Proposed Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances, 4806-4812 [2013-01194]
Download as PDF
4806
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve
Washington’s SIP revision dated
November 28, 2012, specifically
Appendix A, ‘‘2008 Baseline Emissions
Inventory and Documentation’’ and
Appendix B, ‘‘SIP Strengthening Rules.’’
We have made the determination that
this action is consistent with section
110 of the CAA. EPA is soliciting public
comments which will be considered
before taking final action.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed approval
does not impose substantial direct costs
on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Consistent with EPA policy, EPA
nonetheless provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a
letter dated December 11, 2012. EPA did
not receive a request for consultation.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 7, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2013–01339 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941; FRL–6369–9]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on
Certain Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for four
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action would require
persons who intend to manufacture,
import, or process any of the chemical
substances for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use by
this proposed rule to notify EPA at least
90 days before commencing that
activity. The required notification
would provide EPA with the
opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941, by
one of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. ATTN: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0941.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2011–0941. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the comment that is placed in
the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCAHotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use the chemical substances
contained in this proposed rule. The
following list of North American
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Manufacturers, importers, or
processors of one or more subject
chemical substances (NAICS codes 325
and 324110), e.g., chemical
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127; see also 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
that the shipment of the chemical
substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemical substances subject to a final
SNUR must certify their compliance
with the SNUR requirements. The EPA
policy in support of import certification
appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B.
In addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance
that is the subject of a proposed or final
SNUR, are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20),
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4807
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under
TSCA section 5(a)(2) for four chemical
substances which were the subject of
PMNs P–07–204, P–10–58, P–10–59,
and P–10–60. These SNURs would
require persons who intend to
manufacture, import, or process any of
these chemical substances for an
activity that is designated as a
significant new use to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that
activity.
In the Federal Register issue of
September 21, 2012 (77 FR 58666)
(FRL–9357–2), EPA issued direct final
SNURs on these four chemical
substances in accordance with the
procedures at § 721.160(c)(3)(i). EPA
received notice of intent to submit
adverse comments on these SNURs.
Therefore, as required by
§ 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA has removed the
direct final SNURs in a separate final
rule published in the Federal Register,
and is now issuing this proposed rule
on the four chemical substances. The
record for the direct final SNURs on
these chemical substances was
established as docket EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2011–0941. That docket includes
information considered by the Agency
in developing the direct final rule and
the notice of intent to submit adverse
comments.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in Unit III.
Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires
persons to submit a significant new use
notice (SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days
before they manufacture, import, or
process the chemical substance for that
use. Persons who must report are
described in § 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
4808
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
occurring before the effective date of the
rule. Provisions relating to user fees
appear at 40 CFR part 700. According to
§ 721.1(c), persons subject to these
SNURs must comply with the same
notice requirements and EPA regulatory
procedures as submitters of PMNs under
TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular,
these requirements include the
information submission requirements of
TSCA section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the
exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the
regulations at 40 CFR part 720. Once
EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take
regulatory action under TSCA section
5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities
for which it has received the SNUN. If
EPA does not take action, EPA is
required under TSCA section 5(g) to
explain in the Federal Register its
reasons for not taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorized EPA to consider any
other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a
significant new use for the four
chemical substances that are the subject
of this proposed rule, EPA considered
relevant information about the toxicity
of the chemical substances, likely
human exposures and environmental
releases associated with possible uses,
and the four bulleted TSCA section
5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed
Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use
and recordkeeping requirements for four
chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721,
subpart E. In this unit, EPA provides the
following information for each chemical
substance:
• PMN number.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Chemical name (generic name, if
the specific name is claimed as CBI).
• Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
Registry number (if assigned for nonconfidential chemical identities).
• Basis for the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order or, for TSCA non-section
5(e) SNURs, the basis for the SNUR (i.e.,
SNURs without TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders).
• Tests recommended by EPA to
provide sufficient information to
evaluate the chemical substance (see
Unit VIII. for more information).
• CFR citation assigned in the
regulatory text section of this proposed
rule.
The regulatory text section of this
proposed rule specifies the activities
designated as significant new uses.
Certain new uses, including production
volume limits (i.e., limits on
manufacture and importation volume)
and other uses designated in this
proposed rule, may be claimed as CBI.
See Unit IX.
This proposed rule includes PMN
substances P–10–58, P–10–59, and P–
10–50 that are subject to ‘‘risk-based’’
consent orders under TSCA section
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) where EPA determined
that activities associated with the PMN
substances may present unreasonable
risk to human health or the
environment. These consent orders
require protective measures to limit
exposures or otherwise mitigate the
potential unreasonable risk. The socalled ‘‘TSCA section 5(e) SNURs’’ on
these PMN substances are proposed
pursuant to § 721.160, and are based on
and consistent with the provisions in
the underlying consent orders. The
TSCA section 5(e) SNURs designate as
a ‘‘significant new use’’ the absence of
the protective measures required in the
corresponding consent orders.
This proposed rule also includes a
SNUR on PMN substance P–07–204 that
was not subject to a consent order under
TSCA section 5(e). In this case, EPA did
not find that the use scenario described
in the PMN triggered the determinations
set forth under TSCA section 5(e).
However, EPA does believe that certain
changes from the use scenario described
in the PMN could result in increased
exposures, thereby constituting a
‘‘significant new use.’’ This so-called
‘‘TSCA non-section 5(e) SNUR’’ is
proposed pursuant to § 721.170. EPA
has determined that every activity
designated as a ‘‘significant new use’’ in
all TSCA non-section 5(e) SNURs issued
under § 721.170 satisfies the two
requirements stipulated in
§ 721.170(c)(2), i.e., these significant
new use activities, ‘‘(i) are different from
those described in the premanufacture
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
notice for the substance, including any
amendments, deletions, and additions
of activities to the premanufacture
notice, and (ii) may be accompanied by
changes in exposure or release levels
that are significant in relation to the
health or environmental concerns
identified’’ for the PMN substance.
PMN Number P–07–204
Chemical name: Pentane, 1,1,1,2,3,3hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3hexafluoropropoxy)-.
CAS number: 870778–34–0.
Basis for action: The PMN states that
the generic (non-confidential) use of the
substance will be as a heat transfer
fluid. Based on test data on the PMN
substance and structure activity
relationship (SAR) analysis of test data
on analogous perfluorinated substances,
EPA identified concerns for
neurotoxicity and liver effects from
exposures to the PMN substance. For
the uses described in the amended
PMN, EPA does not expect significant
worker exposures due to the use of
impervious gloves. Therefore, EPA has
not determined that the proposed
manufacturing, processing, or use of the
substance may present an unreasonable
risk. EPA has determined, however, that
any use of the substance without
impervious gloves, where there is a
potential for dermal exposure; or any
use of the substance other than as
described in the amended PMN may
cause serious health effects. Based on
this information, the PMN substance
meets the concern criteria at § 721.170
(b)(3)(i) and (ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a 28-day
dermal toxicity test (OPPTS Test
Guideline 870.3200) in rats, a 90-day
inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test
Guideline 870.3465), and a test using
the ‘‘Standard Test Method for
Permeation of Liquids and Gases
through Protective Clothing Materials
under Conditions of Continuous
Contact’’ (American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) International
Standard F739–12) as reported in the
‘‘Standard Guide for Documenting the
Results of Chemical Permeation Testing
of Materials Used in Protective
Clothing’’ (ASTM International
Standard F1194–99 (2010)) would help
characterize the human health effects of
the PMN substance.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10509.
PMN Numbers P–10–58, P–10–59, and
P–10–60
Chemical names: Partially fluorinated
alcohol substituted glycols (generic).
CAS numbers: Not available.
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e)
consent order: October 8, 2010.
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent
order: The PMN states that the generic
(non-confidential) uses of the PMN
substances will be as intermediates (P–
10–58 and P–10–59) and a surface active
agent (P–10–60). EPA has concerns for
potential incineration or other
decomposition products of the PMN
substances. These perfluorinated
decomposition products may be
released to the environment from
incomplete incineration of the PMN
substances at low temperatures. EPA
has preliminary evidence, including
data on some fluorinated polymers,
which suggests that, under some
conditions, the PMN substances could
degrade in the environment. EPA has
concerns that these degradation
products will persist in the
environment, could bioaccumulate or
biomagnify, and could be toxic to
people, wild mammals, and birds. These
concerns are based on data on analogous
chemical substances, including
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and
other perfluorinated alkyls, including
the presumed environmental degradant.
The order was issued under TSCA
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i), 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I),
and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II), based on a finding
that these substances may present an
unreasonable risk of injury to the
environment and human health, the
substances may be produced in
substantial quantities and may
reasonably be anticipated to enter the
environment in substantial quantities,
and there may be significant (or
substantial) human exposure to the
substances and their potential
degradation products. To protect against
these exposures and risks, the consent
order requires submission of testing on
the PMN substance P–10–60 at five
identified aggregate manufacture and
importation volumes; requires analysis
of raw materials; and restricts the use of
P–10–58 and P–10–59 as intermediates
to make P–10–60. The SNUR designates
as a ‘‘significant new use’’ the absence
of these protective measures.
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of certain
fate and physical/chemical property
testing identified in the TSCA section
5(e) consent order would help
characterize possible effects of the PMN
substances and their degradation
products. The TSCA section 5(e)
consent order contains five production
volume limits. The PMN submitter has
agreed not to exceed the confidential
production volume limits without
performing the specified testing on PMN
substance P–10–60. Additional testing is
included in the preamble to the TSCA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
section 5(e) consent order, but this
testing is not required at any specified
time or production volume. However,
the TSCA section 5(e) consent order’s
restrictions on manufacture, import,
processing, distribution in commerce,
use, and disposal of the PMN substance
will remain in effect until the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order is modified or
revoked by EPA based on submission of
that or other relevant information.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10515.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the
Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted
for the four chemical substances that are
subject to these proposed SNURs, EPA
concluded that for three of the
substances, regulation was warranted
under TSCA section 5(e), pending the
development of information sufficient to
make reasoned evaluations of the health
and environmental effects of the
chemical substances. For one of the four
substances, where the uses are not
regulated under a TSCA section 5(e)
consent order, EPA determined that one
or more of the criteria of concern
established at § 721.170 were met. The
basis for these findings is outlined in
Unit IV.
Based upon comments received from
the September 21, 2012 direct final rule,
the proposed SNUR for P–10–58, P–10–
59, and P–10–60 has been amended to
be consistent with the provisions of the
TSCA section 5(e) consent order and the
proposed SNUR for P–07–0204 has been
amended to clarify the restriction at
721.80(j). This proposed rule includes
the following changes:
1. Revision of paragraph (a)(2)(i) for
the proposed SNUR on P–10–58, P–10–
69, and P–10–60.
2. Revision of paragraph (a)(2)(ii) for
the proposed SNUR for P–07–0204.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for
specific chemical substances that have
undergone premanufacture review
because the Agency wants to achieve
the following objectives with regard to
the significant new uses designated in
this proposed rule:
• EPA would receive notice of any
person’s intent to manufacture, import,
or process a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use
before that activity begins.
• EPA would have an opportunity to
review and evaluate data submitted in a
SNUN before the notice submitter
begins manufacturing, importing, or
processing a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4809
• EPA would be able to regulate
prospective manufacturers, importers,
or processors of a listed chemical
substance before the described
significant new use of that chemical
substance occurs, provided that
regulation is warranted pursuant to
TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
• EPA would ensure that all
manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical
substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to
similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical
substance does not signify that the
chemical substance is listed on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory
(TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to
determine if a chemical substance is on
the TSCA Inventory is available on the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/
existingchemicals/pubs/tscainventory/
index.html.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule
to Uses Occurring Before Effective Date
of the Final Rule
To establish a significant ‘‘new’’ use,
EPA must determine that the use is not
ongoing. The chemical substances
subject to this proposed rule have
undergone premanufacture review.
TSCA section 5(e) consent orders have
been issued for three chemical
substances and the PMN submitters are
prohibited by the TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders from undertaking
activities which EPA is designating as
significant new uses. In cases where
EPA has not received a notice of
commencement (NOC) and the chemical
substance has not been added to the
TSCA Inventory, no other person may
commence such activities without first
submitting a PMN. For chemical
substances for which an NOC has not
been submitted at this time, EPA
concludes that the uses are not ongoing.
However, EPA recognizes that prior to
the effective date of the final rule, when
chemical substances identified in these
SNURs are added to the TSCA
Inventory, other persons may engage in
a significant new use as defined in this
proposed rule before the effective date
of the final rule.
As discussed in the SNURs published
in the Federal Register issue of April
24, 1990 (55 FR 17376), EPA has
decided that the intent of TSCA section
5(a)(1)(B) is best served by designating
a use as a significant new use as of the
date of publication of the September 21,
2012 direct final rule rather than as of
the effective date of the final rule for
this proposed rule. If uses begun after
publication were considered ongoing
rather than new, it would be difficult for
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
4810
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
EPA to establish SNUR notification
requirements because a person could
defeat the SNUR by initiating the
significant new use before the proposed
rule became an effective final rule, and
then argue that the use was ongoing
before the effective date of the final rule
based on this proposed rule. Thus,
persons who begin commercial
manufacture, import, or processing of
the chemical substances regulated
through these SNURs will have to cease
any such activity before the effective
date of the final rule based upon this
proposed rule. To resume their
activities, these persons would have to
comply with all applicable SNUR
notification requirements and wait until
the notice review period, including any
extensions expires.
EPA has promulgated provisions to
allow persons to comply with these
SNURs before the effective date of the
final rule. If a person meets the
conditions of advance compliance
under § 721.45(h), the person is
considered exempt from the
requirements of the SNUR.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN. The two exceptions are:
1. Development of test data is
required where the chemical substance
subject to the SNUR is also subject to a
test rule under TSCA section 4 (see
TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be
necessary where the chemical substance
has been listed under TSCA section
5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4
test rule or a TSCA section 5(b)(4)
listing covering the chemical substance,
persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40
CFR 720.50). However, upon review of
PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
In cases where EPA issued a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order that requires
or recommends certain testing, Unit IV.
lists those tests. Unit IV. also lists
recommended testing for TSCA nonsection 5(e) SNURs. Descriptions of tests
are provided for informational purposes.
EPA strongly encourages persons, before
performing any testing, to consult with
the Agency pertaining to protocol
selection. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’ ASTM
International standards are available at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
https://www.astm.org/Standard/
index.shtml.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders for three of the chemical
substances in this proposed rule, EPA
has established production volume
limits in view of the lack of data on the
potential health and environmental
risks that may be posed by the
significant new uses or increased
exposure to the chemical substances.
These limits cannot be exceeded unless
the PMN submitter first submits the
results of toxicity tests that would
permit a reasoned evaluation of the
potential risks posed by these chemical
substances. Under recent TSCA section
5(e) consent orders, each PMN submitter
is required to submit each study before
reaching the specified production limit.
The SNURs contain the same
production volume limits as the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order. Exceeding
these production limits is defined as a
significant new use. Persons who intend
to exceed the production limit must
notify the Agency by submitting a
SNUN at least 90 days in advance of
commencement of non-exempt
commercial manufacture, import, or
processing.
The recommended tests specified in
Unit IV. may not be the only means of
addressing the potential risks of the
chemical substance. However,
submitting a SNUN without any test
data may increase the likelihood that
EPA will take action under TSCA
section 5(e), particularly if satisfactory
test results have not been obtained from
a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA
recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so
that they will be able to conduct the
appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substances.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substances.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substances compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to § 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with
the same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as persons
submitting a PMN, including
submission of test data on health and
environmental effects as described in 40
CFR 720.50. SNUNs must be submitted
on EPA Form No. 7710–25, generated
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
using e-PMN software, and submitted to
the Agency in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 40 CFR 720.40
and § 721.25. E–PMN software is
available electronically at https://
www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs
of establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the chemical substances
during the development of the direct
final rule. EPA’s complete economic
analysis is available in the docket under
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2011–0941.
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish
SNURs for four chemical substances
that were the subject of PMNs, and in
three cases, a TSCA section 5(e) consent
order. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under PRA,
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection
requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR No. 574).
This action would not impose any
burden requiring additional OMB
approval. If an entity were to submit a
SNUN to the Agency, the annual burden
is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden
estimate includes the time needed to
review instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data
needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified
pursuant to RFA section 605(b) (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), that promulgation of a
SNUR does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities where the
following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small
entity would not cost significantly more
than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is
available in the docket for this proposed
rule.
This proposed rule is within the
scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic
Analysis discussed in Unit IX. and
EPA’s experience promulgating SNURs
(discussed in the certification), EPA
believes that the following are true:
• A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
• Submission of the SNUN would not
cost any small entity significantly more
than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of these
SNURs would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government would be impacted by this
proposed rule. As such, EPA has
determined that this proposed rule
would not impose any enforceable duty,
contain any unfunded mandate, or
otherwise have any effect on small
governments subject to the requirements
of UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have
Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct
effects on Indian Tribes. This proposed
rule would not significantly nor
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian Tribal governments, nor would it
involve or impose any requirements that
affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
In addition, since this action would
not involve any technical standards,
NTTAA section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note), would not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4811
Dated: January 14, 2013.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution, Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. Add § 721.10509 to subpart E to
read as follows:
■
§ 721.10509 Pentane, 1,1,1,2,3,3hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3hexafluoropropoxy)-.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
pentane, 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoro-4(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)-(PMN
P–07–204; CAS No. 870778–34–0) is
subject to reporting under this section
for the significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(3), (b)
(concentration set at 1.0%), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(j) (applies
specifically to the confidential uses
identified in the amended
premanufacture notice (PMN)).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph. (1) Recordkeeping.
Recordkeeping requirements as
specified in § 721.125(a), (b), (c), (d), (e),
and (i) are applicable to manufacturers,
importers, and processors of this
substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section.
■ 3. Add § 721.10515 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10515 Partially fluorinated alcohol
substituted glycols (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substances identified
generically as partially fluorinated
alcohol substituted glycols (PMN P–10–
58, P–10–59, and P–10–60) are subject
to reporting under this section for the
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
4812
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(k) (manufacture
and import of the PMN substances
according to the chemical synthesis and
composition section of the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order, including
analysis, reporting, and limitations of
maximum impurity levels of certain
fluorinated impurities; manufacture and
import of P–10–58 and P–10–59 only as
intermediates for the manufacture of P–
10–60), and (q).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of these substances,
except the recordkeeping requirements
for § 721.125(b) and (c) do not apply to
importers or processors when any one of
the substances are contained in a
formulation at less than 3 weight
percent.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section.
[FR Doc. 2013–01194 Filed 1–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0063:
FXES11130900000–134–FF09E32000]
RIN 1018–AV29
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removal of the Valley
Elderberry Longhorn Beetle From the
Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
public comment.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public comment period
on our October 2, 2012, 12-month
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Jan 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
petition finding and proposed rule to
remove the valley elderberry longhorn
beetle (Desmocerus californicus
dimorphus) from the List of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife. The 60-day
comment period for our proposed rule
ended on December 3, 2012. This notice
announces a 30-day reopening of the
comment period to allow all interested
parties an additional opportunity to
comment on the proposed rule and to
submit information on the status of the
species. If you submitted comments
previously, you do not need to resubmit
them because we have already
incorporated them into the public
record and will fully consider them in
preparation of the final rule.
DATES: We will consider all comments
received or postmarked on or before
February 22, 2013. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES
section, below) must be received by
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
date.
ADDRESSES: Document availability: You
may obtain copies of the proposed rule
and related documents on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket Number FWS–R8–ES–2011–
0063, or by mail from the Sacramento
Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Comment submission: You may
submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R8–ES–2011–0063, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
On the search results page, under the
Comment Period heading in the menu
on the left side of your screen, check the
box next to ‘‘Open’’ to locate this
document. Please ensure you have
found the correct document before
submitting your comments. If your
comments will fit in the provided
comment box, please use this feature of
https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most
compatible with our comment review
procedures. If you attach your
comments as a separate document, our
preferred file format is Microsoft Word.
If you attach multiple comments (such
as form letters), our preferred format is
a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
(2) By Hard Copy: Submit by U.S.
mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R8–
ES–2011–0063; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We will post all information received on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see Public Comments in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more
information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan
Knight, Deputy Field Supervisor,
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office,
2800 Cottage Way, Suite W–2605,
Sacramento, CA 95825; telephone 916–
414–6600; facsimile 916–414–6712. If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We will accept written comments and
information during this reopened
comment period on our October 2, 2012,
12-month finding and proposed rule to
remove the valley elderberry longhorn
beetle from the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife, and to remove the
designation of critical habitat (77 FR
60237). For more information on the
specific information we are seeking,
please see the October 2, 2012, proposed
rule. You may obtain copies of the
proposed rule and related documents on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number FWS–R8–ES–2011–0063, or by
mail from the Sacramento Fish and
Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning the proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES. We will not accept
comments sent by email or fax, or to an
address not listed in ADDRESSES. If you
submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments for this reopening of
the public comment period must be
received or postmarked on or before the
date shown in DATES. Comments
previously submitted need not be
resubmitted, as they will be fully
considered in preparation of the final
rule. We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal be as
accurate as possible and based on the
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4806-4812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01194]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941; FRL-6369-9]
RIN 2070-AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for four chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). This action would
require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process any of
the chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity. The required notification would
provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if
necessary, to prohibit or limit the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. ATTN:
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941. The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2011-0941. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or email. The
regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard
[[Page 4807]]
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at
the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation are
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-9232; email address: moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use the chemical substances contained in this
proposed rule. The following list of North American Classification
System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
Manufacturers, importers, or processors of one or more
subject chemical substances (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127;
see also 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the
shipment of the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules
and orders under TSCA. Importers of chemical substances subject to a
final SNUR must certify their compliance with the SNUR requirements.
The EPA policy in support of import certification appears at 40 CFR
part 707, subpart B. In addition, any persons who export or intend to
export a chemical substance that is the subject of a proposed or final
SNUR, are subject to the export notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see Sec. [emsp14]721.20), and must comply
with the export notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart
D.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under TSCA section 5(a)(2) for four
chemical substances which were the subject of PMNs P-07-204, P-10-58,
P-10-59, and P-10-60. These SNURs would require persons who intend to
manufacture, import, or process any of these chemical substances for an
activity that is designated as a significant new use to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that activity.
In the Federal Register issue of September 21, 2012 (77 FR 58666)
(FRL-9357-2), EPA issued direct final SNURs on these four chemical
substances in accordance with the procedures at Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(i).
EPA received notice of intent to submit adverse comments on these
SNURs. Therefore, as required by Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA has
removed the direct final SNURs in a separate final rule published in
the Federal Register, and is now issuing this proposed rule on the four
chemical substances. The record for the direct final SNURs on these
chemical substances was established as docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941.
That docket includes information considered by the Agency in developing
the direct final rule and the notice of intent to submit adverse
comments.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in Unit III. Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B)
requires persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA
at least 90 days before they manufacture, import, or process the
chemical substance for that use. Persons who must report are described
in Sec. [emsp14]721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A.
These provisions describe persons subject to the rule, recordkeeping
requirements, exemptions to reporting requirements, and applicability
of the rule to uses
[[Page 4808]]
occurring before the effective date of the rule. Provisions relating to
user fees appear at 40 CFR part 700. According to Sec.
[emsp14]721.1(c), persons subject to these SNURs must comply with the
same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as submitters of
PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular, these requirements
include the information submission requirements of TSCA section 5(b)
and 5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by TSCA section 5(h)(1), (h)(2),
(h)(3), and (h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR part 720. Once EPA
receives a SNUN, EPA may take regulatory action under TSCA section
5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities for which it has received
the SNUN. If EPA does not take action, EPA is required under TSCA
section 5(g) to explain in the Federal Register its reasons for not
taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorized EPA to consider any other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a significant new use for the
four chemical substances that are the subject of this proposed rule,
EPA considered relevant information about the toxicity of the chemical
substances, likely human exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, and the four bulleted TSCA section
5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use and recordkeeping requirements
for four chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721, subpart E. In this
unit, EPA provides the following information for each chemical
substance:
PMN number.
Chemical name (generic name, if the specific name is
claimed as CBI).
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Registry number (if
assigned for non-confidential chemical identities).
Basis for the TSCA section 5(e) consent order or, for TSCA
non-section 5(e) SNURs, the basis for the SNUR (i.e., SNURs without
TSCA section 5(e) consent orders).
Tests recommended by EPA to provide sufficient information
to evaluate the chemical substance (see Unit VIII. for more
information).
CFR citation assigned in the regulatory text section of
this proposed rule.
The regulatory text section of this proposed rule specifies the
activities designated as significant new uses. Certain new uses,
including production volume limits (i.e., limits on manufacture and
importation volume) and other uses designated in this proposed rule,
may be claimed as CBI. See Unit IX.
This proposed rule includes PMN substances P-10-58, P-10-59, and P-
10-50 that are subject to ``risk-based'' consent orders under TSCA
section 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) where EPA determined that activities
associated with the PMN substances may present unreasonable risk to
human health or the environment. These consent orders require
protective measures to limit exposures or otherwise mitigate the
potential unreasonable risk. The so-called ``TSCA section 5(e) SNURs''
on these PMN substances are proposed pursuant to Sec. [emsp14]721.160,
and are based on and consistent with the provisions in the underlying
consent orders. The TSCA section 5(e) SNURs designate as a
``significant new use'' the absence of the protective measures required
in the corresponding consent orders.
This proposed rule also includes a SNUR on PMN substance P-07-204
that was not subject to a consent order under TSCA section 5(e). In
this case, EPA did not find that the use scenario described in the PMN
triggered the determinations set forth under TSCA section 5(e).
However, EPA does believe that certain changes from the use scenario
described in the PMN could result in increased exposures, thereby
constituting a ``significant new use.'' This so-called ``TSCA non-
section 5(e) SNUR'' is proposed pursuant to Sec. [emsp14]721.170. EPA
has determined that every activity designated as a ``significant new
use'' in all TSCA non-section 5(e) SNURs issued under Sec.
[emsp14]721.170 satisfies the two requirements stipulated in Sec.
721.170(c)(2), i.e., these significant new use activities, ``(i) are
different from those described in the premanufacture notice for the
substance, including any amendments, deletions, and additions of
activities to the premanufacture notice, and (ii) may be accompanied by
changes in exposure or release levels that are significant in relation
to the health or environmental concerns identified'' for the PMN
substance.
PMN Number P-07-204
Chemical name: Pentane, 1,1,1,2,3,3- hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-
hexafluoropropoxy)-.
CAS number: 870778-34-0.
Basis for action: The PMN states that the generic (non-
confidential) use of the substance will be as a heat transfer fluid.
Based on test data on the PMN substance and structure activity
relationship (SAR) analysis of test data on analogous perfluorinated
substances, EPA identified concerns for neurotoxicity and liver effects
from exposures to the PMN substance. For the uses described in the
amended PMN, EPA does not expect significant worker exposures due to
the use of impervious gloves. Therefore, EPA has not determined that
the proposed manufacturing, processing, or use of the substance may
present an unreasonable risk. EPA has determined, however, that any use
of the substance without impervious gloves, where there is a potential
for dermal exposure; or any use of the substance other than as
described in the amended PMN may cause serious health effects. Based on
this information, the PMN substance meets the concern criteria at Sec.
721.170 (b)(3)(i) and (ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a 28-
day dermal toxicity test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.3200) in rats, a 90-
day inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.3465), and a
test using the ``Standard Test Method for Permeation of Liquids and
Gases through Protective Clothing Materials under Conditions of
Continuous Contact'' (American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
International Standard F739-12) as reported in the ``Standard Guide for
Documenting the Results of Chemical Permeation Testing of Materials
Used in Protective Clothing'' (ASTM International Standard F1194-99
(2010)) would help characterize the human health effects of the PMN
substance.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10509.
PMN Numbers P-10-58, P-10-59, and P-10-60
Chemical names: Partially fluorinated alcohol substituted glycols
(generic).
CAS numbers: Not available.
[[Page 4809]]
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e) consent order: October 8, 2010.
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent order: The PMN states that the
generic (non-confidential) uses of the PMN substances will be as
intermediates (P-10-58 and P-10-59) and a surface active agent (P-10-
60). EPA has concerns for potential incineration or other decomposition
products of the PMN substances. These perfluorinated decomposition
products may be released to the environment from incomplete
incineration of the PMN substances at low temperatures. EPA has
preliminary evidence, including data on some fluorinated polymers,
which suggests that, under some conditions, the PMN substances could
degrade in the environment. EPA has concerns that these degradation
products will persist in the environment, could bioaccumulate or
biomagnify, and could be toxic to people, wild mammals, and birds.
These concerns are based on data on analogous chemical substances,
including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and other perfluorinated
alkyls, including the presumed environmental degradant. The order was
issued under TSCA sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i), 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I), and
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II), based on a finding that these substances may
present an unreasonable risk of injury to the environment and human
health, the substances may be produced in substantial quantities and
may reasonably be anticipated to enter the environment in substantial
quantities, and there may be significant (or substantial) human
exposure to the substances and their potential degradation products. To
protect against these exposures and risks, the consent order requires
submission of testing on the PMN substance P-10-60 at five identified
aggregate manufacture and importation volumes; requires analysis of raw
materials; and restricts the use of P-10-58 and P-10-59 as
intermediates to make P-10-60. The SNUR designates as a ``significant
new use'' the absence of these protective measures.
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of certain
fate and physical/chemical property testing identified in the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order would help characterize possible effects of
the PMN substances and their degradation products. The TSCA section
5(e) consent order contains five production volume limits. The PMN
submitter has agreed not to exceed the confidential production volume
limits without performing the specified testing on PMN substance P-10-
60. Additional testing is included in the preamble to the TSCA section
5(e) consent order, but this testing is not required at any specified
time or production volume. However, the TSCA section 5(e) consent
order's restrictions on manufacture, import, processing, distribution
in commerce, use, and disposal of the PMN substance will remain in
effect until the TSCA section 5(e) consent order is modified or revoked
by EPA based on submission of that or other relevant information.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10515.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted for the four chemical
substances that are subject to these proposed SNURs, EPA concluded that
for three of the substances, regulation was warranted under TSCA
section 5(e), pending the development of information sufficient to make
reasoned evaluations of the health and environmental effects of the
chemical substances. For one of the four substances, where the uses are
not regulated under a TSCA section 5(e) consent order, EPA determined
that one or more of the criteria of concern established at Sec.
[emsp14]721.170 were met. The basis for these findings is outlined in
Unit IV.
Based upon comments received from the September 21, 2012 direct
final rule, the proposed SNUR for P-10-58, P-10-59, and P-10-60 has
been amended to be consistent with the provisions of the TSCA section
5(e) consent order and the proposed SNUR for P-07-0204 has been amended
to clarify the restriction at 721.80(j). This proposed rule includes
the following changes:
1. Revision of paragraph (a)(2)(i) for the proposed SNUR on P-10-
58, P-10-69, and P-10-60.
2. Revision of paragraph (a)(2)(ii) for the proposed SNUR for P-07-
0204.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for specific chemical substances that
have undergone premanufacture review because the Agency wants to
achieve the following objectives with regard to the significant new
uses designated in this proposed rule:
EPA would receive notice of any person's intent to
manufacture, import, or process a listed chemical substance for the
described significant new use before that activity begins.
EPA would have an opportunity to review and evaluate data
submitted in a SNUN before the notice submitter begins manufacturing,
importing, or processing a listed chemical substance for the described
significant new use.
EPA would be able to regulate prospective manufacturers,
importers, or processors of a listed chemical substance before the
described significant new use of that chemical substance occurs,
provided that regulation is warranted pursuant to TSCA sections 5(e),
5(f), 6, or 7.
EPA would ensure that all manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical substance does not signify that
the chemical substance is listed on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory (TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to determine if a chemical
substance is on the TSCA Inventory is available on the Internet at
https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/existingchemicals/pubs/tscainventory/.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule to Uses Occurring Before
Effective Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant ``new'' use, EPA must determine that the
use is not ongoing. The chemical substances subject to this proposed
rule have undergone premanufacture review. TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders have been issued for three chemical substances and the PMN
submitters are prohibited by the TSCA section 5(e) consent orders from
undertaking activities which EPA is designating as significant new
uses. In cases where EPA has not received a notice of commencement
(NOC) and the chemical substance has not been added to the TSCA
Inventory, no other person may commence such activities without first
submitting a PMN. For chemical substances for which an NOC has not been
submitted at this time, EPA concludes that the uses are not ongoing.
However, EPA recognizes that prior to the effective date of the final
rule, when chemical substances identified in these SNURs are added to
the TSCA Inventory, other persons may engage in a significant new use
as defined in this proposed rule before the effective date of the final
rule.
As discussed in the SNURs published in the Federal Register issue
of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376), EPA has decided that the intent of
TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) is best served by designating a use as a
significant new use as of the date of publication of the September 21,
2012 direct final rule rather than as of the effective date of the
final rule for this proposed rule. If uses begun after publication were
considered ongoing rather than new, it would be difficult for
[[Page 4810]]
EPA to establish SNUR notification requirements because a person could
defeat the SNUR by initiating the significant new use before the
proposed rule became an effective final rule, and then argue that the
use was ongoing before the effective date of the final rule based on
this proposed rule. Thus, persons who begin commercial manufacture,
import, or processing of the chemical substances regulated through
these SNURs will have to cease any such activity before the effective
date of the final rule based upon this proposed rule. To resume their
activities, these persons would have to comply with all applicable SNUR
notification requirements and wait until the notice review period,
including any extensions expires.
EPA has promulgated provisions to allow persons to comply with
these SNURs before the effective date of the final rule. If a person
meets the conditions of advance compliance under Sec.
[emsp14]721.45(h), the person is considered exempt from the
requirements of the SNUR.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of a SNUN. The two exceptions
are:
1. Development of test data is required where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be necessary where the chemical
substance has been listed under TSCA section 5(b)(4) (see TSCA section
5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4 test rule or a TSCA section
5(b)(4) listing covering the chemical substance, persons are required
only to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe
any other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40 CFR
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing. In cases where EPA issued a
TSCA section 5(e) consent order that requires or recommends certain
testing, Unit IV. lists those tests. Unit IV. also lists recommended
testing for TSCA non-section 5(e) SNURs. Descriptions of tests are
provided for informational purposes. EPA strongly encourages persons,
before performing any testing, to consult with the Agency pertaining to
protocol selection. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in
this document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and
select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.'' ASTM International standards
are available at https://www.astm.org/Standard/index.shtml.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent orders for three of the chemical
substances in this proposed rule, EPA has established production volume
limits in view of the lack of data on the potential health and
environmental risks that may be posed by the significant new uses or
increased exposure to the chemical substances. These limits cannot be
exceeded unless the PMN submitter first submits the results of toxicity
tests that would permit a reasoned evaluation of the potential risks
posed by these chemical substances. Under recent TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders, each PMN submitter is required to submit each study
before reaching the specified production limit. The SNURs contain the
same production volume limits as the TSCA section 5(e) consent order.
Exceeding these production limits is defined as a significant new use.
Persons who intend to exceed the production limit must notify the
Agency by submitting a SNUN at least 90 days in advance of commencement
of non-exempt commercial manufacture, import, or processing.
The recommended tests specified in Unit IV. may not be the only
means of addressing the potential risks of the chemical substance.
However, submitting a SNUN without any test data may increase the
likelihood that EPA will take action under TSCA section 5(e),
particularly if satisfactory test results have not been obtained from a
prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so that they will be able to
conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substances.
Potential benefits of the chemical substances.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substances
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to Sec. [emsp14]721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN must
comply with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures
as persons submitting a PMN, including submission of test data on
health and environmental effects as described in 40 CFR 720.50. SNUNs
must be submitted on EPA Form No. 7710-25, generated using e-PMN
software, and submitted to the Agency in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 40 CFR 720.40 and Sec. [emsp14]721.25. E-PMN software is
available electronically at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN
requirements for potential manufacturers, importers, and processors of
the chemical substances during the development of the direct final
rule. EPA's complete economic analysis is available in the docket under
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941.
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish SNURs for four chemical
substances that were the subject of PMNs, and in three cases, a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), an Agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information that requires OMB approval under PRA, unless
it has been approved by OMB and displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of
the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB control number
2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This action would not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity were to submit a SNUN
to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden estimate includes the time needed
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and submit the required
SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection
[[Page 4811]]
techniques, to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember
to include the OMB control number in any correspondence, but do not
submit any completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified pursuant to RFA section 605(b)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that promulgation of a SNUR does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
where the following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small entity would not cost
significantly more than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is available in the docket for this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule is within the scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic Analysis discussed in Unit IX. and
EPA's experience promulgating SNURs (discussed in the certification),
EPA believes that the following are true:
A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by
small entities in response to the SNUR.
Submission of the SNUN would not cost any small entity
significantly more than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of these SNURs would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government would be impacted by this proposed
rule. As such, EPA has determined that this proposed rule would not
impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise
have any effect on small governments subject to the requirements of
UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a substantial direct effect on States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have Tribal implications because it is
not expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
proposed rule would not significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal governments, nor would it involve or
impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory action as defined by Executive
Order 12866, and this action does not address environmental health or
safety risks disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because this action is not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this action is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
In addition, since this action would not involve any technical
standards, NTTAA section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), would not apply to
this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special considerations of environmental
justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order 12898, entitled
``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 14, 2013.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution, Prevention
and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. Add Sec. [emsp14]721.10509 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10509 Pentane, 1,1,1,2,3,3- hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-
hexafluoropropoxy)-.
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified as pentane,
1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)-(PMN P-07-204;
CAS No. 870778-34-0) is subject to reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(3), (b) (concentration set at 1.0%), and
(c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(j) (applies specifically to the
confidential uses identified in the amended premanufacture notice
(PMN)).
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph. (1)
Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (i) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use is subject to this section.
The provisions of Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of
this section.
0
3. Add Sec. [emsp14]721.10515 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10515 Partially fluorinated alcohol substituted glycols
(generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substances identified generically as
partially fluorinated alcohol substituted glycols (PMN P-10-58, P-10-
59, and P-10-60) are subject to reporting under this section for the
[[Page 4812]]
significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(k) (manufacture and import of the PMN
substances according to the chemical synthesis and composition section
of the TSCA section 5(e) consent order, including analysis, reporting,
and limitations of maximum impurity levels of certain fluorinated
impurities; manufacture and import of P-10-58 and P-10-59 only as
intermediates for the manufacture of P-10-60), and (q).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers,
importers, and processors of these substances, except the recordkeeping
requirements for Sec. 721.125(b) and (c) do not apply to importers or
processors when any one of the substances are contained in a
formulation at less than 3 weight percent.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use is subject to this section.
The provisions of Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section.
[FR Doc. 2013-01194 Filed 1-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P