Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish, 4836-4838 [2013-01282]
Download as PDF
4836
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices
Division, 1325 East West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, Attn: North
Pacific Right Whale Recovery Plan.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Bettridge (301–427–8437),
email Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov or
Larissa Plants (301–427–8471), email
Larissa.Plants@noaa.gov.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions
beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA),
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate: (1)
Objective, measurable criteria which,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time required
and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote its recovery.
The Northern right whale (Eubalaena
glacialis) has been listed as
‘‘endangered’’ under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) since its passage in
1973. In 2008, NMFS determined that
the Northern right whale should be
listed as two separate species, the North
Pacific right whale and the North
Atlantic right whale. North Pacific right
whales historically had a wide
distribution in the Pacific Ocean, but
the population was dramatically
reduced by extensive commercial
whaling, now prohibited by the
International Whaling Commission. It is
estimated that roughly 1,000 individuals
remain. Of the commercially exploited
‘‘great whales,’’ the North Pacific right
whale is one of the least well studied,
and the current status of the North
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Pacific right whale population is poorly
understood. Currently, the population
structure of North Pacific right whales
has not been adequately defined.
Because the current status of North
Pacific right whales is unknown, the
primary purpose of the draft Recovery
Plan is to provide a research strategy to
obtain data necessary to estimate
population abundance, trends, and
structure and to identify factors that
may be limiting North Pacific right
whale recovery. Criteria for the
reclassification of the North Pacific right
whale are included in the draft
Recovery Plan. In summary, the North
Pacific right whale may be reclassified
from endangered to threatened when all
of the following have been met: (1)
Given current and projected threats and
environmental conditions, the North
Pacific right whale population satisfies
the risk analysis standard for threatened
status (has no more than a 1 percent
chance of extinction in 100 years) and
the global population has at least 1,500
mature, reproductive individuals
(consisting of at least 250 mature
females and at least 250 mature males
in each ocean basin). Mature is defined
as the number of individuals known,
estimated, or inferred to be capable of
reproduction. Any factors or
circumstances that are thought to
substantially contribute to a real risk of
extinction that cannot be incorporated
into a Population Viability Analysis will
be carefully considered before
downlisting takes place; and (2) none of
the known threats to North Pacific right
whales are known to limit the continued
growth of populations. Specifically, the
factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or
have been addressed: (A) The present or
threatened destruction, modification or
curtailment of a species’ habitat or
range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational or educational
purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D)
the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; and (E) other natural or
manmade factors.
The population will be considered for
delisting if all of the following can be
met: (1) Given current and projected
threats and environmental conditions,
the total North Pacific right whale
population in each ocean basin in
which it occurs satisfies the risk
analysis standard for unlisted status
(has less than a 10 percent probability
of becoming endangered in 20 years).
Any factors or circumstances that are
thought to substantially contribute to a
real risk of extinction that cannot be
incorporated into a Population Viability
Analysis will be carefully considered
before delisting takes place; and (2)
none of the known threats to North
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pacific right whales are known to limit
the continued growth of populations.
Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the
ESA are being or have been addressed.
The time and cost to recovery is not
predictable with the current information
and global listing of North Pacific right
whales. The difficulty in gathering data
on North Pacific right whales and
uncertainty about the success of passive
acoustic monitoring in fulfilling data
needs make it impossible to give a
timeframe to recovery. While we are
comfortable estimating costs for 50 years
of plan implementation ($19.683
million), any projections beyond this
date are likely to be too imprecise to
predict. The anticipated date for
removal from the endangered species
list also cannot be determined because
of the uncertainty in the success of
recovery plan actions for North Pacific
right whales. The effectiveness of many
management activities is not known on
a global level. Currently it is impossible
to predict when such measures will
bring the species to a point at which the
protections provided by the ESA are no
longer warranted, or even determine
whether the species has recovered
enough to be downlisted or delisted. In
the future, as more information is
obtained it should be possible to make
more informative projections about the
time to recovery, and its expense.
NMFS will consider all substantive
comments and information presented
during the public comment period in
the course of finalizing this Plan. NMFS
concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan
meets the requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: January 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–01249 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC455
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final determination
and discussion of underlying biological
analysis.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices
NMFS has evaluated the
Tribal Resource Management Plan
(Plan) submitted by the ShoshoneBannock Tribes (Tribes) to NMFS
pursuant to the limitation on take
prohibitions for actions conducted
under the Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for
salmon and steelhead promulgated
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The plan specifies fishery
management activities in the Salmon
River sub basin of Idaho. This document
serves to notify the public that NMFS,
by delegated authority from the
Secretary of Commerce, has determined
pursuant to the ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule for
salmon and steelhead that
implementing and enforcing the Plan
will not appreciably reduce the
likelihood of survival and recovery of
ESA-listed salmon and steelhead.
DATES: The final determination on the
Plan was made on January 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries
Service, Salmon Management Division,
1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100,
Portland, OR 97232.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
˜
Enrique Patino at (206) 526–4655, or
email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated
Snake River spring/summer.
Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha):
threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Snake River fallrun.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated Snake River basin.
Sockeye (O. nerka): endangered,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated Snake River.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Background
The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes have
submitted to NMFS a Tribal Plan
describing the management of
ceremonial and subsistence fisheries in
the Salmon River basin in the State of
Idaho. The objective of the Tribal Plan
is to harvest spring Chinook salmon in
a manner that does not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and
recovery of the ESU. Impact levels on
the listed spring Chinook salmon
populations in the ESU are specified by
a sliding-scale harvest rate schedule
based on run size and escapement needs
as described in the Tribal Plan. The
Tribal Plan sets maximum harvest rates
for each management unit or population
based on its status, and assures that
those rates or objectives are not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
4837
exceeded. A variety of monitoring and
evaluation tasks to be conducted by the
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes is specified
in the Tribal Plan to assess the
abundance of spring Chinook salmon
and to determine fishery effort and
catch. A comprehensive review of the
Tribal Plan to evaluate whether the
fisheries and ESA-listed salmon and
steelhead populations are performing as
expected will be done within the
proposed fishery season and at the end
of the proposed season.
Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the
Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and
advisable for the conservation of species
listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a
final ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans
adopting regulations necessary and
advisable to harmonize statutory
conservation requirements with tribal
rights and the Federal trust
responsibility to tribes (50 CFR
223.209).
This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies
the prohibitions enumerated in section
9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find
it necessary and advisable to apply the
take prohibitions described in section
9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery
harvest activities if the fisheries are
managed in accordance with a Tribal
Plan whose implementation has been
determined by the Secretary to not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery of the listed
salmonids.
As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule,
before the Secretary makes a decision on
the Tribal Plan, the public must have an
opportunity to review and comment on
the pending determination. NMFS made
the proposed evaluation and pending
determination available for public
review, and the final evaluation and
determination reflect consideration of
comments received.
The Tribes intend to engage in
ceremonial and subsistence harvest of
both hatchery and natural-origin spring/
summer Chinook salmon. Annually, the
Tribes would issue season regulations
detailing the timing and season
regulations for tributary fisheries
consistent with this long-term Plan.
Under the Plan, the Tribes would
manage all Chinook salmon fisheries to
achieve escapement objectives using
population-specific, abundance-based
harvest rate schedules to limit ESA take
according to year-specific adult
escapement abundances. As a result,
weaker populations will sustain less
harvest and as the number of predicted
adults increase, the number of fish
escaping to the spawning grounds will
also increase.
To achieve its conservation objectives,
the Plan employs a number of key
strategies as part of their harvest
conservation measures, including: (1)
Fishery-related redistribution of the
conservation burden historically borne
by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points
to restrict the take of ESA-listed fish;
and (3) application of a sliding scale
approach to determine appropriate ESA
take limits on critically low runs as well
as on healthier runs at levels that may
not slow recovery.
The Plan includes provisions for
annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards
established through the Plan. The
monitoring and evaluation described in
the Plan will focus on two primary
performance indicators: adult and
juvenile abundance, and the overall
assessment of abundance and
productivity measures for each
population. Reporting and inclusion of
new information derived from Plan
research, monitoring, and evaluation
activities provides assurance that
performance standards will be achieved
in future seasons.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis
Underlying the Determination
Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Proposed Evaluation
and Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its
proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the Plan for public
review and comment on May 30, 2012
(77 FR 31835). The proposed evaluation
and pending determination and an
associated draft environmental
assessment were available for public
review and comment for 30 days.
NMFS received one set of comments,
from the Nez Perce Tribe. Several
comments were addressed in NMFS’
final evaluation and recommended
determination document, but no
substantive changes were required to
the Plan or the environmental
The management objective is for the
Tribes to conduct fisheries in a manner
that does not appreciably reduce the
likelihood of survival and recovery of
listed Chinook salmon. The Plan
includes provisions for monitoring and
evaluation to assess fishing-related
impacts on Snake River spring/summer
Chinook salmon. Performance
indicators include dam, weir, and redd
counts, harvest estimates, and
escapement with respect to escapement
goals. The proposed Plan provides the
framework through which Tribal salmon
fisheries could be implemented while
meeting requirements specified under
the ESA.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
4838
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices
assessment. A detailed summary of the
comments and NMFS’ responses is also
available on the Salmon Management
Division Web site. Based on its
evaluation and recommended
determination and taking into account
the public comments, NMFS issued its
final determination on the ShoshoneBannock Tribes’ Salmon River subbasin
salmon and steelhead fishery
management Plan.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the
Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and
advisable for the conservation of the
species listed as threatened. The ESA
Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR 223.209) states
that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions
will not apply to Tribal Plans that will
not appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery for the listed
species.
Dated: January 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–01282 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Science Advisory Board; Notice of
Public Meeting
Office of Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research (OAR), National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
schedule and proposed agenda of a
forthcoming meeting of the NOAA
Science Advisory Board. The members
will discuss and provide advice on
issues outlined in the section on Matters
to be considered.
DATES: The meeting is scheduled for
Tuesday, February 19, 2013, from 1:00–
3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
ADDRESSES: Conference call. Public
access is available at: NOAA, SSMC 3,
Room 4527, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, Md. Members of the
public will not be able to dial in to this
meeting.
Status: The meeting will be open to
public participation with a 5-minute
public comment period from 2:50–2:55
p.m. The SAB expects that public
statements presented at its meetings will
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
not be repetitive of previously
submitted verbal or written statements.
In general, each individual or group
making a verbal presentation will be
limited to a total time of one minute.
Written comments should be received in
the SAB Executive Director’s Office by
February 14, 2013 to provide sufficient
time for SAB review. Written comments
received by the SAB Executive Director
after February 14, 2013, will be
distributed to the SAB, but may not be
reviewed prior to the meeting date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Science Advisory Board (SAB) was
established by a Decision Memorandum
dated September 25, 1997, and is the
only Federal Advisory Committee with
responsibility to advise the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and
Atmosphere on strategies for research,
education, and application of science to
operations and information services.
SAB activities and advice provide
necessary input to ensure that National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) science
programs are of the highest quality and
provide optimal support to resource
management.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting
will include the following topics: (1)
Presentation of the final report from
Research and Development Portfolio
Review Task Force; and (2) Review of
the Terms of Reference for the
Environmental Information Services
Working Group. For the latest agenda,
please visit the SAB Web site at
https://www.sab.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Cynthia Decker, Executive Director,
Science Advisory Board, NOAA, Rm.
11230, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301–
734–1156, Fax: 301–713–1459, Email:
Cynthia.Decker@noaa.gov).
Dated: January 16, 2013.
Jason Donaldson,
Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative
Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–01277 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Gaining
Early Awareness and Readiness for
Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP)—
College Savings Account Research
Demonstration Project
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
Overview Information: Gaining Early
Awareness and Readiness for
Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP)—
College Savings Account Research
Demonstration Project.
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2013.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.334D.
Applications Available: January
23, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 11, 2013.
DATES:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The GEAR UP
Program is a discretionary grant
program that provides financial support
for academic and related support
services that eligible low-income
students, including students with
disabilities, need to enable them to
obtain a secondary school diploma and
prepare for and succeed in
postsecondary education.
Priorities: This notice contains two
absolute priorities. These priorities are
from the notice of final priorities for this
program published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2013 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, these
priorities are absolute priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet these priorities.
These priorities are:
Priority 1: Funding Eligibility
Priority 2: College Savings Accounts
and Financial Counseling
Note: The full text of these priorities is
included in the notice of final priorities for
this program published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register and in the
application package for this competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a–
21 to 1070a–28.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education
Department debarment and suspension
regulations in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The
regulations for this program in 34 CFR
part 694. (d) The notice of final
priorities, published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
(IHEs) only.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4836-4838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01282]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC455
Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final determination and discussion of underlying
biological analysis.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 4837]]
SUMMARY: NMFS has evaluated the Tribal Resource Management Plan (Plan)
submitted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes) to NMFS pursuant to
the limitation on take prohibitions for actions conducted under the
Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for salmon and steelhead promulgated under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plan specifies fishery management
activities in the Salmon River sub basin of Idaho. This document serves
to notify the public that NMFS, by delegated authority from the
Secretary of Commerce, has determined pursuant to the ESA Tribal 4(d)
Rule for salmon and steelhead that implementing and enforcing the Plan
will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of
ESA-listed salmon and steelhead.
DATES: The final determination on the Plan was made on January 11,
2013.
ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries Service, Salmon Management
Division, 1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Enrique Pati[ntilde]o at (206) 526-
4655, or email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated Snake River spring/summer.
Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha): threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Snake River fall-run.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Snake River basin.
Sockeye (O. nerka): endangered, naturally produced and artificially
propagated Snake River.
Background
The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes have submitted to NMFS a Tribal Plan
describing the management of ceremonial and subsistence fisheries in
the Salmon River basin in the State of Idaho. The objective of the
Tribal Plan is to harvest spring Chinook salmon in a manner that does
not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the
ESU. Impact levels on the listed spring Chinook salmon populations in
the ESU are specified by a sliding-scale harvest rate schedule based on
run size and escapement needs as described in the Tribal Plan. The
Tribal Plan sets maximum harvest rates for each management unit or
population based on its status, and assures that those rates or
objectives are not exceeded. A variety of monitoring and evaluation
tasks to be conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes is specified in
the Tribal Plan to assess the abundance of spring Chinook salmon and to
determine fishery effort and catch. A comprehensive review of the
Tribal Plan to evaluate whether the fisheries and ESA-listed salmon and
steelhead populations are performing as expected will be done within
the proposed fishery season and at the end of the proposed season.
Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt
such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the
conservation of species listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a final
ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans adopting regulations necessary and
advisable to harmonize statutory conservation requirements with tribal
rights and the Federal trust responsibility to tribes (50 CFR 223.209).
This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies the prohibitions enumerated
in section 9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find it necessary and
advisable to apply the take prohibitions described in section
9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery harvest activities if the
fisheries are managed in accordance with a Tribal Plan whose
implementation has been determined by the Secretary to not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the listed salmonids.
As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule, before the Secretary makes a
decision on the Tribal Plan, the public must have an opportunity to
review and comment on the pending determination. NMFS made the proposed
evaluation and pending determination available for public review, and
the final evaluation and determination reflect consideration of
comments received.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis Underlying the Determination
The management objective is for the Tribes to conduct fisheries in
a manner that does not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival
and recovery of listed Chinook salmon. The Plan includes provisions for
monitoring and evaluation to assess fishing-related impacts on Snake
River spring/summer Chinook salmon. Performance indicators include dam,
weir, and redd counts, harvest estimates, and escapement with respect
to escapement goals. The proposed Plan provides the framework through
which Tribal salmon fisheries could be implemented while meeting
requirements specified under the ESA.
The Tribes intend to engage in ceremonial and subsistence harvest
of both hatchery and natural-origin spring/summer Chinook salmon.
Annually, the Tribes would issue season regulations detailing the
timing and season regulations for tributary fisheries consistent with
this long-term Plan. Under the Plan, the Tribes would manage all
Chinook salmon fisheries to achieve escapement objectives using
population-specific, abundance-based harvest rate schedules to limit
ESA take according to year-specific adult escapement abundances. As a
result, weaker populations will sustain less harvest and as the number
of predicted adults increase, the number of fish escaping to the
spawning grounds will also increase.
To achieve its conservation objectives, the Plan employs a number
of key strategies as part of their harvest conservation measures,
including: (1) Fishery-related redistribution of the conservation
burden historically borne by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points to
restrict the take of ESA-listed fish; and (3) application of a sliding
scale approach to determine appropriate ESA take limits on critically
low runs as well as on healthier runs at levels that may not slow
recovery.
The Plan includes provisions for annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards established through the Plan. The
monitoring and evaluation described in the Plan will focus on two
primary performance indicators: adult and juvenile abundance, and the
overall assessment of abundance and productivity measures for each
population. Reporting and inclusion of new information derived from
Plan research, monitoring, and evaluation activities provides assurance
that performance standards will be achieved in future seasons.
Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Evaluation and
Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the Plan for public review and comment on May 30, 2012
(77 FR 31835). The proposed evaluation and pending determination and an
associated draft environmental assessment were available for public
review and comment for 30 days.
NMFS received one set of comments, from the Nez Perce Tribe.
Several comments were addressed in NMFS' final evaluation and
recommended determination document, but no substantive changes were
required to the Plan or the environmental
[[Page 4838]]
assessment. A detailed summary of the comments and NMFS' responses is
also available on the Salmon Management Division Web site. Based on its
evaluation and recommended determination and taking into account the
public comments, NMFS issued its final determination on the Shoshone-
Bannock Tribes' Salmon River subbasin salmon and steelhead fishery
management Plan.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the conservation of
the species listed as threatened. The ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR
223.209) states that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions will not apply
to Tribal Plans that will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery for the listed species.
Dated: January 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-01282 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P