Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Christina River, Wilmington, DE, 5156-5158 [2013-01355]
Download as PDF
5156
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 16 / Thursday, January 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Coast Guard
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
33 CFR Part 117
The Proposed Amendment
[USCG–2012–1085]
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012 is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
ANM OR E5
*
*
Lakeview, OR [Modified]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Lakeview County Airport, OR
(Lat. 42°09′40″ N., long. 120°23′57″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 4.3-mile
radius of the Lakeview County Airport, and
within 1.8 miles each side of the 180° bearing
of the airport extending from the 4.3-mile
radius to 7 miles south of the airport; that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 42°50′00″ N., long.
120°57′00″ W.; to lat. 42°54′00″ N., long.
120°22′00″ W.; to lat. 41°23′00″ N., long.
119°52′00″ W.; to lat. 41°17′00″ N., long.
120°25′00″ W.; to lat. 41°41′00″ N., long.
120°41′00″ W., thence to the point of
beginning; that airspace extending upward
from 10,500 feet MSL bounded on the north
by lat. 44°00′00″ N., on the east by a line
extending from lat. 44°00′00″ N., long.
120°00′04″ W., to the north edge of V–122 at
long. 119°00′04″ W., on the south by the
north edge of V–122, and on the west by the
east edge of V–165.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January
9, 2013.
Rex MacLean,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–01365 Filed 1–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:31 Jan 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
RIN 1625–AA09
Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398–
6587, terrance.a.knowles@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Christina River, Wilmington, DE
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the Third Street Bridge at mile
2.3, the Walnut Street Bridge at mile 2.8,
and the Market Street Bridge at mile 3.0,
all located on the Christina River in
Wilmington, DE. Since the three
drawbridges are located near one
another and the few vessels that do
transit this waterway usually go through
all three bridges, it is proposed that all
the bridges open on the same eight hour
advance notice. This proposal would
change the current regulations by
allowing the Third Street and Walnut
Street drawbridges to be opened in
sequence with the same eight hour
advance notice currently given to the
Market Street drawbridge. This
proposed schedule clarifies the
sequencing of the three drawbridge
openings, and provides for the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–1085 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
will be accepted between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Terrance A. Knowles,
Environmental Protection Specialist,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–1085),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–1085) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH’’. Click on the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this notice of proposed rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
E:\FR\FM\24JAP1.SGM
24JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 16 / Thursday, January 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–1085) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH’’. Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
notice of proposed rulemaking. You
may also visit either the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
B. Regulatory History and Information
The current Drawbridge Operation
Regulation, 33 CFR 117.237(c), for the
Christina River, Third Street drawbridge
at mile 2.3 and the Walnut Street
drawbridge at mile 2.8, in Wilmington,
DE requires both of the bridges to open
on signal, and that the Market Street
drawbridge at mile 3.0, open on signal
with eight hours advance notice.
C. Basis and Purpose
The Delaware Department of
Transportation (DELDOT) who owns
and operates these bascule-type
drawbridges has requested a permanent
change to the existing bridge
regulations, allowing the Third Street
and Walnut Street bridges to also open
on signal with eight hours advance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:31 Jan 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
notice as does the Market Street Bridge.
This proposed schedule allows for all
three of the drawbridges to be opened in
sequence on the same opening request
if required. Vessel traffic on this part of
the Christina River consists of a few
commercial and pleasure craft.
Three vessels cause 97% of the
openings at the three bridges: The
Kalmar Nyckel sail ship, the River Taxi,
and the River Boat Queen. The Market
Street bridge has the most restrictive
vertical clearance of the three
drawbridges (8 feet above mean high
water), and was opened a total 578
times in 2011. In 2011, the Walnut
Street Bridge was opened 244 times and
the Third Street Bridge was opened 250
times. The River Taxi does not require
an opening to pass under the Third and
Walnut Street Bridges.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Our proposed change to 33 CFR
117.237(c) would allow for a more
ordered process of transiting through
the three draw spans while providing
for the reasonable needs of navigation.
The Market Street Drawbridge presently
opens with 8 hours advance notice and
it is proposed that both the Third Street
and Walnut Street bridges open on the
same 8 hour notice when needed.
In addition, a text modification is
required to remove the last sentence in
paragraph 117.237(c) ‘‘The draws of
these bridges shall open at all times as
soon as possible for passage of a public
vessel of the United States’’. This
sentence is being removed because it is
already addressed in paragraph
117.31(b)(1).
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders.
The proposed changes are expected to
have minimal impact on mariners due
to the low number of vessels requiring
openings on the river. In addition,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5157
because an 8-hour advance notice is
currently required for the Market Street
Bridge opening, it is understood that
time for passage through all three
bridges, under the proposed rule, will
be consistent with the current
regulation.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because only a few vessels transit
through all three of the bridges and it is
rare that in such cases any vessel stops
between the three bridges. Most
commercial traffic will leave and return
during the day. The proposed rule
would possibly affect small entities
such as owners/operators of vessels
needing to transit through the three
bridges but requiring more than eight
feet of vertical clearance (most
restrictive bridge). These vessels can
minimize delays and plan their transits
in accordance with the proposed
opening schedule.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
E:\FR\FM\24JAP1.SGM
24JAP1
5158
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 16 / Thursday, January 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
5. Federalism
11. Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:31 Jan 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
PO 00000
Bridges.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 117.237, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.237
Christina River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The draws of the Third Street
Bridge at mile 2.3, the Walnut Street
Bridge at mile 2.8, and the Market Street
Bridge at mile 3.0, located in
Wilmington, DE shall all open on signal
if at least eight hours notice is given.
From 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday
except holidays, the draws of these
three bridges need not be opened for the
passage of vessels. Any vessel which
has passed through one or more of these
bridges immediately prior to a closed
period and which requires passage
through the other bridge or bridges in
order to continue to its destination shall
be passed through the draw or draws of
the bridge or bridges without delay.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 11, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–01355 Filed 1–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2009–0919; A–1–FRL–
9773–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Regional Haze
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Supplemental proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On March 26, 2012, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
proposed to approve a revision to the
Connecticut State Implementation Plan
(SIP) that addresses regional haze for the
first planning period from 2008 through
2018. The SIP was submitted by the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (now known
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JAP1.SGM
24JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 16 (Thursday, January 24, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5156-5158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01355]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG-2012-1085]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Christina River, Wilmington, DE
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the Third Street Bridge at mile 2.3, the Walnut Street Bridge
at mile 2.8, and the Market Street Bridge at mile 3.0, all located on
the Christina River in Wilmington, DE. Since the three drawbridges are
located near one another and the few vessels that do transit this
waterway usually go through all three bridges, it is proposed that all
the bridges open on the same eight hour advance notice. This proposal
would change the current regulations by allowing the Third Street and
Walnut Street drawbridges to be opened in sequence with the same eight
hour advance notice currently given to the Market Street drawbridge.
This proposed schedule clarifies the sequencing of the three drawbridge
openings, and provides for the reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-1085 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries will
be accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Terrance A. Knowles, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398-6587,
terrance.a.knowles@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-1085), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1085) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on the ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated
with this notice of proposed rulemaking. If you submit your comments by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to know that they
[[Page 5157]]
reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period and may change the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1085) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this notice of proposed rulemaking. You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The current Drawbridge Operation Regulation, 33 CFR 117.237(c), for
the Christina River, Third Street drawbridge at mile 2.3 and the Walnut
Street drawbridge at mile 2.8, in Wilmington, DE requires both of the
bridges to open on signal, and that the Market Street drawbridge at
mile 3.0, open on signal with eight hours advance notice.
C. Basis and Purpose
The Delaware Department of Transportation (DELDOT) who owns and
operates these bascule-type drawbridges has requested a permanent
change to the existing bridge regulations, allowing the Third Street
and Walnut Street bridges to also open on signal with eight hours
advance notice as does the Market Street Bridge. This proposed schedule
allows for all three of the drawbridges to be opened in sequence on the
same opening request if required. Vessel traffic on this part of the
Christina River consists of a few commercial and pleasure craft.
Three vessels cause 97% of the openings at the three bridges: The
Kalmar Nyckel sail ship, the River Taxi, and the River Boat Queen. The
Market Street bridge has the most restrictive vertical clearance of the
three drawbridges (8 feet above mean high water), and was opened a
total 578 times in 2011. In 2011, the Walnut Street Bridge was opened
244 times and the Third Street Bridge was opened 250 times. The River
Taxi does not require an opening to pass under the Third and Walnut
Street Bridges.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Our proposed change to 33 CFR 117.237(c) would allow for a more
ordered process of transiting through the three draw spans while
providing for the reasonable needs of navigation. The Market Street
Drawbridge presently opens with 8 hours advance notice and it is
proposed that both the Third Street and Walnut Street bridges open on
the same 8 hour notice when needed.
In addition, a text modification is required to remove the last
sentence in paragraph 117.237(c) ``The draws of these bridges shall
open at all times as soon as possible for passage of a public vessel of
the United States''. This sentence is being removed because it is
already addressed in paragraph 117.31(b)(1).
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The proposed changes are expected to have minimal impact on
mariners due to the low number of vessels requiring openings on the
river. In addition, because an 8-hour advance notice is currently
required for the Market Street Bridge opening, it is understood that
time for passage through all three bridges, under the proposed rule,
will be consistent with the current regulation.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because only a few vessels transit
through all three of the bridges and it is rare that in such cases any
vessel stops between the three bridges. Most commercial traffic will
leave and return during the day. The proposed rule would possibly
affect small entities such as owners/operators of vessels needing to
transit through the three bridges but requiring more than eight feet of
vertical clearance (most restrictive bridge). These vessels can
minimize delays and plan their transits in accordance with the proposed
opening schedule.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
[[Page 5158]]
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rule is categorically excluded under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 117.237, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.237 Christina River.
* * * * *
(c) The draws of the Third Street Bridge at mile 2.3, the Walnut
Street Bridge at mile 2.8, and the Market Street Bridge at mile 3.0,
located in Wilmington, DE shall all open on signal if at least eight
hours notice is given. From 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m., Monday through Saturday except holidays, the draws of these three
bridges need not be opened for the passage of vessels. Any vessel which
has passed through one or more of these bridges immediately prior to a
closed period and which requires passage through the other bridge or
bridges in order to continue to its destination shall be passed through
the draw or draws of the bridge or bridges without delay.
* * * * *
Dated: January 11, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-01355 Filed 1-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P