Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish, 4836-4838 [2013-01282]

Download as PDF 4836 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices Division, 1325 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Attn: North Pacific Right Whale Recovery Plan. Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted to https:// www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Bettridge (301–427–8437), email Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov or Larissa Plants (301–427–8471), email Larissa.Plants@noaa.gov. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Recovery plans describe actions beneficial to the conservation and recovery of species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that recovery plans incorporate: (1) Objective, measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a determination that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific management actions necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals; and (3) estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions. The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each listed species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery. The Northern right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) has been listed as ‘‘endangered’’ under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since its passage in 1973. In 2008, NMFS determined that the Northern right whale should be listed as two separate species, the North Pacific right whale and the North Atlantic right whale. North Pacific right whales historically had a wide distribution in the Pacific Ocean, but the population was dramatically reduced by extensive commercial whaling, now prohibited by the International Whaling Commission. It is estimated that roughly 1,000 individuals remain. Of the commercially exploited ‘‘great whales,’’ the North Pacific right whale is one of the least well studied, and the current status of the North VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Pacific right whale population is poorly understood. Currently, the population structure of North Pacific right whales has not been adequately defined. Because the current status of North Pacific right whales is unknown, the primary purpose of the draft Recovery Plan is to provide a research strategy to obtain data necessary to estimate population abundance, trends, and structure and to identify factors that may be limiting North Pacific right whale recovery. Criteria for the reclassification of the North Pacific right whale are included in the draft Recovery Plan. In summary, the North Pacific right whale may be reclassified from endangered to threatened when all of the following have been met: (1) Given current and projected threats and environmental conditions, the North Pacific right whale population satisfies the risk analysis standard for threatened status (has no more than a 1 percent chance of extinction in 100 years) and the global population has at least 1,500 mature, reproductive individuals (consisting of at least 250 mature females and at least 250 mature males in each ocean basin). Mature is defined as the number of individuals known, estimated, or inferred to be capable of reproduction. Any factors or circumstances that are thought to substantially contribute to a real risk of extinction that cannot be incorporated into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully considered before downlisting takes place; and (2) none of the known threats to North Pacific right whales are known to limit the continued growth of populations. Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have been addressed: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification or curtailment of a species’ habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; and (E) other natural or manmade factors. The population will be considered for delisting if all of the following can be met: (1) Given current and projected threats and environmental conditions, the total North Pacific right whale population in each ocean basin in which it occurs satisfies the risk analysis standard for unlisted status (has less than a 10 percent probability of becoming endangered in 20 years). Any factors or circumstances that are thought to substantially contribute to a real risk of extinction that cannot be incorporated into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully considered before delisting takes place; and (2) none of the known threats to North PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Pacific right whales are known to limit the continued growth of populations. Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have been addressed. The time and cost to recovery is not predictable with the current information and global listing of North Pacific right whales. The difficulty in gathering data on North Pacific right whales and uncertainty about the success of passive acoustic monitoring in fulfilling data needs make it impossible to give a timeframe to recovery. While we are comfortable estimating costs for 50 years of plan implementation ($19.683 million), any projections beyond this date are likely to be too imprecise to predict. The anticipated date for removal from the endangered species list also cannot be determined because of the uncertainty in the success of recovery plan actions for North Pacific right whales. The effectiveness of many management activities is not known on a global level. Currently it is impossible to predict when such measures will bring the species to a point at which the protections provided by the ESA are no longer warranted, or even determine whether the species has recovered enough to be downlisted or delisted. In the future, as more information is obtained it should be possible to make more informative projections about the time to recovery, and its expense. NMFS will consider all substantive comments and information presented during the public comment period in the course of finalizing this Plan. NMFS concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan meets the requirements of the ESA. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. Dated: January 17, 2013. Angela Somma, Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2013–01249 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XC455 Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of final determination and discussion of underlying biological analysis. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices NMFS has evaluated the Tribal Resource Management Plan (Plan) submitted by the ShoshoneBannock Tribes (Tribes) to NMFS pursuant to the limitation on take prohibitions for actions conducted under the Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for salmon and steelhead promulgated under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plan specifies fishery management activities in the Salmon River sub basin of Idaho. This document serves to notify the public that NMFS, by delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce, has determined pursuant to the ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule for salmon and steelhead that implementing and enforcing the Plan will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of ESA-listed salmon and steelhead. DATES: The final determination on the Plan was made on January 11, 2013. ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries Service, Salmon Management Division, 1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ˜ Enrique Patino at (206) 526–4655, or email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Species Covered in This Notice Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): threatened, naturally produced and artificially propagated Snake River spring/summer. Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha): threatened, naturally produced and artificially propagated Snake River fallrun. Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened, naturally produced and artificially propagated Snake River basin. Sockeye (O. nerka): endangered, naturally produced and artificially propagated Snake River. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with Background The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes have submitted to NMFS a Tribal Plan describing the management of ceremonial and subsistence fisheries in the Salmon River basin in the State of Idaho. The objective of the Tribal Plan is to harvest spring Chinook salmon in a manner that does not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the ESU. Impact levels on the listed spring Chinook salmon populations in the ESU are specified by a sliding-scale harvest rate schedule based on run size and escapement needs as described in the Tribal Plan. The Tribal Plan sets maximum harvest rates for each management unit or population based on its status, and assures that those rates or objectives are not VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 4837 exceeded. A variety of monitoring and evaluation tasks to be conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes is specified in the Tribal Plan to assess the abundance of spring Chinook salmon and to determine fishery effort and catch. A comprehensive review of the Tribal Plan to evaluate whether the fisheries and ESA-listed salmon and steelhead populations are performing as expected will be done within the proposed fishery season and at the end of the proposed season. Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the conservation of species listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a final ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans adopting regulations necessary and advisable to harmonize statutory conservation requirements with tribal rights and the Federal trust responsibility to tribes (50 CFR 223.209). This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies the prohibitions enumerated in section 9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find it necessary and advisable to apply the take prohibitions described in section 9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery harvest activities if the fisheries are managed in accordance with a Tribal Plan whose implementation has been determined by the Secretary to not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the listed salmonids. As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule, before the Secretary makes a decision on the Tribal Plan, the public must have an opportunity to review and comment on the pending determination. NMFS made the proposed evaluation and pending determination available for public review, and the final evaluation and determination reflect consideration of comments received. The Tribes intend to engage in ceremonial and subsistence harvest of both hatchery and natural-origin spring/ summer Chinook salmon. Annually, the Tribes would issue season regulations detailing the timing and season regulations for tributary fisheries consistent with this long-term Plan. Under the Plan, the Tribes would manage all Chinook salmon fisheries to achieve escapement objectives using population-specific, abundance-based harvest rate schedules to limit ESA take according to year-specific adult escapement abundances. As a result, weaker populations will sustain less harvest and as the number of predicted adults increase, the number of fish escaping to the spawning grounds will also increase. To achieve its conservation objectives, the Plan employs a number of key strategies as part of their harvest conservation measures, including: (1) Fishery-related redistribution of the conservation burden historically borne by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points to restrict the take of ESA-listed fish; and (3) application of a sliding scale approach to determine appropriate ESA take limits on critically low runs as well as on healthier runs at levels that may not slow recovery. The Plan includes provisions for annual reports that will assess compliance with performance standards established through the Plan. The monitoring and evaluation described in the Plan will focus on two primary performance indicators: adult and juvenile abundance, and the overall assessment of abundance and productivity measures for each population. Reporting and inclusion of new information derived from Plan research, monitoring, and evaluation activities provides assurance that performance standards will be achieved in future seasons. Discussion of the Biological Analysis Underlying the Determination Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Evaluation and Pending Determination NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending determination on the Plan for public review and comment on May 30, 2012 (77 FR 31835). The proposed evaluation and pending determination and an associated draft environmental assessment were available for public review and comment for 30 days. NMFS received one set of comments, from the Nez Perce Tribe. Several comments were addressed in NMFS’ final evaluation and recommended determination document, but no substantive changes were required to the Plan or the environmental The management objective is for the Tribes to conduct fisheries in a manner that does not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of listed Chinook salmon. The Plan includes provisions for monitoring and evaluation to assess fishing-related impacts on Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon. Performance indicators include dam, weir, and redd counts, harvest estimates, and escapement with respect to escapement goals. The proposed Plan provides the framework through which Tribal salmon fisheries could be implemented while meeting requirements specified under the ESA. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 4838 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices assessment. A detailed summary of the comments and NMFS’ responses is also available on the Salmon Management Division Web site. Based on its evaluation and recommended determination and taking into account the public comments, NMFS issued its final determination on the ShoshoneBannock Tribes’ Salmon River subbasin salmon and steelhead fishery management Plan. Authority Under section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the conservation of the species listed as threatened. The ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR 223.209) states that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions will not apply to Tribal Plans that will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery for the listed species. Dated: January 17, 2013. Angela Somma, Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2013–01282 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Science Advisory Board; Notice of Public Meeting Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC). ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the NOAA Science Advisory Board. The members will discuss and provide advice on issues outlined in the section on Matters to be considered. DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 19, 2013, from 1:00– 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. ADDRESSES: Conference call. Public access is available at: NOAA, SSMC 3, Room 4527, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Md. Members of the public will not be able to dial in to this meeting. Status: The meeting will be open to public participation with a 5-minute public comment period from 2:50–2:55 p.m. The SAB expects that public statements presented at its meetings will wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 not be repetitive of previously submitted verbal or written statements. In general, each individual or group making a verbal presentation will be limited to a total time of one minute. Written comments should be received in the SAB Executive Director’s Office by February 14, 2013 to provide sufficient time for SAB review. Written comments received by the SAB Executive Director after February 14, 2013, will be distributed to the SAB, but may not be reviewed prior to the meeting date. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Science Advisory Board (SAB) was established by a Decision Memorandum dated September 25, 1997, and is the only Federal Advisory Committee with responsibility to advise the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on strategies for research, education, and application of science to operations and information services. SAB activities and advice provide necessary input to ensure that National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) science programs are of the highest quality and provide optimal support to resource management. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting will include the following topics: (1) Presentation of the final report from Research and Development Portfolio Review Task Force; and (2) Review of the Terms of Reference for the Environmental Information Services Working Group. For the latest agenda, please visit the SAB Web site at https://www.sab.noaa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Cynthia Decker, Executive Director, Science Advisory Board, NOAA, Rm. 11230, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301– 734–1156, Fax: 301–713–1459, Email: Cynthia.Decker@noaa.gov). Dated: January 16, 2013. Jason Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–01277 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–KD–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Applications for New Awards; Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP)— College Savings Account Research Demonstration Project Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. Overview Information: Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP)— College Savings Account Research Demonstration Project. Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.334D. Applications Available: January 23, 2013. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 11, 2013. DATES: Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program: The GEAR UP Program is a discretionary grant program that provides financial support for academic and related support services that eligible low-income students, including students with disabilities, need to enable them to obtain a secondary school diploma and prepare for and succeed in postsecondary education. Priorities: This notice contains two absolute priorities. These priorities are from the notice of final priorities for this program published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Absolute Priorities: For FY 2013 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet these priorities. These priorities are: Priority 1: Funding Eligibility Priority 2: College Savings Accounts and Financial Counseling Note: The full text of these priorities is included in the notice of final priorities for this program published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register and in the application package for this competition. Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a– 21 to 1070a–28. Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education Department debarment and suspension regulations in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 694. (d) The notice of final priorities, published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized Indian tribes. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education (IHEs) only. E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4836-4838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XC455


Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final determination and discussion of underlying 
biological analysis.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 4837]]

SUMMARY: NMFS has evaluated the Tribal Resource Management Plan (Plan) 
submitted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes) to NMFS pursuant to 
the limitation on take prohibitions for actions conducted under the 
Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for salmon and steelhead promulgated under 
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plan specifies fishery management 
activities in the Salmon River sub basin of Idaho. This document serves 
to notify the public that NMFS, by delegated authority from the 
Secretary of Commerce, has determined pursuant to the ESA Tribal 4(d) 
Rule for salmon and steelhead that implementing and enforcing the Plan 
will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of 
ESA-listed salmon and steelhead.

DATES: The final determination on the Plan was made on January 11, 
2013.

ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries Service, Salmon Management 
Division, 1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Enrique Pati[ntilde]o at (206) 526-
4655, or email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Species Covered in This Notice

    Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): threatened, naturally 
produced and artificially propagated Snake River spring/summer.
    Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha): threatened, naturally produced and 
artificially propagated Snake River fall-run.
    Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened, naturally produced and 
artificially propagated Snake River basin.
    Sockeye (O. nerka): endangered, naturally produced and artificially 
propagated Snake River.

Background

    The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes have submitted to NMFS a Tribal Plan 
describing the management of ceremonial and subsistence fisheries in 
the Salmon River basin in the State of Idaho. The objective of the 
Tribal Plan is to harvest spring Chinook salmon in a manner that does 
not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the 
ESU. Impact levels on the listed spring Chinook salmon populations in 
the ESU are specified by a sliding-scale harvest rate schedule based on 
run size and escapement needs as described in the Tribal Plan. The 
Tribal Plan sets maximum harvest rates for each management unit or 
population based on its status, and assures that those rates or 
objectives are not exceeded. A variety of monitoring and evaluation 
tasks to be conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes is specified in 
the Tribal Plan to assess the abundance of spring Chinook salmon and to 
determine fishery effort and catch. A comprehensive review of the 
Tribal Plan to evaluate whether the fisheries and ESA-listed salmon and 
steelhead populations are performing as expected will be done within 
the proposed fishery season and at the end of the proposed season.
    Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt 
such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the 
conservation of species listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a final 
ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans adopting regulations necessary and 
advisable to harmonize statutory conservation requirements with tribal 
rights and the Federal trust responsibility to tribes (50 CFR 223.209).
    This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies the prohibitions enumerated 
in section 9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find it necessary and 
advisable to apply the take prohibitions described in section 
9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery harvest activities if the 
fisheries are managed in accordance with a Tribal Plan whose 
implementation has been determined by the Secretary to not appreciably 
reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the listed salmonids.
    As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule, before the Secretary makes a 
decision on the Tribal Plan, the public must have an opportunity to 
review and comment on the pending determination. NMFS made the proposed 
evaluation and pending determination available for public review, and 
the final evaluation and determination reflect consideration of 
comments received.

Discussion of the Biological Analysis Underlying the Determination

    The management objective is for the Tribes to conduct fisheries in 
a manner that does not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival 
and recovery of listed Chinook salmon. The Plan includes provisions for 
monitoring and evaluation to assess fishing-related impacts on Snake 
River spring/summer Chinook salmon. Performance indicators include dam, 
weir, and redd counts, harvest estimates, and escapement with respect 
to escapement goals. The proposed Plan provides the framework through 
which Tribal salmon fisheries could be implemented while meeting 
requirements specified under the ESA.
    The Tribes intend to engage in ceremonial and subsistence harvest 
of both hatchery and natural-origin spring/summer Chinook salmon. 
Annually, the Tribes would issue season regulations detailing the 
timing and season regulations for tributary fisheries consistent with 
this long-term Plan. Under the Plan, the Tribes would manage all 
Chinook salmon fisheries to achieve escapement objectives using 
population-specific, abundance-based harvest rate schedules to limit 
ESA take according to year-specific adult escapement abundances. As a 
result, weaker populations will sustain less harvest and as the number 
of predicted adults increase, the number of fish escaping to the 
spawning grounds will also increase.
    To achieve its conservation objectives, the Plan employs a number 
of key strategies as part of their harvest conservation measures, 
including: (1) Fishery-related redistribution of the conservation 
burden historically borne by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points to 
restrict the take of ESA-listed fish; and (3) application of a sliding 
scale approach to determine appropriate ESA take limits on critically 
low runs as well as on healthier runs at levels that may not slow 
recovery.
    The Plan includes provisions for annual reports that will assess 
compliance with performance standards established through the Plan. The 
monitoring and evaluation described in the Plan will focus on two 
primary performance indicators: adult and juvenile abundance, and the 
overall assessment of abundance and productivity measures for each 
population. Reporting and inclusion of new information derived from 
Plan research, monitoring, and evaluation activities provides assurance 
that performance standards will be achieved in future seasons.

Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Evaluation and 
Pending Determination

    NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending 
determination on the Plan for public review and comment on May 30, 2012 
(77 FR 31835). The proposed evaluation and pending determination and an 
associated draft environmental assessment were available for public 
review and comment for 30 days.
    NMFS received one set of comments, from the Nez Perce Tribe. 
Several comments were addressed in NMFS' final evaluation and 
recommended determination document, but no substantive changes were 
required to the Plan or the environmental

[[Page 4838]]

assessment. A detailed summary of the comments and NMFS' responses is 
also available on the Salmon Management Division Web site. Based on its 
evaluation and recommended determination and taking into account the 
public comments, NMFS issued its final determination on the Shoshone-
Bannock Tribes' Salmon River subbasin salmon and steelhead fishery 
management Plan.

Authority

    Under section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt such 
regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the conservation of 
the species listed as threatened. The ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR 
223.209) states that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions will not apply 
to Tribal Plans that will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of 
survival and recovery for the listed species.

    Dated: January 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-01282 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.