Safety Zone; Military Ocean Terminal Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA, 5717-5720 [2013-01635]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
November 6, 2000, and believes that the
action would not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes;
would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and would not preempt
tribal laws. This final rule addresses
obligations of Federal funds to States for
Federal-aid highway projects and would
not impose any direct compliance
requirements on Indian tribal
governments. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has
determined that this is not a significant
energy action under that order since it
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN number
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross-reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 635
Construction materials, Design-build,
Grant programs, Transportation,
Highways and roads, Culvert material
types.
Issued on: January 17, 2013.
Victor M. Mendez,
Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, title
23, Code of Federal Regulations, part
635 is amended as follows:
PART 635—CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE
1. Revise the authority citation for part
635 to read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
■
Authority: Sec. 1525 of Pub. L. 112–141,
Sec. 1503 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144;
23 U.S.C. 101 (note), 109, 112, 113, 114, 116,
119, 128, and 315; 31 U.S.C. 6505; 42 U.S.C.
3334, 4601 et seq.; Sec. 1041(a), Pub. L. 102–
240, 105 Stat. 1914; 23 CFR 1.32; 49 CFR
1.85(a)(1).
2. Amend § 635.411 by adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 635.411
Material or product selection.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) State transportation departments
(State DOTs) shall have the autonomy to
determine culvert and storm sewer
material types to be included in the
construction of a project on a Federalaid highway.
[FR Doc. 2013–01583 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–1008]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Military Ocean Terminal
Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay,
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Interim rule and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone in the
navigable waters of Suisun Bay near
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
in support of military onload and
offload operations. This safety zone is
established to enhance the safety of
mariners transiting the area in the
unlikely event of an ordnance related
mishap. All persons or vessels are
prohibited from anchoring or otherwise
loitering in the safety zone during
military onloads and offloads without
permission of the Captain of the Port or
their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective with actual
notice from January 2, 2013 until
January 28, 2013. This rule is effective
in the Code of Federal Regulations on
January 28, 2013. Comments and related
materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of Docket Number
USCG–2012–1008. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5717
You may submit comments identified
by docket number using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade William
Hawn, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco; telephone (415) 399–7442 or
email at D11–PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MOTCO Military Ocean Terminal Concord
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
5718
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8-1/2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated
with this rulemaking. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before December 20, 2012,
using one of the methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
B. Regulatory History and Information
This interim rule will regulate the
waters of Suisun Bay in vicinity of the
Military Ocean Terminal Concord
(MOTCO) in Concord, California. This
rule will be enforced in conjunction
with the MOTCO security zone,
established in 33 CFR § 165.1199, which
restricts vessel traffic during military
onloads and offloads at MOTCO.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)).
This provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM with
respect to this rule because to do so
would be impracticable. Due to the fact
that military loading operations are
ongoing, there is a need to begin
enforcement of a no-loitering zone
immediately, and a notice and comment
period would expose the public to
additional dangers.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because to do otherwise would
be impracticable, as immediate
prevention measures are needed to
protect the maritime public during
military onload and offload operations.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is the Ports and Waterways Safety Act
which authorizes the Coast Guard to
establish safety zones (33 U.S.C 1221 et
seq.).
The U.S. Army’s 834th Transportation
Battalion requested that the U.S. Coast
Guard develop a no-loitering area
around the piers at Military Ocean
Terminal Concord, CA during military
onloads and offloads. In the unlikely
event of an explosion due to military
loading operations, a no-loitering zone
is needed to minimize the likelihood of
public presence in the projected blast
zone, to protect persons and vessels
from the dangers associated with
military onload and offload operations.
A safety zone is necessary in the
vicinity of MOTCO to prevent persons
and vessels from anchoring or otherwise
loitering in the zone between 500 yards
of MOTCO Pier 2 in position 38°03′30″
N, 122°01′14″ W (NAD 83) as depicted
in National Oceanic and Atmospheric
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656
(the perimeter of the existing security
zone) and 3,000 yards of the pier.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone in Suisun Bay near MOTCO
in Concord California during military
onloads and offloads. Given the
potentially devastating impact of an
ordnance mishap, the Coast Guard is
implementing a safety zone around the
MOTCO piers during military onloads
and offloads. This rule will create a noloitering area in the zone between 500
yards of MOTCO Pier 2 in position
38°03′30″ N, 122°01′14″ W (NAD 83) as
depicted in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Chart 18656 (the perimeter of the
existing security zone) and 3,000 yards
of the pier. The purpose of this safety
zone is to prevent persons or vessels
from anchoring or loitering within the
potential blast zone around the MOTCO
piers during military onloads and
offloads. This safety zone will be
effective for the entire duration of
onload and offload operations.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
The safety zone is limited in duration,
and is limited to a narrowly tailored
geographic area. In addition, although
this rule restricts anchoring and/or
loitering in the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because the local
waterway users will have access to the
waterway for transitory purposes. The
entities most likely to be affected by this
rule are owners and operators of
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities and
sightseeing.
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of commercial vessels, and
pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety
zone would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for a limited duration. The
safety zone does not restrict transitory
use of the waterways and is in place to
prevent anchoring and loitering within
the blast zone. The maritime public will
be advised via actual notice during the
enforcement of this safety zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5719
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone of limited size and duration. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
5720
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1198 to read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
§ 165.1198 Safety zone; Military Ocean
Terminal Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay,
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA.
(a) Location. This safety zone is
established in the navigable waters of
Suisun Bay near Military Ocean
Terminal Concord, CA (MOTCO) as
depicted in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Chart 18656. Upon commencement of
military onloads and offloads, the safety
zone will encompass the navigable
waters in the area between 500 yards of
MOTCO Pier 2 in position 38°03′30″ N,
122°01′14″ W (NAD 83) as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656
(the perimeter of the existing security
zone) and 3,000 yards of the pier.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced during all
military onload and offload operations.
The Captain of the Port San Francisco
(COTP) will notify the maritime
community of periods during which this
zone will be enforced via actual notice
on-scene during military onloads and
offloads.
(c) Regulations. (1) The safety zone is
open to all persons and vessels for
transitory use.
(2) Persons and vessels operating
within the safety zone may not anchor
or otherwise loiter within the safety
zone.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to anchor
or otherwise loiter within the safety
zone must contact Sector San Francisco
Vessel Traffic Service at (415) 556–2760
or VHF Channel 14 to obtain
permission.
(4) All persons and vessels transiting
through or operating within the safety
zone must comply with all directions
given to them by the COTP or a
designated representative.
(5) The public can contact Sector San
Francisco Bay at (415) 399–3530 to
obtain information concerning
enforcement of this rule.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the COTP or the
designated on-scene patrol personnel.
Patrol personnel comprise
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard onboard
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels. The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
of the safety zone by local law
enforcement and the MOTCO police as
necessary. Upon being hailed by U.S.
Coast Guard patrol personnel by siren,
radio, flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel must proceed as
directed.
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2013–01635 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–1062]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway; Oak Island, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is extending
the temporary safety zone established
on the waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway at Oak Island, North Carolina.
The safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of mariners on navigable
waters during maintenance on the NC
133 Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 311.8, at
Oak Island, North Carolina. The safety
zone extension will temporarily restrict
vessel movement within the designated
area starting on February 14, 2013
through June 15, 2013.
DATES: This rule is effective from
February 14, 2013 through June 15,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–1062]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email CWO4 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone
252–247–4525, email
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is extending the
initial Temporary Final Rule USCG—
2012–0431. On June 15, 2012 a Notice
to Proposed Rulemaking was published
in 77 FR 35906 for USCG -2012–0431.
A subsequent Notice to Proposed
Rulemaking was published on
September 13, 2012 in 77 FR 56587 for
USCG–2012–0811. We received no
comments on this proposed rule.
B. Basis and Purpose
North Carolina Department of
Transportation has awarded a contract
to Marine Contracting Corporation of
Virginia Beach, Virginia to perform
bridge maintenance on the NC 133
Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 311.8, at
Oak Island, North Carolina. The contract
provides for replacing the fender system
which commenced on September 12,
2012 with an initial completion date of
December 12, 2012. Subsequently, the
contractor was granted an extension by
North Carolina Department of
Transportation until February 14, 2013.
However, due to the presence of rock on
the sea bed, which has impacted the
construction progress, NCDOT has
granted an additional extension until
June 15, 2013 to complete the bridge
maintenance. The contractor will utilize
a 140 foot deck barge with a 40 foot
beam as a work platform and for
equipment staging. This safety zone will
provide a safety buffer to transiting
vessels as bridge repairs present
potential hazards to mariners and
property due to reduction of horizontal
clearance. During this period the Coast
Guard will require a one hour
notification to the work supervisor at
the NC 133 Fixed Bridge at the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway crossing, mile
311.8, Oak Island, North Carolina. The
notification requirement will apply
during the maintenance period for
vessels requiring a horizontal clearance
of greater than 50 feet.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The temporary safety zone will
encompass the waters directly under the
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5717-5720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01635]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-1008]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Military Ocean Terminal Concord Safety Zone, Suisun
Bay, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in the navigable
waters of Suisun Bay near Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA in
support of military onload and offload operations. This safety zone is
established to enhance the safety of mariners transiting the area in
the unlikely event of an ordnance related mishap. All persons or
vessels are prohibited from anchoring or otherwise loitering in the
safety zone during military onloads and offloads without permission of
the Captain of the Port or their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective with actual notice from January 2, 2013
until January 28, 2013. This rule is effective in the Code of Federal
Regulations on January 28, 2013. Comments and related materials must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before April 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket
Number USCG-2012-1008. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as
being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may submit comments identified by docket number using any one
of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade William Hawn, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-7442 or email at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MOTCO Military Ocean Terminal Concord
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as
[[Page 5718]]
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8-1/2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before December 20, 2012, using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
This interim rule will regulate the waters of Suisun Bay in
vicinity of the Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) in Concord,
California. This rule will be enforced in conjunction with the MOTCO
security zone, established in 33 CFR Sec. 165.1199, which restricts
vessel traffic during military onloads and offloads at MOTCO.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule
because to do so would be impracticable. Due to the fact that military
loading operations are ongoing, there is a need to begin enforcement of
a no-loitering zone immediately, and a notice and comment period would
expose the public to additional dangers.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because to do otherwise would be
impracticable, as immediate prevention measures are needed to protect
the maritime public during military onload and offload operations.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act which authorizes the Coast Guard to establish safety zones
(33 U.S.C 1221 et seq.).
The U.S. Army's 834th Transportation Battalion requested that the
U.S. Coast Guard develop a no-loitering area around the piers at
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA during military onloads and
offloads. In the unlikely event of an explosion due to military loading
operations, a no-loitering zone is needed to minimize the likelihood of
public presence in the projected blast zone, to protect persons and
vessels from the dangers associated with military onload and offload
operations.
A safety zone is necessary in the vicinity of MOTCO to prevent
persons and vessels from anchoring or otherwise loitering in the zone
between 500 yards of MOTCO Pier 2 in position 38[deg]03'30'' N,
122[deg]01'14'' W (NAD 83) as depicted in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656 (the perimeter of the
existing security zone) and 3,000 yards of the pier.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Suisun Bay near
MOTCO in Concord California during military onloads and offloads. Given
the potentially devastating impact of an ordnance mishap, the Coast
Guard is implementing a safety zone around the MOTCO piers during
military onloads and offloads. This rule will create a no-loitering
area in the zone between 500 yards of MOTCO Pier 2 in position
38[deg]03'30'' N, 122[deg]01'14'' W (NAD 83) as depicted in National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656 (the
perimeter of the existing security zone) and 3,000 yards of the pier.
The purpose of this safety zone is to prevent persons or vessels from
anchoring or loitering within the potential blast zone around the MOTCO
piers during military onloads and offloads. This safety zone will be
effective for the entire duration of onload and offload operations.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The safety zone is limited in duration, and is limited to a
narrowly tailored geographic area. In addition, although this rule
restricts anchoring and/or loitering in the waters encompassed by the
safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant because
the local waterway users will have access to the waterway for
transitory purposes. The entities most likely to be affected by this
rule are owners and operators of commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing.
[[Page 5719]]
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of commercial vessels,
and pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for a
limited duration. The safety zone does not restrict transitory use of
the waterways and is in place to prevent anchoring and loitering within
the blast zone. The maritime public will be advised via actual notice
during the enforcement of this safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 5720]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1198 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1198 Safety zone; Military Ocean Terminal Concord Safety
Zone, Suisun Bay, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA.
(a) Location. This safety zone is established in the navigable
waters of Suisun Bay near Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA (MOTCO)
as depicted in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Chart 18656. Upon commencement of military onloads and offloads, the
safety zone will encompass the navigable waters in the area between 500
yards of MOTCO Pier 2 in position 38[deg]03'30'' N, 122[deg]01'14'' W
(NAD 83) as depicted in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) Chart 18656 (the perimeter of the existing security zone) and
3,000 yards of the pier.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced during all military onload and offload
operations. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify
the maritime community of periods during which this zone will be
enforced via actual notice on-scene during military onloads and
offloads.
(c) Regulations. (1) The safety zone is open to all persons and
vessels for transitory use.
(2) Persons and vessels operating within the safety zone may not
anchor or otherwise loiter within the safety zone.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to anchor or otherwise loiter within
the safety zone must contact Sector San Francisco Vessel Traffic
Service at (415) 556-2760 or VHF Channel 14 to obtain permission.
(4) All persons and vessels transiting through or operating within
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
COTP or a designated representative.
(5) The public can contact Sector San Francisco Bay at (415) 399-
3530 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the COTP or the designated on-scene patrol personnel.
Patrol personnel comprise commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of
the Coast Guard onboard Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local,
state, and federal law enforcement vessels. The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by local law
enforcement and the MOTCO police as necessary. Upon being hailed by
U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of a vessel must proceed as directed.
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2013-01635 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P