Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance, 4848-4854 [2013-01255]

Download as PDF 4848 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: Open Session A. Approval of Minutes • December 13, 2012 B. New Business • Review of Insurance Premium Rates • Policy Statement Concerning the Sale of Assets Dated: January 16, 2013. Dale L. Aultman, Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board. [FR Doc. 2013–01201 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6710–01–P FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL [Docket No. FFIEC–2013–0001] Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). ACTION: Notice; request for comment. AGENCY: The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), on behalf of its members, requests comment on this proposed guidance entitled ‘‘Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance’’ (guidance). Upon completion of the guidance, and after consideration of comments received from the public, the federal financial institution regulatory agencies will issue it as supervisory guidance to the institutions that they supervise and the State Liaison Committee (SLC) of the FFIEC will encourage state regulators to adopt the guidance. Accordingly, institutions will be expected to use the guidance in their efforts to ensure that their policies and procedures provide oversight and controls commensurate with the risks posed by their social media activities. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 25, 2013. ADDRESSES: Because paper mail received by the FFIEC is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions in the Washington, DC area, you are encouraged to submit comments by the Federal eRulemaking Portal, if possible. Please use the title ‘‘Social Media Comments’’ to facilitate the organization and distribution of the comments. You wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 may submit comments by any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal (Regulations.gov): Go to https:// www.regulations.gov. Click the ‘‘Advanced Search’’ option located in the bottom-right corner of the Search box. Scroll down to the ’’By Docket ID:’’ search box, type ‘‘FFIEC–2013–0001,’’ and hit Enter to submit or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The ‘‘How to use Regulations.gov’’ section under the ‘‘Help’’ menu provides information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting or viewing public comments, viewing other supporting and related materials, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period. Mail: Judith Dupre, Executive Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, L. William Seidman Center, Mailstop: B–7081a, 3501 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22226–3550. Hand delivery/courier: Judith Dupre, Executive Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, L. William Seidman Center, Mailstop: B– 7081a, 3501 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22226–3550. Instructions: You must include ‘‘FFIEC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘Docket Number FFIEC–2013–0001’’ in your comment. In general, the FFIEC will enter all comments received into the docket and publish them on the Regulations.gov web site without change, including any business or personal information that you provide such as name and address information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. Docket: You may also view or request available background documents and project summaries using the methods described above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OCC: Eric Gott, Compliance Specialist, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW., Washington DC, 20219, (202) 649–7181. Board: Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer Financial Services Analyst, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551, (202) 452–2705. FDIC: Elizabeth Khalil, Senior Policy Analyst, Federal Deposit Insurance PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., Room F–6016, Washington, DC 20429–0002, (202) 898–3534. NCUA: Robert J. Polcyn, Consumer Compliance Policy and Outreach Analyst, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314, (703) 664–3916. CFPB: Suzanne McQueen, Senior Consumer Financial Protection Analyst, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20552, (202) 435–7439. SLC: Matthew Lambert, Policy Counsel, Conference of State Bank Supervisors, 1129 20th Street NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 407–7130. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Information The FFIEC is proposing guidance to address the applicability of federal consumer protection and compliance laws, regulations, and policies to activities conducted via social media by banks, savings associations, and credit unions, as well as by nonbank entities supervised by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (collectively, financial institutions). The six members of the FFIEC are the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC); the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA); the CFPB (collectively, the Agencies); and the State Liaison Committee (SLC). As part of its mission, the FFIEC makes recommendations regarding supervisory matters and the adequacy of supervisory tools to the Agencies. The FFIEC also develops procedures for examinations of financial institutions that are used by the Agencies. The Agencies expect that all financial institutions they supervise will effectively assess and manage risks associated with activities conducted via social media. Upon completion of the guidance, and after consideration of comments received from the public, the Agencies will issue it as supervisory guidance to the institutions that they supervise. Accordingly, such institutions will be expected to use the guidance in their efforts to ensure that their risk management practices adequately address the consumer compliance and legal risks, as well as related risks, such as reputation and operational risks, raised by activities conducted via social media. The SLC, which is composed of representatives of five state agencies that supervise financial institutions, was established to encourage the application of uniform examination principles and standards E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices by state and federal supervisory agencies. Upon finalization of the FFIEC guidance, the SLC will encourage the adoption of the guidance by state regulators. State agencies that adopt the guidance will expect the entities that they regulate to use the guidance in their efforts to ensure that their risk management and consumer protection practices adequately address the compliance and reputation risks raised by activities conducted via social media. Social media has been defined in a number of ways. For purposes of the proposed guidance, the Agencies consider social media to be a form of interactive online communication in which users can generate and share content through text, images, audio, and/or video. Social media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, micro-blogging sites (e.g., Facebook, Google Plus, MySpace, and Twitter); forums, blogs, customer review Web sites and bulletin boards (e.g., Yelp); photo and video sites (e.g., Flickr and YouTube); sites that enable professional networking (e.g., LinkedIn); virtual worlds (e.g., Second Life); and social games (e.g., FarmVille and CityVille). Social media can be distinguished from other online media in that the communication tends to be more interactive. Financial institutions may use social media in a variety of ways, including marketing, providing incentives, facilitating applications for new accounts, inviting feedback from the public, and engaging with existing and potential customers, for example, by receiving and responding to complaints, or providing loan pricing. Since this form of customer interaction tends to be informal and occurs in a less secure environment, it presents some unique challenges to financial institutions. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with II. Principal Elements of Proposed Guidance The use of social media by a financial institution to attract and interact with customers can impact a financial institution’s risk profile. The increased risks can include the risk of harm to consumers, compliance and legal risk, operational risk, and reputation risk. Increased risk can arise from a variety of directions, including poor due diligence, oversight, or control on the part of the financial institution. The proposed guidance is meant to help financial institutions identify potential risk areas to appropriately address, as well as to ensure institutions are aware of their responsibilities to oversee and control these risks within their overall risk management program. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 III. Request for Comments The FFIEC is proposing this guidance to respond to requests that have been articulated to the Agencies by various participants in the industry for guidance regarding the application of consumer protection laws and regulations within the realm of social media. The FFIEC invites comments on any aspect of the proposed guidance. In addition, the FFIEC is specifically soliciting comments in response to the following questions: 1. Are there other types of social media, or ways in which financial institutions are using social media, that are not included in the proposed guidance but that should be included? 2. Are there other consumer protection laws, regulations, policies or concerns that may be implicated by financial institutions’ use of social media that are not discussed in the proposed guidance but that should be discussed? 3. Are there any technological or other impediments to financial institutions’ compliance with otherwise applicable laws, regulations, and policies when using social media of which the Agencies should be aware? Please be aware that all comments received will be posted generally without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),1 the Agencies may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The Proposed Guidance would not involve any new collections of information pursuant to the PRA. Consequently, no information will be submitted to the OMB for review. The text of the proposed interagency Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance follows: Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance I. Purpose The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (Board), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (collectively, the Agencies), and the State Liaison Committee (SLC) are issuing guidance to 1 44 PO 00000 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4849 address the applicability of existing federal consumer protection and compliance laws, regulations, and policies to activities conducted via social media by banks, savings associations, and credit unions, as well as by nonbank entities supervised by the CFPB (collectively, financial institutions). The Agencies are responding to a need for guidance in this area that has been articulated to the Agencies by various participants in the industry. The guidance is intended to help financial institutions understand potential consumer compliance and legal risks, as well as related risks, such as reputation and operational risks associated with the use of social media, along with expectations for managing those risks. Although this guidance does not impose additional obligations on financial institutions, as with any new process or product channel, financial institutions must manage potential risks associated with social media usage and access. The Agencies recognize that financial institutions are using social media as a tool to generate new business and interact with consumers. The Agencies believe social media, as any new communication technology, has the potential to improve market efficiency. Social media may more broadly distribute information to users of financial services and may help users and providers find each other and match products and services to users’ needs. To manage potential risks to financial institutions and consumers, however, financial institutions should ensure their risk management programs provide oversight and controls commensurate with the risks presented by the types of social media in which the financial institution is engaged, including but not limited to, the risks outlined within this guidance. II. Background Social media has been defined in a number of ways. For purposes of this guidance, the Agencies consider social media to be a form of interactive online communication in which users can generate and share content through text, images, audio, and/or video. Social media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, micro-blogging sites (e.g., Facebook, Google Plus, MySpace, and Twitter); forums, blogs, customer review web sites and bulletin boards (e.g., Yelp); photo and video sites (e.g., Flickr and YouTube); sites that enable professional networking (e.g., LinkedIn); virtual worlds (e.g., Second Life); and social games (e.g., FarmVille and CityVille). Social media can be distinguished from other online media E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 4850 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with in that the communication tends to be more interactive. Financial institutions may use social media in a variety of ways including advertising and marketing, providing incentives, facilitating applications for new accounts, inviting feedback from the public, and engaging with existing and potential customers, for example by receiving and responding to complaints, or providing loan pricing. Since this form of customer interaction tends to be both informal and dynamic, and occurs in a less secure environment, it presents some unique challenges to financial institutions. III. Compliance Risk Management Expectations for Social Media A financial institution should have a risk management program that allows it to identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks related to social media. The size and complexity of the risk management program should be commensurate with the breadth of the financial institution’s involvement in this medium. For instance, a financial institution that relies heavily on social media to attract and acquire new customers should have a more detailed program than one using social media only to a very limited extent. The risk management program should be designed with participation from specialists in compliance, technology, information security, legal, human resources, and marketing. A financial institution that has chosen not to use social media should still be prepared to address the potential for negative comments or complaints that may arise within the many social media platforms described above and provide guidance for employee use of social media. Components of a risk management program should include the following: • A governance structure with clear roles and responsibilities whereby the board of directors or senior management direct how using social media contributes to the strategic goals of the institution (for example, through increasing brand awareness, product advertising, or researching new customer bases) and establishes controls and ongoing assessment of risk in social media activities; • Policies and procedures (either stand-alone or incorporated into other policies and procedures) regarding the use and monitoring of social media and compliance with all applicable consumer protection laws, regulations, and guidance. Further, policies and procedures should incorporate methodologies to address risks from online postings, edits, replies, and retention; VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 • A due diligence process for selecting and managing third-party service provider relationships in connection with social media; • An employee training program that incorporates the institution’s policies and procedures for official, work-related use of social media, and potentially for other uses of social media, including defining impermissible activities; • An oversight process for monitoring information posted to proprietary social media sites administered by the financial institution or a contracted third party; • Audit and compliance functions to ensure ongoing compliance with internal policies and all applicable laws, regulations, and guidance; and • Parameters for providing appropriate reporting to the financial institution’s board of directors or senior management that enable periodic evaluation of the effectiveness of the social media program and whether the program is achieving its stated objectives. IV. Risk Areas The use of social media to attract and interact with customers can impact a financial institution’s risk profile, including risk of harm to consumers, compliance and legal risks, operational risks, and reputation risks. Increased risk can arise from poor due diligence, oversight, or control on the part of the financial institution. As noted previously, this guidance is meant to help financial institutions identify potential risks to ensure institutions are aware of their responsibilities to address risks within their overall risk management program. Compliance and Legal Risks Compliance and legal risk arise from the potential for violations of, or nonconformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, internal policies and procedures, or ethical standards. These risks also arise in situations in which the financial institution’s policies and procedures governing certain products or activities may not have kept pace with changes in the marketplace. This is particularly pertinent to an emerging medium like social media. Further, the potential for defamation or libel risk exists where there is broad distribution of information exchanges. Failure to adequately address these risks can expose an institution to enforcement actions and/or civil lawsuits. The laws discussed in this guidance do not contain exceptions regarding the use of social media. Therefore, to the extent that a financial institution uses PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 social media to engage in lending, deposit services, or payment activities, it must comply with applicable laws and regulations as when it engages in these activities through other media. The following laws and regulations may be relevant to a financial institution’s social media activities. This list is not all-inclusive. Each financial institution should ensure that it periodically evaluates and controls its use of social media to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidance. Deposit and Lending Products Social media may be used to market products and originate new accounts. When used to do either, a financial institution must take steps to ensure that advertising, account origination, and document retention are performed in compliance with applicable consumer protection and compliance laws and regulations. These include, but are not limited to: Truth in Savings Act/Regulation DD and Part 707.2 The Truth in Savings Act (TISA), as implemented by Regulation DD, and, for credit unions, by Part 707 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations, imposes disclosure requirements designed to enable consumers to make informed decisions about deposit accounts. Regulation DD and Part 707 require disclosures about fees, annual percentage yield (APY), interest rate, and other terms. Under Regulation DD and Part 707, a depository institution may not advertise deposit accounts in a way that is misleading or inaccurate or misrepresents the depository institution’s deposit contract. Æ If an electronic advertisement displays a triggering term, such as ‘‘bonus’’ or ‘‘APY,’’ then Regulation DD and Part 707 require the advertisement to clearly state certain information, such as the minimum balance required to obtain the advertised APY or bonus. For example, an electronic advertisement can provide the required information via a link that directly takes the consumer to the additional information. Fair Lending Laws: Equal Credit Opportunity Act/Regulation B 3 and Fair Housing Act.4 A financial institution should ensure that its use of social media does not violate fair lending laws. Æ The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as implemented by Regulation B, 2 12 U.S.C. 3201 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 230 and 1030 and 12 CFR pt. 707 (NCUA). 3 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 202 and 1002 and 12 CFR 701.31 (NCUA). 4 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., 24 CFR pt. 100 (HUD), 12 CFR pt. 128 (OCC), 12 CFR pt. 390 subpart G (FDIC), 12 CFR 701.31 (NCUA). E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices prohibits creditors from making any oral or written statement, in advertising or other marketing techniques, to applicants or prospective applicants that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. However, a creditor may affirmatively solicit or encourage members of traditionally disadvantaged groups to apply for credit, especially groups that might not normally seek credit from that creditor.5 Creditors must also observe the time frames outlined under Regulation B for notifying applicants of the outcome of their applications or requesting additional information for incomplete applications, whether those applications are received via social media or through other channels. Æ As with all prescreened solicitations, a creditor must preserve prescreened solicitations disseminated through social media, as well as the prescreening criteria, in accordance with Regulation B.6 Æ When denying credit, a creditor must provide an adverse action notice detailing the specific reasons for the decision or notifying the applicant of his or her right to request the specific reasons for the decision.7 This requirement applies whether the information used to deny credit comes from social media or other sources. Æ It is also important to note that creditors may not, with limited exceptions, request certain information, such as information about an applicant’s race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. Since social media platforms may collect such information about participants in various ways, a creditor should ensure that it is not requesting, collecting, or otherwise using such information in violation of applicable fair lending laws. Particularly if the social media platform is maintained by a third party that may request or require users to provide personal information such as age and/or sex or use data mining technology to obtain such information from social media sites, the creditor should ensure that it does not itself improperly request, collect, or use such information or give the appearance of doing so. Æ The Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or handicap in the sale and rental of housing, in mortgage lending, and in appraisals of residential real property. In addition, the FHA makes it unlawful to advertise or make CFR pt. 1002, Comment 4(b)–2. CFR 1002.12(b)(7). 7 12 CFR 1002.9(a)(2). any statement that indicates a limitation or preference based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or handicap. This prohibition applies to all advertising media, including social media sites. For example, if a financial institution engages in residential mortgage lending and maintains a presence on Facebook, the Equal Housing Opportunity logo must be displayed on its Facebook page, as applicable.8 Truth in Lending Act/Regulation Z.9 Any social media communication in which a creditor advertises credit products must comply with Regulation Z’s advertising provisions. Regulation Z broadly defines advertisements as any commercial messages that promote consumer credit, and the official commentary to Regulation Z states that the regulation’s advertising rules apply to advertisements delivered electronically. In addition, Regulation Z is designed to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about loan terms and costs. The disclosure requirements vary based on whether the credit is open-end or closed-end. Further, within those two broad categories, additional specific requirements apply to certain types of loans such as private education loans, home secured loans, and credit card accounts. Æ Regulation Z requires that advertisements relating to credit present certain information in a clear and conspicuous manner. It includes requirements regarding the proper disclosure of the annual percentage rate and other loan features. If an advertisement for credit states specific credit terms, it must state only those terms that actually are or will be arranged or offered by the creditor. Æ For electronic advertisements, such as those delivered via social media, Regulation Z permits providing the required information on a table or schedule that is located on a different page from the main advertisement if that table or schedule is clear and conspicuous and the advertisement clearly refers to the page or location. Æ Regulation Z requires that, for consumer loan applications taken electronically, including via social media, the financial institution must provide the consumer with all Regulation Z disclosures within the required time frames. Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Section 8 of the Real Estate 5 12 8 12 6 12 9 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 CFR 128.4, 338.3, 390.145. U.S.C. 1601 et seq.; 12 CFR pts. 226 and 1026. PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4851 Settlement Procedures Act 10 (RESPA) prohibits certain activities in connection with federally related mortgage loans. These prohibitions include fee splitting, as well as giving or accepting a fee, kickback, or thing of value in exchange for referrals of settlement service business. RESPA also has specific timing requirements for certain disclosures. These requirements apply to applications taken electronically, including via social media. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.11 The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) restricts how debt collectors (generally defined as third parties collecting others’ debts and entities collecting debts on their own behalf if they use a different name) may collect debts. The FDCPA generally prohibits debt collectors from publicly disclosing that a consumer owes a debt. Using social media to inappropriately contact consumers, or their families and friends, may violate the restrictions on contacting consumers imposed by the FDCPA. Communicating via social media in a manner that discloses the existence of a debt or to harass or embarrass consumers about their debts (e.g., a debt collector writing about a debt on a Facebook wall) or making false or misleading representations may violate the FDCPA. Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices. Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act 12 prohibits ‘‘unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.’’ Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 13 prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices. An act or practice can be unfair, deceptive, or abusive despite technical compliance with other laws. A financial institution should not engage in any advertising or other practice via social media that could be deemed ‘‘unfair,’’ ‘‘deceptive,’’ or ‘‘abusive.’’ As with other forms of communication, a financial institution should ensure that information it communicates on social media sites is accurate, consistent with other information delivered through electronic media, and not misleading.14 Deposit Insurance or Share Insurance. A number of requirements regarding FDIC or NCUA membership and deposit 10 12 U.S.C. 2607. See Interagency Guidance, Weblinking: Identifying Risks and Risk Management Techniques, (2003) https://www.occ.treas.gov/newsissuances/bulletins/2003/bulletin-2003–15a.pdf. 11 15 U.S.C. 1692–1692p. 12 15 U.S.C. 45. 13 12 U.S.C. 5531, 5536. 14 See FTC Guidance, including Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, at https://www.ftc.gov/ os/2009/10/091005revisedendorsementguides.pdf. E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 4852 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices insurance or share insurance apply equally to advertising and other activities conducted via social media as they do in other contexts. Æ Advertising and Notice of FDIC Membership.15 Whenever a depository institution advertises FDIC-insured products, regardless of delivery channel, the institution must include the official advertising statement of FDIC membership, usually worded, ‘‘Member FDIC.’’ An advertisement is defined as ‘‘a commercial message, in any medium, that is designed to attract public attention or patronage to a product or business.’’ The official advertisement statement must appear, even in a message that ‘‘promotes nonspecific banking products and services, if it includes the name of the insured depository institution but does not list or describe particular products or services.’’ Conversely, the advertising statement is not permitted if the advertisement relates solely to nondeposit products or hybrid products (products with both deposit and nondeposit features, such as sweep accounts). In addition to the advertisement requirements, FDICinsured institutions that offer ‘‘noninterest-bearing transaction accounts’’ should provide, if applicable, the required deposit insurance disclosure. Æ Advertising and Notice of NCUA Share Insurance.16 Each insured credit union must include the official advertising statement of NCUA membership, usually worded, ‘‘Federally insured by NCUA’’ in advertisements regardless of delivery channel, unless specifically exempted. An advertisement is defined as ‘‘a commercial message, in any medium, that is designed to attract public attention or patronage to a product or business.’’ The official advertising statement must be in a size and print that is clearly legible and may be no smaller than the smallest font size used in other portions of the advertisement intended to convey information to the consumer. If the official sign is used as the official advertising statement, an insured credit union may alter the font size to ensure its legibility. Each insured credit union must display the official NCUA sign on its Internet page, if any, where it accepts deposits or opens accounts. Æ Nondeposit Investment Products. As described in the ‘‘Interagency Statement on Retail Sales of Nondeposit 15 12 16 12 CFR pt. 328. CFR pt. 740. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Investment Products,’’ 17 when a depository institution recommends or sells nondeposit investment products to retail customers, it should ensure that customers are fully informed that the products are not insured by the FDIC or NCUA; are not deposits or other obligations of the institution and are not guaranteed by the institution; and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested. Payment Systems If social media is used to facilitate a consumer’s use of payment systems, a financial institution should keep in mind the laws, regulations, and industry rules regarding payments that may apply, including those providing disclosure and other rights to consumers. Under existing law, no additional disclosure requirements apply simply because social media is involved (for instance, providing a portal through which consumers access their accounts at a financial institution). Rather, the financial institution should continue to be aware of the existing laws, regulations, guidance, and industry rules that apply to payment systems and evaluate which will apply. These may include the following: Electronic Fund Transfer Act/ Regulation E.18 The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and its implementing Regulation E provide consumers with, among other things, protections regarding ‘‘electronic fund transfers’’ (EFT), defined broadly to include any transfer of funds initiated through an electronic terminal, telephone, computer, or magnetic tape for the purpose of debiting or crediting a consumer’s account at a financial institution. These protections include required disclosures and error resolution procedures. Rules Applicable to Check Transactions. When a payment occurs via a check-based transaction rather than an EFT, the transaction will be governed by applicable industry rules 19 and/or Article 4 20 of the Uniform Commercial Code of the relevant state, as well as the Expedited Funds Availability Act, as implemented by Regulation CC 21 (regarding the 17 Interagency Guidance, Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment Products (Feb. 17, 1994). 18 15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq., 12 CFR pts 205 and 1005. 19 See Operating Rules of the National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA), available at https://www.achrulesonline.org/; Rules of the Electronic Check Clearinghouse Organization (ECCHO), available at https://www.eccho.org/cc/ rules/Rules%20Summary-Mar%202012.pdf. 20 UCC Art. 4. 21 12 CFR pt. 229. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 availability of funds and collection of checks). Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Programs (BSA/AML) As required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) 22 and applicable regulations,23 depository institutions and certain other entities must have a compliance program that incorporates training from operational staff to the board of directors. Among other elements, the compliance program must include appropriate internal controls to ensure effective risk management and compliance with recordkeeping and reporting requirements under the BSA. Internal controls are the financial institution’s policies, procedures, and processes designed to limit and control risks and to achieve compliance with the BSA. The level of sophistication of the internal controls should be commensurate with the size, structure, risks, and complexity of the financial institution. At a minimum, internal controls include but are not limited to: Implementing an effective customer identification program; implementing risk-based customer due diligence policies, procedures, and processes; understanding expected customer activity; monitoring for unusual or suspicious transactions; and maintaining records of electronic funds transfers. An institution’s BSA/AML program must provide for the following minimum components: a system of internal controls to ensure ongoing compliance; independent testing of BSA/AML compliance, a designated BSA compliance officer responsible for managing compliance, and training for appropriate personnel. These controls should apply to all customers, products and services, including customers engaging in electronic banking (ebanking) through the use of social media, and e-banking products and services offered in the context of social media. Financial institutions should also be aware of emerging areas of BSA/AML 22 ‘‘Bank Secrecy Act’’ is the name that has come to be applied to the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act (Titles I and II of Public Law 91–508), its amendments, and the other statutes referring to the subject matter of that Act. These statutes are codified at 12 U.S.C. 1829b, 1951–1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314, 5316–5332; and notes thereto. 23 Bank Secrecy Act regulations are found throughout 31 CFR Chapter X. Also, the federal banking agencies require institutions under their supervision to establish and maintain a BSA compliance program. See 12 CFR 21.21, 163.177 (OCC); 12 CFR 208.63, 211.5(m), 211.24(j) (Board); 12 CFR 326.8, 390.354 (FDIC); 12 CFR 748.2 (NCUA). See also Treas. Dep’t Order 180–01 (Sept. 26, 2002). E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices risk in the virtual world. For example, illicit actors are increasingly using Internet games involving virtual economies, allowing gamers to cash out, as a way to launder money. Virtual world Internet games and digital currencies present a higher risk for money laundering and terrorist financing and should be monitored accordingly. Community Reinvestment Act 24 Under the regulations implementing the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), a depository institution subject to the CRA must maintain a public file that includes, among other items, all written comments received from the public for the current year and each of the prior two calendar years related to the institution’s performance in helping to meet community credit needs, and any response by the institution, assuming the comments or responses do not reflect adversely on the ‘‘good name or reputation’’ of others. Depository institutions subject to the CRA should ensure their policies and procedures addressing public comments also include appropriate monitoring of social media sites run by or on behalf of the institution. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with Privacy Privacy rules have particular relevance to social media when, for instance, a financial institution collects, or otherwise has access to, information from or about consumers. A financial institution should take into consideration the following laws and regulations regarding the privacy of consumer information: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Privacy Rules and Data Security Guidelines.25 Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) establishes requirements relating to the privacy and security of consumer information. Whenever a financial institution collects, or otherwise has access to, information from or about consumers, it should evaluate whether these rules will apply. The rules have particular relevance to social media when, for instance, a financial institution integrates social media components into customers’ online account experience or takes applications via social media portals. Æ A financial institution using social media should clearly disclose its 24 12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 25, 195, 228, 345. 25 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., 12 CFR pt. 1016 (CFPB) and 16 CFR pt. 313 (FTC); Interagency Guidelines Establishing Information Security Standards, 12 CFR pt. 30, app B (OCC); 12 CFR pt. 208, app. D– 2 and pt. 225, app. F (Board); 12 CFR pt. 364, app. B (FDIC); Safeguards Rule, 16 CFR pt. 314 (FTC). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 privacy policies as required under GLBA. Æ Even when there is no ‘‘consumer’’ or ‘‘customer’’ relationship triggering GLBA requirements, a financial institution will likely face reputation risk if it appears to be treating any consumer information carelessly or if it appears to be less than transparent regarding the privacy policies that apply on one or more social media sites that the financial institution uses. CAN–SPAM Act 26 and Telephone Consumer Protection Act.27 The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (CAN–SPAM Act) and Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) may be relevant if a financial institution sends unsolicited communications to consumers via social media. The CAN– SPAM Act and TCPA, and their implementing rules,28 establish requirements for sending unsolicited commercial messages (‘‘spam’’) and unsolicited communications by telephone or short message service (SMS) text message, respectively. These restrictions could apply to communications via a social media platform’s messaging feature. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.29 The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the Federal Trade Commission’s implementing regulation 30 impose obligations on operators of commercial Web sites and online services directed to children younger than 13 that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children, as well as on operators of general audience Web sites or online services with actual knowledge that they are collecting, using, or disclosing personal information from children under 13. A financial institution should evaluate whether it, through its social media activities, could be covered by COPPA. Æ Certain social media platforms require users to attest that they are at least 13, and a financial institution using those sites may consider relying on such policies. However, the financial institution must still take care to monitor whether it is actually collecting any personal information of a person under 13, such as when a child under 13 manages to post such information on the financial institution’s site. Æ A financial institution maintaining its own social media site (such as a 26 15 U.S.C. 7701 et seq. U.S.C. 227. 28 16 CFR pt. 316 (FTC); 47 CFR pts. 64 and 68 (FCC). 29 15 U.S.C. 6501 et seq. 30 16 CFR pt. 312. 27 47 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4853 virtual world) should be especially careful to establish, post, and follow policies restricting access to the site to users 13 or older, especially when those sites could attract children under 13. This may be true, for instance, in the case of virtual worlds and any other features that resemble video games. Fair Credit Reporting Act.31 The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) contains restrictions and requirements concerning making solicitations using eligibility information, responding to direct disputes, and collecting medical information in connection with loan eligibility. The FCRA applies when social media is used for these activities. Reputation Risk Reputation risk is the risk arising from negative public opinion. Activities that result in dissatisfied consumers and/or negative publicity could harm the reputation and standing of the financial institution, even if the financial institution has not violated any law. Privacy and transparency issues, as well as other consumer protection concerns, arise in social media environments. Therefore, a financial institution engaged in social media activities must be sensitive to, and properly manage, the reputation risks that arise from those activities. Reputation risk can arise in areas including the following: Fraud and Brand Identity Financial institutions should be aware that protecting their brand identity in a social media context can be challenging. Risk may arise in many ways, such as through comments made by social media users, spoofs of institution communications, and activities in which fraudsters masquerade as the institution. Financial institutions should consider the use of social media monitoring tools and techniques to identify heightened risk, and respond appropriately. Financial institutions should have appropriate policies in place to monitor and address in a timely manner the fraudulent use of the financial institution’s brand, such as through phishing or spoofing attacks. Third Party Concerns 32 Working with third parties to provide social media services can expose 31 15 U.S.C. 1681–1681u. U.S.C. 1813(u). Guidance from the Agencies addressing third-party relationships is generally available on their respective Web sites. See, e.g., CFPB Bulletin 2012–03, Service Providers (Apr. 13, 2012), available at https:// files.consumerfinance.gov/f/ 201204_cfpb_bulletin_service-providers.pdf; FDIC FIL 44–2208, Managing Third-Party Risk (June 6, 2008), available at https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/ 32 12 E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM Continued 23JAN1 4854 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Notices financial institutions to substantial reputation risk. A financial institution should regularly monitor the information it places on social media sites. This monitoring is the direct responsibility of the financial institution, even when such functions may be delegated to third parties. Even if a social media site is owned and maintained by a third party, consumers using the financial institution’s part of that site may blame the financial institution for problems that occur on that site, such as uses of their personal information they did not expect or changes to policies that are unclear. The financial institution’s ability to control content on a site owned or administered by a third party and to change policies regarding information provided through the site may vary depending on the particular site and the contractual arrangement with the third party. A financial institution should thus weigh these issues against the benefits of using a third party to conduct social media activities. Privacy Concerns Even when a financial institution complies with applicable privacy laws in its social media activities, it should consider the potential reaction by the public to any use of consumer information via social media. The financial institution should have procedures to address risks from occurrences such as members of the public posting confidential or sensitive information—for example, account numbers—on the financial institution’s social media page or site. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with Consumer Complaints and Inquiries Although a financial institution can take advantage of the public nature of social media to address customer complaints and questions, reputation risks exist when the financial institution does not address consumer questions or complaints in a timely or appropriate manner. Further, the participatory nature of social media can expose a financial institution to reputation risks that may occur when users post critical or inaccurate statements. Compliance risk can also arise when a customer uses social media in an effort to initiate a dispute, such as an error dispute under Regulation E, a billing error under Regulation Z, or a direct dispute about information furnished to a consumer financial/2008/fil08044a.html; NCUA Letter 07– CU–13, Evaluating Third Party Relationships (Dec. 2007), available at https://www.ncua.gov/Resources/ Documents/LCU2007-13.pdf; OCC Bulletin OCC 2001–47, Third-Party Relationships (Nov. 1, 2001), available at https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/ bulletins/2001/bulletin-2001-47.html. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jan 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 reporting agency under FCRA and its implementing regulations. A financial institution should have monitoring procedures in place to address the potential for these statements or complaints to require further investigation. Some institutions have employed monitoring software to identify any active discussion of the institution on the Internet. The financial institution should also consider whether, and how, to respond to communications disparaging the financial institution on other parties’ social media sites. To properly control these risks, financial institutions should consider the feasibility of monitoring question and complaint forums on social media sites to ensure that such inquiries, complaints, or comments are addressed in a timely and appropriate manner. Employee Use of Social Media Sites Financial institutions should be aware that employees’ communications via social media—even through employees’ own personal social media accounts— may be viewed by the public as reflecting the financial institution’s official policies or may otherwise reflect poorly on the financial institution, depending on the form and content of the communications. Employee communications can also subject the financial institution to compliance risk as well as reputation risk. Therefore, financial institutions should establish appropriate policies to address employee participation in social media that implicates the financial institution. The Agencies do not intend this guidance to address any employment law principles that may be relevant to employee use of social media. Each financial institution should evaluate the risks for itself and determine appropriate policies to adopt in light of those risks. Operational Risk Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people, or systems. The root cause can be either internal or external events.33 Operational risk includes the risks posed by a financial institution’s use of information technology (IT), which encompasses social media. The identification, monitoring, and management of IT-related risks are addressed in the FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook, 34 as well as other supervisory guidance issued by the FFIEC or individual agencies.35 Depository institutions should pay particular attention to the booklets ‘‘Outsourcing Technology Services’’ 36 and ‘‘Information Security’’ 37 when using social media, and include social media in existing risk assessment and management programs. Social media is one of several platforms vulnerable to account takeover and the distribution of malware. A financial institution should ensure that the controls it implements to protect its systems and safeguard customer information from malicious software adequately address social media usage. Financial institutions’ incident response protocol regarding a security event, such as a data breach or account takeover, should include social media, as appropriate. Conclusion As noted previously, the Agencies recognize that financial institutions are using social media as a tool to generate new business and provide a dynamic environment to interact with consumers. As with any product channel, financial institutions must manage potential risks to the financial institution and consumers by ensuring that their risk management programs provide appropriate oversight and control to address the risk areas discussed within this guidance. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Dated: January 17, 2013. Judith E. Dupre, FFIEC Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–01255 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7535–01–P; 6210–1–P; 4810–33–P; 4810– AM–P; 6714–01–P FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD Sunshine Act Meeting 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), January 28, 2013. TIME AND DATE: 10th Floor Board Meeting Room, 77 K Street NE., Washington, DC 20002. PLACE: Parts will be open to the public and parts will be closed to the public STATUS: 35 FFIEC 33 FFIEC IT Examination Handbook: Management booklet, 2–3 (June 2004), available at https:// ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ITBooklets/FFIEC_ITBooklet_ Management.pdf. 34 Available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/itbooklets.aspx. PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 InfoBase at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov. at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/IT Booklets/FFIEC_ITBooklet_OutsourcingTechnology Services.pdf. 37 Available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ ITBooklets/ FFIEC_ITBooklet_InformationSecurity.pdf. 36 Available E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM 23JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4848-4854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. FFIEC-2013-0001]


Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance

AGENCY: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC).

ACTION: Notice; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council 
(FFIEC), on behalf of its members, requests comment on this proposed 
guidance entitled ``Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management 
Guidance'' (guidance). Upon completion of the guidance, and after 
consideration of comments received from the public, the federal 
financial institution regulatory agencies will issue it as supervisory 
guidance to the institutions that they supervise and the State Liaison 
Committee (SLC) of the FFIEC will encourage state regulators to adopt 
the guidance. Accordingly, institutions will be expected to use the 
guidance in their efforts to ensure that their policies and procedures 
provide oversight and controls commensurate with the risks posed by 
their social media activities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 25, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Because paper mail received by the FFIEC is subject to delay 
due to heightened security precautions in the Washington, DC area, you 
are encouraged to submit comments by the Federal eRulemaking Portal, if 
possible. Please use the title ``Social Media Comments'' to facilitate 
the organization and distribution of the comments. You may submit 
comments by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal (Regulations.gov): Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Click the ``Advanced Search'' option located in 
the bottom-right corner of the Search box. Scroll down to the ''By 
Docket ID:'' search box, type ``FFIEC-2013-0001,'' and hit Enter to 
submit or view public comments and to view supporting and related 
materials for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The ``How to use 
Regulations.gov'' section under the ``Help'' menu provides information 
on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting or 
viewing public comments, viewing other supporting and related 
materials, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment 
period.
    Mail: Judith Dupre, Executive Secretary, Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council, L. William Seidman Center, Mailstop: 
B-7081a, 3501 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22226-3550.
    Hand delivery/courier: Judith Dupre, Executive Secretary, Federal 
Financial Institutions Examination Council, L. William Seidman Center, 
Mailstop: B-7081a, 3501 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22226-3550.
    Instructions: You must include ``FFIEC'' as the agency name and 
``Docket Number FFIEC-2013-0001'' in your comment. In general, the 
FFIEC will enter all comments received into the docket and publish them 
on the Regulations.gov web site without change, including any business 
or personal information that you provide such as name and address 
information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, 
including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the 
public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any 
information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider 
confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
    Docket: You may also view or request available background documents 
and project summaries using the methods described above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    OCC: Eric Gott, Compliance Specialist, Office of the Comptroller of 
the Currency, 400 7th Street SW., Washington DC, 20219, (202) 649-7181.
    Board: Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer Financial 
Services Analyst, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551, (202) 452-2705.
    FDIC: Elizabeth Khalil, Senior Policy Analyst, Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., Room F-6016, Washington, DC 
20429-0002, (202) 898-3534.
    NCUA: Robert J. Polcyn, Consumer Compliance Policy and Outreach 
Analyst, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314, (703) 664-3916.
    CFPB: Suzanne McQueen, Senior Consumer Financial Protection 
Analyst, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20552, (202) 435-7439.
    SLC: Matthew Lambert, Policy Counsel, Conference of State Bank 
Supervisors, 1129 20th Street NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036, 
(202) 407-7130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background Information

    The FFIEC is proposing guidance to address the applicability of 
federal consumer protection and compliance laws, regulations, and 
policies to activities conducted via social media by banks, savings 
associations, and credit unions, as well as by nonbank entities 
supervised by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) 
(collectively, financial institutions).
    The six members of the FFIEC are the Office of the Comptroller of 
the Currency (OCC); the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System (Board); the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); the 
National Credit Union Administration (NCUA); the CFPB (collectively, 
the Agencies); and the State Liaison Committee (SLC). As part of its 
mission, the FFIEC makes recommendations regarding supervisory matters 
and the adequacy of supervisory tools to the Agencies. The FFIEC also 
develops procedures for examinations of financial institutions that are 
used by the Agencies. The Agencies expect that all financial 
institutions they supervise will effectively assess and manage risks 
associated with activities conducted via social media. Upon completion 
of the guidance, and after consideration of comments received from the 
public, the Agencies will issue it as supervisory guidance to the 
institutions that they supervise. Accordingly, such institutions will 
be expected to use the guidance in their efforts to ensure that their 
risk management practices adequately address the consumer compliance 
and legal risks, as well as related risks, such as reputation and 
operational risks, raised by activities conducted via social media. The 
SLC, which is composed of representatives of five state agencies that 
supervise financial institutions, was established to encourage the 
application of uniform examination principles and standards

[[Page 4849]]

by state and federal supervisory agencies. Upon finalization of the 
FFIEC guidance, the SLC will encourage the adoption of the guidance by 
state regulators. State agencies that adopt the guidance will expect 
the entities that they regulate to use the guidance in their efforts to 
ensure that their risk management and consumer protection practices 
adequately address the compliance and reputation risks raised by 
activities conducted via social media.
    Social media has been defined in a number of ways. For purposes of 
the proposed guidance, the Agencies consider social media to be a form 
of interactive online communication in which users can generate and 
share content through text, images, audio, and/or video. Social media 
can take many forms, including, but not limited to, micro-blogging 
sites (e.g., Facebook, Google Plus, MySpace, and Twitter); forums, 
blogs, customer review Web sites and bulletin boards (e.g., Yelp); 
photo and video sites (e.g., Flickr and YouTube); sites that enable 
professional networking (e.g., LinkedIn); virtual worlds (e.g., Second 
Life); and social games (e.g., FarmVille and CityVille). Social media 
can be distinguished from other online media in that the communication 
tends to be more interactive.
    Financial institutions may use social media in a variety of ways, 
including marketing, providing incentives, facilitating applications 
for new accounts, inviting feedback from the public, and engaging with 
existing and potential customers, for example, by receiving and 
responding to complaints, or providing loan pricing. Since this form of 
customer interaction tends to be informal and occurs in a less secure 
environment, it presents some unique challenges to financial 
institutions.

II. Principal Elements of Proposed Guidance

    The use of social media by a financial institution to attract and 
interact with customers can impact a financial institution's risk 
profile. The increased risks can include the risk of harm to consumers, 
compliance and legal risk, operational risk, and reputation risk. 
Increased risk can arise from a variety of directions, including poor 
due diligence, oversight, or control on the part of the financial 
institution. The proposed guidance is meant to help financial 
institutions identify potential risk areas to appropriately address, as 
well as to ensure institutions are aware of their responsibilities to 
oversee and control these risks within their overall risk management 
program.

III. Request for Comments

    The FFIEC is proposing this guidance to respond to requests that 
have been articulated to the Agencies by various participants in the 
industry for guidance regarding the application of consumer protection 
laws and regulations within the realm of social media. The FFIEC 
invites comments on any aspect of the proposed guidance. In addition, 
the FFIEC is specifically soliciting comments in response to the 
following questions:
    1. Are there other types of social media, or ways in which 
financial institutions are using social media, that are not included in 
the proposed guidance but that should be included?
    2. Are there other consumer protection laws, regulations, policies 
or concerns that may be implicated by financial institutions' use of 
social media that are not discussed in the proposed guidance but that 
should be discussed?
    3. Are there any technological or other impediments to financial 
institutions' compliance with otherwise applicable laws, regulations, 
and policies when using social media of which the Agencies should be 
aware?
    Please be aware that all comments received will be posted generally 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),\1\ the 
Agencies may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The 
Proposed Guidance would not involve any new collections of information 
pursuant to the PRA. Consequently, no information will be submitted to 
the OMB for review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed interagency Social Media: Consumer 
Compliance Risk Management Guidance follows:

Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance

I. Purpose

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve (Board), Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (collectively, the 
Agencies), and the State Liaison Committee (SLC) are issuing guidance 
to address the applicability of existing federal consumer protection 
and compliance laws, regulations, and policies to activities conducted 
via social media by banks, savings associations, and credit unions, as 
well as by nonbank entities supervised by the CFPB (collectively, 
financial institutions). The Agencies are responding to a need for 
guidance in this area that has been articulated to the Agencies by 
various participants in the industry. The guidance is intended to help 
financial institutions understand potential consumer compliance and 
legal risks, as well as related risks, such as reputation and 
operational risks associated with the use of social media, along with 
expectations for managing those risks. Although this guidance does not 
impose additional obligations on financial institutions, as with any 
new process or product channel, financial institutions must manage 
potential risks associated with social media usage and access.
    The Agencies recognize that financial institutions are using social 
media as a tool to generate new business and interact with consumers. 
The Agencies believe social media, as any new communication technology, 
has the potential to improve market efficiency. Social media may more 
broadly distribute information to users of financial services and may 
help users and providers find each other and match products and 
services to users' needs. To manage potential risks to financial 
institutions and consumers, however, financial institutions should 
ensure their risk management programs provide oversight and controls 
commensurate with the risks presented by the types of social media in 
which the financial institution is engaged, including but not limited 
to, the risks outlined within this guidance.

II. Background

    Social media has been defined in a number of ways. For purposes of 
this guidance, the Agencies consider social media to be a form of 
interactive online communication in which users can generate and share 
content through text, images, audio, and/or video. Social media can 
take many forms, including, but not limited to, micro-blogging sites 
(e.g., Facebook, Google Plus, MySpace, and Twitter); forums, blogs, 
customer review web sites and bulletin boards (e.g., Yelp); photo and 
video sites (e.g., Flickr and YouTube); sites that enable professional 
networking (e.g., LinkedIn); virtual worlds (e.g., Second Life); and 
social games (e.g., FarmVille and CityVille). Social media can be 
distinguished from other online media

[[Page 4850]]

in that the communication tends to be more interactive.
    Financial institutions may use social media in a variety of ways 
including advertising and marketing, providing incentives, facilitating 
applications for new accounts, inviting feedback from the public, and 
engaging with existing and potential customers, for example by 
receiving and responding to complaints, or providing loan pricing. 
Since this form of customer interaction tends to be both informal and 
dynamic, and occurs in a less secure environment, it presents some 
unique challenges to financial institutions.

III. Compliance Risk Management Expectations for Social Media

    A financial institution should have a risk management program that 
allows it to identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks related 
to social media. The size and complexity of the risk management program 
should be commensurate with the breadth of the financial institution's 
involvement in this medium. For instance, a financial institution that 
relies heavily on social media to attract and acquire new customers 
should have a more detailed program than one using social media only to 
a very limited extent. The risk management program should be designed 
with participation from specialists in compliance, technology, 
information security, legal, human resources, and marketing. A 
financial institution that has chosen not to use social media should 
still be prepared to address the potential for negative comments or 
complaints that may arise within the many social media platforms 
described above and provide guidance for employee use of social media. 
Components of a risk management program should include the following:
     A governance structure with clear roles and 
responsibilities whereby the board of directors or senior management 
direct how using social media contributes to the strategic goals of the 
institution (for example, through increasing brand awareness, product 
advertising, or researching new customer bases) and establishes 
controls and ongoing assessment of risk in social media activities;
     Policies and procedures (either stand-alone or 
incorporated into other policies and procedures) regarding the use and 
monitoring of social media and compliance with all applicable consumer 
protection laws, regulations, and guidance. Further, policies and 
procedures should incorporate methodologies to address risks from 
online postings, edits, replies, and retention;
     A due diligence process for selecting and managing third-
party service provider relationships in connection with social media;
     An employee training program that incorporates the 
institution's policies and procedures for official, work-related use of 
social media, and potentially for other uses of social media, including 
defining impermissible activities;
     An oversight process for monitoring information posted to 
proprietary social media sites administered by the financial 
institution or a contracted third party;
     Audit and compliance functions to ensure ongoing 
compliance with internal policies and all applicable laws, regulations, 
and guidance; and
     Parameters for providing appropriate reporting to the 
financial institution's board of directors or senior management that 
enable periodic evaluation of the effectiveness of the social media 
program and whether the program is achieving its stated objectives.

IV. Risk Areas

    The use of social media to attract and interact with customers can 
impact a financial institution's risk profile, including risk of harm 
to consumers, compliance and legal risks, operational risks, and 
reputation risks. Increased risk can arise from poor due diligence, 
oversight, or control on the part of the financial institution. As 
noted previously, this guidance is meant to help financial institutions 
identify potential risks to ensure institutions are aware of their 
responsibilities to address risks within their overall risk management 
program.

Compliance and Legal Risks

    Compliance and legal risk arise from the potential for violations 
of, or nonconformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed 
practices, internal policies and procedures, or ethical standards. 
These risks also arise in situations in which the financial 
institution's policies and procedures governing certain products or 
activities may not have kept pace with changes in the marketplace. This 
is particularly pertinent to an emerging medium like social media. 
Further, the potential for defamation or libel risk exists where there 
is broad distribution of information exchanges. Failure to adequately 
address these risks can expose an institution to enforcement actions 
and/or civil lawsuits.
    The laws discussed in this guidance do not contain exceptions 
regarding the use of social media. Therefore, to the extent that a 
financial institution uses social media to engage in lending, deposit 
services, or payment activities, it must comply with applicable laws 
and regulations as when it engages in these activities through other 
media.
    The following laws and regulations may be relevant to a financial 
institution's social media activities. This list is not all-inclusive. 
Each financial institution should ensure that it periodically evaluates 
and controls its use of social media to ensure compliance with all 
applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidance.
Deposit and Lending Products
    Social media may be used to market products and originate new 
accounts. When used to do either, a financial institution must take 
steps to ensure that advertising, account origination, and document 
retention are performed in compliance with applicable consumer 
protection and compliance laws and regulations. These include, but are 
not limited to:
    Truth in Savings Act/Regulation DD and Part 707.\2\ The Truth in 
Savings Act (TISA), as implemented by Regulation DD, and, for credit 
unions, by Part 707 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations, imposes 
disclosure requirements designed to enable consumers to make informed 
decisions about deposit accounts. Regulation DD and Part 707 require 
disclosures about fees, annual percentage yield (APY), interest rate, 
and other terms. Under Regulation DD and Part 707, a depository 
institution may not advertise deposit accounts in a way that is 
misleading or inaccurate or misrepresents the depository institution's 
deposit contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 12 U.S.C. 3201 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 230 and 1030 and 12 CFR 
pt. 707 (NCUA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] If an electronic advertisement displays a triggering term, 
such as ``bonus'' or ``APY,'' then Regulation DD and Part 707 require 
the advertisement to clearly state certain information, such as the 
minimum balance required to obtain the advertised APY or bonus. For 
example, an electronic advertisement can provide the required 
information via a link that directly takes the consumer to the 
additional information.
    Fair Lending Laws: Equal Credit Opportunity Act/Regulation B \3\ 
and Fair Housing Act.\4\ A financial institution should ensure that its 
use of social media does not violate fair lending laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 202 and 1002 and 12 CFR 
701.31 (NCUA).
    \4\ 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., 24 CFR pt. 100 (HUD), 12 CFR pt. 128 
(OCC), 12 CFR pt. 390 subpart G (FDIC), 12 CFR 701.31 (NCUA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as implemented by 
Regulation B,

[[Page 4851]]

prohibits creditors from making any oral or written statement, in 
advertising or other marketing techniques, to applicants or prospective 
applicants that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable 
person from making or pursuing an application. However, a creditor may 
affirmatively solicit or encourage members of traditionally 
disadvantaged groups to apply for credit, especially groups that might 
not normally seek credit from that creditor.\5\ Creditors must also 
observe the time frames outlined under Regulation B for notifying 
applicants of the outcome of their applications or requesting 
additional information for incomplete applications, whether those 
applications are received via social media or through other channels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 12 CFR pt. 1002, Comment 4(b)-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] As with all prescreened solicitations, a creditor must 
preserve prescreened solicitations disseminated through social media, 
as well as the prescreening criteria, in accordance with Regulation 
B.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 12 CFR 1002.12(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] When denying credit, a creditor must provide an adverse 
action notice detailing the specific reasons for the decision or 
notifying the applicant of his or her right to request the specific 
reasons for the decision.\7\ This requirement applies whether the 
information used to deny credit comes from social media or other 
sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 12 CFR 1002.9(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] It is also important to note that creditors may not, with 
limited exceptions, request certain information, such as information 
about an applicant's race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. 
Since social media platforms may collect such information about 
participants in various ways, a creditor should ensure that it is not 
requesting, collecting, or otherwise using such information in 
violation of applicable fair lending laws. Particularly if the social 
media platform is maintained by a third party that may request or 
require users to provide personal information such as age and/or sex or 
use data mining technology to obtain such information from social media 
sites, the creditor should ensure that it does not itself improperly 
request, collect, or use such information or give the appearance of 
doing so.
    [cir] The Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination based on 
race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or 
handicap in the sale and rental of housing, in mortgage lending, and in 
appraisals of residential real property. In addition, the FHA makes it 
unlawful to advertise or make any statement that indicates a limitation 
or preference based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, 
familial status, or handicap. This prohibition applies to all 
advertising media, including social media sites. For example, if a 
financial institution engages in residential mortgage lending and 
maintains a presence on Facebook, the Equal Housing Opportunity logo 
must be displayed on its Facebook page, as applicable.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 12 CFR 128.4, 338.3, 390.145.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Truth in Lending Act/Regulation Z.\9\ Any social media 
communication in which a creditor advertises credit products must 
comply with Regulation Z's advertising provisions. Regulation Z broadly 
defines advertisements as any commercial messages that promote consumer 
credit, and the official commentary to Regulation Z states that the 
regulation's advertising rules apply to advertisements delivered 
electronically. In addition, Regulation Z is designed to promote the 
informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about loan 
terms and costs. The disclosure requirements vary based on whether the 
credit is open-end or closed-end. Further, within those two broad 
categories, additional specific requirements apply to certain types of 
loans such as private education loans, home secured loans, and credit 
card accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.; 12 CFR pts. 226 and 1026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] Regulation Z requires that advertisements relating to credit 
present certain information in a clear and conspicuous manner. It 
includes requirements regarding the proper disclosure of the annual 
percentage rate and other loan features. If an advertisement for credit 
states specific credit terms, it must state only those terms that 
actually are or will be arranged or offered by the creditor.
    [cir] For electronic advertisements, such as those delivered via 
social media, Regulation Z permits providing the required information 
on a table or schedule that is located on a different page from the 
main advertisement if that table or schedule is clear and conspicuous 
and the advertisement clearly refers to the page or location.
    [cir] Regulation Z requires that, for consumer loan applications 
taken electronically, including via social media, the financial 
institution must provide the consumer with all Regulation Z disclosures 
within the required time frames.
    Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Section 8 of the Real Estate 
Settlement Procedures Act \10\ (RESPA) prohibits certain activities in 
connection with federally related mortgage loans. These prohibitions 
include fee splitting, as well as giving or accepting a fee, kickback, 
or thing of value in exchange for referrals of settlement service 
business. RESPA also has specific timing requirements for certain 
disclosures. These requirements apply to applications taken 
electronically, including via social media.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 12 U.S.C. 2607. See Interagency Guidance, Weblinking: 
Identifying Risks and Risk Management Techniques, (2003) https://www.occ.treas.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2003/bulletin-2003-15a.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.\11\ The Fair Debt Collection 
Practices Act (FDCPA) restricts how debt collectors (generally defined 
as third parties collecting others' debts and entities collecting debts 
on their own behalf if they use a different name) may collect debts. 
The FDCPA generally prohibits debt collectors from publicly disclosing 
that a consumer owes a debt. Using social media to inappropriately 
contact consumers, or their families and friends, may violate the 
restrictions on contacting consumers imposed by the FDCPA. 
Communicating via social media in a manner that discloses the existence 
of a debt or to harass or embarrass consumers about their debts (e.g., 
a debt collector writing about a debt on a Facebook wall) or making 
false or misleading representations may violate the FDCPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 1692-1692p.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices. Section 5 of the 
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act \12\ prohibits ``unfair or deceptive 
acts or practices in or affecting commerce.'' Sections 1031 and 1036 of 
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act \13\ 
prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices. An act or 
practice can be unfair, deceptive, or abusive despite technical 
compliance with other laws. A financial institution should not engage 
in any advertising or other practice via social media that could be 
deemed ``unfair,'' ``deceptive,'' or ``abusive.'' As with other forms 
of communication, a financial institution should ensure that 
information it communicates on social media sites is accurate, 
consistent with other information delivered through electronic media, 
and not misleading.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 45.
    \13\ 12 U.S.C. 5531, 5536.
    \14\ See FTC Guidance, including Guides Concerning the Use of 
Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005revisedendorsementguides.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Deposit Insurance or Share Insurance. A number of requirements 
regarding FDIC or NCUA membership and deposit

[[Page 4852]]

insurance or share insurance apply equally to advertising and other 
activities conducted via social media as they do in other contexts.
    [cir] Advertising and Notice of FDIC Membership.\15\ Whenever a 
depository institution advertises FDIC-insured products, regardless of 
delivery channel, the institution must include the official advertising 
statement of FDIC membership, usually worded, ``Member FDIC.'' An 
advertisement is defined as ``a commercial message, in any medium, that 
is designed to attract public attention or patronage to a product or 
business.'' The official advertisement statement must appear, even in a 
message that ``promotes nonspecific banking products and services, if 
it includes the name of the insured depository institution but does not 
list or describe particular products or services.'' Conversely, the 
advertising statement is not permitted if the advertisement relates 
solely to nondeposit products or hybrid products (products with both 
deposit and nondeposit features, such as sweep accounts). In addition 
to the advertisement requirements, FDIC-insured institutions that offer 
``noninterest-bearing transaction accounts'' should provide, if 
applicable, the required deposit insurance disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 12 CFR pt. 328.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] Advertising and Notice of NCUA Share Insurance.\16\ Each 
insured credit union must include the official advertising statement of 
NCUA membership, usually worded, ``Federally insured by NCUA'' in 
advertisements regardless of delivery channel, unless specifically 
exempted. An advertisement is defined as ``a commercial message, in any 
medium, that is designed to attract public attention or patronage to a 
product or business.'' The official advertising statement must be in a 
size and print that is clearly legible and may be no smaller than the 
smallest font size used in other portions of the advertisement intended 
to convey information to the consumer. If the official sign is used as 
the official advertising statement, an insured credit union may alter 
the font size to ensure its legibility. Each insured credit union must 
display the official NCUA sign on its Internet page, if any, where it 
accepts deposits or opens accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 12 CFR pt. 740.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] Nondeposit Investment Products. As described in the 
``Interagency Statement on Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment 
Products,'' \17\ when a depository institution recommends or sells 
nondeposit investment products to retail customers, it should ensure 
that customers are fully informed that the products are not insured by 
the FDIC or NCUA; are not deposits or other obligations of the 
institution and are not guaranteed by the institution; and are subject 
to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Interagency Guidance, Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment 
Products (Feb. 17, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Payment Systems
    If social media is used to facilitate a consumer's use of payment 
systems, a financial institution should keep in mind the laws, 
regulations, and industry rules regarding payments that may apply, 
including those providing disclosure and other rights to consumers. 
Under existing law, no additional disclosure requirements apply simply 
because social media is involved (for instance, providing a portal 
through which consumers access their accounts at a financial 
institution). Rather, the financial institution should continue to be 
aware of the existing laws, regulations, guidance, and industry rules 
that apply to payment systems and evaluate which will apply. These may 
include the following:
    Electronic Fund Transfer Act/Regulation E.\18\ The Electronic Fund 
Transfer Act (EFTA) and its implementing Regulation E provide consumers 
with, among other things, protections regarding ``electronic fund 
transfers'' (EFT), defined broadly to include any transfer of funds 
initiated through an electronic terminal, telephone, computer, or 
magnetic tape for the purpose of debiting or crediting a consumer's 
account at a financial institution. These protections include required 
disclosures and error resolution procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq., 12 CFR pts 205 and 1005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rules Applicable to Check Transactions. When a payment occurs via a 
check-based transaction rather than an EFT, the transaction will be 
governed by applicable industry rules \19\ and/or Article 4 \20\ of the 
Uniform Commercial Code of the relevant state, as well as the Expedited 
Funds Availability Act, as implemented by Regulation CC \21\ (regarding 
the availability of funds and collection of checks).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Operating Rules of the National Automated Clearing 
House Association (NACHA), available at https://www.achrulesonline.org/; Rules of the Electronic Check Clearinghouse 
Organization (ECCHO), available at https://www.eccho.org/cc/rules/Rules%20Summary-Mar%202012.pdf.
    \20\ UCC Art. 4.
    \21\ 12 CFR pt. 229.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Programs (BSA/AML)
    As required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) \22\ and applicable 
regulations,\23\ depository institutions and certain other entities 
must have a compliance program that incorporates training from 
operational staff to the board of directors. Among other elements, the 
compliance program must include appropriate internal controls to ensure 
effective risk management and compliance with recordkeeping and 
reporting requirements under the BSA. Internal controls are the 
financial institution's policies, procedures, and processes designed to 
limit and control risks and to achieve compliance with the BSA. The 
level of sophistication of the internal controls should be commensurate 
with the size, structure, risks, and complexity of the financial 
institution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ ``Bank Secrecy Act'' is the name that has come to be 
applied to the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act 
(Titles I and II of Public Law 91-508), its amendments, and the 
other statutes referring to the subject matter of that Act. These 
statutes are codified at 12 U.S.C. 1829b, 1951-1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311-
5314, 5316-5332; and notes thereto.
    \23\ Bank Secrecy Act regulations are found throughout 31 CFR 
Chapter X. Also, the federal banking agencies require institutions 
under their supervision to establish and maintain a BSA compliance 
program. See 12 CFR 21.21, 163.177 (OCC); 12 CFR 208.63, 211.5(m), 
211.24(j) (Board); 12 CFR 326.8, 390.354 (FDIC); 12 CFR 748.2 
(NCUA). See also Treas. Dep't Order 180-01 (Sept. 26, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At a minimum, internal controls include but are not limited to: 
Implementing an effective customer identification program; implementing 
risk-based customer due diligence policies, procedures, and processes; 
understanding expected customer activity; monitoring for unusual or 
suspicious transactions; and maintaining records of electronic funds 
transfers. An institution's BSA/AML program must provide for the 
following minimum components: a system of internal controls to ensure 
ongoing compliance; independent testing of BSA/AML compliance, a 
designated BSA compliance officer responsible for managing compliance, 
and training for appropriate personnel. These controls should apply to 
all customers, products and services, including customers engaging in 
electronic banking (e-banking) through the use of social media, and e-
banking products and services offered in the context of social media.
    Financial institutions should also be aware of emerging areas of 
BSA/AML

[[Page 4853]]

risk in the virtual world. For example, illicit actors are increasingly 
using Internet games involving virtual economies, allowing gamers to 
cash out, as a way to launder money. Virtual world Internet games and 
digital currencies present a higher risk for money laundering and 
terrorist financing and should be monitored accordingly.
Community Reinvestment Act \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq., 12 CFR pts. 25, 195, 228, 345.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the regulations implementing the Community Reinvestment Act 
(CRA), a depository institution subject to the CRA must maintain a 
public file that includes, among other items, all written comments 
received from the public for the current year and each of the prior two 
calendar years related to the institution's performance in helping to 
meet community credit needs, and any response by the institution, 
assuming the comments or responses do not reflect adversely on the 
``good name or reputation'' of others. Depository institutions subject 
to the CRA should ensure their policies and procedures addressing 
public comments also include appropriate monitoring of social media 
sites run by or on behalf of the institution.
Privacy
    Privacy rules have particular relevance to social media when, for 
instance, a financial institution collects, or otherwise has access to, 
information from or about consumers. A financial institution should 
take into consideration the following laws and regulations regarding 
the privacy of consumer information:
    Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Privacy Rules and Data Security 
Guidelines.\25\ Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) 
establishes requirements relating to the privacy and security of 
consumer information. Whenever a financial institution collects, or 
otherwise has access to, information from or about consumers, it should 
evaluate whether these rules will apply. The rules have particular 
relevance to social media when, for instance, a financial institution 
integrates social media components into customers' online account 
experience or takes applications via social media portals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., 12 CFR pt. 1016 (CFPB) and 16 CFR 
pt. 313 (FTC); Interagency Guidelines Establishing Information 
Security Standards, 12 CFR pt. 30, app B (OCC); 12 CFR pt. 208, app. 
D-2 and pt. 225, app. F (Board); 12 CFR pt. 364, app. B (FDIC); 
Safeguards Rule, 16 CFR pt. 314 (FTC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] A financial institution using social media should clearly 
disclose its privacy policies as required under GLBA.
    [cir] Even when there is no ``consumer'' or ``customer'' 
relationship triggering GLBA requirements, a financial institution will 
likely face reputation risk if it appears to be treating any consumer 
information carelessly or if it appears to be less than transparent 
regarding the privacy policies that apply on one or more social media 
sites that the financial institution uses.
    CAN-SPAM Act \26\ and Telephone Consumer Protection Act.\27\ The 
Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act 
of 2003 (CAN-SPAM Act) and Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) may 
be relevant if a financial institution sends unsolicited communications 
to consumers via social media. The CAN-SPAM Act and TCPA, and their 
implementing rules,\28\ establish requirements for sending unsolicited 
commercial messages (``spam'') and unsolicited communications by 
telephone or short message service (SMS) text message, respectively. 
These restrictions could apply to communications via a social media 
platform's messaging feature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.
    \27\ 47 U.S.C. 227.
    \28\ 16 CFR pt. 316 (FTC); 47 CFR pts. 64 and 68 (FCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.\29\ The Children's Online 
Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the Federal Trade Commission's 
implementing regulation \30\ impose obligations on operators of 
commercial Web sites and online services directed to children younger 
than 13 that collect, use, or disclose personal information from 
children, as well as on operators of general audience Web sites or 
online services with actual knowledge that they are collecting, using, 
or disclosing personal information from children under 13. A financial 
institution should evaluate whether it, through its social media 
activities, could be covered by COPPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.
    \30\ 16 CFR pt. 312.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [cir] Certain social media platforms require users to attest that 
they are at least 13, and a financial institution using those sites may 
consider relying on such policies. However, the financial institution 
must still take care to monitor whether it is actually collecting any 
personal information of a person under 13, such as when a child under 
13 manages to post such information on the financial institution's 
site.
    [cir] A financial institution maintaining its own social media site 
(such as a virtual world) should be especially careful to establish, 
post, and follow policies restricting access to the site to users 13 or 
older, especially when those sites could attract children under 13. 
This may be true, for instance, in the case of virtual worlds and any 
other features that resemble video games.
    Fair Credit Reporting Act.\31\ The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) 
contains restrictions and requirements concerning making solicitations 
using eligibility information, responding to direct disputes, and 
collecting medical information in connection with loan eligibility. The 
FCRA applies when social media is used for these activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 1681-1681u.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reputation Risk

    Reputation risk is the risk arising from negative public opinion. 
Activities that result in dissatisfied consumers and/or negative 
publicity could harm the reputation and standing of the financial 
institution, even if the financial institution has not violated any 
law. Privacy and transparency issues, as well as other consumer 
protection concerns, arise in social media environments. Therefore, a 
financial institution engaged in social media activities must be 
sensitive to, and properly manage, the reputation risks that arise from 
those activities. Reputation risk can arise in areas including the 
following:
Fraud and Brand Identity
    Financial institutions should be aware that protecting their brand 
identity in a social media context can be challenging. Risk may arise 
in many ways, such as through comments made by social media users, 
spoofs of institution communications, and activities in which 
fraudsters masquerade as the institution. Financial institutions should 
consider the use of social media monitoring tools and techniques to 
identify heightened risk, and respond appropriately. Financial 
institutions should have appropriate policies in place to monitor and 
address in a timely manner the fraudulent use of the financial 
institution's brand, such as through phishing or spoofing attacks.
Third Party Concerns \32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 12 U.S.C. 1813(u). Guidance from the Agencies addressing 
third-party relationships is generally available on their respective 
Web sites. See, e.g., CFPB Bulletin 2012-03, Service Providers (Apr. 
13, 2012), available at https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201204_cfpb_bulletin_service-providers.pdf; FDIC FIL 44-2208, Managing 
Third-Party Risk (June 6, 2008), available at https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2008/fil08044a.html; NCUA Letter 07-CU-13, 
Evaluating Third Party Relationships (Dec. 2007), available at 
https://www.ncua.gov/Resources/Documents/LCU2007-13.pdf; OCC Bulletin 
OCC 2001-47, Third-Party Relationships (Nov. 1, 2001), available at 
https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2001/bulletin-2001-47.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Working with third parties to provide social media services can 
expose

[[Page 4854]]

financial institutions to substantial reputation risk. A financial 
institution should regularly monitor the information it places on 
social media sites. This monitoring is the direct responsibility of the 
financial institution, even when such functions may be delegated to 
third parties. Even if a social media site is owned and maintained by a 
third party, consumers using the financial institution's part of that 
site may blame the financial institution for problems that occur on 
that site, such as uses of their personal information they did not 
expect or changes to policies that are unclear. The financial 
institution's ability to control content on a site owned or 
administered by a third party and to change policies regarding 
information provided through the site may vary depending on the 
particular site and the contractual arrangement with the third party. A 
financial institution should thus weigh these issues against the 
benefits of using a third party to conduct social media activities.
Privacy Concerns
    Even when a financial institution complies with applicable privacy 
laws in its social media activities, it should consider the potential 
reaction by the public to any use of consumer information via social 
media. The financial institution should have procedures to address 
risks from occurrences such as members of the public posting 
confidential or sensitive information--for example, account numbers--on 
the financial institution's social media page or site.
Consumer Complaints and Inquiries
    Although a financial institution can take advantage of the public 
nature of social media to address customer complaints and questions, 
reputation risks exist when the financial institution does not address 
consumer questions or complaints in a timely or appropriate manner. 
Further, the participatory nature of social media can expose a 
financial institution to reputation risks that may occur when users 
post critical or inaccurate statements. Compliance risk can also arise 
when a customer uses social media in an effort to initiate a dispute, 
such as an error dispute under Regulation E, a billing error under 
Regulation Z, or a direct dispute about information furnished to a 
consumer reporting agency under FCRA and its implementing regulations. 
A financial institution should have monitoring procedures in place to 
address the potential for these statements or complaints to require 
further investigation. Some institutions have employed monitoring 
software to identify any active discussion of the institution on the 
Internet.
    The financial institution should also consider whether, and how, to 
respond to communications disparaging the financial institution on 
other parties' social media sites. To properly control these risks, 
financial institutions should consider the feasibility of monitoring 
question and complaint forums on social media sites to ensure that such 
inquiries, complaints, or comments are addressed in a timely and 
appropriate manner.
Employee Use of Social Media Sites
    Financial institutions should be aware that employees' 
communications via social media--even through employees' own personal 
social media accounts--may be viewed by the public as reflecting the 
financial institution's official policies or may otherwise reflect 
poorly on the financial institution, depending on the form and content 
of the communications. Employee communications can also subject the 
financial institution to compliance risk as well as reputation risk. 
Therefore, financial institutions should establish appropriate policies 
to address employee participation in social media that implicates the 
financial institution. The Agencies do not intend this guidance to 
address any employment law principles that may be relevant to employee 
use of social media. Each financial institution should evaluate the 
risks for itself and determine appropriate policies to adopt in light 
of those risks.

Operational Risk

    Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or 
failed processes, people, or systems. The root cause can be either 
internal or external events.\33\ Operational risk includes the risks 
posed by a financial institution's use of information technology (IT), 
which encompasses social media.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ FFIEC IT Examination Handbook: Management booklet, 2-3 
(June 2004), available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ITBooklets/FFIEC_ITBooklet_Management.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The identification, monitoring, and management of IT-related risks 
are addressed in the FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook, 
\34\ as well as other supervisory guidance issued by the FFIEC or 
individual agencies.\35\ Depository institutions should pay particular 
attention to the booklets ``Outsourcing Technology Services'' \36\ and 
``Information Security'' \37\ when using social media, and include 
social media in existing risk assessment and management programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/it-booklets.aspx.
    \35\ FFIEC InfoBase at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov.
    \36\ Available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ITBooklets/FFIEC_ITBooklet_OutsourcingTechnologyServices.pdf.
    \37\ Available at https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ITBooklets/FFIEC_ITBooklet_InformationSecurity.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Social media is one of several platforms vulnerable to account 
takeover and the distribution of malware. A financial institution 
should ensure that the controls it implements to protect its systems 
and safeguard customer information from malicious software adequately 
address social media usage. Financial institutions' incident response 
protocol regarding a security event, such as a data breach or account 
takeover, should include social media, as appropriate.

Conclusion

    As noted previously, the Agencies recognize that financial 
institutions are using social media as a tool to generate new business 
and provide a dynamic environment to interact with consumers. As with 
any product channel, financial institutions must manage potential risks 
to the financial institution and consumers by ensuring that their risk 
management programs provide appropriate oversight and control to 
address the risk areas discussed within this guidance.

Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

    Dated: January 17, 2013.
Judith E. Dupre,
FFIEC Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-01255 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P; 6210-1-P; 4810-33-P; 4810-AM-P; 6714-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.