Revision to the Washington State Implementation Plan; Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area, 4804-4806 [2013-01339]
Download as PDF
4804
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking
procedure by submitting written
comments to the EPA New England
Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this Federal Register.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 11, 2013.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA
Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2013–01340 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2012–0712; FRL–9772–4]
Revision to the Washington State
Implementation Plan; Tacoma-Pierce
County Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated
November 28, 2012. This SIP revision
consists of two elements proposed for
EPA approval. First, EPA is proposing to
approve the ‘‘2008 Baseline Emissions
Inventory and Documentation’’
included as Appendix A to the SIP
revision. The emissions inventory was
submitted to meet Clean Air Act (CAA)
requirements related to the TacomaPierce County nonattainment area for
the 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). Second, EPA is proposing to
approve updated rules submitted by
Ecology on behalf of the Puget Sound
Clean Air Agency (PSCAA), contained
in Appendix B, ‘‘SIP Strengthening
Rules.’’ The updated PSCAA rules help
implement the recommendations of the
Tacoma-Pierce County Clean Air Task
Force, an advisory committee of
community leaders, citizen
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
representatives, public health advocates,
and other affected parties, formed to
develop PM2.5 reduction strategies.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2012–0712, by any of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: R10Public_Comments@epa.gov.
• Mail: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT–
107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Jeff Hunt,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, AWT–
107. Such deliveries are only accepted
during normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2012–
0712. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
WA 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt at telephone number: (206) 553–
0256, email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov,
or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this
preamble.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, including an
annual standard of 15.0 micrograms per
cubic meter (mg/m3) based on a 3-year
average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and a 24-hour (or daily)
standard of 65 mg/m3 based on a 3-year
average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations (62 FR 38652). EPA
established the standards based on
significant evidence and numerous
health studies demonstrating that
serious health effects are associated
with exposures to PM2.5. On October 17,
2006, EPA revised the PM2.5 24-hour
standard from 65 mg/m3 to 35 mg/m3
based on additional evidence and health
studies (71 FR 61144).
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the
CAA to designate areas throughout the
United States as attaining or not
attaining the NAAQS; this designation
process is described in section 107(d)(1)
of the CAA. Effective December 14,
2009, EPA designated Tacoma-Pierce
County (partial county designation) as a
nonattainment area for the revised 2006
24-hour PM2.5 standard (74 FR 58688;
published on November 13, 2009).
Under the CAA, states are required to
submit a revision to the SIP to meet
nonattainment requirements within
three years of the effective date of
designation.
Prior to Washington’s SIP revision
submittal, EPA issued a proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
finding on July 5, 2012, called a clean
data determination, based upon certified
ambient air monitoring data showing
that the Tacoma-Pierce County
nonattainment area had met the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS for the most recent 2009–
2011 monitoring period (77 FR 39657).
EPA received no comments on the
proposal and subsequently issued a
final clean data determination on
September 4, 2012 (77 FR 53772). In
accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), the
September 4, 2012 clean data
determination suspends the
requirements for Washington to submit
an attainment demonstration, associated
reasonably available control measures, a
reasonable further progress plan,
contingency measures, and most other
planning SIP revisions related to
attainment of the standard for so long as
the nonattainment area continues to
meet the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. However,
40 CFR 51.1004(c) does not suspend the
obligation under CAA section 172(c)(3)
for submission and approval of a
comprehensive, accurate, and current
inventory of actual emissions.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Ecology’s November 28, 2012 SIP
revision contains two elements for
proposed EPA approval, Appendix A
and Appendix B. Appendix A, titled
‘‘2008 Baseline Emissions Inventory and
Documentation,’’ was submitted to meet
the obligation under CAA section
172(c)(3) for an emissions inventory.
The 2008 base year emissions inventory
includes emissions estimates that cover
the general source categories of
stationary point sources, stationary
nonpoint sources, nonroad mobile
sources, and onroad mobile sources.
The pollutants that comprise the
inventory include PM2.5 and precursors
to the formation of PM2.5 including
nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3),
and sulfur dioxide (SO2). EPA reviewed
the results, procedures and
methodologies for the 2008 base year
emissions inventory in accordance with
current EPA guidance, ‘‘Emissions
Inventory Guidance for Implementation
of Ozone and Particulate Matter NAAQS
and Regional Haze Regulations,’’ August
2005. The year 2008 was selected by
Ecology as the base year for the
emissions inventory in accordance with
40 CFR 51.1008(b). Ecology’s SIP
revision contained a discussion of the
emissions inventory development
process and relevant requirements, as
well as the emissions inventory. EPA
agrees that the process used to develop
this emissions inventory meets the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3),
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4805
the implementing regulations, and EPA
guidance for emission inventories.
Appendix B of the SIP revision, titled
‘‘SIP Strengthening Rules,’’ contains the
most recent version of Regulation 1—
Article 13: Solid Fuel Burning Device
Standards, adopted by the PSCAA
Board on October 25, 2012. These rule
changes were adopted to help
implement the recommendations of the
Tacoma-Pierce County Clean Air Task
Force. This task force was an advisory
committee of community leaders,
citizen representatives, public health
advocates, and other affected parties
convened from May 2011 through
December 2011 to develop PM2.5
reduction strategies for the TacomaPierce County area. The task force had
three primary recommendations:
• Strategy #1: Enhancing enforcement
of burn bans—This strategy is intended
to ensure that those who are
contributing the most to the fine particle
pollution during periods of the poorest
air quality reduce their emissions.
• Strategy #2: Requiring removal of
uncertified wood stoves and inserts—
The intent of this strategy is to reduce
pollution by removing the older, more
polluting wood stoves and inserts from
the nonattainment area.
• Strategy #3: Reducing fine particle
pollution from other sources—
Approximately one-quarter to one-third
of the reductions needed to meet the
federal fine particle pollution standard
will be achieved through new federal
regulations and local initiatives related
to gasoline and diesel engines, ships,
and industry.
The SIP revision submitted by
Ecology requests EPA approval of the
revised PSCAA Regulation 1—Article
13: Solid Fuel Burning Device Standards
as a regulation that strengthens the SIP.
Specifically, the revised PSCAA
regulation implements the task force
strategies of enhancing the enforcement
of burn bans and requiring the removal
of uncertified wood stoves and inserts.
Strategy #3 is not included as part of
this SIP revision because the emission
reductions will be achieved primarily
through changes to the federal
regulations as well as ongoing efforts
such as those funded under the Diesel
Emissions Reduction Act. While these
strategies were recommended by the
task force specifically to address PM2.5
pollution in the Tacoma-Pierce County
nonattainment area, the rule revisions
contained in PSCAA Regulation 1—
Article 13 apply throughout the
jurisdiction of Puget Sound Clean Air
Agency.
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
4806
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve
Washington’s SIP revision dated
November 28, 2012, specifically
Appendix A, ‘‘2008 Baseline Emissions
Inventory and Documentation’’ and
Appendix B, ‘‘SIP Strengthening Rules.’’
We have made the determination that
this action is consistent with section
110 of the CAA. EPA is soliciting public
comments which will be considered
before taking final action.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed approval
does not impose substantial direct costs
on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Consistent with EPA policy, EPA
nonetheless provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a
letter dated December 11, 2012. EPA did
not receive a request for consultation.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 7, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2013–01339 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941; FRL–6369–9]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on
Certain Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for four
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action would require
persons who intend to manufacture,
import, or process any of the chemical
substances for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use by
this proposed rule to notify EPA at least
90 days before commencing that
activity. The required notification
would provide EPA with the
opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941, by
one of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. ATTN: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2011–0941. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the comment that is placed in
the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4804-4806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0712; FRL-9772-4]
Revision to the Washington State Implementation Plan; Tacoma-
Pierce County Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)
dated November 28, 2012. This SIP revision consists of two elements
proposed for EPA approval. First, EPA is proposing to approve the
``2008 Baseline Emissions Inventory and Documentation'' included as
Appendix A to the SIP revision. The emissions inventory was submitted
to meet Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements related to the Tacoma-Pierce
County nonattainment area for the 2006 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
Second, EPA is proposing to approve updated rules submitted by Ecology
on behalf of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA), contained in
Appendix B, ``SIP Strengthening Rules.'' The updated PSCAA rules help
implement the recommendations of the Tacoma-Pierce County Clean Air
Task Force, an advisory committee of community leaders, citizen
representatives, public health advocates, and other affected parties,
formed to develop PM2.5 reduction strategies.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 22,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2012-0712, by any of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: R10-Public_Comments@epa.gov.
Mail: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and
Toxics (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101.
Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Jeff Hunt, Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, AWT-107. Such deliveries are only accepted during
normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-
2012-0712. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov
[[Page 4805]]
index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during
normal business hours at the Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt at telephone number: (206)
553-0256, email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10
address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in
this preamble.
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS,
including an annual standard of 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/
m\3\) based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and a 24-hour (or daily) standard of 65 [mu]g/m\3\
based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations (62 FR 38652). EPA established the standards based on
significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that
serious health effects are associated with exposures to
PM2.5. On October 17, 2006, EPA revised the PM2.5
24-hour standard from 65 [mu]g/m\3\ to 35 [mu]g/m\3\ based on
additional evidence and health studies (71 FR 61144).
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining
or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in
section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. Effective December 14, 2009, EPA
designated Tacoma-Pierce County (partial county designation) as a
nonattainment area for the revised 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard (74 FR 58688; published on November 13, 2009). Under the CAA,
states are required to submit a revision to the SIP to meet
nonattainment requirements within three years of the effective date of
designation.
Prior to Washington's SIP revision submittal, EPA issued a proposed
finding on July 5, 2012, called a clean data determination, based upon
certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the Tacoma-Pierce
County nonattainment area had met the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS for
the most recent 2009-2011 monitoring period (77 FR 39657). EPA received
no comments on the proposal and subsequently issued a final clean data
determination on September 4, 2012 (77 FR 53772). In accordance with 40
CFR 51.1004(c), the September 4, 2012 clean data determination suspends
the requirements for Washington to submit an attainment demonstration,
associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further
progress plan, contingency measures, and most other planning SIP
revisions related to attainment of the standard for so long as the
nonattainment area continues to meet the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
However, 40 CFR 51.1004(c) does not suspend the obligation under CAA
section 172(c)(3) for submission and approval of a comprehensive,
accurate, and current inventory of actual emissions.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Ecology's November 28, 2012 SIP revision contains two elements for
proposed EPA approval, Appendix A and Appendix B. Appendix A, titled
``2008 Baseline Emissions Inventory and Documentation,'' was submitted
to meet the obligation under CAA section 172(c)(3) for an emissions
inventory. The 2008 base year emissions inventory includes emissions
estimates that cover the general source categories of stationary point
sources, stationary nonpoint sources, nonroad mobile sources, and
onroad mobile sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory
include PM2.5 and precursors to the formation of
PM2.5 including nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide
(SO2). EPA reviewed the results, procedures and
methodologies for the 2008 base year emissions inventory in accordance
with current EPA guidance, ``Emissions Inventory Guidance for
Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter NAAQS and Regional Haze
Regulations,'' August 2005. The year 2008 was selected by Ecology as
the base year for the emissions inventory in accordance with 40 CFR
51.1008(b). Ecology's SIP revision contained a discussion of the
emissions inventory development process and relevant requirements, as
well as the emissions inventory. EPA agrees that the process used to
develop this emissions inventory meets the requirements of CAA section
172(c)(3), the implementing regulations, and EPA guidance for emission
inventories.
Appendix B of the SIP revision, titled ``SIP Strengthening Rules,''
contains the most recent version of Regulation 1--Article 13: Solid
Fuel Burning Device Standards, adopted by the PSCAA Board on October
25, 2012. These rule changes were adopted to help implement the
recommendations of the Tacoma-Pierce County Clean Air Task Force. This
task force was an advisory committee of community leaders, citizen
representatives, public health advocates, and other affected parties
convened from May 2011 through December 2011 to develop
PM2.5 reduction strategies for the Tacoma-Pierce County
area. The task force had three primary recommendations:
Strategy #1: Enhancing enforcement of burn bans--This
strategy is intended to ensure that those who are contributing the most
to the fine particle pollution during periods of the poorest air
quality reduce their emissions.
Strategy #2: Requiring removal of uncertified wood stoves
and inserts--The intent of this strategy is to reduce pollution by
removing the older, more polluting wood stoves and inserts from the
nonattainment area.
Strategy #3: Reducing fine particle pollution from other
sources--Approximately one-quarter to one-third of the reductions
needed to meet the federal fine particle pollution standard will be
achieved through new federal regulations and local initiatives related
to gasoline and diesel engines, ships, and industry.
The SIP revision submitted by Ecology requests EPA approval of the
revised PSCAA Regulation 1--Article 13: Solid Fuel Burning Device
Standards as a regulation that strengthens the SIP. Specifically, the
revised PSCAA regulation implements the task force strategies of
enhancing the enforcement of burn bans and requiring the removal of
uncertified wood stoves and inserts. Strategy 3 is not
included as part of this SIP revision because the emission reductions
will be achieved primarily through changes to the federal regulations
as well as ongoing efforts such as those funded under the Diesel
Emissions Reduction Act. While these strategies were recommended by the
task force specifically to address PM2.5 pollution in the
Tacoma-Pierce County nonattainment area, the rule revisions contained
in PSCAA Regulation 1--Article 13 apply throughout the jurisdiction of
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.
[[Page 4806]]
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Washington's SIP revision dated
November 28, 2012, specifically Appendix A, ``2008 Baseline Emissions
Inventory and Documentation'' and Appendix B, ``SIP Strengthening
Rules.'' We have made the determination that this action is consistent
with section 110 of the CAA. EPA is soliciting public comments which
will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed approval does not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Consistent
with EPA policy, EPA nonetheless provided a consultation opportunity to
the Puyallup Tribe in a letter dated December 11, 2012. EPA did not
receive a request for consultation.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 7, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2013-01339 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P