Draft Environmental Assessment and Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for the Interim Operations of PacifiCorp's Klamath Hydroelectric Project on the Klamath River, Klamath County, OR, and Siskiyou County, CA, 5830-5832 [2013-01664]
Download as PDF
5830
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices
Indians, and make recommendations to
the Secretary regarding termination.
cobell/commission/index.cfm. All
meetings are open to the public.
Meeting Details
Dated: January 22, 2013.
David J. Hayes,
Deputy Secretary.
On the evening of Monday, February
11, 2013, the Commission will host a
youth outreach session from 7 p.m. to 9
p.m. on the University of Washington
campus to meet with young adults and
college students on their ideas and
recommendations to improve
performance and services to trust
beneficiaries. For additional information
please refer to https://www.doi.gov/
cobell/commission/index.cfm.
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013, and
Wednesday, February 13, 2013, the
Commission will hold a meeting open to
the public. The following items will be
on the agenda.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
• Invocation.
• Welcome, introductions, agenda
review.
• Commission operations reports and
decision-making.
• Commission review and discussion
of preliminary recommendations.
• Initial observations and comments
from public regarding Commission
recommendations.
• Panel session regarding natural
resource assets.
• Panel session regarding real estate.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
• Invocation.
• Welcome, introductions, agenda
review.
• Commissioner reflections and
insights from day 1 and site visit.
• Presentation and discussion from
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Management.
• Panel session regarding trust reform
and administration.
• Remarks from the Assistant
Secretary for Indian Affairs.
• Presentation and discussion
regarding international trust models.
• Public comment regarding
Commission discussion thus far.
• Commission discussion of insights
and conclusions from panel speakers
and preliminary discussion of how to
integrate ideas into draft
recommendations.
• Topics for next Commission public
webinar and in-person meetings.
• Review action items, meeting
accomplishments.
• Closing blessing, adjourn.
Written comments may be sent to the
Designated Federal Official listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above. To review all related
material on the Commission’s work,
please refer to https://www.doi.gov/
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–01650 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
Renewal of the Trinity River Adaptive
Management Working Group
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary), after consultation with the
General Services Administration, has
renewed the Trinity River Adaptive
Management Working Group (Working
Group) for 2 years. The Working Group
provides recommendations on all
aspects of the implementation of the
Trinity River Restoration Program and
affords stakeholders the opportunity to
give policy, management, and technical
input concerning Trinity River
restoration efforts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Finley, Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, CA
95521; 707–822–7201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Working Group conducts its operations
in accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. Appendix). It reports to the
Trinity River Management Council
(TMC) and functions solely as an
advisory body. The TMC reports to the
Secretary through the Mid-Pacific
Regional Director of the Bureau of
Reclamation and the Pacific Southwest
Regional Director for the Fish and
Wildlife Service. The Working Group
provides recommendations and advice
to the TMC on: (1) The effectiveness of
management actions in achieving
restoration goals and alternative
hypotheses (methods and strategies) for
study, (2) the priority for restoration
projects, (3) funding priorities, and (4)
other components of the Trinity River
Restoration Program.
Working Group members represent
the varied interests associated with the
Trinity River Restoration Program.
Members are selected from, but not
limited to, Trinity County residents;
recreational and commercial fishermen;
commercial and recreational boaters;
power/utility companies; agricultural
water users; private and commercial
timber producers; ranchers and people
with grazing rights/permits; tribes;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental organizations; and
Federal, State, and local agencies with
responsibilities in the Trinity River
Basin. Members must be senior
representatives of their respective
constituent groups with knowledge of
the Trinity River Restoration Program,
including the Adaptive Environmental
Assessment and Management Program.
We have filed a copy of the Working
Group’s charter with the Committee
Management Secretariat, General
Services Administration; the Committee
on Environment and Public Works,
United States Senate; the Committee on
Natural Resources, United States House
of Representatives; and the Library of
Congress.
Certification
I hereby certify that the Trinity River
Adaptive Management Working Group
is necessary and is in the public interest
in connection with the performance of
duties imposed on the Department of
the Interior by Public Laws 84–386 and
96–335 (Trinity River Stream
Rectification Act), 98–541 and 104–143
(Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife
Management Act of 1984), and 102–575
(Central Valley Project Improvement
Act). The Working Group will assist the
Department of the Interior by providing
advice and recommendations on all
aspects of implementation of the Trinity
River Restoration Program.
Dated: January 8, 2013.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2013–01645 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2012–N185; FF08E00000–
FXES11120800000F2–123–F2]
Draft Environmental Assessment and
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan
for the Interim Operations of
PacifiCorp’s Klamath Hydroelectric
Project on the Klamath River, Klamath
County, OR, and Siskiyou County, CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; draft
environmental assessment and proposed
habitat conservation plan; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, have prepared a draft
environmental assessment (EA) under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) for the interim operations of the
Klamath Hydroelectric Project in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices
response to an application from
PacifiCorp (applicant) for a 10-year
incidental take permit for two species
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 UDC 1531, et seq;
Act). We request data, comments, new
information or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on the applicant’s permit
application and associated habitat
conservation plan (plan), and also on
the associated draft EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by March
29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Please address written
comments to Laurie R. Sada, Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife
Office, 1936 California Avenue, Klamath
Falls, OR 97601. Alternatively, you may
send comments by facsimile to 541–
885–7837.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Larson, Biologist, or Trisha Roninger,
Assistant Field Supervisor, at the
address shown above or at 541–885–
8481 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
application for an incidental take permit
(ITP) addresses the potential for ‘‘take’’
of the Lost River sucker (Deltistes
luxatus) and the shortnose sucker
(Chasmistes brevirostris), two fishes
federally listed as endangered. The
applicant would implement a
conservation program to minimize and
mitigate the project activities, as
described in the applicant’s plan.
The applicant has developed a plan as
part of their application for an ITP
under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The
proposed plan includes measures
necessary to minimize and mitigate the
impacts, to the maximum extent
practicable, of potential proposed taking
of two federally listed species to be
covered by the plan, and the habitats
upon which they depend, resulting from
the interim operations of the Klamath
Hydroelectric Project (Project), in
Klamath County, Oregon, and Siskiyou
County, California. This ITP would be
in effect for a prospective 10-year
interim period that the Project would be
operating on an annual license from the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
We have prepared an EA to evaluate
the impacts of several alternatives
related to the potential issuance of an
incidental take permit (ITP) to the
applicant, as well as impacts of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
implementation of the supporting
proposed plan.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act and its
regulations prohibit taking of fish and
wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened under section 4 of the Act.
Under the Act, the term ‘‘take’’ means
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct. The term ‘‘harm’’ is defined in
the regulations as significant habitat
modification or degradation that results
in death or injury of listed species by
significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The
term ‘‘harass’’ is defined in the
regulations as to carry out actions that
create the likelihood of injury to listed
species to such an extent as to
significantly disrupt normal behavioral
patterns, which include, but are not
limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified
circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally
listed species, provided that the take
that occurs is incidental to, but not the
purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered and threatened species are
at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains
provisions for issuing such incidental
take permits to non-Federal entities for
the take of endangered and threatened
species, provided the following criteria
are met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a
proposed plan and ensure that adequate
funding for the plan will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and
5. The applicants will carry out any
other measures that the Service may
require as being necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of the plan.
The applicant seeks incidental take
authorization for the following federally
listed endangered fish species—Lost
River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and the
shortnose sucker (Chasmistes
brevirostris)—which we will refer to as
the ‘‘covered species’’ in this notice.
The activities proposed to be covered
under this plan include activities that
are otherwise necessary to operate and
maintain project facilities during the
permit term. In general, the covered
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5831
activities include the following: (1)
Operate and maintain the spill gates at
Link River dam for regulation and
releases of flows from Link River dam
to maintain water in the East Side and
West Side water conveyance features,
and operate and maintain the East Side
and West Side canals and flowlines
following shutdown of the East Side and
West Side powerhouse facilities; (2)
operate and maintain Keno Dam, spill
gates, and fish ladder, and regulate the
water level upstream of Keno Dam in
accordance with the existing agreements
and licenses; (3) operate and maintain
J.C. Boyle Dam, fish bypass system,
water conveyance system, turbines, and
powerhouse facilities, and regulate
water levels and flows necessary to
maintain minimum reservoir elevations,
river flows and ramping rates; (4)
operate and maintain Copco No. 1 and
Copco No. 2 Dams, water conveyance
systems, turbines, and powerhouse
facilities, and regulate water levels and
flows necessary to maintain minimum
reservoir elevations, river flows and
ramping rates; and (5) operate and
maintain Iron Gate Dam (and associated
appurtenances), penstocks, turbines,
and powerhouse facilities, and regulate
releases from Iron Gate Dam in
accordance with instream flow and
ramping rate requirements.
Alternatives in the Draft Environmental
Assessment
The proposed action presented in the
draft EA will be compared to the noaction alternative. The no-action
alternative represents estimated future
conditions to which the proposed
action’s estimated future conditions can
be compared. Other alternatives
considered, including their potential
impacts, are also addressed in the draft
EA.
No-Action Alternative
Under the no-action alternative, we
would not issue a permit. The no-action
alternative would not achieve the
applicant’s objectives and would not
allow for reduced incidental take of
federally-listed species or mitigation of
impacts to listed species.
Proposed Alternative
Under the proposed alternative, the
applicant would continue to operate the
Klamath Hydroelectric Project. The
project consists of eight developments.
The seven developments covered by the
ITP are located on the Klamath River
between river mile (RM) 190.1 and
254.3, including (in order moving
upstream): Iron Gate Dam and Reservoir
(RM 190.1 to 196.9), Copco No. 2 Dam
and Reservoir (RM 198.3 to 198.6),
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
5832
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Copco No. 1 Dam and Reservoir (RM
198.6 to 203.1), J.C. Boyle Dam and
Reservoir (RM 220.4 to 228.3), Keno
Dam and Reservoir (RM 233 to 253.1),
and East Side and West Side facilities
(both in Link River at RM 253.1 to
254.3).
The ‘‘covered activities’’ included in
the plan consist of a variety of activities
at the seven facilities listed above that
are necessary to generate hydroelectric
power and to maintain these facilities.
These include: Operate and maintain
spill gates for regulation and releases of
flows; operate and maintain canals,
flowlines, and other water conveyance
systems; operate and maintain
penstocks, turbines, and powerhouse
facilities; operate and maintain fish
bypass systems; and regulate water
levels and flows necessary to maintain
minimum reservoir elevations, river
flows, and ramping rates.
The applicant proposes to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate the effects to the
covered species associated with the
covered activities by fully implementing
the plan. The following minimization
and mitigation measures will be
implemented as part of the plan: Take
of listed species will be substantially
reduced by shutting down the East Side
and West Side developments within 30
days of issuance of the ITP. These
facilities will remain substantially shut
down until eventual decommissioning
of the facilities as determined by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Mitigation of take will result from
funding of restoration projects and other
activities that will benefit the recovery
of the species.
Under the proposed action
alternative, we would issue an
incidental take permit for the
applicant’s proposed project, which
includes the activities described above
and in more detail in the plan.
Environmental Review
As described in our EA, we have
made the preliminary determination
that approval of the proposed plan and
issuance of the permit would qualify as
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), as provided by Federal regulations
(40 CFR 1500, 5(k), 1507.3(b)(2), and
1508.4) and the Department of the
Interior Manual (516 DM 2 and 516 DM
8). Our EA describes the project effects
on all potential resources that could be
adversely affected, including water
resources (hydrology and water quality);
biological resources (Lost River and
shortnose suckers, anadromous fishes,
and other fishes); socioeconomics (local
employment, recreation, renewable
energy, land use, and development);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
environmental justice; and cultural
resources. It also includes an analysis of
alternatives, and other required analyses
such as unavoidable adverse effects,
irreversible and irretrievable
commitments of resources, short-term
uses versus long-term productivity and
cumulative effects, and the
environmentally preferable alternative
(the proposed project).
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on this notice. We particularly
seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning
the species;
2. Relevant data concerning the
species;
3. Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of the species;
4. Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the species;
5. The presence of archeological sites,
buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns,
which are required to be considered in
project planning by the National
Historic Preservation Act; and
6. Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
development and permit action.
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section.
We will identify in the FONSI if we
need to prepare further NEPA
documentation. We will also consider
public comments on the draft EA when
making the final determination on
whether to prepare additional NEPA
documents on the proposed action.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of the permit
application, plan, and EA from the
individuals in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CONTACT.
Copies of these documents are
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the Klamath Falls Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES), and on
our Web site at www.fws.gov/
klamathfallsfwo/.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the permit
application; including the plan and
comments we receive, to determine
whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act.
If the requirements are met, we will
issue a permit to the applicant for the
incidental take of the Lost River sucker
and the shortnose sucker resulting from
the implementation of the covered
activities described in the plan. We will
make the final permit decision no
sooner than 30 days after the date of this
notice.
Authority
We publish this notice under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.; NEPA), and its implementing
public involvement regulations in the
Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6), as
well as in compliance with section 10(c)
of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; Act).
Dated: January 22, 2013.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–01664 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO620000.L18200000.XH0000]
Call for Nominations for Resource
Advisory Councils
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The purpose of this notice is
to request public nominations for the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Resource Advisory Councils (RAC) that
have member terms expiring this year.
The RACs provide advice and
recommendations to the BLM on land
use planning and management of the
National System of Public Lands within
their geographic areas. The BLM will
accept public nominations for 45 days
after the publication of this notice.
DATES: All nominations must be
received no later than March 14, 2013.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5830-5832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01664]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2012-N185; FF08E00000-FXES11120800000F2-123-F2]
Draft Environmental Assessment and Proposed Habitat Conservation
Plan for the Interim Operations of PacifiCorp's Klamath Hydroelectric
Project on the Klamath River, Klamath County, OR, and Siskiyou County,
CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; draft environmental assessment and
proposed habitat conservation plan; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have prepared a draft
environmental assessment (EA) under the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) for the interim operations of the Klamath Hydroelectric
Project in
[[Page 5831]]
response to an application from PacifiCorp (applicant) for a 10-year
incidental take permit for two species under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 UDC 1531, et seq; Act). We request data,
comments, new information or suggestions from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community, Tribes,
industry, or any other interested party on the applicant's permit
application and associated habitat conservation plan (plan), and also
on the associated draft EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
March 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Please address written comments to Laurie R. Sada, Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls Fish and
Wildlife Office, 1936 California Avenue, Klamath Falls, OR 97601.
Alternatively, you may send comments by facsimile to 541-885-7837.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Larson, Biologist, or Trisha
Roninger, Assistant Field Supervisor, at the address shown above or at
541-885-8481 (telephone). If you use a telecommunications device for
the deaf, please call the Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The application for an incidental take
permit (ITP) addresses the potential for ``take'' of the Lost River
sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and the shortnose sucker (Chasmistes
brevirostris), two fishes federally listed as endangered. The applicant
would implement a conservation program to minimize and mitigate the
project activities, as described in the applicant's plan.
The applicant has developed a plan as part of their application for
an ITP under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The proposed plan includes
measures necessary to minimize and mitigate the impacts, to the maximum
extent practicable, of potential proposed taking of two federally
listed species to be covered by the plan, and the habitats upon which
they depend, resulting from the interim operations of the Klamath
Hydroelectric Project (Project), in Klamath County, Oregon, and
Siskiyou County, California. This ITP would be in effect for a
prospective 10-year interim period that the Project would be operating
on an annual license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
We have prepared an EA to evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the potential issuance of an incidental take
permit (ITP) to the applicant, as well as impacts of the implementation
of the supporting proposed plan.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act and its regulations prohibit taking of fish
and wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened under section 4
of the Act. Under the Act, the term ``take'' means to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to
attempt to engage in any such conduct. The term ``harm'' is defined in
the regulations as significant habitat modification or degradation that
results in death or injury of listed species by significantly impairing
essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term ``harass'' is defined in the
regulations as to carry out actions that create the likelihood of
injury to listed species to such an extent as to significantly disrupt
normal behavioral patterns, which include, but are not limited to,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally listed species, provided that
the take that occurs is incidental to, but not the purpose of, an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing permits for endangered
and threatened species are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains provisions for issuing such
incidental take permits to non-Federal entities for the take of
endangered and threatened species, provided the following criteria are
met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a proposed plan and ensure that
adequate funding for the plan will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
5. The applicants will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes
of the plan.
The applicant seeks incidental take authorization for the following
federally listed endangered fish species--Lost River sucker (Deltistes
luxatus) and the shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris)--which we
will refer to as the ``covered species'' in this notice.
The activities proposed to be covered under this plan include
activities that are otherwise necessary to operate and maintain project
facilities during the permit term. In general, the covered activities
include the following: (1) Operate and maintain the spill gates at Link
River dam for regulation and releases of flows from Link River dam to
maintain water in the East Side and West Side water conveyance
features, and operate and maintain the East Side and West Side canals
and flowlines following shutdown of the East Side and West Side
powerhouse facilities; (2) operate and maintain Keno Dam, spill gates,
and fish ladder, and regulate the water level upstream of Keno Dam in
accordance with the existing agreements and licenses; (3) operate and
maintain J.C. Boyle Dam, fish bypass system, water conveyance system,
turbines, and powerhouse facilities, and regulate water levels and
flows necessary to maintain minimum reservoir elevations, river flows
and ramping rates; (4) operate and maintain Copco No. 1 and Copco No. 2
Dams, water conveyance systems, turbines, and powerhouse facilities,
and regulate water levels and flows necessary to maintain minimum
reservoir elevations, river flows and ramping rates; and (5) operate
and maintain Iron Gate Dam (and associated appurtenances), penstocks,
turbines, and powerhouse facilities, and regulate releases from Iron
Gate Dam in accordance with instream flow and ramping rate
requirements.
Alternatives in the Draft Environmental Assessment
The proposed action presented in the draft EA will be compared to
the no-action alternative. The no-action alternative represents
estimated future conditions to which the proposed action's estimated
future conditions can be compared. Other alternatives considered,
including their potential impacts, are also addressed in the draft EA.
No-Action Alternative
Under the no-action alternative, we would not issue a permit. The
no-action alternative would not achieve the applicant's objectives and
would not allow for reduced incidental take of federally-listed species
or mitigation of impacts to listed species.
Proposed Alternative
Under the proposed alternative, the applicant would continue to
operate the Klamath Hydroelectric Project. The project consists of
eight developments. The seven developments covered by the ITP are
located on the Klamath River between river mile (RM) 190.1 and 254.3,
including (in order moving upstream): Iron Gate Dam and Reservoir (RM
190.1 to 196.9), Copco No. 2 Dam and Reservoir (RM 198.3 to 198.6),
[[Page 5832]]
Copco No. 1 Dam and Reservoir (RM 198.6 to 203.1), J.C. Boyle Dam and
Reservoir (RM 220.4 to 228.3), Keno Dam and Reservoir (RM 233 to
253.1), and East Side and West Side facilities (both in Link River at
RM 253.1 to 254.3).
The ``covered activities'' included in the plan consist of a
variety of activities at the seven facilities listed above that are
necessary to generate hydroelectric power and to maintain these
facilities. These include: Operate and maintain spill gates for
regulation and releases of flows; operate and maintain canals,
flowlines, and other water conveyance systems; operate and maintain
penstocks, turbines, and powerhouse facilities; operate and maintain
fish bypass systems; and regulate water levels and flows necessary to
maintain minimum reservoir elevations, river flows, and ramping rates.
The applicant proposes to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the effects
to the covered species associated with the covered activities by fully
implementing the plan. The following minimization and mitigation
measures will be implemented as part of the plan: Take of listed
species will be substantially reduced by shutting down the East Side
and West Side developments within 30 days of issuance of the ITP. These
facilities will remain substantially shut down until eventual
decommissioning of the facilities as determined by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission. Mitigation of take will result from funding of
restoration projects and other activities that will benefit the
recovery of the species.
Under the proposed action alternative, we would issue an incidental
take permit for the applicant's proposed project, which includes the
activities described above and in more detail in the plan.
Environmental Review
As described in our EA, we have made the preliminary determination
that approval of the proposed plan and issuance of the permit would
qualify as Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) under NEPA (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as provided by Federal regulations (40 CFR 1500,
5(k), 1507.3(b)(2), and 1508.4) and the Department of the Interior
Manual (516 DM 2 and 516 DM 8). Our EA describes the project effects on
all potential resources that could be adversely affected, including
water resources (hydrology and water quality); biological resources
(Lost River and shortnose suckers, anadromous fishes, and other
fishes); socioeconomics (local employment, recreation, renewable
energy, land use, and development); environmental justice; and cultural
resources. It also includes an analysis of alternatives, and other
required analyses such as unavoidable adverse effects, irreversible and
irretrievable commitments of resources, short-term uses versus long-
term productivity and cumulative effects, and the environmentally
preferable alternative (the proposed project).
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this
notice. We particularly seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning the species;
2. Relevant data concerning the species;
3. Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of the species;
4. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the species;
5. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
6. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed development and permit action.
You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
We will identify in the FONSI if we need to prepare further NEPA
documentation. We will also consider public comments on the draft EA
when making the final determination on whether to prepare additional
NEPA documents on the proposed action.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of the permit application, plan, and EA from
the individuals in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Copies of these
documents are available for public inspection, by appointment, during
regular business hours, at the Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office
(see ADDRESSES), and on our Web site at www.fws.gov/klamathfallsfwo/.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the permit application; including the plan and
comments we receive, to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. If the requirements are met,
we will issue a permit to the applicant for the incidental take of the
Lost River sucker and the shortnose sucker resulting from the
implementation of the covered activities described in the plan. We will
make the final permit decision no sooner than 30 days after the date of
this notice.
Authority
We publish this notice under the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; NEPA), and its
implementing public involvement regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR 1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6), as well as in
compliance with section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.; Act).
Dated: January 22, 2013.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-01664 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P