Proposed Modification of the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B Airspace Area; TX, 4356-4365 [2013-01118]
Download as PDF
4356
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
12, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013–01067 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1168; Airspace
Docket No. 07–AWA–3]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Modification of the Dallas/
Fort Worth Class B Airspace Area; TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify the Dallas/Fort Worth, TX, Class
B airspace area to ensure containment of
large turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument procedures to and from the
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
(DFW) and Dallas Love Field Airport
(DAL) within Class B airspace. The FAA
is proposing these actions to further
support its national airspace redesign
goal of optimizing terminal and en route
airspace areas to enhance safety,
improving the flow of air traffic, and
reducing the potential for near midair
collision in the DFW terminal area.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone:
(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2012–1168 and
Airspace Docket No. 07–AWA–3 at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, AJV–113, Office of
Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2012–1168 and Airspace Docket No. 07–
AWA–3) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket Nos. FAA–2012–1168 and
Airspace Docket No. 07–AWA–3.’’ The
postcard will be date/time stamped and
returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or
before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before
taking action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRM’s
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of
the Central Service Center, Operations
Support Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2601 Meacham Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory
Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Background
In 1973, the FAA issued a final rule
(38 FR 13635) which established the
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, Terminal Control
Area (TCA) around the Dallas-Fort
Worth Airport, later renamed the Dallas/
Fort Worth International Airport (DFW),
with an effective date of September 30,
1973. In 1993, the FAA issued the
Airspace Reclassification final rule (56
FR 65638), which replaced the term
‘‘terminal control area’’ with the term
‘‘Class B airspace area.’’
The primary purpose of Class B
airspace is to reduce the potential for
midair collisions in the airspace
surrounding airports with high density
air traffic operations by providing an
area in which all aircraft are subject to
certain operating rules and equipment
requirements. FAA policy requires that
Class B airspace areas be designed to
contain all instrument procedures and
that air traffic controllers vector aircraft
to remain within Class B airspace after
entry. If it becomes necessary to extend
the flight path outside Class B airspace
for spacing, controllers must inform the
aircraft when leaving and re-entering
Class B airspace. However, in the
interest of safety, FAA policy dictates
that such extensions be the exception
rather than the rule.
The configuration of the Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace area has been
modified five times since being
established as a TCA, with the last
modification accomplished in 1996. In
1978, 1984, and 1986, the FAA issued
final rules (43 FR 17937, 49 FR 25424,
and 51 FR 19749) to fully contain large
turbine-powered aircraft within TCA
airspace as the aircraft flew instrument
procedures to and from DFW. In 1992,
the FAA issued a final rule (57 FR 166)
that revoked the Airport Radar Service
Area surrounding DAL and incorporated
the airport into the surface area of the
Dallas Fort-Worth TCA. The FAA
determined the mix of small propeller
and high performance aircraft at lower
altitudes around DAL necessitated
modifying the TCA design to include
DAL within the TCA in the interest of
flight safety and that it would result in
a greater degree of protection for the
greatest number of people during fight
in the DFW terminal area. In 1996, the
FAA issued the last rule (61 FR 47815)
modifying the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area. That rule raised the upper
limit of the Class B airspace area to
11,000 feet mean sea level (MSL), except
in the northern and southern portions of
the airspace area, and redefined several
existing subareas to improve the flow of
aviation traffic and enhance safety in
the Class B airspace area while
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
accommodating the concerns of airspace
users.
Since the last Dallas/Fort Worth Class
B airspace modification in 1996, the air
traffic operations into and out of both
DFW and DAL have changed
dramatically due to increased traffic
levels, a considerable different fleet mix,
updated instrument approach and
departure procedures, and airport
infrastructure improvements. The Class
B airspace configuration has not kept
pace with airport expansions and
increasing operations and the current
design makes it difficult to comply with
FAA’s policy to contain certain aircraft
operations within Class B airspace. For
calendar years 2009, 2010, and 2011,
DFW documented 638,782; 652,258; and
646,803 total airport operations and was
rated 4th among all Commercial Service
Airports with 26,663,984; 27,100,656;
and 27,518,358 passenger enplanements
each year, respectively. During the same
calendar year periods, DAL documented
172,962; 168,544; and 179,198 total
airport operations.
Under the current Class B airspace
configuration, aircraft routinely enter,
exit, and then re-enter Class B airspace
while flying published instrument
approach procedures to DFW runway
13R, DAL runways 31R and 31L, and
DAL runways 13R and 13L, which is
contrary to FAA Orders. Modeling of
existing traffic flows has shown that the
proposed Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace modifications would enhance
safety by containing all instrument
procedures, and associated traffic
patterns, at DFW and DAL within the
confines of Class B airspace and better
segregate IFR aircraft arriving and
departing DFW and DAL and the VFR
aircraft operating in the vicinity of the
Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area.
The proposed Class B airspace
modifications described in this NPRM
are intended to address these issues.
Changes Needed to Existing Class B
Airspace
The current Class B design does not
fully contain large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument arrival
procedures to DFW and DAL once they
have entered the airspace as required by
FAA policy. With a renewed safety
emphasis on retaining all large turbinepowered aircraft within the Class B
airspace to avoid mixing with other
aircraft that are not in contact with Air
Traffic Control (ATC), keeping those
aircraft within the existing Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace is not always
possible. For example, when operations
are on a south flow, arrivals to DFW
runway 13R flying straight-in from
Bowie, TX, routinely exit the bottom of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
the Class B airspace shelf with a 5,000
foot MSL floor and re-enter the side of
the Class B airspace shelf with a 4,000
foot MSL floor. Approximately half of
the arrivals to DAL runways 13R and
13L from the northeast exit the bottom
of the Class B airspace shelf with a
3,000 foot MSL floor into the Addison,
TX (ADS), Class D airspace and re-enter
the side of the Class B airspace shelf
with a 2,000 foot MSL floor. When
operations are on a north flow, aircraft
arrivals to DAL runways 31R and 31L
flying straight-in from Cedar Creek, TX,
routinely exit the bottom of the Class B
airspace shelf with a 4,000 foot MSL
floor and re-enter the side of the Class
B airspace shelf with a 2,500 foot MSL
floor or the surface area, or they exit the
bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with
a 2,500 foot MSL floor and re-enter the
side of the surface area.
Pre-NPRM Public Input
In January 2008, an Ad Hoc
Committee was formed to provide
comments and recommendations for the
FAA to consider in designing a
proposed modification to the Dallas/
Fort Worth Class B airspace area. The
committee met three times between
January and April, 2008, and forwarded
three recommendations to the FAA on
May 16, 2008. The Ad Hoc Committee
membership consisted of
representatives from the City of DallasDepartment of Aviation, Aircraft
Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA),
National Business Aviation Association
(NBAA), Texas Soaring Association,
Skydive Dallas, American and
Southwest Airlines, and representatives
from Addison Airport, TX (ADS);
Lancaster Regional Airport, TX (LNC);
and Mesquite Metro Airport, TX (HQZ).
In addition, as announced in the
Federal Register (73 FR 50258),
informal airspace meetings were held on
November 3, 2008, at the Lancaster
Recreation Center, Lancaster, TX; on
November 6, 2008, at the Cavanaugh
Flight Museum, Addison, TX; on
November 13, 2008, at the Denton
Airport Terminal Building, Denton, TX;
and on November 18, 2008, at the
Mesquite Airport Terminal Building,
Mesquite, TX. The purpose of these
meetings was to provide interested
airspace users with an opportunity to
present their views and offer
suggestions regarding planned
modifications to the Dallas/Fort Worth
Class B airspace area. All substantive
comments received as a result of the
informal airspace meetings and the
recommendations made by the Ad Hoc
Committee were considered in
developing this proposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4357
Discussion of Recommendations and
Comments
Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations
As a starting point for discussion, a
preliminary Class B design was
presented to the Ad Hoc Committee for
review. In general, the preliminary
design proposal consisted of lowering
Class B airspace subarea floors within
portions of existing Class B airspace
northwest, north, and northeast of DFW
and southeast of DAL to ensure
containment of large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument procedures
within Class B airspace. Specifically, a
portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area G) northwest of DFW was lowered
1,000 feet to support aircraft flying
instrument approaches to DFW runway
13R; portions of existing Class B
airspace (Areas D, E, & F) north of DFW
were lowered 500 feet to 1,000 feet to
support aircraft flying instrument
approaches to DFW runways 17R, 17C,
and 17L and runways 18R and 18L; a
portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area D) northeast of DFW was lowered
500 feet to support aircraft flying
instrument approaches to DAL runways
13R and 13L; and portions of existing
Class B airspace (Areas C & E) southeast
of DAL were lowered 1,000 feet to 1,500
feet to support aircraft flying instrument
approaches to DAL runways 31R and
31L. The preliminary design also
expanded the Class B airspace boundary
north of DFW to a 30 nautical mile (NM)
radius of the Point of Origin, over the
Ray Roberts Lake, to contain aircraft
within Class B airspace when DFW is on
a southerly landing flow. The Ad Hoc
Committee submitted three
recommendations to the FAA regarding
the proposed modifications of the DFW
Class B airspace area.
The Ad Hoc Committee was
concerned with the proposed
preliminary design that lowered a
portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area E) located southeast of DAL
between 20–NM and 30–NM of the
Point of Origin from a 4,000 feet MSL
floor to a 2,500 feet MSL floor. They
stated lowering the Class B airspace in
this subarea to 2,500 feet MSL
compromised safety by compressing
general aviation traffic attempting to
transit through that area. They
recommended the FAA split this
proposed subarea into two sections and
raise the Class B airspace floors for one
section to 3,000 feet MSL and the other
to 4,000 feet MSL with the boundary
between the two determined by the
point where instrument approaches to
the DAL runways 31R and 31L fall
below 4,000 feet MSL.
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
4358
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
The FAA accepted the Ad Hoc
Committee’s recommendation to split
the proposed subarea and raise the Class
B airspace floor altitude(s). After
reviewing the DAL runway 31R and 31L
arrival flight tracks from the southeast,
the FAA determined a single, smaller
Class B airspace subarea with the floor
altitude raised would contain the
instrument procedures and large
turbine-powered aircraft flying the
procedures within Class B airspace. The
proposed subarea (Area I) has been
reduced in size by half from the original
design to only extend between 20–NM
and 25–NM from the Point of Origin
with the floor raised from 2,500 feet
MSL to 3,000 feet MSL. The FAA
incorporated these proposal changes to
overcome the Ad Hoc Committee’s
safety concerns of compressing general
aviation aircraft flying in the area while
still containing aircraft flying the
instrument approaches to DAL runways
31R and 31L within Class B airspace.
The Ad Hoc Committee was also
concerned with the design of existing
Class B airspace (Area D) northeast of
DFW and directly over the ADS Class D
airspace area that was lowered from
3,000 feet MSL to 2,500 feet MSL. They
commented that VFR aircraft entering
and leaving the ADS Class D airspace
area would be unnecessarily
compressed with these changes and
recommended the FAA determine an
arc, parallel to the existing 10–NM Class
B airspace surface area arc, to define a
smaller Class B airspace subarea with a
2,500 foot MSL floor. They argued this
mitigation would retain the existing
ceiling on the North and East side of the
ADS Class D airspace area and eliminate
the possibility for the compression
noted above.
The FAA redefined the outer
boundary of the proposed Class B
airspace subarea with an arc, parallel to
the 10–NM arc of the Class B surface
area boundary, to prevent overlapping
the entire ADS Class D airspace area
with a 2,500 foot MSL Class B airspace
floor. The FAA also reduced the size of
the proposed subarea (Area F) by
matching the outer boundary with the
13–NM arc of the adjacent existing Class
B airspace (Area B) located north of
DFW. The proposed Class B airspace
subarea (Area F) would be established
with a 2,500 foot MSL floor between the
10–NM and 13–NM arcs of the Point of
Origin and the adjacent existing Class B
airspace (Area B) segments. The Class B
airspace located northeast of DFW
outside the 13–NM arc from the Point of
Origin would remain unchanged with
the existing 3,000 foot MSL floor.
Reducing the size of the proposed Class
B airspace (Area F) would continue to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
support VFR aircraft ingressing and
egressing ADS from/to the East without
compression, as addressed by the Ad
Hoc Committee, and ensure large
turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument procedures to DAL runways
13R and 13L are contained within Class
B airspace.
Additionally, to overcome potential
confusion, unintentional airspace
incursions, or perceived flight safety
issues associated with the ADS Class D
airspace area having two different
ceilings as a result of this proposed
action, the FAA is also considering
amending the ADS Class D airspace area
with a single ceiling, ‘‘to but not
including 2,500 feet MSL,’’ as a separate
airspace action. Consideration of this
amendment action would not affect VFR
aircraft ingressing and egressing ADS
from/to the East, as noted by the Ad Hoc
Committee.
Lastly, the Ad Hoc Committee
recommended the FAA use prominent
visual landmarks to depict boundaries
and redefine the northern boundary of
the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace
area using the southern shore and dam
of the Ray Roberts Lake or the secondary
road that is adjacent to the lake. They
reiterated the importance of new Class
B airspace boundaries being defined by
prominent visual landmarks for easy
identification by non-participating VFR
aircraft flying in the vicinity of those
boundaries.
The FAA agrees that using prominent
landmarks, when available and
supportive, to describe Class B airspace
boundaries enables non-participant VFR
aircraft to visually identify the
boundaries and to avoid unintended
incursions into Class B airspace. As
such, the northern boundary described
in the proposed Dallas/Fort Worth Class
B airspace area (new Area L) was
changed from a 30–NM radius of the
Point of Origin, which extends over the
Ray Roberts Lake, to a boundary that is
parallel to the existing northern
boundary and intersects the southernmost point of the Ray Roberts Lake dam
for visual reference by non-participating
VFR aircraft.
Informal Airspace Meeting Comments
Thirty-three comments and one
petition signed by forty-one individuals
addressed concerns with the Class B
airspace extension north of DFW, which
was designed to protect aircraft flying
approaches from the north into DFW.
The proposed extension involves
lowering a portion of one existing Class
B airspace subarea (Area D) from 3,000
feet MSL to 2,500 feet MSL, as well as
lowering a portion of the floors in two
other existing subareas (Areas E and F)
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from 4,000 feet MSL to 3,000 feet MSL
over the Hidden Valley and Lakeview
areas. The commenters requested that
the existing Class B airspace floor be
retained based on obstacle clearance
issues with existing towers in the area;
increased noise and emissions
associated with large turbine-powered
aircraft and VFR aircraft flying at lower
altitudes over residential areas;
economic consequences to VFR aircraft
based on increased fuel burn associated
with flying at lower altitudes or longer
distances to circumnavigate the new
area; and safety implications associated
with increased numbers of aircraft at the
lower, compressed altitudes.
The FAA reviewed the proposed Class
B airspace extension north of DFW and
alternatives available to contain the
large turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument procedures within Class B
airspace. In lieu of proposing to lower
existing Class B airspace north of DFW
as noted above, the FAA initiated
procedural changes, which included
modifying the instrument approach
procedures and changing turn-on
altitudes for aircraft flying approaches
to DFW runways 17R, 17C, and 17L, and
runways 18R and 18L. The FAA
determined the procedural change
actions would ensure consistent
containment of large turbine-powered
aircraft within Class B airspace and
therefore is not pursuing this proposed
Class B airspace modification north of
DFW.
Nine comments were received about
the proposed lower Class B airspace
extension southeast of DAL, with seven
opposing the extension altogether and
one suggesting to raise the Class B
airspace floor for a segment of the
proposed extension. Six of the
commenters were concerned about
compression of VFR aircraft and the
lack of viable altitudes for bi-directional
VFR flight in an area frequently used by
VFR aircraft. Four of the commenters
argued that lowering the Class B
airspace extension would force Dallas
Executive Airport (RBD) and Lancaster
Regional Airport (LNC) departures
flying East and Northeast to remain at
low altitudes for extended distances
until clear of the extension; create a
narrow corridor between the towers
located at Cedar Hill (southwest of RBD)
and the proposed extension (southeast
of RBD) that student pilots flying out of
RBD would have to remain within; and
increase the potential for numerous
unintended incursions into the
proposed extension. Lastly, one
commenter highlighted increased noise
concerns with large turbine-powered
aircraft flying at lower altitudes inbound
to DAL, and one commenter contended
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
DAL was not a primary airport and the
associated instrument procedures were
not required to be contained within
Class B airspace.
While the FAA acknowledges the
commenters’ concerns, the lower Class
B airspace floors southeast of DAL are
necessary to contain the existing large
turbine-powered aircraft flying DAL
instrument procedures in use today
within Class B airspace. Lowering a
portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area C) southeast of DAL between 15–
NM and 20–NM of the Point of Origin
from 2,500 feet MSL to 2,000 feet MSL,
as well as a portion of existing Class B
airspace (Area E) southeast of DAL
between 20–NM and 25–NM of the
Point of Origin, as proposed, would
mitigate the commenters’ concerns as
much as possible while still containing
large turbine-powered aircraft within
Class B airspace. However, comments
are invited on this proposal.
The FAA also acknowledges that
compression issues may result where
pilots elect to fly below the floor of
Class B airspace. The Dallas/Fort Worth
terminal area encompasses not only the
FAA’s fourth busiest airport (with over
686,000 airport operations in CY 2011),
but also DAL in close proximity (with
over 179,000 airport operations in CY
2011). Plus, there are numerous other
airports situated in and around the
Dallas/Fort Worth terminal area that
contribute to the complex, high density
airspace environment containing a very
diverse mix of aircraft types and
aviation activities. Currently, large
turbine-powered aircraft and VFR
aircraft are flying simultaneously in the
same airspace. It is an essential safety
requirement to segregate the DFW and
DAL traffic from the non-participating
VFR aircraft that may not be in
communication with ATC.
Consequently, some non-participating
VFR aircraft may have to fly a little
further, or at different altitudes, in order
to remain clear of the proposed Class B
airspace area. Ultimately, it is the pilot’s
responsibility to evaluate all factors that
could affect a planned flight and
determine the safest course of action
whether it should be circumnavigating
the Class B airspace, flying beneath the
Class B airspace, utilizing a charted VFR
flyway, or requesting Class B clearance
from the Dallas/Fort Worth Terminal
Radar Approach Control (TRACON).
Seven commenters objected to
lowering a portion of existing Class B
airspace (Area D) northeast of DFW
between 10–NM and 13–NM of the
Point of Origin from 3,000 feet MSL to
2,500 feet MSL to establish a proposed
Class B airspace Area F. The
commenters again noted increased noise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
and flight safety concerns associated
with a lower Class B airspace floor
based on large turbine-powered jets
flying lower and a portion of the ADS
Class D airspace area being reduced 500
feet. One commenter was concerned the
lower Class B airspace shelf would
negatively impact flights into both ADS
and DAL. Another commenter argued
that the proposed lower Class B airspace
northeast of DFW provided only a 500
foot clearance between the floor of the
Class B airspace and the JERIT final
approach fix of the runway 15 ILS
approach to ADS; highlighting that this
minimal altitude separation jeopardized
IFR traffic in both airspaces.
The FAA considered the Ad Hoc
Committee’s recommendation to reduce
the size of this proposed subarea (Area
F), as discussed previously, and defined
the outer boundary so the proposed
subarea would not overlay the entire
ADS Class D airspace area. The proposal
retains the proposed 2,500 foot MSL
floor, but reduces the lateral size of the
proposed subarea (Area F) by adjusting
the outer boundary to match the 13–NM
arc of the adjacent existing Class B
airspace (Area B) segment located north
of DFW. The proposed Class B airspace
subarea (Area F) presented at the
informal airspace meetings would be
established with a 2,500 foot MSL floor
between the 10–NM and 13–NM arcs
from the Point of Origin and the
adjacent existing Class B airspace (Area
B) segments. The existing Class B
airspace located northeast of DFW
outside the 13–NM arc from the Point of
Origin would remain unchanged. As
previously mentioned, the proposed
Class B airspace (Area F) would
continue to support VFR aircraft
ingressing and egressing ADS from/to
the East without compression and
would contain the large turbinepowered aircraft currently flying the
instrument procedures to DAL runways
13R and 13L within Class B airspace. No
adjustments or changes to existing
traffic flows, traffic patterns, or assigned
altitudes are anticipated as a result of
this proposed Class B subarea. It is not
expected that there would be an
increase in noise or loss of flight safety
associated with lower flying aircraft as
a result of this proposal. Additionally,
aircraft arriving and departing ADS
would continue to be able to use
existing landmarks. Further, aircraft
operating in the ADS Class D and DFW
Class B airspace areas northeast of DFW
would continue to be positively
controlled and required to be in contact
with ATC (ADS control tower, DAL
control tower, or DFW TRACON) using
existing frequency procedures. This
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4359
positive control and communication
requirement would ensure established
separation standards are applied and
flight safety is not compromised.
As mentioned before, to overcome
potential confusion, unintentional
airspace incursions, or perceived flight
safety issues associated with the ADS
Class D airspace area having two
different ceilings, the FAA is also
considering amending the ADS Class D
airspace with a single ceiling, ‘‘to but
not including 2,500 feet MSL,’’ as a
separate airspace action. Consideration
of this amendment would not affect VFR
aircraft ingressing and egressing ADS
from/to the East, VFR aircraft
circumnavigating Class B airspace, or
large turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument procedures to/from DAL.
Two comments recommended the
FAA consider incorporating the sliver of
existing Class B airspace (Area B)
located southwest and south of ADS
[north of DAL] with a 2,000 foot MSL
floor into the proposed Class B airspace
subarea (Area F) northeast of DFW with
a 2,500 foot MSL floor. The commenters
offered that inclusion of the sliver of
existing Class B airspace into a larger
proposed Class B airspace extension
northeast of DFW would reduce the
complexity of Class B airspace in that
area, as well as reduce the associated
chart clutter.
Including the sliver of existing Class
B airspace (Area B) that has a 2,000 foot
MSL floor into the proposed Area F
with a 2,500 foot MSL floor would be
counterproductive to the FAA’s efforts
to ensure large turbine-powered aircraft
flying instrument procedures would be
contained within Class B airspace. The
sliver of existing Class B airspace (Area
B) is necessary to contain aircraft
descending to 2,000 feet MSL for a 6–
NM to 8–NM left base for turn-on to
intercept the DAL ILS/RNAV/RNP
approaches to runways 13R and 13L.
This tight turn-on, from 2,000 feet MSL,
to DAL is necessary to remain clear of
air traffic landing at DFW on runway
17L.
Conversely, lowering the proposed
Class B airspace (Area F) northeast of
DFW to reflect a 2,000 foot MSL floor
to match the sliver of existing Class B
airspace (Area B), to overcome chart
clutter and airspace complexity
concerns, would be inappropriate as it
would incorporate more airspace in the
Class B airspace configuration than is
necessary. Therefore, the FAA is not
proposing any amendment to the sliver
of existing Class B airspace (Area B)
discussed above.
One commenter challenged the
necessity of lowering the airspace
extensions northwest of DFW and
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
4360
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
southeast of DAL to contain the
instrument procedures for DFW and
DAL since the areas extend beyond the
reliable ILS service volume distance of
18–NM as addressed in the Aeronautical
Information Manual (paragraph 1–1–9).
The proposed Class B airspace
extension southeast of DAL actually
overlaps the ILS Localizer service area
volumes supporting DAL runways 31R
and 31L. The ILS Localizer service
volumes supporting DFW runways 13R
and 13L extend out the standard 18–
NM; however, simultaneous ILS
approach operations to those runways
require the aircraft being turned onto
parallel final approach courses be
separated by 3 miles longitudinally, or
1,000 feet vertically until they are
established on the final approach
course. As such, the Class B airspace
extension northwest of DFW was
proposed with the minimum amount of
airspace necessary to contain the large
turbine-powered aircraft flying the
procedures within Class B airspace.
One commenter opposed lowering a
portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area G) located northwest of DFW from
5,000 feet MSL to the proposed 4,000
feet MSL, stating that the lower Class B
airspace would force transient nonparticipating VFR aircraft to fly closer to
multiple 3,000 foot towers located just
northwest of the DFW Class B airspace
area.
The multiple 3,000 foot towers
addressed by the commenter are located
approximately 12–NM outside the
nearest Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area boundary. The nearest
existing Class B airspace subarea (Area
F) to these towers has a 4,000 foot MSL
floor and is not affected by this action.
Lowering a portion of existing Class B
airspace (Area G) from 5,000 feet MSL
to 4,000 feet MSL would also not affect
any VFR aircraft operating in the
vicinity of the towers.
Lastly, one comment was received
stating that unless additional data could
be provided, the 11,000 foot MSL
ceiling of the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area was not needed. The
commenter recommended the FAA take
note of other busy terminal airspace
areas that do not use such a high ceiling;
using the New York City Class B and
Boston Class B airspaces with 7,000 foot
MSL ceilings as examples. The
commenter further determined that the
DFW Class B airspace area could safely
operate with a ceiling of 8,500 feet MSL
and argued this would have a positive
impact on all airspace users by
decongesting air traffic control
frequencies and permitting nonparticipating VFR pilots to transition the
DFW Class B airspace area without the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
need to contact the Dallas/Fort Worth
TRACON.
Although other locations have Class B
airspace ceilings lower than the Dallas/
Fort Worth Class B airspace area, Class
B airspace dimensions are individually
tailored to meet site-specific
requirements. The Class B airspace area
proposed in this action is the minimum
amount of airspace necessary to contain
large turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument arrival and departure
procedures within Class B airspace.
Additionally, the existing 10,000 foot/
11,000 foot MSL Dallas/Fort Worth
Class B airspace ceiling was established
in 1996 (61 FR 47815) to accommodate
arriving aircraft using standard
instrument arrival routes and departing
aircraft using standard instrument
departure routes into and out of the
DFW Metroplex area. Lowering the
Class B airspace area ceilings would mix
the large turbine-powered aircraft flying
on the eight primary arrival and sixteen
departure routes to and from DFW and
DAL, transitioning between the en route
and terminal airspace environments,
with the uncontrolled VFR aircraft
transiting over the top of the Class B
airspace area. By keeping the Dallas/
Fort Worth Class B airspace ceilings
unchanged at 10,000 feet/11,000 feet
MSL, the FAA is able to provide
positive control to IFR aircraft arriving
and departing DFW and DAL and the
VFR aircraft that have obtained Class B
airspace clearances from the nonparticipating VFR aircraft transiting in
the vicinity of the Class B airspace area.
Having VFR aircraft that are not in
communication with ATC operating in
this terminal airspace area reduces the
margin of safety in the high volume
airspace surrounding the FAA’s fourth
busiest airport. For these reasons, the
FAA is not proposing to change the
Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area
ceilings.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify
the Dallas/Fort Worth, TX, Class B
airspace area. This action (depicted on
the attached chart) proposes to lower
the northern portion of existing Area G
located northwest of DFW to 4,000 feet
MSL, lower a portion of existing Area D
located northeast of DFW between the
10–NM and 13–NM arcs from the Point
of Origin to 2,500 feet MSL, lower
approximately the southern half of
existing Area C located southeast of
DAL to 2,000 feet MSL, lower a portion
of existing Area E located southeast of
DAL between the 20–NM and 25–NM
arcs from the Point of Origin to 3,000
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
feet MSL, and redefine the northern
boundary of the Class B airspace area
using the Ray Roberts Lake dam. The
Class B airspace ceiling would remain
unchanged. These proposed
modifications to the Dallas/Fort Worth
Class B airspace area would provide the
minimum airspace necessary to contain
the existing large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument procedures to
and from DFW and DAL within the
confines of Class B airspace.
Except for existing Area A, which
extends upward from the surface to and
including 11,000 feet MSL within an
area surrounding the point of origin,
DFW, and DAL, the proposed
descriptions of all other subareas that
make up the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area would be reconfigured, redescribed, and realigned by geographic
position in relation to the point of
origin, rather than the previous practice
of combining geographically separate
areas that share a common altitude floor
into one large, complex subarea
description. The current Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace area consists of
eight subareas (A through H) while the
proposed configuration would consist of
fourteen subareas (A through N). The
proposed revisions to the Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace area, by subarea,
are outlined below.
Area A. Area A is the surface area that
extends from the surface up to 11,000
feet MSL. The FAA is not proposing any
changes to Area A.
Area B. Area B extends upward from
2,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area B that is located north,
west, and south of DFW. The FAA is not
proposing any changes to this portion of
that Class B airspace.
Area C. Area C extends upward from
2,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area B that is located east of
DFW. The FAA is not proposing any
changes to this portion of that Class B
airspace.
Area D. Area D is a new area
extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL
to 11,000 feet MSL located southeast of
DAL from the Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE)
117°T/111°M radial clockwise to the
129°T/123°M bearing from the Point of
Origin and between 15–NM and 20–NM
of the Point of Origin. This new area
would lower a portion of Class B
airspace contained in the current Area
C, south of the CVE 117°T/111°M radial,
by 500 feet to overcome the issue of
aircraft arriving DAL runways 31R and
31L from the southeast exiting the
bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with
a 2,500 foot MSL floor and then
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
reentering the side of the Class B
airspace surface area.
Area E. Area E extends upward from
2,500 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area C that is not incorporated
in the new Area D described above. The
FAA is not proposing any changes to
this Class B airspace.
Area F. Area F is a new area
extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL
to 11,000 feet MSL located northeast of
DFW from the 023°T/017°M bearing
from the Point of Origin clockwise to
Interstate I–635 and between 10–NM
and 13–NM of the Point of Origin. This
new area would lower a portion of Class
B airspace contained in the current Area
D, northeast of DFW, by 500 feet to
overcome the issue of aircraft arriving
DAL runways 13R and 13L from the
northeast exiting the bottom of the Class
B airspace shelf with a 3,000 foot MSL
floor, flying through the ADS Class D
airspace area, and then reentering the
side of the Class B airspace shelf with
a 2,000 foot MSL floor or the side of the
Class B airspace surface area.
Area G. Area G extends upward from
3,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area D that is located south of
DFW. The FAA is not proposing any
changes to this portion of that Class B
airspace.
Area H. Area H extends upward from
3,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area D that is located north of
DFW and not incorporated in the new
Area F described above. The FAA is not
proposing any changes to this Class B
airspace.
Area I. Area I is a new area extending
upward from 3,000 feet MSL to 11,000
feet MSL located southeast of DAL from
the Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE) 117°T/
111°M radial clockwise to the 129°T/
123°M bearing from the Point of Origin
between 20–NM and 25–NM of the
Point of Origin. This new area would
lower a portion of Class B airspace
contained in the current Area E by 1,000
feet to overcome the issue of aircraft
arriving DAL runways 31R and 31L
from the southeast exiting the bottom of
the Class B airspace shelf with a 4,000
foot MSL floor and then reentering the
side of the Class B airspace shelf with
a 2,500 foot MSL floor.
Area J. Area J extends upward from
4,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area E with an extension
northwest of DFW that would include a
portion of Class B airspace contained in
the current Area G, northwest of the
311°T/305°M bearing from the Point of
Origin. This new area would overcome
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
the issue of aircraft arriving DFW
runways 13R and 13L from the
northwest exiting the bottom of the
Class B airspace shelf with a 5,000 foot
MSL floor and then reentering the side
of the Class B airspace shelf with a
4,000 foot MSL floor.
Area K. Area K extends upward from
4,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area F that is located south of
DFW. The FAA is not proposing any
changes to this portion of that Class B
airspace.
Area L. Area L extends upward from
4,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area F that is located north of
DFW. The FAA is proposing to extend
the northern boundary further north,
parallel to the existing boundary, to
intercept the southern-most point of the
Ray Roberts Lake dam for visual
reference.
Area M. Area M extends upward from
5,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the remaining portion of Class B
airspace contained in the current Area
G that is not incorporated in the new
Area J described above. The FAA is not
proposing any changes to this Class B
airspace.
Area N. Area N extends upward from
6,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet MSL in
the Class B airspace contained in the
current Area H. The FAA is not
proposing any changes to this Class B
airspace.
Finally, this proposed action would
update the DFW airport reference point
(ARP) coordinates and includes the
Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE) navigation aid
information in the Class B airspace legal
description to reflect current National
Airspace System data.
Implementation of these proposed
modifications to the Dallas/Fort Worth
Class B airspace area would ensure the
containment of instrument procedures
and large turbine-powered aircraft flying
those procedures within Class B
airspace, as required by FAA directives,
and enhance the efficient use of the
airspace, the management of aircraft
operations, and flight safety in the DFW
and DAL terminal area.
All radials listed in the Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace description in
this NPRM are stated in degrees relative
to both True North and Magnetic North.
Additionally, all geographic coordinates
for this proposed action are stated in
degrees, minutes, and seconds based on
North American Datum 83.
Class B airspace areas are published
in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order
7400.9W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012,
and effective September 15, 2012, which
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4361
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
section 71.1. The Class B airspace area
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. We
have determined that there is no new
information collection requirement
associated with this NPRM.
Regulatory Evaluation Summary
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 directs that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Public Law 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, the Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this proposed rule.
Department of Transportation Order
DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and
procedures for simplification, analysis,
and review of regulations. If the
expected cost impact is so minimal that
a proposed or final rule does not
warrant a full evaluation, this order
permits that a statement to that effect
and the basis for it be included in the
preamble if a full regulatory evaluation
of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for
this proposed rule. The reasoning for
this determination follows:
This action proposes to modify the
DFW Class B airspace area to ensure the
containment of large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument procedures to
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
4362
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
and from the Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport and Dallas Love
Field Airport within Class B airspace,
reduce controller workload, and reduce
the potential for near midair collision in
the DFW terminal area. It lowers the
Class B airspace floor in some sections
to encompass existing IFR traffic.
Lowering the floor of the Class B
airspace would increase safety by
segregating large turbine-powered
aircraft from aircraft that may not be in
contact with ATC. It would reduce air
traffic controller workload by reducing
the number of radio communications
that air traffic controllers must use to
inform IFR aircraft when they are
leaving and re-entering Class B airspace.
This would reduce the amount of
distraction that air traffic controllers
face in issuing these communications
and free radio time for more important
control instructions. IFR traffic would
not be rerouted as a result of this
proposal.
The proposed airspace restructuring
would result in safety benefits and
increased operational efficiencies. This
rule would enhance safety by reducing
the number of aircraft entering, exiting,
and reentering Class B airspace and
consequently reducing air traffic
controller workload and radio frequency
congestion. By expanding the Class B
airspace area where aircraft are subject
to certain operating rules and
equipment requirements it would also
reduce the potential for midair
collisions. The proposed modification of
the Class B airspace would provide
operational advantages as well by
establishing necessary airspace for
controllers to sequence aircraft within
Class B airspace and thereby reducing
the need for controllers to vector
arrivals and departures to avoid
nonparticipating traffic. The change
may cause some VFR pilots to have to
choose between flying below Class B
airspace, circumnavigating the Class B
airspace area, or requesting Class B
clearance to transition the area. This has
the potential of increasing costs to VFR
operations if the alternative routes are
longer, take more time and burn more
fuel. However, due to the specific
restructuring we do not anticipate that
VFR flights would have to travel far to
circumnavigate the new proposed Class
B airspace.
The FAA expects an increase in
safety, some operational efficiencies
from the larger Class B airspace offset
slightly by possible VFR re-routings
resulting in minimal cost overall. The
proposal would not require updating of
materials outside the normal update
cycle, and would not require rerouting
of IFR traffic. The expected outcome
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
would be a minimal impact with
positive net benefits, and a regulatory
evaluation was not prepared. The FAA
requests comments with supporting
justification about the FAA
determination of minimal impact.
The FAA has, therefore, determined
that this proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, and is not ‘‘significant’’ as
defined in DOT’s Regulatory Policies
and Procedures.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
The proposed rule is expected to
improve safety and efficiency by
redefining Class B airspace boundaries
and would impose only minimal costs
because it would not require rerouting
of IFR traffic, could possibly cause some
VFR aircraft to travel alternative routes
that are not expected to be appreciably
longer than with the current airspace
design, and would not require updating
of materials outside the normal update
cycle. Therefore, the expected outcome
would be a minimal economic impact
on small entities affected by this
rulemaking action.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Therefore, the FAA certifies this
proposed rule, if promulgated, would
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The FAA solicits comments regarding
this determination. Specifically, the
FAA requests comments on whether the
proposed rule creates any specific
compliance costs unique to small
entities. Please provide detailed
economic analysis to support any cost
claims. The FAA also invites comments
regarding other small entity concerns
with respect to the proposed rule.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this proposed rule
and determined that it would have only
a domestic impact and therefore no
effect on international trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$143.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
This proposed rule does not contain
such a mandate; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not
apply.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Class B airspace.
*
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Paragraph 3000
*
*
*
*
ASW TX B Dallas/Fort Worth, TX
[Amended]
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
(Primary Airport)
(Lat. 32°53′49″ N., long. 97°02′17″ W.)
Point of Origin
(Lat. 32°51′57″ N., long. 97°01′41″ W.)
Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE)
(Lat. 32°53′25″ N., long. 96°54′14″ W.)
Boundaries.
Area A. That airspace extending upward
from the surface to and including 11,000 feet
MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 10–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and Josey
Lane at lat. 32°59′08″ N., long. 96°53′26″ W.,
thence southbound along Josey Lane to
intersect Forest Lane at lat. 32°54′34″ N.,
long. 96°52′54″ W., thence eastbound along
Forest Lane to intersect the 15–NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°54′33″ N.,
long. 96°44′07″ W., thence clockwise along
the 15–NM radius to intersect the 129°T/
123M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°42′29″ N., long. 96°47′52″ W., thence
northwest along the 129°T/123°M bearing to
intersect I–30 at lat. 32°46′04″ N., long.
96°53′07″ W., thence west along I–30 to
intersect the 7–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°45′34″ N., long. 97°05′07″
W., thence clockwise along the 7–NM radius
to intersect the 310°T/304°M bearing from
the Point of Origin at lat. 32°56′27″ N., long.
97°08′03″ W., thence northwest along the
310°T/304°M bearing to intersect the 10–NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°58′23″ N., long. 97°10′47″ W., thence
clockwise along the 10–NM radius to the
point of beginning.
Area B. That airspace extending upward
from 2,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 10–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and the
310°T/304°M bearing from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°58′23″ N., long. 97°10′47″
W., thence southeast along the 310°T/304°M
bearing to intersect the 7–NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32°56′27″ N., long.
97°08′03″ W., thence counterclockwise along
the 7–NM radius to intersect I–30 at lat.
32°45′34″ N., long. 97°05′07″ W., thence east
along I–30 to intersect the 129°T/123°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°46′04″ N., long. 96°53′07″ W., thence
southeast on the 129°T/123°M bearing to
intersect the 10–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°45′38″ N., long. 96°52′28″
W., thence clockwise along the 10–NM
radius to intersect SH–303 at lat. 32°42′23″
N., long. 96°58′18″ W., thence west along
SH–303 to intersect the 10–NM radius from
the Point of Origin at lat. 32°42′29″ N., long.
97°05′30″ W., thence clockwise along the 10–
NM radius to intersect the 300°T/294°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°56′57″ N., long. 97°11′58″ W., thence
northwest along the 300°T/294°M bearing to
intersect the 13–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°58′27″ N., long. 97°15′04″
W., thence clockwise along the 13–NM
radius to intersect the 023°T/017°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33°03′56″ N.,
long. 96°55′38″ W., thence southwest along
the 023°T/017°M bearing to intersect the 10–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°01′10″ N., long. 96°57′02″ W., thence
counterclockwise along the 10–NM radius to
the point of beginning.
Area C. That airspace extending upward
from 2,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 10–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and Josey
Lane at lat. 32°59′08″ N., long. 96°53′26″ W.,
thence southbound along Josey Lane to
intersect Forest Lane at lat. 32°54′34″ N.,
long. 96°52′54″ W., thence eastbound along
Forest Lane to intersect the 15–NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°54′33″ N.,
long. 96°44′07″ W., thence counter-clockwise
along the 15–NM radius to intersect I–635 at
lat. 32°54′42″ N., long. 96°44′09″ W., thence
west along I–635 to intersect the 10–NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°55′25″ N., long. 96°50′32″ W., thence
counterclockwise along the 10–NM radius to
the Point of beginning.
Area D. That airspace extending from 2,000
feet MSL up to and including 11,000 feet
MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the CVE
117°T/111°M radial and the 15–NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°49′06″ N.,
long. 96°44′12″ W., thence clockwise along
the 15–NM radius to intersect the 129°T/
123°M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°42′29″ N., long. 96°47′52″ W., thence
southeast along the 129°T/123°M bearing to
intersect the 20 NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°39′19″ N., long. 96°43′16″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 20–
NM radius to intersect the CVE 117°T/111°M
radial at lat. 32°46′45″ N., long. 96°38′46″ W.,
thence northwest along the CVE 117°T/
111°M radial to the point of beginning.
Area E. That airspace extending upward
from 2,500 feet MSL to and including 11,000
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4363
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of I–635 and the
15–NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°54′42″ N., long. 96°44′09″ W., thence
clockwise along the 15–NM radius to
intersect the CVE 117°T/111°M radial at lat.
32°49′06″ N., long. 96°44′12″ W., thence
southeast along the CVE 117°T/111°M radial
to intersect the 20–NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 32°46′45″ N., long. 96°38′46″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 20–
NM radius to intersect I–635 at lat. 32°50′40″
N., long. 96°38′03″ W., thence northwest
along I–635 to the point of beginning.
Area F. That airspace extending upward
from 2,500 feet MSL, to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 023°T/
017°M bearing from the Point of Origin and
the 13–NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 33°03′56″ N., long. 96°55′38″ W.,
thence clockwise along the 13–NM radius to
intersect I–635 at lat. 32°55′26″ N., long.
96°46′ 49″ W., thence west along I–635 to
intersect the 10–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°55′25″ N., long. 96°50′32″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 10–
NM radius to intersect the 023°T/017°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°01′10″ N., long. 96°57′02″ W., thence
northeast along the 023°T/017°M bearing to
the point of beginning.
Area G. That airspace extending upward
from 3,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 300°T/
294°M bearing from the Point of Origin and
the 10–NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32°56′57″ N., long. 97°11′58″ W.,
thence counterclockwise along the 10–NM
radius to intersect SH–303 at lat. 32°42′29″
N., long. 97°05′30″ W., thence east along SH–
303 to intersect the 10–NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32°42′23″ N., long.
96°58′18″ W., thence counterclockwise along
the 10–NM radius to intersect the 129°T/
123°M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°45′38″ N., long. 96°52′28″ W., thence
southeast along the 129°T/123°M bearing to
intersect the 20–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°39′19″ N., long. 96°43′16″
W., thence clockwise along the 20–NM
radius to intersect the 217°T/211°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°35′56″ N.,
long. 97°15′56″ W., thence northeast along
the 217°T/211°M bearing to intersect the 13–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°41′32″ N., long. 97°10′57″ W., thence
clockwise along the 13–NM radius to
intersect the 300°T/294°M bearing from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32°58′27″ N., long.
97°15′04″ W., thence southeast along the
300°T/294°M bearing to the point of
beginning.
Area H. That airspace extending upward
from 3,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 13–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and the
300°T/294°M bearing from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°58′27″ N., long. 97°15′04″
W., thence northwest along the 300°T/294°M
bearing to intersect the 20–NM radius from
the Point of Origin at lat. 33°01′56″ N., long.
97°22′17″ W., thence clockwise along the 20–
NM radius to intersect I–635 at lat. 32°50′40″
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
4364
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
N., long. 96°38′03″ W., thence northwest
along I–635 to intersect the 13–NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°55′26″ N.,
long. 96°46′49″ W., thence counterclockwise
along the 13–NM radius to the point of
beginning.
Area I. That airspace extending upward
from 3,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 20–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and the
129°T/123°M bearing from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°39′19″ N., long. 96°43′16″
W., thence southeast along the 129°T/123°M
bearing to intersect the 25–NM radius from
the Point of Origin at lat. 32°36′09″ N., long.
96°38′41″ W., thence counterclockwise along
the 25–NM radius to intersect the CVE
117°T/111°M radial at lat. 32°44′25″ N., long.
96°33′24″ W., thence northwest along the
CVE 117°T/111°M radial to intersect the 20–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°46′45″ N., long. 96°38′46″ W., thence
clockwise along the 20–NM radius to the
point of beginning.
Area J. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 217°T/
211°M bearing from the Point of Origin and
the 20–NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32°35′56″ N., long. 97°15′56″ W.,
thence counterclockwise along the 20–NM
radius to intersect the 129°T/123°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°39′19″ N.,
long. 96°43′16″ W., thence southeast along
the 129°T/123°M bearing to intersect the 25–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°36′09″ N., long. 96°38′41″ W., thence
counterclockwise along the 25–NM radius to
intersect the CVE 117°T/111°M radial at lat.
32°44′25″ N., long. 96°33′24″ W., thence
northwest along the CVE 117°T/111°M radial
to intersect the 20–NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 32°46′45″ N., long. 96°38′46″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 20–
NM radius to intersect the 300°T/294°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°01′56″ N., long. 97°22′17″ W., thence
southeast along the 300°T/294°M bearing to
intersect the 13–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°58′27″ N., long. 97°15′04″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 13–
NM radius to intersect the 217°T/211°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°41′32″ N., long. 97°10′57″ W., thence
southwest along the 217°T/211°M bearing to
intersect the 20–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°35′56″ N., long. 97°15′56″
W., thence clockwise along the 20–NM
radius to intersect I–20 at lat. 32°39′56″ N.,
long. 97°20′39″ W., thence west along I–20 to
intersect I–820 at lat. 32°41′51″ N., long.
97°28′14″ W., thence north along I–820 to
intersect the 23–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°46′46″ N., long. 97°28′17″
W., thence clockwise along the 23–NM
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
radius to intersect the 311°T/305°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33°07′02″ N.,
long. 97°22′21″ W., thence northwest along
the 311°T/305°M bearing to intersect the 30–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°11′37″ N., long. 97°28′40″ W., thence
clockwise along the 30–NM radius to
intersect the 315°T/309°M bearing from the
Point of Origin at lat. 33°13′10″ N., long.
97°26′58″ W., thence east to the intersection
of the 041°T/035°M bearing of the Point of
Origin and the 30–NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 33°14′36″ N., long. 96°38′13″
W., thence clockwise along the 30–NM
radius to intersect the 138°T/132°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°29′34″ N.,
long. 96°37′57″ W., thence west to the
intersection of the 217°T/211°M bearing from
the Point of Origin and the 28.3 NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°29′17″ N.,
long. 97°21′49″ W., thence northeast along
the 217°T/211°M bearing to the point of
beginning.
Area K. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 138°T/
132°M bearing from the Point of Origin and
the 30–NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32°29′34″ N., long. 96°37′57″ W.,
thence clockwise along the 30–NM radius to
intersect the 149°T/143°M bearing from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32°26′10″ N., long.
96°43′26″ W., thence west to the intersection
of the 210°T/204°M bearing from the Point of
Origin and the 30–NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 32°25′54″ N., long. 97°19′24″
W., thence clockwise along the 30–NM
radius to intersect the 217°T/211°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32°27′55″ N.,
long. 97°23′01″ W., thence northeast along
the 217°T/211°M bearing to intersect the
28.3–NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32°29′17″ N., long. 97°21′49″ W., thence
east to the point of beginning.
Area L. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 315°T/
309°M bearing from the Point of Origin and
the 30–NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 33°13′10″ N., long. 97°26′58″ W.,
thence clockwise along the 30–NM radius to
the intersection of the 30–NM radius from
the Point of Origin and the 344°T/338°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°20′50″ N., long. 97°11′33″ W., thence east
to the intersection of the 012°T/006°M
bearing from the Point of Origin and the 30–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°21′21″ N., long. 96°54′14″ W., thence
clockwise along the 30–NM radius to
intersect the 041°T/035°M bearing from the
Point of Origin at lat. 33°14′36″ N., long.
96°38′13″ W., thence west to the point of
beginning.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Area M. That airspace extending upward
from 5,000 feet MSL up to and including
11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by
a line beginning at the intersection of the
311°T/305°M bearing from the Point of
Origin and the 30–NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 33°11′37″ N., long. 97°28′40″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 30–
NM radius to intersect the 293°T/287°M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
33°03′37″ N., long. 97°34′32″ W., thence
southeast along the 293°T/287°M bearing to
intersect the 26–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°02′04″ N., long. 97°30′09″
W., thence counterclockwise along the 26–
NM radius to intersect SH–377 at lat.
32°39′49″ N., long. 97°28′58″ W., thence
southwest along SH–377 to intersect the 30–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°36′56″ N., long. 97°32′26″ W., thence
counterclockwise along the 30–NM radius to
intersect the 217°T/211°M bearing from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32°27′55″ N., long.
97°23′01″ W., thence northeast along the
217°T/211°M bearing to intersect the 20–NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°35′56″ N., long. 97°15′56″ W., thence
clockwise along the 20–NM radius to
intersect I–20 at lat. 32°39′56″ N., long.
97°20′38″ W., thence west along I–20 to
intersect I–820 at lat. 32°41′51″ N., long.
97°28′14″ W., thence north along I–820 to
intersect the 23–NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32°46′46″ N., long. 97°28′17″
W., thence clockwise along the 23–NM
radius to intersect the 311°T/305°M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33°07′02″ N.,
long. 97°22′21″ W., thence northwest along
the 311°T/305°M bearing to the point of
beginning.
Area N. That airspace extending upward
from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 11,000
feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 30–NM
radius from the Point of Origin and the
293°T/287°M bearing from the Point of
Origin at lat. 33°03′37″ N., long. 97°34′32″
W., thence southeast along the 293°T/287°M
bearing to intersect the 26–NM radius from
the Point of Origin at lat. 33°02′04″ N., long.
97°30′09″ W., thence counterclockwise along
the 26–NM radius to intersect SH–377 at lat.
32°39′49″ N., long. 97°28″ 58″ W., thence
southwest along SH- 377 to intersect the 30–
NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32°36′56″ N., long. 97°32′26″ W., thence
clockwise along the 30–NM radius to the
point of beginning.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
12, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Air Traffic
Control Procedures Group.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 240
[Release No. 34–68660; File No. S7–08–12]
RIN 3235–AL12
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Capital, Margin, and Segregation
Requirements for Security-Based
Swap Dealers and Major SecurityBased Swap Participants and Capital
Requirements for Broker-Dealers
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On November 23, 2012, the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) published in the
Federal Register a proposed rule for
public comment to establish capital,
margin, and segregation requirements
for security-based swap dealers and
major security-based swap participants
under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) and amend
capital requirements for broker-dealers.
The Commission is extending the time
period in which to provide the
Commission with comments.
SUMMARY:
Comments should be received on
or before February 22, 2013.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
EP22JA13.001
[FR Doc. 2013–01118 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am]
4365
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4356-4365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01118]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1168; Airspace Docket No. 07-AWA-3]
RIN 2120-AA66
Proposed Modification of the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B Airspace
Area; TX
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the Dallas/Fort Worth, TX,
Class B airspace area to ensure containment of large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument procedures to and from the Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport (DFW) and Dallas Love Field Airport (DAL) within
Class B airspace. The FAA is proposing these actions to further support
its national airspace redesign goal of optimizing terminal and en route
airspace areas to enhance safety, improving the flow of air traffic,
and reducing the potential for near midair collision in the DFW
terminal area.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone: (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-
1168 and Airspace Docket No. 07-AWA-3 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, AJV-113, Office of Airspace Services, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2012-1168 and Airspace Docket No. 07-AWA-3) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Nos. FAA-2012-1168 and Airspace Docket No. 07-AWA-3.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRM's
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, Operations
Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort
Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-9677,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.
Background
In 1973, the FAA issued a final rule (38 FR 13635) which
established the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, Terminal Control Area (TCA)
around the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport, later renamed the Dallas/Fort
Worth International Airport (DFW), with an effective date of September
30, 1973. In 1993, the FAA issued the Airspace Reclassification final
rule (56 FR 65638), which replaced the term ``terminal control area''
with the term ``Class B airspace area.''
The primary purpose of Class B airspace is to reduce the potential
for midair collisions in the airspace surrounding airports with high
density air traffic operations by providing an area in which all
aircraft are subject to certain operating rules and equipment
requirements. FAA policy requires that Class B airspace areas be
designed to contain all instrument procedures and that air traffic
controllers vector aircraft to remain within Class B airspace after
entry. If it becomes necessary to extend the flight path outside Class
B airspace for spacing, controllers must inform the aircraft when
leaving and re-entering Class B airspace. However, in the interest of
safety, FAA policy dictates that such extensions be the exception
rather than the rule.
The configuration of the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area
has been modified five times since being established as a TCA, with the
last modification accomplished in 1996. In 1978, 1984, and 1986, the
FAA issued final rules (43 FR 17937, 49 FR 25424, and 51 FR 19749) to
fully contain large turbine-powered aircraft within TCA airspace as the
aircraft flew instrument procedures to and from DFW. In 1992, the FAA
issued a final rule (57 FR 166) that revoked the Airport Radar Service
Area surrounding DAL and incorporated the airport into the surface area
of the Dallas Fort-Worth TCA. The FAA determined the mix of small
propeller and high performance aircraft at lower altitudes around DAL
necessitated modifying the TCA design to include DAL within the TCA in
the interest of flight safety and that it would result in a greater
degree of protection for the greatest number of people during fight in
the DFW terminal area. In 1996, the FAA issued the last rule (61 FR
47815) modifying the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area. That rule
raised the upper limit of the Class B airspace area to 11,000 feet mean
sea level (MSL), except in the northern and southern portions of the
airspace area, and redefined several existing subareas to improve the
flow of aviation traffic and enhance safety in the Class B airspace
area while
[[Page 4357]]
accommodating the concerns of airspace users.
Since the last Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace modification in
1996, the air traffic operations into and out of both DFW and DAL have
changed dramatically due to increased traffic levels, a considerable
different fleet mix, updated instrument approach and departure
procedures, and airport infrastructure improvements. The Class B
airspace configuration has not kept pace with airport expansions and
increasing operations and the current design makes it difficult to
comply with FAA's policy to contain certain aircraft operations within
Class B airspace. For calendar years 2009, 2010, and 2011, DFW
documented 638,782; 652,258; and 646,803 total airport operations and
was rated 4th among all Commercial Service Airports with 26,663,984;
27,100,656; and 27,518,358 passenger enplanements each year,
respectively. During the same calendar year periods, DAL documented
172,962; 168,544; and 179,198 total airport operations.
Under the current Class B airspace configuration, aircraft
routinely enter, exit, and then re-enter Class B airspace while flying
published instrument approach procedures to DFW runway 13R, DAL runways
31R and 31L, and DAL runways 13R and 13L, which is contrary to FAA
Orders. Modeling of existing traffic flows has shown that the proposed
Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace modifications would enhance safety
by containing all instrument procedures, and associated traffic
patterns, at DFW and DAL within the confines of Class B airspace and
better segregate IFR aircraft arriving and departing DFW and DAL and
the VFR aircraft operating in the vicinity of the Dallas/Fort Worth
Class B airspace area. The proposed Class B airspace modifications
described in this NPRM are intended to address these issues.
Changes Needed to Existing Class B Airspace
The current Class B design does not fully contain large turbine-
powered aircraft flying instrument arrival procedures to DFW and DAL
once they have entered the airspace as required by FAA policy. With a
renewed safety emphasis on retaining all large turbine-powered aircraft
within the Class B airspace to avoid mixing with other aircraft that
are not in contact with Air Traffic Control (ATC), keeping those
aircraft within the existing Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace is not
always possible. For example, when operations are on a south flow,
arrivals to DFW runway 13R flying straight-in from Bowie, TX, routinely
exit the bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with a 5,000 foot MSL
floor and re-enter the side of the Class B airspace shelf with a 4,000
foot MSL floor. Approximately half of the arrivals to DAL runways 13R
and 13L from the northeast exit the bottom of the Class B airspace
shelf with a 3,000 foot MSL floor into the Addison, TX (ADS), Class D
airspace and re-enter the side of the Class B airspace shelf with a
2,000 foot MSL floor. When operations are on a north flow, aircraft
arrivals to DAL runways 31R and 31L flying straight-in from Cedar
Creek, TX, routinely exit the bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with
a 4,000 foot MSL floor and re-enter the side of the Class B airspace
shelf with a 2,500 foot MSL floor or the surface area, or they exit the
bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with a 2,500 foot MSL floor and
re-enter the side of the surface area.
Pre-NPRM Public Input
In January 2008, an Ad Hoc Committee was formed to provide comments
and recommendations for the FAA to consider in designing a proposed
modification to the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area. The
committee met three times between January and April, 2008, and
forwarded three recommendations to the FAA on May 16, 2008. The Ad Hoc
Committee membership consisted of representatives from the City of
Dallas-Department of Aviation, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
(AOPA), National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), Texas Soaring
Association, Skydive Dallas, American and Southwest Airlines, and
representatives from Addison Airport, TX (ADS); Lancaster Regional
Airport, TX (LNC); and Mesquite Metro Airport, TX (HQZ).
In addition, as announced in the Federal Register (73 FR 50258),
informal airspace meetings were held on November 3, 2008, at the
Lancaster Recreation Center, Lancaster, TX; on November 6, 2008, at the
Cavanaugh Flight Museum, Addison, TX; on November 13, 2008, at the
Denton Airport Terminal Building, Denton, TX; and on November 18, 2008,
at the Mesquite Airport Terminal Building, Mesquite, TX. The purpose of
these meetings was to provide interested airspace users with an
opportunity to present their views and offer suggestions regarding
planned modifications to the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area.
All substantive comments received as a result of the informal airspace
meetings and the recommendations made by the Ad Hoc Committee were
considered in developing this proposal.
Discussion of Recommendations and Comments
Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations
As a starting point for discussion, a preliminary Class B design
was presented to the Ad Hoc Committee for review. In general, the
preliminary design proposal consisted of lowering Class B airspace
subarea floors within portions of existing Class B airspace northwest,
north, and northeast of DFW and southeast of DAL to ensure containment
of large turbine-powered aircraft flying instrument procedures within
Class B airspace. Specifically, a portion of existing Class B airspace
(Area G) northwest of DFW was lowered 1,000 feet to support aircraft
flying instrument approaches to DFW runway 13R; portions of existing
Class B airspace (Areas D, E, & F) north of DFW were lowered 500 feet
to 1,000 feet to support aircraft flying instrument approaches to DFW
runways 17R, 17C, and 17L and runways 18R and 18L; a portion of
existing Class B airspace (Area D) northeast of DFW was lowered 500
feet to support aircraft flying instrument approaches to DAL runways
13R and 13L; and portions of existing Class B airspace (Areas C & E)
southeast of DAL were lowered 1,000 feet to 1,500 feet to support
aircraft flying instrument approaches to DAL runways 31R and 31L. The
preliminary design also expanded the Class B airspace boundary north of
DFW to a 30 nautical mile (NM) radius of the Point of Origin, over the
Ray Roberts Lake, to contain aircraft within Class B airspace when DFW
is on a southerly landing flow. The Ad Hoc Committee submitted three
recommendations to the FAA regarding the proposed modifications of the
DFW Class B airspace area.
The Ad Hoc Committee was concerned with the proposed preliminary
design that lowered a portion of existing Class B airspace (Area E)
located southeast of DAL between 20-NM and 30-NM of the Point of Origin
from a 4,000 feet MSL floor to a 2,500 feet MSL floor. They stated
lowering the Class B airspace in this subarea to 2,500 feet MSL
compromised safety by compressing general aviation traffic attempting
to transit through that area. They recommended the FAA split this
proposed subarea into two sections and raise the Class B airspace
floors for one section to 3,000 feet MSL and the other to 4,000 feet
MSL with the boundary between the two determined by the point where
instrument approaches to the DAL runways 31R and 31L fall below 4,000
feet MSL.
[[Page 4358]]
The FAA accepted the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation to split the
proposed subarea and raise the Class B airspace floor altitude(s).
After reviewing the DAL runway 31R and 31L arrival flight tracks from
the southeast, the FAA determined a single, smaller Class B airspace
subarea with the floor altitude raised would contain the instrument
procedures and large turbine-powered aircraft flying the procedures
within Class B airspace. The proposed subarea (Area I) has been reduced
in size by half from the original design to only extend between 20-NM
and 25-NM from the Point of Origin with the floor raised from 2,500
feet MSL to 3,000 feet MSL. The FAA incorporated these proposal changes
to overcome the Ad Hoc Committee's safety concerns of compressing
general aviation aircraft flying in the area while still containing
aircraft flying the instrument approaches to DAL runways 31R and 31L
within Class B airspace.
The Ad Hoc Committee was also concerned with the design of existing
Class B airspace (Area D) northeast of DFW and directly over the ADS
Class D airspace area that was lowered from 3,000 feet MSL to 2,500
feet MSL. They commented that VFR aircraft entering and leaving the ADS
Class D airspace area would be unnecessarily compressed with these
changes and recommended the FAA determine an arc, parallel to the
existing 10-NM Class B airspace surface area arc, to define a smaller
Class B airspace subarea with a 2,500 foot MSL floor. They argued this
mitigation would retain the existing ceiling on the North and East side
of the ADS Class D airspace area and eliminate the possibility for the
compression noted above.
The FAA redefined the outer boundary of the proposed Class B
airspace subarea with an arc, parallel to the 10-NM arc of the Class B
surface area boundary, to prevent overlapping the entire ADS Class D
airspace area with a 2,500 foot MSL Class B airspace floor. The FAA
also reduced the size of the proposed subarea (Area F) by matching the
outer boundary with the 13-NM arc of the adjacent existing Class B
airspace (Area B) located north of DFW. The proposed Class B airspace
subarea (Area F) would be established with a 2,500 foot MSL floor
between the 10-NM and 13-NM arcs of the Point of Origin and the
adjacent existing Class B airspace (Area B) segments. The Class B
airspace located northeast of DFW outside the 13-NM arc from the Point
of Origin would remain unchanged with the existing 3,000 foot MSL
floor. Reducing the size of the proposed Class B airspace (Area F)
would continue to support VFR aircraft ingressing and egressing ADS
from/to the East without compression, as addressed by the Ad Hoc
Committee, and ensure large turbine-powered aircraft flying instrument
procedures to DAL runways 13R and 13L are contained within Class B
airspace.
Additionally, to overcome potential confusion, unintentional
airspace incursions, or perceived flight safety issues associated with
the ADS Class D airspace area having two different ceilings as a result
of this proposed action, the FAA is also considering amending the ADS
Class D airspace area with a single ceiling, ``to but not including
2,500 feet MSL,'' as a separate airspace action. Consideration of this
amendment action would not affect VFR aircraft ingressing and egressing
ADS from/to the East, as noted by the Ad Hoc Committee.
Lastly, the Ad Hoc Committee recommended the FAA use prominent
visual landmarks to depict boundaries and redefine the northern
boundary of the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area using the
southern shore and dam of the Ray Roberts Lake or the secondary road
that is adjacent to the lake. They reiterated the importance of new
Class B airspace boundaries being defined by prominent visual landmarks
for easy identification by non-participating VFR aircraft flying in the
vicinity of those boundaries.
The FAA agrees that using prominent landmarks, when available and
supportive, to describe Class B airspace boundaries enables non-
participant VFR aircraft to visually identify the boundaries and to
avoid unintended incursions into Class B airspace. As such, the
northern boundary described in the proposed Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area (new Area L) was changed from a 30-NM radius of the Point
of Origin, which extends over the Ray Roberts Lake, to a boundary that
is parallel to the existing northern boundary and intersects the
southern-most point of the Ray Roberts Lake dam for visual reference by
non-participating VFR aircraft.
Informal Airspace Meeting Comments
Thirty-three comments and one petition signed by forty-one
individuals addressed concerns with the Class B airspace extension
north of DFW, which was designed to protect aircraft flying approaches
from the north into DFW. The proposed extension involves lowering a
portion of one existing Class B airspace subarea (Area D) from 3,000
feet MSL to 2,500 feet MSL, as well as lowering a portion of the floors
in two other existing subareas (Areas E and F) from 4,000 feet MSL to
3,000 feet MSL over the Hidden Valley and Lakeview areas. The
commenters requested that the existing Class B airspace floor be
retained based on obstacle clearance issues with existing towers in the
area; increased noise and emissions associated with large turbine-
powered aircraft and VFR aircraft flying at lower altitudes over
residential areas; economic consequences to VFR aircraft based on
increased fuel burn associated with flying at lower altitudes or longer
distances to circumnavigate the new area; and safety implications
associated with increased numbers of aircraft at the lower, compressed
altitudes.
The FAA reviewed the proposed Class B airspace extension north of
DFW and alternatives available to contain the large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument procedures within Class B airspace. In lieu
of proposing to lower existing Class B airspace north of DFW as noted
above, the FAA initiated procedural changes, which included modifying
the instrument approach procedures and changing turn-on altitudes for
aircraft flying approaches to DFW runways 17R, 17C, and 17L, and
runways 18R and 18L. The FAA determined the procedural change actions
would ensure consistent containment of large turbine-powered aircraft
within Class B airspace and therefore is not pursuing this proposed
Class B airspace modification north of DFW.
Nine comments were received about the proposed lower Class B
airspace extension southeast of DAL, with seven opposing the extension
altogether and one suggesting to raise the Class B airspace floor for a
segment of the proposed extension. Six of the commenters were concerned
about compression of VFR aircraft and the lack of viable altitudes for
bi-directional VFR flight in an area frequently used by VFR aircraft.
Four of the commenters argued that lowering the Class B airspace
extension would force Dallas Executive Airport (RBD) and Lancaster
Regional Airport (LNC) departures flying East and Northeast to remain
at low altitudes for extended distances until clear of the extension;
create a narrow corridor between the towers located at Cedar Hill
(southwest of RBD) and the proposed extension (southeast of RBD) that
student pilots flying out of RBD would have to remain within; and
increase the potential for numerous unintended incursions into the
proposed extension. Lastly, one commenter highlighted increased noise
concerns with large turbine-powered aircraft flying at lower altitudes
inbound to DAL, and one commenter contended
[[Page 4359]]
DAL was not a primary airport and the associated instrument procedures
were not required to be contained within Class B airspace.
While the FAA acknowledges the commenters' concerns, the lower
Class B airspace floors southeast of DAL are necessary to contain the
existing large turbine-powered aircraft flying DAL instrument
procedures in use today within Class B airspace. Lowering a portion of
existing Class B airspace (Area C) southeast of DAL between 15-NM and
20-NM of the Point of Origin from 2,500 feet MSL to 2,000 feet MSL, as
well as a portion of existing Class B airspace (Area E) southeast of
DAL between 20-NM and 25-NM of the Point of Origin, as proposed, would
mitigate the commenters' concerns as much as possible while still
containing large turbine-powered aircraft within Class B airspace.
However, comments are invited on this proposal.
The FAA also acknowledges that compression issues may result where
pilots elect to fly below the floor of Class B airspace. The Dallas/
Fort Worth terminal area encompasses not only the FAA's fourth busiest
airport (with over 686,000 airport operations in CY 2011), but also DAL
in close proximity (with over 179,000 airport operations in CY 2011).
Plus, there are numerous other airports situated in and around the
Dallas/Fort Worth terminal area that contribute to the complex, high
density airspace environment containing a very diverse mix of aircraft
types and aviation activities. Currently, large turbine-powered
aircraft and VFR aircraft are flying simultaneously in the same
airspace. It is an essential safety requirement to segregate the DFW
and DAL traffic from the non-participating VFR aircraft that may not be
in communication with ATC. Consequently, some non-participating VFR
aircraft may have to fly a little further, or at different altitudes,
in order to remain clear of the proposed Class B airspace area.
Ultimately, it is the pilot's responsibility to evaluate all factors
that could affect a planned flight and determine the safest course of
action whether it should be circumnavigating the Class B airspace,
flying beneath the Class B airspace, utilizing a charted VFR flyway, or
requesting Class B clearance from the Dallas/Fort Worth Terminal Radar
Approach Control (TRACON).
Seven commenters objected to lowering a portion of existing Class B
airspace (Area D) northeast of DFW between 10-NM and 13-NM of the Point
of Origin from 3,000 feet MSL to 2,500 feet MSL to establish a proposed
Class B airspace Area F. The commenters again noted increased noise and
flight safety concerns associated with a lower Class B airspace floor
based on large turbine-powered jets flying lower and a portion of the
ADS Class D airspace area being reduced 500 feet. One commenter was
concerned the lower Class B airspace shelf would negatively impact
flights into both ADS and DAL. Another commenter argued that the
proposed lower Class B airspace northeast of DFW provided only a 500
foot clearance between the floor of the Class B airspace and the JERIT
final approach fix of the runway 15 ILS approach to ADS; highlighting
that this minimal altitude separation jeopardized IFR traffic in both
airspaces.
The FAA considered the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation to reduce
the size of this proposed subarea (Area F), as discussed previously,
and defined the outer boundary so the proposed subarea would not
overlay the entire ADS Class D airspace area. The proposal retains the
proposed 2,500 foot MSL floor, but reduces the lateral size of the
proposed subarea (Area F) by adjusting the outer boundary to match the
13-NM arc of the adjacent existing Class B airspace (Area B) segment
located north of DFW. The proposed Class B airspace subarea (Area F)
presented at the informal airspace meetings would be established with a
2,500 foot MSL floor between the 10-NM and 13-NM arcs from the Point of
Origin and the adjacent existing Class B airspace (Area B) segments.
The existing Class B airspace located northeast of DFW outside the 13-
NM arc from the Point of Origin would remain unchanged. As previously
mentioned, the proposed Class B airspace (Area F) would continue to
support VFR aircraft ingressing and egressing ADS from/to the East
without compression and would contain the large turbine-powered
aircraft currently flying the instrument procedures to DAL runways 13R
and 13L within Class B airspace. No adjustments or changes to existing
traffic flows, traffic patterns, or assigned altitudes are anticipated
as a result of this proposed Class B subarea. It is not expected that
there would be an increase in noise or loss of flight safety associated
with lower flying aircraft as a result of this proposal. Additionally,
aircraft arriving and departing ADS would continue to be able to use
existing landmarks. Further, aircraft operating in the ADS Class D and
DFW Class B airspace areas northeast of DFW would continue to be
positively controlled and required to be in contact with ATC (ADS
control tower, DAL control tower, or DFW TRACON) using existing
frequency procedures. This positive control and communication
requirement would ensure established separation standards are applied
and flight safety is not compromised.
As mentioned before, to overcome potential confusion, unintentional
airspace incursions, or perceived flight safety issues associated with
the ADS Class D airspace area having two different ceilings, the FAA is
also considering amending the ADS Class D airspace with a single
ceiling, ``to but not including 2,500 feet MSL,'' as a separate
airspace action. Consideration of this amendment would not affect VFR
aircraft ingressing and egressing ADS from/to the East, VFR aircraft
circumnavigating Class B airspace, or large turbine-powered aircraft
flying instrument procedures to/from DAL.
Two comments recommended the FAA consider incorporating the sliver
of existing Class B airspace (Area B) located southwest and south of
ADS [north of DAL] with a 2,000 foot MSL floor into the proposed Class
B airspace subarea (Area F) northeast of DFW with a 2,500 foot MSL
floor. The commenters offered that inclusion of the sliver of existing
Class B airspace into a larger proposed Class B airspace extension
northeast of DFW would reduce the complexity of Class B airspace in
that area, as well as reduce the associated chart clutter.
Including the sliver of existing Class B airspace (Area B) that has
a 2,000 foot MSL floor into the proposed Area F with a 2,500 foot MSL
floor would be counterproductive to the FAA's efforts to ensure large
turbine-powered aircraft flying instrument procedures would be
contained within Class B airspace. The sliver of existing Class B
airspace (Area B) is necessary to contain aircraft descending to 2,000
feet MSL for a 6-NM to 8-NM left base for turn-on to intercept the DAL
ILS/RNAV/RNP approaches to runways 13R and 13L. This tight turn-on,
from 2,000 feet MSL, to DAL is necessary to remain clear of air traffic
landing at DFW on runway 17L.
Conversely, lowering the proposed Class B airspace (Area F)
northeast of DFW to reflect a 2,000 foot MSL floor to match the sliver
of existing Class B airspace (Area B), to overcome chart clutter and
airspace complexity concerns, would be inappropriate as it would
incorporate more airspace in the Class B airspace configuration than is
necessary. Therefore, the FAA is not proposing any amendment to the
sliver of existing Class B airspace (Area B) discussed above.
One commenter challenged the necessity of lowering the airspace
extensions northwest of DFW and
[[Page 4360]]
southeast of DAL to contain the instrument procedures for DFW and DAL
since the areas extend beyond the reliable ILS service volume distance
of 18-NM as addressed in the Aeronautical Information Manual (paragraph
1-1-9).
The proposed Class B airspace extension southeast of DAL actually
overlaps the ILS Localizer service area volumes supporting DAL runways
31R and 31L. The ILS Localizer service volumes supporting DFW runways
13R and 13L extend out the standard 18-NM; however, simultaneous ILS
approach operations to those runways require the aircraft being turned
onto parallel final approach courses be separated by 3 miles
longitudinally, or 1,000 feet vertically until they are established on
the final approach course. As such, the Class B airspace extension
northwest of DFW was proposed with the minimum amount of airspace
necessary to contain the large turbine-powered aircraft flying the
procedures within Class B airspace.
One commenter opposed lowering a portion of existing Class B
airspace (Area G) located northwest of DFW from 5,000 feet MSL to the
proposed 4,000 feet MSL, stating that the lower Class B airspace would
force transient non-participating VFR aircraft to fly closer to
multiple 3,000 foot towers located just northwest of the DFW Class B
airspace area.
The multiple 3,000 foot towers addressed by the commenter are
located approximately 12-NM outside the nearest Dallas/Fort Worth Class
B airspace area boundary. The nearest existing Class B airspace subarea
(Area F) to these towers has a 4,000 foot MSL floor and is not affected
by this action. Lowering a portion of existing Class B airspace (Area
G) from 5,000 feet MSL to 4,000 feet MSL would also not affect any VFR
aircraft operating in the vicinity of the towers.
Lastly, one comment was received stating that unless additional
data could be provided, the 11,000 foot MSL ceiling of the Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace area was not needed. The commenter recommended
the FAA take note of other busy terminal airspace areas that do not use
such a high ceiling; using the New York City Class B and Boston Class B
airspaces with 7,000 foot MSL ceilings as examples. The commenter
further determined that the DFW Class B airspace area could safely
operate with a ceiling of 8,500 feet MSL and argued this would have a
positive impact on all airspace users by decongesting air traffic
control frequencies and permitting non-participating VFR pilots to
transition the DFW Class B airspace area without the need to contact
the Dallas/Fort Worth TRACON.
Although other locations have Class B airspace ceilings lower than
the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area, Class B airspace
dimensions are individually tailored to meet site-specific
requirements. The Class B airspace area proposed in this action is the
minimum amount of airspace necessary to contain large turbine-powered
aircraft flying instrument arrival and departure procedures within
Class B airspace. Additionally, the existing 10,000 foot/11,000 foot
MSL Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace ceiling was established in 1996
(61 FR 47815) to accommodate arriving aircraft using standard
instrument arrival routes and departing aircraft using standard
instrument departure routes into and out of the DFW Metroplex area.
Lowering the Class B airspace area ceilings would mix the large
turbine-powered aircraft flying on the eight primary arrival and
sixteen departure routes to and from DFW and DAL, transitioning between
the en route and terminal airspace environments, with the uncontrolled
VFR aircraft transiting over the top of the Class B airspace area. By
keeping the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace ceilings unchanged at
10,000 feet/11,000 feet MSL, the FAA is able to provide positive
control to IFR aircraft arriving and departing DFW and DAL and the VFR
aircraft that have obtained Class B airspace clearances from the non-
participating VFR aircraft transiting in the vicinity of the Class B
airspace area. Having VFR aircraft that are not in communication with
ATC operating in this terminal airspace area reduces the margin of
safety in the high volume airspace surrounding the FAA's fourth busiest
airport. For these reasons, the FAA is not proposing to change the
Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area ceilings.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify the Dallas/Fort Worth,
TX, Class B airspace area. This action (depicted on the attached chart)
proposes to lower the northern portion of existing Area G located
northwest of DFW to 4,000 feet MSL, lower a portion of existing Area D
located northeast of DFW between the 10-NM and 13-NM arcs from the
Point of Origin to 2,500 feet MSL, lower approximately the southern
half of existing Area C located southeast of DAL to 2,000 feet MSL,
lower a portion of existing Area E located southeast of DAL between the
20-NM and 25-NM arcs from the Point of Origin to 3,000 feet MSL, and
redefine the northern boundary of the Class B airspace area using the
Ray Roberts Lake dam. The Class B airspace ceiling would remain
unchanged. These proposed modifications to the Dallas/Fort Worth Class
B airspace area would provide the minimum airspace necessary to contain
the existing large turbine-powered aircraft flying instrument
procedures to and from DFW and DAL within the confines of Class B
airspace.
Except for existing Area A, which extends upward from the surface
to and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area surrounding the point
of origin, DFW, and DAL, the proposed descriptions of all other
subareas that make up the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace area would
be reconfigured, re-described, and realigned by geographic position in
relation to the point of origin, rather than the previous practice of
combining geographically separate areas that share a common altitude
floor into one large, complex subarea description. The current Dallas/
Fort Worth Class B airspace area consists of eight subareas (A through
H) while the proposed configuration would consist of fourteen subareas
(A through N). The proposed revisions to the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B
airspace area, by subarea, are outlined below.
Area A. Area A is the surface area that extends from the surface up
to 11,000 feet MSL. The FAA is not proposing any changes to Area A.
Area B. Area B extends upward from 2,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area B that is
located north, west, and south of DFW. The FAA is not proposing any
changes to this portion of that Class B airspace.
Area C. Area C extends upward from 2,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area B that is
located east of DFW. The FAA is not proposing any changes to this
portion of that Class B airspace.
Area D. Area D is a new area extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL
to 11,000 feet MSL located southeast of DAL from the Cowboy VOR/DME
(CVE) 117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial clockwise to the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M
bearing from the Point of Origin and between 15-NM and 20-NM of the
Point of Origin. This new area would lower a portion of Class B
airspace contained in the current Area C, south of the CVE 117[deg]T/
111[deg]M radial, by 500 feet to overcome the issue of aircraft
arriving DAL runways 31R and 31L from the southeast exiting the bottom
of the Class B airspace shelf with a 2,500 foot MSL floor and then
[[Page 4361]]
reentering the side of the Class B airspace surface area.
Area E. Area E extends upward from 2,500 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area C that is not
incorporated in the new Area D described above. The FAA is not
proposing any changes to this Class B airspace.
Area F. Area F is a new area extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL
to 11,000 feet MSL located northeast of DFW from the 023[deg]T/
017[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin clockwise to Interstate I-
635 and between 10-NM and 13-NM of the Point of Origin. This new area
would lower a portion of Class B airspace contained in the current Area
D, northeast of DFW, by 500 feet to overcome the issue of aircraft
arriving DAL runways 13R and 13L from the northeast exiting the bottom
of the Class B airspace shelf with a 3,000 foot MSL floor, flying
through the ADS Class D airspace area, and then reentering the side of
the Class B airspace shelf with a 2,000 foot MSL floor or the side of
the Class B airspace surface area.
Area G. Area G extends upward from 3,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area D that is
located south of DFW. The FAA is not proposing any changes to this
portion of that Class B airspace.
Area H. Area H extends upward from 3,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area D that is
located north of DFW and not incorporated in the new Area F described
above. The FAA is not proposing any changes to this Class B airspace.
Area I. Area I is a new area extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL
to 11,000 feet MSL located southeast of DAL from the Cowboy VOR/DME
(CVE) 117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial clockwise to the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M
bearing from the Point of Origin between 20-NM and 25-NM of the Point
of Origin. This new area would lower a portion of Class B airspace
contained in the current Area E by 1,000 feet to overcome the issue of
aircraft arriving DAL runways 31R and 31L from the southeast exiting
the bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with a 4,000 foot MSL floor
and then reentering the side of the Class B airspace shelf with a 2,500
foot MSL floor.
Area J. Area J extends upward from 4,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area E with an
extension northwest of DFW that would include a portion of Class B
airspace contained in the current Area G, northwest of the 311[deg]T/
305[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin. This new area would
overcome the issue of aircraft arriving DFW runways 13R and 13L from
the northwest exiting the bottom of the Class B airspace shelf with a
5,000 foot MSL floor and then reentering the side of the Class B
airspace shelf with a 4,000 foot MSL floor.
Area K. Area K extends upward from 4,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area F that is
located south of DFW. The FAA is not proposing any changes to this
portion of that Class B airspace.
Area L. Area L extends upward from 4,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area F that is
located north of DFW. The FAA is proposing to extend the northern
boundary further north, parallel to the existing boundary, to intercept
the southern-most point of the Ray Roberts Lake dam for visual
reference.
Area M. Area M extends upward from 5,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the remaining portion of Class B airspace contained in the
current Area G that is not incorporated in the new Area J described
above. The FAA is not proposing any changes to this Class B airspace.
Area N. Area N extends upward from 6,000 feet MSL to 11,000 feet
MSL in the Class B airspace contained in the current Area H. The FAA is
not proposing any changes to this Class B airspace.
Finally, this proposed action would update the DFW airport
reference point (ARP) coordinates and includes the Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE)
navigation aid information in the Class B airspace legal description to
reflect current National Airspace System data.
Implementation of these proposed modifications to the Dallas/Fort
Worth Class B airspace area would ensure the containment of instrument
procedures and large turbine-powered aircraft flying those procedures
within Class B airspace, as required by FAA directives, and enhance the
efficient use of the airspace, the management of aircraft operations,
and flight safety in the DFW and DAL terminal area.
All radials listed in the Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace
description in this NPRM are stated in degrees relative to both True
North and Magnetic North. Additionally, all geographic coordinates for
this proposed action are stated in degrees, minutes, and seconds based
on North American Datum 83.
Class B airspace areas are published in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order
7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8,
2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR section 71.1. The Class B airspace area listed in
this document would be published subsequently in the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. We have determined that there
is no new information collection requirement associated with this NPRM.
Regulatory Evaluation Summary
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
directs that each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation
only upon a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended
regulation justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980 (Public Law 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade
Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting
standards that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. In developing U.S. standards, the Trade Act requires
agencies to consider international standards and, where appropriate,
that they be the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other effects of
proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to result
in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more annually
(adjusted for inflation with base year of 1995). This portion of the
preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of the economic impacts of this
proposed rule.
Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations.
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule
does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement
to that effect and the basis for it be included in the preamble if a
full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for this proposed rule. The
reasoning for this determination follows:
This action proposes to modify the DFW Class B airspace area to
ensure the containment of large turbine-powered aircraft flying
instrument procedures to
[[Page 4362]]
and from the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and Dallas Love
Field Airport within Class B airspace, reduce controller workload, and
reduce the potential for near midair collision in the DFW terminal
area. It lowers the Class B airspace floor in some sections to
encompass existing IFR traffic. Lowering the floor of the Class B
airspace would increase safety by segregating large turbine-powered
aircraft from aircraft that may not be in contact with ATC. It would
reduce air traffic controller workload by reducing the number of radio
communications that air traffic controllers must use to inform IFR
aircraft when they are leaving and re-entering Class B airspace. This
would reduce the amount of distraction that air traffic controllers
face in issuing these communications and free radio time for more
important control instructions. IFR traffic would not be rerouted as a
result of this proposal.
The proposed airspace restructuring would result in safety benefits
and increased operational efficiencies. This rule would enhance safety
by reducing the number of aircraft entering, exiting, and reentering
Class B airspace and consequently reducing air traffic controller
workload and radio frequency congestion. By expanding the Class B
airspace area where aircraft are subject to certain operating rules and
equipment requirements it would also reduce the potential for midair
collisions. The proposed modification of the Class B airspace would
provide operational advantages as well by establishing necessary
airspace for controllers to sequence aircraft within Class B airspace
and thereby reducing the need for controllers to vector arrivals and
departures to avoid nonparticipating traffic. The change may cause some
VFR pilots to have to choose between flying below Class B airspace,
circumnavigating the Class B airspace area, or requesting Class B
clearance to transition the area. This has the potential of increasing
costs to VFR operations if the alternative routes are longer, take more
time and burn more fuel. However, due to the specific restructuring we
do not anticipate that VFR flights would have to travel far to
circumnavigate the new proposed Class B airspace.
The FAA expects an increase in safety, some operational
efficiencies from the larger Class B airspace offset slightly by
possible VFR re-routings resulting in minimal cost overall. The
proposal would not require updating of materials outside the normal
update cycle, and would not require rerouting of IFR traffic. The
expected outcome would be a minimal impact with positive net benefits,
and a regulatory evaluation was not prepared. The FAA requests comments
with supporting justification about the FAA determination of minimal
impact.
The FAA has, therefore, determined that this proposed rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
The proposed rule is expected to improve safety and efficiency by
redefining Class B airspace boundaries and would impose only minimal
costs because it would not require rerouting of IFR traffic, could
possibly cause some VFR aircraft to travel alternative routes that are
not expected to be appreciably longer than with the current airspace
design, and would not require updating of materials outside the normal
update cycle. Therefore, the expected outcome would be a minimal
economic impact on small entities affected by this rulemaking action.
Therefore, the FAA certifies this proposed rule, if promulgated,
would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The FAA solicits comments regarding this determination.
Specifically, the FAA requests comments on whether the proposed rule
creates any specific compliance costs unique to small entities. Please
provide detailed economic analysis to support any cost claims. The FAA
also invites comments regarding other small entity concerns with
respect to the proposed rule.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this proposed rule and determined that
it would have only a domestic impact and therefore no effect on
international trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $143.1 million in lieu of $100
million. This proposed rule does not contain such a mandate; therefore,
the requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.
[[Page 4363]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 3000 Class B airspace.
* * * * *
ASW TX B Dallas/Fort Worth, TX [Amended]
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (Primary Airport)
(Lat. 32[deg]53'49'' N., long. 97[deg]02'17'' W.)
Point of Origin
(Lat. 32[deg]51'57'' N., long. 97[deg]01'41'' W.)
Cowboy VOR/DME (CVE)
(Lat. 32[deg]53'25'' N., long. 96[deg]54'14'' W.)
Boundaries.
Area A. That airspace extending upward from the surface to and
including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning
at the intersection of the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin and
Josey Lane at lat. 32[deg]59'08'' N., long. 96[deg]53'26'' W.,
thence southbound along Josey Lane to intersect Forest Lane at lat.
32[deg]54'34'' N., long. 96[deg]52'54'' W., thence eastbound along
Forest Lane to intersect the 15-NM radius from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]54'33'' N., long. 96[deg]44'07'' W., thence clockwise
along the 15-NM radius to intersect the 129[deg]T/123M bearing from
the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]42'29'' N., long. 96[deg]47'52''
W., thence northwest along the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing to
intersect I-30 at lat. 32[deg]46'04'' N., long. 96[deg]53'07'' W.,
thence west along I-30 to intersect the 7-NM radius from the Point
of Origin at lat. 32[deg]45'34'' N., long. 97[deg]05'07'' W., thence
clockwise along the 7-NM radius to intersect the 310[deg]T/304[deg]M
bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]56'27'' N., long.
97[deg]08'03'' W., thence northwest along the 310[deg]T/304[deg]M
bearing to intersect the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32[deg]58'23'' N., long. 97[deg]10'47'' W., thence clockwise
along the 10-NM radius to the point of beginning.
Area B. That airspace extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 10-NM radius from the Point of
Origin and the 310[deg]T/304[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]58'23'' N., long. 97[deg]10'47'' W., thence southeast
along the 310[deg]T/304[deg]M bearing to intersect the 7-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]56'27'' N., long.
97[deg]08'03'' W., thence counterclockwise along the 7-NM radius to
intersect I-30 at lat. 32[deg]45'34'' N., long. 97[deg]05'07'' W.,
thence east along I-30 to intersect the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'04'' N., long.
96[deg]53'07'' W., thence southeast on the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M
bearing to intersect the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32[deg]45'38'' N., long. 96[deg]52'28'' W., thence clockwise
along the 10-NM radius to intersect SH-303 at lat. 32[deg]42'23''
N., long. 96[deg]58'18'' W., thence west along SH-303 to intersect
the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]42'29'' N.,
long. 97[deg]05'30'' W., thence clockwise along the 10-NM radius to
intersect the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]56'57'' N., long. 97[deg]11'58'' W., thence northwest
along the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing to intersect the 13-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]58'27'' N., long.
97[deg]15'04'' W., thence clockwise along the 13-NM radius to
intersect the 023[deg]T/017[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 33[deg]03'56'' N., long. 96[deg]55'38'' W., thence southwest
along the 023[deg]T/017[deg]M bearing to intersect the 10-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]01'10'' N., long.
96[deg]57'02'' W., thence counterclockwise along the 10-NM radius to
the point of beginning.
Area C. That airspace extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 10-NM radius from the Point of
Origin and Josey Lane at lat. 32[deg]59'08'' N., long.
96[deg]53'26'' W., thence southbound along Josey Lane to intersect
Forest Lane at lat. 32[deg]54'34'' N., long. 96[deg]52'54'' W.,
thence eastbound along Forest Lane to intersect the 15-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]54'33'' N., long.
96[deg]44'07'' W., thence counter-clockwise along the 15-NM radius
to intersect I-635 at lat. 32[deg]54'42'' N., long. 96[deg]44'09''
W., thence west along I-635 to intersect the 10-NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]55'25'' N., long. 96[deg]50'32'' W.,
thence counterclockwise along the 10-NM radius to the Point of
beginning.
Area D. That airspace extending from 2,000 feet MSL up to and
including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning
at the intersection of the CVE 117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial and the
15-NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]49'06'' N.,
long. 96[deg]44'12'' W., thence clockwise along the 15-NM radius to
intersect the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]42'29'' N., long. 96[deg]47'52'' W., thence southeast
along the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing to intersect the 20 NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]39'19'' N., long.
96[deg]43'16'' W., thence counterclockwise along the 20-NM radius to
intersect the CVE 117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial at lat. 32[deg]46'45''
N., long. 96[deg]38'46'' W., thence northwest along the CVE
117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial to the point of beginning.
Area E. That airspace extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of I-635 and the 15-NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]54'42'' N., long. 96[deg]44'09'' W.,
thence clockwise along the 15-NM radius to intersect the CVE
117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial at lat. 32[deg]49'06'' N., long.
96[deg]44'12'' W., thence southeast along the CVE 117[deg]T/
111[deg]M radial to intersect the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'45'' N., long. 96[deg]38'46'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 20-NM radius to intersect I-635 at lat.
32[deg]50'40'' N., long. 96[deg]38'03'' W., thence northwest along
I-635 to the point of beginning.
Area F. That airspace extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL, to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 023[deg]T/017[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 13-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 33[deg]03'56'' N., long. 96[deg]55'38'' W., thence
clockwise along the 13-NM radius to intersect I-635 at lat.
32[deg]55'26'' N., long. 96[deg]46' 49'' W., thence west along I-635
to intersect the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32[deg]55'25'' N., long. 96[deg]50'32'' W., thence counterclockwise
along the 10-NM radius to intersect the 023[deg]T/017[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]01'10'' N., long.
96[deg]57'02'' W., thence northeast along the 023[deg]T/017[deg]M
bearing to the point of beginning.
Area G. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 10-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]56'57'' N., long. 97[deg]11'58'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 10-NM radius to intersect SH-303 at lat.
32[deg]42'29'' N., long. 97[deg]05'30'' W., thence east along SH-303
to intersect the 10-NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32[deg]42'23'' N., long. 96[deg]58'18'' W., thence counterclockwise
along the 10-NM radius to intersect the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]45'38'' N., long.
96[deg]52'28'' W., thence southeast along the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M
bearing to intersect the 20-NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32[deg]39'19'' N., long. 96[deg]43'16'' W., thence clockwise
along the 20-NM radius to intersect the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]35'56'' N., long.
97[deg]15'56'' W., thence northeast along the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M
bearing to intersect the 13-NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32[deg]41'32'' N., long. 97[deg]10'57'' W., thence clockwise
along the 13-NM radius to intersect the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]58'27'' N., long.
97[deg]15'04'' W., thence southeast along the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M
bearing to the point of beginning.
Area H. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 13-NM radius from the Point of
Origin and the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]58'27'' N., long. 97[deg]15'04'' W., thence northwest
along the 300[deg]T/294[deg]M bearing to intersect the 20-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]01'56'' N., long.
97[deg]22'17'' W., thence clockwise along the 20-NM radius to
intersect I-635 at lat. 32[deg]50'40''
[[Page 4364]]
N., long. 96[deg]38'03'' W., thence northwest along I-635 to
intersect the 13-NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32[deg]55'26'' N., long. 96[deg]46'49'' W., thence counterclockwise
along the 13-NM radius to the point of beginning.
Area I. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin and the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]39'19'' N., long. 96[deg]43'16'' W., thence southeast
along the 129[deg]T/123[deg]M bearing to intersect the 25-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]36'09'' N., long.
96[deg]38'41'' W., thence counterclockwise along the 25-NM radius to
intersect the CVE 117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial at lat. 32[deg]44'25''
N., long. 96[deg]33'24'' W., thence northwest along the CVE
117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial to intersect the 20-NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'45'' N., long. 96[deg]38'46'' W.,
thence clockwise along the 20-NM radius to the point of beginning.
Area J. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]35'56'' N., long. 97[deg]15'56'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 20-NM radius to intersect the 129[deg]T/
123[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]39'19''
N., long. 96[deg]43'16'' W., thence southeast along the 129[deg]T/
123[deg]M bearing to intersect the 25-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]36'09'' N., long. 96[deg]38'41'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 25-NM radius to intersect the CVE
117[deg]T/111[deg]M radial at lat. 32[deg]44'25'' N., long.
96[deg]33'24'' W., thence northwest along the CVE 117[deg]T/
111[deg]M radial to intersect the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'45'' N., long. 96[deg]38'46'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 20-NM radius to intersect the 300[deg]T/
294[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]01'56''
N., long. 97[deg]22'17'' W., thence southeast along the 300[deg]T/
294[deg]M bearing to intersect the 13-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]58'27'' N., long. 97[deg]15'04'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 13-NM radius to intersect the 217[deg]T/
211[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]41'32''
N., long. 97[deg]10'57'' W., thence southwest along the 217[deg]T/
211[deg]M bearing to intersect the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]35'56'' N., long. 97[deg]15'56'' W., thence
clockwise along the 20-NM radius to intersect I-20 at lat.
32[deg]39'56'' N., long. 97[deg]20'39'' W., thence west along I-20
to intersect I-820 at lat. 32[deg]41'51'' N., long. 97[deg]28'14''
W., thence north along I-820 to intersect the 23-NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'46'' N., long. 97[deg]28'17'' W.,
thence clockwise along the 23-NM radius to intersect the 311[deg]T/
305[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]07'02''
N., long. 97[deg]22'21'' W., thence northwest along the 311[deg]T/
305[deg]M bearing to intersect the 30-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 33[deg]11'37'' N., long. 97[deg]28'40'' W., thence
clockwise along the 30-NM radius to intersect the 315[deg]T/
309[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]13'10''
N., long. 97[deg]26'58'' W., thence east to the intersection of the
041[deg]T/035[deg]M bearing of the Point of Origin and the 30-NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]14'36'' N., long.
96[deg]38'13'' W., thence clockwise along the 30-NM radius to
intersect the 138[deg]T/132[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]29'34'' N., long. 96[deg]37'57'' W., thence west to
the intersection of the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing from the Point
of Origin and the 28.3 NM radius from the Point of Origin at lat.
32[deg]29'17'' N., long. 97[deg]21'49'' W., thence northeast along
the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing to the point of beginning.
Area K. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 138[deg]T/132[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 30-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]29'34'' N., long. 96[deg]37'57'' W., thence
clockwise along the 30-NM radius to intersect the 149[deg]T/
143[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]26'10''
N., long. 96[deg]43'26'' W., thence west to the intersection of the
210[deg]T/204[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin and the 30-NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]25'54'' N., long.
97[deg]19'24'' W., thence clockwise along the 30-NM radius to
intersect the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 32[deg]27'55'' N., long. 97[deg]23'01'' W., thence northeast
along the 217[deg]T/211[deg]M bearing to intersect the 28.3-NM
radius from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]29'17'' N., long.
97[deg]21'49'' W., thence east to the point of beginning.
Area L. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 315[deg]T/309[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 30-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 33[deg]13'10'' N., long. 97[deg]26'58'' W., thence
clockwise along the 30-NM radius to the intersection of the 30-NM
radius from the Point of Origin and the 344[deg]T/338[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]20'50'' N., long.
97[deg]11'33'' W., thence east to the intersection of the 012[deg]T/
006[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin and the 30-NM radius from
the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]21'21'' N., long. 96[deg]54'14''
W., thence clockwise along the 30-NM radius to intersect the
041[deg]T/035[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat.
33[deg]14'36'' N., long. 96[deg]38'13'' W., thence west to the point
of beginning.
Area M. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL up to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 311[deg]T/305[deg]M bearing
from the Point of Origin and the 30-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 33[deg]11'37'' N., long. 97[deg]28'40'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 30-NM radius to intersect the 293[deg]T/
287[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]03'37''
N., long. 97[deg]34'32'' W., thence southeast along the 293[deg]T/
287[deg]M bearing to intersect the 26-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]02'04'' N., long. 97[deg]30'09'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 26-NM radius to intersect SH-377 at lat.
32[deg]39'49'' N., long. 97[deg]28'58'' W., thence southwest along
SH-377 to intersect the 30-NM radius from the Point of Origin at
lat. 32[deg]36'56'' N., long. 97[deg]32'26'' W., thence
counterclockwise along the 30-NM radius to intersect the 217[deg]T/
211[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]27'55''
N., long. 97[deg]23'01'' W., thence northeast along the 217[deg]T/
211[deg]M bearing to intersect the 20-NM radius from the Point of
Origin at lat. 32[deg]35'56'' N., long. 97[deg]15'56'' W., thence
clockwise along the 20-NM radius to intersect I-20 at lat.
32[deg]39'56'' N., long. 97[deg]20'38'' W., thence west along I-20
to intersect I-820 at lat. 32[deg]41'51'' N., long. 97[deg]28'14''
W., thence north along I-820 to intersect the 23-NM radius from the
Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]46'46'' N., long. 97[deg]28'17'' W.,
thence clockwise along the 23-NM radius to intersect the 311[deg]T/
305[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]07'02''
N., long. 97[deg]22'21'' W., thence northwest along the 311[deg]T/
305[deg]M bearing to the point of beginning.
Area N. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 11,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 30-NM radius from the Point of
Origin and the 293[deg]T/287[deg]M bearing from the Point of Origin
at lat. 33[deg]03'37'' N., long. 97[deg]34'32'' W., thence southeast
along the 293[deg]T/287[deg]M bearing to intersect the 26-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 33[deg]02'04'' N., long.
97[deg]30'09'' W., thence counterclockwise along the 26-NM radius to
intersect SH-377 at lat. 32[deg]39'49'' N., long. 97[deg]28'' 58''
W., thence southwest along SH- 377 to intersect the 30-NM radius
from the Point of Origin at lat. 32[deg]36'56'' N., long.
97[deg]32'26'' W., thence clockwise along the 30-NM radius to the
point of beginning.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 12, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Air Traffic Control Procedures Group.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 4365]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22JA13.001
[FR Doc. 2013-01118 Filed 1-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C