection, it is not necessary that the employer actually direct
or control the manner in which the services are performed; it is
sufficient if the employer has the right to do so. See Sec. Sec.
31.3121(d)-1(c), 31.3231(b)-1(a)(2), 31.3306(i)-1(b), and 31.3401(c)-
1(b). This test is also applicable in determining which of two parties
in a three-party arrangement is the employer. See for example,
Professional and Executive Leasing, Inc. v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 225
(1987), aff'd, 862 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1988).
While other factors are helpful in analyzing the common law test,
the critical factor in determining whether a person is the common law
employer of an individual who performs services is whether the
individual is subject to the will and control of the person receiving
the services both as to the work to be done and how it is to be done.
Thus, the person's control of the individual's actual job performance,
rather than merely control of certain administrative functions related
to the individual performing services at the worksite, is paramount
under the common law analysis. In unique circumstances, an individual
may be an employee of more than one employer (concurrent employment)
with regard to the same services. See Rev. Rul. 66-162, 1966-1 C.B. 234
(citing Rest. 2d Agency, Sec. 226). However, in order for an
individual to be concurrently employed by two entities, each entity
must separately satisfy the common law control test.
An employer must file an employment tax return reporting employment
taxes for each employment tax return period. Generally, an employer
files Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return to report wages
the employer paid--during a quarter of a calendar year--that are
subject to federal income tax withholding and FICA taxes. Wages an
employer pays that are subject to FUTA tax are reported annually on
Form 940, Employer's Annual Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Return.
Employers that pay compensation subject to the RRTA file Form CT-1,
Employer's Annual Railroad Retirement Tax Return, as well as Form 941
to report federal income tax withholding. All employers that pay wages
or compensation subject to federal income tax withholding, FICA tax, or
RRTA tax must file Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and a Form W-3,
Transmittal of Wage and Tax Statements, with the Social Security
Administration (SSA) and furnish a Form W-2 to each employee. The
employer must obtain an employer identification number (EIN) using Form
SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number, for use in filing
the forms. An EIN is a nine-digit number used by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) to identify an employer's tax account. See section 6109.
For various reasons, an employer may choose to enter into an
agreement with a third party (such as a payroll service provider or a
professional employer organization (PEO)), sometimes referred to as a
third-party payor. Under the agreement the third-party payor remits the
wages to employees and takes steps to ensure the employer's employment
tax withholding, reporting, and payment obligations are satisfied.
However, employment tax liability cannot be altered by private
agreement between an employer and a third-party payor. See In re
Professional Security Services, Inc., 162 B.R. 901 (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
1993). Rather the liability of the employer and/or the third-party
payor for employment taxes is determined under the Code and depends on
all of the facts and circumstances, including the terms and substance
of the arrangement between the employer and the third-party payor.
There are limited circumstances in a three-party arrangement when the
third-party payor may be considered the person responsible for the
withholding and payment of employment taxes in addition to, or in lieu
of, the common law employer. A description of some common three-party
arrangements follows.
Section 3401(d)(1) Employers
Section 3401(d)(1) provides that for purposes of federal income tax
withholding, the term employer means the person for whom an individual
performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as an employee
of such person, except that, if the person for whom the individual
performs or performed the services does not have control of the payment
of wages for such services, the term employer means the person having
control of the payment of such wages. For purposes of section
3401(d)(1), the term control means legal control. See Sec. 31.3401(d)-
1(f). Thus, when one person is the common law employer of an individual
because it controls the day-to-day performance of services by the
individual, another
[[Page 6058]]
person may be the employer liable to collect, report, and pay
employment taxes because it is the entity solely in control of the
payment of wages to the individual. See Winstead v. United States, 109
F.3d 989 (4th Cir. 1997). Whether an entity is in control of the
payment of wages is determined by considering the facts and
circumstances related to each payment of wages. Thus, an entity can be
in control of the payment of wages for one employment tax return
period, but not in control of the payment of wages for a prior or
subsequent employment tax return period.
The legislative history to section 3401(d)(1) specifies that
section 3401(d)(1) was intended solely to meet unusual situations and
was not intended as a departure from the basic structure of
centralizing employment tax obligations with the common law employer.
See S. Rep. No. 221, 78th Cong. 1st Sess., May 10, 1943. Accordingly,
an entity is not in control of the payment of wages if the payment of
wages is contingent upon, or proximately related to, the entity having
first received funds from its clients.
The FICA, FUTA, and RRTA do not contain a definition of the term
employer similar to the definition contained in section 3401(d)(1);
however, courts have applied the section 3401(d)(1) definition to
determine liability for the payment of FICA tax under sections 3102 and
3111 and FUTA tax under section 3301. See Otte v. United States, 419
U.S. 43, 95 S. Ct. 247, 42 L. Ed. 2d 212 (1974); In re Armadillo Corp.,
410 F. Supp. 407 (D. Colo. 1976), aff'd, 561 F. 2d 1382 (10th Cir.
1977). Due to the similarity between the purpose and scope of the RRTA
and the purpose and scope of the FICA, the same definition also applies
to the RRTA. Accordingly, section 3401(d)(1) shifts the liability for
all the employment taxes due on wages or compensation from the common
law employer to the third-party payor with control of the payment of
those wages or compensation.
Section 3504--Agents
Under section 3504, if a payor pays wages or compensation to
employees who are employed by one or more employers, the Secretary is
authorized, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary,
to designate such payor to perform acts required of employers under the
Code. Section 3504 further provides that, except as otherwise
prescribed by the Secretary, all provisions of law (including
penalties) applicable with respect to an employer are applicable to the
person so designated, but the employer for whom the person acts remains
subject to the provisions of law (including penalties) applicable with
respect to employers. Accordingly, both an employer and the payor
designated in accordance with regulations under section 3504 are liable
for the employment taxes on wages or compensation paid by the payor.
Current regulations issued under section 3504 permit district
directors and service centers in the IRS to authorize a payor to
perform acts required of employers with respect to chapters 21 (FICA
tax), 22 (RRTA tax), and 24 (federal income tax withholding) of the
Code if the payor applies for such authorization. See Treas. Reg. Sec.
31.3504-1(a). The Treasury Department and the IRS have separately
proposed updating these regulations to remove the references to the
district director and service center and to provide that the
application by the payor (referred to therein as an ``agent'') must be
signed by both the payor and employer and made on the form prescribed
by the IRS and according to the instructions provided by the IRS. See
Proposed Regulations Sec. 31.3504-1(a), published in the Federal
Register on January 13, 2010, (75 FR 1735-01).
Pursuant to section 3504 and the regulations, the IRS has
established administrative procedures under which a payor may request
authorization to file employment tax returns and perform other acts for
the employer. Specifically, Revenue Procedure 70-6, 1970-1 CB 420,
provides the general procedures for a payor to request authorization to
act as an agent under section 3504 for FICA, income tax withholding,
and RRTA purposes, and describes the agent's resulting reporting and
filing requirements. Each employer for whom the agent is to act
provides the payor with a signed IRS Form 2678, Employer/Payer
Appointment of Agent. A payor seeking to act as an agent under section
3504 submits these Forms 2678 to the IRS. The IRS sends a letter to the
agent once it has approved the application, and the appointment remains
in effect until terminated by one of the parties. An agent with an
approved Form 2678 files an aggregate Form 941 reporting FICA tax and
income tax withholding for each tax return period using the agent's own
EIN (regardless of the number of employers for whom the agent acts).
Effective for periods on or after January 1, 2010, an agent with an
approved Form 2678 must also complete and attach to the aggregate Form
941 a Schedule R (Form 941), Allocation Schedule for Aggregate Form 941
Filers. The agent uses Schedule R (Form 941) to allocate the aggregate
information reported on Form 941 to each employer. Schedule R (Form
941) is attached to the Form 941 in every quarter for which the agent
files an aggregate Form 941. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b). If an
agent with an approved Form 2678 is acting for employers under the
RRTA, the agent must report for each employer the taxable compensation
as determined under RRTA with respect to each employer on an aggregate
Form CT-1.
Consistent with the limitations in the current regulations, an
agent with an approved Form 2678 is generally not authorized to perform
the employment tax obligations of an employer with respect to the FUTA
tax. Thus, an employer generally must continue to satisfy its FUTA tax
obligations by filing a Form 940 using its own EIN. Proposed Regulation
Sec. 31.3504-1(b), however, provides a limited exception to the
general rule regarding FUTA, which employers may rely on for periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2010. The proposed regulation allows
agents acting on behalf of employers receiving home care services to
perform the acts of an employer required under Chapter 23 (FUTA tax).
An agent that files an aggregate Form 940 under the limited exception
must complete and attach to the Form 940 a Schedule R (Form 940),
Allocation Schedule for Aggregate Form 940 Filers.
Generally, Forms W-2 filed with the SSA and furnished to employees
must reflect the name and EIN of the agent with an approved Form 2678;
however, special rules may apply if the agent is acting as an agent for
two or more employers.
Payroll Service Providers (PSPs) and Reporting Agents
An employer may enter into an agreement with a payroll service
provider (PSP) to prepare employment tax returns (including Forms 940
and 941) using the EIN of the employer for the signature of the
employer. A PSP may also process the withholding, deposit, and payment
of the associated employment taxes for the employer. A PSP is not
liable under subtitle C of the Code as the employer, or as an agent of
the employer, for the employer's employment taxes. An employer's use of
a PSP does not relieve the employer of its employment tax obligations
or liability for the taxes.
Generally, a reporting agent is a PSP that is authorized to sign
and file certain employment tax returns on behalf of the employer using
the employer's EIN, including Forms 940 and 941. A reporting agent may
also process the withholding, deposit, and payment of
[[Page 6059]]
the associated employment taxes for the employer. The IRS has
prescribed Form 8655, Reporting Agent Authorization, as the appropriate
authorization form for an employer to use to designate a PSP as a
reporting agent. Additional information concerning reporting agent
authorizations may be found in Rev. Proc. 2012-32, 2012-35 I.R.B. 1. A
reporting agent is not liable under subtitle C of the Code as the
employer, or as an agent of the employer, for the employer's employment
taxes. An employer's use of a reporting agent does not relieve the
employer of its employment tax obligations or liability for the taxes.
Analyzing Three-Party Arrangements
In certain instances, an employer may mistakenly believe it is
relieved of employment tax liabilities merely because it has entered
into an agreement with a third-party payor (for example, a PEO or
employee leasing company) for assistance in fulfilling its employment
tax obligations. However, an employer remains liable for employment
taxes irrespective of any agreement it may enter into that purports to
place the employment tax obligations and liabilities with the payor,
except in the limited circumstances when the payor satisfies the
conditions to be liable under section 3401(d)(1). In this regard,
status as the employer of the worker is determined based on all the
facts and circumstances under the common law test (or under other
specific Code provisions related to particular types of employees, such
as corporate officers). Neither claims by a payor that it is the
employer (or ``co-employer'') of the worker for federal employment tax
or other purposes nor the fact that the payor may file employment tax
returns under its own EIN are determinative under the Code for purposes
of identifying the employer liable for employment taxes.
The application of the employment tax obligations in a three-party
arrangement often requires an analysis of complex facts and
circumstances that can vary widely. Consequently, the parties to an
arrangement may not always understand which party or parties will be
liable for any unpaid employment taxes. Even when there is no
underlying dispute about the status of the workers as employees or that
employment taxes are due with respect to the wages paid to the
employees, the IRS must expend substantial resources to develop the
facts to determine the liabilities of the parties. The Treasury
Department and the IRS intend that these proposed regulations assist
taxpayers and the IRS in determining the parties' employment tax
obligations in a three-party arrangement when a payor has represented
to its client that it will pay the employment taxes with respect to
wages or compensation it pays to employees for services performed by
employees for the client.
Explanation of Provisions
In General
The proposed regulations provide rules regarding employment tax
obligations in certain three-party arrangements when the employer
enters into an agreement with a third-party payor under which the payor
performs the employment tax obligations of the client with regard to
wages or compensation paid by the payor to individuals performing
services for the client, but the payor does not meet the legal
conditions necessary to be a section 3401(d)(1) employer, does not
obtain an approved Form 2678, and is not a PSP or reporting agent. More
specifically, the proposed regulations provide that, unless one of the
enumerated exceptions discussed below applies, a payor is designated as
an agent under section 3504 to perform the acts required of an employer
with respect to wages or compensation paid by the payor to any
individual performing services for any client pursuant to a service
agreement (as defined in these proposed regulations) between the payor
and the client.
The designation of a payor as an agent to perform acts of an
employer under the proposed regulations addresses all federal
employment taxes. Thus, for purposes of the proposed regulations, the
term wages includes wages as defined for purposes of Chapters 21 (FICA
tax), 23 (FUTA tax), and 24 (federal income tax withholding) of the
Code, and the term compensation means compensation as defined for
purposes of Chapter 22 (RRTA tax) of the Code. The rules in the
proposed regulations regarding the designation of a payor as an agent
required to perform acts of an employer are provided solely for
purposes of determining liability for employment taxes under section
3504. No inference is intended that the same rules would apply for any
other provision of the Code.
As required by section 3504 and consistent with the rules relating
to agents authorized under Sec. 31.3504-1(a), the proposed regulations
provide that if a payor is designated as an agent to perform the acts
of an employer, all provisions of law (including penalties) applicable
with respect to an employer are applicable to that payor and that each
employer for whom the payor is designated to act remains subject to all
provisions of law (including penalties) applicable to an employer.
However, consistent with the IRS's position on administering the
section 6672 trust fund recovery penalty, under the proposed
regulations the employment tax liability of an employer will be
collected only once, whether from the payor or the employer.
Scope and Effect of Designation
Subject to the exceptions set forth in the proposed regulations, a
payor is designated as an agent under section 3504 to perform the acts
of an employer in any case in which the payor entered into a service
agreement with a client. For this purpose, the term service agreement
means a written or oral agreement pursuant to which the payor: (1)
Asserts it is the employer (or ``co-employer'') of individuals
performing services for the client, (2) pays wages or compensation to
the individuals for services the individuals performed for the client,
and (3) assumes responsibility to collect, report, and pay, or assumes
liability for, any employment taxes with respect to the wages or
compensation paid by the payor to the individuals who performed
services for the client.
The first component of a service agreement is that the payor
asserts it is the employer (or ``co-employer'') of individuals
performing services for another individual or entity (the client). For
purposes of these regulations, a payor may implicitly or explicitly
assert it is the employer (or ``co-employer'') of individuals
performing services for a client, including by agreeing to: (1) Recruit
and hire employees or assign employees as permanent or temporary
members of the client's workforce, or participate with the client in
these actions; (2) hire the client's employees as its own and then
provide them back to the client to perform services for the client; or
(3) file employment tax returns using its own EIN that include wages or
compensation paid to the individuals performing services for the
client. A payor that is the common law employer of the individuals
performing services for a client under all of the facts and
circumstances, however, is not designated under the proposed
regulations to perform the acts of an employer with respect to wages or
compensation paid to such individuals (see ``Exceptions to
Designation'') but is liable for employment taxes as the employer.
The second component of a service agreement is that the payor pays
wages or compensation to the individuals performing services for its
client. A
[[Page 6060]]
payor with legal control of the payment of wages or compensation within
the meaning of section 3401(d)(1), however, is not designated under the
proposed regulations with respect to such wages or compensation (see
``Exceptions to Designation'') but is liable for employment taxes as a
section 3401(d)(1) employer.
The third component of a service agreement is that the payor
assumes responsibility for the collection, reporting, and payment of,
or assumes liability for, any employment taxes with respect to the
wages or compensation paid by the payor to the individuals performing
services for the client. Under the proposed regulations, a payor
assumes the responsibility to collect, report, and pay the applicable
taxes if the payor represents to the client that it would make any or
all of the federal employment tax deposits and other payments required
by law. A payor that is a PSP or reporting agent, however, is not
designated under the proposed regulations with respect to such wages or
compensation (see ``Exceptions to Designation'') if the payor files the
employment tax returns reporting such wages or compensation under the
client's EIN.
Exceptions to Designation
As mentioned above, the proposed regulations provide exceptions to
when a payor is designated under section 3504 to perform the acts of an
employer even if the payor has entered into an agreement that includes
the components of a service agreement. The proposed regulations contain
eight examples demonstrating the application or non-application of the
proposed regulations to various factual scenarios.
First, the proposed regulations do not apply to the extent that the
payor files employment tax returns under the client's EIN, reporting
the wages or compensation paid to individuals performing services for
the client. Thus, a reporting agent or a PSP that prepares returns
using the employer's EIN is not designated under the proposed
regulations.
Second, the proposed regulations do not affect the application of
the common paymaster rules under sections 3121(s) and 3231(i).
Therefore, a second exception provides that a common paymaster is not
designated under the proposed regulations for wages or compensation it
pays within the context of the concurrent employment arrangement
described in section 3121(s) or 3231(i) and the related regulations.
Third, a payor is not designated under the proposed regulations if
the person is the employer of the employees under the common law test
(because the person has the right to control and direct the individual
with regard to the details and means of performing services for the
client) or under one of the other section 3121(d) provisions, or is a
section 3401(d)(1) employer. Thus, a third exception provides that if
the payor is the employer of the individuals performing services for a
client, it is not designated as an agent under section 3504. The payor
remains liable for payment of employment taxes, however, as the
employer. For example, if a consulting firm contracts to provide
consulting services to a client and the consulting firm directs and
controls the employees providing the consulting services under the
contract with regard to how to perform those services, the consulting
firm is liable for employment taxes as the common law employer of the
employees, not as a payor designated under the proposed regulations.
Designation Under Proposed Regulations Is Not the Exclusive Remedy for
the IRS
The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that the
determination of the employer and the liabilities of the parties in a
three-party arrangement is a factually and resource intensive
undertaking involving multiple parties. The regulations as proposed
will assist the IRS in cases in which a payor has represented to a
client that the payor is liable for some or all of the client's
employment tax obligations, but the payor has not received
authorization to act as an agent through an approved Form 2678.
However, the designation of a payor as an agent to perform the acts
required of an employer under the proposed regulations will not
preclude the IRS from asserting, in the alternative, that the payor is
the common law employer (or an employer of an employee under one of the
other section 3121(d) provisions) or the section 3401(d)(1) employer of
individuals providing services for a client. Additionally, the fact
that the IRS does not assert that a payor is designated as an agent to
perform the acts required of an employer under the proposed regulations
will not preclude the IRS from determining the payor's employment tax-
related liability under other Code provisions (for example, the section
6672 trust fund recovery penalty).
Effective Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to be effective the date the final
regulations are published in the Federal Register and are applicable to
wages or compensation paid by a payor in quarters beginning on or after
the effective date to individuals performing services for its client
pursuant to a service agreement.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to this regulation, and because the
regulation does not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
regulation has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written or electronic comments that
are submitted timely to the IRS.
The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the proposed
regulations and are particularly interested in comments on the
following issues:
(1) Whether the application of the definition of service agreement
inappropriately results in a payor being designated an agent under
section 3504, or inappropriately results in a payor failing to be
designated an agent under section 3504;
(2) Whether additional exceptions are warranted; and
(3) Potential additional examples.
All comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A
public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person
that timely submits written comment. If a public hearing is scheduled,
notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing will be published
in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Jeanne Royal
Singley, Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt
and Government Entities). However, personnel from other offices of the
IRS and Treasury participated in their development.
[[Page 6061]]
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 31
Employment taxes, Income taxes, Penalties, Pensions, Railroad
retirement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Social security,
Unemployment compensation.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 31 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 31--EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 31 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 31.3504-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 31.3504-2 Designation of Payor as Agent to Perform Acts of an
Employer.
(a) In general. A person (as defined in section 7701(a)(1)) that
pays wages or compensation (``payor'') to the individual(s) performing
services for any client pursuant to a service agreement, except as
provided in paragraph (d) of this section, is designated as an agent to
perform the acts required of an employer with respect to the wages or
compensation paid. For purposes of this section the term wages has the
same meaning as the term wages has for purposes of chapters 21, 23, and
24, and the term compensation has the same meaning as the term
compensation has for purposes of chapter 22. This section is not
applicable if the payor has been authorized as an agent of the employer
under Sec. 31.3504-1.
(b) Definitions--(1) Client. The term client means an individual or
entity that enters into a service agreement with the payor.
(2) Service agreement. (i) The term service agreement means an
agreement pursuant to which the payor:
(A) Asserts it is the employer (or ``co-employer'') of the
individual(s) performing services for the client;
(B) Pays wages or compensation to the individual(s) for services
the individual(s) perform for the client; and
(C) Assumes responsibility to collect, report, and pay, or assumes
liability for, any taxes applicable under subtitle C of the Code with
respect to the wages or compensation paid by the payor to the
individual(s) performing services for the client.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section, the
payor may implicitly or explicitly assert it is the employer (or ``co-
employer'') of the individual(s) performing services for the client,
including by agreeing to:
(A) Recruit and hire employees for the client or assign employees
as permanent or temporary members of the client's work force, or
participate with the client in these actions;
(B) Hire the client's employees as its own and then provide them
back to the client to perform services for the client; or
(C) File employment tax returns using its own EIN that include
wages or compensation paid to the individual(s) performing services for
the client.
(c) Effects of designation. If a payor is designated as an agent to
perform the acts required of an employer under this section--
(1) A payor must perform the acts required of an employer under
each applicable chapter of the Code and the relevant regulations with
respect to the wages or compensation paid by such payor. All provisions
of law (including penalties) and the regulations applicable to the
employer are applicable to the payor so designated with respect to the
wages or compensation paid by the payor; and
(2) Each employer for whom the payor is designated as an agent
remains subject to all provisions of law (including penalties) and of
the regulations applicable to an employer.
(d) Exceptions. A payor is not designated as an agent to perform
the acts required of an employer under this section for any wages or
compensation paid by the payor to the individual(s) performing services
for a client to the extent that--
(1) The wages or compensation are reported on a return filed under
the client's employer identification number (as defined in section 6109
and the applicable regulations);
(2) The payor is a common paymaster under sections 3121(s) or
3231(i); or
(3) The payor is the employer of the individual(s).
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
this section:
(1) Example 1. Corporation P enters into an agreement with
Employer, effective January 1, 2013. Under the agreement,
Corporation P hires the Employer's employees as its own employees
and provides them back to Employer to perform services for Employer.
Corporation P also assumes responsibility to make payment of the
individuals' wages and for the collection, reporting, and payment of
applicable taxes. For all pay periods in 2013, Employer provides
Corporation P with an amount equal to the gross payroll (that is,
wage and tax amounts) of the individuals, and Corporation P pays
wages (less the applicable withholding) to the individuals
performing services for Employer. Corporation P also reports the
wage and tax amounts on Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax
Return, filed for each quarter of 2013 under Corporation P's
employer identification number. Corporation P is not a common
paymaster or the employer of the individuals. Corporation P is
designated to perform the acts of an employer with respect to all of
the wages Corporation P paid to the individuals performing services
for Employer for all quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation P
are each subject to all provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable in respect of employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(2) Example 2. Same facts as Example 1, except that Corporation
P only reports the wage and tax amounts on Form 941, Employer's
Quarterly Federal Tax Return, filed for the 1st and 2nd quarters of
2013. Neither Corporation P nor Employer files returns for the 3rd
and 4th quarters of 2013. Corporation P is designated to perform the
acts of an employer with respect to all of the wages Corporation P
paid to the individuals performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation P are each subject to all
provisions of law (including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(3) Example 3. Same facts as Example 1, except that neither
Corporation P nor Employer reports the wage and tax amounts on Form
941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return for any quarter of
2013. Corporation P is designated to perform the acts of an employer
with respect to all of the wages Corporation P paid to the
individuals performing services for Employer for all quarters of
2013. Employer and Corporation P are each subject to all provisions
of law (including penalties) applicable in respect of employers for
all quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(4) Example 4. Same facts as Example 1, except that Employer
provides only net payroll (that is, wages less tax amounts) to
Corporation P for each pay period. Corporation P is designated to
perform the acts of an employer with respect to all of the wages
Corporation P paid to the individuals performing services for
Employer for all quarters of 2013. Employer and Corporation P are
each subject to all provisions of law (including penalties)
applicable in respect of employers for all quarters of 2013 with
respect to such wages.
(5) Example 5. Same facts as Example 1, except that after
Corporation P reports the wage and tax amounts on Form 941,
Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return, filed for each quarter of
2013 under Corporation P's employer identification number,
Corporation P files a claim for refund of the employment taxes it
paid for each quarter of 2013 that are related to wages Corporation
P paid to the individuals performing services for Employer. The
basis for Corporation P's refund claim is that Corporation P is not
the employer of the individuals that performed services for
Employer. Corporation P is designated to perform the acts of an
employer with respect to all of the wages Corporation P paid to the
[[Page 6062]]
individuals performing services for Employer for all quarters of
2013. Accordingly, Corporation P is not entitled to a refund.
Employer and Corporation P are each subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) applicable in respect of employers for all
quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(6) Example 6. Corporation S enters into an agreement with
Employer, effective January 1, 2013. Under the agreement,
Corporation S provides payroll services, including payment of wages
to individuals performing services for Employer, and assumes
responsibility for the collection, reporting, and payment of
applicable taxes. For all pay periods in 2013, Employer provides
Corporation S with an amount equal to the gross payroll (that is,
wage and tax amounts) of the individuals, and Corporation S pays
wages (less the applicable withholding) to the individuals
performing services for Employer. Corporation S also reports the
wage and tax amounts on Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax
Return, filed for each quarter of 2013 under Employer's employer
identification number. Corporation S is not designated to perform
the acts of an employer with respect to all of the wages Corporation
S paid to the individuals performing services for Employer for all
quarters of 2013. Corporation S did not assert it was the employer
and filed Forms 941 using Employer's employer identification number.
Accordingly, Corporation S is not liable for the applicable
employment taxes under this section. Employer remains subject to all
provisions of law (including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(7) Example 7. Corporation V enters into a consulting agreement
with Manufacturer effective January 1, 2013, to provide consulting
services to Manufacturer. Corporation V is responsible to pay wages
to the individuals providing the consulting services to Manufacturer
and to collect, report, and pay the applicable taxes. Corporation V
has the right to direct and control the individuals as to when and
how to perform the consulting services and, thus, is the common law
employer of the individuals providing the consulting services.
Corporation V is not designated to perform the acts of an employer
with respect to all of the wages Corporation V paid to individuals
providing consulting services to Manufacturer. However, as the
common law employer of the individuals, Corporation V is subject to
all provisions of law (including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers with respect to such wages.
(8) Example 8. Corporation U and Employer execute and submit a
Form 2678, Employer/Payer Appointment of Agent, to the Service,
requesting approval to authorize Corporation U to report, deposit,
and pay taxes with respect to wages it pays, as agent of Employer
for purposes of Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return.
The Form 2678 is approved by the Service and effective for all
quarters of 2013. Accordingly, Corporation U reports the wages it
pays to individuals performing services for Employer and related tax
amounts on Form 941 and Schedule R (Form 941), Allocation Schedule
for Aggregate Form 941 Filers, filed for each quarter of 2013 under
Corporation U's employer identification number. Corporation U is not
designated under this section to perform the acts of an employer
with respect to all of the wages Corporation U paid to the
individuals performing services for Employer for all quarters of
2013. However, as an agent authorized under Sec. 31.3504-1(a),
Corporation U is subject to all provisions of law (including
penalties) applicable in respect of employers for all quarters of
2013 with respect to such wages. Employer also remains subject to
all provisions of law (including penalties) applicable in respect of
employers for all quarters of 2013 with respect to such wages.
(f) Effective/applicability date. These regulations apply to wages
or compensation paid by a payor in quarters beginning on or after the
date of publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register to
individuals performing services for the payor's client pursuant to a
service agreement.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2013-01857 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P