Construction and Maintenance-Culvert Pipe Selection, 5715-5717 [2013-01583]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 522.1367
[Amended]
Background
6. In paragraph (b) of § 522.1367,
remove ‘‘No. 000010’’ and in its place
add ‘‘Nos. 000010, 016729, and
055529’’.
■
Dated: January 22, 2013.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2013–01647 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 635
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2012–0098]
RIN 2125–AF47
Regulatory History
Construction and Maintenance—
Culvert Pipe Selection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Section 1525 of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Act (MAP–21) requires the Secretary of
Transportation to modify FHWA
regulations to ensure that States shall
have the autonomy to determine culvert
and storm sewer material types to be
included in the construction of a project
on a Federal-aid highway. This final
rule is intended to implement this
legislative requirement.
DATES: This rule is effective February
27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Gerald Yakowenko, Office of Program
Administration, (202) 366–1562, or Mr.
Michael Harkins, Office of the Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–4928, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Office hours are from 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
Electronic Access and Filing
This document may be viewed online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval
help and guidelines are available on the
Web site. It is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days a year. An electronic copy
of this document may also be
downloaded from the Office of the
Federal Register’s home page at: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register and
the Government Printing Office’s Web
page at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Under the ‘‘Administrative Procedure
Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency may
waive the normal notice and comment
procedure if it finds, for good cause, that
it would be impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest. The
FHWA finds that notice and comment
for this rule is unnecessary because it
implements a congressional mandate to
amend 23 CFR 635.411 to allow States
to choose culvert and storm sewer
material type. The regulatory
amendments in this final rule are based
upon the statutory language and FHWA
does not anticipate receiving
meaningful comments to alter the
regulation given the explicit mandate.
Accordingly, FHWA finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
notice and opportunity for comment.
The ‘‘General Material
Requirements,’’ found in 23 CFR part
635 subpart D, supports competitive
bidding principles in 23 U.S.C. 112 with
certain requirements and procedures
relating to product and material
selection and use on Federal-aid
highway projects.
Securing competition in the area of
culvert pipe material selection has been
a concern of FHWA since the 1960s. In
an internal Bureau of Public Roads (now
FHWA) Memorandum issued October 7,
1963, the Bureau of Public Roads
addressed the issue of culvert selection
and in general product selection in
writing:
* * * a State’s desire to select only one
type of pipe for bidding purposes on the
basis that such selection will favor State and
local public interests cannot be accepted by
Public Roads.
This Memorandum further states,
Except where otherwise dictated by
engineering evaluations of individual site
conditions, there is no basic disadvantage in
specifying all acceptable alternate types and
either calling for competitive bids on them or
permitting the successful bidder to name the
type he will furnish. Even when it is
indicated that one type might receive lower
bid prices, competitive bidding of the one
type with other acceptable types could result
in lower contract prices.
Through a revision to Policy &
Procedure Memorandum 21–6.3 dated
October 3, 1972, the FHWA included a
table entitled ‘‘Summary of Acceptable
Criteria for Specifying Types of Culvert
Pipes.’’ On September 30, 1974, the
table was included in the CFR as an
appendix to 23 CFR 635.117 (39 FR
35152). According to § 635.117(d), as in
effect in 1974, Appendix A
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5715
* * * sets forth the FHWA requirements
regarding the specification of alternate types
of culvert pipes, and the number and types
of such alternatives which must be set forth
in the specifications for various types of
drainage installations.
On September 10, 1976, this section was
redesignated as 23 CFR 635.411 (41 FR
36204) and remained unchanged until
2006, though the market had changed to
the extent that Appendix A no longer
adequately encompassed the universe of
available alternatives.
Section 5514 of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU, Pub. L. 109.59;
August 10, 2005), titled ‘‘Competition
for Specification of Alternative Types of
Culvert Pipes,’’ required the Secretary of
Transportation to ensure that States
provide for competition with respect to
the specification of alternative types of
culvert pipes through requirements that
are commensurate with competition for
other construction materials. To
implement this provision, the FHWA
issued a final rule on November 15,
2006 (71 FR 66450), that deleted
Appendix A from the CFR.
MAP–21 Legislative Provision
On July 6, 2012, President Obama
signed the Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century Act (MAP–21), Public
Law 112–141, 126 Stat. 405. Section
1525 of MAP–21, ‘‘State Autonomy for
Culvert Pipe Selection,’’ requires the
Secretary of Transportation, within 180
days of the date of enactment of MAP–
21 (October 1, 2012) to modify section
635.411 of title 23 CFR, to ensure that
States shall have the autonomy to
determine culvert and storm sewer
material types to be included in the
construction of a project on a Federalaid highway. The use of the word
‘‘autonomy’’ in this section gives the
State transportation departments (State
DOTs) and other direct recipients the
sole authority and discretion to make a
decision regarding culvert and storm
sewer material types without any input
or approval from the FHWA. As a result,
a State DOT may choose to exercise its
autonomy regarding culvert and storm
sewer type selection to either:
(a) Include all material types deemed
acceptable as a result of engineering and
economic analysis, or
(b) Restrict the pool of available
culvert and storm sewer material types
to those which the State DOT would
select.
Although section 1525 gives the
States the autonomy to determine
culvert and storm sewer material types,
section 1525 does not relieve the States
of compliance with other applicable
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
5716
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Federal requirements, such as Buy
America, culvert design standards in 23
CFR part 625, and the restriction against
the use of patented and proprietary
products in 23 CFR 635.411. Also, while
a State may choose to specify only one
type of material, the State may not
specify only one specific product among
several of the same material type that is
chosen unless otherwise permitted to do
so under section 635.411. Also, with
respect to design standards, the
specified type would have to conform to
engineering design standards such as
structural load, hydraulic capacity,
corrosion resistance, etc., and would
have to fit into the natural and
constructed environment. These culvert
design standards are encompassed in
the various standards found in 23 CFR
part 625.
Analysis
23 CFR 635.411
This final rule amends subsection
635.411 to add a paragraph (f) to grant
autonomy to State DOTs regarding the
selection of culvert and storm sewer
material types to be included in Federalaid highway construction projects. The
language would not permit FHWA to
limit Federal-aid participation in costs
based on the culvert or storm sewer
material type selected by the State DOT.
However, the State DOTs’ use of culvert
and storm sewer material shall
otherwise comply with all applicable
Federal requirements, such as the
provisions regarding the use of patented
and proprietary products set forth in
this section as well as the design
standards set forth in 23 CFR part 625.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined that this
action is not a significant regulatory
action within the meaning of Executive
Order 12866, and within the meaning of
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
regulatory policies and procedures.
Since this rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate to merely allow
States to choose culvert and storm sewer
material type, and does not require or
prohibit the use of a particular type of
culvert and storm sewer material, the
FHWA anticipates that the economic
impact of this rulemaking would be
minimal. The FHWA anticipates that
this final rule will not adversely affect,
in a material way, any sector of the
economy. Additionally, this action
complies with the principles of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Executive Order 13563. In addition,
these changes will not interfere with
any action taken or planned by another
agency and would not materially alter
the budgetary impact of any
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs. Consequently, a full
regulatory evaluation is not required.
Highway Planning and Construction.
The regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program. Accordingly FHWA
solicits comments on this issue.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since FHWA finds good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice
and opportunity for comment for this
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) do not apply. However, the
FHWA has evaluated the effects of this
action on small entities and has
determined that the action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The amendment addresses obligation of
Federal funds to States for Federal-aid
highway projects. As such, it affects
only States and States are not included
in the definition of small entity set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 601.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The FHWA
has analyzed this final rule under the
PRA and has determined that this rule
does not contain collection of
information requirements for the
purposes of the PRA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule would not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, March 22,
1995) as it will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $148.1 million or more
in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial,
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 dated August 4,
1999, and the FHWA has determined
that this action would not have a
substantial direct effect or sufficient
federalism implications on the States.
The FHWA has also determined that
this action would not preempt any State
law or regulation or affect the States’
ability to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program Number 20.205,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Paperwork Reduction Act
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA has analyzed this action
for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and
has determined that this action would
not have any effect on the quality of the
environment and meets the criteria for
the categorical exclusion at 23 CFR
771.117(c)(20).
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
The FHWA has analyzed this final
rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate
that this final rule would affect a taking
of private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this action would not cause
an environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 13175, dated
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
November 6, 2000, and believes that the
action would not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes;
would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and would not preempt
tribal laws. This final rule addresses
obligations of Federal funds to States for
Federal-aid highway projects and would
not impose any direct compliance
requirements on Indian tribal
governments. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has
determined that this is not a significant
energy action under that order since it
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN number
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross-reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 635
Construction materials, Design-build,
Grant programs, Transportation,
Highways and roads, Culvert material
types.
Issued on: January 17, 2013.
Victor M. Mendez,
Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, title
23, Code of Federal Regulations, part
635 is amended as follows:
PART 635—CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE
1. Revise the authority citation for part
635 to read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with
■
Authority: Sec. 1525 of Pub. L. 112–141,
Sec. 1503 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144;
23 U.S.C. 101 (note), 109, 112, 113, 114, 116,
119, 128, and 315; 31 U.S.C. 6505; 42 U.S.C.
3334, 4601 et seq.; Sec. 1041(a), Pub. L. 102–
240, 105 Stat. 1914; 23 CFR 1.32; 49 CFR
1.85(a)(1).
2. Amend § 635.411 by adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 635.411
Material or product selection.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) State transportation departments
(State DOTs) shall have the autonomy to
determine culvert and storm sewer
material types to be included in the
construction of a project on a Federalaid highway.
[FR Doc. 2013–01583 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–1008]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Military Ocean Terminal
Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay,
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Interim rule and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone in the
navigable waters of Suisun Bay near
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
in support of military onload and
offload operations. This safety zone is
established to enhance the safety of
mariners transiting the area in the
unlikely event of an ordnance related
mishap. All persons or vessels are
prohibited from anchoring or otherwise
loitering in the safety zone during
military onloads and offloads without
permission of the Captain of the Port or
their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective with actual
notice from January 2, 2013 until
January 28, 2013. This rule is effective
in the Code of Federal Regulations on
January 28, 2013. Comments and related
materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of Docket Number
USCG–2012–1008. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5717
You may submit comments identified
by docket number using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade William
Hawn, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco; telephone (415) 399–7442 or
email at D11–PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MOTCO Military Ocean Terminal Concord
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5715-5717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01583]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 635
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2012-0098]
RIN 2125-AF47
Construction and Maintenance--Culvert Pipe Selection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 1525 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP-21) requires the Secretary of Transportation to modify
FHWA regulations to ensure that States shall have the autonomy to
determine culvert and storm sewer material types to be included in the
construction of a project on a Federal-aid highway. This final rule is
intended to implement this legislative requirement.
DATES: This rule is effective February 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gerald Yakowenko, Office of
Program Administration, (202) 366-1562, or Mr. Michael Harkins, Office
of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-4928, Federal Highway Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document may be viewed online through the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the Web site. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
a year. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register and the Government Printing Office's
Web page at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
Background
Under the ``Administrative Procedure Act'' (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an
agency may waive the normal notice and comment procedure if it finds,
for good cause, that it would be impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. The FHWA finds that notice and comment
for this rule is unnecessary because it implements a congressional
mandate to amend 23 CFR 635.411 to allow States to choose culvert and
storm sewer material type. The regulatory amendments in this final rule
are based upon the statutory language and FHWA does not anticipate
receiving meaningful comments to alter the regulation given the
explicit mandate. Accordingly, FHWA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice and opportunity for comment.
Regulatory History
The ``General Material Requirements,'' found in 23 CFR part 635
subpart D, supports competitive bidding principles in 23 U.S.C. 112
with certain requirements and procedures relating to product and
material selection and use on Federal-aid highway projects.
Securing competition in the area of culvert pipe material selection
has been a concern of FHWA since the 1960s. In an internal Bureau of
Public Roads (now FHWA) Memorandum issued October 7, 1963, the Bureau
of Public Roads addressed the issue of culvert selection and in general
product selection in writing:
* * * a State's desire to select only one type of pipe for
bidding purposes on the basis that such selection will favor State
and local public interests cannot be accepted by Public Roads.
This Memorandum further states,
Except where otherwise dictated by engineering evaluations of
individual site conditions, there is no basic disadvantage in
specifying all acceptable alternate types and either calling for
competitive bids on them or permitting the successful bidder to name
the type he will furnish. Even when it is indicated that one type
might receive lower bid prices, competitive bidding of the one type
with other acceptable types could result in lower contract prices.
Through a revision to Policy & Procedure Memorandum 21-6.3 dated
October 3, 1972, the FHWA included a table entitled ``Summary of
Acceptable Criteria for Specifying Types of Culvert Pipes.'' On
September 30, 1974, the table was included in the CFR as an appendix to
23 CFR 635.117 (39 FR 35152). According to Sec. 635.117(d), as in
effect in 1974, Appendix A
* * * sets forth the FHWA requirements regarding the
specification of alternate types of culvert pipes, and the number
and types of such alternatives which must be set forth in the
specifications for various types of drainage installations.
On September 10, 1976, this section was redesignated as 23 CFR 635.411
(41 FR 36204) and remained unchanged until 2006, though the market had
changed to the extent that Appendix A no longer adequately encompassed
the universe of available alternatives.
Section 5514 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU, Pub. L.
109.59; August 10, 2005), titled ``Competition for Specification of
Alternative Types of Culvert Pipes,'' required the Secretary of
Transportation to ensure that States provide for competition with
respect to the specification of alternative types of culvert pipes
through requirements that are commensurate with competition for other
construction materials. To implement this provision, the FHWA issued a
final rule on November 15, 2006 (71 FR 66450), that deleted Appendix A
from the CFR.
MAP-21 Legislative Provision
On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141, 126
Stat. 405. Section 1525 of MAP-21, ``State Autonomy for Culvert Pipe
Selection,'' requires the Secretary of Transportation, within 180 days
of the date of enactment of MAP-21 (October 1, 2012) to modify section
635.411 of title 23 CFR, to ensure that States shall have the autonomy
to determine culvert and storm sewer material types to be included in
the construction of a project on a Federal-aid highway. The use of the
word ``autonomy'' in this section gives the State transportation
departments (State DOTs) and other direct recipients the sole authority
and discretion to make a decision regarding culvert and storm sewer
material types without any input or approval from the FHWA. As a
result, a State DOT may choose to exercise its autonomy regarding
culvert and storm sewer type selection to either:
(a) Include all material types deemed acceptable as a result of
engineering and economic analysis, or
(b) Restrict the pool of available culvert and storm sewer material
types to those which the State DOT would select.
Although section 1525 gives the States the autonomy to determine
culvert and storm sewer material types, section 1525 does not relieve
the States of compliance with other applicable
[[Page 5716]]
Federal requirements, such as Buy America, culvert design standards in
23 CFR part 625, and the restriction against the use of patented and
proprietary products in 23 CFR 635.411. Also, while a State may choose
to specify only one type of material, the State may not specify only
one specific product among several of the same material type that is
chosen unless otherwise permitted to do so under section 635.411. Also,
with respect to design standards, the specified type would have to
conform to engineering design standards such as structural load,
hydraulic capacity, corrosion resistance, etc., and would have to fit
into the natural and constructed environment. These culvert design
standards are encompassed in the various standards found in 23 CFR part
625.
Analysis
23 CFR 635.411
This final rule amends subsection 635.411 to add a paragraph (f) to
grant autonomy to State DOTs regarding the selection of culvert and
storm sewer material types to be included in Federal-aid highway
construction projects. The language would not permit FHWA to limit
Federal-aid participation in costs based on the culvert or storm sewer
material type selected by the State DOT. However, the State DOTs' use
of culvert and storm sewer material shall otherwise comply with all
applicable Federal requirements, such as the provisions regarding the
use of patented and proprietary products set forth in this section as
well as the design standards set forth in 23 CFR part 625.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and
within the meaning of the U.S. Department of Transportation's
regulatory policies and procedures. Since this rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate to merely allow States to choose culvert and
storm sewer material type, and does not require or prohibit the use of
a particular type of culvert and storm sewer material, the FHWA
anticipates that the economic impact of this rulemaking would be
minimal. The FHWA anticipates that this final rule will not adversely
affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. Additionally,
this action complies with the principles of Executive Order 13563. In
addition, these changes will not interfere with any action taken or
planned by another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs.
Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since FHWA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
notice and opportunity for comment for this rule, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601-612) do not
apply. However, the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on
small entities and has determined that the action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The amendment addresses obligation of Federal funds to States for
Federal-aid highway projects. As such, it affects only States and
States are not included in the definition of small entity set forth in
5 U.S.C. 601.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48,
March 22, 1995) as it will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $148.1 million or more in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive
Order 13132 dated August 4, 1999, and the FHWA has determined that this
action would not have a substantial direct effect or sufficient
federalism implications on the States. The FHWA has also determined
that this action would not preempt any State law or regulation or
affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program. Accordingly FHWA
solicits comments on this issue.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget for each collection of information they conduct,
sponsor, or require through regulations. The FHWA has analyzed this
final rule under the PRA and has determined that this rule does not
contain collection of information requirements for the purposes of the
PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
and has determined that this action would not have any effect on the
quality of the environment and meets the criteria for the categorical
exclusion at 23 CFR 771.117(c)(20).
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
The FHWA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate that this final rule
would affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this action would not cause an environmental risk to
health or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175,
dated
[[Page 5717]]
November 6, 2000, and believes that the action would not have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; would not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and would not preempt tribal laws. This final rule
addresses obligations of Federal funds to States for Federal-aid
highway projects and would not impose any direct compliance
requirements on Indian tribal governments. Therefore, a tribal summary
impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has determined that this is not a
significant energy action under that order since it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used to cross-reference this action
with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 635
Construction materials, Design-build, Grant programs,
Transportation, Highways and roads, Culvert material types.
Issued on: January 17, 2013.
Victor M. Mendez,
Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, title 23, Code of Federal
Regulations, part 635 is amended as follows:
PART 635--CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 635 to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 1525 of Pub. L. 112-141, Sec. 1503 of Pub. L.
109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; 23 U.S.C. 101 (note), 109, 112, 113, 114,
116, 119, 128, and 315; 31 U.S.C. 6505; 42 U.S.C. 3334, 4601 et
seq.; Sec. 1041(a), Pub. L. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914; 23 CFR 1.32; 49
CFR 1.85(a)(1).
0
2. Amend Sec. 635.411 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.411 Material or product selection.
* * * * *
(f) State transportation departments (State DOTs) shall have the
autonomy to determine culvert and storm sewer material types to be
included in the construction of a project on a Federal-aid highway.
[FR Doc. 2013-01583 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P