Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers; Washington, DC, 4790-4792 [2013-01239]
Download as PDF
4790
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
published suspension of reporting
requirements established for CDC barges
transiting the inland rivers of the Ninth
Coast Guard District. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.921 by staying
paragraphs (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) from
January 23, 2013 until 11:59 p.m. on
September 30, 2013.
■
Dated: January 11, 2013.
Michael N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–01234 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
to depart the security zone, unless
specifically exempt under the
provisions in this rule or granted
specific permission from the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore.
This action is intended to temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in portions of the
Potomac and Anacostia Rivers during
the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from
January 15, 2013 until January 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–0938]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector
Baltimore Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
410–576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard
A. Regulatory History and Information
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0938]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers; Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the
Potomac River and Anacostia River.
This action is necessary to safeguard
persons and property, and prevent
terrorist acts or incidents. This rule
prohibits vessels and people from
entering the security zone and requires
vessels and persons in the security zone
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
On October 24, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Security Zone, Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers; Washington, DC’’ in
the Federal Register (77 FR 64943).
After the NPRM was published in the
Federal Register, however, the Coast
Guard determined that the boundary of
the proposed security zone on the south
between the Virginia shoreline and the
District of Columbia shoreline along
latitude 38°51′00″ N needed to be
relocated farther downstream to and
along latitude 38°50′00″ N. On
November 28, 2012, we published a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled ‘‘Security
Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers;
Washington, DC’’ in the Federal
Register (77 FR 70964). We received one
comment on the proposed rules. No
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment; therefore, a 30-day
notice is impracticable. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone’s intended objectives of
protecting persons and vessels involved
in the event and its associated activities,
and enhancing public and maritime
safety.
B. Basis and Purpose
On January 20, 2013, the U.S.
Presidential Inauguration swearing-in
ceremony will take place at the U.S.
Capitol in Washington, DC. Activities
associated with the Presidential
Inauguration include several Inaugural
ceremonies, balls, parades and
receptions in the District of Columbia,
which are scheduled to occur from
January 15, 2013 through January 24,
2013. During these activities, gatherings
of high-ranking United States officials
and the public-at-large are expected to
take place. These activities are located
along navigable waterways within the
Captain of the Port Baltimore’s Area of
Responsibility. The Coast Guard has
given each Coast Guard Captain of the
Port the ability to implement
comprehensive port security regimes
designed to safeguard human life,
vessels, and waterfront facilities while
still sustaining the flow of commerce.
The Captain of the Port Baltimore is
establishing a security zone to address
the aforementioned security concerns
and to take steps to prevent the
catastrophic impact that a terrorist
attack against the large gatherings of
high-ranking United States officials, the
public-at-large, and surrounding
waterfront areas and communities
would have. The security zone is
necessary to safeguard life and property
on the navigable waters before, during,
and after activities associated with the
Presidential Inauguration and will help
the Coast Guard prevent vessels or
persons from bypassing the security
measures established on shore for the
events and engaging in waterborne
terrorist actions during the highlypublicized events.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received one
comment in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held. What follows is a review of,
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and the Coast Guard’s response to, the
issue that was presented by the
commenter concerning the proposed
regulations.
The commenter, Mr. David A. Bell, a
resident of Hamburg, NY, stated his
support for the Coast Guard’s proposed
temporary security zone.
The security zone is tailored to
impose a minimum adverse affect on
port operations and waterway users
located within certain waters of the
Potomac River and Anacostia River at
Washington, DC during the event and its
associated activities.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. There is no vessel traffic
associated with recreational boating and
commercial fishing expected during the
effective period, and vessels may seek
permission from the Captain of the Port
Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or transit
through or within the security zone
during the enforcement period.
Although the security zone will apply to
the entire width of the Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers, traffic may be allowed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
to pass through the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Before the effective period,
maritime advisories will be widely
available to the maritime community.
Additionally, given the time of year this
event is scheduled, the vessel traffic is
expected to be minimal.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4791
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
4792
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a temporary security zone.
This rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0938 to read as
follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
§ 165.T05–0938 Security Zone, Potomac
and Anacostia Rivers; Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone:
(1) All waters of the Potomac River,
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the Francis Scott Key (U.S.
Route 29) Bridge at mile 113.0,
downstream to and bounded on the
south between the Virginia shoreline
and the District of Columbia shoreline
along latitude 38°50′00″ N, including
the waters of the Georgetown Channel
Tidal Basin; and
(2) All waters of the Anacostia River,
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the 11th Street (I–295)
Bridge at mile 2.1, downstream to and
bounded on the south by its confluence
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
with the Potomac River. All coordinates
refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general security
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.33 apply to the security zone
created by this temporary section,
§ 165.T05–0938.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Vessels already at berth,
mooring, or anchor at the time the
security zone is implemented do not
have to depart the security zone. All
vessels underway within this security
zone at the time it is implemented are
to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the security zone must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. Permission may be
requested prior to activation of the zone.
To seek permission to transit the area,
the Captain of the Port Baltimore and
his designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number 410–
576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The
Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine
Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal,
State, or local agency vessel, by siren,
radio, flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels must comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(c) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(d) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(e) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 8 a.m. on January 15,
2013 through 10 p.m. on January 24,
2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: January 10, 2013.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2013–01239 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0615; FRL–9364–6]
Epoxy Polymer; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of polymers of
one or more diglycidyl ethers of
bisphenol A, resorcinol, glycerol,
cyclohexanedimethanol, neopentyl
glycol, and polyethylene glycol, with
one or more of the following:
Polyoxypropylene diamine,
polyoxypropylene triamine, Naminoethyl-piperazine, trimethyl-1,6hexanediamine isophorone diamine,
N,N-dimethyl-1,3-diaminopropane,
nadic methyl anhydride, 1,2cyclohexane-dicarboxylic anhydride
and 1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic
anhydride; also referred to as epoxy
polymer, when used as an inert
ingredient in a pesticide chemical
formulation. Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC submitted a petition to EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance.
This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of polymers of one or more
of the epoxy polymers.
DATES: This regulation is effective
January 23, 2013. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before March 25, 2013, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0615, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4790-4792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01239]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0938]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers; Washington, DC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the Potomac River and Anacostia River.
This action is necessary to safeguard persons and property, and prevent
terrorist acts or incidents. This rule prohibits vessels and people
from entering the security zone and requires vessels and persons in the
security zone to depart the security zone, unless specifically exempt
under the provisions in this rule or granted specific permission from
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. This action is intended
to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from January 15, 2013 until January 24,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0938]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On October 24, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers;
Washington, DC'' in the Federal Register (77 FR 64943). After the NPRM
was published in the Federal Register, however, the Coast Guard
determined that the boundary of the proposed security zone on the south
between the Virginia shoreline and the District of Columbia shoreline
along latitude 38[deg]51'00'' N needed to be relocated farther
downstream to and along latitude 38[deg]50'00'' N. On November 28,
2012, we published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
entitled ``Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers; Washington,
DC'' in the Federal Register (77 FR 70964). We received one comment on
the proposed rules. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment; therefore, a 30-day notice is
impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone's intended objectives of protecting persons and vessels
involved in the event and its associated activities, and enhancing
public and maritime safety.
B. Basis and Purpose
On January 20, 2013, the U.S. Presidential Inauguration swearing-in
ceremony will take place at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.
Activities associated with the Presidential Inauguration include
several Inaugural ceremonies, balls, parades and receptions in the
District of Columbia, which are scheduled to occur from January 15,
2013 through January 24, 2013. During these activities, gatherings of
high-ranking United States officials and the public-at-large are
expected to take place. These activities are located along navigable
waterways within the Captain of the Port Baltimore's Area of
Responsibility. The Coast Guard has given each Coast Guard Captain of
the Port the ability to implement comprehensive port security regimes
designed to safeguard human life, vessels, and waterfront facilities
while still sustaining the flow of commerce.
The Captain of the Port Baltimore is establishing a security zone
to address the aforementioned security concerns and to take steps to
prevent the catastrophic impact that a terrorist attack against the
large gatherings of high-ranking United States officials, the public-
at-large, and surrounding waterfront areas and communities would have.
The security zone is necessary to safeguard life and property on the
navigable waters before, during, and after activities associated with
the Presidential Inauguration and will help the Coast Guard prevent
vessels or persons from bypassing the security measures established on
shore for the events and engaging in waterborne terrorist actions
during the highly-publicized events.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received one comment in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held. What follows is a
review of,
[[Page 4791]]
and the Coast Guard's response to, the issue that was presented by the
commenter concerning the proposed regulations.
The commenter, Mr. David A. Bell, a resident of Hamburg, NY, stated
his support for the Coast Guard's proposed temporary security zone.
The security zone is tailored to impose a minimum adverse affect on
port operations and waterway users located within certain waters of the
Potomac River and Anacostia River at Washington, DC during the event
and its associated activities.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. There is no vessel
traffic associated with recreational boating and commercial fishing
expected during the effective period, and vessels may seek permission
from the Captain of the Port Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to operate or transit through or within the security zone
during the enforcement period. Although the security zone will apply to
the entire width of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, traffic may be
allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port Baltimore. Before the effective period, maritime advisories
will be widely available to the maritime community. Additionally, given
the time of year this event is scheduled, the vessel traffic is
expected to be minimal.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 4792]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves establishing a temporary security zone.
This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0938 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0938 Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers;
Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone:
(1) All waters of the Potomac River, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the north by the Francis Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at
mile 113.0, downstream to and bounded on the south between the Virginia
shoreline and the District of Columbia shoreline along latitude
38[deg]50'00'' N, including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal
Basin; and
(2) All waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the north by the 11th Street (I-295) Bridge at mile 2.1,
downstream to and bounded on the south by its confluence with the
Potomac River. All coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.33 apply to the security zone created by this temporary
section, Sec. 165.T05-0938.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the security zone is
implemented do not have to depart the security zone. All vessels
underway within this security zone at the time it is implemented are to
depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his designated representative. Permission may be requested prior to
activation of the zone. To seek permission to transit the area, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal,
State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(c) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(e) Effective period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
January 15, 2013 through 10 p.m. on January 24, 2013.
Dated: January 10, 2013.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2013-01239 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P